basic assessment report - Coega Development Corporation

Transcription

Proposed Air Separation
Plant, Coega IDZ, Port
Elizabeth
Final Basic Assessment
Report
Report Prepared for
Report Number 465580/3
DEA Reference Number: ECm1/C/LN1/13/44-2013
Report Prepared by
October 2013
SRK Consulting: Project No: 465580: Air Separation Plant, Final Basic Assessment Report
Page i
Proposed Air Separation Plant, Coega IDZ
Final Basic Assessment Report
Report Prepared for
African Oxygen (Pty) Ltd
P.O. Box 1570
Bedfordview, 2008
South Africa
SRK Consulting (South Africa) (Pty) Ltd.
Ground Floor Bay Suites
1a Humewood Rd.
Humerail
Port Elizabeth, 6001
South Africa
e-mail: portelizabeth@srk.co.za
website: www.srk.co.za
Tel: +27 (0) 41 509 4800
Fax: +27 (0) 41 509 4850
SRK Project Number 465580
October 2013
Compiled by:
Peer Reviewed by:
Robert Els
Environmental Scientists
Rob Gardiner
Principal Environmental Scientist
Email: rels@srk.co.za
Author:
R. Els
GARR/ELSR
465580_FBAR_Cover pages_20131011
October 2013
Page ii
Contents
Summary Report
DEDEAT Basic Assessment Report Form
Appendices
Appendix A
Site Plans
Appendix B
Photographs
Appendix C
Facility Illustration
Appendix D
Specialist Reports
Appendix E
Comments and Responses Report (Public Participation Process)
Appendix F
Environmental Management Programme (EMPr)
Appendix G
Other Information
Definitions
Environment
The external circumstances, conditions and objects that affect the
existence and development of an individual, organism or group.
These circumstances include biophysical, social, economic, historical
and cultural aspects.
Basic Assessment
An assessment of the positive and negative effects of a proposed
development on the environment. The process involves collecting,
organising, analysing, interpreting and communicating information
that is relevant to the consideration of an application for
environmental authorisation. A simpler process than EIA, that is
subject to one phase (Basic Assessment) and generally does not
include specialist studies.
Environmental Impact
Assessment (EIA)
An assessment of the positive and negative effects of a proposed
development on the environment. The process involves the
collecting, organising, analysing, interpreting and communicating of
information that is relevant to the consideration of an application
for environmental authorisation. A full EIA is subject to a Scoping
phase and EIA phase and includes various specialist studies.
Interested and Affected
Party
Any person, group of persons or organisation interested in or
affected by an activity and any organ of state that may have
jurisdiction over any aspect of the activity.
Public Participation
Process
A process in which potential interested and affected parties are
given an opportunity to comment on, or raise issues relevant to,
specific matters relating to a proposed development.
Abbreviations
BAR
Basic Assessment Report
DEA
Department of Environmental Affairs (National)
DEDEAT
Department of Economic Development, Environmental Affairs and Tourism
GARR/ELSR
October 2013
Page iii
(Eastern Cape Province)
DWA
Department of Water Affairs
EAP
Environmental Assessment Practitioner
ECO
Environmental Control Officer
EIA
Environmental Impact Assessment
EMP
Environmental Management Plan
ER
Environmental Representative
IAP
Interested and Affected Party
NEMA
National Environmental Management Act
NMBM
Nelson Mandela Bay Municipality
PPP
Public Participation Process
RoD
Record of Decision
SRK
SRK Consulting
+ve
Positive
-ve
Negative
GARR/ELSR
October 2013
Ground Floor, Bay Suites
1a Humewood Rd,
Humerail
Port Elizabeth, 6001
P O Box 21842
Port Elizabeth 6000
South Africa
T: +27 (0) 41 509 4800
F: +27 (0) 41 509 4850
E E: portelizabeth@srk.co.za
www.srk.co.za
October 2013
465580
Executive Summary
Final Basic Assessment Report: Proposed Afrox Air Separation Plant,
Coega IDZ, Port Elizabeth
1
Summary Report
1.1
Introduction
(DEDEAT), with all relevant information about the proposed activity,
as well as an assessment of the potential impacts in order to inform
the decision as to whether the activity should be approved and, if so,
under what conditions.
African Oxygen (Pty) Ltd (Afrox), part of the Linde Group, proposes
to construct and operate a new Air Separation Plant (ASP) that This BAR comprises two sections, of which Section 2 is mandatory
includes an Air Separation Unit (ASU) and associated infrastructure in terms of the requirements for a Basic Assessment. The Summary
Report is intended to provide additional contextual information in
for the storage and handling of liquefied gases.
support of the application1.
At the ASP ambient air is to be used in the ASU, without any
intermediates or chemical conversions, to produce Oxygen, Nitrogen The report contains the following sections:
and Argon. The products will be stored in storage tanks as liquefied Section 1: Summary Report/ Executive Summary
gases; liquid cryogenic Oxygen (LOX), liquid cryogenic Nitrogen
(LIN) and liquid cryogenic Argon (LAR). LIN will be stored in three Section 1 provides an introduction to the project; describes the
300 m³ tanks and one 10 m³ tank, LOX will be stored in one 300 m³ approach to the Basic Assessment process and provides a
description of the activity and the proposed concept alternatives
tank and LAR will be stored in one 50 m³ tank.
considered. It also describes the public consultation process
Of the gases that are going to be handled and stored on site undertaken during the process, the key findings and
(Oxygen, Nitrogen and Argon) only Oxygen is classified as a recommendations and the way forward. In effect this section
dangerous good according to SANS No. 10234, supplement 2008, provides a summary of the key elements of the Basic Assessment.
Edition 1.00.
Section 2: Completed Final BAR Form
SRK consulting has been appointed to conduct an Environmental
Basic Assessment for the proposed development as per the Section 2 contains the completed Final BAR form, as prescribed by
Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) regulations promulgated in DEDEAT, submitted in support of the application for environmental
terms of the National Environment Management Act (Act No. 107 of authorisation of the activity under the NEMA EIA Regulations.
Section 2 also contains the Appendices as required by the DEDEAT
1998).
BAR.
1.2
Purpose and Structure of the Basic 1.3
Assessment Report
Approach to the Basic Assessment
The Basic Assessment (BA) process for this assessment will be
The National Environment Management Act (NEMA) EIA regulations conducted in accordance with Government Gazette No.R543 in
were promulgated to put into practice the environmental
management principles espoused in the Act. The Basic Assessment
Report (BAR) provides the competent authority, the Department of
Economic Development, Environmental Affairs and Tourism 1 Note that the full report is a collation of sections and not a sequential
compilation of report chapters.
Partners JCJ Boshoff, AH Bracken, MJ Braune, JM Brown, CD Dalgliesh, JR Dixon, DM Duthe, BM Engelsman,
R Gardiner, T Hart, GC Howell, WC Joughin, PR Labrum, DJ Mahlangu, RRW McNeill, HAC Meintjies,
MJ Morris, WA Naismith, GP Nel, VS Reddy, PN Rosewarne, PE Schmidt, PJ Shepherd, VM Simposya,
AA Smithen, KM Uderstadt, DJ Venter, ML Wertz, A Wood
Directors AJ Barrett, JR Dixon, DM Duthe, PR Labrum, DJ Mahlangu, VS Reddy, PE Schmidt, PJ Shepherd
Associate Partners DJD Gibson, M Hinsch, DA Kilian, SA McDonald, M Ristic, MJ Sim, JJ Slabbert,
CF Steyn, HFJ Theart, D Visser, DP Van den Berg, MD Wanless
Consultants AC Burger, BSC(Hons); IS Cameron-Clarke, PrSciNat, MSc; JAC Cowan, PrSciNat, BSc(Hons);
JH de Beer, PrSci Nat, MSc; GA Jones, PrEng, PhD; TR Stacey, PrEng, DSc; OKH Steffen, PrEng, PhD;
PJ Terbrugge, PrSciNat, MSc; DW Warwick, PrSciNat, BSc(Hons)
SRK Consulting (South Africa) (Pty) Ltd
Reg No 1995.012890.07
African Offices:
Cape Town
Durban
East London
Johannesburg
Kimberley
Pietermartizburg
Port Elizabeth
Pretoria
Rustenburg
Accra
Harare
Lumbumbashi
+ 27 (0) 21 659 3060
+ 27 (0) 31 279 1200
+ 27 (0) 43 748 6292
+ 27 (0) 11 441 1111
+ 27 (0) 53 861 5798
+ 27 (0) 33 345 6311
+ 27 (0) 41 509 4800
+ 27 (0) 12 361 9821
+ 27 (0) 14 594 1280
+ 23 (3) 24 485 0928
+ 263 (4) 49 6182
+ 243 (0) 81 999 9775
Group Offices:
Africa
Asia
Australia
Europe
North America
South America
SRK Consulting: Project No: 465580: Afrox Air Separation Plant – FBAR Executive Summary
2
terms of the National Environmental Management Act (Act 107 of
1998) Environmental Impact Assessment regulations.
1.4
The National Environmental Management Act (NEMA) EIA
regulations list activities that may have a significant impact on the
environment, and which consequently require authorisation from the
Department of Economic Development, Environmental Affairs and
Tourism (DEDEAT). The regulations further specify the assessment
process and the information that is required to enable DEDEAT to
make a decision regarding the activity. It is understood that a BA
process is required in terms of the NEMA EIA regulations as the
project may involve (as a minimum) the following activity:
The BAR provides information about the proposed activity, a
description of the affected environment (including ecological, land
use and socio-economic aspects), a description of the process
undertaken in order to consult the public on the activity, as well as a
basic assessment of the potential impacts of the activity on the
receiving environment.
Prescribed Requirements
Basic Assessment
for
the
Several appendices to the BAR are required as supporting
documentation. These include:
 Appendix A - Site plan(s);
Activity 13, listed under the NEMA EIA regulations (GNR 544), is the
 Appendix B - Photographs;
main activity associated with the proposed air separation plant,
 Appendix C - Facility illustration(s);
calling for a BA process to be followed.
 Appendix D - Specialist reports (if any);
GNR 544 (13) The construction of facilities or infrastructure for
 Appendix E - Comments and responses report and proof of
storage or for the storage and handling, of a dangerous good,
Public Participation;
where such storage occurs in containers with a combined
 Appendix F - Environmental Management Programme
capacity of 80 but not exceeding 500 cubic meters.
(EMPr); and
 Appendix G - Other information.
This information is contained in Section 2 of the Final BAR.
1.5
Site Location and Surroundings
The proposed Air Separation Plant is to be located in Zone 3 (light
industrial cluster) of the Coega IDZ between Hamile Road to the
south and Bumba Road to the north.
1.6
The Proposed Development
The project involves the construction and operation of a new ASP to
supply various customers in Port Elizabeth as well as the Eastern
Cape region with Oxygen, Nitrogen and Argon. The ASP includes
an ASU for the production of Oxygen, Nitrogen and Argon, storage
tanks for the on-site storage of the liquefied gases LOX, LIN and
LAR and associated infrastructure.
The new ASP has a total design production capacity of 150 tons per
day (tpd) which is made up of 100 tpd LIN, 50 tpd LOX and 3 tpd
Argon.
1.7
Figure S-1: Typical Basic Assessment Process
Process Description
The plant is to use the process of cryogenic air separation for the
production of the gaseous products. The Pure gases can be
separated from air by first cooling it until it liquefies, then selectively
distilling the components at their various boiling temperatures. The
operation process follows a number of steps, the first of which is the
air is drawn into the process and compressed and cooled. The
condensed water is removed before the process air passes through
the molecular sieve station which removes any remaining water
vapour, carbon dioxide and any hydrocarbons. After passing through
the Molecular Sieve the process air is further passed through a
series of compressors and coolers and then enters the coldbox. In
the coldbox the process air undergoes the process of rectification.
This process results in the production of Lox and Lin which are then
fed to the storage tanks. During this rectification process a vapour
side draw is taken from where the argon concentration is highest
and sent to the argon column system for further processing, from
here where pure argon is withdrawn and fed to the storage tank.
The process entails the assessment of the activity and the
compilation of a BAR (see Section 2) for public comment. Issues
and concerns raised by the public after the distribution of the Draft
BAR have informed the Final BAR which, together with the
prescribed Comment and Reponses Report, have been submitted to
DEADEAT for a decision. A typical Basic Assessment process is
LOX, LIN and LAR are each stored in large capacity tanks ready for
depicted in Figure S-1.
transport. Since LOX and LIN have a very low temperature (approx.
-200 C), special storage tanks are required. The storage tanks are
constructed with a double shell; whereby the inner vessel is made of
