JBS Scorecard

Transcription

JBS Scorecard

JBS Scorecard
A
F
D
E
IL
How the biggest
meat company on the
planet is still slaughtering
the Amazon
contents
3Introduction
4
Table 1: JBS scorecard
on the cattle agreement
5
Partners in crime:
Brazilian government support
fuels deforestation
6
From the Amazon to the market:
the meat on our shelves
7Demands
© Greenpeace / Daniel Beltra
8
Figures & Tables
11Endnotes
2
|
JBS SCORECARD – FAILED
Introduction
Brazil’s advance as the world’s largest meat exporter 1
has taken its toll on the Amazon rainforest. The expansion
of cattle ranching in the Amazon region is currently the
biggest driver of deforestation in the country and largely
responsible for the place it occupies among the top
five emitters of greenhouse gases in the world2. Of the
766,000 or more square kilometres of Amazonian jungle
that has been lost over the past 40 years3, 62%4 has been
converted to pastureland for cattle.
In 2009, Greenpeace exposed how the cattle industry
was involved in deforestation, invasion of protected and
indigenous lands, land disputes and slave labour.5 The
report also showed how products derived from cattle
raised in the Amazon were making their way into food,
shoes, furniture and cars across the world.
Following strong reaction from both international and
domestic consumers of Brazilian beef and leather, the
four largest beef and leather companies in the country
at the time – JBS /Friboi, Bertin 6, Minerva and Marfrig –
signed a public agreement in October 2009 committing
to minimum criteria for industry practice. These included
provisions that would cease the purchase of cattle from
ranches that had recently deforested or ranches that are
located in indigenous lands or within protected areas, or
involved with slave labour 7.
Nearly three years later, progress in implementing the
agreement has been unacceptably slow. In particular, JBS
– the world’s largest market player – is failing to prevent
cattle from deforested land or illegal activities from
entering its supply chain, in stark contrast to its claims
to the contrary8. This scorecard matches the conditions
of the Cattle Agreement with JBS ’s own statements
and Greenpeace Brazil field research over the past 18
months and JBS fails on every count. For instance, the
Cattle Agreement was signed with a six-month timeframe
in which to stop the purchase of cattle derived from new
(i.e. post 2009) areas of deforestation. This was largely
based on the successful implementation of a similar
agreement with the soya industry9. However, JBS says
now its objective is to "guarantee our clients and society
at large that we source all our livestock from suppliers
that have not been involved in illegal deforestation"10
This statement reduces JBS ’s commitment to such an
extent that now it does little more than merely follow
Brazilian law, something it should be doing already. This
means there is no action currently being taken by JBS to
eliminate deforestation from its supply chain, despite its
commitment to do so [see table 1 no. 1].
Monitoring is also an area of great concern with JBS . In
order to understand what a cattle rancher is doing on their
farm and whether they are involved in deforestation, the
boundaries and ownership of that farm must be known. It
was a fundamental cornerstone of the Cattle Agreement
that these farm boundaries would be registered so that
farms involved in new deforestation or illegalities would
be removed from the supply chain and such efforts could
be monitored, verified and reported [see table 1 clause
5]. Until now, JBS has required just one GPS reference
from its farmers. But this is insufficient to determine
whether the supplier is involved in deforestation, since it
does not provide boundary information. If deforestation
has occurred, it is impossible to know if it is inside or
outside the farm in question.
Moreover, in researching JBS’s business practices,
Greenpeace has found, once again, numerous new
cases of JBS purchasing cattle directly and indirectly
from farms involved in illegal deforestation, invasion
of protected areas and indigenous lands, and also of
farms using slave labour. Greenpeace can show that this
contaminated beef is still entering the supply chain of
major companies in the EU and Brazil.
Consumers buying cattle products from JBS cannot
be sure that these products have not contributed to
deforestation. For this reason, Greenpeace is calling on
responsible companies not to buy cattle products from
JBS until they have demonstrated compliance with the
Cattle Agreement in a transparent and auditable manner.
Greenpeace
|
3
Table 1: EEMENT
R
G
A
LE
TT
A
C
E
TH
ON
D
R
A
EC
JBS SCOR
WHAT JBS SIGNED
PASS/FAIL
CURRENT STATUS
1. ZERO DEFORESTATION IN
THE SUPPLY CHAIN:
JBS has failed to do even the bare minimum to ensure that deforestation does not
enter its supply chain.
no new deforestation for cattle
ranching will be accepted after
4 October 2009.
• Illegal deforestation:
DIRECT SUPPLY
FAILED
• Absence of effort against all deforestation:
To be implemented by 4 April
2010, subsequently extended
until 4 October 2010
CLAUSE 1.b. INDIRECT SUPPLY
To be implemented by October
2011
Greenpeace has found that JBS purchased animals from 3 farms11 accused of illegal
deforestation by the federal environmental agency, IBAMA, (see figure 1 and table 2)
between June and December 2011. This continues the trend of illegal purchases that
was exposed by Greenpeace12 in Mato Grosso between January and May 2011.
