Untitled - Vision Sports Publishing
Transcription
Untitled - Vision Sports Publishing
WIMBLEDON: THE OFFICIAL HISTORY Landmarks 1894 New baths and showers were installed in the pavilion. 1895 A large tarpaulin was installed on Centre Court. Wimbledon welcomed its first royal visitor – Crown Princess Stephanie of Austria. 1896 The Plate event was started for men. All players beaten in the first and second rounds of the singles were eligible. 1897 The starting date of the Championships was brought back from July to June. 1899 The Club altered its name again and now became the All England Lawn Tennis and Croquet Club, a title that has not changed to this day. A non-Championship ladies’ doubles event was begun. 1900 A non-Championship mixed Ayres, whose ball was used at Wimbledon from 1879 until replaced by Slazenger in 1902, built two removable stands for the Centre Court to accommodate the ever-growing crowds. In those early years spectators at the Challenge Round would dress formally, many of the men in top hats or straw boaters, the ladies in summer dresses and coats with a variety of headwear. 1884 The Ladies’ Singles Championship was introduced and won by Maud Watson who beat her sister, Lilian, in the final from a field of 13 competitors. The first prize was worth 20 guineas. The Gentlemen’s Doubles Championship was introduced, using the cup donated by Oxford University for a doubles event they had held but abandoned. Advantage sets were played in all events. Three Americans, James Dwight, Arthur Rives and Richard Sears, were the first overseas entrants. Ayres introduced a ‘screw post’ which eliminated the need for guy ropes. 1886 A Challenge Round was introduced for the ladies’ singles and men’s doubles. Improvements were made to the stands around Centre Court. Stop netting, eight feet high, was erected around the ends of outside courts. William Renshaw’s sixth successive Gentlemen’s Singles Championship win set a new record. Refreshments were served in the pavilion. 20 1887 Charlotte ‘Lottie’ Dod won the doubles event was introduced and the reigning American singles champion, Marion Jones, became the first overseas player to compete in the ladies’ singles. Reginald Doherty won for the fourth year in a row. ladies’ singles aged 15. She is still the youngest singles champion of either sex, although when Martina Hingis won the Ladies’ Doubles Championship with Helena Sukova in 1996, she was three days younger. 1901 Arthur ‘Baby’ Gore won the first of 1888 New gates were erected at the 1902 Because rain interrupted the Nursery Lane entrance to the ground. The draw was conducted under the BagnallWild system with all byes in the first round. Sunday play was allowed for members for the first time. 1889 William Renshaw won his seventh singles title, a record for men that was equalled when Pete Sampras beat Pat Rafter in 2000. The Club embarked upon a programme of landscaping and refurbishment to the pavilion. Drainage of the lawns was improved. 1890 For the first time all three titles were won by players from Ireland. his three titles, aged 33, and Charlotte Sterry (neé Cooper) the fourth of her five. A new pavilion was built at a cost of £1,200. ladies’ Challenge Round, Muriel Robb had to start again the next day against Charlotte Sterry before becoming champion. At the request of the leading players, the Slazenger tennis ball was adopted for the first time. It has been the official ball ever since. 1903 For the last time all four semi-finalists in the men’s All-Comers’ singles and the defending champion were British players. 1904 For the only time a match was decided by the toss of a coin. In the fifth round Frank Riseley beat Sydney Smith after being two sets all. A new uncovered Stand D was built on the south-east side of the Centre Court to hold 600 chairs. All outside courts were surrounded by green canvas to aid sighting the ball. 1905 May Sutton (USA), who had been born in Plymouth before the family moved to California, became the first overseas champion. The following year she lost in the Challenge Round although in 1907 she would win again. 1906 Laurence Doherty won for the fifth year in a row, a record that remained until Bjorn Borg equalled the feat in 1980. He and his brother, Reginald, also won an eighth doubles title together, a record that still stands. The Grand Duchess Anastasie and Grand Duke Michael of Russia visited The Championships. The stands surrounding Centre Court were rebuilt at a cost of £1,300. 1907 The Prince of Wales (later King George V) visited The Championships and accepted the first Presidency of the Club. Norman Brookes (AUS) became the first overseas men’s champion. For the first time the St John Ambulance were present at the meeting, attending for the last six days. 21 The Doherty brothers, Reginald and Laurence, were the first great international stars of the sport.Together they dominated Wimbledon between 1897 and 1906, winning a total of nine singles and eight doubles titles.They also led the British Isles to victory four times in the newly-established Davis Cup team competition and Laurie became the first overseas winner of the US Championships in 1903. WIMBLEDON: THE OFFICIAL HISTORY Slazenger balls, sold in boxes of one dozen and individually wrapped, first selected for the 1902 Championships, were selected again in 1922, the first year at the new ground in Church Road, and have been selected for The Championships every year since. thing to a sporting matinee idol the game had so far produced. He was also a keen motorcyclist who won a gold medal in a race from Land’s End to John O’Groats in 1908 and, two years later, motor-cycled from London to Constantinople via Rheims. While there he flew in one of the new aeroplanes, a touch of daredevil eccentricity that greatly increased his appeal. It was tragic that so fine an example of New Zealand manhood, so graceful an exponent of lawn tennis skills, should have joined the