Educational Politics in Focus
Transcription
Educational Politics in Focus
September 2011 Volume 26, Number 3 Educational Politics In Focus Political overview | ICT Levin North | PRINCIPAL(LY) YOURS Drowning in rooms full of paper? We’ve got the answer. Document Management Solutions from Konica Minolta can help your school to store all of your student records electronically in a safe and secure system which will reduce the need for paper files. Documents can be intelligently scanned and filed directly from your MFPs into electronic storage systems and retrieved within seconds whenever you need them. Save Space, Save Time and Save Money with Konica Minolta. Call 0800 933 008 toDay to talK to your loCal EDuCation SPECialiSt anD FinD out how MuCh wE Can SavE you. www.konicaminolta.co.nz Editor Liz Hawes Executive Support Manager PO Box 25380 Wellington 6146 Ph: 04 471 2338 Fax: 04 471 2339 Email: esm@nzpf.ac.nz Editorial Board Peter Simpson, NZPF President Geoff Lovegrove, Lytton Street School (Feilding) Liz Hawes, Editor Advertising Robert Skeen, Sales & Marketing Manager For all advertising enquiries contact Komal Mathur Cervin Publishing Ltd PO Box 68450, Newton, Auckland 1145 Ph: 09 360 8700 or Fax: 09 360 8701 Design Concept Mary Egan Cover artwork courtesy Maxie Bates of Glenavon School, Yr 7, Auckland Production Stuart Sue (Design), Jamie Bell, Bianca Kofoed, Catherine Scott Note The articles in The New Zealand Principal do not necessarily reflect the policy of the New Zealand Principals’ Federation. Readers are welcome to use or reprint material if proper acknowledgement is made. Subscription Distributed free to all schools in New Zealand. For individual subscribers, send $40 per year to New Zealand Principals’ Federation National Office, PO Box 25380, Wellington 6146 New Zealand Principal is published by Cervin Publishing Ltd on behalf of the NZ Principals’ Federation and is issued four times annually. For all enquiries regarding editorial contributions please contact the editor. PHOTOS FOR THE MAGAZINE: If you have any photos showing ‘New Zealand Schools at Work’, particularly any good shots of pupils, teachers or leadership staff, they would be welcome. The appropriate permission is required before we can print any photos. Technical details: Good quality original photos can be scanned, and digital photos must be of sufficient resolution for high-quality publishing. (Images should be at least 120 mm (wide) at 300 dpi). Please contact Cervin Publishing Ltd for further details. Phone 09 360 8700 or email education@cervinpublishing.co.nz ISSN 0112-403X (Print) ISSN 1179-4372 (Online) CONTENTS September 2011 2 EDITORIAL Political – election year 3 PRESIDENT’S PEN Election 5 Educational Politics In Focus Peter Simpson 7 Political overview of Education Sector six questions to each of the National and Labour Education spokespersons 10 Department of Conservation presents schools a new teaching resource for 14 SmokeFree teaching resource 16 Supplementary Learning Support 17 Whakatipuranga – Arapiki Ako 18 Principal(ly) Yours Whetu Cormick, Dunedin 22 Te Akatea Conference Rotorua 23 ICT Levin North 25 A Subject Mauled? Messages about social studies from two Rugby World Cup 2011 resources 29 Do you have sound classrooms? Jenny Barrett 33 School Lines Lester Flockton 35 Rural Ramblings Baabaara Ramsbottom Due to space constraints we are unable to publish ’Advice in an earthquake’ as promised in the last issue of NZ Principal. We will endeavour to bring you this information in the Term 4 issue. Editorial Let’s put the people back in democracy Liz Hawes Editor It’s general election year. Election years generate a heightened interest in things political. In fact everything is political in an election year, as contesting parties try to win us over with their different ideas. It’s the one time that politicians really pay attention to us. It’s simple really. They want our vote. We like to think that politicians are our representatives and speak for us in parliament. After all isn’t that what democracy is about? It is a governance system for the people, by the people. At no time in history do we have examples of the perfect democracy. We romanticise that the Greek agora provided the platform for the ordinary man to have his say and how we wish we could emulate that again. Well let’s just check out that Greek agora. For a start the agora was an exclusively male domain! So straight away we know that half the population had no representation at all. Secondly, those who would gather in the grand amphitheatre to debate the issues of the day were largely the privileged class. So in effect, they had a governance system that was for a few privileged men by a few privileged men! Turning to our own system of government, just how far have we come to approaching the democratic ideal? For most of our history, not very far. The ‘First Past the Post’ two-party system kept representation narrow and did not take account of the proportion of support a party might have. It focused only on the electoral seats. The 1981 election is a good example. The National Party won a third term in government although the opposition Labour Party actually won the largest share of the votes cast. In the same election the Social Credit Party won in excess of 20 per cent of the popular vote to give it two seats in parliament. In 2002 the NZ National Party won the same percentage of votes to give it 27 seats. So what made the difference? With such blatant inequities, in the early ’90s the disen franchised launched a campaign to alter our electoral system. This resulted in our current MMP system that, whilst not perfect, at least has allowed more parties to share in the governance of the country and has provided a far broader base of views to be heard in the parliamentary debating chamber. Despite the levels of support for this system of representation it is not unusual to hear a governing party argue that they have a mandate to implement quite extreme versions of their policies because they won more seats than any other party. This is not the case. A voter may agree with only half a party’s policies but votes for the party because that’s better for them. That does not of course give that party the right to say the voters have given them an open mandate. Parties in government have a responsibility to consult with the people when they are planning changes that affect them. And there is a defined process to make that transparent. It is the select 2 N Z P r i n c i p a l | S e p t e m b e r 2 0 11 committee process that allows for public debate, submissions and careful examination of the arguments. It is the process by which a good idea can become a better idea and a not so good idea can have its flaws exposed and be avoided. When governing parties miss out this process the public is rightly incensed, especially those groups in society that are directly affected. It is bad political process and disrespectful to the people whose views have been ignored. It is even worse when experts in the field are also ignored. It is inexcusable behaviour. Yet that is what the current government in New Zealand has done to the education sector since its first hundred days in government in 2008 when it introduced its standardised assessment system. The profession immediately called for consultation but over the past three years has been repeatedly ignored. With no avenue to democratically and intelligently debate the issues the sector has endeavoured to generate its own public debate and has had some success in this regard. Despite the challenges, the profession has managed to communicate to parents that standardisation, which treats all children as if they were the same, is not the best way for New Zealand children. The New Zealand Curriculum, they have argued, which takes account of differences and celebrates them, is the far better approach. Parents representing their communities on boards of trustees, have now taken a stand and have recommended that their school charters do not include targets that involve standardised assessment measures. As this issue goes to press 533 schools, representing more than one quarter of all schools, have chosen assessment measures that are not standardised but are reliable and valid measures which accurately show children’s progress and achievement. Meanwhile hundreds more are complying in a minimal way but in fact have no confidence in them to provide good information on children’s progress. This is a perfect example of what happens when governments forget what democracy is. Governments have no mandate except that which the people support. The people in the education sector rightly expect to be consulted on educational matters because they are the experts in the field. To not do so is to invite what has happened in New Zealand. When the people know that a government policy is flawed, wrong or harmful, they will not embrace it or implement it no matter what threats are imposed on them. As we focus in on this general election, political parties might think about who it is they are serving. Who are their party policies for? If they are for educating the children of New Zealand then get the educators’ opinion. Failure to do so in a democracy is to lose. President’s Pen Peter Simpson National President, New Zealand Principals’ Federation Since this will be the last issue of NZ Principal before the other schools in the country. general election, this edition has a strong political flavour in More changes to education would follow and most would be respect of education policy. There is no doubt that education has as unpalatable to the education sector as league tables. They are been a political focus for the present government ever since it likely to include performance pay, a greater focus on central took up the reins of power. Some would even argue that education control than we have seen in this term and a weakening of school has been completely at the mercy of political ideology for the self-management and privatisation. There might also be changes past three-year term. Whatever your view, we all work in the to teacher training, reducing the requirement for comprehensive education sector and will have education issues uppermost in training. We have seen the first trial of this approach already our minds as we head to the ballot box in a few months’ time. with the six‑week graduate teacher training scheme designed Last year, the NZPF executive met with a senior politician to get graduates into low decile schools. We have always argued and former education minister. During the discussion general for high standards in our teacher training because research election campaigns were discussed and the way in which parties demonstrates that there is a strong link between quality training, poll the population to find out how people vote on certain issues. quality teachers and quality learning and achievement. Two statements were of interest to us. The first statement was that The question we all need to consider is how such changes will people vote firstly on how a future government will affect their own income. That finding didn’t draw any surprised reactions from us. The second statement did, however, A National-led government would get some reaction. It was that teachers don’t vote Labour! continue on the same path as now Worth thinking about. At the time I write this column, the full education and we could expect more changes policies of the main parties have not been announced. Nevertheless, I think we can be assured of one thing and consistent with policies. that is that a National-led government would continue on the same path as now and we could expect more changes sit with principals, teachers and education support staff. How consistent with policies such as the standardising of assessment long will it take for our children’s achievement rates to decline? that we have seen with their National Standards this term. What Will it be the same as in other countries that have chosen this we need to consider is how we feel about extending policies direction for their education or will it be different? Will our like National Standards to the next step. An obvious one is the profession under this new direction, continue to satisfy us and formation of league tables. League tables were the promise when fulfil our sense of values? If not, then what? Do we continue to the policy was initially launched in 2008. I quote directly from work in a career that is headed down a path with values we don’t the 2008 policy on National Standards: believe in or do we leave the profession to find an equivalent values-driven career that will deliver a comparable income? I Schools will use National Standards to report to parents can’t help but wonder what that career might look like. on the progress their child makes, and how that progress If you want a future in the education profession you know and compares with their classmates and children elsewhere in respect, your vote at this election could be critical. The election New Zealand. outcome could hit both your own income and your values and And in an information brochure the Prime Minister shows that beliefs. it is intended that National Standards will allow comparisons Still related to education, but on a separate issue, I recently between schools by posing the question attended a health symposium on ‘Health Equity and the Social Determinants of Health’. The keynote address was given by Do you want to know how your child’s school is performing Sir Michael Marmot, who is the Director of the International in National Standards when compared with other Institute for Society and Health. He has led a research group schools? on health inequalities for the last 30 years. I found his address So parents will have information on how their child compares riveting and was moved by the evidence he produced showing with children elsewhere in New Zealand and schools will report the impact health inequality has on the very students in our their whole school’s performance against National Standards schools and their families. A report entitled ‘Closing the gap on every year. In this way parents can compare their child with all life expectancy in a generation’ makes some recommendations others in the country and compare their child’s school with all on how to overcome the inequalities. India, for example, is N Z Principal | S e p t e m b e r 2 0 11 3 implementing the recommendations quite rigidly and already the life expectancy for Indian women has been raised by 41 per cent or ten hours a day over their currently expected lifetime. He referred also to the effect of intelligence and income on achievement. According to his findings, if you are born with below average intelligence and are poor, you will remain of low intelligence. If you are born with below average intelligence and are rich, you will improve your intelligence level. If you are intelligent and poor, your intelligence level will reduce. If you are intelligent and rich you will reach the top. New Zealand and the UK are two countries with too many children the negative statistics. The negative trend can be reversed through reading daily to children, having regular bedtimes, cuddling and conversing with a child between the ages of 3 and 5. New Zealand and the UK are two countries with too many children fitting the negative statistics. Sir Michael went on to talk about heating in homes saying that a child from a cold home is twice as likely to have respiratory problems as a child from a warm home. Cold homes, he told the audience, negatively affect educational outcomes. New Zealand presenter Dr Don Simmers, a GP and member of the Board of NZMA, stated that New Zealand is failing its children in health care and needs to do better. Another speaker, Professor Tony Blakely, stated that New Zealand’s child poverty rate is second only to the United States. There were some staggering New Zealand statistics presented at this health symposium that have direct flow-on effects for the children in the schools we lead. It takes little brain power to work out that a sizable number of the children affected by these health issues reside in our education underachievement statistics. There are choices. A government can choose to address these health and poverty issues, or it can transfer the problem directly to the education sector and say, ‘lift the achievement of these children by assuming their circumstances are the same as every other child who doesn’t have these health and poverty fitting related issues.’ It is this latter response that the present government has chosen. There will be no policy change to address the health and poverty concerns. Teachers do their best to help every child in their school reach their potential, irrespective of their circumstances and will continue to do so. When children are suffering from health issues that can be fixed, however, they feel frustration because these health issues impede children’s learning. Dr Don Simmers says that dealing with health inequities, especially as they relate to children, should not be limited by fiscal constraints. I agree and will also take this issue to the ballot box with me in November! GoDairy Education All-new educational website from DairyNZ Help your students engage with concepts such as innovation, enterprise and sustainability within the context of dairying GoDairy Education includes FREE resources such as • Downloadablecurriculum-linkedteachingunits • Up-to-datebackgroundinformationforteachers • Digitalstorybooks • Digitallearningobjects • Adatabaseofdairy-relatedresourcesfromNewZealandandtheworld Featuring • Cross-curricularlearninginEnglish,mathematicsandstatistics,science, technologyandsocialsciences. • CurrentNewZealandpedagogies,inparticular,teachingfor conceptualunderstandings. GoDairy.co.nz 4 N Z P r i n c i p a l | S e p t e m b e r 2 0 11 Educational Politics In Focus Peter Simpson NZPF President tells us the way it is New Zealand’s education system is at a significant cross road. The future of its world-class status is in jeopardy. Ranked fourth in the OECD, and considered by many to have the best curriculum in the world, New Zealand’s education system now faces a dilemma. Ironically, it is not an educational dilemma but a political one. It is the choice between allowing political ideology or professionalism to determine its future. Education now faces a choice between prescription and professionalism. And prescription, is the choice of the present government. Such a choice is not original. It follows a world-wide trend of governments making demands on their education systems. It’s generally a two-fold demand. First is a call for accountability of public spending and second is the demand to lift student underachievement. In New Zealand 14 per cent of children are classified as underachievers, which is amongst the lowest in the OECD. Despite New Zealand’s high education world ranking and low underachievement rates, the current government, determined to introduce its prescription of standardisation called National Standards, was quick to inflate the underachievement rate to 20 per cent. It could then say that one in five New Zealand children were failing, thereby creating a crisis of confidence amongst the population. There’s nothing like a manufactured crisis to get people’s attention. The crisis of course implied that our education system wasn’t performing (despite all the evidence to the contrary) but the rationale (albeit a false one) was now set to introduce the New Zealand version of National Standards. The sector was not consulted or engaged in this process, yet the outcomes have the potential to profoundly undermine our excellent standing in the world and irrevocably change the purpose and direction of public education as we have known it for over a century. Rightly, professional educators feel disrespected, confused and not trusted. These professionals were responsible for delivering one of the best education systems in the world, often under trying conditions. The introduction of National Standards came right at the time that New Zealand had undergone a superb consultation process to involve school communities in redeveloping the New Zealand Curriculum (NZC). Every principal and school community in the country felt proud of their achievements and from one end of the country to the other schools were moving with their implementation process. The NZC has a focus on a broad selection of subjects, individual learning needs and the importance of recognising differences in the way children learn and in the pace at which they learn. That is why it is the envy of the rest of the world. National Standards are a standardising system that have a very narrow focus on reading writing and maths, and assume all children are the same and learn in the same way. National Standards and the NZC are completely conflicted. This reality has sent the sector into a chaotic spin and morale has plummeted. Even worse, we are now observing early overseas adopters of this standardising system abandoning it because it has increased not decreased the levels of underachievement. What our experts recognise is that children who underachieve need a broader not narrower curriculum. They need to find different ways to get motivated about learning, such as through the arts, sport, history, social sciences and the like. Once engaged they can then find relevance in reading, writing and maths, which they view as tools to help them access more. The risk we face now is that with the NZC not yet fully embedded and standardisation being forced on us, we are likely to lose all the benefits of our world-class curriculum as it is narrowed down to the 3Rs. Along with our NZC is another excellent initiative, Ka Hikitia. Ka Hikitia is a strategy to help Mäori children learn and succeed as Mäori. It has been said that if we can get our Mäori children achieving then our tail of underachievement would be hugely reduced. This is another fantastic initiative that is in its infancy. It is likely, however, to fall victim to the drive for standardisation before it is even tried. What deeply concerns our sector is that from the top down education is out of control. Between NZC, National Standards and Ka Hikitia, there is no coherency and no vision. You cannot have a strategy for sameness like National Standards and at the same time have a broad curriculum to address differences. You cannot have a strategy for Mäori that recognises Mäori as different and simultaneously treat Mäori as if they are the same as everyone else. National Standards and its narrowing of curriculum will disadvantage Mäori, Pacific Island children and children from low decile schools, the very children they are supposed to help. Professionals recognise these inconsistencies and we are now seeing it reflected in the more than 500 school charters that do not comply with the standardisation drive. These are schools making a choice for the children they teach, to embrace the NZC and initiatives like Ka Hikitia. They are schools trying to overcome the confusion by taking a position that is right for their school. N Z Principal | S e p t e m b e r 2 0 11 5 Most of the rest, feeling threatened by the forces bearing down on them from government are making weak attempts to seem compliant but are in no way convinced that standardisation is a solution to underachievement. Those who have tried to fathom how to assess achievement through the National Standards are confused and bewildered because these standards do not align with existing reliable normreferenced assessment measures that schools have been using successfully for many years. To add further confusion there are more changes being introduced at random intervals like the latest literary progression charts sent to schools in June 2011. If it is accountability that the government is after, the sector has no argument. Schools need robust reliable assessment practices in order to ascertain what progress children have made, what their achievement levels are and what their next learning steps are. Schools have been employing such valid and reliable assessment tools for years. If a school is failing to collect robust assessment data then it is the role of ERO to ensure that they do. It is quite clear from overseas experiences that standardised assessment practices are not beneficial to children’s learning, but do have the potential to create a high-stakes environment including the ability to compare individual schools through the construction of league tables. The current government made it quite clear that this was one of the reasons they introduced their standards in the first place. The most recent OECD report indicated that in New Zealand there is very little variance between schools. Any variance was within individual schools. The creation of school league tables in New Zealand can therefore not serve any useful purpose, except to create a false sense of competition between schools, which would detract from their existing collaborative culture. Contrast this scenario with countries that have allowed their education systems to be led by professionalism, where changes are instigated through robust research and best practice. The governments of these countries place high trust in their teachers to be professional, hold them in very high esteem and allow them to get on and teach their nation’s children without high-stakes assessment. Finland and Singapore are such countries. These countries are performing at the very top of the OECD rankings and, as more countries turn their back on the standardised assessment practices and embrace the professionalism approach, they too are lifting in the rankings. Another characteristic of high-performing education systems is the strong partnerships they have with related agencies, policymakers and reference groups. Whilst in New Zealand we did once enjoy a culture of healthy working relationships with policymakers and other related groups, those relationships have eroded as the emphasis has shifted to the unpopular and confusing National Standards. The erosion was articulated in the latest Ministry of Education’s (MOE) formal review by the State Services Commission, Treasury and Department of the Prime Minister and Cabinet with the statement: There is room to improve our engagement with, and strategic management of stakeholders, both in terms of developing a shared vision and direction and to more systematically make effective use of stakeholder expertise and viewpoints. As president of one of the most prominent stakeholder groups, I look forward to these words being fully implemented by the MOE. Right now the sector remains in great confusion and with no clear vision for the future. This fact was not overlooked by the MOE review. In the section headed ‘Strategic Leadership of Schools’ it was noted that the performance rating for effectiveness and efficiency was ‘needing development’ and in the same section: We did not encounter a clear and consistent articulation of a long-term direction for the education system. If the MOE doesn’t know where we are going no wonder the sector is confused. My hunch, however, is that the sector has some very clear ideas of where we need to go long term and its time both the government and the MOE listened and took notice. To this end NZPF is holding a summit on Saturday, 27 August, to which sector heads and association presidents have been invited along with some guest speakers. The main thrust of the summit is to address the question: What is the role of a public school in New Zealand today and what are the key principles on which the New Zealand education system should be based? Our intention is that these principles would become the driving force for education policy decision-making in the future irrespective of what political party leads government. Our aim is to get full agreement on these principles. The outcome of the summit will be published in the Federation Flyer in September. New Zealand’s #1 Out of School Care Provider SKIDS provide FUN, SAFE, Out of School Care programmes ON-SITE at local primary schools • Guaranteed rental income • No administration for schools • • Proven track record Highly trained staff For more information visit www.skids.co.nz Phone 09 576 6602 or 0800 274 1722 6 N Z P r i n c i p a l | S e p t e m b e r 2 0 11 POLITICAL SPOKESPEOPLE STATE THEIR POSITIONS Since this is the last issue of NZ Principal that you will receive before heading to the ballot box, President Peter Simpson has constructed a political overview (see previous pages) of the sector, as he and the NZPF executive see it. Six questions were put to both the Minister of Education, Hon Anne Tolley, and to the Labour Party spokesperson on education, Sue Moroney. Sue Moroney answered each question individually, whilst the Minister chose to make a statement. Question 2 Given that a considerable proportion of the ‘tail of underachievement’ is represented by Mäori students, what is your strategy to address this problem and in what ways do you propose to fund solutions that will allow Mäori students to learn and succeed as Mäori? Answer Ka Hikitia was brought in under the Labour government and we also supported the development of Te Kohitahitanga. We Sue Moroney, Labour Party improved access and participation of Mäori in quality early childhood education. It is early Question 1 days yet to determine the success of these strategies but it is encouraging to see the ‘tail Do you agree that the following set of of underachievement’ reduce to 14 per cent principles should be adopted by all NZ Hon Sue Moroney, Labour Party following these initiatives. political parties to guide the development of Labour is opposed to the funding cuts to education policy in New Zealand? If not, what early childhood education which has resulted in higher fees for principles should guide education policy in New Zealand? parents and fewer qualified staff being employed. This makes ■■ A successful education system will lead to a successful and quality ECE less accessible for low income families and will have prosperous country. a disproportionate impact on Mäori. ■■ Positive and healthy working relationships between Labour is also concerned that too few NZ students remain the education sector and government is critical to the engaged at school and that the drop in engagement is steepest implementation of education policy. for Mäori students. ■■ Accountability for the public investment in education should be At the time of publication of this article our education policy transparent and trustworthy. has not been released, but we are working on innovative ways ■■ Children should leave school with appropriate skills to be to improve engagement of students. successful in the twenty-first century global world. ■■ New Zealanders can expect teachers to provide a high quality relevant inclusive education system. Answer Labour does agree with these principles as our track record clearly demonstrates. We are proud that we have a world-class education system in New Zealand and that our students consistently rank in the top five internationally. We know we can do even better. I would also add ‘parents’ to the second bullet point, as Labour believes that when relationships are strong between parents and teachers; schools and the Ministry; the education sector and the government, then children’s education will thrive. That’s why I have been so alarmed at the deliberate strategy by National to drive a wedge between parents and teachers during its short time in government. The rift that is developing between schools and the Ministry of Education is also of concern. The ability of teachers to provide a high quality, relevant, inclusive education system is also being undermined by the constant reduction in funding for professional development by the National government. Question 3 The Tomorrow’s Schools policy of the 1980s made all schools self-managing under a board of trustees. Do you agree that this model is a successful model? Does your party intend to retain and strengthen this model of school administration? Answer Yes. The model is generally successful and it can always be improved with better training and support for BOTs. It is important that schools are responsive to the needs of the local community and that the community has a strong sense of ‘ownership’ and involvement in their children’s education. Once again, we are world leaders in this regard. Labour does oppose the creeping privatisation of our education system that PPPs (Private Public Partnerships) represent. That model has failed overseas and the current government has been unable to demonstrate any benefit to either the taxpayer or the education of our children of going down that risky path. Question 4 Do you agree that the broad New Zealand Curriculum is the key to New Zealand’s high positioning in the OECD rankings because N Z Principal | S e p t e m b e r 2 0 11 7 it allows for the development of skills in creativity, entrepreneurship and critical thinking which are essential for children in the twenty-first century? If so, how would you propose to more fully support the implementation and further development of the school curriculum? I am proud to say that you can judge us on our track record and commentators across the political spectrum agree that our recently-announced economic policy will give New Zealand the boost we need to sustain our future. Hon Anne