The most expensive slide rule
Transcription
The most expensive slide rule
ISSN 1466-3570 June 2009 No. 32 NEWSLETTER of the UK SLIDE RULE CIRCLE Editor: Colin Barnes, 189 Mildenhall Road, Fordham, Ely, Cambs. CB7 5NW England Tel: 01638 720317 e-mail: models@clara.net Editorial Paul Crowther crowther781@btinternet.com A short Editorial this time as there is much of greater interest in this issue. Particularly note the arrangements for the Autumn Meeting at Bletchley Park (TNMOC) and our Appeal for Funds to enhance the slide rule display at this venue. A friend of Tom Martin’s obtained information on images of the scientific instrument maker, R. B. Bate (1782-1847) and his wife Anna Maria, daughter of Sikes the well-known maker of hydrometers. These images were to be auctioned in Cambridge and with great forethought the Whipple Museum was notified. Happily the Whipple took note of this and purchased them. These images are thought to be the only ones in existence so this acquisition can be considered as something of a coup. On a completely different subject, have you noticed that cars being driven in the TV ads have no driver? Willy Robbrecht w.robb@telenet.be Sadly I have to report the death of Anthony Manville who passed away in the middle of March. TNMOC - UKSRC As promised in the last issue here are some further images taken of the setting up of the slide rule display at TNMOC New Members Thanks to Dieter von Jezierski for recruiting Georg Schreiber to the UKSRC. Welcome. His address: Berliner Strasse 269 D-47918 Toenisvorst Germany ge.schreib@t-online.de Also welcome to Peter Sealy: peter.sealy@pera.com Kevin Murrell of TNMOC, Tom Martin and two interested visitors Address Corrections Please note the following corrections in your Member’s Directory: Hans Peter Schaub should read: CH 4123 Allschwil Yukio Kubota Fuji Shizuoka 421-3301 Email address changes: Two of the UKSRC information panels 1 Skid Stick Issue 32 June 2009 Photo John Robertson MK News NEWS RELEASE, 20 February 2009 The UK’s largest public exhibition of slide rules unveiled at The National Museum of Computing at Bletchley Park Tom and Peter put the finishing touches to the display Between the abacus and the computer came the slide rule Since our initial visit your Hon. Ed. made a return visit to the Museum for a photo shoot by a professional photographer. This session was in preparation for the following news release which has now featured in PC World, MK News and the Guardian with various additions by the editors of these publications. The diversity of slide rules, the analogue predecessors of digital computers, is celebrated through the newest exhibit at The National Museum of Computing (TNMOC) at Bletchley Park. Curated by the UK Slide Rule Circle (UKSRC), the display of more than 40 British slide rules spans three centuries and shows the variety of shapes, sizes, materials, and purposes of this sophisticated calculating device. The earliest exhibit is the wooden Gunter’s Rule, first used in the mid 17 th century by navigators and astronomers, and the most recent is a 1960s/70s Photographic Interpreters’ slide rule made by Blundell Harling. The following images were included with the news release: Invented in the 1620s, soon after the publication of the concept of the logarithm, slide rules were in use right up to the 1980s. Their decline began in the 1960s with the advent of electronic computers and calculators. Photo John Robertson PC World "For 350 years the slide rule was the world’s pre-eminent calculating device and its design needed remarkably little modification to maintain its dominance," said Colin Barnes of UKSRC. "In contrast to modern calculators, slide rules were never throw-away items. One or perhaps two would be used throughout a career. They are marvellous pieces of engineering and craftsmanship and the display at The National Museum of Computing pays Photo John Robertson The Guardian (Hon. Ed. and Kevin Murrell, Director of TNMOC) 2 Skid Stick Issue 32 June 2009 tribute to slide rule designers and users across the centuries." 1980s, and many of the earliest desktops of the 1980s and 1990s. "We often wonder how we manage without computers – and this slide rule display indicates just how we did," said Kevin Murrell, a TNMOC Trustee and Director. "We’re delighted to work with the UK Slide Rule Circle to bring this hidden piece of history to the general public. It is of tremendous educational value and we know that will be of great interest to our ever-increasing number of visitors." The Museum is currently open Thursdays and Saturdays from 1pm. For more information, see www.tnmoc.org To coincide with the opening of the display, the UKSRC has produced a booklet to provide a beginner’s guide to the world of the slide rule. Copies of this are available from TNMOC with proceeds shared between TNMOC and the UKSRC. Included in this publication are contact details for the UKSRC, Kring, RST and OS. Always popular with the tax man, one exhibit dating from 1775 is a wooden foursided volume-calculating slide rule used to determine the amount of spirits in a barrel. Another, a circular slide rule with 18 gauge points enabled the rapid computation of interest payments. Other professions and trades were also enthusiastic users of slide rules: Ewart’s Cattle Gauge from the 1840s has an integrated tape measure to calculate the live weight of cattle and percentage of meat on the bone; and the Timber Rule from the 1920s was one of the first industrial applications of the slide rule and was used to calculate timber volumes (making allowances for bark thickness). Passing of an Era Some of you may have noticed that the Stanley Auction held on Saturday 28th March 2009 had a number of lots that included the external and internal signage and display cabinets, as well as the famous work-bench, from Roy Arnold’s shop in Needham Market. Roy has been not well for some time now, and it is a great shame that he has obviously decided to cease trading, and indeed that the business could not be continued as a “going concern”. From my point of view, I have yet to discover whether Astragal no longer have an agent in this country – more anon when I have discovered what is happening The UKSRC and TNMOC have jointly published a ten-page booklet, A Brief History and Types of Slide Rule. It is available for £5 including p&p from TNMOC www.tnmoc.org About The National Museum Computing at Bletchley Park on of The National Museum of Computing at Bletchley Park, an independent charity, houses the largest collection of functional historic computers in Europe, including a rebuilt Colossus, the world’s first electronic programmable computer. Very Simple Thinking Around Numbers The Museum complements the Bletchley Park Trust’s story of codebreaking up to the Colossus and allows visitors to follow the development of computing from the ultra-secret pioneering efforts of the 1940s through the mainframes of the 1960s and 1970s, and the rise of personal