Clippings / Assorted Press (PDF 7956K)
Transcription
Clippings / Assorted Press (PDF 7956K)
Tim Walsh: Painting of uncertain places, This is tomorrow. Contemporary Art Magazine, 09/2012. this is tomorrow - Painting of Uncertain Places Home About Contact Projects Links Advertise + Share London Birmingham Venice Berlin Paris LA Vienna New York Brussels http://www.thisistomorrow.info/viewArticle.aspx?artId=1458 Search Contemporary Art Magazine Frankfurter Kunstverein, Steinernes Haus am Römerberg, Markt 44, 60311 Frankfurt am Main, 10 Sep 2012 Painting of Uncertain Places Europe North America Solo Group Biennale Art Fair Fierce Festival Artist Profile Artist Interview DRAF Shop Shop: Editions Shop: Publications Camden Arts Centre Jerwood Visual Arts Painting Sculpture Installation Photography Performance Architecture Curation Video Sound Drawing Broadcasting < 1 / 12 > Artist : Tilo Baumgartel Title : Der Sturm Date(s) : 2008 Dimensions : 210x350 cm Material : Oil on canvas Website : www.fkv.de Jan 2014 Dec 2013 Nov 2013 Oct 2013 Sep 2013 Aug 2013 Jul 2013 Jun 2013 May 2013 Apr 2013 Mar 2013 Newsletter email address Subscribe Credit : Courtesy Von der Heydt-Museum Wuppertal, Dauerleihgabe Sammlung Ültzen, Bremen Photo: Uwe Walter, Berlin; © Tilo Baumgärtel und galerieKleindienst Like 7 Tweet 1 4 Painting of Uncertain Places Review by Tim Walsh In 2003, Frankfurter Kunstverein presented the work of fifty young German painters in the exhibition ʻDeutschemalereizweitausenddrei.ʼ The show aimed to represent a generationʼs new optimism for a traditional medium, as well as the varied influences the works invoked. In the accompanying press release a move ʻback to paintingʼ in Germany was referenced, alongside the mediumʼs ongoing social concerns – its capacity for political subversion and ʻhistorical potential for critique and reflection.ʼ[1] What this show recognised was that painting lived brightest when powered by multiple influences and concerns – which ultimately fuels good art. It also recognised that the market and the work could no longer be untethered – some of the most powerful and political German paintings have achieved in both the market and the mind. We need only think of Anselm Kieferʼs ʻSulamithʼ (1983) or Gerhard Richterʼs ʻOctober 18, 1977ʼ series (1988) to understand the sort of social and fiscal fusion paintings with an emotional core can achieve. Some sixty artists or so exhibited in ʻDeutschemalereizweitausenddrei,ʼ with big names of today like Katharina Grosse and Corinne Wasmuht, hiding in the ranks at the time. Flash forward almost ten years, and the Frankfurter Kuntsverein is staging another survey exhibition focusing on contemporary painting. Beyond this premise, ʻMalerei Der Ungewissen Gegendenʼ (ʻPainting of Uncertain Placesʼ) 2012 shares little in common. Only four artists are shown – Tilo Baumgärtel, Susanne Kühn, Antje Majewski and Hannes Michanek – and each present figurative paintings that depict moody, isolated and despondent worlds. The opening works depict a vacuum of blue sky and pastoral landscapes by Frankfurt-based Hannes Michanek. In ʻFleshclouds (The discovery of indistinct enlargements and obviousness of things)ʼ (2008), we see a suited boy or young man, squatting in the crevasse of a toy-like countryside. Dwarfed by the immense presence of the figure, houses puff smoke from small chimneys; in the windows scenes play out discordant to outside. In the foreground, minute people stand apart indifferently. In ʻWarm milk (foam ghosts)ʼ (2011) 1 of 2 13.01.14 14:27 this is tomorrow - Painting of Uncertain Places http://www.thisistomorrow.info/viewArticle.aspx?artId=1458 Michanek succeeds more by widening the scale and complicating his composition – dark skies, and the orb of a full moon breaking through parted storm clouds, help to push the mood to a spookier level. Leipzig-based and Arno Rink-taught Tilo Baumgärtel presents a mixture of large canvases, as well as charcoal, pastel and ink drawings. ʻDer Sturmʼ (2008) takes pride of place and is a nice example of Baumgärtelʼs talent for creating dark and complex works. We look outwards from the husk of a modernist pavilion – paint peels from raw concrete walls, light from a single bulb illuminates dry grasses and strewn rubbish on the floor. In the corner two figures huddle together, one with a lit cigar pressed to his mouth. At the edge of the room a hooded figure sits with a dog, looking outwards as bolts of lightning strike the horizon. We witness a scene of urban collapse; disorder seems to rule. Small scenes play out across the picture, but never appear interrelated or dependent. This incoherence unsettles the viewer, destabilising any clear narratives and generating a sense of the uncanny. In ʻDie Nachtwacheʼ (2011) a naked, red-glowing figure perches on top of a tree stump with a conquistador helmet on his head. At his feet, two naked figures appear to either fight or fornicate. Stray animals lurk at the edge of the light, circling the central scene with lit eyes. Works like these recall that of Nigel Cooke, riffing off his ability to disperse focus across the picture plane: multiple scenes exist within the same composition, vying for attention. Based in Freiburg (but taught too in Leipzig like Baumgärtel), Susanne Kühnʼs work mixes alpine scenery with interiors that directly reference the rigid perspectives of Northern Renaissance painters like Jan van Eyck and Jan Vermeer. In Kühnʼs canvases, contemporary figures (generally youths with gloomy faces and dressed in street wear) stand in the foreground, enveloped by twisting and breaking geometries. Kühn seems particularly taken with van Eyckʼs ʻThe Arnolfini Portraitʼ (1434): a copy hangs in the background of ʼDie Arnolfinis (Green – The Arnolfinis)ʼ (2011) and a replica of its iconic interior dominates the right side of ʻBesuch (Visit)ʼ (2012). In the centre of the gallery space is another of Kühnʼs works - a free-standing, modular construction that seems at once influenced by a Scandinavian design aesthetic and an altar piece (like those made famous by Rogier van der Weyden). This work, ʻModulʼ (made in collaboration with the Belgium architect Inessa Hansch) (2012) includes two painted panels within, functioning as a contemporary rethink of the outmoded religious relic – reborn as a lifestyle device. Antje Majewski, a Berlin-based artist, fills the last two spaces