A Critical Analysis and the Clinical Importance of Parameters of
Transcription
A Critical Analysis and the Clinical Importance of Parameters of
eISSN - 2348 - 0173 Vol-2 / Issue - 6 / Nov - Dec - 2014 Free Full Text @ www.ijaam.org www.ijaam.org IJA A M INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF AYURVEDA & ALTERNATIVE MEDICINE Bi-Monthly Peer Reviewed International Journal VOL 2 ISSUE 6 (2014) INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF AYURVEDA & ALTERNATIVE MEDICINE eISSN 2348-0173 eISSN 2348- 0173 REVIEW ARTICLE Global Impact Factor (GIF) – 0.187 (2013) A CRITICAL ANALYSIS AND THE CLINICAL IMPORTANCE OF PARAMETERS OF ASSESSMENT OF VAMANA AND VIRECHANA KARMA Vijay Kumar Rai1*, Radhey Shyam Sharma2 1. Lecturer, Dept. of Swasthavritta, Government Ayurvedic College and Hospital, Varanasi. Contact No. +91 9532340500, E-mail – raivijay07@rediffmail.com 2. Prof. Radhey Shyam Sharma, Honourable V. C., Dr. S.R. Rajasthan Ayurveda University, Jodhpur. Article Received on - 26th Dec 2014 - 20th Jan 2015 Article Revised on Article Accepted on - 4th Feb 2015 All articles published in IJAAM are peer-reviewed and can be downloaded, printed and distributed freely for non commercial purpose (see copyright notice below). Page 16 (Full Text Available @ www.ijaam.org) © 2013 IJAAM This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/deed.en_US), which permits unrestricted non commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Vijay Kumar Rai et. al., A Critical Analysis and the Clinical Importance of Parameters of Assessment of Vamana and Virechana Karma, Int. J. Ayu. Alt. Med., 2014;2(6):16-20 VOL 2 ISSUE 6 (2014) INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF AYURVEDA & ALTERNATIVE MEDICINE eISSN 2348-0173 eISSN 2348- 0173 REVIEW ARTICLE A CRITICAL ANALYSIS AND THE CLINICAL IMPORTANCE OF PARAMETERS OF ASSESSMENT OF VAMANA AND VIRECHANA KARMA *Corresponding Author Vijay Kumar Rai Lecturer, Dept. of Swasthavritta, Government Ayurvedic College and Hospital, Varanasi. Contact No. +91 9532340500, E-mail – raivijay07@rediffmail.com QR Code IJAAM ABSTRACT: Vamana and Virechana Karma are the two internal purification practices described in Ayurveda which help to cleanse the body of the excess amount of the vitiated Kapha and Pitta Doshas respectively and consecutively help in maintaining the Doshika homeostasis in the body. It is very important for a physician to be vigilant during these procedures and supervise and assess carefully the status of cleansing (Shuddhi) achieved in the patient and accordingly plan the further diet and treatment schedule for the individual (Sansarjana Krama). Four types of criteria’s (Vaigiki, Maniki, Aantiki, and Laingiki) are described in the texts for judging the status of cleansing (Shuddhi) achieved in the patient by these procedures. In this paper an attempt has been made to analyze those criteria’s and determine their utility and clinical importance for the purpose of assessing the degree and the success of Vamana and Virechana procedures. The Brihattrayi Granthas of Ayurveda were searched for references regarding the assessment of Shuddhi [3] of the Vamana and Virechana procedures and an attempt was made to interpret them in the light of scientific view so that a genuine interpretation could be done. Criteria for Assessment of Vamana and Virechana Karma described in the texts Charaka has coined some definite parameters regarding the characteristics of proper or successful procedures (Sanshodhana Karma) [4] in terms of Shuddhi (cleansing). He has divided all the characteristics into three types i.e. Jaghanya or Avara shuddhi, Madhya Shuddhi and Pravara Shuddhi which respectively mean the minimum type of