BTS 2014 - AdDynamics
Transcription
BTS 2014 - AdDynamics
Ad Dynamics PerspectiveTM The Power of Market Intelligence Back-to-School: New strategies stand out Advertisers expand their tactics to reach additional audiences A s the Back-to-School (BTS) shopping season comes to an end, and students head back to campus, retailers and manufacturers are now reviewing the season, measuring their results, and scoping potential adjustments to strategy for the Holiday Shopping Season 2014, and BTS 2015. Early sales indicators suggest the BTS season got off to a slow start. EY (formerly Ernst & Young) reported that higher food and gas prices created a BTS shopping environment in which shoppers were willing to wait for lower prices and deeper discounts later in the season. This led to predictions that had spending on traditional BTS items like apparel and stationery flat compared to 2013. EY also anticipated the increasingly competitive retail environment to be marked by late season discounts (in addition to the planned BTS discounts) that spanned into September. Promotional indicators supported many of the predictions from EY. The BTS season was highlighted by notable shifts in flyer promotional volume, increases in ad quality for many key BTS categories, increasing use of offers and overlays by certain retailers, and early-season price drops from leading online retailers. Competition for the BTS shopper was stiff, and retailers leveraged new, dynamic promotional strategies across both print and digital media to differentiate their value to BTS shoppers. In this issue of Ad Dynamics’ Perspectives, we will review the omni-channel promotional and pricing activity for the office/electronics, mass, department, and e-commerce retail channels during BTS 2014. We will uncover which retailers changed their strategy—from a volume, messaging, category allocation, and pricing www.addynamics.com In This Article… Ad Dynamics reviews advertising and pricing trends that stood out during the Back-to-School period, 2014. We examine the office/electronics, mass, department, and e-commerce channels, uncovering: • • • • How well retailers used themes and categories to target specific shoppers Which retailers used an integrated promotional strategy between their flyers and .ca home pages How Amazon pre-empted competitors with online price discounts Which Laptop, Tablet, and Smartphone brands were supported with the highest ad quality Source: Ad Dynamics 2014 Figure 1: Back to School Flyer Volume perspective—from BTS 2013. We will examine online price trends over the course of July and August for top-selling Laptops and Tablets to understand the timing of BTS discounts, who the price leaders were, and who fluctuated their pricing throughout the season. We will close with a discussion on how the emerging promotional and pricing trends from BTS 2014 can help retailers and manufacturers make thoughtful strategy adjustments for the upcoming holiday shopping season, and beyond to BTS 2015. BTS flyer volume saw some extreme fluctuation from retailer to retailer versus 2013. Where certain retailers maintained a similar flyer volume strategy year over year, others executed distinct changes to print strategy by increasing or decreasing their total flyers published and/or pages per flyer. Relative to competing flyer strategies, Best Buy, Future Shop, and Staples each maintained continuity from BTS 2013 to 2014, as seen in Figure 1. Best Buy and Future Shop featured dense flyers during BTS 2013 and 2014, each publishing over 25 pages per flyer. And while both made small changes to the number of flyers they published (Best Buy added one flyer, Future Shop removed one flyer), their page counts remained static relative to their competition. Comparatively, the biggest changes to flyer volume were seen at Walmart, Hudson’s Bay, and Sears. All three made at least a 50% change in volume to either their total flyers or pages per flyer versus BTS 2013. In particular, Sears overhauled their flyer strategy. The department store vastly decreased their count of flyers—down nearly 72% year over year—while making each flyer more dense. In 2013, Sears ran 19 category-specific (eg. Mattress Sale, Home Sale, etc.) two-page flyers, whereas in 2014, the least number of pages they promoted in any one flyer was eight. They increased their pages per flyer by 109%, running just over 11 pages per flyer during BTS 2014, compared to just over five per flyer in 2013. Flyer volume changes can directly impact