Freight Village Land Use Plan
Transcription
Freight Village Land Use Plan
2030 Long Range Transportation Plan Technical Report 6: Freight Urban Village Land Use Plan and Strategies Prepared by: Leftwich Consulting Engineers, Inc. 12151 Science Drive, Suite 101 Orlando, Florida 32826 Final Adopted 2030 Long Range Transportation Plan TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE LIST OF TABLES ............................................................................................................................. ii LIST OF FIGURES........................................................................................................................... ii 1.0 INTRODUCTION.................................................................................................................. 1 2.0 METHODOLOGY ................................................................................................................. 2 3.0 GENERAL LOCATIONS OF PROPOSED FREIGHT VILLAGE AREAS...................................... 3 4.0 TRANSPORTATION INFRASTRUCTURE FACILITIES ........................................................... 20 4.1 The Proposed Horizon West Towncenter Freight Village .......................................... 20 4.2 The Proposed Hermit Smith-Hogshead Road Freight Village ..................................... 20 4.3 The Proposed Landstreet-Vineland Freight Village .................................................... 21 4.4 The Proposed L.B. McLeod Freight Village................................................................ 21 4.5 The Proposed Oakland Freight Village ...................................................................... 21 4.6 The Proposed Ocoee Freight Village ......................................................................... 21 4.7 The Proposed Silver Star Road Freight Village ........................................................... 22 4.8 The Proposed Zellwood Freight Village .................................................................... 22 4.9 The Proposed State Road 417 Southern Extension Freight Village ............................. 22 4.10 The Proposed Kissimmee Gateway Airport Freight Village ........................................ 22 4.11 The Proposed Poinciana Boulevard Freight Village ................................................... 23 4.12 The Proposed Harmony Research Park Freight Village .............................................. 23 4.13 The Proposed Yeehaw Junction Freight Village ......................................................... 23 4.14 The Proposed Orlando Sanford Intl Airport/E. Lake Mary Boulevard Freight Village .. 23 4.15 The Proposed Port of Sanford Freight Village ............................................................ 23 5.0 LAND USE POLICY STRATEGIES ..................................................................................... 24 5.1 Land Use Policy Strategies by Jurisdiction and Agency .............................................. 24 5.1.1 Florida Department of Transportation......................................................... 24 5.1.2 Cities and Counties .................................................................................... 24 5.2 Common Roles for All Jurisdictions and Agencies ..................................................... 25 5.2.1 Review Existing Roadway Network ............................................................ 25 5.2.2 Plan in an Integrated Manner ..................................................................... 25 5.2.3 Design Standards In and Around Urban Freight Villages............................. 25 i TABLE OF CONTENTS (Cont’d) 5.2.4 Private Sector Planning .............................................................................. 26 6.0 SUMMARY....................................................................................................................... 27 LIST OF TABLES 1. Proposed Freight Village Locations ........................................................................................ 3 2. Proposed Freight Village by County ..................................................................................... 27 LIST OF FIGURES 1. Proposed Freight Village Locations – Regional Locations……………………………………….......4 2. Proposed Freight Village Locations – Horizon West Towncenter ........................................... 5 3. Proposed Freight Village Locations – Hermit Smith-Hogshead Road ...................................... 6 4. Proposed Freight Village Locations – Landstreet-Vineland...................................................... 7 5. Proposed Freight Village Locations – L.B. McLeod Road ........................................................ 8 6. Proposed Freight Village Locations – Oakland ....................................................................... 9 7. Proposed Freight Village Locations – Ocoee ........................................................................ 10 8. Proposed Freight Village Locations – Silver Star Road .......................................................... 11 9. Proposed Freight Village Locations – Zellwood ................................................................... 