city of greensboro urban redevelopment plan
Transcription
city of greensboro urban redevelopment plan
CITY OF GREENSBORO URBAN REDEVELOPMENT PLAN Adopted February 21, 2011 by City of Greensboro Areas of Focus Adrian Circle Neighborhood Airport Road Apalachee Avenue Neighborhood Canaan Neighborhood Historic Downtown East Broad Corridor Historic Depot Mary Leila Mill Village Neighborhood North East Street Neighborhood Mary Leila Mill Reynolds Neighborhood A Collaborative Effort of City of Greensboro Greensboro Downtown Development Authority Greensboro Better Hometown Greene County Chamber of Commerce Greene County Development Authority Northeast Georgia Regional Commission Introduction In 1786 an act of the Georgia state legislature set aside the western lands of Washington County to create Greene County and its seat, Greenesborough (later Greenesboro, then Greensboro), which was incorporated in 1803. Taking its name from Nathanael Greene, a Revolutionary War general, Greensboro served as the commercial center of one of Georgia’s most important cotton-producing counties. The city’s history illustrates the struggle, common to many small towns in the rural South, to emerge from the shadow of a cash-crop monoculture. Located between Ogeechee and Oconee rivers in Georgia’s formerly rich cotton belt, Greensboro lies at the heart of Greene County, 70 miles east of Atlanta, 35 miles south of Athens, 80 miles west of Augusta and 65 miles north of Macon along Georgia Highway 15 in Greene County. The rise of the cotton economy facilitated the growth of Greensboro as the commercial center of Greene County. Fifty years after its founding, Greene became Georgia’s largest cotton-producing county. In 1838, responding to the need to transport the region’s ever-growing crop, the Georgia Railroad reached Greensboro, cementing the city’s status as a commercial center. By 1854 the town had its own cotton mill and a merchant class that profited from the new commodity. While cotton made a few men extremely wealthy and underwrote the proliferation of stores, banks and civic buildings in Greensboro, it also created an underclass in the form of slaves and poor whites. All three of Greene County’s representatives to the Georgia Secession Convention voted to secede from the Union, effectively introducing Greene County to the Civil War. A portion of Union general William T. Sherman’s troops briefly occupied Greensboro in November 1864 as a diversionary tactic meant to convince the Confederates that the Union troops were headed to Augusta, not Savannah, on their march to the sea. The end of the Civil War unleashed previously contained social forces in Greensboro. Many newly freed African Americans migrated to Greensboro and formed a community known as Canaan, which became a center of activism in the following years. With the votes of the newly enfranchised African Americans, Greene County elected a slate of Republican candidates in 1868. A series of heinous crimes assured a quick return to subordinate civic and socioeconomic positions for African Americans and effectively thwarted the promise of Reconstruction. Greensboro and Greene County quickly returned to its dependence on cotton and suffered the attendant consequences. With the demise of the old plantation system, sharecropping and tenancy dominated the post-Civil War southern economy. The elite of Greensboro prospered; many became moneylenders in the furnishing system, which arose after the demise of the old cotton-factory system. The proliferation of sharecropping contracts also led to a rise in the number of prosperous lawyers in Greensboro. As a result of the local economy’s lack of diversification, the town’s fortunes rose and fell with the fluctuations of the international cotton market. As the boll weevil began to devastate much of Georgia’s crops, Greene County turned more heavily toward cotton after developing a reputation for being “weevil proof.” The accompanying prosperity led to an increase of automobiles and other luxury consumer goods and even allowed many tenants to become land owners. In 1922 the weevil finally devastated Greene County’s cotton production, ending the boom time and undermining land values. The city’s banks closed, the Georgia Railroad stopped making scheduled stops and Greensboro languished until the innovations of the New Deal. Greensboro benefited greatly from the New Deal years. The Civilian Conservation Corps and Works Progress Administration were located in the city and generated a heavy amount of traffic, therefore bolstering the number of consumers in the town’s commercial district. Whatever temporary relief the New Deal years may have provided, Greensboro could not truly prosper until there were adequate industrial jobs to absorb the surplus agricultural population’s workforce. Greensboro, in an attempt to lure industry to the area, created the Greene County Development Company. The first major project of the Development Company was the recruitment of the MaryLeila Cotton Mill, which opened in 1899 and provided a longer-term solution to Greensboro’s evolving economy – serving the community for over a century. In the aftermath of World War II, the number of farms and farm workers continued to decline. Greensboro struggled to provide enough jobs for those no longer wanting to farm or, having been pushed off the land, no longer could farm. In 1974 the town claimed over 900 manufacturing jobs, most in the garment industry, at a time when the population was 2,583. The industrial jobs offered in years past by large-scale operations, which could have provided a pathway for workers into