Standard PDF - Wiley Online Library
Transcription
Standard PDF - Wiley Online Library
Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc. (2003), 129, pp. 2559–2590 doi: 10.1256/qj.02.151 A mechanism of the Madden–Julian Oscillation based on interactions in the frequency domain By T. N. KRISHNAMURTI¤ , D. R. CHAKRABORTY, NIHAT CUBUKCU, LYDIA STEFANOVA and T. S. V. VIJAYA KUMAR Department of Meteorology, The Florida State University, USA (Received 10 July 2002; revised 20 January 2003) S UMMARY The surface and boundary-layer uxes of moisture exhibit a large ampli cation as the waves in the Madden–Julian Oscillation (MJO) time-scales interact with synoptic time-scales of 2 to 7 days. This ampli cation is clearly seen when the datasets are cast in the frequency domain for computations of the respective uxes. Those ux relations carry triple-product nonlinearities, and the uxes on the time-scale of the MJO are evaluated using co-spectra of triadal frequency interactions. The trigonometric selection rules on interactions among these frequencies are largely satis ed by the time-scales of the MJO and two others that reside in the synoptic timescales. Tropical instabilities provide a rich family of tropical disturbances that appear to be ready and waiting to interact with the MJO time-scales (since these satisfy the selection rules for non-vanishing interactions). A consequence of these nonlinear interactions in the frequency domain is a two- to three-fold ampli cation of the surface uxes. Although this analysis does not address how a small signal in the sea surface temperature on the time-scale of the MJO arises in a coupled atmosphere–ocean model, we are able to show that its presence enables a large ampli cation of this time-scale vertically across the planetary boundary layer. Given a low-frequency ocean with many time-scales, this process ampli es the uxes on the time-scale of the MJO; this ampli cation eventually feeds back to the ocean via ampli ed surface stresses, and an equilibrium state with a robust MJO in the coupled system is realized. The datasets for this study were derived from a coupled ocean–atmosphere model that was able to resolve a robust MJO in its simulations. This study also examines the character of sensible-heat uxes and momentum within the same framework. K EYWORDS: Climate modelling Intraseasonal oscillations 1. Nonlinear dynamics of waves I NTRODUCTION This paper explores the surface and PBL (Table 1 lists acronyms used) uxes of moisture, sensible heat and momentum in the frequency domain with reference to the MJO. The pioneering work of Madden and Julian (1971) has seen a major thrust of research into intraseasonal oscillations in the last 30 years. The MJO is a planetaryscale wave that traverses from west to east in roughly 40 days. It has been identi ed as a global phenomenon with its largest amplitude in the equatorial tropics. Its signature is seen in most variables, such as sea-level pressure, zonal wind and divergent circulation. Since that nding, numerous studies have elucidated the importance of this phenomenon for its modulation of the monsoon activity and even typhoon behaviour in the western Paci c Ocean. Several recent studies have even portrayed the links of the MJO with the onset and decay of the ENSO. In this study, the formulation for the surface and PBL uxes is based on the FSU coupled atmosphere–ocean global spectral model (LaRow and Krishnamurti 1998; Krishnamurti et al. 2000; Cubukcu and Krishnamurti 2002). Triple-product nonlinearities convey interesting scale interactions. In the present study we show that the expressions for the surface uxes in the constant- ux layer theory, and in the PBL ux theory of numerical models, carry such triple-product nonlinearities. Thus, it is possible to examine the uxes on a certain time-scale as they arise due to interactions with two other time-scales. If we designate the Madden–Julian time-scale (20 to 60 days) as a centre-piece for such computations, we see that a large number of possible interactions with the MJO time-scale arise from pairs of time-scales from within the synoptic ¤ Corresponding author: Department of Meteorology, The Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL 32306-4520, USA. e-mail: tnk@io.met.fsu.edu c Royal Meteorological Society, 2003. ° 2559 2560 T. N. KRISHNAMURTI et al. AGCM CCM CGSM ECMWF ENSO FSU GCM GSM MJO NCAR NCEP PBL SST WISHE TABLE 1. L IST OF ACRON YMS Atmosphere-only General Circulation Model Climate Community Model Coupled Global Spectral Model European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts El Niño and Southern Oscillation Florida State University General Circulation Model Global Spectral Model Madden–Julian Oscillation National Center for Atmospheric Research National Centers for Environmental Prediction Planetary boundary layer Sea surface temperature Wind induced surface heat exchange time-scale, in the range of 2 to 7 days. Tropical instabilities arising from horizontal and vertical wind shear and convection, provide a rich environment for these tropical higher frequencies (waves, depressions and storms on time-scales of 2 to 7 days). Given a weak low-frequency signal in the SST on the time-scale of the MJO, it is possible to perceive frequency interactions such as to amplify the MJO signal. A demonstration of this is the goal of this paper. We offer a hypothesis that the surface and PBL uxes invoke nonlinear interactions affecting the growth of the Madden–Julian time-scale. In the frequency domain, this contributes to the maintenance and ampli cation of the Madden–Julian time-scale in a coupled atmosphere–ocean system. The inter-frequency interactions can contribute to either growth or decay of the Madden–Julian time-scale. This is determined by the sign of the co-spectra evaluated from the relevant frequencies. For quadratic nonlinearities, a selection rule for nonvanishing exchanges among frequencies requires that the two frequencies r and s, say, are equal. For triple-product nonlinearities among member frequencies r, s and p, the trigonometric selection rules require that p D r § s, i.e. the growth of a time-scale within the Madden–Julian window (with frequency p/ is exactly equal to r C s or ¨r § s. It turns out that p at the time-scale of the MJO generally prefers two highfrequency time-scales within the 2- to 7-day window for the augmentation of moisture uxes. Over the ocean the spectra of SSTs exhibit some small power on the MJO timescale (Krishnamurti et al. 1988). Figures 1(a) and (b) show power spectra of the SST and zonal wind at 850 hPa, respectively, for the Indian, West Paci c and Central Paci c Oceans. These are based on the coupled-model run covering the period from March 1996 to February 1997 (Cubukcu and Krishnamurti 2002). This shows a plot of power x frequency against the logarithm of the frequency (along the abscissa). The SST shows a noticeable signal on the time-scale of the MJO, whereas on the synoptic time-scales the power is much smaller. We do see a semi-annual signal in the SST from the model output arising from the north–south seasonal migrations of the warm SST regions near the equator. The zonal winds in the atmosphere show a larger signal on the synoptic-scale, as is to be expected, and on the MJO time-scale. The interaction among these time-scales is the topic of this study. Given a number of synoptic-scale tropical disturbances on the time-scale of 2 to 7 days (e.g. Yanai and Nitta 1968; Reed and Recker 1971; Reed et al. 1977; Thompson et al. 1979; and several others), a unique opportunity is provided for interactions between these time-scales and the MJO time-scale in the frequency domain of the surface and PBLs. A MECHANISM OF THE MJO Figure 1. 2561 Power spectra (Power £ frequency against log.frequency //: (a) of sea surface temperatures (SSTs) for the tropical Indian, West Paci c and Central Paci c Oceans; (b) for the zonal wind at 850 hPa. In this paper we demonstrate the following aspects of the growth of the Madden–Julian time-scale over near equatorial latitudes for the oceanic basins, since the amplitude of the MJO is largest there (Krishnamurti and Gadgil 1985). ² The mutual interactions between the low-frequency behaviour of the SST and the higher-frequency synoptic disturbances of the tropical atmosphere over the atmospheric surface layer (the constant- ux layer). 