cleansing procedure, moderate type and maximum type of cleansing procedure. Susruta has also mentioned some characteristics for the assessment of performance of Sanshodhana (internal cleansing practices) Karma in terms of Heena Yoga (less than desired Sanshodhana), Atiyoga (more than desired Sanshodhana) and Samyak Yoga [5] (proper or desired/ successful Sanshodhana) and in terms of volume [6] of morbid Doshas which come out after the procedures in short. Vagbhatta has also mentioned the characteristics of Sanshodhana Karma and followed the pattern of Charaka Samhita with more explanations. First of all, Acharya Chakrapani has categorized [7] all the above stated criteria’s of Sanshodhana Karma (procedure) into four independent parameters by naming them as Aantiki, Vaigiki, Maniki and Laingiki criteria in order to make the parameters for the assessment of a successful procedure in a convenient manner. Vijay Kumar Rai et. al., A Critical Analysis and the Clinical Importance of Parameters of Assessment of Vamana and Virechana Karma, Int. J. Ayu. Alt. Med., 2014;2(6):16-20 Page INTRODUCTION Assessment of the Sanshodhana Karma (the Ayurvedic internal cleansing practices) has great importance. If a Vaidya (physician) is not expert in the assessment of characteristics of a successful procedure of Sanshodhana Karma, he can’t perform the Vamana (medicated vomiting procedure) or Virechana Karma (medicated purgation procedure) successfully [1] because there are some indicators for knowing the status of procedure and assessing the degree of completion of the procedure. Vamana and Virechana [2] are the Sanshodhana processes which are carried out to remove the morbid Kapha and Pitta Doshas from the body by means of the two main openings of the gastrointestinal tract. So it is very necessary to know in detail the characteristics of proper Sanshodhana Karma otherwise procedure can’t achieve the desired clinical benefits. So, in this paper an attempt has been made to review and analyze the literature available in Ayurvedic texts related with the characteristics of proper performance of Vamana and Virechana Karma and make an attempt to find out the best and convenient way to assess the success of Sanshodhana Karma procedure. 17 Key Words: - Vamana , Virechana, Vaigiki, Maniki, Laingiki, Antiki. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF AYURVEDA & ALTERNATIVE MEDICINE Acharya Charaka [8] and Vagbhatta [9] have emphasized on the observations based on Vega, but Acharya Sushruta has ignored the Vaigiki Pariksha completely. Acharya Charaka and Vagbhatta have described three types of Shuddhi naming them as Jaghanya or Avara Shuddhi, Madhya Shuddhi and Pravara Shuddhi when four, six and eight Vegas come out respectively in Vamana and 10, 20 and 30 Vegas in Virechana respectively. Maniki Criteria This criterion assesses the vomitus for its amount, colour, consistency etc. to judge for the amount of Dosha expelled. The reason for stating the Maniki criteria by the Acharyas might have been the fact that Sanshodhana Karma was indicated for ‘Bahu Doshavastha’. The word Bahu denotes that the Doshas are vitiated and increased in all respects i.e. – Dravyatah (quantitatively in amount), Gunatah (qualitatively in properties) and Karmatah (functionally in its actions). Thus, Maniki criteria have been stated to assess the expelled vomited material for its amount, colour, consisitency etc. to judge for the amount of Dosha i.e. Kapha and Pitta which is expelled out. While narrating the Shuddhi, Acharya Charaka [10] and Vagbhatta [11] have mentioned the quantities of the morbid material (Dosha) coming out of the Sanshodhana procedures as two, three and four prastha in Virechana Karma and