English - The Dui Hua Foundation

Transcription

English - The Dui Hua Foundation
DUI HUA
2013
Annual
Report
Directors/Staff
Harold W. Furman II
Chairman and Managing Director
The Furman Group, Inc.
Thomas D. Gorman
Chairman
CCI Asia-Pacific Ltd.
John T. Kamm
Chairman and Executive Director
The Dui Hua Foundation
William C. McCahill, Jr.
Managing Director
Religare Capital Management
Michael T. McCune
Director, Global Advisory Services (Asia-Pacific)
Iconoculture
William N. Simon
Executive Vice Chairman
Cole Haan LLC
Magdalen Yum
First Vice President, Investments
Merrill Lynch Wealth Management
Bank of America Corporation, Asia Pacific US
Linda K. Ziglar
Chief Financial Officer
The Ziglar Group
John T. Kamm
Executive Director
Irene Chan Kamm
Senior Manager, Finance & Development
Kevin Li
Senior Manager, Operations & Technology
Megan Ko
Programs & Publications Manager
Lillian Sie
Development Manager
Luke Wong
Research Manager
Candy Or
Senior Accountant & Gifts Administrator
Rene Kamm
Programs & Publications Associate
Lincey Qi
Research Assistant
Rachel Chenette
Archiving & Data Assistant
Dedi Wong
Accounting & Development Assistant
Our Mission
“
Dui Hua (对话 or “dialogue”) is a nonprofit humanitarian organization that seeks
clemency and better treatment for at-risk detainees through the promotion of
universally recognized human rights in a well-informed, mutually respectful
dialogue with China. Focusing on political and religious prisoners, juvenile justice,
women in prison, and issues in criminal justice, our work rests on the premise that
positive change is realized through constructive relationships and exchange.
Established in 1999, Dui Hua achieves its
mission through five approaches:
Advocacy
”
through respectful, well-informed dialogue with
China both directly and via international and
governmental institutions
Expert Exchange
among criminal justice practitioners and experts,
China’s Supreme People’s Court and lower
courts, and US judges
Research
into Internet and library resources worldwide to
uncover and analyze relevant cases, regulations,
and trends
Publications
of research findings, cases, and analysis on
China’s criminal justice system and human rights
developments
Community Engagement
to apprise the global community of research
findings and practical experience
Content
Executive Director’s Letter ... 2
Political & Religious Prisoners ... 3
Women in Prison ... 6
Juvenile Justice ... 8
Death Penalty ... 9
Community Engagement ... 10
Contributions & Support ... 11
Financial Statements ... 12
Contributors ... 13
Executive Director’s Letter
Human rights has been an issue in US-China relations for more than 100 years. The Chinese
Exclusion Act of 1882 enshrined discriminatory treatment of ethnic Chinese—including naturalized
American citizens—and triggered a boycott of American goods in China between 1904 and 1906. By
some estimates, American exports to China were cut in half.
In 1989, the United States imposed limited economic sanctions over the tragic events that took
place in Tiananmen Square that spring. Beginning in 1990, China’s Most Favored Nation (MFN)
tariff status was debated annually in the US Congress until China gained admission to the World
Trade Organization in 2001. Those seeking to condition or remove China’s MFN focused largely on
allegations of human rights abuses.
Although the issue of human rights is not as central to US-China relations today as it was 20 years
ago, it remains a sticking point. Polls in 2010, 2011, and 2012 consistently showed that Americans
prioritize the promotion of human rights in US foreign policy initiatives towards China, even at the
expense of negatively impacting bilateral relations.
In recent years, China and the US have criticized each other’s human rights records at annual
human rights dialogues. Each year the US Department of State lambastes China in an annual
“country report.” China returns the favor with a report on human rights in the United States that
highlights a raft of abuses including invasions of privacy rights, treatment of immigrants, racial
discrimination, and injustices committed by police.
Eschewing confrontation are non-governmental organizations like Dui Hua. Utilizing our UN Special
Consultative Status, Dui Hua participated in the second Universal Periodic Review of China’s rights
record in Geneva in October 2013. We made recommendations in four areas: political prisoners,
women in prison, juvenile justice, and the death penalty.