and is the only artist of the four also to have exhibited in the Frankfurter Kuntsvereinʼs previous painting exhibition in 2003. Here, in 2012, Majewski shows two quite different series. In the first space, slender, propped canvases stand just taller than human height. Ancient trophies carved from clay or bone drift in front of lazuli blue backgrounds. On the right wall hangs a Neolithic Venus figure or proto-human form. The thin, vertical and free-standing canvases push the works into a more sculptural role, toy with figurative qualities thanks to their scale, and intrigue through their incongruity. The next space, ʻTans RGBCMYKʼ (2009) is composed of multiple canvases, sculptural pieces on the floor, and a loose web of colourful extension cords that arc across the room. In the corner stands a small screening room for a video work, ʻThe Nestʼ (2012), the floor of the structure filled with coarse sand. In ʻThe Nestʼ we see a lone figure as they move from their studio, out into the night. In their hand they hold a spotlight, connected to the studio by a long line of power cords. The spotlight drifts across different scenes shadows fall within bins, light and dark curdle in dank alleyways and the pitch black is pierced by bright flashes. This is the symbol of the artist as explorer, determined to bring up new forms that pry away from familiar ground. ʻPainting of Uncertain Placesʼ sets out to argue for figurative paintingʼs ongoing validity and capacity to do things abstraction canʼt, such as functioning “as a space for rumination…as bearers of broader ideas.”[2] However, in actuality the show seems more determined to present four separate surveys rather than grappling with its own central premise. Ultimately, the curator seems to justify the worksʼ presumed absence of meaning as creating a vessel for self-projection, allowing them to be “negotiable or indefinite.”[3] By these terms, each artist, through their technical proficiency, succeeds at creating beguiling and engaging worlds. [1] Frankfurter Kuntsverein ʻDeutschemalereizweitausenddreiʼ http://www.fkv.de/frontend_en /archiv_ausstellungen_detail.php?id=36 (Accessed 4 September 2012) [2] Ibid [3] Ibid 2 of 2 13.01.14 14:27 Jens Kassner: Eigentlich Romantiker, Leipziger Volkszeitung (LVZ), 01/2014. Xamou Art: Tilo Baumgaertel the New Leipzig school artist, Xamou Art, 08/07/2012 Tilo Baumgaertel the New Leipzig school artist http://www.xamou-art.co.uk/tilo-baumgartel-the-international-... artists art services art movements art galleries art museums type in your search artists a – c artists d – f artists g – i artists j – l artists m – o artists p – r artists s – u artists v – x artists y – z Taken for a ride - but a very fine one indeed Fernkurs: Kreatives Malen Share Share Share Share More Tweet Like 0 www.akademie-fuer… Tilo Baumgärtel the international artist from Leipzig Fernlehrgang zum kreativen Malen und Zeichnen. Alle Infos hier! Characteristically, the painter Tilo Baumgärtel depicts spaces with an undercurrent of tension and loneliness. The compositions might at first appear linear narratives as loaded with minimalist fragments but they are everything but. There is this eerie Edward Hopper-like quality to his works as one key ingredient, though Hopper never did it 100% like that. Then another ingredient is the expressive use of colour rarely seen elsewhere. In Hydroplane you see duo-tone areas clearly creating associations to printed materials. That is stuff faded unevenly due to exposure of too much direct sunlight. It is like a printed poster left a decade or so in a shop window with the magenta and yellow burned away. It is as if there is no life, and a sense of decay. The boat in this ‘would-be’ East German landscape is realistically painted, but the idyllic scene is disturbed by the fact that the house is submerged in water. His paintings can be full of colours, and yet he is a master of combining them in ways that display a lifeless dullness quite deliberately. He is perhaps a master of capturing the former east block with- or without being conscious of it. Google-Anzeigen Up untill 1989, the whole nation could do with a lick of paint. Count in houses, garden gates, windows, train carriages; the lot. The uneasy feeling of the party keeping tab on everything, and things not being everything they appeared to be, are all factors visible in his art. However, it is worth mentioning that his expression probably would have been as allowed and encouraged by the former regime, as it is with the current. Much of the ‘old or original Leipzig school did their own cutting edge and ambivalent work we now mount in exhibitions. enigmatic visual riddles Anoyther of Bamgärtel’s works ‘Wartezeit’ (waiting time) displays a lonely bus shelter. The trailing plant is looking like a person waiting, and the very presence of the plant suggest no one human comes and sits there very often, but it might also suggest that nature takes over from the concrete. A third painting features (amongst other things) a step ladder plonked down outside. But it is somehow leading out of the picture frame, leaving you wonder what’s hanging above. A pitch black figure is sitting besides, but painted flat solid colour almost like a silhouette. It is this experience of being sent on a picnic. On your way to the agreed location, you find out the that edge of the 1 of 2 13.01.14 14:29 Tilo Baumgaertel the New Leipzig school artist http://www.xamou-art.co.uk/tilo-baumgartel-the-international-... world is constantly being extended with the aid of holograms, plasterboard and chewing gum. It is as if you are being told to crawl up a lightbeam knowing full well that the light might be turned off. His work are best summed up as enigmatic visual riddles. They are somewhere between reality, dream or nightmare, and yet you are not allowed to call it surreal – because however good – the surreal of Dalí and Magritte comes with a heavy cargo. One which consists of art historical referencing and cross referencing that is a suffocating blow to contemporary artists by instantly labelling them as anachronisms. The track record The German artist Baumgärtel has been a rising star for some time. He has a strong work ethics and several good solo exhibitions under his belt. The exhibit venues chosen have been everything from the predictable European home turf to further afield such as China, South