Department of Psychology, Howard University
Transcription
Department of Psychology, Howard University
Rugrats! Goal Plans in Televised Narratives and Implications for Children’s Comprehension Silas E. Burris CB Powell N-179 525 Bryant St. NW Washington, DC, 20059 burris.silas@gmail.com 859-302-4666 Silas E. Burris, Chastity C. McFarlan, Ashley A. Jenson, & Danielle D. Brown Department of Psychology, Howard University INTRODUCTION TENTATIVE DEFINITION OF GOAL PLAN COMPLEXITY • Comprehension of narratives encourages the development of literacy skills in young children (Brown, Lile & Burns, 2011; van den Broek et al., 2005). • Hierarchical levels: Average number of hierarchical levels across all subgoal structures in a particular narrative. • Subgoal structures: Number of unique superordinate goals that result in goal structures; usually dictated by different character perspectives • Competing elements: Presence of competing goal structure elements; can be competing character goals or entire subgoal structures • Goal object presence: Number/percentage of scenes in which goal object is present • Goal object tangibility: Concrete goal objects are physical objects; abstract goal objects do not have a physical form. • Goal abandonment: Number of times a character abandons a goal attempt • GAO episodes: Number of complete goal-attempt-outcome episodes • Underlying comprehension process are similar for narratives of different media type (Kendeou et al., 2005). • Narrative comprehension requires identifying narrative goal plans as well as causal inference generation (Trabasso & Nickels, 1992; Wenner, 2004). • Understanding narrative goal structures facilitates comprehension by allowing one to make inferences, detect problems, and predict outcomes (Graesser et al., 1994). • All narratives consist of goal plans or structures that can be made explicit and include: • Superordinate Goal: the overarching main goal that drives the narrative. • Subordinate Goals: lower level goals that aid in achieving the superordinate goal, which may need to be achieved before attempting to resolve the superordinate goal. • Attempts: any action taken toward achieving a goal. • Outcomes: the resulting success, failure, or abandonment of an attempt or goal. • The current study assessed the complexity of narrative goal plans in popular children’s television narratives and discusses their implications for comprehension processes RESULTS Subgoal Competing Goal Object Goal Object Goal Object GAO Levels Structures Elements Presence Tangibility Abandonment Episodes Episode Title Angelicon 3 3 Yes Attention Please 3 2 Yes Bad Shoes 2 1 No Bigger Than Life 3 1 No Cat Got Your Tongue? 3 2 Yes Cuddle Bunny 3 1 No Dil Saver 3 3 No Falling Stars 4 2 No Home Sweet Home 3 3 No My Fair Babies 4 2 No 3/9 scenes 33% 1/3 scenes 33% 6/6 scenes 100% 1/4 scenes 25% 1/11 scenes 9% 5/6 scenes 83% 7/12 scenes 58% 1/5 scenes 20% 5/5 scenes 100% 5/5 scenes 100% Concrete 1 13 Abstract 1 10 Concrete 4 8 Abstract 0 3 Concrete 0 7 Concrete 0 3 Concrete 0 11 Concrete 0 2 Concrete 2 7 Concrete 1 6 METHOD Materials • 10 Rugrats episodes meeting the following operational definition of narrative: • A narrative is a story with a character, a goal, and a plot or set of events that leads to the accomplishment of the goal. Procedure • Narratives were transcribed. • Goal plan elements were identified based on previously used definitions. • Goal structure illustrations were diagramed from previously used models (Trabasso & Nickels, 1992). • Narrative goal plans were characterized according to complexity dimensions. Rugrats Goal Structure: “My Fair Babies” Black Reverse to White Blac PMS 2757 Reverse to White PMS 2 Goal Structure Description This narrative contains two competing goal structures, Chuckie’s and his parents’. The parents’ superordinate goal (G1) is to make Kimi feel at home in her new family. To accomplish this goal, the Elements the HU parents must do things with Kimi, which is the subgoal at theofsecond level (G2). In order to achieve the second-level goal, seven subgoals need to be achieved at the third level. At the third level, the parents make Logotype: The specially set type style for HU and 3/26/13 3:03 PM seven