to the print edition of this Issue as a

Volume 17 No. 8
December 2006
WORKS IN PROGRESS
established in 1990 by the thurston county rainbow coalition
WHERE THE STREETS
HAVE NO SAY
Selective enforcement keeps the homeless worrying about more than the yellow reign of patrons
by Wally Cuddeford
Recently, Olympia City Council members
Jeff Kingsbury and Doug Mah co-sponsored proposed revisions to the city ordinances to discourage, what they call, “antisocial behavior” encountered downtown.
The proposal would, among other things,
make it illegal to sit, lie, vend, or solicit
within six feet of the edge of a building.
The proposal would only take effect within
the downtown area, and has exemptions
for people with disabilities, people waiting in long lines at businesses, and for
people experiencing a medical emergency. Mayor Mark Foutch calls the new ordinance a “more certain tool to get groups
of people to move along from in front of
businesses or residences or other places
where they’ve been harassing passersby
and other people.”
But this will not just affect the people
who are committing the unwanted behavior. For those for whom the downtown area
is home, the proposal is akin to an eviction notice. Having to sit at least six feet
out from any business downtown puts one
out under the elements. The proposal also
outlaws begging for money (or as the proposal puts it, “aggressive panhandling”),
an income staple for the homeless.
“Regardless of what’s being said, it’s going to affect the homeless,” said Selena
Kilmoyer, volunteer at Bread and Roses
downtown, who recalled some of the history of the city’s attempts to drive the homeless out of public spaces. “Two years ago,
Sylvester Park was a big hub for the homeless. The State Police, enforcing the wishes
of the business owners and others, basically cleared the park of the homeless. Then,
they moved to the IT [Intercity Transit]
station … and with different techniques,
the police drove them out of there too, and
onto the sidewalks of 4th Avenue.”
The co-sponsors of the new ordinance
say it has nothing to do with the homeless.
They say they are taking these actions because of repeated complaints from downtown patrons and businesses regarding
lewd and threatening behavior on the
part of unidentified people. Examples
cited were public urination, aggressive
panhandling, the blocking of sidewalks,
and even the harassment and ridicule of
people with disabilities.
Many people against the ordinance
claim to have seen well-dressed bar patrons with cars urinating in alleys downtown.
Olympia resident Phan Nguyen claims
to have been the target of racial epithets
at Arts Walk and Lakefair. “Are you going
to get rid of Arts Walk because someone
had a bad experience [there]?”
The proposed ordinance does not address most of the undesired behavior
that is cited, because most of the undesired behavior is already illegal. The proposal outlaws behavior supporters deem
Photo by Pat Tassoni.
to be related, such as sitting on the public being panhandled ... or having comments
sidewalk, in hopes that it would deter the made about us.” Alternately, many people
actual targeted behavior. But all the behav- who opposed the new ordinance used the
iors listed are staples of being homeless. In message of opposing “anti-social” behavior,
effect, the ordinance will criminalize the saying that prohibiting people from being
homeless for being homeless.
downtown is what’s really “anti-social.”
“I can empathize with business owners
Opponents began picking away at the
and the city council and law enforcement,” technicalities of the proposal. What about
Kilmoyer continues, “because they are employees who are taking their breaks?
by Drew Hendricks
extremely frustrated. But penalizing the What about the Salvation Army Santas?
poor is not the answer to this particular What about parents who are accompanyThe Olympia City Council passed the
problem.”
ing their children in lines for movie and
amendments to the Sidewalk Ordinance
Many people spoke out in regards to the concert tickets?
Tuesday, Nov. 28, with Councilmember
measure at the weekly City Council meetThis brings us to the crux of the issue:
TJ Johnson voting against, and Counciling on Tuesday, Nov. 21. The hearing was selective enforcement. When people point
member Doug Mah absent.
standing room only, with people massed out that patrons of businesses could be tarCouncilmember Laura Ware tacked
all the way back
geted by these ordion three amendments, setting an expirainto the lobby
nances, the general
tion for the ordinance on Dec. 15, 2007,
and out the door.
response from evpending
renewal; allowing an exception
A couple dozen
eryone is, “Well, of
for
sitting
or lying down in doorways
or so people were
course they’re not
between 10 pm and 7 am; and allowing
stuck outside in
going to get kicked
“busking” (street performance) within
the cold during
out of downtown.”
designated areas, with a permit. Ware
the beginning of the hearing, because the
This attitude betrays the notion that the
also
secured a guarantee from the City
building’s authorized capacity had been proposed ordinances are intended to give
Council to spend $200,000 to “fill gaps in
reached.
the police the power to chase people out
services” to the homeless and poor.
While well over 100 people signed up to of downtown who are not there to patronCouncilmember Karen Messmer addspeak at the hearing, only 82 people got ize businesses, while leaving alone those
ed
an amendment which specified that
their chance. 64 of those 82 voiced their who are downtown to spend money. Writbusiness furniture would also need to
opposition to the proposal. Many names, ing such a rich versus poor dichotomy into
be clear from the walking zone (6 feet
when called out, went unanswered. One law would be a huge red flag for civil libfrom the building) or have a special use
individual pointed out that the Salvation ertarians and advocates for the poor and
permit.
The law is slated to become efArmy’s check-in time is 9:00, while the hear- could be easily challenged in a court of law.
fective on Feb. 1, 2007.
ing lasted past 11:30, which suggests that If such a rich/poor discriminative measure
TJ Johnson pointed out that the law
many of those unanswered names were were to be enacted, it would have to be done
does
not address public safety, and is
homeless themselves.
in such a way where basic behaviors such as
extremely
divisive. He recounted many
Many of the proposal’s supporters said sitting down on a public sidewalk are made
names which were hurled at each side of
it has nothing to do with the homeless. universally illegal, and the police are exthe debate, and asked us to consider the
Speaking of the undesired behavior, Mr. pected to enforce selectively, however they
common humanity in each other’s views.
Foutch said, “There’s no evidence that the or their bosses wish.
Mayor
Mark Foutch called for the vote
people who were doing the kinds of things
And how would the police know who’s an
and the measure passed 5–1.
I described are, in fact, homeless or poor.” acceptable business patron and who’s an
There is already an exception (known
Supporters maintained that their ire is di- unacceptable loiterer? Speaking for myself,
as
an “affirmative defense,” one which
rected at the “anti-social behavior,” and not I’ve been harassed by the police on occasion
must
be used in court after one is arrestat the homeless.
for loitering around in public spaces withed) for standing in line to buy a ticket.
Matthew Green, former City Council out buying anything. Never once did the
That’s an interesting coincidence, since
member, had a different take on the matter. police ask to see a sales receipt before they
tickets to Olympia Copwatch’s December
“Of course this is targeted at poor people. issued their ultimatum that I move. Some2007
Ball at the Eagles Hall will only be
That’s why there’s an exception for people how, they looked at me and just knew.
made available to people who are standwho are about to go into a business and buy
Mayor Foutch started the hearing by saying on an Olympia sidewalk. No one in a
something. Of course this is not about be- ing the sidewalk areas in front of downtown
building
will be sold the tickets, which
havior, because all the behaviors and all the businesses have always belonged to the
will
cost
$1 in December 2006 and incrimes that were mentioned earlier tonight property owners, even though the public
crease in price each month until Decemare already covered by other criminal ordi- have maintained it for them since the midber 2007. We’re not trying to limit sales
nances. Of course this is not about blocking 1850s. He has said that the public has since
of tickets to persons by class, “we’re just
the sidewalk because the people [who write] been “obligated to manage that right of way
trying
to reward acceptable behavior.”
angry letters to the editor don’t write angry in the general public interest.”
letters about how ‘That dang sidewalk is
Many people at the hearing spoke of how
blocked.’ It’s about who’s blocking it.”
much they love Olympia and its culture.
Many people in opposition to the propos- But the culture of downtown Olympia is and uniqueness of Westfield Shopping Cenal held signs that said, “Downtown is for ev- only maintained by the ability of people to ter. It’s hard to call anything that receives
eryone.” Some of the proposal’s supporters exist, regardless of whether they are fuel- such resounding opposition as being in the
tried to use that message by highlighting ing money or work into local businesses. “general public interest.”
what they called “anti-social behavior” on By outlawing the right of people to just be
the part of downtown loiterers. Their mes- (regardless of their usefulness to the busi- Wally Cuddeford is an Olympia resident,
sage was that, if something isn’t done about ness sector), the Olympia culture people US Navy veteran, and organizer with the
this behavior, they won’t feel comfortable love would be strangled. The ordinance
South Sound Project for Military Resisgoing downtown anymore. Doug DeForrest, would, in effect, turn downtown Olympia
tance and Justice, and the Port Militariwho spoke out in support of the ordinance, into a shopping center, welcoming only emsaid “We have a right to be there without ployees and customers, with all the culture zation Resistance.
Update: Anti-social
sidewalk ordinance
amendments pass
The ordinances are intended to
give police the power to chase
people out of downtown.
Page Works in Progress
WORKS IN PROGRESS
Works In Progress is a free, volunteeroperated progressive community newspaper based in Olympia, Washington.
Opinions expressed do not necessarily
reflect those of Works In Progress and
are solely those of the authors.
Submissions
Please send text as Word attachments.
Artwork and photos can be sent electronically or we can scan them for you
as camera-ready/black & white.
WIP reserves the right to publish in
whole or part all submissions. For editing purposes, please enclose your
phone number.
Articles may be reprinted. Please cite
source.
If you don't see your issue being covered in Works In Progress, it's because
you aren't writing about it! (Or aren't
finding someone else to cover it!)
Send submissions to wip@zhonka.
net or mail to Works In Progress, PO
Box 295, Olympia, WA 98507-0295.
WORKERS IN PROGRESS
Chris Allert
Dave Campbell
Renee Cruickshank
Christian DesMarets
Brendan Funtek
Drew Hendricks
Teresa Jennings
David Lavender
Sandy Mayes
Phan Nguyen
hali panneton
Melissa Roberts
Sandia Slaby
Sylvia Smith
Jeff Sowers
Pat Tassoni
Scott Yoos
based on economic, social, and environmental justice. Works In Progress
is dedicated to providing a voice for
those most affected by the exclusionary and unfair practices that seek to
silence the oppressed."
Anti-Discrimination Clause
We will collectively endeavor to be
sensitive and respectful to all those
Governing Tool
The following statement is part of oppressed in this society, and their isthe Editorial Policy and is the govern- sues. However, if and when we should
ing tool for the Anti-Discrimination make a mistake in this regard, we expect to acknowledge it and to express
Clause:
WIP will make every effort to work with regret for injury or insult given.
the contributor of material considered
by WIP to be offensive in order to reach Back Issues
a mutually agreed upon resolution, but Get your catalog of indexed WIP’s beWIP reserves the right as a last resort low. Some back issues are available in
to edit or not print submitted material. the Timberland Library system. WIP
is being archived on microfilm by the
UW Library.
Mission Statement
"Our aim is to confront injustice and
encourage a participatory democracy
On the cover: A bunch of kids who need to get jobs. Or maybe
it’s...Critical Mass! Photo by Jon Huey. See story on page 4.