Korea and the US. His works have already been collected by Saatchi, Arken and Von der Heydt Museum, and he has been honoured with the award Sachsen Kunstpreis. Tilo and the New Leipzig School Born in 1972 in Leipzig, Tilo Baumgärtel is one of a few representatives of what is increasingly known as the New Leipzig School of painting in the same generations as Neo Rauch. As with so many artists before him, the journey towards art has been less than straightforward. Talent alone is never enough in art, and you have to make ends meet before you can turn professional. Hence, Tilo chose first to train as a skilled machine technician. He later enrolled in the local art academy: Hochschule für Grafik und Buchkunst in Leipzig. There he studied under the influence of Arno Rink amongst others. Somewhere along his academy days he turned professional and has been ever since. Article: Tilo Baumgärtel the international artist from Leipzig Associate: AD Published: Tuesday, 7th August 2012 Last edited: 22nd October 2012 news advertise partnerships be the first to know name 2 of 2 email post your event contact about rss receive updates from us Read our cookie policy 13.01.14 14:29 Katinka Fischer: Erotischer Akt in ungewissen Gegenden; Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung (FAZ), 07/27/2012 Erotischer Akt in ungewissen Gegenden Nach langer Pause stellt der Flanldurter Kunstverein wieddr Malerei aus. Vier Kinstler zeigen Arbeiten. Von Katinka Fischer Fiir dje Gegenwart Ma3gebliches scheinr Gegenwartslunsl nur noch mir dbn als neu bezeichneten Medien tra$po*ieren zu k6Imen. Das lie0€ sich aus der Tatsache folgem, dass seit der let?ten Malerei-Ausstellimg im Frankfurter Kunslvercin neun Jah€ \r'eigangen sind. Mt seiner aktuell€n Schau wil Dl€ktor Holger Kube'Veotuia da8 klessische lblelbild r.od dem lnag€ befreien. zu nah arn I'lark, zu derdrna- ckid, zu museal zu s€in. Ausgewiiblt hat er dafiir Arb€iten lnn vier zwischen 1958 und 1979 gebor€nen Kiinstlem, dil den Eindruck vemitteln, dass es hitdsta Zeit rer dem Tit€l ,Mal€rei der Ger-run Senden" frlllen monunental,e das gaiz€ St€in€me tlaus. Platz um (Eurr€s 6fhen und erklrmen zu nen, wie dezidiert die auf Fragen der GegenwErt reieren, sich dabei im Zeieeist zu verfsngen. Ilarmes Michdek etw malt Monrm€nt.lw..lc TiIa BarmBAtuLe Gemdld. an R.mbmndl R.mbra ll "Di. Na.hitache. erinnen enfetu atch a, nen Schlihs€l zu seinen Bild-ldeen mit, wenn er in Hinterhdfe, Abbruchhiuser oder hinter funkionslo€e Mauem blickt, uro sich r€rmummte Gestalten heben Nackten au0ralten, es also kalt und hei0 Viel weiter zurock veMist unterdee sdmften. Zllsleich wnken ZenEifugal- Antje Majewski. Lr Form ihrcr in der Gegenwan etrtstandenen AbbilduDgeo begesnen sich - endlid? - eine 40 0m Jahre alte venus und eh 8Om Jslre jnngercr Phalls- elren rich n,,mfiillen.l. lnstallatione; mt Faft theorie auseinander, kef& auf geometris.he Elemenre, die in schaften, in denen geom€tsische rung auf freie Virtuositat Eifft, tiit auf Miniatur, Weite auf Enge, Bl Uit auf Idylle und doch all6 in alle tungen auseioanderzufl iefi en srheinr. sir tiviert die Olsemnld€ d€l Stiidr solventen von ganz pers6nliche$ E nissen und biographischen Details, denen Betrachter irn Normaffal nichts fahren. Doch nan muss lediglich hi.sehen, um Fotzdem zu dass es in di€sen Bildem lor allem um b€n, Nicht-Haben und die der gemdten nusion mdgliche dl48 dies6 Kh.trt Seht. S.tF. sd niirr liofcn S.hflcr Ttlo Baungirt€l rus L€ipzit zugleich sein muss, \rro Affenw€sen leben und surreale Dingc passieren, sich €twa ein Arm in eine Wofsknlle r€rwandelt. Im Ungewissen bleibt nicht nur d€r Orr. Man fragt sich auch, wann sid dies€ Szenen eretnen, die einen Zustand entwed€r lor oder nach al€r Zeil abarbilden, jedoch nicht all€r Zei! emhoben scheinen. Die Rembnndt-Replik in seiner "Nachtwach€" wei$ Baumgiirtel jedenJalls als in der Ges.hichte vennkert.Ds sen tseffen mit Form, Farbe und oeb€nsgroBer) Fisur die Urthenen der Mslerci auf die Urthemen der Menschhei! Liebe und Erotik. So isl schlieBlich die MaleEi elbst der erctische Akt. Sehr konhele, wie ntt einen Architekturprogramm am Comput€r entworftne R?iume l6sen sich in S sanne KnhDs Bildem auf in unvrirklich leuchtende land- derhoch geordneter Fornation nber die (mnche whbeln. Die Alten Meister hat audr die FYeibureerin im Blick, wenn sie B Eltks benlhmte Arnofini-Hochzeit in z€iigedlssis.he Aslhenk nbers€tzt und es sicb wieder einmal zeigt,_dais es Jan van Gegpn*€n ohne Ces.hichre nicht gibt und es gut ist, wDnn mall dies€ G€schichte kermt. Dl. lcrr.iune 44, diue.t im franktuier &nr.€rein, ru,k arm 16 S€pcmber und ln dienrtags, donn€6ta$ und ieitags bn I I bh 19, minwhs rcn I 1 bls 2l ro{ie $mr.$ und sonniags wn 10 bis 19 Uhr gEoftr€r bls Christoph Tannert: Tilo Baumgärtel, Vitamin P2. New perspecitves in painting, 2011, Phaidon, 48-49. -.c tsA-l,,GAt;=_ Tilo Baumgärtel seems to have alignec - s =lE-'es option society'as Peter Gross calls it. referri,rg to :-e ,',a-' large sections of society have dispensed with the concept of sal "ation. Representatives of this exlstence appear slack and voiceless, thrust involuntarily into a particular and often peculiar set of circumstances - slumped on the ground in a makeshitt campsite next to an amphitheatre, or sharing a cigarette with an Eskimo during a thunderstorm, for example. The characters in his paintings thus appear strangely inactive - lethargic perhaps, or simply without purpose. Baumgärtel is not a social analyst, but he is a realist when it comes to his own inner worlds - there is something down-to-earth and believable about the strange scenarios he concocts. His worldly yet unworldly approach is reflected in deliberately neutral yet curiously retrospective attire - his characters regularly appear in period costume from one era or anothen This, however, is only a trick to liberate himself from rules and norms. He sometimes leaves realism behind and gets closer to fantasy when he turns to exaggeration as a strategy, whether in the form of an oversized animal or a figure verging on caricature. Some commentators describe his style as fairy-tale, while others say it is nostalgic. His aim, however is serious engagement. During an interview in 2oo8 he declared to me,'l see myself as a hinge between people asking questions on all levels, and as an agitator who presents his findings and tries to capture madness, beauty, questionable