hundreds of thousands of wasted young lives who were sacrificed in that tragic conflict that history refers to as the Great War. Wilding, a captain in the Royal Marines, was killed in action at Neuve Chapelle in France on 9 May 1915. THE ARRIVAL OF SLAZENGER There were other notable events during this period as The Championships expanded. In 1902, at the request of a group of leading players, the Slazenger ball replaced the Ayres as the official ball of The Championships. It is a remarkable tribute to the quality of the product and the friendly and efficient working relationship that developed between the many representatives of firm and club over the years that the supply of Slazenger balls, equipment and tournament personnel, voted on annually by the Club’s Committee until the recent contracts of the post open era, has continued until this day. This is thought to be the longest commercial association between a major event and an official supplier in the whole of world sport. To recognise the 100 years of Slazenger service to The Championships, in 2002 the All England Club Chairman, Mr Tim Phillips, presented a piece of Waterford Crystal to Mr Robert Brooke, the Chairman of Dunlop Slazenger Ltd, in the Royal Box. In 1906 Harry Scrivener, a former Oxford blue and one of the founders of the LTA in 1888, replaced Bonham Evelegh as Referee and held the office until the First World War. Evelegh had resigned because, as someone who wrote on the game, he could not agree to the Committee’s new demand that he would not write about any incidents concerning The Championships without first seeking the approval of the Committee. It was also in 1906 that Archdale Palmer, who had been a most successful Club Secretary since 1899, was persuaded by Slazenger to join them as joint Managing Director. Palmer was also an LTA councillor and had managed Davis Cup ties for the LTA with great success. To recognise this work he had been nominated to be elected as an LTA Vice-President.Yet he became the victim of a heated campaign to prevent anyone whose income was derived from the tennis industry from holding an official position on the LTA or acting as a Referee or Manager at any official tournament. In the end he resigned from the LTA. 94 1901-1914 – WIDER HORIZONS Palmer was replaced at the All England Club by Commander George Hillyard who, besides having played cricket for Middlesex and Leicester and for the Gentlemen versus the Players, had also won many singles and doubles titles, several of the latter with the Dohertys. Hillyard’s appointment did not end his playing days. In fact, in 1907 he won three important tournaments, the South of England, East of England and Sussex Championships, and the following year, playing with Reggie Doherty, he won the Olympic doubles title at Wimbledon. During the First World War he rejoined the Navy as a LieutenantCommander and afterwards picked up where he had left off. Another important piece of Wimbledon history was made in 1907 through the presence of the Prince of Wales, accompanied by Princess Mary, at the finals of the two singles events when, for the first time, both titles went overseas. For two years, Prince George consented to become the Club’s first President. It was the start of a long and happy relationship between the Royal Family and the All England Club that is still as strong as ever today thanks to the frequent attendance at Wimbledon of the Club’s President, the Duke of Kent. This link with the Royal Family sprang from the fact that in 1877 Commander Hillyard had been a naval cadet on HMS Britannia at the same time as Prince George and his brother Prince Albert. It was an extremely fortuitous connection for the regular presence of King George and Queen Mary and, later, the Kents, has done so much to add status to The Championships. By 1913 the proceeds from The Championships were considerable – the accrued profits stood at more than £14,000. The Club’s new Secretary, George Hillyard, accompanies the Accordingly, in that year the LTA were allocated a share of Prince of Wales during his first visit to The Championships the surplus for the first time. in 1907.Thus began a long and happy royal connection. Curiously, in the two new Championship events there were For the next two years Prince George consented to serve as unusual outcomes. In the ladies’ doubles Mrs Sterry had to retire with President and, when he became King George V, as Patron a torn tendon in her leg; and in the mixed doubles final, played before from 1910–1935. the singles Challenge Rounds, Mrs Larcombe was hit in the eye by a ball from her partner. He was the former Irish rugby captain, Australian tennis champion and scratch golfer, James Cecil Parke, who was always called J.C. Consequently, Mrs Larcombe could not challenge Mrs Lambert Chambers in the singles. 95 WIMBLEDON: THE OFFICIAL HISTORY 1919-1930 Above: Spectators are watching a match on No.3 Court with the double-sided stand behind them that overlooked No.2 Court on the other side.This was an age when hats were de rigueur for everyone, gentlemen and ladies alike. Left: Improvised headgear was essential on the hottest days. Far left: Crowds gather to see which dignitaries are arriving for an afternoon in the Royal Box. 128 – The Inter-War Boom Kitty McKane (left) and the young Helen Wills emerge onto whom she had defeated twice in the United States the previous Centre Court before the famous 1924 final. It was the only season. Leading by a set and 4–1, and with a point for 5–1, Helen time the eight-time champion lost at Wimbledon. Kitty, by seemed certain to capture her first Wimbledon title. However, Kitty, now Mrs Godfree, won again in 1926, the year when Helen keeping the pressure on her opponent and attacking for all she was was absent due to sickness. Helen had grown up in San worth, staged one of her now famous recoveries. Amid mounting Francisco, playing first with her father’s racket at the Berkeley