12 10. Proposed Freight Village Locations – SR 417 Southern Extension ......................................... 13 11. Proposed Freight Village Locations – Kissimmee Gateway Airport ....................................... 14 12. Proposed Freight Village Locations – Poinciana Boulevard .................................................. 15 13. Proposed Freight Village Locations – Harmony Research Park ............................................. 16 14. Proposed Freight Village Locations – Yeehaw Junction ........................................................ 17 15. Proposed Freight Village Locations – Orlando Sanford International Airport/East Lake Mary Boulevard............................................................................................................................ 18 16. Proposed Freight Village Locations – Port of Sanford ........................................................... 19 17. Proposed Freight Village Locations – Orange County Locations ........................................... 29 18. Proposed Freight Village Locations – Osceola County Locations .......................................... 30 19. Proposed Freight Village Locations – Seminole County Locations ........................................ 31 ii 1.0 INTRODUCTION METROPLAN ORLANDO, as part of the Year 2030 Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP) update, is developing an Urban Freight Village Land Use Plan/Strategy. Under a supplemental contract, the Urban Freight Village Land Use Plan/Strategy will be developed and coordinated with the 2030 LRTP. This technical report, titled Freight Urban Village Land Use Plan and Strategies, provides a summary of the development of an Urban Freight Village Land Use Plan and Strategy with proposed freight village locations. An urban freight village is an intermodal or freight staging facility where access is provided to rails, trucks, ports, and/or airports. These facilities with warehousing and distribution enhance the integration and connectivity of the transportation system, across and between modes, for people and freight as well as encourage large scale manufacturing. They also help to better manage the flow of commodities in and around the different areas within the study area. From an economic standpoint, they act as facilitators to attract manufacturing businesses that wish to relocate to lower logistics costs; they also create secondary jobs in warehouses, distribution centers, manufacturing, packaging plants, and other value added businesses. This section (Section 1.0) provides the general introduction for this Technical Report 6: Freight Urban Village Land Use Plan and Strategies. Section 2.0 offers a brief methodology of the tasks outlined in the scope. Section 3.0 identifies the general location of the proposed urban freight village areas. Section 4.0 details the purpose and role of the various transportation infrastructure facilities. Section 5.0 presents specific land use policy strategies in supporting the growth and development of the freight urban villages. Finally, Section 6.0 includes a summary of the proposed freight village locations and the land use policy strategies detailed in this report. Final Adopted 2030 Long Range Transportation Plan 1 Technical Report 6 2.0 METHODOLOGY This task was sub-divided into four (4) parts. With the first part, the Leftwich Consulting Engineers, Inc. (LCE) Team identified locations within the study area for the development of urban freight village land use plans, policies, and strategies. Previous studies commissioned by local agencies were referenced in order to identify locations that were ideal for this type of approach. Also, county staff was contacted for initial identification of the potential freight village sites. Field reviews were conducted at all locations. The LCE Team then met with county staff from Orange, Osceola, and Seminole Counties to finalize the locations. Section 3.0 details the locations identified. For the second part, LCE developed a GIS map and database with the general locations of the proposed urban freight village areas identified. The data included roadway, rail, air and other freight infrastructures in and around the freight urban villages. The GIS maps are described and can be found in Section 3.0 of this report. The third part defines the purpose and role of various transportation infrastructure facilities. More specifically, the network roles are defined for the key roadways within the urban freight villages, as well as those connecting them to the broader system and network. GIS maps of the connecting transportation infrastructure facilities are provided and detailed as a part of Section 4.0. Finally, the fourth part of this task provides specific land use policy strategies to be utilized by the various local jurisdictions in supporting the growth and development of the urban freight villages. Current policies regarding freight villages and goods movement within the study area were researched and reviewed. Those policies relevant to the proposed freight villages contained within this report are mentioned in Section 5.0. Final Adopted 2030 Long Range Transportation Plan 2 Technical