School Accountability Plan
Transcription
School Accountability Plan
Accountability and School Improvement Plan/ Title I Plan 2015-2016 for BLOOMINGDALE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Savannah-Chatham County Public Schools Aysha S. Parks, Interim Principal Thomas Lockamy, Ed.D. Superintendent of Schools August 21, 2015 INSERT Revision Date (if applicable) Revised September, 2015 I. Principal’s Message August 21, 2015 Dear Bloomingdale Elementary School Stakeholders: Our school is engaging in an ambitious school improvement planning process this year, focusing on the vision our District has for each and every student and the daily mission of our school. Vision: From school to the world: All students prepared for productive futures Mission: To ignite a passion for learning and teaching at high levels In many ways, our School Accountability Plan will serve as our road map for continued success. This plan, which is supported by research-based strategies, will focus on the continuous growth of student achievement, ensuring a safe, secure, and disciplined learning environment, and demonstrating that parents, business, and community members are actively engaged in the educational process. Because we value your input and your support, you are invited to join us as we work to make Bloomingdale Elementary School even better. Sincerely, Aysha S. Parks, Interim Principal Bloomingdale Elementary School 2|Page II. Development Plan and Communication Process Various stakeholders are involved in the school improvement process to ensure that the needs of all students are addressed. The chart below illustrates the diverse group involved with the development of this plan. The plan is reviewed annually and communicated using a variety of formats such as, school website, parent meetings, school newsletters, staff meetings, etc. A comprehensive needs assessment is conducted annually and used to develop the School Data Profile Narrative, which helps paint a total picture of the school’s progress and tells “the story behind the numbers.” Committee Members/Representation Individual/Groups Aysha S Parks Signature Position Principal Robert Owens Assistant Principal Lisa Barras Kindergarten Teacher/Leadership Team Member Michelle McDonald 1st Grade Teacher/ Leadership Team Member Lori Howell 2nd Grade Teacher/Leadership Team Member Bethany Payne 3rd grade Teacher/Leadership Team Member Stephanie LaClair 4th grade Teacher/Leadership Team Member Cheryl John 5th grade Teacher/Leadership Team Member Catherine Cummings Special Education Teacher /Leadership Team Member Sheila Lindbladt Gifted Teacher/Leadership Team Member Shelly Willis STEAM Teacher/Leadership Team Member Revised September, 2015 Pamela Tyson Media Specialist/Leadership Team Member Eileen Morgan Teacher on Loan/Title 1 Parent Contact Natasha Cobos Parent/PTA President Michelle Smiley Parent/Executive Board Member Lisa Diaz Paraprofessional 3 4|Page Revised September, 2015 III. Needs Assessment Data Sources Continuous Growth of Student Academic Achievement School Demographics (gender, race, poverty rate, etc.) SWD Data SRI Data MAP Data mCLASS GKAP-R GHSWT – First Time Pass Rate EOCT Data (3-years) Incidents of Physical Violence Incidents of Possession of Firearms in School Incidents of Possession of Weapons Other than Firearms in School Professional Development Hours and Involvement Related to Academic Achievement Incidents of Possession of Drugs/Alcohol on Campus Hearing Office Data Teacher Survey Incidents of Out-of-School Suspensions Incidents of In-School Suspensions Incidents of Expulsions Incidents of permanent Expulsion Advanced Placement Exam Enrollment and Results HiQ Percentage Percent Staffed by Certified Teachers DIBELS Data Safe, Secure & Disciplined Learning Environment Parent Survey Student Survey SACS/CASI Gifted Programs Data CCRPI Data SAT Participation and Results Quarterly Assessment Data ACT Participation and Results Disproportional Data 5|Page Revised September, 2015 PSAT Participation and Results IB Programs Data website Post-Secondary Enrollment Report Dual Enrollment Class Results and Enrollment PowerSchool Database Data Accountability and Assessment Grade Distribution Report Other Parent Involvement Data 21st Century Program Data INSERT other applicable data source INSERT other applicable data source Promotion/Retention Data Governor’s Honors Program Attendance Data for Students and Staff Dropout Rate (3-Years) Cohort Graduation Rate (3Years) 6|Page Revised September, 2015 Focus Area (#1): Continuous Growth of Student Academic Achievement Based on the data from the comprehensive needs assessment, we prioritized the areas of focus and formulated the corresponding Tier 2 indicators/goals and developed strategies with an emphasis on academic achievement. These goals are directly aligned to the District Accountability System (DAS). GOAL 1. 85% of all students in second and fourth grades will attain scores in the range of basic, proficient or advanced on the spring 2016 administration of the Scholastic Reading Inventory (SRI). RATIONALE: The student population of Bloomingdale Elementary is a moderately high achieving population. This goal is aimed at increasing our percent of students who simply “meet” the standard on the SRI, as well as assisting the “bubble” students to attain at the advanced level. This goal focuses on students without diagnosed reading disabilities. All available supports will be provided to students with reading disabilities to ensure that they reach their maximum potential – striving to meet/exceed the District Benchmark also. GOAL 2. 80% of students in grades 3 and 5 will attain ratings of “On Track” or “Commendable” on the Math portion of the spring 2015 administration of the Georgia Milestones Assessment System (GMAS). RATIONALE:MAP scores trend lower than SRI Scores GOAL 3. 80% of students in grades 3 and 5 will attain ratings of “On Track” or “Commendable” on the Reading portion of the spring 2015 administration of the Georgia Milestones Assessment System (GMAS). RATIONALE: Content reading, which is a primary component of standardized testing, is weaker, as indicated by science and social studies scores. A focus on content reading and writing across the curriculum will be implemented with the goal of increasing students’ content-area reading and writing. Teachers will teach Social studies within the context of reading. GOAL 4. Increase the percentage of kindergarten and first grade students meeting or exceeding the grade level benchmark between Middle of the Year (MOY) and End of Year (EOY) benchmark by 10% RATIONALE: Students have made great strides in Kindergarten and First grade raising the literacy rate of students. Students are readying themselves for reading to learn. Focus Area (#2): Safe, Secure, and Disciplined Learning Environment GOAL 1. Students with 10 or more absences will decrease by 30% from 110 to 77 by the end of the 2015-2016 school year RATIONALE: Students’ absenteeism contributes to poor academics. Students need to be present for instruction and wellbeing. Attendance committees will meet frequently with the assistance of the school social worker to ensure students attend school regularly. 7|Page Revised September, 2015 GOAL 2. The Emergency Response Team (ERT) will review and revise the evacuation and safety procedures for Bloomingdale Elementary School, in particular the fire evacuation plan. RATIONALE: The open concept nature of this school lends itself to question evacuation procedures. The fire chief of Bloomingdale will work with administration and the ERT to ensure a safe transition. Day-to-day procedures, evacuation plans and lock down procedures will be reviewed and modified as needed and practiced through drills during the 2015-2016 school year. GOAL 3. During the month of November 2015, the school will participate in a full-scale evacuation drill to the primary evacuation site, with full evacuation of campus taking place in no more than five minutes. RATIONALE: The open concept nature of the campus does not lend itself to quick evacuations. This goal supports SCCPSS Board Goal #4: Safe and Secure Environment. Focus Area (#3): Community Engagement GOAL 1. During the 2015-2016 school year, the principal will make presentations on the topics of school performance, volunteer/support opportunities, and community collaboration to a minimum of three community groups/organizations. RATIONALE: While this goal fulfills a District mandate for principals, it further supports community collaboration and partnerships resulting in mutual benefits for both the school and community entities. GOAL 2. As a school, we will support at least three different charities this year through collection of funds during dress down and/or student engagement with designated program RATIONALE: Students need to develop positive character traits and think beyond their individual wants and needs by caring about and making a difference in the lives of others. Character Counts is infused in everything we do and students focus monthly on a trait that should be exhibited by all Focus Area (#4): Fiscal