In 2013, Dui Hua recorded milestones in all four areas: The Chinese
government sent us information on three dozen political prisoners.
We successfully funded field research in Chinese women’s prisons
and detention centers. Custodial punishments for juvenile offenders
declined. Our estimates on the number of executions in China were
called the “best available” by The Economist.
As we enter our 15th year, Dui Hua is on strong financial footing and
maintains excellent working relationships with the United Nations,
China, and North American and European governments involved in
dialogues and consultations with China. Our approach to dealing
with differences in human rights has shown solid results, and we
intend to build on this success in the coming year.
2
John Kamm
Executive Director
Political & Religious Prisoners
Dui Hua continued to call for clemency and
better treatment for political and religious
prisoners by raising their names directly with
Chinese interlocutors, governments that
conduct bilateral human rights dialogues with
China, and the Office of the United Nations High
Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR) and
its subordinate Special Procedures.
In 2013, we drafted or edited 30
prisoner lists totaling over 500 names
for submission to Chinese authorities.
including about 5,000 “active cases,” or
people known or believed to be in custody.
Religious cases, predominately Falun Gong but
also Protestant and Muslim cases, accounted
for about half of active cases, while Tibetan
activism, generally involving pro-independence
or self-immolation protests, accounted for
more than a fourth. (Cases may be
classified as more than one type.)
37
Counterrevolution and endangering
state security (ESS) cases made up
The Chinese government was less
a fifth of active cases, while Uyghur
keen to discuss prisoners with foreign
activism accounted for just 3 percent.
prisoners’
countries but provided Dui Hua with
The dearth of information on Uyghur
information
information on 37 prisoners, 12 more
activists is troubling since the
than in 2012, including information
number of ESS trials in the Xinjiang
obtained
on eight sentence reductions. In
Uyghur Autonomous Region rose
from
June, China’s Ministry of Foreign
10 percent to around 300 trials in
Chinese
Affairs (MFA) told Dui Hua Executive
2013 and represents as many as 75
authorities
Director John Kamm that it would no
percent of all ESS trials nationwide.
longer accept prisoner lists during
Because Xinjiang’s ESS trials typically
bilateral human rights dialogues
involve more than one defendant and
with foreign countries. However, Dui
result in long sentences with little
Hua assisted two countries in compiling lists
clemency, Dui Hua estimates that there are
of names that were successfully handed over
several thousand Uyghurs in prison for political
during the year.
crimes in China. ESS crimes include subversion,
incitement of subversion, splittism, and
With new information from the Chinese
incitement of splittism, which involve activities
government and open-source research, Dui
such as building political parties, penning
Hua’s Political Prisoner Database (PPDB)
essays, and working towards the protection of
ended the year with more than 28,000 entries,
ethnic customs and languages.
3
Nationwide, ESS indictments fell an estimated
21 percent year-on-year to 830 indictments—
their lowest level since 2007 (see graph).
Cases of individuals involved in the New
Citizens’ Movement provide evidence that the
decrease signaled a change in prosecution
tactics rather than a more tolerant approach
to political activity. Li Sihua (李思华), Liu
Ping (刘萍), and Wei Zhongping (魏忠平)
were detained in Xinyu, Jiangsu Province, for
inciting subversion in May, but later indicted
for disturbing public order. In Yichang, Hubei
Province, authorities charged Liu Jiacai
(刘家财) with inciting subversion in August
but revised the charge to causing a serious
disturbance in November.
The New Citizens’ Movement is known in part
for calling on public officials to disclose their
assets. Anti-corruption protests documented
in Dui Hua’s Mass Incident Database rose
26 percent year-on-year to 307 incidents
in 2013. The database ended the year with
nearly 5,500 records, mostly involving labor
protests, land disputes, or general petitioning.
Detentions took place in 25 percent of
incidents recorded in the database.
A drop in ESS indictments signaled a shift
in prosecution tactics.
1407
1223
1095
974
886
830
766
555
1049
660 683
561
455 467
619
349
*The 2013 figure is a Dui Hua estimate. All other data are from
China Law Yearbook. Source: Dui Hua, China Law Yearbook,
Supreme People’s Procuratorate Annual Work Report 2013.