computing in the 1980s. New working exhibits are regularly unveiled and the public can already view a rebuilt and fully operational Colossus, a working ICL 2900, one of the workhorse mainframes computers of the D. Len Peach I believe that anyone who has a natural interest in Number Handling Tools cannot fail to have a similar innate interest and fascination in the very root of our interest, the Numbers themselves and how they relate to each other. For even out of simple addition, some surprising patterns emerge that are both intriguing and rather amazing at the same time, 3 Skid Stick Issue 32 June 2009 because they can and do explain things we might not have quite grasped the first time round in our now far away school days. Bookworm “The Young Dual Arithmetician;” or, Dual Arithmetic Oliver Byrne Even the word ‘difference’ was always a difficult one for me to get to grips with mathematically at school, and yet so much hung on it. (I am a bird of lesser brain, and was labelled a late developer!) Also a lot of us now have grandchildren and this thinking might be of help when talking about numbers and sums with them and so add to our credibility! Thanks to Bill Thacker, (well maybe!) comes this puzzle which had me scratching my head till I got splinters. This book (available via Google books, http://books.google.com/) was published in London in 1866, and appears to be one of many by Byrne (formerly Professor of Mathematics, College for Civil Engineers) on the subject of Dual Arithmetic, which was completely new to me, but seemed to promise much! The title page talks about “Tables of Ascending and Descending Dual Logarithms, Dual Numbers and corresponding Natural Numbers”. I thought single logs were interesting enough. As a very simple example and if you have never done it before, starting at zero just progressively add our even numbers together, then the uneven numbers together and finally add the odd with the even numbers together and note the patterns that emerge from these successive tables of answers. There is little point going much beyond 20 as the tables will then show clearly the patterns that emerge. I share this exercise because around 50% of people suddenly realise links they did not realise were there, especially regarding differences and squares. The Preface starts “Those who examine Dual Arithmetic in all its bearings will find that a branch of greater importance has not been contributed to mathematical science”. Wow! Later it continues “The tables given in the third part are more comprehensive and more easily used than any tables hitherto calculated. They are equal in power to Babbage’s and Collet’s combined and take up less than one eighth part of their size”. Double Wow! Suitably impressed I continued with my study and by about page 15 or so out of 227, found Dual Arithmetic totally and absolutely incompressible! If anyone can make either head or tail, and maybe more importantly, tell us what that is in a few short paragraphs, I for one will have learned something and probably continue to thank my stars that I only heard about this gobble-de-gook in my dotage! Similarly, if you have never multiplied 123,456,789 by 8, try it and note that answer. Also multiply 123,456,789 by 9 and if you need to multiples of 9 and note again the answers. Next look at the square root of 123,456,789 and look at that answer, and then after a minute (or two) you will probably say: “Of course it is”. At any level the answers are more than a little intriguing, and cause for a little extra thought to see what has gone on. But be warned, it can all get a little addictive when you go to the next logical step and you find that the clocks really are turbocharged! “How Round is Your Circle?” John Bryant and Chris Sangwin Princeton University Press, 2008 ISBN 978-0-691-13118-4 Hardback £17.05 from Amazon books UK Looking at our numbers in this simple way does help our understanding and our ability to see where the numbers are going and patterns that emerge, because patterns lead to formula and codes, and ultimately to those things called computers. I wonder if John Napier ever did such exercises, certainly because the thought behind his “Bones” shows he could. Being subtitled “Where Engineering and Mathematics meet” reflects the contrasting 4 Skid Stick Issue 32 June 2009 backgrounds of the two authors and is what makes the complex subject matter eminently readable. John Bryant is a retired chemical engineer and the UKSRC’s very own Chris Sangwin is a lecturer in mathematics at the University of Birmingham. What a lovely thought, and what’s more, this jangled bells in my memory. The book not only does its bit to dispel irritating modern management speak like “squaring the circle” (Sic: one of the three famous impossibility proofs) but takes the reader on a revealing journey of what we often take too much for granted. For example, could you draw a straight line without a ruler, can you explain how a steering wheel steers or why a Pantograph works? I always had a very high opinion of the children’s version and recommended it to many people who were looking for a simple guide to what at that time was truly newfanged technology. Indeed one of my favourite memories of that time is my then eight year old son explaining to his 80 year old grandfather the subtleties of the ZX81 he had just been given with the aid of just this book which is still in my collection – see above! Has anyone seen or even got a copy of the plain cover version? PMH Alongside references to Gunter rules and sectors, the 306-page book includes a full chapter on the slide rule. Apart from possibly the sections on non-logarithmic slide rules and nomograms, this chapter has little new for the avid collector. However, like John Kvint’s presentation at the IM2003 1, the rest of the book gives a great insight into many related aspects – such as how to design and engineer an accurate scale. Also for those of a more “Blue Peter” practical nature, the book could well get you taking over the kitchen table and trying to reconstruct (instructions provided) some of the many fascinating models featured in the book. For example, can you beat the authors’ record of 30 overlapping tiles that seem to defy gravity? For those with two lefthands or of a more mathematical persuasion, the book recommends some excellent free software for virtual model makers. “Astrolabes at Greenwich” Koenraad Van Cleempoel Subtitled “A Catalogue of the Astrolabes in the National Maritime Museum, Greenwich” published by OUP in 2005 under the ISBN 0-19-853069-2, is a large 12.¾”x 9.