one, one and half & two Prastha in Vamana Karma respectively for Jaghanya or Avara suddhi, Madhya Suddhi and Pravara Suddhi . Chakrapani has considered them under the term ‘Maniki Pariksha’. Antiki Criteria The features reflecting that therapy or procedure has passed in the end phase can be assessed using the features towards the end of Vamana and Virechana Karma which have been called as "Antiki Criteria." Charaka has advised to continue procedure till bouts of Pitta or Kapha stop appearing. [12] Later on [13] he has given a clue that Vamana should be Pittanta (Pitta should come out at last) and Virechana should be Kaphanta (Kapha should come out at last) to assess the “Samyaka Vamana and Virechana symptoms”. He has stated that in "Samyaka Vamana”, Kapha should be succeeded by Pitta and in "Samyaka Virechan” Pitta should be succeeded by Kapha. Sushruta [14] has also included the symptom of “Kapha followed by Pitta" in the "common symptoms of Samyaka Vamana” which may be considered as Aantiki Criteria for Vamana. Acharya Vagabhatta has described the Antiki Criteria as- Pittantam Vamanam and Kaphanta Cha Virekamahu. [15] So, it can be concluded that the Antiki Criteria shows that Vamana having Pitta and Virechana having Kapha should be taken as endpoint for the procedure. Laingiki Criteria This criterion describes for the assessment of the features shown in the patient’s body. Laingiki Criteria depends upon the sign and symptoms which appear after the proper procedures of Sanshodhana Karma (Samyaka Vamana and Virechana) and this criterion is always accompanied by Antiki Criteria, which is explained immediately after the same. Chakrapani [16] has stated that there is little existence of other Shuddhi except ‘Laingiki’ one. Pittanta and Kaphanta criteria have been included in the Laingiki criteria by Chakrapani and Dalhana both. Laingiki criteria have two aspects i.e. features appearing immediately after the procedure and symptoms arising after some time (after the completion of Sansarjana krama). As, the goal behind the conduction of Sanshodhana Karma /procedure is to check the disease or to minimize the symptoms present in it; hence, Laingiki criteria are much more emphasized by all the commentators. Method of estimation – Vaigiki Criteria In this criteria estimation of the number of vegas (bouts) expelled by the patient is done and each vega is also observed carefully. Four, six and eight Vegas in Vamana and 10, 20 and 30 Vegas in Virechana constitute Jaghanya or Avara Shuddhi, Madhya Shuddhi and Pravara Shuddhi respectively. Maniki Criteria The measurement of the total vomited and voided material is described in the unit quantity of Prastha. As we know that Kapha and Pitta are Dravyabhuta Doshas and have some forms in the body and like all material substances have specific properties, volume and weight which can be measured. So, Maniki criteria can be dealt by considering both the meanings i.e. weight and volume. According to Chakrapani [17] one Prastha = 13 ½ Pala = 54 Tola = 540 ml. So, the described literature for the three Vijay Kumar Rai et. al., A Critical Analysis and the Clinical Importance of Parameters of Assessment of Vamana and Virechana Karma, Int. J. Ayu. Alt. Med., 2014;2(6):16-20 18 Vaigiki Criteria Vaigiki criterias include parameters about the bouts (Vegas) for its nature like speed, force and strength etc. The analysis of bouts regarding its several factors constitutes 'Vaigiki criteria'. eISSN 2348-0173 Page VOL 2 ISSUE 6 (2014) kinds of Shuddhis can be interpreted in terms of grams and milliliters as Table No.1- Showing the volume of the vomitus and voided materials for each Shuddhi Jaghanya or Avara Shuddhi, Madhya Shuddhi Pravara Shuddhi Vamana - 540ml Virechana - 1080ml Vamana - 810 ml Virechana - 1620ml Vamana - 1080 ml Virechana - 2160ml Antiki Criteria Panchakarma Vaidya has to be very careful in watching the changes in colour (and smell) of vomitus and expulsion also, because these are the criteria which indicate about the arrival of Pitta and Kapha in vomitus expulsion respectively. To decide for the “Pittanta Lakshana” Vaidya has to ask the patient about symptoms like pungent or bitter taste in mouth (Katukasyata or Tiktasyata), Netradaha (burning sensation in the eyes), Kanthadaha (burning sensation of throat) & Urodaha (heartburn) etc. for determining whether Pitta is coming out or not. Similarly, to decide “Kaphanta Lakshana” Vaidya has to observe the series of expulsion of faeces, Pitta, Kapha and Vayu in succession in the procedure of Virechana. At the end phase of Virechana procedure, only white, Pichhilla (slimy) and watery material comes out, indicating the Kaphanta criteria. Laingiki Criteria The criteria’s for the assessment of Samyaka Vamana and Virechana in terms of features evolving in the body can be evaluated in two categories (A) The symptoms appearing immediately after Sanshodhana procedure as Kale Pravritti (movement of the Doshas at the desired time), Yathakrama Kapha Pitta Vata Dosha Harana (the expulsion of the Doshas in the proper order of Kapha, followed by Pitta and lastly Vata Dosha), Swayam Cha Avasthanam (self stoppage of the bouts) and Hridaya Parshwa Shuddhi (feeling of lightness in the heart and sides of the chest) etc. (B) The Symptoms occurring after a span of time (after Sansarjana Krama) as Swasthata (health), Swara Vishuddhi (feeling of clarity in the voice), Ruchi, (desire for food) Laghava (lightness in the body) and Koshtha Tanutva (lean stomach). DISCUSSION The analysis of all these above stated criterias for the purpose of determination of the type of Shuddhi in the patient reveals the following aspects. eISSN 2348-0173 In Vaigiki criteria each Vega is assessed carefully because they intimate about Jaghanya or Avara suddhi, Madhya Suddhi and Pravara Suddhi through the analysis of bouts, which helps them in planning ‘the Sansarjana Krama’ (The schedule for planning of diet and some restrictions which are to be followed after these procedures) and achieving the benefits of procedures. Gangadhara has explained that a Vaidya can take prompt decision after sensing any fore coming complication by keeping his mind alert and assessing each Vega carefully. The quantity wise analysis [18] of the vomitus voided after each bout gives a clear idea about the drug which is remaining inside and the analysis of the Vegas also gives an idea about the changes in colour, pH and consistency of the vomitus occurring after each bout. Maniki criteria guides us in differentiating the three types of cleansing types (Shuddhi) i.e. Avara, Madhyama and Pravara Shuddhi on the basis of the overall amount of material expelled out in Vamana and Virechana. It guides us in deciding the quantity of morbid Doshas i.e. Kapha and Pitta, expelled out and also to analyze the quantity of the same within the body, which is to be pacified afterwards with the Shamana treatment. It also helps us to judge the characteristics of Doshas like colour, odour, and properties like Guruta (heavy), Dravata (liquidity), etc. which will further help us to judge the vitiated properties in the Doshas accordingly. When factors like Prakriti, Doshavastha etc. are taken in account, a lot of variations are observed in the consistency of the expelled material. This criteria helps us know the amount of each Vega separately and the total volume of all Vegas. It can also help us in knowing the differences in the vomitus obtained