Process Mapping Improving Organizational Performance

Transcription

Process Mapping—
Improving Organizational
Performance
GBAS Business Administrator Institute
November 14, 2013
Copyright © 2013 by ScottMadden, Inc. All rights reserved.
Agenda and Objectives
Agenda
 Introduction to Process Improvement Framework
 Analyze
 Design
 Implement
 Applying What We’ve Learned
 Breakout Session
 Report Out
 Wrap-up
Objectives for today’s GBAS Institute
 Provide participants a process improvement framework to use in future redesign efforts.
 Generate ideas and discussion around potential improvement areas in your respective departments and
colleges.
 Perform a process walk-through to illustrate how to break down process improvement components and
apply them to your day-to-day work.
1
Introduction to the Process
Improvement Framework
Process Improvement Overview
Introduction to Process Improvement
What’s a Process?
 A series of actions or steps taken to achieve an end (dictionary.com)
 A collection of related, structured activities or tasks that produce a specific service or product (Wikipedia)
We Perform Processes Everyday
 For example, what is the process for filling up your gas tank?
1. Notice that your car needs gas
2. Locate and drive to a gas station
3. Pull up to an available pump
4. Select a payment method
5. Select a fuel type and grade
6. Pump gas
7. Replace nozzle and gas cap
8. Start your car and leave gas station
What Do We Mean by “Improvement”?
 A review, analysis, and assessment of a business process to identify opportunities to:
 Better align with business strategy and goals (e.g., university, college, or department initiatives)
 Work “smarter” not “harder” to meet increasing business demands
 Gain efficiencies and reduce process costs
 Improve product and/or service quality
 Create a better customer experience
 Encourage continuous improvement (there’s always room!)
Improvements can take on a variety of traits, but the end result should produce
a streamlined, standard set of clear process steps.
3
Process Improvement Overview
Common Process Improvement Framework
A common method used for process redesign is demonstrated in the following 3-step approach.
Analyze
Design
Implement
What is the problem?
What is the solution?
Solve the problem
 Define the problem
 Determine the scope
• Delineate where the process begins
and ends
• Identify related processes and
process owners
 Perform current state assessment
• Identify what process metrics are
available (e.g., transaction volumes,
cycle time, operational costs, etc.)
• Collect and organize data
• Conduct current state process
interviews (shadow sessions) and/or
facilitate workshop sessions
• Draft current state process maps and
review with stakeholders
 Define future state design guidelines
(i.e., criteria or guiding principles)
 Draft “ideal state” process flows (vision
of the future)
 Identify external considerations
(technology, budget, business
constraints)
 Conduct future state design sessions
 Identify potential business impacts
 Complete stakeholder review
 Define future state performance
metrics and service levels (i.e., time
between process initiation and
completion)
 Document design decisions
Common Tools:
Project Plan,
Organization Charts,
Process Inventories,
Process Maps
Common Tools:
Improvement Log,
Impact Analysis,
Basic Technology
Requirements
Desired Outcomes:
Baseline data,
Improvement
opportunities,
Validated current
state process maps
4
Desired Outcomes:
Future state process
flows, stakeholder
buy-in, high-level
communication
milestones
 Identify process requirements (e.g.,
technology, tools, staffing)
 Communicate and manage change
 Design and build tools and technology
(as required)
 Test the process/system and adjust as
needed (e.g., pilot, simulation)
 Develop and deliver training
 Determine transition needs
 Document the final process
 Develop continuous improvement plan
Common Tools:
Implementation
Plan,
Communication/
Training Plan,
Procedures and
Guidelines, Training
Materials
Desired Outcomes:
Improved service,
service level
agreements, quality
metrics and reports,
higher automation,
less workload
Analyze
Analyze
Analyze
Understanding and Analyzing a Process for Improvement
It is critical to conduct a thorough analysis of your existing process(es), although this phase is commonly
overlooked. Without a firm, understanding of how a process currently works, there is no foundation on which
to build an improved process.
Common Mistakes:
 Not clearly understanding the problem or related
issues
 Believing the process is well understood and well
documented
 Believing that everyone shares the same view of a
process
 Not getting enough perspectives or including
adequate subject matter expertise
 Not documenting and agreeing on the current state
 Not developing a standard format to document results
 Not assigning a process owner to take accountability
for process analysis, improvement, and future
maintenance
How to Avoid Pitfalls:
 Assign a process owner to lead the analysis
 Identify relevant stakeholders
 Determine which SMEs should be involved at the
appropriate juncture
 Collaborate and develop a standard template (or
use an existing one provided by the University)
 Document process flows
It is essential to include key stakeholders and subject matter experts (SMEs) in your analysis to ensure you’ve
covered all of your bases.
Failure to develop a solid understanding of the current state through data and process analysis will
result in a future state design built on a rocky foundation of assumptions and “best guesses.”
6
Analyze
The Key to Analyzing a Process
We will break down the process improvement framework into simple, manageable steps.
Analyze
Design
Implement
Solve the problem
Step 1
Define the
Problem
 Identify issues
 Determine what
needs to be
solved
7
Step 2
Determine
the Scope
Step 3
Collect
Information
 Define the
start and
end of the
process
 Build a data
request
 Collect
available
information
Step 4
Review and
Document
 Identify
stakeholders
and SMEs
 Interview or
conduct
workshops
Document
results
(findings,
improvements,
flows, etc.)
