Georgia საქართველო Sakartvelo

TOWARDS AN ACTION PLAN FOR
ENERGY EFFICIENT HOUSING IN
GEORGIA
Dr Karine Melikidze
Director at Sustainable Development and Policy
(SDAP) Center www.sdap.ge
kmelikidze@sdap.ge
GEORGIA
საქართველო
SAKARTVELO
One of the former Soviet Republics.
Land boundaries: 1,461 km
– Russia 723 km
– Azerbaijan 322 km
– Turkey 252 km
– Armenia 164 km
• Capital – Tbilisi
• Official language – Georgian
• Government – Unitary
•
semi-presidential republic
• Legislature – Parliament
• Total Area - 69,700 km 2
• Population – 4 483,8 (2013 estimate)
2
GEORGIA
საქართველო
SAKARTVELO
Energy Statistics:
Approximate Annual Electricity Consumption: 10 billion kWh
3
Approximate Annual Gas Consumption 1.5 billion m
Economic Statistics:
GDP (PPP):
o total - $26 094 billion (2012)
o Per capita - $5 803
• GDP (Nominal):
o total - $15 829,7 billion (2012)
o Per capita - $3 519,6
OVERVIEW OF EXISTING SITUATION WITH THE
EE LEGISLATION IN GEORGIA

In Georgia the buildings sector accounts for over 40% of energy
consumption in country’s energy balance. Buildings, especially the
residential ones, are the biggest energy (and money) wasters and
largest sources of greenhouse gas emissions in the country;

For the buildings sector new national construction standardization
documents (codes) have not been adopted yet. The first draft of the
new Georgian Construction codes that will reflect energy efficiency in
buildings it is anticipated in December 2013.

In 2007 Georgia has adopted Law on House ownership, that lays down
foundation for forming HOA management.
4
PREREQUISITES FOR ENERGY EFFICIENT
HOUSING ACTION PLAN IN GEORGIA

In 2012 Georgia requested assistance of UNECE for development
of a national action plan on energy efficiency of the housing sector,
that had been approved.

The 4 -the International Forum: Energy for Sustainable Development
followed by the National workshop, took place in September in
Tbilisi as UNECE‘s direct response to the official request of
Government of Georgia aiming at outlining a major situation and
support activities for a EE Action plan for housing sector.

In 2011 Tbilisi City Hall signed Covenant of Mayors Initiative, a step
which led to development of the Buildings sector Sustainable
Energy Action Plan(SEAP) for Tbilisi City with the helping hand of
the USAID NATELI/ SDAP Center.
5
MAIN CHALLENGES FOR GEORGIA IDENTIFIED
BY NATIONAL WORKSHOP
Development of National strategy (plan) for energy efficiency that will
outline priority areas:





Laws and regulations
Financial mechanisms (policy, schemes, capability of the banking sector,
etc.)
Management and rehabilitation of housing stock
Improvement of technical capacities
Rising public awareness of citizens
6
PAST EXPERIENCE - STRATEGY OF TBILISI SEAP

The overall strategy for the buildings sector SEAP in Tbilisi was set up
aiming at reduction of greenhouse gas emissions through the
sustainable use of energy resources and reduction of the overall energy
consumption.

Underlying assumption that led to setting this goal is as follows:
- huge heat losses in winter since the main part of targeted building
stock subsectors were built during the Soviet era.

Two target subsectors:
- municipal buildings
-residential buildings


7
PROPOSED MITIGATION MEASURES UNDER
TBILISI SEAP

Action plan rehabilitation measures:
- upgrading/insulation of building envelopes;
- installation of modern energy efficient heating systems;
- replacement of incandescent bulbs with fluorescent ones;
- implementation of pilot “low energy consumption buildings” projects;
- utilization of “renewable energy resources” for heating and domestic hot
water supply purposes.
8
FRAMEWORK FOR IMPLEMENTATION OF THE
SEAP MEASURES






creating an enabling policy/regulation environment
providing opportunities for setting up financial support
setting up best practice examples (pilot projects)
generating citizens support
directly engaging citizens in energy efficiency implementation process
engaging various parties into SEAP activities
9
ENERGY CONSUMPTION DATA- TBILISI CITYPOPULATION 1.170 MLN.
10
TBILISI SEAP - ENERGY CONSUMPTION
FORECAST BY BAU SCENARIO

