Santa Barbara Lawyer - Santa Barbara County Bar Association
Transcription
Santa Barbara Lawyer - Santa Barbara County Bar Association
Santa Barbara Official Publication of the Santa Barbara County Bar Association December 2009 • Issue 447 Santa Barbara Official Publication of the Santa Barbara County Bar Association &EBRUARYs)SSUE Lawyer Santa Barbara Official Publication of the Santa Barbara County Bar Association -ARCHs)SSUE Lawyer Santa Barbara Official Publication of the Santa Barbara County Bar Association *UNEs)SSUE Santa Barbara Official Publication of the Santa Barbara County Bar Association !PRILs)SSUE Lawyer Santa Barbara Official Publication of the Santa Barbara County Bar Association -AYs)SSUE Official Publication of the Santa Barbara County Bar Association *ANUARYs)SSUE Santa Barbara Lawyer Lawyer Lawyer Lawyer Santa Barbara Official Publication of the Santa Barbara County Bar Association *ULYs)SSUE Lawyer Bridging the Gap Santa Barbara Official Publication of the Santa Barbara County Bar Association !UGUSTs)SSUE Lawyer Santa Barbara Official Publication of the Santa Barbara County Bar Association 3EPTEMBERs)SSUE Lawyer SECURING JUSTICE Santa Barbara Official Publication of the Santa Barbara County Bar Association /CTOBERs)SSUE Lawyer Santa Barbara Official Publication of the Santa Barbara County Bar Association .OVEMBERs)SSUE Lawyer L LEECEGSSAION?!! RE Client Relations Professional Transitions Perspectives from Local Practitioners ! tions Lay head! c e l l offs! Over Co 2 Santa Barbara Lawyer R U B E N ST E I N S O R E N S E N MEDIA T I ON ,UNCHTIME-#,%SNOWOFFERED 3EEWWWRSMEDIATECOM UNDER2ESOURCES 2 E AD Y T O S E T T L E Y O U R C A S E 2EALPROPERTY 0ROBATE "USINESS &AMILYBUSINESSANDSUCCESSION %MPLOYMENT 0ERSONALINJURY McIvers&Slater_7.5x4.5.ad:McIvers&Slater 7/8/09 *UDITH2UBENSTEIN*$-!0SYCH *UDITH RSMEDIATECOM WWWRSMEDIATECOM T F ,OL3ORENSEN*$-37 LO L R S M E D I A T E C O M WWWRSMEDIATECOM T F 2:47 PM Page 2 McIvers & Slater Mediation and Arbitration Kevin Thomas McIvers kmcivers@mciversandslater.com Hon. James M. Slater Judge of the Superior Court, Ret. jslater@mciversandslater.com Excellence in Dispute Resolution Business Disputes Real Estate Elder Abuse Professional Liability Medical Malpractice Insurance & Bad Faith Employment & Wrongful Termination Construction Contract & Defect Personal Injury & Wrongful Death (805) 897-3843 www.McIversandSlater.com 211 East Anapamu Street • Santa Barbara, CA 93101 December 2009 3 Santa Barbara County Bar Association www.sblaw.org A Publication of the Santa Barbara County Bar Association 2009 Officers and Directors Melissa Fassett President Price, Postel & Parma LLP 200 E. Carrillo Street, Suite 400 Santa Barbara, CA 93101 T: 962-0011 F: 965-3978 Lynn E. Goebel President-elect; Events Committee Ehlers, Fairbanks & Goebel, LLP 15 West Carrillo Street, Suite 217 Santa Barbara, CA 93101 T: 879-7513 F: 879-4006 Mack Staton Secretary Bench and Bar Conference (2010) Mullen & Henzell LLP 112 E. Victoria Street Santa Barbara, CA, 93101 T: 966-1501 F: 966-9204 Catherine Swysen Chief Financial Officer Sanger & Swysen 233 E. Carrillo Street, Suite C Santa Barbara, CA 93101 T: 962-4887 F: 963-7311 William Clinkenbeard Past President Bench and Bar Conference (2010) Clinkenbeard, Ramsey & Spackman, LLP Post Office Box 21007 Santa Barbara, CA 93121 T: 965-0043 F: 965-8894 Lora Brown Liaison, Legal/Community Associations Hardin & Coffin, LLP 1531 Chapala Street, Suite 1 Santa Barbara, CA 93101 T: 963-3301 F: 963-7372 Luis Esparza Events Committee Esparza Law Group, PC 1129 State Street, Suite 13 Santa Barbara, CA 93101 T: 564-1018 F: 564-1437 Saji Gunawardane Santa Barbara Lawyer Editor-in-Chief Law In Motion, PC 924 Anacapa Street, Suite 2-J Santa Barbara, CA 93101 T: 845-4000 F: 845-4867 Jennifer Kruse Hanrahan MCLE Chair Attorney at Law 285 Chateaux Elise, Suite B Santa Barbara, CA 93109 T: 636-5566 F: 966-6407 Richard F. Lee Liaison / Bench and Bar Reicker, Pfau, Pyle and McRoy 1421 State Street Santa Barbara, CA 93101 T: 966-2440 F: 966-3320 Santa Barbara Lawyer Donna Lewis Special Projects Attorney at Law 1727 Bath Street #B Santa Barbara, CA 93101 T: 682-6710 F: 682-6710 Cristi Michelon Events Committee Eaton, Jones & Michelon 1032 Santa Barbara Street Santa Barbara, CA 93101 T: 963-2014 F: 966-2120 John J. Thyne III Law Day/Law Week The Law Offices of John Thyne 2000 State Street Santa Barbara, CA 93105 T: 963-9958 F: 963-3814 Paul Roberts Bench and Bar Conference (2010) 1126 Santa Barbara Street Santa Barbara, CA 93101 T: 963-7403 F: 966-7869 William Duval, Jr. Law Day/Law Week 1114 State Street, Suite 240 Santa Barbara, CA 93101 T: 963-9641 F: 963-4071 Elizabeth Nolan Executive Director SBCBA Office 123 W. Padre Street, No. E Santa Barbara, CA 93105 T: 569-5511 F: 569-2888 sblawmag@verizon.net Mission Statement Santa Barbara County Bar Association The mission of the Santa Barbara County Bar Association is to preserve the integrity of the legal profession and respect for the law, to advance the professional growth and education of its members, to encourage civility and collegiality among its members, to promote equal access to justice and protect the independence of the legal profession and the judiciary. 4 Santa Barbara Lawyer ©2009 Santa Barbara County Bar Association EDITOR-IN-CHIEF Saji Gunawardane ASSISTANT EDITORS John Derrick • Winnie Cai SENIOR EDITOR Lol Sorensen MOTIONS EDITOR Justin Greene VERDICTS & DECISIONS EDITOR Lindsay G. Shinn COVER ART Michael Lyons Saji Gunawardane EDITORIAL SUPPORT Adam Carralejo Jill Jackman Sadler CONTRIBUTING WRITERS Herb Fox Robert Sanger PRINTING Wilson Printing Submit all EDITORIAL matter to Saji Gunawardane at Saji@LawInMotionSB.com with “submissIon” in the email subject line. Submit all advertising to Elizabeth Nolan at: SBCBA, 123 W. Padre Street, #E Santa Barbara, CA 93105 phone 569-5511, fax 569-2888 Classifieds can be emailed to: sblawmag@verizon.net Santa Barbara Official Publication of the Santa Barbara County Bar Association December 2009 • Issue 447 Lawyer Articles 6 Santa Barbara Lawyer: A Milestone Year 10 Bridging the Gap: Reflections from Our First Law Student Intern, By Adam Carralejo 11 Reflections and Rebuilding, By Melissa Fassett 12 Santa Barbara Barristers 2009 Retrospective, By Gabriela Ferreira 15 Santa Barbara Women Lawyers: Another Excellent Year, By Naomi Dewey 16 Lawyer Referral Service Spotlight, By Lida Sideris 18 An Evening with Our Appellate Bench, By Betty L. Jeppesen 23 Reflections From the Bench: Commissioners Steven Belasco and Ed DeCaro Retire 24 When the Judge Tells You to Sing, You Sing!, By Jennifer K. Hanrahan 26 Report on Proposition 8: Past, Present, and Future, By Pauline Maxwell 29 FINRA and Whistleblowers, By Robert Sanger Sections 32 Motions 33 Verdicts & Decisions 36 Section Notices 37 Classifieds Associate Justice Steven Z. Perren, Associate Justice Paul H. Coffee, Presiding Justice Arther Gilbert and Associate Justice Kenneth R. Yeagan See page 18 and the centerspread for coverage and photos from the SBCBA 2009 Justice’s Reception. December 2009 5 Reflections from Our Readers Santa Barbara Lawyer: A Milestone Year Dear Colleagues: My Editorial Team and I extend our sincere appreciation for your support during our term at Santa Barbara Lawyer. As stated in my January introduction (“Turning the Page”), our objective was to produce an engaging publication that reflects the many facets of being a Santa Barbara lawyer. In so doing, we aimed to honor past traditions, while ushering in a few new approaches. It is our hope that this was achieved with the introduction of formal submission guidelines, a revamped, more objective Verdicts & Decisions, new columns (such as “Inn Focus” and “Motions,” our legal community grapevine), and new photography and graphic standards, among other new elements. The most integral part of our success this year was having the right team on board. I am most grateful for the tireless efforts of Assistant Editors Winnie Cai and John Derrick; Senior Editor Lol Sorensen; Motions Editor Justin Greene; Verdicts Editor Lindsay Shinn; Cartoonist Michael Ferrone; and key editorial and graphic support from Michael Lyons, Alessandro Casati, Adam Carralejo and Jill Sadler. I set out to assemble a collegial team with experience with the written word and the practice of law; I hoped for a team with vision. Words cannot express the pride of working with talented colleagues equally committed to producing an engaging read for our readers. To my Team and our advertising support, Liz Nolan: Thank you for your talent and patience as we worked together to “perfect the beast.” A law journal should serve as a vehicle to host a conversation about how to relate to each other, both locally and globally. How to nurture and develop who we are as professionals, and to exchange ideas about how we practice. We thank our contributing writers (in particular, Herb Fox, Robert Sanger and David Hughes), court personnel and other community leaders for their invaluable contributions. Putting pen to paper taps into the promise of why we practice law. Sometimes even who we aim to be – as lawyers, leaders, respected opponents…and as neighbors in, what Judge James Herman calls “our tiny fishing village.” That’s a Santa Barbara lawyer. That is what Santa Barbara Lawyer has evolved into. We hope you enjoy our final issue of year-end “reflections.” -Saji D. Gunawardane, Editor-In-Chief 6 ear Saji, D Thank you for inviting me to serve as Senior Editor for the Santa Barbara Lawyer in 2009. Through your leadership, new efficiencies you and the team established, and the hard work of each editor, the Journal established a new high water mark for themed content and for graphics. I was proud to play a small role in its success. [Your being there as an experienced “sounding board” was instrumental. Thank you. -SG] - Lol Sorensen, Esq. Rubenstein & Sorensen Mediation Dear Editor: I have been blown away at the extremely high quality of the Santa Barbara Lawyer with the innovations that were undertaken this year. My goal in accepting the appointment as ADR Section Chair was to do all in my power to increase the excellence in image and execution of all that the Section desired to accomplish in 2009. Santa Barbara Lawyer was a large key to our success in doing this. As a team we all have done a great job for the Bar Association and its image, along with the image of the lawyers in the community, which have been raised as a result. - Dave Peterson, Esq. SBCBA Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR), Section Chair Hello Editor & Team: Since 1999, when I was the Editor of the then Quibbler, the publication has undergone a vast transformation. At that time, the Editor did everything but typeset the edition. It was a huge job. We were also a black and white edition with a budget for only the occasional color version. We were excited when we went to a glossy finish. Tim Metzinger, who I picked to succeed me as Editor, continued the improvements by delegating duties which not only was a brilliant thing to do, but added people to Santa Barbara Lawyer Reflections from Our Readers the task who had expertise in the various areas that were covered. He also renamed the magazine and was able to obtain the budget to print all editions in color. Since then, Santa Barbara Lawyer has simply become better and better. The columns solicited and written by attorneys specializing in their various fields are illuminating and interesting. The photographs have been terrific especially when schedule conflicts prevent attending some events. This team’s attention to standards and details, and careful scrutiny of the articles