2562 T. N. KRISHNAMURTI et al. The mutual interactions of the Madden–Julian time-scale with the synoptic-scale disturbances in the PBL. ² The issue of climate model simulation of the MJO has been a topic of great interest in recent years. Summaries of recent contributions on the topic may be found in Kemball-Cook et al. (2002) and Maloney (2002). The consensus seems to be that models with prescribed SSTs are not able to simulate realistic features of the MJO, whereas the coupled atmosphere–ocean models are somewhat more successful in this respect. Maloney (2002) explored the effects of WISHE following Emanuel (1987) in the simulation of the MJO. He noted that a removal of WISHE in the NCAR-CCM3.6 model led to an improved simulation of the MJO, and he concluded that WISHE might contribute to the growth of modes outside of MJO frequencies. This is just one aspect of the details of a cumulus parametrization through which MJO sensitivity has been addressed. A more recent unpublished work from Colorado State University (David Randal, personal communication) points to the importance of cloud-resolving models where explicit, rather than parametrized, cumulus convection has been very successful in the mapping of the MJO. Some of the earlier work of Manabe et al. (1965) where moist convective adjustment was used has provided some evidence of intraseasonal oscillations. Further work is clearly warranted to identify the scope of models that resolve the MJO and its variability. Simulation of the MJO is regarded as one of the most important components for the medium- and long-range forecasts of the Asian summer monsoon. In many GCM studies, it has been observed that the simulation of tropical intraseasonal oscillations highly depends on the choice of cumulus convection parametrization scheme (Wang and Schlesinger 1999). In some recent studies, Lee et al. (2001) emphasized the in uence of cloud–radiation interaction and cumulus entrainment constraint in simulating tropical intraseasonal oscillations using the aqua–planet version of Seoul National University GCM (SNUGCM). Wang and Schlesinger (1999) pointed out the importance of the boundary-layer relative-humidity thresholds for producing realistic variability of the MJO in GCMs. In another study, Maloney and Hartman (2001) pointed out that convective downdraughts are important and control the variability of the tropical MJO. However, most AGCMs forced with a slowly varying SST annual cycle are unable to represent the eastward propagation of convection from the Indian Ocean to the West Paci c. This indicates that the atmospheric internal dynamics may contain mechanisms driving the MJO in AGCMs. The implication is that the ocean is necessary for generating the MJO in a model, and this remains an open question. Waliser et al. (1999) have compared the MJO in coupled and atmosphere-only versions of the same GCM and showed an improvement in many aspects of simulation of the MJO. Due to the complex interaction between large-scale dynamics and convection, and between convection and the ocean surface, representation of the MJO presents a challenge for a coupled model (Inness and Slingo 2002). 2. Q UADRAT IC AND TRIPLE - PRODUCT NONLI NEARITIES AND COMPUTATIONS OF CO SPECTRA We assume that a given time series of data for two variables u.t/ and v.t/ are cyclic and discrete in time. Since the FSU coupled model was run for one year, we have assumed a fundamental periodicity over this time span. Our aim is to examine the role of the MJO within this period. These series are represented by temporal Fourier series A MECHANISM OF THE MJO 2563 with discrete frequency (n) and Nyquist frequency (N ) such as: u.t / D N » X Cnu nD0 ¼ 2¼ 2¼ u nt C Sn sin nt : cos N N (1) In particular, Cou D uo (time mean), see Sheng and Hayashi (1990a,b). The sample frequency co-spectrum Pn .u; v/ is de ned as: Pn .u; v/ D 12 .Cnu Cnv C Snu Snv /: (2) In the wave number domain the co-spectrum would be de ned by: ´ Z 2¼ »³ 2¼ 2¼ Pn .u; v/ D 1=2¼ Cnu cos n¸ C Snu sin n¸ N N ³ 0 ´¼ 2¼ n¸ £ Cnv cos n¸ C Snv sin d¸: N However over the frequency domain the co-spectrum would be expressed by: ´ 2¼ 2¼ u Pn .u; v/ D nt C Sn sin nt cos N N ¡T =2 ³ ´ ¼ ¿ Z T =2 2¼ 2¼ v v nt C Sn sin nt dt £ Cn cos dt: N N ¡T =2 Z T =2 »³ Cnu Thus, in principle, the frequency co-spectrum can be formally replaced by a wave number co-spectrum, Hayashi (1980). Given triad interaction in the frequency domain, v.t / in Eq. (2) can be expressed as a product of two sets b.t/ and c.t/, i.e. v.t / D b.t/c.t /. Now, Pn .u; v/ takes on the form: Pn .u; v/ D Pn .u; bc/ D L.n/ D X LN .n; r; s/: (3) r;s LN .n; r; s/ in Eq. (3) denotes a contribution to L.n/ due to the speci ed combination of frequencies r and s, where r and s satisfy either of the selection rules r C s D n or jr ¡ sj D n. The explicit expression for L.n/ in the frequency domain is given below, using Fourier transforms of u, b and c in the time domain. Thus, ´³ ´ 2¼ 2¼ 2¼ 2¼ u b b L.n/ D nt C Sn sin nt Cr cos rt C Sr sin rt cos N N N N ¡T =2 ³ ´ ¼ ¿ Z T =2 2¼ 2¼ c c st C Ss sin st dt £ Cs cos dt: (4) N N ¡T =2 Z T =2 »³ Cnu 2564 T. N. KRISHNAMURTI et al. The above formalism has been extensively discussed by Hayashi (1980) in his pioneering studies. Thus we may write: Z T =2 ³ X X X 2¼ 2¼ 2¼ L.n/ D .1=T / Cnu Crb Csc cos nt cos rt cos st N N N ¡T =2 n r s 2¼ 2¼ 2¼ nt sin rt cos st N N N 2¼ 2¼ 2¼ nt cos rt cos st C Snu Crb Csc sin N N N 2¼ 2¼ 2¼ nt sin rt cos st C Snu Srb Csc sin N N N 2¼ 2¼ 2¼ nt cos rt sin st C Cnu Crb Ssc cos N N N 2¼ 2¼ 2¼ nt sin rt sin st C Cnu Srb Ssc cos N N N 2¼ 2¼ 2¼ nr cos rt sin st C Snu Crb Ssc sin N N N ´ 2¼ 2¼ 2¼ nt sin rt sin st dt: C Snu Srb Ssc sin N N N C Cnu Srb Csc cos Considering the rst term of this equation ³ ´ Z 1 T =2 X X X u b c 2¼ 2¼ 2¼ Cn Cr Cs cos nt cos rt cos st dt T ¡T =2 N N N n r s Z T =2 µ X X X 1 2¼ Cnu Crb Csc cos nt D N 2T ¡T =2 n r s » ¼ ¶ 2¼ 2¼ .r C s/t cos .r ¡ s/t £ cos dt: N N This is an in nite integral and must be made nite for computational purposes. Using the orthogonal property of Fourier functions, this term takes the following form: Z X 1 T =2 X u b c 2¼ 2¼ Cn Cr Cs cos2 nt dt C Cnu Crb Csc cos2 nt dt T ¡T =2 nDr Cs N N nDr¡s X 2¼ Cnu Crb Csc cos2 nt dt C N nDs¡r (only these terms survive under the condition n D r C s, n D r ¡ s, n D s ¡ r). Applying cos2 A D .1 C cos 2A/=2, this takes the form 2 X 3 6nDrCs 7 6 X 7 7 u b c 16 7C C C : D 6 7 n r s 46 6nDr¡s 7 X 4 5 nDs¡r 2565 A MECHANISM OF THE MJO Hence the above equation reduces to: X 3 X 2 2 C ¡ 6 rCsDn 7 6 r CsDn 6 6 X 7 X 7 u b c 16C 16 C 6 7 6 L.n/ D 6 7 Cn Cr Cs C 4 6 r ¡sDn 4 6 r¡sDn 7 6 X X 4 5 4 C C 2 r ¡sD¡n C X 3 2 3 7 7 7 u b c 7C S S 7 n r s 7 5 r¡sD¡n C X 3 6 r CsDn 7 6 rCsDn 7 6 7 6 X X 7 7 u b c 16 7 u b c 16 ¡ C 6 7 6 7S S C : Sn Cr Ss C 6 C 6 7 7 n r s r¡sDn 4 6 r ¡sDn 4 6 X 7 X 7 4 5 4 5 C ¡ r¡sD¡n (5) r ¡sD¡n This is used to calculate the net gain or loss of energy (in our problem the uxes) by a frequency n as it interacts with frequencies r and s. (a) Surface similarity theory Our use of surface similarity theory, based on the work of Businger et al. (1971), can be expressed following Krishnamurti et al. (1998). The latent-heat ux is given by: Lh D ½CLH LjV j.Qs ¡ Qa /: (6) Ls D ½Cp CS jV j.Ts ¡ Ta / (7) Here ½ is the density of air, L is the latent heat of vaporization, jV j is the magnitude of the surface wind and Qs and Qa denote the speci c humidities over the sea surface and at the anemometer level. CLH denotes the exchange coef cient for latent heat. This is a stability-dependent time varying coef cient of the similarity theory. The expression for sensible-heat ux is given by: where Cp is the speci c heat of air at constant pressure, CS is the exchange coef cient for sensible heat, Ta is the temperature of air near the surface (at anemometer level) in Kelvin and Ts is the surface temperature. The expression for u momentum ux is given by: ¿ x D ½CM jV j.ua ¡ us / (8) where ua and us are zonal winds at anemometer and surface levels, respectively; CM is the exchange coef cient for momentum. Lh , Ls and ¿ x are the respective uxes of latent heat, sensible heat and momentum at the top of the constant- ux layer. It is assumed that CLH D CS D CM , where CLH , CS and CM are the bulk exchange coef cients of latent heat, sensible heat and momentum respectively; these exchange coef cients are functions of stability and, as such, are space and time dependent. Daily values of Lh , Ls and ¿ x on the left-hand side (l.h.s.) of Eqs. (6), (7) and (8), respectively, are obtained as model output based on surface similarity theory. On the right-hand side (r.h.s.) of these equations daily values of jV j, jQs ¡ Qa j, (Ts ¡ Ta / and (ua ¡ us / are also obtained from model output datasets. Using all those values in Eqs. (6), (7), and (8), values of bulk coef cients are obtained as space- and time-dependent quantities. We used this methodology for computations of uxes in the frequency domain. 2566 T. N. KRISHNAMURTI et al. Using Fourier time series for CLH , jV j, and L.Qs ¡ Qa / and taking the co-spectrum among them on the r.h.s. of expression (6), with the help of formula (5) latent-heat ux in the frequency domain can be written as: X 3 2 C 6 r CsDn 7 6 X 7 7 ½ 6 C 6 7 [LHC.n/:MVC.r/:DMC.s/] hLh .n/i D 6 7 2 6 r ¡sDn X 7 4 5 C 2 r¡sD¡n ¡ X 3 6 rCsDn 7 6 X 7 7 ½ 6 C 6 7 [LHC.n/:MVS.r /:DMS.s/] C 6 7 2 6 r¡sDn X 7 4 5 C 2 r ¡sD¡n C X 3 6 rCsDn 7 6 X 7 7 ½ 6 ¡ 6 7 [LHS.n/:MVC.r /:DMS.s/] C 6 7 2 6 r¡sDn X 7 4 5 C 2 r ¡sD¡n C X 3 6 rCsDn 7 6 X 7 7 ½ 6 C 6 7 [LHS.n/:MVS.r /:DMC.s/]; C 6 7 2 6 r¡sDn X 7 4 5 ¡ r ¡sD¡n (9) where .LHC; LHS/, .MVC; MVS/ and .DMC; DMS/ are the cosine and sine coef cients of CLH , jV j, and L.Qs ¡ Qa / associated with frequencies n, r and s respectively. Using Fourier time series for CLH , jV j and .Ts ¡ Ta / and taking the co-spectrum among them in the r.h.s. of expression (8), with the help of formula (5), sensible-heat ux in the frequency domain can be written as: X 3 2 C 6 rCsDn 7 6 X 7 7 ½Cp 6 C 6 7 [LHC.n/:MVC.r /:DTC.s/] hLs .n/i D 7 2 6 6 r¡sDn X 7 4 5 C 2 r ¡sD¡n ¡ X 3 6 r CsDn 6 X ½Cp 6 C 6 C 2 6 6 r ¡sDn X 4 C r¡sD¡n 7 7 7 7 [LHC.n/:MVS.r/:DTS.s/] 7 7 5 A MECHANISM OF THE MJO 2 C 2567 X 3 6 r CsDn 7 6 X 7 7 ½Cp 6 ¡ 6 7 [LHS.n/:MVC.r/:DTS.s/] C 7 2 6 6 r ¡sDn X 7 4 5 C 2 r¡sD¡n C X 3 6 r CsDn 7 6 X 7 7 ½Cp 6 C 6 7 [LHS.n/:MVS.r/:DTC.s/]; C 7 2 6 6 r ¡sDn X 7 4 5 ¡ (10) r¡sD¡n where .DTC; DTS/ are the cosine and sine coef cients of .Ts ¡ Ta / associated with frequency s. Using Fourier time series for CLH , jV j and .ua ¡ us / and taking the cospectrum among them on the r.h.s. of expression (10), with the help of formula (5), u momentum ux in the frequency domain can be written as: X 3 2 C 6 rCsDn 7 6 X 7 7 ½ 6 x C 6 7 [LHC.n/:MVC.r/:DUC.s/] h¿ .n/i D 6 7 2 6 r¡sDn X 7 4 5 C 2 r ¡sD¡n ¡ X 3 6 r CsDn 7 6 