PDF - PharmaBoardroom
Transcription
PDF - PharmaBoardroom
HEALTHCARE LIFE SCIENCES REVIEW & PHARMACEUTICALS: SHAKING UP THE SYSTEM PAGE 21 CARVING OUT A MEDICAL DEVICE MARKET PAGE 56 CASE STUDY: SILANES PAGE 70 CONVERGENCE IN ACTION: FOCUS ON DIABETES PAGE 82 MEXICO 2013 COFEPRIS Revamped Mikel Arriola, the man who changed an institution and an industry PAGE 18 published in association with 2013 Nuevo Sinaloa Su Sur California a Baja Coahula Chihuahua Sonora UNITED STATES Norte California Baja Baja California Norte UNITED STATES Sonora Chihuahua Baja California Sur Coahula Sinaloa Nuevo Leon Durango Tamaulipas Zacatecas San Luis Potosi Nayarit Yucatan Jalisco 1 Aguascalientes 2 Guanajuato 3 Queretaro 4 Hidalgo 5 Tlaxcala 6 Mexico 7 Distrito Federal 8 Morelos Colima Quintana Roo Michoacan Campeche Veracruz Puebla Tabasco Guerrero BELIZE Oaxaca Chiapas GUATEMALA EL SALVADOR EL SALVADOR GUATEMALA Mexico 8 Morelos 7 Distrito Federal 6 Mexico 5 Tlaxcala 4 Hidalgo 3 Queretaro 2 Guanajuato 1 Aguascalientes Oaxaca Chiapas BELIZE Guerrero T b Tabasco Puebla Co a Colima Veraccruz cr Michoacan Campeche Roo Quintana Q uintana Jalisco Yucatan Nayarit Potosi San S an Luis s Zacatecas s Durango Tamaulipas s ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 1 Healthcare & Life Sciences Review – Mexico 2013 is brought to you by Mexico: Healthcare & Life Sciences Review 2013 2 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Focus Reports would like to thank all individuals, institutions and companies involved in producing this report. Special thanks go to Rafael Gual (CANIFARMA), Mikel Arriola (COFEPRIS), Milton Rosario (OD Consulting Group) Hector Valle (IMS), and Fabiola Trigueros (Smart Scale) who showed us their strong support and interest throughout our project. Mexico: Healthcare & Life Sciences Review 2013 CONTENTS THE MEXICAN HEALTHCARE SYSTEM 3 7 The Current Situation Through the Eyes of a Patient 8 Fragmented Institutions, universal coverage? 10 Interview with Eduardo Gonzalez Pier – former finance director of IMSS 14 Medical Tourism 16 Interview with Mikel Arriola, COFEPRIS 18 PHARMACEUTICALS 21 Introduction by Rafael Gual, CANIFARMA 22 Shaking up the system 23 An outstanding example 24 Shifting landscapes shift strategies 26 Home turf 29 Unreached Potential 32 Pharma’s affair with Private labels 33 Stengthening guidelines for biosimilars 35 Interview with Fabiola Trigueros, Smart Scale 36 The legal perspective on…by Alejandro Luna, Olivares 38 Expert eye… The Mexican Public System, by José Carlos Ferreyra. President, Pharmaceutical Institute, A.C. 40 Expert eye… The Healthcare System and Regulatory Framework in Mexico By Sandra Sánchez, President of the Mexican Association of Pharmaceutical Research Industries (AMIIF) 42 Interview with José Alberto Peña, VP & General Manager of GSK Mexico 44 Focus on orphan drugs Interview with Markus Krenzlin, Country Manager, Shire Mexico 46 Expert eye: Optimizing pharmaceutical distribution channels By Dominik Bacher and Reto Zoppi, director general and commercial director, BacherZoppi 48 MEDICAL DEVICES 50 Mexico’s potential for medical devices 51 A Challenging Regulatory Landscape 53 Carving Out A Medical Device Market 56 Seguro Popular Needs To Extend Its Reach 58 Made in Mexico 60 Doing Business With “Integrators” 62 Distributing health 64 INNOVATION: Creado en Mexico? 66 Case Study: Silanes 70 REINVENTING HEALTHCARE 73 Expert eye… Public Private Partnerships, by Jose Alarcon, PWC 74 Interview with Jaime Cervantes, Vitalmex 76 Looking for leaders 80 Convergence in action, a focus on diabetes 82 Mexico: Healthcare & Life Sciences Review 2013 4 INTRODUCTION Introduction from DHL José F. Nava, President, DHL Supply Chain Latin America The publication of this first edition of a Healthcare & Life Sciences Review on Mexico in 2013 couldn’t be timelier. Mexico has blossomed in the healthcare arena and has become an important partner for the US. I’m pleased that the Mexican healthcare sector is having a turn in the spotlight. Over the last decade, the Mexican government has made unprecedented efforts to ensure universal healthcare coverage to all its citizens through Seguro Popular – and today, the program serves as a role model for health policies around the world. Beyond Seguro Popular, a growing middle class, and aging population have increased healthcare expenditures and the demand for an efficient distribution system throughout the diverse geography of the country. In addition, Mexico has consolidated its position as a major manufacturing hub for both pharmaceuticals and medical devices. The trade flows between Mexico and the US to the North; and Mexico to the south with Central and South America have also grown. All of this means opportunities and challenges for logistics in the region. DHL Supply Chain has a keen focus on the development of the Latin American healthcare industry, which has shown steady growth for almost a decade now. This growth is credited to the exponential growth of the world’s emerging markets – primarily Brazil and Mexico, where governments and manufacturers have committed to increase market penetration and expand coverage, at a lower cost for the end consumer. The region’s overall economic conditions and rapid recovery from global economic crisis ensures solid opportunities for industry players in the region. DHL Supply Chain has a strong presence in the key Latin American markets, pioneering sophisticated and customized logistics solutions for customers with highly complex supply chains. We develop strategic partnerships with our customers to: help them identify opportunities for efficiencies; to help them achieve their business goals; and to simplify their logistics through our end-to-end solutions such as hospital logistics and secondary packaging, both recently launched and already providing great benefits to our customers. We are pleased to share the knowledge, infrastructure and expertise that support the impressive industry growth in Mexico and throughout Latin America. We are delighted to support Focus Reports in the compilation of this invaluable report on the current Healthcare and Life Science industry in Mexico. The publication encapsulates the views of key figures across the healthcare and life sciences industry, and provides essential opinion and analysis for those wanting to understand this quickly evolving market. I hope it proves to be a valuable asset for your business, as well. Sincerely, José F. Nava, President, DHL Supply Chain Latin America Mexico: Healthcare & Life Sciences Review 2013 “DHL Supply Chain has a keen focus on the development of the Latin American healthcare industry, which has shown steady growth for almost a decade now.” INTRODUCTION 5 A Call for Convergence Note from the Focus Reports team “As Mexicans we must be prepared for a new stage of our country’s development”. These have been the inspiring words of newly-elect President Peña Nieto, who has promised to transform Mexico into a competitive global power. As the world’s thirteenth largest economy, there is no question that Mexico has outgrown its status as a low-income developing nation. Nevertheless, the country has disappointed in the rate of its development considering that more than 40% of its citizens are still defined as poor. With such indicators, it comes as no surprise that the country’s provision of healthcare is still a work in progress. For the last decade Mexico has made healthcare a priority and a right of all its citizens. With the introduction of universal coverage in 2004, known as the Seguro Popular, the country has been moving to increase healthcare access and improve the quality of service. To do this, the government has vowed to augment health expenditures from 6.4% of GDP to 10%. This is certainly a welcome move given that currently Seguro Popular only budgets around USD$200 per patient per year. Money alone, however, will not fix the fragmented nature of the Mexico’s current healthcare system, which varies widely in terms of quality from state to state. Indeed, the greatest challenge at the moment is defining an effective structure that will efficiently incorporate all of the actors relevant to the healthcare sector. Only once this has been achieved will true efficiencies emerge and access be enhanced. This will be reflected in a reduction of waiting times, a decrease in overall costs and an increase in the quality of service. Currently, there are constant reports of mismanaged funds and insufficient resources. Greater transparency must be created so that states and healthcare institutions become accountable for the money they are granted by the federal government. A predominating opinion amongst experts is that Mexico’s healthcare must be rearranged under the scope of convergence. The idea is that the patient should become the focal point of all actors, who must understand their role in the healthcare ecosystem in a holistic manner. Rather than simply playing an individual part, it is essential for all actors to understand how their contributions affect the wider system and how they can better interact with other players to improve their services. This includes coordinating the activities of the public, private and not-forprofit sectors with the final aim of creating an integrated system. Publisher: Julie Avena juliea@focusreports.net Digital Publisher: Iain Plummer iainp@focusreports.net Senior Editor: Leonardo Barquero leonardob@focusreports.net Art Director: Ines Nandin inesn@focusreports.net Associate Editor: Nala Nouraoui Kirsty Avril Jane Walker Rachel Marusak Contribution: Teddy Lamazere Focus Reports Lynton House 7 - 12 Tavistock Square London WC1H 9LT UK Tel: +44 203 356 4889 Undoubtedly, convergence of wills should happen before convergence of actions. This is why raising awareness and rallying all actors around a core objective – the patient – is crucial. We hope this publication serves to further this effort. Copyright Focus Reports 2013 All rights reserved. No part of this publication maybe reproduced in any form or by any means, whether electronic, mechanical or otherwise including photocopying, recording or any information storage or retrieval system without prior written consent of Focus Reports. While every attempt is made to ensure the accuracy of the information contained in this report, neither Focus Reports nor the authors accept any liabilities for errors and omissions. Opinions expressed in this report are not necessarily those of the authors. Mexico: Healthcare & Life Sciences Review 2013 THE MEXICAN HEALTHCARE SYSTEM 7 The Mexican Healthcare system Mexico: Healthcare & Life Sciences Review 2013 8 THE MEXICAN HEALTHCARE SYSTEM The Current Situation Through the Eyes of a Patient Whether it is cost, efficiency, quality or technology, what do Mexicans think of their healthcare system today? Statistics from Deloitte 2011 Survey of Healthcare Consumers in Mexico - Key Findings, Strategic Implications Using a typical report card scale of A, B, C, D and F, how would you grade the health system in Mexico on the following dimensions? • Most Mexicans (44%) are dissatisfied with the performance of the Mexican healthcare system. • Primary reasons for criticizing the healthcare system’s performance are waiting times (74%), the availability of medications (52%), lack of patient-/consumer-orientation (47%), limited access to services and convenience (45%), and wellness-orientation (38%) • 65% of consumers believe that 50% or more of healthcare spending is wasted. • Consumers are optimistic (69% agree) about the possibility to simultaneously improve quality and reduce costs in the current system of care. • However, Mexicans are satisfied with the level of care offered by primary care centers (83%) and hospitals (72%) 39% Up-to-date technology 24% Up-to-date buildings and equipment 33% 30% Medical innovation (new treatments or services) 31% 33% Focus on wellness rather than illness 22% 38% Access to services (availability and convenience) 19% Patient- and consumer-centered 19% Availability of medication products 19% Wait times for service 45% 47% 52% 10% 74% • Dimensions of the Mexican healthcare system that consumers feel positively about include up-to-date technology (39%), modern buildings and equipment (33%), and medical innovation (31%) O 0% 20% 40% 60% Favorable grade (”A” or “B”) Unfavorable grade (”D” or “F”) Copyright © 2011 Deloitte Development LLC. All rights reserved. Mexico: Healthcare & Life Sciences Review 2013 THE MEXICAN HEALTHCARE SYSTEM Using a typical report card scale with grades A, B, C, D and F, how would you grade the overall performance of Mexico’s healthcare system? 100% Overall, how satisfied are you with the quality of care you receive from your primary care provider/received from the hospital you used most recently? 100% 80% 15% 80% 44% 3% / 6% 60% 41% 24% 14% 20% 36 40% 20% 2221 2526 20% 1% A B FAVORABLE GRADE 83% / 72% 60% 40% 0% 9 C D F UNFAVORABLE GRADE 3 1 1 1 2 2 3 1 4 34 0% 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 NOT SATISFIED 25 9 10 7 8 9 10 SATISFIED 2011 Mexico Note: Bars may not sum precisely to the totals above due to rounding. Source: Deloitte 2011 Primary care provider Hospital care Source: Deloitte 2011 Specialty Injectable Pharmaceuticals (SIP) Medication Management Systems (MMS) Driving quality transformation Hospira is the world's leading provider of injectable drugs and infusion technologies, backed by proven experience producing highquality products. One of the aspects that differentiates Hospira is our combination of pharma and device expertise and offerings. We can offer our customers “one-stop” shopping to address the pressing needs they face in reducing costs while improving the safety and productivity of medication administration. At Hospira, we are committed to delivering the highest possible quality of products and services to our customers and ensuring that we are in full compliance with the manufacturing standards of regulatory agencies of markets we serve. These are the catalysts behind our dedicated focus on operational excellence: a foundational element of our business. Because Mexico is an important market in Latin America, Hospira is now expanding our offer with a strategic line of injectable generics and a software to reduce dosage errors in IV therapies, becoming one of the most strategic partners for health professionals. Mexico: Healthcare & Life Sciences Review 2013 10 FRAGMENTED INSTITUTIONS Fragmented Institutions, universal coverage? Mexico’s move to offer universal healthcare coverage to its population is unprecedented and has been hailed as an example for other countries to follow. Exactly 10 years ago Mexico realized that its public healthcare provision was inadequate as it was based on a system of employment benefits. This left over 50 million Mexicans without healthcare coverage because they were largely employed by the country’s widespread informal economy. The implementation of the Seguro Popular transformed access to healthcare into a right rather than a privilege, and today it has succeeded in registering all those who were excluded under the original national healthcare plan, the Mexican Institute of Social Security (IMSS) created in 1943. More than just the social aspect of covering the whole country without leaving anyone behind, Seguro Popular is also interesting for the pharmaceutical and medical device industry as a whole, by massively bringing new consumers into the market – despite the low prices. Even more interesting for the government, if Seguro Popular currently represents huge spending to cover the most citizens under its umbrella, it should in the long term allow savings through preventive medicine rather than expensive treatment. Unfortunately, the more Seguro Popular grows, the more it exaggerates the fragmentation of the healthcare system, as it is the states that are responsible for the implementation of the program and the management of the infrastructure. Each state manages its network of general hospitals and a smaller group of highspecialty hospitals. To meet the huge demand of such an attracting new coverage system, both the federal and state governments had to build their own primary care and hospital facilities in a short amount of time but it has not been accompanied by a similar growth in terms of human resources, making it very difficult to deliver a quality and efficient care. This is a direct consequence of the lack of strict national requirements and standards expectations that would encourage most hospitals to homogenize the care provided, whether it is through IMSS, ISSSTE, PEMEX or the National Institutes. This disparate mosaic of so many different institutions is the main source for varying services and quality offered at health clinics. If the GDP spending for healthcare is still below Latin American average and far behind OECD countries, Mexico: Healthcare & Life Sciences Review 2013 “There is clearly enough money for healthcare in the country. However the issue is infrastructure and the articulation of the fragmented elements of the system: it is too complex and not efficient.” Jaime Cervantes, President of Vitalmex, FRAGMENTED INSTITUTIONS 11 IN THE SPOTLIGHT: Dra. Mercedes Juan López Health Secretary” Born in Mexico City, Dr. Mercedes Juan Lopez is a surgeon specialized in Rehabilitation Medicine. Dr. Juan López has garnered over 35 years experience in federal, state, and academic pursuits of public health policy and research. In her distinguished career, she has served as Deputy Chief of Education at the Ministry of Health General Directorate of Rehabilitation; Technical Secretary, Health Cabinet, Republic of México Presidency; Secretary of Health Regulation and Promotion, Ministry of Health; Federal Deputy, LVII Legislature; Secretary, Health Commission and the Commission on Population and Development; Vice-coordinator, Parliamentary Faction, PRI; Coordinator, Liaison Unit, Ministry of Health Congress; Secretary, General Health Council; Commissioner of Health, COFEPRIS; Member, Governing Board, National Women’s Institute; Executive President, Board of the Mexican Health Foundation. As the first woman to head the Ministry of Health, she has offered to work with care and dedication to guarantee efficient and quality public health services, with a particular focus on prevention. The industry’s reactions to her nomination in December 2012 were very positive. She is perceived as competent and committed, and her nomination was seen as “ a great news for the industry but also for the country”. We’re changing the way Life Science companies manage their legal risk in Mexico. Pharma, Biotech and Medical Devices companies now have the ability to manage all their legal needs under one roof. Regulatory, IP Prosecution, IP Litigation, Finance & Transactional Compliance, ADR and Non IP related Litigation Trust, Value, Experience Olivares & Cia. is proud to be the only Mexican firm ranked in the “Tier 1/Band 1” in all IP related categories within both Chambers Latin America and Managing Intellectual Property’s World IP Survey. INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY, CORPORATE and Commercial Law olivlaw@olivares.com.mxs www.olivares.com.mx Mexico: Healthcare & Life Sciences Review 2013 12 FRAGMENTED INSTITUTIONS The National Health System SERVICE PROVIDER POPULATION SERVED FINANCING Institutions that provide services to an open/uninsured population Secretariat of Health Self-employed, unemployed, workers in the informal economy State Health Services Vulnerable and marginalized population IMSS-Oportunidades Federal Government and user fees Federal Government, State Government and user fees Federal Government Institutions that provide services to a population with social security IMSS Workers from the private sector of the formal economy and IMSS workers 1. 2. ISSSTE , SEDENA , 4. SEMAR , PEMEX 3. 5. Workers from the public sector of the formal economy Federal Government, employers and workers fees Federal Government and workers Institutions of the private sector Private hospitals and clinics Individuals with or without social insurance and with a larger ability to pay for health services 1. Mexican Institute of Social Security 2. Institute for State Workers Insurance and Social Services 3. Secretariat of National Defense some state that Mexico has the resources to create a better healthcare system, if only it was more united. Jaime Cervantes, President of Vitalmex, a company providing integrated healthcare services, explains that “there is clearly enough money for healthcare in the country. However the issue is infrastructure and the articulation of the fragmented elements of the system: it is too complex and not efficient.” Echoing the views of many general managers of the industry, Carlos Jimenez, Director General of B. Braun Aesculap de México contends that “it is difficult to view the Mexican healthcare market as one single entity. Indeed, the healthcare market is Mexico is composed of 4 to 5 different segments. There is the highest standards segment, that would be the private sector and the “5 star hospitals”, followed by the National Institutes at the government level, which are every much focusing on quality. I would then classify IMSS and ISSSTE as the third segment and finally the decentralized parts with the Mexico: Healthcare & Life Sciences Review 2013 Employees and employers 4. Secretariat of the Navy 5. Mexican Petroleum Source: IMSS “Secretarias de Salud”. Each of these different segments act with their own mechanisms, their particular processes, using different technologies for treatments. That is why the Mexican market is not very clear and difficult to classify as developed or not, given the fact that it has so many different layers.” Roman Rosales, general manager of medical services and ER for Mexico City, Health Department, adds that “as long as our health institutions remain financially independent, it will be difficult to obtain a performing healthcare system. Universal coverage is the best solution to homogenize medical practices in the country, provide equal services to the patients, display high technology equipment, and insure equal professional medical attendance to all patients.” Indeed, the notion of a cohesive healthcare system was one of the propositions of incoming President Peña Nieto who included healthcare as one of his main pillars for reform. The idea was a central part of his Pacto Por Mexico reform proposal that rallied all political parties together under FRAGMENTED INSTITUTIONS a single cause. That cause is the assurance to transform Mexico into a country with enviable living standards and robust economy that is recognized globally. Population by insurance status Seguro Popular, 43,518,719 (38.47%) PEMEX, SEDENA, SEMAR, Private, 1,091,321 2,006,687 (0.96%) (1.77%) Other public organizations, 900,884 (0.8%) 13 IMSS, 55,705,875 (49.24%) ISSSTE, 11,993, 354 (10.6%) The sum of insurees may be larger than the total Mexican population (113,122, 894 citizens) due to the overlap in insurance agencies. For instance, individuals covered by both IMSS-Oportunidades and Seguro Popular. Sources: Individual estimates are based on IMSS, Monthly Report to the IMSS user population and AcceDer, December 2010; The State Workers Institute for Insurance and Social Security (ISSSTE), Annual Statistics 2010; System of Social Protection in Health, Report of Results 2010; Mexican Petroleum (PEMEX); Secretariat of National Defense (SEDENA), Secretariat of the Navy (SEMAR); and the National Institute of Statistics and Geography (INEGI), Population and Housing Census 2010. Gonzalez Pier, former Finance Director of IMSS, and current President of Fundación Mexicana para la Salud (Funsalud) concludes that “the healthcare system in Mexico is at a crossroads. We are working on turning a system that is very fragmented and inefficient into something that is more appropriate to the needs of the population. There is a lot of consensus regarding universalizing health care coverage, but we need to be more precise on what exactly universal health care entails.” “There are two hot topics on the core agenda: what will be the benefits and the population groups covered. We need to include those who are not covered yet, and provide more interventions currently not being delivered. It will be a tough challenge because it is difficult to deliver the same level of care throughout the whole healthcare sector. We also need to define and work on the new tools required to deliver this brand new health system. Beyond defining a common view of health care, the real challenge will lie in implementing the system in an efficient and sustainable manner.” O Your partner for the Public Sector in Mexico We offer the most compelling range of services related to strategic information on pharmaceutical purchases in the Mexican Public Sector. Instituto de