how successful a retailer is in attracting shoppers to their stores during key calendar events like BTS. Understanding the volume strategies of competitors is essential for any retailer when planning their count of flyer drops and pages per flyer. Volume changes during key periods should be governed by the competitive promotional landscape. Source: Ad Dynamics 2014 Figure 2: Back to School Themes & Targeting, Canada versus US Flyers 2 Ad Dynamics PerspectiveTM Figure 3: Category Ad Quality, Back to School 2014 (Sum of ADVI) Opportunity for increased use of themes, targeting Just as promotional volume can influence a retailer’s ability to drive shoppers to their stores, so can promotional timing, themes, and targeting. If you are late to market with your BTS promotional offers—whether you are a retailer or manufacturer—you risk being pre-empted by competitive offers. Likewise, if your flyer themes fail to incent your target BTS shoppers specifically, you risk losing your critical segment of shoppers to a competitor. Figure 2 shows the timing, themes, and targeting of BTS flyers at Best Buy and Staples compared to Best Buy and Staples US. In this analysis, Ad Dynamics looked at combination of flyer theme and front page category mix to determine, from a qualitative perspective, which shoppers each retailer targeted during BTS. As they did with their flyer volume, Best Buy and Staples replicated the timing of their BTS promotions from 2013 in 2014. Best Buy’s first BTS-themed flyer dropped on 7/24, while Staples’ first drop occurred on 7/31. Both ran BTS-themed flyers through the end of August, showing consistent promotional engagement through the end of the season. From a theme and targeting perspective, neither Best Buy nor Staples explicitly called on one segment of shoppers, instead using a more catch-all strategy. Best Buy pushed a theme of low prices on laptops throughout the season, featuring promotions like, “School-ready Laptops, Student-ready prices”, “We’ll beat any laptop price online or anywhere else”, and “Laptops that fit your budget and backpack.” Overall, Best Buy pushed the low prices and great savings message. Similarly, Staples leveraged their “Make back to school Source: Ad Dynamics 2014 happen for less” campaign each week from their first flyer drop in August, through their drop on 9/4. They focused on cost savings for all BTS shoppers, rather than making a push for a particular target shopper. Comparing the timing and themes of Best Buy and Staples to their counterparts in the US, there may be opportunity for strategy adjustments when planning for BTS 2015. Both Best Buy US and Staples US began their BTS flyer promotional campaigns on the week starting 7/6—more than two weeks prior to the first BTS flyer drops in Canada. By dropping a BTS flyer just one week earlier in 2015 than in 2014, Best Buy and Staples stand to gain a pre-emptive advantage over their direct competitors by being the first retailer to capture BTS shopper attention. Their US counterparts were also targeted in their promotional approach. Best Buy US promoted themes geared more towards high school and university students—for example, “Selection for higher learning” and “Grade-A Tech to help you succeed.” Their front page category mix supported their themes as well, as they promoted almost exclusively computers, tablets, and other electronics categories during BTS. Of the 54 total products featured on Best Buy front pages between 7/6 and 8/17, 61 percent were either laptops, tablets, or smartphones. No other subcategory had more than 7 percent share of Best Buy US circular front page promotions. Staples US went the opposite route with their targeted flyer promotions, focusing on winning shoppers seeking the lowest priced school supplies for elementary and middle school students. Though their theme of “Less List. Our lowest prices all season long,” didn’t directly call on younger students, they The Power of Market Intelligence 3 Source: Ad Dynamics 2014 Figure 4: Brand Ad Quality, Laptops, Back to School 2013 versus 2014 promoted school supplies much more heavily on their flyer front pages than computers and electronics categories—101 of their 151 promoted products on flyer front pages were nonelectronic school supplies. As planning for BTS 2015 begins over the next few months, retailers like Best Buy and Staples have an opportunity to adjust both the timing and targeting of their BTS flyer promotions to put themselves in a better position to win