GARR/ELSR
465580_FBAR_Executive Summary_20131011
October 2013
stainless steel, and acts as the liquid storage vessel, and the outer
vessel is made of carbon steel. The storage tanks are vacuum
insulated and equipped with appropriate safety valves.
3
 Medium: the potential impact should influence the decision
regarding the proposed activity.
 High: the potential impact will affect a decision regarding the
proposed activity.
 Very High: the proposed activity should only be approved
under special circumstances.
To ensure the distribution of the liquid products (LOX, LIN or LAR),
three filling pumps are included in with the ASP. The filling pumps
are positioned near the storage tanks and each pump is fed from a
separate storage unit to ensure that there is no mixing of the 1.10
Evaluation
products. The liquefied products are transferred into trucks for
distribution; it is anticipated that approximately 6 trucks will be Key relevant observations with regard to the overall impact
required per day in order to meet the demand
significance ratings, assuming mitigation measures are effectively
implemented, are (refer to Table 1):
1.8
Public Consultation Process
A public participation process aimed at allowing the public to
participate and to be involved in the environmental process has
been carried out. The public participation process completed to date
includes the following:
 Newspaper advert (Die Burger);
 Screening of an E-Notice on the CDC’s electronic notice board
in the foyer of the Coega Business Centre;
 Distribution of an Executive Summary of the Draft BAR to IAPs
for comment; as well as the placement of copies of the Draft
BAR in public libraries for public review for a period of 40 days.
Comments received on the Draft BAR have been included in the
Final BAR.
1.9
Assessment of Potential
Environmental Impacts
A number of potential impacts of the proposed development were
identified by the project team and specialists. The project
alternatives, and most of the identified impacts, were considered by
the Environmental Assessment Practitioner.
Potential impacts were assessed using SRK’s impact assessment
methodology. The significance of an impact is defined and
assessed as a combination of the consequence of the impact
occurring (based on its extent, intensity and duration) and the
probability that the impact will occur.
For all potentially significant impacts, the significance of the
anticipated impact was rated with and without recommended
mitigation measures. These are presented in Table 1 (refer to
section D of the BAR form for a complete list of impacts assessed)
which summarises:
 The impacts that were assessed;
 Their significance following the implementation of mitigation
measures; and
 The key mitigation measures on which the significance rating
is based.
The impact significance rating should be considered by the
competent authority in their decision-making process based on the
definitions of ratings ascribed below.
 Insignificant: the potential impact is negligible and will not
have an influence on the decision regarding the proposed
activity.
 Very Low: the potential impact is very small and should not
have any meaningful influence on the decision regarding the
proposed activity.
 Low: the potential impact may not have any meaningful
influence on the decision regarding the proposed activity.
GARR/ELSR
 A very low noise impact was predicted during construction
activities as this would be temporary. With mitigation, these
impacts could be reduced to insignificant;
 Socio economic impacts were determined to be insignificant, in
the construction phase of the development, due to the
relatively small scale nature and short time period of the
construction activities. With the use of local labour and other
measures this can be increased to a very low (+ve)
significance;
 The potential impacts from the loss of indigenous flora and
fauna on the site during the construction phase are considered
to be very low (-ve) with mitigation;
 The potential heritage impacts (archaeological &
palaeontological) during the construction phase are considered
to be of a very low (-ve) significance; however with mitigation
the significance of these potential impacts could be optimised
to a very low (+ve) significance;
 The potential air quality impacts (dust) on the site during the
construction phase are considered to be very low (-ve), as
construction will be over a short period. With mitigation, the
significance of these potential impacts could be reduced to
insignificant;
 Waste management impacts were anticipated to be very
low (-ve) due to the limited construction activities. With correct
disposal of waste this impact can be reduced to insignificant;
 Traffic impacts during the construction phase are considered
to be insignificant;
 Safety impacts during the operational phase are predicted to
be very low due to the safety measures that are to be
incorporated;
 Noise during the operational phase is rated as a low (-ve)
significance as the plant is to be located in an industrial area
and is it is anticipated that the noise emissions will remain
within the permissible limits;
 The proposed operational phase of the plant is anticipated to
result in approximately 20 jobs, which was rated to be of a
low (+ve) socio economic significance;
 The significance of the contamination of surface and ground
water was rated as very low (-ve) which could be reduced to
insignificant with the implantation of mitigation measures;
 Traffic impacts during the construction phase are considered
to be very low (-ve) due to the measures that have been
incorporated into the plant layout, as well as it is anticipated
that a maximum of 7 trucks will access the plant in a 24 hour
period;
 The cumulative effect of surrounding developments on safety
is rated as very low (-ve) as a result of the safety measures
that are to be incorporated into the plant;
 The cumulative effect on noise impacts is rated as low as the
anticipated noise levels of the plant are shown to be below the
October 2013
4
70dB(A) threshold at the fence line and as such the cumulative 7. The no-go option is associated with negative impacts related to
levels should not exceed the threshold unless the levels form
the jobs created by the development. Therefore, it is sociothe neighbouring properties are in excess of 70 dB(A);
economically preferred that the ASP be constructed as
 If the No-go alternative is implemented (no air separation plant
proposed.
development), the anticipated jobs associated with the
8. No major impacts were identified that should prevent to
construction and operation of the plant, as well as the
proposed activities from continuing.
investment into the economy, will not materialise. The impact
was therefore rated to have a very low (-ve) and low (-ve) 1.12 Way Forward (IAPs)
significance for the construction and operation phases
The Final BAR has identified and assessed potential impacts
respectively.
associated with the proposed Air Separation Plant and proposed
1.11 Findings
measures to mitigate these impacts. The public participation
1. African Oxygen (Pty) Ltd (Afrox) proposes to develop an Air process has given IAPs the opportunity to assist with identification of
Separation Plant (ASP) in Zone 3 of the Coega IDZ, Port issues and potential impacts.
Elizabeth.
The comments received from IAPs and stakeholders have been
2. The plant will produce Liquefied cryogenic Nitrogen (LIN), incorporated into the report which has been submitted to DEDEAT in
Liquefied cryogenic Oxygen (LOX) and Liquefied cryogenic order for them to make a decision on the environmental acceptability
Argon (LAR).
of the proposed development and issue a Record of Decision (RoD).
3. The ASP is designed to have a production capacity of 150 tons The Executive Summary of this Final BAR has been distributed to
per day (tpd) and will store the product on site in tanks for registered IAPs.
distribution; the table below shows a breakdown of the daily
Printed copies of this report are available for public review at the
production as well as storage capacity of the products;
following locations:
Production
Storage Capacity
Product
 Port Elizabeth Main Library; and
Capacity (tpd)
(m³)
 Motherwell Library.
LIN
100
910
Comments regarding the Final BAR can be forwarded to:
LOX
50
300*
LAR
3
50
Andries Struwig at DEDEAT
There is an additional amount of hold-up Oxygen inside the cold box and other
parts of the new ASU equating to approximately 10.5 m³ (or 12 t). This means
that the maximum amount of Oxygen at the entire plant site is approximately
310.5 m³.
Private Bag X5001, Greenacres, Port Elizabeth, 6057
Email: Andries.Struwig@deaet.ecprov.gov.za
Fax: (041) 508 5865
Reference Number: Ref No: ECm1/C/LN1/13/44-2013
4. Positive impacts as a result of the proposed activity include
socio-economic benefits associated with temporary and
permanent employment opportunities as well as potential
A copy of the comments must be forwarded to:
knowledge gained from the discovery of heritage resources.
5. The potential negative impacts, including those relating to safety
Wanda Marais at SRK Consulting
risks, noise impacts, loss of flora and fauna, dust emissions,
PO Box 21842, Port Elizabeth, 6000
waste management and the contamination of surface and
Email: wmarais@srk.co.za
ground impacts, can be prevented and managed by
Fax: (041) 509 4850
implementing the specified mitigation measures.
6. The significance of all the potential negative impacts were rated
to be low, very low or insignificant with the implementation of the SRK believes that the Final BAR provides an accurate reflection of
appropriate mitigation measures, as described in the the public participation process and the issues identified.
Environmental Management Programme (EMPr).
GARR/ELSR
October 2013
5
Table S-1: Summary of impact significance for the proposed Afrox Air Separation Plant
Construction
Impact
Operation
Without Mitigation
With Mitigation
Without
Mitigation
With Mitigation
-
-
VERY LOW
(-ve)
-
Noise Emissions
VERY LOW
(-ve)
INSIGNIFICANT
LOW
(-ve)
-
Socio-Economic
INSIGNIFICANT
LOW
(+ve)
-
-
-
Safety
LOW
(-ve)
VERY LOW
(+ve)
VERY LOW
(-ve)
Loss of Indigenous Fauna
VERY LOW
(-ve)
VERY LOW
(-ve)
-
-
Heritage Impacts
VERY LOW
(-ve)
VERY LOW
(+ve)
-
-
Dust Emissions
VERY LOW
(-ve)
INSIGNIFICANT
-
-
Waste Management
VERY LOW
(-ve)
INSIGNIFICANT
-
-
INSIGNIFICANT
-
VERY LOW
(-ve)
-
-
-
VERY LOW
(-ve)
INSIGNIFICANT
Removal of Indigenous Vegetation
Traffic Impacts
Contamination of Surface and Ground
Water
Cumulative Impacts
Construction
Impact
Operation
Without Mitigation
With Mitigation
Without
Mitigation
With Mitigation
Safety Impacts from surrounding
developments
-
-
VERY LOW
(-ve)
-
Noise Emissions
-
-
LOW
(-ve)
-
No-go alternative
Construction
Impact
Socio-Economic
GARR/ELSR
Operation
Without Mitigation
With Mitigation
Without
Mitigation
With Mitigation
VERY LOW
(-ve)
-
LOW
(-ve)
-
October 2013
SRK Consulting: Project No: 465580: Afrox Air Separation Plant – BAR Executive Summary
6
Figure S-2: Locality Plan for the proposed project
GARR/ELSR
October 2013
PROVINCE OF THE EASTERN CAPE
DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
AND
ENVIRONMENTAL AFFAIRS
BASIC ASSESSMENT REPORT
(For official use only)
File Reference Number:
Application Number:
Date Received:
Basic assessment report in terms of the Environmental Impact Assessment Regulations, 2010,
promulgated in terms of the National Environmental Management Act, 1998(Act No. 107 of 1998), as
amended.
Kindly note that:
1.
This basic assessment report is a standard report that may be required by a competent authority in terms of the EIA
Regulations, 2010 and is meant to streamline applications. Please make sure that it is the report used by the particular
competent authority for the activity that is being applied for.
2.
The report must be typed within the spaces provided in the form. The size of the spaces provided is not necessarily
indicative of the amount of information to be provided. The report is in the form of a table that can extend itself as each
space is filled with typing.
3.
Where applicable tick the boxes that are applicable or black out the boxes that are not applicable in the report.
4.
An incomplete report may be returned to the applicant for revision.
5.
The use of “not applicable” in the report must be done with circumspection because if it is used in respect of material
information that is required by the competent authority for assessing the application, it may result in the rejection of the
application as provided for in the regulations.
6.
This report must be handed in at offices of the relevant competent authority as determined by each authority.
7.
No faxed or e-mailed reports will be accepted.
8.
The report must be compiled by an independent environmental assessment practitioner.
9.
Unless protected by law, all information in the report will become public information on receipt by the competent
