Read PDF - Apollo Aviation
Transcription
Read PDF - Apollo Aviation
AMERICAS DEAL OF THE YEAR Americas Deal of the Year: Apollo Aviation ABS The Aviation 100 Americas Deal of the Year is awarded to Apollo Aviation for its debut securitisation transaction, which substantially closed oversubscribed on November 21. The $556.3 million Apollo Aviation Securitization Equity Trust 20141 is comprised of two tranches: The $422.052 million A tranche with an initial loan-to-value of 55% and an A rating from Kroll Bond Rating Agency, priced at 5.125%. The $134.289 million B notes, with an LTV of 72.5% and a BBB Kroll rating, priced at 7.375%. Both tranches have a final maturity of November 15, 2029. The notes are secured by a pool of 40 aircraft, with an average age of 14.2 years and an average remaining lease term of 3.6 years. The aircraft are all in production and currently on lease to 20 airlines in 15 countries. The narrowbody pool, comprised of 35 aircraft, accounts for 76.1% of the initial portfolio and includes a mix of 1 Airline Economics January/February 2015 A319/320/321 and 737-700/800 as well as older models of the 737 (-600/900). The five widebodies are A330200/300, representing 23.9% of the initial pool value. Apollo Aviation Management Limited is the sole servicer. Goldman Sachs was sole structuring agent and global coordinator. Joint lead arrangers were Goldman Sachs Lending Partners, DVB Capital Markets, and Crédit Agricole Corporate & Investment Bank. Wells Fargo was the Facility Agent and Trustee, with DVB Bank as Liquidity Facility Provider. The deal was oversubscribed and succeeded in attracting a similar investor base to the Castlelake securitisation that closed in March although the tighter pricing on both tranches and the younger age of the pool of aircraft attracted new insurance investors that are reported to have been hesitant to join the Castlelake deal. With these older aircraft securitisations, maintenance exposure is a heightened concern for investors. For Apollo however this risk partially mitigated by the assumed liquidation of older aircraft upon the scheduled expiration of the initial leases since there is limited reliance on the releasing of aircraft assets within AASET 2014-1 compared to other, younger, aircraft ABS transactions. Moreover the transaction is expected to generate significant cash flows from the underlying leases, as older aircraft can generate high cash flow levels relative to their low asset values through active management and technical expertise. Kroll projects the rental income for AASET 2014-1 to total approximately $148.3 million in the first year (including $101.5 million of base rent and $46.8 million of supplemental rent), resulting in strong cash flow coverage. The fact Apollo is a leading www.airlineeconomics.co AMERICAS DEAL OF THE YEAR participant in the aviation part-out market and has managed the partout of more than 80 airframes and approximately 185 engines in the past three and a half years also helps to mitigate risk in this transaction. Over the past two years, Apollo Aviation’s total assets under management (AUM) have risen by 50% to $1.5bn. 40% of Apollo’s total revenue is generated by parting out of older airframes and engines – it currently has over 100 airframes and 250 engines on consignment – however, Apollo expects to make $200 million in revenue from leasing income. At the end of 2013, Apollo had 57 aircraft and 36 engines on lease – this is an increase over two years ago when it leased 50% of its assets in its fund – SASOF – where the majority of the aircraft purchased were parted out almost immediately. Under SASOF, Apollo was restricted in that it could only purchase aircraft with leases attached of up to two years. For SASOF II, Apollo has more flexibility and can purchase aircraft with longer-life leases of up to five years. Bill Hoffman, Chairman of Apollo Aviation, says that he would expect to have 100 aircraft on lease by the end of 2015. “The demand is there for airlines to lease older, in production aircraft but www.airlineeconomics.co we also have had a lot more flexibility with SASOF II to invest in aircraft with longer-life leases,” he says. “On average the aircraft in AASET have a remaining lease of over three years. A much smaller percentage of our fleet is being parted out in the short term. Apollo remains committed to buying older inproduction aircraft, with a focus on late1990s 737NGs and A320CEO-family aircraft. We are focused on bringing value to our investors and aircraft in the 10-14 year old range tend to provide the best returns.” Robert Korn, President of Apollo, concurs: “Our basic investment strategy hasn’t changed – we are committed to buying in-production, mid-life aircraft and those with short-term leases from anywhere from a few months to five years attached provide the most attractive opportunities for us. We are still parting out aircraft but are not acquiring aircraft on the ground as frequently as we had in the past. As we are completing more lease transactions, we have a growing number of lessees from around the world. We are not focused in one jurisdiction over another; we focus where the opportunities are, which are geographically diversified as far as the lessees are concerned.” Apollo Aviation remains committed to acquiring post-1997 A320s, 737NGs, A330s and 777s, although it has acquired some 747s since it had plans for their engines. A renewed focus for Apollo has been making a conscious effort to buy engines that are due for an overhaul. Previously the company was focused on acquiring engines that had a significant amount of green time remaining. However the demand for engines is such that it makes commercial sense for Apollo to acquire certain engines due for overhaul – at the right price – overhaul them and lease them back out. “We are overhauling CF6-80 engines and CFM56-5A engines currently and are looking to start a CFM56-5B engine overhaul program,” says Korn. “We have also overhauled engines on some 747s recently and leased them back out into the market. This trend will continue. We started Apollo by buying JT8D engines for overhaul and leasing them back out some ten years ago – the market has moved to make this strategy profitable again.” The returns in the space are attractive for investors and as such there are a few new entrants into this space. “There is clearly competition,” says Hoffman, “but I am not sure there has been a clear increase. There is probably more capital being invested in this space but there are more deals happening so that isn’t surprising. More competition is only meaningful if it changes the pricing on the deals that we see. Our target aircraft models are monitored closely and the appraisers do not show much of an increase on those types year over year. Some of the most attractive ones have ticked up marginally, while some have continued to drift downwards – so there is clearly no direction.” Korn too isn’t fazed by new competition. Apollo is focused on aligning its strategy to that it agreed with investors in its funds. “There is a lot of new capital coming into the market and a lot of deals pass us by because they don’t work for us – somebody is funding those deals,” he says. “We are focused on delivering on the promises made to our investors. We are very transparent – our business model is easy to understand and easy for our investors to underwrite.” Airline Economics January/February 2015 2 $556.3 million Apollo Aviation Securitization Equity Trust 2014-1 TRANSACTION PARTIES: Servicer Sole Structuring Agent & Global Coordinator Joint Lead Arrangers December 2014 AVIATION EXPERTISE • NICHE STRATEGY • COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGES • CREATING VALUE • DISCIPLINED INVESTING MIAMI DUBLIN SINGAPORE APOLLO AVIATION GROUP: 848 BRICKELL AVENUE, SUITE 500 • MIAMI, FL 33131 USA WWW.APOLLO.AERO