Tolley, National Party Answer The government is absolutely committed Labour is proud to have worked with to education and giving every young New the sector to develop the New Zealand Zealander the opportunity to succeed. We Curriculum and we find it frustrating see education and skills as part of the main that National’s National Standards have drivers for leading us out of the current been forced in over the top to narrow the economic climate, and we are investing curriculum down to reading, writing and heavily in this area. maths. Budget 2011 gave a record $12.2 billion Good educationalists know that we all to education – and an additional $1.4 learn in different ways and are inspired to billion over the next four years. This means Hon Anne Tolley, National Party achieve by different means. Narrowing the the government has invested an extra $4.4 curriculum will have the effect of further billion in education since 2009. entrenching underachievement for children who don’t learn And we remain focused on doing the very best for our literacy and numeracy in the traditional way. The ‘one-size-fits- children and young people – from early childhood education, all’ approach to education does not work. through schooling, and into vocational and tertiary training National Standards have distracted our primary schools from and education. being able to fully implement and further develop the school It’s too early to claim that the new, recently-introduced curriculum. curriculum has had any bearing in international rankings. But we know it is innovative and prepares our students with the skills Question 5 they need to succeed in the twenty-first century. Do you think that student engagement lies behind student We also know that students can’t take advantage of all the rich achievement, and if so how would a narrowing of the curriculum and diverse areas of the curriculum if they can’t read, write and through the creation of a high-stakes assessment regime focused do maths properly. on just the three subjects of reading, writing and maths, help That’s why National Standards are so important – for underachieving students? identifying the students who need extra help and making sure they get the support they need – as well as ensuring that students Answer who are doing well can do even better. Student engagement is fundamental to student achievement And we know that students with poor literacy and numeracy and therefore the National Standards approach does not help skills are at a much greater risk of disengaging and giving up on underachieving students. school. We can’t allow this to happen. If schools are going to be judged on how many students they Our other great challenge is keeping 16- and 17-year-olds get ‘over the line’ then the natural tendency will be to focus all engaged in education, and ensuring they don’t drop out of the efforts on those performing just below. Over time, this will erode system. the focus from those who are really struggling and also those The Youth Guarantee, trades academies and service academies who are at or above the standard. This will lead to a mediocre are providing exciting opportunities for thousands of teenagers, education system. free of charge. Labour wants an education system that works to unlock the Vital partnerships between schools, tertiary institutions and potential of each child. We can only do that if we recognise that employers are allowing young people to learn practical skills each child is unique rather than expecting them to be standard. while gaining worthwhile qualifications, using the flexibility of NCEA credits. Question 6 Work is also underway with the education sector and industry Will your party provide funding to schools for learning support groups to develop much clearer career pathways for young programmes that have been researched and identified as people from next year, as we continue our work to improve the successful in lifting student achievement? transition between school, tertiary education and skills training, and the workplace. Answer I have worked closely with many sector groups on the changes Labour has a track record of responding to evidence-based we are making to the education system, and I would like to programmes and we would prioritise funding for those that are take this opportunity to thank them for their hard work and proven to lift student achievement. dedication. Contrast this with the approach from National, which was to Our policies going into the election have yet to be announced – rush the National Standards legislation through parliament under but we will continue to ensure that lifting student achievement urgency, preventing any public scrutiny on this programme and and giving every child the chance to reach their potential is at then implementing it without appropriate consultation or even the heart of everything we do. a trial? 8 N Z P r i n c i p a l | S e p t e m b e r 2 0 11 Finding a roof to meet your school’s needs Since the Ministry of Education’s Technical Guidelines for Structural Mitigation Work report (2003), schools across the country have been re-evaluating their choice of roofing with a view to improving safety and performance. The report addressed ‘heavy’ roofs made from concrete or clay and recommended that “All heavy tiled roofs are required to be removed and replaced with a lightweight roof”. Since that time, many schools have chosen to replace their old heavyweight concrete or clay tile roofs with lightweight alternatives, such as pressed steel. Schools have found that a move to lightweight roofing, such as Gerard Roofs’ pressed steel tiles, is beneficial for many reasons: • Weight – While a concrete tile roof on an average home can weigh around 10 tonnes, the equivalent Gerard satin finish steel tile roof would weigh just one tonne. • Water-tightness – A properly installed Gerard steel tile roof is fully weatherproof, and unlike traditional concrete or clay tiles, Gerard tiles won’t crack and let in water. • Secure in high wind zones – Gerard’s pressed steel tiles are interlocking and horizontally fixed. A Gerard roof can resist winds equivalent to a Category 5 cyclone. • Safe in heavy snow – Gerard roofs can easily withstand heavy snow loadings. They also feature a textured coating that ensures a safe thaw rate; preventing snow dumping that can endanger people and property. • Resistance to corrosion – The protective coatings on Gerard roof tiles include a special combination of aluminium and zinc, which provides up to eight times the corrosion resistance of some steel roofing products. • Drinking water - Rural communities benefit from being able to collect potable water, directly from Gerard roofs that easily meets World Health Organization standards. Pressed steel roofing is a cost-effective option. No special materials are needed for coastal areas – therefore there are no additional costs. Fewer weight-bracing materials are needed for new buildings. The price of a Gerard Roof includes all required materials. Maintenance is simple and inexpensive and Gerard Roofs offers a 50-year pro-rata warranty. If you would like more information on Gerard Roofs’ pressed steel tiles for your school, please visit www.gerardroofs.co.nz 1. Lightweight While a heavyweight tile roof on an average building can weigh around 10 tonnes, an equivalent Gerard pressed steel roof would weigh as little as just one tonne. 1 1 NE N TO 1 NE N TO m m 20 1 NE N TO 1 NE N TO 1 NE N TO 1 NE N TO E NN TO 10 .5 1 NE N TO 1 NE N TO 1 NE N TO 1 NE N TO 10 .5 m m 20 2. Locked on Gerard tiles are interlocking, and every tile is fixed with eight separate fasteners locking the roof together into one structural unit. In many cases, old concrete or clay tiles are not individually fixed to the roof framing and many rely mainly on their weight to stay put. Positive outcomes for schools making the change Schools that have made the move to lightweight pressed steel, are impressed with the results of their investments. Kevin Dean, Deputy Principal of Whangarei Girls High School says “We are very happy with our new roof – it looks good and has solved a major problem we had with roofing integrity”. But on their 1930’s buildings, retaining a certain aesthetic was important too. Dean adds “We selected Gerard tile as these have the same look, but are steel and interlocking so of course are a much improved product”. At South Otago High School, Project Manager Greg Johnston tells, “The board was committed to replacing the roof with a lightweight alternative, but they were keen to preserve its unique character” and adds “I recommended Gerard tiles after noticing another school in the area had used them for the same reasons. The price was competitive and the application was straightforward – the roofing team were slick operators”. In view of so many compelling reasons to replace old heavy roofs with lightweight pressed steel, there is now a real movement happening in New Zealand, with students and staff reaping the rewards. MyPlanet Connects the Natur Curriculum and Inquiry Lear Liz Hawes Editor The Department of Conservation (DOC) accepts growing evidence that children are increasingly disconnected from the natural world: Without direct experiences in nature, research findings suggest that children are missing opportunities to enhance their health and wellbeing, and to develop responsible long-term environmental behaviour.1 DOC’s national education advisor, Pam Crisp, says, ‘The research identifies a lot of scattered resources and activities of varying quality, but nothing that communicates a “big picture” understanding of the natural world, and the vital role of our rivers, seas, forests, soils, marine reserves and indigenous biodiversity to our health and wellbeing, economy, sense of national identity and ultimately, our survival.’ DOC is therefore developing a web-based interactive planning tool (working title: MyPlanet) to help teachers explore and develop with their students big ideas and values about the natural world and conservation – the big picture of life on Earth. This web-based tool is part of wider programme of work to support young people connect to the natural world. The tool has three main purposes: ■■ ■■ ■■ to support students’ conceptual understandings of the natural world using an inquiry model of action-based learning to explore conservation big ideas to examine values with respect to the natural environment – in particular, traditional Mäori values. The conservation big ideas and values The overarching conservation concept of MyPlanet is: People are an integral part of the natural diversity of our planet. Everything is connected, so what we do DOES make a difference. This concept is unpacked into four big ideas and whakatauki: ■■ ■■ Everything is connected – Ko au ko te taiao, ko te taiao ko au / I am the environment, the environment is me People can’t live without the planet’s diversity – Toitü te marae a Täne, Toitü te marae a Tangaroa, Toitü te Tangata / If we care for the resources of the land and the sea, we the people, will survive ■■ ■■ People are part of the natural world – He nohonga ngätahitanga ahau me te taiäo / We live as one with our natural world New Zealand is a special place with many unique species and ecosystems – Käore he wähi i kö atu i a Aotearoa me öna koiora, me ona waahi ahurei / There is no place in the world like Aotearoa with its special biodiversity and unique ecosystems. Alongside the big ideas are trad itional Mäori values: Aroha, Through the magnifying glass. Pho Manaaki, Wairua, Mauri and Mana. Learning about these values is embedded in the suggested learning experiences within the pathways provided in the online planning tool. MyPlanet planning tool The MyPlanet planning tool provides ‘pathways’ depending on search criteria (like a Google search). Pathways are similar to unit plans that connect conceptual understandings, the New Zealand Curriculum, Te Marautanga o Aotearoa, and related learning experiences to learning resources and conservation big ideas. Teachers can select learning experiences from pathways and community-based activities, and save them to a ‘personal pathway’, where the suggestions can be tailored for the specific needs of their students. While this tool provides many exciting ideas for teachers to save and use, it also provides prompts to encourage teachers to think critically and inquire into what they are teaching, and why. Pathways are staircased around curriculum levels 1–5 and focus on activities conducted either in the classroom, in the school grounds, or outside the school. The learning experiences sit mostly in the science and social science learning areas, however, many are cross-curricula and specific literacy learning links have been outlined in the tool. The pathways are not designed to be comprehensive units of work. Instead, they are designed to motivate, challenge and inspire teachers to: ■■ ■■ ■■ think about students’ learning needs focus on conceptual knowledge scaffold students into taking informed action. Conceptual understandings are delivered via a specific setting/ context with a range of contexts suggested within each pathway. Any combination of contexts can be explored. DOC staff member showing children from Waiotahi Valley School the way to plant trees, Ohiwa Harbour, East Coast. Photo: Nikki Slade-Robinson 10 N Z P r i n c i p a l | S e p t e m b e r 2 0 11 ral World with the rning Experiences Suggested learning exper iences are divided into types, following a basic inquirylearning approach modelled from ‘Approaches to Social Enquiry’, from the Building Conceptual Understandings in the Social Sciences series. Regional events MyPlanet also allows teachers to look for activities in the community that are delivered by various conservation edu to: Catherine Tiffen cation providers. These may be one-off events or ongoing learning programmes. The tool will provide information on the community event and how it links to the NZ Curriculum, Te Marautanga o Aotearoa and the conservation big ideas. A teacher can add these events to their personal pathway. Once the teacher has created a personal pathway that contains the learning experiences, events and curriculum information that they want, it can be emailed, posted to social network sites, downloaded or printed. Next steps Initial content for the prototype of MyPlanet has been developed by Lift Education in consultation with teachers, environmental educators, education advisors at Victoria University College of Education and educational researchers. The prototype is already in development and testing, and teachers will begin to use it in September, this year. After that, a full version will be developed for release to schools. The target is for all schools to have access to MyPlanet by early 2012. Reference Benefits of Connecting Children with Nature. Department of Conser vation, March 2011. Research in support of Investing in Conservation Education for a sustainable and Prosperous Future – Tai Ao – Tai Awatea. Department of Conservation National Education Strategy 2010–30. 1 You can copy TV for teaching Take out a Screenrights licence through the STA and 0:07 • copy documentaries, drama, movies, whatever you like • record from payTV, free to air TV, and radio • download programmes legally available on the internet • store, play and access programmes using interactive whiteboards, eTV, Clickview and Digital Video Commander More information Freephone: 0800 44 2348 Freefax: 0800 44 7006 licensing@screenrights.org www.screenrights.org/nz Image credits L-R: Whare Maori, Scottie Douglas Productions; Polynesian Panthers, Tumanako Productions. 0:12 0:18 N Z Principal | S e p t e m b e r 2 0 11 11 Smokefree teaching Corinna School in Porirua reports on the Years 7 and 8 resource aimed at building student resilience Kath Blair Health Sponsorship Council Young people are faced with a bewildering number of choices from the standards they set for themselves in the classroom to decisions about drinking or smoking cigarettes. Student resilience is key to ensuring students make good choices. Caro Begg from Porirua’s Corinna School sums it up by saying her goal is to equip her students to have the ability to sift information, think and make informed decisions. Corinna is a health-promoting school and as part of this approach Caro has been using the new Smokefree years 7 and 8 teaching resource Staying Smokefree/Te Noho Auahi Kore. This resource has a primary focus on levels 3 and 4 of the health and physical education learning area but has links to most learning areas, including mathematics and statistics, as well as English. Teachers can choose to use some of the inquiry-based learning activities or the entire resource, which includes a teacher guide with learning activities arranged in four units, an audio CD containing eight stories, student cards with a full transcript of the stories and a student journal. The journal encourages students to think about their attitudes and beliefs, as well as ways to deal with peer pressure and stress. Ideal for hot seating Caro found hot seating was ideally suited to getting students talking about the questions raised in the stories. ‘The stories have challenged their thinking and I hope this will transfer into other areas of their lives where they have to make difficult choices.’ One of the stories is about Old Mitch, who asks a boy called Ngäkau to buy his smokes, although he doesn’t want to do this. Caro’s students raised questions about whether Ngäkau and other whänau members should have helped Old Mitch give up smoking. ‘It was interesting that the students used the word “bystander.” We try to give students the message that if you are not part of the solution, you are part of the problem. The students have obviously made a connection between the messages we’re trying to give them and this particular learning situation.’ Old Mitch story gets students thinking 14 N Z P r i n c i p a l | S e p t e m b e r 2 0 11 resource new Smokefree teaching Making maths real Students at Corinna also had great fun working out how much money Old Mitch was spending on smokes and how much he could save by quitting. Caro says using the resource to contextualise the maths was a real opportunity. ‘Maths is about real life and this resource made it real to them.’ Another pleasing outcome was the students’ development of tactics or techniques for questioning during hot seating, Caro says. ‘It’s about having the ability to ask more probing questions and having a discussion where you can support your point of view with evidence.’ The students got the idea very quickly that the message was not to smoke. She had to work harder however, to get them thinking about some of the difficulties of not smoking. They talked about peer pressure and also the influence of older people, like Old Mitch in the story. ‘A lot of our kids have that extended sort of family, where everybody in the community is an auntie or uncle, and these relationships will affect some of the decisions students make. These decisions are not simple and they’re complicated by feelings of love, responsibility and duty.’ Caro stresses her goal is not to preach to the students or their families about not smoking. She says the learning intention was to work out the author’s message and develop students’ literacy, as well as the skills they need to become informed citizens. Corinna’s Caro Begg aims to build student resilience for working with community groups and families, and sample templates. Teacher Kate Collins says becoming a health-promoting school has been an important step for the school, with smokefree being promoted through communications with parents. ‘Our students are very critical if they think anyone is smoking around the school – they’re very clear that it’s not acceptable.’ The planning guide has been sent to every New Zealand school and the teaching resource has gone to all schools with year 7 and 8 students. If you have questions or need more information please contact Kath Blair at kath@hsc.org.nz or (04) 472 5777. About the Author Kath Blair is a former teacher who manages the HSC’s Smokefree Schools project. The HSC (Health Sponsorship Council) is a New Zealand government agency that uses health promotion to promote health and encourage healthy lifestyles. Planning guide for principals and trustees Many boards of trustees have asked for a practical planning guide to help them move beyond compliance and make their school community truly smokefree. Feedback from school trustees has shown growing awareness of the importance of the Smokefree/Auahi Kore kaupapa and a willingness to go further than just a sign on the gate! The new planning guide, Our Smokefree School/He Kura Auahi Kore will help you embed smokefree lifestyles into the culture of your school. You can use the planning guide to take small steps or make major change. The guide will give you programme planning tools, including a DVD, tips Corinna students asked many questions N Z Principal | S e p t e m b e r 2 0 11 15 Supplementary Learning Support Marie Treloar SLS Teacher and Team Coordinator, Counties Manukau. President of the NZ SLS Teachers’ Association Inc Supplementary Learning Support (SLS) is a Ministry of Education initiative that began in 2004 with 55 learning support teachers nationally catering for around 550 students. Support teacher numbers were increased in 2005 to cater for 1,000 students and in 2006 were further increased. Today we have approximately 150 teachers nationally catering for the needs of 1,500 students. Learning support teachers come from a wide variety of backgrounds in education. Ex–resource teachers of learning and Students receiving SLS are also eligible for specialist services from the Ministry of Education, special education, as well as learning support from LSTs. Eligibility for SLS service is based around students meeting criteria for both literacy and numeracy. They will be operating at or below level 1 of the curriculum. Nominations are called for in the various Ministry of Education – special education areas, and nominations are submitted by special education or RTLB for moderation. The moderation process enables the SLS management committees to rank the nominations in order of need. Students may meet This association has been formed to criteria and get service if the area has a teacher available to pick them up. However, they may also help provide a bridge to those who meet criteria and not get service in some areas, because the need outweighs the availability of a are isolated, provide contact with all the teacher at that time. Some areas have a far greater regions, and to provide a forum for greater need than others. There are also some nominations that do not information sharing. meet criteria. In areas where students meet criteria, but the behaviour (RTLB), special education, experienced classroom travel time to their school is beyond 30 minutes, the school teachers, special education needs coordinators (SENCOs), may be given managed pool funding. This enables the school special needs teachers, deputy principals and principals. to manage the additional teacher resource for the good of the Learning support teachers (LSTs), or supplementary learning student. support teachers (SLS) as they are also known, provide support The MOE website has information around the criteria, and to students with significant and ongoing special education also a copy of the MOE nomination form. needs, with the overall goal of improving educational outcomes In April last year we held our third national conference, which for students. was hosted by Wellington. Approximately 120 SLS teachers They support teachers and teacher aides, by working with attended the conference. them, providing guidance and adaptations of classroom A number of SLS teachers are quite isolated, being the only programmes and adapted resources so that identified students ones in their area. Others work in cluster groups. The conference can access the curriculum in an inclusive setting. They can also is an opportunity for wonderful professional development and provide strategies that may assist with the management of the to meet up and share experiences with other SLS teachers. student in the classroom. Over the past four years we have worked hard to create our LSTs also work with the individual students, teaching and own association. At conference last year we held our inaugural supporting them through their individual educational plan meeting for the NZ Supplementary Learning Support Teachers’ (IEP) goals, as they grow in confidence and in the knowledge Association Incorporated. The national executive has regional that they can learn. representation across New Zealand. An IEP is an important plan that outlines what the student This association has been formed to help provide a bridge to can do, and what their next steps or goals need to be, and how those who are isolated, provide contact with all the regions, and these might be attained. These goals ought to be measurable and to provide a forum for greater information sharing. We see this as incremental enough that they are attainable. a means to strengthen an already focused and highly motivated The IEP is what the SLS teacher is guided by when planning group of specialist teachers who, for an identified group of activities for the student’s learning. students, know they are ‘making a difference.’ Supplementary Learning Support is supplementary to what We know that the SLS service is currently under review. In the the school already provides for the student. SLS teachers work meantime the current guidelines apply. collaboratively with school personnel and other agencies If you would like to learn more about SLS, go to the MOE involved with a student. This collaboration is very important website, and search SLS, or get in touch with your designated as when everyone works together for the good of the student, a SLS coordinator at your special education district office. wrap around service is provided. 16 N Z P r i n c i p a l | S e p t e m b e r 2 0 11 Whakatipuranga – Arapiki Ako Centre for Māori and Indigenous Literacy and Numeracy AD1159_CERVIN He aha te mea nui o tënei kaupapa – What is the importance these qualifications which refer to ‘Mäori literacy’ and which of this gathering? He tauira, he tauira, he tauira – It is the learner, use the definition of this term from the Te Käwai Ora Report it is the learner, it is the learner. (Mäori Affairs, 2001) commissioned by the Rt Hon Minister He aha te mea nui o te ao? – What is the most important thing Tariana Turia. in the world? He tangata, he tangata, he tangata – It is people, it Echoing conversations elsewhere in the sector, staff at is people, it is people. Awanuiarängi found themselves engaged in rich debate about Recently, Te Whare Wänanga o Awanuiärangi launched diverse ways in which tutors interpreted the phrase ‘Mäori literacy’ Whakatipuranga – Arapiki Ako. Taken from the document and its stated definition. A resulting nationwide hui focused on prepared by the National Institute of Mäori Education, Centre the fundamental question of how context (Mätauranga Mäori) for Mäori and Indigenous Literacy and Numeracy, Te Ako Tüapapa, the report provides key findings in the interpretations He tauira, he tauira, he tauira – It is the of literacy and numeracy for Mäori. learner, it is the learner, it is the learner. Awanuiarängi invited literacy and numeracy leaders and experts within the tertiary sector and mätauranga and content (the deliberate teaching of literacy and numeracy) Mäori to discuss and provide direction for the use of terminology connect to this terminology. such as ‘Mäori literacy’ and ‘literacy for Mäori’. The full report document is accessible by contacting the The Mäori literacy hui were convened nationwide with the Centre for Mäori and Indigenous Literacy and Numeracy, Te notion of rähui in mind. In his publication Tikanga Mäori (Mead, Ako Tüäpapa at akotuapapa@wananga.ac.nz. 2003), Sir Hirini Moko Mead discusses the types of ‘rähui’ or ritual prohibition and cites Best’s definition of a ‘pou rähui’ as ‘a post to which is attached a maro (apron)’ (Best, 1904). Mead goes on to explain that either a rangatira (chief) or tohunga (expert) held the authority to drive a stake into the ground and attach their maro to the pou. This idea of putting a stake in the ground underpinned the hui that form the basis of this report. Mäori literacy is multifaceted. The qualifier ‘Mäori’ can be PROGRAMMES OF STUDY 2012* added to the way we understand literacy and numeracy in two ways. The first, ‘Mäori literacy’, implies literacy as ‘content’ while school of iwi development the second, ‘literacy for Mäori’, is more focused. Awanuiarängi Marae based programmes received Pütea Arapiki ako funding from the Tertiary Education school of undergraduate studies Commission to convene a series of nationwide hui to facilitate Certificate programmes korero with interested stakeholders and, ultimately, to draw Bachelor of Health Sciences Māori (Nursing) together a collective understanding of this terminology by Bachelor of Māori Performing Arts connecting ideas and continuing conversations. Bachelor of Humanities In recent years tertiary education organisations throughout Bachelor of Environment Studies Aotearoa, New Zealand have been building capacity in Bachelor of Education addressing adult literacy and numeracy. This work has been government funded and aims to address the large numbers of school of indigenous graduate adult New Zealanders with literacy and numeracy issues. It is studies Masters of Indigenous Studies, Masters of Māori Studies, widely acknowledged that this capacity-building phase has been Doctor of Philosophy, (Māori Studies/ Indigenous Studies/ one of preparation for all organisations. The overall aim was that Environmental Studies/ Education) explicit teaching of literacy and numeracy would be ‘business as usual’ throughout the sector. SCHOLARSHIPS AVAILABLE C ONDI T IONS A PPLY As part of the capability process across the sector, many educators – including Awanuiarängi staff – are enrolled in further WH A KATĀ N E | AU C K L A N D | WH A NG A R E I professional development such as the National Certificate in Adult Literacy Education (NCALE). This certificate is offered as to enrol or for more information please call NCALE Vocational, for tutors who aspire to teach literacy and 0508 92 62 64 numeracy as a curriculum topic. Significantly, Awanuiarängi OR VISIT OUR WEBSITE AT WWW.WANANGA.AC.NZ staff were drawn to the special notes in the unit standards for N Z Principal | S e p t e m b e r 2 0 11 AD1159_CERVIN.indd 1 17 12/08/2011 9:18 AM PRINCIPAL(LY) YOURS Liz Hawes Editor Whetu Cormick, with empowering style, leads his children through a time of epic change This is the story of a merger. It is also perhaps the last story that will be told of Macandrew Intermediate, a school that boasts a proud and lengthy history stretching back 128 years and has seen many a change in both role and roll over those years. For some years now numbers have been dropping across Dunedin schools and in particular the South Dunedin area, which experienced a 40 per cent decline. Whetu Cormick takes a pragmatic view of the situation. He recognises that his surplus classrooms need to be filled and has already explored the idea of establishing a preschool unit on his school grounds. That idea never came to fruition but what is absolutely certain is that some time next year Macandrew Intermediate will merge with the local Forbury Primary School. 18 N Z P r i n c i p a l | S e p t e m b e r 2 0 11 ‘The review has followed a good process so far’, says Whetu. ‘The issue of falling rolls in Dunedin South had to be addressed and the decision to merge with Forbury is a sensible one.’ Whetu has since been preparing his staff and students for the change. I am taken on a tour of the school by two senior students, Sam and Jamie, who tell me their views on the merger. ‘It will be different having the younger Forbury kids here,’ says Jamie, ‘but we’re the big people and it’s our job to make sure that they feel welcome here because they won’t just be our visitors. They will be the same as us. Our school will be their school too. At the end of the year we are having a celebration for the years 7 and 8 Macandrew kids because that’s the last time we will be the Macandrew Intermediate School, and then we are going to have a big welcome party for the Forbury school kids.’ ‘At Macandrew we are like a big family,’ says Sam. ‘Everyone knows everyone else. Our principal knows everyone by name. When the Forbury kids come we will have to make sure that we look out for the little kids. We will have to be fair and not just take them over. So we might have to make some changes to our systems like our school council to include the younger kids too.’ The maturity and foresight of these responses is inspirational. I think back to tertiary-level mergers I have encountered myself and think how much more successful they would have been with Jamie and Sam on the merger boards. Principal Whetu Cormick blends easily into the back row of the class ‘People have to take this on board in their own way and in their own time. There are many people involved here and they all have different issues to deal with so let’s just take the time we need to look after everyone in the process.’ On the issue of whether he will apply for the principal’s position of the new merged school Whetu is quite clear. ‘For me it will be all about whether the new board shares the same values and vision as me.’ Whetu’s values and vision are also very clear. He wants to develop young people to be drivers of their own learning; he wants a student-driven curriculum that reflects the contributions Macandrew kids choose their pastels to sketch out the wonders of Matariki Whilst kids like Jamie and Sam are well prepared for their role that the students make; he is committed to biculturalism which in helping the merger succeed, the issues for principal Whetu he sees as an inclusive term, and works hard to ensure ‘things Cormick stray across a much wider spectrum. They include Mäori’ have prominence in his school. What’s good for Mäori funding, staffing, classroom allocation, demolition of some is also good for Päkehä kids.’ classrooms and the building of a new staff room, appointment of a new school board of trustees and of course the issue of the future It’s our job to make sure that they [Forbury principal of this future school. kids] feel welcome here because they won’t just ‘It’s not without its stressful moments’, says Whetu of the merger process. ‘My concern be our visitors, they will be the same as us. is that it is proceeding too fast. There are so many issues to address and there is a Our school will be their school too. strong will to make it fair and get it right for everyone, but that will never be achieved in haste.’ ‘The curriculum is the key to our success as educators’, says Whetu’s view is that good will and focus could be lost through Whetu. ‘That is why it is so disappointing to watch the current the desire to have the new merged school up and running at Minister of Education wanting to focus only on reading, writing the start of 2012 and this could compromise its chances of and maths. The Minister says underachieving kids need the three succeeding. Rs to access the rest of the curriculum and to lift achievement that’s what we have to concentrate on. I say she is fundamentally wrong! What those kids need are our best efforts to engage them through a connected curriculum that they are interested in and one where they contribute to its design thus empowering them to be in charge of their own learning. That’s where our broad curriculum is invaluable. If we can re-engage them through sport, the arts, technologies, social science or performing arts, sooner or later they realise that they need to be able to read and do maths because they are the tools that they will use to learn about the things they are now interested in.’ Recognising this has persuaded Whetu Cormick’s board of trustees to turn its back on the government’s National Standards policy. ‘My board and school community can see that National Standards which, as the name suggests, is a system of N Z Principal | S e p t e m b e r 2 0 11 19 Excited children bursting to give their view Teachers’ art work is also displayed to inspire standardising kids and treating them as if they are all the same. They know that this is not the way to help our children who are struggling or are reluctant learners. In fact it’s far more likely that curved balls that life sometimes dishes up. ‘Through the emphasis we have on our school values and positive education programmes our kids learn to face difficult situations when they arise. We want them to have a range of functional and intelligent responses to Every kid here can do something well adverse situations,’ says Whetu. I looked to my school guides, Jamie and whether its maths or sport or ice Sam to see how successful Whetu and his staff had been. We were a short way into the school skating. We learn off each other too. tour, which had so far taken us down the main National Standards would do them damage. For the good of our corridor towards the technology rooms when ‘Innovation’, children and especially our struggling children, our board is not ‘Respect’, ‘Excellence’ and ‘Integrity’ made themselves known. engaging with National Standards.’ They loomed large on the expansive corridor walls, which were Whetu believes that schools do have a role to play in educating otherwise lavishly decorated with examples of the school’s art children to be resilient and to have the skills to cope with the works. Jamie and Sam chat together 20 N Z P r i n c i p a l | S e p t e m b e r 2 0 11 Principal Whetu Cormick joins the boys in class The girls get special attention from principal Whetu Cormick I goaded my guides a little. ‘Oh we see the word “excellence” For Sam the most special thing about Macandrew was the all the time but does it really mean anything?’ learning. ‘The teachers here are great. Every time I do maths, ‘We see excellence as being bus drivers’, replied Jamie. ‘We I learn something new. Because our classes aren’t so big it is strive to all be bus drivers. That means we drive our own learning. Some people are still passengers and they need help to become He’s an awesome leader because he gets us drivers. Some are hitch-hikers and they need even more support. And then there are to drive our own learning and even to run hijackers who disrupt other people’s learning our assemblies. and they need support to help them see that they could be bus drivers too if they wanted.’ a real advantage for us and we know everyone. Leadership is Sam agreed. ‘Excellence also means you always put in your encouraged and I think that at our school everyone could be a best effort and you have to reflect and focus on your learning peer leader.’ otherwise you don’t know what to do next.’ And how do the kids find Mr Cormick as a leader? ‘He’s an We moved on to talk about ‘innovation’ with its attendant awesome leader because he gets us to drive our own learning and actions including problem solving, finding other ways and even to run our assemblies. Kids who don’t like assembly much, meeting challenges. ‘This is about using your creativity,’ says they are the ones who organise it. Mr Cormick just speaks when Sam, ‘and one way to express creativity is through art works. he’s invited, like to tell us about the merger. He makes sure we That’s why we have so many different sorts of art works at our are involved in everything.’ school so that you have lots of opportunities to be creative in I leave without doubt that this extraordinary school will rise different ways.’ to meet the challenge of the new day in a new role but with all ‘It’s not just about visual arts either’, says Jamie, ‘Some kids the qualities and strengths of the old. Kia kaha Macandrew find maths is their art and they are really good at maths. And Intermediate. you can solve problems in all sorts of different ways other than maths or art. It might just be fixing a problem with your mate in the playground.’ There was no doubt these kids had a firm grip on what their school values were and, more importantly, how to live them. I asked my guides what was special about being at Macandrew School. ‘Everyone is special here and you feel like you belong,’ said Jamie. ‘It doesn’t matter how clever you are or if you are not clever because if you’re not clever you will be good at something and the teachers will find what that is and you will get better at it. Everyone gets better at something here.’ ‘That’s right,’ says Sam. ‘Every kid here can do something well whether it’s maths or sport or ice skating. We learn off each other too. There are really bright people here, who are much smarter than kids at a lot of other schools and we’ve got rep rugby players and cricket players too.’ ‘This is a really good school,’ says Jamie, ‘because you have so many opportunities. We are not a big school so whatever you want to do, you can. You don’t have to wait to get into the cricket team, for instance, you just go straight in. It’s not exclusive.’ The boys enjoy each others camaraderie at lunch time N Z Principal | S e p t e m b e r 2 0 11 21 TE AKATEA CONFERENCE 2011 Liz Hawes Editor Conference delegates head to the dining room for a traditional hāngī lunch NZPF President, Peter Simpson, considered it an honour to be invited to speak at this year’s Te Akatea hui. NZPF has recently focused a great deal of its attention on Mäori achievement, especially for Mäori children in mainstream schools, and has been looking for a way forward. Peter and the NZPF executive saw Te Akatea as the first step on the journey towards making a difference for Mäori children because one of the Te Akatea principles is that Akatea will drive the changes for Mäori education. ‘It makes good sense to look to our Mäori principal colleagues at Te Akatea to advise us on how best to proceed to make a positive difference for our tamariki,’ he said. Cloak and piupiu created at the Te Rito school of weaving The rare and therapeutic mud pools of Whakarewarewa In his address to the conference Peter Simpson expressed this desire to work alongside Te Akatea to promote the philosophy of Matauranga Mäori, take direction from his Mäori principal colleagues and support them in getting their vision for tamariki Mäori embedded in mainstream schools. He assured the audience that what is right for Mäori success will also be right for Päkehä success and that he wanted to see that Mäori children had the opportunity to develop their own cultural identity in their school learning environment and to learn and succeed as Mäori. Most of the NZPF executive members attended the conference and were deeply impressed by the warm welcome, the hospitality, the excellent speakers and the superb humour of MC Kingi Biddle, who pulled the conference together. For some, being welcomed onto the marae was a new experience and the exceptional hängï-prepared food was a special treat. The tour of Te Puia Te Rito School of Weaving and the Te Puia carving school gave delegates first-hand experience of the creation of tukutuku panels, piupiu skirts and cloaks whilst the young students in the carving school demonstrated their skills whilst we watched. The later tour of Whakarewarewa with its rare collection of mud pools and geysers was a further pleasure and capping the social activities was the performance at Mitai Village and of course the conference dinner. The conference provided a royal feast of cultural immersion. There was also much to learn from the conference itself. Dr Rich Allen with his ‘greenlight’ classrooms, demonstrated the importance of learning with movement telling his audience that 22 N Z P r i n c i p a l | S e p t e m b e r 2 0 11 inventing physical activities as a means of children answering questions was more beneficial to their learning than sitting at tables waiting to call out or write the answer. Tommy Wilson, a passionate children’s writer and initiator of the series of ‘kapai’ books, both entertained and educated his audience on the importance of kaupapa Mäori and the value of storytelling as a means of giving our tamariki the knowledge they need. He later took a workshop on his work in low decile schools where he encourages children to tell their own ‘backyard’ stories. Dr Angus Macfarlane talked of motivating Mäori learners and that this was both an art and a science. He emphasised the importance of recognising that tamariki arrive at school together A young carver at work at the Te Puia carving school Whakarewarewa in action with their socio-cultural experiences and backgrounds and that unless these aspects are also addressed, it is unlikely that successful learning will occur. Professor Graham Smith presented his model for transforming education referring to the notion of ‘connecting the words with the music’. He referred to Kaupapa Mäori intervention elements including self-determination (tino rangatiratanga), cultural aspirations (taonga tuku), culturally preferred ways of doing things (ako Mäori), mediation of socio-economic impediments (ka orite), extended family structure and practice (whänau), and having a collective vision (kaupapa). We learned that to achieve such a vision for educational transformation first depends on validating indigenous ways of knowing. This theme was repeated in different ways throughout the conference by all the presenters. The over-arching message was that for Mäori to learn and succeed it is necessary for them to first be acknowledged as Mäori and given the opportunities to express their own culture and values system within the school environment. President Peter Simpson and the NZPF executive extend their congratulations to the Te Akatea conference organising committee for a superbly run and stimulating conference and thank the Te Akatea executive for their very generous welcome. ‘This is just the first step towards trying to get better results for our tamariki,’ said Peter Simpson. ‘We look forward to working closely with Te Akatea and look to our Mäori principal colleagues to give us advice on how best to provide for the future of our tamariki.’ ICT Ākonga captured in the Horowhenua Getting tricky with your wiki Liz Hawes Editor I have always respected the Mäori language for its ability to articulate huge concepts in a single word. ‘Äkonga’ is such a word which encapsulates the notion of being both a teacher and a learner. And it doesn’t stop there. It refers to learners teaching each other; teachers teaching learners; learners teaching teachers; teachers teaching teachers. Such a concept engenders feelings of connectedness of collaboration, of close family and abandonment of hierarchy. It’s such a cool notion to aspire to but not necessarily an easy one to facilitate. In the Horowhenua I was privileged to see ‘Äkonga’ in action under the school roof of Julie Hepburn, the principal of Levin North. Julie Hepburn places a high value on the importance of children being computer literate if they are to succeed in their future. Her school obtained its first Apple Mac in Principal Julie Hepburn gets down to work with the children. 1984 and later on installed a network system to fit with the What a happily engaged bunch! school’s ICT vision which expressed networking in terms of communications. Since then, investment in ICT has been a high priority for the school. Other Horowhenua schools addition each group of children brings a teacher of their own. in her cluster group also rate ICT as a critical component of Some of these teachers have wide ICT experience and some don’t. twenty-first-century learning and together have developed a Some are learning along with the children and others take up programme which sees children becoming ICT tutors in their an instructional role . own schools. ‘In the first year,’ says Julie, ‘there was a higher level of teacher Levin North School is the host for this programme. A small direction, but now it’s the kids who take the leadership role,’ group of four or five children from each of the seven schools she continues proudly. I learned that last year the focus was on in the cluster meet together at Julie’s school once a term. They animation and the kids learned how to make movies. Today they travel from as far away as Shannon and Foxton. Amongst these are building on their previous experience of learning about how children are identified ‘peer tutors’. These are children who help to create wiki spaces. They have already had one session so today other children with their new learning. As the children become they begin with a brief round-up on what they have been doing computer competent, they take turns at being peer tutors. In with wiki creation in their own schools. The Foxton Primary School team announced with great pleasure that they had helped everyone in their school to create their own wiki space. The Shannon school children had been building a wiki at their school, too, but were stuck and now needed to know more. As Hoani Perigo from Levin North School announces it is time to ‘get tricky with your wiki’, 30 pairs of eyes follow him to the front of the room and focus intently on the interactive whiteboard, which in the olden days would have been the blackboard space. They watch intently as they are instructed to go to the site where the pictures are stored, click on ‘edit this page’, go to ‘images and files’, then to ‘upload files’ – all the pictures come up! Click on a particular picture to load it then click on it again to size it and there it is on your wiki screen! Writing captions for the pictures is next and of course saving your changes. ‘It’s just practice’, Mr Perigo counsels the children. ‘It’s all about having a go. Making mistakes is no problem. You These boys have just uploaded a game onto their wiki. just go back and fix it up.’ They sit back to admire their work N Z Principal | S e p t e m b e r 2 0 11 23 I learn how useful wikis are through interacting with the children and teachers. ‘We can publish everything on the wiki,’ says Julie, ‘and of course it’s a great way to get parents involved too. Teachers can communicate directly with parents and vice versa. We encourage the children to publish their own work, and the parents can share what they have produced in school that day’. The wiki ensures too that children can’t trick parents into thinking they have no homework. Homework tasks can also be published on the wiki! In addition, there are numerous sites for parents to access to help children with their homework whether its maths, reading, comprehension or learning a song! ‘Tasks like learning tables can be very boring for kids,’ Julie tells me, ‘but we have a selection of maths games that can be accessed on the wiki and that’s a fun way for kids to learn.’ It doesn’t stop there. The children directed me to the ‘nstereo’ site. ‘We can video Kapa Haka, upload it on the wiki and show it to our parents at home.’ What a great idea, I muse, thinking of all the parents who would love to see their children performing, but can’t get to the school during the day. It all seems just too good to be true, but Julie tells me there is a downside to be aware of. ‘You need the vision and the infrastructure in your school for this to work,’ she says. We take every opportunity to increase professional development for our staff and continually upgrade our infrastructure. There is growing leadership in the school around elearning and it is important to recognise the strength of staff in making this successful. We are fortunate too that we operate an inquiry model and elearning fits very comfortably with that. The kids have a voice in this environment.’ A peer tutor shows the girls what to do As I circulate around the class, it is impossible in the end to work out who is tutoring who. Teachers are giving instructions, children respond and sometimes with a new idea that surprises and informs the teacher! The child peer tutors are also learning from the peers they are tutoring. The visiting teachers take time to have a class of their own where they in turn share their own learning, sometimes gleaned from working with the children! They talk about useful learning websites, strategies, special needs applications and ideas that they can all use in their own schools. I realise that this same situation will be occurring in the children’s own homes, where parents will be learning from their own children. ICT at Levin North is as close to achieving true ‘Äkonga’ as I have seen operating in any school. CHRISTCHURCH TOP 10 Holiday Park Meadow Park • SelfContainedUnits • LodgePrivateBunkRoomswithCommunal Kitchen&DiningFacilities • StandardUnits • ClosetoCity’sAttractions • SpaPool • HeatedIndoorPool • FreeBBQs • JumpingPillow • Playground/GamesRoom • MovieRoom We specialise in Sports Groups & School Parties Reservations: 0 8 0 0 3 9 6 3 2 3 Fax: (03) 352 1272 email: stay@christchurchtop10.co.nz Website: www.christchurchtop10.co.nz 24 N Z P r i n c i p a l | S e p t e m b e r 2 0 11 A Subject Mauled? Messages about social studies from two Rugby World Cup 2011 resources Mike Taylor School of Education Policy and Implementation, Faculty of Education, Victoria University of Wellington Messages about social studies are implicitly conveyed through the resource materials designed to help support teachers plan and deliver quality learning experiences. It is important, therefore, that contemporary glossy materials, available to schools for little cost, are critically appraised by teachers, otherwise messages about social studies may be conveyed to learners that are counterproductive to the intentions of the subject. Thus it is in the spirit of ‘proceed with caution’, that I turn my eye to two similarly branded, yet deeply contrasting, Rugby World Cup (RWC) resources for primary schools: 1. Kidzone RWC 2011 student activity sheets produced by RWC Limited 2008/New Zealand Rugby 2010, available at www.rugbyworldcup.com/kidzone. These materials encourage learners to adopt a second team and use the 20 activities to find out more about that country. In addition each activity sheet has three focus-level questions, aimed at ages 5–7, 8–10 and 11–12 respectively. Teacher Resources are brief, largely consisting of the answers to activity sheets. 2. RWC 2011 booklets produced by the NZ 2011 Office in association with the Ministry of Education and sent out in hard copy to all primary schools. These materials are targeted at years 1–3, 4–6 and 7–8 learners with a particular focus on event management and the shaping of culture. The booklets are accompanied by extensive teacher notes accessed via the TKI website (http://nzcurriculum.tki.org.nz/Curriculum-resources/ Learning-and-teaching-resources). Choosing evaluation criteria What criteria should be selected to evaluate social studies resources? Figure 1 offers a starting point for discussion. Readers may not only agree or disagree with my choice of seven criteria, they may also attribute greater weighting to some of the criteria than others. The rationale for my selection is as follows: Factual content may be enjoyable to learners keen to do well in ‘Kiwi quiz’ settings, but if this is at the expense of developing ideas about society, does it meet the aims of social studies? The need for students to be able to identify some surface features of cultural expression, is undoubtedly important, but to what extent should such ‘tip of the iceberg’ knowledge dominate social studies learning, and for how long? New Zealand social studies has been described as an ideas subject (Barr, 1998). Ideas are represented as abstract concepts, embedded in the wording of curriculum achievement objectives. The recommendations from the most recent NEMP results for social studies call for greater emphasis to be placed on developing students’ conceptual understandings and to encourage deeper levels of thinking (NEMP, 2010). Thus concept-led social studies activities may help learners meeting the aim of transferring ideas to new contexts. Factual content Concept-led Learning progression Social inquiry Controversial issues Curriculum links Assessment Figure 1: Criteria for Evaluating Social Studies RWC 2011 Resources The NZC achievement objectives signpost learning progression. Teachers may need to break down these large ideas into more manageable conceptual understandings, as they plan for student learning. For example, when addressing the Level 4 AO ‘Understand how people pass on and sustain culture and heritage for different reasons and that this has consequences for people’ (MOE, 2007) a teacher might develop the following conceptual understandings to guide the focus of student activities in a rugby context: 1. Discrimination is a way of sustaining power. 2. Apartheid regimes in South Africa attempted to sustain the power of the minority white culture by excluding black South Africans from representing their country in sporting events. 3. Social conflict during the 1981 Springbok tour was between those who wanted to sustain rugby culture and those who wanted to dismantle apartheid. The need to develop increasingly more complex ideas about society is affirmed by the Ministry of Education’s helpful Approaches to Building Conceptual Understandings teacher resource, which states that at ‘each level, the conceptual understanding . . . will differ according to the context of study and the accompanying concepts’ (MOE, 2009, p. 6). The potential for social inquiry to unpack controversial issues rests upon the opportunity for students to explore contested values, perspectives, peoples’ responses to decisions and ultimately develop their own social action. This moves social studies methodology beyond simply data collection, processing and presentation, to ‘doing the hard bits’ (Keown, 1998). It might be naïve to expect to see controversial issues in resources that are ultimately a celebration of New Zealand N Z Principal | S e p t e m b e r 2 0 11 25 hosting RWC 2011, thus reflecting a ‘citizenship transmission’ orientation to social studies education (Barr, 1998). Avoiding the controversial in social studies will, however, lessen the scope to ‘engage critically with societal issues’ (MOE, 2007, p. 30). An important decision to consider when selecting resources to use in the classroom, is to what extent it links to the curriculum. Primary schools have, in the last few years, spent considerable time considering how their learning programmes reflect the intentions of the NZC. Social studies contributes to the bigger educative picture of informed, connected citizens. Assessment of social studies is difficult and therefore teachers may look for suggestions from resource providers for approaches that can be integrated into, and provide authentic summaries of, student learning. Comparison of two RWC 2011 teaching resources 26 Kidzone RWC 2011 student activity sheets RWC 2011 booklets (NZ 2011 Office) Factual content? Accumulation of facts is the name of the game. For example, ‘History’ requires students to identify the proud captains holding aloft the Webb Ellis Cup, with a space for the year and country to be inserted; ‘Clothing’ requires students to identify traditional or unique clothing worn by people from their adopted country; and ‘Food and drink’ requires the writing of a daily meal planner for a family in the adopted country. Factual knowledge is developed, but not at the expense of deeper understanding. The year 7–8 question ‘How can we avoid cultural tokenism and promoting low-level understanding of our culture (such as only looking at flags and capital cities)?’ makes the NZ 2011 Office position on the place of facts quite explicit. Concept led? Some of the focus questions require understanding of ideas to be developed, but these are presented as ‘footnotes’, following on from the factual focus of the worksheets. Prominence is given to social studies concepts in many of the activities. For example, the year 1–3 booklet focus on the knowledge and skills required to successfully manage an event, emphasises roles and responsibilities. This gives learners the opportunity to make more sense of the operations required to successfully organise a significant (sporting) event. Treat some concept-led approaches with caution. For example, in the year 7–8 booklet, how sport has changed over time is presented by a flow diagram that presents an overly simplistic linear relationship between cause and effect. Such a representation belies the complexity of societal change, and it may well behove teachers to challenge students, once equipped with enough content knowledge, to design their own multi-causal models to represent examples of societal-sporting change. Learning progression? Difficult to determine because of the factual nature of the activity sheets. Increasing levels of difficulty is a feature of many of the student activities. At one point in the Teacher Notes, learning progression is communicated through carefully crafted propositional statements that each link to a number of social studies concepts (in bold) about New Zealand’s relationship with Pacific culture: 1. New Zealand is a Pacific nation. 2. Immigration from the Pacific Islands has changed the ethnic composition of New Zealand, and Auckland now has the largest population of Pasifika peoples in the world. 3. New Zealand’s culture, especially in sport and the arts, has gained a distinctly Pacific flavour. However, the year 7–8 booklets contain some activities (e.g ‘Everyone counts’ and ‘Working together’) that do not seem to have progressed learning a great deal from the ‘roles and responsibilities’ themes of the books targeting younger children. Progression towards the acquisition and exercising of leadership may be more appropriate for year 7–8 in the context of the RWC 2011? Social inquiry? Emphasises finding and selecting information from a range of sources. Some of the focus questions represent a social inquiry orientation at level 3 (for example, ‘In what ways can these symbols include and exclude different groups?’; ‘What challenges or difficulties do you think someone from your adopted country might have if they came to live in your country?’), but these are sporadic. Student self-reflection a feature of some of the focus questions. As well as including traditional information seeking aspects there are a few occasions in which points of view (e.g. considering ‘trends in sport’ at years 4–6; interviewing relatives to discuss ‘Sport, then and now’ at years 7–8) and perspectives (year 4–6 ‘Consequences wheel) are requested. The final activity in the year 7–8 booklet ‘Find-out – then what?’ has some values orientated question stems that might be useful to use. There does not appear to be much opportunity for learners to explore peoples’ responses to action or exercise their own active participation in response to issues emanating from RWC 2011. Controversial issues? The RWC 2011 is presented as simply an ‘event’ and controversy is almost entirely absent in these overtly celebratory worksheets. Largely benign accounts of international relationships through sport are presented. Recognises some of the challenges of hosting a RWC in the year 4–6 ‘Consequence Wheel’ & ‘Hosting RWC 2011’ and year 7–8 ‘Costs and Benefits’ activities. Curriculum links? Teacher resources suggest that it is up to the teacher to identify learner needs and curriculum aims before deciding how to use activity sheets. Teacher Notes contain detailed ‘front’ and ‘back’ end NZC links, although the links between conceptual understandings and curriculum achievement objectives could be clearer. Assessment? Activity 1 is ‘KWL’ chart used to identify prior knowledge and what a student would like to learn. Final activity is a multi-choice quiz that enables learners ‘to see how much you have learnt!’ The quiz is consistent with the low-level factual approach of the activities. While developing student conceptual understanding is clearly the focus, how that should be assessed is noticeably silent. Is the message here that assessment is unimportant, beyond the scope of external resource providers, or too difficult? N Z P r i n c i p a l | S e p t e m b e r 2 0 11 Conclusion This brief analysis of two RWC resources represents very different representations of social studies. The Kidzone RWC 2011 activity sheets present social studies mauled: a superficial collection of facts with little commitment to deeper learning. These resources have little in the way to support recommendations from the most recent social studies NEMP report (2010) about developing conceptual understanding. In contrast, the NZ 2011 Office booklets present a message of social studies as an ideas subject (Barr, 1998), in which learning about society is promoted by carefully planned, predominantly concept-led activities. The celebration of RWC 2011 means that social controversy is largely invisible across both resources, although there is some space dedicated to the economic ramifications of the event in the NZ 2011 Office materials. It is likely that teachers will need to consider extending the controversial to social, cultural and environmental ramifications of the RWC if social studies learning is to support the aim of developing critical, actively engaged learners. For example, making the homeless less visible to international visitors, exorbitant service industry price rises, and the carbon footprint of international sporting events may also offer critical lenses on contemporary New Zealand culture and values through the context of the RWC. In summary, it is hoped that this brief analysis of two social studies resources reinforces the importance of casting a critical eye on materials sent to schools. Having a rigorous set of selection criteria as a tool to evaluate such resources not only has an instrumental purpose; it also underscores some of the big ideas of social studies teaching and learning. References Barr, H. (1998). ‘The Nature of Social Studies’. In P. Benson and R. Openshaw (eds), New Horizons for Social Studies (pp. 103–120). Palmerston North. Ministry of Education (2007). The New Zealand Curriculum. Wellington: Crown. Ministry of Education (2009). Approaches to Building Conceptual Understandings Wellington: Learning Media Limited. http://ssol.tki. org.nz/social_studies_years_1_10/teaching_and_learning/effective_ teaching_in_social_studies/building_conceptual_understandings National Education Monitoring Project (2010). Focus 2010. Otago University. http://nemp.otago.ac.nz/_forum.htm Keown, P. (1998). ‘Values and social action: doing the hard bits’. In P. Benson and R. Openshaw (eds), New Horizons for Social Studies (pp. 137–160). Palmerston North. About the Author Mike is currently an Initial Teacher Education lecturer at the Faculty of Education, Victoria