Responsibility GOAL 1. The number of audit findings will be reduced from 9 to 5 on the Change in Principal Audit RATIONALE: The previous change-in-principal audit resulted in multiple (minimal level) findings, primarily related to improper receipting. Working with office staff and teachers to make them accountable will help to reduce the findings. Table of Contents 8|Page Revised September, 2015 Components Page 1. Comprehensive Needs Assessment 11 2. Schoolwide Reform Strategies 19 3. Instruction by Highly Qualified Staff 24 4. Ongoing Professional Development 24 5. Strategies to attract Highly Qualified Staff 26 6. Strategies to increase parental involvement 26 7. School Transitioning 28 8. Include Teachers in Decision Making 29 9. Assistance for Students who Experience Difficulty 31 10. Coordinate and Integrate Programs 32 11. Student Assessment Results Collection and Interpretation 34 12. Collection and Disaggregation of Data 34 13. Valid and Reliable Data 35 14. Public Reporting of Data 35 15. Plan Developed in One Year 35 16. Plan used Community Input 36 17. Plan Available to LEA and Community 36 18. Plan Translated where Feasible 36 19. Plan is Subject to School Improvement 36 20. Comments 37 9|Page Revised September, 2015 V. TITLE I SCHOOLWIDE PLAN COMPONENTS Title I Schoolwide/School Improvement Plan SCHOOLWIDE/SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT PLAN TEMPLATE School Name: Bloomingdale Elementary School District Name: Chatham County Principal Name: Aysha S. Parks School Year: 2015-2016 School Mailing Address: 101 East Main Street, Bloomingdale, GA 31302 Telephone: 912-395-3680 ESEA WAIVER ACCOUNTABILITY STATUS (Check all boxes that apply and provide additional information if requested.) Priority School Title I Alert School Focus School X Not Applicable Principal’s Signature: Date: 8/21/15 Title I Program Manager’s Signature: Date: Revision Date: Revision Date: Revision Date: SWP Template Instructions All components of a Title I Schoolwide Program Plan and a School Improvement Plan must be addressed. When using SWP and SIP checklists, all components/elements marked as “Not Met” need additional development. Please add your planning committee members on the next page. The first ten components in the template are required components as set forth in Section 1114 of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 (ESEA). Please submit your School Improvement Plan as an addendum after the header page in this document. 10 | P a g e Revised September, 2015 1. A comprehensive needs assessment of the entire school, (including taking into account the needs of migratory children as defined in Section 1309(2)) that is based on information which includes the achievement of children in relation to the state academic content standards and the state student academic achievement standards described in Section 1111(b)(1). Response: Bloomingdale Elementary is one of 34 elementary schools (including K-8 and charter schools) in the Savannah-Chatham County Public School System. Pre-Kindergarten through fifth grade enrollment for the 2015-2016 school year is approximately 390 students. The ethnic composition of the school is currently 70% Caucasian, 11% African-American, 6% multi-racial, < 1% Asian, 1%Hispanic, and <1% American Indian; 11% of our student population is identified as “unclassified.” 55% of Bloomingdale students participate in the Federal free/reduced lunch program. Bloomingdale qualifies for many of the federal and state programs offered to help disadvantaged students, such as the Early Intervention Program (EIP) and school-wide free breakfast. Community partners serve a growing number of students through the “Back Pack Buddies,” a program that provides food for students to take home for the weekend and over holiday breaks. Bloomingdale’s student population is highly transitional. This is due, in part, to our school’s close proximity to Effingham County and the transitional nature of families on the west side of Chatham County – frequently relocating between Bloomingdale, Pooler, Garden City, and Port Wentworth Elementary school zones. The majority of Bloomingdale Elementary School’s student population lives in the greater Bloomingdale community; 9% of our students attend on administrative placement. Bloomingdale Elementary School’s organizational structure consists of a school leadership team that includes a principal, full-time assistant principal, counselor, media specialist, grade level/resource chairpersons, and a classified representative. Other support personnel include a secretary, an information specialist, and a full-time nurse. Additional components of the organizational structure consist of a School Council, Parent Teacher Association (PTA), and community business partners. The school leadership team and school council work to promote positive community- school relations and to establish coalitions for overall school improvement. The Title I School Improvement Team was formed to conduct a comprehensive needs assessment of the entire school and develop a plan that will meet the needs of our learners. 11 | P a g e Revised September, 2015 The Title I School Improvement Team is comprised of diverse representatives from each program and department of the school. The staff members and parents listed on page 3 of this document will contribute information and data needed to complete our Title I plan. As part of the development of our School Accountability and Title I Plans, the Bloomingdale staff reviews data from numerous sources to determine the overall needs of the school, including common assessments, student progress, and achievement assessments to assess student strengths and weaknesses. Our school’s CCRPI data is reviewed to determine specific areas in which our school did not receive the total points available. We also scrutinize our benchmark indicator, performance indicator and percentages for students passing the SRI, MAPS and GMAS when results become available. We also examine other areas, fixed assets to determine our needs in terms of technology and tools that are used to deliver the instructional material to our students. To ensure input from our stakeholders needs assessment surveys were administered to the students, parents, community, and staff. Additional information is obtained from parents and members of the School Council, Title I parent meetings, and PTA. This information is shared with the faculty for further input and processing. The school administration, school counselors, and teachers analyze data consistently throughout the school year. All data sources are analyzed and cross-referenced between assessments to look for correlations among them and examine the relationships between Common Core Georgia Performance Standards and assessments. The team brainstorms to examine the data and determine not only students’ strengths and weaknesses, but also instructional strengths and weaknesses. The data, to include strengths and weakness, are presented to the committee utilizing charts, graphs, tables, and survey results. With this information, the committee is able to develop findings and recommendations. Although Bloomingdale does not have any migrant students enrolled at this time, we have taken into account the needs of migrant children. The following procedures have been put into place determining Eligibility for Migrant Services: A copy of the Occupational Survey is in all school registration packets 12 | P a g e Revised September, 2015 All surveys returned with indicators checked are sent by the school to the District Program Manager of Homeless/N & D Program Manager of Homeless/N&D then forwards surveys with indicators checked to the Regional Migrant Office The Regional Migrant Office determines what, if any services they are eligible for and notifies the District Program Manager The District Program Manager then works with the schools to ensure that families receive services they are eligible to receive In the event that the parents elect to have their children attend Bloomingdale Elementary in lieu of the ESOL school, these are the procedures we would follow should those students be in attendance: Provide professional development for teachers which focus on strategies and techniques for working with migrant students within the context of the regular classroom. Provide professional development for staff members to train in cultural sensitivity. Provide classroom buddies for migrant children to assist the child in adapting to school. Provide parent outreach through the parent center liaison to help parents understand that they are authentic partners in the education of their child. Provide individualized assessment for students to identify strengths as well as needs. Provide all correspondence in the home language as well as English. Exceeding the Bar Points Challenge Points ED/EL/SWD Performance Points Achievement Gap Points Progress Points Achievement Points CCRPI Score 13 | P a g e Revised September, 2015 2012 41.8 2013 46.7 14.7 17.1 7 12 2.3 1 3.3 5.5 0.5 6 2014 6.7 62.7 6.3 32.7 3.3 52.5 5.3 46.5 4.7 55.2 5.5 N/A N/A 86.3 8.6 99.7 10 96.1 9.7 