German hospital nurses` attitudes concerning evidence
Transcription
German hospital nurses` attitudes concerning evidence
Sektion für Forschung und Lehre in der Pflege German hospital nurses‘ attitudes concerning evidence-based nursing practice Anja Behncke, Katrin Balzer, Sascha Köpke Sektion für Forschung und Lehre in der Pflege Evidence-based practice (EBP) • Claim for EBP • • • • best research evidence patient values clinical expertise resources • Basis for implementation of EBP • use of effective nursing interventions in practice („research utilization“ RU) • Identification and elimination of potential barriers • e.g. nurses‘ attitudes and skills Anja Behncke 22.03.2013 Sektion für Forschung und Lehre in der Pflege Attitudes concerning EBP and RU • Squires et al. (2011) • Systematic Review: 108 publications concerning 60 instruments • High level of evidence-based practice • Nurses‘ attitudes concerning research important requirement for RU • Germany / Austria: Schnittger et al. (2012) / Breimaier et al. (2011) • Small regional surveys • Indicating negative attitudes concerning EBP and RU Anja Behncke 22.03.2013 Sektion für Forschung und Lehre in der Pflege Nursing training in Germany • Currently mostly 3-year vocational training • Research council (2012) and science council (2012) • Need for scientific education for nurses • Academic nursing training necessary to maintain suitable care (i.e. EBP) • Own motivation • Obvious need for adequately trained nurses in direct patient care at our University hospital (UKSH) • Currently planning of a Bachelor-programme for „Advanced Nurse Practitioners“ Anja Behncke 22.03.2013 Sektion für Forschung und Lehre in der Pflege Aim of the study To assess • nurses‘ attitudes concerning EBP and RU • nurses’ evaluation of different prerequisites for EBP • current status of implementation of EBP • nurses‘ attitudes concerning academic training • prerequisites to start academic nursing training Anja Behncke 22.03.2013 Sektion für Forschung und Lehre in der Pflege Methods Multi-centre survey in Northern Germany • Literature review • Questionnaire development • Items or subscales of validated instruments (EROS instrument, Parahoo instrument, Estabrooks instrument) • Own items • Pretest • 4 experts (cognitive interviews) • 2 wards with 21 participants (feasibility) Anja Behncke 22.03.2013 Sektion für Forschung und Lehre in der Pflege Methods • Aim: 20 hospitals with approx. 80 wards • Hospitals were randomly selected from hospital directories, stratified according to number of hospital beds and federal state • Wards were selected by hospitals managers • Participants: Nurses and trainees who were on duty during a predefined week Anja Behncke 22.03.2013 Sektion für Forschung und Lehre in der Pflege Results: Response • 21 participating hospitals (of 37 invited) • 92 wards • 1,384 nurses response 1,023 questionnaires (74%) Anja Behncke 22.03.2013 Sektion für Forschung und Lehre in der Pflege Demographic data (n=1.023) Age (mean years±SD) 39.3±11.5 Registered since (mean years±SD) 16.4±11.3 Advanced training (n) 335 (33.5%) Education level 9 years education 31 (3.1%) 10 years education 649 (64.7%) 12 years education 119 (11.6%) 13 years education 204 (20.3%) Anja Behncke 22.03.2013 Sektion für Forschung und Lehre in der Pflege Sources of knowledge (Estabrook instrument) The knowledge that I use in my practice is based on … 91,4 personal experience 7,9 0,7 84 information about each patient/client 13,2 2,8 the information my fellow nurses share 77,8 20,5 1,7 16,8 30,5 articles published in nursing research journals 52,8 13,3 33,2 information I get from the media 53,5 13,1 30 articles published in medical journals frequently/always sometimes 56,9 0 10 rarely/never Anja Behncke 20 30 40 50 60 22.03.2013 70 80 90 100 % Sektion für Forschung und Lehre in der Pflege Research utilization (Parahoo instrument) Have you used current research in your practice during the last two years? 