BTS shoppers. flyers from 2013, several of which featured major appliances exclusively on the front page. ADVI provides insight into how shoppers may perceive a retailers’ promotional offers during a given period. Both Walmart and Sears made adjustments to their category strategy from 2013 to cater more towards the BTS shopper, rather than featuring categories like major appliances that may not be the best trip driver during the BTS period. Sears, Walmart feature more BTS categories Two retailers that made significant changes to their flyer category mix from BTS 2013 to 2014 were Walmart and Sears. Both allocated improved ad quality to BTS categories year over year. Figure 3 lists the top promoted flyer categories by retailer for both BTS 2013 and 2014, measured by Ad Dynamics Value Index (ADVI). The ADVI of each category is determined using the product of multiple factors, including page position, ad size, and ad count. The better the page position, larger the ad size, and greater the ad count, the higher the ADVI. In 2013, among the top five promoted categories by ADVI at Walmart, three were non-BTS categories, including Sony PS3 Games, Pool/Water Accessories, and Household. Walmart adjusted their allocation of premium flyer space in 2014, during which the top six categories (Backpacks, Markers/ Highlighters, Prepaid phones, Pencils, Postpaid phones, and Pens) by ADVI were BTS-focused. Similarly, the top four promoted categories in Sears BTS 2013 flyers were major appliances. In 2014, four of the top five promoted categories were more BTS-focused, including Backpacks, Bras-Womens, Pillows-Other, and CoordinatesWomens. The shift seen at Sears was, in part, a product of the retailer eliminating many of their two-page, category-specific Computers, Tablets, and Smartphones given high ad quality across retail channels In addition to highlighting the shifts in ad quality year over year, Figure 3 shows us that, regardless of retail channel, Laptops, Tablets, and Postpaid Smartphones were promoted with high ad quality. Of the six retailers we examined, Laptops were among the top two categories by ADVI at three retailers, Tablets were among the top five categories at four retailers, and Postpaid Smartphones were among the top seven categories at four retailers. In our next section, we will review the brands within these three categories that saw the largest year over year increases in ADVI. Figure 4 reviews the top promoted Laptop brands by ad quality during BTS 2013 and 2014. Seven of the top nine promoted Laptops brands saw an increase in ADVI year over year. Toshiba, Lenovo, and Dell were among the biggest winners in ad quality, each seeing more than a 200% increase in ADVI compared to BTS 2013. Toshiba vaulted from the fifth highest cumulative ADVI in 2013, to third in 2014 among Laptop brands. Their spike in ad quality was driven primarily by a drastic increase in their count of front page promotions— they saw an increase of 550% in flyer front page promotions versus BTS 2013. *Ad Dynamics Value Index (ADVI) is Ad Dynamics’ proprietary measure of ad effectiveness, which includes factors such as placement, size, retailer, and market. 4 Ad Dynamics PerspectiveTM Source: Ad Dynamics 2014 Figure 5: Brand Ad Quality, Tablets, Back to School 2013 versus 2014 Despite seeing an increase in ADVI year over year, Apple actually fell from third to fourth among Laptop brand ad quality. They joined ASUS, Sony, and Samsung as the only Laptop brands to see a drop in their ADVI rank relative to other brands. Where Samsung and Apple dropped in the ADVI ranks for Laptops, both brands cemented themselves as the top players within the Tablets category during BTS 2014. Samsung Tablets saw a 304% increase in ADVI year over year, driven by a huge spike in flyer front page promotions. Samsung Tablet front page promotions jumped from two in 2013, to 17 in 2014, making it the top promoted Tablet brand on flyer front pages during BTS 2014. The next closest Tablet brand in total ADVI, after Samsung and Apple, was Microsoft, which saw roughly 25% of the ad quality of Apple and Samsung. The wide disparity in ad count between the top two promoted Tablet brands and the rest of the pack resulted in the huge delta in ADVI. Apple and Samsung accounted for 74% of all Tablet promotions during BTS 2014. To better compete within categories where there are clear-cut brand leaders, brands like Microsoft and ASUS can focus more on ad quality drivers such as page position and ad