University of Wellington. He coordinates and teaches social studies and social science (geography) papers in the Primary Graduate Diploma, BTeach and Secondary Graduate Diploma programmes. Mike’s research focus is on geography and science teachers’ curriculum response to the Canterbury–Christchurch earthquakes. Freeto-air viewing will offer the chance for Mike to be an armchair pundit for the duration of the RWC, but he is unwilling to predict if the All Blacks will choke once again. Email: mike.taylor@vuw.ac.nz N Z Principal | S e p t e m b e r 2 0 11 27 CLASSROOM SOUNDFIELD SYSTEMS REDCAT Lightspeed Soundfield System $1395.00 This money-saving, no installation, all-in-one audio system allows schools to put more audio in more classrooms. The REDCAT's all-in-one, single speaker, no installation system provides high speech intelligibility and easy adoption with immediate results. Proven in classrooms worldwide the revolutionary REDCAT in combination with the lightweight and durable REDMIKE fills the classroom with clear, even sound so that every child hears every word. • All-in-one classroom audio • No installation required • Advanced NXT Technology for high speech intelligibility • System Components- REDCAT, REDMIKE and cradle charger • 8-band graphic equalizer Visit www.sitech.co.nz/teacher_resources to access REDCAT research and resources $425.00 REDMIKE VC REDMIKE delivers, with an attractive, ultra-light, easy to use pendant-style wireless solution. The REDMIKE can be worn comfortably around the teacher's neck, or used as a hand-held for student use (perhaps in a two-microphone scenario). For situations where the Classroom Audio Technology (CAT) system may be located high on a wall or in a media cabinet, the all new REDMIKE VC with volume control is now available. This microphone has the same great benefits of the standard REDMIKE plus the added ability to conveniently change the volume level from anywhere in the classroom. • REDMIKE — small, lightweight, easy-to-use microphone • 2 stereo audio inputs with volume control • Audio output for assistive listening and recording iR MediaConnector $320.00 The iR MediaConnector is another Lightspeed innovation that eliminates costly installation fees associated with classroom audio. Think of the iRMC as a wireless router for your classroom audio sources. This compact device wirelessly transmits audio signals to your Lightspeed Classroom Audio System for crystal clear amplification. When you have multiple audio sources, a powerful, wireless tool like this makes a lot of sense. Simply connect the iR MediaConnector to your multimedia sources using the included patch cables and eliminate the need to run cabling around the classroom. • Wireless transmission of up to 3 audio sources • Simple integration of classroom technology • Power from computer USB or AC wall outlet • Eliminates costly and time consuming wire runs for integration • Compatible with all Lightspeed Infrared Classroom Systems • Reliable: 5-year warranty Get quotes and order online at www.sitech.co.nz Free Phone 0800 100 607 Free Fax 0800 300 607 Pricing excludes GST and freight - Sitech Systems terms and conditions apply. Visit www.sitech.co.nz for current pricing, on-line quotes and to place an order. Free Phone 0800 100 607 • Free Fax 0800 300 607 • Email sales@sitech.co.nz Do you have sound classrooms? Jenny Barrett General Manager, Sitech Systems NZ Ltd By ‘sound’ classrooms, I mean do you have classrooms in which information can be clearly heard? It seems timely as we all clamour for touch screen computers, interactive whiteboard technologies and iPods, to remind ourselves not to overlook the fundamental requirement of a learning space – that our students can hear information that is being shared. Conduct an experiment To help you assess your learning spaces, let’s think about the level of noise in a typical New Zealand classroom. Ideally, your teachers and students could access a data logger and keep a record of the noise level of their classrooms when occupied and when empty. First, they need to consider background noise – AJ Puleiata presenting to the class and reading to the class traffic, construction, airplanes and other classrooms. There is classroom noise such as sliding chairs and (60 dB). In plain English, each increase of 6 dB means that the air conditioning. Plus with our more communicative approach noise level has effectively doubled. Next you will want to identify the SNR – the signal-to-noise to learning, there will be many individuals talking. Students do not just sit and listen to the teacher anymore. They work in ratio. The signal is the teacher’s voice or the student doing a different groups on different tasks. They run computers and presentation or the video that you are sharing. If the teacher’s data projectors, play videos and audio. Research has shown that voice is 70 dB and the level of noise is 60 dB, then you have noise levels in empty classrooms can vary from 30–35 decibels an SNR of +10 dB. The recommended SNR for adults to hear (dB) at night to 55–75 dB with teacher and students present.1 effectively is +6 dB. However, for children with normal hearing, Compare these findings with your classrooms. Note that decibels it is recommended that it be +15 dB.2 Younger listeners need a are logarithimic not linear, as with the Richter scale. Therefore a greater SNR because children’s brains are not fully developed vacuum cleaner (70 dB) is twice as loud as average street traffic for listening until they are in their early teenage years, so N Z Principal | S e p t e m b e r 2 0 11 29 primary school-age children find it much harder to correctly hear their teacher’s voice. They can miss keywords, phrases and concepts in poor listening conditions and don’t really understand the words that have been spoken. Add to the equation ESOL Learners, Special Needs students and those children who suffer recurrent ear infections – all of whom may have even greater needs and you begin to understand the size of the problem. Failure to hear accurately can have a huge impact on a child’s achievement at school. The New Zealand National Foundation for the Deaf quotes international research that has shown that children with ‘mild’ hearing loss (i.e. that of a recurrent ear infection) have 12 times the risk of educational failure than their normal-hearing peers. 90 per cent of the intelligibility of speech is in the higher frequencies – soft consonant sounds which are difficult, if not impossible, to project loudly. In order to deliver intelligible speech, we need to boost the softer sounds and slightly reduce the energy in low frequency sounds. Louder is not necessarily better. This is where classroom audio technology comes in. What is the latest in classroom audio technology and how does it work? The two most prevalent types of sound field amplification for classroom use are FM and infrared systems. FM technology has been on the market for many years and it transmits sound via radio waves. Each room uses a specific channel (or FM frequency) and the signal is not interrupted by physical Diego Serpa, Year 5 & 6 Classroom Teacher The key – intelligibility objects in the room. However, this In order for learning to occur, type of system can be susceptible children therefore have to be able to hear all of the spoken to radio frequency interference (from other types of wireless instruction. The loudest sounds in speech are low frequency technology) and the signal can transmit through walls, which vowel sounds and they are easy to hear. On the other hand, could compromise confidentiality. Infrared systems are the most widely used for a group or classroom setting today. This type transmits sound in the form of invisible infrared light waves, similar to a television remote control. The more modern technology is immune to electromagnetic interference and the signal will not transmit through walls, ensuring privacy. Providing quality cost effective financial services Benefits to schools Most research indicates that classroom amplification systems have School Services Ltd is a company with more than 20 years a positive impact on students’ levels of academic achievement combined experience catering to the financial and accounting and speech recognition and listening abilities. Studies have also needs of schools and the education industry. found that the use of classroom amplification systems results in High quality personnel who specialise in school accounting provide years of experience in the school accounting field, an improved classroom environment, as evidenced by increased and strong working relationships with Ministry of Education, student attention, fewer distractions, and increased on-task IRD and your auditor. behaviour. Schools using classroom amplification systems Some key services include: have reported significant decreases in teacher absences due to • Accurate monthly, annual and special reporting vocal strain and voice fatigue. Researchers have found support • ComputerisedFixedAssetregister among school staff, students and parents for the use of classroom • Paymentofallauthorisedbills amplification systems.3 Also of interest is the positive impact on • Bankreconciliations levels of literacy as Dr Carol Flexer explains: • • • • PreparationandsubmissionofGSTreturnstoIRD Financialadviceandassistance ClientSitevisitsandtraining Annualfinancialstatementsandliaisonwithauditorsin a stress free audit process • Onlineaccesstoyouraccounts Andmore...Pleasecontactusforadetaillistofwhatwe can do for your school. Pleasementionthisadvertisementwhenyoucallusfora no-obligation quote. 20% off first year’s fee if you sign up before 31 December 2011. Visit www.schoolservices.co.nz for full details, or phone 07 849 6406 30 N Z P r i n c i p a l | S e p t e m b e r 2 0 11 A primary component of literacy is phonemic awareness – the knowledge of the sound structure of language focusing on auditory distinctions. So the clearer those auditory distinctions are to the child, the better will be their opportunity to learn to read. Studies show that literacy has been positively impacted in the classrooms that use audio systems.4 Cost Okay – your teachers and students have identified a need. Now you need to sell it your board of trustees and/or approach a trust. Simple! Compared to the benefit that sound field amplification systems provide to students and teachers, they can be the most inexpensive technology purchased for a classroom. Up-to-date costs from leading manufacturers average $1 to $1,500 for a complete system. When this is divided by 25 students per class, it is a cost of $60 per student. The estimated lifespan for each system is ten years; therefore the annual unit cost per student is $6. Plus additional savings to a school may be in the form of reduced sick days due to voice problems and fatigue. Of the teachers participating in an American study examining voice disorders in the profession, 18 per cent reported missing at least one day of work per year due to a voice disorder.5 Based on average relief teacher pay of $250 per day, every six sick days saved would pay for another unit! What do we need to know when purchasing a classroom audio system? RF versus IR In the past, radio frequency (RF) has been the primary, if not only, viable method of transmission for wireless microphones. Since they use radio waves, RF wireless microphones (specifically VHF or UHF) can transmit over relatively long distances and even through walls, making it the optimum technology for use in churches, concert halls and outdoor events. The classroom environment presents a whole different set of issues than a typical wireless microphone application. Rooms are small and don’t require long range transmission. Systems are being placed in every classroom in a building; and in many cases each classroom has two active microphones. Systems are sometimes moved to different classrooms from year to year. With all of these unique challenges, infrared transmission has overwhelmingly become the standard in the classroom amplification market for the following reasons: ■■ ■■ ■■ immunity to outside interference from TV and radio stations elimination of frequency management issues ability to use microphones interchangeably throughout a building. Cone speakers versus flat panel speakers Cone speakers do a fine job of defusing low-frequency sound, however, these single point speakers project a relatively narrow funnel of higher frequency sound. To clearly hear phonemes and softer word sounds in these higher frequencies, one must be positioned directly in line with the speaker. Off-axis, even a little, will degrade speech intelligibility, resulting in loss of information. The radiation of sound waves from flat panels is more diffuse because the entire surface of the panel is activated rather than a single point. Thus the mid and high frequency information is preserved and is distributed more evenly throughout the learning space making it an ideal fit for classroom amplification systems, especially as it relates to phonemic awareness, literacy and language acquisition. How many microphones? Going back to Dr Carol Flexer: Not only do pupils need to hear teachers, they need to hear other pupils and they need to hear themselves, and that takes two microphones. Cracked? Puddled? uddy s, and m rt u o c g From ivin tudents! t, unforg s e ll w a y rm b skill sfo ed e to tran s – utilis hanced, u n ie n e it ti il e n c b o l fa c il r we weathe ampus w es! igerTurf lti-use all es, the school c u Here at T m e go to in hes, intenanc pitch c a y it m e p k d s c n s o a h gra size appear rt to full ations dis ll e c one cou n a c lifted, levels are A Little Tired? TigerTurf™ Closed? Drained? Phone Toll Free 0800 804 134 New Zealand’s manufacturer of Genuine – For 30 years! www.tigerturf.co.nz info@tigerturf.co.nz N Z Principal | S e p t e m b e r 2 0 11 31 Media connection Finally, future-proof your purchase and ensure integration with other multimedia in your classroom. Computers, LCD projectors, video, TVs, CDs, iPods and other audio sources are generally limited due to speaker size and location in the classroom. Therefore add an integrated amplifier to your package that is designed to accept audio from all these sources. One school’s experience Case study Windley School is a decile 1 school situated in Porirua East, north of Wellington. There are approximately 370 students from year 1 through to 8. Our experiences: ■■ ■■ ■■ Teachers prefer to wear the microphone around their neck, rather than the older headset model which was connected to a transmitter pack worn on a belt or in a pocket. Relief teachers were never very enthusiastic about wearing the headset models but consistently wear the pendant microphone. The system ensures every student hears what is being said, even for example when rain is pounding on the roof. Many of our students are softly spoken and can be hesitant when sharing information with the rest of the class. The advantage of the second pendant microphone for student use has been very successful. They can have their hands free when reading or demonstrating to the class. ■■ ■■ The pendant microphone is worn up close to the throat and responds to voice vibrations, which is fantastic for students and teachers because the head can be turned and there is no loss of sound or clarity as there is when the microphone is worn as a head piece or is hand held. And amazingly even though there is just the one speaker all the students can hear their teacher. Case study by Judy Waterhouse – a teacher at Windley School with a passion for digital innovation. References Berg, F., Blair, J. and Benson, P. (1996). ‘Classroom acoustics: The problem, impact, and solution’. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 27, 16–20. 1 2 Palmer, C. (1997). ‘Hearing and listening in a typical classroom’. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 28, 213–218. 