have given the publication an even more professional persona. The magazine monthly covers have been entertaining and have no doubt derived from your interest and expertise in photography. The articles that you have produced have been timely and informative. You can be proud of the 2009 Editorial Board. - Betty L. Jeppesen, Esq. Former Editor-in-Chief and Former President, SBCBA; Former President, Santa Barbara Women Lawyers Dear Editor: Thank you for the opportunity to have the Project Excel student mentorship project profiled in your bar magazine. We look forward to ongoing contact with you and your group. And I hope that your colleagues liked the article. - Julie Carlson Project Excel Santa Barbara (Affiliated with UCSB Black Studies Department) Dear Editors: Thanks to the Santa Barbara Lawyer for working hard to promote civility and the positive efforts made by local lawyers. In the twentyfive plus years that I have been in practice, I have seen what happens to families when the parents divorce. The “traditional” method of divorcing involved pursuing the adversarial route assigned to civil litigation and followed the same rules. Each side hired an attorney and went to war, just as those in days of old had a knight/champion go bash at another knight/champion. The problem was that the divorcing couple and their children were the casualties. Then, the concept of mediation crept into family law, wherein couples worked with a “neutral” to try to craft their own solution… In the early 1990’s, Minnesota family lawyer Stu Webb, developed the notion of “collaborative divorce.” Each party would still have and advocate, but the couple, both lawyers, financial experts, and mental health professionals would work as a “team” to find the best solution for the entire family. Well, it works. Couples coming out of this process are pleased with the results. Some of them even reconcile… The lawyers involved also find their work more rewarding, and they experience less “burnout.” So, it is not only better for our clients, it is better for us. Locally, some family law attorneys formed the Santa Barbara Collaborative Law Group; we continue to serve our community in this new role. The collective effort to get the right message across to our peers and share new developments in local practice makes all the difference. Thanks again for your efforts and drive to support this direction. - Laura Dewey, Esq., Certified Specialist, Family Law Attorney and Mediator, Collaborative Practice Dear Editor: Hats off to you for your thoughtful, creative stewardship of Santa Barbara Lawyer this year, and to your team for all of the focused work behind the scenes required to produce a monthly publication. The magazine looks good, reads well, and is full of interesting content, due partly to the new theme approach you have developed for individual issues and partly to the dedicated group of writers and editors you have assembled or continued to publish. I have particularly appreciated your willingness to include reports and photos of section programs in the magazine. Sections carry out a critical part of SBCBA’s mission by keeping members up to date on specific areas of practice, and this benefit is enhanced by substantive coverage of section presentations in Santa Barbara Lawyer. - Christine L. Kopitzke, Esq. SBCBA I.P./Technology Business Section Head December 2009 7 Reflections from Our Readers Dear Editorial Board: It is difficult to find an issue more universal for your membership than the issue of parenting. It is an issue about which most professionals have an overabundance of guilt since “the law is a jealous mistress” — jealous even of our children. Thank you for your attention to the issues arising in the lives of lawyers whose parental role frequently collides with their lawyer duties. I offer you a poem I wrote more than a decade ago… A working mother’s perspective: I’ll Take It Sometimes I feel that it isn’t fair. Other moms get to stay home and play. Their work is very hard too, but still They have freedom to hold their babies. Sometimes I feel cheated by my day All filled with other peoples problems. Valuable time in my children’s Brief childhood has been spent with strangers. Yes, I would prefer to be with them. Yes, I am missing cherished moments. But, I do not have to miss them all! I have kids I love and who love me. Sometimes I feel that it isn’t fair. Those poor people who have spent their lives At work without their children waiting Not knowing the joy of coming home. Evenings with laughter and kisses. Weekends with pancakes and bacon. Baby hugs with sticky wet kisses. This is the only way I get them. I’ll take it. Thank you for your continued attention to the issues important to the bench and bar. - Sue McCollum, Esq. Hollister & Brace, PC [Thank you for your candor and insightful profile in our May issue, Sue. Special recognition must be given to Winnie Cai (who I have tapped as our 2010 Incoming Editor) for leading the development of our May issue and its thematic content. –SG] 8 Dear Editor: Congratulations on a great year of Santa Barbara Lawyer In particular, I want to commend you and the entire Santa Barbara Lawyer team for putting together the first “Green” issue and for moving to recycled paper. Sustainability is not just for tree huggers and granola eaters — it’s for everyone, including multi-national corporations and, yes, lawyers. Illustrative of this movement is the State Bar’s recent adoption of an Eco-Pledge and Law Office Sustainability Policy and accompanying sustainability guidelines. In your next “Green” issue (I suggest an annual issue commensurate with Earth Day), I would encourage an article providing a brief tutorial on this Eco-Pledge and sustainability guidelines so that Santa Barbara lawyers and law firms can lead the way towards minimizing the environmental impacts in the business and practice of law. - Bret A. Stone, Esq. Paladin Law Group® LLP Dear Editor: The Santa Barbara Lawyer has really come of age. The 2009 covers, for example, have been more than just cool. The arresting back-lit leaf of the June issue sticks in my memory. The magazine pulled off themed issues, not an easy thing to do when the source of articles is volunteers. The editor’s message oriented the reader to the theme with that relentlessly positive yet never forced style of Saji Gunawardane. This year also saw a welcome return to listing the names of people appearing in event photos. Kudos to all on the 2009 SBL team! - Donna Lewis, Esq. SBCBA Board Member Santa Barbara Lawyer Reflections from Our Readers Dear Editor: 2009 was a FANTASTIC year for the Santa Barbara Lawyer. The quality of articles submitted and printed were top notch and I looked forward every month to receiving the next edition. What a great editorial staff! I love the new sections that have been added and really enjoy learning about my colleagues and what they are up to both professionally and in their private lives. Thank you so much for making the Santa Barbara Lawyer a publication I look forward to receiving and one so beautiful that I can keep it on the office coffee table! Dear Justin: Great article on the courthouse in the recent Santa Barbara Lawyer. Good information. I’ve always wanted to get involved in the Courthouse Legacy Foundation and I appreciate now having the information as to what is being done to preserve our incredible landmark. - Mary Jane Miller, Esq. Miller & Berryhill LLP - Dear Editor: Thank you for soliciting my article for the September issue (“The Strike of 12: 12 Tips...”). Your publication recognizes that legal staff are very interested in knowing what is expected in motion filings and changes to come at the courts. I urge all firms to make a copy of my “12 tips” and share it with all staff... These 12 helpful pointers will save much aggravation and facilitate the administration of justice. - Marilyn Metzner Secretary to Judges Thomas P. Anderle, Thomas R. Adams and Denise de Bellefeuille Santa Barbara County Superior Court Dear Justin: Thanks for including me in Santa Barbara Lawyer’s new “Motions” column. It looks great! - Kevin R. Nimmons, Esq. Hollister & Brace, PC December 2009 Jennifer E. Drury, Esq. Drury Pullen, PC Dear Editorial Board: Santa Barbara Lawyer in 2009 probably had a better year than most Santa Barbara lawyers. The publication, which I edited “way back when,” has transmogrified into the major league sphere of bar publications – without a paid professional staff, an astounding feat, for which serious commendations are due for all involved. In particular, Saji Gunawardane, as editor-in-chief, you innovated, cajoled, and fretted to produce a vintage year: The new features and ongoing columns and journalistic reportage have been an educative and enthralling read, with striking covers and daring photography to boot. I personally thank you and staff for extolling the virtues and history of the public-interest law firm, California Rural Legal Assistance, for which I serve as Directing Attorney of the Santa Barbara office. Looking back, my singular regret is flubbing the opportunity to push Saji, the intrepid Santa Barbara Lawyer, into the Santa Ynez swimming pool of Judges Denise de Bellefeuille and Jim Herman during a late summer barbecue for the south and north County Inns of Court. There is always next year. [I will be on the lookout, Mr. Ah Tye. -SG]… My best wishes to the 2010 incoming editors, Winnie Cai and John Derrick, both of whom were invaluable and amiable members of my Pupillage during the 2009 William L. Gordon Inn of Court year. - 9 Kirk Ah Tye, Esq. Former President, SBCBA; Former Editor-in-Chief, Santa Barbara Lawyer Reflections practicing law in and around Santa Barbara. I also gained perspective from a variety of different practice areas, such as family law, employment, Social Security disability and civil litigation. A second, but no less important, opportunity was in meeting and working with established legal professionals. The interviews showed me the challenges that new attorneys faced, as well as the work ethic required to succeed. Working with the production and editorial staff showed me how By Adam Carralejo the writing, editing, and printing of a monthly publication works – and the time and effort involved. The contacts gained, and the personalities I’ve met, made the time and welve months ago, when our editor, Saji Gunawareeffort that much more rewarding. dane, asked if I was interested in writing for Santa BarAs a law student with more questions than answers about bara Lawyer, I jumped at the opportunity. I anticipated this profession, I was very lucky to meet a group of lawyers that it would be both challenging and rewarding to work with a deep commitment to this community. They were with such a dynamic group of legal professionals. As Saji both helpful and unnoted when we met, derstanding. I was also the twin advantages of encouraged by their writing for the publicadiverse background. tion have been gaining There was Winnie Cai, experience and confiwhose constructive dence as a writer, and criticism was always having the opportunity accompanied by a to meet and work with warm smile. (Every established professiontime someone noticed als in the community. and complimented an I also thought that bearticle I always thought ing involved would to myself, “Thank God offer me a glimpse at I have Winnie around what it’s like to work to make me look good in the profession, and …”.) John Derrick was I might even pick up a pleasure for his effort some of the tricks of The Santa Barbara Lawyer editorial team takes time out from their busy schedules to and intellect – and of the trade along the mentor Young