National Church Residences - Supportive Housing Network of New

9.18.2013
National Church Residences
Permanent Supportive Housing Impact Analysis
Property Values, Land Use and Crime
in Columbus, Ohio Neighborhoods with National
Church Residences Permanent Supportive Housing
Prepared By:
Arch City Development
Urban Decision Group
Table of Contents
Executive Summary 1
I. Introduction 12
II. Methodology
12
III. Neighborhood Comparative Analysis 15
IV. Project Conclusions
VI. Appendix
63
65
Executive Summary
!"" # $ # % % &%$'(%%#
& ) $ & & #
#*+,)$&#
%&&$
- % % # % # % $ - / # % %
$ & % % % # % % & &#$
#
#%%4
/ #$ & #)%
% $ 55%6%%
#$
#
7:#7;
<$
7
#)# =
#$ > ? &* %%#
#&$&*%%#
&*#)#&
#&&#<$
+!%&
#$
:# 7 ; # < ; %
%$
*%#$-
=%
$:#7;@$
- - ; -
-
?*-
A-
-$-%%&<&
5 '& % %( 5
')#=%#($-5
& & & % #
+
#&*$-5*
% % #* % # %> #'(#)##'
($-#%#*
$#%&
%%&%%&
%%#$
- ; & % # $ - +"") % % && #$ %&%%#
#*&#%$
&* % # %
*$&&&
%%$-&%
4#$
%this facility has actually been mistaken for a market-rate apartment
complex at times.
-5%#
%#$
*#%
' #($ % % &&'+,C(&%
'!,C($ & &$7,""D,"+,
E+F"""" & & %
EGH"""$-%&
G$+C%,""H,"+,&,$,C&
%$-*%
*=#<$
-
;$
?%/>&)#*
&#$
,
Total Crime Over Time
160
140
120
100
80
60
40
20
0
2008
2009
Grant Area
2010
2011
2012
Grant Comparative
H
Average Assessed Total Value
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
Grant Area
$359,791
$350,057
$336,287
$345,318
$342,296
$351,316
$412,260
$391,725
$374,317
$330,598
$341,519
$322,385
$323,057
$346,902
$356,306
$391,787
$348,999
$350,461
$348,871
$348,871
- +"") % %#
$&#
%
##&
&$->#<)
&&*$&
&= $
-*%&%>
$
&&&/=
$ A DC % # & +"""
%%%I/%*&
#=$-
&&&&
&:$$*&$A &$
-55-
#$%
*#&#%
#$
D
Average Assessed Total Value
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
Chantry Area
$154,268
$154,444
$157,078
$154,319
$150,506
$126,665
$126,441
$200,952
$199,958
$198,906
$198,897
$191,406
$165,008
$164,790
!
-
?*
/
#%&&
#
AJJ7)
/'($-+"")%,"+"
)%&&#&
$K%
?*&#
#
$7L#%
#
K 6 67 7# $ &<-
;%&
?*$L#
##%
#
#%&&*#%
&* % $ L# # * />#
$
-% ,""G&+,D
,"+,$-
&&/%
MM+H,$-%#
#&&
#>##$&
#
$-#
*%$
# %&
$&,"+"#
&
$
7%-
?*/
#&&
%&$%*&&
# * % &&
#$-%5&*%%
$
F
Average Assessed Total Value
2009
2010
2011
2012
Buckingham Area
$292,984
$295,931
$265,767
$265,767
$75,366
$74,298
$73,497
$88,586
-
A,"++&!"
#;)AJJ7% $A%
7
&)%:$$O$
&%!")#$-%
# % I % 5 &
5$&&*
%
$ - # % # # #*%%% &&*#$
- A =% %
# $- A # & #%%%>%&+"""%%
#%$-
= #
*4%&$A#%
%/>,"++$&% %%
%#%%$
G
Average Assessed Total Value
2010
2011
2012
Livingston Area
$91,365
$79,700
$79,346
$107,810
$92,167
$91,490
- % # # I - ; - A - $&A<7%L%
##
,""D has received no complaints about any Central Ohio permanent
supportive housing project at the district or individual school level. %
&&%
$
-
-
>
% # $ - +"") AJJ7 %%# ,"+,$-%%-
;-
?*F"#
$
-
-
A%%
&$ -% 5 % %> # 5$L%)#)&
J&%&#%%
#==%&%#%#$
J&>*/%%PO
&%4
9
$Q & #* % - J&>$
@%%-
-&
major projects like the $500 million development
Grandview Yard and the proposed $25 million View on 5th Apartments at the
corner of 5th Ave. and Holly Ave. imply that developers believe the area to
be a sound investment;#%
$&&4$
+"
Average Assessed Total Value
2011
2012
Third Ave Area
$300,883
$299,520
$218,293
$218,188
Conclusions
-%#55
% # #>#$%%
&
# & % 4 $-%%&%%%
%&#%#$
-%&&RJ$J
J= 7 % 7 % # #> $ J # / #&%#$“The buildings [National Church
Residences] have developed are attractive and they provide a valuable service
to the community.” said Edgar. “I would love to see one on the Southside.”
++
I. Introduction
-<)#% '( % !"" # $%%#&)
$&&##*
+,)$&#%&
&$-%-
;-
?*-
-
A
- -$ - = & % %%
$ %% /= & 5 = & &
##&&*#
&5$-# 7
5%%
% & # :# 7 ; ':7;( 5%$
?=#/<
% % & %$-&
#%#
%*#%$
% :7;%
#'(##&
& % '
($ - #
# %%#&&
5#'%(##$
A*&*% %%*%
$
II. Methodology
-5#55$-5
%%&%&&*%
%&
'=
%%($%I
= % # / $ -
5=$&
%#*
%>$-5#*
%/$
- 5 # #/ '% % PQ( & # '%
+,
%P
Q($:#7;
7&*
##%
$-
%<%
$?%##'%
=/&(##<%4
&#%&$
%##/%#*%
$ - #* # # % %#$-
S
S
S
S
?
A
; % ';( & % $ 7 & % L* % % :$$ ?)J$-
&
$ - # & $
% <
&#&
$ *
#%'(&=$-#
& # %# # # #
)%#$%
%%%',""H),"+H($/
&%#
#$
&%%I#%$
*:7;**
=)$-
#4%$
Crime
/ % # &%&%$&
%:7;*
&+"""%%%$
Crime Risk Over Time
J= > * % & +H
* = :$$ $ * # L ? % > 'L?( :% $##%*
% %
$-L? *=&+""
$-%&*=%,""&#&
*=%%$
*#
# < )& # $ $
*%#*&
&=%,""D,""F,""G,"+","+,$
Crime Instances Over Time
- # 7 % %,""G$-) %%%
&;$
&<#$-&
<&%56%&
$
Crime Near Facility
&%##%
#:7;<%%$-#
#&%
%$:%+"""%%#%%
; #7>&
+"""%%%$-%%
$
Conveyances
%%#&$-
&%%
#&%%$
&#L*
% %$7%,""D,"+,&
#%$?
*#&#
&<
*%
$
Parcel Data
L=%%
$-=#A:O$
+D
Land Use
J= & >#$L5#
# $
%5
# #*
#<#$
Appraised Values
-*%#
$-&#L*
>
% %L*
%,""H,"+,$;&
$
III. Neighborhood Comparative Analysis
-%% %$ - % #&,""H,"+,$&&%
%%$-%% 5
& % $
%%$
- % % - -
A-
-$-
;
?*&#&)$
-%%'$$)
%#%
($L=#$
The Commons at Grant (2003)
- ; +"" && #$ %#
$
#KK
&%# %&&
;&%
&& / ,+ $ / & * # :# ) %%&&/$
>&R
# & & $ # ;&&*
=%;O#%
%)M"6)M+%=$;O
% # % # #& $-%#>
+!
=%/$
A&K*K&**)
/ ;$ % # /
# $ # & & % ; # P & I&&>&5#
%TQ
&&%/%##
%&
;
%$L=
#77#
+""&%&-
;#,""D%/$:#
&%&&%%
$-#%>%
##$
;>&=
#%
J
-&#=)=%
# &$ of Anne Lenzotti, the Director of Facilities for the Columbus Public Schools
since 2004, has received no complaints about any Central Ohio permanent
supportive housing project, nor was she aware of any complaints made
directly to the school itself.
A K ) % > &*=%)
$&
%%#
& % $ ) &#&#&
# & %&) $ After learning about the intense
level of support provided to residents to help them reintegrate into society,
Connolley-Ross became a strong advocate for the project. )
<#-
;&%&
%%;O#&
&%&$-;
O#&%%&*&##
#%%$@%&*%
)#/#*%;O$
-)*$@5
##%#&%*=
&-
;/$This experience
is a testament not only to the physical attractiveness of the building, but to
the positive impact this property has had on the development character of
the surrounding community.
+F
Quantitative Analysis
7&#&%>
$L=#;%
&%
$&&#>
#*%&%$
;%/
%#$
Study Area (Snapshot Information)
& %& - ; %&
#
JK
J)M+%%)
L
@;
L+;
-%%&&
#
#M"&&&
#5
$-#%/#
#$
#%$
Demographics and Physical Character
-;%&
National Church Residences: Permanent Supportive Housing Impact Analysis
+M
K*K&*$
%/L*:
#7&&
$
;$-,"+"
&HDG&,"+,%H!D$:
=%HF^#,"+M$-
%&E+!G!H,"+,E+FDM,
# ,"+M$ % ,"+, % / % GD$M $
&) % +!$HC % #!$DC%$-%&
=,"+M#&&%MC
,"+"H$+C,"+M$
Comparative Area (Snapshot Information)
- % ; % & % & %&#
?
JA7
-&
@;
L,;
& %& / #);$-&%
& & % ;%$?%5)#)&
%&&&#$A*
%&&#
+G
LH;_
$
Demographics and Physical Character
- ; % &
L*$%/
#KA#7%-*$%
,"+,%&G"M&GM$,C
%F$,C$-%,"+,
&E,HHF+E,!+!+#,"+M$-
%
#%;##
%&)&%
&%$
Grant Study Area
2010
348
758
2012
354
807
2017
369
906
-#+;
Median HH Income
Grant Study Area
2012
$15,853
$23,361
2017
$16,472
$25,151
-#,;K
+^
Analysis
-%-
;
$-
;5%#
%##$&#
%%)%
##$
Crime
*#:$$
%,""D),"+,&&=%+"+,""F=%+"^,"+,$
-*%&&
:$$$-
&*
%$&&&=%+"^,""F
=%+HD,"+,$-<%&#
Crime Risk Index
Grant Study Area
2004
104
112
2006
101
109
2008
108
116
2010
108
115
2012
109
134
-#H;
*
LD;
*
,"
7%>#*%
& %;%
*%$
*
& 4 I % & *=$
%#%,""G;=
+,C%,""G,"+,)&GH,""G^H,"+,$-
=%!,C%)^M
,""G+DG,"+,$-<%&#
Total Crime Reports
2008
83
97
Grant Study Area
2009
106
144
2010
74
121
2011
83
127
2012
93
148
-#D;-
Total Crime Over Time
160
140
120
100
80
60
40
20
0
2008
2009
Grant Area
2010
2011
2012
Grant Comparative
L!;-
,+
Total Crime Over Time
160
140
120
100
80
60
40
20
0
2008
2009
Grant Area
2010
2011
2012
Grant Comparative
LF;-
-%%%#%#&&
#%#$@
%%&;
$
##-
;
/$*%
%#&$
%%,""G,"+,&#&DDC
MDC*&+"""%%%$-%<%&
#
All Crime Incidents
Grant Facility
Grant Study Area
Percentage of Total Crime: 1000 feet of Facility
2008
62
83
74.70%
2009
71
106
66.98%
2010
38
74
51.35%
2011
2012
37
50
83
93
44.58% 53.76%
-#!%
&+"""%%L
,,
LM-
&+"""%%;L
LG%-
&+"""%%;L
@#&%
$
*#&
%%'+""(%$
Conveyances
-;%+"#&,""D,"+,%
%EHDF^H!H!$-
%FF
%%%EM"F,HGF$-
,H
% ) ; & $ - #* & # # %& #$ - #*& 4 / #%
Property Type
Total Conveyances: Grant Study Area
2004
4
Commercial
2005
25
2006
5
2007
28
2008
4
2009
7
2010
2
2011
14
2012
7
2011
8
1
2012
5
6
-#F;-
Property Type
Commercial
!"
2004
4
0
2005
3
3
2006
8
2
2007
5
0
2008
1
3
2009
0
0
2010
14
0
-#M;
-
Property Type
Total Sales Amount: Grant Study Area
2004 2005 2006
2007
2008 2009 2010
2011
$0
$0
$0 $13,727,943 $93,200 $0 $100,000 $9,980,700
Commercial
2012
$4,910,000
-#G;-
Property
Type
#
2004
2005
2006
2007
Commercial $1,678,000 $282,636 $1,171,000 $774,500
Low Density
"
$0
$333,000
$0
$0
2008
$0
2009 2010
2011
$0 $0 $1,714,562
$349,000 $0
$0
2012
$0
$152,279 $895,000
-#^;
-
Property Type
Commercial
Average Sales Amount: Grant Study Area
2004 2005 2006
2007
$0
$0 $0 $490,284
2008
$23,300
2009 2010
$0 $50,000
2011
2012
$712,907 $701,429
-#+";
Property Type
Commercial
Low Density
"
#
2004
2005
2006
2007
$419,500 $94,212 $146,375 $154,900
$0
$111,000
$0
$0
2008
$0
$116,333
2009 2010
2011
$0
$0 $214,320
$0
$0
2012
$0
$152,279 $149,167
-#++;
,D
-;&>
$?4%%:$$###&<
,""^,"+"$?%;%>
%
#$-%%*4%
:$$ $ 7 E+!GF++#&,""D,"+,&
&%EG,^G+$
Parcel Data
=%
$-'-O(;
&EHH"!^G,"+,EHDGGM+
$-)G$+C`,$,C
%,""H-O$7=
#M$+C&=#
,$!C
-#%%-O&
&$-<%&#
Average Assessed Total Value
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
Grant Area
$359,791
$350,057
$336,287
$345,318
$342,296
$351,316
$412,260
$391,725
$374,317
$330,598
$341,519
$322,385
$323,057
$346,902
$356,306
$391,787
$348,999
$350,461
$348,871
$348,871
-#+,;-O
,!
