Theory of relaxation oscillations in semiconductor quantum dot
Transcription
Theory of relaxation oscillations in semiconductor quantum dot
!"#"" ! $& '()*)+ &*, -/& 0, ,- 1 2, ,*, 0& , ," / 3+ & 45)67&!89:7;6+ < #! Rate equations for photon and electron/ hole occupation in wetting layer (WL) and quantum dot (QD) states Microscopic approach to determine Coulomb scattering rates in InAs / GaAs QD lasers Strong relaxation oscillations (RO) on ps / ns timescale as observed in experiment Rate equations for electron density photon density in QD states: , hole density cavity loss, optical confinement factor, Quantum Dot density, spontaneous emission coefficient ' z-component and Bloch function ' . 72 Scattering rates '*;'= - / 4 5 Spontaneous emission: Normalization Area: Einstein coefficient: Induced emission: , and +;?7@ , 0 5 , 4 0 Timescales restricted by applicability of Markov approximation: occupation probability in e / h QD state Coulomb scattering rates with sum over WL state occupations with Evaluate matrix elements function and energy levels byby eigenfunctions harm. approximated approximated eigenfunctionsofof2D 2D harm. oscillator oscillator and and orthogonal orthogonal plane plane waves waves 0 . 20 7 20 7 :,>+9 9-2 / ( ' ( ' strong strongconfinement confinementby byinfinite infinitebarrier barriereffective effective well wellwidth widthapproximation approximation by separation of QD–WL system's wave : into in-plane component , 2 72 ( '*;'= - / 0 calculated up to 2nd order Coulomb interaction Lindhard equation screening: screening:2D 2Dstatic staticlimit limitofofdynamic dyn. Lindhard equation 2 background dielectric constant 2 3 :,>+9 9-2 / ' 2 Calculation of steady states of equations (1)-(5) ' ' 3 7 / 2 2 scattering rates artificially 10 - times reduced with and (a) Photon density 2 70 72 8 . WL occupation 2 9 2 70 3 < . 2 # 6 2 2 3 5 . 6 # 2 3 4 < 2 -/ < 4 2 5 6 # 3 2 2 -/ -/ turn-on delay of 0.8 ns 12.5 GHz relaxation oscillations 0 (b) QD carrier density (c) measured RO in QD structure 3 (Kuntz, Bimberg 2005) strongly damped RO 4 4 @ 7 $ + -2 / @ 0 good agreement with simulations 0 1 . 2 0 1 < 3 < 5 . 30 3 2 2 2.1 2.@ 2< 2<2 2 2< 7 6 +-2 / Parameters : # 6 72 2 7 8-2 / 4 5 0 9 7 equations (1)-(5) with injection current ( 2 8-2 / 7 72 7 rate equations for WL electron density and hole density : in QD fed by 70 = > , 5 hole and electron levels ?86(8-/-2 / / 7 6 -2 0 $ +-2 / ( 2 characteristics 2 2 7 $ + diode – laser typical :,76 +- ' 2 6 -2 / 7 0 -2 / Laser: weak δ - like perturbation '*;- 72 / system (1) – (3) with fixed scattering rates 0 . 1 2 !"# "$ $%& '& #! !() * # $+, -./ 2 3