Investigación e Innovación Farmacéutica, A.C. WTC Montecito # 38, Piso 21, Oficina 38. Col. Nápoles, Deleg. Benito Juárez, México D.F., 03810. Tels.: 9000-5386, 9000-5387. Ext.109 Cell.: 04455-5432-8286 Info@investigacion-farmaceutica.org Mexico: Healthcare & Life Sciences Review 2013 14 INTERVIEW: EDUARDO GONZALEZ PIER Eduardo Gonzalez Pier – former finance director of IMSS Eduardo Gonzalez Pier, finance director of IMSS at the time of the interview, shares with Focus Reports the challenges but also the achievements of Latin America’s largest social security institution. IMSS is a central pillar of Mexico’s healthcare system and the largest social security institution in Latin America. How do you assess the level of healthcare provided by IMSS? To evaluate the efficiency of our services, it is key to look at the amount of resources we are granted per person. When you divide the available budget per person covered, it comes down to about USD$ 350 per person per year, which is only slightly higher than Seguro Popular. Taking into account the amount of money allocated per person each year, we provide an excellent service. We offer all levels of care, with very few restrictions. It is difficult to find an insurance scheme that is so comprehensive with the budget constraints we have. Furthermore, the quality of service is good considering the infrastructure capacity we have. In Mexico the average rate for beds is 1.5 per thousand people whereas the OECD standard is more than 4, and at IMSS our rate is 0.8 per thousand. For Seguro Popular the rate stands slightly below 1 bed per thousand people. This means that IMSS and Seguro Popular’s rates are below the national average and far from the OECD level. The reality is that there are not enough beds or hospitals in the system, despite the government’s efforts to build more hospitals. The problem, however, is that many times this has meant that we end up with hospitals with insufficient doctors or trained specialists because the allocated resources are less than what is required. Mexico has an average of 2 physicians per thousand patients, which is much lower than the OECD average. It is also obvious that we have a problem with a very low number of specialty doctors and their geographical distribution. Most specialty doctors are based in urban areas Mexico: Healthcare & Life Sciences Review 2013 INTERVIEW: EDUARDO GONZALEZ PIER 15 “The reality is that there are not enough beds or hospitals in the system, despite the government’s efforts to build more hospitals. ” and big cities. Also, we need to find the right mix of doctors with different specialties. For instance in a country like Mexico with an ageing population, we need less obstetric doctors and more oncologists, geriatricians and cardiologists. However, I am not sure that the right motivations and communication are there for young students to specialize in what is needed. How does IMSS define the price of medicines it purchases? There are two different mechanisms for the purchase of drugs – one for single-source drugs (mainly patented products) and another for generics. Prices of single-source drugs are negotiated yearly under a centralized process where prices are established based on a combination of criteria, such as cost and efficacy of the drug compared to therapeutic substitutes. Other variables we account for include social and financial protection concerns. For generics or multiple-source drugs, prices are set competitively through a tender process. Is IMSS integrating some elements of value based pricing in Mexico? There are two types of value-based pricing we take into consideration: Ex-ante, when the price will be set according to the health and cost-saving benefits directly expected from that drug. Then there is the ex-post pricing, where the final price is adjusted later on when the actual health outcomes are evaluated and thus the risks are shared. If gains are not delivered, whether they are economic or health related, then it is possible to get some sort of reimbursement and price adjustments. At IMSS we already use the first scheme, since we purchase some drugs in accordance to our forecast of the benefits. We are also starting to design the contracting process for the second type. These sort of risk-sharing arrangements are new and complex; we are looking at best practices and experiences elsewhere, including the UK where there has been more experience, especially through patient access schemes. Do you think the tender process is transparent enough? What has been done to improve it? It is more transparent than it used to be. IMSS has implemented several new tendering schemes, with different price setting criteria, new tendering technologies, and more complete and readily available information. For the last 3 years, we have been following a set of recommendations issued by the OECD, which include best practices for transparency and accountability. I believe our process has improved and the cost savings and other results obtained so far have been part of these new managerial efforts. The tender process switched from a cost-per-product to a cost-per-procedure. What has been the impact of this shift? The net gain comes down to whether you can actually measure the end-result or not with sufficient reliability. When looking at the numbers associated to potential savings from more efficient tendering practices, of course this becomes very attractive. The challenging part, however, is that once we move away from buying products in the traditional way to buying procedures and services – which are much more difficult to monitor – we might end up in a worse scenario. It is necessary to be able to have reliable systems to measure the necessary procedures and the actual costs and benefits. For many medical activities it is hard to check the end-result, so there needs to be a careful selection of what can and cannot be contracted under different payment schemes. O Mexico: Healthcare & Life Sciences Review 2013 16 MEDICAL TOURISM The view on medical tourism Medical tourism in Mexico has been experiencing rapid growth in recent years, evolving from low cost dental clinics at the US border to high-tech hospitals with international accreditation spread throughout the country. Founded in 1886, The American British Cowdray Medical Center is a leading not-for profit medical center in Mexico with an outstanding reputation for patient care. Alejandro Alfonso Diaz, its managing director, gives Focus Reports his insight on the role of medical tourism in Mexico. What are the main trends of medical tourism in Mexico today? First of all I do not think the term medical tourism is appropriate. Tourism is related to vacation and enjoyment and to me receiving a treatment or having surgery should not be related to leisure. Mexico has been a part of this trend for many years, because people with means in Mexico have been going to the US and sometimes Europe to receive health treatment. Now, we are experiencing medical tourism from the other side: we see many American or Canadian patients coming to Mexico to be treated. The motivation is obviously different, as they come to Mexico to get more cost-effective treatments. What is your opinion on such a growing phenomenon? Medical Tourism should not turn care into something mechanical. We are not an assembly line providing healthcare, and patients are not machines that need to be repaired and can then go back to normal life. There should always be continuous treatment when patients go back home. Surgeries and specific procedures that people seek through medical tourism are most of the time a small part of the treatment they need, and that is why there is a risk involved with this phenomenon. An example would be bariatric surgery: people with obesity problems come to the Mexican border, get cheap surgery, but afterwards do not receive follow up treatment. The surgery is only the first step to the bariatric treatment. So a question remains - how are we going to ensure that the patient will have follow-up care when he is back in his country and which physician will continue the treatment? What is ABC Hospital’s involvement with medical tourism? At ABC, we need to make some additional efforts to ensure that our patients will continue to receive medical care even after surgery. Otherwise, we are omitting quality and safety factors, and as a high-end hospital we should not compromise our main values. That is also why we are affiliated to the Methodist Hospital in Houston, which allows us to organize a formal follow up process in the US. O Mexico: Healthcare & Life Sciences Review 2013 “Medical Tourism should not turn care into something mechanic. We are not an assembly line providing healthcare, and patients are not machines that need to be repaired and can then go back to normal life.” Alejandro Alfonso Diaz, managing director, The American British Cowdray Medical Center MEDICAL TOURISM 17 Table 1: Medical tourism prices (in selected countries) Procedure US India Thailand Singapore Malaysia Mexico Heart Bypass (CABG) 113 000 10 000 13 000 20 000 9 000 3 250 Heart Valve replacement Cuba 150 000 9 500 11 000 13 000 9 000 18 000 Angioplasty 47 000 11 000 10 000 13 000 11 000 15 000 Hip replacement 47 000 9 000 12 000 11 000 10 000 17 300 Knee replacement 48 000 8 500 10 000 13 000 8 000 14 650 Gastric bypass 35 000 11 000 15 000 20 000 13 000 8 000 Hip resurfacing 47 000 8 250 10 000 12 000 12 500 12 500 Spinal fusion 43 000 5 550 7 000 9 000 Masectomy 17 000 7 500 9 000 12 400 Rhinoplasty 4 500 2 000 2 500 4 375 2 083 3 200 1 535 Tummy Tuck 6 400 2 500 3 500 6 250 3 903 3 000 1 831 Breast reduction 5 200 2 500 3 750 8 000 3 343 3 000 1 668 Breast implants 6 000 2 200 2 600 8 000 3 308 2 500 1 248 385 180 243 400 250 300 400 350 1 500 2 636 950 Crown Teeth whitening 289 100 100 Dental implants 1 188 1 100 1429 15 000 7 500 *Cost of surgeries around the world. Costs given in US$. **The price comparisons for surgery take into account hospital and doctor charges, but do not include the cost of flights and hotel bills for the expected length of stay. Source: Medical Tourism: Treatments, Markets and Health System Implications: A scoping review Neil Lunt, Richard Smith, Mark Exworthy, Stephen T. Green, Daniel Horsfall and Russell Mannion, OECD, 2011. List of Hospitals in Mexico with Joint Commission International (JCI) accreditation Assisteo Mexico S.A. de C.V. Program - Care Continuum First Accredited: 16 March 2012 Christus Muguerza Alta Especialidad Monterrey Program - Hospital First Accredited: 22 July 2007 Re-accredited: 27 August 2010 Accreditation Withdrawn on 27 August 2011 Clinica Cumbres Chihuahua Chihuahua Program - Ambulatory First Accredited: 23 April 2008 Re-accredited: 30 August 2011 Hospital CIMA Chihuahua Chihuahua Program - Hospital First Accredited: 31 August 2012 Hospital CIMA Hermosillo Hermosillo, Sonora Program - Hospital First Accredited: 11 December 2008 Accreditation Expired: 10 December 2011 Voluntarily Withdrew from Accreditation Hospital CIMA Monterrey Monterrey, Nuevo Leon Program - Hospital First Accredited: 19 December 2008 Hospital Galenia Cancun, Quintana Roo Program - Hospital First Accredited: 5 October 2012 Hospital Mexico Americano, SC Guadalajara, Jalisco Program - Hospital First Accredited: 20 March 2010 Hospital San José Tec de Monterrey Monterrey, Nuevo Leon Program - Hospital First Accredited: 25 December 2007 Re-accredited: 18 June 2011 Voluntary Withdrawal from Accreditation Accreditation Expiration Date: 17 June 2012 The American British Cowdray Medical Center IAP - Observatorio Campus Mexico City Program - Hospital First Accredited: 6 December 2008 Re-accredited: 17 December 2011 The American British Cowdray Medical Center IAP - Santa Fe Campus Mexico City Program - Hospital First Accredited: 12 December 2008 Re-accredited: 10 December 2011 Source: www.jointcommissioninternational. org , March 2013. Hospital Y Clinica OCA, S.A. de C.V. Monterrey, Nuevo Leon Program - Hospital First Accredited: 27 September 2008 Re-accredited: 22 December 2011 Mexico: Healthcare & Life Sciences Review 2013 18 INTERVIEW: COFEPRIS Interview with COFEPRIS: Mikel Arriola Life has not been easy for Mikel Arriola since he stepped in as head of COFEPRIS. The regulatory authority’s agenda has been daunting and overwhelming since Arriola’s entrance, but results have been impeccable. Despite a change in government, Mikel Arriola was reappointed as the head of COFEPRIS in December 2012. You were appointed as Federal Commissioner of COFEPRIS in March 2011. What have been the biggest challenges you’ve faced within this time? COFEPRIS regulates every sanitary risk related to any industry- we regulate 10% of Mexico’s GDP, and 12% of international trade. The most important challenge I faced when entering COFEPRIS was understanding whom I had to deal with to make things happen. On a more material point of view, the major challenge we first experienced was tackling the massive backlog of sanitary registrations. Mexico had a major legal reform in 2005 that mandated the renewal of every drug registration in the market to ensure that we had only 2 types of medicines: generics and innovative medicines. This reform was crucial, but the government didn’t regulate this reform in administrative terms until 5 years later. This agency went into an administrative crisis, and when I arrived from the Ministry of Finance, I had to deal immediately with the backlog. The other challenge was also to determine what we wanted in terms of pharmaceutical policy. Our pharmaceutical policy is to provide the patient – our main object of protection – with the best alternatives in the market. The COFEPRIS universe was unreadable and lacking priorities; we needed to set them and to reset communication with the whole industry. One of our strategies, for example, was to establish access to medicines for all Mexican families – so we started to issue sanitary registrations for generic drugs. What steps have you taken to actively change the reputation of COFEPRIS in the minds of the Mexican public and the pharmaceutical industry? Our goal is to generate predictability for the market, and send the right messages to our regulated industries. By doing so, we are going to have a better set of alternatives for the consumer, hence protecting public health. We have to assume our position as a sanitary regulator, but also as an economic regulator, and build strong relations with the sectors that we manage. I invest a lot of my time receiving companies of all sizes and, I suppose, this is how the image of the institution has changed. We need to be the best for the health of the consumer and the industry can’t survive without a market. COFEPRIS cannot meet its objective to protect the consumer if we don’t regulate firmly but with a commitment to both industry and consumers. Mexico: Healthcare & Life Sciences Review 2013 “Our goal is to generate predictability for the market, and send the right messages to our regulated industries. By doing so, we are going to have a better set of alternatives for the consumer, hence protecting public health.” INTERVIEW: COFEPRIS 19 Pharmaceutical Policy – a roadmap Improve access for consumers to Health Supplies as to reduce sanitary risks Reducing the backlog Legal framework improvement to eliminate barriers to entry Deregulation and organizational modernization International harmonization Issuance of sanitary registrations Introduction of generics into the market Removal of the manufacturing plant requirement Certification by the Panamerican Health Organization Simplified liberation of vaccines Legal reforms for the introduction of biotechnological drugs Reclassification of medical devices and creation of low risk classification Specialized lanes for administrative procedures Introduction of innovative drugs into the market Equivalence agreements on medical devices and new molecules Specialized lanes for pharmaceuticals and medical devices Recognition of foreign GMP certificates Authorized Third Parties Source: COFEPRIS, 2012 We have heard many times that the Government should start to see COFEPRIS not just as a quality controller, but as a promoter for Mexican exports. How do you achieve this? The Mexican pharmaceutical industry is an industry with great quality, and is a huge asset for the economy. If we can work with the industry to expand their opportunities to invest internally and externally, we are making a change for our country. We have to be creative, and build the best profile for the Mexican industry to be able to attract more investment and provide better opportunities. We have to create a more flexible market, and the best tool to create this is regulation. I want to be very aggressive in terms of gaining market share internationally. What do you feel have been the most significant achievements of COFEPRIS since you have managing the organization? We designed a very specific strategy when we first arrived in COFEPRIS, and I think we have been quite successful in complying and enforcing it. Firstly, we had to reduce the backlog, and we have since then issued 9000 registrations the first year. Secondly, we had to improve our regulatory framework and eliminate barriers to entry into the market, which was done by issuing 109 generic registrations, suppressing the manufacturing plant requirement and building consensus around our regulations on biological products and bio-similars. Thirdly, we had to build international recognition, and we have achieved it through the PAHO recognition which was achieved in late 2012. My conclusion is that we have a strategy to reinforce the Mexican market for the well-being of our patients and we are on the right path. O Mexico: Healthcare & Life Sciences Review 2013 WE’RE HERE TO HELP Market dynamics like evolving customer service, rising costs and an expanding market are reshaping the medical device supply chain. As the global market leader in the logistics industry, we provide market research findings and insights to better understand the implications to your business. Learn about best practice supply chain solutions from other industries designed to optimize operations and better support the medical devices industry. Download a copy of the white paper. www.dhl.com/medicaldevices PHARMACEUTICALS 21 Pharmaceuticals Mexico: Healthcare & Life Sciences Review 2013 22 PHARMACEUTICALS FOREWORD BY RAFAEL GUAL, director general of CANIFARMA Since 1946 The National Chamber for the Pharmaceutical Industry (CANIFARMA) has been working to represent and further the interests of the Mexican pharmaceutical sector in relation to governmental authorities. In this section, Rafael Gual, General Director of CANIFARMA, speaks about the chambers objectives regarding sanitary regulation, research and innovation, and economic development. In the last three years CANIFARMA has been working tirelessly in defining a development program for the pharmaceutical sector, which is unprecedented in terms of depth and scope. In brief, the development program involves transforming the pharmaceutical sector into one of the most important economic engines for Mexico, and a new route of economic development for the country. All essential aspects of the country’s health are touched by the pharmaceutical sector, since we help to improve life expectancy and the quality of life of the population; we generate knowledge through the intrinsic relationship of our business with research, innovation and applied science; and we also impact the economy, since we create high quality jobs that foster a virtuous circle of human capital, productivity, welfare and development. In recent years there have been significant advances in regulatory matters in which the concurrence, understanding and cooperation between authorities and industry have made a notable difference, all working in favor of Mexico. As for research, Mexico has a great potential yet to be properly exploited. The infrastructure and human resource available in our country allows us to predict that under favorable conditions, we can become the most important clinical research development center for Latin America, which will bring significant technological and economic spillover for our country. Besides, our sector is currently the second largest productive sub-branch for the country, as it shares more than seven percent of gross domestic product for manufacturing sector, and generates almost four hundred thousand jobs, both direct and indirect. We maintain our growth dynamics in both the domestic and external markets, with a significant increase in exports, even in times of crisis. To support all these facts, CANIFARMA recently completed the first census of the pharmaceutical industry, which confirms and validates most of the data we already knew, and also gives us a strong base that allows us to foresee a promising future in terms of investment in new manufacturing facilities, clinical research, employment generation and financial development. With all the input and ideas provided by industry experts, we have finalized the Development Program for the Pharmaceutical Sector, which contemplates three progressive stages of development along the first hundred days of the new government in office, the first four years, and the last two years for project consolidation. These three stages are referred to three aspects; namely, the improvement of the regulatory framework, innovation and research, and industrial policy. Our sector has always been recognized because of its cohesion and unity, and exerted a positive influence and important representation in the economic and political scene of our country. We have met innumerable challenges with integrity and consistency. The challenge now is to persevere in this spirit for the growth and benefit of our industry and our country. O Mexico: Healthcare & Life Sciences Review 2013 PHARMACEUTICALS 23 Shaking up the system Over ten years ago, the economic concept of the ‘BRIC’ countries- Brazil, Russia, India and China, was coined by Jim O’Neill, chief economist at Goldman Sachs. Earlier this year, the very same man who declared that by 2020 Mexico would be the seventh largest economy in the world, surpassing both India and Russia. Mexico belongs to one of four recently defined ‘growth markets’ alongside Indonesia, South Korea and Turkey. That certainly shakes things up a little for both outside observers and active local stakeholders in the economy. “It is not how fast you grow, but how consistent your growth is over time.” Ricardo Alvarez Tostado, president and general director of AstraZeneca MACRO DATA OF THE MEXICAN PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRY (last available data, INEGI 2009, OECD 2011) Share in GDP 1.2% Share in Manufacturing GDP 6.9% Health expenditures as a share of GDP 6.1% Health expenditures per capita (dlls.) 934 Value of the Pharmaceutical Market (billion dlls.) 13* Direct Employment Indirect Employment 78,500 330,000 SOURCE : COFEPRIS – with data from INEGI and CANIFARMA * Note: value estimated for 2011 using 12.42 pesos per dollar, average exhange rate for 2011 But what does this recent categorization as a ‘growth market’ suggest for Mexico’s pharmaceutical industry? With an estimated value between 12 and 14 billion USD, the Mexican pharmaceutical industry has seen some significant changes over the last four years. The government has significantly increased public health spending and its coverage in an effort to pull Mexico up from the bottom of the pile. According to the latest OECD Health Data, Mexico fared 33rd out of 34 OECD countries for total expenditure on health as a percentage of GDP. The government is also fighting against rapidly increasing levels of chronic long-term illnesses rife in the population, such as diabetes. These wide-reaching changes have affected industry dynamics, and coupled with the patent cliff, and the worldwide innovation drought, have opened up a bigger space for generics penetration and created the perfect storm that has pushed present multinational companies to either diversify, or to focus on niche markets. Mexico’s solid macroeconomic policies and encouragement of foreign investment have also increased competition in the market, pushing local companies to take a side step on their strategies and in some cases to be more resourceful and aggressive in retaining and increasing their share of the pie. Last but not least, there has been an undeniable shift of power towards the point of sale: pharmacies and supermarkets. Pharmacy giants are taking warehousing and distribution into their own hands and private label (store brand) drugs are becoming increasingly popular. Some say positioning a general medical service with doctors at the point of sale has created an even bigger demand for private label medicines at the expense of other brands. For some players in the market, it