Appendix D – Correspondence for the Supply Header Project

ATLANTIC COAST PIPELINE, LLC
ATLANTIC COAST PIPELINE
and
DOMINION TRANSMISSION, INC.
SUPPLY HEADER PROJECT
Supplemental Filing
September 1, 2016
APPENDIX D
Correspondence for the Supply Header Project
APPENDIX D
Summary of Agency Contacts for the Supply Header Project
Date(s) of
Correspondence
Format
Joshua Shaffer
6/15/16
Letter
Section 408 Review.
Ken Lieu
7/18/16
Letter
Results of Section 408 Review.
6/15/16
Letter
Section 408 Review.
Kenneth Bumgardner
6/23/16
Email
Results of Section 408 Review.
Stephen Porter
6/30/16
Email
Results of Section 408 Review.
5/10/16
Letter
Response to revised Phase I Archaeological Survey Report.
5/12/16
Letter
Revised copies of Phase I Archaeological Survey Report.
8/25/16
Letter
Project concurrence.
Agency/Contact Name(s)
Description
FEDERAL AGENCIES
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers – Pittsburgh District
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers – Huntington District
Adam Fannin
STATE/COMMONWEALTH AGENCIES
Pennsylvania State Historic Preservation Office
Douglas McLearen
Pennsylvania Historical and Museum Commission Bureau for Historic Preservation
Steven McDougal
FEDERALLY RECOGNIZED INDIAN TRIBES
Catawba Indian Nation
Wenonah Haire
Federal Agencies
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers – Pittsburgh District
0
10
AP
Service Layer Credits: Sources: Esri, HERE,
DeLorme, Intermap, increment P Corp.,
GEBCO, USGS, FAO, NPS, NRCAN,
GeoBase, IGN, Kadaster NL, Ordnance
Survey,20Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong
Kong), swisstopo, MapmyIndia, ©
OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS
User Community
Pitt sbu rgh
H unt i ngt on
-1
30
40
This information is for environmental review purpos es only.
O
0
2
4
Milepost
Proposed Pipeline
6
Miles
1:400,000
Regulatory District
Atlantic Coast Pipeline
U.S. Army Corps - Pittsburgh District
Civil Works Project Review
Page 1 of 2
1 inch equals 33,333 feet
FILE: M:\Clients\D-F\DOM\SRPP\_ArcGIS\2016\05\17_COE_Civil_Works\_ACP_COE_Civil_Works_Pittsburgh.mxd | REVISED: 06/03/2016 | SCALE: 1:400,000
an ERM Group company
DRAWN BY: EKP
30
40
50
A P1
Service Layer Credits: Sources: Esri, HERE,
DeLorme, Intermap, increment P Corp.,
GEBCO, USGS, FAO, NPS, NRCAN,
GeoBase, IGN, Kadaster NL, Ordnance
Survey, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong
Kong), swisstopo, MapmyIndia, ©
OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS
User Community
Pit t
No
60
P it
n ti
t sb
ng
urg
to n
rgh
rf ol
k
h
n
Hu
sbu
No
Hu
nt i
rf o
l
k
ng
to
70
This information is for environmental review purpos es only.
0
O
2
4
Milepost
6
Miles
1:400,000
1 inch equals 33,333 feet
Proposed Pipeline
Regulatory District
Atlantic Coast Pipeline
U.S. Army Corps - Pittsburgh District
Civil Works Project Review
Page 2 of 2
FILE: M:\Clients\D-F\DOM\SRPP\_ArcGIS\2016\05\17_COE_Civil_Works\_ACP_COE_Civil_Works_Pittsburgh.mxd | REVISED: 06/03/2016 | SCALE: 1:400,000
an ERM Group company
DRAWN BY: EKP
1
Doddridge
Co.
West
Virginia
ton
Huntin g
h
Pittsbu rg
TL-635
Harrison
Co.