Report 6 3.0 GENERAL LOCATIONS OF PROPOSED FREIGHT VILLAGE AREAS As mentioned in Section 2.0, the LCE Team identified locations within the study area for the development of urban freight villages upon consultation with county staff and field reviews. Table 1, Proposed Freight Village Locations, lists the finalized sites, the county upon which they lie, and the general location. TABLE 1 PROPOSED FREIGHT VILLAGE LOCATIONS Name Boggy Creek Road Horizon West Towncenter Landstreet-Vineland Oakland Ocoee Hermit Smith-Hogshead Road Taft Zellwood SR 417 Southern Extension Kissimmee Gateway Airport Poinciana Boulevard Harmony Research Park Yeehaw Junction Orlando Sanford Int’l2 Airport Port of Sanford County Orange Orange Orange Orange Orange General Location Southwest of OIA1 (Boggy Creek Rd at Ringhaver Dr) SR 429 at New Independence Pkwy Interchange US 441 (S. OBT) at Turnpike West Colonial Dr (SR 50) at Turnpike West Colonial Dr (SR 50) at SR 429 Orange Hermit Smith at Hogshead Road (South of US 441) Orange Orange Osceola Orange Ave (SR 527) at Landstreet Rd US 441 (N. OBT) at Laughlin Rd Turnpike south of Deer Run Rd (Green Island DRI2) Osceola West of the Kissimmee Gateway Airport Osceola Osceola Osceola Poinciana Boulevard at US 17-92 US 192 (east of Hickory Tree Road) SR 60 at Turnpike Seminole Southeast of Sanford Int’l Airport (East Lake Mary Blvd) Seminole East of Interstate 4 between SR 46 and US 17-92 Notes: (1) OIA – Orlando International Airport (2) Int’l – International A GIS map was developed by the LCE Team with general locations of the proposed freight villages. Figure 1, Proposed Freight Village Locations – Regional Locations, is a map of all the proposed freight villages within the study area. Figures 2-16 provide a detailed map of each individual proposed freight village and their general location. Final Adopted 2030 Long Range Transportation Plan 3 Technical Report 6 FIGURE 1 Proposed Freight Village Locations – Regional Locations Page needs to be deleted Final Adopted 2030 Long Range Transportation Plan 4 Technical Report 6 FIGURE 2 Proposed Freight Village Locations – Horizon West Towncenter Final Adopted 2030 Long Range Transportation Plan 5 Technical Report 6 FIGURE 3 Proposed Freight Village Locations – Hermit Smith-Hogshead Road Page needs to be deleted Final Adopted 2030 Long Range Transportation Plan 6 Technical Report 6 FIGURE 4 Proposed Freight Village Locations – Landstreet-Vineland Final Adopted 2030 Long Range Transportation Plan 7 Technical Report 6 FIGURE 5 Proposed Freight Village Locations – L.B. McLeod Road Final Adopted 2030 Long Range Transportation Plan 8 Technical Report 6 FIGURE 6 Proposed Freight Village Locations – Oakland Final Adopted 2030 Long Range Transportation Plan 9 Technical Report 6 FIGURE 7 Proposed Freight Village Locations – Ocoee Final Adopted 2030 Long Range Transportation Plan 10 Technical Report 6 FIGURE 8 Proposed Freight Village Locations – Silver Star Road Final Adopted 2030 Long Range Transportation Plan 11 Technical Report 6 FIGURE 9 Proposed Freight Village Locations – Zellwood Final Adopted 2030 Long Range Transportation Plan 12 Technical Report 6 FIGURE 10 Proposed Freight Village Locations – SR 417 Southern Extension Final Adopted 2030 Long Range Transportation Plan 13 Technical Report 6 FIGURE 11 Proposed Freight Village Locations – Kissimmee Gateway Airport Final Adopted 2030 Long Range Transportation Plan 14 Technical Report 6 FIGURE 12 Proposed Freight Village Locations – Poinciana Boulevard Final Adopted 2030 Long Range Transportation Plan 15 Technical Report 6 FIGURE 13 Proposed Freight Village Locations – Harmony Research Park Final Adopted 2030 Long Range Transportation Plan 16 Technical Report 6 FIGURE 14 Proposed Freight Village Locations – Yeehaw Junction Final Adopted 2030 Long Range Transportation Plan 17 Technical Report 6 FIGURE 15 Proposed Freight Village Locations – Orlando Sanford International Airport/East Lake Mary Boulevard Final Adopted 2030 Long Range Transportation Plan 18 Technical Report 6 FIGURE 16 Proposed Freight Village Locations – Port of Sanford Final Adopted 2030 Long Range Transportation Plan 19 Technical Report 6 4.0 TRANSPORTATION INFRASTRUCTURE FACILITIES The transportation infrastructure facilities that provide for the mobility of freight, goods, and services in and around Central Florida include Interstate 4, Florida’s Turnpike, State Road 50 (Colonial Drive), and State Road 528 (the Beachline). More specifically, Interstate 4 connects Interstate 75 (Tampa) through Orlando, the heart of Central Florida, and to Interstate 95 (Daytona Beach). Florida’s Turnpike also connects Interstate 75 (Ocala) through Orlando to Interstate 95 (Miami). Both Intestate 75 and Interstate 95 start from South Florida and run northward out of the state on the west and east side of Florida, respectively. State Road 528 is a major arterial that joins Interstate 4 in Orlando to Port Canaveral, Florida’s number two cruise port of annual passenger volumes. As mentioned in Section 3.0, GIS maps were developed by the LCE Team with general locations of the proposed freight villages. These maps also include designated truck routes for the region as well as within the general location of each proposed freight village. Figures 1-16 provide detailed maps of the individual proposed freight village, their general location, and the truck routes in and around the proposed site. The following sections describe each proposed freight village and their connectivity to the region’s transportation infrastructure facilities. 