excitement from a packed gallery that included Queen Mary, Kitty Tennis Club which lay behind the family home. Helen’s came back to win the second set 6–4 and then outlasted a tiring sound technique, depth of concentration and boundless opponent to win the decider by the same margin. This first British confidence in her own ability made her one of the greatest success since Mrs Lambert Chambers’ win in 1914 was immensely champions of all time. popular with the home crowd. Most of them stayed on to see Kitty win the mixed title as well with Brian Gilbert after losing in the doubles final with Mrs Covell against Helen and Mrs Wightman. Hazel Wightman was the donor of the cup for annual competition between the ladies of the United States and Britain that began in 1923 and ended in 1989 when Britain could no longer find the players to offer a serious challenge to the strong American teams of the era. Kitty had been a member of the British team that had travelled to the United States on the SS Franconia the previous year to compete in the inaugural Wightman Cup match. It was the first event to be played at the new Forest Hills stadium in New York and the start had been delayed by one day for the funeral of President Harding. Kitty had had the honour of playing in the first rubber against Helen and had fought well before losing this first 129 WIMBLEDON: THE OFFICIAL HISTORY THE AMERICANS REGAIN CONTROL Budge had much greater difficulty in the 1937 final against a fully fit von Cramm, nevertheless winning in straight sets 6–3 6–4 6–2. Curiously, two weeks later these two would meet again on the same court in the deciding rubber of the Inter-Zone final of the Davis Cup, USA v Germany. In one of the most dramatic matches ever played Budge came back from the loss of the first two sets to level the match but then fell 1–4 behind in the fifth. Trailing 4–5 and 5–6 he recovered both times and at last broke the German to lead 7–6.Von Cramm, fighting to the last, saved five match points before Budge finally prevailed 6–8 5–7 6–4 6–2 8–6. Budge always claimed that in the dressing room before the match von Cramm had received a telephone call from Adolf Hitler demanding a win for Germany, though this story has never been substantiated. Budge used a heavy racket weighing over 15 ounces so that he could hit a very heavy ball. His great strength was his powerful Above right: Donald Budge who in 1938 became the first backhand, basically a flat drive hit with lift and taken early, in which he of only four men who have won the singles without the loss had tremendous confidence. Allied to a fearsome serve, a good forehand of a set.The others are Tony Trabert (1955), Chuck and a fine volley, he was the complete all-rounder. He could equally McKinley (1963) and Bjorn Borg (1976).The American well dominate opponents from the back or subject them to a fierce net was also the first to win a Grand Slam, a feat he completed attack. His feats in winning all three titles at both the 1937 and 1938 at Forest Hills later in the year. meetings, particularly when he dropped only one set in singles in 1937 and none in 1938, were thought at the time to be almost superhuman efforts. The fact that the triple has been repeated only twice by a man, namely Bobby Riggs in 1939 and Frank Sedgman in 1952, suggests that contemporary observers were right. Curiously, it has always seemed easier for the ladies to achieve this level of success, perhaps because the Above left: Germany’s elegant stylist Baron Gottfried von Cramm was arguably the greatest pre-war player never to win the men’s singles. Like Fred Stolle in the 1960s, he reached the final three years in a row. In 1935 and 1936 Fred Perry beat him and the following year he ran into the American Don Budge who was just emerging as the greatest pre-war champion.Von Cramm twice won in Paris, in 1934 and 1936, and had a wonderful Davis Cup record: 82 wins from 102 matches over a span of 22 years, the last being in 1953 when he was 44. After losing the deciding rubber in the 1937 Inter-Zone final against Budge and subsequently criticising Hitler and the Nazi party, which he refused to join, von Cramm was jailed for a year and did not play at Wimbledon again until 1951 when, at the age of 41, he lost a close three-set match to Jaroslav Drobny, the No.2 seed. 148 1931-1939 – British and American Supremacy great lady champions have been further ahead of their contemporaries than the men have been ahead of theirs. It is certainly true that there has been greater depth of talent among the men than among the women. Altogether five women have won the triple crown at Wimbledon on nine occasions: Suzanne Lenglen three times (1920, 1922, 1925); Louise Brough twice (1948, 1950); Billie Jean King twice (1967, 1973); Alice Marble once (1939); and Doris Hart once (1951). When Budge went on to Forest Hills in 1938 needing only the US Championships to complete his hand of the four major titles, he was in the same position that Crawford had been five years earlier. On that occasion the New York Times columnist, John Kieran, a regular bridge player, had suggested that “if Crawford beats Perry today it would be something like a grand slam on the courts, doubled and vulnerable”. Thus the Grand Slam concept was born. Crawford had enjoyed a spectacularly successful season in 1933. His match against Perry at Forest Hills was his 14th consecutive final (he had won the previous 13) and he was 149 The great Donald Budge does an early interview on court after beating Bunny Austin (right) in the 1938 final. WIMBLEDON: THE OFFICIAL HISTORY During the 1930s London Underground produced a different poster each year advertising The Championships, a number of which can be seen in the Wimbledon Lawn Tennis Museum.They have become collectors’ items. Club might throw over the LTA altogether and conduct The Championships independently, a suggestion “that may seem absurd to most of you as it does to