0
250
O
500
Feet
Mileposts
Milepost Tenths
Proposed Pipeline (TL-635)
Regulatory District
Supply Header Project
U.S. Army Corps - Pittsburgh District
Civil Works Project Review
FILE: M:\Clients\D-F\DOM\Supply_Header\_ArcGIS\COE_Report\20160525\Overview_Maps\_DRS_SHP_COE_OverviewMap_Pittsburgh.mxd, REVISED: 05/25/2016, SCALE: 1:8,000
an ERM Group company
DRAWN BY: TAH
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
PITTSBURGH DISTRICT, CORPS OF ENGINEERS
WILLIAM S. MOORHEAD FEDERAL BUILDING
1000 LIBERTY AVENUE
PITTSBURGH, PA 15222-4186
Real Estate Office
Mr. Spencer Trichell
Dominion Resources Services, Inc.
5000 Dominion Boulevard
Glen Allen, Virginia 23060
Dear Mr. Trichell:
This is in response to your request by electronic mail dated June 16, 2016 concerning the
need for a Section 408 permission that may be associated with the potential crossings depicted in
attachments to that message. We have reviewed the proposed alignment and determined that the
pipeline path would not encroach on any Corps property and is far enough removed from any
Corps infrastructure so as to not require a Section 408 permission per the date of the design
location received and dated April 1, 2016 (second location revision). We have calculated that
the line is approximately 5 miles northeast of Stonewall Jackson Lake, and 2 miles southwest of
the Buckhannon Flood Control Project (see attached map). Any changes to the proposed line
location will involve additional research, review, and approval by our office.
If you have any questions regarding this finding, please contact the undersigned at 412395-7535.
Sincerely,
Ken Lieu
Chief, Real Estate Office
Enclosure
Copies Furnished:
Jeff Benedict (USACE)
Josh Shaffer (USACE)
Leslie Hartz (Atlantic Coast Pipeline)
William Scarpinato (Dominion)
SWJ Lake
Figure 1 - April 1, 2016 Atlantic Pipeline location data (yellow mile markers) compared to USACE projects
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers – Huntington District
50
gh
sbur
Pitt
on
H u n t i ng t
60
h
urg
tsb
Pit
lk
rfo
No
70
Hu
ntin
gto
No
n
rfo
lk
Pit
tsb
urg
Hu
n ti
h
ng
ton
Service Layer Credits: Sources: Esri, HERE,
DeLorme, Intermap, increment P Corp.,
GEBCO, USGS, FAO, NPS, NRCAN,
GeoBase, IGN, Kadaster NL, Ordnance
Survey, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong
Kong), swisstopo, MapmyIndia, ©
OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS
User Community
AP
-1
80
AP
-1
90
This information is for environmental review purposes only.
O
0
2
4
Milepost
6
Miles
1:400,000
Proposed Pipeline
Atlantic Coast Pipeline
Regulatory District
U.S. Army Corps - Huntington District
Civil Works Project Review
1 inch equals 33,333 feet
FILE: M:\Clients\D-F\DOM\SRPP\_ArcGIS\2016\05\17_COE_Civil_Works\_ACP_COE_Civil_Works_Huntington.mxd | REVISED: 06/02/2016 | SCALE: 1:400,000
an ERM Group company
DRAWN BY: EKP
#
0
30
Marion
Co.
Wetzel
Co.
25
Tyler
Co.
20
TL-635
West
Virginia
15
Doddridge
Co.
10
Harrison
Co.