LM;-O
Conclusions
- ; % > / $
?%/>&)#*
& # $ - ; # % %> ,""H$A*%#
$ @ & +""" % % ; % % %=#&
$:%& #%,""G%
% =&/>,""H
$
@,""H&
%#&%/
$-*##
%*,""G$-
&
%$
The Commons at Chantry (2006)
- % #
$-%+""&))#&
%%$-
#
)#&$
-
5
National Church Residences: Permanent Supportive Housing Impact Analysis
,F
/#)#=&&#
*)
O$According to Tonda
Roberson, property manager for Chantry Village, the two developments are
often confused by prospective tenants. # & P & # 5 $Q
,""F#
#
%$-&&&
O#$-
&%
#&#$
- & K % % # #
%%#%#$
P'-
(*&K/>R$
$>
Q&$P&=
#/#,!F$Q
Quantitative Analysis
A > #%%>$@&
%&%%%#
#$-)
O
,D"*)=#,""!$
Study Area (Snapshot Information)
&%&-
#
%&#
),M")M"
J?;
%
@?=#
,M
LG
- & % # &#&
$
Demographics and Physical Character
-
#&%6
% $ - K#J$-R
5
$%,"+,%
&^+GD&FH$FC&
%G$HC$-%,"+,&EDGGHD=
&E!HF!+#,"+M$
Comparative Area (Snapshot Information)
-
%
L/%
&%&#
)M"
JL*
%
@?;
,G
L^
&%&
/
=%$?%&
# %% L*
6L #$?$
L+"
Demographics and Physical Character
-
%
&&$-%
#+^M">&;K$%,"+,
%
&F^D+&D+$^C&)
,^
%^$FC$-%,"+,
E!"^,H$
2010
9,061
6,978
Chantry Study Area
2012
9,184
6,941
2017
9,577
7,053
-#+H
Median HH Income
Chantry Study Area
2012
$48,834
$50,923
2017
$53,651
$55,008
-#+D
K
Analysis
Crime
*#:$$
,""D),"+,&&=%+,!,""F=%+HH#,""G
,"+,$-*%&
&:$$$-
&&*
%$&&&&=%D^,"+,
=%!M#,"+","+,$-<#&
Crime Risk Index
Chantry Study Area
2004
129
56
2006
125
54
2008
133
57
2010
132
57
2012
133
49
-#+!
*=
H"
L++
*
7%>#*%
& %
%*%$&
*
*
,""D%#%/,""F$
% # % ,""G = DF$^C % FHF ,""G ^HD ,"+,$ -
&%FD$HC%DMF
,""G MG, ,"+,$ - < %& # Total Crime Reports
Chantry Study Area
2008
636
476
2009
644
490
2010
651
454
2011
667
610
2012
934
782
-#+F
-
H+
L$+,
-
'A(
L$+H
-
'?(
-%%%#%#&&
##H"""
$ & % # %5%%&
$
%%,""G,"+,&#&,$DC
H$^C*&+"""%%%$-%<%&
#
H,
All Crime Incidents
Chantry Facility
Chantry Study Area
Percentage of Total Crime: 1000 feet of Facility
2008
21
636
3.30%
2009
24
644
3.73%
2010
26
651
3.99%
2011
16
667
2.40%
2012
24
934
2.57%
-#+M-
&+"""%%
L$+D
&+"""%%
L
L+!%-
&+"""%%
L
@ % % & % HH
*#4#$K%
,"+,&%#=*
$'(&$
Conveyances
-
%,^GG#&,""D,"+,%
%E+MF^G+!F!$-
%+F^M
%%%E,"FHM!GHH$-
%
$ - #* & # # %&
#$-#*&4/
#%
Property Type
Commercial
!"
Total Conveyances: Chantry Study Area
2006
10
421
2007
6
357
2008
16
348
2009
5
298
2010
0
344
2011
1
320
2012
7
334
-#+G
-
Property Type
Commercial
!"
2006
11
240
2007
20
206
2008
5
185
2009
2
174
2010
4
151
2011
9
165
2012
2
199
-#+^
-
Property
Type
Total Sales Amount: Chantry Study Area
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
$0
$0
$4,724,676
Commercial $8,052,607 $4,752,445 $2,327,474 $2,050,000
Low Density
" $27,591,012 $21,477,246 $16,950,143 $14,194,577 $16,827,172 $12,398,697 $12,357,088
-#,"
-
Property
Type
Commercial
#
2006
2007
2008
2009
$380,500
$9,005,615
$50,625
$176,629
2010
2011
$4,118,000 $8,907,600
2012
$4,170,000
Low Density
" $26,198,960 $17,613,987 $11,314,407 $10,424,005 $7,740,032 $7,507,599 $14,382,465
-#,+
-
HD
Property
Type
Average Sales Amount: Chantry Study Area
2006
Commercial $805,261
2007
$792,074
2008
$145,467
2009
$410,000
2010
$0
2011
$0
2012
$674,954
Low Density
" $65,537
$60,160
$48,707
$47,633
$48,916
$38,746
$36,997
-#,,
Property Type
Commercial
Low Density
"
#
2006
$34,591
2007
$450,281
2008
$10,125
2009
2010
2011
2012
$88,315 $1,029,500 $989,733 $2,085,000
$109,162
$85,505
$61,159
$59,908
$51,258
$45,501
$72,274
-#,H
@%&,""F
& %#&%/
$%&
&)HG$FC&&
&)+!$GC$-
##
*,""G$A*%,""M,""G
#
&###%%#
%%$
Parcel Data
=%
$-'-O(
&E+,FDD+,"+,E+FDDD+
$-)H$^C
`D$^C%,""H-O$&,""F'(
%%#&-O%
#
$-<%&#
H!
Average Assessed Total Value
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
Chantry Area
$154,268
$154,444
$157,078
$154,319
$150,506
$126,665
$126,441
$200,952
$199,958
$198,906
$198,897
$191,406
$165,008
$164,790
-#,D
O
L$+F
O
Conclusions
%
#&
-
###>&$
=%*#%%
,""F
$& #%,""G#/%
%%#%#%
#
O?*
$?%>*
%##*
#$
%5%&#
##$A
& # $ & % HF
#%###
%%$
The Commons at Buckingham (2010)
-
?*
%
#&&
#$-
;
+""%#&)
& $ - ?* % AJJ7 #$
R#%%
%
?*
& * # *) P $Q P % # # )#* & % # $Q - 5 5 % %)&%$&%
=
#&
%#$
K % ?* & # #
$7L#%
#
K6677#$&
<-
;%&
?*$L#
##%&
##
%&&*#%
&*%$Fidelibus believes that the key to the project’s
success is the oversight and programming provided by National Church
Residences.
$
Quantitative Analysis
? % # & % > 5%-
;$
%
$-%#&/>*
% %>#
#%%>
$
HM
Study Area (Snapshot information)
&%&-
?*%&
#
)FM"
J
@L
L$+M?*
@ < % ##&*%&*#
%%$
Demographics and Physical Character
- ?* #
##A#
#$7*%
#$&GG#
&,GHM$
HG
Comparative area (Snapshot Information)
-
/%%%&
#
L%
J
)FM"
@L
L$+G?*
- < # # /
%$
H^
L$+^?*
Demographics and Physical Character
- ?* A#%b&$%,"+,
%
&DM+&FD$FC
%+,$MC$-%,"+,
&E,HHGG$,"+,&!H#&H"G$
Buckingham Study Area
2010
5
471
2012
NA
484
2017
NA
516
-#,!?*
Median HH Income
Buckingham Study Area
2012
NA
$23,388
2017
NA
$26,958
-#,F?*K
Analysis
-%-
?*
$7*%*
%&%
$
D"
Crime
*#:$$
,""D),"+,&&=%+!D,""F=%+FD,"+,$-
*%&:$$
$-
&*
%$&&&&=%+,M
,""F=%+DH#,"+"$-<#&
Total Crime Risk
Buckingham Study Area
2004
158
131
2006
154
127
2008
164
135
2010
163
135
2012
164
143
-#,M?*
*
*%%#%?*,""D%
&%&$-
*=
%##%%/>I*
?*#>
*=$
L$,"?*
*-
-% ,""G&+,D
,"+,$-
&&/%
MM+H,$-%#
#&&
#>##$
D+
Total Crime Reports
Buckingham Study Area
2008
72
77
2009
89
90
2010
121
79
2011
128
102
2012
124
132
-#,G?*-
L,+?*-
'A(
L$,,?*-
'?(
%%,""G,"+,&#&+$+C
+"C*&+"""%%%$K%*
#&$$%$-%
D,
<%&#
All Crime Incidents
Buckingham Facility
Buckingham Study Area
Percentage of Total Crime: 1000 feet of Facility
2008
2
72
2.78%
2009
1
89
1.12%
2010
7
121
5.79%
2011
13
128
10.16%
2012
10
124
8.06%
-#,^%-
&+"""%%?*L
L$,H-#%
&+"""%%?*L
L$,D%-
&+"""%%?*
% - ?*I #$-
DH
#
*%$
Conveyances
? % % & %& $ %
#
?*&H
,"+H$ - H"! %
,""D,"+,)%#%%$
Property Type
Exempt
Commercial
Number of Conveyances: Buckingham Study Area
2010
3
0
2011
0
0
2012
0
1
-#H"?*-
Property Type
Commercial
!"
$
%&
2010
2
25
2011
8
14
2012
23
80
-#H+?*
-
Property Type
Exempt
Commercial
Total Sales Amount: Buckingham Study Area
2010
$0
$0
2011
$0
$0
2012
$0
$1,000,000
-#H,?*-
Property Type
Commercial
!"
#
2010
$1,000
$977,300
2011
$1,371,429
$451,971
2012
$462,000
$588,400
-#HH?*
-
Property Type
Exempt
Commercial
Average Sales Amount: Buckingham Study Area
2010
$0
$0
2011
$0
$0
2012
$0
$1,000,000
-#HD?*
DD
Property Type
#
Commercial
!"
2010
$500
$39,092
2011
$171,429
$32,284
2012
$20,087
$7,355
-#H!?*
Parcel Data
%,"+,%?*&
E,F!MFM%+"C%,"+"$-
#&
+^$,C$-
%&&%&$
-/,""H$
Average Assessed Total Value
2009
2010
2011
2012
Buckingham Area
$292,984
$295,931
$265,767
$265,767
$75,366
$74,298
$73,497
$88,586
-#HFO%?*
Conclusions
7%-
?*/
#&&
%& $ #/
$%
*&&#
* $ -% 5 % %
$
The Commons at Livingston (2011)
-
A,"++&!"
#;)AJJ7% $#
%A%&)
%:$$O$
&%!")#$
-
A&#%?&J
$
%</>$AK#
%&#*&&
#/%#%#
D!
= /# % $ K &#*&*#%
$As a result, she has stated with some authority that the opening
of the Commons at Livingston has had no impact, positive or negative, on
crime in the community.&#=
##>$-
A
#I #&%#$
#&5#%
& % # $ 7 #> #* % A
*% $A#
@P%#$Q
- L K % # * 7>
?
%-
A$
%%&$
,F
%$
Quantitative Analysis
A
% #%>&$%%#%
= ,$!$- %#& A> *% $
& * % & &
&#$
Study Area (Snapshot Information)
& %& - A %&
#
JK
J)%)&A
)M"
@R
DF
L$,!A
%%#/%
& #$ 4=#
#$
Demographics and Physical Character
- % & $%A
?
$,"+"&M^+,&
,"+,%G+M+$:&
%GMG,#,"+M$-%D"
5%&)$-%
&EH,^^H,"+,EHMDH+#,"+M$
Comparative Area (Snapshot Information)
-
%A L&%&%&
#
JK
J
)M"
@)%)&A
DM
L$,FA
&%&
/
#% $
L,MA
Demographics and Physical Character
- % $ & K&$
,"+"
&GD+!&,"+,%GDDH$:
&%GF!!#
DG
,"+M$ - % D" 5 % &) $ - % EH!MMM,"+,$-
>
&$
2010
7,912
8,415
Livingston Study Area
2012
8,171
8,443
2017
8,782
8,655
-#HMA
Median HH Income
Livingston Area
2012
$32,993
$35,777
2017
$37,431
$40,009
-#HGAK
Analysis
-
A&%&#%=
#$-%
#$
% #& & & #%%
#$
Crime
* A # :$$
%,""D),"+,&&=%,,",""F=%,HD
,""G$-*%&&
:$$$#
%
#%*=:$$
$&&&=
%D,+,""F=%DD^,"+,$-<%&
#
Total Crime Risk
Livingston Study Area
2004
226
433
2006
220
421
2008
234
448
2010
233
447
2012
233
449
-#H^A
*=
D^
L$,GA
*
# % # # &*$@%
,""G#/#&,"++,"+,$&
%%#&&'`HG^`H,,(
%%#%%$-&
## ##&&
%A%*#
%#$
Total Crimes Reported
Livingston Study Area
2008
984
751
2009
1,016
651
2010
1,042
720
2011
1,052
818
2012
1,441
1,140
-#D"A-
!"
L$,^A-
'A(
LH"A-
'?(
%%,""G,"+,&#&FC
^C*&+"""%%%$-%<#&
!+
All Crime Incidents
Livingston Facility
Livingston Study Area
Percentage of Total Crime: 1000 feet of Facility
2008
92
984
9.35%
2009
71
1,016
6.99%
2010
90
1,042
8.64%
2011
95
1,052
9.03%
2012
138
1,441
9.58%
-#D+-%
&+"""%%A
L$H+-
&+"""%%AL
L$H,%-
&+"""%%AL
!,
% # %
#%%A%>,"++$*
%A%$
Conveyances
-A%,MDF#&,""D,"+,%
%E+,",MD^+M$-
%,!!H
%%%E+,D^G!FG"-4
%#4%:$$
%&#$-#*&4/
#%
Property Type
Commercial
!"
Total Conveyances: Livingston Study Area
2011
53
211
2012
17
253
-#D,-A
Property Type
Commercial
!"
2011
19
239
2012
16
255
-#DH-A
Property Type
Commercial
!"
Total Sales Amount: Livingston Study Area
2011
$2,390,568
$4,633,301
2012
$1,116,102
$5,613,359
-#DD-A
Property Type
Commercial
!"
#
2011
$2,074,308
$7,006,814
2012
$1,932,000
$7,096,951
-#D!-A
!H
Property Type
Average Sales Amount: Livingston Study Area
2011
$45,105
$21,959
Commercial
!"
2012
$65,653
$22,187
-#DFA
Property Type
#
Commercial
!"