JBS is only communicating to other companies and the public on the issue of illegal
deforestation. In March 2012, JBS told their clients that its objective is to ‘source all
our livestock from suppliers that have not been involved in illegal deforestation’ 13
FAILED
JBS is not monitoring its indirect suppliers. Table 3 and figure 2 demonstrate how
the web of indirect supply leads back to JBS . Clause 1.b. in the agreement sought
to close this precise loophole – where farms are essentially ‘laundering’ their dirty
supply via a third party which then sells produce on to JBS .
Indirect supply was never reassessed or renegotiated
CLAUSE 1.c.
REASSESSMENT OF
INDIRECT SUPPLY TIMELINE
FAILED
CLAUSE 1.d. RESTITUTION
FAILED
JBS has not made any claim or provided evidence to show compliance with this
commitment.
FAILED
Every time Greenpeace investigates, JBS is caught buying cattle from farms inside
indigenous land. In fact, research from Greenpeace shows that the purchase of
cattle reared illegally in indigenous lands is ingrained within the JBS supply chain.
Between June and September 2011, JBS purchased hundreds of animals from farms14
located within the limits of the Marãiwatsede indigenous land (table 4 and figure 3).
CLAUSE 2. REJECTION OF INVASION OF
INDIGENOUS LANDS AND
PROTECTED AREAS
For direct supply the deadline was extended by an additional six months. One and
a half years after the extension deadline, commitments remain unfulfilled.
In early 2011, the JBS unit in Tucuma, Para purchased animals from Pantera farm15
located within the Apyterewa indigenous land16.
CLAUSE 3. REJECTION OF SLAVERY WORK
FAILED
CLAUSE 4. REJECTION OF
LAND GRABBING AND LAND
CONFLICTS
FAILED
CLAUSE 5. A MONITORABLE,
VERIFIABLE AND
REPORTABLE TRACKING
SYSTEM
JBS is indirectly purchasing animals from farms accused of slave labour (figure 4).
Greenpeace has already exposed a case of direct supply to JBS from a farm
involved in slave labour in February last year 17.
JBS has not made any claim or provided evidence to show compliance with this
commitment.
JBS claims to have conducted third party audits but has not so far made any audit
reports available for analysis. Neither is any information that can be monitored,
verified and reported available on their systems, as required by the agreement:
FAILED
a. JBS has not provided the geo-referenced polygons for the boundaries of all of
its supply farms. In recent communications18, JBS refers only to the single GPS
coordinate from each supplier in its monitoring system. Ensuring farms did not
deforest after 2009 requires all boundary information so that cleared areas can be
compared over time. One coordinate gives no certainty that JBS knows what its
suppliers are doing with their forested land.
b. JBS has not presented evidence that all its suppliers are registered with the
relevant state environmental secretaries. When registered, data on farm boundaries
and ownership are available online, which enables a transparent monitoring system.
CLAUSE 6. IMPLEMENTATION
OF THE SUPPLY CHAIN
COMMITMENTS
FAILED
JBS has not worked collaboratively with other companies, and left the group set up
to work on the Cattle Agreement at the end of 2009. Instead, they hired their own
consultancy company, Apoio, to implement the Cattle Agreement commitments.
> The full text of MINIMUM CRITERIA FOR INDUSTRIAL SCALE CATTLE OPERATIONS IN THE BRAZILIAN AMAZON BIOME can be
accessed in: http://www.greenpeace.org/international/Global/international/planet-2/report/2009/10/minimum-criteria-for-industria.pdf
4
|
Modern day slavery
Since 2004, the Ministry of Labor and Employment has made information public on all farms that have been found to
have workers living in situations akin to slavery. By the end of December 2011, 294 farms were on its website19 and
an estimated 7,736 people were released by the government’s Mobile Task Force against Slavery20. Most of these
people were working in cattle farms in the Amazon, cutting trees, burning forests and seeding pasture21. These
workers were bonded to the farms through debts and forced to live in very poor conditions without proper food, water
and sanitation22. The threat of violence and the presence of gunmen prevented them from being able to leave 23.