me”. But the Club had been advised, he said, “that unless we took steps to dispel the uneasiness it might possibly spread to those who had a better opinion of the good sense and the good faith of the Club”. In order to convince the LTA that we had no wish to separate ourselves from them, “we are willing the Agreement should be prolonged for as long a period as you like; in order to show we do not wish to conduct a separate competition we will make you joint owners of the Ground, we will increase your representatives on the Committee from 4 to 6, and lastly ... all the Club feels it is justly entitled to is funds sufficient to maintain the Club as a club ... the balance shall be handed over to you to dispose of in accordance with your constitution”. There were two modifications to the original proposals requested by the LTA that the Chairman disliked. First was the creation of a Board of Arbitration to settle any disputes when terms cannot be agreed if either side were to give five years’ notice of not wishing to continue. Second was the fact that, in effect, the Council of the LTA, through the Joint Finance Board, would control any change of policy affecting revenue or expenditure and the allocation of tickets. Nevertheless, the Chairman still felt the Agreement worth signing. The first member to speak was Denys Stocks. After expressing concern about trying to absorb the terms of the proposed new Agreement in such a short time, his first comment was to ask why, a mere four years after the conclusion of the last Agreement (the 1928 Supplemental Agreement), that was due to run until 1954, it was necessary to have a new one. Describing the LTA as “the cuckoo in the nest” as a result of the 1922 Agreement, he asked why it was felt necessary to give away half the Club’s ownership in the ground. “All this Agreement says is that in 1972, after we have given the LTA for nothing half of the property of the Club, the Club is entitled to go to an arbitrator, not to determine the terms on which the LTA may carry on Championships on our ground, but ... the terms and conditions upon which the Club shall have the right to use its own grounds ... a most extraordinary position.” Mr Stocks was perfectly happy that he, as a member, should not benefit financially from The Championships but, at the same time, he said: “I am very reluctant to hand over to the Lawn Tennis Association for nothing half the property which this Club owns. I cannot see any necessity for it ... we do not want to make money, we do not want to dispose of our property – it is the last thing we want – we want to keep the interests of the game; we undertake we will not dispose of anything at all as long as you undertake the Championships shall be held on our ground.What fairer than that? What more do they want?” The clapping which followed indicated a wide measure of support for Mr Stocks’ views among the members present. Next came speeches by Mr E.J. Harrison and Mr F.W. Perceval supporting Mr Stocks and expressing concern about other financial aspects of the proposed Agreement. Mr E.A. Stoner wondered if there really was this urgency. “Can’t we adjourn until 158 1931-1939 – British and American Supremacy the autumn so as to give members a better chance?” he asked. Mr E. Pretty seconded the motion that the meeting should be adjourned and that the speeches of the Chairman and others be circulated to all members. The suggestion of Mr Turnbull that a small committee of members be set up to go over the points raised and come forward with suggestions to the Committee was supported by Mr Gibson. The Chairman, realising that the day was lost, embarked upon a long closing speech in which he justified the decision to give away half of the Club because there was, he said, “a serious risk of arousing a hostile spirit in the Council in general and in those who desired to continue in association with us, and unless we took some steps to remedy this we might alienate those who are at present our friends”. The Chairman then took a vote on the motion to adjourn the meeting until some convenient date at the end of October and to appoint four members to meet with four members of the Club Committee and report to that meeting. The motion was carried nem. con. and Mr A.D. Stocks, Mr R.J.T. Gibson, Mr F.W. Perceval and Mr G.C. Ball Greene were nominated to serve on the small committee. So ended arguably the most important meeting the Club had held since first deciding to hold a tennis tournament in 1877. During the weeks that followed the sub-committee held many discussions with Committee representatives and proposed a set of amendments which answered some of the members’ concerns. The terms of a revised Agreement were put before members at an SGM on 29 March 1933 and were passed unanimously. The vote to approve the signing of the Agreement was passed at another SGM held immediately after the AGM on 7 December 1933. It still transferred 50 per cent ownership of the Ground Company to the LTA but there was now a break clause. Either party would be able to say that they wished to end the Agreement, provided notice was given five years in advance of 31 December 1972. The Club would be allowed to continue to manage The Championships via a Management Committee consisting of 12 Club members and six LTA members. The LTA would control by six to three a newly created Joint Finance Board which would have wide powers over expenditure and changes of policy. After covering expenses and tax, plus monies needed to repay Debentures and provide for a Ground Company Reserve Fund, the entire surplus would go each year to the LTA for them to run the game in Britain. Now that the LTA had been offered a 50 per cent ownership of the ground, extra representation on the Management Committee, control of the Joint Finance Board, as well as the entire surplus from The Championships each year, most Councillors felt they had done well; not Mr Monckton, though. At the