X 7 7 ½ 6 C 6 7 [LHC.n/:MVS.r/:DUS.s/] C 6 7 2 6 r ¡sDn X 7 4 5 C 2 r¡sD¡n C X 3 6 r CsDn 7 6 X 7 7 ½ 6 ¡ 6 7 [LHS.n/:MVC.r/:DUS.s/] C 6 7 2 6 r ¡sDn X 7 4 5 C 2 ½ C 2 r¡sD¡n C X 3 6 r CsDn X 6 6C 6 6 r ¡sDn 6 X 4¡ 7 7 7 7 [LHS.n/:MVS.r/:DUC.s/]; 7 7 5 (11) r¡sD¡n where DUC, DUS are the cosine and sine coef cients of .us ¡ ua / associated with frequency s: 2568 T. N. KRISHNAMURTI et al. (b) A simple example of triad interactions If u, b and c are interacting such that the energy going into frequency n is given by Eq. (5), under what circumstances is there growth of the wave with that frequency? The cosine and sine coef cients can be expressed as: Cnu D ®nu cos ’nu ; where Snu D ¡®nu sin ’nu ; ³ ®nu D 2 .Cnu C 2 Snu /1=2 ; ’nu D tan ¡1 Su ¡ nu Cn (12) ´ : (13) If we substitute (12) into the Fourier expansion of u (Eq. (1)), we obtain: ³ ´ X X 2¼ 2¼ 2¼ u u u u u u u.t/ D ®n cos ’n cos nt ¡ ®n sin ’n sin nt D ®n cos nt C ’n : N N N n n (14) Thus ’nu can be interpreted as the phase shift of the nth wave in the cosine decomposition of u. If we substitute expressions (9) into Eq. (5) and focus on a single triad combination (n; r; s) we get: 1 L.n/ D ®nu ®rb ®sc £ 2 .cos ’nu cos ’rb cos ’sc ¡ cos ’nu sin ’rb sin ’sc C sin ’nu cos ’rb sin ’sc C sin ’nu sin ’rb cos ’sc /; .cos ’nu r C s D n; cos ’rb cos ’sc C cos ’nu C sin ’nu sin ’rb cos ’sc /; r .cos ’nu cos ’rb cos ’sc C cos ’nu ¡ sin ’nu sin ’rb cos ’sc /; s which can be simpli ed to: sin ’rb sin ’sc ¡ sin ’nu cos ’rb sin ’sc ¡ s D n; sin ’rb sin ’sc C sin ’nu cos ’rb sin ’sc ¡ r D n; fcos.’nu ¡ ’rb ¡ ’sc /g; 1 u b c L.n/ D ®n ®r ®s fcos.’nu ¡ ’rb C ’sc /g; 2 fcos.’nu C ’rb ¡ ’sc /g; r C s D n; r ¡ s D n; s ¡ r D n: (15) (16) Since the ®’s are positive de nite, the maximum possible value of L.n/ is obtained when the cosine contribution is unity, i.e. when: ’rb C ’sc D ’nu § 2k¼; ’rb ¡’rb ¡ C ’sc ’sc D D ’nu ’nu § 2k¼; § 2k¼; r C s D n; r ¡ s D n; (17) ¡r C s D n; or, in other words, when ’rb ; ’sc relate to ’nu in the same way that r, s relate to n. Figure 2(a) is a schematic illustration of the r; s; n frequency space. Here we highlight those regions of r C s and r ¡ s where the synoptic-scale interacts with the MJO timescale. Outside of the two slanting zones in Fig. 2(a), the MJO does not interact with the synoptic time-scales. Also shown in the bottom left is a region where r C s lies on the MJO time-scale. Those are the regions where r and s also individually lie on the MJO time-scale. Since a robust synoptic time-scale covering the period 2 to 7 days A MECHANISM OF THE MJO 2569 Figure 2. (a) A schematic diagram illustrating regions on a frequency, r, versus frequency, s, space where the synoptic time-scales can interact with the Madden–Julian Oscillation (MJO) time-scales. The shaded areas denote where s ¡ r or r ¡ s can amplify the MJO time-scales via triad interactions. (b) A schematic diagram illustrating the lines along which three frequencies 9, 48 and 57 interact to amplify the lower frequency (with a period of 40 days). Since the relationship among frequencies is cyclical, this family of lines reappears at §2k¼ . (c) An example of three frequencies 9, 48 and 57 showing where the triad interactions can amplify the MJO time-scale. The phase shifts of the synoptic-scale frequencies, 48 and 57, illustrated by thin dotted and solid lines, match the phase shift of the MJO, shown by the heavy solid line. 2570 T. N. KRISHNAMURTI et al. Figure 2. Continued from previous page. is known to exist over the tropics, strong interaction within the MJO time-scale is possible along the shaded region. To illustrate an example of an interaction leading to growth of the MJO time-scale, consider the contribution of the interaction of waves n D 9, r D 48 and s D 57 (n D s ¡ r/ to the energy of n D 9. According to Eq. (17), b C ’ c D ’ u § 2k¼ . there will be maximum growth of energy at frequency 9 when ¡’48 57 9 The solutions to this equation are displayed as a diagram in Fig. 2(b). An example of a triad of waves satisfying this equation is shown in Fig. 2(c). Given the SST, Ts , and the surface speci c humidity Qs , if they carry a small signal on the MJO time-scale we ask whether that frequency can amplify from triad interactions at the top of the constant- ux layer. The selection rules tell us that higherfrequency tropical waves can, in principle, provide such a possibility. A question not addressed in this study is whether the temporal variations of the exchange coef cients can also contribute to the growth or decay of the MJO via triad interactions. (c) Disposition of uxes in the PBL Here, again, our interest is in the speci c algorithm that was used in our coupled model for the vertical disposition of surface uxes within the PBL. Our formulation of the PBL follows that of Louis (1979). The vertical ux convergence is expressed by a vertical diffusion of surface uxes, the general expression is given by: ³ ´ @¿ g2 @ 2 @¿ ½ K ; D¢¢¢C 2 (18) @t @¾ ps @¾ where ps is the surface pressure, ¾ is the vertical sigma coordinate (p=ps /, and ¿ is a basic dependent variable such as momentum, heat or moisture. The exchange coef cient, K; is determined from a mixing-length theory that involves stability-dependence via the bulk Richardson number RiB (Louis 1979; Krishnamurti et al. 1998). In our model the exchange coef cients are expressed by: @jV j KH D KQ D ` 2 Fh RiB ; (19) @z A MECHANISM OF THE MJO 2571 and @jV j Fm RiB ; (20) @z where Fh (Fm / denotes the non-dimensional heat (momentum) ux, ` is the mixing length (Blackadar 1962), expressed by ·z=.1 C ·z=¸/ where · is the Von Karman constant, z is the height of the relevant computational level in the PBL, and ¸is a constant which denotes an asymptotic mixing length whose values for heat and moisture uxes are set to 450 m, and to 150 m for momentum. Following Louis (1979), the analytical formulae for the surface similarity theory, Fh and Fm are given as: 1 Fh D Fm D ; RiB ¸ 0; (21) .1 C 5RiB /2 for the stable case, and KM D ` 2 1 C 1:286jRiB j1=2 ¡ 8RiB ; RiB < 0; (22) 1 C 1:286jRiB j1=2 1 C 1:746jRiB j1=2 ¡ 8RiB Fm D ; RiB < 0; (23) 1 C 1:746jRiB j1=2 for the unstable case. Here, the bulk Richardson number over an atmospheric layer is given by: ¿ 2 g @µ @jV j : RiB D (24) @z µ @z Fh D The heat ux is given by: @µ @jV j @µ · 2 z2 @jV j RiB @µ Fh RiB D ½Cp l 2 D ½Cp @z @z @z .1 C ·z=¸/2 @z .1 C 5RiB /2 @z for the stable case, and FH D ½Cp KH FH D ½Cp 2 / · 2 z2 @jV j .RiB C 1:286RiB jRiB j1=2 ¡ 8RiB @µ 2 1=2 @z .1 C ·z=¸/ @z 1 C 1:286jRiB j (25) for the unstable case. Using Fourier time series for the term involving RiB , @µ=@z and @jV j=@z, and by taking co-spectra among them in the r.h.s. of expression (25) with the help of formula (5), the heat ux in the frequency domain is given by: X 3 2 C 6 rCsDn 7 6 X 7 2 2 6C 7 ½Cp · z 6 7 [RIC.n/:PTC.r/:VTC.s/] hFH .n/i D 6 7 2 .1 C ·z=¸/2 6 r¡sDn 7 X 4 5 C 2 r ¡sD¡n ¡ X 3 6 r CsDn 7 6 X 7 6 7 ½Cp C 6 7 [RIC.n/:PTS.r/:VTS.s/] C 6 7 2 .1 C ·z=¸/2 6 r ¡sDn 7 X 4 5 C · 2 z2 r¡sD¡n 2572 T. N. KRISHNAMURTI et al. 2 C X 3 6 r CsDn 6 X 6 ½Cp ¡ 6 C 2 .1 C ·z=¸/2 6 6 r ¡sDn X 4 C · 2 z2 2 7 7 7 7 [RIS.n/:PTC.r/:VTS.s/] 7 7 5 r¡sD¡n C X 3 6 r CsDn 6 X 6C ½Cp 6 C 2 .1 C ·z=¸/2 6 6 r ¡sDn X 4 ¡ · 2 z2 7 7 7 7 [RIS.n/:PTS.r/:VTC.s/]: 7 7 5 (26) r¡sD¡n Values of RIC.n/ and RIS.n/ will be different for stable and unstable cases. Here .RIC; RIS/, .PTC; PTS/ and .VTC; VTS/ are the cosine and sine coef cients of the terms involving RiB , @µ =@z and @jV j=@z associated with frequencies n, r and s; respectively. The moisture ux is given by: @q @jV j @q · 2 z2 @jV j RiB @q FQ D ½KQ Fh RiB ; D ½l 2 D½ 2 2 @z @z @z .1 C ·z=¸/ @z .1 C 5RiB / @z for the stable case, and 2 / · 2 z2 @jV j .RiB C 1:286RiBjRiB j1=2 ¡ 8RiB @q FQ D ½ ; (27) 2 1=2 .1 C ·z=¸/ @z @z 1 C 1:286jRiB j for the unstable case. Using Fourier time series for the terms involving RiB , @q=@z and @jV j=@z, and taking the co-spectrum among them on the r.h.s. of expression (27) with the help of formula (5), the expression of moisture ux in the frequency domain, FQ .n/ is the same as FH .n/ except that PTC and PTS are to be replaced by PQC and PQS, the Fourier temporal coef cients of @q=@z. The momentum ux is given by: @v @jV j @v · 2 z2 @jV j RiB @v FM D ½KM Fm RiB ; D pl 2 D½ 2 2 @z @z @z .1 C ·z=¸/ @z .1 C 5RiB / @z for the stable case, and 2 / @v · 2 z2 @jV j .RiB C 1:746RiBjRiB j1=2 ¡ 8RiB FM D ½ ; (28) .1 C ·z=¸/2 @z @z 1 C 1:746jRiB j1=2 for the unstable case. Using Fourier time series for the terms involving RiB , @v=@z and @jV j=@z, and taking co-spectra among them on the r.h.s. of expression (28) with the help of formula (5), the expression for FM .n/ in the frequency domain is the same as that for FH .n/ except that PTC and PTS are replaced by P V C and P V S, the Fourier temporal coef cients of @v=@z. The frequency interactions in the PBL are determined entirely by the variation of the exchange coef cient K . Our premise is that these uxes in the frequency domain build up within the PBL, thus enhancing the amplitude of the Madden–Julian time-scale via the triad interactions. Thus we expect that a small oceanic signal in the SST on the Madden–Julian time-scale is enhanced at the top of the atmospheric constant- ux layer, and a further enhancement occurs across the PBL. These are illustrated in the results of computations presented in the next section. A MECHANISM OF THE MJO 3. 