WIP Schedule
Submission Deadline:
Fri., Dec. 22
PO Box 295 • Olympia WA 98507
wip@zhonka.net • www.olywip.org/wip
WIP Advertising
(360) 956-1136
7.25" x 4.75" . . . . . . . $125
4.75" x 4.75" . . . . . . . . $83
3.0" x 4.75" . . . . . . . . . $52
4.0" x 2.25" . . . . . . . . . $34
3.5" x 2.25" . . . . . . . . . $30
2.25" x 2.25" . . . . . . . . $20
4 Months for the price of 3
*Special Non-Profit Rates*
Only You Can Keep
Works in Progress Going
for another 16 Years
Subscriptions: o Individual – $35 o Low-Income – $15
o Please do not mail, I'll pick it up!
Support Progressive Journalism
If the corporations aren't paying for it, then you have to!
Name
Address
City State Zip
Send to: Works In Progress, PO Box 295, Olympia, WA 98507
December 2006
upcoming events
Documentaries: “Affluenza” and
“Escape from Affluenza”
Sunday, December 3, 6:00 pm
Traditions Café and World Folk Art, 300 5th
Ave SW
Free admission: $5-$10 donation appreciated.
This event is a sponsored by the Alliance for
Democracy, South Puget Sound Chapter. The
Alliance for Democracy is dedicated to restoring democratic authority over government and
corporations, reviving grassroots democracy,
and establishing appropriate limits on corporate influence. To find out more, visit www.
sounddemocracy.org.
For more information, contact Jacqui at 360236-9684 or jacquiAFD@comcast.net .
Homeless in Olympia: A community
forum to educate, agitate, and organize
Wednesday, December 6, 7:00 to 9:00 pm
Olympia Community Center, Room B
The Olympia Movement for Justice and
Peace will host a community forum on Homelessness in Olympia on Wednesday, December 6, 7 to 9 PM at the Olympia Community
Center, Room B. This Forum is free and open
to all. Childcare will be provided, along with
meals courtesy of Food Not Bombs. (See related articles and announcement on pages 1,
5, and 8.)
Vigil on 4th Ave bridge for military
resisters
Saturday, December 9, 12:00 to 1:00 pm
This OMJP-sponsored vigil is in solidarity
with the National Days of Action for Military
Resisters taking place around the country
throughout the weekend of December 8–10.
The purpose is to support military resisters
and protest the war.
The themes that we are asking people to
emphasize and bring banners and signs for
are: Peace on Earth...now! Support Lt. Ehren
Watada! The war in iraq is illegal! Justice for
Suzanne Swift and other victims of command
rape! 650,000 Iraqi deaths is too many! 3,000
American deaths in Iraq is too many! (By that
weekend the number will be over 2900. The
actual 3,000th death may well be on Christmas Day.) The American people have spoken!
Not another life lost—American or Iraqi!
Will we keep Democracy Now! on
TCTV?
Please help us find community members
interested in maintaining TCTV’s airing of Democracy Now! It’s hard to know who watches
the program there, or who values having it
available in that medium at 5 am and 4 pm.
If you are one of those, OR if you might know
someone who is, please rally them to help. Our
local Media Island sponsors Democracy Now!
on TCTV. Without community financial donations for the required expenses this successful, four-year, three-way collaboration will not
continue past our 2006 contract with DISH
Network. Ask around, will ya!? Are you one
who can/will support this grassroots, independent, local media effort? Is your neighbor,
hairdresser, grocery cashier, your accountant,
your mother...? We still need only $135.
Send tax-deductable checks by Dec. 30 to:
Sandia, MII, P O Box 7204, Olympia, WA
98507 with “DN!/TCTV” on subject line.
Questions? 866-4561.
Documentary: “Hacking Democracy”
Friday, January 5
Olympia Unitarian Universalist Congregation,
2200 East End Street NW
Hacking Democracy is a timely, cautionary
documentary that exposes gaping holes in the
security of America’s electronic voting system. Bev Harris from Black Box Voting (www.
blackboxvoting.org) will share her views from
the voting security trenches. Electronic voting
machines count about 87% of the votes cast
in America today. But are they reliable? Are
they safe from tampering? Watch the documentary and find out!
For more information, visit: www.olyuu.org
or www.sounddemocracy.org
Support Works In Progress or the
Olympia 22 and get a Toy Piano
Make a donation of $50 to Works In Progress
or the Port of Olympia Legal Defense Fund
(for the Olympia 22) and get 50 toy piano tokens, which you can trade for a toy piano at
Last Word Books, Dumpster Values, or Fire &
Earth while supplies last. Please indicate that
you want toy piano tokens in your donation.
www.toypiano.org
ArtWROC
Saturday, December 9, 6:00 to 9:00 pm
Sunday, December 10, 10:00 am to 6:00 pm
At Bryce’s Barbershop, 118 4th Ave
ArtWROC is a celebration and sale of the
work of local artists and crafters, and a fundraiser for the Welfare Rights Organizing Coalition (WROC). Buy unique gifts, enjoy local musicians and fabulous desserts, and possibly win
and a handmade quilt in the raffle. WROC is a
local nonprofit organization whose members
are low income parents working for social and
economic justice by education, empowerment
and action. We can be contacted with questions or if you would like to donate art or music
at 360-352-9716 or wrocoly@wroc.org .
Works In Progress still
urgently needs more help!
Can you help with content coordination, proofreading, distribution, or
website management?
To find out how you can plug in,
join us Sunday, Dec 10, 4:30–6:00
pm, at the “Studio” (the small building behind the main house) at Fertile
Ground Guesthouse, 311-9th Av SE,
Downtown Olympia.
Remember, only you can keep
Works In Progress going another 16
years!
December 2006
If this man is
deserving of a
death sentence,
then what of
the supporters
of the Iraq war:
the American
people, the
Republicans and
Democrats, and
the US troops.
What of their
unforgiveable
crimes of rabid
patriotism
and willful
studipity which
led to so many
needless deaths?
four months before the coalition forces invaded Iraq, Saddam’s government made a series of increasingly
desperate offers to the US. In December, the Iraqi intelligence services approached Vincent Cannistraro,
the CIA’s former head of counter-terrorism, with an offer to prove that Iraq was not linked to the 9/11
attacks, and to permit several thousand US troops to enter the country to look for weapons of mass
destruction. If the object was regime change, then Saddam, the agents claimed, was prepared to submit
himself to internationally-monitored elections within 2 years. According to Mr Cannistraro, these
proposals reached the White House, but were “turned down by the president and vice president.”
Sunday
Monday
Tuesday
Wednesday
Thursday
Friday
HALADJA
after the battle the D.I.A. produced a classified report
immediately
1
asserting it was Iranian gas that killed the Kurds. . .The condition of
Saturday
2
the dead Kurds’ indicated they had been killed with a blood agent which 2005: Revealed NSA 2005: State Dept
in 1964 “deliberately workers say those
Iran was known to use. The Iraqis used mustard gas in the battle.
skewed” evidence on against war are cut
Stephen C. Pelletiere, CIA’s senior political analyst on Iraq during the Iran-Iraq war
3
4
2005:Senate committee
approves secret agency
to develop/test new
drugs and vaccines
1996: Olympia City
Council decides to cut
its D.A.R.E. budget by
$26,800
10
11
2002: White House
announced strategy
to use pre-emptive
military strike
2005: 5,000 drunken
white youths attack
Arab immigrants in
Sydney Australia
17
18
5
2005: New law in
Britain permitting civil
partnerships goes into
effect
12
2005: Federal judge
dismisses legal
challenges to building
Mexico border fence
19
1859: GA legislature
declares any AfricanAmerican indicted for
vagrancy can be sold
2005: Bush states, “not
only can we win the war
in Iraq–we are winning
the war in Iraq.”
1996: Olympia City
Council votes to build
the proposed library on
the old Yard Birds site
24
25
26
2002: Saddam says
Iraqis ready to fight
holy war; accuses the
United States of lying
2005: 46 Guantanamo
detainees join 38
detainees already on a
hunger strike
1996: An ice storm
hits South Puget
Sound region leaving
thousands in the dark
31
2003: Papers reveal US
plan to seize Middle
East oil fields during
the 1973 oil embargo
6
2005: In a Spokane
special election, Mayor
Jim West (Rep) is
recalled from office
13
2005: Analysis finds
most US pollution falls
on low-income people
and minorities
7
2002: Iraq hands over
12,000 pages detailing
its chemical, biological
and nuclear programs
14
2005: Katrina survivors
are being rejected at a
high rate for low-interest
government loans
20
21
27
28
2005: Cheney says
domestic spying okay;
“the world we live in
demands it.”
1999: Seattle Police
Chief Norm Stamper
takes blame for WTO
decisions
Malachi Ritscher
of Tonkin
incident from official travel
Gulf Tonkin
incident
8 2005: Washington’s
statewide indoor
smoking ban goes into
effect
15
1855: Free-soil people
of Kansas approve
law banning AfricanAmericans
22
2000: LOTT gives $8
million to Miller to w/
draw from sewer; Miller
to create more jobs
29
1998: Iraq warns it will
fire on US and British
planes that fly over any
part of Iraq
9
2005: US will deny
Red Cross access to a
“limited #” of prisoners
held in secret
16 2005: Report reveals
US wire taped own
citizens w/o warrants
2005: Hamas wins
23 2005: Italian court
issues arrest warrants
for 22 CIA operatives
for Milan kidnapping
30
2005: Five Chihuahuas
attack police officer,
send him to hospital
w/ bites on ankle
We’ve destroyed Iraq . . . there was no civil war in Iraq, until
we took certain steps to pit Sunnis against Shias. . . we’ve
managed to not only destabilize Iraq, but destabilize Jordan,
Saudi Arabia, Iran. . .the region won’t recover from this . . .
for decades. And Americans are responsible .
Nir Rosen on Democracy Now!
Page Works in Progress
December 2006
Notice how Officer Gassett uses his 250-plus frame to manhandle an unassuming student who did nothing more than ride his bike at Critical Mass. Photo by Jon Huey.
Critical Mass bike parade met with resistance from OPD
by T. Claw
On October 27th, cyclists from Olympia
and surrounding areas converged in their
monthly ride to support safe, non-motorized transportation.
The Halloween Critical Mass was Olympia’s largest in two years, surpassed only by
the 2004 election ride. The bike parade was
tainted when police harassment ended the
ride with unsafe road conditions, multiple
citations, and two arrests.
The Mass ride left The Evergreen State
College at 4:45 p.m. with 75–80 cyclists. There was little or no dangerous/aggravated behavior by cyclists
or motorists on the stretch between
Evergreen and the intersection of
Harrison and Division. The motorists treated the mass of cyclists
with respect and a general tone of
support.
Throughout the ride, one or two cyclists
would stop at intersections and signal for
motorists to slow down and stop, allowing
the entire group to get through the intersection safely.
When past large rides had occurred, the
Olympia Police Department chose to escort
the rides and hold back traffic at intersections for the group’s safety. Those rides
were successful, nonviolent, and quite fun.