For residential buildings

For municipal buildings
11
TBILISI SEAP - CO2 EQUIVALENT EMISSIONS
FORECAST BY BAU SCENARIO

For residential buildings

For municipal buildings
12
TBILISI SEAP -ENERGY SAVINGS AND
REDUCTIONS OF CO2 EMISSIONS BY 2020
SECTORS
& fields
KEY actions/measures
per field of action
of action
Municipal buildings, equipment/
facilities
Action 1: installation of
central heating systems
Action 2: Installation of
efficient lighting system
Action 3. Refurbishment of
residential buildings
structure
Action 4.
Use of renewable
sources for hot water
supply purposes
Expected energy
saving
per
measure
[MWh/a]
Expected
Expected
CO2
renewable
reduction
per
energy
measure [t/a]
production per
measure
[MWh/a]
1:1055
1: 6305.3

Energy saving target
per sector [MWh]
in 2020
Local renewable energy
production target
per sector [MWh]
in 2020
733,636
13,849.60
CO2
Reduction target
per sector
[t] in 2020
1: 1482.9
2:1147.5
2: 447.9
3: 3642.95
3: 753.8
4. 189
4: 753.8
Residential buildings
Action 1: installation of
central heating systems
Action 2: Installation of
efficient lighting system
Action 3. Refurbishment of
residential buildings
structure
Action 4. Use of
renewable sources for hot
water supply purposes
1: 6305.3
1: 1225.5
2: 29410
2: 11730
3: 698381
3.141659.6
4.
1050
4:.210
165,998
13
TBILISI SEAP -PILOT PROJECT(ESIB)

Multi-apartment 9-storyed single entrance residential
building built in 1978 consists of two identical units A
and B connected to each other by the staircase.

Building has been selected by Tbilisi municipality,
since it is considered to implement heat insulation in
one of the units with the objective of comparing actual
results of heat consumption between the heat
insulated unit and the unit without heat insulation.

It is planned to monitor heat consumption and
compare the data with the energy audit data.
14
PILOT PROJECT -ENERGY SAVING MEASURES
Proposed energy saving activities
1 Heat insulation of walls
2 Heat insulation of roof (floor of attic)
3 Heat insulation of floor (ceiling of basement)
4 Installation of new metal plastic double glazed windows
5 Implementation of space heating and solar HWS system
Proposed energy saving activities
1
Installation of metal plastic double glazed windows
2. Implementation of space heating and solar HWS system
15
ENERGY AUDIT RESULTS
Energy saving potential (unit A)
Energy saving
Net saving
Investments into energy saving*
Payback period
244,791 kWh/year
44,713/ 20,143 [GEL/ € year]
387,864 / 174,729 [GEL/ €]
8.7 years
Energy saving potential (unit B)
Energy saving
Net saving
Investments into energy saving*
Payback period
143,829 kWh/year
37,662/ 16,967 [GEL/ € year]
317,873 / 143,199 [GEL/ €]
8.4 years
16
ENERGY SAVING POTENTIAL BY
MEASURES(UNIT А)
Energy saving potential (unit А)
Residential building in Temka sub-district (unit A)
Energy efficient activities
1. Heat insulation of walls
Investment
[GEL /€]
52,265/
Heated area:
Saving
[kWh per year]
63,904
23,545
1,674 m²
Payback
[GEL /€ year]
5,110/
NPVQ
[year]
10.1
*
0.03
2,302
2. Heat insulation of roof (floor of attic)
5,293/
15,499
754/
7.0
0.38
3. Heat insulation of floor (ceiling of basement)
2,384
3,875/
21,353
340
1,039/
3.7
1.6
4. Installation of new windows
1,746
16,431/
17,911
468
1,672/
9.8
0.06
5. Installation of heating system and solar HWS
310,000/
126,124
753
36,138/
8.6
0.05
139,652
387,864 /
244,791
16,280
44,713/
8.7
7,402
system
Total
174,729
20,143
17
ENERGY SAVING POTENTIAL BY
MEASURES(UNIT B)
Energy saving potential (unit B)
Residential building in Temka sub-district (unit B)
Energy efficient activities
1.
Installation of new windows
Heated area:
Investment
[GEL /€]
16,467/
Saving
[kWh per year]
22,521
7,418
2..
Installation of heating system and solar HWS
system
Total
1,491 m²
[GEL /€ year]
1,758/
Payback
NPVQ
[year]
9.4
*
0.08
792
301,406/
121,308
35,904/
8.6
135,781
317,873/
143,829
16,175
37,662/
8.4
143,199
0.09
16,967
18
ANNUAL ENERGY CONSUMPTION CHART FOR THE
BLOCK A (ENSI COMPUTER SIMULATION MODEL)
19
ANNUAL ENERGY CONSUMPTION CHART FOR THE
BLOCK B (ENSI COMPUTER SIMULATION MODEL)
20
ENVIRONMENTAL BENEFITS-TOTAL 78.565 TON/YEAR