things and strange things in pictures in order to create a certain resonance.' He also likes to incorporate a little irony into his pictures, perhaps to make his messages less indigestible. For fun, he brings everyday objects absurdly to life - quite literally in the drawn animation films that he creates alongside his paintings. Baumgärtel thinks in filmic and theatrical terms, and his staged spaces have an extraordinary unity as painterly compositions. Within his complex pictorial arrangements, his figures are exposed in their isolation. They are shown in interior and exterior spaces, frozen mid-step as they realize that they have entered at the wrong time. They wait on staircases and in hallways, on beaches and wharfs; they meditate at writing desks or pianos or blow their psychoplasm pensively at the moon, always with unmoved faces (some reveal their dreams and yearnings, floating above their heads in the kind of speech bubbles found in comics). The pictorial spaces that Baumgärtel creates are like memories and fantasies torn from their proper homes, offering visions of incipient decay or a looming downfall - we can't help but feel we are looking at the visualization of someone's worst-case scenario. This unsettling world is one of beguiling possibilities - of the dark, of threatening incidents, or of the menace of something unforeseen that enshrouds the figures in their post-catastrophic surroundings. Baumgärtel's paintings have considerable affinity with the great decades of the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries - the spirit of Max Klinger; Arnold Böcklin and Edvard Munch with a leavening of Giorgio de Chirico. The contemporary relevance of his work is anchored in his respect for tradition and in a sense of rootedness within it. He has thrown the window of memory wide open and made the past contemporary. - Christoph Tannert Woadwoy,2oog Oil on canvas 30x40 cm About the Showtime (Über die Vorste/ Oil on canvas 210 x 3OO 2. 048 lu ng), 2oo8 cm he Dependent lndependent, 2oo9 IheTempest,2ooS T Oil on canvas Oil on canvas 210x350 cm 21Ox3OO cm Hans Werner Schmidt: Begegnung mit Tilo Baumgärtel, SpinArt, 04/2011. 1 Begegnung mit Tilo Baumgärtel Im Dezember 2000 bin ich zum ersten Mal den Bildern von Tilo Baumgärtel begegnet. Es ist eine von Studenten der Hochschule für Grafik und Buchkunst organisierte Ausstellung in Steibs Hof gewesen – eine temporäre Kunstpräsenz in einem städtischen leerstehenden Areal, organisiert nach den Maßgaben einer Produzentengalerie. Rückschauend mag mir dies als Paradebeispiel Leipziger Kunstpraxis erscheinen. Im Folgejahr besuchte ich den Künstler in seinem Atelier – und erwarb ein Werk für das Museum der bildenden Künste. Dies sorgte hausintern aber auch beim Künstler und dessen Kollegenkreis für eine gewisse Irritation. Wie sollte ein damals 29-jähriger Caspar David Friedrich, Max Klinger und anderen Großmeistern im Museum begegnen? Das Bild „Begegnung“ entwickelte einen Sog, mich immer mehr einsehen zu müssen. Zuerst ist da die Fassade eines mächtigen Hauses, dessen Nutzung sich sicherlich nicht über private Heimeligkeit bestimmen lässt. Keines der Fenster ist erleuchtet, dagegen taucht ein Illuminationspektakel, ein Zusammenspiel von Nordlicht und bengalischem Feuerwerk, die Schneelandschaft in einen psychedelischen Farbenzauber. Die weiße Pracht hat die Landschaft üppig bedeckt – und kreative Geister haben den Eingangsbereich des verschatteten Hauses humorvoll mit einem Schneemonster erweitert, das durch seinen geöffneten Mund zum Eintritt auffordert. Unweit davon ist ein Fahrzeug in einer Schneewehe stecken geblieben. Was des einen Freud, ist des anderen Leid. Eine Gestalt bewegt sich davon fort und fixiert dabei eine ihm entgegenkommende Person. Beide Figuren sind vom gleichen Farbfluss „gezeichnet“ und so prononciert, wie die sanft sich auftürmenden Schneewehen. Die „Begegnung“, hier in deutlicher Distanz arrangiert, bleibt offen: Annäherung oder Konfrontation? Verweisen die dunklen Schatten im Vordergrund auf Zeugen, oder haben alle den Ort angesichts der „Schneekatastrophe“ verlassen? Ein Wort, das einem durch den Schlagzeilen orientierten Journalismus leicht über die Lippen geht, wobei die Schreckensdimension einer Katastrophe ausgeblendet zu werden droht. Die hiesigen Winter 2009 und 2010 sorgten – selbst in der Stadt – für einen katastrophenfreien Stillstand. Die weiße Pracht kaschierte alle urbanen Unzulänglichkeiten, minimierte den urbanen Geräuschpegel Richtung Ruhezone und forderte die Passanten in Flaniermeilen auf, sich einen Weg zu bahnen. Seit zehn Jahren stellt mir das Bild immer wieder neue Fragen und es gibt mir stets neue Antworten. 2 Baumgärtels Figuren haben es meist schwer, voranzukommen. Neben den Schneewehen sind es oft morastiges Gelände oder schilfumsäumtes Sumpfland, das den Bewegungsabläufen hinderlich ist. Das Fortkommen ist nur den (wenigen) Akteuren gegeben, die über das Vermögen verfügen, sich in einen Schwebezustand zu transferieren. In den geräuscharmen Zonen treffen wir auch auf vielerlei Arten des Müßiggangs. Bei Baumgärtel begegnen wir Schlafwandlern, Tagträumern und SichLiebenden. Diejenigen, welche aus den Trancegestimmtheiten ausscheren, mögen zwar über eine dynamische Ausstrahlung verfügen, doch der Zweck ihres Tuns und das Ziel, auf das sie orientiert sind, bleibt im Nebel, wie soviele Horizonte in Tilo Baumgärtels Landschaften. Die Ruhe, welche aus den Bildern wie ein gering dosiertes Narkotikum in den Raum zwischen Betrachter und Werk dringt, ist oft eine trügerische. Die anscheinend leer gefegte Straße wirkt wie die Piste für einen gleich um die Ecke biegenden Amokfahrer. Die sich den Hang hocharbeitende Bergsteigertruppe ahnt noch nichts vom kommenden Lawinenunheil. Die rustikale Bebauung entlang der Dorfstraße schirmt die Öffentlichkeit von den privaten familiären Tragödien hinter den Fassaden ab. Doch wer sind diese Lebewesen, denen Baumgärtel zu ihren Auftritten verhilft? Es sind Menschen, die sich ansatzweise in einem Mutationsprozess zu Comic-Figuren befinden. Das heißt über karikierende Elemente sollen Wesenszüge augenscheinlich werden. Baumgärtel bevorzugt dabei ein Alter, das selten über den Teenager-Status hinausgeht. Und die treffen dann auf anscheinend zum Leben erweckte Kuscheltiere, denen man auf Augenhöhe begegnet. Diese Mensch-Tier-Zusammenkünfte finden oft an Orten deutlicher Verwahrlosung statt, wobei die hier Auftretenden Gleichmut demonstrieren. Aufgegebene Laubenansiedlungen, dem Stadtorganismus durch Trassenführung verlorengegangene Bezirke, still gelegte Industrieareale sind die vom Künstler bevorzugten Terrains – Unorte. Tilo Baumgärtel äußert sich wie folgt über seine Akteure: „In den Comics von Robert Crumb merkt man irgendwann gar nicht mehr, dass dort kleine Schweine oder Katzen agieren. Mit so einer Normalität möchte ich damit umgehen. Tiere sind gute Erzähler, auch in Fabeln beispielsweise.