4
The second Universal Periodic Review
(UPR) of China’s human rights record
was held in Geneva on October 22,
2013. As an organization with UN Special
Consultative Status, Dui Hua filed a
submission and attended the review. The
most recommended action by countries that
made statements during the UPR was for
China to ratify the International Covenant
on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR). Rights
abuses against human rights activists were
also raised, but only the United States
named names, mentioning New Citizens’
Movement leaders Xu Zhiyong (许志永) and
Yang Maodong (杨茂东) (a.k.a. Guo Feixiong
(郭飞雄)).
In our submission, we called on China to
ratify the ICCPR and narrowed in on ways to
promote fair treatment for ESS prisoners.
We asked that standards for sentencing and
establishing motive be clarified; ESS verdicts
be made public; ethnicity not be the basis
for restricting fundamental freedoms and
for discrimination in law enforcement and
sentencing; barriers to clemency, including
requirements to acknowledge guilt, be
eliminated; and those convicted of the
now defunct crime of “counterrevolution”
be released.
About three weeks after the UPR, during the
Third Plenum of the 18th Central Committee
of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), the
CCP passed a resolution on major reforms.
This included the long-awaited announcement
that reeducation through labor would be
abolished. Dui Hua welcomed the news but
redoubled efforts to compile and publish
information about other forms of arbitrary
and extralegal detention—such as Custody
and Education for sex workers and Legal
Education for Falun Gong adherents and
petitioners—that continue to threaten and
lock up Chinese citizens. ■
Sentence Reductions & Releases Reported to Dui Hua, 2013
Name
In Prison
Details
Sentence
Lists*
Sentence Reduction
Chen Yulin
(陈瑜琳)
One of three senior officials at Xinhua News
Agency, which was Beijing’s de facto embassy
in Hong Kong before 1997, convicted of
espionage in Guangzhou in 2004. All three
are naturalized British citizens.
Life
17
Reduced 19 mos
in 2013; incl.
commutation and
earlier reductions,
release date
12/26/22
Ding Shuyin
(丁树银)
Convicted of “disrupting official business” and 12.5 yrs
“gathering a crowd to disturb traffic,” Ding
was one of 30 farmers arrested in Tianjin
in December 2006 for interrupting railroad
construction on lands that were illegally
seized by the local government.
2
Reduced 19 mos in
2012; release date
Nov 2017
Liang Jiantian A co-owner of a Guangzhou publishing house, Life
Liang was accused of printing books without a
(梁鉴添)
license and publishing Falun Gong books.
6
Reduced 15 mos
in 2013; incl.
commutation and
earlier reductions,
release date May
2022
Lin Jieshan
(林介山)
Convicted of collecting intelligence in
Guangdong for Taiwan
15 yrs
1
Reduced 47 mos;
release date 1/13/15
Rao Wenwei
(饶文蔚)
A county official whose critical essays were
published in overseas media, including
The Epoch Times, Rao was sentenced for
inciting subversion and taking bribes amid
former Chongqing Party Secretary Bo Xilai’s
“Strike Black” campaign in November 2007.
12 yrs
1
Reduced 20 mos in
2011; release date
11/8/18
Song Bukun
(宋步坤)
A leader of the “Southwest Yangtze Column of
the Chinese Anti-Corruption Army,” an antigovernment militia and opposition party that
rallied against excessive agricultural taxes in
Chongqing
12 yrs
13
Released 11 mos
early on 9/17/13
Xu Jianchi
(许剑池)
Convicted of collecting intelligence in
Chongqing for Taiwan
15 yrs
4
Reduced 10 mos in
2012; incl. earlier
reductions, released
44 mos early on
2/14/14
Xu Wanping
(许万平)
A Chongqing native, Xu was sentenced for
subversion for writing articles, recruiting
members, and raising funds for the China
Democracy Party.
12 yrs
18
Reduced 10 mos
in 2013, 14 mos in
2012 and 1 yr in
2008; released on
4/29/14
Released
* The number of lists of cases of concern including the individual’s name that Dui Hua has drafted for submission to the Chinese government.