Step 5
Analyze and
Validate
 Validate findings
with stakeholders
and SMEs
 Finalize
documentation
Analyze
Analyze
Step 1 – Define the Problem
Process improvements are often identified by the individuals who know the process the best. As you complete
your day-to-day work, ask yourself (and your peers) some simple questions:
1. Why am I doing these particular steps?
2. Are there duplicative steps being performed by me and anyone else?
3. Can I eliminate any of my steps?
4. Am I handing off information in the best way possible (e.g., paper versus automated routing?)
5. Who is using the information that I am generating?
6. How are they using it?
7. Can I generate and provide the information in a simpler way?
Identify a process, or set of processes, that would benefit from undergoing further examination.
Empower your organization to ask the simple questions that will drive improved results!
8
Analyze
Analyze
Step 2 – Determine the Scope
Once a process or list of processes has been identified for further evaluation, you must clearly define the
process scope.
 Select process(es) that will address the key problems defined within your organization (e.g., where is the biggest
“bang for the buck”)
 Prioritize using level of effort and level of impact to your organization
 If possible, use your organization’s strategic goals to help determine which processes should be tackled first.
 Clearly define the “start” and “end” of each process or set of processes
Start
 For example, if evaluating the HR Onboarding process, define the following parameters:
– Does the process start when the new hire ePAF is initiated?
– Or does it start after the candidate is hired into PeopleSoft?
What is the
process
trigger?
– What is the trigger to start the process?
End
– Does the process end once the new hire completes day one?
– Or, does the process end after all paperwork is signed?
– Or, does the process end after the department checklist is complete?
– What is the final step in the process?
9
What is the
process
terminator?
Analyze
Analyze
Step 3 – Collect Information
This step begins by building a request and collecting the pertinent data. While the type of data required
depends on the organization and process being examined, a typical data request may include organizational,
operational, and external pieces of information.
Organizational Information
 Organizational charts (high
level)
 Organizational charts
(detailed/functional)
 Job descriptions
 Employee (FTE) counts (regular,
temporary, contract employees)
Process and Operational
Information
 Performance metrics,
KPIs/targets
 Process staffing
 Volume of transactions
 Operational costs
 Error, scrap/rework rates
 Process technologies and
automation (current/planned)
 Business rules or policies
 Process maps and/or
procedures
 Training guides or materials
External Information
 Customer data (volume,
markets, segments, etc.)
 Data specific to the industry,
organization, or process (e.g.,
product information, market
data)
 Documentation from other
business cases, benchmarking
studies or other process design
initiatives
Example for University ePAF Process
 Department ePAF roles and
responsibilities
 HR Core roles and
responsibilities
 FTEs performing work
10
 Benchmarks (personnel
 PeopleSoft transaction volumes
transaction cycle times
 Process cycle times (e.g., initiation
and error rates)
through recycle)
 Recycle rates (errors)
 GatorStart / eVerify system
 Directives, procedures, and toolkits
Analyze
Analyze
Step 4 – Review and Document
In addition to hard data, a thorough process review should include collecting “anecdotal” information from
individuals that are 1) experts within a certain functional area or perform an integral role in the process, 2) are
recipients of a service provided by the process (e.g., travel authorization), or 3) are a key stakeholder in the
process.
Determine the appropriate interview targets as well as the best venue to collect the information. For example, if
redesigning the pre-award process you may want to speak to:
 Principal Investigator
 Department Grants Administrator
 Contracts and Grants Specialists
 DSP Research Administrator
 Transaction Entry Owner (person
entering transactional data into system)
One-on-one Interviews
Sessions can be
conducted in an
interview format or
through a workshop
(group) session. You
may choose to
“shadow” the
processors.
11
Workshops
Pros
 Individuals are not
influenced by others
 Can get “into the
weeds”, including
detailed process steps
 Get an individual
perspective
 Faster / more efficient
 Participants often feed off
of each other
 Get a comprehensive view
of the process
Cons
 Takes longer to meet
with each person alone
 May miss out on group
interaction
 Get only one perspective
(per meeting)
 Individuals may be hesitant
to speak publicly
 Can be difficult to control
and stay on task
 Process differences can be
overlooked
Analyze
Analyze
Step 4 – Review and Document (Cont’d)
In preparation for the interview sessions or process workshops, we recommend creating an interview guide to
keep the audience on task and to ensure all information is covered.
 Develop and ask clear questions that provide answers to your “problem statement,” for example:
 How long does it take to create and submit a promotion request?
 How long does it take from the time a promotion is announced for the promotion to be effective?
 How many approvers are required?
 Do thresholds exist that can minimize number of approvals?
 How frequently are promotions given? Is this the same policy company wide?
 Do specific promotion criteria exist?
 Are policies standardized across the organization (department, college, University)?
 Understand particular pain points evident in the process
 Obtain information on future state improvement opportunities
 What ideas do the interviewees have for process improvements?
 Document responses and follow up as needed
12
Analyze
Analyze
As you complete your interviews or workshops, document your findings and draft the process maps.
A process map (or process flow, or flowchart) is a graphical representation of a process that:





Identifies all of the steps in a process (the “what”)
Demonstrates the order and logic supporting the steps (the “why and when”)
Depicts roles and responsibilities (the “who”)
Clearly shows handoffs between functions (the “where”)
Demonstrates how technical tools are used in the process (the “how”)
Benefits of process mapping:
 Establishes an agreed upon baseline (current state) for process improvements
 Increases transparency in the process (e.g., around types and number of handoffs)
 Ensures consistency and standardization
 Prevents diffusion of responsibility or duplication of efforts
Keys for success:
 Organize by functions (swim lanes) that depict what organization is responsible for a process step
 Delineate process step owners within the swimlanes, as need (clarity only)
 Use diamonds to highlight decision points
 Include communication / information sharing methods (email, phone, PDF, hardcopy, etc)
 Differentiate systems by color coding (e.g., myUFL, ISIS, NERC)
 Clearly define where a process begins and ends
 Use notes to add additional clarifying information
13
Analyze
Analyze
Sponsor*
UF Pre-Awards Process
Current State
Begin
Dept Admin/
SSC/PI
DSR
Proposals
Note: Process shown
for new grants.
However, process
does not change
significantly for
temporary awards
Swim Lanes: depict
who is completing
activity
Forward to Sr.
Clerk to enter into
Mail Log
(Team Lead)
DSR Awards
Email & Hardcopy
inboxes “triaged”
(Team Lead)
Is the item a
question or for
action?
Print hardcopy (if
electronic) and
assign to RA to
work
(Team Lead)
For Action
Notes: Used to add
descriptive detail
Can question
be quickly
answered?
Enter item into
Mail Log and route
to assigned RA
(Sr. Clerk)
Contact Sponsor,
PI, Dept, or SSC
for information
(RA)
Return to RA to
revise/complete
(RA)
Verify PeopleSoft
data complete.
Submit to C&G
(RA)
No
Print NOA and
send to approver
(RA)
Enter award into
NERDC and
review for
completeness
(RA)
Is the
information
complete?
No
End
Approve NOA?
Review hardcopy
NOA
(Team Lead or
Asst Director)
Note: Information
includes budget,
compliance reviews,
subcontracts,
subprojects, etc.
Yes
Sign NOA and
return to RA
(Team Lead or
Asst Director)
Merge/Mark NOA
approved in
NERDC
(RA)
Batch NOA and
send to Sr. Clerk
(RA)
Yes
Decision: Indicates the point in the
process where a decision must be made.
Typically have Yes and No exit arrows
Note: Answered emails do not get logged in Mail Log
Process Box: The actual process step or
task (action). Responsibility for task is
based on swim lane location
Receive file
(RA)
No
Yes
Answer email
(Team Lead)
Provide additional
information
Note: Information
could include budget
info, compliance
reviews, etc.
Question
14
Connectors: Arrows that link one
process step to another. Process
continues in the direction of the arrow
Triggers/Terminators: Indicates
beginning or end of a process. Will
often be: “Start” or “End”
Scan supporting
documentation into
IBM Client
(Sr. Clerk or Parttime staff)
Off-Page Reference: Used to
link process steps on different
pages.
Theto linked page contains a
Send NOA PDF
C&G, PI & Dept
corresponding
shape to indicate
via email
(Sr. Clerk)
where
the process picks up
Funds
Release Part
1
Analyze
Analyze
Step 5 – Analyze and Validate
Although you will be analyzing along the way, this final step provides an opportunity to critically think about
how to maximize the process potential. It serves as the bridge between current state review and future state
design.
Types of questions to ask yourself when analyzing :
What obstacles
prevent the process
from functioning
efficiently?
Are there any
opportunities to
automate steps in
the current process?
Are there extra steps
or excessive
handoffs and
approvals?
What are the
benchmarks or goals
that the process
should achieve?
Improvement Opportunities
It is essential that the current state findings and recommended improvements be vetted with process owners
and stakeholders. The objectives of this validation step are to:





Ensure consensus on current state results and analysis
Validate process scope – Are changes to scope needed based on information discovered during analysis?
Validate metrics
Understand and agree to recommendations
Prepare the plan for future state design
Once sponsor or stakeholders agree to improvement opportunities, proceed with designing your
ideal future state process.
15
Analyze
Analyze
Step 5 – Analyze and Validate (Cont’d)
An example improvement opportunity inventory that resulted from a detailed review of the University’s ePAF
process review is illustrated below.
#
1
Role
Impacted
All
Originator,
2 Level 1, Level
2
Originator,
3 Level 1, Level
2
Process
Impacted*
All
Hires
Job Status
Process
Improvement
Type
Process
Process
Process
Impact
Description of Opportunity
Streamline approval process for SSCs: Shared Service Centers
should streamline the approval process for Originator and Level 1,
with SSC staff established as Level 1 approvers so that ePAFs do
not have to go to central HR Level 1 for duplicative review. SSC
staff should receive additional/re-enforced training to ensure ePAFs
are thoroughly and accurately completed before submitting directly
to Level 2 (see training opportunity #11)
GatorStart requirement: Departments should require new hires to
use GatorStart (rather than accept paper). Most departments do
so, however those that hire hundreds of employees at one time
prefer not to because they have to spend too much time monitoring
GatorStart. It is easier for them to have all new hires complete
paperwork together in large room setting. If a report, work list
enhancement, or email is created that would differentiate which
new hires have gone through GatorStart and which are outstanding,
departments would be more amenable to fully convert to GatorStart
(see opportunity #18)
Terminations and hires: Departments need to communicate to
Originator when employee leaves their department or is hired so
that Originator can process ePAF. Otherwise, in the case of
terminations, employee continues to get paid. This is not an issue
if the employee's job type has to use time and labor, but is an
issue if employee is not required to use time and labor (e.g., some
graduate assistant students who graduate and continue to get paid
if department does not notify Originator).
3-High
2-Med
1-Low
3
Level of
Effort
3-Low
2-Med
1-High
2
Total
Priority
Score
(high
score =
top
priority)
5
2
3
5
2
3
5
Process
Owner
Action Steps Required
Comments
• Establish transition plan
• Determine additional
training needs for existing
SSC Originators
HR Core
• Conduct training
• Grant Level 1 approval
authority to existing SSC
Originators
• Communicate
requirement to Originators
and Level 1
• Implement opportunity
#18
Departments could still utilize
large room group setting to
help answer new hire questions
as they complete paperwork.
Could have new hires bring
their laptops to complete
HR Core
GatorStart. If doing so, would
need to have Level 1 submit
approval the day before
scheduled session so that
GatorStart feed updated to
allow access to new hires
• Develop communication Does a termination checklist
to educate departments
exist that departments can
• Distribute communication use?
to departments
This is a
cultural/communication issue
HR Core
Talk to audit to put structure in place for when someone leaves.
Sync up access control piece so that any terminations would
trigger access being cut of to building access, computers, etc.
4
All
Hires
Process
16
International hires: Centralize processing of international hires.
This is complicated and time consuming for departments and
approvers. It would be significant help in minimizing recycles and
number of approvals if they could send all international hires
through a central office
3
1
4
• Conduct business case
to determine feasibility,
cost, ownership, etc.
HR Core
• Assemble project team
• Implement establishment
of centralized office
Significant process change
Would need to dive deeper to
determine work load and
potential FTEs
Future State Design
Design
The Key to Designing a Process
The process design component consists of a three-step approach.
Analyze
Design
Implement
Solve the problem
Step 1
Define Design Criteria
 Determine design
principles, including
“must haves” to
achieve goals, as
well as possible
constraints
18
Step 2
Design Future State
 Incorporate process
improvements
identified in current
state
 Document automation
opportunities
 Document process
flows
Step 3
Identify Gaps and
Determine Impact
 Identify gaps between
current state and future
vision (e.g., what changes
must occur)
 Determine impact of making
changes (e.g., other
processes, technologies,
staff roles and
responsibilities, training, etc.)
Design
Design
Step 1 – Define Design Criteria
The process owner should establish and obtain consensus on clear guidelines that define the boundaries and
expectations of the improved process. First and foremost, challenge the current state! This is the time to “push
the envelope” and create an ideal vision for the future state process.
Leading practice process redesign criteria includes:
 Take into consideration the WHOLE process (start to finish, handoffs and sub-processes)
 Streamline to remove process “waste,” for example:
 Eliminate steps
 Automate steps
 Minimize approvals
 Reduce handoffs; cross fewest organizational boundaries (swimlanes)
 Minimize paper
 Establish clear, fast communications
 Assign clear accountabilities