the middle class, had largely evaporated, and the city still struggled to attract much-needed jobs to the area. Greensboro’s largest employers provided service-sector catering to individuals that lived or vacationed on the shores of Lake Oconee. Several public initiatives have established present-day Greensboro as a progressive town interested in the preservation of its rich cultural and historic resources, the revitalization of its downtown commercial district, the celebration of the arts, the promotion of recreation and tourism and the continued recruitment of entrepreneurial activity. Greensboro has experienced many positive changes over its 224 year history; however there are areas which display persistent neglect and/or stagnation. The City of Greensboro, through the adoption of an Urban Redevelopment Plan, will build upon its past and current successes by applying directed redevelopment strategies at alleviating existing negative conditions and helping the city realize their full potential as a wonderful place to live, work and play. Legislative Authority The Urban Redevelopment Act was adopted in 1955 and has been amended several times since its establishment. The “Urban Redevelopment Act” may be found at O.C.G.A. §36-61-1. The legislative findings and declaration of necessity for urban redevelopment powers are found in O.C.G.A. §36-61-3 and state: “It is found and declared that there exist in municipalities and counties of this state slum areas, as defined in paragraph (18) of Code Section 36-61-2, which constitute a serious and growing menace, injurious to the public health, safety, morals, and welfare of the residents of this state; that the existence of such areas contributes substantially and increasingly to the spread of disease and crime, constitutes an economic and social liability, substantially impairs or arrests the sound growth of municipalities and counties, retards the provision of housing accommodations, aggravates traffic problems, and substantially impairs or arrests the elimination of traffic hazards and the improvement of traffic facilities; and that the prevention and elimination of slums is a matter of state policy and state concern, in order that the state and its municipalities and counties shall not continue to be endangered by areas which are local centers of disease, promote juvenile delinquency, and, while contributing little to the tax income of the state and its municipalities and counties, consume an excessive proportion of its revenues because of the extra services required for police, fire, accident, hospitalization, and other forms of public protection, services, and facilities. (b) It is further found and declared that certain slum areas or portions thereof may require acquisition, clearance, and disposition, subject to use restrictions, as provided in this chapter, since the prevailing condition of decay may make impracticable the reclamation of the area by conservation or rehabilitation; that the other areas or portions thereof, through the means provided in this chapter, may be susceptible of conservation or rehabilitation in such a manner that the conditions and evils enumerated in subsection (a) of this Code section may be eliminated, remedied, or prevented and that, to the extent that is feasible, salvable slum areas should be conserved and rehabilitated through voluntary action and the regulatory process. (c) It is further found and declared that the powers conferred by this chapter are for public uses and purposes for which public money may be expended and the power of eminent domain may be exercised. The necessity, in the public interest, for the provisions enacted in this chapter is declared as a matter of legislative determination.” The Urban Redevelopment Act provides local governments with the ability to: purchase blighted property and resell it to private developers for redevelopment purposes deemed in the best interest of the community, execute long term contracts with housing authorities, downtown development authorities, urban redevelopment agencies or private entities, issue revenue bonds or general obligation bonds to accomplish the purposes of the Act, and waive building codes and other fees within the redevelopment area to achieve the goals established in the Plan. The Act also strengthens the local government’s ability to enforce development and building codes and allows for the establishment of design standards that may be more stringent or specific in terms of aesthetics than typical zoning ordinances. To access the redevelopment powers allowable under the act, a local government must, under O.C.G.A. § 36-61-5, “adopt a resolution finding that one or more slum areas exist in such municipality or county; and the rehabilitation, conservation, or redevelopment, or a combination thereof, of such area or areas is necessary in the interest of the public health, safety, morals, or welfare of the residents of the municipality or county.” The Urban Redevelopment Act, under O.C.G.A. § 36-61-2 defines "Slum area" as: “an area in which there is a predominance of buildings or improvements, whether residential or nonresidential, which by reason of dilapidation, deterioration, age, or obsolescence; inadequate provision for ventilation, light, air, sanitation, or open spaces; high density of population and overcrowding; existence of conditions which endanger life or property by fire and other causes; or any combination of such factors is conducive to ill health, transmission of disease, infant mortality, juvenile delinquency, or crime and is detrimental to the public health, safety, morals, or