Points Earned on Indicator 66.7 Performance on Indicator (%) Points Earned on Indicator Student Attendance Rate Performance on Indicator (%) Percent of students scoring at Meets or Exceeds on the 5th Grade Writing Assessment Percent of students in Grade 3 achieving a Lexile measure of 650 or higher. Percent of students in Grade 5 achieving a Lexile measure of 850 or higher. Percent of students in Grades 1-5 completing the Career Clusters Points Earned on Indicator Post Elementary School Indicators 2014 2013 Performance on Indicator (%) 2012 n/a Scholastic Reading Inventory Results Student Levels 2014-2015 2nd Grade 2014 Advanced 68 Proficient 13 Basic 4 Below Basic 15 2015 3rd Grade Advanced Proficient Basic Below Basic 14 | P a g e Revised September, 2015 4th Grade 32 Advanced 42 Proficient 3 Basic 23 Below Basic 5th Grade Advanced Proficient Basic Below Basic 2nd Grade 2014 Advanced 2012 14% 2013 52% 68% Proficient 52% 21% 13% Basic 31% 8% 4% Below Basic 3% 19% 15% 4th Grade Advanced 10% 48% 32% Proficient 48% 27% 42% Basic 28% 5% 3% Below Basic 14% 20% 23% 15 | P a g e Revised September, 2015 Analysis: 85% of 2nd graders met or exceeded expectations on the 2014 Spring administration; 77% of 4th grade students met or exceeded expectations on the 2014 Spring administration: There is an upward trend in students exceeding expectations (Advanced) in second grade; There is also an increase in the number of 2nd and 4th grade students receiving below basic; and Additional instructional emphasis must be placed on remediation, with continued enrichment of “bubble” students who can attain improved results. Suspected Root Causes: Lack of time to implement appropriate RtI interventions and progress monitoring. Lack of appropriate reading intervention materials for both below average and accelerated students. NWEA –MAP (Math) 2013-2014 NWEA MAP RIT Grade Spring 2013 Spring 2014 Spring 2015 2 190.9 193.6 195.8 3 199.8 202.7 203.8 4 217.1 212.1 212.3 5 220.5 223.9 218.9 Analysis: Students at all levels are scoring at the Proficient and Advanced level. Suspected Root Causes: Individualized instruction offered through Compass Learning, an online learning portal which provides instruction specifically correlated to students’ RIT scores. 16 | P a g e Revised September, 2015 An intervention block was offered in 2014-15 which allowed classroom teachers to devote a specific amount of time to RTI with the assistance of non-classroom teachers focusing on areas of weakness. Gifted Population 2015-2016 Reported by Grade Level Totals and Area(s) of Strength Grade Level # of Gifted Students NonVerbal Strengths 1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th 10 12 15 18 10 3 1 4 2 3 Quantitative Math Strengths 3 10 8 10 5 Verbal Reading Strengths 8 10 11 10 6 Creative Strengths 10 10 14 18 8 Motivation Strengths 10 12 13 18 10 Special Needs Population 2015-2016 Reported by Grade Level/Exceptionality Grade Level Pre-K Kdg 1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th Total # SPED 1 2 13 6 9 10 6 SDD/SI OHI/SI 1 1 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 OHI OI/SI SLD EBD MID SI SDD SLD/SI 0 0 0 0 1 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 3 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 8 5 5 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Summer School Participation Summer 2015 Grade Level 3rd 4th 5th White Male 2 5 0 White Female 9 7 3 Black Male 0 0 0 Black Female 0 1 0 Other Male 0 1 0 Other Female 0 0 0 17 | P a g e Revised September, 2015 KDG & 1st GRADE mClass DIBELS Reading Grade Kdg 1st Meets Benchmark Meets Benchmark SY 13-14 SY 14-15 Change +/- 74% 45% 91% 71% 17% 26% Meets Benchmark Meets Benchmark SY 13-14 SY 14-15 Change +/- 62% 22% 66% 59% 4% 37% mClass: Math Grade Kdg 1st 2nd GRADE Scholastic Reading Inventory (SRI) Pass Pass Grade Rate SY Rate SY 13-14 14-15 2nd 85% 91% 3rd 57% 72% Change +/6% 15% STUDENT ATTENDANCE DATA SY 13-14 SY 14-15 Change +/- 95% 95% 0% Bloomingdale Elementary Attendance Data 10 or more Absences 2011-2012 2012-2013 2013-2014 2014-2015 113 121 98 110 Bloomingdale students with 10 or more absences have experienced an increase in years due to a number of factors. 18 | P a g e Revised September, 2015 Root causes: Attendance Meetings were not held with fidelity A high number of lice cases were reported Misinformation of students’ ability to come to school and leave earlier to attend appointment. Many parents kept their children out of school for the day. Lack of appropriate transportation 2. Schoolwide reform strategies that: Response: Regular Attendance Meetings will be held with fidelity Education about lice prevention will be distributed to parents All staff will encourage students and parents to come to school on time and stay for the entire school day Provide opportunities for all children to meet the state’s proficient and advanced levels of student academic achievement described in Section 1111(b)(1)(D). Response: Use effective methods and instructional strategies that are based on scientifically based research that: o strengthen the core academic program in the school. o increase the amount and quality of learning time, such as providing and extended school year and before- or after-school and summer programs and opportunities, and help provide an enriched and accelerated curriculum o include strategies for meeting the educational needs of historically underserved populations Response: 19 | P a g e Revised September, 2015 Small Group Instruction Intervention Block Offer instruction at individual levels of learning. This block allows time to implement daily RTI interventions and weekly progress monitoring for students who are struggling. The block is placed at the beginning of the day and involves Specials, Gifted Ed, and Special Ed teachers working with a group of students at each grade level. In-Class Small Group Instructional Support Specials teachers (Art, P.E., Music) and Gifted Ed teachers will provide daily support, to assist students in grades 35 with mastery of standards In-School Small Group Tutorial Utilize retired and newly-graduated teachers to provide remediation services to students. Early Intervention Program (EIP) Identified struggling students will be provided with additional instruction using state-specified criteria. K-5 Burns, Matthew K., and Kimberly Gibbons. Implementing response-tointervention in elementary and secondary schools: Procedures to assure scientific-based practices. Routledge, 2013. 3-5 4-5 Elbaum, B., Vaughn, S., Tejero Hughes, M., & Watson Moody, S. (2000). How effective are one-to-one tutoring programs in reading for elementary students at risk for reading failure? A meta-analysis of the intervention research. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92(4), 605. 2-3 Early Intervention Program. (n.d.). Retrieved October 20, 2014, from http://www.gadoe.org/CurriculumInstruction-and-Assessment/Curriculum-andInstruction/Pages/Early-InterventionProgram.aspx Include strategies to address the needs of all children in the school, but particularly the needs of lowachieving children and those at risk of not meeting the state student achievement standards who are members of the target population of any program that is included in the schoolwide program which may include: o counseling, pupil services, and mentoring services; o college and career awareness and preparation, such as college and career guidance, personal finance education, and innovative teaching methods, which may include applied learning and team-teaching strategies; and o the integration of vocational and technical education programs; and Response: Differentiated Instruction in Math Informational Text Provide small group instruction, use of manipulative, math journals, songs, chants, mnemonics, and computer software Utilize leveled text to support struggling readers K-5 K-5 Cusumano, Celeste, and Jonel Mueller. "How Differentiated Instruction Helps Struggling Students." Leadership 36.4 (2007): 8-10. Duke, Nell K. "The case for informational text." Educational Leadership 61.6 (2004): 40-45. 