ment
n
er
v
o
g
n
zilia
a
r
B
:
ime
r
c
Partners in
n
io
t
a
t
es
r
o
def
els
fu
t
r
o
pp
su
Brazil remains one of the countries with the highest
rate of forest loss globally. Although deforestation
rates have been dropping, Brazil lost 6,238 km2 24 of
Amazon forest in 2011 alone. Furthermore, there is a
concerted effort by vested interests within the Brazilian
government to weaken environmental legislation. In May
2012, president Dilma approved a new Forest Code 25,
the key law that should protect forests, including the
Amazon. The project approved by the president with a
few vetoes weakens this protection and offers numerous
possibilities for “legal” new deforestation which was not
possible with the previous code. Other initiatives include
reducing protected areas26, weakening the powers of
environmental enforcers and approving new infrastructure
projects in the Amazon27. These efforts have the potential
to vastly increase deforestation rates in the future.
On top of this, the Brazilian government plays a big role
in the cattle industry. Through the Brazilian National
Development Bank (BNDES), the financial arm of the
Brazilian Ministry of Development, Industry and Foreign
Trade, the government has invested in JBS helping turn
it into the largest beef and leather supplier in the world 28.
After a US$2 billion injection into JBS stocks in June of
last year, BNDES now controls 31.4%29 of the company.
Such an investment makes the Brazilian government
JBS’s partner in deforestation. Furthermore, by
not ensuring legal compliance as a precondition to
investment, the government is not only undermining
the role of its own environmental enforcers but is also a
key stakeholder in a company operating with impunity
and a company which buys cattle raised in violation of
Brazilian laws.
Greenpeace
|
5
Following research conducted over the past 18 months,
Greenpeace can prove that beef from farms involved in
the invasion of indigenous lands and illegal deforestation
is still present in the supply chain of JBS slaughterhouses
that provide produce to supermarkets and wholesalers in
Europe and Brazil.
Through a combination of field research, document
analysis, export data analysis and product information,
Greenpeace can construct a chain of custody from the
field to the marketplace. Such an analysis shows how
problem farms sell their livestock to slaughterhouses and
the processed products arrive on shop shelves all over
the world. This is one example of such an analysis that
reveals the gravity of the situation. During 2011, cattle
from 10 farms located inside Marãiwatsede indigenous
land, and two farms accused of illegal deforestation by
the federal environmental agency IBAMA, (totaling 640
animals), were sold to JBS ’s slaughtering facility in Barra
do Garças30. From here, the company transfers the beef
to its processing units located hundreds of kilometres
away in Presidente Epitácio, Lins and Barretos31, all in
the state of Sao Paulo. In these units, beef is processed,
cooked and mixed, then conserved in cans, which are
transported overseas and sold in Europe. All of these
cans display a SIF (reference number) that enables
traceability back to the processing facility.
In the UK, cans from this tainted chain of custody are
branded and sold by supermarkets such as Tesco32. In
the Netherlands the Dutch supermarkets Jumbo, and
Boni sell cans with the same tainted chain of custody
under the brand Impala33 and the wholesaler Makro
Netherlands (owned by the Metro Group34) under the
Hereford brand (figure 5). JBS was a direct supplier
© Greenpeace / Rodrigo Baleia
ket:
From the Ama zon to the mar
the meat on our shelves
for corned beef to the Dutch wholesaler = Sligro Food
Group but communicated to Greenpeace that they cut
their contracts with JBS since the beginning of this year.
In the past three years, the total value of imports of
canned beef from Brazil to the United Kingdom place it
as the largest importer, with a total of US$ 346 million
(78,800 tonnes), accounting for almost 30% of the total
exported. The Netherlands is the third largest importer
of canned beef from Brazil – in the 2009-2011 period it
purchased canned beef to the value of US$100 million
(19,800 tonnes)35.
Greenpeace found that the JBS unit, Barra do Garças,
also sells fresh beef directly to Pão de Açucar, Wallmart36
and Makro37 (owned by the SHV Group38), supermarkets
chains in Brazil. Pão de Açúcar is controlled by the French
group, Casino39.
In the Netherlands and UK, fresh and frozen beef from
JBS /Friboi can be found in wholesalers such as Makro40
(owned by the Metro Group41) and Sligro Food Group42.
JBS trades Brazilian beef to Belgian importers Van Aerde43
and JBS -Toledo, based in Ghent, is a subsidiary of JBS 44
Without a transparent third party audit to prove
compliance with the Cattle Agreement, JBS cannot
guarantee to its buyers in Europe and Brazil that its beef
is deforestation-free.