At the Halloween Critical Mass, the OPD
acted to the contrary.
described the incident: “They caused everyone to stop suddenly, turning a perfectly
safe situation into a very dangerous one. I
couldn’t stop in time and hit the person in
front of me. After a nasty fall I heard one
of the policemen say, ‘That’s what you get
for trying to run a red light.’ They made
absolutely no effort to see if I was okay or
apologize for causing my accident.”
On the other side of the intersection,
one Critical Mass participant was being issued an $81 ticket for riding more than two
abreast of the curbside. One rider noted
While police harassment was heightening, a hissing noise was reported by people
on the sidewalk. An officer was seen sprinting to the front of the mass where he assaulted a participant with a flying choke
hold, sending him to the pavement.
The participant, who offered no signs of
struggle, was handcuffed and dragged into
a police car.
As this happened, two tires of a parked
OPD cruiser hissed flat.
Participants were later informed that
the officer thought he saw a shiny metal
object in the hand of the participant but did not see him use it to
puncture tires. A judgment call
was made that this particular
individual, out of many people
standing near the police car,
was the one who deflated the
tires. Evidence was never found
and there are no confirmed witnesses that saw the tires punctured. An innocent bystander who inquired about the
situation was also arrested.
“I think that offering citations is making
the group more aggressive and the situation more dangerous overall.” The officer
responded, “We are just doing our job.”
Detour into a pigsty
As the group descended the Harrison Road
hill toward downtown, the parade of cyclists picked up approximately twenty additional riders and stretched the length of
three to four city blocks. The group made
one circle around each roundabout, occupying them for less than one minute each,
to allow for stragglers to catch up safely and
stay as one unified parade as it crossed the
4th Avenue bridge.
While passing through the light at the intersection of 4th Avenue and Yashiro Street,
the light turned red and a bike cop shouted
not to run a red light and held his bicycle
out in front of the crosswalk.
One participant who was badly injured
that “police were waiting at the bottom of
the hill anticipating our presence.” It was
later learned that the police were present
not due to a commuter call (as stated by
the OPD press release) but were waiting for
Bad cop, confused cop
approximately 30 minutes on the east side At the police station, the arrestee says he
of the 4th Avenue bridge.
was told by officer Gasset, “You don’t have
After the group picked up more cyclists at to put on a show anymore, your friends
Heritage Park, the ride continued through aren’t here. You should cooperate. If they
downtown Olympia.
do show up, I’ll give them a show, if you
Police officers continued to pick people know what I mean. What’s the matter can’t
off and cite them for minor infractions. you talk?”
This aggravated the group which had been
Not until 2.5 hours after his arrest was he
participating in a peaceful and joyful bike read his Miranda rights. Reportedly, Officer
parade.
O’Neil told him he was being charged with
One cyclist was quoted while convers- ‘malicious mischief in the first degree’.
ing with a police officer, “I think that of“I only know what I saw,” the officer said “
fering citations is making the group more and all I saw was a bunch of officers arrestaggressive and the situation more danger- ing you and suddenly you were in my car.”
ous overall.”
The arrestee states that the officer later
The officer responded, “We are just do- asked, “Did you slash the tires, and if you
ing our job … who knows, there might be didn’t, who did? And why were you standing
commuters calling in angry and they want so close?” To which the arrestee replied, “I
to see us cracking down.” Three police cars would like to exercise my Fifth Amendment
and three bicycle cops herded the group rights to not answer that question”
into a large mass, completely stopping traffic on 4th Avenue.
Cyclists’ rights
Officers were witnessed ordering and As a statement of the legality of the ride,
physically pushing cyclists into other cy- the following state laws are cited from
clists.
the Revised Code of Washington (RCW
46.67.770):
1) When traveling slower than traffic, cyclists should ride as far right as is safe,
except when: a) preparing to turn, b)
when passing another vehicle, c) when
on a multi-lane one-way road.
2) Cyclists may occupy the middle of the
lane when: a) traveling at the speed of
traffic, b) when the lane is too narrow to
permit a car to share the lane, c) when
road conditions (poor surface, drain
grates, parked cars, etc.) prevent riding
to the far right.
Bicycles are considered vehicles by state
law and subject to the same rights and responsibilities as a motor vehicle. However,
it is legal for cyclists to ride two abreast. It
is also legal to parade without a permit in
Thurston County.
Olympia has built an impressive infrastructure to support bicycle commuters.
Many large cities such as Seattle (where
thousands of citizens commute by bike
every day) do not have such amenities
available.
However, it is the motorists’ awareness of
bicycles on the road and the respect riders
deserve on the road that still needs work.
Day-glo clothing and night-lights can only
go so far. Cyclists everywhere are harassed
and routinely have their lives endangered
without provocation.
The road is meant to be shared, and Critical Mass has been an effective and largely
safe way to raise that awareness for 12 years.
As the saying goes, “We’re not blocking traffic, we are traffic.”
Ride On: cyclists ride down Kaiser Road unperturbed from previous simple compliance
from police. Photo by Jon Huey.
December 2006 Works in Progress
Page More on advocacy for the homeless
Forum for educaExcerpts from statement by Olympia City
Councilmember T.J. Johnson on sidewalk ordinance tion on homeless
I intend to oppose this ordinance for two
reasons. First, because I believe it is based
on a faulty assumption – that our downtown is unsafe and that passing this ordinance will make it safer. Second, because
passing this ordinance tonight is a divisive
action when what this community clearly
needs from its City Council is strong leadership that brings people together to create the kind of inclusive downtown that is
welcoming to all and consistent with the
vision of our comprehensive plan.
This ordinance is based on a false belief that downtown is unsafe, and that the
downtown economy is in a downward spiral...Police service calls are down. Building vacancy rates continue to be within
the range that national experts consider
healthy in order to keep rents down and
encourage the formation of new businesses.
Parking is becoming more difficult, indicating that demand is growing beyond supply. Downtown Olympia continues to be a
popular tourist destination as evidenced
by relatively stable occupancy rates at area
hotels, and only this week, a major national ranking organization announced that
Olympia was the 15th safest mid-sized city
in the United States.
Does this mean the downtown faces no
challenges? Of course not. However, the notion that hordes of good citizens are being
kept from spending their money downtown
due to rampant lawlessness on our sidewalks has taken on the status of an urban
legend, and like most urban legends lacks
a grounding in reality.
The real challenges facing our downtown are the same as those facing all
downtowns, and won’t be addressed with
this ordinance. In the interest of time I’ll
address just one of these real, rather than
imaginary, challenges—competition from
high volume, low cost retailers which offer
acres of free parking and spend billions on
advertising directed to seduce a population
that increasingly defines itself by its level
of consumer consumption rather than the
depth of its civic engagement. For many
people the choice is simple.
Why bother coming downtown to a small
independent bookstore with a limited selection and higher prices when you can go
to one of two national mega-bookstores
in West Olympia, both of which offer huge
selections, lower prices and acres of free
parking (one of which was recently fast
tracked for development by the City Council without adequate consideration of its
impact on existing businesses). Better yet,
stay at home and order your book online
and avoid the hassle of ever leaving your
refrigerator, home entertainment center,
and your climate-controlled 2,600 square
foot fortress.
I fully understand that some people feel
uncomfortable in the downtown. It is always more uncomfortable to be among
people who don’t look like you do, act like
you do, and smell like you do...And it is this
same affinity for people like ourselves that
is at the root of this ordinance and which
will likely lead to discriminate enforcement
by our police officers who are not evil, but
rather human.
For people who want that experience of
being exclusively among people like them,
there are ample opportunities to find it—at
the mall, in covenant-protected neighborhoods, frankly, in most other parts of this
and every other community... The diversity
of the downtown is its strength, and this ordinance diminishes, rather than enhances,
that diversity.
Many people who have contacted us in
support of this ordinance seem to believe
that, following its passage, they will never
see another teenager hanging out downtown, someone asking them for money, or
someone with obvious psychological problems acting “scary.” These people will be
sorely disappointed by the effect of this
ordinance, and I fear will soon come back a step back and make another attempt at
Homeless In Olympia: A Community Foasking for even “tougher” laws. Let’s be dialogue? Why not exercise our responsibilrum To Educate, Agitate, and Organize
clear; the type of people they object to will ity as community leaders and invite voices
still be among us, only now they will be on from all sides to sit down together and try The Olympia Movement for Justice and
the outside of the sidewalk, creating new to identify common ground? What is the Peace will host a community forum on
user conflicts with people trying to park worst that could happen? If the process Homelessness in Olympia on Wedneson the street and exit their car. We will fails, then we can say that we gave it our day, December 6, 7 to 9 pm at the Olympia
also likely see new user conflicts as these best shot but we could not reach agreement, Community Center, Room B. This forum is
displaced people seek refuge in Intercity at which point, I believe a higher percent- free and open to all. Childcare will be proTransit bus shelters, at the Olympia Center, age of our citizens would understand and vided, along with meals courtesy of Food
in the library, and countless other places probably support action. If, on the other Not Bombs.
we have not yet even thought of.
hand we were actually able to come up with
The forum will include five speakers who
Another thing we’ve heard from many a shared agreement about problems and will break through stereotypes and illumisupporters of the ordinance is “Thank God solutions, would we not then have a power- nate the struggles of the homeless in our
the City Council is finally doing something ful new tool for resolving other community community.
to improve the Downtown”. Well, if they conflicts? It seems to me that under either
Speakers will critique Olympia’s current
are regular readers of the Olympian, I can scenario the community would be better off and newly proposed ordinances that target
understand how they might have such a than approving this ordinance tonight.
Olympia’s homeless population by crimidistorted perception about this community
I understand I am in the minority on this nalizing behavior specific to that populaand the reality of what this City Council is issue, and that this ordinance will probably tion, reveal the underlying economic and
and isn’t doing....Its important for everyone pass. I also know that the members of this social causes of homelessness, examine
to understand that this community and Council that support the ordinance do so the unmet needs and gaps in social serthis Council will continue to work collab- not because they want to hurt any person vices here in Thurston County, and present
oratively on all of these far more important or group, but because they believe this will personal experiences with homelessness.
projects [Percival Landing renovation, new help our struggling downtown. I am very
Speakers include Pat Tassoni, Thurston
City Hall, Children’s Museum, investment proud of this Council and its commitment County Tenants Union and Coalition for
for housing/parking], regardless of the out- to our policy of “Vote and Move On.” I know Low-Income Power; Phil Owen, Bread and
come of tonight’s vote.
that the winners will not gloat and that the Roses; Rosalinda Noriega, Partners In
On the other side, opponents of the or- losers will not sulk, and we will continue to Prevention and Education; Peter Bohmer,
dinance argue that the City is not doing work together to make this great city even Olympia Movement for Justice and Peace
enough to help the homeless and the men- better. I only hope that the larger commu- and Professor of Political Economy at
tally ill who, I believe, will be negatively im- nity that has been so divided over this issue TESC; Tim Nelson, a Homeless Activist
pacted by this ordinance. Not by intention can do the same. We have important work with The Poor People’s Union. The forum
but by practice. And they are probably right, to do together to build an inclusive com- will be moderated by Marco Rosaire Rossi,
we should be doing more to help the less munity, a great downtown and to address street outreach worker and member of The
fortunate. However, I think they have over- the genuine needs of the people that will be Olympia Movement for Justice and Peace.
stated their case by not recognizing what most impacted by this ordinance.