2011
$109,174
$29,317
2012
$120,750
$27,831
-#DMA
-%
$?=%
%EHH+M+EH+F^,#&,""D,"+,$&
/ % % % A %$ -
#&>
%E!!",MF^,"++EF!D^DF+,"+,$-
&
%E^HG++,,EF^G"^FM$
Parcel Data
=%
$-'-O(A&EM^HDF
,"+,E^+D^"
$-)!$GC`+$FC
%,""H-O$-<##&
Average Assessed Total Value
2010
2011
2012
Livingston Area
$91,365
$79,700
$79,346
$107,810
$92,167
$91,490
-#DG-O%A
-&%:$$
%&$*A%
I*%*
$K&#%>
*%$
%,"+H%
&
& # % ,""H$ - * % ##%
!D
$
Conclusions
A =% %
#$-A#&
#%%%>%&+"""%%
#%$-
= #
*4%&$A#%%
/>,"++$&% %%%
#%%$
The Commons at Third (2012)
-
-
>
%
#$-+"")%%#
,"+,$-%%-
;-
?*
F"#$A*
?*
-AJJ7#$
&
/
-# %# %%%%$K*=
%L*
>J77#
#
$L=% %%%5
#$J%%&
$
-
-5<&/&
#L%)#)&
$
#
#%%#&#
& % $ - #<I&&
&
$ J& % & # % % # = =
%&#%#$J&>*/
%%PO&%
4$Q&
#*%
-J&>$
R ,G ,"+H Columbus Business First ran an article about a proposed
285-unit development at Fifth and Holly Avenues, one block north of The
Commons at Third. The article was titled, “Resort-style View on Fifth
apartment complex planned near Grandview” and indicated that the project
!!
would also include nearly 25,000 square feet of retail and additional project
amenities. /%&#=%E,!$#
O
#)#* O ) = #<$P*%#Q
O$P$Q
Quantitative Analysis
-
A-
% #%>$%
%#%=$&*
%&&&
#$
Study Area (Snapshot Information)
&%&-
-%&
#
b
J)%)&
-J?
@&?
L$HH-
%%#/%
& #$ 4=#
#$
!F
Demographics and Physical Character
--=%$-
L%/%%
#$
-
->%,"+"
&,HHH&
,"+,%,H,!$:&
%,H!M#,"+M$-%,^
MD$,C$-%EHM+HG
,"+,&ED,H!^#,"+M$
Comparative Area (Snapshot Information)
-
%-
-&%&%&
#
-
J&?
;?
@;&
L$HD-
&%&
/
&?#$-/%
%$-
&&%;&
$
!M
L$H!-
Demographics and Physical Character
-
-
%&
;?$,"+"
&H!MH
&,"+,%HM,H$:
& % D"D^ # ,"+M$ - % ,^
# % &) &%D$FC$-
%
&E!"M+M,"+,&E!F+GF#,"+M$
Third Ave Area
2010
2,333
3,573
2012
2,325
3,723
2017
2,357
4,049
-#D^-
Median Income
Third Ave Area
2012
$37,138
$50,717
2017
$42,359
$56,186
-#!"-K
Analysis
A*A?*-&%)
#%=#$
#$%
!G
#&&&
#%%#$
Crime
*#&:$$%
,""D),"+,&&=%G^,""F=%^!,""G,"+"$
-%&*G$
*
&
&&=%D",""F
= % !, ,"+,$ &
*
/%&%;&$-<%&
#
Total Crime Risk
Third Ave Study Area
2004
92
42
2006
89
40
Third Ave Comparative
-#!+-
*=
2008
95
43
2010
95
43
2012
92
52
L$HF-
*
?&%;&&#%
$
,""G
&%,G%,""G),"+,&%+GH
,"+"$
% % ,""G ,"+, & #& D$+C
+M$FC*&+"""%%%$@,"+,%
!^
%R$-%<
%&#
All Crime Incidents
Third Ave Facility
Third Ave Study Area
Percentage of Total Crime: 1000 feet of Facility
2008
6
148
4.05%
2009
13
174
7.47%
2010
13
183
7.10%
2011
14
165
8.48%
2012
31
176
17.61%
-#!,%
&+"""%%-L
Crime within 1000 feet of Facility Compared to
Crime in Study Area
200
150
100
50
0
2008
2009
Third Ave Facility
2010
2011
2012
Total Third Ave Study Area
L$HM-#%
&+"""%%-L
F"
L$HG%
&+"""%%-L
- - ,"+, # / $//
;&f/%&$
Conveyances
--%!GH#&,""D,"+,%
%EFG,+M+HG$-
%G,+
%%%E+++,FMG^!$&,"++
#%#)%
#<$-<%&#
Property Type
Industrial
Commercial
!"
Total Sales Amount: Third Ave Area
2011
$2,987,500
$2,636,550
$3,775,400
2012
$2,512,968
$1,569,100
$4,184,000
-#!H-%-
Property Type
Industrial
Commercial
!"
2011
0
26
68
2012
0
5
94
-#!D-%-
F+
Property Type
Total Sales Amount: Third Ave Area
2011
$2,987,500
$2,636,550
$3,775,400
Industrial
Commercial
!"
2012
$2,512,968
$1,569,100
$4,184,000
-#!!--
Property Type
#
2011
$0
$2,363,000
$9,788,514
Industrial
Commercial
!"
2012
$0
$330,000
$12,576,812
-#!F--
Property Type
Average Sales Amount: Third Ave Area
2011
$746,875
$175,770
$107,869
Industrial
Commercial
!"
2012
$83,766
$74,719
$116,222
-#!M-
Property Type
#
Industrial
Commercial
!"
2011
$0
$90,885
$143,949
2012
$0
$66,000
$133,796
-#!G-
Parcel Data
=%
$ - '-O( & E,^^!," ,"+,E,+G++G
$-`G$MC`+$DC
%,""H-O$-&%<
%&#
Average Assessed Total Value
2011
2012
Third Ave Area
$300,883
$299,520
$218,293
$218,188
-#!^-O-
F,
-##
%&$
Conclusions
@%%-
-&
//*;&fO&
!%!$$#
#I#%
$&&4$
IV. Project Conclusions
%=#
$%%%
=%$@#
%$
<
&*
/$-&&&L
%%&&&*
%$&&*&)
$-%#%
&)*&)
$
The broader development community no longer holds a stigma against these
types of facilities as illustrated by three recent transactions near some of the
sites. E,!/&R@!)#*%-
-$
#
&K%
R$-&%%%/&#*%
-
?*$L
;H""%%
#&
>$-++)&5#
%E+^$,I&%$@*
%=%-
;&K7%
%P&
>&%%-
; &
)%$Q
Perhaps the greatest testament to the success of these projects is that
communities are now approaching National Church Residences to explore
whether or not a permanent supportive housing project could be built
in their community. = = % % R J J=
7 % 7 % # #> $ J # / #&%#$“The buildings [National Church Residences]
have developed are attractive and they provide a valuable service to the
FH
community.” said Edgar. “I would love to see one on the Southside.”
- % 5 permanent supportive
housing facilities have no discernible negative impact on their surrounding
neighborhoods’ character or stability. %%
&
#&%4
$ -% % & % % % % & # % #$
FD
VI. Appendix
F!
Firm Summaries
Arch City Development
7
#)# =
#$ > ? &* %%#
#&$&*%%#
&*#)#&
#&&#<$
+!%&
#$
Urban Decision Group
:# 7 ; # < ; %
%$
*%#$-
=%
$:#7;@$
Commons at Grant Data Summary
Demographics
2010
348
758
Grant Study Area
2012
354
807
2017
369
906
Median HH Income
Grant Study Area
2012
$15,853
$23,361
2017
$16,472
$25,151
Crime
Crime Risk Index
Grant Study Area
2004
104
112
2006
101
109
2008
108
116
2010
108
115
2012
109
134
Total Crime Reports
2008
83
97
Grant Study Area
2009
106
144
2010
74
121
2011
83
127
Total Crime Over Time
160
140
120
100
80
60
40
20
0
2008
2009
Grant Area
2010
2011
2012
Grant Comparative
Total Crime Over Time
160
140
120
100
80
60
40
20
0
2008
2009
Grant Area
2010
2011
2012
Grant Comparative
2012
93
148
All Crime Incidents
Grant Facility
Grant Study Area
Percentage of Total Crime: 1000 feet of Facility
2008
62
83
74.70%
2009
71
106
66.98%
2010
38
74
51.35%
2011
2012
37
50
83
93
44.58% 53.76%
Conveyances
Property Type
Total Conveyances: Grant Study Area
2004
4
Commercial
2005
25
2006
5
Property Type
Commercial
!"
2007
28
2008
4
2011
14
2012
7
2004
4
0
2005
3
3
2006
8
2
2007
5
0
2008
1
3
2009
0
0
2010
14
0
2011
8
1
2012
5
6
Total Sales Amount: Grant Study Area
2004 2005 2006
2007
2008 2009 2010
2011
$0
$0
$0 $13,727,943 $93,200 $0 $100,000 $9,980,700
Commercial
Property
Type
2012
$4,910,000
#
2004
2005
2006
2007
Commercial $1,678,000 $282,636 $1,171,000 $774,500
Low Density
"
$0
$333,000
Property Type
$0
$0
2008
$0
2009 2010
2011
$0 $0 $1,714,562
$349,000 $0
$0
2012
$0
$152,279 $895,000
Average Sales Amount: Grant Study Area
2004 2005 2006
2007
$0
$0 $0 $490,284
Property
Type
Commercial
Low Density
"
2010
2
Property Type
Commercial
2009
7
2008
$23,300
2009 2010
$0 $50,000
2011
2012
$712,907 $701,429
#
2004
2005
2006
2007
$419,500 $94,212 $146,375 $154,900
$0
$111,000
$0
$0
2008
$0
$116,333
2009 2010
2011
$0
$0 $214,320
$0
$0
2012
$0
$152,279 $149,167
Appraised Values
Average Assessed Total Value
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
Grant Area
$359,791
$350,057
$336,287
$345,318
$342,296
$351,316
$412,260
$391,725
$374,317
$330,598
$341,519
$322,385
$323,057
$346,902
$356,306
$391,787
$348,999
$350,461
$348,871
$348,871
Commons at Chantry Data Summary
Demographics
2010
9,061
6,978
Chantry Study Area
2012
9,184
6,941
2017
9,577
7,053
Median HH Income
Chantry Study Area
2012
$48,834
$50,923
2017
$53,651
$55,008
Crime
Crime Risk Index
Chantry Study Area
2004
129
56
2006
125
54
2008
133
57
2010
132
57
2012
133
49
All Crime Incidents
Chantry Facility
Chantry Study Area
Percentage of Total Crime: 1000 feet of Facility
2008
21
636
3.30%
2009
24
644
3.73%
2010
26
651
3.99%
2011
16
667
2.40%
2012
24
934
2.57%
All Crime Incidents
Chantry Facility
Chantry Study Area
Percentage of Total Crime: 1000 feet of Facility
2008
21
636
3.30%
2009
24
644
3.73%
2010
26
651
3.99%
2011
16
667
2.40%
2012
24
934
2.57%
Conveyances
Property Type
Total Conveyances: Chantry Study Area
2006
10
421
Commercial
!"
Property Type
2007
6
357
2008
16
348
2009
5
298
2010
0
344
2011
1
320
2012
7
334
2006
11
240
Commercial
!"
Property
Type
2007
20
206
2008
5
185
2009
2
174
2010
4
151
2011
9
165
2012
2
199
Total Sales Amount: Chantry Study Area
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
$0
$0
$4,724,676
Commercial $8,052,607 $4,752,445 $2,327,474 $2,050,000
Low Density
" $27,591,012 $21,477,246 $16,950,143 $14,194,577 $16,827,172 $12,398,697 $12,357,088
Property
Type
Commercial
#
2006
2007
2008
2009
$380,500
$9,005,615
$50,625
$176,629
2010
2011
$4,118,000 $8,907,600
2012
$4,170,000
Low Density
" $26,198,960 $17,613,987 $11,314,407 $10,424,005 $7,740,032 $7,507,599 $14,382,465
Property Type
Average Sales Amount: Chantry Study Area
Commercial
2006
$805,261
2007
$792,074
2008
$145,467
2009
$410,000
2010
$0
2011
$0
2012
$674,954
Low Density
"
$65,537
$60,160
$48,707
$47,633
$48,916
$38,746
$36,997
Property Type
Commercial
Low Density
"
#
2006
$34,591
2007
$450,281
2008
$10,125
2009
2010
2011
2012
$88,315 $1,029,500 $989,733 $2,085,000
$109,162
$85,505
$61,159
$59,908
$51,258
$45,501
$72,274
Appraised Values
Average Assessed Total Value
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
Chantry Area
$154,268
$154,444
$157,078
$154,319
$150,506
$126,665
$126,441
$200,952
$199,958
$198,906
$198,897
$191,406
$165,008
$164,790
Commons at Buckingham Data Summary
Demographics
2010
5
471
Buckingham Study Area
2012
NA
484
2017
NA
516
Median HH Income
Buckingham Study Area
2012
NA
$23,388
2017
NA
$26,958
Crime
Total Crime Risk
Buckingham Study Area
2004
158
131
2006
154
127
2008
164
135
2010
163
135
2012
164
143
Total Crime Reports
Buckingham Study Area
2008
72
77
2009
89
90
2010
121
79
2011
128
102
2012
124
132
All Crime Incidents
Buckingham Facility
Buckingham Study Area
Percentage of Total Crime: 1000 feet of Facility
2008
2
72
2.78%
2009
1
89
1.12%
2010
7
121
5.79%
2011
13
128
10.16%
2012
10
124
8.06%
Conveyances
Property Type
Exempt
Commercial
Property Type
Commercial
!"
Number of Conveyances: Buckingham Study Area
2010
3
0
Property Type
Commercial
!"
Property Type
Exempt
Commercial
Property Type
Commercial
!"
2012
0
1
$
%&
2010
2
25
Property Type
Exempt
Commercial
2011
0
0
2011
8
14
2012
23
80
Total Sales Amount: Buckingham Study Area
2010
$0
$0
2011
$0
$0
2012
$0
$1,000,000
#
2010
$1,000
$977,300
2011
$1,371,429
$451,971
2012
$462,000
$588,400
Average Sales Amount: Buckingham Study Area
2010
$0
$0
2011
$0
$0
2012
$0
$1,000,000
#
2010
$500
$39,092
2011
$171,429
$32,284
2012
$20,087
$7,355
Appraised Values
Average Assessed Total Value
2009
2010
2011
2012
Buckingham Area
$292,984
$295,931
$265,767
$265,767
$75,366
$74,298
$73,497
$88,586
Commons at Livingston Data Summary
Demographics
2010
7,912
8,415
Livingston Study Area
2012
8,171
8,443
2017
8,782
8,655
Median HH Income
Livingston Area
2012
$32,993
$35,777
2017
$37,431
$40,009
Crime
Total Crime Risk
Livingston Study Area
2004
226
433
2006
220
421
2008
234
448
2010
233
447
2012
233
449
Total Crimes Reported
Livingston Study Area
2008
984
751
2009
1,016
651
2010
1,042
720
2011
1,052
818
2012
1,441
1,140
All Crime Incidents
Buckingham Facility
Buckingham Study Area
Percentage of Total Crime: 1000 feet of Facility
2008
2
72
2.78%
2009
1
89
1.12%
2010
7
121
5.79%
2011
13
128
10.16%
2012
10
124
8.06%
Conveyances
Property Type
Commercial
!"