Marãiwatsede Indigenous Lands
The plight of the Xavante people has been highlighted in previous Greenpeace publications revealing how they are
forced to live on only 20% of the 165,000 hectares reserved for them45 while the rest is controlled by large illegal
farms, mostly raising livestock. The Xavantes can no longer fish because the rivers have run dry or are contaminated46
due to the destruction of forests, landfills invading river systems in an effort to expand pastoral areas, plus extensive
use of agrochemicals. Now 85% of the forest has been cut down47 and the Xavante people’s reports to the authorities
describe substantial conflict with farmers accused of attempted murder and destruction of property48 49 50.
Throughout last year, JBS purchased cattle raised illegally in Xavante land (Table 4) 51.
6
|
Demands
For JBS :
• The 2009 Cattle Agreement (The Minimum Criteria for
Cattle Operations in the Amazon Biome) should be fully
implemented by JBS in a manner that can be monitored,
verified and reported. This includes contracting a
reputable and efficient third party to monitor methodology
and conduct transparent audits.
• Commercial relationships with farms exposed in this
publication must be immediately terminated by JBS and
other signatory Brazilian beef and leather producers
until reparations as per the Cattle Agreement have
been made.
For President Dilma and the
Brazilian Government:
• Do not allow the further weakening of environmental
laws or the reduction of environmental regulatory powers.
For companies who buy from JBS
• A time-bound commitment to making your supply
chain deforestation-free.
• Stop purchasing products supplied by JBS until such
time as JBS can guarantee in a monitored, verifiable
and reportable fashion its implementation of the Cattle
Agreement.
• Demand that other Brazilian suppliers also adhere to
the Cattle Agreement in a manner that can be monitored,
verified and reported. This includes contracting a
reputable and efficient third party to monitor methodology
and conduct transparent audits.
• Show your support for the call of Brazilian citizens for
a Zero Deforestation law.
• Use the Brazilian Government’s investment in JBS to
demand changes to their operating systems and ensure
that, at the very least, JBS is adhering to labour and
environmental legislation.
• Support the call of Brazilian citizens for a Zero
Deforestation law.
Greenpeace
|
7
Figure 1:
JBS suppliers
accused of illegal
deforestation
by the federal
environmental
agency, IBAMA.
These farms
then sell their
livestock to JBS
slaughterhouses
JBS
Slaughterhouse
Juruena
102 animals (out/11)
Farm J K Pneus
126 animals (ago/11)
Farm Muiraquita
Environmental
Embargo
Table 2: JBS suppliers accused of illegal deforestation by the federal environmental agency, IBAMA
SUPPLYING FARM
MUNICIPALITY
SLAUGHTERHOUSE
J K PNEUS
COTRIGUAÇÚ
JBS JURUENA
126
Ibama Embargo
MUIRAQUITA
ARIPUANA
JBS JURUENA
102
Ibama Embargo
Total of animals supplied
687
NR OF ANIMALS
DIRECT SUPPLIED
(Jun 11 -DEC11)
NON-COMPLIANCE
WHITH CATTLE
AGREEMENT
Table 3: Shows an example of indirect supply which starts with 11 farms52 accused of illegal deforestation by the federal
government53 which then supplied 7,344 animals to another 15 farms54 that then sold 9,742 animals to JBS 55 Many of these
transactions occurred after the deadline to ensure farms supplying JBS indirectly were adhering to the Cattle Agreement.
BREED/
FATTENING FARM
Farm Brejo Alegre
MUNICIPALITY
BREED/
FATTENING
Vila Bela da
Santissima Trindade