Discussion with Question and Answer pewe are already doing. The City of Olympia
riod will follow speaker presentations.
does a lot in this area, more so than any
other city in this region and more so than
almost any city of our size.... Of course, its
not enough. It will never be enough as long
as we continue to exist within a larger soby Marco Rosaire Rossi
272 violent crimes per every 100,000 perciety where the rich are getting richer, the
sons.
poor are getting poorer, the middle class is In their Nov. 6 issue, editors of the OlymThis evidence makes clear that the sostressed and looking for someone to blame, pian proclaimed that Lacey was a “role called “public safety crisis” is unfounded.
and the corporate media and politicians model for its neighbors” because of the The myth persists and is seriously debatof both major parties continue to ignore city’s rapid growth in retail sales through ed only because of an intense class-bias
the problem.
“enticing business patrons.” In particular, against the poor and homeless. People with
I believe that everyone who has partici- the editorial compared Lacey’s economic this bias automatically assume that if the
pated in this debate has what they consider growth to that of Olympia’s – where retail homeless or street vagabonds are hanging
to be the best interests of the downtown at sales dropped.
out together then they must be “up to no
heart. However, as we have seen, not everyThe stated reason for Lacey’s increase good,” or if a person is engaging in anti-soone agrees on the definition of best inter- in sales growth was its “business-friendly cial behavior downtown, that person must
ests. This is to be expected. But what has environment,” while one of the reasons be homeless.
been most troubling about this debate has cited for Olympia’s sales decline was its
been the lack of civility. Given that [what] “crisis of public safety” in its downtown
The economic question
we are talking about has been called a “ci- core. Before everyone else follows the lead The editorial in the Olympian attributes
vility” ordinance I find this particularly of the Olympian editorial board and jumps Lacey’s recent economic success to its abilironic and troubling.
on the “Lacey model” for economic growth, ity to attract major corporate enterprises
...Rather than working through our dif- it is time to ask some important questions: such as Home Depot and Costco with its
ferences with respect, creativity and com- Is the Olympian’s analysis of the situation “business-friendly environment.” Lacey is
passion – as we educate and expect our accurate?
a very young city – especially compared to
children to do – supporters and opponents
Specifically, is there really a public safety Olympia. It has only been incorporated
alike have resorted to demonizing and ste- crisis in downtown Olympia, and is Lacey’s since 1966, which means that Olympia
reotyping. Here are just a few of the terms formula for economic growth sustain- and Lacey have two very different economic
that have been thrown about in the past few able?
infrastructures. Lacey is very under-develweeks to describe people on various sides
oped compared to Olympia. Rapid economof this issue: vermin, excrement, losers,
ic growth through corporate enterprises is
The public safety question
freaks, punks, druggies, miscreants, filth, Despite all the rhetoric about the dangers possible in underdeveloped areas because
psychopaths, bums, cold-hearted, arrogant, of Olympia, comparatively speaking, has a you are starting from nothing.
upper-middle class snobs, elitist, greedy very low violent crime rate.
Olympia, on the other hand, has built
businessman, and my favorite “the silent
According to FBI figures for 2004, Olym- itself off of industries and businesses that
majority” which has been claimed by all pia experienced 333 violent crimes per ev- have survived for decades. Allowing major
sides of this debate.
ery 100,000 persons. This is low for both corporate enterprises to move in could se...In denying our basic common human- state and national figures. For Washington riously disrupt these foundations – which,
ity, we seem to have started down the slip- state, the average is 461 violent crimes per for Olympia, would be locally owned busipery slope that leads quickly from stereo- every 100,000 persons, and for the nation nesses that are mostly located in the downtyping to discrimination and oppression. it is 596 per every 100,000 persons. The fig- town core.
Is this the kind of community we wish to ures become even more interesting when
There is also the issue of how large corpobecome?
Olympia is compared to its neighbor Lacey rate enterprises tend to depress the econoI believe that passing this ordinance for the past few years. In 2003, Olympia had mies they enter over time. An essential part
tonight will only further divide our com- a higher rate of violent crime than Lacey. of any development plan is the ability to
munity, when what we should be doing is (Olympia was at 3.3% while Lacey was at build off of previous gains.
bringing people together to find collabor- 2.8%). But a shift occurred in the followThis is difficult to do in a corporateative solutions to our common problems. ing years. Olympia had 145 acts of violent friendly atmosphere. Dollars spent at Home
Even proponents of the ordinance acknowl- crime in 2003, and by 2005 that figure had Depot and Costco vanish from circulation
edge that whatever problem they believe dropped to 115 violent crimes. Conversely, in the local economy. The ability of corpoexists has disappeared or at least signifi- Lacey’s violent crime rate jumped in 2004 rations to undercut prices and offer more
cantly diminished with the advent of colder (to 3.3%), and in 2005 remained higher than services ends up destroying small indepenweather and shorter days. Why then can’t Olympia’s. Olympia had 258 violent crimes dent businesses. The low pay and
we use this window of opportunity to take per every 100,000 persons while Lacey had
4Lacey continued on page 8
The Lacey example?!
r
Page Works in Progress
December 2006
Weapons of Mass Determination
amid silence from the us press, an olympian reports on the people’s struggle in oaxaca
Story and photos by Rochelle Gause
to hide, of those who could not run. People
of all ages had been in the streets all day. I
hear gunshots.
Running as fast as I can, surrounded by hundreds of others, I can hear screams behind me.
Glancing back, through the darkness of night,
Seventh mega-march turned into
I can only differentiate between the masses
confrontation
running with me and the federal police by Saturday, November 25, had begun with
the light reflecting off their shields and face the seventh “mega-march.” Thousands
masks. They are still advancing.
had marched from the outskirts of Santa
A hand pushes my left shoulder and I real- María Coyotepec to the Oaxaca City cenize there are medics behind me trying to run ter. It was yet another incredible show of
from the police while carrying a man on a support for the Popular Assembly of the
stretcher clasping a bloody cloth to his head. Peoples of Oaxaca (appo). The march was
The medics are trying to reach the makeshift calling for the removal of both the corrupt
clinic that the movement set up in a building governor of Oaxaca, Ulises Ruiz Ortiz, and
just a short distance ahead.
the Federal Preventative Police (pfp), who
I continue to run block after block as more have been in Oaxaca for almost a month
people pour in from side streets. The police now. The demonstrators were a highly diare obviously advancing on multiple streets verse group — including people of all ages
simultaneously. Panic is starting to set in. — from various indigenous groups, unions,
and rural villages. People gathered along
the streets applauding as the march passed.
Many handed out tangerines, water, and
sandwiches to the crowd.
When they arrived in the city, the plan
was to encircle the center square for 48
hours. This is the square where striking
teachers from all over the state of Oaxaca
created an encampment that led to the beginning of the movement over six months
ago. The federal police have occupied it
since they entered Oaxaca on October 29.
As the people began the circle, the police,
in full riot gear, refined their formation at
each of the entrances backed by a police
officer armed with live ammunition on top
of an armoured vehicle.
Although appo had made it clear that the
plan was to remain completely nonviolent,
within half an hour street battles broke out
between the movement and the police in at
least two of the entrances. Some members
of the movement, armed with rocks, Molotov cocktails, and fireworks, faced off with
A demonstrator calls for Ulises’ ouster during
the police, who used an incredible amount
the Nov. 19 Women’s March.
of tear gas, rocks and marbles shot with
Rushing through my mind are the stories I slingshots. Also, according to limeddh,
have listened to over and over in the past two the Mexican League in Defense of Human
weeks while interviewing those who have suf- Rights, state government backed paramilifered human rights violations at the hands taries were seen on the roofs of buildings
of the federal police — the stories of sexual helping to provoke the confrontations. Earassault, of beatings, of psychological torture, lier in the day the radio station of Ulises’
of death threats.
political party (pri) had called for people to
A few men duck into an alley. I follow, un- dump boiling water and acid on the demsure if I am escaping the danger or running onstrators.
directly into it. A woman and her daughter,
who recognize me from the internet cafe, moFederal police advance
tion us into their home. Inside, I lean against After a while the police pushed the people
the wall and slide to the floor. Immediately I north up the hill, at one point taking over
think of those who were unable to find a place the Santo Domingo plaza, where the move-
Nov. 19 Women’s March. Leila, a member of the APPO women’s coordination committee,
explains the objects carried by the women: “The pots and pans reflect that in Oaxacan homes,
there is no food. In a country where there is no justice, no equality, where there is no respect
for human rights, these pans are not only empty of food but also of these basic principles.”
ment has been centered since the police
forced them out of the main square. The
police continued to fire tear gas into the
crowd and burned the tarps and other belongings of the movement and vendors in
the Santo Domingo plaza. The report from
appo’s most recent Constitutive Congress
were scattered all over the ground. During
this time plainclothes police were detaining people in the streets. After the police
retreated back to the main square, many
movement members regrouped in Santo
Domingo as night was falling.
Suddenly the police advanced over eight
blocks, forcing the crowd to continue
running north of the main square. Paramilitary groups also arrived on the scene,
shooting into the crowd as people ran for
their lives. Movement members attempted to set up barricades; I witnessed many
women scrambling to gather rocks for
defense, breaking stones off of the fancy
plazas where Ulises has squandered the
state’s money. Cars and government buildings were set on fire.
Throughout the next few hours federal
police and plainclothes gunmen continued to attack members of the movement
who had taken cover in various locations.
Three movement members were killed, 39
Delegates from Chiapas traveled to Oaxaca to show solidarity. The delegates included survivors of the 1997 Acteal massacre.
disappeared, 149 detained, and over 140
injured (twenty with live ammunition), not
including the hundred people the medics
assisted who were overwhelmed by the gas
and pepper spray. And this is just on November 25.
The people of Oaxaca who are facing this
fate are guilty of the crime of demanding
justice and trying to organize a democratic
alternative to the corrupt and repressive
leadership that governs their state.
The Mexican federal government’s response, supposedly to restore order, has
instead attempted to maintain the exploitive status quo through further repression
and with no regard for the true root causes
of this conflict — the extreme poverty and
unjust government policies that benefit a
few at the cost of the majority.
According to Yésica Sánchez, president of
limeddh, “It is clear that the pfp are not
interested in instilling peace. What they
come to do is intimidate and try to criminalize the social movement in Oaxaca.”
If the federal police had come to Oaxaca
with the true intention of restoring order,
those who have committed the violence
would be brought to justice. Instead, the
murderers of the fifteen people killed for
their involvement in the movement still
walk the streets, now with added protection and assistance of the pfp.
Ulises claims victory
On the morning after the mass repression,
standing in the very spot where hundreds
had run for their lives less than eighteen
hours before, Governor Ulises claimed victory. It had been months since he had been
able to show his face in the city.
As helicopters flew overhead, Governor
Ulises, surrounded by plainclothes police,
explained that Oaxaca now belongs to the
true Oaxaqueños. “We who love Oaxaca, its
history and its traditions feel profoundly offended and attacked by the vandals’ actions
on Saturday. Those responsible are being
arrested and should be held accountable
for their actions in the face of justice. Today
with the help of the pfp and the state forces
we have recuperated the heart of Oaxaca for
the Oaxaqueños and for all Mexicans.”