Carralejo course his biting wit. I way. No more theory thought Michael Ly– time to employ some ons, Alessandro Casati practical skills. and Saji did a wonderful job with the art and photography. Considering how much independence I was given Lol Sorenson was a familiar and useful sounding board. And and how much I was encouraged to participate in team of course, Saji was an insightful mentor who made every discussions, I got to learn a lot about self-reliance and aspect of this process easier. problem-solving in a non-academic setting. I was able to I would like to thank everyone involved for such an inwrite both substantive articles and lawyer interviews as formative and valuable experience. the publication’s first Law Student Intern. With my article, “Growing Up Quickly,” I had the opportunity to research Mr. Carralejo is currently a second-year student at the Santa substantive law and translate that research into a reasoned Barbara College of Law. The Editorial Board thanks him for his opinion regarding the Ricardo Juarez murder trial and important contributions to the team. We look forward to watching youth sentencing issues. In my lawyer interviews, I was and supporting his pursuits in the years ahead. able to speak with both returning and new attorneys about Bridging the Gap: Reflections from Our First Law Student Intern T 10 Santa Barbara Lawyer Reflections from the Bar Reflections and Rebuilding By Melissa Fassett, 2009 SBCBA President A s I look back on the past year, I can only describe it as a year of challenges. One year ago, as I accepted the position of president of the Santa Barbara County Bar Association, Santa Barbara was reeling from the Tea Fire which had broken out suddenly, spread uncontrollably, and left hundreds of our friends and colleagues without homes. Disasters such as the Tea Fire remind us all how vulnerable we are, and even those of us whose homes survived realize that it could as easily have been us. Then, as the community began to rebuild, six months later, the Jesusita Fire broke out and threatened an even broader swath of our community with its angry flames. The new threat kept vast areas of the community in uncertain peril for many days until it could finally be controlled, and then contained. The imprint of these natural disasters erased the feeling that we, in beautiful Santa Barbara, are somehow removed from the hardships others are confronted with. Additionally, our community has felt the tremors of a shaky economy. Like our clients, the legal community has been affected and has had to tighten its collective belts. However, notwithstanding the challenges we faced, it is how we respond to challenge that defines us. Our community has consistently responded by reaching out and helping those who are affected by hardship, both locally and internationally. The awards that our Bar Association gave this year reflected this and we honored individuals who have given of themselves generously in order to help others. This year, 80 people, members of the bench and bar, and their guests, attended the 2009 Annual Dinner Meeting to recognize the contributions of these individuals. The Honorable Ruggero Aldisert was honored for his almost 50 years on the bench, even in the face of health difficulties. David Hughes was honored for all of the work he has done to provide assistance to those affected by the Tea Fire and the Jesusita Fire. Catherine Swysen was honored for her work with December 2009 the Chad Relief Organization assisting refugees from Chad and helping to provide them with basic health care, clean water, schools, wheelchairs, and other basic needs, and to educate about the prevention of domestic violence. Arnold Jaffe, Marjorie Johnsen, and R. Thomas Griffith were honored for their contributions to Legal Aid’s Outreach Program Melissa Fassett and these volunteers spent countless hours helping others with their legal needs, without compensation. When we recognize those who have given of themselves so generously, we are reminded that we can all contribute. When we are consulted by a neighbor with a problem who can’t afford to pay for a lawyer, an elder person who is being neglected, a family whose home was lost in a fire, or a non-profit whose coffers are empty, we should try to make an effort to do what we can to assist. As lawyers, we are uniquely qualified to help people with problems and I believe we are bound to do what we can to make our community a little better. Our new State Bar President, Howard Miller, has asked that all attorneys commit to providing a number of hours of pro bono service to those who can’t afford it, and I agree with his message. The coming year will be one of rebuilding as we recover and move on from the challenges of the last. We are starting to rebuild from the damage caused by the fires, and there are signs that the economy is also beginning to recover. For the Santa Barbara County Bar Association, our particular challenge this year was to re-establish the Lawyer Referral Service, to serve both the public need for referrals and to offer the bar an opportunity to sign up to receive referrals. We have put in place the foundation for the Lawyer Referral Service, and we will all benefit from that service. I hope to see it become strong and self-sustaining in the coming years. Our collective efforts have done much to advance the image of lawyers in the public eye, something that has been sorely needed. I am proud of what we have done during the past year to weather these challenges and proud that, as President of our Bar Association, I have been a small part of it. I thank the members of the Bar for allowing me this opportunity to serve and I look forward to being part of the next chapter. 11 Reflections from the Bar Santa Barbara Barristers 2009 Retrospective By Gabriela Ferreira W hen I was asked to write an article summing up Santa Barbara Barristers’ accomplishments in 2009, my mind raced a thousand miles per hour attempting to remember all that has happened. It was for sure a challenging, exciting and successful year. The exciting part started when I was elected to be the President. I was truly honored and happy to undertake this position after having served on the Board of Directors since 2007. That short period of excitement quickly faded with the realization that I would be faced with creating the bi-annual Santa Barbara Attorney Directory. It is a project that involved hours upon hours of volunteer work from our Board of Directors. We worked after-hours and weekends for several months. At last we got it done and have been selling the directories since June. It has been a great success! SBB Vice-President Brandi Redman had this to say about the Directory, “My highlight of the year was the final publishing and distribution of the 2009-2010 Santa Barbara Attorney Directory. What began as a seemingly simple project became a true labor of love for us all. All of the members of the Barristers’ Board of Directors spent many a weekend and night gathering information, only to then spend even more time proofing that information. All of us worked hard; and we worked together. For me, this is the true achievement. Amazingly enough, relationships not only survived the process, but were strengthened. The product is a beautiful and up-to-date directory we hope our legal community utilizes and enjoys.” I must say that a great deal of the success this year was due to the wonderful young attorneys that I had the privilege of working with. All of the Board members donated their time and energy to the success of our association. The amazing work achieved this year would not have been possible without the help of everyone involved. Our 2009 Board of Directors included Brandi Redman (Vice President), Michael Lyons (Treasurer), and Jacqueline Binger (Secretary). The officers were Ryan Drake, Casey Nelson, Justin Greene, and Gary Semerjian. Serving in an advisory role was Saji Dias Gunawardane (Past President, 12 2007, 2008). The year of 2009 has also been an interesting year because SBB rolled out several informative, entertaining, and well-attended events throughout the year. It offered legal education (MCLE) programs and several networking events and mixers. By promoting legal education programs, we brought professional development and opportuGabriela Ferreira nities to the legal community, especially to young lawyers. These opportunities introduced new attorneys to the legal community and acted as a forum for attorneys of all experience levels to re-acquaint themselves with their fellow colleagues. The programs and events offered throughout the year were informative and fun. In March, John Parke of Allen & Kimbell, LLP offered an MCLE on Conflict of Interest. In June, a swearing-in ceremony and reception were held for the new admittees, and the much anticipated 2009-2010 Attorney Directory was released. In August, we had our well-attended Summer Barbeque, followed by September’s program on family law presented by Elizabeth Vogt. Next, in October, we had an informal networking gathering at Dargan’s Pub. We also held a program in partnership with the Anti-Defamation League (ADL) in immigration law presented by Arnold Jaffe and Santa Barbara Sheriff Bill Brown. This program was well attended by the community and definitely constructive in generating much needed discussion about legal justice and immigration issues. November’s MCLE program was our annual “Lunch with a Judge.” This year we hosted the Honorable Arthur Garcia who spoke about the adjustments and changes made to the county courts due to the economic crisis. Finally, to close this amazing year we will have the December swearing-in ceremony and our 3rd Annual Merry Mixer. SBB believes that the promotion of programs like these help to further develop legal skills, build professional reputations and strengthen the network of legal professionals within our community beyond the workplace. One major change in the SBB’s activities this year is that we will give back to our community as it struggles to cope with the economic crisis. SBB will match the proceeds of its upcoming Merry Mixer and donate the funds to our local Continued on page 16 Santa Barbara Lawyer ALL THREE FREE! LUNCH CLE CREDIT MONEY-SAVING TIPS You are cordially invited to enjoy a fine lunch provided by West – and learn from experts about tools that can help you practice more efficiently, productively, and profitably. Wednesday, December 9, 2009 Noon – 1:30 p.m. Riviera Grand Ballroom • Canary Hotel 31 W. Carrillo Street, Santa Barbara All attendees are automatically registered for a chance to win a $50 American Express® gift card. MCLE credit This activity approved for Minimum Continuing Legal Education Credit by the State Bar of California in the amount of one hour of general credit. Space limited … register today! Contact Connie Bush at connie.bush@thomsonreuters.com or 952-250-7114. © 2009 Thomson Reuters L-354483/10-09 December 2009 13 14 Santa Barbara Lawyer Reflections from the Bar Santa Barbara Women Lawyers: Another Excellent Year By Naomi Dewey S anta Barbara Women Lawyers celebrates its twenty-first anniversary this year, and 2009 has been a year to remember for the organization. SBWL was founded in 1988 as a support network and resource for female attorneys. Over 100 people attended the first meeting, and the organization never looked back. Among other achievements, SBWL was the first group in the County to offer continuing education programs. SBWL began 2009 with two goals — first, to continue the legacy of service to our members and the community, and second, to assess what members needed in the future. When I became President of SBWL, I was