4.1 The Proposed Horizon West Towncenter Freight Village As depicted in Figure 2, this proposed freight village is situated northeast of the State Road 429 interchange at New Independence Parkway. New Independence Parkway gives access to State Road 429 and State Road 545, both designated truck routes. 4.2 The Proposed Hermit Smith-Hogshead road Freight Village As depicted in Figure 3, this proposed freight village is situated at the intersection of Hermit Smith Road and Hogshead Road which is just south of US 441 (N. OBT). US 441, a designated truck route, connects directly with State Road 429 and State Road 436. This site is also within close proximity to the Florida Central railroad. Final Adopted 2030 Long Range Transportation Plan 20 Technical Report 6 4.3 The Proposed Landstreet-Vineland Freight Village As depicted in Figure 4, this proposed freight village is situated east and west of South Orange Blossom Trail (S. OBT), south of State Road 528 and north of Wetherbee Road. This site is proposed near the general area of the CSX Intermodal Property. Access at S. OBT, a designated truck route, offers a multitude of connections to other truck routes. S. OBT connects with directly with the City of Kissimmee in Osceola County, Florida’s Turnpike (north to Ocala or South to Miami), SR 528 (east Port Canaveral or west to Interstate 4), and State Road 417 (south to Interstate 4 towards Celebration or north to Interstate 4 towards Sanford). Not only is this proposed freight village location very well tied into the transportation infrastructure facilities, it is also within close proximity to the CSXT railroad and OIA (via Boggy Creek Road). 4.4 The Proposed L.B. McLeod Freight Village As depicted in Figure 5, this proposed freight village is situated south of L.B. McLeod Road and in the area of Mission Road and Vineland Road, west of Interstate 4. Access to L.B. McLeod Road and/or Conroy Road allows for a direct connection to Interstate 4, within close proximity other highways. They include Florida’s Turnpike State Road 528, State Road 408 and many other designated truck routes. 4.5 The Proposed Oakland Freight Village As depicted in Figure 6, this proposed freight village is situated south of State Road 50, north of Florida’s Turnpike, and east of the Florida’s Turnpike interchange at State Road 50. Access at State Road 50, a designated truck route, offers connections to Florida’s Turnpike, State Road 429, and State Road 408. This site is within close proximity to the Florida Central railroad. 4.6 The Proposed Ocoee Freight Village As depicted in Figure 7, this proposed freight village is situated in the northeast corner of the interchange at State Road 429 and State Road 50. Access at State Road 50, a designated truck route, offers connections to Florida’s Turnpike, State Road 429, and State Road 408. This site is also within close proximity to the Florida Central railroad. Final Adopted 2030 Long Range Transportation Plan 21 Technical Report 6 4.7 The Proposed Silver Star Road Freight Village As depicted in Figure 8, this proposed freight village is situated west of US 441 (N. OBT) and the CSX Railroad, near the intersection of Silver Star Road and State Road 423 (John Young Parkway). Access to US 441, a designated truck route, offers connections to State Road 50, State Road 408, and Interstate 4. This area is home to existing intermodal activities which makes a proposed freight village highly desirable here. 4.8 The Proposed Zellwood Freight Village As depicted in Figure 9, this proposed freight village is situated just west of US 441 (N. OBT) near Willow Street. US 441, a designated truck route, connects directly with State Road 429 and State Road 436. This site is also within close proximity to the Florida Central railroad. 4.9 The Proposed State Road 417 Southern Extension Freight Village As depicted in Figure 10, this proposed freight village is situated around Florida’s Turnpike southeast of Lake Tohopekaliga. This site is within very close proximity to the Proposed Green Island Development of Regional Impact and proposed interchange at the Turnpike. More specifically, this site is located roughly halfway between the Kissimmee Park Road interchange and the Canoe Creek Service Plaza on the Turnpike. Access to Florida’s Turnpike, a designated truck route, allows direct connectivity with State Road 417, State Road 528, and Interstate 4 to the north and south to Miami. 