20 | P a g e Revised September, 2015 STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics) Class and Challenges Experiential Learning Opportunities Instructional Technology Enrichment Opportunities STEM will be utilized to increase student achievement in math and science. It is included as a Special for PreK-5th grade students. All grades will participate in STEM Day in the spring. K-5 Portsmore, M. D., & Rogers, C. (2004). Bringing engineering to elementary school. Journal of STEM education, 5. Field trips correlated to CCGPS will provide students with academic and cultural experiences that might not otherwise be possible. Field trips will also allow students the opportunity to participate in experiential learning. Computer Lab: Establish a computer lab to facilitate remediation activities and academic enrichment. Keyboarding Skills: Keyboarding skills will be gained through regular use of classroom devices and additional practice in the computer lab. Technology Integration: Teachers will have access to electronic writing portfolios. These portfolios will follow students through their elementary careers and will be carried over to middle school. Also, a scanner will be provided for each grade level. Teachers will also have access to Promethean ActivSlates, projectors,Mimios and document cameras to integrate technology into instruction. Each grade level will have a COW (Computers On Wheels) to supplement instruction Enrichment for Gifted/Accelerated Students: Provide opportunities for enrichment for gifted and accelerated (not identified as gifted) students K-5 Falk, J. H., & Dierking, L. D. (1997). School field trips: assessing their long‐term impact. Curator: The Museum Journal, 40(3), 211-218. K-5 Sivin-Kachala, J., & Bialo, E. R. (1994). Report on the Effectiveness of Technology in Schools, 1990-1994. Participation in Academic Competitions: High-achieving students will compete in a variety of academic competitions. Possibilities include: Odyssey of the Mind, Spelling Bee, Quiz Bowl, Pi Day, etc. Family Night Family Night events will be held for Math, Science, and Reading. These events will allow parents an opportunity to learn strategies for assisting in their child’s learning Rogers, Harriet, et al. "The status of elementary keyboarding—A longitudinal study." Unpublished research study, Whitewater, WI: UWWhitewater (2003). Christensen, R. (2002). Effects of technology integration education on the attitudes of teachers and students. Journal of Research on technology in Education, 34(4), 411-433. K-5 4-5 K-5 Kulik, J. A., & Kulik, C. L. C. (1984). Effects of accelerated instruction on students. Review of Educational Research, 54(3), 409-425. Karnes, F. A., & Riley, T. L. (1996). Competitions: Developing and Nurturing Talents. Gifted Child Today Magazine, 19(2), 14. Sheldon, S. B., & Epstein, J. L. (2005). Involvement counts: Family and community partnerships and mathematics achievement. The Journal of Educational Research, 98(4), 196-207. Carey, N., Lewis, L., & Farris, E. (1998). Parent Involvement in Children's Education: Efforts by Public Elementary Schools. National Center for Education Statistics Statistical Analysis Report. US Government Printing Office, Superintendent of Documents, Mail Stop: SSOP, Washington, DC 20402-9328 21 | P a g e Revised September, 2015 Character Education and Community Building Career Education Character Counts Program: Improved implementation of Character Counts program to reinforce effective choices that impact student learning. Expand the program and PTA partnership to include Captain Character and new characters—focusing on proper behavior, respect, and academic focus. Bear Jamboree: Student of the Month recognition. The Bear Jamboree will be held just after the end of each marking period to recognize student achievement, promote Character Counts traits, highlight academic goals, and build community. Career Education Lessons: These lessons will be implemented by the counselor in each K-5 classroom, to include the development of career portfolios. K-5 Research on Character Counts!: Summary. (n.d.). Retrieved October 20, 2014, from http://charactercounts.org/research/summary.html K-5 Magnuson, C. S., & Starr, M. F. (2000). How early is too early to begin life career planning? The importance of the elementary school years. Journal of Career Development, 27(2), 89-101. Career Day Host a Career Day to introduce students to a variety of options for future employment. Guest speakers provide an opportunity to explore tools of various trades/careers and to ask questions of someone in the field. Auger, R. W., Blackhurst, A. E., & Wahl, K. H. (2005). The development of elementary-aged children’s career aspirations and expectations. Professional School Counseling, 8(4), 322-329. Address how the school will determine if such needs have been met; and Are consistent with, and are designed to implement, the state and local improvement plans, if any. Response: The following data will be utilized to determine the effectiveness of the interventions utilized: Student achievement data - Scholastic Reading Inventory (SRI); Monitoring Academic Progress (MAP-RIT); Georgia Milestones Assessment System (GMAS); DIBELS/mClass; CCRPI Index, as related to academic performance and college/career education; Parent Survey data related to the school’s instructional program; and Student Survey data (Grades 3-5) as related to the school’s instructional program and teacher effectiveness. Professional Learning Communities Establish Data Teams Student Data Teams: Grade group chairs will review student data to ascertain areas in need of improvement and focus on ways to adjust instruction in mathematics and writing. Grade chairs will serve as standing committee members. K-5 Wayman, J. C., Midgley, S., & Stringfield, S. (2005, April). Collaborative teams to support data-based decision making and instructional improvement. InAnnual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Montreal, Canada. Miller, R. T., Murnane, R. J., & Willett, J. B. (2008). Do teacher absences impact student 22 | P a g e Revised September, 2015 Teacher Attendance Tracking: Teacher attendance will be tracked on a monthly basis using Kronos. Data will be analyzed with administration rewarding teachers for perfect attendance and meeting with teachers to develop a plan to affect change in their attendance.s. achievement? Longitudinal evidence from one urban school district. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 30(2), 181200. Knight, J. (2006). Instructional coaching. School Administrator, 63(4), 36-40. Professional Learning Coaches Teachers will receive support from district learning coaches in the areas of Math, Literacy, Instructional Technology, and RTI 3. Instruction by highly qualified professional staff A. Response: Bloomingdale works in collaboration with the Human Resources Department to ensure that all teacher candidates are Highly Qualified prior to employment. Highly Qualified Percentage : 100% of teachers at our school are Highly Qualified 100% of Para Professionals at our school are Highly Qualified Teachers at our school and their Qualification Degrees Number Percentage Bachelors 11 Masters 23 Specialist 1 Doctorate 0 Teachers at our School and Years of Experience 3 Years and Under 4 to 10 Years 11 Years or over 5 14 13 23 | P a g e Revised September, 2015 4. In accordance with Section 1119and subsection (a)(4), high-qualified and ongoing professional development for teachers, principals, and paraprofessionals and, if appropriate, pupil services personnel, parents, and other staff to enable all children in the school to meet the state’s student academic achievement standards. Response: Bloomingdale Elementary has included teachers, principals, paraprofessionals, parents, and other staff in our staff development that addresses the root causes of our identified needs. For example: Teachers and administrators will participate in ongoing staff development in Small Group instruction, teaching Social Studies in the context of reading, utilizing Thinking Maps, assessment and differentiation. Response to Intervention Strategies and documentation will be used to support the students with the most severe needs. Teachers and administrators will utilize technology to assist in improving math instruction. Professional Learning will be differentiated based on individual teacher needs, grade level needs, and school-wide needs. Professional learning is aligned with the Georgia Standards of Excellence (GSE) and student academic achievement goals. The focus of this year’s whole-staff professional learning is divided between math and writing. The strategies learned will be used to address the Georgia Standards of Excellence (GSE) and enhance student achievement. Weekly PLC/Data Team meetings to review student achievement data and to discuss best practices in math/writing, planning for instruction and common assessments. Each Monday is reserved for PLCs/Data Team meetings. Additionally, every Wednesday is reserved for RTI meetings per grade level to review student intervention data and make determinations regarding next steps. Each Thursday is set aside for instructional planning. Effective Use of Specials Teachers: Teachers Effective utilization of Instructional Coaches: Monthly visits from the math, literacy, and technology coaches will provide teachers with content-based assistance. The coaches will provide PL activities as requested/scheduled to support teacher requests and district/school initiatives, as well as teacher-requested support. Faculty book/article studies to improve math and writing instruction: o The Daily Five, Boushey and Moser (includes math) o Craft Lessons – Teaching Writing K-8, Fletcher and Portalupi o Comprehension Connections, Tawny McGregor o Making Small Groups Work, Debbie Diller o Nonfiction Craft Lessons – Teaching Writing K-8, Fletcher and Portalupi o Online articles from the National Writing Project Planned professional learning topics: District-wide writing plan/RACE; Small Group Reading Instruction; Writing Across the Curriculum; FIP; Guided Reading for Instruction; Flexible Grouping for Math, ELA; CPUs for Effective Assessment Management; Instructional Tech Best Practices, Thinking Maps. 24 | P a g e Revised September, 2015 Teachers who participate in District professional learning trainings outside the school will redeliver to appropriate faculty members during PLCs or staff meetings. Teachers will participate in grade level professional development event facilitated by District professional learning coaches during which grade-level teams will disaggregate data, design effective instructional approaches, and establish short term action plans. Paraprofessionals will participate in District professional learning opportunities, as well as site-based mini-seminars: o Effective small group instruction (reading and math) o Modeling writing Parent Trainings for Common Core Math will be held quarterly and will be facilitated by the District Math Coach and grade level teachers. 