struck by the number of people who questioned the relevance of the organization. “We don’t need a women’s bar,” said some — “women have shown that they are equal,” or “treating women differently misses the point.” To counter those that question the relevance of SBWL, I note the vibrancy of our MCLE program, our mentoring work, special projects, and a busy, busy year of serving the Santa Barbara legal community. In February, Santa Barbara Women Lawyers Foundation, the gift-giving and fundraising arm of SBWL, hosted Masquerade Madness, a Mardi Gras themed event on the waterfront where guests danced, partied (and gambled) the night away while raising money for our scholarship program. The event came at a time when economic uncertainty was affecting us all — and was a testament to our donors’ commitment to SBWL’s mission and goals. Working with the Santa Barbara Legal Secretaries, SBWL was a supporter of Law Bowl, raising funds for the Teen Court program. Working with the Santa Barbara County Bar Foundation, SBWL acted as a provider for continuing education programs on topics including Proposition 8 and Rules and Ethics in Collecting Legal Fees. For 2010, SBWL will be the MCLE provider for all Law Week continuing education programs. In July, SBWL launched a countywide salary survey. Working with names provided by the County Bar and Barristers Club of Santa Barbara, SBWL surveyed over 600 December 2009 attorneys about their compensation, employment and background. The survey was a “repeat” of one conducted in 1998. This time, we used email to reach participants. While the data is still being tabulated, one thing is clear. In 1998, women attorneys earned 66 cents on the dollar compared to their male counterparts. In 2009, we have moved closer to parNaomi Dewey ity — but not much closer. Women lawyers on average earn 74 cents on the dollar compared to men in 2009. There are, of course, variables in the data that refine this broad overview. An important part of SBWL’s work is representing the County at the state and national level. In early September two SBWL directors represented the organization at the California Women Lawyers annual dinner at the State Bar Conference. CWL affiliation helps SBWL access statewide programs and resources for members; we are also members of the National Conference of Women’s Bar Associations. Later that month, SBWLF honored six scholarship recipients and Judge Jean Dandona at a luncheon at the University Club. The scholarship recipients, five women and one man, come from very different backgrounds, but share one thing in common — they hope to practice law in this County. As a former scholarship recipient, I can attest to the powerful links these recipients will form as SBWL members mentor them and assist in their transition to practice. Also in September, SBWLF gave its only non-scholarship grant of 2009. This special grant went to the Domestic Violence program at Legal Aid. Outgoing SBWLF President Stephanie Ball has done an excellent job of shepherding the Foundation through two tough years, and is to be commended for her leadership in difficult financial times. November saw SBWL’s annual Legal Education Program at the Santa Barbara Courthouse. In response to the changing climate for legal jobs, we chose a career focus for the three-hour MCLE. Attendees dedicated enough to venture to the Courthouse on a Saturday morning heard from legal recruiter Kathi Whalen, Commissioner and SBWL founding member Deborah Talmage, and Naomi Beard from Lawyers Life Coach. Continued on bottom p. 16 15 SBCBA News Lawyer Referral Service Spotlight By Lida Sideris L arge corporations and the affluent comprise the majority of litigants in the United States. At the opposite end of the spectrum, indigents often have the benefit of low cost or free legal services in many cities, subsidized, at least partially, by the government, bar associations, charitable organizations and/or private groups. Reflections Ferreira, continued from page 12 Legal Aid Foundation. I am happy to say that particularly in light of 2009’s economic crisis, that the degree of time and commitment shown by the community in attending our events, as well as the level of support and contributions to our association was impressive! To all of the speakers, volunteers, attendees, contributors and supporters, the SBB Board of Directors thanks you for making this year such a successful one! Ms. Ferreira served as as President of the Santa Barbara Barristers in 2009 and is a sole practitioner based in Santa Barbara. Dewey, continued from page 15 Finally, we will end 2009 with our annual dinner and meeting, on December 14, 2009, at the Canary Hotel, celebrating 21 years of SBWL with guest speaker and former State Bar President Holly Fuije. I can’t think of a better way to answer those who question our relevance in the 21st century. SBWL remains a key part of the local legal community, and it has been a pleasure to head the organization in 2009. The 2010 SBWL Board of Directors will be headed by incoming President Brandi Redman, and as we head to the next milestone, it’s all about you: our members and colleagues. Ms. Dewey served as 2009 President of Santa Barbara Women Lawyers and is a litigator at Hardin & Coffin LLP. 16 Between these two sit millions of Americans of moderate means that seldom utilize attorneys. Why? First, the perceived costs of attorney services discourage most from seeking legal help. Second, potential clients are often uncertain as to whether they even have a problem that requires legal assistance. And finally, they postpone or forego contacting an attorney at all because of the difficulties in finding the right one. This is where the Lawyer Referral Service comes in. It fills a void for those at a loss as to whether they have a legal issue and when they do, where to go to resolve it. The LRS has, in many ways, become a lifeline for those seeking legal help, but lacking the ability to find an attorney with the requisite expertise in the needed area of law. It provides a vital means of legal accessibility for middle class Americans. So how exactly does the Lawyer Referral Service work? Ideally, it matches those seeking legal advice, but unsure of how to find it, to the right attorney. Callers are screened by LRS staff to determine whether a potential referral actually has a legal problem or whether the case may be better suited to another resource or organization such as the Legal Aid Foundation, Small Claims Court or the Labor Board. Once a caller is determined to require legal assistance from the LRS, an attorney member with the proper experience is contacted, and the referral is made. The Lawyer Referral Service exists to assist members of the public in obtaining access to an attorney while providing attorneys with leads to clients they otherwise might not have. Additionally, the LRS provides public relations benefits for the legal profession. The majority of the public imagines attorneys as unapproachable, the services as unaffordable and the lexicon as unfathomable. Referral services make it convenient and less daunting for the public by serving as a buffer between prospective client and attorney, taking into consideration the potential client’s spoken language, circumstances, geographical convenience and the type of legal problem they’re experiencing. The Service enables solo practitioners and smaller law firms, who are without the benefit of a marketing department, to find prospective clients. The Lawyer Referral Service of Santa Barbara County is State Bar certified and is sponsored by the SBCBA. For more information, please call (805) 569-9400 or e-mail director@ sblawyerreferralservice.org. Ms. Sideris is Executive Director of the Lawyer Referral Service of Santa Barbara County. She previously served as Director, Business Affairs for Lorimar-Telepictures and as an attorney for the Alliance of Motion Picture & Television Producers. Santa Barbara Lawyer “Finally, someone my clients can count on just like they count on me.” Your relationship with your clients is all about trust. They trust your integrity and expert legal advice. And they value the personal and confidential relationship you share. It’s very much the same at Montecito Bank & Trust. Like you, we believe in longstanding client relationships. In offering creative solutions for each person’s unique needs. And especially in earning their trust with personal commitment and professional expertise. Whether it’s designing an investment portfolio, managing multiple real estate properties or planning charitable gifts, you can count on our Wealth Management team to provide your clients with a level of service that meets not just their needs, but your standards. Wealth advisory services – one of the many Paths to prosperity® you’ll find at Montecito Bank & Trust. What’s your path? WEALTH MANAGEMENT Investment Management - Trust Services - Estate Administration Real Property Management - Philanthropic Services www.montecito.com Call for more information Santa Barbara: 1106-E Coast Village Road, Montecito, CA 93018 U 805 564-0219 Solvang: 591 Alamo Pintado Road, Solvang, CA 93463 U 805 686-8620 Ventura/Westlake Village: 701 E. Santa Clara Street, Ventura, CA 93001 U 805 830-8005 December 2009 17 Member FDIC SBCBA News An Evening with our Appellate Bench By Betty L. Jeppesen O n Wednesday, October 28, the Annual Reception with the Appellate Justices of Division Six tried a new venue. The event was held at the Santa Barbara Maritime Museum at the boat harbor. This was an inspired choice, as the clear crisp evening provided an excellent view of one of Santa Barbara’s best attractions, its scenci harbor. Elements Restaurant catered the event, with servers circulating — as well as three serving stations with delicious shrimp, pasta, and kabob. The ambiance of boats and seaplanes suspended from the ceiling, as well as deep sea diver “Jim” greeting the visitors at the door, added to the festive atmosphere. The Santa Barbara County legal community is fortunate to have such an intellectual, and yet approachable, appellate bench. Each year, the Justices hold forth on events that have been significant to Division Six and allow attorneys to hear their thinking processes in various cases that came before them. Guests also leave with timely and helpful hints about what works and what will not be accepted when presenting both appellate briefs and oral argument. Though the overall topic is the same, the annual event is always different. This year, the colloquy between the Justices and the audience focused on a complicated estate case and one in which the Justices held differing opinions while managing to assist each other in writing the opinion. The Justices also stated their views on the efficacy of oral argument. The Justices welcomed participation from the attendee attorneys and answered questions, as they always do, very openly. For anyone with even a remote chance of appearing in Division Six, this is a “must attend” evening. No law books provide the insight and direction given here. That said, Justice Gilbert’s new book, “Under Submission,” was made available to attendees and is fast catching on as an informative and entertaining read. (See a review of the book in the Janaury 2010 issue of this publication.) Ms. Jeppesen is a former SBCBA President and serves as in-house counsel for Santa Barbara-based Islay Investments. See our centerspread for additional photos from the 2009 SBCBA Justices Reception. Associate Justice Steven Z. Perren, Associate Justice Paul H. Coffee, Presiding Justice Arther Gilbert and Associate Justice Kenneth R. Yeagan Santa Barbara County Superior Court Judge Thomas