is a bitter pill to swallow. Mexico certainly offers a lot of growth potential. One can debate whether Mexico is still truly an emerging market, but as Ricardo Alvarez Tostado, president and general director of AstraZeneca Mexico points out: “it is not how fast you grow, but how consistent your growth is over time, and I genuinely believe that Mexico is very well positioned through a rigorous monetary policy and an improving fiscal policy. It is a democratic, free enterprise emerging market. Mexico is, and will remain, a strategic market for any industrial interest.” O Mexico: Healthcare & Life Sciences Review 2013 24 PHARMACEUTICALS An outstanding example The Mexican pharma market has always had a historically low generics penetration, but initiatives such as Seguro Popular are pushing firmly towards a more generics-focused environment. “The national companies who used to sell to the government are now coming to the private market because of the price drop in the institutional sector.” Hector Valle, general manager North Latin America, IMS Health First, in terms of ‘cleaning up’ the market, in February 2005 COFEPRIS amended Article 376 of the country’s General Health Law that mandated the renewal of every drug registration in the market. All generic pharmaceutical products were expected to have proven bioequivalence and therapeutic efficacy by February 2010. A much anticipated move for the industry, opening up the way for innovative and generics companies alike. It also ensured there were only two types of medicine available: generic and innovative. This new registration setup was an important milestone in the organization’s history, and more so because it helped to phase out the so called similares from the market. Similares were legally questionable medicines without proof of bioequivalence, and incredibly popular amongst lower income population groups. Similares caused regulatory and safety concerns for the government and some people say that due to adverse side effects, they had fired up suspicion in the general public about generic medicine as a whole. The elimination of similares hand-in-hand with the increase in public healthcare using predominantly generic medicines have essentially made generics much more accessible to the Mexican public, both financially and psychologically. Hector Valle, general manager for IMS Health in North Latin America, says that as a company they run 10,000 interviews on a monthly basis with customers leaving the point of pharmaceutical sale. This is to understand what is happening to the end consumer. As a testimony to the increasing levels of public understanding on generics, Valle explains “80% of the people we interviewed said they understand generics, but when we ask more questions to qualify their understanding, it is actually 50%. Around 41% said that if there was a generic version of products they buy normally, they would buy the generic. That’s a huge change, and part of it has to do with the government putting a lot of information out, and also giving quick registrations for generic drugs to speed up access.” “COFEPRIS is making a great effort to reduce the time needed to issue a generic registration” Dagoberto Cortes, General Director, Hormona Mexico: Healthcare & Life Sciences Review 2013 Dagoberto Cortes, general director of Hormona Laboratories, points out that in the government’s continued push to open access and reduce barriers for cheaper generic products, they have also significantly reduced time to market. “A couple of years ago, the average time between patent loss and generic arrival on the market was two years. Today COFEPRIS is making a great effort to reduce the time needed to issue a generic registration. In some cases the time to market has reduced to a couple of months. This is very important for the authorities because it represents a lot of savings.” PHARMACEUTICALS 25 TOP 5 REGIONS % OF PRESCRIPTIONS WRITTEN IN INN. “While we understand Seguro Popular has a limited budget and is required to look for the lowest possible prices, Apotex cannot compromise on quality just to get the extra sale.” Hector Carrillo, director general, APOTEX 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 2008 2009 2010 10,06% Puebla 6,04% Guadalajara 5,54% Monterrey 4,90% Although the generic pharmaceutical industry has expressed its delight at such efforts, many people in the industry feel that when price is the only basis on which to win a government tender, quality is inevitably marginalized. 16 Source: Close – Up 19,60% Estado de México SOURCE : Close –UP. % INN prescription vs Total Market 0 Ciudad de México 2011 2012 Hector Carillo, general director of Apotex Mexico, points out that “the government continues to be a good business for us because supplying on time is becoming increasingly important. When it comes to timely and high quality product delivery, they know we can do it. But we cannot supply at their requested benchmark prices. They demand the lowest possible pricing from the market, and while we understand Seguro Popular has a limited budget and is required to look for the lowest possible prices, Apotex cannot compromise on quality just to get the extra sale.” O Mexico: Healthcare & Life Sciences Review 2013 26 PHARMACEUTICALS Shifting landscapes shift strategies Marked socio-economic differences are also playing an important role in pushing the uptake of generics, and these issues are starting to affect multinational corporations (MNCs). MNCs are being forced to open up and diversify, quite simply to have their fingers in as many pies where they can compete successfully. Alternatively they are applying a more focused sales strategy to concentrate on niche markets. Alvarez Tostado of AstraZeneca, believes that MNCs need to adjust their activities to become competitive in both the private and public sector. “Mexico provides a uniquely generous market structure where you have the institutional sector, the private outof-pocket segment of the market, and then you have the new up-and-coming popular insurance systems that will cater to those who have very little access to medical care, if they have access at all. So in that regard, I think the industry has to realign itself to make sure that it is able to provide adequate services to the institutional sector; provide broadened access to the out-of-pocket consumer, and obviously realign to be competitive in the Seguro Popular concept.” Mexico is no exception to the global trend of companies moving towards branded generics; a successfully growing sector in a very much brand-driven Mexican society. Bertrand Baron, general director of Sanofi Mexico, is confident that Sanofi’s global strategy of diversification fits well with the current climate in Mexico. “I believe that Sanofi in Mexico is a perfect example of what we are as a diversified healthcare player because here we are playing in all the markets: human vaccines, consumer healthcare, biotech, rare diseases, innovative products, generics, and soon we will be in eye care.” Sanofi acquired Mexican laboratory Kendrick in 2009, and last year bought Medley, the Brazilian branded generics company that currently sits at #1 in Brazil and #3 in Latin America. The acquisitions are perfect examples of decisions that will allow Mexico: Healthcare & Life Sciences Review 2013 PHARMACEUTICALS 27 SHARE OF MARKET BY COMPANY TYPE US Germany France Q LOCAL Russia Q Other Foreign India Korea China Brazil Mexico Arg. Q Large Global (15) Source: IMS HEALTH, MIDAS 2010. Argentina, Venezuela, Brazil, Mexico & Korea Retail only; China hospital only TOTAL PHARMACEUTICAL MARKET BY PRODUCT TYPE (MAT JANUARY 2012) Generics Institutional Value (US$ M) Growth vs. PY 14,040 2% Original brands 2% Generics 2% Branded generics 2% Units (M packs) Growth vs. PY 3.032 5% 1% Retail 3% Original brands 2% 7% -3% Source: IMS Health analysis and estimates; CER: 13.45 USD the company to compete in all market segments. “We believe there is a huge market, and generics were a piece of the market we were not tackling. Now we are doing it with good quality brands, guaranteeing quality to both the physician and the patient.” he continues. The first products under the Medley brand were launched in the Mexican market just a few months ago with high expectations. Medley is already rising fast in the industry ranks. Aspen Labs, the South African pharmaceutical giant and relative newcomers to the market, started operations in Latin America through a 50% acquisition of Strides in 2007. They found the key to success in Mexico was through turning an originally hospital-focused and opportunistic market business, into a business driven primarily by promotion and branding. “In 2009, Aspen started to implement a structure that would enable us to enter into the private ethical market, or the prescription-based business. That is where we started to build up our sales and marketing team. At the same time, we were launching a small portfolio of locally developed and manufactured branded generics. The combination of the two would provide a strong platform with greater brand recognition for future Aspen branded generics.” says Peter “I believe that Sanofi in Mexico is a perfect example of what we are as a diversified healthcare player because here we are playing in all the markets: human vaccines, consumer healthcare, biotech, rare diseases, innovative products, generics, and soon we will be in eye care.” Bertrand Baron, general director of Sanofi Mexico Erlbacher, COO of Aspen Labs, Spanish Latin America. This turnaround strategy to harness the Mexican market trends was proven successful as Erlbacher goes on to explain. “Since then, Aspen Labs has performed incredibly well: we have delivered significant growth, more than tripling our turnover in the last three years.” Other MNCs did not turn around to join in the generic playground, but fought back by taking it a step further from a localization point of view. They are making tailor-made solutions from their current portfolio, or using their innovative pipelines to target niche biotechnology sectors. Tim Daveler, vice president and general director of MSD in Mexico explains that they “have a unique development laboratory here in Mexico [the Mexican Product Development Laboratory] that is not commonly seen in other companies, especially not multinational companies. We use this development laboratory to expand the lifecycle management for our products in order to meet the needs of Mexicans. Many of our products that are on the shelves in Mexico have come from our development laboratory, in order to meet the market needs here in Mexico.” Similarly, Karel Fucikovsky, general director in Mexico & Central Mexico: Healthcare & Life Sciences Review 2013 28 PHARMACEUTICALS “Many of our products that are on the shelves in Mexico have come from our development laboratory, in order to meet the market needs here in Mexico.” “We have delivered significant growth, more than tripling our turnover in the last three years.” Maria del Pilar Serrania, director general, Pharma Data Mexico Peter Erlbacher, COO of Aspen Labs, Spanish Latin America Timothy Daveler, VP and general manager, MSD Mexico America for the French company Pierre Fabre Medicament, believes a specialty focus will bring reward. “The rules of the market will keep changing. International companies will start to focus on higher specialty drugs, and a company like Pierre Fabre Medicament that is very focused on products and medical specialties, will be able to deliver growth.” Medical education and awareness has traditionally been quite challenging in Mexico, leading some companies to put resources into education in order for the market to open up. Angel Sosa, general director in Mexico of human protein specialists Octapharma, explains that “it is not easy to show the government authorities the savings to be made in giving patients the treatments that they require, but it is possible, and it is also the key to further developing immune deficiency treatment in Mexico.” Octapharma takes an active role in promoting this, he says. “We participate in both government and scientific meetings in which authorities, physicians and patients discuss awareness issues openly… and in the field of immune deficiencies, we have been working very closely with a patient organization by sponsoring a road trip across the country that transmits the key focal signs of the diseases to local physicians.” Mexico: Healthcare & Life Sciences Review 2013 Here to stay “We are clearly flying onto the radar; Mexico is a priority market and Pierre Fabre Medicament is here in Mexico to stay”, remarks Karel Fucikovsky. Despite the range of necessary strategy shifts deployed by many multinationals to stay present on the undulating Mexican landscape, it seems there is so much potential to be realized that it is duly worth the effort. In some cases, it has catapulted Mexico onto the priority list for investment and resource assignment- in some cases assigning Mexico as their Latin American headquarters. Norbert Oppitz, senior vice president for Nycomed, A Takeda Company, in Latin America points out, “Today, Brazil is the most important economy, but in a regional context Mexico will be the most important player for decades to come. Mexico today is much more consolidated than many of the other so called truly emerging markets, it is a more industrialized and modern society than many people realize. Things are moving here, and one of the most dangerous things we can do as a multinational company is not to understand it.” O PHARMACEUTICALS Home turf 29 On the inside, looking out If multinational companies are looking in, then you could say that Mexican companies have been looking out to send their products elsewhere. IMS figures show that local companies in Mexico have introduced more products to the market than multinationals in the last 10 years. In 2011 for example, national companies launched a total of 657 SKUs (stock-keeping units, or unique products) in Mexico, compared to 492 SKUs from multinational companies. In the last two years national companies have either maintained or increased promotional investment in order to gain market share. They are also finding it more tempting to look across the border and export their products- both North and South of Mexico- to increase revenue, despite the challenges faced along the way. This could possibly be explained by turning back the clock for a second. Guy Jean Savoir, general director of Carnot Laboratories recalls that “in 2008 you could find a market that was extremely healthy and a feeling that both price and unit increases would continue to be prevalent; everything was easy.” That was the point when things started to change. Savoir points out that Mexico has three main, large sources of capital: oil, tourism, and remittance (this is the income from Mexicans working in the United States).When the global economic crisis hit the world that year, all three income sources dropped significantly. Remittance dropped due to changes in U.S. migratory policy, the oil price dropped after being high for so long, and tourism was sent packing after both swine flu, and the spiraling war on drugs. Purchasing power reduced dramatically at the same time when COFEPRIS was implementing bioequivalency regulations that suddenly enabled the public to access cheap, trusted generics. Generics didn’t stop growing, foreign competition also joined the crowd, and prices dropped even more. “Multinational companies might want to come and find out what we are doing, and to take our products into markets where we are not capable of going by ourselves.” Guy Jean Savoir, General Director, Carnot Some companies had foreseen these market changes and preferred to look outwards and export sooner, rather than later. Guillermo Funes Rodriguez, CEO of innovative Mexican company Silanes comments that “due to the fact that our major market was Mexico, we had to make a change ourselves. The only way was to diversify our products, and go into Latin America, the United States and Europe to build up strategic alliances. We are now growing in those markets and we are currently developing new products in our European research and development facilities.” Silanes as a company puts 10% of sales back into research and development. Although Mexico is still their principal market, they have also been manufacturing their own products in Brazil after forming a strategic alliance with Ache Labs, the Brazilian pharmaceutical company. Socorro España Lomeli, executive director of ANAFAM believes, “When a company Mexico: Healthcare & Life Sciences Review 2013 30 PHARMACEUTICALS “We have worked for many years in promoting our vision of the company which is based on quality and trust through our services and our products.” Alfredo Rimoch, general director, Liomont wants to export, they are often blocked by bureaucratic red tape and regulations which makes it impossible. It is mainly the administrative processes that pose a problem, not the quality. This has been a big hurdle for Mexico in both entering the United States market, and some Latin American markets.” Silanes has completed its learning curve, which leads Funes to conclude: “By the end of 2013 we hope to have two more products approved by the FDA, and we will then submit a further three. Now we know the mechanisms and the processes behind approvals, we can be more efficient and faster in complying with them. The long term outlook of Silanes is fantastic: we have patented products in biotechnology, with a plant that is FDA and soon to be EMA approved, we are ready to compete globally” Many other national companies are also exporting homegrown innovation. Guy Jean Savoir of Carnot Laboratories realized that their differentiated and innovative pipeline was essential to export success. “Today Mexico is a tougher market; you have to be aware of the added benefits of a differentiated product. When you export generics the only driving factor is price, which means you have to be very price conscious if you want to succeed and be competitive. This is not our business model- we have 130 people in Research and Development and we have decided that this is the side of the fence for us to be on. In fact, our differentiated pipeline was exactly what enabled us to successfully export and launch in different markets in the first place”, says Savoir. His advice: “don’t overlook Mexican innovation. Mexico is a place where multinational companies might want to come and find out what we are doing, and to take our products into markets where we are not capable of going by ourselves.” Mexico: Healthcare & Life Sciences Review 2013 Building Trust Other companies decided to stick to their strategy during these tough times and came out on top, due to the strength of their brands and the trust built up with the medical community. Liomont Laboratories, whose portfolio is 75% prescription medicine, will celebrate 75 years in the industry next year and is in the top ten rankings for prescription drugs in the country. Alfredo Rimoch, general director of the company, explains how they won through on trust and reputation. “Over recent years we have put particular focus on branded generics which we promote to doctors through a very strong sales force. We prepared well for the boom in pure generics, which took a lot of work, but we succeeded. Branded generics have existed for a long time in Mexico and we have worked for many years in promoting our vision of the company which is based on quality and trust through our services and our products.”Equally, Stendhal has based a large part of its business on in-licensing innovation from multinationals, and building itself up to be the government’s partner of choice. That is not an easy task, especially when focused on the anti-retroviral market involving tricky negotiations with government healthcare institutions. The company has managed to maintain 2530% yearly growth over the last two years and its products are now offered to 70% of HIV patients in Mexico. Luis Calderon, managing director of Stendhal, attributes this to their long-term attitude and quality. “Stendhal is not a company that looks for opportunistic business, by participating in a tender one year and disappearing the following year: we want to increase our PHARMACEUTICALS 31 market share sustainably and be in a place where we can adapt alongside the changing interests of the healthcare environment in order to increase patient share.” he explains. Maquila country Other companies have turned to contract manufacturing, an easier revenue generator as long as you have quality standards and longterm vision. In fact, many companies use contract manufacturing to provide the revenue needed to develop their own brand. “We want to increase our market share sustainably and be in a place where we can adapt alongside the changing interests of the healthcare environment.” Luis Calderon, Managing Director, Stendhal This is the case with Biofarma Natural CMD, whose general director Ignacio Luna explains, “creating a brand in Mexico involves many years of hard work and a lot of investment, and for us it has been much easier to simply generate revenue through our manufacturing strengths. We are proud of the fact that we are one of the only manufacturing plants in Mexico granted licenses for both medical products and herbal products. We have all the certificates and Good Manufacturing Processes (GMPs) that go with it. This attracts companies in the industry who are searching for high quality.” O Mexico: Healthcare & Life Sciences Review 2013 32 PHARMACEUTICALS Unreached potential According to industry data, the pharmaceutical sector represented 7.2% of Mexico’s manufacturing GDP last year. When compared to other manufacturing industries in Mexico, this is significant, but by no means in stellar. But can we call Mexico a real ‘hub’ for the pharmaceutical industry? Rafael Gual of CANIFARMA clearly states that “our goal is to make the Mexican pharmaceutical industry the biggest manufacturing sector in Mexico over the next 5 or 6 years. Currently pharmaceutical manufacturing represents 7% of manufacturing GDP in Mexico, and we want to push it into first place.” In 2008 COFEPRIS abolished article 168 and 170 of pharmaceutical legislation, which meant that companies no longer needed a plant in Mexico in order to distribute their products. Since then five companies entered the market without a manufacturing plant. This includes Italian company Menarini, Daiichi Sankyo from Japan, and Swedish Meda Pharma. But it also resulted in several multinationals re-assessing their Mexican manufacturing strategies as plants were no longer required to be part of the market. Miguel Salazar, general director of Boehringer Ingelheim Mexico points out that “the pharmaceutical real estate market is getting crowded because everyone is selling their plants.” “In 1995, Boehringer Ingelheim wrote their manufacturing strategy and decided that Mexico was to be a center of excellence in terms of manufacturing.” Miguel Salazar, general director of Boehringer Ingelheim Mexico However, there are some obvious benefits in setting up a manufacturing hub for Latin America in Mexico, as compared to Brazil. Labor costs are significantly lower, it is geographically very strategic bordering the United States, and Mexico also shares a common language with most of the region. “In 1995, Boehringer Ingelheim wrote their manufacturing strategy and decided that Mexico was to be a center of excellence in terms of manufacturing, and the company invested more than $70 million USD in a new plant which would be one of the manufacturing hubs for the rest of the world”, boasts Salazar of the company’s award-winning plant located in the south of Mexico City. “Around 60% of our products are exported globally and 40% is local. We are focused on high quality and high delivery.” Along the same lines, Bertrand Baron of Sanofi comments, “Today we have three manufacturing sites in total and we strongly believe in increasing our business in Mexico. 