authority. Any interested and affected party should be provided with the information contained in this report on request,
during any stage of the application process.
10. A competent authority may require that for specified types of activities in defined situations only parts of this report
need to be completed.
SECTION A: ACTIVITY INFORMATION
Has a specialist been consulted to assist with the completion of this YES
section?
If YES, please complete form XX for each specialist thus appointed:
Any specialist reports must be contained in Appendix D.
1.
NO
ACTIVITY DESCRIPTION
Describe the activity, which is being applied for, in detail
Introduction and Background:
African Oxygen (Pty) Ltd (Afrox), part of the Linde Group, proposes to construct and operate a
new Air Separation Plant (ASP) that includes an Air Separation Unit (ASU) and associated
infrastructure for the storage and handling of liquefied gases. It is proposed that the ASP be
located in Zone 3 (Light Industrial Cluster) of the Coega Industrial Development Zone (IDZ), a
locality map has been attached in Appendix A of this final Basic Assessment Report (BAR).
At the ASP ambient air is to be used in the ASU, without any intermediates or chemical
conversions, to produce Oxygen, Nitrogen and Argon. The products will be stored in storage
tanks as liquefied gases; liquid cryogenic Oxygen (LOX), liquid cryogenic Nitrogen (LIN) and
liquid cryogenic Argon (LAR).
Of the gases that are going to be handled and stored on site (Oxygen, Nitrogen and Argon)
only Oxygen is classified as a dangerous good according to SANS No. 10234, supplement
2008, Edition 1.00. Nitrogen and Argon are not listed in SANS No. 10234, supplement 2008,
Edition 1.00. Based on the design capacity of the ASU and the capacity of the storage tanks,
the total storage capacity of dangerous goods (Oxygen) in the new ASP, as shown in table 3
below, is within the thresholds listed in Activity No. 13 of Listing Notice 1 (GNR 544,
18 June 2010).
Table 1: The listed activity as per the NEMA EIA regulations 2010
Government Notice
No. GNR 544
Activity No.
Description
13
The construction of facilities or infrastructure for
storage or for the storage and handling, of a
dangerous good, where such storage occurs in
containers with a combined capacity of 80 but
not exceeding 500 cubic meters
Project overview:
The project involves the construction and operation of a new ASP to supply various customers
in Port Elizabeth as well as the Eastern Cape region with Oxygen, Nitrogen and Argon. The
ASP includes an ASU for the production of Oxygen, Nitrogen and Argon, storage tanks for the
on-site storage of the liquefied gases LOX, LIN and LAR and associated infrastructure.
The new ASP has a total design production capacity of 150 tons per day (tpd). Table 2 below
shows a breakdown of the daily production capacity of each of the products to be produced at
the plant.
Table 2: Breakdown of the products and production capacity per day
Product
Abbreviation
Production capacity (tpd)
Liquefied cryogenic Nitrogen
LIN
100
Liquefied cryogenic Oxygen
LOX
50
Liquefied cryogenic Argon
LAR
3
The liquefied gases (Oxygen, Nitrogen and Argon) are to be stored at low temperatures and at
a slightly higher pressure than the ambient pressure. The storage capacity of the different
tanks are as follows:
Table 3: Breakdown of the storage capacity on site for each of the products
Total
Storage
Product
Abbreviation
Storage
Tons
Tanks
capacity (m³)
3 x 300 m³
Liquefied cryogenic Nitrogen
LIN
910
736
1 x 10 m³
Liquefied cryogenic Oxygen
LOX
1 x 300 m³
300*
342
Liquefied cryogenic Argon
LAR
1 x 50 m³
50
70
* There is an additional amount of hold-up Oxygen inside the cold box and other parts of the new ASU
equating to approximately 10.5 m³ (or 12 t). This means that the maximum amount of Oxygen at the
entire plant site is approximately 310.5 m³.
Plant infrastructure:
A detailed layout of the plant and associated infrastructure is attached in Appendix C of this
BAR.
The plant infrastructure consists of the following:
1. Guard house, gated entrance and security fence around the property;
2. Multiple purpose building (offices etc)
3. Car park and road infrastructure
4. Filling station (Diesel)
5. Storage Container including ‘SALSA’ and associated infrastructure
6. Weighbridge and associated infrastructure
7. Air Separation Unit (ASU)
7.1. Electrical Power and Control Systems
7.2. Machine House
7.3. Molecular Sieve Absorbers
7.4. Cooling Water System
7.5. Coldbox
8. Storage Tanks
9. Filling systems
10. Wash bay
11. Truck service area including a tyre and spares storage area
Process Description
Pure gases can be separated from air by first cooling it until it liquefies, then selectively
distilling the components at their various boiling temperatures. The air is used as an industrial
source of nitrogen, oxygen, argon for technical and medical uses.
The separation process requires a very tight integration of heat exchangers and separation
columns in order to be efficient. A prerequisite of an ASU is a refrigeration cycle which is
required to achieve the low distillation temperatures required. The cooling will be achieved
through compression and expansion as well as through heat exchange against liquid products.
A simplified flow diagram of the process (Appendix C2) shows the main components as well as
the supply- and product streams of the ASU and storage systems. The reference numbers
provided in brackets in the section below refer to the more technical process flow diagram
which is attached as Appendix C3.
The operation process is as follows:
1. Air compression and precooling system
Ambient air is drawn into the process at the ‘air intake’ point, the incoming air is first
cleaned from dust and other particles in an air filter (S1146) and then compressed to a
pressure of approximately 6 bar by a multistage turbo-type air compressor (C1161). This
compressed air enters the ‘cooling water after cooler’ (E1121) and subsequently the
‘chilled water after cooler’ (E2418) where it is finally cooled down to around 15°C. It then
passes through a water separator (D2431) which removes the condensed water before
entering the molecular sieve station.
2. Molecular sieve station (air purification)
The process air passes through the molecular sieve station; which removes any remaining
water vapour, carbon dioxide (CO2) and any hydrocarbons.
The adsorbents have a limited adsorption capacity and need to be regenerated after a
certain time. While the air passes through one adsorber vessel, the other adsorber vessel
goes through a regenerating cycle. This regeneration process involves a heating cycle
whereby a hot dry stream of nitrogen gas is heated by an electric heater (E2618), and
passed through the molecular sieve in the opposite direction to the normal process air flow.
This is followed by a cooling cycle during which the adsorber is cooled with dry nitrogen
gas which bypasses the electric heater.
The adsorbers are continuously alternating between the adsorption cycle and the
regeneration cycle, in this way one adsorber is always available for the air purification
process.
3. Process streams distribution and refrigeration, air recycle
After passing through the Molecular Sieve the process air is further passed through a
series of compressors and coolers. The compressed chilled air enters the coldbox (see
box 1 below) where it is further cooled to around condensing temperature.
Box 1: Description of the coldbox
The coldbox houses the equipment for the cryogenic air separation process. It is
positioned between the Machine House and Storage Tanks in a vertical position; its
anticipated dimensions are 34.59 x 4.2 x 4 m. The coldbox is completely assembled off
site.
4. Rectification (Oxygen & Nitrogen) pressure column
In the pressure column (T3211) the air is separated into pure nitrogen, yielding at the top of
the column and into oxygen enriched liquid at the bottom of the column; through a process
of repeated distillation known as rectification.
Liquid oxygen product (LOX) is withdrawn from the sump of the low pressure column, subcooled and fed to the LOX storage tank; with the liquid nitrogen product (LIN) being
withdrawn from the top of the low pressure column to the LIN storage system.
5. Argon Extraction
When argon is produced, a vapour side draw is taken from the low pressure column where
the argon concentration is highest and is sent to the crude argon column system which is
separated into two column sections (T4110/ T4111) in order to keep the cold box height in
reasonable limitations. The pure liquid argon product (LAR) is withdrawn from the bottom of
the pure argon column and fed to the LAR storage tank.
6. Product storage
Liquid oxygen (LOX), liquid nitrogen (LIN) and liquid argon (LAR) are each stored in
large-capacity tanks at a slight overpressure ready for liquid transport. Since LOX and LIN
have a very low temperature (approx. -200 C), special storage tanks are required. The
storage tanks are constructed with a double shell; whereby the inner vessel is made of
stainless steel, and acts as the liquid storage vessel, and the outer vessel is made of
carbon steel. The storage tanks are vacuum insulated and equipped with appropriate
safety valves.
The three 300 m³ and one 10 m³ LIN tanks, as well as the one 50 m³ LAR tank, are
positioned vertically while the one 300 m³ LOX tank is positioned horizontally (see
diagrams included in Appendix C). This allows for the different products to be gravity fed to
the storage tanks from the pressure columns situated in the coldbox, thereby eliminating
the need for pumps.
7. Filling System
To ensure the distribution of the liquid products (LOX, LIN or LAR), three filling pumps are
included in with the ASP. The filling pumps are positioned near the storage tanks and each
pump is fed from a separate storage unit to ensure that there is no mixing of the products.
The liquefied products are transferred into trucks for distribution; it is anticipated that
approximately 6 trucks will be required per day in order to meet the demand.
In order to ensure that the trucks do not exceed the total weight allowed to drive on public
roads, every truck will be weighed upon arrival and departure via a central truck weigh
bridge. The filling process is then controlled via a flow meter in order monitor, measure
and record the loading of the trucks. Each distribution order will be controlled by a Linde
process-system called “SALSA”. The SALSA system ensures, among other things,
checking of the suitability and permission of vehicles for the desired product, determination
of the allowed cargo load, material identification and protection against overfilling.
Associated Infrastructure
Truck Service Point
The truck service point consists of a wash bay, a truck service area and a small tyre and
spares store of approximately 10 m² in size. In this way trucks can be washed and receive
attention for small maintenance issues (e.g. replace tyres).
Fuel Filling Station (Diesel)
The fuel station allows trucks to be filled up with Diesel if necessary. The filling station includes
a 25 000 litre double walled underground storage tank, equipped with a leak detection system,
and a filling pump.
Operating Hours and Staff
The ASU is designed for continuous on-site operation from a local control room or via remote
operation control from a remote central control room. AFROX are responsible for the proper
operation of the ASP and for performing regular inspection, maintenance, servicing and repair
work on site.
The plant is designed for continuous operation, 24 hours a day 365 days a year. In order to
operate effectively the ASP will require 8 persons for transport-works and an additional
12 persons for plant operation. The plant operators are to work in three shifts resulting in
4 operators per shift. The plant is to be staffed around the clock by at least one trained and
skilled employee.
Utilities
Electrical Power
The new ASP will be connected to a 11 kV, 50 Hz substation (see appendix C14) by Nelson
Mandela Bay Municipality (NMBM). The substation is to be located on the western boundary of
the site as indicated in the layout plan (Appendix C1). The 11kV cable system between the
NMBM substation and the ASU plant will be directly buried. The ASU plant requires 4250 kW
for operation.
Water
The new ASU plant is anticipated to utilise 14 m³/h of potable water for make-up water.
Substances used on site
The following table lists the substances that will be on site as they are required for the correct
operation of the equipment during the production process. These substances are as follows:
Table 4: Substances on site
Substance
Quantity
Remarks
Machine Oil ISO
VG32/46
Machine Oil VG32/46
Approx. 800 litres
For Air Compressor
Approx. 1 300 litres
Turbine Oil ISO VG46
R134a
Alugel LA20
Molsieve LMS920
Nalco 3DT104
Nalco 3DT129
Nalco 77352
Nalco Trac107
Diesel
450 litres
200 kg
1 200 kg
3 900 kg
Continuously dosing
Continuously dosing