For hours prior to this press spectacle,
workers cleaned up the remains of the
police repression. They picked up the tear
gas canisters; the graffiti and stencils
were painted over. A large water truck had
sprayed away the dried blood and burnt remains of the movement from the square.
Since November 25, the federal police
have surrounded the Santo Domingo plaza
and most large parks in the city; they are
routinely patrolling the streets of Oaxaca.
Reports of people being picked up off the
streets by armed gunmen are being called
in to Radio Universidad regularly. The station has once again called for support in
fear that the police will manage to ignore
December 2006 Works in Progress
Page Left: Sixth mega-march, Nov. 5. A woman shows the face of one of many movement members who have recently been disappeared by the police or by PRI supporters. Center: Nov. 19 Women’s
March. Participants hold hands in a line to prevent people (including infiltrators) from provoking the federal police—not that the federal police require an excuse. As the march approached
the first line of police, marchers chanted loudly. The police met these chants with pepper spray. Right: Nov. 19 Women’s March. Many women carried mirrors with labels such as “I am a rapist,”
“Murderer,” “Repressor,” which they held up to the federal police. At least one rape has been reported during their time in Oaxaca.
the autonomous nature of the university
and destroy the station, the primary means
of communication remaining for the movement. The pri radio station has called for
the burning of educa, a well-respected social organization that operates throughout
the state. Over 100 of the movement members detained by the police have been transported out of Oaxaca to federal prison.
Those in power continue to try to suppress this movement with intimidation,
violence, and murder, because change is in
motion. According to Cesar Chavez, “once
social change begins, it cannot be reversed.
You cannot uneducate the person who has
learned to read. You cannot humiliate the
person who feels pride. You cannot oppress
the people who are not afraid anymore.
We have seen the future, and the future is
ours.”
On November 10–12, the movement held
a Constitutive Congress where they elected
220 representatives from all seven regions,
formalizing the popular governance structure of appo. Three thousand people attended the forum further defining their
program of struggle and creating a true
bottom up alternative to the corrupt political parties that run the state.
I still fear for the people, for how much
suffering they will have to face. On November 20, there was an incredible number of
actions worldwide in solidarity with the
people of Oaxaca, but there needs to be an
even larger outcry.
Please consider getting involved in solidarity actions. This is not simply to support the efforts of the people of Oaxaca
to achieve self-determination and social
justice. They are providing a model for the
rest of Mexico to also stand up in the face
of poverty, estimated at over fifty percent
update
of the population, of losing their land and On Nov. 30, just hours before going to press,
resources to foreign corporations, of hav- Works in Progress received a message from
ing to flee to the US illegally to be able to Rochelle that she was leaving Oaxaca, due
provide for their families.
to the increasing police crackdown on forOn the national level, Andrés Manuel eigners. Rochelle wrote, “It is hard to leave
López Obrador held his own swearing-in right now. The movement decided to have a
ceremony on November 20 as the “legiti- big march tomorrow anyway [despite intemate president” of Mexico in front of hun- sified repression]. I really fear for their lives,
dreds of thousands of supporters. Two days but there is no question we [internationals]
prior, he told his supporters, “Those neo- would get picked up if we were there. The
fascist reactionaries better not think they’ll police are driving through the streets reguhave room to maneuver; we’re going to keep larly now—police state. The radio station
them on a short leash.”
of the movement is gone. The last barricade
Massive civil disobedience is planned for destroyed. Over 250 people detained in the
December 1, the date of the inauguration last 72 hours...”
ceremony for Felipe Calderón, who “won”
the presidential election by less than one
percentage point with clear evidence of
fraud.
The trend of electing leftist leadership
continues in Latin America, confronting
the injustice of neoliberal policies and beginning to unravel the exploitive policies
that have left the majority of their population in immense poverty. At the same
time, President Bush has quietly dropped
the ban on training the militaries of Latin
America.
As our country readies itself to carry on
our legacy of genocide to prevent the much
needed changes the people are demanding,
we must become active. Not only for the
people of Oaxaca, Mexico, or Latin America,
but for the global struggle that is taking
root.
Rochelle Gause is an Olympia activist who
has been in Oaxaca since the uprising began
in June, and has served as a delegate with the
Olympia–Rafah Sister City Project.
Oaxacan activists and Chiapas delegates
raise a peace flag together.
The Popular Assembly the People of
Oaxaca (appo) is a nonviolent movement
engaged in civil disobedience in response
to widespread corruption, electoral
fraud, and brutal repression. Please take
a few moments to express your solidarity and support by demanding that the
civil and human rights of all involved be
respected. Send faxes, make phone calls,
and send e-mails to the officials below
expressing your concern for the safety
for those involved in the peaceful protest,
urging non-violent methods and sincere
dialogue to resolve the conflict. We also
urge you to call your senators and congressional representatives, expressing
your concern for the human rights of
people in Oaxaca’s popular movement,
and asking them to demand that the government not use force in their attempt to
resolve the conflict.
Thank you for your help.
Please write to President Vicente Fox
and Interior Secretary Carlos Ababscal,
and tell them to respect the people of Oaxaca and to dismiss Gov. Ulises Ruiz Ortiz
right away. Their e-mail addresses are:
vicente.fox.quesada@presidencia.gob.mx
cabascal@segob.gob.mx
Also, send appeals to Carlos de Icaza,
Mexican Ambassador to the US:
(202) 728-1600
Fax: (202) 728-1698
mexembusa@sre.gob.mx
1911 Pennsylvania Ave NW
Washington, DC 20006
Sixth mega-march, Nov. 5. More people have
been covering their faces amid the increasing
number of arrests and disappearances
caused by the federal police.
Page 4Lacey continued from page 5
lack of job security for people who work at
these businesses stagnates the economy
because they only make enough money to
cover their basic necessities. In the end,
this corporate-friendly environment is not
sustainable; it leads to economic growth,
but not necessarily to economic development.
Perhaps the biggest and most important loss in this corporate-friendly environment is that of civic virtue. The reorganizing of city life — with the elimination
of public spaces, the arts, and recreation
(essentially transforming the city into one
big mall) — also changes its people.
Soon, people start identifying more as
consumers, managers, and workers than
as citizens. Civic participation and social
life end up taking a back seat to corporatecontrolled markets. People become more
concerned with shopping than they are
with voting or more meaningful levels of
civic engagement.
Ironically, this atmosphere of isolation and rampant materialism becomes
a breeding ground for the very anti-social
behavior which the editors of the Olympian
claim is preventing people from shopping
in downtown Olympia.
Creating our own example
The editors were right that Lacey’s
neighbors do have a lot to learn from the
city, but the lesson is in what not to do.
This of course does not mean to say that
Olympia is “good” and Lacey is “bad.” Both
cities have their problems and both have
residents who are working to create more
livable and democratic communities.
If either city is to move forward in a manner that supports all its citizens, they must
craft policies with a focus on social and
economic justice. If not, then “lost sales”
will be the least of either city’s hardships
in the perhaps not-so-distant future.
Marco Rosaire Rossi is a street outreach worker and member of The Olympia Movement for Justice and Peace.
Homeless Outreach:
Supplies needed
For many of us, winter is a time of fellowship. It’s a time to recognize major holidays, remember family, celebrate the new
year and start new beginnings. However
for others, winter can be a time of hardship and isolation. Each Winter, Olympia’s
homeless and street populations struggle
to meet their basic needs for food, sobriety, warmth, and community. For some,
getting through winter is literally a matter
of life or death.
The Emma Goldman Youth and Homeless Outreach Project (egyhop), a Project of Done & Done, has dedicated itself
to relieving these burdens on Olympia’s
most downtrodden by providing direct resources to populations in need. We serve
all types of people, and are sometimes the
only option left for those who have been
denied access to other services based
on mental health issues, addictions, or
criminality.
Please help us fight poverty this winter by giving generously to the Emma
Goldman Youth and Homeless Outreach
Project. We always appreciate monetary
donations, but our true value is in what we
can immediately offer to others. Blankets,
sleeping bags, backpacks, camping gear,
gloves, tarps, hygiene supplies and warm
clothing—especially socks, are the most
important contributions.
Donations can be dropped off at the
Bike & Bike space on Fourth Avenue and
Franklin Street in Olympia. A donation
bin is located at the Franklin Street side
door of the new Dumpster Values building. Monetary donations can be made by
sending a check to “Done and Done,” PO
Box 6382, Olympia, WA 98507-6382.
Call (360) 570-0608 for more information. egyhop is a project of the Done and
Done 501(c)3 non-profit. Non-profit id
#20-3433042
Works in Progress
December 2006
Of War and Politics:
Closing the gap between the veteran and peace communities
by Jeff Berryhill
A disturbing, yet illustrative article appeared in the New York Times on Nov. 10
entitled “The Struggle for Iraq; Marines
Get the News from an Iraqi Host: Rumsfeld’s Out. ‘Who’s Rumsfeld?’”.
The article reveals that soldiers currently serving in Iraq failed to recognize
the name Donald Rumsfeld. Published
two days following the resignation of the
embattled defense secretary, this demonstrates a sad reality all too familiar in my
encounters with members of the armed
forces. Aside from the knowledge of their
immediate commanders, soldiers were
generally unaware or unconcerned about
their civilian and military leadership or
the politics of war. This is especially troubling considering the decisions enacted
by Rumsfeld and his associates with the
consequences they entailed.
For a number of reasons, both frustrating and tragic, soldiers consider themselves either disinterested or unaware of
the political climate in the domestic or
international arena. I recently attended
a forum at St. Martin’s College in Lacey
where returning soldiers and witnesses
to warfare shared elements and perspectives from what they witnessed. A recurring theme for the panelists who served in
Iraq was how they considered themselves
fairly apolitical, yet steadfastly in favor of
the current war effort and occupation.
This pro-war position can certainly be
perceived as political in nature, just as
much as the fact that joining the United
States military has a number of accompanying political ramifications. Yet, service
for GIs is understood
as a simple matter
of duty; duty to our
country, its citizens,
its ideals, and most
importantly to the
fellow soldiers they
go to battle with. Accordingly, partisanship and the various
other ways political discourse is represented in this country appear very distant
or insignificant to the soldier attempting
to earn a living and, at the same time, preserve their own life.
Martin’s event expressed considerable disdain at the penny-pinching practices of the
federal government, with regards to supplying soldiers with deficient equipment
and low salaries.
Among his friends
The insight and perspective veterans provide from the unique narrative they possess
is invaluable in understanding the politics
of war, making effective interaction critical for those involved in peace and justice
movements. I come from a town where
we’ve had five young men within a year or
two of my age (22) serve one or more tours
of duty in Iraq. From my graduating class,
I have had about
half a dozen or
so friends join
some branch of
the armed forces. Due to these
f r iendships, I
have considerable
contacts with soldiers which have
provided me with insight on how to communicate with them in a very non-confrontational or informal yet often inquisitive
manner. From my experience, I have found
it is important to be sensitive and respectful of their decisions, perhaps asking questions or conveying opinions in a subtle and
non-confrontational fashion.