80% of what we sell in terms of volume is coming from our local plant. I would be shooting myself in the foot if I withdrew our Mexican plant.” Despite these multinationals here to stay, how can the industry live up to Gual’s tough target of becoming the number one manufacturing sector for the country? Socorro España Lomeli of ANAFAM strongly believes that the government should play a bigger role, especially when it comes to local companies. “I believe fiscal incentives are very important because they encourage industries to grow”, she concludes. O Mexico: Healthcare & Life Sciences Review 2013 PHARMACEUTICALS 33 Pharma’s affair with private labels When asked to define the three most impactful changes on the Mexican pharmaceutical industry over the last few years, executives put Seguro Popular, and COFEPRIS regulation in the lead. The third change is muttered perhaps a little more reluctantly. “The Point of Sale”. The truth is that the rise of large pharmacy chains is starting to hit the industry big time. This is a fast-moving shift of control away from the pharmaceutical wholesalers, who have been the traditional torch bearers. It does not just change the dynamics of the industry today; it transforms the future dynamics of the pharmaceutical landscape. “Many years ago power in the industry was in the hands of the pharmaceutical companies, a few years after that it was in the hands of the distributors, and today we have it in the points of sale.” Gabriel Zavala, Commercial General Director, Farmacias del Ahorro Pharmacy chains are gradually moving their purchasing ratio in favor of buying directly from pharmaceutical companies who manufacture, as opposed to the wholesalers. The manufacturers involved do face opposition from wholesalers, but they can still see the potential benefits. Farmacias del Ahorro, one of Mexico’s largest pharmacy chains, is starting to take warehousing and distribution into its own hands. It recently opened a large warehouse just outside of Mexico City, and is planning to open two more in the Mexico: Healthcare & Life Sciences Review 2013 34 PHARMACEUTICALS “The stigma that private labels are low quality stayed in the mind of the Mexican consumer, but this has changed dramatically over the last several years.” Ricardo Ganem, VP & general manager, Perrigo Mexico coming years. “The most recently opened warehouse will account for 70% of the units that we buy directly; today we have a ratio of roughly 60/40 favoring direct purchasing from the pharmaceutical companies”, says Gabriel Zavala the company’s commercial director. “The distributors will always be necessary in the future. But at the same time, we will be prepared for ongoing changes in the market with the infrastructure to support more laboratories if they wish to sell directly.” fairly slow on the uptake of private label products – not only for pharmaceuticals. Ricardo Ganem, vice president and general manager of Perrigo Mexico, explains why it took so long. “For many years, store brands in general were all about putting a “cheaper” product next to the leader with focus on low prices, but often at the expense of quality. The stigma that private labels are low quality stayed in the mind of the Mexican consumer, but this has changed dramatically over the last several years.” Not only are pharmacy chains buying directly from pharmaceutical companies, but a more visual change is taking place. Private label drugs have had a growth explosion in Mexico and are affecting the way both national and international companies operate. Hector Valle of IMS explains, “The national companies who used to sell to the government are now coming to the private market because of the price drop in the institutional sector. Now private labels give them a very good opportunity to do just that. This enables national companies to grow but also affects the brands from the multinational companies as well.” Ganem also notes that Mexico is the country with the highest brand loyalty index. He observes that this can be explained by studies on the monopolistic advertising structure favoring high-priced media such as television, for the last 60 years. The historical attrition to well-known brands is exactly what is helping to make private labels successful now. Mexicans feel confident buying own-brands from pharmacy and supermarket chains that they know and love. Companies promoting their own brands to sell in retail stores, at the same time find themselves increasingly attracted to manufacturing private label goods for that very same point of sale. Pharmaceutical companies are ‘having an affair’ with private labels, but can they have their cake and eat it? Local company Gelpharma is doing just that. Luis Verduzco, managing director of the company, realizes just how important private labels are to his business after producing primarily for the public sector. “The private market didn’t have the same level of uncertainty as the government market, so we changed direction. At the moment, we are giving higher priority to third party manufacturing for private labels because the relationships we are forming with pharmacy chains and supermarkets are extremely important. If we don’t make those relationships robust now, maybe in a couple of years there will be another company offering the same service and we will lose market share.” The core Mexican business of U.S. company, Perrigo, is manufacturing private label medicines. When compared to the United States or Europe, up until now Mexico has been Mexico: Healthcare & Life Sciences Review 2013 In August 2010, regulations prohibiting the sale of antibiotics in retail pharmacies were implemented by the health authorities, with the intention of reducing risk related to inappropriate use of antibiotics and increasing bacterial resistance. Retailers came up with a solution in the form of having a qualified doctor on site to avoid any problems, which also fuelled the intense rise of private label medicines. A recent study by IMS Health showed that the majority of Mexicans who use a doctor at the point of sale had used the service up to ten times previously. This is clear evidence of its popularity. The most common reasons for using a doctor present in a pharmacy were found to be convenience and low price; the perfect combination for a busy, working Mexican on a budget. So what next for the private label business at the points of sale? Ganem is already thinking to the future and working on innovative ways to develop his customers’ product. “I’ll give it another three or four years before most retailers will have upgraded strategies in place with differentiated brands to satisfy specific consumer needs.” Zavala adds, “Many years ago power in the industry was in the hands of the pharmaceutical companies, a few years after that it was in the hands of the distributors, and today we have it in the points of sale.” O PHARMACEUTICALS Strengthening guidelines for biosimilars 3 Uribe adds, “Half of new innovative drug registrations given here in Mexico are for biotechnology products: the world is looking to biotechnology and companies are investing more and more every day.” Indeed, Mirassou sees Grupo Ifaco’s biotechnology center as the main growth driver for the group, and concludes: “Mexico is emerging as an important hub for the production of biotechnology products. Once we have our legislation in order, we will be extremely competitive, not only inside Mexico, but internationally.” O 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Recently concluded a joint project with the UNIDO to prevent damage to the ozone layer. 3 3 3 3 According to BMI figures, Mexico’s biopharmaceutical sector currently employs almost 25,000 Mexicans in more Ana Cristina Mirassou, Biotechnology Manager, Grupo IFACO 3 Dr. Ana Cristina Mirassou, director of biotechnology in Jaliscobased company, Grupo IFACO, tells us how this lack of tight regulation affected the launch of their first biotechnology product. “There has been some turmoil around biotech regulation in Mexico, and for a long time, the authorities were uncertain as to which requirements to ask for in a new biotech product. Companies who were able to register their products before this turmoil were granted the registration in about six months, whereas we had to wait three years.” “There has been some turmoil around biotech regulation in Mexico.” 3 “This enabled almost unmonitored competition from China, India, South Korea and other fast-growing countries, which sometimes caused more damage than good to the patient”, explains Jaime Uribe, CEO of Mexican biosimilar company, Probiomed. “This is the reason why biosimilars started to be regulated much more closely, and after five years of negotiations the law was finalized”, he continues. The Mexican guidelines for the approval of biotech and biosimilar drugs became effective in April 2012. than 32 biotechnology companies. Biotechnology is also becoming more of a priority for many States in Mexico when compared to traditional pharmaceuticals. “The governor of Jalisco declared biotechnology as one of the key strategic industries for the state. He sees biotechnology as the future,” Mirassou says. 3 Despite being in the Mexican market for over twenty years, biosimilars have never been regulated as a separate entity. They have always been regulated as simply another category of generic medicines. 35 3 o Mexico: Healthcare & Life Sciences Review 2013 36 INTERVIEW: SMART SCALE Interview with Fabiola Trigueros President and Owner of Smart Scale Knowledge, experience, dedication and enthusiasm! Smart Scale was recently certified and recognized for its international quality standards. What have been the main growth drivers? Our experience and deep knowledge of the pharmaceutical market has been rewarded by the ISO 9001:2008 certification which we managed to get when the company was established. It shows that we are able to meet and fully understand the needs and requirements of our customers at an international scale. Smart Scale’s owes its stable growth to quality, which has always been the key value for us, along with dedication and care, in every single service we provide. Smart Scale is composed of experts working in the field, providing ad hoc solutions for pharmaceutical industry sales and marketing departments, such as targeting, database, deployment, rep. Equiv., CRM, benchmarking, etc…We deliver efficient and accurate solutions to help companies achieve a better decision making process. Smart Scale operates under a diversified product portfolio. Could you give us a breakdown of these products as well as how do you achieve synergies between them? Our objective is to provide external support to companies to help them being innovative: First, we have the best database in the Mexican market for the pharmaceutical industry, doctors, pharmacies, hospitals, etc… (complying with the Data Protection Act). If companies ask themselves, who should we sell or promote to? Where should we sell? Why must our products be sold there? The answer is Smart Data. Second, we are experts in medical, pharmacy, hospitals, and retail outlets visits, etc. Smart Scale is considered the best option for business strategy and sales force automation as “Media Soft “ is the most advanced, flexible, fast and user friendly tool for the Latin American market. The goal of our CRM “Sales Vision” is to analyze and provide feedback on the effectiveness of our clients’ business strategy. Our third innovative tool is called Marketimetrics, that provides very precise information for the sales and marketing teams of pharmaceutical laboratories. The data is collected from different sources coming from our clients, and it allows them to get the information directly rather than spending time searching for it themselves. All our tools give “state of the art” information through high technology, with the permanent goal to help pharmaceutical companies improve their sales and profits. What are the future challenges and opportunities for Smart Scale, and what message do you want to convey to the readers of our review? We want to achieve a worldwide recognition as the leaders for the Latin American pharmaceutical market in technology and information services. As a Mexican businesswoman with over 27 years of experience in this wonderful industry, and as a mother, wife, sister, daughter, friend, my message would be: Smart Scale can be a significant support between information technology and health care science for us to fulfill our mission; to ensure that everyone has a Better Quality of Life. O Mexico: Healthcare & Life Sciences Review 2013 “Smart Scale owes its stable growth to quality, which has always been the key value for us, along with dedication and care, in every single service we provide.” 38 LEGAL PERSPECTIVES The legal perspective on… ALEJANDRO LUNA FANDIÑO, Partner, Olivares & Cia I. Pricing & Reimbursement. Price control in the private sector is based on a scheme of self-regulated maximum retail price (MRP) covering patented products, as overseen by the Ministry of Economy. Pharmaceutical companies’ participation is voluntary. Under the price control each product’s MRP must not exceed an international reference price, estimated as the average price in six major markets, plus a market factor. There are no established sanctions for violations of the MRP. In 2008, the government created the Committee for the Negotiation of Drug Prices (CNDP) to: - Support public acquisitions through a process of negotiation transparency between public insurers and pharmaceutical companies. - Determine the cost-benefits ratio of new medicines and therapies in relation to their prices and those of other products in the market Public sector purchases are made through public tender processes. The CNDP analyzes the effectiveness of drugs and relevant therapeutic alternatives, and the feasibility and implications of an eventual substitution with equivalent medicines. The CNDP also conducts an economic evaluation of the cost-effectiveness of patented medicines compared with potential substitutes. Drug payments by the government (mainly in the IMSS) derive from the obligatory fees paid by both employees and employers. However, federal government subsidies are necessary in all segments of the public health system at the federal and state levels. In the private sector, the majority of payments are made on an out-of-pocket basis. Private insurers are currently improving the level of pharmaceutical coverage as the private market in medi¬cines has grown considerably in the last six years. II. Patents Conditions and legislation Patent applications are regulated by the Intellectual Property Law (IPL) and its regulations. Patentable inventions must (Article 16, IPL): -Be novel. -Result from an inventive step. -Be industrially applicable. The Mexican Institute of Industrial Property (IMPI) now grants patents protecting the compounds, formulations, uses and manufacturing processes of medicines. Mexico: Healthcare & Life Sciences Review 2013 ALEJANDRO LUNA FANDIÑO Partner, Olivares & Cia T +52 55 5322 3080 F +52 55 5322 3001 E alf@olivares.com.mx W www.olivares.com.mx LEGAL PERSPECTIVES Article 19 of the IPL excludes medical procedures from being the subject matter of an invention. However, a patent can be obtained for a therapeutic method by drafting the claims in the Swiss-style format, that is, claiming the medical use of the compound for the treatment of a specified illness. Process and timing The average time for obtaining a Mexican patent varies depending on the field of technology. Generally, it takes from four to six years to obtain a patent. A patent is obtained by filing a patent application with the IMPI. Duration and renewal The term of a Mexican patent is 20 years from the effective filing date of the patent application. For Paris Convention and non-Paris Convention applications, the effective filing date is the filing date in Mexico. For Patent Cooperation Treaty 1970 applications, the effective filing date is the date of filing of the international patent application. The patent cannot be renewed. Data Package Exclusivity Arguably in conflict with international law (which contains provisions concerning industrial secrets and the protection of data package exclusivity rights (DPE)), Mexico does not have any domestic legislation which expressly establishes and protects DPE. Extending protection There are no provisions for exclusivity term extensions or supplementary protection certificates in domestic law. 39 to exclude others from making, using, offering for sale or importing the patented invention. In a patent infringement action, the claimant must prove the following: - Ownership or recorded license over a granted, valid and fully in force patent. Generally, a certified copy of the “file wrapper” of the patent prosecution is enough to prove these requirements. Validity of the patent can be challenged by the defendant. - That someone is using, making, offering to sell or importing the patented invention. The IPL establishes direct infringement over the manufacturer. Infringement against sellers requires evidence of prior notice of the alleged infringement. When a claimant claims infringement of a patented process, the defendant has the burden of proving the use of a different process other than the patented process. There are no grounds in the IPL to apply the contributory infringement doctrine. - Use of the patented invention. Under the IPL, only literal infringement is recognized. No doctrine of equivalence applies. The burden of proving authorization is on the defendant. The doctrine of implied license has never been tested before the Mexican courts. Proving patent infringement in Mexico is a difficult task, since the jurisdiction follows a strict civil law system which has formalistic rules for both evidence and proceedings. Patent infringement The patent infringement claim must be submitted before the IMPI. The claim is served on the alleged infringer, who then has ten working days to respond and, if applicable, bring a counterclaim. That response is then served on the claimant for the claimant to refute it. All the evidence is analyzed, and finally a decision is issued. That decision can be challenged before the Federal Courts. The IPL grants patentees the right to the exclusive exploitation of the patented invention. Therefore, a patent grants the right The IMPI is an administrative authority. There is no judge or jury participation in patent infringement actions. O In theory, the life term of a patent could be extended under certain international treaties (for example, NAFTA) where the Health Authority has delayed the process to obtain a marketing authorization for a patented product. However, in practice no-one has yet attempted to do this. Mexico: Healthcare & Life Sciences Review 2013 40 EXPERT EYE The Mexican Public Sector José Carlos Ferreyra. President, Pharmaceutical Institute, A.C., info@investigacion-farmaceutica.org In the past 10 years, México has been dramatically changing the market dynamics of the pharmaceutical market, as well as the health sector, in general. The private sector has been reducing its values and its strategic weight, while the public buyers (the public sector) are gaining a more competitive advantage, and are becoming a must-have line of business due to its unprecedented growth. Nowadays, the overall view of the public sector: • Accounts for more than 50% of the total Mexican market in units. • Is composed by aprox 150 public health providers, or institutions (IMSS, ISSSTE, PEMEX, the armies, National Institutes and Hospitals, and the States. These last ones receive every year over $ 5,000 million USD via the Seguro Popular program). • Per year, more than 1,000 public tenders or biddings are published with opportunities for the pharmaceutical products manufacturers and distributors to sell to these public institutions. • The public sector manages over 7,000 different hospitals and medical units. The Mexican population is divided into the following major grouping1,2: • IMSS: 55 million beneficiaries. • Seguro Popular: 52 million beneficiaries. • ISSSTE: 12 million beneficiaries. • PEMEX: 750,000 beneficiaries. In order to make a good penetration in the Mexican public sector, the pharmaceutical manufacturers come every day to our facilities, to search for consultancy, either for a better understanding of the Mexican public market dynamics, or to analyze the entry/growth strategies to make public buyers a real business opportunity. Footnotes: 1 Population joints may occur, i.e.: multiple health coverage per beneficiary. 2 Gross numbers. We must consider at first, which market segments offer better business scenarios. Based on the database information of the public sector we grow every day, we assess our clients by the following: 3 Based on the pharmaceutical products acquisitions audited information of more than 100 public institutions in México. Source: Pharmaceutical Institute, A.C. Each market must focus on a differential strategy. This means, for the same pharmaceutical product that we wish to sell to the Government buyers, we must create a differentiated strategy based on: 4 Group names according to the National Health Counsel official national formulary. Mexico: Healthcare & Life Sciences Review 2013 EXPERT EYE 41 • Differentiated Price. Even though the law establishes the prices to be observed and followed, in the practice we can see that each public buyer will set up different prices for the same product. • Patient outsourcing. This model is being offered by • Differentiated Seller/Distributor. The same distributor that can win the tenders in IMSS or ISSSTE, is not the same that will make a good market penetration in the Seguro Popular (states). peritoneal dialysis. This growing model is allowing the • Differentiated Value added. All the 150 public buyers in México are different, and so as well, their priorities in terms of value added. Don’t think of a good access strategy that worked well in an institution to be bulletproof anywhere else. and supplies needed. the private industry, on which the provider takes along all the service required by the public institution. For example, in the private clinics of hemodialysis and big public institutions to refocus their budget to other priorities, due to the fact that by outsourcing patients, the institution no longer has to buy the pharmaceuticals • Local pharmacies. Take into consideration that providing drugs and medicines to over 100 million Mexicans, is not an easy job. This is why, the recipe for the beneficiary, sometimes must be provided by a local pharmacy (which Besides, in order to make public buyers the best bet you can get, you must observe accurately and develop commercial and access strategies for a good coverage of the following market dynamics: • Service integrator owner (SIO). This model is being quickly adopted by Mexico’s public sector. Within this contract scope, the SIO must buy, store and distribute all the pharmaceutical products (all other medical supplies as well) under a fixed contract that includes the margin and benefits for the SIO. So, in order to make your product available to the institution, you must establish a good relationship with the SIO. • Private hospitals. The huge chain hospitals are becoming a very important provider of the Mexican public institutions, for an outstanding number of services that are being now provided to the public beneficiaries in private hospitals all over the country. has the surrogate-recipe contract with the institution), with no cost to the beneficiary. However, in México, the pharmacy employee can offer either a generic or a substitute to the product signed in the recipe. If you are looking to make your business grow, Mexican public sector is the answer. Look for a strong market database tool (market database providers MUST tell you exactly where the source information is coming from), who also has proven knowledge in assessing access strategies, and can also train and certify your KAMs and Government Sales Reps in both promotion and Contract Management for each client you want to reach. In the Pharmaceutical Institute we can help you develop the best mix of strategies to reach this huge public market. Contact us for any consultancy you might need. O TABLE 1: TOP GROWING MARKET SEGMENTS3,4: Top 10 markets growing in units (2012 vs 2011) Top 10 markets growing in values (2012 vs 2011) Top 10 markets growing in average price (2012 vs 2011) 1. Ophthalmology (+36.29%). 1. Endocrinology (+59.45%). 1. Endocrinology (+54.47%) 2. Psychiatry (+26.87%). 2. Ophthalmology (+31.49%). 2. Nephrology and urology (+30.04%). 3. Neumology (+19.10%). 3. Nephrology and urology (+27.59%). 3. Immunoallergic diseases (+27.91%). 4. Oncology (+17.95%). 4. Immunoallergic diseases (+25.69%). 4. Hematology (+21.31%). 5. Gynecology (+16.94%). 5. Neumology (+23.28%). 5. Intoxications (+20.30%). 6. Otolaryngology (+10.18%). 6. Hematology (+19.36%). 6. Analgesics (+12.88%). 7. Dermatology (+6.20%). 7. Gynecology (+18.79%). 7. Plasma substitutes (+12.49%). 8. Endocrinology (+3.22%). 8. Neurology (+10.33%). 8. Neurology (+10.74%). 9. Gastro (+2.62%). 9. Plasma substitutes (+8.38%). 9. Anesthesia (+7.22%). 10. Oncology (+1.55%). 10. Analgesics (+3.12%). 