5. Strategies to attract high-quality highly qualified teachers to high-need schools. Response: Savannah Chatham County Public School System’s ( SCCPSS) Human Resource Department in conjunction with Title 1 schools employ a number of methods to recruit highquality highly qualified teachers to include using: Teachers-Teacher.com., K-12 Job Spot, EdWeek –Top School Jobs, College Educator Fairs, Tweets, Career Recruitment Fairs, and SCCPSS website postings. The SCCPSS Human Resource Department screens all applications to insure that teachers are high-quality high qualified prior to releasing application for interview to Title 1 schools. This ensures that all teachers hired are properly vetted before a school begins the interview process. 6. Strategies to increase parental involvement in accordance with Section 1118, such as family literacy services. Response: : In an effort to strengthen student academic achievement by increasing family involvement, we have involved our parents in decisions regarding how the 1% reserved fund will be used for parental involvement; we have involved parents in the planning, review, and improvement of the school-wide program plan by soliciting their input in the planning and goal setting process, providing updated data on student achievement, and training parents about available resources and appropriate intervention strategies. We have developed a Parent Involvement Policy (Appendix 1) that includes strategies to increase parent involvement: parent meetings, parent trainings, parent goal setting sessions, parent volunteer opportunities. Our Parent Involvement Policy was developed with input from teacher, parents and community members. School-Parent compacts which are intended to build a strong partnership between home and school have been developed with input from teacher, parents, students and teachers (Appendix 2). Parent verbal and written communication and opinions are highly valued and collected when possible at meetings, during conversations and through surveys. To keep parents and the community better informed of our intentions related to family involvement we will make the school-wide program plan, Parent Policy and School-Parent 25 | P a g e Revised September, 2015 Compacts available to the LEA, parents, and the public (internet, at public meetings and in the school’s Parent Resource Center). Back to School Open House Title I Annual Parent Meeting PTA Back to School night during which parents are given information about their child’s classroom assignment, curriculum, school services, classroom rules, procedures and assessment practices Parent trainings for Georgia Standards of Excellence in Math will be held quarterly and will be facilitated by the District Math Coach and grade level teachers. Specific training opportunities to help parents work with their children. Examples: Family Literacy Night, Math/Science Night, and Science Fair/Science Fair that incorporate workshops based on Comprehensive Needs Assessment and our school wide goals. SCCPSS Best Practices in Parental Involvement in parent/community programs. Encouraging parents to participate in the District Parent University by sending meeting flyers and publishing information and notices in teacher and school newsletters and on the school web site. Providing before and after school hours so the Parent Resource Library may be open to the public for research and checking out materials. The resource library is open Monday through Friday from 8:30 a.m. until 4:00 p.m. each day, or by appointment. Making available to parents books and materials specific to academic standards to assist parents in working with their children. Hosting at least two scheduledParent Conferences in the Fall and Spring, during which the student’s academic progress, the state’s academic standards, and other student concerns are discussed. This conference will include a review of the parent-school compact (specific to each grade level). Encouraging parents to become involved in their children’s education through PTA as we work toward model PTA status. Aside from active participation in membership meetings, parents may volunteer in the classroom or though PTA projects (such as uniform closet, fundraising committees, special events, etc…). Distributing a school-wide Student-Parent-Teacher Compact, jointly developed with parent input and feedback, which outlines how parents, students, teachers, and administrators share the responsibility for student achievement and the means by which the school and parents will build and develop partnerships to promote optimal student achievement. Hosting a spring 2015 Career Day where parents and community members share their interests and job skills with students. Distributing Monthly/Weekly Newsletters informing parents of upcoming school activities and programs. Sending Weekly school wide Communication Folders home with student work and school wide/District information. 26 | P a g e Revised September, 2015 Recruiting parents and community members as mentors and classroom volunteers. Collaborating with PTA to host free monthly movie night to correlate with “Character Counts” Inviting parents to participate in the monthly birthday lunch for students having a birthday Establishing a Volunteer Room in which parents and other community volunteers can collaborate on projects, work on specific tasks for teachers, or tutor students. Providing a volunteer clothing donation and distribution system to provide uniforms to families who are found in need or request aid. Providing individual student academic assessment results, including an interpretation of those results. Sending academic status reports home to the parents in the middle of every marking period. Issuing report cards four times each year. Sharing formative assessment results with parents at scheduled conferences. These formative assessments include Star Reading, GKIDS, and Quarterly Assessments. Invite parents/guardians to quarterly Bear Jamboree Assembly We have provided written notice to parents stating both our College and Career Readiness Performance Index (CCRPI) status and what we are doing to improve our school. These letters are in a format and to the extent practicable in a language that the parents can understand. 7. Plans for assisting preschool children in the transition from early childhood programs, such as Head Start, Even Start, Early Reading First, or a state-run preschool program, to local elementary school programs and/ or students entering middle or high school to include new student during the school year. Response: Following are our plans for assisting preschool children in the transition from early childhood programs. Also included are transition plans for students entering middle school and students enter from private schools plus students entering Bloomingdale throughout the year. To enhance the transition from Pre-Kindergarten to Kindergarten: Kindergarten orientation is held each spring on campus. Parents have the opportunity to attend an informative meeting where school leadership and Kindergarten teachers present pertinent information. Parents are provided information packets detailing Kindergarten standards, expectations and resources for helping rising Kindergartners. All prospective students and their parents have the opportunity to visit a Kindergarten classroom and participate in school activities during orientation. 