The New York Times article I referred to
earlier also indicated that most veterans
become more politically active later in their
lives. Due to this
reality, it is important to forge strong
and meaningful
relationships with
GIs as many are
dealing with posttraumatic stress
disorder. A combat
Vietnam veteran
friend of mine
told me how understanding the manipulation of patriotism
and the immorality of such wars as Vietnam and Iraq can actually help veterans
begin to heal their own emotional wounds.
It can actually be therapeutic for veterans
who become actively involved in ending
the type of wars they once participated in
by diverting PTSD-related self-destructive
behavior into constructive anti-war involvement.
While many of us would like to see the
type of heroic stance exhibited by Iraq
war resister Lt. Ehren Watada increase in
Crossing the gap
Veterans speak with tremendous authority on matters of war and peace and we
must recognize this reality. They provide a
wealth of information and insight on the
nature of conflict,
revealing a perspective only a first-hand
account can provide.
Therefore, our contacts with veterans
should be done in a
manner that could
facilitate the internalized criticisms
or reservations of how war is conducted
to come to the surface, rather than alienating the soldier. Often our contacts with
veterans are both ill-advised and combative, failing to move beyond our own reservations about war and failing to humanize
the exchange. Many veterans and current
members of the service are frustrated by
the condescension and ridicule they perceive from the ‘enlightened’ peace community and often immediately disregard
our efforts.
Repairing our relationship with
soldiers is an important step we
should take towards actualizing
our goals of eliminating war and
ensuring justice.
He indicated that if he were
to see that his efforts had
been made in vain..., his
service (which he viewed as
humanitarian and liberating
in nature) would be tainted.
Coming to terms
Following the conclusion of the panel, I
approached one of the panelists, a young
man discharged after being injured in
Iraq, for further questions. What he revealed was both heartrending and illuminating. I asked why he felt he was not very
political. He responded by saying that in
light of his sacrifice and the sacrifice of
a number of his friends and peers, some
losing their life in combat, he did not want
to explore the motives or circumstances
surrounding the decision to invade. He
indicated that if he were to see that his
efforts had been made in vain or had
been conducted with less than altruistic
intentions, his service (which he viewed
as humanitarian and liberating in nature)
would be tainted.
Recently, a friend of mine who served
in the Marine Corps returned from a tour
of duty in Iraq. At one point during his
service, prior to his mission in Iraq, this
friend of mine berated me for not supporting the President during the 2004 election
cycle while identifying himself as politically disinterested. After his return, the
friend was singing a completely different tune: remarking about his frustrating experience in Iraq and his perception
that the occupation served no effective
purpose. In fact, he said he hoped we’re
involved in that region to secure access to
oil or else we would have no other reason
to continue any further. This type of cynical and frustrated response to the experience is commonplace in my interactions
with members of the service after their
return. A different panelist from the St.
numbers, this act of Herculean courage is
relatively rare. What may be more likely is
the hope that those returning from Iraq
and Afghanistan would recognize the
systemic problems with these invasions
and be open to joining a peace and justice
veterans group (like Veterans for Peace or
Iraq Veterans Against the War) to vocalize their critiques or concerns about the
armed services.
 
 

   
   
   
     
     
    
  

Goals to set
Repairing our relationship with soldiers is
an important step we should take towards
actualizing our goals of eliminating war
and ensuring justice. Constructive communication with combat veterans is a responsibility for all members of the peace
and justice community precisely because
it has the extraordinary potential to play
an integral component in creating a more
equitable and just society we so vigorously
labor to build.
Jeff Berryhill is a Senior at The Evergreen
the State College studying political economy. He is currently involved with the local group South Sound Project for Military
Resistance and Justice, and has worked on
projects in solidarity with war resisters Lt.
Ehren Watada and Spc. Suzanne Swift.
December 2006 Works in Progress
Page The Case of Spc. Suzanne Swift:
by Caitlin Esworthy
In January of 2005, the date of her redeployment to Iraq, Military Police Specialist
Suzanne Swift went Absent Without Leave
(AWOL). She had endured (in addition to
the ‘normal’ traumas of service) sexual harassment in Kuwait at the hands of her platoon sergeant and subsequent command
rape, public humiliation and harassment
by her squad leader in Iraq.
The medical consequences of her experience have been grave. She was diagnosed
with Post Traumatic Stress Disorder related
to sexual abuse by a personal therapist in
Oregon, but the military’s health professionals did not confirm the diagnosis in
its entirety. She is currently working at
Fort Lewis but remains in a delicate situation. After being reassigned (thankfully
away from her assailant) she is still dealing
with the backlash of going public with her
accusations. Due to the stigma attached to
victims of sexual assault and the publicity
of her case, those around her at times don’t
speak with Swift for fear of being accused
of sexual harassment. In September, after
withholding the results of their investigation for over two months, the army formally
charged Suzanne with “missing movement”
and Absence Without Leave.
With public support for the war in Iraq
waning on a massive level, Suzanne Swift’s
continually unfolding case has received significant attention from the press. Sexual
assault and rape within the armed forces
add further dimensions to the already violent history of the US occupation. Swift’s
refusal to deploy and her bravery in making
her case public has inspired anti-war activists and other victims of sexual violence in
the armed services across the country. Her
stand has provided a face for the statistics
of rape in the military and brought forth
into the consciousness of many the reality
of women service members.
Suzanne’s case brings attention to one
of the realities of war that is often not discussed: rape. Rape, sexual violence, and the
eroticization of violence have long been a
part of how war is executed. By speaking
out against sexual violence, Suzanne is
speaking out against one of the tenets of
war and therefore working to expose and
dismantle war itself.
Although we hear very little about sexual
assault and abuse in the military, it is tragically a common occurrence. A 2003 Denver
Post article stated that, “Nearly one-third
of the women in the military have reported
a rape or attempted rape, compared with
18 percent in the civilian world. Yet during
the past decade, twice as many accused sex
offenders in the Army were given admin-
A Gendered Approach to Organizing Against Rape in the Military
istrative punishments as were court-martialed.”
The lack of effective prosecution for sex
offenders is connected with systemic problems for women regarding bureaucratic
procedures, confidentiality, and access to
systems of justice within the military. In society at large, we are all victims of ‘a culture
of silence’ surrounding sexual assault, but
the armed forces also suffer from a heightened ‘culture of violence.’ “Sexual assault
is the most underreported violent crime in
America, and that’s going to be true in the
military as well,” according to Pentagon
spokesman Roger Kaplan. Silence isn’t the
only factor in the systemic deficiencies in
justice for sexual assault victims; recruiters
often turn a blind eye to warning signs.
Comma nding and superior officers
often reinforce
the prevalence
of sexual assault. According to a study
conducted by
University of
Iowa researchers and Iowa
City Veterans
Affairs Medical
Center (VAMC)
“Our findings suggest that if sexual harassment is allowed in the workplace, women
in those environments have a significantly
increased risk of being raped.” The results
were consistent in all areas of service to be
about a four-fold risk of rape for women
whose superiors made sexually demeaning
comments or allowed such behavior.
Suzanne was a victim of both sexual harassment and command rape. In an interview Suzanne details that sexual remarks
are simply a part of military life. She makes
it clear that difference in rank changes
the situation, especially in a combat zone
where your assailant is making life and
death decisions. “The other soldiers don’t
have power over you,” she said.
As an institution, the military is integrally reliant on a violent construction of
masculinity. This begs the question: where
do women fit into the social relations and
power structures within the military?
The military is dependent on exploiting
and promoting violent sexuality and sex
as conquest. From the “shock and awe”
bombing of Baghdad to the fact that the
U.S. Air Force now “…admits showing films
of violent pornography to pilots before they
fly bombing raids.” It is contradictory to
have this type of violent sexuality prevalent
and expect rape to not play a significant
role, especially in the lives of women in the
armed forces.
The organizing and campaigning around
Suzanne’s case has fluctuated in intensity,
but has been marked by a few minor debates in the region which highlight some
key issues that need to be recognized.
Some conflicts were brought up surrounding the creation of ‘Camp Suzanne’
situated outside of Fort Lewis, an attempt
to replicate Camp Casey in Crawford, Texas — a campaign that was one of the more
prominent actions by the peace movement
during the Iraq war. Preparation, outreach,
and dialogue were lacking prior to the beginning of Camp Suzanne. Other activists cited conflicting times with another
campaign, lack of pragmatic support due
to short notice,
and unwillingness to delay
ot her issues
during the campaign. Conceptually, the idea
received a great
deal of support
by the larger
peace movement as well as
Suzanne, Sara
Rich (Suzanne’s
mother), Cindy
Sheehan, and was endorsed by Ani DiFranco and groups such as Veterans For Peace
(local and national).
However well-intentioned, the language
initially used by organizers belied a naiveté
at the systemic nature of sexism and strongarmed approach that doesn’t always work
when you are dealing with issues of sexual
violence.
Another question brought up around
Suzanne’s case and organizing support
was whether or not she qualified as a war
resister.
Because her legal case was based on
military justice and she did not go AWOL
as a statement against the war or to achieve
Conscientious Objector status, some do not
consider Swift to technically be a war resister. This point, although accurate at a certain level, neglects the important fact that
her message has become increasingly more
anti-war and more radical as her trauma
is extended by her continued service and
lack of justice on her case. It is important to
be mindful of what was clearly a hierarchy
of needs for Suzanne. Knowing that she
would be placed back under the command
of the same officer that had abused her, an
anti-war message was probably not seen
in her mind as the most effective strategy.
It also important to be mindful of the dis-
Organizing for war resisters like
Suzanne involves working toward
a greater understanding of how
gender politics play into the daily
lives of women in the military and,
more important to the role of a
supporter, how sexism functions
within the anti-war movement.
crepancy between what one might imagine
a war resister to look like and the reality of
the armed forces today.
Camp Suzanne was gaining noticeable
support by the end from motorists once
commuters entering and leaving the base
became familiar with the message. Solidarity with women living on base is important in building a broad-based movement.
Organizing for war resisters like Suzanne
involves working toward a greater understanding of how gender politics play into
the daily lives of women in the military and,
more important to the role of a supporter,
how sexism functions within the anti-war
movement.
There are a number of areas that civilians
can pressure the military to improve upon.
According to the report “Sexual Assault in
the Military: Context Factors and Measurements Issues,” sexual assault can be significantly reduced if women are recruited
and promoted into positions of leadership,
gender-balanced work environments are
created, and organizational climates are
created where complaints of sexual harassment and assault are taken seriously,
responded to swiftly.
Fort Lewis should seriously take into
account these studies and respond to Suzanne’s case judiciously if they are genuinely interested in reducing sexual violence. A
recommendation to create an environment
that is intolerant of sexual violence could
include the introduction of more thorough
and frequent sexual assault prevention
trainings (in addition to the twice-a-year
classes cited by Sgt. 1st Class James Currier,
a spokesman for the Equal Opportunity
Program at Fort Lewis) and mandatory antioppression workshops for all soldiers, with
a more focused and detailed program for
officers.