2573 FSU COUPLED OCEAN – ATMOSPHERE MODEL AND THE MJO (a) Description of the coupled model (i) Ocean model. The ocean model employed here is a modi ed version of the Max Planck Institute ocean model (Sterl 1991; Latif et al. 1994). The model has 17 irregularly spaced vertical layers. The upper part of the ocean is of greater interest since turbulent activity due to external forcing is effective there; therefore, the upper 300 m have ner vertical resolution with the thickness of layers from the top being 20, 20, 20, 20, 20, 30, 30, 40, 50, 50, 100, 200, 500, 1000, 1500 and 2000 m, respectively. There is variable resolution in the meridional direction where: within §10± of the equator the resolution is constant at 0.5± ; between §10± and §20± it increases to 1± ; and outside of §50± it is set to 5± . Constant resolution of 5± is used in the zonal direction. The equations of motion are solved using nite-differencing techniques on a horizontally staggered E-grid scheme (Arakawa and Lamb 1977). The time integration of the full system with a time step of 120 minutes is carried out by the method of fractional steps. This method allows for each individual equation to be separated into components which are integrated individually and then combined to give the solution of the full system. For turbulent diffusion, a constant mixing coef cient of 1000 m2 s¡1 is used in order to calculate the horizontal mixing processes, whereas in the vertical a formula dependent on the Richardson number is used. Surface forcing is represented by the exchange of heat and momentum at the air–sea interface. (ii) Atmospheric model. The numerical weather prediction model used in this study is the FSUGSM described in Krishnamurti et al. (1998). The horizontal and vertical resolution of the model are exible; for this study we use a horizontal resolution truncated at wave number 42 (T42) which gives an approximate grid mesh of 2.8± latitude/longitude and a vertical resolution of roughly 0.5 km described by 14 sigma-levels between roughly 50 and 1000 hPa. A semi-implicit time integration scheme is used with a time step of 20 minutes to represent the time derivatives in the model equations. The highfrequency gravity-wave oscillations are suppressed by semi-implicit time differencing wherever they appear in the model equations. The initial data sources for the FSUGSM comprise the global analysis of ECMWF and the SSTs from NCEP. The prognostic model variables are: vorticity, divergence, dew-point depression, surface pressure, and a variable which combines the geopotential height and logarithm of the surface pressure. The model physics includes: ² ² ² ² ² ² ² modi ed Kuo scheme for cumulus parametrization (Krishnamurti et al. 1983); shallow convective adjustment (Tiedke 1984); dry convective adjustment; large-scale condensation; surface-layer parametrization by similarity theory (Businger et al. 1971); PBL parametrization includes a diffusive formulation based on mixing length theory dependent on Richardson number (Manobianco 1989); parametrization of short-wave radiation by Lacis and Hansen (1974), and longwave radiation by Harshvardhan and Corsetti (1984). The salient elements of this coupled model are outlined in Fig. 3. (b) Datasets The datasets used in the present study are global daily values for an entire year (March 1996 to February 1997, inclusive) extracted from the coupled-model output 2574 Figure 3. T. N. KRISHNAMURTI et al. A schematic diagram describing the Florida State University (FSU) Coupled Ocean–Atmosphere model. (Cubukcu and Krishnamurti 2002). The variables relevant to the study of uxes include winds, temperature, bulk coef cients and humidity in the atmosphere, and the ocean temperatures of the coupled model. Here area averaging is carried out in areas: between latitudes §11± and longitudes 130± and 150± E for the warm pool; between longitudes 180± and 160± W for the central tropical Paci c; and between 60± and 110± E for the Indian Ocean. The same algorithms that were used within the coupled-model forecasts are used for the computation of uxes in the frequency domain. It should be noted that the total uxes of the coupled model’s output are not used directly, since the computation of uxes in the frequency domain calls for the explicit computation of the co-spectra of the triad interactions. At each transform grid point of the spectral model, where the physical processes are evaluated, we construct a time series for these triple-product variables. These are 360-day time series, one entry per day for each variable, denoting the value at the top of the constant- ux layer for the period from March 1996 to February 1997. This is based entirely on the model output datasets from the coupled model. This database is used to construct the frequency co-spectra for the triads described earlier. (c) The MJO in the FSUCGSM The coupled model has previously been applied to numerous climatological problems (e.g. LaRow and Krishnamurti 1998; Krishnamurti et al. 2000; Cubukcu and Krishnamurti 2002). The results have demonstrated that the FSUCGSM is an excellent 2575 A MECHANISM OF THE MJO (a) 0 -1 2 12 4 4 4 -4 12 -4 -12 4 10 -4 2 -1 12 12 12 -12 12 4 4 20 -4 12 -1 2 12 12 30 -44 12 12 4 12 4 -4 -12 40 412 -4 12 12 -4 4 -12-4 -4 124 4 50 12 12 -4 12 -4 4 60 12 4 1 2 4 70 12 12 4 12 -4 12 4 -4 4 80 12 -12 4 12 -4 60E 4 120E 4 -4 12 90 0 12 180 120W 60W 0 (b) Figure 4. (a) A coupled-model result based on the eastward passage of the Madden–Julian Oscillation. Shown are the 200 hPa zonal wind anomalies (m s¡1 / on a Hovmüller diagram for a 90-day period during the summer of 1996 in the equatorial belt 5± S to 5± N. (b) Power spectra of the 200 hPa zonal wind anomalies for the tropical Indian, West Paci c and Central Paci c Oceans. 2576 T. N. KRISHNAMURTI et al. tool for climatological studies. Cubukcu and Krishnamurti (2002) showed the model’s performance in simulating the tropical intra-annual oscillations such as the MJO to be quite successful. The entire context of this paper is based on the same numerical simulation used by Cubukcu and Krishnamurti (2002). A simple example of MJO signal as simulated by the FSUCGSM is shown in Fig. 4(a), which displays the time–longitude cross-section of tropical 200 hPa zonal wind anomalies for three consecutive months towards the end of the time integration (October–December 1996). The anomalies are relative to a oneyear mean of the model output; positive values denote westerly anomalies. The zonal wind at 200 hPa is often used in various climate diagnostics bulletins to illustrate the eastward passage of the MJO—a phenomenon that was captured quite nicely in our oneyear coupled-model run. The model output, as illustrated, shows a robust MJO, with the largest westerly wind anomalies of the order of 20 m s¡1 . The power spectra of 200 hPa winds shown in Fig. 4(b) highlights the peak signals in the time range of 25–60 days that represent the MJO. From Figs. 1(a) and (b), and 4(b), a strong signal in the power spectra of the SSTs, and the zonal winds at 850 hPa and 200 hPa levels, can be seen for several frequencies within the 20- to 60-day time-scales. It does not show a strong band covering the entire MJO time-scale as noted by Salby and Hendon (1994) and Hendon and Salby (1994). However, several spectral peaks covering the entire range from 25 to 60 days can be seen on these gures. In this study we have limited our examination to 30–50 days, primarily based on the SST spectra and our previous studies. 4. C OMPUTATION OF FLUXES IN THE FREQUENCY DOMAIN The results presented in this paper are based on the following computations of the uxes. The letters are used to label corresponding panels of plots displayed in Figs. 5 to 11. (a) Total uxes on the time-scale of the MJO for the sensible heat, latent heat and momentum across the constant- ux layer. (b) Total uxes in the constant- ux layer on the time-scale of the MJO arising from interaction of the MJO with the synoptic time-scale of from 2 to 7 days. (c) Fluxes contributed by salient (strongest contributing) triad interactions in the surface layer. (d) Salient triad interaction frequencies contributing to (a) in the constant- ux layer. (e) Total uxes on the time-scale of the MJO for the sensible heat, latent heat and momentum in the PBL at the 850 hPa level. (f) Total uxes in the PBL on the time-scale of the MJO arising from interaction of the MJO time-scale with synoptic time-scale of 2 to 7 days. (g) Fluxes contributed by the salient triad interactions in the PBL. (h) Salient triad interaction frequencies contributing to (e) in the PBL. In this section uxes of latent and sensible heat are expressed in W m¡2 , and momentum uxes in N m¡2 . We consider three domains for illustrating these uxes in the frequency domain: ² ² ² Indian Monsoon: 11.2± S to 11.2± N, 61.88±E to 109.69±E; Central Paci c Ocean: 11.2± S to 11.2± N, 160.31± W to 180± W; Western Paci c Ocean: 11.2± S to 11.2± N, 151.88± E to 132.19±E. We did not include a domain over the Atlantic since the MJO signal was weak in that sector. 2577 A MECHANISM OF THE MJO a 10. 9.0 91894 88 7.2 3.65.4 83 86 1.880 1.7 8 0 1.88 3.683 3. d 7,57,50 9,49,40 6,57,51 9,57,48 6,57,51 8,43,35 8,57,49 6,57,51 9,49,40 8,57,49 8,49,41 7,57,50 6,57,51 8,57,49 6,57,51 7,57,50 6,57,51 7,57,50 6,57,48 9,57,48 7,57,50 8,49,41 8,49,41 9,49,40 9,49,40 7,57,50 6,57,51 9,49,40 9,49,40 9,49,40 7,57,50 7,57,50 7,57,50 9,57,48 6,57,51 e f 15.4 19 1157..9.7 4 11.2N 8.4N 5.6N 1.195 0.862 0.528 2.8N 0 2.8S 5.6S 8.4S 11.2S 60 70 190.4.96 12.41 4 17.7 10.9 5.03 19.9 22.2 1 .1 g h 95 1 9 .5 2 1.81.5 6229 80 9.46 79.91.40.9 86 4 6.51 5.03 3.55 .9 19 22.2 15.417.7 8 4 15. 2 .9 . 