27 | P a g e Revised September, 2015 Provide all transition information to parents of children in neighborhood private day care centers: Little Miracles, Little Tots, and First Baptist Church Preschool. Any known home day care providers will also receive information for parent distribution. To assist Kindergarten students who are moving to First Grade: An information session for parents in the spring before the Kindergarten Promotion ceremony. Parent packets with information about First Grade readiness skills and expectations; curriculum and standards taught, and resources for helping rising kindergarteners or First Graders. Parents and students have the opportunity to visit a First Grade classroom and talk with First Grade teachers. To facilitate the transition from Fifth Grade to Middle School: A tour and/or participate in an in- school program presented by the receiving middle school. An Orientation Night is held for parents of fifth grade students going to middle school. In the spring, several former fifth grade students who currently attend sixth grade at the feeder school are invited to participate on a peer expert panel to give rising fifth graders the opportunity to have their questions answered by experienced sixth graders. Counselors and teachers help students understand differences of elementary and middle school. Our fifth grade teachers meet with the feeder schools’ sixth grade teachers to discuss expectations and student readiness. Exceptional Children Staff includes middle school personnel in end of the year transition planning. To enhance the transition for students entering from private schools and students entering throughout the year: Students are carefully placed using available transcripts and parent information in classrooms and programs to meet their individual needs. An exemplary boy and girl from each homeroom are trained by the School Counselor to become a “Buddy Bear Ambassador”. When a new student enters, he/she will be paired with a “Buddy Bear” from his/her homeroom who will help the new student learn the rules and routines. School Counselor will check-in with new students to ensure transitioning is as easy as possible. 8. Measures to include teachers in the decisions regarding the use of academic assessments described in Section 1111(b)(3) in order to provide information on, and to improve, the achievement of individual students and the overall instructional program. Response: 28 | P a g e Revised September, 2015 In addition to the methods listed below, two teacher representatives actively serve on the School Council. There is a school leadership team comprised of each of the grade level chairs and other teacher-leaders, in addition to the school administration. The ways that we include teachers in decisions regarding use of academic assessment are: School Leadership met prior to the start of school and will continue to meet monthly to collaborate on academic, social, and business matters pertaining to the school Weekly Grade Level Meetings are held every other Monday where administrators meet with each grade level during their common planning time. Teachers and administrators review state testing results, district testing results, common assessment results, formative assessments completed by individual classes, and individual student progress. Special education teachers and gifted teachers are included in these meetings. Data reviewed and discussed include: a. District Assessments GMAS Common Math Assessments DIBELs (K-1) Quarterly Assessments- Grade levels 3-4-5 SRI (Scholastic Reading Inventory) Grade levels 2-5 Measurement of Academic Assessment GKIDS (Kindergarten) b. Classroom Assessments Formative Assessments – Grade levels k – 5 Summative Assessments – Grade levels k - 5 c. Power School Data (Bloomingdale) Progress Reports – Grade levels K -5 Report Cards – Grade levels K-5 Attendance Data Discipline Data Monthly Data Team meetings are represented by the grade chairs to discuss the information obtained in the bi-weekly meetings discussed above. Grade chairs are able to report information to the team and discuss ways to support the learning process as well as additional needs. RTI meetings are held weekly on Wednesdays. These meetings are held during planning periods and facilitated by the EIP teacher. Teachers meet to implement interventions and discuss the progress monitoring at each grade level. Teachers work as a team along with administration to move students between Tiers 1,2, and 3 depending on the individual needs and collect necessary data. 29 | P a g e Revised September, 2015 9. Weekly Attendance Committee Meetings occur every Tuesday and are composed of the principal, assistant principal, information specialist, counselor and social worker. Attendance data is compared utilizing the Administrative Dashboard (District information) vs. Power School attendance information (school information). Parents of students with chronic absences or tardies are contacted by the Committee and are invited to meet to form a plan for attendance improvement. Monthly Faculty PLC meetings are held where the administration meets with the entire faculty and staff on the fourth Tuesday of every month. The focus of these meetings is to review professional reading material as assigned by the administration, receive professional development from a staff member or district member and receive training or information regarding policy changes or curriculum innovations. Teachers then use this information to plan for student instruction in their classrooms. Teachers input, feedback, and participation in the development of the School Accountability Plan and the Title I Schoolwide Plan. Kindergarten teachers use formative data from the Georgia Kindergarten Inventory of Developing Skills (GKIDS) and DIBELS to drive instruction within the classroom. Informal/formative assessments are utilized in classrooms to provide differentiated instruction to meet the needs of all students. Teachers use academic assessment information for the purpose of improving student achievement in making decisions as part of the Response to Intervention process. Assessment information is used by teachers to determine which students are eligible for the Early Intervention Program and students who are in need of tutorial support. Activities to ensure that students who experience difficulty mastering the proficient or advanced levels of academic achievement standards required by Section 1111(b)(1) shall be provided with effective, timely additional assistance, which shall include measures to ensure that students’ difficulties are identified on a timely basis and to provide sufficient information on which to base effective assistance. Response: Increase non-fiction reading, particularly through the use of leveled text to support struggling readers. Provide differentiated instruction in math and reading to include: small group instruction, use of manipulatives, math journals, songs, chants, mnemonics, guided reading instruction and computer software programs. Implement FLEX time to provide instruction at individual levels of learning. This block provides time to implement daily RTI interventions and weekly progress monitoring for students who are struggling. This block is placed strategically 30 | P a g e Revised September, 2015 throughout the day and involves gifted education, and special education teachers working with a group at each grade level. Implement Fast Forward reading program with students in most serious need of reading interventions. Provide in-class support with specials teachers (art, music and P.E.) and gifted education teachers supporting students in grades 3 – 5 to assist in the mastery of standards and increase technology and science awareness. In-school tutorial programs utilizing retired or newly-graduated teachers to provide remediation services to students. Establish data teams for reviewing student data to ascertain areas in need of improvement and focus on ways to adjust instruction. Provide training in and implement writing across the curriculum using Thinking Maps. Writing will take place in all classrooms, to include specials classes. Conduct STEAM (science, technology, engineering, art and mathematics) class and challenges to increase student achievement in math and science. STEAM included as a special for prek-5th grade students. Implement the RTI (response to intervention) process with fidelity to provide appropriate interventions and progress monitoring. Improved implementation of the character counts program to reinforce effective choices that impact student learning. Expand the program and PTA partnership to include captain character and new characters – focusing on proper behavior, respect, and academic focus. Student of the month recognition. Bear jamboree assembly held just after the end of each marking period to recognize student achievement, promote character counts traits, highlight academic goals, and build community. Grade level professional learning communities that review student achievement data to adjust instruction in reading and mathematics Establish a computer lab for remediation activities and academic enrichment. Utilize data to identify students qualifying for additional support services such as the early intervention program, tutorials, mentors, and support by volunteers. Providing enrichment opportunities not only for gifted students, but also for “bubble” and accelerated (but not identified as gifted) students. Participation academic competitions. Possibilities include: odyssey of the mind, spelling bee, quiz bowl, pi day, etc.… School wide participation in STEAM day in the spring. Provide professional learning for staff Tracking teacher attendance Family night events for math/science/reading. Career education lessons implemented by the counselor in each k-5 classroom, to include the development of career portfolios. Host a career day to introduce students to a variety of options for future employment. Guest speakers provide an opportunity to explore tools of various trades/careers and to ask questions of someone in the field. 