100 n=1.023 90 Breimaier et al. 2011 80 70 100 60 90 50 45.7 80 70 40 29.4 30 24.9 20 60 50 40 10 30 0 % n=974 86.8 yes no I don't know 20 13.2 10 0 % Anja Behncke n/a yes no 22.03.2013 I don't know Sektion für Forschung und Lehre in der Pflege Attitudes concerning EBP (EROS instrument: subscale ‘being on the leading edge’) 94.5 New ideas about clinical practice are exciting. 2.1 3.4 85.8 Keeping up with new information is an important part of my job. 8.1 6.2 85.6 I like to incorporate new ways of doing things into my clinical practice. 7.3 7.1 69.5 I am capable of developing new or revised treatments which will help clients. 13.6 17 69.2 I am looking for new information to help with my work 23.4 7.4 34.9 I am willing to use own money to attend a conference that interests me 0 rather valid/definitely valid rather not valid/definitely not valid Anja Behncke 52.6 12.5 20 40 I don't know 22.03.2013 60 80 100 % Sektion für Forschung und Lehre in der Pflege Requirements for EBP (own items): What do you need to establish EBP? nurses superior support 4.7 Nursing examination 4.6 advanced training to research 4.5 support by colleaques 4.4 support by medical colleaques 4.3 accesss to literature database 4.2 access to online-plattform with current scientific findings in nursing science 4.2 proportionate exemption for implementation of research findings 4.1 offer on EbN-courses 4 proportionate exemption to search for current research findings 3.9 regular meetings in journal clubs 3.8 long-time professional experiences 3.5 good command of English 1=irrelevant to 5=relevant (Mean±SD) 3.4 1 Anja Behncke 1.5 2 2.5 22.03.2013 3 3.5 4 4.5 5 Sektion für Forschung und Lehre in der Pflege Value and implementation of research (Parahoo instrument) Research often leads to real practical advances in nursing care. 3,7 Nursing should become a research-based profession 3,5 Research is no relevant to the real day-to-day work in nursing. 3,5 Nursing superiors support the implementation and use of research results into practice. 3,4 Nurses rarely use research findings in practice. 3,2 Nurses are too busy delivering care to spend time reading professional journals. 3,2 Nurses are too busy delivering care to incorporate research findings. 3,2 Most nurses are informed about research results. 2,3 Research is no relevant to the real day-to-day work in nursing. 2,3 Nursing is only relevant to nursing education, not to nursing practice. 1=is definitely not valid to 5=is definitely valid 2 1 1=definitely not valid to 5=definitely valid (mean±SD) Anja Behncke 1,5 2 2,5 22.03.2013 3 3,5 4 4,5 5 Sektion für Forschung und Lehre in der Pflege Academic nursing training (own item) I consider it important that it is now possible in Germany to achieve a bachelor of nursing degree together with a nursing certificate. 100 90 80 70 58.3% 60 50 40 30,9 30 23,4 20 10 27,4 13,2 5 0 % definitely not rather not valid valid Anja Behncke I don't know rather valid 22.03.2013 definitely valid Sektion für Forschung und Lehre in der Pflege Are you planning to start an academic nursing course during the next two years? (own item) 100 90 80 70 60 60 50 45 37 40 31 29 30 10 21 19 20 5 6 27 15 5 0 % no (study completed/ongoing) no, is out of question ≤ 39 years (n=494) Anja Behncke I don't know > 39 years (n=484) yes total 22.03.2013 Sektion für Forschung und Lehre in der Pflege Conclusion • Representative survey of nurses‘ attitudes in Northern Germany • Research is considered important for nursing practice • Discrepancy between readiness and implementation • Skills and knowledge limited • Academic programmes are rated important • 20% are planning to start academic courses (27% in younger participants) • Nursing education and training should focus on EBP by combining research and practical expertise Anja Behncke 22.03.2013 Sektion für Forschung und Lehre in der Pflege Thank you very much for your attention! Anja Behncke 22.03.2013