welfare. "Slum area" also means an area which by reason of the presence of a substantial number of slum, deteriorated, or deteriorating structures; predominance of defective or inadequate street layout; faulty lot layout in relation to size, adequacy, accessibility, or usefulness; unsanitary or unsafe conditions; deterioration of site or other improvements; tax or special assessment delinquency exceeding the fair value of the land; the existence of conditions which endanger life or property by fire and other causes; by having development impaired by airport or transportation noise or by other environmental hazards; or any combination of such factors substantially impairs or arrests the sound growth of a municipality or county, retards the provisions of housing accommodations, or constitutes an economic or social liability and is a menace to the public health, safety, morals, or welfare in its present condition and use.” Demographics The City of Greensboro is a rural community located in northeast Georgia. Tables 1 through 12 show statistics for Greensboro and Greene County compared to other counties in the northeast Georgia region and the State of Georgia. Table 1: Population – History and Projections Greensboro Greene County 1960 2,773 11,193 1970 2,583 10,212 1980 2,985 11391 1990 2,860 11,793 2000 3,258 14,406 2010 3,256 14,088 2020 3,382 14,887 Region (avg.) 190,746 224,983 275,449 328,223 438,300 634,900 881,760 Georgia 3,943,116 4,587,930 5,463,105 6,478,216 8,186,453 9,550,897 10,915,340 Source: Greene County Comprehensive Plan, 2004; US Census, 2000 Census; DCA Data Views, Northeast Georgia Regional Commission Planning Department Table 2: Historical Trends in Measure of Per Capita Income Area 1969 1974 1979 1984 1989 1994 Greensboro 2,340 3,710 5,079 7,177 9,275 11,885 1,735 3,022 4,308 6,849 9,390 16,390 Greene County 2,096 3,758 5420 8,277 11,133 14,996 Region (avg.) 2,649 4,526 6,402 10,017 13,631 17,393 Georgia 1999 14,494 23,389 2005 16,872 28,167 2010 19,250 32,946 18,859 (X) (X) 21,154 26,975 28,549 Source: Greene County Comprehensive Plan 2004; US Census, 2000 Census; DCA Data Views; Northeast Georgia Regional Commission Planning Department Table 3: Occupants Per Room (>1 occupants per room is considered overcrowded by Federal standards) 1,194 Total 646 Owner Occupied 548 Renter Occupied 51 Total 1.01 to 1.50 occupants per room 0 Total 1.51 to 2.00 occupants per room Total 2.01 or more occupants per room 15 Source: US Census Bureau, Census 2000 Table 4: Telephone Service Available by Household 1,194 Total 118 No Telephone Service Available 10% of all households without service Percentage of Total Source: US Census, 2000 Census Table 5: Plumbing Facilities by Housing Units 1,274 Total Housing Units Lacking Complete Plumbing Facilities 16 Source: US Census, 2000 Census Table 6: Selected Demographics – Minority Population, Poverty Rate, Housing Vacancy Rates Greensboro Greene County Region (avg.) Georgia 14,406 438,300 8,186,453 Total Population 3,238 63% 45% 23.4% 34.9% % Minority 26.4% 16% (X) 9.9% % Families Below Poverty 80 (6%) 1,176 (18%) (X) 275,368 (8%) Number of Vacant Housing Units (%) Source: US Census, 2000 Census; DCA Data Views; Regional Comprehensive Plan 2004;ERS/USDA Table 7: City of Greensboro Business Closures Year 2010 2009 2 2 Business Closures 2008 3 2007 4 Source: Greene County Chamber of Commerce Table 8: Unemployment Rate (2005 – 2010) Month/Year May 2010 May 2009 May 2008 10.5 6.1 Greene County 10.7 Percent Unemployed 10.2 9.5 5.7 Georgia Percent Unemployed May 2007 4.5 May 2006 5.8 May 2005 7.2 4.2 4.6 5.1 Source: georgiastats.uga.edu and Georgia Department of Labor-Labor Force Estimates Table 9: City of Greensboro Crime by Year 2001 2002 2003 0 0 1 Murders 3 1 2 Rapes 1 3 2 Robberies 10 16 18 Assaults 49 32 35 Burglaries 174 141 180 Thefts 8 7 Auto Thefts 12 1 1 N/A Arson 2004 0 1 4 17 23 168 14 N/A 2006 0 0 4 21 39 188 22 N/A 2007 0 2 4 27 34 165 4 N/A 2008 0 2 8 20 46 147 10 N/A Source: City-data.com crime index; FBI Uniform Crime Report (numbers reported by Greensboro police) 2009 0 N/A 7 N/A 42 130 13 N/A Table 10: City of Greensboro Building Permits Issued by Year Year Number of Building Permits Issued 2010 2009 13 58 2008 70 2007 89 2006 124 2005 107 Source: City of Greensboro Table 11: Historic Downtown Greensboro Vacancy Rate and Underutilized Property by Year and Type (underutilization self-reported by Better Hometown Manager – September 2010) Year Vacancy as Percentage of Total Downtown Property Vacancy as Percentage of NonResidential Downtown Property Underutilized and Vacant Properties as Percentage of Total Downtown Property Underutilized and Vacant Properties as Percentage of Non-Residential Downtown Property 2010 10.69 2009 8.4 2008 9.16 2007 9.16 2006 7.63 12.50 9.91 10.81 11.01 9.09 14.50 12.21 12.21 12.21 10.69 16.96 14.41 14.41 14.68 12.73 Source: City of Greensboro Better Hometown Program and Downtown Development Authority Table 12: Historic Downtown Greensboro Commercial Properties in Use by year Year Number of Commercial Properties in Use 2010 78 2009 80 2008 80 2007 78 Source: City of Greensboro Better Hometown Program and Downtown Development Authority 2006 81 Redevelopment Need Residential Within the City of Greensboro’s Urban Redevelopment Area there are several examples of dilapidated residential structures, both occupied and unoccupied, in need of redevelopment. In particular, the following residential areas have been identified as areas of focus: Mary Leila Mill Village Constructed in the early 1900’s these Bungalow/Craftsman style homes once provided housing for the Mary Leila Cotton