4.10 The Proposed Kissimmee Gateway Airport Freight Village As depicted in Figure 11, this proposed freight village is situated adjacent to the Kissimmee Gateway Airport on the west side. Additionally, the site is south of US 192, north of Old Tampa Highway, and west of Pleasant Hill Road. Access to designated truck routes may include US 192 and US 17-92. US 192 offers a direct connection to State Road 535, Interstate 4, Boggy Creek Road, and Florida’s Turnpike. US 17-92 connects to Haines City in the south as well as with State Road 417 and State Road 528 (via State Road 423) to the north. Not only is this proposed freight village location very well tied into the transportation infrastructure facilities, it is also within close proximity to the CSXT railroad. Final Adopted 2030 Long Range Transportation Plan 22 Technical Report 6 4.11 The Proposed Poinciana Boulevard Freight Village As depicted in Figure 12, this proposed freight village is situated near the intersection of US 17-92 and Poinciana Boulevard. US 17-92, a designated truck route, connects to Haines City in the south as well as with State Road 417 and State Road 528 (via State Road 423) to the north. This proposed freight village location is also within close proximity to the CSXT railroad and the Kissimmee Gateway Airport. 4.12 The Proposed Harmony Research Park Freight Village As depicted in Figure 13, this proposed freight village is situated off US 192, east of East Hickory Tree Road in the Community of Harmony and within the proposed Research Park. Access to US 192, a designated truck route, connects with State Road 15 and Florida’s Turnpike to the west. To the east, US 192 connects with the City of Melbourne. 4.13 The Proposed Yeehaw Junction Freight Village As depicted in Figure 14, this proposed freight village is situated just north of the Florida’s Turnpike interchange at State Road 60 and east of US 441. With access to Florida’s Turnpike, a designated truck route, direct connections are offered to Orlando to the north and Miami to the south. 4.14 The Proposed Orlando Sanford International Airport/East Lake Mary Boulevard Freight Village As depicted in Figure 15, this proposed freight village is situated to the west of and adjacent to the Orlando Sanford International Airport. It is generally located off Airport Boulevard and north of East Lake Mary Boulevard. This site is also within close proximity to the CSXT railroad. Nearby truck routes include State Road 417 and US 17-92. These facilities tie into Interstate 4, State Road 419, and State Road 434. 4.15 The Proposed Port of Sanford Freight Village As depicted in Figure 16, this proposed freight village is situated along the Interstate 4 corridor between the State Road 46 and US 17-92 interchanges and includes the Port of Sanford. This site has access to designated truck routes Interstate 4, State Road 417, and US 17-92. Interstate 4 connects west to Orlando and Tampa and east to Daytona Beach. This proposed freight village location is also within close proximity to the CSXT railroad. Final Adopted 2030 Long Range Transportation Plan 23 Technical Report 6 5.0 Land Use Policy Strategies As mentioned in Section 1.0, an urban freight village is an intermodal or freight staging facility where access is provided to rails, trucks, ports, and/or airports. These facilities with warehousing and distribution enhance the integration and connectivity of the transportation system, across and between modes, for people and freight as well as encourage large scale manufacturing. The following describes land use policy strategies that may be utilized in order to promote the growth of urban freight villages and facilitate in the movement of goods between these freight villages. 5.1 Land Use Policy Strategies by Jurisdiction and Agency A diverse group of jurisdictions and agencies represent the tri-county study area. As these agencies address the needs specific its jurisdiction, the following land use policy strategies give details for specific agencies as well as details common to all agencies. 5.1.1 Florida Department of Transportation The Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT), as having authority over State Roadways and Interstates and connect many jurisdictions governed by various local agencies, should work with these agencies in preserving the specific existing and future roles corridors and arterials within the region. Monitoring existing roadway conditions, identifying transportation impacts of new or redevelopments and future design implementations with greater freight mobility will encourage the growth and sustainability of freight villages. The Department should assist local agencies in identifying sources of funding for greater freight prospects. 5.1.2 Cities and Counties Cities and Counties, with focus on comprehensive planning zoning designations, should direct the development of warehousing and distribution in and around the proposed freight villages herein. The requirement of buffers and/or transitional zones between incompatible land uses shall also be implemented. The Cities and Counties should also protect undeveloped land adjacent to freight villages for future freight expansion or by preventing encroachment of incompatible land uses through zoning, easements and/or purchase. Final Adopted 2030 Long Range Transportation Plan 24 Technical Report 6 5.2 Common Roles for All Jurisdictions and Agencies Although the region is governed by multiple jurisdictions and agencies, all have some common roles they may play is supporting and augmenting the proposed urban freight villages. The following details these commonalities. 