Continuously dosing
Continuously dosing
25 000 litres
For Recycle Air
Compressor
For Turbine (X3471)
Refrigeration Unit
Adsorber filling
Adsorber filling
For water treatment
For water treatment
For water treatment
For water treatment
Filling station storage tank
Exchange
Frequency
3 to 5 years
3 to 5 years
3 to 5 years
No Exchange
10 years
10 years
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Site Access and Plant Safety
The ASU is to be situated in Zone 3 of the Coega IDZ between Hamile Road to the south and
Bumba Road to the north. Access to Zone 3 can be gained from two points, namely; from the
Coega IDZ via Neptune Road and from the R102. The whole plant site will be fenced and
access to the plant will only be permissible via authorisation and will be from the south side of
the plant, via a controlled entrance off Hamile Road.
The plant is provided with safety-related monitoring and protection equipment as well as being
fitted with automatic shut-offs and emergency stop switches. In addition, a risk analysis
(“HAZOP-Study”) will be performed for the entire system, in which the proposed measures
against hazards are evaluated. As a result dangerous conditions such as excessive pressures,
extreme temperatures and the accumulation of critical materials or leakages will be prevented.
Timeline
It is envisaged that the plant is to be operational by March 2015.
2.
FEASIBLE AND REASONABLE ALTERNATIVES
“alternatives”, in relation to a proposed activity, means different means of meeting the general
purpose and requirements of the activity, which may include alternatives to—
(a)
the property on which or location where it is proposed to undertake the activity;
(b)
the type of activity to be undertaken;
(c)
the design or layout of the activity;
(d)
the technology to be used in the activity;
(e)
the operational aspects of the activity; and
(f)
the option of not implementing the activity.
Describe alternatives that are considered in this application. Alternatives should include a consideration
of all possible means by which the purpose and need of the proposed activity could be accomplished in
the specific instance taking account of the interest of the applicant in the activity. The no-go alternative
must in all cases be included in the assessment phase as the baseline against which the impacts of the
other alternatives are assessed. The determination of whether site or activity (including different
processes etc.) or both is appropriate needs to be informed by the specific circumstances of the activity
and its environment. After receipt of this report the competent authority may also request the applicant
to assess additional alternatives that could possibly accomplish the purpose and need of the proposed
activity if it is clear that realistic alternatives have not been considered to a reasonable extent.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
1. Location
Port Elizabeth was chosen as the location to establish the new Air Separation Plant due to its
proximity to Afrox’s main clients in the region. The Coega IDZ was specifically chosen due to the
benefits of being associated with an IDZ, the infrastructure and the future development growth of
the area. The specific site within Zone 3 of the IDZ was identified by the CDC.
As such no alternative site is proposed.
2. Type of activity
Afrox specialises in the gas industry and currently supplies gas products (specifically Oxygen,
Nitrogen and Argon) to the Eastern Cape region. As the demand for these products grow Afrox
have had to assess the most effective way to continue supplying the area in the future. Afrox have
an existing filling station in Port Elizabeth which relies on the importing of the gas products from
other regions of the country which is expensive and not viable in the long term, due to this reason
expanding the filling station was deemed non-viable. A smaller type of ASU, which involves a
pressure separation process, was considered but this was removed as an option due to the low
purity that of the resulting products. Therefore the only viable option is to install a cryogenic ASU
plant capable of meeting the current as well as future anticipated demands.
As such no alternative activity is proposed.
3. Design and layout
The design and layout of the plant has been altered to incorporate the CDC Architectural
Guidelines, this included the relocation of the car park to the front of the building to meet the
requirement of not building within the identified reserve; the accommodation of trucks on the Afrox
property (i.e. off the road) to avoid traffic congestion and the design of the building to fit in with
required guidelines. The buildings have also incorporated environmentally sustainable design
measures to improve the efficiency of the heating and cooling systems of the buildings by insulating
them as well as glazing the windows.
As such no alternative design/layout is proposed
4. Technology alternatives
The Linde Group, of which Afrox is a member, is a world leading supplier of industrial, process and
specialty gases. They have been in industry for 130 years during which time they have made major
technological advances which have resulted in the increased efficiency of the process. This best
available technology is to be utilized in the proposed Air Separation Plant.
As such no alternative technology is proposed
5. Operational aspects
As part of the operations of the plant a fully closed cooling system was considered, however; this
option was eliminated as a result of the increased power and reduced efficiency that it would cause.
As such no alternative operational aspects are proposed
6. No go alternative
The No Go alternative would result in Afrox having to continue importing products from other
regions of the country. This method is expensive and results in a large amount of trucks having to
travel long distances on the roads transporting the products. This approach is considered to not be
economically viable to continue to meet the current and future demand requirements of the
industry.
Paragraphs 3 – 13 below should be completed for each alternative.
3.
ACTIVITY POSITION
Indicate the position of the activity using the latitude and longitude of the centre point of the site for
each alternative site. The co-ordinates should be in degrees and decimal minutes. The minutes should
have at least three decimals to ensure adequate accuracy. The projection that must be used in all
cases is the WGS84 spheroid in a national or local projection.
List alternative sites if applicable.
Latitude (S):
Alternative:
Alternative S11 (preferred or only site
33o
47.701’
alternative)
Alternative S2 (if any)
In the case of linear activities:
Alternative:
Latitude (S):
Alternative S1 (preferred or only route
alternative)
 Starting point of the activity
 Middle point of the activity
 End point of the activity
Longitude (E):
25o
37.647‘
Longitude (E):
For route alternatives that are longer than 500m, please provide an addendum with co-ordinates taken
every 250 meters along the route for each alternative alignment.
4.
PHYSICAL SIZE OF THE ACTIVITY
Indicate the physical size of the preferred activity/technology as well as alternative
activities/technologies (footprints):
Alternative:
Size of the activity:
2
Alternative A1 (preferred activity alternative)
13 540 m2
Alternative A2 (if any)
or, for linear activities:
Alternative:
Length
of
the
activity:
1
2
“Alternative S..” refer to site alternatives.
“Alternative A..” refer to activity, process, technology or other alternatives .
Indicate the size of the alternative sites or servitudes (within which the above footprints will occur):
Alternative:
Size
of
the
site/servitude:
5.
SITE ACCESS
Does ready access to the site exist?
YES
If NO, what is the distance over which a new access road will be built
Describe the type of access road planned:
Access to the plant is via the existing road infrastructure in the Coega Development
Corporation IDZ. Access to the plant will be by authorisation only via the factory gate on the
south side of the Afrox site, off Hamile Road (Road 19).
It is anticipated that all internal roads will consist of 10 to 15 cm interlocking paving stones laid
on a suitably prepared base.
Include the position of the access road on the site plan and required map, as well as an indication of
the road in relation to the site.
6.
SITE OR ROUTE PLAN
A detailed site or route plan(s) must be prepared for each alternative site or alternative activity. It must
be attached as Appendix A to this document.
The site or route plans must indicate the following:
6.1 the scale of the plan which must be at least a scale of 1:500;
6.2 the property boundaries and numbers of all the properties within 50 metres of the site;
6.3 the current land use as well as the land use zoning of each of the properties adjoining the site or
sites;
6.4 the exact position of each element of the application as well as any other structures on the site;
6.5 the position of services, including electricity supply cables (indicate above or underground), water
supply pipelines, boreholes, street lights, sewage pipelines, storm water infrastructure and
telecommunication infrastructure;
6.6 all trees and shrubs taller than 1.8 metres;
6.7 walls and fencing including details of the height and construction material;
6.8 servitudes indicating the purpose of the servitude;
6.9 sensitive environmental elements within 100 metres of the site or sites including (but not limited
thereto):
 rivers;
 the 1:100 year flood line (where available or where it is required by DWA);
 ridges;
 cultural and historical features;
 areas with indigenous vegetation (even if it is degraded or invested with alien species);
6.9 for gentle slopes the 1 metre contour intervals must be indicated on the plan and whenever the
slope of the site exceeds 1:10, the 500mm contours must be indicated on the plan; and
6.10 the positions from where photographs of the site were taken.
The proposed site plan is attached in Appendix A to this Final Basic Assessment Report (BAR)
7.
SITE PHOTOGRAPHS
Colour photographs from the centre of the site must be taken in at least the eight major compass
directions with a description of each photograph. Photographs must be attached under Appendix B to
this form. It must be supplemented with additional photographs of relevant features on the site, if
applicable.
Photographs can be found attached as Appendix B to this Final BAR.
8.
FACILITY ILLUSTRATION
A detailed illustration of the activity must be provided at a scale of 1:200 as Appendix C for activities
that include structures. The illustrations must be to scale and must represent a realistic image of the
planned activity. The illustration must give a representative view of the activity.
The proposed development illustrations are included in Appendix C of this Final BAR.
9.
ACTIVITY MOTIVATION
9(a)
Socio-economic value of the activity
What is the expected capital value of the activity on completion?
What is the expected yearly income that will be generated by or as a result of the
activity?
Will the activity contribute to service infrastructure?
Is the activity a public amenity?
How many new employment opportunities will be created in the development phase
of the activity?
What is the expected value of the employment opportunities during the development
phase?
What percentage of this will accrue to previously disadvantaged individuals?
How many permanent new employment opportunities will be created during the
operational phase of the activity?
What is the expected current value of the employment opportunities during the first
10 years?
What percentage of this will accrue to previously disadvantaged individuals?
9(b)
R 305 mil.
R 80 mil.
NO
NO
Up to 300
R 15 mil.
Not available
Up to 20
Not available
Not available
Need and desirability of the activity
Motivate and explain the need and desirability of the activity (including demand for the activity):
Currently Afrox purchases LIN & LOX from PetroSA in Mosselbay to supply the Eastern Cape market
(approximately 400 km away from the market). This source is no longer sufficient to meet the demand
and the shortfall is imported from Afrox’s Cape Town facility, more than 800 km away. Argon is
imported from Afrox facilities in the inland power zone (either Witbank or Pretoria) more than 1 100 km
away from the market.
Afrox proposes to invest in a 150 tpd (100 tpd LIN, 50 tpd LOX, 3 tpd LAR) stand-alone merchant plant
in Port Elizabeth. Establishment of the ASU in Port Elizabeth will provide Afrox with a cost effective
and reliable solution, compared to the traditional expensive and unreliable model of transporting the
products across large distances. Building a plant of this size will allow Afrox the opportunity to protect
its current market position, but to also capitalize on future growth opportunities that are anticipated for
this region.
It is proposed that the ASU be located within the Coega IDZ. More than 90% of the LIN and 60% of