P. Anderle with SBCBA Past President Ann Anderson and outgoing President Melissa Fassett 18 Santa Barbara Lawyer TERENCE J. MIX, Esq. Mediation and Arbitration Services v v v v v v v Former President, Consumer Attorneys Association of Los Angeles Former Board Member, Consumer Attorneys of California (12 years) One of the Founders, Attorneys Special Arbitration Plan (Los Angeles) Former Member, State Bar Advisory Committee on Mandatory Arbitration Rules Former Member, Los Angeles Superior Court Arbitration Administrative Committee Former Superior Court Arbitrator (Los Angeles) Former Superior Court Settlement Officer (Los Angeles) Over 40 years of civil litigation experience, with special expertise in personal injury, drug product liability, medical malpractice, legal and professional liability, insurance bad faith, commercial and entertainment law litigation. (805) 681-1401 Phone P.O. Box 60908 (805) 681-1403 Fax Santa Barbara, CA 93160 Terry@terencemix.com Tax Audits Tax Litigation ________________________________________________________________ Law Office of Gregory Arnold ________________________________________________________________ Counsel on 18 U.S. Tax Court Opinions Ten Years in Private Practice Former IRS Senior Trial Attorney Former U.S. Tax Court Clerk ________________________________________________________________ 510 Castillo Street, Suite 304 Santa Barbara, CA 93101 805-560-8200 Arnold@ArnoldTax.com Representative Cases: www.ArnoldTax.com December 2009 19 Marcus Kocmur and Marcus Bird Douglas Large and Justice Gilbert Justice Perren, Ann Battles, and Santa Barbara Lawyer Editorial Staff Michael Lyons (Event Photographyer and Adam Carralejo (Law Student Intern) 20 Santa Barbara Lawyer 2009 SBCBA Justices Reception Judge Jean Dandona and Justice Steven Perren Santa Barbara Maritime Musuem Below: Appellate Specialist Wendy Lascher poses a question to the Justices. December 2009 21 Photos: M. Lyons Reicker Pfau Pyle & McRoy, LLP presents Taste for Justice Santa Barbara Wine - Food - Beer - Auction Thank you Sponsors Ƭ ǡ Ƭ´ǡ Ƭ Ƭ ǡƬ ǡ Ǥ Santa Barbara Independent & CaliforniaWineryAdvisor.com Food & Beverage Ƭ ǡƬ Ǥ Ƭ ± ± School of Culinary Arts Ǧ Ƭ ϐ 22 Auction± ǯ CaliBressan Photography ǡ M.ED., M.T. ǦSan Marino, LA Ǥ ± Theatre Corp Santa Barbara Lawyer Ǥ Eyeglass Factory Museum of Art ±Ƭ Restaurant Ƭ Country House Ͷʹ Jewelry Designs & Beyond Transitions 2009 Reflections from the Bench: Commissioners Belasco and DeCaro Retire By Michael Lyons A fter many years of serving as Commissioner in Santa Barbara’s North County courts, Steven Belasco is retiring. A second generation Californian, Commissioner Belasco came to Santa Maria in 1976 after receiving his J.D. at U.C.L.A. Additionally, Mr. Belasco served four years as a Peace Corps volunteer in the Kingdom of Lesotho before entering law school in 1971. His selection as a Court Commissioner followed 13 years in private practice. In court he emphasizes the need for mutual respect and understanding. While serving on the bench, Mr. Belasco simultaneously served on three different North County benches: Solvang, Lompoc, and Santa Maria. He would often travel from court to court, and for this he was known as the “traveling judge.” Both North and South County attorneys share a mutual respect and admiration for Belasco as a member of the bench and bar. Craig Smith, a former North County Commissioner, reflects, “I first met Steve many years ago when I was the court commissioner handling juvenile court in Santa Maria and Steve was an attorney appearing in front of me. He was bright and always well-prepared and I always considered him to be one of the upper echelon of the local defense bar. Not to mention the fact his impeccable taste in clothing brought a sense of big-city style to a courtroom that had a small country feel. Too bad all that sartorial splendor was hidden beneath a black robe.” Darrel Parker, North County Assistant Court Executive Officer, comments that, “Commissioner Steve Belasco has been one of the hard working bench officers, handling thousands of cases every year throughout northern Santa Barbara County, and he will be sorely missed.” In transitioning from the bench, Mr. Belasco commented that he now has more time on his hands and is able to take on projects that he could not undertake while serving on the December 2009 bench. Additionally, Mr. Belasco enjoys using his extra time to travel and spends considerable time in Mexico. At the time of this writing Mr. Belasco was traveling in Spain. I returned to Santa Barbara and resumed the private practice of law in 1981 following five years as Chief Assistant City Attorney in Los Angeles. In my absence, Stan Roden, who I had served as Assistant District Attorney in 1975, had hired Ed DeCaro. He was the key deputy district attorney to contact if you hoped to negotiate a disposition that minimized the punitive consequences of a conviction and maximized the therapeutic opportunities that were more likely to reduce the prospects of recidivism. It was a pleasure to “work with” Ed as an adversary. He was realistic, understanding, patient and, most importantly, he listened. He didn’t lose these qualities when he was appointed to serve as a commissioner of the Municipal Court in 1987 and later elevated as a commissioner of the Superior Court in 1998. I represented clients in his courtroom and was especially impressed with his appreciation and consideration for the needs of private attorneys. When I was appointed as a judge of the Superior Court in 2003, I learned quickly how valuable he is to the administration of the criminal courts. Despite my 45 years of experience in criminal law, Ed was always available as a mentor to me, and I sought his advice regularly. He has an extraordinary work ethic and a remarkable commitment to excellence. He is an invaluable asset whose retirement will leave a gaping vacuum, and I will miss his wise counsel. Ed DeCaro has been a marvelous ambassador for the court in the legal community and with the general public. -George Eskin Commissioner Ed DeCaro suits up for a final performance. (Golf digest, cap and door within arm’s reach!) 23 Inn Focus When the Judge Tells You to Sing, You Sing! By Jennifer K. Hanrahan “W hen the Judge tells you to sing, you sing.” Sue McCollum shared this invaluable lesson with a curious crowd at the University Club as she introduced Pupillage 8’s presentation to the William L. Gordon American Inn of Court on Sept. 2, 2009. And sing we did! Directed by the Honorable J. William McLafferty, Peter Umoff, Susan McCollum, Michael Gerson, Preston Marx III, Jennifer Hanrahan, Robert Croteau, and James Stoichef dug deep into their dramatic, comedic, and musical backgrounds to act, sing, and even dance. Members of our pupillage debuted the first-ever musical at the Inn! We produced two Acts and five scenes with seven musical numbers. Judge McLafferty’s son, John McLafferty, filmed and edited the scenes with amazing talent. The Musical Both Acts were based on real cases that Judge McLafferty had heard, and most of the characters were based on characters in the 1950s musical Guys and Dolls. In Act I, Adelaide (Jennifer Hanrahan), former Hot Box dancer and GIVE YOUR STAFF A BECOME A BRIDGE BUILDER STEP UP Attorneys: Paralegals can bring better service to the client and decrease your workload, while providing you a higher profit margin. You remain competitive and are able to serve more clients. Is there someone in your office who could benefit from paralegal training? Paralegal Professional Certificate Program Classes begin Jan. 4. For questions regarding the program, contact Craig A. Smith, paralegal@ els.ucsb.edu, 893-7440. To enroll call (805) 893-4200 or visit www.extension.ucsb.edu Changing lives wife to gambler Nathan Detroit, is in her late-eighties and meeting with her trust officer Marker (James Stoicheff) after her husband’s death. Marker takes one look at her assets, spots Adelaide’s huge rocks on her gloved fingers, and it is love at first sight. With a little help from the ballad “I’ve Never Been in Love Before,” Marker tricks poor, little old Adelaide into marrying him and giving him her money. After the wedding, things go south, and Adelaide walks in on Marker checking chlorine levels with the Juan the Pool Boy (Michael Gerson). Marker is dressed up in all of Adelaide’s pretty things — authentic mink stole, pearls, 1950s hat, dress, gloves — extreme drag. Adelaide immediately bursts into “Give Back My Mink,” a parody of the Guys and Dolls song “Take Back Your Mink.” After Marker pleads with Adelaide to take him back so that she won’t take her money back, they duet to a parody of “Sue Me,” and Adelaide declares the marriage over. In Act II, Preston Marx III plays somewhat senile, decrepit, one-time high-roller and ladykiller Sky Masterson, who is now bundled under a blanket in a wheelchair, leading a much more routine life with the help of his caregiver Ima Golddigger (Sue McCollum). Ima’s daughter Phoebe (Jennifer Hanrahan) sees the opportunity and convinces her mother to take Sky to Las Vegas and marry him. Ima celebrates by belting a parody of Guys and Dolls’ leading lady Sarah Brown’s “If I Were a Bell.” Phoebe encourages her mother further with a parody of the favorite duet “Marry the Man.” “Vegas? I remember Vegas,” Sky reminisces in a gruff New York City accent as he flashes back to the good old days, and Preston performs a classy, exciting rendition of UCSB Extension’s mediation courses can show you how. Cultural Perspectives of Conflict Angela Antenore, M.Ed., Jacqueline Oliveira, M.A., Sat., 9am-4pm, Mar. 6, 13, 20 (3 meetings) UCSB — Location to be announced Mediation: Theory and Practice Laurel Kaufer, J.D. Sat., 9am-5pm, Jan. 9-Feb. 13 (excluding Jan. 30); Sat., 9am-4pm, Feb. 20 (6 meetings) UCSB — Location to be announced Enroll today! Call 893-4200 or visit www.extension.ucsb.edu UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SANTA BARBARA Changing lives 24 Santa Barbara Lawyer UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SANTA BARBARA Inn Focus “Luck Be a Lady” of which Sinatra would be proud, under the spotlight of his mind’s eye. When the conspiring women and Sky return from Vegas, Ima is upset and embarrassed because she was unable to withdraw money from Sky’s account and the bank officers called the cops on her. Phoebe assures her that she is Sky’s lawfully wedded wife, and she will get everything when he dies. They punctuate their plans with a duet encore of parodied “If I Were a Bell.” The Legalities What remedies did Adelaide and Sky have? During a live, audience-interactive, theater-in-the-round-style panel postfilm debut, Sue McCollum, Pete Umoff and Rob Croteau applied legal principles to the musical fact scenarios. The panel discussed the Family Code, Probate Code, elder abuse law, conservatorships and case law pertinent to challenging marriage status, obtaining a judgment of nullity of marriage, and the significance of a putative marriage, defined as a matrimonial union that was solemnized in due form and celebrated in good faith, but which, because of some legal infirmity, is void or voidable, in inheritance contexts. (See Estate of Long (1961) 198 Cal. App.2d 732, 738; see also Family Code section 2251(a).) The panel also discussed Elder Abuse issues raised by the Second Act, including remedies for abduction of a dependent adult and raised other issues such as the following: Was Ima disqualified to inherit because she was a care custodian? What about after she married Sky? What were Sky’s options to nullify his marriage to his former caregiver? The panel highlighted several prohibited transfers under the