“ (Leipziger Volkszeitung, 13.7.2007, S. 10). Das, was auf den ersten Blick wie eine Illustration, ein Szenenbild zu einer Fabel aussieht, ist eine von 3 Texten unabhängige visuelle Setzung. Der Bildbetrachter erfährt stattdessen die Aufforderung, nun als Autor das Bild einzubetten in seine ureigene Geschichte. In diesem Gedankenspiel sollte er ein nicht ganz einfaches Genre beherrschen. Der Künstler: „Ich versuche immer Tragikkomik zu erzeugen. Die Bilder wirken zwar oft unheimlich, aber ich habe den Humor im Blick. Ich amüsiere mich auch über meine Bilder.“ Vielleicht ist es doch einfacher, den Faden aus Tilo Baumgärtels Bildern fortzuspinnen. Tragikkomik ist ein gewichtiger Wesenszug unserer Wirklichkeit und müsste uns damit sehr vertraut sein. Hans-Werner Schmidt Tony Godfrey: The Leipzig school, Painting today, 2009, Phaidon, 370-389. PHAIDOI{ Painting Today v,, It. 413. Norbert Bisky Muck Spreader lD re cks ch I e u de l, 2O06. Oil on canvas,210 x 420 cm (823/a @m w#, x 165Y2in) 414. Wolfgan. {\,4attheuer Behind the Seven Mountains lHinter den sieben Bergen), efr Y\Yü 1 973. Oil on hardboard, 170 x 130 cm (67 x 51% in) l1 415. Neo Rauch Auiz,2OO2. Oil on canvas, 250 x -d .d-' The so-called'Leipzig School' has been described as 'the first art world phenomena of the twenty-first century' and 'the twenty-first century's first artistic phenomenon'. lt is 'the hottest thing on earth', we are told by Joachim Pissarro, a curator from the Museum of Modern Art, New York, and Neo Rauch 'is to the twenty-first century as Max Beckmann is to the twentieth century'. These are big claims! Historically, the importance of a movement, if it is one, is that it creates a paradigm shift, a great leap Various reasons have been given {or the continuing pre-eminence of German painting: that German society takes culture and collecting seriously; that the art school system works best in Germany, employing major artists and giving them a free hand to teach by example; that the trauma of the Third Reich and division between East and West has provided a need for art as analyst and healer First, one should add that we see in Germany a {ascinating paradox: a generally complacent society that neveftheless supports versions of traumas seen elsewhere. Many remain unconvinced, seeing these artists' work as nothing but a marketing ruse Germany has four myths about its nature and its future, each rich and replete with visual images. Firstly, concocted by a number of clever dealers, a {eeding frenzy for rich collectors grown desperate to have the latest thing. 'We're talking fin-de-siöcle ennui in the flesh the images represent no intellectual the Romantic German fixation on nature, often associated with Caspar David Friedrich; the racist, - helplessness, loss of utopias, their paintings tell of a standstill, of waiting for something vague.' Other its own critics generously; and second, one could obserue that the German traumas are just more intense militaristic dream of the failed painter Adolf Hitler and the Nazis; the socialist workers' paradise of the East German state, the DDR; and finally the" capltalist, Americanized fantasies of rich, industrial West Germany. Painting had (and has) a crucial part in embodying these four myths or visions. The reuni{ied Germany of the twenty-first century has no new equivalent visual myth, but the four old visions remain syndromes that no writers decry their melancholy, their loss of purpose, silence and passivity, how, 'with their set-meal offer therapy can suppress. For a German, images of nature, people and society cannot but have associations, o{ retro-socialist Surrealism all they really display is a certain kind of painterly skill coated in Teutonic ambivalence, with the political sting removed paintings packaged lii<g a de luxe brand, wirh a often conflicting ones. This was true of Baselitz or Kiefer and remains true of today! artists. discreet air of consensus and admiration.' Rauch, we told, 'invokes the ta-ste of German-ness, but he {ails to grasp the historical realities of the country and instead produces images that are as superficial as are they are mythical ... a confused sense o{ Germanic identity lacking any critical sensibility,. More than photography or film, painting where these four myths can co-exist, collide or 0 cm (9812 x 823/a in) Art, Los Angeles ,# .forwards; it changes the way we think, as lmpressionism or cubism did. Do the Leipzig artists Rauch, David Schnell, Matthias Weischer et a/. do this? threat whatsoever. They Iack youthful audacity, anger, ambiguity or allegorical sophistication', writes the critic Christian Schüle. 'Their appeal is a negative one, their meaninglessness touches a nerve of the present, 21 Museum o{ Contemporary is coalesce. Even those artists who, unlike Jonathan Meese or Daniel Richter, eschew a political position, cannot but let this happen. The inner contradictions of this myth-ridden country remain as constant but profitable irritations to a younger generation, even though they tend to look asl<ance at the earnestness a. a \p.t. ä 1' Painting Today with which that older generation of Baselitz et a/. engaged with 'German-ness'. As Norbert Bisky remarked, he and his contemporaries have their'feet in the muck, nose in the clouds'. lf we look at Bisky's phantasmagoric Muck Spreader, we see echoes of Friedrich, Fascist and socialist heroes (all Aryan blond) and capitalist advertising. but all now morphed into something new, simultaneously delirious andwry / +'tz /. Why Leipzig? There is the perverse romance of the place, which we would once have seen as the acme of the unromantic: dreary socialist housing, run- down factories and rotting military barracks. We see the conjunction of the new with the old: autobahns and McDonald's alongside the failed project of the DDR, There was the continuity of the Hochschule für Grafik und Buchkunst, where Wolfgang Mattheuer and Werner Tübke still taught and where students learned to draw in a traditional manner / 414 /, and where they would be asked to consider how Cranach solved figure-ground problems, rather than the theories of Derrida. 