Property Type
Commercial
!"
Property Type
Commercial
!"
Property Type
Commercial
!"
Total Conveyances: Livingston Study Area
2011
53
211
2012
17
253
2011
19
239
2012
16
255
Total Sales Amount: Livingston Study Area
2011
$2,390,568
$4,633,301
2012
$1,116,102
$5,613,359
#
2011
$2,074,308
$7,006,814
2012
$1,932,000
$7,096,951
Property Type
Average Sales Amount: Livingston Study Area
2011
$45,105
$21,959
Commercial
!"
Property Type
2012
$65,653
$22,187
#
Commercial
!"
2011
$109,174
$29,317
2012
$120,750
$27,831
Appraised Values
Average Assessed Total Value
2010
2011
2012
Livingston Area
$91,365
$79,700
$79,346
$107,810
$92,167
$91,490
Commons at Third Data Summary
Demographics
Third Ave Area
2010
2,333
3,573
2012
2,325
3,723
2017
2,357
4,049
Median Income
Third Ave Area
2012
$37,138
$50,717
2017
$42,359
$56,186
Crime
Total Crime Risk
Third Ave Study Area
Third Ave Comparative
2004
92
42
2006
89
40
2008
95
43
2010
95
43
2012
92
52
All Crime Incidents
Third Ave Facility
Third Ave Study Area
Percentage of Total Crime: 1000 feet of Facility
2008
6
148
4.05%
2009
13
174
7.47%
2010
13
183
7.10%
2011
14
165
8.48%
2012
31
176
17.61%
Crime within 1000 feet of Facility Compared to
Crime in Study Area
200
150
100
50
0
2008
2009
2010
Third Ave Facility
2011
2012
Total Third Ave Study Area
Conveyances
Property Type
Industrial
Commercial
!"
Total Sales Amount: Third Ave Area
2011
$2,987,500
$2,636,550
$3,775,400
2012
$2,512,968
$1,569,100
$4,184,000
Property Type
2011
0
26
68
Industrial
Commercial
!"
Property Type
2012
0
5
94
Total Sales Amount: Third Ave Area
2011
$2,987,500
$2,636,550
$3,775,400
Industrial
Commercial
!"
Property Type
2012
$2,512,968
$1,569,100
$4,184,000
#
2011
$0
$2,363,000
$9,788,514
Industrial
Commercial
!"
Property Type
2012
$0
$330,000
$12,576,812
Average Sales Amount: Third Ave Area
2011
$746,875
$175,770
$107,869
Industrial
Commercial
!"
Property Type
2012
$83,766
$74,719
$116,222
#
Industrial
Commercial
!"
2011
$0
$90,885
$143,949
2012
$0
$66,000
$133,796
Appraised Values
Average Assessed Total Value
2011
2012
Third Ave Area
$300,883
$299,520
$218,293
$218,188
I-7 1
od
e
Ore gon Ave
Indi ano la Ave
Fr an ce s Pl
N 4th St
il C o
n
F ields Ave
t
We s t S
0.7 33
St
W
23
W E lm
G ay St
1.05S t
ut St
E C h e s tn
ry St
E H ic k o
le St
70
da
E Goo
I- 6
N Gra nt Ave
Co r r uga ted Wa y
Gro ve St
N 6th St
A ly
St
E L on g
t
N 5 th S
1.4
Miles
St
E E lm
t Av e
N Gr a n
e St
St
E G ay
e tt
E L a fa y
Mckee
Mt Ve rnon Av e
E Na ght en St
670
E 2nd A
ve
Yo em an St
3
E 5th Av e
Jac k G i b b s
in
N Wa s h
0.35
W Sp rin g St
W Long S t
d
id e B lv
V ine St
Spr uce St
St
N H ig h
B lv d
71
n Av e
0.175
Spru ce S t
Br od be lt Ln
n
W Go od ale St
W a rr e n
E 1s t Ave
ln S t
E L in c o
St
B ri c k e l
l St
N Pear
nw
W N a ti o
Ne
Pe nn syl van ia Av e
al
l
s Ave
li n
Lu nd y St
But tles Ave
W Hub bard Ave
Co
Pric e Ave
W Sta rr Ave
W Pr es co tt St
Wi lbe r Av e
W 1s t Av e
W 2n d Av e
Den nison Ave
W 5th Ave
Sm ith Pl
J e ff e rs o
0
Go
Mic hig an Av e
Th urb er Dr W
Fo rs yt he Av e
W 3rd Av e
Ha rris on Av e
W 4th Ave
De law are Ave
N 5th St
N 4th St
Wa lte rs St
40
N 20 th St
d
E B ro a
al
dwell Pl
Eton Grv
Du po nt Av e
Dick Ave
a l St
E C a p it
Ag ate Aly
St
St
St
Av e
M a d is o n
Fa ir Av e
St
E Long
lm
A o n d A ly
g
E S p r in
eson
e
n Av
At c h
Elda C t
e rn o
Mt V
N 21 st St
L eonard Av e
Ha llido n Av e
$15,000 - $20,000Gibba rd Av e
$20,000 - $25,000
E Sta rr Av e
$25,000+
E 3rd Av e
<$15,000
2012 Median Household Income
Block Groups
Comparative Area
Study Area
Sh oem ake r Ave
Commons at Buckingham
Ol ms tea d Av e
Legend
Le on a Av e
E 4th Av e
Le xin gt on Av e
Ha mi lto n Av e
Sid ne y St
Ho wa rd St
The Commons
at Buckingham: 2012 Median Household Income
W 6th Ave
Ne ils to n St
Gr ay St
Essex Ave
N 9th St
Pe te rs Av e
St Cl air Av e
N Ga rfield Av e
Hi gh lan d St
Ri ga Al y
Hu nt er Av e
Neil Ave
Ke ss le r St
E 7th Av e
C
N Mo nr oe Av e
Co urt lan d Av e
t
Pa rk S
Sc ho ol St
N 19t h St
W 7th Ave
N 6t h St
Lo ew St
Sa wy er Blv d
e
N e il Av
N 18t h St
e
S a y Av
e
a s a nt A v
M t P le
Mia mi Av e
Ke r r S t
N 20 th St
St
Tr ev itt St
t
H aml e t S
y
ll
A
n
Be a c o
N 21s t St
ly
Pe ru A
N 22n d St
S u m m it
I- 71
St
N 11 th
e
g to n Av
l St
N Pear
t St
N Fron
w St
N L u d lo
i B lv d
Mar con
Lil l
i
Zim m er Dr
Ha rb or Bl vd
0.325
Ha
s
ot
r
fo
d
st
a le R d
Dr
tf ie ld Dr
Se da lia Dr
ort Rd
In let Dr
aR d
n i De fo
to
re st Dr
a
L
Ar ns by R d
0.65
Ne wp
70
270
Korn w a l r
M ap ler id g e D
re
Rd
Dr r
ll e l e D
e
y
a
b
La o n d
b
C ar
L ind
o ra Dr
B
No
e
1.3
Dr
ha
tfo rd Dr
F ox C h a p le Dr
Lak
e
Upp
A ye r s
K aise
Gi
in g
Glen bri ar St
Bl
B en
ia l D r
ne l
Mo
Pla
l Dr
r
c
Rd
256
Ha v
oft Dr
$75,000+
$50,000 - $75,000
$25,000 - $50,000
<25,000
St a
d
gR
Ci r
in
Tu s s
2012 Median Household Income
Block Groups
Comparative Area
Study Area
Commons at Chantry
Legend
r
Ha ft D
R efug ee Rd
cana Pk y
Li v
Av e
Sh aul is D
n
st o
Tu ss in g Rd
ak Be
Cent e n n
E than Dr
r i d g e Dr
2.6
Miles
117
Ch an try Dr
Als hir e R d
1.95
Te m pl ar S t
C
O
ak m
ont Dr
Sa ra nac Dr
a le D r
d
k
Ra de ki n Rd
As to r Av e
er
0
m o re D r
Wy
Re fug ee R d
xb
Bi
Rd
r
Sh ady Lan e Rd
Be lfa st D r
El le ry Dr
y
W ood
c
o od Rd
M a yw
d
Du nlo e R
Flee t Rd
Rd
Su ndal e
e n t Dr
Bair
sf
Bir o rd
rk
Pa
D
nm ark Rd
De
Rd
W hit low
Fo nt ai ne Rd
Re tr
Br ic e Rd
Hi gh St
E Li vi ng st on
Av e
Le gi on Ln
sc
Cr
e
B ea l Dr
Ameri
ge Dr
Ly nbr i d
Dr
Ge nd er Rd
L onsd
er Rd
ie
v
Be llt re e Dr
O
Gr ov es Rd
Rd
N o e B ix
by
Rd
Br ic e Rd
ne R d
Il e
re Dr
m
H ux l
Lu ck s
Ro s elaw n Av e
r D
r
The Commons at Chantry: 2012 Median Household Income
e
l et t
a n Ln
Ret ton Rd
Dr
Be ts y Dr
Dr
E s qui
it h
Dr
A rrows
vd
tts
Mayb u r
l
d
ey Dr
Club Dr
Tr
R
Rd
Fr ee d o m
e
Mc na ug h t e n
e ncr
St o
Rd
Hi ne s Rd NW
r
Dr
D
w
e
n
G ra d H a v
d le
r
r
ld
Rd
hlan d
k
Fulle r's
e
ud
Ba
in
Hig
r
Pa
n Dr
Lo n g
nd
nw
W N at io
Br od be lt Ln
Ne il Av e
40
33
St
S B e ll e
Sta r li n
g St
rn ace S t
0.15
St
W G ay
St
W Ly nn
St
W R ic h St
Ne ils ton St
0.3
Sh o r t
0.6
mo
W Sy ca
r ty S t
Li be
70
E Na ght en St
Mt Ve rnon Av e
Cl ev ela nd Av e
S Wa ll
n
E F u lt o
St
St
E N o b le
d St
E M oun
W
St
hittier
W
St im m
el St
t
S 3r d S
r k Av e
C it y P a
l St
S Pear
0.9
I- 7 1 N
St
E R ic h
ner St
E B le n k
r St
E H o s te
re S t
St
E
t
ng S
Sp ri
670
P a rk N
Lib r a r y
I- 7 0
St
Ale xan der Aly
E Fr an kf or t St
1.2
Miles
E Sy ca mo re St
Le ar St
A ly
t
E M a in S
So uth Ln
St
Ch
N 22n d St
N 20 th St
N 18t h St
nA
M a d is o
n Av e
Fa ir Av e
Mcal liste r Ave
70
sto
n Av e
Stone Av e
Moobe
E Sy ca mo re St
Ne wt on St
r ry St
E Fulto n St
Co le St
E Ric h St
Bryden Aly
E Moun d St
Fo re st St
ly
$25,000+
$20,000 - $25,000
$15,000 - $20,000
Fra nk lin Av e
Gu sta vu s Ln
E Chap el St
Bryde n Rd
E
D e n Liv i n
g
to
33
re
ild
Mia mi Av e
Study Area
N Oh io Av e
Comparative
Area
St
E Long
2012
Median
Household
Income
ly
A lm o n d A
<$15,000 E Ga y St
Ag ate Aly
40
N 21 st St
S tCommons at Grant
Legend
g
E S p r in
Ell iot Aly
N Ga rfield Av e
M o oberry St
St
E Oak
d
E B ro a
71
Ma y Aly
Els me re St
u t St
E Wa ln
St
E R ic h
St
E C h e r ry
Ell io tt
r St
E E n g le
t
nS
E F u lt o
Ja ck so n St
Be rg er Al y
E Be ck St
St
E S ta te
el St
E C hap
St
E Tow n
23
St
E E lm
St
E G ay
e St
al
E C a p it
e tt
E L a fa y
3
A ly
Mckee
St
E L ong
St
E Ly nn
y St
I-71 S
n St
W To w
St
d St
W M ou n
WM
a in
St
St
St
W E lm
y e tt e
W L a fa
r
E H ic k o
t St
S Fron
0
62
n St
W To w
ad
W B ro
W Long St
W Spr ing S t
d
id e B lv
Dr
N Mo nr oe Av e
I- 670
r Dr
N 17t h St
Co nvCommons
en tio n C ente r
The
at Grant: 2012 Median Household Income
d
t
S 2 nd S
Fu
C enter Dr
vi c
w
S L u d lo
Dix on Aly
St
S H ig h
S 4t h
Ra de r Aly St
Mo ha wk St
Ma co n Al y
t
S 3 rd S
Br igg s St
La th ro p St
S 9th St
St
S Wa ll
Ke nn ed y Dr
l St
N Pear
L est e
i Bl v
Ci
St
Pa rso ns Av e
ll e
S Laz e
t
S 4 th S
Wa ge r St
t
N 5 th S
t
S 5 th S
An n St
M a rc o n
Allen Av e
S Mo nr oe Av e
St
N Front
w St
N L u d lo
t
S 6 th S
ns
t
N 3 rd S
S 17 th St
St
L a z e lle
t
S 18 th St
t
We s t S
Se ll s C
t Ave
S G r an
S 17 th St
t
N 9 th S S 9 th S t
Heyl Ave
t A ve
N G ra n
S 19 th St
St
N H ig h
S 20t h St
N
n d Av e
e
g to n Av
Car pen ter St
C le v e la
in
S Wa s h
Gil ber t St
t
N 4 th S
S 21s t St
t
N 6 th S
St
N 11 th
S 22 nd St
N Wa s
Av e
hin g to n
S 22 nd St
I- 7 1
S Oh io Av e
A ly
Wil lo w
e
v
A
rs o n
S Ch am pio n Av e
J e ff e
n Av e
Oa kw oo d Av e
H a m il to
Dr
St
Ba n k S t
Sh erw oo d Rd
B ro ok si de D
r
Sco t twood Rd
r
Rd
d d Tu d o
ey
l
d
vd
R
le s
Bl
d
Wel
k
o
wi c
wo
Ber
tl e
s
Ca
Do ve r Rd
E Mo rel an d D
r
Br ow nle e A
ve
Rd
0.25
naby Dr
r
Hallec k D
Mitzi D r
Kenview Rd S
Sona ta D r
Flo rib un da Dr
Sc ha af Dr
0
40
E Mo un d St
Tem ple to n Rd
As to r Av e
S Br oa dl eig h Rd
S Ch e ste rfi e ld
Rd
N
0.5
Br en tw oo d Rd
Ma plew oo d Av
e
Ba rn et t Rd
Dr
Penfield Rd
Be xv ie Av e
1
r
z in g
1.5
er
Pe t
E De sh le r Av e
Liv -M oor D
Rd
Ro sw el l Dr
Rd
s
Rd
Cu sh ing Dr
Bo l t o n Av e
Elm St
Car lto n Ave
Dr
A l coy Dr
2
Miles
Gi lro y Rd
Co nw ay Dr
G ro ve s R d
Ro ss Rd
Wri ght Ave
Lan gle y Ave
Tr u
ro
Sta t i on Rd
n
i n e s h ir e L
t on
Sim
317
Comparative Area
Study Area
Dr
ing to n
70
illie
$25,000 - $50,000
40
<25,000
d
orm an D