Probate Code. The presentation seemed to be well received, and Pupilage 8 has been encouraged to submit the presentation to the American Inns of Court competition. “I keep thinking of additional songs to write or dialogue for new scenes that would have made our presentation even better,” Judge McLafferty ruminated at our table during the last Inn of Court meeting of the year on October 7. The muse is still with Judge McLafferty, and the 2010 American Inns of Court began on Wednesday, November 4, 2009, so it will be exciting to see what genius pours forth from his Honor’s pen next year. Ms. Hanrahan is a 6th year attorney, a member of the William L. Gordon Inn of Court, and MCLE Chair for the Santa Barbara County Bar Association. To play Old Doll Adelaide, Jennifer Hanrahan was made up to look like she was in her late-eighties and straight out of the 1950s. Caregiver Ima Golddigger sings “If I Were a Bell” to her daughter Phoebe who joins in with “Marry the Man” after they decide to take dependant adult Sky Masterson to Vegas to get married! “Trust Officers” harmonize about the follies of a slick trust officer taking advantage of a rich, older doll. December 2009 25 After old doll Adelaide walks in on her new, younger husband Marker dressing in drag with Juan the Pool Boy, she demands that he “Give Back [her] Mink” and the marriage is over. When Marker sings “Sue Me,” Adelaide says “How?” and searches for her legal remedies. Inn Focus Report on Proposition 8: Past, Present, and Future By Pauline Maxwell P upillage 9 of the William L. Gordon American Inn of Court gave the final presentation of the year in the form of a mock newscast on the first Wednesday of this past October. “Sean Palminteri,” aka Sean Mason, of “Channel 9 News” began by announcing that the Supreme Court, down to four members after being decimated by the swine flu, would soon be hearing oral arguments in Perry v. Schwartznegger, the case that represents the latest legal challenge to Proposition 8. While waiting for the Court to convene, the well-known commentator turned to local attorney Aaron Heisler for a short, informative slide show presenting an overview of the legal background of the case. Mr. Heisler informed the viewers that originally, the statute defining marriage in California was ambiguous as to whether it included samesex partners, but was uniformly interpreted as including only opposite-sex partners. In 1977, AB 607 amended the statute to define marriage as a contract between a man and a woman. In 2000, voters showed their approval of this definition by passing Proposition 22. The pendulum swung the other way in 2005, when the Legislature passed a bill that would have legalized same-sex marriage. However, the bill was vetoed by the Governor based on Proposition 22. A repeat attempt in 2006 met the same fate. In 2008, however, the California Supreme Court struck down Proposition 22 as a violation of the state constitution. The court’s decision became final on June 16, 2008, and same-sex couples immediately began marrying — until November 2008, that is, when voters approved Proposition 8, which amended the state constitution to ban same-sex marriages. This round, the California Supreme Court upheld Proposition 8, although it did not invalidate the approximately 18,000 same-sex marriages that had been formed before it was passed. With the California Constitution amended, proponents of same-sex marriages brought their attack on Proposition 8 to federal court, claiming that it violates the United States Constitution. The State of California declined to defend 26 Panelists Jennifer E. Drury, family law attorney with Drury Pullen ACLP; Lori A. Lewis, estate planning attorney at Mullen & Henzell; and Jane E. Russell, CPA at MacFarlane, Faletti & Co. the lawsuit, a task that was taken up by Proposition 8’s proponents. Pupillage 9 took the liberty of advancing the case to the oral argument stage for the purposes of their presentation. With that background in mind, Mr. Palminteri brought his cameras to a discussion panel occurring at the University Club that night. Lori A. Lewis, an estate planning attorney at Mullen & Henzell; Jennifer E. Drury, a family law attorney with Drury Pullen ACLP; and Jane E. Russell, a CPA at MacFarlane, Faletti & Co., discussed issues faced by couples in California who are registered domestic partners or were legally married here. These couples were in the unique position of being afforded the same rights as married people by the state, but not the federal government. This enthusiastic and enlightening discussion was interrupted by Mr. Palminteri when Justices Roberts (Judith Rubenstein), Ginsberg (Jill Friedman), Scalia (Jared Katz) and Sotomayor (Pauline Maxwell) filed into the “Supreme Court,” and the camera turned to the oral argument. Kenneth Starr, (Scott Campbell), began his argument in support of Proposition 8 but didn’t get very far before the Justices peppered him with questions regarding whether homosexuality was an immutable characteristic and whether marriage was a fundamental right. Mr. Starr was followed by Theodore Olsen, (Kenny McDaniel), arguing a constitutional right to same-sex marriage. Without taking anything away from seasoned attorney Campbell, the Pupillage’s only student member wowed the audience with his polished oratory skills as he answered the Justices’ questions about the standard of review and whether homosexuals are a suspect class. About the only thing the viewers could be sure of after the presentation was that same-sex marriage is an issue that is likely to make the news for years to come. Stay tuned to “Channel 9” for further developments! Ms. Maxwell serves as a Research Attorney at Santa Barbara County Superior Court. Santa Barbara Lawyer 2010 Membership Application Member Name:_______________________________________________________________________________________ Check here if you do not want your name and office address disclosed to any buyer of Bar Assoc. mailing labels. Check here if membership information is the same as last year. If so, the rest of the form may be left blank. Office Address:_______________________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________________________ City: ______________________________________________________ State: _______________ Zip: ______________ E-mail Address:_______________________________________________________________________________________ Phone Number:_____________________________________________ Fax Number: ____________________________ Home Address:_______________________________________________________________________________________ City:______________________________________________________ State: _______________ Zip: ______________ State Bar#: _________________________________________________ Year Admitted to Bar: _____________________ Your member dues include a subscription to Santa Barbara Lawyer. Schedule of dues for 2010 Active Members $130 Student Members $30 New Admittees (First Year Attorneys Only) $00 Affiliate Members (non-Attorney members only) $65 Santa Barbara County Bar Foundation donation $_______.__ Total amount enclosed $_______.__ AREAS OF INTEREST OR PRACTICE (check box as applicable) ADR Civil Litig. Family Law Debtor/Creditor Elder Law In-House Counsel & Corporate Law Intellectual Property/Tech. Business Employment Law Real Property/Land Use Taxation Estate Planning/Probate Mail completed form along with check to: Santa Barbara County Bar Association, 123 W. Padre St., #E, Santa Barbara, CA 93105 Tel: (805) 569-5511 Donations to the Santa Barbara County Bar Foundation are tax deductible to the full extent provided by law to a 501(c)(3) non-profit organization. December 2009 27 As Local as the Courthouse. YO U C A N BA N K O N I T. COMMERCIAL BANKING GROUP www.sbbt.com PRIVATE WEALTH M ANAGEMENT N FINANCING SOLUTIONS N INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT N ADVISORY SERVICES N TRUST SERVICES N TREASURY SERVICES N PRIVATE BANKING Steve Mihalic Senior Vice President Regional Manager Wendy Edmunds 805.882.3809 805.564.6209 Vice President Wealth Advisor A Division of Pacific Capital Bank, N.A., Member FDIC 28 Santa Barbara Lawyer Criminal Justice FINRA and Whistleblowers By Robert Sanger A s most of you know, in 2007, the National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc. (NASD) amended its by-laws and changed its name to the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA). FINRA has also taken over the regulatory duties of the New York Stock Exchange’s (NYSE) wholly owned subsidiary, NYSE Regulation, Inc. FINRA is not a governmental agency but works closely with the Securities Exchange Commission (SEC). However, just like the NASD and NYSE Regulation, Inc., FINRA has the potential for making referrals for regulatory action and criminal prosecution. In this month’s Criminal Justice column, we will review the history of self-regulation in the securities industry culminating in the 2007 revamping of the FINRA organization. We will then look at the new Office of Whistleblower created by FINRA and its implication for the prosecution of federal criminal violations arising out of the securities industry. Foxes Guarding the Chicken Coop After the stock market crash of 1929, the federal government enacted the Securities Act of 1933 and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The idea was to avoid another crash and to do so by imposing strict regulations upon the stock traders and the securities industry. Like a lot of regulatory programs, once the industry to be regulated saw the handwriting on the wall, the industry itself sought to control the regulatory process. The 1934 Act created the U.S. Securities Exchange Commission (SEC), an institution of the federal government. Five Commissioners are appointed to enforce the federal securities laws. They now have a staff of over 3,500 people, have headquarters in Washington, D.C. and offices in 16 other cities. The SEC investigates wrongdoing and has the power to take civil enforcement actions in the federal courts. They can also refer matters for prosecution to the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), to the Department of Justice and to the offices of the United States Attorneys. But the 1934 Act, as further amended in 1939, also gave the securities industry an opportunity to create what were December 2009 designated “self-regulatory organizations.” Interestingly, only one major organization was formed to do this, the National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc. (NASD). Although the NASD was a private corporation, it took on quasi-governmental powers and, by statute, can make referrals to and work closely with the SEC to regulate the securities Robert Sanger industry. The NASD issued licenses to brokers, employed enforcement officers and lawyers and even had internal administrative tribunals to adjudicate disputes and enforcement actions against individuals and businesses that held licenses. In 2007, FINRA took over the role of the NASD and merged the regulatory functions of the NYSE into one private agency. It was touted as a bigger, better and more streamlined organization that would be better able to compile one Rulebook and to provide more modern regulation of the securities industry. It is still not a governmental organization but has the same quasi-governmental powers based on its statutory grant and on its relationship with the SEC. Besides licensing and rule-making, it is supposed to be the first line of defense for investors against fraud and misconduct among securities brokers. Its officers and directors are, for the most part, active or retired members of the big