Mill workers. Once a thriving neighborhood, Mill Village is currently plagued with vacant dilapidated houses which require structural and aesthetic attention. The area encompasses portions of Buffalo Street, North Spring Street, First Avenue, West Richland Avenue east of Georgia Highway 15 and Mill Street, Sycamore Circle, West Church Street, Cherry Street and Maple Circle west of Georgia Highway 15. The Mill Village is generally located north of the historic Downtown District. The 2009 City of Greensboro Five Year Plan identifies this neighborhood as an area of focus. Canaan Neighborhood The Canaan Neighborhood, once the epicenter of the African American community in Greensboro, is also plagued with overgrown landscaping and dilapidated houses in need of structural and aesthetic repair. The area encompasses numerous residential structures located on Bush Street, Gordon Street, Robbin Circle, East 2nd Street Canaan Street, Foster Terrace, Canaan Circle, Canaan Terrace, Brighton Road east of Martin Luther King Jr. south of the historic downtown district. The 2009 City of Greensboro Five Year Plan identifies Canaan Street, Foster Street, Robbin Court, Gordon Street, East 2nd Street, Mulberry Street and Brighton Street as areas of focus. Reynolds Neighborhood The Reynolds Neighborhood includes a collection of single and multifamily residential options of varying types. There are several examples of c. 1920-1940 Bungalows, Great American small houses and mid-century ranch style homes. The area encompasses the following residential streets: Reynolds Drive, Walker Street, Wilson Street, Rachel Street and Oak Street. The Reynolds Neighborhood’s immediate needs include updating failing and inadequate public infrastructure (i.e. water distribution system, storm water management system, roads and sidewalks). The 2009 City of Greensboro Five Year Plan identifies Reynolds Drive, Oak Street, and Rachel Street as areas of focus. Adrian Circle The Adrian Circle Neighborhood includes predominantly ranch style homes and manufactured homes along two residential streets: Adrian Circle and Adrian Drive. The most immediate need has been identified as the lack of adequate public infrastructure. North East Street The North East Street Neighborhood includes both commercial and residential property. For the purposes of this plan, the North East Street Neighborhood will focus on residential property. The North East Street Neighborhood includes a mix of c. 1920-1940 Bungalows, ranch style homes, manufactured homes and Great American small houses. This neighborhood presently is in need of infrastructure redevelopment. Additionally, attention should be focused on structural and aesthetic repairs of various residences. Apalachee Avenue The Apalachee Avenue Neighborhood includes a mix of c. 1920-1940 Bungalows, ranch style homes, manufactured homes and Great American small houses on the northern and southern portions of Apalachee Avenue. This neighborhood displays homes with significant structural damages and need for infrastructure installation and replacement. Commercial The 2010 Greene County Comprehensive Plan Partial Update (pg. 23) discusses the importance of encouraging the redevelopment of existing commercial areas. The following commercial areas have been identified as areas of focus as part of the urban redevelopment planning process: Mary Leila Mill As the rest of the country was shifting from an agricultural to an industrial society, Greensboro and Greene County were quickly seeking a way to create enough industrial jobs for its displaced farmers. In 1899, the Mary-Leila Cotton Mill opened its doors, but as time progressed and the Cotton industry lost its place among the dominant southern industries and production diminished the mill eventually closed. The Mary-Leila Cotton Mill is a significantly blighted area; expressing increased levels of deterioration such as cracked and crumbling masonry walls, broken glass and boarded-up windows as a result of years of general neglect. Historic Downtown Greensboro’s historic downtown is characterized by two-story buildings constructed primarily of brick and wood. The buildings are designed to encourage pedestrian activity in that they are located close together with a sidewalk running between buildings. Some styles that serve as appropriate models include Greek Revival, Queen Anne, Georgian and Italianate commercial row buildings. As the mainstay of the city’s economy there needs to be a renewed focus on the downtown area. According to the City’s 2009 Five-Year Plan and 2010 Comprehensive Plan Partial Update, the downtown area still ranks highly as a desirable aspect of Greensboro. In response to a questionnaire filed with the Five-Year Plan, respondents mentioned that the downtown was confined, lacking in its variety of retail establishment, short on parking, lacking aesthetic quality at its entrances and fringes and contains buildings in disrepair. Historic Downtown Greensboro displays clear evidence of underutilized, vacant and dilapidated structures, as well as decreasing property values, increasing unemployment and rampant business turnover and closure. Historic Depot With the rise of cotton production in Greensboro and the construction of the Mary Leila Cotton Mill, the city became an important fixture of the southern textile industry. In the early 1900’s the Historic Depot was constructed as the center of trade and means of transport for Greensboro’s cotton-dependent economy. The Historic Depot outlived its necessity with the decline of cotton production and has most recently been serving as a local feed and seed