3 1 10 8.7 6.4 8 3 52 c 11.2N 8.4N 5.6N 2.8N 0 2.8S 5.6S 8.4S 11.2S 11.2N 8.4N 5.6N 2.8N 0 2.8S 5.6S 8.4S 11.2S b 8.727 5.25 6.9892 3.5 1.23 788 7.9 11.2N 8.4N 5.6N 2.8N 0 2.8S 5.6S 8.4S 11.2S 90 100 110 60 8,57,49 8,57,49 8,49,41 9,49,40 7,57,50 8,57,49 8,57,49 8,49,41 8,49,41 7,57,50 8,49,41 8,49,41 8,49,41 8,49,41 8,57,50 9,49,40 6,57,51 6,57,51 6,57,51 7,57,50 8,49,41 7,57,50 6,57,51 9,57,48 9,57,48 8,57,49 8,57,49 9,57,48 9,57,48 9,49,40 8,57,49 8,57,49 8,57,49 9,57,48 9,57,48 70 80 90 100 110 Figure 5. Latent-heat uxes (W m¡2 / over the Indian Ocean region. (a) Total latent-heat uxes on the time-scale of the Madden–Julian Oscillation (MJO) across the constant- ux layer. (b) Total uxes of latent heat across the constant- ux layer on the time-scale of the MJO arising from interaction of the MJO with the synoptic time-scale of 2 to 7 days. (c) Fluxes of latent heat contributed by salient (strongest contributing) triad interactions in the surface layer. (d) Salient triad interaction frequencies contributing to latent-heat uxes on the time-scale of the MJO across the constant- ux layer. (e) Total latent-heat uxes on the time-scale of the MJO in the planetary boundary layer (PBL) at 850 hPa. (f) Total latent-heat uxes in the PBL on the time-scale of the MJO arising from interaction of the MJO time-scale with the synoptic time-scale of 2 to 7 days. (g) Latent-heat uxes contributed by the salient triad interactions in the PBL. (h) Salient triad interaction frequencies contributing to latent-heat uxes on the time-scale of the MJO in the PBL at 850 hPa. 2578 T. N. KRISHNAMURTI et al. 11.2N 8.4N 5.6N 2.8N 0 2.8S 5.6S 8.4S 11.2S 4.60 6 3.1 1.72 11.2N 8.4N 5.6N 2.8N 0 2.8S 5.6S 8.4S 11.2S 3 0.5 6 0.3 0.18 11.2N 8.4N 5.6N 2.8N 0 2.8S 5.6S 8.4S 11.2S .2.9 14 12 .7 11 1 0.95.2 8.0 a b 5 2 .2 1.24 4.60 1.72 16 3.4. 60 4 8 6.0 7. 8.942 3 .2 7 1.24 25 2.3. 27 4.2 19 32 5.3 6. 4.29 6.04 c d 0.70 0.3 6 0.53 0.18 6 0.30.70 3 0.5 0.87 1 1.2.0 25 1.39 1.57 6,57,51 9,49,40 9,57,48 9,57,48 7,57,50 6,57,51 6,57,51 9,57,48 8,57,49 8,57,49 9,57,48 9,49,40 9,57,48 8,57,49 8,49,41 8,49,41 6,49,43 9,57,48 8,49,41 8,49,41 7,57,50 7,57,50 7,57,50 7,57,50 7,57,50 7,57,50 7,57,50 7,57,50 0.70 e 9.2 5.5 6.7 8.0 6.7 8.0 9.2 10.5 11.7 12.9 15.14.2 4 6.7 1 1.7 5 11.2N 0.7 8.4N 5 0. 7 5.6N 2.8N 0.60 0 2.8S 5.6S 8.4S 11.2S 130 135 f 9.58 9 8.7 3 1 7.28.0 4 6.4 6 5.6 4 .8.089 4 31 4.3. 09 4.88 5.66 6.44 7.23 8.01 8.79 7.23 6.44 10.5 g h 0.90 1.05 0 .45 0.0.7 605 0.90 11.0.159 1.34 1.49 1.64 140 Figure 6. 145 150 6,49,43 6,57,51 6,57,51 6,57,51 6,57,51 6,57,51 6,57,51 6,57,51 6,57,51 6,57,51 9,57,48 9,49,40 6,57,51 6,57,51 8,57,49 8,57,49 9,57,48 7,57,50 8,49,41 8,49,41 7,57,50 7,57,50 7,57,50 7,57,50 9,57,48 7,57,50 7,57,50 7,57,50 130 135 140 145 150 Same as Fig. 5 but for the West Paci c region. (a) Latent-heat uxes The results for latent-heat uxes in the frequency domain are illustrated in Figs. 5, 6 and 7. These cover the results from our computations for the Indian, West Paci c and Central Paci c Oceans. Each illustration comprises eight panels (a) to (h) corresponding to the ux computations listed at the beginning of this section. Overall the results of these latent-heat uxes over the Indian Ocean show that the total surface uxes (Fig. 5(a)) on the time-scale of the MJO are largest in the trade wind belt of the southern hemisphere and the south-west monsoon ow over the Arabian Sea. These maximum total uxes are of the order of 10 W m¡2 . The uxes over the equatorial belt are smaller. In general, the uxes over land areas between 90± and 110± E 2579 A MECHANISM OF THE MJO 11.2N 8.4N 5.6N 2.8N 0 2.8S 5.6S 8.4S 11.2S a 2.13 3.29 0 5.4 7.5 9.6 31 11.2N 8.4N 5.6N 2.8N 0 2.8S 91 5.6S 0.23 8.4S 11.2S 11.2N 8.4N 5.6N 2.8N 0 2.8S 5.6S 8.4S 11.2S b 15. 18.07 1396 .85 11 .74 9.6 3 7.5 1 5.40 3.29 9.6 3 4.71 6 .01 6. 0.4545 1 1. 2 .885 0.66099 20.0 6 00 6,57,51 6,57,51 6,57,51 6,57,51 6,57,51 9,57,48 9,57,48 9,57,48 9,49,40 7,49,42 6,57,51 6,57,51 6,57,51 6,49,43 6,57,51 6,57,51 6,57,51 6,57,51 6,57,51 6,57,51 6,57,51 6,57,51 6,57,51 6,57,51 8,49,41 7,49,42 6,57,51 6,57,51 7,57,50 7,57,50 7,57,50 9,57,48 9,57,48 6,57,51 7,57,50 7,49,42 7,57,50 7,57,50 7,57,50 7,57,50 7,57,50 7,57,50 7,38,31 7,57,50 7,57,50 7,57,50 7,57,50 7,57,50 9,57,48 f 218 0.0.5 17.0 9.09.7 99.7.0 15.5 14.0 6.1 12.5 10.9 14.0 15.5 1. 35 6 .1 h 8,57,49 9,43,34 6,57,51 6,57,51 6,57,51 6,57,51 8,57,49 7,57,50 7,57,50 6,57,51 6,57,51 6,57,51 6,57,51 9,57,48 9,49,40 6,49,43 6,57,51 6,57,51 6,57,51 6,57,51 9,57,48 6,49,43 6,49,43 6,49,43 8,57,49 8,57,49 8,57,49 0.73 9,57,48 7,57,50 7,57,50 8,57,49 9,57,48 9,57,48 8,57,49 7,57,50 7,57,50 7,57,50 7,49,40 7,49,42 7,49,42 7,49,42 7,57,50 7,57,50 7,57,50 7,49,40 7,49,42 7,49,42 7,49,42 14 1. 5 3 1. 8,57,49 1.56.35 14 1 1. 0.93 1.14 Figure 7. 8.3 7.5 6.8 7.5 6.8 8.3 9.0 9.7 10.4 g 190 .3 0 01 7 d 160 1.3 1.1 006 0.606.8 98 952 0.4 545 91 0.23 20.0 11.2N 8.4N 3 5.6N 0. 9 2.8N 0 2.8S 1.5 6 5.6S 8.4S 11.2S 180 185 3.42 c e 11.17 9.88 8.5 90 7.3 6.0 1 4.71 3.42 2.13 195 200 180 185 190 195 200 Same as Fig. 5 but for the Central Paci c region. are small. Around 30 to 50% of these total uxes (on the MJO time-scale) come from the triad interaction of the MJO time-scale with two other frequencies on synoptic timescales, Fig. 5(b). The single salient time-scale that contributes the most to the latent-heat uxes on the MJO time-scale is found to be in the synoptic time-scales of 2 to 7 days. This seems to be true over the entire Indian Ocean domain. These uxes and the salient triads are shown in Figs. 5(c) and (d). The total uxes of latent heat within the PBL at 850 hPa on the time-scale of the MJO are shown in Fig. 5(e). These total uxes are almost twice those at the surface. A surprising aspect is the lack of continuity of the 850 hPa uxes with respect to those at the surface. Over the active monsoon region east of 80± E the uxes at 850 hPa are quite large, and the pattern of uxes bears little resemblance to those at the surface 2580 11.2N 8.4N 5.6N 2.8N 0 2.8S 5.6S 8.4S 11.2S 11.2N 8.4N 5.6N 2.8N 0 2.8S 5.6S 8.4S 11.2S a b 3.221 2.171 1.121 6.86 3.50 1 1.12 11.2N 8.4N 5.6N 2.8N 0 2.8S 5.6S 8.4S 11.2S T. N. KRISHNAMURTI et al. c d 0.4 0.235685 5 8,18,10 9,13,4 8,13,5 9,10,1 9,10,1 9,10,1 9,10,1 8,11,3 8,11,3 8,13,5 6,8,2 6,9,3 6,7,1 7,9,2 7,9,2 9,14,5 6,9,3 6,7,1 9,10,1 9,10,1 9,11,2 9,10,1 6,9,3 9,14,5 6,9,3 9,11,2 9,11,2 7,9,2 9,11,2 7,10,3 6,8,2 8,8,2 8,11,3 6,11,5 6,9,3 e f 14 .64 9.81 4.99 4.894 2.480 2.480 4.99 4.894 11.2N 8.4N 0.410.8270 47 5.6N 2.8N 0 2.8S 5.6S 8.4S 11.2S 60 70 Figure 8. g 80 h 90 100 110 60 9,13,4 9,13,4 8,22,14 8,9,1 6,7,1 8,16,8 8,16,8 6,7,1 9,11,2 9,10,1 6,9,3 6,8,2 9,10,1 7,9,2 7,8,1 8,13,5 7,9,2 9,22,13 9,10,1 9,10,1 6,13,7 9,11,2 8,11,3 9,11,2 9,10,1 7,18,11 7,9,2 9,11,2 9,11,2 8,9,1 7,13,6 6,9,3 7,8,1 6,11,5 7,10,3 70 80 90 100 110 Same as Fig. 5 but for sensible-heat uxes (W m¡2 / over the Indian Ocean region. level, especially over land areas. Steady input of moisture laterally into the monsoon region from the Oceans can contribute to the excessive uxes at the 850 hPa level over the surface level. Around 50 to 75% of these total uxes (on the time-scale of the MJO) arise from the interaction of the MJO time-scale with high-frequency motions (i.e. on the 2- to 7-day time-scale), Fig. 5(f). Nearly 10% of these total uxes can be attributed to a contribution from the single local salient triad, Fig. 5(g). These salient triads are displayed in Fig. 5(h). A typical salient triad of frequencies here is 9, 57, 48, roughly corresponding to 40, 6 and 7 days, respectively. It is interesting to note again that the interactions between members of the MJO time-scale and the synoptic time-scale (2 to 7 days) carry these triads that contribute the largest to the uxes on the time-scale of the MJO. This is true over the entire Indian Ocean domain. The data 2581 A MECHANISM OF THE MJO a 11.2N 8.4N 5.6N 2.8N 0 2.8S 5.6S 8.4S 11.2S b 0.5 97 0.966 0.597 1.106 15 1.6 0 .9 66 5 1.77 1.775 1.615 c 11.2N 8.4N 5.6N 2.8N 0 2.8S 5.6S 8.4S 11.2S d 0.0595 0.0595 6,20,14 7,16,9 6,21,15 6,21,15 7,24,17 6,11,5 9,10,1 8,10,2 9,10,1 8,11,3 9,10,1 9,16,7 6,7,1 9,10,1 9,10,1 9,10,1 7,16,9 8,13,5 8,9,1 8,10,2 9,11,2 7,9,2 8,21,13 8,10,2 9,10,1 7,9,2 7,20,13 7,9,2 e 11.2N 8.4N 5.6N 2.8N 0 2.8S 5.6S 8.4S 11.2S f 1.70 2.71 11.2N 8.4N 5.6N 2.8N 0 2.8S 5.6S 8.4S 11.2S 130 1.70 3.11 4.52 2.71 4.80 4.80 4 .5 2 g h 0 .1 28 0.128 0.242.355 0 135 Figure 9. 140 145 150 9,10,1 6,8,2 6,8,2 9,13,4 6,7,1 9,10,1 9,10,1 9,10,1 9,10,1 9,12,3 7,10,3 9,18,9 9,10,1 9,10,1 9,10,1 9,10,1 7,10,3 6,7,1 6,7,1 6,7,1 7,15,8 7,15,8 7,9,2 7,9,2 7,9,2 7,9,2 7,9,2 7,9,2 130 135 140 145 150 Same as Fig. 5 but for sensible-heat uxes (W m¡2 / over the West Paci c region. considered for the present study cover the period from March 1996 to February 1997, and hence the underlying thermodynamical effects of El Niño may have come into play in possibly shifting the latent-heat ux maxima from the West Paci c to the Indian Ocean. This maximum of latent-heat ux reaches 26.5 W m¡2 at (11.2± N, 75.94± E). These results convey some of the most important results of this study. A good proportion of the total latent-heat ux (on the time-scale of the MJO) arises from the interaction of the MJO time-scale with the disturbances at the synoptic time-scale (2 to 7 days). A small signal in the SST on the time-scale of the MJO is successively ampli ed via these triad interactions, rst over the constant- ux layer and next within the PBL. 2582 T. N. KRISHNAMURTI et al. 11.2N 8.4N 5.6N 2.8N 0 2.8S 5.6S 8.4S 11.2S 11.2N 8.4N 5.6N 2.8N 0 2.8S 5.6S 8.4S 11.2S 11.2N 8.4N 5.6N 2.8N 0 2.8S 5.6S 8.4S 11.2S a b 4.575 3.115 1.656 9.88 6.68 3.49 3.49 1.656 3.115 6.68 c d 0.2305 0.1 190 0.2305 0.1190 e 5.82 10.67 11.2N 8.4N 5.6N 2.8N 0 2.8S 5.6S 0.241 8.4S 11.2S 180 185 Figure 10. 