Playing a preventive role in the approach
toward rape and sexual assault in the military is crucial in the struggle against a culture of violence. There is ample evidence
to suggest reforms will have a significant
impact on the daily lives of women serving
in the military and it is the role of civilian
citizens to be allies of rape and abuse victims in a manner that fulfills the needs of
those resisting and with the requisite sensitivity due. This is not to say that reform of
the system erases the violent culture that is
being struggled against but it could mean
all the difference to the life of a woman
serving in the armed forces.
Caitlin Esworthy is a student at TESC and
works with Olympia Movement for Justice
and Peace.
From “Kramer” to the NYPD: Racism kills us
by Molly Secours
Last week comedian Michael Richards fired
a round of angry racial epithets at several
young black men heckling him in a comedy
club in Los Angeles. One week later, Sean
Bell, a 23 year old groom-to-be and his two
friends (all black) were gunned down by five
plain-clothed New York City police officers
who felt compelled to fire over fifty shots
total at the three unarmed men who were
celebrating Bell’s impending marriage.
Although some have characterized
the slaughter as “mistaken identity,” the
three were unmistakably young, black and
deemed menacing --even without possessing weapons. Apparently these young men
didn’t need to be armed to be considered
dangerous.
When replaying the video of Richards’ relentless round of expletives aimed at pranksters in the audience, one cannot help but
draw parallels to one of the police officers
emptying two full magazines at three unarmed black men. He too must have felt
very threatened.
It appears racism has no coastal bias
and the indignation and public outcry that
erupted on the heels of Richards’ “slip of
the tongue” was deafening and certainly
warranted. And yet, after all the criticism
and numerous video replays plastered on
network television, Richards, in an interview with talk show host David Letterman,
earnestly insists “I’m not racist,” as if this
is the only question of concern.
Pundits, entertainers, activists and journalists spend hours posing the question
“Is he racist?” and carefully pointing their
forefinger in the direction of the culprit,
speculation abounds as to whether or not
Richard’s career is over.
Why? Because in America we don’t tolerate overt racism. No Siree, no “N” words
here. Never mind that our prisons are disproportionately filled with black men and
women, that schools serving predominately
black and brown communities remain understaffed and underfunded and that in
study after study, it is revealed that people
of color receive inferior health care, employment opportunities and many are destined to live in poverty their entire lives.
So just what did we learn from the past
week’s debacles? We learned that after a
white, wealthy, quick witted and beloved
comedian felt threatened by several young
black hecklers, he reached in his comedic
tool bag and pulled the pin out of a racially
charged verbal grenade and hurled it into
the balcony.
Richards’ apologetic protestations on
Letterman are indicative of the mass denial infecting this entire country, especially
white America. We shake our heads in consternation as if what lies in Richards does
not live inside all of us. As if somehow, the
problem is “over there” and thank god it
does not live in me. If that were true, Sean
Bell (and thousands like him) would most
likely be enjoying his honeymoon rather
than lying buried six feet under.
After viewing the Richards video several
times, it appeared the vitriol was lurking
just under the surface, which of course it
was.
Just under the surface in the ways we instinctively clutch our purses on the street
when approached by a black man, when we
are alone on an elevator or when we read
the latest headline about what is commonly
known as “black-on-black crime.”
If only we were less concerned with being labeled “a racist” and more concerned
about the systemic and institutional damage inflicted on people of color on a daily
basis. Maybe then we could transform our
outrage and indignation of overt bigotry
and violence into something meaningful.
When will we understand that these out-
bursts, like the one Richards displayed last
week, are symptomatic rather than atypical
of something much deeper? That the words
he vomited at his audience are very much
connected to the fatal fifty shots fired at
Sean Bell and his friends.
If only we could start from the premise
that yes, of course Michael Richards is
racist, and so are most white people. It is
impossible to be raised in a society where
white supremacy is one of the founding
principles and not entertain racist notions.
It’s too deeply ingrained for any of us to
boast of immunity. Simply impossible.
If we could somehow grasp the notion
that it is only to the degree that we acknowledge and unearth the racist notions that lie
hidden in all of us, often just beneath the
surface, that we will become “less racist.”
If so, perhaps we might one day be capable of making the correlation between
words that wound and bullets that kill.
Molly Secours is a writer/filmmaker/
speaker and frequent co-host on”Behind The
Headlines” and “FreeStyle on 88.1 WFSK in
Nashville. She can be reached through her
website: www.mollysecours.com .
Page 10
Works in Progress
No choice but to live together
by Ali Abunimah
As I watched the images last week of destruction from the Gaza Strip, where an
Israeli shelling attack had killed an entire
family, as a Palestinian I could understand
the feelings of one survivor who said, “I
cannot see a day when we will live in peace
with them.” But I also know there is no
other choice.
When Israel was established, its founders
said it would be an exemplary, moral state.
For many Jews, it seemed like a miraculous
redemption after so much suffering and
loss in the Nazi Holocaust.
Palestinians experienced a different reality. Israel became a “Jewish state” in a
country that had always been multicultural and multireligious. The expulsion and
exclusion of Palestinians from their own
homeland has led Israelis and Palestinians
into an endless nightmare of mutual nonrecognition and bloodshed.
For decades, the conventional wisdom
has been that this conflict can only be resolved by partitioning the country into two
states. Yet despite enormous political and
diplomatic efforts to achieve this, the two
peoples remain thoroughly if unhappily
intertwined. Israel’s project of establishing
settler-colonies inside the territories where
Palestinians wanted to create a state has
rendered separation impossible.
At the same time, Israel finds itself in a
conundrum. For the first time since the
state was founded, Israeli Jews no longer
form an absolute majority in the territory
they control. Today
there are roughly 5
million Jews and 5
million Palestinians
living in the same
land. The trends are
incontestable. Within
a few years, Palestinians will form the
clear majority.
Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert recognized in 2003 what
this would mean: “We
are approaching the
point where more and more Palestinians
will say, ‘There is no place for two states,’”
in this country, and “‘All we want is the
right to vote.’ The day they get it, we will
lose everything.” Warning that Israel could
not remain both a Jewish state and a democracy if it held on to all of the occupied
Palestinian territories, Olmert added, “I
shudder to think that liberal Jewish organizations that shouldered the burden of
struggle against apartheid, will lead the
struggle against us.”
Some Israeli extremists, like the new
Deputy Prime Minister Avigdor Lieberman,
believe this “demographic problem” can
be solved by expelling non-Jews. Israel’s
December 2006
Human Rights Watch must retract
its shameful press release
by Norman G. Finkelstein
chosen solution, which it calls “unilateral
separation,” walls Palestinians into impoverished ghettos Palestinians compare
to the townships and Bantustans set up
for blacks by the apartheid government of
South Africa. The result of this approach,
as we see in Gaza, is more hopelessness,
resistance and defiance, and sure disaster
for both peoples.
The two-state solution remains attractive
and comforting in its apparent simplicity
and finality. But in reality, it has proved
unattainable because neither Palestinians
nor Israelis are willing to give up enough of
the country that they love. Faced with this
impasse, a small but
growing group of Israelis and Palestinians are
tentatively exploring an
old idea long dormant:
Why not have a single
state in which both peoples enjoy equal rights
and protections and religious freedom? Many
people dismiss this as
utopian dreaming.
Allister Sparks, the
legendary editor of the
anti-apartheid Rand
Daily Mail newspaper, observed that the
conflict in South Africa most resembled
those in Northern Ireland and Palestine–Israel, because each involved “two ethno-nationalisms” in a seemingly irreconcilable
rivalry for the “same piece of territory.” If
the prospect of “one secular country shared
by all” seems “unthinkable” in Palestine–
Israel today, then it is possible to appreciate
how unlikely such a solution once seemed
in South Africa. But “that is what we did,”
Sparks says, “without any foreign negotiator [and] no handshakes on the White
House lawn.”
To be sure, Palestinians and Israelis
would not simply be able to take the new
South Africa as a blueprint. They would
have to work out their own distinct constitution, including mechanisms for ethnic
communities to have autonomy in matters that concern them, and to guarantee
that no one group can dominate another.
There would be hard work to heal the terrible wounds of the past. Such a solution offers the chance that Palestine–Israel could
become for the first time ever the truly safe
home where Israelis and Palestinians can
accept each other. It may be an arduous
path, but in the current impasse we cannot afford to ignore any ray of light.
If the prospect of “one
secular country shared by
all” seems “unthinkable”
in Palestine–Israel today,
then it is possible to appreciate how unlikely such
a solution once seemed in
South Africa.
Printed with permission. Ali Abunimah
is a Palestinian–American and the author
of One Country: A Bold Proposal to End the
Israeli–Palestinian Conflict.
Even by the grim standards of Gaza, the
past five months have been cruel ones.
Some four hundred Palestinians, mostly
unarmed civilians, have been killed during Israeli attacks. (Four Israeli soldiers
and two civilians have been killed.) Israel
has sealed off Gaza from the outside world
while the international community has
imposed brutal sanctions, ravaging Gaza’s
already impoverished economy.
“Gaza is dying,” Patrick Cockburn reported in CounterPunch, “its people are on
the edge of starvation.A whole society is
being destroyed.The sound that Palestinians most dread is an unknown voice on
their cell phone saying they have half an
hour to leave their home before it is hit by
bombs or missiles. There is no appeal. “
“Gaza is in its worst condition ever,”
Gideon Levy wrote in Ha’aretz, “The Israeli
army has been rampaging through Gaza-there’s no other word to describe it--killing
and demolishing, bombing and shelling
indiscriminately....This is disgraceful and
shocking collective punishment.”
Predictably Gaza teetered on the precipice of fratricidal civil war. “The experiment was a success: The Palestinians are
killing each other,” Amira Hass wryly observed in Ha’aretz, “They are behaving as
expected at the end of the extended experiment called ‘what happens when you
imprison 1.3 million human beings in an
enclosed space like battery hens.’”
It is at times like this that we expect human rights organizations to speak out.
How has Human Rights Watch responded to the challenge? It criticized Israel for
destroying Gaza’s only electrical plant,
and also called on Israel to “investigate”
why its forces were targeting Palestinian
medical personnel in Gaza and to “investigate” the Beit Hanoun massacre.
On the other hand, it accused Palestinians of committing a “war crime” after
they captured an Israeli soldier and offered to exchange him for Palestinian
women and children held in Israeli jails.
(Israel was holding 10,000 Palestinians
prisoner.) It demanded that Palestinians
“bring an immediate end to the lawlessness and vigilante violence” in Gaza.
(Compare Amira Hass’s words.) It issued a
101-page report chastising the Palestinian
Authority for failing to protect women and
girls. It called on the Palestinian Authority
to take “immediate steps to halt” Palestinian rocket attacks on Israel.
Were this record not shameful enough,
HRW crossed a new threshold at the end
of November.
After Palestinians spontaneously responded to that “unknown voice on a cell
phone” by putting their own bare bodies
in harm’s way, HRW rushed to issue a
press release warning that Palestinians
might be committing a “war crime” and
might be guilty of “human shielding.” (“Civilians Must Not Be Used to Shield Homes
Against Military Attacks”)
In what must surely be the most shocking statement ever issued by a human
rights organization, HRW indicted Pal-
estinian leaders for supporting this nonviolent civil disobedience:
Prime Minister Haniyeh and other Palestinian leaders should be renouncing, not
embracing, the tactic of encouraging civilians to place themselves at risk.