Extraordinary General Meeting of the LTA, held in their offices at River Plate House in Finsbury Circus on 21 February 1934, Monckton tried to insist that the LTA should continue to pursue control of The Championships. Over recent weeks Monckton had 159 The outside courts in 1934 were less crowded than they are during the first week of The Championships today. The men are all dressed in long white flannels, as they would be until the post-war era, and the crowded car parks in Somerset Road reveal the foresight of the Committee men who loaned money to the Club for their purchase. WIMBLEDON: THE OFFICIAL HISTORY Famously the first man to wear shorts on Centre Court was Britain’s Davis Cup hero Bunny Austin. In an era when decorum and the dress code were widely observed (notice the formal attire of the spectators with ties for the men and hats for most of the ladies), the fashion did not become the norm until after the war when life generally became more informal. shown his disdain for the proposed new Agreement with articles in Lawn Tennis and Badminton and the Birmingham Post which had been answered briefly by the LTA Secretary, Mr Batley. Now Monckton could personally express to his fellow Councillors his strong feelings: “I want you to concentrate on three main points and one sub-point.The first point is this: do not forget that you are the governing body of the game.The next is: do not forget that you own, as Mr Batley has told you, the five most valuable Championships in the world.The third is: do not forget that if the three All-England Championships are ever lost or unmarried from our Championships, they fall back again into the ordinary category of territorial championships in this country with no privileges whatever.” In full flow now, Mr Monckton condemned the financial arrangements which, he said, were strongly in favour of the Club: “Anything that is contributed to Debenture redemption and anything that is contributed to capital is going to come eventually out of our pockets because it will reduce in the first instance our 60 per cent and it will reduce any chance we have of getting anything out of the 40 per cent ... to my knowledge they would have no difficulty in spending the whole of the 40 per cent if they wished to do so ... there are two unlimited items in that category; one is overseas tours, with no limit of expenditure, and the other is capital expenditure on the buildings and ground improvements and – a very nice, large word – ‘amenities’, in which they could probably include everything.” Turning now to the question of the governing body he asked: “Can you imagine any other governing body of any kind entering into an arrangement of this kind? ... what would you say to the governing body of a school who handed over to their staff of masters the whole control of the school for 40 years, upon their making certain reservations that they would return to the governors a certain 160 1931-1939 – British and American Supremacy amount of money at the finish if they had it to spare? The idea is preposterous!” So too, he thought, was the inclusion of future Championships owned by the LTA: “We are not only going to deprive posterity of what we have already, but of anything they may get in the future! That is a preposterous thing and was not in when this thing was approved in November; it has been put in since.” Mr Monckton then turned his fire on aspects of the joint ownership which was one of the points on which he had been thwarted when negotiating the 1922 Agreement. “With regard to this question of the ownership of shares in the ground ... I suppose you have noticed that all the money which we put into it hereafter for the redemption of Debentures and for capital expenditure will never be recovered by the Association at all. I asked members of the Club about that and could get no answer as to why that was ... Mr Batley explained ... that ‘you cannot expect your National Championships to be run on the ground without paying rent for them’ ... but you must remember that we have got half shares in the ground and there is no mention whatever of the Club paying anything for the running of their share of the Championships on the ground, nor for their having the use of the ground for the whole of the rest of the year ... and we have it for certain purposes during 20 days in the year at the outside. It seems to me to be ridiculous.” After having a dig at the Club for a rise in salaries paid to Club employees, Mr Monckton asked why Clause 12, which listed privileges that should be enjoyed equally by Club members and Councillors, had been dropped. It had been a long speech. The Councillors were getting restless. There were cries of “vote ... vote”. But Mr Monckton had one last score to settle. “I would just call your attention, in conclusion, to the resolution which was passed in February 1906, proposed by two gentlemen who still sit on the Council ... it was to the effect that an effort be made to come to some amicable arrangement with the All England Club by which the management of the English Championships, as they were called then by the proposer, should in future be under the control of the Lawn Tennis Association ... I am going to ask that gentleman and his seconder to explain to you why they have changed their mind so considerably, that when they had no Championship of their own they wanted to control the management of the Club’s Championship, but when they have their five most valuable Championships in the world they wish to hand over management of them, without any control, to the Club.The gentlemen I ask to do that are Mr Macfie, now Brigadier-General Macfie, and Mr Prebble, his seconder.” The Chairman spared the blushes of the two worthy gentlemen by calling for a vote. The result was no surprise. On a show of hands the resolution was carried by 92 votes to six and with the proxies added the totals were: For 398, Against 27. The final form of the Agreement, due to run until 1972, was signed by both parties on 15 May 1934. So ended a long-running battle which ultimately left both parties feeling reasonably satisfied. In the pre-open era the new Agreement, revised by the 1966 Supplemental Agreement, was the basis of a successful and largely harmonious working relationship between the Club and the LTA. Generally speaking it served its purpose well. The Club got on with running The Championships and the LTA ran the game in Britain. 