½”, beautifully produced dust-jacketed hardback volume with slipcase. The book is probably not a “cover-tocover” read. But by bridging the worlds of engineering and mathematics it will open your eyes to the wonders of many everyday items and make you more inquisitive about how the world around you works. David Rance “The Computer” How it Works Ladybird Books - 1979 The Daily Telegraph Obituary early in the New Year for Douglas Keen: “Editor and creative spirit behind Ladybird Books” included a comment that they had “Produced a plain cover version of the Ladybird How it Works book on the computer in the late 1970s for the Ministry of Defence to inform its staff”. The book came at a suitably reduced price from Postscript, and is the third in a series on the collections of the National Maritime Museum. It is 339 pages, with much excellent high quality monochrome and a number of colour illustrations. There are a number of essays on the features of Astrolabes by various expert authors; Van Cleempoel is 1 John Kvint: “Proceedings of the 9th International Meeting of Slide Rule Collectors”, The Netherlands, 2003, pg 29, Euro 15.00 (KRING Jubileum DVD only) 5 Skid Stick Issue 32 June 2009 the editor and author of the detailed catalogue. A fascinating read on the background to the collection, as well as being the authoritative document on all aspects of these devices. PMH First we have from Guus Craenen of the Dutch Kring: “Rechenschieber im Wandel der Zeit. 1787 – 1906” (“Slide Rules in changing times. 1787 – 1906”). This will be available to order in Greifswald at the German IM in September, and all orders will be sent out shortly afterwards. The book: - 100 Pages - 100 Colour pictures, 60 B/W-pictures - 12 Manufacturers and 12 Inventors in 3 Countries (UK, France and Germany) - Correspondence with Hans Dennert - 25 Experts - 40 Conclusions Guus says it is his best book to date! To order: - Price: Euro 35, plus P&P Euro 5.Contact Guus at: acraenen@wolmail.nl DVD Set – WWII in Colour Daily / Sunday Telegraph I had always associated both World Wars as “Black & White” conflicts, so the recent availability of “True Colour” DVD sets for both conflicts was an education in itself – both wars look so completely different in colour, even more harrowing and awful if that is at all possible. Then we have Peter Hopp’s long awaited book on 2-foot, 2-fold slide rules: “JOINT SLIDE RULES; Sectors, Two-Foot, Two-Fold & Similar Slide Rules”; which should be available via his publisher’s web site: www.jeremymillspublishing.co.uk at about the same time. Advance Notice IM 2010 Preparations for the organisation of IM2010 in Holland have started. We are planning to have this International Meeting in the old city of Leiden on 17 and 18 September, 2010. As always, we would like to have contributions from abroad for presentations. We have no theme into which presentations need to be fitted, so any subject on slide rules or calculating instruments will be welcome. Anyone who maybe has some research under consideration that would benefit from reporting in an international environment and who is willing to prepare and give a presentation would they please contact Otto van Poelje ovpoelje@chello.nl The 7 DVD set for WWII runs for just under 6 hours, the 2nd DVD covering the air war and the special 7th giving the “True Story of the Dam Busters” both contain sequences showing a slide rule, a “whizwheel” and Barnes Wallis using his slide rule. That apart, the different approach taken is educational and enlightening. Recommended. PMH A couple of new slide rule books are planned for publication later this year. Amazing find in the wilds of Norfolk! One of these devices, a “Washington G36” concrete calculator, was displayed and very briefly described at the last IM (see IM2008 Proceedings, page 113). However exactly how it works is a mystery, and the functions of all the various widgets and buttons on it equally so. Subsequently a second example in excellent condition has come to 6 Skid Stick Issue 32 June 2009 light in the wilds of Norfolk, the picture only hints at its splendour! as in the original article. Apparently these are distinguished by having the window in the top part – as did the Golden one. See below: This device came with a 1984 calendar from Montevideo in Uruguay, and a set of Spanish Manuals – hence, pending translation, its workings remain a mystery! There is a separate insert for the scales. The plaque on the beast is: Brevetto Italiano; N236298; Serie G; N978 However, Bill Thacker who generated the original article, has since come up with the ultimate web site for absolutely anything to do with Curta calculators, see: http://www.vcalc.net and for sectioned models add /eu-demo.htm This site is well worth a look. There is an incredible range of devices produced at various times by Contina for demonstration, training and also I’m sure, for sales. I have borrowed a couple of images of the most extraordinary. Illustrated on the web site, but not here, is a model with Perspex body on display in the Deutsches Museum. I would hate to think just how much one would have to pay for such a device were it ever to come on the market! Then we have a cased collection of a sectioned Curta with various associated piece parts. If you can cast any further light on the device and its use or help with a translation of the Spanish instructions, please contact: John Hunt Snr. jhuntsnr@btinternet.com CURTA GOLDEN CUT MODEL (Contd.) Peter Hopp The piece in last Skid Stick prompted several responses on sectioned Curtas, not least it reminded David Rance that a fellow collector had bought a demo/shop window normal-sized CURTA at the German IM2001. This was fully working except the outside shell was made of a clear plastic so that the workings could be seen as it was used - a bit like a transparent Swatch! Anyway, I contacted said member who kindly let me have pictures of that Curta which was not actually one with a plastic shell, but an example of a Contina produced sectioned Curta 7 Skid Stick Issue 32 June 2009 These Curta cases seem relatively common, one features in the 1992/3 Millers Collectors Price Guide with a guide price of £650–£700, probably very expensive even then. The next device, a chromed example (below) I picked purely for its gleaming magnificence, but to what purpose I have no idea, personally I prefer the raw devices! If anyone comes across any other examples please do let us know. Musings 32 Peter Hopp One of my regular sources of inspiration has come up trumps again. Admittedly looking through old Scientific Instrument Society Bulletins is a sad and nerdy occupation, however all such actions on my part start with good intentions – research – and then rapidly go to pot as I get distracted elsewhere! My better half is quite insistent that as I have got older I have got ever more easily distracted. My lame excuse from a Musing or two ago that I now study things much more deeply hardly even gets off the runway. Anyway, two headlines from the autumn 1997 SIS Bulletin No 54 blare off the page (can the SIS Bulletin actually have headlines that blare off the page? Answers on a postcard please) or at least strike a chord in this fevered brain, and are still as relevant 12 years later. “Reproduction or Fake” says one headline; “To polish or not to polish” queries the second; both are topics you have heard me