10. Infectious diseases (+4.41%). Mexico: Healthcare & Life Sciences Review 2013 42 EXPERT EYE The Healthcare System and Regulatory Framework in Mexico By Sandra Sánchez, President of the Mexican Association of Pharmaceutical Research Industries (AMIIF) Despite the considerable progress done towards an effective public health system in Mexico, all healthcare actors, from government to pharmaceutical companies and health providers, recognize that much more needs to be done. Too many patients still suffer from delays and insufficient availability of high quality care. Only by working together more closely, we will find better solutions for healthcare in Mexico. “It is a complex task, and, even within the pharmaceutical industry, opinions vary as to which is the best way to achieve this. Nevertheless, there is a consensus around the need to expand access and promote innovation. Regarding these two key issues, in AMIIF we are proud to say that we think Mexico is on the right track, with a number of positive initiatives underway. There is still, of course, work to be done – specifically, in offering access to innovation. Out of the three necessary steps – regulation, inclusion in the National Basic Formulary (NBF) & Institutional formularies, and supply of innovative drugs for the population– we have made substantial progress in regulation through COFEPRIS. However, we still need to focus on moving forward with inclusion into NBF and Institutional formularies, as well as securing supply of innovative drugs. It is important to ensure that any improvements in any of these areas, quality, cost and effectiveness can be sustained in the long-term. Within AMIIF, we are working on a number of proposals and I would like to share our top line thoughts with Focus Reports. The regulatory framework in Mexico: improvements, drawbacks, and future perspectives In terms of improvements, drawbacks and future perspectives in the regulatory framework in Mexico, there are three key areas to work on. First of all, the efficiency and effectiveness of the regulatory authority must be maintained and guaranteed. To this effect, a series of factors should take place under this new administration. To begin with, the improvement that started last year by “COFEPRIS” (especially the PAHO certification), should continue. It should be noted that all improvements took place under Comissioner Mikel Arriola´s leadership, and as a result of his performance, he was reappointed in this position. There is still work to be done Mexico: Healthcare & Life Sciences Review 2013 “It should be noted that all improvements took place under Comissioner Mikel Arriola´s leadership, and as a result of his performance, he was reappointed in this position.” EXPERT EYE to guarantee the adherence to deadlines for regulatory approvals, but there are also high expectations in regards to the improvements Mr. Arriola is planning to achieve during his new tenure. Biotechnology and biosimilar COFEPRIS has taken significant steps towards developing a regulatory and legal framework for “Biocomparables” (as they are called in Mexico) drugs, potentially creating the standard for Latin America and being one of the most robust on an international scale. However, this regulation still needs continued review and effective implementation as the nature of each class of drugs is complex and very different between them. We believe science-based standards offer the best opportunity for expanding access and protecting patient safety. Patient safety is a collective effort. Making biologic medicines - whether innovative or biosimilar - is neither straight forward nor easy. Biologics have highly complex manufacturing processes and today require significant investment in order to deliver high quality and reliable supply – both important to patient safety. Complex products require high standards. We believe that sound science-based regulations must start and finish with rules that protect and preserve patient safety, including: • appropriate standards for the approval of biosimilars /”biocomparables”; • strict rules about substitution and interchangeability; • a focus on the need for medical providers and patients to make individualized decisions; and • a process that ensures that each biologic productwhether innovator or biosimilar—enters the marketplace in a manner that permits its use to be tracked and traced to assure that any safety issue can be addressed promptly, and that products are monitored and used responsibly (pharmaco-vigilance) The biosimilar approval pathway presents opportunities and challenges. Stringent guidelines will play a key role in advancing the safety of biologics and improving the lives and productivity of Mexican citizens. Intellectual property, It encourages the research and development of new innovative drugs. The most recent improvement in this area is that the ‘Linkage mechanism’ has taken a step forward with the inclusion of formulation patents, eliminating court orders that forced authorities to respect them. However, this protection still needs to be established in the proper legal precepts as this mechanism today does not explicitly consider formulations or secondary use patents when COFEPRIS 43 validates with the Patent Office (Instituto Mexicano de la Propiedad Intelectual – IMPI), whether a drug registration application violates patent rights or not. Combating the illegal market (counterfeit, adulterated and / or expired) There is a need to strengthen interagency collaboration with industry participation to eliminate it and raise awareness on the health risks it entails; hence it has not only become a national priority but a worldwide one in recent year. The R&D pharmaceutical industry has been very proactive at taking steps to combat these illegal activities by maintaining a close collaboration with various government agencies (COFEPRIS, IMPI, PGR, Internal Revenue Service “SAT” through its customs offices and the States General Attorneys). Albeit, both industry and Government have shown a strong determination to combat and reduce the problem, and their actions have resulted in benefits to patients, the medical community, and the industry, mechanisms for more efficient and continuous collaboration still must be identified. Recommendations for the healthcare system in Mexico One of the biggest hurdles and challenges of the Healthcare system in Mexico is access, ensuring availability to innovative drugs to most of the Mexican patients who need it, which entails securing a lengthy formulary reimbursement process to get on the “National Basic Formulary” (NBF) and “Basic Formularies” (BFs) of all government institutions / payers. Transparency, redundancy and consistency in the evaluation of dossiers remain a concern and limits patients to have access to innovative drugs. There are still important changes that could be made to the review process to eliminate redundancies in the system and establish a unified set of criteria for determining cost effectiveness that will have an even greater impact and increase access to new life saving medicines. Recommendations for the healthcare system in Mexico include the need for clear, transparent and streamlining the inclusion process for NBF and BF, as well as comprehensible mechanisms for purchasing and supply. The roadmap for achieving these goals consists of 4 key actions. 1. Standardization of criteria for the development and evaluation of health economic data (pharmacoeconomics) needed for the inclusion of new therapeutic options in the NBF. 2. Streamlining evaluation process and reducing duplicative reviews 3. Transparent bidding and negotiation of drug prices 4. Effective purchasing and efficient supply / distribution / Rx filling of drugs O Mexico: Healthcare & Life Sciences Review 2013 44 INTERVIEW: GSK Interview with José Alberto Peña, VP & General Manager of GSK Mexico Following a previous assignment as general manager for GSK in Hong Kong, José Alberto Peña was appointed in July 2012 in his current position – bringing a fresh look and new perspectives to the Mexican market. How would you describe the current Mexican pharmaceutical landscape and what is GSK’s strategic positioning? GSK today is the 6th pharmaceutical company in Mexico with a 4% market share, structured in 4 divisions: the pharmaceutical division, the consumer division, and 2 manufacturing divisions. Within the pharmaceutical department that is under my responsibility, we have 4 business units: the first one focused on innovative brands, the second one on classic brands and generics, one on vaccines and the last one on dermatology. Over the last few years, we have diversified our offer to follow the market trends, and there have been some important changes in the market in both private and public sectors. In the private market there has been a shift towards generic products. The impact of generics can be positive, the main benefit being more access to these products for a lot of people, notably because of the lower pricing. The second change is in pharmacy channels. Nowadays we see doctors at the point of sale, which changed the whole dynamics of the pharmaceutical industry. The presence of doctors in pharmacies is becoming more significant and the number of visits to these doctors has dramatically increased, making it a new channel that we need to consider as a group as big as IMSS in terms of visits. As a result, we need to adapt our go-to-market strategy. On the public sector front, there have been some important challenges as well. If we look at the past few years, the amount of new products that have been included in Mexico: Healthcare & Life Sciences Review 2013 “We need to get closer to our consumers; we need to understand their needs as well as their limitations.” José Alberto Peña, VP & General Manager of GSK Mexico INTERVIEW: GSK the public sector has been significantly reduced. As a result, access to new pharmaceutical products has been limited. One of the challenges is to plan a strategy to work closer with the government institutions. Our goal would be to find win-win situations for innovative commercialization approaches with shared risks and common benefits, in order to satisfy the existing market. There is no doubt that innovation continues to be a prime driver of GSK’s business, taking in account that we are launching 3 to 5 products per year, and we will continue going forward. Our pipeline is very interesting but it is becoming more specialized, making it more crucial to work with government institutions. What is your opinion on value based pricing and how would you describe your proposal to the Mexican healthcare system? 45 Morelos, and one in Queretaro. For us, local manufacturing is definitely something that is important, for the local market as well as for exports. We have our footprint here, but now our objective should be to maximize the installed capacity and see how we can make the best out of it. I think Mexico has the basics, and the right support. There are a lot of positive aspects here, especially if we look at the macroeconomic environment in Mexico, with 4% growth in GDP. Also, from a basic perspective, Mexico has the right framework. Is it sufficient to say that it will become the leading manufacturing hub? Of course there could be more incentives to attract more manufacturing, because there will always be a competition between countries. That is very difficult to say, but it can definitely be more competitive. We need to get closer to our consumers; we need to understand their needs as well as their limitations. One of the limitations we see in IMSS is that they get a lot of financial pressure. As a result, we need to adapt our style and our way of going to market by accepting that things have changed. It is more important to understand their needs and share responsibility through a real win-win situation rather than just selling products to users. I believe that we need to look at alternative models and we need to open up to different options. What are your priorities as General Manager of GSK and what do you think of the Mexican healthcare work environment? Do you think Mexico has the qualities to become the biggest manufacturing hub in the region? One of the biggest challenges we approach with great interest is access to innovative medicines and making sure that people who need these new treatments can have access to it. We are open to discussion to see how we can make things change in that sense. O GSK has 4 manufacturing sites in Mexico, and there are very few companies that can compete with that in the pharmaceutical industry. We have one in Mexico City, two in GSK is a great company globally, it has a fantastic image, and we need to put it back on the map in Mexico where it deserves to be. We want to be part of the decision making process in the Mexican healthcare sector: being an influence rather than a reaction. As a final message, as an industry leader in the pharmaceutical industry, what do you think should be improved in the Mexican healthcare system? Mexico: Healthcare & Life Sciences Review 2013 46 ORPHAN DRUGS Focus on orphan drugs Interview with MARCUS KRENZLIN, Country Manager, Shire Mexico Please can you give us a rundown of Shire’s activities in Mexico in the last four years, and the key achievements and milestones along the way? Shire started operations in Mexico in 2008 and we have had a compound growth rate of almost 100 percent per year. We are doing this by focusing on a segment of the market that has always been there, but only now are people actually receiving the treatment. I think that Mexico has a great attitude towards orphan drugs. The Mexican authorities are very conscious of the various niche problems that exist for patients across the country and have been very open in making orphan drugs available to them. This is why Shire has been able to establish itself here and make treatments available to patients. Over the past two years we have been able to get four products on the market, three of which are available in the public health system: one for Hunter’s Disease, another for Fabry Disease, and the third that was approved last year is for Gaucher´s Disease. The situation in Mexico seems different from Brazil where some patients have had to fight in court in order to receive their treatment. Has this ever happened in Mexico? We know there are patients in Mexico that have legally fought for access to their drugs, but now there is no need to take legal action. We made access possible for our orphan drugs simply through dialogue with the authorities. A great example is Seguro Popular, which provides one of our treatments – for Hunter Disease – to patients under 10 years of age. These are very poor patients whose families would never be able to afford a biotechnology drug in order to be treated privately. There was a change to general health law in Mexico published on February 29th 2012. Article 224 has been amended so that it both recognizes that there are orphan diseases, and that there are orphan drugs to treat them. In essence it means that the Ministry of Health has to support the development of the diagnosis and treatment of these diseases. I think this opens up considerable possibilities, and if you look at the social issues in Mexico then you can see this is a huge step forward. We have now cases with people living in very poor and remote areas that are getting treated with a biotechnology product. How did you manage to get orphan drugs under the umbrella? The Seguro Popular covers basic needs but it has also very important programs for catastrophic diseases such as certain type of cancers. It’s true that our products are Mexico: Healthcare & Life Sciences Review 2013 “The Mexican authorities are very conscious of the various niche problems that exist for patients across the country and have been very open in making orphan drugs available to them.” Marcus Krenzlin, Country Manager, Shire Mexico ORPHAN DRUGS 47 not cheap, but they are providing great value to patients and their family and the society overall by really enabling people with life threatening diseases to lead better lives. In addition to the authorities’ awareness of the problem, there are also a number of very active and well organized patient organizations who, through dialogue, have been able to open up the doors to get these approvals. know the families and the patients, which helps them to handle the problem more effectively. We are also giving continuous support to physicians for diagnosis, but even though we are trying to play our part it is very difficult as many of the patients live in extremely rural areas, and Mexico is a huge country. Do you think there is enough awareness for the diseases you are treating in Mexico, amongst both the public and the physicians? Yes I believe so. We are already in discussions with the authorities on how we can support them and provide training and information to the parties involved. At the end of the day Shire is a company that enables patients with difficult and life-threatening diseases and their families to live much better lives. Awareness is definitely a problem: if you look at prevalence or incidence data and how many patients have been either identified or are on treatments, you will find figures indicating that only 10-15 percent of the theoretical disease population have been diagnosed. This means there are a large number of patients in need of our treatment but not receiving it. Even though there is not a high level of awareness, it is difficult to conduct any big campaigns because these diseases are so rare. There are maybe 250 cases in the whole of Mexico, so we need to deal with awareness differently. We usually manage awareness through supporting medical education programs or through supporting the patient associations because they Will the growth of healthcare from the government aid this awareness issue? Where can we expect to see Shire in five years’ time? At the moment we just do Human Genetic Therapies (HGT) here in Mexico, but there are two more business units one of which specializes in Attention Deficit and Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) and Gastrointestinal (GI) which are about to be launched here rather soon, and the third business unit is regenerative medicine. So we expect establishing full Shire operations in the country in the mid-term. O Mexico: Healthcare & Life Sciences Review 2013 48 EXPERT EYE Optimizing pharmaceutical distribution channels By Dominik Bacher, CEO, and Reto Zoppi, Commercial Director, BacherZoppi Mexico’s last decade of political and economic stability has brought about demographic changes that are shifting the structure and needs of the country’s healthcare industry. In parallel, the regulatory framework for pharmaceutical products has been evolving to address a new socio-economic reality of greater economic polarization, leading the different actors of the industry to test the new rules through innovation. Whereas innovation has traditionally been known as the development of new pharmaceutical products, in Mexico innovation pertains to experimenting with new business models that break away from traditional paradigms regarding the distribution, pricing and sales methods of pharmaceuticals. In the short term, Mexico will face an accelerated aging population, which will generate significant increase in demand for medical services, particularly in the detection, prevention and treatment of chronic diseases. Under such market dynamics, no longer will product characteristics be the differentiating factor for their sales, but rather there will be an equal onus on secondary services and benefits that are offered to patients. This combination represents a great opportunity for both pharmaceutical laboratories and pharmacy chains across the entire spectrum of products; from prescription drugs to OTC and personal care. Ultimately, this is a chance for the industry to enhance the added value they can offer patients through their products. At BacherZoppi, we are prepared to support, design and execute innovative marketing strategies across all types of distribution channels and of points of Mexico: Healthcare & Life Sciences Review 2013 “At BacherZoppi, we are prepared to support, design and execute innovative marketing strategies across all types of distribution channels and of points of sale.” EXPERT EYE sale. Through the hard work of our talented sales-force in conjunction with the most current marketing data provided by our collaborators, we are determined to develop the best practices in optimizing pharmaceutical distribution channels. The Pharmacy Modernizing Mexico’s Healthcare Industry 2011 marked the beginning of a decline in Mexico’s young population (ages 15-24), decreasing from 20.2 million in 2010 to 14.1 in 2011. This has also initiated a reversal of the country’s population pyramid. The group of elderly (those above 64 years old), is currently on a fast-track growth path that will see its expansion from 5.8 million in 2008 to an estimated 25.9 million in 2050. As we speak, two-thirds of healthcare expenditures in the poorest 10th percentile of the population stem from the purchase of medicines. With the new trend of people living longer, the demand for medicines, medical services and personal health products is bound to by amplified dramatically, further exacerbating the heavy medical expenses of the Mexican population. Equally as striking has been the change over the past few years in the way Mexicans purchase medical products and the structure 49 of their points of sale. Recent studies have revealed that, while pharmacy chains and self-service locations only account for 30% of the total points of sale, they are responsible for 80% (in terms of quantity) of all pharmaceutical products sold. All market actors are currently readjusting to accommodate this reality, including the pharmaceutical laboratories, distributors and pharmacies themselves. Pharmacies of all kinds, whether independent, chains or wholesalers, are now looking to determine their competitive advantage in order to survive under the new market dynamics. For independent pharmacy owners, this has meant a reduction in their presence as it becomes increasingly harder for them to compete with larger chains. They have been relegated to selling generic medicines that are not favored by the majority of consumers or medical experts. On the other hand, pharmacy chains are fostering a market penetration of private brands that has allowed both national and international laboratories to become direct providers of their own brands. This has meant an increase in volume of such products, counterbalanced by a reduction in their final sales price. O Mexico: Healthcare & Life Sciences Review 2013 MEDICAL DEVICES 51 Medical Devices Mexico: Healthcare & Life Sciences Review 2013 52 MEDICAL DEVICES Mexico’s Potential for Medical Devices While the medical device industry is perceived as less appealing and alluring than its pharmaceutical counterpart, the sector has been thriving in recent years. Mexico has taken advantage of its experience and expertise in light manufacturing in order to capitalize on the growing demand for medical devices around the world. Mexico’s strengths as a manufacturer, and the fact that the country has more free trade agreements in place than any other country in the world, make the country an excellent hub for multinational companies to base their medical device manufacturing, particularly given Mexico’s close proximity to the US. However, it must be noted that at this point, Mexican companies have not taken full advantage of the possibilities offered by the medical device industry: there are no domestic companies currently manufacturing medical devices. However, many multinationals are located in Mexico, and although the market opportunities available in Mexico are not game changing, the potential for cheap and good quality manufacturing make the country particularly interesting. Similar to the challenges faced by pharmaceutical producers, the medical device industry has been struggling to expand their business in Mexico in the face of lengthy registration and approval times. Unlike a pharmaceutical product, medical devices tend to have much shorter life cycles. This means that any delay in the product’s registration process can seriously reduce its profitability and lifespan. COFEPRIS has been working to reduce registration bureaucracy, yet there are still numerous examples of unnecessary delays. Additionally, once registration has been achieved, medical devices also encounter obstacles in regards to their coverage under healthcare plans and their sales through public tenders. As the local market matures to widely accept the use and benefits of medical devices, manufacturers are taking advantage of the country’s free trade agreements to export these products to other markets. Given Mexico’s numerous free trade agreements, strong intellectual property rights protection, and an inexpensive labor force, medical device manufacturers have discovered that there are several advantages to producing in Mexico. According to the Global Trade Atlas, medical device exports from Mexico reached USD$5.79 billion in 2010, with a strong proportion of the products destined for the US. Many of the