161 Bjorn Borg • Born: 6 June 1956 • 1976, 1977, 1978, 1979, 1980 x This Swede was one of the giants. He won his first Grand Slam title with the French Open in 1974 when he was barely 18. In 1981 he won it for the sixth time – a record. At Wimbledon he controlled events for five tremendous years. Curiously his initial victory in 1976 was the most one-sided and was the only occasion he did not lose a set. He made his Davis Cup debut when only 15. His double-fisted backhand and his heavy, topspun forehand, combined with a lethal serve, made him virtually invincible when on form. His Wimbledon record was unsurpassed until the arrival of Pete Sampras and Roger Federer in later years. He won 41 successive singles matches and his eventual defeat was in the 1981 final against John McEnroe. The US title, however, eluded him, the blot on an almost perfect record. He retired in 1982 when only 26. He was then a millionaire but he ceased being a tax exile in Monte Carlo to return to his native Sweden. His example created a vast school of effective Swedish players. John McEnroe • Born: 16 February 1959 • 1981, 1983, 1984 Boris Becker • Born: 22 November 1967 • 1985, 1986, 1989 x x This left-handed genius, supreme in singles and doubles, rarely ceased to be sensational. When a junior in 1977 he turned form upside down by qualifying for Wimbledon and then reaching the semi-finals. His emergence as champion in 1981 was through brilliant play combined with controversial behaviour. His readiness to argue with officials and his lack of graciousness caused the All England Club to take the unprecedented step of withholding the normal honorary membership of the Club after winning. The honour was given a year later when, though not winning, he had purged his offence by good behaviour. He showed his flair equally in the US Open where he succeeded in 1979, 1980, 1981 and 1984. In the French Open (where he won the mixed doubles in 1977) he met with surprising failure and in 1984 actually dissipated a twosets-to-love lead in the final against the Czechoslovak Ivan Lendl. Four times he was in winning US Davis Cup teams. He won five Wimbledon doubles titles – four with Peter Fleming, one with Michael Stich. The 99th Wimbledon meeting produced its most remarkable winner. At 17 years, 227 days, Boris Becker, from Leimen in West Germany, became the youngest gentlemen’s singles winner of all time. By losing a total of eight sets (winning 166 games, losing 126) he became the most laboured winner. He was the first German singles winner among men and the first unseeded victor since seeding began in 1927. When he successfully defended his title a year later with an impressively mature performance against world champion Ivan Lendl, he silenced forever those critics who had called his first win lucky. His third win in 1989 was followed by success at the US Open and in 1996 he won the second of his two Australian titles. Twice he led West Germany to Davis Cup success in 1988 and 1989, on both occasions against Sweden. A national hero, according to a newspaper report he was better known in Germany than the Chancellor. Virginia Wade • Born: 10 July 1945 • 1977 x Born in Bournemouth, trained in South Africa, where her father was Archdeacon of Durban, she indicated her strength of character by sitting for her science degree at Sussex University during the course of a Wightman Cup match; she had success in both. Her Wimbledon triumph was a patriotic highlight and perfectly timed, being in front of the Queen in her Silver Jubilee year and on Wimbledon’s centenary. Thereafter she became a national treasure. She had acquired the first US Open in 1968 and the Australian in 1972 but her Wimbledon success was after 15 earlier failures. Her aggressive game was often costly in its mistakes and put her legion of supporters through agonies of suspense. She competed for the 24th consecutive time in 1985 in singles. She was the first woman elected to the Committee of the All England Club. Martina Navratilova • Born: 18 October 1956 • 1978, 1979, 1982, 1983, 1984, 1985, 1986, 1987, 1990 x Arguably the greatest champion among women, Martina Navratilova has contributed more than any other player to Wimbledon’s glorious history. Her nine singles titles stand alone and her seven in doubles (five with Pam Shriver) plus four in mixed give her a total of 20, a record she shares with Billie Jean King. A highly trained athlete, Martina dominated the sport for more than a decade with her bold attacking game that brought her 167 tournament victories in singles and 177 in doubles as well as 10 Grand Slam mixed titles. No woman in tennis history has been so professional. Her tremendous earning capacity (she won more than $21 million in prize money alone) enabled her to employ expert and continuing advice, not only in training but in matters often thought peripheral, like diet. She turned herself into the most expert and complete woman player in the history of the sport. WIMBLEDON: THE WIMBLEDON: THE OFFICIAL HOFFICIAL ISTORY HISTORY SPOTLIGHT ON WIMBLEDON Players and Fashion SPOTLIGHT ON WIMBLEDON: PLAYERS AND FASHION horizontal stripes. No players among the men had more elegance and style, or more followers in fashion, than the brothers Reggie and Laurie Doherty (champions for virtually a decade from 1897–1906). For the ladies, conventions were strict in the late 19th century. Modesty was required at all times. Ladies would wear attire on a tennis court