6,11,5 6,11,5 6,11,5 6,11,5 9,10,1 6,13,7 6,21,15 6,16,10 6,9,3 6,9,3 7,13,6 8,10,2 8,10,2 6,12,6 9,10,11 6,7,1 6,7,1 6,7,1 6,8,2 6,22,16 6,22,16 9,10,1 9,10,1 6,7,1 6,7,1 6,13,7 6,29,23 7,13,6 7,11,4 9,10,1 7,8,1 9,10,1 9,10,1 9,10,1 7,9,2 7,8,1 7,8,1 9,11,2 6,7,1 7,14,7 7,15,8 7,15,8 7,14,7 9,24,15 8,15,7 8,15,7 7,15,8 8,15,7 9,11,2 f 1520 .51.36 10.67 5.82 9.85 6.72 3.59 3.59 6.72 15.51 g h 0.45 6 0.241 190 195 200 6,10,4 6,10,4 6,10,4 6,10,4 6,10,4 6,7,1 6,9,3 6,9,3 6,8,2 6,19,13 6,19,13 6,10,4 6,7,1 6,9,3 6,9,3 6,9,3 6,19,13 9,10,1 9,10,1 6,29,23 6,9,3 6,7,1 9,15,6 9,10,1 9,10,1 9,10,1 7,10,3 7,10,3 9,10,1 8,9,1 9,10,1 9,10,1 9,10,1 9,10,1 7,29,22 7,14,7 7,9,2 7,9,2 7,29,22 7,29,22 7,29,22 7,9,2 7,14,7 7,14,7 7,9,2 7,9,2 7,9,2 7,9,2 9,11,2 180 185 190 195 200 Same as Fig. 5 but for sensible-heat uxes (W m¡2 / over the Central Paci c region. Tropical disturbances arising from the tropical instabilities abound on the synoptic timescale, and the presence of a non-zero SST uctuation on the MJO time-scale facilitates the rapid ampli cation of the MJO via these triad interactions. The results of these same computations for the Central and the West Paci c Ocean are presented in Figs. 6 and 7. These domains are both essentially oceanic except over Australia. Overall we nd quite similar results over the three ocean basins. The southern hemisphere trades carry the largest moisture and latent-heat uxes on the MJO timescale over the western Paci c Ocean. For moisture uxes on the MJO time-scale the largest contribution comes from triad interaction with the synoptic time-scale over all tropical ocean basins. The salient triads such as 7, 57, 50 (which translate roughly to 2583 A MECHANISM OF THE MJO a 11.2N 8.4N 5.6N 2.8N 0 2.8S 5.6S 8.4S 11.2S 0.027 b 268 -0.0 -0.0060 5 -0.0060 0.0 27 5 c 11.2N 8.4N 5.6N 2.8N 0 2.8S 5.6S 8.4S 11.2S 8.9 -3 8.9510 d -3 510 9,10,1 8,9,1 8,9,1 8,9,1 8,9,1 8,10,2 8,10,2 8,13,5 8,9,1 8,9,1 8,10,2 6,8,2 8,10,2 8,13,5 8,9,1 9,10,1 9,10,1 9,11,2 8,9,1 8,9,1 7,9,2 9,25,16 8,9,1 8,9,1 8,9,1 8,9,1 8,9,1 8,10,2 8,9,1 6,7,1 9,12,13 6,9,3 7,10,13 9,12,13 9,12,13 e 0.00 5 6 0.179 65 06 0.30 f 0.0 373 0.0 11.2N 8.4N 5.6N 2.8N 0 2.8S 5.6S 8.4S 11.2S 0.0065 0.052 11.2N 8.4N 5.6N 2.8N 0 2.8S 5.6S 8.4S 11.2S 60 g h 0.0621 0.0 414 0.0207 70 Figure 11. 80 90 100 110 60 8,10,2 8,9,1 8,9,1 8,9,1 9,10,1 8,9,1 8,9,1 8,9,1 8,9,1 8,9,1 8,9,1 8,9,1 8,9,1 8,13,5 9,11,2 7,9,2 8,9,1 8,9,1 6,16,10 6,9,3 7,9,2 7,13,6 6,13,7 6,16,10 9,16,7 7,9,2 7,13,6 7,13,6 7,13,6 9,16,7 9,12,3 7,13,6 7,13,6 7,13,6 7,13,6 70 80 90 100 110 Same as Fig. 5 but for momentum uxes (N m¡2 / over the Indian Ocean region. 52, 6 and 5 days) contribute about 25% of the total uxes of moisture on the MJO timescale over a speci c region. We also note that, overall, the near equatorial belt is not a large contributor to uxes on the MJO time-scale. These salient triads are also quite active over the date line, where they again seem to contribute nearly 15% of the total uxes (on the MJO time-scale) in the PBL (at 850 hPa level). The signi cant nonlinear inter-time-scale triad interactions in latent-heat ux involve a pair of frequencies around 40 and 57, corresponding to high-frequency oscillations on the MJO time-scale at the two layers and over the three regions considered, h6; 57; 51i, h9; 49; 40i and h9; 49; 40i exhibit the most prominent-scale interactions having values of 1.25, 0.82 and 1.78 W m¡2 over the Central Paci c, West Paci c and Indian Oceans, respectively. This ampli cation of the MJO over the western Paci c is consistent with the robust 2584 T. N. KRISHNAMURTI et al. MJO seen over this region on the familiar x ¡ t Hovmüller diagrams of the zonal winds (Fig. 4). (b) Sensible-heat uxes Figures 8, 9 and 10 illustrate the results for sensible-heat ux over the Indian, Central and West Paci c Oceans, respectively, each comprising eight panels. Panel (a) shows the total sensible-heat ux in the constant- ux layer on the time-scale of 20 to 60 days. The largest values of these uxes are around 3 to 10 W m¡2 . These total surface uxes are largest in the trade wind belt of the southern hemisphere, the southwest monsoon ows of the Arabian Sea and the monsoon trough over India. The near equatorial belt has a minimum of sensible-heat ux on the MJO time-scale. Panels (b) show the contributions to the uxes on the MJO time-scale arising from all possible interactions with high-frequency motion (i.e. 1- to 10-day time-scale). Roughly 30 to 50% of the total sensible-heat ux on the MJO time-scale appears to come from the interaction with these high-frequency motions. The pattern of the total uxes and the MJO time-scale uxes resulting from high-frequency interaction are similar, and the maxima of the uxes generally occur over regions of strong surface winds. The ux contribution by the single largest triad and the speci c salient triads are illustrated in panels (c) and (d). A typical triad is 8, 18 and 10, here the three frequencies 8, 18 and 10 interact, where 8 D 18 ¡ 10 satis es the selection rule. The time-scales of these are roughly 45, 20 and 36 days. This is clearly not one of the triads where the MJO timescale interacts with the synoptic time-scale. If we look across the Indian Ocean, we nd that the salient triads contributing to an enhancement of the uxes on the MJO timescale are not in the high frequencies. This is not surprising since the thermal structure on the scale of tropical disturbances is quite at and the Bowen ratio quite small over the tropics. In this sense the decomposition of uxes on the time-scale of the MJO are quite different for latent- and sensible-heat uxes. Panels (e) illustrate the total ux of sensible heat within the PBL at the 850 hPa level. The PBL uxes are about 25 to 50% larger than the surface uxes, due to lateral convergence of uxes on the MJO timescale within the PBL. The contribution to the 850 hPa total uxes that arises from triad interaction with the synoptic-scale are shown in panels (f). Again, we note that roughly 50% of the total uxes on the time-scale of the MJO are contributed by the interaction with the high-frequency motions on the time-scale of 2 to 7 days, even though these are not the salient triads. Panels (g) and (h) show the sensible-heat uxes, within the PBL at 850 hPa, arising from single salient triads and the speci c triads respectively. Here again we note that the strongest sensible-heat uxes are not contributed from the interaction of the MJO time-scale with the synoptic time-scale. Frequencies much lower than the synoptic time-scales provide the salient triads for interaction with the MJO time-scales. In general the sensible-heat uxes in the frequency domain call for interactions of the MJO time-scale with another member of the MJO time-scale and a much lower frequency. These uxes are small, and do not convey anything important in respect of the growth of the MJO uxes across the PBL. We have also examined the results of the sensible-heat ux computations over the western and eastern Paci c. In all cases the maximum uxes occur over the region of strongest surface and PBL winds. The results for the three ocean basins were quite similar in terms of the composition of salient triads. The uxes of sensible heat are found to be at a maximum over the Central Paci c, where they are of the order of 16 and 25 W m¡2 at (11.2± N, 160.31± W) in the surface layer, and between the surface layer and the free atmosphere, respectively. Similarly, the values of the uxes of sensible heat over West Paci c are of the order of 2 and 6 W m¡2 A MECHANISM OF THE MJO 2585 at (11.2± N, 151.88± E) in the above mentioned two layers. The maximum values of the sensible-heat ux in the respective layers over Indian Ocean are of the order of 15 and 23 W m¡2 . Thus we notice systematic strengthening of uxes of sensible heat on the MJO time-scale from the surface layer to the free atmosphere through the PBL. At almost all grid points this trend has been maintained. (c) Momentum uxes The results for momentum uxes on the time-scale of the MJO for the Indian Ocean are presented in Figs. 11(a) to (h). The largest upward ux of momentum is over the southern trade winds and in the south-westerly monsoon ow. Between the surface level and the PBL these uxes are approximately doubled. Overall, the patterns of uxes at the surface and the PBL (850 hPa level) are quite similar. The most interesting aspects of the momentum uxes are the distribution and composition of the salient triads at the surface and the PBL. A number of these triads show interactions between two members of the MJO family and a lower frequency (i.e. lower than the MJO time-scale). For example, 8, 9, 1 denotes an interaction among 44- and 45-day oscillations and the annual cycle. Overall, this entire pattern of salient triads is very different from that for the moisture uxes. The contribution of the high frequencies interacting with the MJO (Fig. 11(b)) is larger. What this means is that higher frequencies, i.e. the synoptic time-scales, do contribute signi cantly to the overall total even though they are not a part of the salient triads. This is also true for the sensible-heat uxes. In that sense the moisture uxes contributed by the high frequencies at the surface and in the PBL are quite unique, in that they readily interact with the MJO to amplify the latter. The results for the Central and West Paci c Oceans are quite similar to those over the Indian Ocean and are not displayed here. (d ) Total MJO time-scale uxes versus total uxes including all time-scales The uxes discussed so far