on about previously. Without belabouring the old horse at all, it was new responses and points of view that caught my eye: What should the collector do about reproductions or fakes, we were asked. Truly beautiful, and it would be quite something to have on display! Then we had another interesting Curta on e-Bay, this time a skeleton Curta which sold for about £400 which seems very cheap until one looks at the device, see below. A number of very simple actions were proposed for the collector, I quote: - Firstly be more interested in learning about the subject than making money. A novice collector will make mistakes and learn, a greedy collector, more interested in price than value, will get badly burned. - Learn the difference between new wood and old wood, modern brass and old, French polish and varnish, black plastic and vulcanite, new screws and old screws and so on. Acquire an eye for anachronisms in restoration. I heartily agree with everything suggested, and as the article goes on to note, this would soon weed out the amateur fake. The professional fake will be harder to detect, but “experience will develop your eye and intuition”. Yes, there is no substitute for experience, and that is one reason why I just like looking at slide rules. The learning curve is ever upwards the more of them you see – even Uniques! More later. However, one area the article only skirted around was what should be the attitude or reaction of the collector when This does not look in any way complete, one can only speculate whether it is original or a ‘bitsa’ made up out of spares or remains. It is still an attractive device, and cheap – relatively. By the way, the next “Golden” model stood at over £1900 with over a week to go when last I looked, a nice little earner I would say. 8 Skid Stick Issue 32 June 2009 confronted with a fake. The article went on to waffle about guidance and codes of practice, neither of which, in my opinion, are worth powder or shot. Those who will be dishonest will be dishonest despite codes etc, and the real nub of the matter is whether one is brave enough to declare that you believe something to be fake or reproduction. I remember the very dusty reactions that Hon Ed. and I got when we were debating ivory, bone or plastic with some dealers at an antique fair. This is a much more difficult decision and probably less likely to be fraudulent. It makes me think that one would need a hide like a rhino and a good team of bodyguards to be really outspoken about a fake! Fortunately slide rule collectors still do not have much to worry about, however watch out for those French sectors and Indian “Stanley” repro instruments! Having had a politically incorrect “People and Slide Rules” picture in the last Musing, how’s about another one? Courtesy of Dieter von Jezierski and e-Bay comes the one adjacent. Shows again how fashions change! I must admit that this struck a chord – I used to classify problems as one or two (or more) cigarette problems! The earlier comment about Unique raises a different problem. Many years ago I was shown a Unique Log-Log slide rule on a thick Paxelin stock by a fellow collector and asked my opinion. He was absolutely convinced that he had a very rare factory “prototype”, and as such a valuable “find”. My opinion was pretty straightforward. What he had was an amateur repair or transplant. The wood on the original had probably got wet and warped. That owner had then taken the scales (which probably had also fallen off as a result of getting wet) and stuck them onto a lump of Paxelin he had in his junk box, and milled out the bit in the middle to make room for the slide. When he had come to mill the slots for the cursor, he had made a real bog of this as he had milled the slots at the top of one and at the bottom of the opposite side, hence no cursor would ever fit. He had then flogged the result at a boot fair! Ergo, the new owner had junk. We agreed to differ! Experience tells me I was right. I know diplomacy is not my strong suite, but what would you have said? Help! Aston & Mander post 1900 Aston & Mander has featured several times in SS as well as UKSRC International and National meetings. They are a top-flight maker who produced a fascinating and comprehensive range of rules by Hoare, Hannyngton and many others. However, we have never really been able to come to a conclusion about their later life, indeed when they finally ceased trading is, to my knowledge anyway, still a mystery. The 2005 IM Survey had at least one A&M (1917) slide rule. No one could tell us what the significance of the 1917 date was. Dixon’s listing of London Makers gives A&M as working till ~ 1918, but again with no detail. The “polish or not” question was actually an impassioned reply from two dealers who said that if a customer was prepared to pay them good money to polish a “valuable antique instrument” into becoming an “ornament”, then why should they not do so? The purist in me shudders, the businessman agrees with them! Truly a terrible dilemma. Again, what would you do? In 2005 Ray Hems and I swapped emails with a delightful Lady Police Officer in New Zealand about an Aston & Mander fingerprinting pad which she was trying to date for their Police Museum. We came to the conclusion that it must have been made or sold much earlier than her original guess of post WW2, and was probably pre WW1, the perception was that they were around much later than we know so far. 9 Skid Stick Issue 32 June 2009 such a rule and don’t know how to use it. The rule measures in total 352mm. Additional information: On the upper edge there are two scales, one scale for ORDINATES with divisions in different spaces and a scale for “56” from 0 to 70; on the lower edge there is a scale for “24” from 0 to 30 and an inch-scale from 0 to 12. I assume that a spread sheet had belonged to this rule because of the scale ordinates and the pointer on the cursor. I also think that the positions of the scales on the back have to be considered. I hope that somebody has an explanation. Now we have this delightful rolling rule (courtesy of an eagle eyed J.H. Snr. and eBay) which logically we would guess is yet another manifestation of the company, and is dated 1944 with the broad arrow. Can anyone help with the later history of this fascinating company? Peter Hopp Peter Fox also writes: “In SS31 under What is it? ‘Calculating Rule’ from Barron, the photos show a similar rule to one I had purchased a few months previously. I must confess that I did not notice one of these rules at the International Meeting. The scales and cursor are the same, it is also made by T G Barron but the address is Zilleberke, Linden Grove, West Hartlepool. I had intended to enquire through the pages of Skid Stick as to the use of this rule but was beaten to it by Brian Harwood. With scales on the back being marked LBS TO THE INCH I wondered if it could be related to springs, but have no idea as to how you would use it. Hopefully someone out there