'The disadvantage of the Berlin wall was well known,' the director of the Hochschule, Arno Rink, ruefully mentioned, 'but if you want to talk of an advantage, you can say it allowed us to continue in the tradition of Cranach and Beckmann. It protected art against the influence of Joseph Beuys.' ln fact, many of the artists now associated with Leipzig came from the former West Germany, attracted by the chance to concentrate on painting, its traditional genres and techniques. The skill levels of these painters are, indisputably, exceptionally high. Neo Rauch is a little older than this new lauded (or hyped) generation and indeed helped teach them. His early success fed their ambitions and perhaps 'gave them permission'to follow their instincts and keep their touch light, unlike the older generation, with their paint clogged, all-so-serious canvases. We have considered Raucht paintings in terms of carnival, o{ the world turned on its head, but it is also wholly valid to see his paintings in terms of politics, especially when we *e,s pff remember that he trained in the 1980s to be a painter for socialist East Germany but graduated in 1990 in a united capitalist Germany. His painting Ouiz could be read as merely comic, but there is something more sinister about the man being quizzed or interuiewed, crumpled on his knee, head in hand / ats /. This is a bad dream: being asked to {it geometric shapes together while the interviewers mark you, as though in an ice-skating competition, and one ofthe shapes cheekily comes to life and stares at you. lt is wholly feasible to see this as an allegory of the Eastern worker flung into a Western workplace whose rules he does not understand and for which he has not been prepared. The painting, both in content and style, wobbles between bathos and pathos, between the modernity of television furniture and the homeliness (Gemüt/ichkert) of old-fashioned German houses. Painting Today People have often seen Rauch's paintings as 420. Thoralf Knobloch Diver (Springer),20O1. Oil oo 95 x 1 70 cm canvas, (37 Y2 x 67 t^) Ey e Co nt a c t lB I ckko n i ta k t), 2004. Oil and acry ic on canvas, 90 70 cm (35Y2 x 27 lz in) ' in my art that is based on my command of painting, the how empty such works were. This seems wrong. lt professional use o{ colour and technique.' Like is perhaps better to see his worl( as carnivalesque: for all his wit and japes, this is serious, solid art. He tells us 421. Tim Eltei ' 1 90 cm l102Yz x 783/a in) 423. Tim Eltel Hole (Grube),2008. Oil on canvas,221 187 * x 69Y2i^) 176.5 cm dream and consciousness, between reason and 'ltt unreason: ln this he is, perhaps surprisingly, very like Kiefer Rauch really explain this, I wouldn't have painted it.' New Drum Roiis (Neue Ro//en) seems to play on himsel{ wishes to see his work as timeless. Everything is grist to his mill. Boygroup,2003. Oil on canvas, a psychoanalyst, he rides in the liminal area between nothing directly about Germany, but in endlessly recycling its iirages he re{ive: Inuch of its recenL history. 422. Tim Eitel 260 inner conflicts in my work. There's a healing aspect pastiches of socialist realism or as demonstrations of I refrain both from any hierarchization and from this strange twilight zone between reason ancl irrationality where tlre ariist lrLrnts lor prey. lf i coi,ld the French Revolution: we see men lifting red Phrygian caps (the symbol of liberty in '1789) on their sabres, while in the background a figure sits on a guillotine / 416 /. ä conscrous evaluation of my pictorial inventory. This 'For me the {unction of paintings means that elements /ike Balthus, Vermeer, Tintin, .. Donald Judd, Donald Duck, agit-prop and cheap the actors on the stage.' lf he gets them on the stage, advertising garbage can flow together in a furrow of my he leaves them mid-scene, with the farce childhood landscape and generate an intermingled conglomerate of surprising plausibility. - is to work with myths .having set the fundamentals, the stage, I introduce - or tragedy unfinished. Things are always happening in Rauch's work, people are always making or searching but rarely completing or finding. ln one of his more diaThe metaphor he uses to describe himself as a painter grammatic, earlier paintings, Seeker, as a man searches 'l view myself as a kind of peristaltic filtration system in the river of time. I view the process of painting as an extraordinary natural form of for land-mines with a magnetic ring, Annunciation-like discovering the world, almost as natural as breathing', whether this beam is a quotation {rom a quattrocento Rauch says. Natural and therapeutic: 'l try to evoke painting or, like Roy Lichtenstein, frcm a carloon is an unusual one: : ,;;. 'llq';.':*i-.;.:-.-.:-. ---:. ." . a beam of light strikes the canvas waiting on an easel. It is typical of Rauchl ambivalence that we are not sure / 4'19 /. The Leipzig School 426. Eberhard Havekost Global Player,2OO4. Oil on canvas,280 x 145 cm (1O9 x 56 lz tn) Of the group of painters that have become brought up in the East, and it to waiting. is he who is closest to more readable: their spaces are more like those in this 427. lvlatthias Weischer Overhe ad Light lobetlicht), 2006. Oil and egg tempera on canvas, 1 20 x 1 50 cm @7% x 59 in) on'in a sitting-room. As so many of the dramatis personae in paintings by Rauch in creating such stage sets. But his stories are following pages: a television permanently left famous in Rauch! wal<e perhaps only Tilo Baumgärtel is truly similar. He is one of the few Leipzig 'stars' actually world, or those in films. lt seems often as though Leipzig ariists, the figures in Eitel! work are consigned Some of this mood of anomie I as to do with the way Eitel uses photographs as sketches, perfecting and abstracting them in the paintings. Stoic l'tz /. to direct storytelling like Rauch!, this painting suggests being on the point of philosophers lamented that we were but strangers in a world we had not made, and this is what Francis Bacon demonstrating some allegory shows us as strangers in the world that we have made. Hunting Lodge by the As David Schnell was finishing his painting Sea (Hütte am See) he painted out the legs of the tower from which hunters shoot game superimposed: the boys leave no footmarl<s in the sand as they wander off to the dunes / t22 /. Their wandering / +rs /. Likewise he did not paint in the leaves of the which he had calculated the painting's geometry. The is laddish, aimless, unlike the questing poets and pilgrims in Friedrich! paintings. 