Virtual volcanology - Global Volcano Model Network (GVM)
Transcription
Virtual volcanology - Global Volcano Model Network (GVM)
Virtual volcanology Quaternary Large Magnitude Explosive Volcanic Eruptions (LaMEVE) database has been completed and made accessible online. GVM is developing its own initiatives through the partnership by forming three task forces to address knowledge gaps. One is developing volcanic hazard and risk indices, one is managing the global assessment of volcanic risk for the UN’s GAR15 report and another is preparing a database on volcano deformation recorded by satellite data (principally radar). GVM is also supporting the second Volcano Observatory Best Practices workshop on communication which is in the planning stage. The governance structure of GVM has been agreed with the Board and Steering Committee, the latter including representatives from all partners. Can you briefly introduce the Global Volcano Model (GVM) project and its key goals? SS: GVM is a new international collaborative platform to integrate information on volcanoes from the perspective of forecasting, hazard assessment and risk mapping. The platform includes databases, such as the Global Volcanism Program, Smithsonian Institution, WOVOdat (a database on precursors to volcanic eruptions by the World Organization of Volcano Observatories), VHub (a US-led effort to develop an online collaborative environment for volcanology research and risk mitigation) and the Volcanic Global Risk Identification and Analysis Project (VOGRIPA). In addition, the platform aims to provide tools for forecasting, assessment of hazard and risk, and dealing with complications associated with volcano information at global, regional and local scales. A major goal of GVM is the translation of volcano science into forms that are useful and accessible to the public, researchers, decision makers, governments, international agencies, NGOs and commerce. To achieve this, GVM will build upon and take advantage of the volcanology community’s growing online collaborative infrastructure at www. vhub.org. This presents an opportunity for interested parties to provide contributions which demonstrate the successful transfer of volcano science to decision making, either during a crisis or for planning and preparedness between eruptions. Why is a collaborative approach so vital to the development of GVM? SL: The GVM network is an international collaboration with partners and sponsors across the globe, including Australia, France, Germany, Iceland, Italy, Japan, Mexico, New Zealand, Singapore, Spain, the UK and the US. Each partner offers different expertise in developing models, methods, information and tools to analyse and monitor hazard risk and impacts. GVM has been commissioned by the UN Office for Disaster Risk Reduction to carry out an assessment of global volcanic hazard and risk for its 2015 report (GAR15) and will deliver the first comprehensive assessment of global volcanism from such a perspective. This has never been done before and will provide a benchmark assessment of the state of knowledge on volcanoes in relation to their hazards and risks. To date, what progress has been made towards these goals? SS: We now have 19 partners, including many major volcanological research centres, three insurance sector partners and other international organisations, notably WOVO, which has 80 Observatory members. The GLOBAL VOLCANO MODEL Professor Steve Sparks and Dr Sue Loughlin are preparing to embark on the first comprehensive global volcanic hazard and risk assessment. Here, they discuss the critical processes supporting this effort Who will be the key users of GVM? SL: There are many potential users spread across the world. These include citizens living on or near volcanoes; governments; the humanitarian aid sector and development organisations interested in disaster risk reduction; the insurance sector; aviation; national, regional and local authorities; civil protection; international agencies such the UN and World Bank; businesses and critical facilities affected or threatened by volcanic hazards; as well as a number of research institutions around the world. Looking ahead, what are the next steps in building the network? SS: Looking beyond the current work, the next stages are to give GVM much more visibility in the community and create a sense of community ownership, which are both very challenging goals. GVM is not yet widely known in the community, except in a rather vague way, and we will work hard to engage interested parties worldwide in the coming months and years and hopefully develop a wide sense of ownership. A science goal is to develop ensemble numerical global volcano models, which can be used to characterise global volcanism in a framework to look at past and future volcanism based on available evidence and understanding. This goal is achievable but will likely involve several years of work, major resources and coordination within GVM. WWW.RESEARCHMEDIA.EU 77 GLOBAL VOLCANO MODEL Heeding the hazards Under the flagship of the Global Volcano Model, a truly international effort has been mobilised to improve the capacity of communities to understand volcanoes, anticipate eruptions and better manage their