with a greater knowledge than mine or Brian’s can enlighten us”. Yet another Strange Rule Mind the Edge David Rance Courtesy of Werner Rudowski, comes another unusual rule, not a slide rule, a ruler which, according to the Buenos Aires dealer who sold it to him, should be a “Carpenter’s rule to measure the content of trees in cu-ft”. It has a square 1” x 1” section and the length is 605 mm (a shade under 24”). The four sides are numbered at the right end 8, 9, 10, 11; 12, 13, 14, 15; 16, 17, 18, 19; 20, 21, 22, 23. Nearly in the middle at 305 mm there is a common division; i.e. 1 foot is divided into 8, 9, … 23 equal parts. It is strange that the second part measures only 300 mm, it might be that the ruler was shortened at one time. The photographs show details. Often a slide rule stays on my desk for weeks. Mostly it just serves as a reminder to do something but on occasions it is because something about it is … well “odd”. Annoyingly I usually cannot put my finger on what is odd – it could be a scale out of place or just something that does not look quite right. After a recent tidy-up, a 28cm pearwood Faber-Castell 361 ended up on my desk. From the blind back-stamp of “1” and the paper table of conversion factors, it dated from 1921 (in the 1920’s F-C used a single digit for the date year). Like all 361’s it is basically a simple Mannheim rule but it looked “wrong”. Eventually it dawned on me what was out of place: it had both a top (cm) and a bottom (inch) bevelled side edge. A quick check confirmed my hunch – rules from the F-C 300 series usually have a single bevelled top edge. To find out more I turned to the ever-helpful Dieter von Jezierski. It seems early on in the 300 series the 361, the 366 (System Schumacher) and the famous 368 all had both a Does anyone have any ideas as to what it is please? Peter Hopp Barron’s “Calculating Rule” Following the piece on this rule in SS 31, word comes from Werner Rudowski that he too has an example. He writes: “I have also 10 Skid Stick Issue 32 June 2009 top and a bottom bevelled edge. Besides being the first electro rule1, the 368 uniquely also had a “hooked” cursor extension for reading off the LL3 and LL2 scales that F-C initially put on the top bevelled edge before switching to the bottom bevelled edge. However, from 1924 FC stopped making the 361 with two bevelled edges and not too long after the 368 was replaced by the wider bodied (making room for the LL scales on the stock) 378. So from the 1930’s all the models in the F-C 300 series had the characteristic single top (cm or inch) bevelled edge and a flat bottom edge. all the way from Czechoslovakia a couple of early Fullers (with the owner looking for inspiration on how to get into them) as well as a lovely small and early Tavernier Garvett Soho (seems odd that the French should copy an English design). During the course of the day we also looked at a variety of planimeters, a couple of interesting Gebr. Wichmann catalogues, and of course, as always, it was the chat that made the meeting so worth while. After a most excellent lunch, the small amount of formal business included: - The agreement to a voluntary collection from the members for a third cabinet at TNMOC to increase our slide rule display there. - Discussion on the proposed International Meeting to be hosted by the OS in the USA (Boston) in 2011, and how it might impact on the next UK IM which will now be held in 2012 instead. - Discussion on the possibility of holding the next (Autumn) meeting of the UKSRC at TNMOC in Milton Keynes (this was popularly received as an idea) A proposal by Dave N. to award Rod and Tom free UKSRC subscriptions as a small gesture of thanks for their considerable contributions was agreed by acclaim, however both were reluctant to accept this and instead agreed that this years subscriptions would be the start of TNMOC cabinet appeal! - It was agreed by all that the UKSRC would not be the most appropriate lead to any future Napier quadricentenary celebrations in 2014, but if so asked we would happily contribute. - The meeting also sent its collective best wishes to Bruce Williams, and David Blight who would normally have attended but have not been well. 1921 “double-edged” F-C 361 Although, except for the 366, they are not super rare, pre-1930 double bevelled-edged F-C rules from the 300 series are uncommon. So look out for them – they can add an edge to any collection! UKSRC Spring Meeting Chandlers Ford, 26 April 2009 12 members were welcomed to Chandlers Ford by Dave and Jenny Nichols and enjoyed a great meeting, as usual the conversation seamlessly segueing from the last meeting a year ago! It was great to welcome two new faces, “Joe” Davies from Basingstoke, and Len Peach from just down the road at Romsey. Once again Ray Hems had just returned from the colonies, and also Colin Barnes, Pete Hopp, Rod Lovett, Jerry McCarthy, Tom Martin, David Riches, Derek Slater, Peter Soole, and of course our host Dave Nichols. There being no specific theme this time, there was an eclectic mix of slide rules to view, including a couple of Pilot Balloon examples, a strange circular Logarex Len Peach, Tom Martin, Ray Hems and Peter Soole relax after an excellent lunch Business successfully concluded, it was back to the slide rules and then members 1 Bob Adams: “Proceedings of the 13th International Meeting of Historical Calculating Instruments”, The Netherlands, 2007, pg 156, Euro 20.00 (CD only). 11 Skid Stick Issue 32 June 2009 began to gradually drift away to homes, replete with slide rule conversation and hospitality. Our grateful thanks to Dave and Jenny who were exemplary hosts and contributed to yet another memorable meeting. Whereabouts is Dr. Strangelove’s Slide Rule? John Hunt Snr. We all know the whereabouts of Einstein’s, Teller’s and astronaut’s slide rules – but what about the slide rule used by Dr. Strangelove? Reference was made by Peter Hopp in his “Musings” of the image of Dr.Strangelove to sell a Radiac Nuclear slide rule on eBay (Skid Stick Issue 17 June 2003). Fleeting film images look like a Radiac slide rule – but look very carefully at Peter Seller’s forefinger and thumb – and you see they are adjacent to or controlling cursors – which is definitely not present in Radiac Mk 1 or Mk 2. Originally, the film was due to be premiered on November 23rd 1963, but as everybody knows John F. Kennedy was assassinated on the 22nd. Stanley Kubrick and Columbia decided to pull the premier. The film was finally premiered after a decent interval – in late January 1964 – and after making script changes to the venue of the pilot’s throw-away line “You could have a good week-end in Dallas” to “Vegas”. The plastic “computer” allowed the film-goer to estimate the biological effects of nuclear bombs bursts at various radii and various yields and an estimation of exposure to heat and radiation – according to the flyer. I guess that the promoters of the “Strangelove computer” didn’t design from scratch and took an actual model of a typical Radiac calculator. However, in the early 1960s – these were restricted items – issued only to civil defence chiefs and commanding officers of HM services – who had signed the official secrets act. Our leaders would not want the Radiac or a Radiac type slide rule to come into the hands of the CND movement and face the scathing rhetoric of Bertrand Russell, Michael Foot or Canon Collins. Columbia, the makers of the film via their Promotions Department, made an actual atomic fallout slide rule – see photos below. Maybe, although the film was shot in Shepperton Studios, the “computer” was only produced in the US and didn’t come to these shores. Has anyone got a specimen or knows more details? These images were taken from a promotional flyer to all film distributors in 1964. 