5
Increases in Prison Populations
200%
Women in Prison
150%
100%
Increases in Prison Populations
Growth in Prison Populations Since 2000
200%
Total
Dui Hua believes that advocacy for women’s
Women
Women
rights should include the rights of women
150%
suspects, defendants, and 50%
prisoners through
the promotion of the UN Rules for the
Treatment of Women Prisoners and NonTotal
100%
0% Offenders (the
Custodial Measures for Women
Women
China (since 2000)
US (since 2000)
Bangkok Rules). Adopted by the UN General
Assembly in December 2010,Sources: World Female Imprisonment List, second edition the rules attempt
50%
to promote equality by bringing
a gendered
& World Prison Population List, ninth and seventh editions
perspective to criminal justice that takes into
account the realities that women have different
0%
healthcare needs and are more likely than
China
USA
China (since 2000)
US (since 2000)
men to have histories of domestic or sexual
Source: International Centre for Prison Studies, 2011
abuse or to be the primary caretakers of minor
Sources: World Female Imprisonment List, second edition & World Prison Population List, ninth and seventh editions
children. Despite worldwide growth in the
to organize an international symposium on
number of women in prison, few policymakers
women in prison in Hong Kong in February
and corrections officers are aware of the
2014. In 2013, Dui Hua worked on the project
Bangkok Rules.
with three partners: the Centre for Comparative
Acknowledging that nearly half of the more
and Public Law at the Faculty of Law, University
than 625,000 women and girls imprisoned
of Hong Kong; the Center for Criminal
Procedure and Reform (CCPR) at Renmin
worldwide are incarcerated in the United
States and China, Dui Hua continued its efforts University of China Law School; and Londonbased Penal Reform International (PRI).
CCPR Deputy Director Cheng Lei
conducted research in 5 women’s
prisons and detention centers in China
6
With the support of the Ministry of Foreign
Affairs of the Kingdom of the Netherlands,
CCPR Deputy Director Cheng Lei led a team
of researchers to carry out fieldwork in two
Chinese women’s prisons and three detention
centers in the second half of 2013. Data were
collected through interviews, questionnaires,
and on-site observations and supplemented
with judicial statistics. During the study,
researchers distributed 500 questionnaires
and recovered 458. Their research focused
on women prisoners’ rights to physical health
and hygiene, marriage and family, mental
healthcare, and privacy using the Bangkok
Rules as a framework for analysis. Cheng’s
report helped fill in the existing research gap on
Chinese women prisoners and raise awareness
Left: The second UPR of China’s human rights record takes place in Geneva, October 22, 2013. Right: Members of the WGDAW visit China
in December following Dui Hua’s recommendation to the Chinese. (Photo credit: MFA)
about the Bangkok Rules in China. It also
brought to light practical ways to improve the
lives of women prisoners including providing
greater access to hot water, better and more
frequent family contact, and professional
mental healthcare.
In October, Dui Hua attended a panel, entitled
“Human Rights of Women in Prison: A Toolbox
to Implement the UN Bangkok Rules,” organized
by the Permanent Mission of Thailand to the
United Nations, Thailand Institute of Justice,
and PRI. Participants noted that the barriers to
implementing gender-specific treatment include
low awareness about the Bangkok Rules as well
as practical realities like corrections facilities
that do not house men and women separately
and that lack female corrections staff.
In our submission to China’s UPR, we noted
that Chinese law requires that men and women
be incarcerated separately and that greater
access to non-custodial measures is afforded
to women who are pregnant and breastfeeding.
On the other hand, we pointed out that
gender-specific training is seriously lacking,
female corrections staff are overworked and
undervalued, and incarcerated mothers do
not have legal guarantees that their children
will be cared for once they are weaned. Dui
Hua recommended that China incorporate
the Bangkok Rules into national laws and
policies, bolster gender-specific training,
increase promotional opportunities for female
corrections officers, and recognize the children
of incarcerated parents in child-protection laws
that offer state assistance.