threats VOLCANIC ERUPTIONS CAN have far-reaching and devastating impacts on people, economies and the climate. In the short term, effects include loss of lives, and the destruction of livelihoods and lifeline infrastructure. Over the longer term, disease, famine, displacement of populations, disruption of clean water supplies and physical destruction of key economic facilities can all have lasting impacts on communities. Global efforts are underway to identify and better manage the risks resulting from the complex interactions of volcanic eruptions with the environment and society. In order to draw together and assimilate much of this work, a global partnership and network of institutions known as the Global Volcano Model (GVM) is generating key information about volcanoes, their hazards and their impacts. The driving goal of the work is to improve understanding of past volcanic activity and anticipate future risk. Professor Steve Sparks from the Department of Earth Sciences at the University of Bristol explains that the project arose from the recognition that, although the international volcanological community is very active, key knowledge gaps exist and efforts in the field need better coordination and integration: “There 78INTERNATIONAL INNOVATION was a sense that volcanology would be more effective in applying its science to the benefit of society if it presented a united front”. As such, there is a strong international consensus that GVM is an essential and timely undertaking. ACCESSIBLE GLOBAL INFORMATION PLATFORM Formed in 2011, GVM works principally through holding workshops and secondments of staff and students, supplemented by virtual meetings and online collaboration via vhub.org. Task forces on key topics with clearly defined deliverables are an important component of GVM. These activities allow partners to work closely together to develop the data and methodologies of analysis, write papers where novel research results emerge, and develop the outreach side of the project. The network has now expanded to comprise 19 institutions and organisations representing many of the world’s centres of research excellence in volcanology as well as organisations from the insurance sector. The LaMEVE database is a good illustration of the data-gathering efforts that have been developed to feed into GVM. This contains the nearly 3,000 Quaternary volcanoes catalogued by the Smithsonian’s Global Volcanism Program and over 1,800 explosive eruption records spanning the last 1.8 million years. The database – accessible online at www.bgs.ac.uk/ vogripa – primarily consists of data on eruption magnitude, age and source volcano location. The datasets were collected from published literature; principally Volcanoes of the World by Siebert et al. (2010) and journal articles, but also other online databases, books, public reports and conference proceedings. LaMEVE represents a major resource for identifying and evaluating past explosive eruptions on local, national and regional scales. INTERFACING WITH INTERNATIONAL INITIATIVES GVM is closely linked with the International Association of Volcanology and Chemistry of the Earth’s Interior (IAVCEI, see p80) – the only international organisation of volcanologists. IAVCEI Commissions include the World Organization of Volcano Observatories (WOVO) and Cities on Volcanoes, which holds a major meeting every two years to bring scientists and public officials responsible for emergency management together. GVM activities are aimed at complementing rather than duplicating the activities of these key organisations. It supports and interfaces with major international initiatives: •Global Volcanism Program (GVP) – housed in the Department of Mineral Sciences – part of the National Museum of Natural History – in Washington DC, GVP is a visionary geoinformatics endeavour coordinated by the Smithsonian Institution. In operation since 1968, it uniquely and comprehensively documents the eruptive histories of Holocene volcanoes (over the last 10,000 years). The overall mission of GVP is to understand global patterns of volcanism in space and time • WOVOdat – this is a collective record of volcano monitoring worldwide presently hosted at the Earth Observatory of Singapore. It will have many uses for both crisis response and research. The principal goal of WOVOdat, as contrasted with databases at individual observatories, is to enable swift comparisons of unrest at various volcanoes, rapid searches for particular patterns of disturbance, and other operations on data from many volcanoes and episodes of unrest • VHub – the online resource for collaboration in volcanology research and risk mitigation provides easy mechanisms for: sharing tools to model volcanic processes and analyse volcano data; sharing resources such as teaching materials and workshops; and communicating with other members of the volcanology community and members of the educational and stakeholder communities • The Volcano Global Risk Identification and Analysis Project (VOGRIPA) – the project aims to create a global database of volcanic activity, hazards and vulnerability information that can be analysed to identify locations at high risk from volcanism and gaps in knowledge about hazards