different efforts to do things with Kimi in GAO episodes 3.1-3.7. Chuckie’s superordinate goal (G1) is to get attention from his parents. To accomplish this goal, he must copybe Kimi’s actions, is thewith 1867 should never altered or which replaced subgoal at the second level (G2). In order to achieve the second-level goal, three subgoals need to be another typeface. achieved at the third level. At the third level, Chuckie copies Kimi’s actions in GAO episodes 3.1, 3.2, and 3.3 which directly compete with the parent’s GAO episodes 3.4, 3.5, and 3.7. In an external event Chuckie plays ball with Kimi successfully making her feel at home. This in turn causes the external event of Chuckie’s Dad giving him attention and offering to read him a story. Official Uses • Marketing, communicatio Legend (G) = Goal; number indicates level on the hierarchy (A) = Attempt (Q) = Quit/abandoned goal (O+) = Successful outcome (O-) = Negative outcome (O?) = Unclear/marginal outcome capital campaign efforts • For use by all offices, dep and schools CONCLUSIONS • Televised narratives often contained characteristics that were considered complex for many of the dimensions. • Many underlying comprehension processes required for these narratives are immature in 3- to 8-year-old children, indicating that the goal plans of these narratives may be too complex for target audience to comprehension. • Future studies should assess the effects of different dimensions of goal plan complexity on comprehension and recall. REFERENCES Brown, D. D., Lile, J., & Burns, B. M. (2011). Basic Language Skills and Young Children's Understanding of Causal Connections during Storytelling. Reading Psychology, 32(4), 372-394. Graesser, A. C., Singer, M., & Trabasso, T. (1994). Constructing inferences during narrative text comprehension. Psychological Review, 101(3), 371-395. Kendeou, P., Lynch, J. S., van den Broek, P., Espin, C. A., White, M., & Kremer, K. E. (2005). Developing Successful Readers: Building Early Comprehension Skills through Television Viewing and Listening. Early Childhood Education Journal, 33(2), 91-98. Trabasso, T., & Nickels, M. (1992). The Development of Goal Plans of Action in the Narration of a Picture Story. Discourse Processes, 15(3), 249. van den Broek, P., Kendeou, P., Kremer, K., Lynch, J., Butler, J., White, M., & Lorch, E. (2005). Assessment of Comprehension Abilities in Young Children. In S. G. Paris, S. A. Stahl, S. G. Paris, S. A. Stahl (Eds.), Children's reading comprehension and assessment (pp. 107-130). Mahwah, NJ US: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers. Wenner, J. (2004). Preschoolers' comprehension of goal structure in narratives. Memory, 12(2), 193-202. Goal Structure Description The superordinate goal (G1) is for the babies to be allowed to attend Angelica’s business luncheon. To accomplish this goal, the babies must prove to Angelica that they are “grownups”, which is the subgoal at the second level (G2). In order to achieve the second-level goal, four subgoals need to be achieved at the third level. At the third level, Suzie must teach the babies to act “grownup” and the babies must learn to act “grownup” G3.1). The babies then learn to act grownup in GAO episodes 4.1, 4.2, and 4.3. Once G4.3 is achieved, the babies make attempts to prove to Angelica that they are grownup in GAO episodes 3.2, 3.3, and 3.4 by performing a series of tasks. In external event, Angelica discovers that the babies are still wearing diapers. The babies are then unsuccessful at proving that they are grown up and are not allowed to attend her luncheon. Rugrats Goal Structure: “Attention Please” Legend (G) = Goal; number indicates level on the hierarchy (A) = Attempt (Q) = Quit/abandoned goal (O+) = Successful outcome (O-) = Negative outcome (O?) = Unclear/marginal outcome ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS We would like to thank Porsche M. Boddicker, Laura O’Shea, and Leah Hairston for their contributions.
Similar documents
danielles doggie den
understanding of causal connections during storytelling. Reading Psychology, 32, 1-23. Elliot, C. D. (2007). The differential ability scales-second edition. San Antonio, TX: Harcourt Assessment, In...
More information