 Eliminate dependencies on individuals to extent possible (i.e., no single failure point)
 Don’t break up processes
 Focus on the process, not the people doing the work
 Understand external impacts
 Business requirements
 Benefits or burdens to customers
 Constraints and degrees of freedom
 Systems, tools and technologies
 Budget
19
Design
Design
Step 2 – Design Future State
Once design principles are agreed upon, the process owner can proceed with the process redesign efforts. We
recommend the following basic approach:
 Conduct process future state design sessions with stakeholders and subject matter experts, leveraging information
obtained during initial analysis (i.e., data, interviews, workshops, improvement opportunities, etc.)
 Create process maps to understand how work is accomplished and where opportunities for improvement exist
 Time-box design sessions and keep participants on track to achieve specific objectives
 Don’t overdesign; move to a test or pilot implementation, if it makes sense to do so
 Benchmark against process goals
 Set process goals (e.g., do you want to reduce errors, reduce cycle time, improve service levels, etc.)
 Obtain benchmarks (e.g., how are other departments, colleges, Universities performing this process?)
 Refine processes, as needed, to achieve goals
Types of questions to ask yourself when creating the future state improved process:
Does the
improvement solve
the existing
problem(s)?
Is it feasible
(technically,
financially)?
Are there short and
long-term
opportunities (“must
have” versus “nice
to have”)?
Process Redesign
20
Does it impact, or
depend on, other
processes?
Design
Design
Step 2 – Design Future State (Cont’d)
Pre-Awards Process – DSR Awards
Future State
SYSTEM LEGEND
Sponsor
PeopleSoft
Document
management system
Start
Centralized
Management System
Dept Admin / SSC /
PI
•
•
•
•
Receive inputs
from Sponsors,
Proposals,
Departments, or
C&G into inboxes
DSR Awards
•
Provide additional
information
Contact Sponsor,
PI, Dept, or SSC
for information
(RA)
Includes:
-IRB, financial disclosures, export
controls, etc. (if applicable)
-Commitment form
-Award notification
No
Electronic or hard
copy documents?
Elec.
Open/modify case
and attach
documents
(RA)
Retrieve case
(RA)
Review award
information
(RA)
Hard copy
Scan documents
(Sr. Clerk)
21
Information
complete/
accurate?
Return case to RA
to revise
(Team Lead/
Assistant Director)
No
Approve?
Yes
Access standard
checklist and
supporting
documents
(RA)
Verify PeopleSoft/
budget information
(RA)
Enter award
information
(RA)
•
End
Transfer case to
approver to review
and sign-off
(Team Lead/
Assistant Director)
Yes
Transfer case to
C&G
Key Process
Improvements:
Removed process
steps
Automated steps
Removed paper
Reduced approvals
Recommended
document
management
system
Recommended case
management
system
Design
Design
Step 2 – Design Future State (Cont’d)
1
Hiring Process – Part 1 – Standard Hires for Shared Service Centers
Future State 3/26/2013
SYSTEM LEGEND
New Hire
Start
ePAF
Complete
GatorStart new
hire entry
Accept job offer
Complete initial
department
requested form(s)
End
GatorStart
Come to SSC to
complete
documentation
Receive
GatorStart link
Receive new hire
form(s)
Update and
resubmit ePAF
•
SSC
Complete section
2 of I-9
Hiring
Process Part
2 - Int’l Hires
Yes
Hiring
Process
Part 2 - Int’l
Hires
Receive ePAF
email notification,
and/or run query to
view open ePAFs
End
Approve ePAF?
No
Recycle ePAF?
Yes
No
Review ePAF and
use GatorStart
information to
complete ePAF
Submit ePAF
approval
Contact Originator
to receive
additional
information and
update ePAF
Note: Review ePAF for completion, and
enter info for I-9, W4, race and ethnicity,
veteran status. If international hire,
review applicable scanned documents
End
22
•
•
•
No
Is new hire a NonResident Alien
(NRA)?
Level 2
Note: Loyalty oath
and intellectual
property agreement
must be signed and
notarized
Contact new hire
to schedule time to
complete
documentation
required in person
Initiate new hire
ePAF
International
Tax Navigator
Yes
1
Note: Future state process combines
Originator and Level 1 Approver roles
for Shared Services, and assumes
implementation of potential
International Center organization for all
international hires
Key Process
Improvements:
Improved existing
system functionality
Reduced approvals
Reduced
opportunities for
errors
Improved customer
experience (Gator
Start features)
Design
Design
Step 3 – Identify Gaps and Determine Impact
Identify gaps between your existing current state and your newly designed future state process, such as
technology, organizational, or other processes changes. It is important to understand the qualitative and
quantitative impacts that may result from the transition.
Example Improvement Impacts:
Financial
Technology
•
Increase in operational costs
•
•
Reduction in costs
Changes to tools or
technologies (e.g., case
management, AP automation,
etc.)
Organizational
Stakeholders
•
Organizational changes (e.g.,
roles and responsibilities)
•
•
Policy changes
•
Process changes
23
Impact to customers (internal
and external); customer
experience
Implementation
Implement
Implement
The Key to Success is Execution!
All the work that goes into designing a new, improved process can be lost without an effective implementation.
It doesn’t matter how great the design is, if it is not rolled out the right way.
When developing the plan, the following elements should be considered:








How/who will the implementation be managed?
Do you have management support?
Is staff available to work the project? If so, what are the possible constraints (e.g., semester beginning or end)?
Are all team members clear on task deadlines? Have critical path items been identified?
Is the project calendar aligned with important activities happening externally?
Are there dependencies on other projects? Are there dependencies on your project?
How will you interface with stakeholders or external process owners (e.g., IT)?
How/who will manage the communications and training process?
Thorough
Planning
Successful
Implementation
Plan the work and work the plan!
25
Implement
Implement
Project or Implementation Plan
A common mistake is to say “why bother with a plan? Let’s just go do it!” A detailed plan is a project
management tool that documents activities, assigns ownership, prioritizes, and tracks timelines to ensure the
execution is completed in an effective and timely manner.
Recomnendation
Reference ID
(links to original
opportunity list)
#
1.0
2, 15, 18, 28
Implementation Activity
Enhance GatorStart functionality for ePAFs and require usage for all new hires
1.1 Meet with key stakeholders to discuss specifications
1.2 Document business requirements
Long or shortPriority2
term solution1
Short-term
1, 11
Estimated
Duration3
5 days
5 days
1.3 Meet with ES to review business requirements and evaluate feasibility
1.4 Identiy implementation costs and determine if feasible
5 days
1.5 Document technical requirements
1.6 Build functionality
5 days
1.7 Implement functionality
1.8 Develop training materials
TBD
Streamline approval process for SSCs
2.1 Meet with key stakeholders to discuss specifications
2.2 Meet with Level 1 HR offices to review plan and obtain support
5 days
5 days
5 days
1 day
Short-term
High
5 days
5 days
10 days
2.5 Finalize implementation and transition plan
2.6 Review implementation and transition plan with impacted staff
5 days
2.7 Identify priority training needs for staff
2.8 Develop training materials
5 days
2.9 Conduct training
2.10 Grant Level 1 approval authority to staff
5 days
3
Improve departmental communication for terminations and new hires
3.1 Identify how many issues typically occur
3.2 Meet with Payroll to discuss issue
Involves:
-Implementing functionality to periodically send GatorStart link
reminders to new hires
-Enhancing work list to include indication of new hire
GatorStart completion
-Developing GatorStart email bounce notification to Originator
TBD
2.3 Develop implementation and transition plan
2.4 Review implementation and transition plan with sponsors/stakeholders
3.0
Notes
High
1.9 Communicate/train users on new functionality
1.10 Post communication/trainting to HR website (or other appropriate location)
2.0
Owner
5 days
5 days
10 days
1 day
Short-term
High
Long-term
Medium
3.3 Communicate issue to leadership (Faculty Senate and Dean's Meetings)
4.0
4, 10
Develop centralized international hires office
4.1 Develop business case to determine feasibility, cost, ownership, etc.
4.2 Review business case with sponsor(s)
4.3 Finalize business case
4.4 Secure stakeholder approval of business case
4.5
Execute business case/implement new office (select staff, hire staff, train, etc.)
26
4 weeks
1 week
2 weeks
1 week
TBD
Interim - Track international hire recycled ePAF causes to
work toward reducing recycle rate. Involves:
-Tracking most prevalent errors
-Enhancing/clarifying existing training materials
-Conducting open forum workshops to review prevalent errors
-Distributing training materials and posting to HR website
Implement
Implement
Communications and Training
Well-planned communications and training events must be designed to continuously inform key stakeholders
about changes as well as obtain feedback in order to gain buy-in.
A common communications methodology employed at the University embraces a three-phase approach:
Key Activities
Audience
Goal
Inform
Engage
Prepare
 Inform is designed to provide basic
information about the project to
interested parties and signal that
the project is moving forward
 Engage is designed to provide an
opportunity for stakeholders to
participate, voice concerns and
influence the outcomes of the
project
 Prepare is designed to
communicate changes between old
and new processes and systems to
end users and provide any needed
training and/or information
 High-level University administrators
and College leadership
 Faculty representatives
 Department leadership / staff