size. If you cannot match the ad counts of leading brands, then work with your retailers to improve the quality of the ads your products do receive. The story for Postpaid Smartphones was similar to that of Tablets in that Source: Ad Dynamics 2014 Samsung and Apple phones accounted for 59% of total Figure 6: Brand Ad Quality, Postpaid Phones, Back to School 2013 versus 2014 Postpaid flyer promotions during BTS. Samsung alone *Ad Dynamics Value Index (ADVI) is Ad Dynamics’ proprietary measure of ad effectiveness, which includes factors such as placement, size, retailer, and market. The Power of Market Intelligence 5 Postpaid brands during BTS 2013, and ranked fourth in ADVI. With Blackberry off of BTS flyers entirely, Apple saw their overall ad count nearly double versus 2013, HTC saw a 66.7% increase in cover page ads, and Motorola saw their total ad count increase from nine in 2013 to 39 in 2014 (36 of which were on interior pages, which limited their spike in ADVI relative to Samsung or Apple). Source: Ad Dynamics 2014 Figure 7: Promotional Pricing by Flyer Page Position, Backpacks, Back to School 2013-14 made up 40% of all Postpaid promotions, and 57% of all flyer front and back page Postpaid promotions. Their dominance in ad share and share of key flyer pages resulted in Samsung more than doubling their closest competitor’s ADVI. Additionally, each Apple, HTC, and Motorola saw a spike in ADVI year over year in the Postpaid category, in part due to Blackberry falling out of the Postpaid picture (Figure 6). Blackberry had the second highest total ad count among Mass & Department channel retailers use flyer cover pages to promote lowest prices in Backpacks category Where Laptops, Tablets, and Smartphones were the primary promotional focus for the office/electronics retail channel, one of the top categories promoted in mass and department channel flyers during BTS was Backpacks. Per Figure 3, Backpacks was the top promoted category by ADVI in Walmart and Sears flyers, and ranked second by ADVI on Target flyers. Sears expressly supported the Backpacks category—of their 41 Backpacks ads during BTS 2014, 32 were either on the front page or front wrap of BTS flyers. Figure 7 shows the average promoted price of Backpacks products broken out by page position. A consistent pattern can be seen at Sears, Target, and Walmart. All three featured their lowest promoted price for the Backpacks category on their flyer front page. Sears and Walmart both featured an average promoted price of under $10 on their flyer front pages, with Walmart owning the lowest average front page promoted at $5.00. Not only did these three retailers allocate quality ad space to the Backpacks category, but they also saved the best promoted prices in the category for their flyer front pages. These are both leading indicators that the Backpack category was a primary traffic driver for the mass and department channels during BTS 2014. Source: Ad Dynamics 2014 Figure 8: Apparel Offer Types by Percent of Total Apparel Promotions, Flyers, Back to School 2013-14 6 Ad Dynamics PerspectiveTM Hudson’s Bay, Sears leverage different offer types to win shoppers There was agreement between mass and department stores in promoting Backpacks as a key BTS traffic driver, yet the manner in which they promoted Backpacks varied greatly from retailer to retailer. Figure 8 shows, within Apparel categories across all flyer pages, the variety of offer types used by Hudson’s Bay, Sears, Target, and Walmart during BTS 2013 and 2014. Hudson’s Bay and Target both increased Source: Ad Dynamics 2014 Figure 9: Top promoted categories on .ca home pages, ad count totals, Back to School 2013 versus 2014 the percentage of products that were promoted with an offer type from BTS 2013 to 2014. Over 50% of promoted products at Hudson’s Bay featured a “% Off” offer, while just over 20% of their promoted products were featured with only a sale price, no offer. By comparison, nearly 80% of Walmart’s promoted products during BTS were promoted with only a sale price. This was consistent with Walmart’s overall strategy of being the everyday low price leader, yet shows the dichotomy between their offer type strategy relative to cross-channel competitors. The most significant change to offer type strategy year over year was seen at Target. During BTS 2013, only about 20% of products on Target flyers were tied to an offer type. In 2014, that percentage jumped to over 50%. They featured a “% Off” offer on just over 15% of