store. A second depot structure, originally used for passenger travel, was constructed circa 1917 and currently is in a state of disrepair due to a lack of use and occupancy. Both depot structures have been identified in the City’s 2009 Five-Year Plan and 2010 Comprehensive Plan Partial Update as redevelopment targets. East Broad Street Corridor The 2009 City of Greensboro Five-Year Plan utilized questionnaires that revealed that the East Broad Street Corridor has become a focal point of community-wide concern due to the negative features associated with this redevelopment area, including a lack of sufficient retail “mass” and the declining aesthetics of visual entrances to the historic downtown as well as lack of private investment, declining property values, general neglect and several vacant, dilapidated and underutilized structures. The need for a concrete redevelopment plan was identified in the 2009 Five-Year Plan and has yet to be implemented. The East Broad Street Corridor has been identified as an “area requiring special attention” in the 2010 Greensboro Comprehensive Partial Plan Update, reinforcing the community’s desire to focus redevelopment efforts in the area. Industrial The following industrial areas have been identified as areas of focus as part of the urban redevelopment planning process Airport Road With 111,500 +/- SF of underutilized or vacant industrial and warehouse space available for lease or purchase, the Airport Road portion of the Redevelopment Area is suffering from declining property values, decreasing private investment, increasing unemployment and overall neglect. Without a renewed redevelopment focus, the Airport Road area will continue to decline and become a severe example of blighted conditions. Consistency with Comprehensive Plan The Greensboro City Council, in conjunction with Greene County and all local municipalities officially adopted the Comprehensive Plan in 2004 and Partial Plan Update in 2010. The initiatives, goals and objectives described in this Urban Redevelopment Plan are consistent with the planning goals of the Comprehensive Plan and Partial Plan Update. More specifically, the Urban Redevelopment Plan substantiates and confirms the following items identified in the Comprehensive Plan and Partial Plan Update as Areas Requiring Special Attention: East Broad Redevelopment Corridor Neighborhood Stabilization Target Areas - Mary Leila Cotton Mill Neighborhood - Reynolds Neighborhood - Canaan Neighborhood The planning process surrounding the creation and adoption of the Urban Redevelopment Plan has highlighted several other areas in need of redevelopment. While not itemized within the Comprehensive Plan, the additional URP target areas and the following suggestions for improvement do not deviate from locally adopted planning documents. Boundaries of the Redevelopment Area In accordance with regulations issued by the State of Georgia for the development of an Urban Redevelopment Plan under the Urban Redevelopment Act (O.C.G.A. §36-61 et seq.), the City of Greensboro has established its Urban Redevelopment Area by resolution making a determination of need and identifying the boundaries. This area is represented in the Urban Redevelopment Area Boundary Map located in the Appendix. Negative Conditions within Redevelopment Area The Redevelopment Plan Team identified several locations within the redevelopment area that are negatively contributing to the economic and social well-being of the City of Greensboro. The most significant issues are the overwhelming occurrence of vacant, dilapidated or underutilized structures – residential, commercial and industrial. The negative conditions present within the redevelopment plan area have been a contributing factor to the higher rates of criminal activity, lack of private investment, decreasing property values, business closures, decreasing number of building permits, increased unemployment and substandard or inadequate public infrastructure. More specifically, the following tables illustrate the negative conditions present in each URP target area. Residential Areas Vacant Structures Adrian Circle Apalachee Avenue Mary Leila Mill Village North East Street Residential Reynolds Residential Canaan Residential Dilapidated Structures Underutilized Structures High Crime Rate x x Decreasing Private Investment x Decreasing Property Values x x Substandard or Inadequate Public Infrastructure x x x x x x x x x x x x x x Commercial and Industrial Areas Airport Road (Industrial) Historic Downtown East Broad Street Corridor Historic Depot Mary Leila Mill Vacant Structures Dilapidated/ Underutilized Structures x High Crime Rate Decreasing Private Investment Decreasing Property Values x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x Substandard or Inadequate Public Infrastructure Business Closures Increased Unemploy ment x x x x x x x Consistency with Land Use Objectives In accordance with the Georgia Planning Act, the City of Greensboro and Greene County have Existing and Future Land Use maps detailing the specific land uses prescribed for the entire city. According to the 2024 Future Land Use Map, _14.6% of the properties located within the designated Urban Redevelopment Area are identified as Commercial; 78.54% of the properties are identified as Residential; 1.07% of the properties are identified as Industrial; 4.11% of the properties are identified as Education, Public Administration, Health Care, and Other. This Urban Redevelopment Plan proposes no changes to the City of Greensboro’s land use objectives or zoning districts. Description of Parcels to be Acquired The City