Evolution of hurricane Alberto (2000) in the field of - SEOM
Transcription
Evolution of hurricane Alberto (2000) in the field of - SEOM
Evolution of hurricane Alberto (2000) in the field of water vapor over North Atlantic retrieved from satellite data D. Ermakov1, E. Sharkov2 (1) Institute of Radioengineering and Electronics of RAS, Fryazino department, 141195 Vvedenskogo sq. 1, Fryazino, Moscow region, Russia, Email: dima@ire.rssi.ru (2) Space Research Institute, 117997, 84/32 Profsoyuznaya str., Moscow, Russia, Email: e.sharkov@mail.ru Abstract The hurricanes or tropical cyclones (TC) of the Northern Atlantic often demonstrate extremely complicated and unpredictable behaviour which to a certain extent can be explained by the features of the Atlantic basin: its relative narrowness, active interaction with Polar Region, and the resulting picture of winds and currents. TC Alberto (2000) with its three stages of intensification and dissipation is a bright example of such a complicated behavior. The animated analysis of total precipitable water (TPW) field reveals a particular interdependence between the Alberto evolution (in terms of standard meteorological parameters) and the large-scale features of the TPW field (which can be formally characterised with convergent/divergent flows of the latent heat estimated by the authors’ original approach). Schematic flowchart of data processing Input remote data (SSM/I F13, F14, F15 27 July – 26 August 2000) Stage 1: TPW fields calculation Reference fields (2 daily TWP fields on 0.2° grid) Stage 2: spatiotemporal interpolation Animated fields (16 TWP fields on 0.2° grid and 8 vector-ofmotion fields on 0.8° grid per day) Stage 3: calibration/integration Derivative characteristics (Latent heat flow) Issue of precision of TWP estimates Global TPW distribution on 5 August, 2000 as by (Ruprecht, 1996) (top) and (Alishouse et al, 1990) (bottom) A simple formula by (Ruprecht, 1996) was used to recover TPW values from the SSM/I data. Though known to somewhat overestimate higher values of TPW, it was initially used by us in testing purposes. As it was later checked by us in comparison with other widely used methods like (Alishouse et al, 1990) it gave qualitatively correct patterns of TPW distributions, so that the results of the further animated analysis can be considered quite robust though possibly requiring some recalibration to be more precise. A thorough analysis of the influence of the TPW algorithm onto the results of the overall data processing is a subject to further research. TC Alberto evolution 5 1 7 9 3 TC Alberto evolution: maximum 2 wind speed in the wall, W (red), and minimum pressure in 8 4 6 10 the eye, P (black); arrows labelled ‘a’…‘k’ indicate stages of the TC illustrated and analyzed below; dates by horizontal axis are in MM/DD format. (Pokrovskaya, Sharkov, 2001) TC Alberto trajectory: colours indicate the TC stages. (Pokrovskaya, Sharkov, 2001) Generally, evolution of TC Alberto can be subdivided into the three stages of intensification (indicated in as a, d, h), of maximum intensity (b, e, i), of weakening (c, f, g) and final dissipation (j, k). Animated approach allows performing a detailed analysis of the TC evolution in the TPW field over the North Atlantic and makes it possible to point out some characteristic features of this field correlating with the TC intensification/dissipation. a) Generation and fast intensification P = 994 mbar W = 28 m/s 11:00 b) First maximum P = 979 mbar W = 41 m/s 17:00 c) First dissipation P = 990 mbar W = 31 m/s 14:00 d) Second intensification P = 981 mbar W = 38 m/s 11:00 e) Second maximum P = 950 mbar W = 65 m/s 21:00 f) Second dissipation P = 990 mbar W = 31 m/s 17:00 g) Second minimum P = 1000 mbar W = 21 m/s 06:30 h) Third intensification P = 974 mbar W = 44 m/s 08:00 i) Third maximum P = 966 mbar W = 49 m/s 21:30 j) Third dissipation P = 985 mbar W = 33 m/s 17:00 k) Collapse P = 986 mbar W = 31 m/s 03:00 Latent heat flow estimation Contours of integration (black circles) in the TPW field TC Alberto evolution: maximum wind speed in the wall, W (red), and latent heat flow, Q (black); dates in MM/DD format The values of latent heat flow Q were calculated as described in (Ermakov et al, 2013). The contours of integration were round, centred at the TC eye. The positive flow corresponds to the direction towards centre. To check the calculations stability a pair of contours with similar radii (about 8° of latitude) was used to obtain two values of Q per every calculation. The resulting time series of latent heat flow values were plotted with the time series of the maximum wind speed value W in the TC wall (independent data source). The plot shows that series of Q for both contours of integration are very close to each other and are in a remarkable correlation with the series of W. Generally, positive values of Q (convergence) correspond to growth of W, while negative values of Q (divergence) correspond to decrease of W. Possibly there is some lag between Q (earlier change) and W series. Yet the plots of Q demonstrate some “oscillations”. They can reflect some features of the calculation approach itself (effects of sampling) or/and a complicated spatiotemporal structure of the latent heat flow in the area of investigation and are subject to further analysis. Conclusion The considered case of the TC Alberto evolution reveals a remarkable interdependence between the phases of its intensification/dissipation and the convergent/divergent flows in the TPW field around the TC. Namely, the TC intensification matches the cases of positive latent heat flow to the region around the TC, realized by the advective streams of the atmospheric air saturated with water vapour (typical TPW values of about 40 mm and higher), while the TC dissipation matches the cases of destruction of these vapour-saturated streams and the negative sign of the latent heat flow. This primary conclusion requires further thorough examination by collecting representative statistics for multiple cases of TC intensification/dissipation which is one of the aims of the further authors’ research. Important research efforts will focus on a more precise calibration of the results (including the analysis of initial TPW estimates), and extending the approach to investigate other important geophysical characteristics of the atmosphere-ocean system to integrate them into complex analysis of TC evolution. Acknowledgements The authors are grateful to Dr. A.P. Chernushich, I.V. Pokrovskaya and Dr. M.D. Raev for their useful advices and cooperation in the research. Microwave measurements of the SSM/I instrument (hereafter the SSM/I data) were obtained from the Global Hydrology Resource Center (GHRC) at the Global Hydrology and Climate Center, Huntsville, Alabama, US (http://ghrc.nsstc.nasa.gov/) References Alishouse, J.C., Snyder, S.A., Vongsathorn, J. & Ferraro, R.R. (1990). Determination of oceanic total precipitable water from the SSM/I. IEEE. Trans. Geo. Rem. S. 28(5), 810–816. Ermakov, D., Chernushich, A. & Sharkov, E. (2013). A closed algorithm to create detailed animated water vapor fields over the Oceans from polarorbiting satellites’ data. In Proc. ‘ESA Living Planet Symposium 2013’, 9–13 September 2013 (ESA SP-722, December 2013). Pokrovskaya, I.V. & Sharkov, E.A. (2001). Tropical cyclones and tropical disturbances of the World Ocean: chronology and evolution. Version 2.1 (1983–2000), Poligraph servis, Moscow, Russia, 548 p. Ruprecht, E. (1996). Atmospheric water vapor and cloud water: an overview. Adv. Space Res. 18(7), 5–16.