similar to the dresses worn during the day – long garments which even covered the ankles, wrists and neck. With boned corsets and then layers of petticoats to fill out the skirt, it was difficult for them to run and bend, twist and leap for their shots. A straw hat or boater would often top the costume. Maud Watson, in 1884 the first winner, followed the custom. Importantly, ladies wished to avoid any signs of perspiration despite running. All-white clothing, concealing embarrassing stains, was the answer. The ‘all-white’ convention was established. Perhaps the first major clothing controversy came in 1887. Just 15 years old and still at school, Lottie Dod was permitted to play in calf-length skirts, without corsets or petticoats, equivalent to her school uniform, and with comfortable shoes. Quicker about the court than her rivals, she duly won the title. Britain’s Dorothea Lambert Chambers (the winner seven times between 1903 and 1914) nevertheless triumphed while still wearing stiff petticoats – but the hats had gone. May Sutton (the first American to win the women’s title), however, caused a stir in 1905 when she played with her shirtsleeves rolled up, revealing her wrists, because they were “too long and too hot”. JUST LIKE THE GAME ITSELF, TENNIS FASHION HAS CHANGED BEYOND ALL RECOGNITION SINCE THE FIRST CHAMPIONSHIPS A long-standing and unique feature of Wimbledon is the all-white (or almost entirely white) clothing of the players. Crisp and clean against the green grass, it simply looks right. Surprisingly, it was not until 1963 that a specific rule requiring ‘predominately in white’ clothing was formally introduced. The dress and attire of the players have changed significantly over the history of The Championships, reflecting the trends of the period – and, in more recent years, the influence of clothing manufacturers promoting the images of their sponsored players. A review of the fashions and attire of the game’s leading players is itself a fascinating story which can be seen in the Wimbledon Lawn Tennis Museum. V I C TO R I A N E R A x In the early years of The Championships, the Reggie Doherty, with his brother Laurie, led trends of gentlemanly elegance at the turn of the 20th century. accepted dress for ‘gentlemen’ tennis players was similar to that worn for playing cricket. Well-cut flannels, usually cream or white, long-sleeved flannel or cotton shirts, a short silk tie – spotted or striped and with squared-off ends – combined comfort with ease of movement. Trousers were kept up with a variety of striped or coloured belts, scarves or sashes. A few players in the 1880s started to adopt cream knickerbockers, fastened at the knee, with long black or navy socks and a long-sleeved rugby-style shirt with 430 431 Opposite: Maria Sharapova plays freely in an elegant dress in 2012, with the restraints on ladies’ players of a century earlier now distant history. Left: This cotton sateen skirt and blouse, with belt and buckle, is an elegant tennis outfit from c. 1900. Britain’s Dorothea Lambert Chambers played in an era of petticoats, stays and strict Edwardian dress. WIMBLEDON: THE OFFICIAL HISTORY P O ST-WA R W I M B L E D O N x After the Second World War, more varied and France’s Suzanne Lenglen revolutionised fashion among the ladies in the 1920s with her calf-length cotton frocks and colourful bandeaux. T W E N T I E S A N D T H I R T I E S x The First World War changed social attitudes. Bunny Austin was the first man (in 1933) to play in shorts on the Centre Court, here seen alongside a more traditional opponent. SPOTLIGHT ON WIMBLEDON: PLAYERS AND FASHION Everyday wear for the ladies became more informal. On the tennis court, it was the legendary French champion, Suzanne Lenglen, who transformed tennis fashion in the 1920s with her daring diaphanous knee-length chiffon dresses with short sleeves, long coloured cardigans and a collection of matching bandeaux. Her balletic style, personality and skill captivated the tennis world and beyond. Her doubles partner, American Elizabeth Ryan, said: “All women players should go on their knees in thankfulness to Suzanne for delivering them from the tyranny of corsets.” It was in 1927 that Billie Tapscott became the first woman at Wimbledon to play in ankle socks and bare legs rather than the long, white traditional stockings. By the late 1930s, among the women, American players were dominating Wimbledon and bringing with them an efficient, practical dress look. Helen Wills Moody wore wide-pleated skirts, short-sleeved blouses and golf-style eyeshades; Pauline Betz wore jockey caps, shorts and short-sleeved shirts; Helen Jacobs and Alice Marble favoured flannel shorts and crew-neck T-shirts, while divided skirts became popular. Among the men, change was less dramatic. Long, comfortable trousers with turn-ups were favoured both on and off the court. Sweaters were usually of the cable-stitch variety preferred by cricketers. This was the look of great champions from Bill Tilden to Fred Perry, although a certain panache was provided by the French ‘Four Musketeers’ (of whom René Lacoste would have a lasting influence, on and off the court, through the ‘crocodile’ branded kit of which he was a founder). Yet in 1933 signs of revolution were seen at Wimbledon – Britain’s Bunny Austin became the first player to wear shorts on the Centre Court. Long flannels were, though, still being worn after the Second World War with Yvon Petra in 1946 being the last champion to play in long trousers. 