Farm Jesus e o Senhor Marcelandia
SUPPLIER
NUMBER MUNICIPALITY
DATE BREED/ OF
DESTINATION
FATTENING CATTLE
Farm Fattening
SUPPLYER
DATE
SLAUGHTER
NUMBER
JBS SE
HOU
R
OF CATTLE
E
HT
SLAUGHTE SLAUG
Nov - Dec-11
4246
Aug-11
254
Vila Bela da
Santissima Trindade
Farm Reunidas Serra Negra
Mar-11
35
Peixoto de Azevedo
Farm Sol Nascente
Jun-11
18
Matupa
Apr-11
68
Peixoto de Azevedo
Grange Sossego
Oct-11
19
Matupa
Sep-11
1918
Farm Morada do Sol
Jun-Jul-11
288
Araputanga
Sep-11
1918
Vila Bela da
Santissima Trindade
Vila Bela da
Santissima Trindade
Farm Morada do Sol
Jun-Dec -11
998
Jun - Set-11
599
Sao Jose dos
Quatro Marcos
Matupa
Jun-11
60
Alta Floresta
Araputanga
Farm Confins
Peixoto de Azevedo
Farm Brejo Alegre
Farm Carme
Vila Bela da
Santissima Trindade
Vila Bela da
Santissima Trindade
Guaranta do Norte
May-11
54
Guaranta do Norte
Farm Braço Sul
Farm Quatro Irmaos
Nova Bandeirantes
Oct-10
150
Nova Bandeirantes
Farm Campina Verde
Farm São Sebastião
Uniao do Sul
Mar-11
18
Uniao do Sul
Farm Juju
Jul-11
36
Diamantino
Farm Horvatich
Alta Floresta
Apr-11
156
Alta Floresta
Farm Alvorada
Nov-11
2
Alta Floresta
Farm Est.Tres Irmaos
Dec-11
40
Cuiaba
Farm Est.Tres Irmaos
Jun-Dec -11
1382
Nov-11
58
Sao Jose dos
Quatro Marcos
Juruena
Jul - Dec-11
63
Matupa
Juruena
Farm Brejo Alegre
Farm Bela Vista
Juruena
Feb-11
166
Farm Bela Vista
Juruena
Feb-11
166
Sao Jose dos
Quatro Marcos
Sao Jose dos
Quatro Marcos
Farm Bela Vista
Juruena
Oct-10
50
Juruena
Farm Manati
Farm Quatro Irmaos
Nova Bandeirantes
Jun-11
90
Terra Nova do Norte
Grange Sao Roque
Farm Quatro Irmaos
Nova Bandeirantes
Apr-11
47
Nova Bandeirantes
Grange America
Aug-11
72
Farm Roxo
Querencia
Jul-11
2232
Querencia
Farm Santa Cruz
Aug - Set - 11
1625
Agua Boa
Farm Santo Antonio
Nova Monte Verde
Sep-10
5
Nova Monte Verde
Farm Sao Joao da Floresta
Oct-11
111
Juruena
Farm Vitoria
Matupa
Dec-10
17
Matupa
Farm Mata Grande
Jul - Out-11
125
Matupa
8
|
Figure 2:
the
Shows an example of
web of indirect supp
Farm
Sao
Sebastiao
18 animals
(mar/11)
Farm
Juju
36 animals
(jul/11)
Farm
Roxo
2232 animals
(jul/11)
Farm
Santa Cruz
1625 animals
(ago/set/11)
Farm
Horvatich
156 animals
(abr/11)
Farm Alvorada
2 animals
(nov/11)
150 animals
(out 11)
Farm Campina
Verde
60 animals
(jun 11)
90 animals
(jun 11)
Grange
Sao Roque
63 animals
(jul/dez 11)
Farm
Vitoria
17 animals
(dez/11)
Farm
Mata Grande
125 animals
(jul/out/11)
Farm
Cofins
68 animals
(abr/11)
Grange
Sossego
19 animals
(out/11)
Farm
Jesus e o
Senhor
35 animals
(mar/11)
Farm Sol
Nascente
18 animals
(jun/11)
54 animals
(mai/11)
Farm
Braço Sul
599 animals
(jul/set 11)
47 animals
(abr/11)
Grange
America
72 animals
(ago/11)
Farm
Quatro
Irmaos
Farm
Carme
ly, from the data of tab
le 3.
Slaughterhouse
Diamantina
Slaughterhouse
Água Boa
Slaughterhouse
Alta Floresta
Slaughterhouse
Cuiabá
40 animals
(dez/11)
Slaughterhouse
SJ Quatro
Marcos
1382 animals
(dez/11)
Slaughterhouse
Juruena
Slaughterhouse
Matupé
Farm Tres Irmaos
85 animals (jul/11)
Farm Sonho Meu
36 animals (jul/11)
JBS
Slaughterhouse
Barra do Garças
50 animals
(fev/11)
1918 animals
(set/10 e 11)
Farm
Morada
do Sol
1918 animals
(set/10 e 11)
4246 animals
(nov/dez 11)
Farm
Reunidas
Serra
Negra
254 animals
(ago/11)
111 animals
(out/11)
Farm
Sao Joao
da Floresta
5 animals
(set/11)
Farm Primavera
234 animals (jun/11)
Jodao III
18 animals (jul/11)
Farm Silva
102 animals (set/11)
Farm Panorama
108 animals (jun/jul/11)
85 animals (ago/11)
Farm Boa Esperança
Farm Fortaleza
Table 4: JBS suppliers located within the limits of the Marãiwatsede indigenous land.