the LOX demand is centred in Port Elizabeth.
Indicate any benefits that the activity will have for society in general:
The establishment of an ASU in the region will have the following associated benefits:
 Afrox’s merchant market in the Eastern Cape comprises of 25 LOX customers (19 of which are
hospitals), the ASU will improve reliability of LOX supply for these hospitals by reducing the
dependency on supply from sources outside of the province;
 The reduction of transportation distances resulting from bringing in LIN, LOX & LAR from outside of
the province;
 Competitive pricing structure for industries reliant on LIN, LOX & LAR in the region; and
 Jobs will be created during the construction phase of the ASU.
Indicate any benefits that the activity will have for the local communities where the activity will be
located:
The local communities will benefit from the employment opportunities that will be created during the
construction phase of the air separation plant.
10. APPLICABLE LEGISLATION, POLICIES AND/OR GUIDELINES
List all legislation, policies and/or guidelines of any sphere of government that are applicable to the
application as contemplated in the EIA regulations, if applicable:
Title of legislation, policy or guideline:
National Environmental Management Act (NEMA)
Act 107 of 1998, including the NEMA Amendment
Act 2008 (No. 62 of 2008)
NEMA EIA Regulations, 2010 (Government Notice
Nos. 543, 544, 545 and 546)
Constitution of the Republic of South Africa Act
No. 108 of 1996
Eastern Cape Biodiversity Conservation Plan
National Environmental Management: Biodiversity
Act (No. 10 of 2004)
Occupational Health & Safety Act, 1993 (Act No. 85
of 1993) (OHSA) as amended in July 2001
The National Heritage Resources Act, 1999 (Act No
25 of 1999) as amended
The National Water Act, 1998 (Act No. 36 of 1998)
Municipal By-laws
Environmental Conservation Act (No. 73 of 1989)
Administering authority:
DEA & DEDEAT
South African Government
Date:
27
November
1998
18 June
2010
1996
DEA
DEA & DEDEAT
2007
2004
Department of Labour
30 July
2001
1999
DEA & DEDEAT
SAHRA
Department of Water Affairs
(DWA)
NMBM
DEA & DEDEAT
1998
2010
1989
National Building Regulations and Building National Government
Standards Act (No 103 of 1977)
Model Noise Regulations published under the
National Government
Environment Conservation Act, 1989 (Act 73 of
1989)
11.
1977
1989
WASTE, EFFLUENT, EMISSION AND NOISE MANAGEMENT
11(a) Solid waste management
Will the activity produce solid construction waste during the
YES
construction/initiation phase?
If yes, what estimated quantity will be produced per month?
Minimal
How will the construction solid waste be disposed of (describe)?
Small quantities of solid waste produced during the construction phase of the proposed
development and will primarily consist of building rubble and litter (e.g. plastic, glass, etc.). The
contractor will remove and discard any waste resulting from construction to the closest
registered waste disposal site. Where possible, construction waste will be re-used and/or
recycled.
Any hazardous waste will be collected and stored separately according to the specific
requirements of the waste type and will be collected by an approved waste disposal service
provider and will be disposed of at an approved hazardous waste disposal landfill site.
Where will the construction solid waste be disposed of (describe)?
As above
Will the activity produce solid waste during its operational phase?
YES
Minimal
How will the solid waste be disposed of (describe)?
Very small quantities of waste will be generated during the operational phase and are readily
accommodated within the existing waste management infrastructure within the Nelson Mandela
Bay Municipal area.
An integrated waste management approach that is based on waste minimisation will be used
and should incorporate reduction, recycling, re-use and disposal where appropriate. All general
waste material (e.g. non-hazardous waste) will be contained in general waste bins and
disposed of via the municipal waste system.
Hazardous substances (e.g. oil rags, oil cans, spent molecular sieve, etc.) will be disposed of at
an appropriate classified waste site (unless it is to be recycled by approved methods), as per
the National Environmental Management Waste Act, 2008 (Act 59 of 2008).
Where will the solid waste be disposed if it does not feed into a municipal waste stream
(describe)?
As above
If the solid waste (construction or operational phases) will not be disposed of in a registered
landfill site or be taken up in a municipal waste stream, then the applicant should consult with
the competent authority to determine whether it is necessary to change to an application for
scoping and EIA.
Can any part of the solid waste be classified as hazardous in terms of the
NO
relevant legislation?
If yes, inform the competent authority and request a change to an application for scoping and
EIA.
Is the activity that is being applied for a solid waste handling or treatment
NO
facility?
If yes, then the applicant should consult with the competent authority to determine whether it is
necessary to change to an application for scoping and EIA.
11(b)
Liquid effluent
Will the activity produce effluent, other than normal sewage, that will be
NO
disposed of in a municipal sewage system?
Will the activity produce any effluent that will be treated and/or disposed of on Yes
NO
site?
If yes, the applicant should consult with the competent authority to determine whether it is
necessary to change to an application for scoping and EIA.
Will the activity produce effluent that will be treated and/or disposed of at
NO
another facility?
If yes, provide the particulars of the facility:
Facility name: N/A
Contact
person:
Postal
address:
Postal code:
Telephone:
Cell:
E-mail:
Fax:
Describe the measures that will be taken to ensure the optimal reuse or recycling of waste
water, if any:
The ASU will generate condensate, on a continuous basis, from the following sources:
 Condensate from compressor: 7.2 m³/h (172.8 m³/day)
 Side-stream blow down: 23.76 m³/h for 20 minutes every two hours (95.04 m³/day)
 Cooling water blow down: 7 m³/h (168 m³/day)
This water will be discharged to the municipal sewer and is expected to meet the municipal
effluent discharge standards (being essentially condensation from the atmosphere containing
no additives from the process). No treatment or re-use of this water will take place.
A control pit will be installed to ensure that only rainwater is sent to the collection system. The
course of the pipelines for surface water and for sewerage is shown in Appendix C15.
11(c)
Emissions into the atmosphere
Will the activity release emissions into the atmosphere?
If yes, is it controlled by any legislation of any sphere of government?
If yes, the applicant should consult with the competent authority to determine
whether it is necessary to change to an application for scoping and EIA.
If no, describe the emissions in terms of type and concentration:
NO
NO
It is probable that dust will be generated during the construction phase, particularly during high
wind conditions. Mitigation measures are provided in the EMPr and will become legal and
binding once authorisation is received from the authorities.
During operation of the plant the ambient air is sucked in and separated as product streams in
the elements Oxygen, Nitrogen and Argon. The remaining air is discharged back to the
atmosphere. Only small amounts of evaporation losses from the storage tanks for liquefied
gases (Oxygen, Nitrogen and Argon) and some further amounts of impure Oxygen, Nitrogen
and Argon at the ASU are emitted. All emitted gases are components of the ambient air
originally drawn in, and contain no additional components.
11(d)
Generation of noise
Will the activity generate noise?
YES
If yes, is it controlled by any legislation of any sphere of government?
NO
If yes, the applicant should consult with the competent authority to determine
whether it is necessary to change to an application for scoping and EIA.
If no, describe the noise in terms of type and level:
Noise will temporarily be generated during the construction phase due to plant machinery,
equipment and vehicle movement; however, due to the location of the plant as well as the short
term of the construction period it is not anticipated to result in a significant impact.
During the feasibility study of the new air separation plant a noise impact assessment was
undertaken by the engineering office of IBAS (Ingenieurgesellschaft für Bauphysik, Akustik und
Schwingungstechnik mbH). A copy of the assessment has been attached to this BAR as
Appendix G. The operation is anticipated to operate 24 hours a day 365 days a week and as
such the basis for the calculation refers to normal operating conditions of a stationary operation
(24 hours a day), with a constant noise level by the process plant. Additional truck driving and
loading takes place 24 hours a day.
The assessment has taken into consideration that during operation the relevant sound sources
(compressors, pumps etc.) of the new ASP will be erected inside soundproofed buildings
(machine house, pump house). The anticipated preliminary construction methods result in a
transmission loss from the walls of ≥ 42 dB, roofs of ≥ 37 dB and the doors and gates of 22 dB
and 24 dB respectively. Noise levels from all the outdoor equipment, vehicular traffic as well as
the wash bay was taken into consideration in the assessment.
The results of the assessment show that the ASP will lead to the following sound pressure
levels at specific points within the area being developed on the Afrox property:
Point on site boundary
Sound pressure level
IP 1 (Southwest)
66 dB(A)
IP 2 (Northwest)
65 dB(A)
IP 3 (Northeast)
68 dB(A)
IP 4 (Southeast)
62 dB(A)
(The figures in the assessment attached in Appendix G shows the position of the identified points).
As shown above the noise levels at the fence line of the site should not exceed 70 dB(A) at any
point during the day or night; In accordance with SANS 10103:2008 (note 4) for industries
legitimately operating in an industrial district during the entire 24 h day/night cycle, L R,eq,d =
LR,eg,n = 70 dB(A) can be considered as typical and normal. As such the results of this report
demonstrate that the sound technical requirements can be fulfilled with the planned design.
Furthermore the sound pressure level of 85 dB(A) at the working areas will not be exceeded.
12.
WATER USE
Please indicate the source(s) of water that will be used for the activity by ticking the appropriate box(es)
municipal
If water is to be extracted from groundwater, river, stream, dam, lake or any other natural
feature, please indicate
the volume that will be extracted per month:
Does the activity require a water use permit from the Department of Water
NO
Affairs?
If yes, please submit the necessary application to the Department of Water Affairs and attach
proof thereof to this application if it has been submitted.
13.
ENERGY EFFICIENCY
Describe the design measures, if any, that have been taken to ensure that the activity is energy
efficient:
This refrigeration cycle requires a large amount of energy to work; this energy is provided by
the compression of the air at the inlet of the unit. For improved efficiency the proposed ASU
includes an expansion turbine for cooling; the output of the expander helps drive the air
compressor. In addition, the cold equipment has to be kept within an insulated enclosure
called a ‘cold box’ to maximise efficiency.
For reasons of energy efficiency and to minimize heat input into the system all parts with
cryogenic liquefied gases are insulated with a state of the art cold insulation system.
All compressors of the air separation plant will be driven by medium-voltage motors.
For refrigeration in the ASU turbines are used, in which the gas is expanded. The turbines are
coupled with a compressor and an electric generator. Thus, the released energy of the
expanding gas can be partially recovered.
The buildings of the new plant (i.e. machine house, pump house) will be insulated with 100 mm
mineral fibre board (Rg > 50 kg/m³).
The windows to the buildings will be glazed in order to improve heating and cooling efficiency
and additionally the parking areas will be covered; resulting in energy savings due to the
reduced operation of car air-conditioning systems.
Describe how alternative energy sources have been taken into account or been built into the
design of the activity, if any:
N/A
SECTION B: SITE/AREA/PROPERTY DESCRIPTION
Important notes:
 For linear activities (pipelines, etc) as well as activities that cover very large sites, it may be
necessary to complete this section for each part of the site that has a significantly different
environment. In such cases please complete copies of Section C and indicate the area, which
is covered by each copy No. on the Site Plan.
Section C Copy No.
(e.g. A):