and risk There are several current activities and initiatives within GVM. Task forces include efforts to develop standardised indices of volcanic hazard and risk, activities to coordinate a synthesis for global volcanic risk for the United Nations International Strategy for Disaster Reduction within the GVM partnership, a task force to develop a database on deformation of volcanoes as recorded by satellites, and one to start developing stochastic models of ash hazard. A Volcano Observatory Best Practices workshop is being planned on the topic of communication and will support observatory scientists from around the world to gather together and share knowledge and experience on this critical topic. The VOGRIPA project is currently developing new databases on debris avalanches and lahars (volcanic mudflows). MODEL BEHAVIOUR One of the eventual goals of GVM is a complex system ensemble model. Parameters typically have wide ranges and their uncertainties can be large. The researchers envisage several linked and hierarchical models, each with different objectives that explore a range of behaviours and impacts, and how certain systems might respond to an eruption: “There is a need for interoperability between different models and datasets to create an integrated family of dynamic and hazards models that can forecast risks on multiple spatial- and timescales,” observes Sparks. “Impact models require knowledge of vulnerabilities of people, infrastructures and assets along with uncertainties, as well as how these attributes of society might interact under the stress of eruptions and the quantification of risks.” It is hoped that all of this work will help to improve the assessments of what kind of unrest is likely to lead to future high-risk eruptions. A SUCCESSFUL START The first GVM Steering Group and Management Meeting took place on 30 April and 1 May 2012 at the British Geological Survey offices in Edinburgh. The meeting provided an excellent opportunity for networking, information sharing and brain-storming. Moreover, the first project meeting and subsequent workshop achieved agreement on database content, database architecture, standards, protocols, definitions, methodologies and, crucially, division of labour between the partners. The Global Volcano Model is generating key information about volcanoes, their hazards and their impacts. The driving goal of the work is to improve understanding of past volcanic activity and anticipate future risk The next major meeting is the IAVCEI General Assembly in Kagoshima July 2013. As well as welcoming presentations on all aspects of the GVM initiatives, IAVCEI are also particularly keen to invite contributions demonstrating successful transfer of volcano science to decision making either during a crisis or for planning and preparedness between eruptions. Ultimately, the efforts of this novel international collaboration represent a significant leap in development of information on volcanoes and their hazards. It is hoped that new international metadata standards can be developed to help minimise the current uncertainty found in the use of global volcanic datasets. Moreover, a plethora of potential end-users will benefit from the GVM research activities and utilise the scientific evidence as a basis for mitigation planning and developing risk management strategies in a wide range of sectors and industries. INTELLIGENCE GLOBAL VOLCANO MODEL OBJECTIVES To provide systematic evidence, data and analysis of volcanic hazards and risk on global, regional and local scales, and to develop the capability to anticipate future volcanism and its consequences. PARTNERS University of Bristol, UK • British Geological Survey (BGS), NERC, UK • The Earth Observatory of Singapore • European Plate Observing System • GeoScience Australia • Geophysical Institute University of Alaska at Fairbanks • GNS Science, New Zealand • International Association of Volcanology and Chemistry of the Earth’s Interior • INGV, Italy • IVHHN, Durham University, UK • The Geological Survey of Japan • NGI, Norway • Risk Management Solutions • Seismic Research Centre, The University of the West Indies • The Smithsonian Institution, UK • The State University of New York, USA • The Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México • University of Iceland • University of South Florida, USA • U.S. Geological Survey • Willis and Munich • WOVO FUNDING Natural Environment Research Council, UK CONTACT Professor Steve Sparks School of Earth Sciences Wills Memorial Building, University of Bristol Queen’s Road, Bristol, BS8 1RJ, UK T +44 117 954 5419 E steve.sparks@bristol.ac.uk www.globalvolcanomodel.org STEVE SPARKS is Professor of Geology in the School of Earth Sciences at Bristol University and a senior researcher in one of the world’s leading research groups in volcanology. His research concerns volcanic and igneous processes. SUE LOUGHLIN is Head of Volcanology at the British Geological Survey in Edinburgh, UK and leads a team with diverse skills dedicated to volcano research and monitoring who collaborate widely to help build resilience to volcanic eruptions. She worked for several years at Montserrat Volcano Observatory and was Director from 2004-06. WWW.RESEARCHMEDIA.EU 79