their promoted products, and an “Exclusive Buy” promotion on nearly 20% of promoted products. As the newcomer within the channel, Target leaned heavily on offer types and overlays to compete during BTS 2014. Synergistic and disparate online promotional strategies As shoppers continue the trend towards habitual omnichannel shopping, it becomes more important for retailers and manufacturers to engage their shopper base using omni-channel promotions. When developing an online promotional strategy, it is critically important to determine the purpose of your online promotions. Is your goal to support your flyer promotional activity and attract the same shoppers you are trying to drive to the store? Or is your online promotional activity intended to capture the attention of a different shopper? BTS 2014 featured a mix of both synergistic and disparate online promotional strategies relative to print. Among the retailers that supported their flyer category mix with their .ca home page promotions were Best Buy and Future Shop (Figure 9). Of the top ten flyer categories at Best Buy by ADVI (as shown in Figure 3), seven were among the top promoted categories on the bestbuy.ca home page during BTS, and the top two promoted categories—Laptops and Postpaid Smartphones— were the same in print and online. Staples and Walmart used more disparate online promotional strategies relative to Best Buy and Future Shop. Only two of the top ten categories in Staples and Walmart flyers (again, by ADVI) were also featured in the top ten categories on Staples.ca and Walmart.ca. Staples leveraged their website home page to promote more office supplies categories, rather than the computers and electronics categories they pushed in print. Walmart, alternatively, lent relatively little support to BTS categories on their .ca home page, instead promoting many summer activity categories such as Outdoor Accessories, Gazebos, and Swimming Pools. Whatever approach a retailer takes to their omni-channel promotional plan, strategy decisions should always be made based on an analysis and understanding of how competitors promoted across media channels. The Power of Market Intelligence 7 Source: Ad Dynamics 2014 Figure 10: Top-selling Laptop Online Price Trend, Back to School 2014 Growing impact of e-commerce According to a recent report from Forrester Research, online retail spending is projected to reach $33.8 billion (or 8% of overall retail) by 2018, up from a projected $20.6 billion in 2014. Though still making up only a small fraction of overall retail spending, a growing segment of shoppers are taking their purchases online, which has put additional pressure on retailers and manufacturers to have more consistent visibility into the competitive promotional and pricing activity in the e-commerce space. This is especially true for periods like BTS, during which many retailers and manufacturers realize a large percentage of their annual sales. Amazon BTS discounts hit earlier than flyer promotional discounts Reviewing the online pricing for some top-selling Laptops and Tablets during BTS, we found that discount periods varied greatly from retailer to retailer, and from product to product. Figure 10 tracks the online price at Amazon.ca, Walmart.ca, BestBuy.ca, and Sears.ca for the Hewlett Packard Intel Celeron Laptop from the beginning of July through the beginning of September. Of the utmost importance to brick and mortar retailers was Amazon.ca’s early BTS discount on this Laptop. Amazon dropped their price on 7/5 from $289.99 to $249.99, and 8 Ad Dynamics PerspectiveTM kept that discount active through the end of July. Why is this important? Most brick and mortar retailers waited until the last two weeks of July to publish their first BTS flyers. Thus, for two weeks, BTS shoppers were finding the lowest price on this top-selling Laptop on Amazon—a price roughly 15% lower than the rest of market. Best Buy’s online price on the HP Laptop, by comparison, was not discounted for their BTS sale until 8/3, when they dropped from $299 to $279.99. Where the Laptop in Figure 10 saw early BTS season discounts, Figure 11 shows that the deepest online discounts on the Apple iPad Air Tablet were available to shoppers as the calendar turned from August to September. BestBuy.ca and FutureShop.ca each fluctuated their online price for the Tablet on a similar pattern. Both increased their price from about $555 on July 1 to $576 on July 15th, and fluctuated price for periods of a few days