Paragraphs 1 - 6 below must be completed for each alternative.
Has a specialist been consulted to assist with the completion of YES
this section?
If YES, please complete form XX for each specialist thus appointed:
All specialist reports must be contained in Appendix D.

1.
GRADIENT OF THE SITE
Indicate the general gradient of the site.
Alternative S1:
Flat
Alternative S2 (if any):
Alternative S3 (if any):
2.
LOCATION IN LANDSCAPE
Indicate the landform(s) that best describes the site:
2.1 Ridgeline
2.2 Plateau
2.3 Side slope of hill/mountain
2.4 Closed valley
2.5 Open valley
2.6 Plain
2.7 Undulating plain / low hills
2.8 Dune
2.9 Seafront
None – flat industrial area
3.
GROUNDWATER, SOIL AND GEOLOGICAL STABILITY OF THE SITE
Is the site(s) located on any of the following (tick the appropriate boxes)?
NO
Alternative S1:
Shallow water table (less
than 1.5m deep)
Dolomite, sinkhole or doline
areas
Seasonally wet soils (often
close to water bodies)
Unstable rocky slopes or
steep slopes with loose soil
Dispersive soils (soils that
dissolve in water)
Soils with high clay content
(clay fraction more than 40%)
Any other unstable soil or
geological feature
An area sensitive to erosion
Alternative
(if any):
S2
Alternative
(if any):
S3
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
If you are unsure about any of the above or if you are concerned that any of the above aspects may be
an issue of concern in the application, an appropriate specialist should be appointed to assist in the
completion of this section. (Information in respect of the above will often be available as part of the
project information or at the planning sections of local authorities. Where it exists, the 1:50 000 scale
Regional Geotechnical Maps prepared by the Council for Geo Science may also be consulted).
4.
GROUNDCOVER
Indicate the types of groundcover present on the site:
4.1 Natural veld – good condition E
4.2 Natural veld – scattered aliens E
4.3 Natural veld with heavy alien infestation E
4.4 Veld dominated by alien species E
4.5 Gardens
4.6 Sport field
4.7 Cultivated land
4.8 Paved surface
4.9 Building or other structure
4.10 Bare soil
The location of all identified rare or endangered species or other elements should be accurately
indicated on the site plan(s).
Natural veld - good
condition E
Natural veld
with scattered
aliens E
If any of the boxes marked with an “E “is ticked, please consult an appropriate specialist to assist in the
completion of this section if the environmental assessment practitioner doesn’t have the necessary
expertise.
5.
LAND USE CHARACTER OF SURROUNDING AREA
Indicate land uses and/or prominent features that currently occur within a 500m radius of the site and
give description of how this influences the application or may be impacted upon by the application:
5.1 Natural area
5.2 Low density residential
5.3 Medium density residential
5.4 High density residential
5.5 Informal residential A
5.6 Retail commercial & warehousing
5.7 Light industrial
5.8 Medium industrial AN
5.9 Heavy industrial AN
5.10 Power station
5.11 Office / consulting room
5.12 Military or police base / station / compound
5.13 Spoil heap or slimes dam A
5.14 Quarry, sand or borrow pit
5.15 Dam or reservoir
5.16 Hospital/medical centre
5.17 School
5.18 Tertiary education facility
5.19 Church
5.20 Old age home
5.21 Sewage treatment plant A
5.22 Train station or shunting yard N
5.23 Railway line N
5.24 Major road (4 lanes or more) N
5.25 Airport N
5.26 Harbour
5.27 Sport facilities
5.28 Golf course
5.29 Polo fields
5.30 Filling station H
5.31 Landfill or waste treatment site
5.32 Plantation
5.33 Agriculture
5.34 River, stream or wetland
5.35 Nature conservation area
5.36 Mountain, koppie or ridge
5.37 Museum
5.38 Historical building
5.39 Protected Area
5.40 Graveyard
YES
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
YES
YES
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
YES
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
YES
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
5.41 Archaeological site
5.42 Other land uses (describe):
NO
If any of the boxes marked with an “N “are ticked, how will this impact / be impacted upon by the
proposed activity.
5.23 – The plant will have no impact on the railway line and noise generated from the railway line will
not be an issue as this is an industrial area, with its own noise related impacts.
If any of the boxes marked with an "An" are ticked, how will this impact / be impacted upon by the
proposed activity.
If YES, specify and explain:
5.8 – No Impact as the proposed activity fits in with the surrounding land use (industrial)
If any of the boxes marked with an "H" are ticked, how will this impact / be impacted upon by the
proposed activity.
If YES, specify and explain:
N/A
6.
CULTURAL/HISTORICAL FEATURES
Are there any signs of culturally or historically significant elements, as
defined in section 2 of the National Heritage Resources Act, 1999, (Act
NO
No. 25 of 1999), including
Archaeological or paleontological sites, on or close (within 20m) to the
NO
site?
If
YES, N/A
explain:
If uncertain, conduct a specialist investigation by a recognised specialist in the field to
establish whether there is such a feature(s) present on or close to the site.
Briefly
N/A
explain the
findings
of
the specialist:
Will any building or structure older than 60 years be affected in any way?
NO
Is it necessary to apply for a permit in terms of the National Heritage
NO
Resources Act, 1999 (Act 25 of 1999)?
If yes, please submit or, make sure that the applicant or a specialist submits the necessary
application to SAHRA or the relevant provincial heritage agency and attach proof thereof to
this application if such application has been made.
N/A
SECTION C: PUBLIC PARTICIPATION
1.
ADVERTISEMENT
The person conducting a public participation process must take into account any guidelines applicable
to public participation as contemplated in section 24J of the Act and must give notice to all potential
interested and affected parties of the application which is subjected to public participation by—
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
(e)
2.
fixing a notice board (of a size at least 60cm by 42cm; and must display the required
information in lettering and in a format as may be determined by the competent authority) at a
place conspicuous to the public at the boundary or on the fence of—
(i)
the site where the activity to which the application relates is or is to be undertaken; and
(ii)
any alternative site mentioned in the application;
giving written notice to—
(i)
the owner or person in control of that land if the applicant is not the owner or person in
control of the land;
(ii)
the occupiers of the site where the activity is or is to be undertaken or to any alternative
site where the activity is to be undertaken;
(iii)
owners and occupiers of land adjacent to the site where the activity is or is to be
undertaken or to any alternative site where the activity is to be undertaken;
(iv)
the municipal councillor of the ward in which the site or alternative site is situated and
any organisation of ratepayers that represent the community in the area;
(v)
the municipality which has jurisdiction in the area;
(vi)
any organ of state having jurisdiction in respect of any aspect of the activity; and
(vii)
any other party as required by the competent authority;
placing an advertisement in—
(i)
one local newspaper; or
(ii)
any official Gazette that is published specifically for the purpose of providing public
notice of applications or other submissions made in terms of these Regulations;
placing an advertisement in at least one provincial newspaper or national newspaper, if the
activity has or may have an impact that extends beyond the boundaries of the metropolitan or
local municipality in which it is or will be undertaken: Provided that this paragraph need
not
be complied with if an advertisement has been placed in an official Gazette referred to in
subregulation 54(c)(ii); and
using reasonable alternative methods, as agreed to by the competent authority, in those
instances where a person is desiring of but unable to participate in the process due to—
(i)
illiteracy;
(ii)
disability; or
(iii)
any other disadvantage.
CONTENT OF ADVERTISEMENTS AND NOTICES
A notice board, advertisement or notices must:
(a)
(b)
indicate the details of the application which is subjected to public participation; and
state—
(i)
that the application has been submitted to the competent authority in terms of these
Regulations, as the case may be;
(ii)
whether basic assessment or scoping procedures are being applied to the application,
in the case of an application for environmental
(iii)
(iv)
(iv)
3.
authorisation;
the nature and location of the activity to which the application relates;
where further information on the application or activity can be obtained; and
the manner in which and the person to whom representations in respect of the
application may be made.
PLACEMENT OF ADVERTISEMENTS AND NOTICES
Where the proposed activity may have impacts that extend beyond the municipal area where it is
located, a notice must be placed in at least one provincial newspaper or national newspaper, indicating
that an application will be submitted to the competent authority in terms of these regulations, the nature
and location of the activity, where further information on the proposed activity can be obtained and the
manner in which representations in respect of the application can be made, unless a notice has been
placed in any Gazette that is published specifically for the purpose of providing notice to the public of
applications made in terms of the EIA regulations.
Advertisements and notices must make provision for all alternatives.
An advert was placed in ‘Die Burger’ newspaper (see appendix G3) and an electronic notice was
placed on the electronic notice board in the foyer of the CDC Business Centre (see Appendix G4)
4.
DETERMINATION OF APPROPRIATE MEASURES
The practitioner must ensure that the public participation is adequate and must determine whether a
public meeting or any other additional measure is appropriate or not based on the particular nature of
each case. Special attention should be given to the involvement of local community structures such as
Ward Committees, ratepayers associations and traditional authorities where appropriate. Please note
that public concerns that emerge at a later stage that should have been addressed may cause the
competent authority to withdraw any authorisation it may have issued if it becomes apparent that the
public participation process was inadequate.
5.
COMMENTS AND RESPONSE REPORT
The practitioner must record all comments and respond to each comment of the public before the
application is submitted. The comments and responses must be captured in a comments and response
report as prescribed in the EIA regulations and be attached to this application. The comments and
response report must be attached under Appendix E.
The comments and response table is attached as Appendix E to this report.
6.
AUTHORITY PARTICIPATION
Authorities are key interested and affected parties in each application and no decision on any
application will be made before the relevant local authority is provided with the opportunity to give input.
The planning and the environmental sections of the local authority must be informed of the application
at least 30 (thirty) calendar days before the submission of the application.
List of authorities informed:
The Department of Economic Development, Environmental Affairs and Tourism
(DEDEAT)
The Department of Water Affairs (DWA)
The Department of Labour
The South African Heritage Resource Agency (SAHRA)
The Nelson Mandela Bay Municipality (NMBM)
List of authorities from whom comments have been received:
7.
CONSULTATION WITH OTHER STAKEHOLDERS
Note that, for linear activities, or where deviation from the public participation requirements may be
appropriate, the person conducting the public participation process may deviate from the requirements
of that subregulation to the extent and in the manner as may be agreed to by the competent authority.
Any stakeholder that has a direct interest in the site or property, such as servitude holders and service
providers, should be informed of the application at least 30 (thirty) calendar days before the submission
of the application and be provided with the opportunity to comment.
Has any comment been received from stakeholders?
NO
If “YES”, briefly describe the feedback below (also attach copies of any correspondence to and
from the stakeholders to this application):
SECTION D: IMPACT ASSESSMENT
The assessment of impacts must adhere to the minimum requirements in the EIA Regulations, 2010,
and should take applicable official guidelines into account. The issues raised by interested and
affected parties should also be addressed in the assessment of impacts.
1.
ISSUES RAISED BY INTERESTED AND AFFECTED PARTIES
List the main issues raised by interested and affected parties.
The issues raised by Interested and Affected Parties (IAPs) on the Draft BAR can be summarised as
follows:
1. Power and water consumption requirements and power source;
2. Permits / licenses required (if any);
3. Waste products particular to this industry;
4. Identify design measures that will be incorporated into the design / operation of the plant to
improve efficiency and no contamination of water sources;
5. What technology will be used and how does rate environmentally to alternative technology;
6. Main operational risks associated with this type of industry; and
7. Cumulative noise levels.
Response from the practitioner to the issues raised by the interested and affected parties (A full
response must be given in the Comments and Response Report that must be attached to this report):
The response from the Consultant/Client to the listed issues on the Draft BAR were as follows:
1. Electrical requirements
 The plant will be connected to an 11 kV, 50 Hz substation by the NMBM and will require
approximately 4250 kW for operation.
Water requirements
 14 m³/h of potable water for make-up water.
No boiler or fuel burning appliance is required.
2. The application is for authorisation for the construction for storage and handling of a
dangerous good (Oxygen). As the proposed plant is to be located in the Coega IDZ a search
and rescue permit will be required for the clearing of the site. There is no evidence for the
requirements of any other permits/licenses.
3. Very small quantities of waste will be generated during the operational phase and are readily
accommodated within the existing waste management infrastructure within the Nelson
Mandela Bay Municipal area. Potentially small amounts of hazardous substances (e.g. oil rags,
oil cans, spent molecular sieve) will be disposed of at an appropriate classified waste site.
4. Items included in the design to improve efficiency of the plant and to prevent contamination of
surface and ground water are provided in section 13 and section D-2 (Operational Impacts) of
the report (for a detailed response see the comments and response table attached as
Appendix E to this report).
5. The air separation plant will make use of the cryogenic air separation process with the use of
best available technology. The Linde Group, of which Afrox is a member, is a world leading
supplier of industrial, process and specialty gases. They have been in industry for 130 years
during which time they have made major technological advances which have resulted in the
increased efficiency of the process, as such no alternative technology is proposed.
6. A risk analysis (“HAZOP-Study”) will be performed for the entire operational system of the air
separation plant, in which the proposed measures against hazards are evaluated. The plant is
to be provided with safety-related monitoring and protection equipment as well as being fitted
with automatic shut-offs, emergency stop switches and spill kits. As a result dangerous
conditions such as excessive pressures, extreme temperatures and the accumulation of critical
materials or leakages will be prevented or contained.
7. During the feasibility study of the new air separation plant a noise impact assessment was
undertaken by the engineering office of IBAS. The results of the assessment show that the
noise levels at the fence line of the site should not exceed 70 dB(A) at any point during the day
or night; in accordance with SANS 10103:2008 (note 4) for industries legitimately operating in
an industrial district during the entire 24 h day/night cycle, LR,eq,d = LR,eg,n = 70 dB(A) can
be considered as typical and normal. As such the results of this report demonstrate that the
sound technical requirements can be fulfilled with the planned design. As the anticipated levels
are shown to be below 70 dB(A) at the fence line of the site the cumulative levels are not
anticipated to exceed the 70 dB(A) threshold; unless the sound levels form neighbouring
properties are in excess of the 70 dB(A) threshold at the border of their sites.
2.
IMPACTS THAT MAY RESULT FROM THE PLANNING AND DESIGN, CONSTRUCTION,
OPERATIONAL, DECOMMISSIONING AND CLOSURE PHASES AS WELL AS PROPOSED
MANAGEMENT OF IDENTIFIED IMPACTS AND PROPOSED MITIGATION MEASURES
List the potential direct, indirect and cumulative property/activity/design/technology/operational
alternative related impacts (as appropriate) that are likely to occur as a result of the planning and
design phase, construction phase, operational phase, decommissioning and closure phase, including
impacts relating to the choice of site/activity/technology alternatives as well as the mitigation measures
that may eliminate or reduce the potential impacts listed.
DESIGN PHASE
Alternative (preferred alternative)
No impacts are anticipated in terms of planning and design, as the proposed site is a partially
developed property, zoned for industrial use, within an Industrial Development Zone.
Direct impacts
None
Indirect impacts
None
Cumulative impacts
None
Mitigation measures that may eliminate or reduce the potential impacts listed above:
N/A
CONSTRUCTION PHASE
Direct impacts
1. Noise Emissions
Background
Noise will result mostly from the increase in vehicular traffic on the roads to the site as well as from
the movement of vehicles and use of machinery (plant) for construction related activities. In all
likelihood the construction noise will have little impact on the surrounding community or
businesses, as it will most likely occur during the day when the ambient noise is louder and there
are unstable atmospheric conditions. Based on the timelines provided, the construction noise will
also be short lived as the construction phase of the project is expected to take less than two years
to complete.
Assessment
The significance of the impact resulting from construction activities is rated as VERY LOW (-ve) for
the proposed development as the site is classified as industrial with very low baseline noise levels
and it is not near any residential areas. With the implementation of mitigation measures the impact
can be reduced to INSIGNIFICANT.
Extent
Intensity
Duration
Consequence
Probability
Significance
Without
mitigation
Local
1
Low
1
Short-term
1
Very Low
3
Probable
VERY LOW
-ve
Medium
With
mitigation
Local
1
Low
1
Short-term
1
Very Low
3
Possible
INSIGNIFICANT
-ve
Medium
No-go
alternative
Status Confidence
N/A
Mitigation Measures
 Maintenance of plant and machinery to be undertaken on a regular basis;
 Speed limits should be implemented on site and adhered to off site;
2. Socio-economic impacts
Background
The project will result in direct investment into the economy, consisting of capital expenditure,
including engineering, procurement and construction; additionally approximately 200 - 300 job
opportunities will be created during the construction phase. As the plant is to be located within the
Coega IDZ, it is required to comply with the Zone Labour Agreement as provided by the CDC.
Assessment
Given the size of the local economy and the relative scale of investment during the construction
phase, the impact is expected to be of low intensity over the short-term period. The overall impact
is thus considered to be of VERY LOW (+ve) significance with the implementation of proposed
optimisation measures.
Not implementing the proposed development would mean that the potential for induced stimulus
on regional production, and associated secondary economic development would not occur. The
no-go alternative associated with this impact is expected to be of a VERY LOW (-ve) significance.
Extent
Intensity
Duration
Consequence
Probability
Significance
Status Confidence
Without
mitigation
Local
1
Low
1
Short-term
1
Very Low
3
Possible
INSIGNIFICANT
+ve
High
With
mitigation
Local
1
Low
1
Short-term
1
Very Low
3
Probable
VERY LOW
+ve
High
No-go
alternative
Local
1
Low
1
Short-term
1
Very Low
3
Probable
VERY LOW
-ve
High
Mitigation Measures
 Local labour is to be employed as far as it is possible to do so;
 Source as many goods and services from the local and regional economy as feasible; and