SUPPLYING FARM
MUNICIPALITY
SLAUGHTERHOUSE
JORDAO III
ALTO BOA VISTA
JBS ÁGUA BOA
PRIMAVERA
SÃO FÉLIX DO ARAGUAIA
PANORAMA
SERRA NOVA DOURADA
BOA ESPERANÇA
NR OF ANIMALS
DIRECT SUPPLIED
(Jun 11 -Sep11)
NON-COMPLIANCE
WHITH CATTLE
AGREEMENT
234
TI Marãiwatsede
JBS ÁGUA BOA
54
TI Marãiwatsede
JBS ÁGUA BOA
102
TI Marãiwatsede
BOM JESUS DO ARAGUAIA
JBS ÁGUA BOA
108
TI Marãiwatsede
FORTALEZA
SERRA NOVA DOURADA
JBS ÁGUA BOA
85
TI Marãiwatsede
SILVA
ALTO BOA VISTA
JBS ÁGUA BOA
18
TI Marãiwatsede
PONTALINA
JBS ÁGUA BOA
17
TI Marãiwatsede
SONHO MEU
JBS BARRA DO GARÇAS
36
TI Marãiwatsede
TRES IRMÃOS SUIA-MISSU
85
TI Marãiwatsede
CAPIM FINO
96
TI Marãiwatsede
Total number of animals supplied
835
Greenpeace
Farm
Brejo
Alegre
Farm
Santo
Antonio
Farm Pontalina
54 animals (set/11)
Slaughterhouse
Água Boa
96 animals (xx/11)
288 animals
(jun/dez 11)
Slaughterhouse
Araputanga
Farm
Bela
Vista
166 animals
(fev/11)
Farm
Mamati
998 animals
(jun/dez 11)
17 animals (jul/11)
Figure 3: JBS suppliers
its of the
located within the lim
nous land.
ige
ind
Marãiwatsede
Farm Capim Fino
58 animals
(nov/11)
166 animals
(fev/11)
Farm
Tres
Irmaos
|
9
luded in
Mato Grosso, was inc
ia, located in Juara,
ss
Ca
ten of his
de
a
pt
ke
Rit
,
oz
nta
eir
Sa
56
r, Fabiano Qu
10, the farm,
Figure 4: In December 20 the Ministry of Work and Employment . Its owne 5 animals to Olho dAgua II farm
ty list by
this farm supplied 13
the Slave Labour dir
als to JBS and Beira
very. In August 2011,
sla
to
r
ila
sim
ns
n supplied 134 anim
itio
the
m
far
57
II
a
gu
dA
employees in cond
ho
ara. Ol
mber 2011 .
ira Rio farm, also in Ju
November and Dece
er,
mb
pte
Se
in
and 118 animals to Be
nt
Juara pla
6 animals to the JBS
Rio farm supplied 23
Slave
Labour
Farm
Beira Rio
236 animals (dez/11)
118 animals (ago/11)
JBS
( Slaughterhouse Juara)
Farm Santa Rita de
Cassia Juara, MT
Farm Olho
da Agua II
stody which
Figure 5: The chain of cu m farms
go fro
reveals how animals
d arrive on
an
ing
ss
ce
through pro
around the world.
supermarket shelves
Tesco
UK
Boni (Impala brand)
Tinned Beef
Netherlands
JBS Lins - SIF 337
JBS - Barra
do Garças
SIF-42
Jumbo (Impala brand)
JBS - Barretos - SIF 76
Tinned Beef
Netherlands
Fresh Beef
Grupo Pão de Açucar
Makro (Hereford brand)
Brazilian Supermarkets
Makro Atacadista S.A.
Walmart Brasil
Companhia Brasileira
de Distribuição
Sendas
Distribuidora S.A.