T e ddy Dr
Be atr ice Dr
Be ts y Dr
Fo lg er Dr
in Dr
lai n
Dic ke ns Dr
Av e
D
B elf as t Dr
El le ry Dr
H e aly
D u nd ee
r
$50,000 - $75,000
Mcallis ter A v
$75,000+
Jus tin Rd
2012 Median Household Income
Block Groups
Ke ele r Dr
rr
Do ra l Av e
Dim so n Dr N
Win slo w Dr
Commons at Livingston
Legend
K ae A ve
Ar agon Av e
er Dr
Co lb y Av e
E Li vi ng st on Av E Li vi ng
st on Av e
e
A ve
As to r Av e
d
An r u s Av e
E M ou nd St
E Fu lto
n St
Rd
33
S Wey an t Av e
By ro n Av e
Av en Dr
Be xle y Pa rk Rd
Br yd en Rd
Ha
Ric ke nb a c ker Ave
Ur al Av e
Vi rgi nia Ci r E
Be ec hw oo d Rd
The Commons
at Livingston: 2012 Median Household Income
Fa ir Av e
Ba rn et t Rd
S Go ul d Rd
Rd
on
Ch els ea Av e
B
d Av e
Cr es twoo
N iag ara Rd
Mi lle rd al e Rd
S Ev er et t Av e
S Ashb u
rton Rd
Elizabet
h Ave
S Hamp
t o n Rd
S Wav er ly St
Ze ttl er Rd
Ka rl St
St rie be l Rd
C ar st ar e
En fie ld Rd
Ke nw ick Rd
Ken vie w Rd
ew
f
Rd
d
Ar kw oo d
ur
Co lling wood Av
e
gu rd
Ar na
Cu
Rd
Pic a r d
st
k
ie
l
Cobu rg Rd
La m by Ln
Bo
c
wi
S Ja m es Rd
Se lkirk Rd
Ave
E lde rw oo d
Ln
V
Eas
t
Bu rli ng to n Av e
B
Sh a d y Lane Rd
El ai ne Rd
Er ick son Av e
Pi er ce Av e
Wes tp ha l Av e
Be rn ha rd Rd
Wi l
en
Dr
ha
v
L itt lej o h n D r
e
e Dr
l l i an Ln
S Ha m ilt on Rd
Baxt
Ma nfe ld D
N
Cal
v
B
Dr
Ma etz el Dr
Gra tta n Rd
Cl ov er le af St E
V
rd o
il a
Co ur tri gh t Rd
270
d
M ar th a Ln
Ro se m or e Av e
w Rd
S Ha m ilt on Rd
r
Co un try Cl ub
Rd
Ex et er Rd
Du ke Rd
Co lga te Rd
Bu ck ne ll Rd
An tw er p Rd
La tt im e r
R
E
N
H a r lo
Li
Dr
on y
s
p
nt l
Hu
oe
B ix b
yR
d
Ma rble Dr
Noe Bixby R
Dr
r
st
Glen n Av e
Elm wo od Av e
0.35
33
le B lvd
Wa t
er
m
Du
ar
0.175
G oo da
f Av
e
Westw ood Av e
t r y Rd
ven
Co
Rd
ov e r
Wya nd otte R d
B l uf
W 7th Ave
0.7
ge
Rd
Ri d
b li n
Fa irv iew Av e
Rd
f o rd
Ste elw ood R d
St
Ha ine s Av e
m
Mu lf o rd
Ing lis Av e
1.05
W 1s t Av e
kw a y D r
Rd
P ar
W 3rd Av e
1.4
Miles
Mc mi lle n Av e
Sell s Av e
W 5t h Av e
Tho rnw ood Pl
W 2n d Av e
Ida Av e
W 6th Ave
Ch am be rs Rd
Ch es ap ea ke Av e
vd
King Av e
Bl
Ho pe Av e
No rth sta r Rd
Oa kla nd Av e
Me rri ck Rd
As hla nd Av e
Ur lin Av e
Wi lla rd Av e
Tre mo nt Rd
Br oa dv iew Av e
G ran dvi ew Av e
Me ad ow Rd
Kr a
e r Av e
Qu ay Ave
Bed
0
No rth St ar Rd
The Commons at Third:we 2012 Median Household Income
Gl en da le Av e
Do ten Av e
Wo od hil l Dr
Ca m br id ge Bl vd
rt h
Av on d ale A
ve
Virgin ia Av e
Pa lm er Rd
An d
Lin coln Rd
No
Th om as Rd
Ke nn y Rd
Ox ley R d
Ho lly Ave
Par
kw ay N
Co pe lan d Rd
Ea stv iew Av e
Mc cla in Rd
Burr Av e
rre ll Av e
Bu
Ya r
Go od ale Blv d
i c al C e
W 8th Ave
W 9th Ave
W Sw an St
I- 6
70
W Goodal e St
315
$75,000+
W 6th Ave
W 7th Ave
W 4th Av e
$50,000 - $75,000
$25,000 - $50,000
<25,000
670
Go
od
al
e
N
e il
W 1s t Av e
W 2n d Av e
Co n
De law are Ave
n
W 1 0 th Av e
Median
Income
Kin g Av2012
e
King Household
Ave
Block Groups
M ed
Comparative
Area
Study Area
Commons at Third
Legend
OH -31 5
Sta nfo rd Rd
Pe rry St
He ss St
No rto n Av e
m
rs R d
Rd
Tw i
nR
i ve
Ti
rm
be
Gla dd en Rd
n ter Dr
Bat tell e Blv d
Ore gon Ave
Ing les ide Av e
d
Mic hig an Av e
er
O len ta ng y Ri v
Th urb er Dr W
Bl v
ss
He
Pe nn syl van ia Av e
a Av e
Ha rris on Av e
Rh o d
Ed ge hil l Rd
Can non D r
d St
U pham Dr
e
N e il Av
an Rd
k
Dr
F ields Ave
Ore gon Ave
od
al
e
il C o
n
N 4th St
0.7 33
t
We s t S
0.35
W
23
W E lm
G ay St
1.05S t
ut St
E C h e s tn
ry St
E H ic k o
le St
70
da
E Goo
I- 6
N Gra nt Ave
Co r r uga ted Wa y
Gro ve St
N 6th St
A ly
St
E L on g
t
N 5 th S
1.4
Miles
St
E E lm
t Av e
N Gr a n
e St
St
E G ay
e tt
E L a fa y
Mckee
Mt Ve rnon Av e
E Na ght en St
670
3
Jac k G i b b s
in
N Wa s h
0.175
St
ln S t
E L in c o
St
B ri c k e l
W a rr e n
E 1s t Ave
E 2nd A
ve
B lv d
71
n Av e
W Sp rin g St
W Long S t
St
N H ig h
d
id e B lv
V ine St
Spr uce St
W Go od ale St
Spru ce S t
s Ave
li n
Br od be lt Ln
n
l
Pric e Ave
Lu nd y St
But tles Ave
W Hub bard Ave
Co
Den nison Ave
W Pr es co tt St
Wi lbe r Av e
W 1s t Av e
W 2n d Av e
W Sta rr Ave
N 9th St
Indi ano la Ave
Fr an ce s Pl
l St
N Pear
nw
W N a ti o
Ne
Pe nn syl van ia Av e
Essex Ave
E 5th Av e
Sid ne y St
Ho wa rd St
Wa lte rs St
al
dwell Pl
Eton Grv
Du po nt Av e
301+
Dick Ave
201 - 300
151 - 200
101 - 150
51 - 100
< 50
St
Ag ate Aly
The primary source for Crime Risk data
is the FBI Uniform Crime Report (UCR).
Risk indexes are standardized based
on the national average. A Risk Index value
of 100 for a particular risk indicates that,
for the area, the relative
t probability of the risk
d Sthe
consistent
average probability
B r o awith
a l St
40 is E
C a p it
of that risk across the
States.
E United
St
Av e
M a d is o n
Fa ir Av e
St
E Long
lm
A o n d A ly
g
E S p r in
eson
e
n Av
At c h
Elda C t
e rn o
Mt V
N 21 st St
L eonard Av e
Ha llido n Av e
Gibba rd Av e
2012 Total Crime
E Sta rr Av e
E 3rd Av e
E 4th Av e
Block Groups
Comparative Area
Study Area
Sh oem ake r Ave
Commons at Buckingham
Ol ms tea d Av e
Legend
Le on a Av e
Gr ay St
W 5th Ave
Fo rs yt he Av e
W 3rd Av e
Ha rris on Av e
W 4th Ave
De law are Ave
Yo em an St
I-7 1
J e ff e rs o
0
Go
Mic hig an Av e
Th urb er Dr W
Hi gh lan d St
Ri ga Al y
Hu nt er Av e
Neil Ave
N 5th St
N 4th St
Sm ith Pl
Ne ils to n St
Ke ss le r St
The Commons
at Buckingham: Total Crime Risk 2012
W 6th Ave
Co urt lan d Av e
t
Pa rk S
Sc ho ol St
N 19t h St
E 7th Av e
N 6t h St
Pe te rs Av e
St Cl air Av e
N Ga rfield Av e
N 20 th St
W 7th Ave
C
N Mo nr oe Av e
Le xin gt on Av e
Ha mi lto n Av e
Lo ew St
Sa wy er Blv d
e
N e il Av
N 18t h St
e
S a y Av
e
a s a nt A v
M t P le
Mia mi Av e
Ke r r S t
N 20 th St
St
Tr ev itt St
t
H aml e t S
y
ll
A
n
Be a c o
N 21s t St
ly
Pe ru A
N 22n d St
S u m m it
I- 71
St
N 11 th
e
g to n Av
l St
N Pear
t St
N Fron
w St
N L u d lo
i B lv d
Mar con
r au nin g
rk l
ry
Ca
or a Dr
r bo nd a l e D
in e D
r
Id le wi ld Dr
Se da lia Dr
Ne wp ort Rd
1.2
r
R
1.8
M at uk a Dr
Te m pl ar S t
Ro ve r Ln
117
Ch an try Dr
Al sh ire Rd
tford Dr
t
on D r
Lo
Up
2.4
Miles
w
0.6
a Rd
ni
to
De fo re st Dr
a
L
Ar ns by R d
tfi el d D r
Pa
Lin
d
Dr
ha
m
ch
ot
St o
vie
rc h w D r N
Bi
d ge Dr
v ie w
Dr
S
Lo
ng
kB
Oa e
D
i al r
Bl
n el
rR
d
B en
ta
t on
e
Ha
ft Dr
Ap lin Dr
301+
201 - 300
151 - 200
101 - 150
51 - 100
< 50
Ha
2012 Total Crime
Block Groups
Tu s
Comparative Area
Study Area
n
si
Commons at Chantry
Legend
P source for Crime Risk data
The primary
is the FBI Uniform Crime Report (UCR).
Risk
M o indexes are standardized based
on the national average. A Risk Index value
of 100 for a particular risk indicates that,
for the area, the relative probability of the risk
is consistent with the average probability
of that risk across the United States.
lac
l Dr
Rd
Av e
R efug ee Rd
icana Pk y
Tu ss in g Rd
Ge
Cent e n n
E th an Dr
Ln
A ye rs
r i d g e Dr
r
l Rd
r 0.3 de
l
lle
bo
C
Oak
Sar a n ac Dr
a le D r
kd
pe
Ro
Ha
be
is
70
le Rd
270
Korn w a l
r
Ma ple ri d g e D
d
cr l e
a
d
Rd
R
nd
ore D
La
lbe rt Dr
Ta
d
N
xb
Bi
oe
La
k
L
gs
ivin
vd
ym
W0
Re fug ee R d
Gr ov es Rd
El le ry Dr
No
eB
i xby
Rd
D ail y R
Woo
d
R iver
t
es
e Rd
Su ndal
M ayw
o od Rd
Dunl oe R
d
r
D
De
nm
Rd
W hit low
Dr
d
fo
r
Bai
rs
s da
Lo n
ar k
Rd
y
Gl en br ia r St
L e ah
Ln
Be llt re e Dr
Rd
Fl ee t R d
Dr
Fo nt ai ne Rd
Retr i
ev
er Rd
B ric e Rd
Hi gh St
e Dr
Ly nbr i
dg
r
D
Bir
rk
Pa
B eal Dr
e n t Dr
sc
Cr
e
Fo x C h a p le
Ka dy Ln
A mer
The Commons
at
Chantry: Total Crime Risk 2012
E Li vi ng st
on Av e
Le gi on Ln
eap
T
ne R d
Il e
li n g Brg
r
Dr
S tir
L
Rd
G en de r Rd
M ay b u
E s qui re Dr
nD
a p ha el
t ts
l ub D r
eC
utd Dr
Br ic e Rd
Amb arw ent
d
r
s
rb
R
Bi
m
ncro
B
Rd
in
ur
g
n Dr
Rd
To w
Dr
ve
s
ck
Lu
Dr
dw
Hi ne s Rd NW
l
Ba
Rd
en
n
G ra d H a v
o
Rd
ri
nw
W N a ti o
St
S B e ll e
W
70
Sh o r t
St
0.3
St
t St
St
E E lm
St
E G ay
re S t
ner St
E B le n k
r St
E H o s te
n St
E F u lt o
St
E N o b le
d St
E M oun
Cl ev ela nd Av e
W
St
hittier
W
el St
r k Av e
C it y P a
l St
S Pear
St im m
t
S 3r d S
0.9
e
St
E Tow n
I- 7 1 N
St
E R ic h
St
St
E S ta te
el
E C hap
23
E
e St
St
St
C a p it a l
e tt
E L a fa y
g
E S p r in
St
0.6
3
St
E L on g
St
E Ly nn
St
S H ig h
mo
W Sy ca
r ty
Li be
I-7 1 S
t St
S Fron
0.15
St
t
S 2 nd S
d St
W M o un
WM
a in
n St
W To w
St
ll e
S Laz e
0
62
St
W G ay
St
W Ly nn
St
W E lm
St
u
E C h e s tn
y e tt e
W L a fa
W R ic h S t
St
B roa d
W Long St
St
W S p ri n g
n St
W To w
40
33
vd
id e Bl
E N a tionw i d e Bl
vd
r
E E n g le
Ma y Aly
Els me re St
So uth Ln
1.2
Ale xan der Aly
Miles
E Sy ca mo re St
E Be ck St
Ja ck so n St
Le ar St
St
A ly
C
ldre
hi
to
N 21 st St
N 18t h St
N 22n d St
M a d is o
n Av e
Stone Av e
Moobe
S Wa ll
Fo res t St
Co le St
Sy ca mo re St
Ne wt on St
rr y S t
E Fulto n St
E Moun d St
Mcal liste r Ave
E Ric h St
E Cher ry St
Bryden Aly
Fra nk lin Av e
Gu sta vu s Ln
E Chap el St
Bryde n Rd
301+
201 - 300
Fa ir Av e
151 - 200
101 - 150
51 - 100
< 50
2012 Total Crime
Ga y St
BlockE Groups
Comparative Area
Study Area
nA
The primary
source for Crime Risk data
l y Crime Report (UCR).
is the FBI Uniform
Risk indexes are standardized based
on the national average. A Risk Index value
of 100 for a particular risk indicates that,
for the area, the relative probability of the risk
is consistent with the average probability E
of that risk across the United States.