12 Skid Stick Issue 32 June 2009 More Slide Rule Pictures Help – replies Mr Spock. David Hoare suggests that Mr Spock is using a Concise slide rule. This is certainly a good guess but the mystery still remains – why did he need one in the 23rd century? Won’t the problem of the crashing computer have been solved by then? In a message from Andrew West, he is convinced that the rule is a pilot’s whizwheel. So does Derek Slater who says “Mr Spock seems to be using a "flight computer", such a pilots of light aircraft would use to calculate wind drift. I have a Dutch made "Mercator" which looks identical”. Our thanks to Robert Evans for spotting this slide rule featured in a recruitment ad for the Ministry of Defence. Amazingly this was found in the Daily Mail on 22 nd January, 2009! Gareth Morris sends the following image and says: Watching the film ‘The Core’, which contains the worst physics in the history of the film industry, I saw an astronaut using a slide rule whilst trying to plot an alternative landing site for the Shuttle. I captured the frame as best I could and have attached it to see if any member knows what kind it is. Hudson. In answer to David Riches enquiries, David Rance (and others) found the following image of Hudson’s Horse-power Computing scale in Stanley’s catalogue of 1924. The scale is 4½ x 2¼ x 1/16 inch, made of cardboard. No price is given but a second version supplied in an opaque celluloid case is mentioned. [A “whizwheel” yes, but can anyone identify the maker? Ed] David Rance also supplied the following insight into the query regarding the Wichmann 3503: WICHMANN & the Eagle I checked my copy of the Wichmann master catalogue (Hauptcatlog). It is a 20th edition but it is unclear from which year it dates. Regrettably although listing over 40 pages of slide rules, the 3503 does not feature. There is virtually nothing in the 3xxx range and those that are (34xx) are all 100 and 150cm demonstration/training rules. If it is the same as the "Adelaar" blind stamped in the back of a rare 30cm Nestler air navigation time/distance slide rule I have in my collection, then I can confirm it is a German This next picture comes from Ford Motor’s Plant at Dagenham. This would appear to be a Pickett rule in their famous “eye-saver yellow”. (BBC Four – Ford’s Dagenham Dream) 13 Skid Stick Issue 32 June 2009 military stamp. Several years ago I learnt from Dieter von Jezierski and Gunter Kugel that the eagle stamp designated supplies ordered by various German military authorities from the likes of D&P, F-C, Nestler, etc. (although according to Dieter the eagle may not have made it onto all the F-C orders!). It seems that regardless of whether the order was destined for the “Wehrmach”, “Marine” or the “Luftwaffe” they all had got the Eagle stamp (n.b. a swastika is not part of the stamp). As a result of this enquiry, Dieter also informs that the rule is by F-C as witnessed by the three wooden pins holding the scales at each end. enough to find it (and not break your teeth on it) you could keep it! Jerry McCarthy [Jerry was lucky to keep his silver 3d piece. In our house we had to return ours for use the following Christmas. It was however redeemable for a current 3d piece. Ed,] Both Rod Lovett and Derek Slater suggest that the gauge mark on Werner Rudowski’s rule at 1760 refers to yards in a mile. John Hunt Snr. has no special answer to Werner’s enquiry but has prepared a tongue in cheek article on metrication for this year’s Gazette. 3sh / 6½d / x 25 = ? I read Mr Rudowski's article with interest, and I think I can make some points. Firstly, I don't think that the shilling was actually abbreviated to “sh”, but instead, just “s” was used. The reason for this was actually that the “s” didn't in fact stand for “shilling”, but actually for the Latin word “solidus” (plural “solidi”). When we wrote “two shillings and sixpence”, (a week's pocket money in my youth), it would be written as “2s 6d”, or even as “2/6d”. Note that the punctuation character “/” can even today be referred to as a “solidus”. The other units, the “L” and the “d” in their turn stood for “libra” (pl. “librae”) and “denarius” (pl. “denarii”). I don't think that we would ever have written “3s/6d”, “3sh 6d” or “3sh/6d”, although I am referring to the later practices for the 15-odd years before the £ s d system was replaced by the decimal system. Rod Lovett suggests that the giant Thacher on Pg 17. of SS 31 looks like one of the larger LOGAs. Multiplication would have been done individually for each currency type, so, for 25 items at 3/6d we would have calculated 25 x 6d and 25 x 3/-, the latter showing how "3 shillings and no pence" would have been written. Of course, the cash registers in those days (the ones with the pop-up monetary symbols) were well capable of doing the necessary multiplication, probably by repeated addition. In reply to Werner’s enquiry regarding slide rules for feet and inches, Gerald Stancey says he doesn’t know if they existed but that he has a set of log tables that do. “It is a hard backed book, 5” x 7” x 1” thick and the cover is embossed ‘SMOLLEY’S Parallel Tables of Logarithms and Squares, 10th Edition, USA, 1943’. The table are laid out with the pages assigned to feet. On each page there are three columns assigned to inches. Each line is from 1/32” incrementing to 31/32” by 32nds. Within each column the log and the square of the number is given. It goes up to 200 feet but from 50’ to 199’ the lines are reduced 1/16” increments and 1/8” increments for 100’ to 200’. The foot is taken as the base unit so that the log of 2’ is 0.30103 and 20’ is 1.30103. The log of 28’ 63/16” is 1.45496. The book also contains five figure log tables and other useful data. It is said to be for ‘Engineers, Architects and Students’. The cover sheet also that it is a second printing of the tenth edition and that the total issue is 94,000 copies. I find it hard to believe that such a book was really needed but the number printed shows how wrong one can be” It was interesting to see in this article the display of the old £sd coins; it reminds me that the copper half-penny was exactly (well, close enough anyway) to an inch in diameter, so it could be used as a handy measurement aid: also the silver 3d piece had been replaced by a twelve-sided brown-coloured coin (I don't know of what metallic mix) by the time I was interested in money, but the silver 3d piece still existed as a “lucky” token to be put into Christmas puddings. If you were lucky Table of Sines. Further to Klaus Kühn’s article on “Table of Sines” (SS31) I think I can make some points. There is a practice of deliberately inserting errors in dictionaries, or even madeup words, so that if a malefactor copies a dictionary, there is something of a trail of evidence that one dictionary is a copy of another. In a similar way, I wonder if it could be possible that some of these sine errors could have been deliberately planted. 