with each change, all up until the end of August, when both BestBuy.ca and FutureShop.ca dropped their prices significantly. On 8/27, FutureShop.ca discounted the iPad Air from $548 to $478—a discount of about 13%. BestBuy.ca followed on 9/5 when they dropped from $569 to $533, a discount of about 6%. Both online retailers featured their lowest prices of the season for this top-selling Laptop on or after 8/27, almost a full month after the discount we saw on the HP Laptop in Figure 10. Comparing the price trends in Figure 10 and 11 prove that About Ad Dynamics Ad Dynamics is a market intelligence firm dedicated to increasing our customers’ returns on their advertising investments and providing real-time visibility into e-commerce pricing. We support our 850+ clients through monitoring and analyzing over 200 U.S. and Canadian markets for every channel of trade and 1 billion buy pages from 3,000 global merchants, enabling dynamic decision making by turning data into actionable insights. Source: Ad Dynamics 2014 Figure 11: Top-selling Tablet Online Price Trend, Back to School 2014 online pricing and discounting is not something that needs to be checked in on once a month, or even once per week, if retailers and manufacturers want to remain competitive on price during key selling seasons. Daily competitive price tracking is necessary in order to pick up on the sudden and unpredictable prices changes seen during BTS 2014. Conclusion Between the drastic flyer volume and category ad quality at Walmart and Sears, the increased use of offer types and overlays at Target, the shifts in category allocation on Walmart.ca and Staples.ca, and the fluctuations and variance in timing of online discounts at Amazon and BestBuy.ca, retailers were pulling out all the stops to try and attract the BTS shopper to their stores or online retail space. Many of the strategies seen during BTS should be top of mind for retailers and manufacturers finalizing their plans for the holiday shopping season. Competitive changes to promotional volume should be monitored to determine flyer strategy during key events, just as competitive category support should govern the process for allocating key flyer page space to different categories. Likewise, if a retailer or manufacturer lacks a process for continuously monitoring competitor prices online during the holiday season, days and weeks could pass during which they thought they were priced competitively, and during which your competitor was successfully winning shoppers with the best price. For both holiday 2014 and BTS 2015, make sure you have the tools in place to thoroughly monitor competitive promotions and prices, and the process in place to adjust your own strategy in the moment to ensure the competitive changes do not have a significant impact on your ability to attract shoppers and drive sales. The Power of Market Intelligence www.addynamics.com Key Takeaways • Omni-channel promotional strategies varied from retailer to retailer during BTS 2014, with retailers like Best Buy featuring cohesive category promotions in both their flyers and website home pages, and retailers like Staples promoting different categories in print than online. Both media types—flyers and website—should be monitored daily during key event periods like BTS to ensure you are aware of all competitive promotional offers facing your potential shoppers. • Online price changes and discounts can happen at any time during key sales periods like BTS holiday. Amazon preempted all competition with discounts on top selling Laptops occurring early in July. Do you have the tools in place to identify discounts to online price early in the Holiday Shopping Season? This is critical to avoid losing the attention of early season shoppers. • Within the Tablet and Postpaid Smartphone categories, Samsung and Apple owned a majority of ad share, and were featured with the best ad quality. Though smaller brands within categories that have one or two brand leaders may struggle to surmount leading brands in ad share, they can work with their retailer partners to achieve better page position or ad size when they are on promotion. Focus more on ad quality of the placements you do receive, rather than getting hooked on competing for ad share. Learn More For more insight into the entire promotional landscape or an analysis of your digital and print strategies, call Ad Dynamics at 1.800.235.3781 or e-mail perspectives@addynamics.com. © 2014 Ad Dynamics. All rights reserved.