Den
33
40
N Oh io Av e
Commons at Grant
Legend
Mia mi Av e
St
E Long
A lm o n d A ly
St
Ag ate Aly
Ell iot Aly
N Ga rfield Av e
M oob erry St
70
St
St
E O ak
d
E B ro a
71
t
E M a in S
E ll io tt
E Liv ing sto n Av e
I- 7 0
St
u t St
E Wa ln
St
E R ic h
St
E C h e r ry
P a rk N
L ib r a r y
K ie fe r
g
E S p r in
N Mo nr oe Av e
Gro ve St
N 17t h St
The Commons at Grant: TotalMt Crime
Risk 2012
Ve rnon Av
C enter Dr
vi c
w
S L u d lo
S 4t h St
Ra de r Aly
Mo ha wk St
Ma co n Al y
r Dr
N 20 th St
Co nv en tion Cen r D r
te
Dix on Aly
Ci
S 6th St
St
S Wa ll
Br igg s St
t
S 3 rd S
La th ro p St
S 9th St
l St
N Pear
L est e
St
N Front
w St
N L u d lo
Pa rso ns Av e
t
N 3 rd S
t
S 4 th S
Wa ge r St
g St
S Yo u n
t
S 5 th S
An n St
St
Allen Av e
S Mo nr oe Av e
t
We s t S
lle
N Laz e
t
ns
St
N H ig h
Se ll s C
t
S G ran Ave
S 17 th St
t A ve
N G ra n
S 17 th St
t
N 4 th S
n d Av e
S 18 th St
C le v e la
t
S 9 th S
Heyl Ave
t
N 9 th S
Car pen ter St
t
N 5 th S
S 19 th St
Ho ffm an Av e
S 20t h St
Ne i l s to n S t
e
g to n Av
Gil ber t St
in
N Wa s h
S 21s t St
t
N 6 th S
St
N 11 th
S 22 nd St
W
ve
e rs o n A
S 22 nd St
I- 7 1
S Oh io Av e
il lo w A ly
S Ch am pio n Av e
J e ff
n Av e
Oa kw oo d Av e
H a m il to
Dr
St
Ma plew oo d Av
e
Br ownl e
E Mo re lan d Dr
e A
ve
Do ve r Rd
d
l
r R
s
B
do
le
u
k
T
el
c
i
W
rw
Be
Rd
d
o
o
ew
stl
a
C
r
Mitzi Dr
r
Hallec k D
Son ata D
Sc ha af Dr
40
E Mo un d St
Te m pl et on Rd
As to r Av e
S Br oa dl eig h Rd
S Ch e st e rfi e
ld Rd
En fie ld Rd
l e y Rd
sh bu rn St
0.9 P e tz in g
er R
d
1.35
Dr
Wri ght Ave
E Li vi ng st on
Av e
S Ye ar lin g Rd
G ro ve s R d
Dr
Carl ton Ave
Gi lro y Rd
Co nw ay Dr
o
S h a mr ck
A l coy Dr
1.8
Miles
Andr u s Av e
E M ou nd St
E Fu
lto n St
La m by Ln
As to r Av e
Be ec hw oo d Rd
A ve
Ar kw oo d
0.45
Penfield Rd
Be xv ie Av e
Rd
Ro sw el l Dr
L i v -Moor D r
E De sh le r Av e
Sc ott w o od Rd
Rd
Cu shi ng Dr
Se ab rook Av e
E Li vi ng st on Av
e
Bol t o n Av e
alm S
Elm St
Ka rl St
d
kR
0.225
N
e
Be xley Pa rk Rd
Ba rn et t Rd
Br en two od R d
C obur g R d
Br oo ks id e D
r
vd
Mi lle rd al e Rd
Tr u
ro
Block Groups
H
on
70
d
151 - 200
101 - 150
201 - 300
J u lia
n Dr
H ea ly
D
Be lfa st Dr
El le ry Dr
Hux ley
Jan
Dr
301+
or
r p ate Dr
Ke ele r Dr
er Dr
Ar ag on Av e
r rin gt
illie
B
51 - 100
< 50
The primary source for Crime Risk data
is the FBI Uniform Crime Report (UCR).
Risk indexes are standardized based
on the national average. A Risk Index value
of 100 for a particular risk indicates that,
for the area, the relative probability of the risk
is consistent with the average probability
of that risk across the United States.
Dr
Be ts y D r
Fo lg er Dr
Ted d
y
Jus tin Rd
vin Dr
lai n
Di ck en s Dr
Comparative Area
Study Area
Commons at Livingston
Legend
E Mai n2012
Crime
St Total
40
317
Va le rie Ln
o
St ati o n R d Hil to n C
hir
Vin e s e Dr
l ton
Sib le y A v e
Co lb y Av e
Pi er ce Av e
Br yd en Rd
Rd
Ke nw ick Rd
Ke n vie w Rd
s
g u a rd
n
Cu
st
Rd
Bo
c
wi
ew
Wi
fi
Dr
el
d
Ro ss Rd
Rd
S Ja m es Rd
Pic a r d
r
0
S Ev er et t Av e
d Av e
Cr es two
o
Be rn ha rd Rd
Vir gi nia Cir E
Wes tp ha l Av e
The Commons at Livingston: Total
Crime Risk 2012 Langley Ave
Wa
Co lling wood Av
e
Ar
do
Ln
Ni ag ar a Rd
Q u ig le y R d
Sha d y Lane Rd
Fa ir Av e
Ze ttl er Rd
S As hbur
t o n Rd
El izab et
h Ave
S Ha
m pton Rd
S Wav er ly St
S Wey ant Av
By ro n Av e
Av en Dr
Av e
El de rw oo d
Ela ine Rd
Er ic ks on Av e
M ar th a Ln
R
P
S e lki rk Rd
St rie be l Rd
Ro se m or e Av e
Ma rble Dr
Co ur tri gh t Rd
Dr
is
S Ha mi lto n Rd
r
Vi l a
Ca rs ta re
w
Bu rli ng to n Av e
S Ha m ilt on Rd
Ma etz el Dr
E
Bax t
L i ttl ejoh n Dr
Cl ov er le af St E
Co unt ry Cl ub Rd
Ex et er Rd
Du ke Rd
Co lga te Rd
Cal
B
t
r
La tt im e r
Dr
H a r lo
Dr
D
on
ps
m
Si
Dr
tl y
un
e
Dr
Elm wo od Av e
0.15
0.3
Wa ter
33
a le Blvd
We stwo od Ave
G o od
Fa irv iew Av e
ma
rk
D ub
l in
Br oa dv iew Av e
Ri d
0.6
ge
Rd
Ri dg ew ay Pl
Gr an dv iew Av e
St
D o ug
0.9
la s S
t
W 1s t Av e
Ha ine s Av e
m
Ing lis Av e
1.2
Miles
H il o
W 3rd Av e
kwa y D r
Pa r
Thor nwo od Pl
W 2n d Av e
Ida Av e
W 5t h Av e
Ln
Bu rr Av e
m
And
ove
0
Glenn Ave
f Av
e
Gr an dv ie w Av e
Mc mi lle n Av e
Dela shm ut Ave
r Rd
Wya nd otte R d
B l uf
Me rri ck Rd
As hla nd Av e
Ur lin Av e
Ho pe Av e
W 6th Ave
Wi lla rd Av e
No rth Sta r Rd
No rth sta r Rd
Oa kla nd Av e
Do ten Av e
Wo od hil l Dr
W 7th Ave
Gl en da le Av e
Virgin ia Av e
Pa lm er Rd
King Av e
Av on da le A
ve
Me ad ow Rd
Kra
e r Ave
Qu ay Av e
Ke nn y Rd
Ea stv iew Av e
Mc cla in Rd
Ho lly Ave
Th om as Rd
ms
St
W 9th Ave
W 6th Ave
301+
W 4th Ave
201 - 300
151 - 200
101 - 150
51 - 100
< 50 W 7th Ave
2012 Total Crime
KingGroups
Block
Ave
Comparative Area
Study Area
W 8th Ave
Commons at Third
W 1s t Av e
W 2n d Av e
W Goodal e St
315
Kin g Av e
W 10th Ave
Legend
The primary source for Crime Risk data
is the FBI Uniform Crime Report (UCR).
W Sw
Risk indexes
arean
standardized
based
St
on the national average. A Risk Index value
of 100 for a particular risk indicates that,
for the area, the relative probability of the risk
is consistent with the average probability
of that risk across the United States.