 Department staff
 Department chairs
 Office managers





 Reengage with high level
leadership
 Meet with key stakeholders
 Meet with process owners
 Communicate key messages
 Put out communications for
newsletters, forums, etc.
Meet with high level leadership
Meet with key influencers
Identify key stakeholder groups
Define key messages
Develop communications for
newsletters, forums, etc.
27
Select University leadership
Faculty representatives
Department leadership / staff
Ad hoc opportunities / audiences




Delta sessions
Develop training materials
Refine training
Determine roles requiring training
and delivery methods
 Deliver training
Implement
Communications and Training (Cont’d)
It is imperative not to short-change training efforts. Determine who needs to be trained on what topics (e.g., new processes, new
technologies, PeopleSoft, etc.), and plan training accordingly.
Department
Staff
Human
Resources
Department
Staff
Fiscal
Department
Staff
Insert
Audience
Insert
Audience
Manager 1
Manager 2
Staff 1
Staff 2
HR Staff 1
HR Staff 2
HR Staff 3
Insert
Financial Staff 1
Financial Staff 2
Insert
Insert
Insert
Insert
Insert
Insert
Insert
Insert
Insert
Insert
28
Insert Training Subject
Insert Training Category
Insert Training Category
Customer Service
Workshop
Customer
Communication
Customer Service
Initiating Travel
Authorizations
Processing Vouchers
Operations
Staff
Software Introduction
and Usage
Audience
Group
University of Florida
Directives &
Procedures
General
Applying What We’ve
Learned
Applying What We’ve Learned
Breakout Session Exercise – Task and Instructions
Your Task
 Create a current state process, identify improvement opportunities, and document future steps.
Instructions
 Stay at your existing table (or combine with a nearby table if you have less than 4 people)
 Select a process to assess and improve from the following functions (you may select an alternative process if you’d
prefer)
 HR
– Terminations
– Leave of Absence
– Onboarding
– Foreign National Processing
 Fiscal
– Travel Authorizations
– Expense Reporting
– Pcards
 Grants
– Proposal Submissions
– Budget Development
30
Breakout Session – Exercise Part 1
Define the Problem
 For example, what are the main issues with the process you’ve selected?
 Cycle times (process components and start to finish)
 Costs
 Performance
 Manual versus automated processes
 Error rates
 Other?
Define the Process Scope
 What process are you evaluating?
 Are there other sub-processes that may be impacted?
 Where does the process begin and end?
Evaluate and Document the Current State
 Write the steps down in the process (~10 steps); keep relatively high-level at this stage.
 You may do this in a numerical list format, a simple process flow, or however your team
can capture the key information.
You will have 10 minutes to
complete this exercise.
31
Breakout Session – Exercise Part 2
After documenting your current state in Exercise Part 1, you are ready to begin designing the ideal future state.
You must identify improvement opportunities.
 Review your findings
 Develop a list of process improvement opportunities (don’t need to draw out process map)
 How would you change the process?
 What overall improvements would you recommend?
32
Breakout Session – Report Out
Select a volunteer from your table to share your process improvement ideas. Only one group will report out to
everyone.
We welcome volunteers!
33
Wrap-Up
Wrap-Up
So What’s Next?