after the usage of various types of Vamanopaga and Virechanopaga drugs. Antiki Criteria is the most valuable criteria assisting Vaidya in making the decision of whether to carry on or to cease the process of Sanshodhana therapy as it indicates about the complete expulsion of morbid Kapha and Pitta Dosha in Vamana and Virechana procedures. It limits the procedure and warns the Vaidya from proceeding further and creating ‘Atiyoga’ of therapy [19] Laingiki criteria also helps a physician to decide about the time for the stoppage of Vamana or Virechana Karma and plan the Sansarjan karma (diet regimen) accordingly just like the Antiki criteria (end point criteria). The specialty of this criterion is that it is the only criterion which considers the features being produced in the patient as a result of these procedures besides considering the parameter of bouts. These features in the patient are to be judged twice - once immediately after the Sanshodhana procedures and secondly after the completion of the prescribed dietary schedule [20] Vijay Kumar Rai et. al., A Critical Analysis and the Clinical Importance of Parameters of Assessment of Vamana and Virechana Karma, Int. J. Ayu. Alt. Med., 2014;2(6):16-20 19 INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF AYURVEDA & ALTERNATIVE MEDICINE Page VOL 2 ISSUE 6 (2014) (Sansarjana Krama) [21] The immediate assessment of the patient after these procedures helps a physician to know about the physiological status of the patient and the assessment after the Sansarjana Krama helps him determine the overall effect of therapy and decide his further course of action for the remaining Doshas, either by Shamana or further Shodhana whichever is suitable for the patient. CONCLUSION – The above discussion regarding the four criteria of assessing the Samyaka Vamana and Virechana Yoga in the patient reveals that though all the criteria’s have their own importance, still Laingiki criteria can be considered as the best for assessment of Samyaka Vamana and Virechana Yoga in the patient because this criteria also takes into account the various features developing in the patient also; unlike the other criterias which take into account only the characteristics of the vomitus and voided matterials. Still, the other criterias can’t be denied as they also have their own importance for determining the kind of Shuddhi achieved in the patient. A principle in Ayurveda states for the examination of the same patient by various methods and techniques so that no minor detail about him may be missed or overlooked. It is in compliance with this principle only that so many methods of estimation of type of Shuddhi (of Vamana and Virechana) might have been advocated, so all these criteria’s should be used together for determining the type of Shuddhi achieved in the patient after Vamana and Virechana procedures and accordingly plan his further regime of treatment. REFERENCES 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Kasture Haridas Sridhar, Ayurvediya Panchakarma Vigyan, 6th ed. Nagpur: Sri Vaidyanath Aayurved Bhawan Ltd; 1999.p.258-260 & 327-332. Shastri Kaviraja Ambika Dutta, editor. Sushruta Samhita with Ayurveda Tatva Sandeepika Hindi Comm, Chikitsasthan 33/4, 16th ed. Varanasi: Chaukhamba Sanskrit Sansthan;2002.p. 142. Lavekar G.S., Sharma S.K., Padhi M.M., Srikanth N., Venkateshwarlu V., Contributors, Guideline on basic training and safty in Panchakarma, 1st ed. New Delhi: CCRAS;2008. P.37-40 & 41-45. Jadavaji T.A., editor. Charaka Samhita. with Ayurveda Dipika Comm of Cakrapanidatta, Siddhi sthana 1/13, 1st ed (reprint2005). Varanasi: Chaukhamba Surbharati Prakashana; 2008.p. 679. Shastri Kaviraja Ambika Dutta, editor. Sushruta Samhita with Ayurveda Tatva Sandeepika Hindi Comm, 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. eISSN 2348-0173 Chikitsasthan 33/8-25, 16th ed. Varanasi: Chaukhamba Sanskrit Sansthan; 2002.p. 142-45. Shastri Kaviraja Ambika Dutta, editor. Sushruta Samhita with Ayurveda Tatva Sandeepika Hindi Comm Chikitsasthan 39/6, 14. 