14 Skid Stick Issue 32 June 2009 Having said that, I’ve recently been reading a biography and an auto-biography of Charles Babbage (the former being “The Cogwheel Brain” by Doron Swade, and the latter being “Passages from the Life of a Philosopher”) In both of these, the tale is told of how he was sitting with his friend John Herschel checking manually created tables and he (Charles Babbage) became so exasperated that he exclaimed “I wish to God these calculations had been executed by steam.” Out of that, of course, came his obsessions with various mechanical calculating machines resulting in designs for his Difference Engines and Analytical Engine, none of which was actually built in his time, although a D.E. has been built in more modern times and is on display in the Science Museum in London. Jerry McCarthy The Rockwell Slide Rule 3sh / 6½d / x 25 = ? Much to the disappointment of the children, the following image of Werner Rudowski’s rule that was featured in the last issue was omitted. Here you are kids, a picture to show your grandchildren. For Sale 19 Aristo simplex slide rules, model no. 0911 in very good condition, in their cream and red cases. Approx. half of then have instructions. 1 Aristo simplex slide rule, model no. 911 in .cardboard case. 1 Faber Castell 57/87 Rietz in a clear plastic case. All are in good condition. Contact: Linda Cross l.cross2@ntlworld.com Old Wine in New Bottles Peter Fox Having read Peter Hopp’s article ‘Old Wine in New Bottles’, SS 30, it stirred memories of my own first scientific calculator. After some rummaging about in the loft I found it, I’m not one to throw useful stuff away, a Rockwell 202 Slide Rule. There were no instructions, not that you really need any, and no power supply. The battery compartment was empty, probably just as well as 30+ year old batteries would probably have destroyed the calculator. I put 4 re-charged AA batteries into the compartment and turned in on. Much to my delight it worked! This set me thinking that maybe I should collect electronic calculators as well as slide rules, but my wife drew the line at this suggestion. So this will be the only slide rule that I own that will need batteries. Matters arising… Responses to SS31 etc. SS31 has once again generated a great collection of response! The extra half-dozen “natural laws” prompted a corollary and a new one: Rance’s Law from David of the same name: “a synonym is a word that you use when you cannot spell the first word you thought of”. This jangled huge bells for me, I must be suffering the first stages of dementia because I find myself gazing at the screen either praying for a word or how to spell a word I no longer remember! Rod Lovett had a brilliant corollary to the first law of Socio-genetics: “If your parents don’t have children, you won’t.” 15 Skid Stick Issue 32 June 2009 The “Golden Cut” Curta article produced a number of memories, so much so that there is a separate short article elsewhere in Skid Stick. intermediate answer, just the total. From my part I was reminded of a bloke who used to work for me who could add and subtract up and down a column of figures with a pencil almost as fast as he could move the pencil – an amazing sight! It was certainly faster than a bloke with an electronic calculator, and was invaluable when we were doing tender vets. He would quote a figure and minutes later the bloke with the calculator would agree – I have no idea why we just did not take Greavsie’s word, it just did not seem the done thing! He was only overtaken when Spreadsheets arrived. On a couple of famous occasions after, he found basic faults in the worksheets we used, (it remained an instinct to always mentally add up columns of figures) and on one memorable occasion a basic fault in Excel which involved some strange happening in a particular cell in the sheet – that reminded me that there are supposed to be all sorts of strange things buried in the far reaches of Excel, including a flight simulator program? A number of members congratulated us on the slide rule display at TNMOC, Colin and I hope that you all make the effort to go and view not only our display but the whole of the Bletchley Park experience. Reference the request for data regarding the Stanley Catalogue, I got the dates round my neck, sorry! In case it confused anyone, the telephone number in the catalogue is a HOLborn exchange number rather than an AFN, and that change took place in 1965 – so we are looking for a date prior to 1965 and after the previous catalogue was published. We now have over 30 examples of Planimeters owned by members. Joachim Fischer in Germany has been able to provide dates of manufacture for all of them, and in some cases intriguing facts such as the shop that originally bought it, or the supply to a mail order organisation in Germany during WW2, and the subsequent sale to somewhere in the UK, despite the war! So if you have a planimeter, analyser or similar device you have not yet let me know about, you still are very welcome to do so. Several comments that the gauge mark on Werner’s rule at 1760 is yards in a mile. I have a feeling it may not be that simple, or else we have missed how it is used. Continuing with the subject of computers, should you care to send us anything on CD – remember we do not all have broadband! – then the CD, either wrapped in a covering letter, or a plastic sleeve, and an ordinary B4 envelope easily gets into the cheapest small letter rate! If by mischance some idiot tries to bend it through our letterboxes then it is easy and cheap to send a replacement CD. See, we save you money as well! It is always great to receive responses to anything in Skid Stick, Derek Slater noted that Mr Spock seems to be using a “flight computer”, such as pilots of light aircraft would use to calculate wind drift – strange when travelling at “warp speed”! Also that Rod Lovett is quite right about the dog-latin, and his version is an improvement on the original, but that Derek had recently seen a drawing of a fifth-century tombstone (March issue “Postscript” catalogue) with “Hic jacet”, so iam and jam are the same! I love it when we get to the roots of the weeds ….! The 46th International Antique Scientific, Early Technology and Medical Instrument Fair Werner Rudowski’s article made a number of us feel like dinosaurs. Derek Slater remembers being drilled at school to add, subtract multiply and divide in pounds, shillings and pence. Both his grandfather (a shopkeeper) and father (a land agent) could add columns of L s and d (no pounds sign on his keyboard), working from right to left and down, doing the “carries” at twelve and twenty by mental arithmetic. He could visualise his father with a pencil in his right hand, using three fingers of his left hand to keep track of his place. He didn’t write down any An individual’s impressions Sunday, 26th April 2009. Thistle Hotel, Bryanston Street, W1. 