'l have no relationshlp to the countryside whatsoever', Eitel says. 'For me, the woods at the back, assumed euphoria, the elegiac, is rather an expression characters are waiting for something to happen / Although Baumgartel is closer bulrushes and left in all those compositional lines by lil<e the forests he often paints, often painted - man alienated in nature - but Eitel Even when they are seen in nature, his figures seem seem schematic, very different from the archetypal o{ {ailure. Since the romantic experience of nature Romantic German woods as painted by Caspar David does no longer work for me, God is not in every plant.' Friedrich. Schnell's paintings, for example his Flyover (Auffahrt) / see zg6 For Eitel, light is ambient, even and artificial /, seem to depict a model o{ the world rather than reality. ln the train stations of continental Europe one can often find a glass vitrine in which a beautifully made model landscape, often replete with historical buildings and wooded hills, is criss-crossed by trainlines. lnserting a 1 Euro coin will send the model trains moving round this landscape. Made with impressive detail by the Mäcklin Company, they present an innocent, immaculate world. Much of the appeal of the Leipzig painters to offer a 'Mäcklin'world. is the way they seem even nature seems illuminated by tungsten lighting. - Perhaps because this undramatic light is a constant condition in other paintings, his characters, like the undead in horror films, seem to cast no shadow; generally they are as unanimated as the plastic figures that wait at the platform for the Mäcklin train. Yet there is also an air of calm and beauty in his work, often, recently, accentuated by paintings that evoke the hour of twilight / 423 /. Perhaps his appeal is like ihat of the nineteenth-century fläneur, the man disengaged, window shopping and happy in his disengagement Partly this is because they often paint scenes in a world of spectacle. He makes manifest the strange as though they are an unfinished construction site, pleasure we can find in the anonymity and ubiquity partly it is because they are such conscious technicians of non-places, those museums, offices, municipal parks and partly it is because their work hovers between and airport waiting-rooms that lack defining figuration and abstraction. Schnell's canvases are characteristics. formally sophisticated, as satisfying as the best abstract It is a rare shock when, in his painting painting. His newest paintings demonstrate this Eye Contact, one concern with complex but coherent composition: there is greater improvisation, more unexpected colour museum turns and catches our eye / relationships, but above all there which museum it made painting / 424 is the sense of a well- /.Thedeeperappeal is in seeing ofthe women floating through the lzl /. Her expression tells us nothing. We cannot tell, as always, is - it could just as well be a computer simulation. The eye and the way it catches someone make a new world, not so much unreal as our own remind us that Eitel! world is perhaps parallel to our own. ln this world things are precise and balanced, despite also being strange: objects fly or parallel one and one that is inhabited. hover, it is very silent. Kobe seems to explore postmodern or cybernetic Like Schnelll work, the paintings of Tim Eitel a Like Julie Mehretu or Matthew Ritchie, Martin space, but in fact he never uses acomputer / +25 /. can be seen as nice but anonymous, elegant but une- He is fascinated by modern architecture, by what motional. Again this is slightly inaccurate.,People in Eitel's paintings wander through the museum and pose he terms 'the frozen beauty of urban situations. The elegantly in their everyday clothes. The geornetry of complex structures that he invents lceep breal<ing apart: the museum's architecture is represented meticulously, paint flows and drips: echoing Mondrian's grids - labyrinthine quality of rooms. The coldness.'These or those of some immacu- lately kept prison. Above all, they do not connect. While I paint the /ogistics of the room slip out of my Eitel rarely paints people looking at paintings: where control; the free play of painting is the precondition for paintings are shown, they are in the background, like things to gain in openness. ... While I paint I move like Painting Today a blind man through the structures I erect. ... tension that we get in the interior paintings of Vermeer, I repeatedly over-paint, destroy and question the that tease of eyes gazing or averted. lt is not so architecture that / sketch out. ... Painting and much that there is no-one in his interiors as that there architecture aim at something completely different, are no eyes inside the spaces animating them. These while I understand my form of work as 'core meltdown'. seem more like meticulous autopsies. Weischert early Freed,;m and play in opposition to structLrre are paintings often had a container, a caravan or suit of clothes that could stand as an equivalent of a figure. constant theme in Leipzig painting - a and elsewhere. ln more recent paintings, where people do emerge, One could see this as synonymous with the struggle they lack faces of the individual in society, or of an emotional being in awaiting the presence of life. Sometimes a mere a world dominated by cybernetics and geometry. The painters of Leipzig! rival town Dresden are presented as both cool analysts o{ pictorial problems and faithful recorders ofthe everyday as opposed to 'languishing in kitschy world-weariness painted in the manner of the Old Masters, like the Leipzig school'. Artists such as Thoralf Knobloch and Eberhard Havekost work from photographs. Knobloch's Diver / +zo / intriguing riposte to Hockney's A Bigger / see Spiash is an ro /: Hockney shows us a glamorous and eternally sunny - they are husks of people or shells fragment will appear: a leg, as in a crime scene, or both legs. Objects are key: if we seem strangers in this world