16th ed. Varanasi: Chaukhamba Sanskrit Sansthan; 2002.p. 176-77. Jadavaji T.A., editor. Charaka Samhita. with Ayurveda Dipika Comm of Cakrapanidatta, Siddhi sthana 1/14 -16, 1st ed (reprint2005). Varanasi: Chaukhamba Surbharati Prakashana; 2008.p.679 -80. Jadavaji T.A., editor. Charaka Samhita. with Ayurveda Dipika Comm of Cakrapanidatta, Siddhi sthana 1/13-1, 1st ed (reprint2005). Varanasi: Chaukhamba Surbharati Prakashana; 2008.p.679. Suresh Babu S., editor. Ashtang Sangraha. Sutra sthana 27/25, 1st ed. Varanasi: Chaukhambha Orientalia; 2004.p. 255. Jadavaji T.A., editor. Charaka Samhita. with Ayurveda Dipika Comm of Cakrapanidatta, Siddhi sthana 1/13-14, 1st ed (reprint2005). Varanasi: Chaukhamba Surbharati Prakashana; 2008.p.679. Suresh Babu S., editor. Ashtang Sangraha. Sutra sthana 27/25, 1st ed. Varanasi: Chaukhambha Orientalia; 2004.p. 255. Jadavaji T.A., editor. Charaka Samhita. with Ayurveda Dipika Comm of Cakrapanidatta, Kalpa sthana 1/14, 1st ed (reprint2005). Varanasi: Chaukhamba Surbharati Prakashana; 2008.p.654. Jadavaji T.A., editor. Charaka Samhita. with Ayurveda Dipika Comm of Cakrapanidatta, Siddhi sthana 1/14-17, 1st ed (reprint2005). Varanasi: Chaukhamba Surbharati Prakashana; 2008.p.679-80. Shastri Kaviraja Ambika Dutta, editor. Sushruta Samhita with Ayurveda Tatva Sandeepika Hindi CommChikitsasthan 33/8-9, 16th ed. Varanasi: Chaukhamba Sanskrit Sansthan;2002.p. 142. Suresh Babu S., editor. Ashtang Sangraha. Sutra sthana 27/26, 1st ed. Varanasi: Chaukhambha Orientalia; 2004.p. 255. Jadavaji T.A., editor. Charaka Samhita. with Ayurveda Dipika Comm of Cakrapanidatta, Siddhi sthana 1/14-17, 1st ed (reprint2005). Varanasi: Chaukhamba Surbharati Prakashana; 2008.p.679-80. Jadavaji T.A., editor. Charaka Samhita. with Ayurveda Dipika Comm of Cakrapanidatta, Siddhi sthana 1/132/4 -2/4 15, 1st ed (reprint2005). Varanasi: Chaukhamba Surbharati Prakashana; 2008.p.679 -780. Padia Akhil Nath, Shukla V.D. Comparative Study of Vamana & Virechana karma in Ekakushtha w.s.r to Psoriasis. Jamnagar: Gujarat Ayurved University; 2008.p.131 Padia Akhil Nath, Shukla V.D. Comparative Study of Vamana & Virechana karma in Ekakushtha w.s.r to Psoriasis. Jamnagar: Gujarat Ayurved University; 2008.p.134 Jadavaji T.A., editor. Charaka Samhita. with Ayurveda Dipika Comm of Cakrapanidatta, Siddhi sthana 6/57, 1st ed (reprint2005). [Ch. Si. 6/57, Su. Chi. 39/3-5]. Varanasi: Chaukhamba Surbharati Prakashana; 2008.p.707. Shastri Kaviraja Ambika Dutta, editor. Sushruta Samhita with Ayurveda Tatva Sandeepika Hindi CommChikitsasthan 39/4, 5, 16th ed. Varanasi: Chaukhamba Sanskrit Sansthan; 2002.p. 176. .CITE THIS ARTICLE AS – Vijay Kumar Rai et. al., A Critical Analysis and the Clinical Importance of Parameters of Assessment of Vamana and Virechana Karma, Int. J. Ayu. Alt. Med., 2014;2(6):16-20 Source of Support – Nil Conflict of Interest – None Declared Vijay Kumar Rai et. al., A Critical Analysis and the Clinical Importance of Parameters of Assessment of Vamana and Virechana Karma, Int. J. Ayu. Alt. Med., 2014;2(6):16-20 20 INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF AYURVEDA & ALTERNATIVE MEDICINE Page VOL 2 ISSUE 6 (2014) INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF AYURVEDA & ALTERNATIVE MEDICINE #401/8-A, 4th Floor, Shiv Shrishti Apt. Nardas Nagar, TP Rd., Bhandup (W), Mumbai – 400078 E:mail-editorijaam@gmail.com, Web- www.ijaam.org