As part of Dui Hua’s work on women in
prison and the UPR, Executive Director
John Kamm recommended during official
meetings that China invite the Working Group
on Discrimination Against Women in Law
and in Practice (WGDAW) to visit China. This
recommendation came into fruition when the
working group made an eight-day visit to the
country in December 2013. Among the myriad
issues raised during the visit was the condition
of women in detention. ■
Most Chinese
1
none
7
Juvenile Justice
Effective January 1, 2013, China’s amended
Criminal Procedure Law (CPL) includes for the first
time a section on juvenile cases meant to reinforce
the principle of “education first, punishment
second.” Following our third juvenile justice
exchange with the Supreme People’s Court (SPC)
Juvenile Court Guiding Group in 2012, Dui Hua staff
met with SPC judges in November 2013 to discuss
the progress of reforms and future partnerships.
Senior Judge Ma Dong, who headed the Chinese
delegation to last year’s exchange, indicated that
reforms introduced in the revised CPL are already
making an impact. The senior judge told Dui Hua
that the percentage of youth who are incarcerated
after trial fell to 54 percent in 2013 from 58 percent
in 2012.
4
percentage point
decline in youth
incarcerated
after trial
8
Reducing unnecessary
incarceration among
youth can help
promote healthy
socialization and
development and
reduce the chance
of reoffending. This
is particularly the
case in China where
it is not uncommon
for juveniles to
be held in adult
detention centers. Detention can last for months
for migrant youth, who do not live in their place
of household registration, since they often lack
the guarantor or funds necessary to post bail.
Juveniles, especially girls, may even be placed in
adult prisons to serve custodial sentences, making
it difficult to carry out age-appropriate programs and
compulsory education.
We highlighted these and other juvenile justice
issues in our submission to China’s UPR. While
recognizing the importance of CPL revisions
that are helping to reduce the number of youth
behind bars, we raised concerns that lowerincome migrant youth are less likely to benefit.
This is partially because “expressing remorse” is a
criterion for non-custodial suspended sentences,
and the actions that courts find to demonstrate
this remorse, such as providing financial
compensation, are generally more difficult for
poor and transient youth to perform. Moreover,
migrants may be categorically ineligible for noncustodial sentences since some monitoring
organizations limit their scope to local residents.
Dui Hua recommended in its submission that
China reduce the use of custodial sentences for
all juveniles regardless of residency status and
implement laws for juveniles in custody to be held,
managed, and educated separately from adults in
facilities that provide programs designed for their
developmental needs. ■
Death Penalty
Dui Hua monitors developments in Chinese
criminal justice and rule of law including
the use of the death penalty. In a press
statement and communications with
government interlocutors, Dui Hua advocated
for clemency for Li Yan (李彦). Li killed
her husband in one of many instances
during which he subjected her to physical
abuse. She was convicted of homicide
and sentenced to death by the Ziyang
Intermediate People’s Court in Sichuan
Province in 2011, and the verdict was upheld
by the Sichuan High People’s Court at the
end of 2012. In January, the SPC approved
the death sentence, which usually leads to
immediate execution, but Li remained in
prison through the end of the year.
Li Yan is one of many women sentenced to death for killing her abusive
husband by fighting violence with violence. Her life and the lives of others
may be spared by court consideration of domestic violence, which is
involved in nearly 10 percent of intentional homicide cases in China.
data points to make an estimate of the number of
Domestic violence, which occurs in one fourth of
executions in 2013.
Chinese families, is involved in nearly 10 percent
of intentional homicide cases and is a particularly
Executive Director John Kamm told The Economist
common trigger of crime among women. In
in August that the decline in Chinese executions
2010, the vice president of the Chongqing High
was “the most significant positive development
People’s Court called crimes committed by
domestic violence survivors “less
heinous,” and in 2013, the SPC
created a task force to develop
The Economist calls Dui Hua’s decade-long tally the
standards for sentencing in cases
“best figures available” on capital punishment in China.
involving domestic violence. In
its UPR submission, Dui Hua
recommended that China exempt domestic violence in the human rights situation in China in recent
decades.” The newspaper said that western
survivors from the death penalty, especially while
scholars broadly agree with Dui Hua’s estimates,
sentencing standards are under review.
which are “the best figures available.”