of Greensboro has expressed interest in acquiring a 4.95 acre tract of land commonly referred to as the “Mill Ball Field” in an effort to remain consistent with their comprehensive plan, therefore creating a green-space for public recreation near the historic downtown. This parcel is zoned industrial and is located adjacent to the Mary Leila Mill. The City has also taken interest in acquiring the Mary Leila Mill property for potential mixed-use facilities. This property consists of five parcels of land totaling 14.69 acres located east of SR 15 and one block north of Hwy 278 along Spring St adjacent to the historic downtown area. The City of Greensboro has expressed interest in acquiring a <.5 acre tract of land commonly referred to as the “Caldwell Laundry Parcel” for use as off-street parking for the historic downtown. This parcel is zoned commercial and is located at the corner of S. East Street and E. Broad Street. Structures to be Demolished or Rehabilitated The city does not currently have any plans to demolish or rehabilitate any property however they do not want to negate the possibility of any future plans to partake in such activities. Plan to Leverage Private Resources for Redevelopment The City of Greensboro has identified multiple measures for the encouragement of private resources to redevelop the Urban Redevelopment Area. The City of Greensboro intends to pursue Opportunity Zone (OZ) and Enterprise Zone (EZ) designations for eligible areas within the Urban Redevelopment Area identified in this plan. Upon approval of the Urban Redevelopment Plan, the community will seek an OZ designation according to the Rules of Department of Community Affairs’ Chapter 110-241: Opportunity Zone Job Tax Credit Program Regulations. Please reference the Appendix for specific Opportunity Zone and Enterprise Zone Application Information. The city is also looking into getting Revitalization Area Strategy designation for the aforementioned areas in efforts to potentially receive bonus points on any future CDBG/CHIP applications. The city will also consider the sources available through the State and Federal Tax Credit ProgramHistoric Preservation Division, The Georgia Department of Community Affairs’ Community Development Block Grant program for Housing, Infrastructure and Economic Development, The Georgia Department of Transportation’s Transportation Enhancement and Local Maintenance and Improvement Grant, Downtown Development Revolving Loan Fund and The Georgia Municipal Association’s Georgia Cities Foundation through the Greensboro Downtown Development Authority. The City of Greensboro intends on utilizing the following programs in order to leverage private investment within the URP target areas: Residential Areas CDBG Housing/ CHIP Adrian Circle Apalachee Avenue Mary Leila Mill Village North East Street Residential Reynolds Residential Canaan Residential CDBG Infrastructure Historic Preservation Tax Credits GDOT – Transportation Enhancement/LMIG x x x x x x x x x x x x x SPLOST x x x x x Commercial and Industrial Areas DDRLF/ Georgia Cities Foundation Airport Road (Industrial) Historic Downtown East Broad Street Corridor Historic Depot Mary Leila Mill Opportunity Zone/ Enterprise Zone Historic Preservation Tax Credits GDOT – TE/LMIG SPLOST x (OZ) x x CDBG Economic Development (EIP/RDF) x x (OZ) x x x x (OZ) x x x x (OZ) x (OZ) x x x x Strategy for Relocating Displaced Residents The City of Greensboro does not anticipate engaging in any relocation activities because a strong majority of its initial focus will be focused on commercial revitalization and the rehabilitation of vacant and/or dilapidated structures. If relocation becomes necessary, the City of Greensboro will comply with all applicable requirements as outlined in the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Act of 1970. Covenants and Restrictions to be Placed on Properties The city does not currently have any plans to enter into any covenants or place restrictions on any properties however they do not want to negate the possibility of any future plans to partake in such activities. The city does have an interest in looking into Building Maintenance Code adoption. Public Infrastructure to be Provided The City of Greensboro intends on assessing the current state of its transportation, water, sewer, sidewalks, lighting, streetscapes, public recreational space and parking needs as part of the Urban Redevelopment Plan process. Once recognized as needing improvement, the City of Greensboro anticipates making any and all infrastructure improvements needed to facilitate the successful redevelopment of all target areas. Implementing Authority The Mayor and City Council of the City of Greensboro will serve as the implementing agency for the redevelopment plan. Strategy for Implementing Plan – Goals & Objectives Goal #1: Encourage Citizen Participation Objectives: 1. Advertise Urban Redevelopment Plan and host public hearing to receive public comment on plan: February 2011 2. Adopt Urban Redevelop Plan: March 2011 3. Publicize and make URP information available to local citizenry: March 2011 – Ongoing Goal #2: Accelerate Economic Development Objectives: 1. Apply for Enterprise Zone and/or Opportunity Zone Designation: April 2011 2. Utilize and market Enterprise Zone and Opportunity Zone through the Downtown Development Authority, Greene County Chamber of Commerce and Greene County Development Authority: April 2011 – April 2021 3. Investigate and Achieve Revitalization Area Strategy designation: March 2011 – April 2011 (Deadline for RAS is April 2011) 4. Explore eligible grant sources: Ongoing Goal #3: Promote Community Development Objectives: 1. Investigate and Achieve Revitalization Area Strategy designation: March 2011 – April 2011 2. Apply for CDBG Infrastructure Grant: April 2011 3. Review and Update available GDOT funds (LMIG and TE): Ongoing 4. Apply for GDOT Transportation Enhancement Funds: Ongoing 5. Continue Brownfield Program Participation with the EPA: Ongoing 6. Acquire Property: Ongoing 7. Explore eligible grant sources: Ongoing Goal #4: Examine and Implement Planning and Code Enforcement Strategies Objectives: 1. Investigate adopting ICC Property Maintenance Code: April 2011 2. Investigate adoption of East Broad Street Zoning Overlay District: April 2011 – June 2011 3. Review and Update Municipal Codes: April 2011 – April 2012 Goal #5: Improve Housing Conditions Objectives: 1. Apply for CDBG Housing and CHIP funds: April 2012 2. Enforce Municipal and Property Maintenance codes: Ongoing 3. Work on establishing partnership with local groups (i.e. Habitat for Humanity, Public Housing Authority, etc.): Ongoing Goal #6: Continue Downtown Redevelopment Efforts Objectives: 1. Implement Main Street Four Point Approach™: Ongoing (Reference Appendix for Greensboro Better Hometown Program Plan of Work FY11, including specific work items) Table of Appendices Appendix A Appendix B Appendix C Urban Redevelopment Area Boundary Map Target Area Maps (City-Wide and Area-Specific) Greensboro Better Hometown Program Plan of Work FY11 Appendix A Urban Redevelopment Area Boundary Map City of Greensboro Urban Redevelopment Plan US Highway 278 State Route 15 R ic hl an d Spring S t t N West S N Main St t St rest Park Pl Maple Ln Pine c Roads Robin Cir ach el S t Re yno lds Dr St ce rra C e T an aa nC Fos t er S ir t ir Adrian C State Route 44 t Brig hton R State Route 15 City Street County Road State Route URP Properties d SR West St S Sprin g S d rk Pa y wa out hS r R ey e St rt wa 4th St ES D ines l Ash St 5th 3rd St t St P Twin 2nd St Elm St Oa k St 1st St St E Bush S S East St Spring St Chestnut St S We st S t E Green e E South Dr r t E No rth St ak e D ge rita He W South S Ave We bb sL r W Broad St l le sD Mill St Apa lach ee ria mo Me rc Ci elp Ph Maple Cir Av e Cir W Cha pel N Laurel St Po ol A ve Greensboro Boundary Dr Adrian 0 0.25 0.5 1 Miles Appendix B Target Area Maps (City-Wide and AreaSpecific) City of Greensboro Urban Redevelopment Areas US Highway 278 State Route 15 NH le Chap Ea st St N t Airport Rd St out hS Pinec rest Canaan Cir Downtown East Broad St Historic Depot t Mill Village North East St St ce r r a Ca e T na an C Fos t er S ir t Brig hton R SR ach Re yno lds Dr Oa k St el S t West St d State Route 44 ir Adrian C ar Adrian Cir Apalachee Ave Dr Adrian r R ey ew St y wa URP Properties Dr Robin Cir 4th St k ar tP St Park Pl N Main St Maple Ln ES t Elm St S East St t E Bush S State Route Old Mill Reynolds Dr D ines l Ash 3rd St E Green e t ak e P Twin 2nd St S Sprin g S el Cir i rc lC M em or ia Spring S t N West S Spring St Chestnut St 1st St E No rth St County Road r W South S S We st S t St 5th City Street D ge rita He r Ave Av e We bb sL sD Mill St Apa lach ee hl an d elp Ph Maple Cir ic Dr R n orto W Roads Po ol A ve Greensboro Boundary State Route 15 d 0 0.25 0.5 1 Miles City of Greensboro Urban Redevelopment Plan Adrian Cir u aln SW t tS es Ch te r 's A pt Rd ri Ad C an ir Dr b Li er ty n Adria Ch c ur h Roads Rd City Street County Road State Route URP Properties Adrian Cir Canaan Cir Greensboro Boundary 0 125 250 500 Feet City of Greensboro Urban Redevelopment Plan Airport Rd o Rh t Ai rp or t R d N sS de ning Plan M il l Rd Roads City Street County Road State Route URP Properties n Pla M il g n ni lR d Airport Rd Greensboro Boundary 0 125 250 500 Feet St City of Greensboro Urban Redevelopment Plan Apalachee Ave Apa lach e e Av e Roads City Street Charity Dr County Road State Route Av nee o c O URP Properties Apalachee Ave Greensboro Boundary 0 125 250 500 Feet e S Laur el Ave Step h ens St Grime s W Broad St City of Greensboro Urban Redevelopment Plan Canaan Cir So 1st St n St Siloam Rd Gord o Elm St St Mulber ry Rd uth S Ea s t St t E E Bu s h S Ca n aan C ir c le Robin Cir Se c on dS Ca na a nC t ir Twi n Foster St tre e Dr St Pi n es Oak St Terrac e Roads Dr ld s yno Re r Te ach el S n SR a na t Ca tre et County Road State Route URP Properties Adrian Cir Canaan Cir St nS Rd ut ilso City Street a ln SW EW Brig hton Reynolds Dr Greensboro Boundary r ia Ad nC ir n Adria Dr 0 250 500 1,000 Feet W North St W Green Old Maxe ys R d E North St N Main St N W es t S t Spring St City of Greensboro Urban Redevelopment Plan Downtown e St E Green e St Court St W Broad St E Broad St Roads St City Street S W es t County Road S E as t S t State Route Downtown East Broad St t E South Historic Depot St Old Mill Greensboro Boundary S Walnut St W South S URP Properties S Main St E B us h S t 0 125 250 500 Feet E Greene St S E as t S t Old Maxeys N Walnut S t Rd E North St City of Greensboro Urban Redevelopment Plan East Broad St Park Pl E Broad St t Siloam Rd Maple Ln E South S Roads ES City Street E B us h S County Road t State Route Downtown East Broad St Go r d Greensboro Boundary Elm St 0 250 t S Walnu Canaan Cir on S Mulber ry t St Rd URP Properties ou t hS 500 1,000 Feet t n Pi ec s re tS t N W es t S t Spring St City of Greensboro Urban Redevelopment Plan Historic Depot W North St Roads City Street County Road Spring St State Route URP Properties Downtown Historic Depot Old Mill Greensboro Boundary 0 75 150 300 Feet W Green e St City of Greensboro Urban Redevelopment Plan Mill Village State Route 15 ze Mi urt Co W R