world’s biggest names in medical devices have manufacturing facilities close to the US-Mexican border, benefitting from Mexico’s famous maquiladora program. Under this scheme, companies can import parts duty free for assembly, as long as a majority of the production is destined for export. This has proven a great incentive for international medical device companies that are taking advantage of this unique production environment. O Mexico: Healthcare & Life Sciences Review 2013 “Although the market opportunities available in Mexico are not game changing, the potential for cheap and good quality manufacturing make the country particularly interesting for multinationals.” MEDICAL DEVICES 53 A Challenging Regulatory Landscape Today in Mexico, the regulatory environment is a point of particular concern for medical device manufacturers. Although health authorities are earnestly trying to improve the system, many companies struggle with long delays when registering new products for production and distribution in the country. “Product registration has been the main headache for all the medical devices and pharmaceutical companies in Mexico.” Jose Alberto Villazon, executive vice president of Siemens in Mexico The situation is without a doubt trying for pharmaceutical companies, but for the medical device sector the COFEPRIS backlog is particularly burdensome. Incremental innovation is a way of life, and many medical devices are constantly improved based on practitioner feedback and rapid technological improvement. Product lifespans are short, with an estimated expiration date of a mere two years for most products. For many medical device companies, this situation in Mexico is dire. According to Jose Alberto Villazon, executive vice president of Siemens in Mexico, “Product registration has been the main headache for all the medical devices and pharmaceutical companies in Mexico. Even if COFEPRIS strives to improve the situation, many issues are still pending and the process is one of the most complex and time consuming in the world. Consequently, new innovations and technologies that would benefit the population and, in many cases, reduce healthcare costs, are available in the country with a one- to two-year delay compared to the US or European countries.” In an effort to alleviate delays, COFEPRIS has implemented several measures, which have received mixed reactions from medical device companies. On 25 November 2010, “Fast Track Health Accord” came into effect in Mexico, which recognizes medical devices that have been approved and sold in the USA and Canada. Today, the accord also includes products authorized in Japan. According to COFEPRIS, medical devices registered and commercialized in these countries should be evaluated and authorized within 30 days from when the importer files. “The main challenge for COFEPRIS has been the registrations, and today the fast track health accord has changed the ballgame tremendously.” Ramon Soto, managing director at St Jude Medical Mexico Mexico: Healthcare & Life Sciences Review 2013 54 MEDICAL DEVICES For many companies, the measure is making a difference. Ramon Soto, managing director at St Jude Medical Mexico, says “the main challenge for COFEPRIS has been the registrations, and today the fast track health accord has changed the ballgame tremendously. Just some weeks ago, we had three product approvals granted in eight days. So the government is listening to us. Meetings with COFEPRIS are very useful so that they can hear the opinions of the industry and try to act on them.” Similarly, Mauricio Monjardin, the director of 3M’s Healthcare Division in Mexico, also reports a positive experience dealing with the authority. “What we decided to do with COFEPRIS is to really select the priority products that we wanted to be registered instead of wasting time on trying to get all our products approved,” Monjardin explained. And with 80% of their products receiving timely approvals, the strategy seems to be working for the company. “We allow them to save time, and we get more efficiency from them, so it is a win-win situation at the end. We can even focus more on training them so that we are sure they know our products perfectly well,” Monjardin said. “Although it is too early to judge the impact of these third authorized parties, I truly believe this measure is game changing and will give us the certainty we need to prosper.” Kurt Wicker, general manager of Becton Dickinson Mexico However, the experience has not been as positive for all companies, especially those based in Europe. Carlos Jimenez, managing director of B Braun, a German medical device and pharmaceutical company, explains that “in Mexico, the only process that is working in terms of registration is the fast track—and as a European company, our portfolio benefits from the EC mark rather than FDA approval, so we do not fully benefit from it. The certification we receive from the European authorities does not correspond to what COFEPRIS asks for. The European community in Mexico is working together to improve this situation.” Nonetheless, the company sees a bright future in the country. “My expectation for 2015 is to double sales. The question is whether the purchasing model of the government will be changed towards more quality and better services…. Today, Mexico is back on the investment map. We have a growth rate of about 20 to 25% every year and this is also our expectation for the next years,” Jimenez said. Another effort to reduce product registration delays, COFEPRIS has recently given the green light to “Third Authorized Parties” to prepare and pre-screen registration applications for a fee. Kurt Wicker, general manager of Becton Dickinson, a USbased manufacturer of medical devices, instruments, and reagents, said, “Although it is too early to judge the impact of these third authorized parties, I truly believe this measure is game changing and will give us the certainty we need to prosper. In the past, our low expectations of lead-time to register our products were weakening us. Today, we feel good to be benefited by such improvements.” “What we decided to do with COFEPRIS is to really select the priority products that we wanted to be registered instead of wasting time on trying to get all our products approved.” Mauricio Monjardin, the director of 3M’s Healthcare Division in Mexico Mexico: Healthcare & Life Sciences Review 2013 Similarly, Adriana Ibarra, partner with Baker McKenzie, a global law firm, is optimistic about the pre-screening services. “I am convinced that the outcome will be extremely positive. The procedures will be facilitated and accelerated with the help of personal face-to-face meetings to resolve product queries and general doubts on the application review. Third authorized parties are extremely necessary since companies suffer from slow internal regulation processes, heavy competition, and tight schedules for product launch,” Ibarra concludes. Critics of the system, however, are concerned that it gives an inside track to multinationals with the financial wherewithal to take on the additional fees. Nonetheless, given the current regulatory landscape and persisting authorization delays, most companies are pleased to have another option. According to Ibarra, third parties will have to first “earn companies trust” to determine their future place in Mexico’s regulatory process. O 56 MEDICAL DEVICES Carving Out A Medical Device Market With an epidemiological profile that increasingly resembles that of a developed country, with rates of diabetes, cancer, and cardiovascular disease on the rise, Mexico offers plenty of market potential to medical device manufacturers. However, often called a “country of pills,” there is a strong societal resistance to surgery and invasive therapies. In order to make inroads in Mexico, medical device companies must raise awareness about the benefits of long-term healthcare solutions to convince patients, healthcare practitioners, and providers. Luis Nieto, Managing Director of ConvaTec in Mexico, a medical device company that specializes in wound therapeutics, ostomy, and continence care, is well aware of these market dynamics. “Mexico is more a ‘quick fix’ country—there is a systematic preference for pills rather than the use of a therapy or medical device (surgery) that could solve the problem. Some of the most advanced therapies have only penetrated the market up to 4 or 5%, leaving great room for opportunity. However, it is complicated to change people’s perception of treatment and adopt the medical device and the solution to their condition rather than fixing the problem with a pill,” states Nieto. For Medtronic, a global leader in medical technologies, proof of this Mexican mindset can be seen in the numbers. German Garcia, regional director of Mexico and Central America for the company, pointed to the low level of sales of one of the company’s key products. “The use of pacemakers is highly underdeveloped in Mexico. Around 123 pacemakers of all brands are implanted per year per million inhabitants here versus 400 in Argentina, around 1,000 in the US, and more than 1,000 in Europe,” Garcia said. “Patients believe implanting a pacemaker will be a complicated procedure, and refuse to do it. So we are working on providing information to the population,” Garcia explained and said that raising awareness is a key part of the company’s in Mexico. “Mexico is more a ‘quick fix’ country— there is a systematic preference for pills rather than the use of a therapy or medical device (surgery) that could solve the problem.” Luis Nieto, Managing Director of ConvaTec in Mexico, “The pharmaceutical companies have done a very good job on this aspect and today the penetration of drugs in Mexico is comparable to developed countries. However, in terms of surgeries, we are by no means comparable to developed countries, and this is something that medical devices companies need to work on together as an industry,” Garcia said. According to ConvaTec’s Nieto, to reach its full potential, the industry has to overcome four challenges—physician awareness, patient awareness, physician capacity (hospital beds and operating rooms), and healthcare capacity—to have more people treated and with better outcomes. Nieto said, “Out of these four challenges, physician awareness is by all means the most important and needs to by systematically addressed. Of course, all are linked in a virtuous—or vicious—circle, but it all starts with physician awareness, since they are the first ones to meet patients.” Along the same lines, for BSN Medical, a global medical device company, education in Mexico must start with the healthcare practitioners. Jose Manuel Lezama, general manager of the company in Mexico, explains that “clinical education is extremely important to us and needs to be consistent. You cannot only have training programs when you launch a product, because you constantly have new nurses Mexico: Healthcare & Life Sciences Review 2013 “Patients believe implanting a pacemaker will be a complicated procedure, and refuse to do it. So we are working on providing information to the population.” German Garcia, regional director of Medtronic Mexico and Central America MEDICAL DEVICES “Clinical education is extremely important to us and needs to be consistent.” Jose Manuel Lezama, general manager of BSN Medical in Mexico “Lack of proper training is one of the main causes why dentists do not consider implants as their first alternative to treat patients “One of the issues at hand was to know how we were going to bring more patients to attend their dental practitioner.” Enrique Saldivar, general manager of Nobel Biocare Mexico Armando Martinez Reyes, general manager of KaVo Sybron in Mexico and new users. If you are seriously committed to clinical education like we are, you have to do it every day to make a difference. To date, we have already trained 500 healthcare specialists all over the country.” “We don’t only sell medical devices, we are committed to clinical education. Every week, we are doing training in different hospitals; we continually train nurses, physicians and wound care specialists. If you want to make a difference, you have to be committed to clinical education. Sales will follow after you have made a positive impact on users,” declares Lezama. Similarly, Enrique Saldivar, general manager of Nobel Biocare, world leader in innovative restorative and esthetic dental solutions, said that physician education is also the missing link for the dental sector. “Even when there are a few implantology programs offered by universities, these are still very limited considering the 80-100 thousands dentist practicing in the country. Lack of proper training is one of the main causes why dentists do not consider implants as their first alternative to treat patients. Only 5% of dentists do it because it is “risky” and most of them were not taught this treatment while they were studying, although it is a longterm solution that will outlast all other options” Armando Martinez Reyes, general manager of KaVo Sybron in Mexico, another leading dental company, concurs. 57 “Mexicans engage in self-prescription and medication, which can really worsen their condition.” Francisco Ascension, general manager Bausch & Lomb Mexico “Here, the opportunity relies on education, and spreading information as to increase the importance of dental risk prevention. For example, we are explaining that orthodontics is not only a problem of esthetics but also of hygiene. I have been working with key dental decision makers and professionals, and one of the issues at hand was to know how we were going to bring more patients to attend their dental practitioners. Nonetheless, I am convinced that education will resolve these issues, and health prevention will prevail in the middle and long term.” Francisco Ascencion, Bausch & Lomb, a US-based company focusing on eye health products and medical technologies, also notes a pressing need to increase awareness not only to physician but also to patients. “Mexico’s level of pollution and altitude cause a phenomenon called dry eye. In Mexico, only a small part of the population has knowledge of this eye condition, and Mexicans engage in self-prescription and medication, which can really worsen their condition.” Improving awareness of the importance of medical devices in the healthcare ecosystem was a sentiment expressed by many medical device stakeholders in Mexico. An emerging voice of the sector, the Mexican Association for Innovating Industries in the Medical Devices Industry (AMID) is helping to get out the message that medical devices can provide solutions that are more sustainable for patients and healthcare systems. O Mexico: Healthcare & Life Sciences Review 2013 58 MEDICAL DEVICES Seguro Popular Needs To Extend Its Reach Limited in resources, Seguro Popular has so far focused primarily on prevention and primary care. Therefore, patients who are covered by this regime are largely unable to benefit from sustainable medical device interventions. While the medical device sector is pleased that more people have access to healthcare, many stakeholders are pointing the need for additional coverage. “Unless you own very good private insurance, most medical expenses relative to eye care are not reimbursed,” notes Francisco Ascension of Bausch & Lomb. This is illustrated by the fact that the contact lenses market in Mexico is one of the lowest in the world with a market penetration of two to three percent. Lourdes Mejia, director general of Smith & Nephew in Mexico, a UK-based company specializing in orthopedics and wound management, hopes to see Seguro Popular’s coverage extended in the years to come. “We believe that wound management and orthopedics will play an important role. For example, in Mexico, 60,000 people are affected by osteoarthritis every year and need replacements. Unfortunately, Mexico: Healthcare & Life Sciences Review 2013 “We believe that wound management and orthopedics will play an important role.” Lourdes Mejia, director general of Smith & Nephew in Mexico MEDICAL DEVICES only 30% are being treated, and we believe that Seguro Popular will give the chance to the remaining 70% to receive treatment,” Mejia said. However, some question whether the popular insurance scheme has the financial means to sufficiently cover the country’s healthcare needs in the future. German Garcia of Medtronic said, “Mexico does not have enough health infrastructure to cover this drastic increase in the insured population.” As for most of the medical device companies in Mexico, he noted that the initiative has not meant much to his business. “Seguro Popular hasn’t really started having an impact for us. For example, stents have just been included in Seguro Popular, but the hospitals doing the procedure need certifications that most have not acquired. The 59 implementation hasn’t been smooth,” Garcia said. For Diego Prieto, country manager of Coloplast, an international company focusing on medical devices and services related to ostomy, urology, continence, and wound care, said that in general, the country needs to take on a more holistic approach to health. “There is a need in Mexico to create public policies for people that need our medical devices. For instance Seguro Popular, Instituto Mexicano de Seguridad Socia (IMSS), and Instituto de Seguridad y Servicios Sociales de los Trabajadores del Estado (ISSSTE), focus way more on medicines that on medical devices. Usually medical devices rely on nurses’ decision and this needs to change in a sense that it should be integrated in the healthcare system together with medicines”, says Prieto. O Ottobock: Offering Mobility Solutions and Fighting Stigmas As the official technical service provider for the London 2012 Paralympic Games, the German prosthetics firm garnered international attention and showed the world the performance potential of disabled people. In Mexico, Ottobock is also trying to help society see people living with disabilities in a different light. Interview with Orison Huerta, managing director of the company in Mexico. How would you describe the landscape of the Mexican market when it comes to Ottobock’s product offerings? It is difficult to assess the size of our market in Mexico, because the statistics tend to vary. Government statistics assume that there are about five million handicapped people, including problems with ears, eyes, etc. However, these statistics are very low according to some non-profit organizations, which estimate that there are about 10 to 20 million in Mexico living with disabilities. Around 50% of those people have a problem related to mobility. Some were amputated or injured; others had congenital diseases that ended with a certain limitation of their abilities. What is the main challenge that you face in Mexico? Our main challenge is that the situation of handicapped people is not properly addressed by the authorities, mainly because of the way it is seen in the society and among families. We want to change people’s mind and prove that handicapped people have the right to be taken into consideration for economic activities. We want to show our government and institutions how important it is to rehabilitate disabled people to be productive again. We are launching a large awareness campaign through a special PR strategy by showing the problems we have as a country. Very often, recruiters avoid hiring disabled people, even with equal skills. How are you addressing this issue in Mexico? People need to understand that disabled people are normal. That’s why the backbone of the problem is: awareness, making people understand that it is not something strange or bad, and that it could happen to anyone. We want to show them that we are all equal no matter what physical problem some of us may have. We need to reinforce and increase laws in favor of handicapped people. At Ottobock, we are taking this very seriously and we have already suggested solutions and projects to Mexican politicians to address these challenges. O Mexico: Healthcare & Life Sciences Review 2013 60 MEDICAL DEVICES Made in Mexico Along the US border, Baja California, Chihuahua, Sonora, and Nuevo Leon have been key destinations for international medical device manufacturers for decades. Companies there have set up shop to benefit from “maquiladoras.” It’s the Mexican term for manufacturing operations in a free trade zone where companies can import materials duty-free for assembly in the country as long as most of the finished products are shipped back out. The regime has made Mexico a particularly attractive manufacturing location and the numbers show it. According to data from Global Trade Atlas, by 2011 Mexico’s medical device exports surpassed USD$ 6 billion, putting the country in eleventh place for the industry globally. Additionally, Mexico is the leading exporter in Latin America and is the main supplier to the US. Many of the big names in US medical device manufacturing are set up along the border to benefit from the system. With manufacturing facilities in Tijuana and Sonora, Medtronic is one such example. Other companies include Becton Dickinson, Productos Bard de México, BSN medical, among many others (see chart opposite). US-based company Baxter has manufacturing roots going back to 1948. Victor Pedroza, managing director for the company in Mexico, said the country has long been attractive to US companies. “We decided to come to Mexico and very early on, we also chose to have manufacturing facilities in the country. Mexico has a lot of opportunities to offer, mainly a very large market, and proximity to the United States”, says Pedroza. Beyond maquiladora and the strategic location, companies are also attracted to Mexico for its low labor costs, high quality of work, and strong intellectual property Sonora 19 exporting companies Chihuahua 45 exporting companies Coahuila 21 exporting companies Nuevo León 46 exporting companies Baja California 67 exporting companies Tarnaulipas 38 exporting companies Jalisco 52 exporting companies Estado de México 48 exporting companies + Concentration of companies Distrito Federal 238 exporting companies Source: ProMexico Mexico: Healthcare & Life Sciences Review 2013 Other exporting companies 170 “Mexico has a lot of opportunities to offer, mainly a very large market, and proximity to the United States.” Victor Pedroza, managing director for Baxter in Mexico protection. Bio-Rad Laboratories, a USbased life sciences company, opened a state-of-the-art manufacturing facility in Mexico City in 2010 and has been exporting all over the world. Octavio Zendejas, regional manager of Latin America for the company claims that “our manufacturing facility is perhaps the only one in the diagnostics segment fully ISO 13485 certified in Mexico. Thanks to this certification, we are exporting, mainly to Europe but also worldwide.” “We are producing according to the highest international standards of quality, and this is perceived positively in Mexico. When you invest in such certification and with all the high tech production systems, your products may not be the cheapest on the market, but they are the best”, boasts Zendejas. According to BSN’s Lezama, Mexico is an essential hub of production for the group, with its largest facility located MEDICAL DEVICES in Reynosa. “We now employ more than 500 people there, despite the fact most of the facility is automated. We have five different manufacturing lines. Ten percent of the production stays in Mexico; the US represents 70% of exports and the rest goes overseas. We are in the optimizing phase for the moment, but when we’ll need additional capacity, we do have additional plans for another facility in Reynosa. 