Aside from calling for clemency in specific cases,
During China’s UPR, the second most
Dui Hua has called attention to Chinese capital
punishment by publicizing estimates of the number recommended action by countries making
statements was for China to declare a moratorium
of executions that take place in China each year.
on the death penalty and release execution
Dui Hua’s latest estimate is 3,000 executions for
statistics. In our UPR submission, we recommended
2012, a sharp drop from the estimated 12,000
that China make death penalty verdicts and
executions carried out in 2002. In 2013, state
sentencing data available to the public; reduce the
media publicized fewer executions and China
number of capital crimes, particularly non-violent
confirmed in its UPR report that it would continue
and economic crimes; and lower the maximum age
to reduce, although not abolish, the use of the
of execution from 75. ■
death penalty. There were not, however, enough
9
Community Engagement
To accomplish our mission, Dui Hua regularly
engages with senior government officials,
diplomats, scholars, activists, and other
individuals seeking to advance human rights in
China. Executive Director John Kamm made three
trips to China, two trips to Europe, and two trips to
the US East Coast to meet with US and Chinese
government officials and foreign diplomats.
Through our consultative status with the UN
Economic and Social Council, Dui Hua held talks
with the OHCHR and UN Special Procedures
including the Committee Against Torture and the
Working Group on Arbitrary Detention. We also
met with international humanitarian organizations
such as the International Committee of the Red
Cross and the Quaker United Nations Office.
34%
increase in
media featuring
or mentioning
Dui Hua
10
In 2013, Dui Hua
meetings and
talks focused on
our core areas of
focus—political
prisoners, women
in prison, juvenile
justice, and the
death penalty—as
well as prospects
for reform under
Chinese President
Xi Jinping, who took
Director Magdalen Yum speaks to entrepreneurs in Silicon Valley.
office in March 2013. Our executive director
spoke at various forums including the University
of California, Berkeley, School of Law; University
of Notre Dame; The 1990 Institute; Swedish
Institute for International Affairs; American
Chamber of Commerce in Hong Kong; Reflection
Group in Copenhagen; and Sweden China
Trade Council. Audiences included students,
academics, businesspeople, venture capitalists,
human rights activists, and diplomats and
government officials.
Dui Hua continued to hold annual Friends of
Dui Hua receptions in San Francisco and Hong
Kong. The focus of the events in 2013 was our
women in prison symposium. The San Francisco
reception also served as a launch for a new
video clip, produced by Train of Thought, that
introduces Dui Hua’s work to a new online
audience. American businessman Jude Shao
(邵裘德) attended the San Francisco event.
Arrested in China in 1998, he returned to the
United States in May 2013 after spending more
than eight years in prison and five years on
parole. Shao told Dui Hua that the interventions
by his support group, Dui Hua, and government
actors significantly improved how he was treated
in prison and contributed to his parole. The
Stanford Business School graduate maintains
his innocence. Shao’s case was repeatedly
raised with senior Chinese leaders by his
peers and members of the US government, in
particular former President George W. Bush.
More than 300 media reports featured or
mentioned Dui Hua in 2013, up 34 percent
from the previous year. Coverage spanned
about 60 countries and regions. Scores of
media reports included our death penalty
statistics, ESS estimates, and analysis related
to the reform and abolition of reeducation
through labor and other forms of administrative
detention. The MFA publicized its engagement
with Dui Hua by posting two photos of a meeting
between Executive Director Kamm and Vice
Minister Li Baodong on its website. The photo
caption stated that the two exchanged views
on human rights. Justice: Faces of the Human
Rights Revolution—a book by photographer
Mariana Cook, the last student of Ansel
Jude Shao (top right) told Dui Hua that
interventions significantly improved
how he was treated in prison.