The international community has for decades implored Palestinian leaders to forsake armed struggle in favor of nonviolent
civil disobedience. Why is a human rights
organization now attacking them for adopting this tactic?
Is it a war crime to protect one’s home
from collective punishment?
Is it human shielding if a desperate and
forsaken populace chooses to put itself
at deadly risk in order to preserve the last
shred of its existence?
Indeed, although Israeli soldiers have
frequently used Palestinians as human
shields in life-threatening situations, and
although HRW has itself documented this
egregious Israeli practice, HRW has never
once called it a war crime.
It took weeks before HRW finally issued
a report condemning Israeli war crimes in
Lebanon. Although many reliable journalists were daily documenting these crimes,
HRW said it first had to conduct an independent investigation of its own.
But HRW hastened to deplore the nonviolent protests in Gaza based on anonymous
press reports which apparently got crucial
facts wrong.
Why this headlong rush to judgment?
Was HRW seeking to appease pro-Israel
critics after taking the heat for its report
documenting Israeli war crimes in Lebanon?
After Martin Luther King delivered his
famous speech in 1967 denouncing the war
in Vietnam, mainstream Black leaders rebuked him for jeopardizing the financial
support of liberal whites. “You might get
yourself a foundation grant,” King retorted,
“but you won’t get yourself into the Kingdom of Truth.”
HRW now also stands poised at a crossroads: foundation grants or the Kingdom
of Truth?
A first step in the right direction would be
for it to issue a retraction of its press release
and an apology.
HRW executive director Kenneth Roth
“commended” Israel during its last invasion for warning people in south Lebanon
to flee--before turning it into a moonscape,
slaughtering the old, infirm and poor left
behind. It would seem that Palestinian
leaders and people, too, merit some recognition for embracing the tactics of Gandhi and King in a last desperate bid to save
themselves from annihilation.
Email HRW Middle East director Sarah
Leah Whitson--whitsos@hrw.org - and
HRW executive director Kenneth Roth-RothK@hrw.org.
Norman Finkelstein’s most recent book is
Beyond Chutzpah: On the misuse of antiSemitism and the abuse of history (University of California Press). His web site is www.
NormanFinkelstein.com.
December 2006 Works in Progress
Page 11
Falling in line on Israel
by Stephen Zunes
The election of a Democratic majority in 2004 ruling calling for the enforcement of given by the United States to Israel .
Nor is it a matter of Democratic lawmakthe House and Senate is unlikely to result the Fourth Geneva Convention in Israeliin any serious challenge to the Bush ad- occupied territories. In a resolution that ers somehow being forced against their will
ministration’s support for Israeli attacks summer, the Democratic leadership and to back Bush’s policy by Jewish voters and
against the civilian populations of its Arab the overwhelming majority of Democrats campaign contributors. In reality, Jewish
neighbors and the Israeli government’s on- in both houses also condemned the World public opinion is divided over the wisdom
going violations of international humani- Court’s near-unanimous advisory opinion and morality of many Israeli policies entarian law.
that Israel’s separation barrier could not be dorsed by the Democrats, recognizing that
The principal Democratic Party spokes- built beyond Israel’s internationally-recog- such policies actually harm Israel’s legitimen on foreign policy will likely be Tom nized border into the occupied West Bank mate long-term security interests. FurtherLantos in the House of Representatives and in order to incorporate illegal settlements more, the vast majority of Democrats who
support Bush’s Middle East policies come
Joe Biden in the Senate, both of whom have into Israel.
been longstanding and outspoken supportMore recently, Pelosi and other Demo- from very safe districts where a reduction
ers of a series of right-wing Israeli govern- cratic leaders have condemned former in campaign contributions would not have
ments and opponents of the Israeli peace President Jimmy Carter’s newly-released a negative impact on Democratic re-elecmovement. And, despite claims—even book criticizing Israeli violations of inter- tion. Contrary to the belief that it is politiwithin the progressive press—that future national humanitarian law in the West cal suicide to condemn the policies of the
House Speaker Nancy Pelosi is a “consistent Bank. Carter’s use of the word “apartheid” Israeli government, every single Democrat
supporter of human rights,” such humani- in reference to Israeli policies of building who opposed this summer’s resolution in
tarian concerns have never applied to Ar- Jewish-only settlements and highways on support of the Israeli assault on Lebanon
was re-elected by a larger margin
abs, since she is a staunch defender
than in 2004.
of right-wing Israeli Prime Minister
Perhaps more damaging than
Ehud Olmert and his predecessor
pressure from right-wing PACs
Ariel Sharon.
has been the absence of pressure
For example, when President
from progressive groups that opGeorge W. Bush defended Israel’s
pose Israeli policies. Indeed, some
assaults on Lebanon’s civilian inof the most hard-line Democratic
frastructure this summer and deopponents of Israeli peace and hufied the international community
man rights groups were endorsed
by initially blocking United Nations
by leading US peace and human
efforts to impose a cease-fire, the
rights groups.
Democrats rushed to pass a resoluUntil the progressive community serition commending him for “fully support- confiscated Palestinian land and allowing
ing Israel.” The resolution, co-authored by Palestinians to enter only as laborers with ously challenges Democratic hawks, there
Rep. Lantos, claimed that Israel’s actions special passbooks proved particularly in- is little hope that the new Democratic mawere legitimate self-defense under the UN flammatory to Pelosi and her colleagues. jority can be expected to contribute anyCharter and challenged the credibility of Meanwhile, they have refused to criticize thing to the cause of peace and justice in
reputable human rights groups. Although this policy by any name and insist that the the Middle East.
groups like Amnesty International and Hu- Israeli colonial outposts in the occupied
man Rights Watch documented widespread territories—constructed in violation of the Originally published on November 18, 2006
attacks by Israeli forces against civilians in Fourth Geneva Convention and a series of by Foreign Policy in Focus. Reprinted here
areas far from any Hezbollah military ac- UN Security Council resolutions—are le- with permission. Stephen Zunes is a professor
of Politics at the University of San Francisco
tivity, the resolution praised “Israel’s long- gitimate.
standing commitment to minimizing civilOngoing talks between Fatah and Hamas and the author of Tinderbox: US Middle East
ian loss and welcom[ed] Israel’s continued for a coalition government have raised the Policy and the Roots of Terrorism (Common
efforts to prevent civilian casualties.” All hope that the Palestinian Authority will Courage Press). He serves as Middle East edibut 15 of the House’s 201 Democrats voted soon have a non-Hamas prime minister tor of Foreign Policy In Focus. Copyright ©
in support.
and a largely non-partisan, technocratic 2006 Foreign Policy in Focus.
Similarly, the Democrats echoed Presi- cabinet. However, the Democrats support
dent Bush’s support for Israel’s 2002 offen- Bush’s policy of refusing to resume normal
sive in the West Bank in another resolution relations with the PA unless the cabinet exco-authored by Lantos. In response to Am- cludes members of Hamas or any party that
nesty International’s observation that the does not recognize Israel’s right to exist as
massive assault appeared to be aimed at a Jewish state. By contrast, no prominent
the Palestinian population as a whole, all Democrat has raised any concerns over
but two dozen Democrats went on record Olmert’s recent appointment of Avignor
supporting the devastating Israeli offensive Lieberman, who has called for the ethnic
and claiming that it was “aimed solely at cleansing of Palestinians from Israel and
the terrorist infrastructure.”
much of the West Bank, as a cabinet minisIn March 2003, Pelosi and other Demo- ter and his new deputy prime minister.
cratic leaders signed a letter to President
The Democrats have also pushed for
Bush opposing the White House-endorsed increasing US military aid to Israel and
Middle East “Road Map” for peace, which have rejected calls to condition the aid on
they perceived as being too lenient on the an improvement in Israel’s human rights
Palestinians. The authors insisted that the record. The Democrats have also pushed
peace process must be based “above all” on for an increase in economic assistance to
the end of Palestinian violence and the es- Israel’s rightist government, already the retablishment of a new Palestinian leader- cipient of nearly one-third of all U.S. foreign
ship, not an end to Israeli occupation and aid, despite the country’s relative affluence
colonization of Palestinian land seized in and the fact that Israelis represent only onethe 1967 war. Indeed, there was no men- tenth of 1% of the world’s population.
tion of any of the reciprocal actions called
The decision by Democratic members of
for in the Road Map—not ending Israel’s Congress to take such hard-line positions
sieges and military assaults on Palestin- against international law and human rights
ian population centers and not halting the does not stem from the fear that it would
construction of additional illegal settle- jeopardize their re-election. Polls show that
ments. The letter also voiced opposition a sizable majority of Americans believe U.S.
to the UN or any government other than foreign policy should support these printhe United States monitoring progress on ciples. More specifically, regarding Israel
the ground.
and Palestine , majorities support a more
The Democrats have attacked the Inter- even-handed US policy on the Israeli-Palesnational Court of Justice for its landmark tinian conflict and oppose the blank check
Until the progressive community seriously challenges Democratic hawks,
there is little hope that the new Democratic majority can be expected to contribute anything to the cause of peace
and justice in the Middle East.
Letter from
Jed Whittaker
Thank you for voting for me (you know
who you are). You might be wondering
why the convential media has reported that 100% of the vote went to Congressman Brian Baird and Michael
Messmore. You might be wondering
if your vote was counted. In fact your
vote was not counted. Washington
elections law does not allow it. Specifically, unless a write-in vote total
is statistically relevant and could determine the outcome of an election,
according to Washington election law,
it will not be counted.
Wait a minute, you say. Aren’t all the
votes supposed to be counted? Isn’t
this America? You’re right. All the
votes are supposed to be counted, and
this is America. The ideals set forth by
the framers of the United States Constitution are ideals that we have yet
to achieve. We must work to achieve
those ideals.
Accordingly I am attempting a major revision of Washington election
law, and will be building a coalition
in support of the revision. If you want
representative democracy in Washington, and you want your vote to be
counted, please contact your state
Representatives and Senators. Ask
them to sponsor the omnibus election bill, a work in progress.
Peace.
Jed Whittaker was an independent, antiwar write-in candidate in the recent
race in the 3rd Congressional District.
Come join your Critical Mass friends on
page 4 to see what ruined their fun journey
WORKS IN PROGRESS
FREE
Dec 2006
Volume 17, No. 8
contents
1 City Council sucks Oly downtown’s will to live
1 Update on bureaucratic sidewalk purge
4 Cops secret envy of mass riders turns violent;
two arrested, interrogated
5 Councilman Johnson delivers the real word on
the streets
5 If the Olympian doesn’t like it here, why doesn’t it
move to Lacey?
6 New York Times can’t find Oaxaca on the map
8 Veterans, peace communities urged to empathise amidst differing views
9 Women’s injustice in the armed forces
9 Kramer’s racist potential as NYPD cop
10 One state proposal
10 Human Rights Watch is being watched
11 Democrats campaign in Israel
11 Jed Whittaker
If we can’t sit on the sidewalks, at least let us fly kites in the street like they do in Lacey.
Read about the Olympian’s bright idea on page 5.
Works In Progress
PO Box 295
Olympia WA 98507