MUNICIPALITY
SLAUGHTERHOUSE
SAO SEBASTIAO DA GOIANA
SAO JOSE DO XINGU JBS BARRA DO GARCAS 90
Ibama Embargo
XINGU SANTA CRUZ DO XINGU JBS BARRA DO GARCAS 74 Ibama Embargo
SOMBRA DA MATA SAO FELIX DO ARAGUAIA JBS BARRA DO GARCAS 34 TI Maraiwatsede
PONTALINA SAO FELIX DO ARAGUAIA JBS BARRA DO GARCAS 24 TI Maraiwatsede
MATA VERDE SAO FELIX DO ARAGUAIA JBS BARRA DO GARCAS 17 TI Maraiwatsede
CATUABA DO FONTOURA SAO FELIX DO ARAGUAIA JBS BARRA DO GARCAS 34 TI Maraiwatsede
ELO DE OURO ALTO BOA VISTA JBS BARRA DO GARCAS 24 TI Maraiwatsede
MARURUNA SAO FELIX DO ARAGUAIA JBS BARRA DO GARCAS 18 TI Maraiwatsede
DAMARE SAO FELIX DO ARAGUAIA JBS BARRA DO GARCAS 108 TI Maraiwatsede
SONHO MEU BOM JESUS DO ARAGUAIA JBS BARRA DO GARÇAS 36 TI Maraiwatsede
TRES IRMÃOS SUIA-MISSU SÃO FÉLIX DO ARAGUAIA JBS BARRA DO GARÇAS 85 TI Maraiwatsede
CAPIM FINO BOM JESUS DO ARAGUAIA JBS BARRA DO GARÇAS 96 TI Maraiwatsede
Total of animals
640
SUPPLYING FARM
10
|
NR OF ANIMALS
NON-COMPLIANCE
WHITH CATTLE
AGREEMENT
ENDNOTES
1 Ministry of Agriculture (September 2011). Brazil. Available at: http://
www.agricultura.gov.br/portal/page/portal/Internet-MAPA/paginainicial/animal
2 Ministry of Science and Technology (December 2005). ‘Inventário
de Emissões e Remoções Antrópicas de Gases do Efeito Estufa
(Comunicação Nacional)’. Available at: http://www.mct.gov.br/
upd_blob/0004/4199.pdf
3PRODES/INPE data consolidated until 2011
4National Institute for Space Research (September 2011). ‘Terra
Class: Levantamento de informações de uso e cobertura da terra na
Amazônia’ (Executive Summary). Available at: http://www.inpe.br/
cra/projetos_pesquisas/sumario_executivo_terraclass_2008.pdf
5 Greenpeace International (December 2009). ‘Slaughtering the
Amazon’. Available at: http://www.greenpeace.org/international/en/
publications/reports/slaughtering-the-amazon/
6 Bertin was subsequently purchased by JBS , 16 September 2009.
Available at: http://jbs.riweb.com.br/JBS/Show.aspx?id_materia=XK
F5lOeHXESx3VQYUBThbw==
dteor=176261&filename=PEC+215/2000
27 Federal Government of Brazil – Economic Growth Acceleration
Program (PAC). Available at: http://www.brasil.gov.br/pac
28 JBS. JBS Ends 2011 as the Most Internationalized Company and
the Largest Brazilian Multinational in the Food Sector. Webpage.
Available at: http://jbs.riweb.com.br/JBS/Show.aspx?id_materia=xq
XNgl7PftLuCTCVVs+AQQ==
29 BNDES Participações S.A. - BNDESPAR. Demonstrações
Financeiras Referentes aos Exercícios Findos em 31 de Dezembro
de 2011 e de 2010 e Relatório dos Auditores Independentes
p.47-48. Available at: http://www.bndes.gov.br/SiteBNDES/export/
sites/default/bndes_pt/Galerias/Arquivos/empresa/download/1211_
BPAR.pdf
30 Data held by Greenpeace.
31 Research conducted from March 2010 to May 2011.
32 Found in stores in February 2012.
7 Greenpeace. Minimum criteria for industrial scale cattle operations
in the Brazilian Amazon Biome. Available at: http://www.greenpeace.
org/international/Global/international/planet-2/report/2009/10/
minimum-criteria-for-industria.pdf
33 Found in stores in January 2012.
8 JBS. JBS and Sustainability webpage. ‘Our values in production
meat’. Available at: http://www.jbs.com.br/JBS/_doc/NossosValores.
pdf accessed 11/4/2012.
36 Research conducted from January to March 2012.
9 Soy Moratorium. Available at http://www.abiove.com.br/english/
ss_moratoria_us.html accessed 9/4/2012..
10 JBS (12 March 2012). ‘Letter to our Clients’. Available at: http://
jbs.riweb.com.br/JBS/Show.aspx?id_materia=%20/UD%20
DGuHn1q2WEt6y7EBg== accessed 22/3/2012.
12 Greenpeace (October 2011). ‘Broken Promises’. Available at: http://
www.greenpeace.org/international/Global/international/publications/
forests/2011/12%20pages%20ingles%20baixa_FINAL.pdf
13 JBS (12 March 2012). ‘Letter to our Clients’. Available at: http://
jbs.riweb.com.br/JBS/Show.aspx?id_materia=%20/UD%20
DGuHn1q2WEt6y7EBg== accessed 22/3/2012.
17 Greenpeace (October 2011). ‘Broken Promises’. Available at: http://
www.greenpeace.org/international/Global/international/publications/
forests/2011/12%20pages%20ingles%20baixa_FINAL.pdf
18 JBS. Sustainability and Cattle Buying Procedures – presentation
during meeting of the LWG in March 2012.
19 Cadastro de empregadores – portaria interministerial nº 02 de 12 de
maio de 2011. Atualização semestral em 30 de dezembro de 2011.