The contracted company is to provide ancillary training to workers on maximising the use of
income and training to further future economic prospects.
3. Removal of Indigenous Vegetation
Background
According to Mucina and Rutherford, (2006), the site falls within the Albany Thicket Biome with the
vegetation type of the area consisting of Coega Bontveld which is also known as Grass Ridge
Bontveld (Vlok & Euston-Brown, 2002). The distribution of this vegetation type is restricted to
shallow stony soils strongly influenced by an underlying calcareous substrate. The Coega
Bontveld has many Species of Special Concern (SSC), often in the form of small succulents and
geophytes. According to the FSR, of the proposed Kalagadi Manganese Smelter in Coega, a
previous study conducted on this vegetation type within the Coega IDZ by Dold (2002) reported
140 species, 19 of which are protected in terms of the National Forest Act and the Provincial
Nature Conservation Ordinance (PNCO). He also found one endangered plant and 10 species
endemic to the Albany Centre of Endemism. In his report, Dold recommended that 13 species
would need to be relocated from the Bontveld community (Coastal & Environmental Services,
2008). A list of SSC is provided in the EMPr.
Assessment
Clearing of the vegetation will occur but before this takes place a search and rescue process is to
be undertaken by a specialist to identify and remove species of special concern (SSC) (see list in
EMPr). As such the impact of the clearing of vegetation is considered a LOW (-ve) which can be
reduced to VERY LOW (-ve) with the implementation of mitigation measures.
Extent
Intensity
Duration
Consequence
Probability
Significance
Without
mitigation
Local
1
Low
1
Long-term
3
Low
5
Probable
LOW
-ve
High
With
mitigation
Local
1
Low
1
Long-term
3
Low
5
Possible
VERY LOW
-ve
High
No-go
alternative
Status Confidence
N/A
Mitigation Measures
 Before clearing takes place a search and rescue process is to be undertaken by a specialist to
identify and remove SSC (as identified by the CDC – see list in EMPr). The plants rescued off
the site are to be held in the CDC's nursery and reused in landscaping of the same site. In the
case that all of the rescued plants cannot be used in the landscaping of the Afrox site, then the
CDC will use these plants to rehabilitate identified sites within the IDZ (this will only be
confirmed on completion of the final designs).
4. Loss of Indigenous Fauna
Background
There is a general lack of pristine terrestrial habitats in the Coega region. This means that some
components of the terrestrial fauna have been severely impacted by previous human activity,
particularly the loss of vegetation, invasion of alien vegetation, local extinction of large mammals,
and varied industrial developments. However, despite the construction and development activity
within the IDZ the following fauna have been observed in area, these are namely; kudu, duiker,
steenbok, grysbok, tortoises, rabbits, jackal, mongooses, herons and numerous raptor species.
Assessment
Loss of fauna will take place owing to the loss of the habitat that will result due to the
establishment of the plant. Although the intensity is considered to be low the impact will be long-
term as the plant is not anticipated to be decommissioned in the near future. During the clearing
process care is to be taken so as not to harm fauna, including reptiles, should it be required a
specialist is to be called in to assist in the relocation. As such the impact is considered a VERY
LOW (-ve) impact, with or without the implementation of mitigation measures.
Extent
Intensity
Duration
Consequence
Probability
Significance
Without
mitigation
Local
1
Low
1
Long-term
3
Low
5
Definite
VERY LOW
-ve
High
With
mitigation
Local
1
Low
1
Long-term
3
Low
5
Probable
VERY LOW
-ve
High
No-go
alternative
Status Confidence
N/A
Mitigation Measures
 Clearing is to take place from one side of the property to the other, allowing the wildlife a
chance to relocate, and not get trapped in ‘islands’ of vegetation.
5. Impact on Heritage (Archaeology and Palaeontology)
Background
According to the Archaeological Impact Assessment of the greater Coega IDZ, undertaken by Dr
Johan Binneman in 2010, zone 3 has a well-developed infrastructure and at the time had several
large buildings already built while others were under construction. During the assessment the
occasional quartzite Middle Stone Age stone tools similar to those found in other zones of the IDZ
were found where pebble/cobble gravels were exposed, however these were not recorded. The
assessment identified that although the area/zones investigated were occupied extensively in the
past, the area is relatively poor in large and important ecological sites. It was noted that materials
may be covered by soil and vegetation and may only be exposed when development takes place.
Assessment
Based on the above there is a chance that archaeological remains/sites may be uncovered during
the clearing of the site. The impact is considered to be VERY LOW (-ve), however with the
implementation of mitigation measures the impact can be changed to a VERY LOW (+ve).
Extent
Intensity
Duration
Consequence
Probability
Significance
Without
mitigation
Local
1
Low
1
Long-term
3
Low
5
Improbable
VERY LOW
-ve
High
With
mitigation
Local
1
Low
1
Long-term
3
Low
5
Improbable
VERY LOW
+ve
High
No-go
alternative
Status Confidence
N/A
Mitigation Measures
 Construction managers/foremen must be informed before construction starts on the possible
types of heritage sites and cultural material they may encounter and the procedures to follow
should they find sites;
 If concentrations of archaeological heritage material, human remains or fossils are uncovered
during construction, all work must cease immediately and be reported to the Albany Museum
(046 622 2312) and/or the South African Heritage Resources Agency (SAHRA)
(021 642 4502) so that systematic and professional investigation/ excavation can be
undertaken; and
6. Dust emissions
Background
During the construction phase areas of vegetation and land will be stripped in preparation for the
construction process. During this phase areas will be left bare and the movement of large
machinery will result in the creation of dust.
Assessment
The intensity of the impact is rated as medium, primarily due to dust normally settling up to a
distance of 2 km from the source; however the duration is short-term. As a result, the significance
rating for the air impact on the receptors associated with the facility is VERY LOW (-ve), which can
be reduced to INSIGNIFICANT with the implementation of mitigation measures.
Extent
Intensity
Duration
Consequence
Probability
Significance
Without
mitigation
Local
1
Medium
2
Short-term
1
Very Low
4
Probable
VERY LOW
-ve
High
With
mitigation
Local
1
Low
1
Short-term
1
Very Low
3
Possible
INSIGNIFICANT
-ve
High
No-go
alternative
Status Confidence
N/A
Mitigation Measures
 Dust suppression techniques, such as wetting or covering potential dust sources should be
implemented to minimise the impact of dust, when necessary;
 Construction vehicles must adhere to speed limits; and
 Prompt rehabilitation of cleared areas should take place to reduce exposure.
7. Waste Management
Background
The accumulation of solid domestic waste at any site can result in unpleasant odours and the
attraction of vermin (i.e. flies, rats etc.). Dispersal of these solid wastes, particularly nonbiodegradable items such as plastic and polystyrene, either by animals or wind can also cause
harm to animals if ingested or if they become entangled.
Assessment
A VERY LOW (-ve) impact is expected due to incorrect disposal of construction waste which could
lead to other visual impacts and loss of natural habitat. However, the probability of this impact
occurring is low if standard management practices are followed. Therefore, with mitigation the
impact is reduced to INSIGNIFICANT.
Extent
Intensity
Duration
Consequence
Probability
Significance
Without
mitigation
Local
1
Low
1
Short-term
1
Very Low
3
Probable
VERY LOW
-ve
High
With
mitigation
Local
1
Low
1
Short-term
1
Very Low
3
Possible
INSIGNIFICANT
-ve
High
No-go
alternative
Status Confidence
N/A
Mitigation Measures
 Sufficient weather and scavenger- proof bins (with lids, to prevent the escape of litter) shall be
provided, and be easily accessible at all points were wastes are generated;
 The site shall be kept clean and free of litter, and no litter from the site shall be allowed to