securities firms, banks or related entities. They are the brokers regulating the brokers for the protection of the investors. Self-regulation can be a good thing, of course, but it can also be utilized as a way to deflect real regulation. It cannot go without notice that FINRA was up and running for a year before the 2008 financial crisis. That crisis was precipitated in large part by sharp practices on the part of the securities industry. FINRA dropped the ball. They failed to regulate the big firms and the fraudulent Bernie Madoff, and Allen Stanford operations went undetected. The SEC itself has been criticized for being too easy on the biggest organizations. One researcher recently evaluated this phenomenon in light of the theory that the Commissioners are less likely to commence enforcement actions or make criminal referrals regarding the biggest firms because that is where former Commissioners often find employment after serving. FINRA, as a private company, makes no 29 Criminal Justice pretense otherwise. But the SEC and FINRA are inseparable. The former CEO of FINRA, Mary Shapiro, who presided over the lack of oversight of Madoff and Stanford, has now been appointed the Chairman of the SEC. In the wake of Madoff and Stanford, as well as the general disaster in the securities industry in 2008 and 2009, a Special Review Committee (the “Special Committee”) was appointed by the Board of Governors of FINRA. In addition to investigating the failure to detect Madoff and Stanford, the Special Committee determined that there are more systemic problems with the organization. Whistleblowers There is skepticism about the ability of FINRA or the SEC to independently regulate the industry that they purport to oversee. There is also concern that the vast bureaucratic resources of these organizations are likely to be reinvigorated sufficiently to make a difference. More than one commentator has remarked that current reforms may be no more than rearranging the deck chairs on the Titanic. In one step toward reform, FINRA has created a new Office of the Whistleblower through which, individuals with material information about potentially illegal or unethical activity can submit their information in a way that should get to the appropriate staff people. They will evaluate the information and take necessary action including referring any whistleblower tips that fall outside FINRA’s jurisdiction to regulatory or law enforcement agencies. On the face of it, this seems like a good idea. Certainly if tips about Allen Stanford or Bernie Madoff had been followed up on, those schemes might have been stopped before they harmed so many people. Of course, there is a question about how this will really work. FINRA, and the NASD before it, always had a protocol to accept tips $POOFDUJOH R "5503/&:4t1"3"-&("-4t-&("-45"'' DPOmEFOUJBM FNQMPZNFOU QMBDFNFOU ,BUIJ"8IBMFO_1SFTJEFOU &%BJMZ%SJWF 4VJUF $BNBSJMMP$" 7FOUVSB$PVOUZ 4BOUB#BSCBSB $FMM 'BY XXXXIBMFOCSZBODPN and complaints from investors and other members of the community. It is hard to see how a new e-mail address and phone number for “whistleblower tips” will change the staff response from what it has been to complaints coming into their regular e-mail address and phone number. Even if there is a means to focus staff attention on legitimate whistleblower tips, is this the way to conduct the kind of regulation that the securities industry requires? FINRA should be regulating, investigating, verifying the information from the actual players, particularly the largest players, in the industry. There is something desperate in the thought that a major announced change in FINRA operations is the creation of an Office of the Whistleblower. But the bigger problem from a criminal law standpoint is the fact that whistleblowers as a source of information are problematic. First, there is no guarantee that whistleblowers will assist in detecting the problems in the securities industries with the biggest players and with the bigger schemes. There may be an undue focus on complaints about individual brokers and individual transactions rather than the types of systemic problems that led to the current recession. Hence, there are likely to be more prosecutions of individuals and smaller organizations rather than the larger companies or higher up individuals who make policy. Second, whistleblowers often have their own agendas. They can be unreliable reporters in order to advance their own interests. They can suffer from the same weaknesses as informants in other kinds of criminal cases. Many studies, including those of the California Commission on the Fair Administration of Justice, have determined that reliance on informants is dangerous in criminal cases and can lead to wrongful convictions. Conclusion FINRA is under pressure to make significant changes in light of the current financial disaster. Criminal prosecutions are always a good way to deflect attention from institutional failures. FINRA is likely to make more referrals to the SEC and to the FBI and United States Attorneys for prosecution of people and companies. The new Office of the Whistleblower makes it more likely that we will see increased activity at the local level. Unfortunately, the whistleblower/informant procedure is likely to result in criminal investigations and prosecutions of individuals and smaller companies, which may not be guilty while allowing untoward practices to continue at a larger level. Robert Sanger is a Certified Criminal Law Specialist and has been a criminal defense lawyer in Santa Barbara for 36 years. He is partner in the firm of Sanger & Swysen. 30 Santa Barbara Lawyer December 2009 31 Legal Community Jared Green is a new associate at Mullen & Henzell LLP in their Estate Planning group. Prior to this move Mr. Green was an associate at Clifford Chance US LLP in their Corporate Finance department. Mr. Green graduated from Brigham Young University with a B.S. in Physics and Philosophy, and earned his law degree from New York University School of Law. The Santa Barbara Women Lawyers Foundation (SBWLF) has elected its officers for 2010. The SBWLF is the fundraising and gift-giving arm of Santa Barbara Women Lawyers. Serving the Foundation in 2010 will be Angela Roach (Hager & Dowling), President; Gabriela Ferreira (Law Offices of Gabriela Ferreira), Vice President; Naomi Dewey (Hardin & Coffin, LLP), Treasurer; and Laura Dewey (Law Offices of Laura Dewey), Secretary. Interested in serving on the SBWLF’s 2010 Board of Directors? Any inquiries should be directed either to current president Stephanie Ball, at SBall@bhfs.com, or incoming president Angela Roach, at Aroach@ hdlaw.com. As a reminder, the Santa Barbara Women Lawyers (SBWL) will hold their annual dinner on Monday, December 14, 2009, at the Canary Hotel. Holly Fujie, past California State Bar President will be the featured guest speaker. The event will begin at 6pm with a no-host bar at the Perch overlooking Santa Barbara followed by dinner at 7pm. The cost to attend is $60 SBWL member/$65 non-member before Monday, December 7, 2009. After December 7 the cost is an additional $5 per person. To RSVP send a check payable to SBWL, to Angela Roach at Hager & Dowling, 319 East Carrillo Street, Santa Barbara, CA 93101. For additional information please contact Angela Roach at Aroach@hdlaw.com. 32 Michelle Montez, an Assistant City Attorney with the Santa Barbara City Attorney’s Office, and Ian Fisher, an Estate and Trusts Partner at Price Postel and Parma LLP, welcomed their third child, Sterling James Montez Fisher on August 28, 2009. Sterling joins big brother, Sebastian (5 years old) and big sister, Sydney Rose (2 years old). The Editorial Board offers congratulations to the Montez Fisher family on this joyous occasion! John Eck of Griffith & Thornburgh, LLP has recently joined the St. Francis Foundation Board of Directors. The mission of the St. Francis Foundation is to promote and support healthcare in the South Coast community, with particular attention to those most in need. Mr. Eck’s practice focuses on general civil and real estate litigation. The Santa Barbara District Attorney’s Office has bid farewell to District Attorneys Gerald Franklin, Darryl Perlin, Vicki Johnson, Allan Kaplan, and Tom Lake, all of whom have retired within the last few months. These seasoned civil servants will be taking decades of experience with them. Despite their official retirements, a few will not be making a final break. Perlin plans on finishing up some trials that he has been involved in, and Franklin is going to return on a volunteer basis. With 34 years of experience, Franklin imparts his wisdom to young lawyers: “Whomever you represent, be honest in your representations to the court and to your opponent’s counsel.” Good luck to these deserving retirees! If you have news to report the Santa Barbara Lawyer Editorial Board invites you to “Make a Motion!” Send one to two paragraphs for consideration by the editorial deadline to our Motions editor, Justin Greene at justin@greenelawsb.com. If you submit an accompanying photograph, please ensure that the JPEG or TIFF file has a minimum resolution of 300 dpi. Please note that the Santa Barbara Lawyer editorial board retains discretion to publish or not publish any submission as well as to edit submissions for content, length, and/or clarity. Santa Barbara Lawyer Verdicts & Decisions Verdicts & Decisions Montello v. Defendant Santa Barbara Superior Court, Cook Division Type of case: Type of proceeding: Judge: Length of trial: Length of deliberations: Date of Verdict or Decision: Plaintiff: Plaintiff’s Counsel: Defendants: Defendants’ Counsel: Experts: Premises liability Jury Trial Hon. James F. Rigali 4 days 4 hours September 28, 2009 Jackie Montello Louis Koory of the Law Offices of James McKiernan Confidential David G. Halm of Pettit Kohn Ingrassia & Lutz PC For Plaintiff: Dennis Blackburn, D.O. (orthopedic surgery) and Brad Avrit, P.E. (safety engineer); For Defendant: Michael Behrman, M.D. (orthopedic surgery) Facts: On June 25, 2007, plaintiff, age 57, was walking into defendant’s premises when her heel became stuck in the rubber open link grid mat. Defendant’s surveillance video showed that plaintiff lost her balance and fell to the ground. Contentions: Plaintiff claimed that the open grid mat defendant used at the entrance of the premises created a dangerous trap condition and an unreasonable risk of injury. Plaintiff’s expert testified that the use of the mat was dangerous in that it was foreseeable that customers could wear high heels. Manufacturers of similar mats warn consumers to avoid using such mats in areas where ladies wear high heels. The National Safety Council in 1995 indicated that the open grid style mats caused risks for high heels. Defendant argued that plaintiff was inattentive, that there was no evidence regarding the dimensions of the holes in the mat, and that there was no evidence that such an accident was foreseeable. Summary of Claimed Damages: Plaintiff fractured the right radial head bone in her forearm. She underwent closed reduction and pin fixation. Plaintiff claims she now needs radial head replacement surgery. Defendant’s expert agreed plaintiff needed surgery but recommended radial head excision surgery without placement of an implant. Plaintiff claimed $40,206 in past medical specials, $22,000 in future medical specials, $19,500 in past loss of earnings, $6,200 in future loss of earnings, plus $475,000 in past and future general damages for pain and suffering. Result: The jury, by a vote of 11-1, awarded plaintiff $263,176. The jury found that plaintiff was negligent but that her negligence was not