Adams—was released in the spring featuring
Executive Director Kamm. Dui Hua is deeply
honored to have our founder and executive
director appear alongside international
advocates including former US President Jimmy
Carter, Burmese opposition politician Aung San
Suu Kyi, and Archbishop Desmond Tutu. ■
Contributions & Support
Dui Hua ended 2013 on a firm financial
footing. Thanks to the support from our
generous contributors, we returned from
a deficit in 2012 to finish the year with
a modest surplus. Grants were received
from the following governments and
institutions: Denmark, Netherlands,
Norway, Switzerland, Swedish International
Development Cooperation Agency, OHCHR,
Ford Foundation, and Smith Richardson
Foundation. We also received donations
from more than 220 individual contributors
totaling about $250,000, an increase of 16
percent year-on-year. ■
11
Summarized Audited Financial Statements
These statements are summarized from the financial statements audited by Lindquist, von Husen & Joyce LLP,
San Francisco, California. All amounts are in US dollars.
STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL POSITION
(as of December 31, 2013)
Assets
Cash & cash equivalents
Liabilities & Net Assets
701,495
Deposits & prepaid expenses
42,698
Contributions receivable
245,031
Property & equipment (net)
2,505
Accounts payable & refundable advance
59,467
Net assets
Unrestricted net assets
932,262
466,646
Board-designated reserve fund
300,000
Undesignated
166,646
Temporarily restricted net assets
465,616
Total
991,729
991,729
STATEMENT OF ACTIVITIES
(year ended December 31, 2013)
Unrestricted Temporarily Restricted
Total
Support & revenue
Government & foundation grants
211,498
300,894
512,392
Individual & corporate contributions
237,677
13,200
250,877
Special events & publication sales
530
-
530
Investment & other income
608
-
608
617,326
(617,326)
-
1,067,639
(303,232)
764,407
817,452
-
817,452
120,624
-
120,624
96,427
-
96,427
1,034,503
-
1,034,503
33,136
(303,232)
(270,096)
Net assets, start of year
433,510
768,848
1,202,358
Net assets, end of year
466,646
465,616
932,262
Net assets released from restrictions
Expenses
Program services
Supporting services
Management & general
Fundraising
Change in net assets
12
Our Generous Contributors
Grantors
Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Denmark
Ford Foundation
International Republican Institute
Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Kingdom of
the Netherlands
Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Norway
Smith Richardson Foundation
Swedish International Development
Cooperation Agency
Federal Department of Foreign Affairs,
Switzerland
Office of the United Nations High
Commissioner for Human Rights
Patrons (from $25,000)
Anonymous (1)*
Charles S. Monat
Benefactors (from $10,000)
Andrew Duncan
Tom & Jenny Gorman
Jean Hoffman
Runvee Inc.
Sir Gordon & Lady Wu
Sponsors (from $5,000)
Anonymous (2)
Hal & Sally Furman
John & Irene Kamm*
Stephen O. Lesser
Bruce McEver
The Rossotto Family
Supporters (from $1,000)
Anonymous (7)
Kei On Chan & Sonia Ng
Maggy H. Cheng
Jerome A. Cohen
Mary Ann Collier
Jerome & Carol Crowley
Gilbert Graham
Kenneth Grant & Constance Taube
The Hassenfeld Foundation
Douglas Henck
Chuck & Ann Hoover
Alice Lam
Benjamin Lee & Jianying Zha
Emily Leung & Ricky Ho
Jack Londen
Roderick MacFarquhar
Ken Manes
Donald & Ann Munro