disperse to surrounding areas;
All personnel shall be instructed to dispose of all waste in the proper manner;
The Contractor shall identify and separate materials that can be reused or recycled to
minimise waste e.g. metals, packaging and plastics, and provide separate marked bins for
these items;
All construction materials (e.g. bags of cement) must be suitably stored and protected, so that
they do not become damaged and unusable;
The Contractor shall be responsible for the regular disposal (at suitable and licensed municipal
waste disposal facilities) of all waste generated as a result of the construction. Waste disposal
slips shall be kept for auditing purposes;
No dumping within the surrounding area shall be permitted, and no waste may be buried or
burned. Where potentially hazardous substances are to be disposed of, a safe disposal slip
shall be kept on record as proof of final disposal; and
General waste is to be collected either by the Local Municipality or via a Municipal approved
waste transporting contractor. The frequency of collections will be such that waste
containment receptacles do not unduly accumulate or overflow.
8. Traffic Impacts
Background
During the construction phase materials and equipment will need to be transported to site by
means of road transportation, resulting in more traffic utilising the CDC road network. Additionally
certain parts of the plant (e.g. the cold box and storage tanks) will be brought in from the harbour
already assembled; which could result in some abnormal loads being transported from the harbour
to the site during the construction phase – this will only be confirmed on final design of the
structures.
Assessment
Due to the relatively small size of the development as well as the short construction time (less than
one year) the intensity of the impact is considered low. It was also taken into consideration that
the traffic from / to the Afrox site will be concentrated through the Neptune Road / Cable Road
intersection; however since access to the area can also be gained from the R102, it is not
anticipated that the construction traffic will result in congestion of traffic in the area. It is also
anticipated that the construction traffic generated will not exceed the vehicle carrying capacity of
any of the affected roads in the area.
Based on the above the significance of this negative impact on the congestion at the intersections,
as well wear and tear of the infrastructure, is rated as INSIGNIFICANT, with no mitigation
measures proposed.
Extent
Intensity
Duration
Consequence
Probability
Significance
Local
1
Low
1
Short-term
1
Very Low
3
Possible
INSIGNIFICANT
Without
mitigation
With
mitigation
N/A
No-go
alternative
N/A
Indirect impacts
None.
Cumulative impacts
None.
Status Confidence
-ve
High
No-Go Alternative
Direct impacts
See impact 2 above - Socio-economic impacts
Indirect impacts
None.
Cumulative impacts
None.
See Impacts above
OPERATIONAL PHASE
Direct impacts
1. Safety Impacts (Risk of accidents in relation to the storage of dangerous goods)
Background
The entire plant site will be fenced; meaning any lawful access to the plant will only be gained by
authorisation with adherence to safety protocol. The ASU, storage facilities and associated
machinery are to be manufactured according to the relevant safety standards. The plant is
provided with safety-related monitoring and protection equipment. As a result dangerous
conditions such as excessive pressures, too high or too low temperatures, and accumulation of
critical materials or leakages can be prevented. Additionally the products are stored in double
shelled storage tanks so that in the case of any external incidents, if the external shell is punctured
the internal shell will remain intact.
There are management measures that will be implemented that are inherent in all of the
companies associated ASU’s, these include (but are not limited to):
1. A risk analysis (“HAZOP-Study”) is to be undertaken for the entire system, in which the
proposed measures against hazards are evaluated;
2. The plant is to be equipped with lights, and escapes routes from the systems are to be
clearly marked;
3. Regular maintenance of the machines is to be carried out.
The above form part of the design criteria for the plant and as such reduces the risk associated
with the plant.
Assessment
With consideration of the taken measures the significance is rated as a VERY LOW (-ve), no
additional mitigation measures are proposed.
Without
mitigation
Extent
Intensity
Duration
Consequence
Probability
Significance
Local
1
High
3
Short-Term
1
Low
5
Improbable
VERY LOW
With
mitigation
N/A
No-go
alternative
N/A
Status Confidence
-ve
High
2. Noise
Background
The noise impact assessment undertaken for the proposed plant shows that that the anticipated
noise levels at the boundaries of the property will not exceed the stipulated 70 dB(A). The noise
created from the machinery which operates 24 hours a day will result in an increase in the ambient
noise levels in the immediate vicinity; however as these are not anticipated to exceed the 70 dB(A)
threshold.
Assessment
The plant design has already taken into consideration the positioning of noise generating
equipment to reduce the noise levels at the boundaries and Afrox have also implemented
soundproofing of the structures housing noise generating equipment, as such the impact is rated
as a LOW (-ve), with no additional mitigation measures proposed.
Without
mitigation
Extent
Intensity
Duration
Consequence
Probability
Significance
Local
1
Low
1
Long-Term
3
Low
5
Probable
LOW
With
mitigation
N/A
No-go
alternative
N/A
Status Confidence
-ve
Medium
3. Socio-economic impacts
Background
It is anticipated that the plant will result in approximately 20 job opportunities during the operation
phase (8 persons for transport-works and an additional 12 persons for plant operation).
Assessment
Although the intensity of the impact is low due to the small number of jobs required for the
operation of the plant, the period of the impact (25 to 30 years) results in the impact to be rated as
a LOW (+ve).
Without
mitigation
Extent
Intensity
Duration
Consequence
Probability
Significance
Local
1
Low
1
Long-Term
3
Low
5
Probable
LOW
With
mitigation
No-go
alternative
Status Confidence
+ve
Medium
-ve
Medium
N/A
Local
1
Low
1
Long-Term
3
Low
5
Probable
LOW
4. Contamination of surface water and ground water
Background
There is a potential for oil leaks from the compressors, hydraulic systems and transformers as well
as spills during maintenance. There is also the risk of diesel spills when filling up trucks at the
filling point as well as leaks from the storage tanks (above and below ground). However; the area
where the filling of trucks is to take place will be constructed out of an impermeable concrete slab,
and the above ground storage tanks, as well as equipment that could potentially result in spills or
leaks, are to be positioned within defined areas so as to contain any leaks or spills that may occur.
Additionally the underground diesel storage tank is to be manufactured of non-corrosive glass fibre
material, eliminating the chance of leaks.
Assessment
The significance of this impact is rated as a VERY LOW (-ve) which can be reduced to
INSIGNIFICANT with the implementation of mitigation measures.
Extent
Intensity
Duration
Consequence
Probability
Significance
Without
mitigation
Local
1
Low
1
Short-Term
1
Very Low
3
Probable
VERY LOW
-ve
Medium
With
mitigation
Local
1
Low
1
Short-term
1
Very Low
3
Possible
INSIGNIFICANT
-ve
Medium
No-go
alternative
Status Confidence
N/A
Mitigation Measures
1. Use the minimum quantity of treatment chemicals necessary to achieve adequate system
protection;
2. Minimise leaks through preventative maintenance.
5. Traffic Impacts
Background
The plant is designed for the production of and distribution of products and not as an
administrative or sales base, therefore the only traffic that will be generated by the plant are the
employees, the distribution trucks and occasional service providers when required. The operation
of the plant requires approximately 20 employees throughout a 24 hour period, some of which are
shift workers. It is anticipated that the plant will require approximately 7 trucks per day, spread
throughout the 24 hour period, to fill up with products for distribution purposes. In a situation
where trucks have to wait to be filled, the plant layout has made accommodation for the on-site
parking of up to 6 trucks (excluding those being refilled or serviced), thereby eliminating the
chance of impeding the flow of traffic on the road outside the plant.
The ASP is located in Zone 3 of the IDZ, which is designated for light industrial development, as
such it is anticipated that each of the developments within the Zone will not have an exorbitant
amount of trucks making deliveries or collections. As it is an IDZ it is anticipated that the design of
the road infrastructure as well as the road network was done in accordance with required
specifications to handle the anticipated carrying capacity of the developed area on completion of
the IDZ. The addition of 7 trucks per 24 hours is not considered a large amount in terms of a light
industry development and as such should not interfere with the operations of other developments
in the Zone, and the other developments should not interfere with the operations of the Afrox plant
as the plant can be reached from two directions, minimising the chance of congestion.
Assessment
Based on the above the significance of this negative impact on the congestion at the intersections,
as well as wear and tear of the infrastructure, is rated as VERY LOW (-ve) due to the long term
operation of the plant, as such no mitigation measures are proposed.
Extent
Intensity
Duration
Consequence
Probability
Significance
Local
1
Low
1
Long-term
3
Low
5
Possible
VERY LOW
Without
mitigation
With
mitigation
N/A
No-go
alternative
N/A
Status Confidence
-ve
High
Indirect impacts
None
Cumulative impacts
6. Safety Impacts as a result of surrounding developments
Background
The Afrox site is situated adjacent to three other developments, of which the one stores Liquid
Oxygen. There are no inherent dangers of explosions from any of the existing adjacent properties.
However, if an explosion where to take place safety measures have been planned for to be put in
place on the Afrox site, these include (but are not limited to); double shell storage tanks, the layout
of the plant (i.e. being situated as far from the other developments as possible) and safety shutoff
valves.
Assessment
With consideration of the safety measures that are to be incorporated into the plant, the
significance is rated as a VERY LOW (-ve).
Extent
Intensity
Duration
Consequence
Probability
Significance
Local
1
High
3
Short-Term
1
Low
5
Improbable
VERY LOW
Without
mitigation
With
mitigation
N/A
No-go
alternative
N/A
Status Confidence
-ve
High
7. Noise
Background
The noise created from the machinery which operates 24 hours a day will result in an increase in
the ambient noise levels; as the anticipated levels are shown to be below 70 dB(A) at the fenceline
of the site the cumulative levels are not anticipated to exceed the 70 dB(A) threshold; unless the
sound levels form neighbouring properties are in excess of the 70 dB(A) requirements at the
border of their sites.
Assessment
The plant design has already taken into consideration the positioning of the plant on the site so as
to reduce the noise levels at the boundaries of the site and thereby reducing the combined sound
levels form neighbouring properties. As such the impact is rated as a LOW (-ve), with no additional
mitigation measures proposed.
Extent
Intensity
Duration
Consequence
Probability
Significance
Local
1
Low
1
Long-Term
3
Low
5
Probable
LOW
Without
mitigation
With
mitigation
N/A
No-go
alternative
N/A
Status Confidence
-ve
Medium
No-Go Alternative
Direct impacts
See impact 3 – Socio-economic impact
Indirect impacts
None.
Cumulative impacts
None.
Mitigation measures have been provided with the impacts listed above.
DECOMMISSIONING AND CLOSURE PHASE
No decommissioning is anticipated in the foreseeable future as the plant has an anticipated lifespan of
20 to 25 years; after which it will be reassessed as to whether to continue, expand the facility or halt
production.
Direct impacts
None.
Indirect impacts
None.
Cumulative impacts
None.
No-Go Alternative
Direct impacts
None.
Indirect impacts
None.
Cumulative impacts
None.
None.
3.
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT
Taking the assessment of potential impacts into account, please provide an environmental impact
statement that summarises the impact that the proposed activity and its alternatives may have on the
environment after the management and mitigation of impacts have been taken into account, with
specific reference to types of impact, duration of impacts, likelihood of potential impacts actually
occurring and the significance of impacts.
Impact Significance Rating Summary Table (for the preferred alternative)
A summary table of all potential impacts for the construction and operational phases is included below.
The significance of each impact without and with the implementation of mitigation measures is stated.
Direct Impacts
Construction
Impact
Operation
Without
Mitigation
With
Mitigation
Without
Mitigation
With
Mitigation
-
-
VERY LOW
(-ve)
-
Noise Emissions
VERY LOW
(-ve)
INSIGNIFICANT
LOW
(-ve)
-
Socio-Economic
INSIGNIFICANT
VERY LOW
(+ve)
LOW
(+ve)
-
LOW
(-ve)
VERY LOW
(-ve)
-
-
VERY LOW
(-ve)
VERY LOW
(-ve)
-
-
VERY LOW
(-ve)
VERY LOW
(-ve)
VERY LOW
(-ve)
VERY LOW
(+ve)
-
-
INSIGNIFICANT
-
-
INSIGNIFICANT
-
-
INSIGNIFICANT
-
VERY LOW
(-ve)
-
-
-
VERY LOW
(-ve)
INSIGNIFICANT
Safety as a result of the
proposed activity
Removal of Indigenous
Vegetation
Loss of Indigenous Fauna
Heritage Impacts
Dust Emissions
Waste Management
Traffic Impacts
Contamination of Surface and
Ground Water
Cumulative Impacts
Construction
Impact
Operation
Without
Mitigation
With
Mitigation
Without
Mitigation
With
Mitigation
Safety Impacts from
surrounding developments
-
-
VERY LOW
(-ve)
-
Noise Emissions
-
-
LOW
(-ve)
-
No-go alternative
Construction
Impact
Socio-Economic
Operation
Without
Mitigation
With
Mitigation
Without
Mitigation
With
Mitigation
VERY LOW
(-ve)
-
LOW
(-ve)
-
The proposed activity is characterised by the separation of ambient air into the components Oxygen,
Nitrogen and Argon and the storage of these products. As per regulations Oxygen is listed as a
dangerous good and due to the proposed storage capacity of Oxygen on the site a Basic Assessment
is required.
It is evident from the above that the potential environmental and social impacts from the facility are of
low significance and should not influence a decision to approve the application.
SECTION E.
RECOMMENDATIONS OF PRACTITIONER
Is the information contained in this report and the documentation attached
hereto sufficient to make a decision in respect of the activity applied for (in the YES
view of the environmental assessment practitioner)?
Is an EMPr attached?
YES
The EMPr must be attached as Appendix F.
If “NO”, indicate the aspects that should be assessed further as part of a Scoping and EIA process
before a decision can be made (list the aspects that require further assessment):
N/A
If “YES”, please list any recommended conditions, including mitigation measures that should be
considered for inclusion in any authorisation that may be granted by the competent authority in respect
of the application:
Due to the low significance of all of the impacts identified, it is the Practitioner’s view that the
application should be approved. Mitigation measures proposed in this report, and captured in
the EMPr, are considered optional and do not need to be included as conditions of
authorisation.
SECTION F: APPENDICES
The following appendixes must be attached as appropriate:
Appendix A: Site plan(s)
Appendix B: Photographs
Appendix C: Facility illustration(s)
Appendix D: Specialist reports
Appendix E: Comments and responses report
Appendix F: Environmental Management Programme (EMPr)
Appendix G: Other information

basic assessment report - Coega Development Corporation

Transcription

Similar documents

Diapositiva 1

PDF - City of Terrell Hills

Aberdeen Western Peripheral Route (AWPR)

MABAS 47

PDF file

Georgia Emergency Management Agency Homeland

Class IX

Addition to Ottawa Westin Hotel

Marina de Joyuda - staging.files.cms.plus.com