in this paper are those on the time-scale of the MJO. It is important to know how those contributions on the time-scale of the MJO compare with the total annual-mean surface uxes (from March 1996 to February 1997 inclusive), where all time-scales are included. The total surface ux of latent heat for the three oceanic basins, Indian, West Paci c and Central Paci c are shown in Figs. 12(a), (b) and (c), respectively. Overall, the largest oceanic uxes are of the order of 140 W m¡2 , and occur near the borders of these domains where the surface winds are strongest. The total latent-heat uxes on the time-scale of the MJO are only around 10 W m¡2 . The total uxes shown here include contributions for all time-scales; a substantial portion are contributed on the synoptic time-scales. These total uxes invariably increase between the surface and 850 hPa. These are illustrated in Figs. 12(d), (e) and (f) for the three ocean basins. The increase of uxes is largest over the land areas of the monsoon region over the Indian Ocean, where there appears to be a doubling of uxes between the surface and 850 hPa. Figures 12(g), (h) and (i) show the increase of uxes between the surface and 850 hPa for the contributions of the three oceanic areas on the MJO time-scale. It is clear that a large proportion (approximately 60%) of the increase of total uxes between the surface level and the PBL arises from the contribution on the MJO time-scale. This increase in the MJO time-scale is largely attributed to the triad interactions with the synoptic time-scales. It is this increase of the original signal on the MJO time-scale, starting from the SSTs over the ocean, which appears quite striking in these datasets. 2586 T. N. KRISHNAMURTI et al. 11.2N 8.4N INDIAN OCEAN 140 5.6N 0 5.6S CENTRAL PACIFIC 14 0 120 100 80 14 0 120 100 2.8N 2.8S WESTERN PACIFIC 1 20 80 100 120 120 140 8.4S 11.2S a 5.6N 2.8N 0 2.8S c 10 9 10.04 7.5 21 8.82 11.2N 8.4N b 1.27 .0 4 10 .04 10.04 27 .5 9 10.0 10.04 4 1.27 5.6S 8.4S 11.2S d e 11.2N 8.4N f 26 9. 26 9. 2 14.2 4.3 1 5.6N 0 2.8S 1 4.31 9.26 2.8N 4 .3 1 9.2 6 9.2 6 7 9 .1 4. 3 1 5.6S 8.4S 11.2S 60 4 .3 70 80 90 100 110 130 g 135 140 145 1 150 h 180 185 190 195 200 i Figure 12. (a) Total ux of latent heat (W m¡2 ) over the Indian Ocean; (b) and (c) as (a) but for the West Paci c and Central Paci c Ocean basins, respectively. (d), (e), (f) As (a), (b) and (c) but differences in total uxes (W m¡2 ) between the 850 hPa and surface levels. (g), (h), (i) As (a), (b) and (c) but ux contributions on the time-scale of the Madden–Julian Oscillation. 5. C ONCLUDING REMARKS Tropical instabilities have been enumerated by many scientists: Yanai and Nitta (1968) on barotropic shear ow instabilities; Lindzen (1974) on Wave CISK¤ ; Rennick (1977) on combined barotropic–baroclinic instabilities plus CISK; Moorthi and Arakawa (1985) on vertical shear and convection; and several others. The focal point of these studies is the mechanisms of growth of tropical wave disturbances whose time-scale is of the order of 2 to 7 days (Reed et al. 1977). These disturbances can be found over ¤ Conditional Instability of the Second Kind. A MECHANISM OF THE MJO 2587 most of the tropical oceanic basins. They are, so to speak, waiting to interact with the MJO time-scale of 20 to 60 days. A number of these tropical wave disturbances satisfy the trigonometric selection rule, Fig. 2(a): MJO frequency n D r § s (the tropical wave frequencies). This relationship appears to be more readily met by the pre-existing tropical wave disturbance and a weak MJO signal over the tropical oceanic SSTs, or in the surfacelayer ows. From Eq. (9) we can see that the intraseasonal frequency, n; is associated with exchange coef cient CLH , which is a function of stability and therefore a function of Richardson number (RiB /. RiB depends on surface potential temperature and wind stress for computation of latent-heat uxes in the surface layer. SST affects these two parameters very close to the sea surface, therefore, the intraseasonal variation of CLH is involved with SST. The humidity uxes are affected much more by the SST oscillations (Krishnamurti et al. 1988). The term .Qs ¡ Qa / in Eq. (6) does have variations at intraseasonal time-scales, but synoptic time-scales involved with it are found to be important in nonlinear interactions between time-scales as far as their contributions to the MJO time-scale are concerned. The signal in intraseasonal SST in the surface layer associated with stability-dependent CLH gets ampli ed in the PBL, though CLH in the PBL is independent of SST. It is this feature that makes it possible for the surface uxes of moisture to amplify over the constant- ux layer, and it is this same feature that allows for the further ampli cation of the MJO over the PBL. Our parametrization of cumulus convection carries, at most, quadratic nonlinearities, which can convey in-scale (MJO to MJO) information from the cloud base to the cloud top. Thus, an MJO signal of the SST can be passed on through the deep convective cloud base to the tropical upper troposphere. It is our premise that a similar extension of this analysis over the deep convective layers would reveal the passage of this signal from the cloud base to most of the tropics via divergent circulations. Over tropical regions of convection the mid-troposphere vertical motion shows a signal on the time-scale of the MJO; the same feature was also noted over subtropical regions of descent. The present work is, of course, based entirely on model output from a coupled model that happened to simulate a somewhat realistic MJO signal. The model output was better suited for demonstrating the boundary-layer ampli cation of the MJO signal. This is an internally consistent dataset where the large-scale variables, especially in the PBL, were part of known model equations. Those equations were used, with the same model algorithms, to address the triad interactions in the frequency domain. What is presented here does not preclude other existing theories on the MJO, most of which are based on climate diagnostics and reanalysis datasets. According to Fjortoft (1960), cascading of energy can take place either way, i.e. from larger-scales to smaller-scales (temporal and spatial) or vice versa. In the present study interactions of oscillations slower than the MJO, with the MJO and higher frequencies, are not considered. Enhanced uxes of latent heat do feed convection on the MJO-scale. Propagation of clouds on this scale was noted by Yasunari (1980). Steady import of moisture laterally into the monsoon region from the oceans as well as from the southern trades carrying the largest moisture into Paci c are important features in the surface layer. Tropical disturbances arising from the tropical instabilities abound on the synoptic time-scale, and the presence of a small SST signal on the MJO timescale facilitates the rapid ampli cation of the MJO through nonlinear triad interactions. We have also looked at the issues of sensible-heat and momentum transports in the frequency domain. While these results are most revealing and complementary to 2588 T. N. KRISHNAMURTI et al. the above ndings, we feel that the ampli cation of moisture uxes is the central issue for this MJO theory. Further work is clearly needed to understand the scale interaction of sensible-heat and momentum uxes. The role of the ocean has not been adequately addressed here. A starting point in our analysis was the given fact that a small signal on the time-scale of the MJO exists in the SST over the upper ocean. If a MJO frequency in SST were to be absent (identically zero) then the triad interactions with the tropical waves would cease to exist. What about the need for an initial MJO signal in the oceanic SST that undergoes ampli cation over the atmosphere? How does that oceanic signal come about? The answer to this question requires further work. Oceanic behaviour is inherently of lower frequency than the atmosphere. If we accept that, and allow for some non-vanishing signal (however small) in the SST elds on the time-scale of the MJO to be present, given a plethora of tropical disturbances on the synoptic timescale of 2 to 7 days in the lower troposphere we can provide a simple explanation. These disturbances arise from prevalent tropical instabilities. These time-scales provide rich possibilities for triad interactions with a MJO time-scale because they are able to satisfy the selection rules for triad interactions. This permits the MJO time-scale to amplify in the PBL. The resulting winds acquire a stronger signal on the MJO timescale; these in turn convey the MJO time-scale to the ocean via surface stresses to amplify the SST signal. This positive feedback can establish an equilibrium state in the ocean and in the atmosphere, with both exhibiting the MJO signal. Thus we perceive the presence of the synoptic-scale disturbances in the tropics, on time-scales of 2 to 7 days, as an essential element for the excitation of the MJO. We have not considered the changes in the atmospheric basic states as such, as described in Molinari et al. (1997), Hartmann and Maloney (2001) and Maloney and Hartmann (2001). In the frequency domain even the so-called basic-state’s variation can be part of the MJO. That could have been revealed from an analysis in the ‘wave number–frequency domain’ where wave number zero (evidently the basic state) would have exhibited variations. That is beyond the scope of this study as we have concentrated here only on the ‘frequency–frequency’ interactions. It may be premature to consider the