3 Access Dr Michael Heeney’s PhD paper on ‘Classroom Sound Field Amplification, Listening and Learning’ (2007), which looks at New Zealand. See: http://www.wom.com.au/files/01Thesis%20on%20 sound%20field%20amp-%20Heeney%202007.pdf Dr Carol Flexer, audiologist and distinguished professor emeritus, is based at the University of Akron and Northeast Ohio Au.D. Consortium (NOAC) Akron, OH, USA. Dr Flexer may be reached through her website: www.carolflexer.com 4 5 Mosheim, J. (2004). ‘Sound field systems benefit teachers’. Advance for Speech-Language Pathologists & Audiologists, 13–14. • • • 32 N Z P r i n c i p a l | S e p t e m b e r 2 0 11 School Lines Lest we forget – to remember! Lester Flockton Feedback, feedforward, feedup, feeddown lester.flockton@otago.ac.nz What is the official justification for National Standards, and Standards, ‘enticements’ are on offer! But even simple minds who is responsible for such a badly designed system? know that true improvement of the kind to be expected from the National Standards were conceived by politicians under the magnitude of this tax payer–funded bulldozer must be proven influence of populist, delusional fix-it fertility inseminations to be demonstrably incremental and sustained over years – not from places abroad like England and America. They were merely in short, impermanent snaps in children’s schooling. You dutifully delivered by Ministry midwives but badly malformed would have to be very gullible indeed to think that data from one in their fast-cook incubators with prescriptions given by a few year’s progress and achievement on its own is proof of a ‘sure to consultants deficient in the realities and workings of children, rise’ pudding. The data on which such assumptions are made are schools, communities, curriculum, teaching, learning and likely to be as fragile as the pudding is indigestible. assessment. Now the signs are clear: this all-powerful and insistent National Standards ‘baby’ is rapidly growing into a bureaucratic This all-powerful and insistent National monster that has all the potential to wreak havoc on a schooling system that hitherto Standards ‘baby’ is rapidly growing into had been widely acclaimed as among the best a bureaucratic monster. in the world for children and their learning (there can never be a single ‘best’ system). It is profoundly unfortunate in this whole sorry saga of National Standards that the force of argument and opposition We cannot assume that assessment, or indeed any other is centred largely on the dubiousness (unreliability) of the data educational practice (National Standards) will work in the it manufactures (the ‘metric’ as measurement people now like way intended. Activities as deeply personal as education to say). Clearly, data is the centre pole of the Ministry’s system, must be recognised for the emotionally complex, culturally consistent with its blinded adherence to the orthodoxy of datadiverse and more or less unpredictable things they led school improvement. But should this data fixation really be are . . . we may be in danger of unwittingly unleashing the central focus for challenge and debate around the National a Frankenstein’s monster. Indeed, we may already have Standards policy? I think not! The vast majority of ‘grounded’ done so. educators in this country know full well that the Ministry’s (Broadfoot, 2002) system is badly designed and hyper-spun. Even the Minister But let’s be fair about this. Account should not be simply laid at of Education’s own partisan advisory group acknowledges the the feet of the politicians. The law changes introducing National problems in recommending to her that National Standards be Standards made within weeks of the current government being reviewed (but her Ministry has done such a good job in spellelected were worded quite broadly. They allowed more than binding her, that she has disapproved of the overdue advice – at ample scope for the Ministry of Education to design a sensible, least for the meantime – at least until some convenient time after sound and acceptable ‘system’ – but that’s not what we got. the upcoming election). So let’s put the Ministry’s ‘system’ aside Instead we have been saddled with a system that is shot through and put the spotlight where it should rightfully be: the reason with serious design and implementation problems. Its only true for having National Standards in the first place! The justification promise is to increase bureaucratic busy work, mountains of for the policy and all that is oozing out of it. Let’s not forget to cyber paper, and ill-founded faith in ‘glorious’ data. remember this! The whole reason, justification, rationale, political persuasion . . . the term data inclines most educators to think good for the National Standards policy has been repeated time and thoughts laced with notions of evidence, science, and rigor. again by the Minister of Education and ministers around her: But data shouldn’t elicit automatic obeisance from rightto rescue the alleged one in five children who are failing. This thinking educators. Indeed, we should spurn some data. raison d’être must at every point be the measuring rod for the (Popham, 2003) success or failure of the policy – and the system designed to Already the Ministry of Education is tirelessly on the hunt for support it. And where, might you ask, did that ‘one in five’ come any faint signs that their National Standards system is improving from in the first place? student achievement, no matter how isolated and unchecked National Party education spokesperson Bill English says the examples and data might be (look for the photos and stories children who are underachieving need National Standards in their Education Gazette). Moreover, if a school happens in literacy and numeracy, plain English reporting and to somehow show flickers of improvement against National highly performing teachers. N Z Principal | S e p t e m b e r 2 0 11 33 He is responding to the Education Review Office’s annual report that finds that up to 20 per cent of students are not achieving. (EDUVAC, 7 November 2005) The credibility of National Standards stands or falls on substantially denting the percentage of ‘underachieving’ students in this country – a percentage that continues to be paralleled in other Western developed countries regardless of their National Standards systems, the relentless spin, and the curious constructions and interpretations of their data. What New Zealand now has in common with those countries is a highly stratified society – or layers of people from the very very rich at the top, to the very very poor at the bottom. And therein lies the major clue to explaining ‘tails’ of underachievement. At long last our shameful child poverty record with attendant social and intellectual dysfunctionalism is being publicly admitted and declared. The sad truth is that the large majority of our underachieving children are located in the seriously disadvantaging circumstances of the lower strata. The simplistic belief is that the tail of underachievement can be severed by ‘targeting’ those students and holding their teachers and schools accountable for lifting their achievement through National Standards. This flies in the face of highly credible evidence that 70 to 80 per cent of a child’s achievement is typically related to their inherent personal attributes (we are each made differently), and to the circumstances of their home and living environment. To think that National Standards will override this fundamental truth is to think without knowing! We do know where the problem lies and where policy should be directed – but the » » » » » » » » » » » 34 N Z P r i n c i p a l | S e p t e m b e r 2 0 11 » justification for National Standards foreshadowed by Bill English is based on the assumption that schools can override individual differences exacerbated by societal problems. There are many proposed solutions to both raising the bar and closing the gap (‘reducing disparities among diverse learners’). But very few of these proposed solutions – some would say none – have been demonstrably effective on a large scale under the variable conditions that exist in most schools. (Leithwood, 2007) Public and professional scrutiny, debate and argument about National Standards is not about reliability of data. It is about whether they can lift the achievement of disadvantaged and differently abled children so that they are no longer ‘failing’. If they cannot do that, then they too fail miserably on many counts. Internationally the evidence from places with established National Standards systems shows that they have indeed failed. So don’t take them too seriously, and don’t waste too much time on them. References Broadfoot, Patricia (2002). ‘Beware the Consequences of Assessment!’ Assessment in Education, vol. 9, no. 3. Kenneth Leithwood (2007). In The Jossey-Bass Reader on Educational Leadership. 2nd Edition. John Wiley & Sons, p. 187. Popham, James W. (2003). ‘The Seductive Allure of Data’. Educational Leadership. February 2003, pp. 48–51 Rural Ramblings Ten thousand hours of practice . . . Baabaara Ramsbottom When it comes to lifelong learning my grandad was an marginally) implicated in our future achievements, we are inspiration – he loved music and when he retired he taught likely to persevere . . . What we decide about the nature of himself to play the electric organ. He was so enthused that he talent, then, could scarcely be more important. decided his eldest granddaughter must learn an instrument too. Syed, Bounce, p. 16 So it was that at the age of eight I embarked upon violin lessons. I He quotes the work of Anders Ericsson who carried out an would love to tell you that I showed immense promise and that if extensive study of outstanding, world-class performance. His you search the ‘Flight of the Bumblebee’ on YouTube you would subjects (coincidentally!) were violinists at find me alongside Yehudi Menuhin, Nigel a renowned German music school. After Kennedy and Vanessa Mae. You won’t. extensive research he found that all had My partner runs a tertiary-level rugby started at a very similar age, had good programme where he endeavours to ensure teaching and parental support – the only that no promising rugby player in the significant difference between those who Manawatu leaves school without UE. In would go on to be world-class, exceptional the belief that every stocking should have performers and the rest was the number of at least one good book, every November I hours they had dedicated to practice. By the begin trawling bookshops for the perfect age of 20 the elite violinists had averaged one. Last Christmas I hit a particularly 10,000 hours, over 2,000 hours more than high note with a book called Bounce by those judged to be very good. Syed’s premise Matthew Syed. Matthew is a Commonwealth is well researched and well written – it is also medal–winning table-tennis champion and the only book to have taken up permanent journalist. His book is built on the theory residence on my partner’s bedside table. that the difference between a champion I find it unimaginable that anyone could and an average performer can be measured spend 10,000 hours practising the violin – in hours of practice. Being at the top of which probably accounts for the fact that Photo by Graeme Brown your field takes on average 10,000 hours the height of my achievement has been of practice. He stacks up some convincing three excruciatingly painful arrangements evidence which has serious implications for our beliefs about of ‘Twinkle, Twinkle Little Star’! However, it has occurred to me learning new skills: that for at least 15 years of my 20-year career I have devoted 40 If we believe that attaining excellence hinges on talent, we working weeks of six hours a day to the practice of teaching – are likely to give up if we show insufficient early promise. which I calculate to amount to 18,000 hours. Despite this, with And this will be perfectly rational given the premise. If, an ERO visit on the horizon, I am loathe to consider myself to on the other hand, we believe that talent is not (or is only be at world-class performance standard! Hence, my continued Vision Cabinet Slider The whiteboard with heaps of storage! • Availablein2.4m,3.6mand4.8mstandardmodules • 1970mmhighx400mmdeep • WritingsurfacescomewithourForevalifetimeguarantee • Optionallocksforwhiteboards • Customisedmodulesandcoloursavailableuponrequest • NewZealand’sleadingwhiteboardmanufacturer 0800 POTTERS | www.potters.co.nz | info@potters.co.nz N Z Principal | S e p t e m b e r 2 0 11 35 reflection on the importance of lifelong learning. As we are often reminded ‘shift happens’ and there cannot be many careers that demand such willingness to learn and unlearn and relearn. Added to that, working in a country school means that my class may be taught by me for five or six years of their schooling; I owe it to them to work at my learning in the areas where I don’t yet excel. It was therefore with dismay that I recently listened to a Ministry presentation on new plans for professional learning. with populations of less than 1,000. Will rural schools, who will have less actual numbers of underachieving pupils, miss out on funded PD? Even though ‘country service’ is no longer considered an essential part of a principal’s career path, many New Zealand principals begin their professional lives in rural schools. I hope that access to high-quality professional learning continues to be ongoing for the development of our profession as a whole. In the meantime, were there a National Standard in music I would undoubtedly be ‘well below’ – but I am a lifelong learner (and with the hope Even though ‘country service’ is no that I finally make my grandad proud!) I persistently strive towards the heights of musical longer considered an essential part of greatness. My junior teacher and I recently began learning the ukulele and, having learned four a principal’s career path, many New chords, we attended the first Central Ukulele Zealand principals begin their professional Festival in Palmerston North*. It was an amazing day – we took the whole school and played our lives in rural schools. new chords with more enthusiasm than accuracy. It seemed to suggest that access to freely available professional As a result I have now mastered the intro to Deep Purple’s ‘Smoke development will now be decided on the basis of charter targets on the Water’, which – according to my 9-year-old son – is and overall school data gathering – with support targeted at meeeeeaaaaan. schools with the highest numbers of pupils judged to be below I have since bought a beautiful yellow ukulele and estimate I and well below National Standards. Our New Zealand data have racked up around ten hours of practice so far – only 9,990 tells us that the greatest differences in learning achievement to go! lie between classrooms in the same school rather than between schools and yet it seems that some of us will be prioritised as *The Central Ukulele Festival was organised by Jennifer Moss who offers having greater needs where PD is concerned. ukulele lessons to pupils and teachers! She hopes to make the festival an Over a quarter of all schools in New Zealand are in rural areas annual event – she can be contacted at: home@jennifersmusic.co.nz R O T O R U A Welcome to 3 hectares of peaceful parkland at ALL SEASONS HOLIDAY PARK 50-58 Lee Road, Hannahs Bay, Rotorua Ph/fax (07) 345 6240 Email: info@allseasonsrotorua.co.nz Web: www.allseasonsrotorua.co.nz Lee Road is ten minutes from town, off the Tauranga/Whakatane Highway (SH30) and 200 metres from revamped Hannahs Bay Wetland Boardwalk, playground and boat ramp. The ideal location to base your group visit to Rotorua. YOUR HOSTS KEVIN & TRACIE LOOK FORWARD TO SEEING YOU ACCOMMODATION OPTIONS ON-SITE ATTRACTIONS • • • • • • • 36 N Z P r i n c i p a l | S e p t e m b e r 2 0 11 48 Bed Lodge Use camp showers and kitchen, dining area Large amenities building including kitchen, dining/conference room, laundry, showers and toilets Cabins/Self Contained Units Powered/Non-Powered Sites Can accommodate groups of up to 120 people • • • • • • • Large outdoor pool (check winter availability) Spa TV Room Trampoline, Children’s Playground Shop Barbecues and Picnic Tables Kayaks Internet Instant Marquees The perfect weather protection and marketing tool for school events and sports teams Shade7 Instant Marquee benefits: Available in 3m x 3m and a huge 3m x 6m Heavy Duty frames available Lightweight and easy to carry One piece construction so no small parts to get lost Can be easily erected and collapsed within 60 seconds! 5 standard colours available Affordable logo printing and branding Premium grade aluminium frame ensures a long life time and maximum durability Mention this advertisement when placing your order and receive FREE delivery and a FREE carry bag valued at up to $230! www.shade7.co.nz Phone: 09 570 1112 | Email: info@shade7.co.nz FLY HIGH activexpression with explore new worlds today VERY a SPECial OFFER Buy an activexpression set with the activBoard 387 pro fixed system and you receive both for 7705 +gst * $ lEaRNER RESPONSE SYSTEm IncreaseD partIcIpatIon ImmeDIate assessment self-paceD learnIng Ph 0800 368 474 * Email 5 year enhanceD DIscussIon YOU SaVE $3185! ON SITE SUPPORT INCLUDED It’s just our little way of saying thank you enquiries@activboardnz.com WEb www.activboardnz.com Terms and Conditions apply. Refer to www.activboardnz.com/activexpression or call 0800 368 474