31 | P a g e Revised September, 2015 10. Keyboarding skills gained through regular use of classroom devices and additional practice in the computer lab. Field trips correlated to the Georgia Standards of Excellence (GSE) provide students with academic and cultural experiences that might not otherwise be possible. (Exa: theater, factory, beach, etc.) Tracking Student Attendance Coordination and integration of federal, state, and local services and programs, including programs supported under this Act, violence prevention programs, nutrition programs, housing programs, Head Start, adult education, vocational and technical education, and job training Response: Programs/Services Title I, Part A: Improving Basic Programs Operated by Local Education Agencies Targeted Assistance Program School Year 2014 - 2015 Teachers to provide additional support and reduce the pupil/teacher ratio. No Title 1 funded personnel Title I funds will be utilized to purchase items which will assist students in mastering Georgia Performance Standards. Teachers to provide support to students struggling in Math, Reading and Writing Instructional supplies for the area of Social Studies and Writing Increased vocabulary instruction using programs such as Flocabulary. Classroom technology support to enhance instruction such as an additional COW and computer assisted technology programs such as MyOn and Brain Pop Customized professional development activities for teachers in the area of Reading using the Social Studies curriculum, Math and Writing. Materials and supplies for parent workshops and parent resource center Stipend for teacher serving as Parent Contact Thinking Maps materials and/or software Computer Assisted technology programs such as Compass Learning will be used to improve instruction After school, Before School or Summer School tutorial programs for remediation and credit recovery. Leveled Readers (Classroom libraries to encourage both fiction and nonfiction interest as well as reading across the curriculum Parent involvement activities and materials to help parents support their students at home 32 | P a g e Revised September, 2015 Title II A: Teacher and principal Training and Recruiting Fund Professional Development Courses as needed by individual or groups of teachers Substitutes during such activities Stipends for teachers to attend PDs Registration fees and travel for professional development Stipends for professional development and career enhancements Substitutes for teachers to attend professional development activities District Professional Development Coaches – Tomeka Barron (Literacy), Beth Tuck (Math), and Pam Tyson (Instructional Technology) Title V, part B: 21st Century Learning Communities Carl Perkins CHANCE (Small Learning Communities ESPLOST State Funds Local Funds 349/and or 322 Other After school tutorial for both remediation and enrichment Educational, Psychological, and Social Development of all students N/A N/A Technology upgrades Building Upgrades REP –for Math and Reading remediation Gifted and Talented Education Teachers Media Center books and technology Instructional supplies After school and Saturday School tutoring Special Education teachers and paraprofessionals Local Salary Supplements for additional support after school; Saturday school; credit recovery; tutorial; Incentive Programs Fulltime Nurse PTA Business Partners In-house funding sources such as Coke and Picture monies to support inschool projects and initiatives 11. Description of how individual student assessment results and interpretation will be provided to parents. Response: Parents will receive individual student test results for all required state assessments. For state tests, individual student results are sent to the local schools where the results are given to the parents in hard copy with explanations through conferences, in the student folders sent home each Wednesday, or mailed to the student’s home. Interpretation of test results is sent with 33 | P a g e Revised September, 2015 the student scores. Whenever possible, letters explaining results are translated in the student’s home language. Parents will be invited to parent-teacher conferences so that teachers may provide detailed explanations of local, state and national assessments and to discuss individual student achievement. Between those conferences, teachers communicate with parents on a regular basis through phone calls, emails and weekly reports. RTI and IEP meetings are another opportunity for parents to discuss their student’s achievement with teachers and other professionals. RTI meetings are held weekly on Wednesdays and parents are invited to participate. IEP meetings are held as needed to evaluate, amend, and/or present findings to ensure students are educated in their least restrictive environment. 12. Provisions for the collection and disaggregation of data on the achievement and assessment results of students. Response: The College and Career Ready Performance Index (CCRPI), is a comprehensive school improvement, accountability, and communication platform for all educational stakeholders that will promote college and career readiness for all Georgia public school students. The CCRPI is available to parents and the community on the Georgia Department of Education website (www.doe.k12.ga.us). Each Chatham County Public School’s data is published in the District Accountability Plan posted on the website (www.sccpss.com). The report includes trends in data and highlights programs that schools are implementing to increase student achievement. The most recent version is included with this schoolwide plan which will be available for parent to read at the parent center. Each school year, Bloomingdale works with the Office of Student Research and Accountability to update and maintain the most current data and information that identifies trends within the data. ghlights 13. Provisions to ensure that disaggregated assessment results for each category are valid and reliable. Response: The statistical validity and reliability of the instruments administered are maintained by the Georgia Department of Education. Also, initial reports of assessment results will be downloaded from the GADOE portal and reviewed for accuracy. Teachers and staff will be trained by the school Testing Coordinator for each test administration throughout the school year. This training will make certain that the testing results will be valid and reliable. Additionally, a designee from the Special Education Department, the ELL Coordinator, the Gifted Coordinator and the 504 Coordinator will all collaborate to appropriately code groups that require testing accommodations. 14. Provisions for public reporting of disaggregated data. Response: For each major assessment throughout the year, the overall results of the testing, (GMAS, EOCs, SRI, MAP, DIBELS) as well as the data disaggregated by subgroups, will be shared with the faculty and staff. The central office will prepare a press release of disaggregated 34 | P a g e Revised September, 2015 data that will be posted to the Chatham County School System website. Also, a link to this site will be included on Bloomingdale School’s website. Additionally, this information will be released to the local media. The Principal will present a summary of the testing data to the School Council, which will consist of community members, parents, and teachers. The Leadership Team will prepare disaggregated data, charts, and graphs to be displayed in data rooms throughout the school. A summary of testing data will also be presented to stakeholders through email messages, school‐wide announcements, workshops, and other communication methods. 15. Plan developed during a one-year period, unless the LEA, after considering the recommendation of its technical assistance providers, determines that less time is needed to develop and implement the school wide program Response: The school leadership teams met multiple times during the school year to review data, prioritize needs, and develop strategies to increase student achievement. The goals of the plan were shared with teachers during pre-planning. Parents, students (where applicable) and community partners were invited to provide input and feedback. This plan is intended for implementation throughout the 2015-2016 school year. Revisions will be made as new data is presented. 