Return to your departments and share knowledge gained in this session
Identify potential processes in your areas to further evaluate
Put a plan into place to analyze, design, and implement
Follow-up with GBAS leaders on any initiatives undertaken in your area
 Workshop will be planned for 2014 to share lessons learned around a particular process
improvement effort
35
Contact Us
Courtney Jackson
Kevin Hernandez
Director
Senior Associate
ScottMadden, Inc.
2626 Glenwood Avenue
Suite 480
Raleigh, NC 27608
CourtneyJackson@scottmadden.com
O: 919-781-4191 M: 919-672-7521
ScottMadden, Inc.
2626 Glenwood Avenue
Suite 480
Raleigh, NC 27608
KevinHernandez@scottmadden.com
O: 919-781-4191 M: 202-640-8662
36
Appendix: Example Tools
Analyze
Interview Discussion Guide
Prior to interviews or review sessions, prepare interview questions that will allow you to take a deeper dive into the
key elements of the current state process. Below is an example set of question:
 Interviewees (Define criteria for desired populations)
 Employees (e.g., those that submit X expense reports per year)
 Approvers (e.g., those that approve X expense reports per year)
 T&E auditors (all)
 Delegates (e.g., those that create/approve some amount per year)
 Finance (payroll or accounts payable representatives, depending on organization)
 Travel department (all or some subset)
 Process Details
 What format do you use to enter expenses? (Excel spreadsheet, software, etc.)
 Who do you send your completed report to for approval?
 What do they do with it after it’s approved? What do you do?
 How do you submit your receipts?
 Do you review all receipts before approval?
 What do you do with the report once approved?
 Are you reimbursed before you are required to pay your credit card bill?
 Data and Process Metrics
 How long does it typically take from the time you complete your expense report to the time your manager approves,
signs, and returns the report to you for processing?
 How long does it typically take to receive your expense reimbursement check after submission?
 How long does it take, on average, to approve an expense report?
 What volume of expense reports are processed annually?
 How many expense reports are returned monthly due to data entry errors? For non-compliance with policy?
38
Analyze
Process Development Tools
Visio is the most widely accepted process development tool.
39
Design
Future State Impact Analysis
Impact Categories
Impact Description
Process
Future State Recommendation
(e.g., if a financial impact - describe the cost
components requiring further analysis)
Cost/
Savings
Work Arrangments Telecommuting
For PS and GTS all current telecommuters would
not be eligible (those telecommuting are doing so
b/c they don't live in state...)
Tax/Legal requirement that employee must
- On-site customer reps - how to handle? How to
telecommute from state in which BAE has a legal
meet customer needs if can't have on-site in
presence. (Is it BAE Inc. or the legal business
state? Assignments are typically 2 years (not
entity?) - tax implications?
short-term)
- Can we complete an IWO for employee to
circumvent issues?
X
Deployments
Employees will be required to maintain company
sponsored global health care
X
Deployments
a) Additional cost associated with paying holiday
Holiday pay will be paid for the actual holiday in
pay in addition to hours worked b) Impact to
addition to the actual hours worked unless super
deployed EE's (not being able to take the day off
ceded by host country law
when they return)
40
ES does not require Aetna Global (company
sponsored health care).
Systems
Staffing
X
Policy
Business
Operations
Other
X
X
X
X
(employee
morale)
Implement
Supporting Process Detail – Procedures
Step
Who
Process Step
Detailed Steps
Part 1 – Submitting an Employee Referral
1
Referring
Employee,
Referred
Candidate
Identify qualified
individual to refer to
BAE for consideration
as potential hire
Apply for BAE Systems
job at
www.baesystems.jobs.
Note employee’s name
in the “Referred by” field
 Referring employee identifies potential candidates, discusses available
opportunities and reviews the referral process
 Referred candidate applies for the recommended job on BAE Systems
external careers website, noting the name of the employee in the
“referred by” field
 Employee visits internal career website and submits an employee
referral, including the candidate’s resume
 The Resource Center is not involved in this initial phase
Part 2a – Processing Referral Bonuses
2

Recruiter
Offer
Generation


Update candidate
status in Hodes iQ to
“Hired”

The second phase of this process immediately follows the “offer
generation” process
After the candidate returns the signed offer letter and passes the preemployment requirements (background and drug screenings), the
recruiter updates the candidate’s status to “hired”
Hodes iQ generates a referral report which includes the following:
1) Receiving Employee ID
2) Earnings Code
3) Earnings Amount
4) Project ID
5) Account ID
6) Organization ID
An email is sent to the Resource Center from Hodes iQ containing the
referral report
Note: This step is a touch point for OFCCP compliance
<Insert screenshot with what the referral report looks like>
3
Recruiter
Additional award?
Additional
award?
Recruiting
Support
Specialist
(Tier 2)
YES – employee is eligible for additional
award
41



Referring employees are entered into quarterly and annual drawings for
prizes; however, job referrals may be eligible for an additional referral
bonus
Employees eligible for the referral bonus are included on the referral
report generated by Hodes iQ
On the employee’s 360 Degree View, create a new Employee Referral
case
Proceed to step 4

Process Mapping Improving Organizational Performance

Transcription

Similar documents

Free Gas InserT LIner KIT

Acting As A Proxy

Host Company Tour Application

Eiffel Tower - University Games

Tri-Base - Lavi Industries

Cost vs. capacity The first hard drive in 1956 was the IBM 305

iFanz v3.0 Tips Message | Media Editor 1. To insert an image, click

Installation of Scrolling Banner CNFS00 1

How to Use the EAZI-BREED™ CIDR® Cattle

ST INF_Game_of_Onboarding_Tabloid SS1514