a substantial factor. Plaintiff filed a motion for cost of proof sanctions and then the case settled for an undisclosed amount. December 2009 33 Bench and Bar Conference 2010 When: Saturday, January 23, 2010, 8:30 am to 4 pm Where: The Santa Barbara Mission Registration includes up to 5.5 hours of MCLE, tech and vendor displays, continental breakfast, lunch, beverages, and a drawing for Westlaw products. Registration Date: SBCBA Member Non-Member Until 1 Dec. 2009 $100 $130 12-1-09 to 1-15-10 After 1-15-10 $110 $140 $130 $150 Registration Form (Please use additional sheets for additional names) Name:_________________________________________________ Firm:__________________________________________________ Email: _________________________________________________ Daytime Phone:________________________________________ Total enclosed:__________________________________________ Mail Registration Form with payment to Santa Barbara County Bar Association 123 W. Padre St., #E, Santa Barbara, CA 93105 Questions? Comments? Email John Thyne at john@thynelaw.com 34 Santa Barbara Lawyer December 2009 35 3:45 PM - 5:00 PM 2:45 PM - 3:45 PM SESSION B 1:45 PM - 2:40 PM 1 hr MCLE 1:15 PM-1:45 PM 11:45 AM - 1:15 PM 11:30 AM - 11:45 AM 10:00 AM - 11:30 AM 1 hr Ethics MCLE .5 hr General MCLE SESSION A 9:00 AM - 9:50 AM 1 hr MCLE 8:30 AM – 9:00 AM “Death of Civil Jury Trials” “Bringing Down the House – recent real estate developments” John J. Thyne, III Paul Roberts “Family Law Topic” Jason Toon “S tripping Mortgages in Personal Bankruptcies and other comparisons of Chapters 7 + 13” Wine and cheese reception for conference attendees, speakers and sponsors KEYNOTE: Barry Cappello – Reflections of a Trial Attorney (1 hour MCLE) Elimination of Bias Credit “Elimination of Bias Topic” To Be Announced TECH FAIR and VENDOR EXHIBITS AFTERNOON SESSION LUNCHEON PANEL: Tim Metzinger & Herb Fox: “Recent Developments in Appeals of Arbitration Awards.” (1 hour MCLE) TECH FAIR and VENDOR EXHIBITS JUDGES’ FORUM (1.5 hours MCLE) featuring Judges Herman, Anderson, de Bellefueille, Gilbert Substance Abuse Credit “The Law of Medical Marijuana” Commissioner Talmadge (tentative) Registration at Santa Barbara Old Mission Front Portico, with Continental Breakfast MORNING SESSION The BENCH AND BAR CONFERENCE 2010 – TENTATIVE SCHEDULE Saturday, 23 January 2010 at the Santa Barbara Mission Santa Barbara Women Lawyers THE OTHER BAR Free confidential assistance to those in the legal community with substance abuse problems. MCLE Luncheon Weekly Other Bar recovery Meetings are held in many areas, and others are being established. For times and locations, or to start a meeting in your area, contact the number or website below. Date: December 10, 2009 Time: Provider of Certified MCLE Instructors MCLE courses available on our website www.otherbar.org 12:00 p.m.-1:30 p.m. Topic: Sexual and Gender Based Violence in Chad. Presentation will include a discussion of sexual and gender based violence in the context of international laws and the United States High Commission on Refugees response to these issues. Confidential Hotline: (800) 222-0767 Speaker: Catherine Swysen, Esq. Location: Santa Barbara College of Law 20 East Victoria St. Santa Barbara, CA 93101 Menu: Selection of sandwiches Price: SBWL members Non-Members: $20 $25 NOW IS THE TIME Reservation Deadline: TO SCHEDULE YOUR PORTFOLIO REVIEW. December 7, 2009 (add $5 to reservations after deadline) Name(s) ______________________________________ Phone _______________________________________ When you stop to think about what’s happened in the past year, it’s easy to realize how quickly things can change. #SBWL Members attending at $20___ $25 ___ #Non-members attending at $25___ $30___ Total Enclosed $____________ MCLE: All attendees will receive one hour of Elimination of Bias MCLE credit. Questions or late reservations? Brandi Redman, b.redman@cox.net or Lora Hemphill, ldh@hardincoffin.com (805) 963-3301 That’s why you should schedule your portfolio review today. This is an ideal time to discuss how the market may have impacted your financial goals. Then we can help you decide if you should revise your investments. And even if you don’t need to make changes, it’s still important to evaluate your investment strategy and help ensure it’s still on track with your goals. Call today to schedule your free portfolio review. Daniel J De Meyer Financial Advisor . 125 E De La Guerra St Ste 101 Santa Barbara, CA 93101 805-564-0011 Send Checks payable to SBWL to: Brandi Redman 1021 Laguna St. #8, Santa Barbara, CA 93101 www.edwardjones.com 36 Santa Barbara Lawyer Member SIPC Classifieds OFFICE SPACE AVAILABLE Rarely available office in prestigious La Arcada Building with five established attorneys. Includes large office, secretarial space and library/conference room. Receptionist, runner, copier, fax machine, phone system, and Westlaw available, if wanted. $1,340 a month. For more information please call Harvey at (805) 966-1671. Don’t forget to renew.... Deluxe Executive Office Building Downtown Full service receptionist, conference facilities, kitchen, copy/ fax/scanner, patios, janitorial and utilities included. Suites and single offices available. From $550-$1,200+. Call (805) 568-5216. The 2010 Membership Application for the Santa Barbara County Bar Association can be found on page 27. Corporate/Transactional Associate We have a position for a transactional lawyer with 3-5 years of experience to handle general business, real estate, tax and securities matters including contracts and agreements, mergers and acquisitions, partnerships, private offerings and financing, public securities issues and real estate leases and purchase agreements. Candidates must have relevant law firm work experience and top academic credentials. JACKMAN SADLER INCORPORATED Litigation Associate CONTRACT PARALEGAL SERVICES 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 We also have a position for a litigation lawyer. Excellent legal research, writing and communication skills along with strong academics and California Bar required. Law firm work experience is a plus. Trial Preparation Trial Support Document Management Summation Proficient Case Chronologies Deposition Summaries Financial Declarations Motions to Compel We are an exciting, busy, AV-rated law firm providing business, transactional and litigation legal services. We offer a competitive salary and benefits package with attractive downtown offices. Check out our website at reickerpfau.com to learn more about our firm. Please e-mail your resume to ccornett@rppmh.com Call today to find out how your practice can benefit from the assistance of experienced, capable contract paralegals. Visit us on the Web for a comprehensive list of services, fee information, and answers to FAQs. (805) 560-7674 ɸ www.jackmansadler.com Santa Barbara and Ventura paralegals available December 2009 37 December 2009 Calendar SUNDAY MONDAY TUESDAY 1 8 6 13 7 14 WEDNESDAY THURSDAY 2 SBCBA Family Law Section Morning Coffee SBB Swearing-In Ceremony, 3rd Annual Merry Mixer 3 4 5 9 10 11 12 17 18 19 24 25 26 Jan. 1 2 Santa Barbara Lawyer December Submission Deadline 15 FRIDAY SATURDAY SBWL MCLE Luncheon (See page 36) 16 State Court Furlough Day 20 27 21 22 28 23 29 State Court Limited Operations/ Hours 30 Christmas Court Holiday 31 New Years Day Court Holiday SBCBA 2009 SECTION HEADS Alternative Dispute Resolution David C. Peterson 441-5884 davidcpeterson@charter.net Bench and Bar Conference 2010 Mack Staton 966-1501 mstaton@mullenlaw.com William Clinkenbeard 965-0043 wclinkenbeard@bhcrlaw.com Paul Roberts 963-7403 paroberts@hbsb.com Bench & Bar Relations Richard Lee rlee@rppmh.com Civil Litigation John C. Eck eck@g-tlaw.com Eric A. Woosley ericw@zwlegal.com Client Relations Thomas Hinshaw th2@mindspring.com 966-2440 965-5131 897-1830 729-2526 Client Relations, cont. Lol Sorenson lol@rsmediate.com Nicole Champion nchampion@sbfamlaw.com Debtor/Creditor David B. Commons Elder Law Denise Platt denise@jodymoorelaw.com Jody Moore jody@jodymoorelaw.com Employment Law Rafael Gonzalez rgonzalez@mullenlaw.com Estate Planning/Probate Christopher Jones chris@eatonjones.com Claude Dorais cdorais@dorais.com 38 963-4110 Family Law Jennifer Drury jdrury@drurypullenlaw.com Vanessa Kirker-Wright vk@kirkerlaw.com 899-1222 In-House Counsel & Corporate Law Betty L. Jeppesen 963 -8621 BtJpps@aol.com 649-1389 604-7130 604-7130 966-1501 963-2014 965-2288 Santa Barbara Lawyer 879-7523 964-5105 Intellectual Property/Tech. Business Christine L. Kopitzke 882-1440 ipcounsel@cox.net Real Property/Land Use Marcus Bird msbird@hbsb.com Bret Stone bstone@paladinlaw.com Taxation Peter Muzinich pmuzinich@rogerssheffield.com Joshua P. Rabinowitz jrabinowitz@fmam.com 963-6711 898-9700 963-9721 963-0755 Lawyer Referral Service of Santa Barbara County Your next client could be a LRS Referral • Want to build your practice? • Want to find new clients in your concentration? • Want to develop a new practice area? As a member of the Lawyer Referral Service of Santa Barbara County, you’ll enjoy receiving potential clients who already have been screened by Lawyer Referral Service staff. Not only will you receive potential clients in need of legal help, but you can be assured that anyone referred to you will have the type of legal problem that you have indicated as fitting within your practice areas. You won’t be wasting your time listening to people who need help, but who don’t need legal help. Member service and compliance with State Bar Rules are top priorities. Contact us for specifics and an application. Email Lida Sideris at director@sblawyerreferralservice.org, (805) 569-9400. • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • December 2009 39 Prsrt Std Santa Barbara Lawyer U.S. Postage Paid Santa Barbara, CA The Santa Barbara County Bar Association 123 W. Padre Street, #E Santa Barbara, CA 93105 Permit #734 Change Service Requested For Your Real Estate needs, choose carefully and choose experience! I’ve been a Lawyer for 17 years and a Real Estate Broker with my own company for 14 years. Gary Goldberg 3FBM&TUBUF#SPLFSt-JDFOTFE"UUPSOFZ “As a real estate company owner beginning my 15th year of serving Santa Barbara, I look forward to helping you buy or sell real estate property, and as always, personally dedicating myself to striving for excellence in every transaction. My expertise and detailed knowledge of properties includes Montecito, Hope Ranch, Carpinteria, Summerland, Goleta, Santa Barbara, and all the surrounding beach communities.” 6$)BTUJOHT$PMMFHFPG-BXt0SEFSPGUIF$PJG Over $390,000,000 t3FQFBUIBQQZDMJFOUTHMPXJOHUFTUJNPOJBMT t*OUFOTJWF.BSLFUJOH1MBOGPSFBDIMJTUJOH t1SPGFTTJPOBMQIPUPHSBQIZBOEGVMMDPMPS CSPDIVSFGPSFBDIMJTUJOH t-JTUJOHTGFBUVSFEPOBUMFBTUEJČFSFOUXFC TJUFTBEWFSUJTFESFHVMBSMZJOQVCMJDBUJPOT BOEPO57 t8FFLMZCSPLFSTPQFOIPVTFTBOEQVCMJD PQFOIPVTFT t.FNCFS4BOUB#BSCBSB7FOUVSBBOE4BOUB :OF[3FBM&TUBUF#PBSET t#FBDIQSPQFSUZTQFDJBMJTUGSPN7FOUVSBUP (PMFUB t5PQ/FHPUJBUPSXJOXJOSFTVMUT t4VQQPSUUFBNPGGPVSGPSTFWFOEBZBXFFL DPWFSBHF t&YQFSUXJUOFTTJO3FBM&TUBUFBOE%JWPSDF .BUUFSTBOE&TUBUF1MBOOJOH t-JDFOTFE"UUPSOFZ1SPGFTTPS3FBM&TUBUF -BXT$PVSTFBU4#$$ t:PVDBOSFBDINFCZQIPOFGBYDFMMQIPOF BOE&NBJMIPVSTBEBZ Sold Since January 1, 2000 Among the top 10 agents in Santa Barbara (per MLS Statistics in Gross Sales Volume) 2008 - over $49 million sold 2007 - over $64 million sold 2006 - over $58 million sold 2005 - over $67 million sold 2004 - over $50 million sold 2003 - over $62 million sold 2002 - over $49 million sold $PBTU7JMMBHF3PBE4BOUB#BSCBSB$BMJGPSOJBtOffice 805 969-1258tCell 895 455-8910 UPWJFXMJTUJOHTWJTJUXXXHBSZHPMECFSHOFUtgary@coastalrealty.com 40 Santa Barbara Lawyer