Go od ale Blv d
l ia
Wi l
Ave
B ur rell Av e
Ed ge hil l Rd
Ch es ap ea ke Av e
Ox ley R d
Ge rra rd Av e
N
P a rkw ay
Co pe lan d Rd
He ss St
No rto n Av e
Ti
be
a n Rd
rm
Gla dd en Rd
Pe rry St
Sell s A ve
Bobcat Av e
Ore gon Ave
Tre mo
Pe nn syl van ia Av e
Rd
Ch am be rs RdRisk 2012
ThentCommons
at Third: Total Crime
Y ard
e
s Av
OH-3
H i gg
15
Ole n ta n g y
River R d
5
670
Ing les ide Av e
- 31
Mic hig an Av e
OH
I- 6
70
Th urb er Dr W
Can non D r
Dr
n
nt
r
U S -2 3 S
St
N H ig h
N a t io n
ll e
N La ze
l St
N Pe ar
lz
wi de P
St
U S -3 3
0.3
23
W
33
0.2
0.4
Miles
t
N 5t h S
0.05
0.1
W
US -3 3
St
l
3N
ory
E H ic k
t St
N 3 rd S t
u
E C h e s tn
st St
E Lo cu
n
Co
i
ra
23
Mckee
67
e
E L a fa y
ly
K e ll y A
3
ly
C h u rc h A
Mt Ve rno n Av e
Gro v e St
Mc coy St
COMMONS AT
BUCKINGHAM
Edw ard S t
tt e S t
E Na gh te n S t
Ne ils to n St
A ly
0
t
N Gran
0
io
nt
Ce
D
er
E N a ti o nwide B lvd
Co
e
nv
E
le S t
G o o da
4A
670
N 6t h S t
The
A ly Commons at Buckingham: Surrounding Land Uses
I-
3
ri
E Sp
Cl ev el a nd Av e OH
-3
Eden
U
2
S-
t
ng S
Warehouse
High Density Residential
Recreation
Park
Office
Mixed Use
lvd
b s B Residential
Density
Jac kLow
G ib
Institutional/Exempt
Industrial
Condominium
Commercial Vacant
Commercial
Land Use
School
Child Care
Study Area
Commons at Buckingham
Legend
in
N Wa s h
St
E Lo ng
ve
g to n A
Av e
670
Rd
Ma pl er id ge Dr
Noe Bixby Rd
0.175
C
o
Dr
b
ar
le
el
le
0.35
R
et
ne
0.7
Dr
Qu in cy Dr
Dr
Lind or a Dr
d
H olb ro ok
r kli
Nor cr es t Dr
Pa
Dr
ck
70
Ha
I -2
Maybury
Maybury
Park
Park
a
nd
Cr yo do n Blvd
N
H at fie ld D r
B en ha m Dr
Talb ert D r
b
Dr
La
el
n
so
Dr
Dr
d Ja
r
m
fo
es
ts L
on
is
Bo
bo
n
Ke
w ning
War mi ns te r Dr
e Rd
Ref u g e
Nafzger
Nafzger
Park
Park
0
Do
L ar ai n e C t
Dr
on
on
d
Rd
by
N oe
Bix
Da i l y
Rd
L ip t o
n Rd
Ced a r
Dr
W
o
Ar go Ln
e
fo
Sq
s
rce
Ch
te r
a t ford Dr
Ca
ry
Ln
Qu
Te m pl ar St
1.4
Miles
M at uk a Dr
Me nd on C t
Sh er ry Ct
Re fu ge e Rd
Ke dg e Ln
1.05
t
at
COMMONS
AT CHANTRY
Sp ire Ln
R
Ch
I-7 0
St
D e llw ort h
270
Ha lif ax Ct
Gl en br ia r St
70
od Rd
M ay wo
d
Du nlo e R
Flee t Rd
Mo un dcr est St
Dr
le Rd
Su nd a
De nm ar k Rd
d
W hit low R
Fo nt ai ne Rd
Be al Dr
rd
Walnut Hill
Golf Course
af
ri d
ge
Ln
Ab ern ath y Ln
Ro ve r Ln
Le
Ch an try Dr
Al sh ire Rd
Sc a r
bo
The Commons at Chantry: Surrounding Land Uses
My er s
Kor nwa l D r
r
r
Ra ph ae l D
rk
Pa
B
t Dr
in by Dr
C
Dr
Cr
e
sc
en
G al la nt Dr
Club Dr
L ake
117
Br ic e Rd
Rd
Bri c e
117
ice
Br
Kraner
Kraner
Park
Park
Kin gs Re alm A v e
l d Rd
Br ow n f ie
i e ve r Rd
B lu e M oo n
Dr
Le gi on Ln
Br ice Rd
M ot z S t
Hi gh St
T
Te
a
B re n t C
t
AySchool
ers D
Ct
y
Dr
r S
ro
Study Area
Commons at Chantry
Office
Warehouse
C
a
n
E th an D r
Ref u
ar
lin
Ct
g ee R
d
Be
nn
r
Mo
n
lD
r
ampt
eh
o
el
r
Cent enn i a l D
High Density Residential
Recreation
Park
Other Residential
Ct
Low Density Residential
Institutional/Exempt
Industrial
Condominium
Commercial Vacant
Commercial
Land Use
pot
view
C her
Child Care D
B ir c h
Legend
R
dS
Tu ss in g Rd
70
o
C omm
irl i n g Brg
r
n
Fla g L
Stam ford Brg
by
Pl
Br ee d D r
Ge nd er Rd
ar ro ws R d
Pe rin to n Pl
Ka dy Ln
t
oC
vd
ac
L
k
oc
St
m
sh
C
Ha
r
ne R d
Ile
Dr
Dr
m
od
Dr
do
l
Tr
D ee pwo
Mayb u r y
e
F re
C
t
r
Dr
Bl
Manr in g
lD
an
ro
h
ug
ta
d
l an
Ct
ns
Co n ti n e n
Z e t t le r
W
US -3 3
St
US -33 E
t
S 4 th S
62
Yo u n g
23
0.05
St
ll e
S La ze
0
0.1
Mac on Aly
Mo ha w k St
O sc a r A ly
0.2
I- 7 1 S
St
E R ic h
33
0.3
I- 7 1 N
100B
St
I-70
r
E E n g le
St
nd St
E Mou
E N o b le
E Li vin gs to n Av e
0.4
Miles
E Bl en kn er St
US -3 3
70
COMMONS
AT GRANT
E
St
Ch erry
St
E R ic h
E
101A
dy Dr
St
E M a in
r Dr
Child Care
Warehouse
M oo b er ry St
High Density Residential
Park
Other Residential
Office
Mixed Use
Low Density Residential
Institutional/Exempt
Industrial
Condominium
Commercial Vacant
Commercial
107
Study Area
Commons at Grant
School
Land Use
L es te
Legend71
I- 7 1
t
The Commons at EGrant:
Surrounding Land Uses
To w n S
St
W a ln u t
t Av e
S Gr a n
S 4th S t
Av e
Di xo n Al y
t
S G ran
S 6th S t
h in
S Was
Ke n ne
a
R ic
Pa rso ns Av e
M
in
n
h St Con
ve
gton A
St
S 5th
St
S Re m in gt on
Rd
oo
Br
S Ro os ev el t Av
e
Rd
he
Elm St
W aterf a ll
a
wo
od
ism an Ct
Sc ott wo od Rd
Ca
e
st l
d
r R
Rd
y
e
l
s
l le
We
o
Tu d
lv d
Be r w ic k B
H
Roehamp ton Ct
0.4
Pe tz in ge r Rd
Kenview Rd S
Mitzi D r
r
Halleck D
urnaby Dr
Sona ta Dr
Sc ha af Dr
Flo rib un da Dr
ve
Rd
Do ve r Rd
Br ow nl ee A
E Mo re lan d Dr
As to r Av e
Te m pl et on Rd
Rob inw ood Av e
0.8
70
Q ue e n
1.2
s row e Dr
1.6
Miles
I-7 0
Penfield Rd
E De sh le r Av e
ob
Ro sw el l Dr
Rd
Cu sh in g Dr
Ra nd Ci r
R an d C t
COMMONS AT
LIVINGSTON
L iv- Mo or Dr
Be xv ie Av e
O
Bolton Av e
E Li vi ng st on Av
e
Tow ers C t
Be ec hw oo d Rd
Office
Mixed Use
Low Density Residential
Institutional/Exempt
Industrial
Condominium
Commercial Vacant
Gr ov es Rd
70
Ela ine Pl N
Dr
C arl ton A v e
Ba y C t
Warehouse
La rr
ton
S ta
t i on Rd
Vin e shir e Dr
Ln
ire
V in e sh
Ellery Dr
Du nd ee Av e
il
Sib ley A v e
High Density Residential
E Li vi ngst on Av
e
Park
Other Residential
Co lb y Av e
As to r Av e
Dr
al lis te r Av e
Study Area
E M ou nd StCommercial
Gi lro y Rd
Co nw ay Dr
mroc k
S ha
Wri ght Ave
Commons
at Livingston
Mc
School
Child Care
Land Use
Andru s Av e
E Fu
lto n St
La m by Ln
Ap ril Ln
Co urt rig ht Ct
As ht on Rd
Pal m S
40
Ka rl St
40
Legend
We stp ha l Av e
Wr igh t Pa rk
Rd
0
0.2
af S
fo rd Pl
33
Gr an do n Av e
Ch ar le s St
Ve rnon Rd
k wo
od
Ch els ea Av e
B
o k e Pl
ro
Ke nw ic k Rd
Rd
n
dd
o
E Mo un d St
Mi lle rd al e Rd
Rd
Ruby Ave
Ba rn et t Rd
n Rd
S As hb ur t
o
Cr es two
d
S Ha mp to n R
Ze ttl er Rd
Ro se Pl
St rie be l Rd
Be xley Pa rk Rd
S Wey an t Av
e
By ro n Av e
S Ye ar lin g Rd
Ave
El izab et
h
o d Av
e
Ni ag ar a Rd
Q u ig le y R d
S
Av en Dr
S Br oa dl eig h Rd
S C h est e rfi e
l d Rd
Tal
Rd
Pi er ce Av e
The Commons at Livingston: Surrounding Land Uses
Ke nv ie w Rd
S elk irk Rd
Rd
Be rnh ard
Sher wood R d
Wilmore D r
ew
N
rb
Dr
e
view
Av
Ro s e
le ge
Co l
f
St
d
rd
l
ie
l
r
B as il D
C
a
un
st
u rg
C
Bo
k
Hem sw ell Ct
do
c
wi
Wyt on Ct
l ar
Ln
Co ur tri gh t Rd
El ai ne Rd
Av e
Vi
Ca rs ta re
E lde rw ood
Er ick son Av e
yP
Tr
Dr
W
ur
o
ey
ln
Bu rli ng to n Av e
t
Dr
A lcoy Dr
Ln
Gr an dv ie w Av e
Gr an dv ie w Av e
0
Su nri se Av e
Hai n es Av e
Mu lfor d 0.3
Rd
Do te n Av e
0.45
Ea stv ie w Av e
V irg in ia Av
e
0.6
Miles
w
P a rk a y D r
Ke nn y Rd
O xl e y R d
0.15
Ing lis Av e
W 1st
Av e
Ge rra rd Av e
W 5t h Av e
W 3rd Av e
n
H il o L
r
Bu
re l
Del ash mut Ave
Do v er Av e
He ss St
Mc mi lle n Av e
l Av e
Ki ng Av e
COMMONS
AT THIRD
Hi g g
0.075
No rth we st Bl vd
W 2n d Av e
Tho rnw o od Pl
Ho pe Av e
Ida Av e
Mo rn ing Av e
Me ad o w Rd
W ill ar d Av e
W 6th Av e
Ho lly Av e
W 7t h Av e
No rto n Av e
am be rs Rd
The Commons at Third: Surrounding Land ChUses
Ch es ap ea ke Av e
po r ta
Gl en da le Av e
ra n s
Csx T
Av o n d a
le Av e
Low Density Residential
Warehouse
315
High Density Residential
Park
Other Residential
Office
Mixed Use
Institutional/Exempt
Industrial
Condominium
Commercial Vacant
Commercial
Agriculture
Land Use
Study Area
Kin g
Av
e
Commons at
Third
School
Child Care
Legend
5
w ay N
R
31
Pa
rk
A sc h inge r Bl v d
Ed ge h ill Rd
O len ta n g y
r
ive
OH
Rd
tion
e
s Av
W 3rd Av e
Go oda le Blv d
B urr A v e
y R iv er Rd
315
Kin g Av e
ve
Meek A
e
A
Ro d g ers v
0.275
t
Sc o tt S
R
n
T wi
D ublin Rd
0.55
40
W
G
da
Br od be lt Ln
S ta rlin
te S t
S ta
1.1
St
33
W Sp ring S t
d
W B roa
670
Co nv e n tio n
Spr uce St
Vin e S t
Ce
5
W
t St
S Fron
R ic h S t
1.65
nt
Wa rr en St
e
E 11 th Ave
E 2 n d Av
e
St
E E lm
St
E L on g
Cla ra Ave
St
t
S 5 th S
2.223
Miles
St
St
E C h e r ry
ut
E Wa ln
ng S t
ib b
Ja c k G
I -670
3
ri
E Sp
t Av e
S G ra n
St
E S ta te t
S
l
e
p
E Cha
St
E Tow n
al
E C a p it
St
E G ay
E Na ght en St
St
E Ly nn
St
S H ig h
b
S G ru b
62
W
Bu ttle s Av e
W Go od ale St
s Ave
le N
e il C
onn
l in
Wil ber Av e
E 1s t Ave
E 3rd Av e
23
E 9th Ave
E 8th Ave
Pr i ce Ave
W 1s t Ave
W 2n d Av e
d
id e B lv
N a ti o n w
oo
W 6th Ave
King Ave
W 8th Ave
W 4th Ave
W 5th Ave
Pe rry St
Ore gon Ave
Mic hig an Av e
Th urb er Dr W
Ind ian ola Ave
W 9th Ave
Ha rris on Av e
De law are Ave
C ol
e
Cl
W 10t h Ave
Hi gh lan d St
Ri ga Al y
Hu nt er Av e
De nn ison Av e
Neil Ave
Fie lds Av e
t
S 6 th S
0
Ch itt en de n Av e
Dr
r
Ess ex Ave
N 9th St
ve
l
a
nd
Av
e
s
e
n Av
e rn o
Mt V
40
St
E Long
De we y Ave
Comparative Area
Study Area
H i l dr
Mcal liste r Ave
from the Franklin County Auditor
for the years indicated. The parcel
EbyRic
h Stblock
data was apportioned
census
group and an average parcel value was
Mainthen
St calculated for each block group
Appraised Parcel Value Change
Elli ot Aly
Fa ir Av e
Ku tc hi ns Pl
Ma dison Ave
Ha wt ho rne Av e
St
ville
Gr an
Ph ale D Ha le Dr
ve
e th A
L eonard Ave
670
Bli ss St
e
Av
Old L
d
r
e o na
+10.1% or more
+5.1% to +10%
+0.1% to +5%
-19.9% to 0%
< -20%
Parcel Value Change
Bryde n Rd
is based on total parcel value
E
Av e
Le e Av e
Commons at Buckingham
Block Groups
Gibba rd Av e
Aga te A ly
E O a k St
Fran klin Ave
d St
E B ro a
71
W in ds or
Legend
e
Grv Leo nard A v
on
t
E
ell Pl
l dw
E Sta rr Av e
E 4th Av e
E 5th Av e
Ca m de n Av e
Le on a Av e
Ol ms tea d Av e
Sh oem ake r Ave
Bo nh am Av e
The Commons at Buckingham: Average Appraised Parcel Value Change 2010-2012
W 11th Ave
E 12 th Av e
Ne ils to n St
N 6t h St
Sid ne y St
Wa lte rs St
H o ward St
B lvd
N 5th St
N 6th St
N Gra nt Ave
N 3r d S t
O le nt a n g
rs R
d
iv
e
e r Ave
N Soud
Ca
N Mo nr oe Av e
Jo yc e Av e
ve
W 1 2 th A
N 17t h St
a mi lto n Av e
St Cl air Av e
H
Tr ev itt St
N Oh io Ave
Sum mit St
St
N Wa ll
St
N Front
d
i Blv
M a rc o n
Pa rso ns Av e
t
We s t S
S 20t h St
e
s Av
H i gg
N 18t h St
Mia mi Av e
N 20 th St
N 21s t St
N 22n d St
OH- 31
S 22 nd St
t
He n r y S
N Oh io Av e
St
N Wa ll
t
Pa rk S
S Oh io Av e
e
N e il Av
NP
Ke r r S t
ear l St
Wi lso n Av e
Lin wo od Av e