Pi
H
un
tts
b
u
tin rgh
gt
on
5
0
1.5
O
3
Miles
Mileposts
Proposed Pipeline (TL-635)
#
0
SHP Compressor Station
Supply Header Project
U.S. Army Corps - Huntington District
Civil Works Project Review
Regulatory District
an ERM Group company
FILE: M:\Clients\D-F\DOM\Supply_Header\_ArcGIS\COE_Report\20160525\Overview_Maps\_DRS_SHP_COE_OverviewMap_Huntington.mxd, REVISED: 05/25/2016, SCALE: 1:190,080
DRAWN BY: TAH
From: Porter, Stephen M LRH [mailto:Stephen.M.Porter@usace.army.mil]
Sent: Thursday, June 30, 2016 11:13 AM
To: Linda Morrison; Bumgardner, Kenneth R LRH; Fannin, Adam E LRH
Cc: david.a.frantz@lrh01.usace.army.mil; Robert M Bisha (Services - 6); Rhodes, Charlie JR LRH; Walker, Gary
M LRH; Spencer Trichell (Services - 6); Porter, Stephen M LRH
Subject: RE: [EXTERNAL] RE: ACP - Section 408 Review Request (LHR-2014-484 and LHR-2014-1110) Clarification Requested on District Response
Linda, In reviewing the provided information, I saw no indication of impacts to Federal (or sponsor‐owned/operated) structures that would require a Section 408 engineering review. If you have any questions or need any additional information, please feel free to contact me. Very respectfully, Stephen Stephen M. Porter, PMP, CFM US Army Corps of Engineers Huntington District 502 Eighth Street Huntington, WV 25701
Email: stephen.m.porter@usace.army.mil
Office: 304-399-5062
Cell: 304-360-2729
-----Original Message----From: Linda Morrison [mailto:lmorr@fedmarksolutions.com]
Sent: Wednesday, June 29, 2016 9:43 AM
To: Bumgardner, Kenneth R LRH <Kenneth.R.Bumgardner@usace.army.mil>; Fannin, Adam E LRH
<Adam.E.Fannin@usace.army.mil>
Cc: Porter, Stephen M LRH <Stephen.M.Porter@usace.army.mil>; david.a.frantz@lrh01.usace.army.mil;
'Robert M Bisha (Services - 6)' <robert.m.bisha@dom.com>; Rhodes, Charlie JR LRH
<Charlie.Rhodes.JR@usace.army.mil>; Walker, Gary M LRH <Gary.M.Walker@usace.army.mil>; 'Spencer
Trichell (Services - 6)' <Spencer.Trichell@dom.com>
Subject: [EXTERNAL] RE: ACP - Section 408 Review Request (LHR-2014-484 and LHR-2014-1110) - Clarification
Requested on District Response
Ken,
Thank you for your quick review and response to Dominion's June 16th letter. You state that the District has
"determined the proposed pipeline does not cross any of the Huntington District's project boundaries,
therefore no action is necessary by the Real Estate Division". We understand that your statement includes any
Real Estate easements, outgrants, and any other Real Estate requirement; however, we are not sure whether
your statement includes that no Section 408 Permissions are required as well by the District. We respectfully
request clarification.
If your statement does not include Section 408 permissions, then please advise as to the status of the District's
reviews regarding whether any Section 408 permissions are required for any crossings.
Please call me if you would like to discuss or have any questions (cell 912-659-8318). I am a consultant for
Dominion on the ACP project and retired from the Corps.
Very respectfully,
Linda
1
Linda Morrison | Senior Advisor Dawson & Associates, Inc. | 1225 I (Eye) Street, NW Suite 250 | Washington, DC 20005 Blockedwww.dawsonassociates.com | lmorrison@dawsonassociates.com FedMark Solutions, LLC | Owner 3654 Coughlin Court, Franklinton, NC 27525 lmorr@FedMarkSolutions.com (912) 659‐8318 Cell
-----Original Message----From: Bumgardner, Kenneth R LRH [mailto:Kenneth.R.Bumgardner@usace.army.mil]
Sent: Thursday, June 23, 2016 2:42 PM
To: Spencer Trichell (Services - 6); Fannin, Adam E LRH
Cc: Porter, Stephen M LRH; 'david.a.frantz@lrh01.usace.army.mil'; Robert M Bisha (Services - 6); William A
Scarpinato (Services - 6); 'Linda Morrison'; Rhodes, Charlie JR LRH; Walker, Gary M LRH
Subject: RE: ACP - Section 408 Review Request (LHR-2014-484 and LHR-2014-1110)
Mr. Spencer: Huntington District Real Estate Division has reviewed your attachments and have determined the proposed pipeline does not cross any of the Huntington District's project boundaries, therefore no action is necessary by the Real Estate Division. This determination does not relieve you of any obligation/coordination with
Regulatory or any other Federal, State, or local agencies.