5.2.1 Review Existing Roadway Network All agencies should review existing roadways in the network and examine the interactions among land uses to ensure the sustainability of freight villages. Only allowing supporting developments of like land uses around transportation infrastructure facilities with available or improved capacity also aids in the success of these villages. This requires coordination of freight and non-freight land uses to be separated in order to preserve freight mobility as the region continues to grow. 5.2.2 Plan in an Integrated Manner All agencies should involve freight operators, shipper, and receivers in local and regional planning. This includes comprehensive planning as well as long range planning. Again, requiring a buffer and/or transitional zone between mixed matched land uses is essential in planning. This should be implemented by protecting undeveloped land neighboring freight villages for future freight development or by averting the advancement of incompatible land uses through zoning, easements, and/or acquisition. 5.2.3 Design Standards In and Around Urban Freight Villages All agencies should enhance the long range planning, local comprehensive planning, and zoning processes to address freight related issues. This may include limiting land use intensities to what the surrounding transportation infrastructure and intersection may support. Guidelines for developers and planners may include requiring transportation infrastructure, intersection design, signage, and signalization to encourage truck traffic. Also, require deliver/access needs to be built into site design and review process. Site layout and building design guidelines and templates for freight support should also be implemented as well as adequate access for deliveries. Goods movement and logistics needs should be built into land development and site design. Final Adopted 2030 Long Range Transportation Plan 25 Technical Report 6 5.2.4 Private Sector Planning The private sector should be involved in the planning process through advisory committees and technical planning processes. METROPLAN ORLANDO’s Citizen Advisory Committee (CAC) should continue providing general direction and guidance to the planning process of freight villages. Although the former Freight Mobility Working Group (FMWG), an advisory committee, and its Steering Committee, which consisted of private and public sector stakeholders, no longer exists, the private sector may participate by becoming involved with the CAC. Final Adopted 2030 Long Range Transportation Plan 26 Technical Report 6 6.0 SUMMARY This technical report provided an outline of the development of an Urban Freight Village Land Use Plan/Strategy which is coordinated with the 2030 LRTP and includes proposed freight village locations. Presented in this technical report is the definition of an urban freight village and the need for them in the region. Also presented are the proposed locations and the land use policy strategies that will promote the growth of these villages. Figures 17-19 map out the Proposed Urban Freight Villages by County. In summary, a total of fifteen (15) Urban Freight Villages are proposed for the METROPLAN ORLANDO study area. Table 2, Proposed Freight Villages by County, lists the proposed freight villages by county. TABLE 2 PROPOSED FREIGHT VILLAGE BY COUNTY County Orange Osceola Seminole Name Boggy Creek Road Horizon West Towncenter Landstreet-Vineland Oakland Ocoee Hermit Smith-Hogshead Road Taft Zellwood SR 417 Southern Extension Kissimmee Gateway Airport Poinciana Boulevard Harmony Research Park Yeehaw Junction Orlando Sanford International Airport Port of Sanford The land use policy strategies presented included agency specific roles as well as roles common for all agencies. Agency roles pertained more particularly to the FDOT, as well as Cities and Counties. Common roles incorporated a review of the existing roadway network, planning in an integrated manner, design standards in and around Urban Freight Villages, and private sector planning. Final Adopted 2030 Long Range Transportation Plan 27 Technical Report 6 With the Proposed Urban Freight Villages and the land use policy strategies summarized herein, these facilities with warehousing and distribution will enhance the integration and connectivity of the transportation system, across and between modes, for people and freight as well as encourage large scale manufacturing. Final Adopted 2030 Long Range Transportation Plan 28 Technical Report 6 FIGURE 17 Proposed Freight Village Locations – Orange County Locations Final Adopted 2030 Long Range Transportation Plan 29 Technical Report 6 FIGURE 18 Proposed Freight Village Locations – Osceola County Locations Final Adopted 2030 Long Range Transportation Plan 30 Technical Report 6 FIGURE 19 Proposed Freight Village Locations – Seminole County Locations Final Adopted 2030 Long Range Transportation Plan 31 Technical Report 6 METROPLAN ORLANDO One Landmark Center 315 E. Robinson Street, Suite 355 Orlando, Florida 32801 (407) 481-5672 www.metroplanorlando.com