dC lan ich ir Richland Cir W cle Me mo rial St C ir Spring S t t Syca more St rc h Chu e Av aple S d an hl SM ic ir Sycamore Cir R Ma ple C 1st Ave Buffa lo S t Mill St E Mill St City Street Downtown State Route Mill Village County Road t URP Properties N West S Roads W North S N Laurel St Historic Depot Old Mill Greensboro Boundary 0 375 750 1,500 Feet Spring St W Green e St t City of Greensboro Urban Redevelopment Plan North East St H or t on D r NH Old xe Ma ys Rd t r St rS nD il e We or t o Ra d r oa Ch Roads ap el S t City Street Ch a l pe County Road URP Properties Ci r North East St Greensboro Boundary 0 250 500 1,000 Feet City of Greensboro Urban Redevelopment Plan Old Mill 1st Ave Po u lan dS Buffalo S t Mill St t re et E Mill St N Laurel St Roads Spring St N W es t S t City Street County Road State Route URP Properties W North St Downtown Historic Depot Mill Village Old Mill Chestnut St N Main St Greensboro Boundary Spring St 0 250 W Green 500 e St E Green 1,000e St Feet Se c East 2nd St on d St re et e St City of Greensboro Urban Redevelopment Plan Reynolds Dr Terra c 3rd St na S Wa Oa k S t Ca an Cir St S E as t S t l nut Foster St an C ir Re y no lds Dr C ana er St SR ac he lS t EW al k EW Roads URP Properties City Street Reynolds Dr State Route Greensboro Boundary County Road Canaan Cir ilso nS t re et 0 125 250 500 Feet Appendix C Greensboro Better Hometown Program Plan of Work FY11 Greensboro Better Hometown Program Plan of Work FY11 Organization Task Number Target Completion Date Task Task Responsibility BHT Budget O1 December Complete and maintain an updated Downtown Property Inventory. BHT -0- O2 Year-long Continue the “Goings in Greensboro” monthly newsletter. BHT -0- O3 February Facilitate an Arbor Day Tree Planting.* Tree Board -0- O4 Year-long Make recommendations to city based on the professional arborist report and tree plan for public trees in Greensboro.* Tree Board -0- O5 Year-long Implement an Urban Redevelopment Plan and/or Enterprise Zone, Opportunity Zone for the city and downtown area. BHT/NEGRC TBD O6 Year-long Facilitate relationship between City, DDA, and the Greensboro Business Association BHT -0- * Denotes item carried over from FY 10 Plan of Work. Page 1 of 5 Greensboro Better Hometown Program Plan of Work FY11 Design Task Number Target Completion Date Task Task Responsibility BHT Budget D1 December Establish a holiday lighting contract for downtown and facilitate the decoration of the downtown area for the winter holiday season.* BHT/City $13,000 D2 June Partner with the Greensboro Business Association to encourage participation from downtown businesses in the new pedestrian signage. BHT/GBA -0- D3 June Maintain landscaping around new Gateway Signs. City -0- D4 Year-long Continue the façade grant program.* Historic Preservation Commission/DDA -0- D5 Year-long Facilitate design requests from prospective buildings owners.* BHT/DCA -0- D6 Year-long Maintain the downtown hanging baskets.* BHT/City -0- D7 Year-long Serve as city staff for the Greensboro Historic Preservation Commission. BHT -0- * Denotes item carried over from FY 10 Plan of Work. Page 2 of 5 Greensboro Better Hometown Program Plan of Work FY11 Promotion Task Number Target Completion Date Task Task Responsibility BHT Budget P1 October Host a Downtown Trick-or-Treat event that will be child-friendly and beneficial to the downtown merchants.* BHT/GBA $1,000 P2 May-August Partner with the Greensboro Business Association to produce a series of third Saturday events: May - August BHT/GBA $4,000 P3 September Partner with the Classic Cruisers Car Club to produce the Cruise In. BHT/CCC $4,000 P4 December Create and promote a Christmas sales promotion/downtown holiday event.* Promotion Committee $2,000 P5 April Host the 13th Annual Southland Jubilee downtown festival.* SJ Steering Committee $5,000 P7 Year-long Continue successful co-op advertising relationships with Treasures Along I-20 and Georgia’s Lake Country.* BHT Manager $3,000 P8 Year-long Work to have downtown Greensboro included as part of the product that is promoted through the Greene County Tourism committee’s Lake Oconee marketing efforts.* BHT Manager -0- P9 Year-long Maintain Downtown Greensboro’s facebook page with regular updates. BHT Manager -0- P10 November Update and reprint the Downtown Greensboro Shopping Guide brochure. BHT Manager $5,000 Page 3 of 5 Greensboro Better Hometown Program Plan of Work FY11 Economic Restructuring Task Number Target Completion Date Task Task Responsibility BHT Budget E1 Year-long Plan for the implementation of Phase II Streetscape Improvements. BHT/City $85,000 (SPLOST) E2 October Submit an application for the next round of Transportation Enhancement Grant funding offered through GA DOT. BHT/City TBD E3 Year-long Assist in the implementation and management of the Phase III Streetscape Improvements as funded through an existing TE Grant. BHT/City E4 Year-long Support the Mill Condominium Project through the administration of the Brownfields Assessment Grant from the United States Environmental Protection Agency DDA/City -0- E5 Year-long Serve in an advisory and support role to the Festival Hall House Manager. BHT Manager -0- E6 Year-long Monitor the public opinion and future plans concerning a relocation of the Greene County court functions. DDA -0- E7 Year-long Bring ___ new restaurants and ____ new businesses to downtown.* BHT/DDA -0- E8 Year-long Provide Downtown Business Recruitment Packet to potential new businesses. BHT -0- * Denotes item carried over from FY 10 Plan of Work. Page 4 of 5 Greensboro Better Hometown Program Plan of Work FY11 Page 5 of 5