Unit A

Energy carrier
Natural gas
Heavy oil
Other
District heating
Electricity
Natural gas
Heavy oil
Other
Energy carrier
Electricity
Unit B
District heating
Unit A
Unit B
Basic (kWh/m² year)
-
-
212.8
-
-
Basic (kWh/m² year)
-
-
217.9
-
-
After implementation of energy efficient activities
(kWh/m² year)
-
-
66.5
-
-
After implementation of energy efficient activities
(kWh/m² year)
-
-
121.3
-
-
Energy saving (kWh/m² year)
-
-
146.3
-
-
Energy saving (kWh/m² year)
-
-
96.6
-
-
Coefficients of CO2 emissions (kg/kWh) for Georgia
-
0.3999
0.202
-
-
Coefficients of CO2 emissions (kg/kWh) for Georgia
-
0.202
-
-
Reduction of CO2 emissions (kg/m² g) year
-
-
29.553
-
-
Reduction of CO2 emissions (kg/m² g) year
-
19.513
-
-
Reduction of CO2 emissions (tonne/year)
49.471
Reduction of CO2 emissions (tone/year)
29.094
0,3999
-
21
MUNICIPAL ENERGY PLANNING SOFTWARE TOOL
DEVELOPED BY SDAP CENTER IN PARTNERSHIP
WITH WINROCK INTERNATIONAL(INRMW PROJECT)
22
MUNICIPAL ENERGY PASSPORT

An instrument to help the local governments and other interested stakeholders
to evaluate the severity and extent of the existing energy problems as well as to
prioritize these problems in order to develop appropriate instruments to solve, or
at least help ameliorate them;

Can be modified as needed in order to accommodate additional analytical and
decision-making features to satisfy the future development needs of small
territorial units like municipalities and/or regions of Georgia

It is interactive, bilingual (Georgian/English), enables users to choose among
variety of options of data presentation (numerical, %, charts, etc), to retrieve and
store data
Operating System: Windows XP/Vista/7 or Windows 8
Screen resolution: minimum 1024/768
Ram:2GB (or higher)



23
MUNICIPAL ENERGY PASSPORT OBJECTIVES
Energy Passport meets the following basic characteristics:




It is not a model of any particular energy system, but rather an
instrument that can be used to create models of different energy
systems;
As a database it can provide a comprehensive system for maintaining
energy information;
As a policy analysis tool it can assess the effects - physical, economic,
and environmental - of alternative energy programs, investments, and
actions;
It is expected to be used for forecasting energy balances and
development of the energy efficiency action plans for each watershed
(municipality)
24
Thank you
25