Was the Temple Mount Not the Site of Solomon`s Temple?

Was the Temple Mount Not
the Site of Solomon’s Temple?
As conflict rages in Gaza, and anti-Semitic riots erupt in European cities,
something is happening deep within Jerusalem that could change the course
of history.
Israel’s holy city is dominated by the 36-acre Temple Mount, on which sits
the Dome of the Rock, or Mosque of Omar, which has occupied the spot since
around 692 A.D., following the Muslim conquest in 638 A.D. The building is
atop a massive foundation built more than two thousand years ago.
It has been believed since the Crusades about 1,000 years ago that the Temple
Mount was the site of Solomon’s Temple, which the Babylonians destroyed in
586 B.C., some lesser temples and finally, Herod’s Temple, which the Roman
General Titus destroyed in 70 A.D.
Part of the Temple Mount structure constitutes the Western Wall, which Jews
believe is the sole remaining section of Herod’s Temple.
The problem: The Bible itself in several places clearly says that both temples
were erected in the City of David or Zion, which is a far smaller, 12-acre area
now being excavated about 600 feet south of the Temple Mount in the City of
David Jerusalem Walls National Park.
The implications are enormous, as explained in a new book, Temple, by
Robert Cornuke of the Bible Archeology Search and Exploration Institute
based in Colorado Springs. Mr. Cornuke, who some describe as the “Christian
Indiana Jones,” is an FBI-trained investigator and former SWAT team
member who has spent years searching for prominent places in the Bible. In
the book’s introduction, he credits Dr. Paul Feinberg for alerting him to “the
revolutionary work of the late archeologist and author, Dr. Ernest L. Martin,”
an originator of the theory that the Bible points away from the Temple Mount
as the site of Israel’s great temples.
A few years ago, following strictly biblical references, Mr. Cornuke also found
striking evidence for an alternative Mount Sinai, such as an inexplicably
burned up mountain top and 12 stone altars at the mountain’s base. That
account is in his book The Search for the Real Mt. Sinai.
His current offering has far greater potential to shake up prophetic Holy Land
debates.
Last summer, Mr. Cornuke accompanied Eli Shukron, director of excavations
at the City of David, through recently discovered passages buried for
centuries. Mr. Cornuke, who is also a novelist, draws a suspenseful, nonfiction narrative as he takes the reader down ancient pathways.
His case for the City of David temple site, at least to this non-archeologist
journalist, is quite compelling. Located there is the Gihon Spring, where
Solomon was crowned king of Israel and which is the only natural water
source big enough to wash away massive blood flows from temple animal
sacrifices. There is no such water source up on the Temple Mount, Mr.
Cornuke notes.
There is also Hezekiah’s Tunnel, which was discovered in 1880 by some
adventurous boys. Second Chronicles 32:30 says that, “This same [King]
Hezekiah also stopped the water outlet of Upper Gihon, and brought the
water by tunnel to the west side of the City of David.” If several Jewish
historians are correct that priests ritually washed in the Gihon Spring before
entering the Temple, “why would they then walk almost a quarter mile to the
traditional Temple Mount area?” Mr. Cornuke asks, adding, “That discovery
in 1880 almost single-handedly blasted to pieces the false understanding of
Zion’s placement on the upper city hill area.”
The City of David, Cornuke explains, is the site of Ornan the Jebusite’s
threshing floor, which David purchased after defeating the Jebusites and
occupying the city. In 2 Chronicles 3:1, it says, “Now Solomon began to build
the house of the Lord at Jerusalem … at the place that David had prepared on
the threshing floor of Ornan the Jebusite.”
There is not space for the many fascinating details, but here’s one more: The
massive structure on the Temple Mount over which the Dome of the Rock
was built has the hallmarks of a Roman fortress, not a Jewish temple. In
Herod’s time, an entire Roman legion was housed in Jerusalem, which meant
fortifying a base for 6,000 soldiers and 4,000 support personnel.
It makes no sense that the Romans would build a small fortress beneath a
Jewish edifice on the Temple Mount when they could seize the summit. Mr.
Cornuke concludes that the Wailing Wall was part of a Roman fortress, not
Herod’s Temple. Despite the explosive nature of this claim, Mr. Cornuke told
me that no scholar in Israel has yet taken issue with the facts that he has
presented.
Why does all this matter? Because it’s the most fought-over real estate in
human history, sacred to Jews, Christians and Muslims. It’s where Jesus
walked, and it contains the Pool of Siloam, where Jesus told a blind man to
wash and be healed (John 9: 1-11). The Book of Revelation says the End
Times will come when Jews build a new Temple that the anti-Christ will
desecrate.
Bottom line: The Dome of the Rock does not have to be removed for a new
Temple to rise. This would be a stunning reset of the prophetic clock and
might explain why Israel came back into existence after 2,000 years and why
the Jewish nation is increasingly isolated in a time of violent Islamist
expansion.
It’s enough to make you crack open a Bible
and read it for yourself while keeping
an eye on the Middle East.
Källa: townhall.com
= Här skulle templen ha legat.
Tempelberget i Jerusalem
sett från sydväst.
Skissen visar Tempelberget sett från sydost,
med Antonia Fort till höger på bilden.
Templet till vänster, ligger här söder om
själva Tempelberget.