16. Plan developed with the involvement of the community to be served and individuals who will carry out the plan, including teachers, principals, other school staff, and pupil service personnel, parents, and students (if secondary). Response: Parents and stakeholders are invited to a Parent Forum in which a variety of topics are discussed. They are contacted by various means such as flyers, marquee announcements, call-out, and messages on the school’s website. At the meeting, committee members are given an update of school wide data, and areas of strengths and weaknesses are shared. The school wide plan is reviewed and together the committee discovers the schools needs of the most at-risk students and what the instructional focus needs to be and what needs to be done to meet those goals. The Title 1 budget draft is shared and parents and stakeholders are encouraged to provide feedback and offer input on how the Title 1 funds should be spent at Bloomingdale. The Title 1 parent involvement policy is reviewed from 2014-2015. School-Parent Compact and the school wide Calendar of Events are shared. Questions are answered which clarifies parents’ understanding of the purpose and layout of the documents. Parents and stakeholders are encouraged to offer feedback on each of the items discussed. Additionally, teachers met during planning times and were given the opportunity to provide feedback on the School Improvement Plan, the Parent Policy and the School-Parent Compacts. Students were also surveyed and their input was taken into consideration as these documents were developed. 17. Plan available to the LEA, parents, and the public. Response: All components of our Title I School-wide Plan including the Parent Policy, SchoolParent Compact, and School Improvement Goals, are available to all stakeholders upon request. Our plans are also available in the office and school’s website. • availability of the plan in the media center and the parent center • Plan posted on the website • District website under Accountability tab 35 | P a g e Revised September, 2015 A copy of the plan will be provided if requested. 18. Plan translated, to the extent feasible, into any language that a significant percentage of the parents of participating students in the school speak as their primary language. Response: Bloomingdale’s population for the 2015 - 2016 school year, consists of English speaking students. We do not have a significant sub group of non- English learners. Therefore, Bloomingdale School does not currently have a need to provide information in multiple languages. If in the future that need should develop, we will then provide all public notifications and the reporting of data in the language that is appropriate. 19. Plan is subject to the school improvement provisions of Section 1116. Response: Beginning with the 2012-2013 school year; the GaDOE transitioned from needs improvement (NI) school designations based on adequate yearly progress (AYP) reports to Reward, Priority, Focus and Alert Schools designations based on ESEA Flexibility Waiver formulas. Title I schools will now implement specific programs and interventions based on Reward, Priority, Focus, and Alert Schools status. In addition, the GaDOE ESEA Flexibility Waiver outlines Georgia’s new Single Statewide Accountability System, the College and Career Readiness Performance Index (CCRPI). The CCRPI will serve as a comprehensive report card for all schools in Georgia. The state system will give parents, students, teachers and families a more complete and comprehensive picture of where a school or district is meeting performance expectations and where it is not. The Georgia ESEA Flexibility Waiver also eliminated Supplemental Educational Services (SES) and Public School Choice (Choice). However, for schools designated as Priority or Focus (or Alert if they choose to provide the service) the Georgia ESEA Flexibility Waiver provides greater flexibility in designing a Flexible Learning Program (FLP) tailored to the needs of the schools. As a result, these identified schools will have the capacity to serve more students in need of additional academic support. Bloomingdale does not have a designation title. 36 | P a g e Revised September, 2015 Schoolwide Program Checklist All components of a schoolwide program plan must be addressed. Those areas marked Not Met need additional development. *Denotes required components as set forth in Section 1114 of Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 (ESEA). MET NOT MET 1. A comprehensive needs assessment of the entire school, (including taking into account the needs of migratory children as defined in Section 1309(2)) that is based on information which includes the achievement of children in relation to the state academic content standards and the state student academic achievement standards described in Section 1111(b)(1). 2. Schoolwide reform strategies that: Provide opportunities for all children to meet the state’s proficient and advanced levels of student academic achievement described in Section 1111(b)(1)(D). 37 | P a g e Revised September, 2015 MET Use effective methods and instructional strategies that are based on scientifically based research that: strengthen the core academic program in the school. increase the amount and quality of learning time, such as providing an extended school year and before- or after-school and summer programs and opportunities, and help provide an enriched and accelerated curriculum include strategies for meeting the educational needs of historically underserved populations NOT MET Include strategies to address the needs of all children in the school, but particularly the needs of low-achieving children and those at risk of not meeting the state student achievement standards who are members of the target population of any program that is included in the schoolwide program which may include: counseling, pupil services, and mentoring services; college and career awareness and preparation, such as college and career guidance, personal finance education, and innovative teaching methods, which may include applied learning and teamteaching strategies; and the integration of vocational and technical education programs; and 38 | P a g e Revised September, 2015 Address how the school will determine if such needs have been met; and Are consistent with, and are designed to implement, the state and local improvement plans, if any. 3. Instruction by highly qualified teachers. 4. In accordance with Section 1119 and subsection (a)(4), high-quality and ongoing professional development for teachers, principals, and paraprofessionals and, if appropriate, pupil services personnel, parents, and other staff to enable all children in the school to meet the state’s student academic achievement standards. 5. Strategies to attract high-quality highly qualified teachers to high-need schools. 6. Strategies to increase parental involvement in accordance with Section 1118, such as family literacy services. 7. Plans for assisting preschool children in the transition from early childhood programs, such as Head Start, Even Start, Early Reading First, or a state-run preschool program, to local elementary school programs. 8. Measures to include teachers in the decisions regarding the use of academic assessments described in Section 1111(b)(3) in order to provide information on, and to improve, the achievement of individual students and the overall instructional program. MET NOT MET 9. Activities to ensure that students who experience difficulty mastering the proficient or advanced levels of academic achievement standards required by Section 1111(b)(1) shall be provided with effective, timely additional assistance, which shall include measures to ensure that students’ difficulties are identified on a timely basis and to provide sufficient information on which to base effective assistance. 10. Coordination and integration of federal, state, and local services and programs, including programs supported under this Act, violence prevention programs, nutrition programs, housing programs, Head Start, adult education, vocational and technical education, and job training. 11. Description of how individual student assessment results and interpretation will be provided to parents. 12. Provisions for the collection and disaggregation of data on the achievement and assessment results of students. 39 | P a g e Revised September, 2015 13. Provisions to ensure that disaggregated assessment results for each category are valid and reliable. 14. Provisions for public reporting of disaggregated data. 15. Plan developed during a one-year period, unless the LEA, after considering the recommendation of its technical assistance providers, determines that less time is needed to develop and implement the schoolwide program. 16. Plan developed with the involvement of the community to be served and individuals who will carry out the plan, including teachers, principals, other school staff, and pupil service personnel, parents, and students (if secondary). 17. Plan available to the LEA, parents, and the public. 18. Plan translated, to the extent feasible, into any language that a significant percentage of the parents of participating students in the school speak as their primary language. 19. Plan is subject to the school improvement provisions of Section 1116. Comments: ____________________________________________________________ ______________________ Principal’s Signature Date ____________________________________________________________ ______________________ Title I Program Manager’s Signature Date ____________________________________________________________ ______________________ Title I Senior Director’s Signature 40 | P a g e