61 However, some critics of the current situation caution that Mexico’s reliance on the US for exports is far too great. The difficult economic situation in the US and President Obama’s move to strengthen economic ties in Asia could threaten the status quo in the future. For increased stability, Mexico should make a move to expand export destinations beyond its northern border. O Mexico’s main trade partners for medical devices (2011) Imports (million) Exports (million) United States 5639 92.9% United States 1993 65.7% France 145 2.4% Germany 233 7.7% Ireland 144 2.4% China 195 6.4% Germany 19 0.3% Japan 72 2.4% Netherlands 15 0.2% Switzerland 48 1.6% Belgium 11 0.2% Netherlands 48 1.6% Canada 11 0.2% Brazil 42 1.4% Venezuela 10 0.2% Ireland 41 1.4% Columbia 8 0.1% France 37 1.2% 1.1% UK Other Total 8 0.1% Taiwan 34 62 0.1% Others 289 9.5% 6072 100% Total 3032 100% Source: Global Trade Atla “ Thanks to [our] certification, we are exporting, mainly to Europe but also worldwide.” Octavio Zendejas, regional manager of Latin America for Bio-Rad Laboratories Think in Safety Think in B. Braun B. Braun Mexico | Tehuantepec 118 | Roma Sur |Del. Cuauhtémoc | ZIP 06760 | Mexico City Lada 01 800 522 7286 | Tel +52 (55) 5089 7800 | www.bbraun.com.mx Mexico: Healthcare & Life Sciences Review 2013 62 MEDICAL DEVICES Doing Business With “Integrators”: A Unique Distribution System In Mexico, health institutions are increasingly issuing tenders based on the cost of procedure, rather than individual devices or products. From the anesthesia and the surgery instruments, to Class III medical device, companies are called to provide the integral package. This is a tough task given that companies rarely have such a broad portfolio. Therefore, new firms called “integrators” are putting all of the pieces together and taking on increasingly important role in Mexico’s distribution system. For Siemens Healthcare, the company has come to rely on integrators for the sale of clinical products and diagnostics. Siemens’ Villazon estimated that “around 80% of the public business and also some of the private hospitals use integrators and do not invest directly in clinical laboratory equipment.” This is clearly an advantage for public institutions. “They do not need to invest in assets, and avoid warehousing expenses and product losses or damages. The integrator is responsible for overall operation of the laboratory taking that weight from the healthcare institution. This concept is gaining power, and it has already expanded into areas like laparoscopy, anesthesia, short term surgery and other healthcare services, with a tendency to keep growing into services like diagnostic imaging and oncology”, concludes Villazon. Philips healthcare division develops a wide range of medical devices including large size equipment, such as MR and CT scanners. Alejandro Paolini, general manager of Philips healthcare in Mexico, believes that integrators play a key role in the country’s distribution system today. “I believe the government used the integrators as a means to face the infrastructure gap. Appropriate infrastructure and standard quality service in health are the real issues.” “In order to close this gap, the government offered two different options – Integral services and public-private partnerships. Philips for example has sold its equipment to different integrators, and as a provider of equipment we remain transparent with all our clients. In the end, selling our equipment to integrators is the same as selling to any other client from the private sector,“ Paolini said. It’s a good outlook to have because these integral service providers are gaining ground in Mexico’s healthcare system. According to Mejia of Smith & Nephew, “These integrators have completely changed the market dynamics and we believe they will stay in the market for a very long time.” O Mexico: Healthcare & Life Sciences Review 2013 “I believe the government used the integrators as a means to face the infrastructure gap. Appropriate infrastructure and standard quality service in health are the real issues.” Alejandro Paolini, general manager of Philips healthcare in Mexico DISTRIBUTION Source: BOMI de Mexico 64 Distributing Health 3PLs: the new prescription for distribution The Mexican distribution market has traditionally been dominated by a handful of very powerful wholesalers: Nacional de Drogas (NADRO), Casa Saba, Casa Marzam, and Fármacos Nacionales. However, as market dynamics change, one niche is emerging as the trusted partner to the industry: Third Party Logistics companies (3PLs). Mario Sicilia, CEO of 3rd party logistics company BOMI Mexico tells us, “The suppression of the manufacturing plant requirement has helped the third party logistics industry, because we have had more customers from outside of Mexico. Our solution is usually their best option to comply with regulation and create value. These kinds of customers can operate using our sanitary license after signing a contract with BOMI. This saves a lot of time with COFEPRIS, and of course guarantees a better and more efficient logistics operations.” Moreover, as pharmaceutical companies start selling directly to pharmacy chains and supermarkets, another market opportunity was created for 3PL companies. Indeed, if this distribution channel is new for the healthcare industry, it is not unknown to some of these companies. DHL, for example, already handles a large part of the distribution volume to these outlets - around 20 to 25% of their loads every day - creating economies of scale and allowing them to deliver multiple orders in a single truck. Luis Felipe Martinez, Senior Director of Operations Retail, Life Sciences, Strategic Development of DHL Supply Chain Mexico continues on a third market change which benefitted the 3PL industry: the rise of integrators. “Our perception is that integrators are traders that add real value because of their commercial skills, but show no real desire on developing expertise or participating and investing in distribution. This creates opportunities for companies such as DHL Supply Chain to combine our logistics know-how with the commercial ability of the integrators”, he explains. Mexico: Healthcare & Life Sciences Review 2013 “Our perception is that integrators are traders that add real value because of their commercial skills, but show no real desire on developing expertise or participating and investing in distribution.” Luis Felipe Martinez, Senior Director of Operations Retail, Life Sciences, Strategic Development of DHL Supply Chain Mexico DISTRIBUTION 65 the cutting edge of security advancement and options. We have developed some of the technology in house, with the goal of protecting our customers’ products. Our state of the art boxes can only be opened by a GPRS satellite device. Our GPRS technology even allows DHL to track the merchandise even in the case of theft”, Martinez explains. “Similar to our investments in facilities and controls, we invest in full monitoring systems which help us control and maintain our operating conditions. Our GPRS system has multiple purposes: monitor the temperature in real time, analyze the vibrations inside the truck, and assess the driver’s behavior. We go even further by voluntarily monitoring humidity even though it is not yet a requirement.” he continues. “We always try to make our employees aware that they are not just pulling a cart or pushing a box in the warehouse: they are saving or improving someone’s life.” Mario Sicilia, CEO, BOMI de Mexico The company also managed to take advantage of the geographic context as many medical devices are assembled in Northern Mexico along the maquila model, and the cross border flows represent an important strategic opportunity. Outsourcing logistics is also increasingly seen as a real winwin partnership by healthcare companies. “Outsourcing logistics allows companies to focus on their core business through a less expensive and more transparent operation; you get one invoice for the cost of logistics, rather than having a ‘black box’ in your P&L. Logistic Operators also take care of all compliance with warehousing and distribution regulations for their customer”, BOMI’s Mario Sicilia explains. “Moreover, companies who choose to outsource eliminate the need for CAPEX, and have the flexibility to grow because they don’t need to invest in a warehouse. If operations increase or decrease, we can adapt to that as well. We ultimately receive a customer’s product, linking their manufacturing processes to their final customers. We act as commercial partners to our clients, keeping in mind that their success is ours.” However, managing logistics in Mexico is not a walk in the park. Whether it is insecurity, theft and robbery, the climate or the geographic disparity of the country, the challenges are real and have to be overcome. “Our vehicles and facilities have GPS active monitoring and are protected 24/7 by strong dissuasive processes and active protection forces. In addition, when a customer requests an escort or a guard inside to protect the merchandise of the truck, we provide this service. DHL Supply Chain stays on But beyond the challenges, distributing health is no common business. According to Mario Sicilia, BOMI’s success comes directly from the company’s philosophy that he has spread among the employees: “When I came into the company, we changed the historical mission and vision to a mantra that says: “We save and improve lives”. We always try to make our employees aware that they are not just pulling a cart or pushing a box in the warehouse, but they are saving or improving someone’s life. This has also allowed us to link ourselves much more closely with our customers, especially those who are focused on high quality and high service level”. O The new distribution paradigm Own DISTRIBUTION Challenges PRODUCTS Biotechnological products handling ies part third h g u Thro MARKET Regulatory harmonisation • Temperature • Traceability • Expiration • Negotiation • Pharmacy chains • Supermarkets • Reduction of regional warehouses • Increase number of direct shipments • Increase minimum delivery size • Computerise orders processing • Computer-designed distribution routes • Environmental protection Benefits, (financial, tax, logistic, medical care) Information Technologies & Communications (EMR, m-Health, e-Health) Socially Responsible Business Source: PwC Mexico 2012 Mexico: Healthcare & Life Sciences Review 2013 66 INNOVATION Creado en México? Forgetting the maquila – and looking at Mexico’s innovation capabilities The rise of healthcare costs around the world is transforming the way life sciences are evolving. Governments are increasingly being forced to streamline and review their provision of healthcare services while private industry faces greater pressure to develop new business models, molecules and products while lowering expenses. At the heart of this evolution lie the clinical trials that provide the basis for all new drugs released into the market. With a heightened focus on maintaining costs as low as possible, pharmaceutical companies are more frequently conducting their trials in countries that offer a price advantage. From Eastern Europe to Asia and Latin America, R&D of new pharmaceutical products has become a truly globalized endeavor, forcing countries to compete against each other in order to attract R&D investment. India and China have been leading the trend, attracting the largest number of trials outside of the US and Europe. In Latin America, Brazil and Argentina have traditionally been the favored destinations for clinical research, with Mexico trailing behind. This scenario, however, has been shifting over the last few years as Mexico leverages its advantages to become a likely contender as a preferred clinical trial destination. “The main advantage of developing clinical studies here in Mexico, aside from the significantly lower costs, is the type of population that we have – from children and adolescents, to adults and seniors, and from a variety of different climates that enables us to re-create different situations and setups for the clinical trials”, explains Arturo Rodriguez, President of the Association of CROs in Mexico (ACRO). Mexico’s ethnic diversity is undoubtedly a boon for the pharmaceutical industry, Mexico: Healthcare & Life Sciences Review 2013 INNOVATION 67 The country has fantastic world class institutions for generating scientific and engineering talent but it is critically important to provide strength to Mexican small and medium sized organizations that create and innovate. [...] Alandra Medical’s successes are meant to reflect well on Mexico as a research location, to stimulate other Mexicans to participate in a value chain, and to be a global testimony of Mexico’s high quality level of research, innovation and creativity.” David Hite, CEO, Alandra Medical as it allows companies to test their drugs on a wide variety of gene pools at the same research location. Furthermore, as Mexico’s economic development has progressed, the disease profile of the country is comparable to that of the US and Europe, where pharmaceutical companies make most of their profits. “Currently Mexico is working on harmonizing guidelines for clinical trials with those of the international community”, adds Rodriguez. This will inevitably make the country more competitive once universal protocols become standard practice. In July 2012 The Mexican Federal Commission for the Protection of Sanitary Risks (COFEPRIS) was certified by the Pan American Health Organization (PAHO) as a national regulatory agency of regional reference, alongside those of Brazil, Argentina, Colombia and Cuba. After this event “the government has promised to reduce regulatory process timeframes, and to also increase the number of reviewers, at the same time implementing a specialized section in COFEPRIS made up of experts who will work on setting up a faster approval structure depending on the type of submissions”, states Rodriguez. The agency was set up in 2001 as the country’s independent regulatory body that oversees all activities related to the healthcare industry, from research and pharmacovigilance to the control of pharmaceutical marketing. Since its creation, attracting clinical research has become a priority for the country. Time is of critical essence for clinical trials, and is often cited by companies to be more important than cost concerns. Some pharmaceutical companies still complain that Mexican approvals are slower than they need to be, averaging 14-16 weeks. However, this is still quite speedy when compared to Brazil and Argentina that hold average approval times of 8-11 months and 6 months respectively. Mexico is becoming particularly attractive to small and medium-sized biotech companies based in the US who collaborate with Big Pharma to create new molecules for them. Since these smaller biotech companies do not have the deep pockets that Big Pharma does, the cost savings of clinical research in Mexico and the acceptable timeframes have become rather attract. The bottom line is that there are still many improvements that can be made for Mexico to become a major clinical trials hub. This includes increasing the number of beds available for clinical research given that overall the country has a shortage of beds to meet the needs of its population. Additional sites are also needed considering that most of them are now public institutions with stretched resources. Furthermore, one of the main challenges to clinical research in the country is quite specific to the Mexico’s diverse cultural and linguistic heritage. The informed consent of patients in Mexico can prove to be burdensome due to language barriers and illiteracy in the country. UNESCO estimates that 10% of the Mexico: Healthcare & Life Sciences Review 2013 68 INNOVATION country’s population is illiterate, while other statistics place this number closer to 50% of people being functionally illiterate. Similarly, with over 50 indigenous languages spoken across the country, getting patients to sign a consent form can be tricky when they don’t speak Spanish or even less English. This has caused some questionable ethical practices in the past where patients were simply coaxed to participate in clinical studies without truly understanding the risks. Arturo Rodriguez of Infinite Clinical Research explains how his CRO has dealt with this issue. “The main step taken was the audits, both from those inside the same clinical research companies, and externally. Our business culture does not allow a mistake to happen more than once, and this can be attributed to the amount of feedback with which we work. For example if a doctor did not register a piece of information or did not safe-keep paperwork for the patient the solution we find to prevent it from happening a second time is almost always through better training for those involved, and for those who were not, but who can learn from the situation.” Examples such as this are proof of Mexico’s improving clinical research landscape and of a general cultural shift to increase life sciences R&D in the country. This notion Mexico: Healthcare & Life Sciences Review 2013 has even led companies to develop drugs in Mexico and to question whether the country can in the future create its own molecules for the rest of the world. Some local academics are strong believers that the country has the capacity for pure innovation and are betting on local scientists to come up with new products. They have gone as far as creating a Biocluster that is entirely dedicated to research in developing life science products. Dr. Gregorio Cuevas, president of the Biocluster explains that “eight years ago I developed ‘Biocluster’ which is a not-for-profit group made up of the State Council for Science and Technology, various Universities in the state, different Chambers, the State of Jalisco, and the pharmaceutical companies dedicated to research and promotion in the biotechnology sector. I set up this group to get everyone involved in putting the state of Jalisco on the map in terms of biotechnology. We are looking at the companies here that are investing in new technology that can be applied in the sector. At the moment we are working on tissue clusters in order to develop vaccines with re-combinant proteins and synthesized peptides. Before we start any new research project, we always ask the government which are INNOVATION the strongest demands at the moment in the healthcare sector, and as a result we are working predominantly on novel treatments for diabetes, obesity, and cancer. We have also made it clear to COFEPRIS that we are not working on generics, or bio-similars; we are innovating to provide treatments for currently unmet needs in biotechnology. Because of this we have received special pre-approvals for our laboratory phase developments from them. If we can show them that we comply with the entire federal requirement for bio-tech research and development then we can move to the second step. Biocluster is the first group of its kind in Mexico, and initiatives such as this in Jalisco really help the company to push research forward and to soon become the leader in its field on a national level- we are breaking a lot of paradigms.” Certainly this initiative is commendable, although some experts lament the limited “cluster effect” found in Mexico’s healthcare and life sciences sector today. Jose Alarcon, partner at PWC Mexico, claims that “Mexican academic institutions, both public & private, should be playing a bigger role in transforming the way healthcare is 69 being provided in the country – simply because they train the health professionals and are a key player in research. For instance, Tec de Monterrey or Panamericana, as well as public universities such as the University of Nuevo Leon, should have the entrepreneurial spirit to join forces and create APPP (Academic Public- Private Partnerships) such as bioclusters. That would be a key driver that would create some change rapidly. The concept of bioclusters is still a challenge for the industry but is slowly emerging – and one example is the Campus BioMetropolis in the south of Mexico City.” However, some question how successful or productive these initiatives will be. Guillermo Abdel Musik, director of competitiveness at the Autonomous Technological Institute of Mexico (ITAM) recommends that before spending resources, the government should establish very specific investment priorities in order to reach critical mass and the cluster emulation necessary to innovation. Altogether, rather than spending these resources on research that might eventually not be marketable, he suggests that Mexico should concentrate on what they know to do best: creating innovative business models that directly address the inefficiencies of the national healthcare system. O Mexico: Healthcare & Life Sciences Review 2013 70 CASE STUDY: SILANES Developed in Mexico: Silanes as a case study Silanes is the first and only Mexican company to have an innovative drug developed on home turf and approved by the FDA. Guillermo Funes Rodriguez develops on his winning strategy. We are an innovative Mexican company that invests more than 10% of our sales back into R&D. Mexico is still our principal market, and we have five manufacturing plants in the country, including a 52,000 square meters plant in Toluca for solid pharmaceuticals. In 2007 we formed an alliance with the Brazilian company Ache Labs, after which we started exporting to Brazil. We also have another international strategic alliance with Sanofi, in order to distribute anti-diabetic products in other Latin American countries, and we also have an alliance with Procaps, a Colombian company, to distribute our products in Colombia. With these strategic alliances we can cover South America, while still operating our own forces in Mexico and Central America. On the research side, our investment program is three-fold. The first area is traditional pharmaceuticals with a very strong emphasis on cardiovascular, diabetes “We are ready to compete globally. The approval of Anascorp was just our first step” GLOBALIZATION Mexico: Healthcare & Life Sciences Review 2013 CASE STUDY: SILANES 71 and metabolic disorders which include obesity. In this area we have patents, alongside twenty two academic liaisons in Mexico, the United States, and Europe. venom, which we subsequently submitted to the FDA for analysis and approval. It took them 11 years- but we finally got the approval. The second area of our investment is in biotechnology, which has three main focuses. The first focus is on our antivenom treatments which we use as a platform, and might also be used to treat pain. The second focus is on molecular biology and genomic techniques, in partnership with UNAM and a research institute in the United States. Our third focus is on molecular diagnostics, where we are investing in both pharmacogenomics and proteomics. Anascorp is a completely new patented and innovative drug that is selling fantastically in the United States, and now we also have sanitary registers for the drug in Africa and we will be launching Anascorp there in less than a year: specifically in South Africa, Kenya and Senegal amongst others. If we had decided to go into the North American market with just generics, as other companies have done, we would have failed because Asian countries are selling their generics to the Americans much more cheaply than Mexicans ever could. So we had to conquer the North American market with quality and innovation in the field of biotechnology. The biotechnology branch of the company, Bioclon, developed Anascorp which is a snake, scorpion and spider bite anti- Receiving FDA approval means open doors everywhere you go because it is the agency of reference. By the end of 2013 we hope to have two more products approved by the FDA, and we will then submit a further three. Now we know the mechanisms and the processes behind approvals, we can be more efficient and faster in complying with them. The long term outlook of Silanes is fantastic: we have patented products in biotechnology, and with a plant that is FDA and soon to be EMA approved, we are ready to compete globally. The approval of Anascorp was just our first step. O Headquarters: Amores 1304, Col. Del Valle México D. F., C. P. 03100 Tel. (52-55) 5488 3700 Manufacturing plant : Prolongación 6 Norte No. 200 Parque Industrial Toluca 2000 Toluca, Edo. de México. Tel. (722) 548 0770 www.silanes.com.mx Providing the world with health solutions AND INNOVATION Mexico: Healthcare & Life Sciences Review 2013 REINVENTING HEALTHCARE 73 Reinventing healthcare Mexico: Healthcare & Life Sciences Review 2013 74 EXPERT EYE 3 questions about Public Private Partnerships (PPP) to Jose Alarcon, Partner Healthcare at PWC Mexico Mexico’s PPP law is expected to transform the healthcare landscape, with procurement for infrastructure projects but also high tech services. Lessons to be learnt from Mexico. What are the challenges and opportunities of having a PPP implemented today? Where there are not enough resources, PPPs come in line as an innovation in financial models. Thanks to PPPs, the government has an enhanced cash flow management to provide the services they want, and the patients get better efficiency. It also brings better infrastructure that is built faster. The financial model is a trust in which the government allocates ticketed resources. There is in most cases a 20 to 25 years contract in which the private sector commits to build and then operate the infrastructure for this period of time, providing the management while the government provides the supervision and the clinical services. The real challenge is to educate and raise awareness among the local governments on how the PPPs work. How do you incentivize local governments to engage in PPPs ? The advantages of a PPP are very clear. First, they reduce risk for the government, as responsibilities and costs are shared with the private sector. Another very important factor is that cash flow pressure on the government side is reduced, allowing for bigger scale projects in the short term. In turn, this means that the population is provided with better services. PPPs also reduce administrative complexity for local governments, as the daily management of logistical services such as cleaning or laundry can be managed by the private partner. Finally, PPPs leave a lasting legacy for the government administration that created them. Mexico: Healthcare & Life Sciences Review 2013 EXPERT EYE 75 “The real challenge is to educate and raise awareness among the local governments on how the PPPs work.