432 interesting changes in fashion were witnessed at Wimbledon among the women. Most were inspired by one man – Ted Tinling, an Englishman brought up in the south of France and frequently a young umpire in a group accompanying Suzanne Lenglen. He became the game’s leading fashion designer. No controversy was greater than his design for Gussie Moran at Wimbledon in 1949. At first she wished to use colour on her dress but this was rejected. Instead, Tinling designed a satin-trimmed dress complying with the all-white convention – but sufficiently short that frequent glimpses could be seen of lace-edged panties. The design received great publicity but was only worn once, in a second round match, before the Committee expressed its firm disapproval. Tinling, who also had an official liaison role with the players at Wimbledon, was forced to resign from that post. Tinling’s legacy to the sport was, however, immense. His beautiful creations were worn by numerous post-war champions over three decades in the 1950s, 1960s and 1970s, from Maria Bueno to Evonne Goolagong and the three British champions, Angela Mortimer, Ann Jones and Virginia Wade. The last champion to wear a Tinling creation at Wimbledon was Martina Navratilova in 1979. He set new standards in terms of materials and designs. Many of his loveliest dresses were for the elegant Brazilian, Maria Bueno. In 1962 controversy struck again. In one match, Bueno’s undergarment was in navy and turquoise, suspiciously close to the Club’s colours. In her semi-final, “shocking” pink diamond shapes on her skirt lining, and across her panties, were clearly visible and also showed through the white of her dress. The following year, 1963, the entry conditions were changed and laid down for the first time that (except for a cardigan, pullover or headwear) competitors must be dressed ‘predominately in white’. Attire for the men was far less adventurous. The American champions of the late 1940s and early 1950s, from Jack Kramer to Vic Seixas, wore short-sleeved shirts (sometimes crew-neck) and well-cut shorts in a practical ‘down to earth’ look. They were followed by a series of great Australian champions including Roy Emerson and Rod Laver. Shirts were usually all-white but occasionally colour–trimmed at the collar and cuff with sweaters and slipovers bearing more colour (and, frequently, the laurel emblem of Fred Perry clothing with which Britain’s great In the1960s, Brazilian Maria Bueno was graceful and elegant in style but controversial in dress. Teddy Tinling was the sport’s major post-war fashion designer and his dresses were joyfully worn by many of the leading ladies, as shown here in 1971. 433 WIMBLEDON: THE OFFICIAL HISTORY SPOTLIGHT ON WIMBLEDON: PLAYERS AND FASHION champion was successfully linked). Ladies’ champions Margaret Court and Billie-Jean King generally wore functional-looking outfits with skirts (plain or pleated) becoming shorter in length. The 1980s saw a wider range of competing kit manufacturers and colouredged clothing but lightweight fabrics and efficient styles prevailed – with shorts, among the men, of stars such as Bjorn Borg, John McEnroe and Boris Becker all being much shorter than today’s style. N I N E T I E S A N D T H E N E W C E N T U RY x One player with a very Anne White of the USA attempted to bring a new dimension to ‘predominately white’ clothing in 1985 with her all-white body suit but she was asked not to wear it again for her doubles match as it was not recognised tennis wear. Andre Agassi, known for his colourful style, made a welcome return to Wimbledon in 1991 after a three-year gap to reveal, after much suspense, a traditional all-white outfit without a trace of colour but complete with cycling shorts under his tennis shorts. Venus and Serena Williams are among many of the leading ladies now wearing specially-designed and distinctive dresses. 434 distinctive image was the flamboyant American Andre Agassi. At first rebelling against the all-white tradition at Wimbledon, he declined to enter The Championships. In 1991, though, he changed his mind. As he walked onto the Centre Court, tension was in the air as he unzipped his tracksuit. Would he challenge the authorities? Agassi teased his audience – to reveal perfectly all-white shorts and shirt. Perhaps the biggest change among the men was that shirts became looser and shorts (including those of Pete Sampras) became distinctly longer. As the 1990s passed into the new century, rewards for the players, on and off the court, became even greater and intense rivalry between the clothing manufacturers led to more distinctive designs and use of the latest materials to promote the images of their sponsored players. At Wimbledon, the entry conditions were clarified in 1995 to state that “each individual item of clothing must be almost entirely white in colour”. Shoes must also be almost entirely white. Rules regarding the size and placement of manufacturers’ logos or other advertising material were also keenly negotiated. One manufacturer, adidas, even made a legal challenge in court in 2006 before revised rules were agreed with the leading manufacturers and settled by the Grand Slam Committee. It has, as ever, been among the women that the variety of dress continues to be greatest. After a period of more functional-looking attire, specially-designed dresses for the leading players have again been common across the lawns of Wimbledon – from Maria Sharapova to Venus and Serena Williams. Among the men, perhaps the most individual look was that of Rafael Nadal who, in 2005, introduced his sleeveless shirt and three-quarter-length ‘piratas’ which he wore for a number of years. Multi-winning champion Roger Federer kept his most distinctive look (apart from an early ponytail) to various classically-styled cream jackets as he walked on court. Dress and attire will continue to change. Colour trim (and sometimes more) continues to be used to provide individuality but Wimbledon’s ‘almost entirely white’ rule still preserves a traditional look at The Championships which is very different from the other Grand Slams. The ‘white’ tradition is unlikely to change. 435 Rafael Nadal’s ‘piratas’ and sleeveless shirt was a different and notable style for several years. A selection of Roger Federer’s outfits (including memorable white jacket) show the classic refined style for which he is famous.