(in memory of Professor Michel
Oksenberg)
Beverly O’Grady
George & Susan Schreiber
Hon. Julie Tang
Helen Tomlinson
Edward L. & Mary Lee Turner
John Watkins
Frank & Cindy Wong
Vincent V.C. Woo Memorial Foundation
Amelia Yeung
Linda K. Ziglar
Friends (up to $999)
Anonymous (30)
Shoichi Aoyagi
James T. Areddy
William Armbruster
Frankie K. Au-Yeung & Po Yan Or*
Peter Barry
Bruce & Terese Bartholomew
Mark Bayuk*
Shirley & Dennis Bloomquist
The Breen-Tsang Trust
Michael & Sylvia Brown
Don & Beth Bunnell
Richard & Martha Bush
Charles & Joan Caviness
Flora Chan
Hang Chan & Yuki Ku
Cangioli Che
Raphael Che*
Rex Chen
Jennifer Cheung
Frank Ching*
Rev. Ronald C. Chochol
Jenny Choi
Carrol Chrys
Terence & Raphaela Chu
Norman Chui & Cleresa Wong
Gary & Nobuko Cleary
Andrew Conn
Ruthann Ballou Conway
John Corbett
Patrick Cranley
Dennis Cusack
Howie & Kerry Dallmar
Roy & Kipp Delbyck
David Denny
Clayton Dube
Hon. Leonard Edwards
Christina Ellerker
Mark Fisher
John J. & Mary Beth Foarde*
Fuming Fong
Fong, Ko & Associates, LLP
Bennett Freeman
Frank & Esta Friedman
Jani Friedman
Richard Glover & Lily Lee
Thomas B. Gold
Andrew Green
Jonathan & Natsuko Greenberg
Robert Hamm
Mary Hatzenbehler
Robert K. Hornby
Keren Hu
Benson Huang
Matthew Hurlock
Kenji Ito
Tom James
Kenneth Jarrett
Juan & Patricia Jayo
Rene Kamm
Michael Kao
Robert Kato
Donald Keyser
Alfred P. Knoll
Daniel Hin Ki Kwan
Carmen Lam
Mark Lambert & Laura Stone
Richard & Harriet Larsen
Alan & Mandy Law
Hon. Elizabeth Lee
Bruce Leitstein
Yvonne Leung
Herbert Levin
Linda Lewis
Hong Li
Michele Liedeker
Jennifer Liu & Timothy Tsun
Wen Liu
Andrew Lomano
Winston & Bette Lord
Tim Mangan & Lori Wider
Tim Mar & Melissa Choy
Toby Marion
Sandy Marks
Terry McCaffrey
William C. McCahill, Jr.
Penny McCarthy
Michael & Jennifer McCune
Hon. Larry McKinney & Carole McKinney
Robin Moore
Jeffrey & Carolyn Muir
Warren Muir
Lillian K. Nakagawa
Andrew Nathan
Peggy Nathan
Bret Newman
David S. Ng*
Vincent Ng
Rodney W. Nichols
Kevin J. O’Brien
Seth Peterson
Nancy Pickford
Johnathan D. Pollack
Roberta Raine
Denis & Pamela Rice
Janet & Barry Robbins
Gene Rostov
Pietro Franco Saputo
Stephen A. Schlaikjer
Helen Schneider
Donald Scruggs
Scott Seligman
Jude Shao
Wilfred Shepardson
Hon. Lillian Sing
Siwei Consulting Services Limited
Sam & Nancy C. Smith Family
Tobias Smith
Dorothy Solinger
Barbara Spack
David Spitzer
Donald & Elizabeth Steckler
Michael Stelmach*
William A. Stewart
(in memory Arun Stewart)
Michael Strizich & Sheila Gleeson
Robert L. Suettinger
Marc Suidan
Claire Tan
Angie Tang
Frederick C. Teiwes
Patricia Thornton
Clayton & Christine Tominaga
Johnny Tsai
Harris Tsim
Samson Tu
Ezra F. Vogel & Charlotte Ikels
Peter Weldon
William Welsh
Lynn & Barbara-Sue White
Diana Whitehead
John & Carol Wilen
Elain Oi Wong
Sam & Daisy Yau
Laura Yip
John & Rainbow Zeng
Jon & Ellen Zinke
Matching Gifts
CEB Iconoculture
*Dui Hua Sustainer who gives
recurring donations.
Additional gifts were received
through the Combined Federal
Campaign, a workplace charity
program, and Valley of the Sun
United Way.
感
谢
Thank you for
making Dui Hua
research and
advocacy
possible.
13
Head Office
450 Sutter Street
Suite 900
San Francisco, CA 94108
USA
Branch Office
Room 701, 299QRC
287-299 Queen’s Road Central
tel: (415) 986-0536
fax: (415) 986-0579
duihua@duihua.org
www.duihua.org
Hong Kong
DuiHuaFoundation
@DuiHua
© 2014 The Dui Hua Foundation