St
N H ig h
ve
S ay A a n t A v e
s
a
M t Pl e
Ta ylo r Av e
Ha m le t S t
Mi lle r Av e
r
C ann o n D
ly
Pe ru A
Gra h a m S t
L e s ter D r
St
S B e ll e
gSt
St
S G if t
St
r
Ma etz el Dr
Re fu ge e Rd
r
Rd
i xb y
D
Pi
0.375
ke
Fu lle rto n Dr
or
D
d r
nd
da
l ia
1.5
Se
D
ou
gh
2.25
aR d
n i D efo res
t Dr
Ar ns by R d
Dr
Ne wp ort R d
o
at
70
st D
r
Dr r
ll e l e D
e
L a b nda
Car b o L in
do
r a Dr
Bo
f
ts
a
Ivyhu r
E Li vi ng st on
Av e
Sign al
376
0.75
Harb o r Zim m er Dr
Blv d
Wal bu rn Rd
W
in
Wi n
ga
ch
te
es
Rd
te
r
317
270
El le ry Dr
Du nd e e A v e
Gr ov es Rd
S Ha m ilt on Rd S Ha mi lto
n Rd
V i ne shir e D
il
Co lb y Av e
o
Pi er ce Av e
0
D
e
L
R yg
R
Pen ick D r o
Ma no r Dr
Bl
vd
C
P
ha
r
3
Miles
117
U pp
Ch an try D r
Als hir e R d
tford D
S aranac D r
Lak
As to r Av e
Ra de ki n Rd
er
Lu c ks
Ka
hv
iew D
ri d g e Dr
B e n ne ll
n ia l D r
Ab b ie Tra i l s D r
E
Liv
st
in g
a
ie
Comparative Area
Study Area
Commons at Chantry
H
Tu s s
+10.1% or more
+5.1% to +10%
+0.1% to +5%
-19.9% to 0%
< -20%
Rd
b o r Tow n D
u
i ng
Parcel Value Change
256
d S
W
Rd
Pal me r R
Block Groups
Re fu ge e Rd
ve
on A
Legend
Appraised Parcel Value Change
is based on total parcel value
from the Franklin County Auditor
for the years indicated. The parcel
data was apportioned by census block
L
group and an average parcel value waso n g
then calculated for each block group
Dr
Tu ss in g Rd
Cen t e n
a
n
D
h
r
t
E
r S
view D r
N
rch
Bi
Dr
is er
Dr
Dr
Ha
ft
The Commons
at Chantry: Average Appraised Parcel Value Change
Retto n Rd2006-2012
Sh au l i s
r
Te dd y Dr
r
Bea tric
Be ts y Dr
Fo lg er Dr
Rd
W hit lo
w Rd
Dr
d
N o e B ix
by
De
n
O rl
Fl ee t R d
Noe B
Rd
L o ns
da l e R d
m ark Rd
Rd
y Rd
May b u r
Cle arw ate r Dr
L a tt i m e r
Du nloe
Br ic e Rd
Hi gh St
B airs
fo
r
k
ar
r
pl
Fox C ha e Dr
e nt Dr
sc
Cr
e
bo
Le gi on Ln
ar
Br ic e Rd
Sc
Ge nd er Rd
lu
e C b Dr
s q ui r e Dr
W
Fre e d o m
l
L
k ev
w
g arb ar k Dr
t on Dr
c
Bi r
Tr
ar
Su
Mc na ug ht e n R d
Hi ne s Rd NW
Mar ble D
D
pso n r
Si m
ld
Rd
r
en D
and H a v
Bo we n Rd
ate Dr
r Ba
Gr
Dr
T rl
e
ud
S to
Rd
rD
n
wi
hla nd
k
r
hill R d
se
H ig
r
Pa
r
Pa rk St
40
Neil Ave
W N a ti
ad
W B ro
h A ly
Rus
St
te
ta
WS
St
W h itt ier
L
St
0.9
St
ib er ty
1N
St
E E lm
St
E G ay
y nn S t
E
E C h e r ry
St
Wa lnu t
t
ng S
I- 670
r k Av e
C it y P a
1.35
C o n co
E Co
u th S t
E K oss
Le ar St
E Bl en kn er St
Ja ck so n St
Be rg er Al y
St
lu m b u s
St
E B eck
w St
E W il lo
ri
E Sp
St
E Tow n
St
E R ic h
23
St
E N o b le
St
d
n
u
o
EM
EL
3
E Na ght en St
St
E L on g
l St
S Pear
rd Pl
A ly
71
0.45
70
I-71 S I -7
W
62
St
M o u nd
WM
a in S t
r
D
t
S 3r d S
0.225
Fu r
ce S t
St
W R ic h
St
W Sp rin g St
W L on g S
t
33
B lvd
on w i d e
Co nv e n tio n C
er
N 6t h St
t
M o h aw k S
315
S
ci
vd
Bl
ot
o
t
en
Ma y Aly
E Fr an kf or t St
A lex and er Aly
Re inh ard Av e
1.8
Zim pf er St
Miles
Dr
So uth Ln
St
71
Pa rso ns Av e
Br od be lt Ln
na
i c Ce n t e r D r
Ci v
e
n Av
e rn o
Mt V
N 17t h St
N Mo nr oe Av e
gst
40
on
Av
Si eb er t St
E W hi tti er St
e
70
Bryde n Rd
Fo res t St
33
Ne wt on St
St
Comparative Area
Study Area
Appraised Parcel
Change
E Value
Ko ss
ut h St
is based on total parcel value
from the
Franklin
St an
ley County
Av e Auditor
for the years indicated. The parcel
data was apportioned by census block
group and an average parcel value was
then calculated for each block group
Ga ult St
Ke nt St
Moo ber ry St
Cole St
E Fulto n St
E Moun d St
Pa rk wo od Av e
E Cherr y St
Ku t c hi ns Pl
Fa ir or
Avmore
+10.1%
e
+5..1% to +10%
+0.1% to +5%
-19.9% to 0%
< -20%
Parcel Value Change
n Ave
E Ric h St
ville
Ha wt ho rne Av e
t
o n g SGroups
E LBlock
Elli ot Aly
Fra nk lin Av e
E Fulto n St
Gr an
Ph
ale D HaatleGrant
Commons
Dr
Legend
ve
e th A
M a d is o
Mcal liste r Ave
E Engle r St
E Sy ca mo re St
EL
ivin
Mo obe rry S t
E Main St
Gu sta vu s Ln
E Chap el St
Ag ate A ly
E Oa k St
d St
E B r o a E C a p it a l S t
H i l dr
N 22n d St
Atc hes on S t
N 21s t St
S 21s t St
Vine St
Macon
0
Ne ils to n St
Ra de r Aly
Win ner Ave
d
The Commons
Value
Change 2003-2012
Bl v
Spr uce St at Grant: Average Appraised Parcel
Jac k G ib b s
Cl ev ela nd Av e
Jae ger S t
Sh erm an Av e
St Cl air Av e
Wa ge r St
La tta Av e
670
Eb ne r St
N 18t h St
S 18t h St
Ta ylo r Av e
W Go od ale St
Br igg s St
La th ro p St
S 9th St
Br uc k St
Ke nn ed y
S Wa sh ing ton Av
e
Mia mi Av e
S 19 th St
N 20 th St
S 20t h St
N Ga rfield Av e
An n St
St
S 17 th St
St
S B e ll e
He yl Av e
e ll S t
Mcdow
ly
Mead A
t
S
S M ill if t S t
SG
Sh o r t
Car pen ter St
Lucas
St
Gil ber t St
w
S L u d lo
t St
S Fron
Wag ne r St
S 22 nd St
N Oh io Av e
S Ch am pio n Av e
t
We s t S
St
S Wa ll
S Oh io Av e
l St
N Pear
Oa kw oo d Av e
St
N Front
w St
N L u d lo
i Bl v d
M a rc o n
t
S 3 rd S
Wa lto n Al y
St
N Wall
St
Wi lso n Av e
St
N H ig h
Ma cle e Al y
N 3 rd S t
ll e
S Laz e
t
S 4 th S
t
S 5 th S
St uder Av e
t
N 4 th S
Ke nd all Pl
t
N 5 th S
Ki m ba ll Pl
t
S 6 th S
Lo ck bo ur ne Rd
n Av e
St
N 11 th
Mi lle r Av e
J e ff e rs o
Mille r Av e
Ell sw ort h Av e
n Av e
Ke lto n Av e
H a m il to
St
S H ig h
St
S Wa ll
t
B an k S
W
n ek Rd
e r k Rd
B ee ch c r e
Blv d
ch b a
e
w
B e fl o
San J
Co llin gw oo d Av
e
Pr es
Wes tla nd to n Rd
S Pa rkv iew Av e Av e
um
Al
Cr
k
ee
Dr
Pe
r
e
0.4
0.8
104
o
OH
-10 4
33
Mit zi Dr
1.6
Fl o r ib un da Dr
Sch aaf Dr
onata Dr
Sco ttw ood Rd
US
nce Wa y
ma
Br
Do ve r Rd
R
B
Rd
l ey c k
s
e
ll
i
We
w
Be r
Rd
Ch arl e s S t
S Ch es te rfield
Rd
S Ha rd in g Rd
A sto r Av e
Fa ir Av e
Et na St
2.4
z in g
R
er R
d
Re fu ge e Rd
Penfield Rd
Pe t
Ro sw el l Dr
Liv -M o
o r Dr
E De sh le r Av e
d
Bo lton Ave
Be xv ie Av e
Ro bi nw oo d Av e
Wa sh bu rn St
Ma ple wo od Av e
n
C u Rd
Pi c a r dd
C obu rg R
for
Br en tw oo d Rd
Be xle y Pa rk Rd
Bry den Rd
She rwo od Rd
D ale Av e
d
W ins l o w
S Da ws on Av e
E Mo und St
S Dr ex el Av e
Po we ll Av e
M ay
E Ful t o
n St
Ur al Av e
Se ig m an St
3.2
Miles
Ki
m
be
rly
yN
Pk
il
Co lb
E Li vi ng st ony Av e
Av e
Gr ov es Rd
317
40
70
Bl
vd
E Mai n St
D
Dr
< -1%
f
ts
or
d
Dr
Ivyhu r s
Appraised Parcel Value Change
is based on total parcel value
from the Franklin County Auditor
for the years indicated. The parcel
data was apportioned by census block
group and an average parcel value was
then calculated for each block group
270
t Dr
+1.1% or more
+0.1% to +1%
-0.9% to 0%
Dr r
ll e l e D
e
L a bn d a
Car b o
Bo
Be ts y D r
Fo lge r Dr
Norm a
Te dd y Dr
Jus tin Rd
Mca llis ter A v e
El le ry Dr
Comparative Area
Study Area
Commons at Livingston
Legend
Et na Rd
Groups
D or alBlock
Av e
Parcel
Value Change
d
Lang l ey Ave
Du nd e e Av e
Wri ght Ave
Wes tp ha l Av e
r oad hurs t Dr
B
S Ye ar lin g Rd
El ai ne Rd
Er ick son Av e
El m Av e
E l b ern Ave
Ro s s Rd
40
Sh ad y Lane Rd
St An n Ln
L a tt i m e r
0
16
d Dr
Br iar wo o
o se Ln
ad St
The CommonsE at
Average AppraisedDoParcel
Value Change
2011-2012
B r oLivingston:
ney St
Fo un tai n Ln
S Ca ss ad y Av e
S Ar dm or e Rd
ok
wo
H ad
od
do
n
St rie be l Rd
Rd
Dr
S As hb ur o
t
Eli za be t h n Rd
A ve
Ze ttl er Rd
S Ha mp to n Rd
S Wa ve rly St
S Wey an t Av e
S Na po leo n Av e
Av en Dr
Ba rn et t Rd
n Dr
Cl ift on Av e
Alco y D r
S Go ul d Rd
Fr an cis Av e
Eu
S Ca ss cl ai re Av e
in gh am Rd
Mo
nt
ro
se
Av
e
S Re m in gt on
Rd
Ve rnon Rd
S Ro os ev el t Av
e
Gr an do n Av e
Ch els ea Av e
Ke nw ic k Rd
S Bro
adleig h Rd
S
u n t ry
Cl ub R d
Co
Pi er ce Av e
Be rn ha rd R d
Ex ete r R
u ke Rd
N oe B ix b y R d
En fie ld Rd
Ea st m oo r Bl vd
d
lv
d
Mi lle rd al e Rd
Kenv iew Rd
ar
Co ur tri gh t Rd
v
eA
s
ck
ro
ug
bo
n
Bo
i
tw
ar
De
C
eg
oll
L o ns
ve
an A
Dr
so n
h
Sc
m ark Rd
S h e r id
p
S im
S Ha m ilt on Rd
y
da l e R d
a
ir w
Fa
Bl
d
R
O ld Fa rm b y R d
ix
No e B
y Rd
M ay b ur
ton Dr
W
- 33
vd
r sford D
Ba i
r
Bl
or
M
i
ck
nl
ey
A
ve
Ha rp e
r
0.9
r
Rd
0.45
Me
Ru n
I-6 70
g ans e r
st
ge
Rd
Bl
tee lwo o d Rd
Ch es ap ea ke Av e
Ing lis Av e
W 2n d Av e
Ha ine s Av e
Ida Av e
1.35
St
S
Ch am be rs Rd
King Av e
vd
l D
r
W 6th Ave
we
Ri d
b li n
Dr
0.225
Du
Wat e
r
a le B lvd
th
e
W 1s t Av e
k
670
G o od
f Av
e
m
ar
70
33
B l uf
No rth Sta r Rd
d R
d
d
Roxb u r y R
Con cor d Rd
Gle nn Av
e
Wes twoo d A
ve
Pr es id
No
r
Fa irv iew Av e
W
W Che lse a Rd
ge
Lin coln Rd
id
Wy an do tte Rd
br
B e d fo rd Rd
o v e r Rd
And
Sta nfo rd Rd
Elm wo od
Ave
As hla nd Av e
Ur lin Ave
dg
m E
on
tR
d
Ho pe Av e
Rd
ont
em
Do ten Av e
Virgin ia Av e
Ea stv iew Av e
1.8
Miles
Pa lm er R d
Mcc lain R d
No rth sta r Rd
Oa kla nd Av e
Sel l s A v e
W 5t h Av e
Ke nn y Rd
Ox ley R d
a
m
0
l th
Ho lly Ave
Th om as Rd
f
Gui l
Gl en da le Av e
Br oa dv iew Av e
Gr an dv ie w Av e
Jo
hn
Bu rr ell Av e
Ed ge hil l Rd
Dr
H
d
He
R
The
Commons
at Third: Average Appraised
Parcel Value Change 2011-2012
rr ic
Ki nn ea r Rd
am
k
Me ad ow Rd
e
Quay Av
He ss St
Ti
rm
be
St
Burr A v e
33
i
Tw
n
R
i
W 11th Ave
Study Area
Comparative Area
Block Groups
le
N ei
I-6 70
n s Ave
ll i
l Co
nn
670
Co
W Lo ng S t
Appraised Parcel Value Change
Br od be lt
is based on total parcel value
from the Franklin County Auditor
for the years indicated. The parcel
lv d
data was apportioned by census
n w id e B
ti oblock
N avalue
group and an average W
parcel
was
then calculated for each block group
da
W 2n d Av e
Ln
V in e St
Spru ce St
Wi lbe r Av e
W Hu bba rd Ave
Lu nd y St
Bu ttle s Av e
W 1s t Av e
W 6th Ave
+1.1% or more
+0.1% to +1%
King Ave
-0.9% to 0%
W 8th Ave< -1%
W 9th
Ave Value Change
Parcel
W 4th Ave
W G oodale St Go
o
315
at Third
W 12tCommons
h Av e
Legend
S O va l D r
W 10th Ave
r
Joh n H e rr ic k D
W 3rd Av e
Kin g Av e
Go od ale Blv d
Ya
rd
am
Ar lin gt on Av e
e
s Av
rs R
d
C
vd
H i gg
Dr
15
-3
OH
O le nt a n gy Ri ve r R d
ve
e
Tr
d
e
N e il Av
Th urb er Dr W
Bl v
es s
Ha rris on Av e
nti a
Wo rth ing ton Ave
H
a Av e
Hi gh lan d St
Ri ga Aly
Hu nt er Av e
Rh o d
St
N Wa ll
Neil Ave
r
Can no n D
Pe rry St
Rd
Ore gon Ave
Mic hig an Av e
S C o ll e g e
St
N H ig h
Dennis o n Av e
St
N Pear l
t
We s t S
an Rd