1000 to 1500 hours. Entrance fee £7.50. Word was quickly passed around the collectors waiting for the doors to open that a new venue for future fairs had been found – not, as previously rumoured at Alexandra Palace, but in Bloomsbury, central London. 16 Skid Stick Issue 32 June 2009 The number of exhibitors has bottomed-out to a core of around 32, with a strong presence of Dutch, German, French and Austrians. About a third of the stalls had some kind of calculating devices, including rules – notably Wallis Fletcher and our own member, Conrad Schure. For myself, the most interesting were the French exhibitors. I bought a 19th century rule where the sines and tangents were engraved in grads (100 degrees to a rightangle) – it could be a very early stadia rule. Also, a Great War French aerial observation circular rule – enabling the pilot to indicate to the gunners on the ground where their shells were falling. A quiet interval in the Fair, showing a corner of the Edinburgh Suite, at the Thistle Hotel. Seated at their tables, on the left is David Coffeen of Tesseract and on the right is Wallis Fletcher. On the tables are a pristine Fuller and a Hannyngton together with a collection of ullage and other wooden slide rules, timber rules and sliding Gunters. Since the budget, the government and the media have warned us about deflation - but not at this fair. On several stalls there were tired non-descript ordinary wooden Gunters asking price was in excess of £120. Tesseract has returned to the fair, exhibiting an eye watering series of goodies of museum quality – but at bank-busting prices. Appeal for Funds These are not words usually found in the vocabulary of the UKSRC but we believe this to be an exceptional situation. The Scientific Instrument Society was promoting various books – I liked and bought “Making Scientific Instruments in the Industrial Revolution” by A.D.Morrison-Low. But there were three stall-holders who indicated that this was a clearance sale – they were thinking of quitting the antiques game. Reasons given - the difficulty of getting good items and the ubiquitous eBay. It could be a selling ploy but if not it is a worrying trend. As you will be aware The National Museum of Computing (TNMOC) has generously provided the UKSRC with space and financed the purchase of two high-quality display cabinets for our permanent display of slide rules. Space is available for a third cabinet and this is something that the UKSRC should finance. Whilst the first cabinets have been filled with a wide range of types of rules from various countries, it is envisaged that the third cabinet will be used for rotating themed displays. One exhibitor, Michael Bennett-Levy, who had produced a flyer showing a cellar full of antiques, including early calculators, is intending to migrate to France. He is selling off his entire stock at Bonhams – down to the last gramophone spring without reserve. Contact via email: Michael.bennett-levy @ virgin.net for more information – he has a two minute preparatory video ready on the internet. In view of this situation and the importance of having a national display at a prestigious venue we are asking all members to contribute to the cost of the third cabinet. Next Fair, the 47th Antique Science and Technology Fair, will be on Sunday 18 th October 2009 1000-1500 hrs, entrance fee £5, at the Holiday Inn, Bloomsbury, Coram Street, London WC1N 1HT, Russell Square is the nearest underground station. Additional details can be found on the internet at: scientificfair.com, or: scientificfair.blogspot.com – it looks like every dealer must have a website! All contributions, however small, will be welcomed. It is our intention to treat all donations as anonymous. Cash, cheques and postal orders to Dave Nichols please at: 80 Pine Road Chandler’s Ford Eastleigh Hants SO53 1JT Our overseas members contributions will also be very welcome and these can be made by PayPal to the account of: rod@lovett.com 17 Skid Stick Issue 32 June 2009 Please ensure that the reason for your contribution is clearly indicated whichever method of payment is made. Subject to the response from your good selves, we hope that the third case will be in place in time for our Autumn meeting at TNMOC. (See below). The third cabinet will be as shown in the following image of one of the two existing cabinets. The details are as follows: Brushed aluminium 5 Glass shelves 6 Lights Lockable doors Tempered glass 1000mm (w) x 250mm (d) x 1200mm (h) Bletchley Park Mansion Programme: 1100/1130 Meeting start 1130 Tour of the Bletchley Park complex and exhibits (£10.00*) 13.30 Lunch in the restaurant. A reasonably priced hot and cold menu available. 1415 a tour of TNMOC exhibits including Colossus, the world’s first semi-programmable computer and of course our own slide rule display followed by our usual chance to chat and deal with any other business. To register please contact Colin Barnes 7/10 days in advance: 01638 720317 models@clara.net * Providing we have more than a dozen members, a reduced rate and dedicated guide has been arranged. We sincerely hope that as many members as possible will be able to attend this special meeting. Special Autumn Meeting Vincent Square Sunday, 4th October, 2009 From Jenny Hutchinson, co-author of “Never Mind the Quality….Feel the Width” (Gazette 9), we hear that the father of Jeff Vincent, the great grandson of W D F Vincent has recently died. It was Jeff whose assistance provided so much of the information in the article. His father would have been W D F’s grandson. The National Museum of Computing has kindly offered to host our Autumn meeting at their facility at Bletchley Park, the home of the WWII codebreakers. This is a fantastic chance to, not only hold one of our friendly meetings, but an opportunity to visit the whole of the complex with its vast array of exhibits. Special arrangements have been made with TNMOC for parking on site close to the meeting room. Entrance to the complex is a few hundred yards from the railway station (Bletchley) with services from London, Euston and Birmingham, New Street. Further details will be given on your registration of attendance. (See also maps in Appendix). Unfortunately, at the time of going to press we have no further information. 18