“ José Alarcon, Partner at PWC Mexico The main obstacle and challenge of PPPs is that they require strong and agile leadership from the government side. Strong leadership is the key, since the political cycle is illadapted to PPPs. The local governments have to think through a long-term vision if they want to make the right choices, but on the other hand they are only in place for 6 years, which makes the task much more challenging. The issue is making sure that they leave the right projects in place for the future government without causing problems to the population, especially if there is a change of political party. Also, you need to sell the idea to the local congress and unions and convince them you are not giving away public property. That is a matter of education and awareness, and I am confident this will soon be an issue of the past. Then, agile leadership, as PPPs are complex to implement politically. For example, the only players that have the financial leverage to build the infrastructure and get payments only after initiating operations are medium to large size companies. Often, the state governments tend to like more to provide investment opportunities to local or national companies that are often too small to support the financial challenges of integrating a PPP. A way around this challenge would be that the large companies often hire the smaller local companies to benefit from their market knowledge. Another political challenge that requires agility is being able to find a constructive agreement between federal & local levels for effective patient referral. How do you get a PPP right for all parties in the healthcare industry? In the planning stages, it is crucial that the government gets the best advice possible as it is a long term and highly complex project. The first step is to get a strong market study in order to forecast the size of the hospitals. It is absolutely critical to identify the minimum demand level to justify the project and guarantee to private investors the minimum return on investment they could receive – and this has been a major problem in Mexico so far. Then, the government should get a detailed business plan that would serve as a grid to evaluate the quality of proposals in the bid phase. On the private side, companies should identify the right level of definition of the architectural design to ensure harmony while allowing reasonable flexibility of design and amenities. The rest of the factors are linked to typical successful project management: adequate governance structure, a quality supervisor, monitoring key performance indicators (KPIs), independent assessors, appropriate penalties, and a strong Project Management Office (PMO) for aligning work streams and oversee risk management. It is also very important to look at what has been done in Mexico PPPs project up to today, to extract best practices and capitalize on lessons learnt to better plan the next PPPs. One of the lessons learnt in Mexico is that the market study period is critical. Two of the PPPs conducted in Mexico – in Nuevo Leon and Ciudad Victoria –faced a big challenge there because there was an apparent mismatch between the infrastructure built and the actual demand. Second, there is a need to gather the most precise details in the bidding process phase to increase transparency and avoid legal complications at a later stage. Third, the medical devices companies can’t bid for a 25 year contract when they don’t know what tomorrow’s technology will be. Therefore, the timeframe for medical device has to be divided into several layers, depending on expectations for the technology’s future obsolescence. We could also think of different models such as opening to full service outsourcing for certain areas of the hospital, and leasing the equipment with a service level agreement. Fourth lesson is how to deal the IT infrastructure in the hospital, and whether to keep it in the frame of the PPP or leave it outside. There is no rule here, but this is something that needs to be considered. Another question that was raised is how to include the clinical personnel in the PPP – and correctly evaluating how much staff will be necessary to correctly run the hospital is crucial. Last, Big Pharma still has to find their place in PPPs, possibly by offering clinical trials that could take place in those hospitals. If pharma companies get smart enough, they can win with PPPs. O Mexico: Healthcare & Life Sciences Review 2013 76 INTERVIEW: VITALMEX Interview with Jaime Cervantes, President of Vitalmex Discussion on how integrated services are reshaping the Mexican healthcare system… and beyond. Can you give us a historical overview of the company and tell us about the vision behind its creation? Vitalmex is a very humanistic company that puts the patient at the center of its activities. We focus on a very specific strategy based on 3 goals: accessibility, availability, and opportunity. There is clearly enough money for healthcare in the country. However the issue is infrastructure and the articulation of the fragmented elements of the system: it is too complex and not efficient. Vitalmex saw this issue 20 years ago. We were pioneers as we were the first integrator in the country, creating the comodato system (when the government buys equipment, they have to buy all the accessories from the same provider) and the first offering an integrated services model. It means that innovation, medicines, information, technology, financing, are articulated around the patient’s needs. Mexico is a very challenging country when it comes to healthcare, and there are a lot of barriers that do not allow us to work as we wish. At Vitalmex, we are used to changing paradigms and we happened to modify the way the government was purchasing products, just by our strong will to improve the system. We realized that we had invented a very specific business model that could even become an example for other countries. We convert the investment in equipment to current expenses, which helps the hospitals and the government a lot. We believe that if private companies get a bigger role in the healthcare system, by offering better management systems and integral solutions, the level of care will increase and the country will be able to offer better service to its population. How would you describe your growth strategy for the near future? There are 3 different Mexicos that need to be taken in account, and therefore 3 different ways to do business. Mexico: Healthcare & Life Sciences Review 2013 INTERVIEW: VITALMEX 77 “To work with the poorest, we need to change the way we behave: that is why we are not only distributors, we are not only manufacturers, or integrators, but we are developers of healthcare systems. We want to give them accessibility, availability and opportunity.” Jaime Cervantes, President of Vitalmex The first Mexico is extremely rich, with 23 million Mexicans that can receive world-class and expensive care. They are the target of the 5-star hospitals that Mexico as such as Hospital Angeles, ABC etc. The second Mexico is based on the social security system, where the employees prepay for their care through their federal taxes. However people are not using this system fully because the quality is not always reliable. The third Mexico accounts for 40 million people, which are considered as poor. They are supposed to rely on Seguro Popular, which is a fantasy. The level of training of the staff working in these institutions is very low, funds are misused, the infrastructure is in bad condition, the equipment is obsolete, abandoned, 80% of the budget goes to payroll, so the institution is only running with 20% of the budget dedicated to the patient. We decided to focus on this bottom of the pyramid target because the challenges are huge and it is in our values and philosophy to try our best to increase the level of healthcare for this part of the population. To work with the poorest, we need to change the way we behave: that is why we are not only distributors, we are not only manufacturers, or integrators, but we are developers of healthcare systems. We want to give them accessibility, availability and opportunity. How can developers create value for Mexico? As developers we want to create 4 different criteria for value. First, we want to create what we call flexible standardization, with a system that could be individualized, universal and functional. Second, we can bring economic benefits to the government from our solutions. We have engineers looking at the best technology, even to reuse equipment that is obsolete in Europe or in the USA but that could be refurbished and used in Mexico at a low cost. Our third criterion is simplicity, in order to create an affordable solution. We provide exact numbers and statistics to the government and we align our offer to these realistic needs, which creates economical advantage. The fourth is the guarantee of service, because we are committed to provide high quality. Our offer is completely unique: it is not focused on the hospital, not on the surgeon, nor technology. Our one and only focus is the patient – and we have strategic partnerships with companies such as SAP, Philips, Johnson&Johnson, Boston Scientific… Today in Seguro Popular, everything is purchased and organized separately: transportation, technology, telecommunications, medical equipment, infrastructure, staff training, logistics, etc. What Vitalmex offers is putting everything together. Our offer is an integral solution based on a yearly fee with a cost per patient. We make sure to avoid any kind of shortage, lack of staff or technical problem as the service is global and takes every variable into account. In some cases the government might even ask us to build new hospitals or refurbish some clinics. We also train and provide physicians. We are not selling products but opportunity of health. We operate all the equipment and are in charge of the maintenance. We basically provide everything to run a hospital so that the patients can get the best care out of the available infrastructure. Our first project where we were able to show that we were pioneers was at a public hospital in Veracruz for which we have a 12-year contract. Based on the PPP law, our hospital runs 15,500 procedures per month in Veracruz, and we created 150 jobs there. We installed surgery rooms, high specialty surgeries, imaging, hemo-dialysis clinics. We raised the capacity and productivity and the perception of quality of the service we provide is up to 96%. We developed not only a new business model, but also a new healthcare system. Our knowledge of integrated services can allow us to be developers and spread our program with universities, social funds, non-profit organizations, private hospitals, etc. The system is so fragmented in Mexico that we could be the solution to unify all the different segments that compose the system, if the government would contract us, state by state. We have a strategic planning of 20 years and we want to contribute to a better future for Mexico. Vitalmex is also opening in Spain, Peru and Colombia because we believe our model could help other countries solve their healthcare issues. O Mexico: Healthcare & Life Sciences Review 2013 80 LEADERS Looking for leaders “The right job can transform a person’s life. The right person can transform a business.“ Gerardo Kanahuati, partner Healthcare, Hays Mexico In the face of globalization and convergence, leadership skills within life sciences are becoming increasingly crucial for the success of the sector. Whereas in the past most industry leaders had a purely medical and technical background, the leaders of today must have a solid grasp of business concepts, as well understand different legal, financial and cultural frameworks. Often functioning ambassadors of a global group in their country, they must not only adapt best practices to the local needs, but also develop the company’s operations, while being flexible towards the rapid changes of the industry. To address these challenges, those industry leaders need to be strongly trained and talented. Recruitment firms such as Hays Mexico or Korn Ferry help companies find the best match to take the reins of their operations. According to Carlos Apellaniz, Sector Leader, Life Sciences for Korn Ferry, the main asset for a candidate in leading positions of the healthcare industry should be its “Learning Agility”. Korn Ferry has coined the concept and assures it has the highest correlation to success and return on investment that can be observed. Apellaniz explains that “some practices support the idea that high potential individuals are individuals who will be able to grow certain number of levels in management positions in a defined timeframe. The truth is quite different, since high potential individuals are individuals who are capable of switching from a completely new role and yet be successful in either parallel or higher positions in their organizations. The key is to always locate an individual who has a strong learning agility. Being able to anticipate in order to better understand the changes of the market is key to survive in a very competitive landscape. “You need to separate two different angles in the profiles: the expert and the creative individuals. The experts are capable of grasping the market by analyzing past factors and defining the stakeholders – yet that is not necessarily enough in the current changing dynamics. On the other side, the creative ones are highly innovative, but do not necessarily understand the new trends in time in a pragmatic way. The ideal individual must be balanced between the expert person and the creative mind, in order to have the ability to learn and deliver results in both a short and long term, while adapting to the new circumstances.” Hays Mexico, another recruiting firm with a specialized life science subsidiary, takes a long-term view of future structural changes by identifying 4 trends that will change the work landscape: the emergence of structural growth markets; the macroeconomic cycle; skills shortages; and the globalisation of the flow of labour. This is why Hays Mexico “helps clients simultaneously deal with talent shortages in certain markets, while having to reshape workforces in others”, says Gerardo Kanahuati, managing director of Hays Mexico. “Industry leaders need to be more proactive and take strategic long term commitments”, he concludes. “The right job can transform a person’s life. The right person can transform a business.” O Mexico: Healthcare & Life Sciences Review 2013 “Some practices support the idea that high potential individuals are individuals who will be able to grow certain number of levels in management positions in a defined timeframe. The truth is quite different.” Carlos Apellaniz, Sector Leader, Life Sciences, Korn Ferry SUCCESSFUL TARGETING AND SALES, WITH A SIMPLE CLICK..! 82 DIABETES Convergence in action: a focus on diabetes Type 2 diabetes is Mexico’s leading cause of death – but could be prevented through education, risk screening and early treatment. According to the Mexican Ministry of Health , there are currently 11 million people living with diabetes in Mexico, and data published suggests that there will be more than 16 million sufferers by the year 2030. Not only is the disease incurable, but diabetic patients are sometimes referred to as “ticking bombs” given the variety of medical complications associated with the disease – retinopathy, heart diseases, kidney failure, diabetic foot just to name a few. As it stands, it is estimated that diabetes represents about 35% of all Mexico’s public health spending, and as the prevalence increases, so do concerns for the sustainability of the healthcare system as a whole. Joel Duran Chavez, director of marketing for Mexico at Novo Nordisk, suggests that due to the sheer size of the problem, a solution backed by all stakeholders in the market has to be found. “Given the speed at which diabetes is rising we need stronger collaborations and partnerships in order to change the mentality of the Mexican people. We should beat diabetes before it beats us.” From treatment to patient care Not many people can disagree with that stance, but it may be easier said than done. Even today, there is still social stigma surrounding diabetes. This would probably explain the high percentage of undiagnosed sufferers – around 35% of Mexican diabetics haven’t been diagnosed yet according to statistics. In the meantime, Mexico continues to be top in the world for child obesity, and number two in adult obesity. Carlos Lopez Patan, general director of Medix, the Mexican healthcare company specialized on obesity, explains that “diet, nutrition and exercise are extremely important but there are also several psychological, social and environmental factors to consider when looking at treatment for a patient. We can’t just offer a product, but you need a holistic solution that addresses many factors in the equation.” Novo Nordisk’s Duran believes there is a strong emotional connection with food in Mexico because of the high proportion of family events that involve eating. “This Mexico: Healthcare & Life Sciences Review 2013 “You need a holistic solution that addresses many factors in the equation.” Carlos Lopez Patan, general director, Medix DIABETES 83 “Given the speed at which diabetes is rising we need stronger collaborations and partnerships in order to change the mentality of the Mexican people. We should beat diabetes before it beats us.” Joel Duran Chavez, director of marketing for Mexico at Novo Nordisk emotional connection is preventing a lot of patients from making small but crucial changes in diet and lifestyle habits that would enable better treatment compliance”, he explains. “It´s very hard to change the cultural habits, and as a country it is key not to lose our cultural identity. Family and social events are common in our culture, and that will not change. Therefore, education is a main prevention factor for diabetes and obesity”, shares Claudia Duran, President of the Mexican Federation of Diabetes. If mentality is the underlying cause of both under-diagnosis and non-compliance with treatment, it becomes even more important to break down barriers and start to tackle this mammoth. Carlos Baños, president and general director of Eli Lilly in Mexico believes, along with the majority of the industry, that education is the only answer to address treatment compliance. This not only involves telling people about the disease and what they need to do, but tailor-making real educational solutions for society. “In Mexico the average person reads fewer than two books a year. This is a big challenge because we can produce the most beautiful material about how to manage diabetes, but achieve nothing because the materials have not been read.” One of Eli Lilly’s solutions to the problem is an educational tool called Diabetes Conversations Maps. “This tool was developed globally and adapted locally to adjust to the culture of Mexico. It is a game, similar to Monopoly, which helps teach people living with diabetes and their family all they need to know on the disease and how to care for themselves”, he explains. “The most important health problems must be attended by everyone: government, private enterprises, patients, families, doctors, and society at large” Claudia Duran, President, Mexican Federation of Diabetes Education can often be seen in Mexico in the form of a trained nurse who spends more time with the patient than the doctor in the patients’ own homes, to show them how to use the treatment equipment, how to clean it and store it properly. A big investment on the part of the healthcare companies, but brand loyalty for chronic illnesses is surely worth it. Dominik Bacher and Reto Zoppi, director general and commercial director respectively of BacherZoppi, the leading contract sales organization in the Mexican healthcare market, remember their first contract promoting a diabetes related product. “We had to set up a pool of psychological talent to support the patients throughout the therapy. The support teams also trained the patients’ relatives on technical and nutritional aspects, and kept the patient motivated through the initial adaptation phase. Compliance is also a driving force with the physician: if a patient drops out of the therapy, doctors become more cautious in recommending the therapy to the patient. This has been an incredible learning experience for us - to be closer to the patients, understanding them, considering their context, their family. The industry is just starting to see the tip of the iceberg when it comes to patient care. “ Mexico: Healthcare & Life Sciences Review 2013 84 DIABETES to neighborhood grocery stores and pharmacies to provide health management opportunities for casual shoppers. Today, Previta has also entered the mobile health (mhealth) segment with their trademark e-healthtracker. Falcon is another company investing in mhealth. The company recently launched a program called HDO designed to work with the clinical history of the patient. “We want to use algorithms to cross reference the patient’s medical information, which will allow the program to automatically provide medical recommendations to the patient. The idea is to create a dynamic interface between our system and the patient”, explains Alejandro Bolin, Falcon’s general manager and head of HDO. By using accurate indicators and business rules, the program would update the patient’s statistics without having to send him to the clinic. Morgan Guerra, Founder, Previta From mobile health units to leading the mobile health revolution Mexican health authorities clearly feel the urge to shift from a curative health scheme to a preventive approach, and this is materialized through a series of prevention policies encouraged by both companies and institutions. Companies started to commit themselves to this new goal of teaching better nutrition habits, by implementing wellness programs at the work place such as encouraging the use of stairs and the consumption of fruits. One of the pioneers in mhealth in Mexico is the The Carlos Slim Health Institute. Today their groundbreaking diabetes monitoring program DiabeDiario is in evaluation phase of 600 patients in the city of Xalapa, Veracruz. If successful, DiabeDiario could have a tremendous impact not only on the Mexican healthcare landscape – but also worldwide. What is certain is that, in a country that has more mobile phones than people, mhealth is set to reinvent the way Mexicans deal with diabetes – and the way they perceive their healthcare system. O The second main channel of prevention improvement is encouraged by the government through the use of “Health Caravans”, medical mobile units created by the Ministry Of Health, that can diagnose and alert people on certain health habits rather than just provide curative care. These mobile units are an opportunity for the country to solve part of its diabetes problem, by implementing more mobile facilities able to raise awareness on nutritious habits and weight in the country. This is an issue directly linked to the very uneven distribution of infrastructures and human resources throughout the country, since some rural areas do not get to see the opportunity to see a specialist physician or receive proper care on time given the scarcity and fragmented quality of care in remote regions. Some innovative companies have decided to tackle the prevention challenge. Created in 2004 by two brothers, Morgan & Christian Guerra, Previta provides preventive healthcare services, including diagnostic tests, clinical laboratory exams, vaccinations, and affordable and convenient health-monitoring programs. Previta’s mobile health centers treat communities and corporate employees through preventive campaigns, while its retail clinics venture Mexico: Healthcare & Life Sciences Review 2013 “In Mexico the average person reads fewer than two books a year. This is a big challenge because we can produce the most beautiful material about how to manage diabetes, but achieve nothing because the materials have not been read.” Carlos Baños, president and general director of Eli Lilly