Florida`s Turnpike Enterprise Florida`s Turnpike Enterprise

Florida
’s Turnpike
Florida’s
Enterprise
Evolution from Authority to
Enterprise
1994
1953
2002
1969
Florida’s
Florida’s
Turnpike
Sunshine
State
Turnpike
Office
Parkway
Authority
District
Enterprise
(FDOT)
Turnpike Enterprise System
449 miles
125 miles
21 miles
595 miles
Florida’s Turnpike System
Other FDOT Owned
Other FDOT Operated
TEAMS History
Florida’s Turnpike “Futures” Study
• In February 1996, the Florida
Transportation Commission requested
the Florida Department of
Transportation to “conduct a thorough
review of the Turnpike Program’s future
after the year 2000…”
Coincided with Asset Management
• 1997 AASHTO created an Asset
Management Task Force
• 1998 AASHTO Board of Directors
approved an Asset Management
Strategic Plan
• 1999 FHWA created an Office of
Asset Management
Florida’s Turnpike “Futures” Report
• “Futures Report” provided 22 strategies to
guide the Turnpike into the 21stst century
• Resulted in legislation which increased
the Turnpike District bonding authority to
$3 Billion
• Identified projects throughout the state for
further in-depth examination
Florida’s Turnpike System Plan
“TSP”
• Prepare detailed analysis of the potential
projects identified in the “Futures Report”
• Prioritize newly identified expansion projects
and necessary improvements over the next
20 years
• While reserving sufficient funds for periodic
system renewal and replacement (R&R
Program)
TSP Required…
• Forecast funding levels
• Prioritize periodic capital
expenditures for the R&R Program
Asset Management System
What is TEAMS?
• TEAMS is a web-enabled desktop method to:
– Show an accurate inventory of infrastructure assets
(and certain other capital assets)
– Provide the current condition of assets
– A method to forecast and prioritize capital expenditures
required for periodic renewal & replacement
FDOT’s Work Program
Administration (WPA)
• Subsystem of mainframe Financial
Management System (FM).
• Assists in planning, implementation
and tracking of multi-year programs.
• Legacy DB2 relational database
updated nightly.
FDOT’s Work Program
Administration (WPA)
• Contains records of all transportation
related projects.
• Provides both historical and future
project information including actual
or estimated projects costs.
• Provides project location
information.
TEAMS Data Integration
TOLLS
FACILITIES
(Work Order System)
STRUCTURES
- PONTIS
- BID
FM(WPA)
ROADWAY
NPDES
RCI
TEAMS
CRASH
UTILITIES
PAVEMENT
Linear Referencing System
County Line
Roadway ID
11470000
Roadway ID
75470000
mp 0.000
3.200 5.800
0.000
2.950
0.000
Mileposts increase North and East (Side R)
Decrease South and West (Side L)
Importance of Guidelines
Integration problems are
encountered when data entry and
project programming guidelines
–are not followed
–or do not exist
Importance of Guidelines
FDOT’s Work Program Instructions
• Published annually
• Required by Florida State Statutes
Importance of Guidelines
FDOT’s Work Program Instructions
Establish a new Financial Project Number:
• Roadway project crosses a county line
• Character of project changes (affects unit
costs of pay items)
• Significant physical separation between
project legs
Example of Multiple Location Project
LM = [“new lanes added” + “existing lanes improved”] x project length
19 mi. No Man’s Land
Benefits: Better Condition Forecasting
•
•
•
•
•
Accurate Automation
What project is already planned?
Where is it?
When will it be constructed?
Does it need to be included or excluded
in the analysis?
Benefits: Better Candidate Project
Selection & Scoping
1.
2.
3.
4.
Pavement Condition Survey Data
Construction Project Schedule
Maintenance Office Needs Report
Work Program Office Budget Info
Benefit to Cost Analysis?
Forecasting?
Prior Method of Managing Assets
• Prior Methods of Developing R&R Funding
– Rule of Thumb
– Historical Expenditures
– Short Term Horizon
– Reactive Rather than Proactive
With Integrated WPA Data
• Greater Fiscal responsibility
– “Fix it before it’s broke” principle
– Facilities maintained at a higher level of
service
– Lower cost to maintain over time
You Get What You Ask For:
Tools in TEAMS
You Get What You Ask For:
Tools in TEAMS
You Get What You Ask For:
Tools in TEAMS
You Get What You Ask For:
Tools in TEAMS
You Get What You Ask For:
Tools in TEAMS
You Get What You Ask For:
Tools in TEAMS
You Get What You Ask For:
Tools in TEAMS
You Get What You Ask For:
Tools in TEAMS
You Get What You Ask For:
Tools in TEAMS
You Get What You Ask For:
Tools in TEAMS
You Get What You Ask For:
Tools in TEAMS
You Get What You Ask For:
WPA Reports in TEAMS
You Get What You Ask For:
WPA Reports in TEAMS
You Get What You Ask For:
WPA Reports in TEAMS
Data Integration Lessons Learned
•
•
•
Get Agency buy-in at the start.
Understand the users’ needs.
Utilize Asset Team Leaders in “User
Requirement” development.
• Customized system costs more, but meets
100% of the users’ requirements.
• Be prepared for data maintenance; plan for
it prior to system roll-out.
For the long haul, or just around town…
we’re with you all the way.