Kenneth R. Bumgardner
Chief, Real Estate Division
(work) 304-399-5374
(cell) 304-360-0961
(fax) 304-399-5218
-----Original Message----From: Spencer Trichell (Services - 6) [mailto:Spencer.Trichell@dom.com]
Sent: Thursday, June 16, 2016 2:12 PM
To: Fannin, Adam E LRH <Adam.E.Fannin@usace.army.mil>
Cc: Porter, Stephen M LRH <Stephen.M.Porter@usace.army.mil>; 'david.a.frantz@lrh01.usace.army.mil'
<david.a.frantz@lrh01.usace.army.mil>; Bumgardner, Kenneth R LRH
<Kenneth.R.Bumgardner@usace.army.mil>; Robert M Bisha (Services - 6) <robert.m.bisha@dom.com>;
William A Scarpinato (Services - 6)
<william.a.scarpinato@dom.com>; 'Linda Morrison' <lmorr@fedmarksolutions.com>
Subject: [EXTERNAL] ACP - Section 408 Review Request (LHR-2014-484 and LHR-2014-1110)
Mr. Fannin,
Atlantic Coast Pipeline is respectfully requesting your review and concurrence on potential crossings requiring
Section 408 permission. I have attached a letter stating this request, maps depicting the proposed route in the
Huntington District, and a GIS shapefile to help with your review. Please let me know if you have questions or
need additional information.
Regards,
Spencer Trichell
Environmental Consultant - Atlantic Coast Pipeline
Dominion Resources Services, Inc.
O:(804)-273-3472
M:(804)-263-5980
5000 Dominion Blvd, Glen Allen, VA 23060
spencer.trichell@dom.com
2
State/Commonwealth Agencies
Pennsylvania State Historic Preservation Office
10 May 2016
William Scarpinato
Dominion Resources Services, Inc.
5000 Dominion Boulevard
Glen Allen, Virginia 23060
RE:
ER# 2015-0336-042-B
FERC: Revised Phase I Archaeological Report, Supply Header Project, Greene and
Westmoreland Counties
Dear Mr. Scarpinato,
Thank you for submitting information concerning the above referenced project. The Pennsylvania
State Historic Preservation Office (PA SHPO) reviews projects in accordance with state and
federal laws. Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, and the implementing
regulations (36 CFR Part 800) of the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation, is the primary
federal legislation. The Environmental Rights amendment, Article 1, Section 27 of the
Pennsylvania Constitution and the Pennsylvania History Code, 37 Pa. Cons. Stat. Section 500 et
seq. (1988) is the primary state legislation. These laws include consideration of the project's
potential effects on both historic and archaeological resources.
This report meets our standards and specifications as outlined in Guidelines for Archaeological
Investigations in Pennsylvania (BHP 2008) and the Secretary of the Interior's Guidelines for
Archaeological Documentation. We agree with the recommendations of this report and in our
opinion no further archaeological work is necessary for this project.
Please send one bound copy and three digital copies (PDF preferred) on separate CDs of the
final report for our files. For all copies, photographs must adhere to the National Register Photo
Policy.
If you need further information regarding archaeological resources, please contact Kira Heinrich
at kiheinrich@pa.gov or at (717) 705-0700. If you need further information concerning above
ground resources, please contact Barbara Frederick at bafrederic@pa.gov or at (717) 772-0921.
Sincerely,
Douglas C. McLearen, Chief
Division of Archaeology & Protection
Commonwealth Keystone Building | 400 North Street | 2nd Floor | Harrisburg, PA 17120 | 717.783.8947
Pennsylvania Historical and Museum Commission
Bureau for Historic Preservation
Federally-Recognized Indian Tribes
Catawba Indian Nation