scenario portrayed here as a theory for the MJO. Further work is clearly needed to isolate the effects of the respective capabilities of coupled versus uncoupled models in the simulation of the MJO. Given a picture, such as Fig. 4, where for many months an intraseasonal wave traverses the globe, it seems that the oceanic contributions may have to be important. An AGCM, with prescribed SST, can carry a MJO signal primarily by the aforementioned scenario for a long period of time, simply from the inertia of the initial state of the surface layer and PBL where the proposed mechanism can operate for a few months. Evidently, lacking an oceanic support on the MJO time-scale, this signal could weaken in the AGCMs. Atmospheric internal dynamics may generate the MJO, but the role of ocean may be important for its enhancement. Computations of uxes over land in the frequency domain may give more clues about the physical and dynamical mechanisms of the origin of the MJO. This problem will be addressed in our future work. Computation of energy uxes in the frequency domain is a powerful tool for isolating the role of an important time-scale such as the MJO and the ENSO. In a number of recent studies, Sheng and Hayashi (1990a,b) explored global energetics in the frequency domain. They focused on the maintenance of the eddy kinetic energy on the time-scale of the MJO. In these studies several frequencies covering ENSO, annual, MJO, and storm-scales (1–10 days) were examined using 6 years of daily global datasets. A major nding of this study was that the high-frequency (2- to 7-day) timescales were a major source of energy for the MJO. That transfer mainly occurs from A MECHANISM OF THE MJO 2589 three-component triad interactions, i.e. kinetic to kinetic energy exchanges invoking nonlinear dynamics. A smaller gain of energy for the MJO occurs from the in-scale vertical overturnings of potential to kinetic energy. The roles of the annual cycle and larger time-scales in the maintenance of the MJO were smaller. The main message from these studies is that tropical high-frequency disturbances play a major role in the maintenance of the MJO. The present study of the PBL uxes in the frequency domain complements these results. A CKNOWLEDGEMENTS The research work reported here was supported by NOAA grants number NA96GPO400, NA06GPO512, NA16GP1365, and FSU Research Foundation Center of Excellence Award. The visit of Dr D. R. Chakraborty to FSU was sponsored by the Indian Institute of Tropical Meteorology, Pune, India. We acknowledge the data from the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts especially through the help of Dr. Tony Hollingsworth. R EFERENCES Arakawa, A. and Lamb, V. R. 1977 Blackadar, A. K. 1962 Businger, J. A., Wyngard, J. C., Izumi, Y. and Bradley, E. F. Cubukcu, N. and Krishnamurti, T. N. Emanuel, K. A. 1971 Fjortoft, R. 1960 Harshvardan and Corsetti, T. G. 1984 2002 1987 Hartmann, D. L. and Maloney, E. D. 2001 Hayashi, Y. 1980 Hendon, H. H. and Salby, M. L. 1994 Inness, P. M. and Slingo, J. M. 2002 Kemball-Cook, S., Bin Wang and Xiouhua Fu 2002 Krishnamurti, T. N. and Gadgil, S. 1985 Krishnamurti, T. N., Low-Nam, S. and Pasch. R. Krishnamurti, T. N., Oosterhof, D. K. and Mehta, A. V. Krishnamurti, T. N., Bedi, H. S. and Hardiker, V. Krishnamurti, T. N., Bachiochi, D., LaRow, T., Jha, B., Tewari, M., Chakraborty, D., Correa-Torres, R. and Oosterhof, D. 1983 1988 1998 2000 Computational design of the basic dynamical processes of the UCLA general circulation model. J. Comput. Phys., 16, 173– 263 The vertical distribution of wind and turbulent exchange in a neutral atmosphere. J. Geophys. Res., 67, 3095–3102 Flux pro le relationship in the atmospheric surface layer. J. Atmos. Sci., 28, 181–189 Paci c warm pool thermostat characteristics. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 83, 678–679 An air–sea interaction model of intraseasonal oscillation in the tropics. J. Atmos. Sci. 44, 2324–2340 On the control of kinetic energy by the atmosphere by external heat sources and surface friction. Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc., 86, 437–453 ‘Long-wave parameterization for the UCLA/GLAS GCM’. NASA Tech. Memo. 86072, Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD 20771, USA The Madden–Julian oscillation, barotropic dynamics, and North Paci c tropical cyclone formation. Part II: Stochastic barotropic modeling. J. Atmos. Sci., 58, 2559–2570 Estimation of non-linear energy-transfer spectra by the crossspectral method. J. Atmos. Sci., 37, 299–307 The life cycle of the Madden and Julian Oscillation. J. Atmos. Sci., 51, 2225–2237 Simulation of the Madden–Julian Oscillation in a coupled general circulation model I: Comparison with observations and an atmosphere-only GCM. J. Climate, 16, 345–364 Simulation of the intraseasonal oscillation in the ECHAM4 model: The impact of coupling with an ocean model. J. Atmos. Sci. 59, No. 9, 1433–1453 On the structure of the 30 to 50 day mode over the globe during FGGE. Tellus, 37A, 336–360 Cumulus parameterization and rainfall rates II. Mon. Weather Rev., 111, 815–828 Air–sea interaction on the time scale of 30 to 50 days. J. Atmos. Sci., 45, No. 8, 1305–1322 Introduction to global spectral modeling. Oxford University Press, New York, USA Coupled atmosphere–ocean modeling of the El-Niño of 1997–98. J. Climate, 13, 2428–2459 2590 T. N. KRISHNAMURTI et al. Lacis, A. A. and Hansen, J. E. 1974 LaRow, T. E. and Krishnamurti, T. N. Latif, M., Wolff, J., Burgers, G., Maire-Reiner, E., Junge, M., Arpe, K. and Bengtsson, L. Lee, M.-I., Kang, I.-S., Kim, J.-K. and Mapes, B. E. 1998 Lindzen, R. S. Louis, J. F. 1974 1979 Madden, R. A. and Julian, P. R. 1971 Maloney, E. D. 2002 1994 2001 Maloney, E. D. and Hartmann, D. L. 2001 Manabe, S. J., Smagorinsky, J. S. and Strickler, R. F. Manobianco, J. 1965 Molinari, J., Knight, D., Dickinson, M., Vollaro, D. and Skubis, S. Moorthi, S. and Arakawa, A. 1997 Reed, R. J. and Recker, E. E. 1971 Reed, R. J., Norquist, D. C. and Recker, E. E. 1977 Rennick, M. A. 1977 Salby, M. L. and Hendon, H. H. 1994 Sheng, J. and Hayashi, Y. 1990a 1989 1985 1990b Sterl, A. 1991 Thompson R. M. Jr., Payne, S. W., Recker, E. E. and Reed, R. J. 1979 Tiedke, M. 1984 Waliser, D. E., Lau, K. M. and Kim, J. H. 1999 Wang, W. and Schlessinger, M. E. 1999 Yanai, M. and Nitta, T. 1968 Yasunari, T. 1980 A parameterization of the absorption of solar radiation in the earth’s atmosphere. J. Atmos. Sci., 31, 118–133 Seasonal prediction using a coupled ocean–atmospheric model with data assimilation, Tellus, 50A, 76–94 Climatology and variability in the ECHO coupled GCM. Tellus, 46A, 351–366 In uence of cloud–radiation interaction on simulating tropical intraseasonal oscillation with an atmospheric general circulation model. J. Geophys. Res., 106, 14219–14234 Wave-CISK in the tropics. J. Atmos. Sci., 31, 156–179 A parametric model of vertical eddy uxes in the atmosphere. Boundary-Layer Meteorol., 17, 187–202 Detection of a 40–50 day oscillation in the zonal wind in the tropical Paci c. J. Atmos. Sci., 28, 702–708 An intraseasonal oscillation composite life cycle in the NCAR CCM3.6 with modi ed convection. J. Climate, 15, 964–982 The Madden–Julian oscillation, barotropic dynamics, and North Paci c tropical cyclone formation. Part I: Observations. J. Atmos. Sci., 58, 2545–2558 Simulated climatology of a general circulation model with a hydrological cycle. Mon. Weather Rev., 93, 769–798 Explosive east coast cyclogenesis —numerical experimentation and model based diagnostics. Mon. Weather Rev., 117, 2384– 2405 Potential vorticity, easterly waves, and eastern Paci c tropical cyclogenesis. Mon. Weather Rev., 125, 2699–2700 Baroclinic instability with cumulus heating. J. Atmos. Sci., 42, 2007–2031 Structure and properties of synoptic wave disturbances in the equatorial western Paci c. J. Atmos. Sci., 28, 1117–1133 The structure and properties of African wave disturbances as observed during Phase III of GATE. Mon. Weather Rev., 105, 317–333 The parameterization of tropospheric lapse rates in terms of surface temperature. J. Atmos. Sci., 34, 854–862 Intraseasonal behavior of clouds, temperature and motion in the tropics. J. Atmos. Sci., 51, 2207–2224 Observed and simulated energy cycles in the frequency domain. J. Atmos. Sci., 47, 1243–1254 Estimation of atmospheric energetics in the frequency domain in the FGGE year. J. Atmos. Sci., 47, 1255–1268 ‘Manual for the Primitive Equation OGCM as used for ENSO studies and the interface of ECHAM’. Available from the Max Planck Institute for Meteorology, Hamburg, Germany Structure and properties of synoptic scale wave disturbances in the Intertropical Convergence Zone of the Eastern Atlantic. J. Atmos. Sci., 36, 53–72 ‘The sensitivity of the time-mean large-scale ow to cumulus convection in the ECMWF model’. Pp. 297–316 in Proceedings of the workshop on convection in large-scale numerical models, ECMWF 28 November to 1 December 1983. Available from the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts, Shin eld, Reading, UK The in uence of coupled sea surface temperatures on the Madden–Julian Oscillation: A model perturbation experiment. J. Atmos. Sci., 56, 333–358 The dependence on convection parameterization of the tropical intraseasonal oscillation simulated by the UIUC 11-layer atmospheric GCM. J. Climate, 12, 1424–1457 Finite difference approximation for the barotropic instability problem. J. Meteorol. Soc. Jpn, 46, 389–403 A quasi-stationary appearance of the 30–40 day period in the cloudiness uctuations during the summer monsoon over India. J. Meteorol. Soc. Jpn, 59, 336–354