Available at: http://portal.mte.gov.br/data/files/8A7C816A36A27C14
0136AD9FF1503398/CADASTRO%2013.04.2012.pdf
20 Comissâo Pastoral da terra. Conflitos no Campo no Brasil.
Available at: http://www.cptnacional.org.br/index.php?option=com_
content&view=article&id=908:cpt-divulga-dados-parciais-dosconflitos-no-campo-brasil-de-janeiro-a-setembro-de-2011&catid=12
:conflitos&Itemid=94 Accessed 9/4/2012.
21 Repórter Brasil - Lista Suja do Trabalho Escravo. Available at: http://
www.reporterbrasil.com.br/pacto/listasuja/lista Accessed 9/4/2012.
22 Repórter Brasil - O que é trabalho escravo. Available at: http://www.
reporterbrasil.org.br/conteudo.php?id=4 Accessed 9/4/2012.
23 Repórter Brasil - O que é trabalho escravo. Avaiable at: http://www.
reporterbrasil.org.br/conteudo.php?id=4 Accessed 9/4/2012.
24 INPE, 2011. www.inpe.br
25 Law nº 12. 651/2012. Available at: http://www.in.gov.br/imprensa/
visualiza/index.jsp?jornal=1&pagina=1&data=28/05/2012 And
Provisional Measure 571. Available at: http://www.planalto.gov.br/
ccivil_03/_Ato2011-2014/2012/Mpv/571.htm
26PEC 215/2000, recently approved by the Senate, includes among
the exclusive powers of Congress to vote the demarcation of lands
traditionally occupied by indigenous peoples and the ratification
of the limits already approved, establishing that the criteria and
procedures for demarcation will be regulated by law. Available at:
http://www.camara.gov.br/proposicoesWeb/prop_mostrarintegra?co
34 http://www.makro.nl/public/nl-makro/over-makro/ontstaan
35 http://aliceweb2.mdic.gov.br/index/home accessed 6/4/2012
37 Research conducted from March to May 2010.
39 http://www.gpari.com.br/grupopaodeacucar/web/conteudo_pt.asp?i
dioma=0&conta=28&tipo=29897
40 Found in stores in January 2012.
42 http://www.sligrofoodgroup.com/Pages/home.aspx
43 http://www.vanaerde.biz/catalog/landend.asp?dier=49&land=2 and
http://www.vanaerde.biz/catalog/landend.asp?dier=46&land=2
44 http://www.toledoint.com/usp/00/
45 World Wildlife Foundation (February 2000). Indigenous Peoples
and Conservation Organizations – Experiences in Collaboration’.
Available at: http://www.worldwildlife.org/what/communityaction/
people/partneringwith/WWFBinaryitem6048.pdf
46 World Wildlife Foundation (February 2000). ‘Indigenous Peoples
47 World Wildlife Foundation (February 2000). ‘Indigenous Peoples
48 Ação Civil Pública 2207.01.00.05103 “Retirada dos posseiros da TI”.
Ministério Publico do Estado do Mato Grosso; Ação Civil Pública
95.00.00679-0. 5 Vara da Justiça Federal Mato Grosso.
53 Instituto Brasileiro de Meio Ambiente e Recursos Renováveis IBAMA/MMA. Consulta Pública de Áreas Embargadas. Available at:
http://siscom.ibama.gov.br/geo_sicafi, accessed February 2012.
56 Cadastro de empregadores – portaria interministerial nº 02 de 12 de
maio de 2011. Atualização semestral em 30 de dezembro de 2011.
Available at: http://carep.mte.gov.br/trab_escravo/default.asp
Greenpeace
|
11
w5.com.br
Greenpeace is an independent global campaigning
organisation that acts to change attitudes and behaviour, to
protect and conserve the environment and to promote peace.
Greenpeace is committed to stopping climate change.
We campaign to protect the world’s remaining ancient forests
and the plants, animals and peoples that depend on them.
We investigate, expose and confront the trade in products
causing forest destruction and climate change.
We challenge governments and industry to end their role in
forest destruction and climate change.
We support the rights of forest peoples.
June 2012
Second edition, published by
Greenpeace International
Ottho Heldringstraat 5
1066 AZ Amsterdam
The Netherlands
www.greenpeace.org
12
|

JBS Scorecard

Transcription

Similar documents

JBS ad 3 (mag) - JBS Auto Designs

JOIN US! Thursday, March 13th 9:00 am

Heifer International

In 1928, Amelia Earhardt took her first successful flight over the

Homemade Probiotics Flyer (To Print)

Influence of Coagulants, Sanitizers and FOG on Digester Operations

Market Plan

Sonrise Farm Boer Goats ..Gowboy Auctiontt Saturday April 15