that we have not made, it is nonetheless strangely familiar to us now because we have filled it with the things we have made. These may appear to be highly technical academic paintings, but to a greater degree these are paintings about how we attempt to make and inhabit our world.ln Overhead Light (Ober/icht) a man is seen in a top-lit art gallery, waiting, Knoblocht image, with its belly-flopping boy, lacks the bathing in the light, incompletely formed / +zt /. As always, tiny smears and snicks of paint forbid one ever to believe this is an illusion of reality. The lumpiness of the air of elegant sexiness that Hockneyt poolside paint at the edge emphasizes this. California, Knobloch a time-stained municipal pool. paintings have. But both play on the unreality of Like Schnell, Weischer uses the word 'play' painting: Hockney with his unpainted margin, Knobloch (in German, 'splei'): with his PollockesQue dribbles of green and white. Havekost sometimes refers to his pictures as At first I think abstractly in terms of the composition, 'user interfaces': the on-screen appearance of a computert operating system. Between 'reality' and the canvas is the camera and the computer. He laments that form and colour, and then I play around. lf I think then about how to continue, rather figurative images appear .he can no longer take holiday snaps: everywhere has been taken over by the media, so that our experience frequently, and set something new on the canvas. in my mind. Now I usually over-paint the picture of reality and of the imagery that mediates it seem to It is easy to criticize Weischerl work as cold have become synonymous. Havekost's work can be seen as a meditation on this state of affairs: living with and artificial, but his is a unique vision, and the skill and deliberateness with which he uses those smears and apparent loss of reality. The creative work or play for him is, first, in the preparation stage, when he adjusts as much attention and weight as the figurative elements. or distorts his starting image in Photoshop, and second, as he adjusts the painting, working 'like a plastic surgeon'. Although he sets the canvases up as places where we may find associations and sensation, they seem placeless: the faces have become generic or, as here, hidden - or protected / lzo /.lmpeccably painted, elegant, cold, the paintings seem to be of a world slipping into that abstracted land, Generica. But Havekost's intention is the opposite: 'Today . snicks are unparalleled. Such abstract marks are given It may also turn out that Weischer is the greatest colourist in German painting since Emil Nolde. When we look at his Memling, we may be first struck by the screen with the appended image by the Flemish parnter Hans Memling and the way Weischer's composition echoes Hockney! portrait of Henry Geldzahler / see og; a2e / . (As part of a scholarship Weischer went to work with Hockney.) We may also notice the other elements the skeletal hat-stands, - painting is a way to get closer to reality. To the reality that is detached from appearances, the counter-world, the world of thought.' To a far greater extent than earlier photorealism, his and Knoblocht work form which are strangely like Schnellt trees, and the a critique of the way we use representation. in counterpoint. work is One thing that is odd about Maühias Weischer's that he paints interiors like still lifes. When we look at still lifes by seveiieenth-century Dutch or Spanish artists, we see a stasis of composit;on and tremendous attention to detail. What we do not get in Weischert work is anything like the play of erotic ubiquitous drips and smears - but what dominates the painting and is in fact its heart or voice, is the vast expanse of blue, to which all the reds and yellows are As so often, this is a painting of the studio: on the one hand, we may say Weischer treats it like a computer screen on which things can appear and be dismissed or morphed, and yet it is also, above all, a homage to other great studio paintings by Vermeer or Veläzquez or Picasso. As with them, so here Painting Today a a t o I t l I the studio is a philosophical space where we can both embody the world and meditate on it. Furthermore one must emphasize how very physical these paintings are, how specifically they are made with paint: in places smooth, in places Iumpy, scratched and caressed. This of a virtual reality. is the very opposite Of the six graduates of the Leipzig academy who are normally cited as the key Leipzig artists (the others being Baumgärtel, Eitel, Kobe, Schnell and Weischer), Christoph Ruckhäberle is the one most fixated on human figures. When we consider that socialist realism was above all a painting of human figures enga'ged in making history, it is telling that Ruckhäberle shows figures almost wholly in private seclusiän. Often they are shown in rooms in groups doing nothing but waiting. ln Farewell (Abschied) we see an encounter group stuck in a banal flat / +zc /. The role of women in Leipzig painting has been questioned. People have asked why there are so few women painters in the Leipzig school, änd whether this is a boys' club, as German painting of the 1 980s was. 'First,' Baumgärtel has remarked, 'men seek sublimation in painting: women are too intelligent for that. And, second, there are women.' He refers, among others, to Rosa Loy, whose paintings, as if to make a point, have a greater irony than those of other Leipzigers. Like them, she takes surrealism, as seen in a painting such as Hiding Place, but her emphasis on creating a personal mythology is far greater: her work is less technical / +go Many people abhor contemporary painting for its lack of technical skill. Artists come out of art school lamenting they have not been taught such skills as many once complained that that was -.1ust all they were taught. The commercial success of Leipzig painting, much like recent Chinese painting, is due to its technical excellence: it looks difficult to /. do. When David Schnell says that for him going to Leipzig was like being 'thrown back into the nineteenth century', many would think 'Oh great, real skills at last!'although others would iaugh at such antediluvianism. (The display of technical skill, as for example in Japanese nihonga, is often seen as equivalent to kitsch.) ln Leipzig painting such skill has been turned to the service of both burlesque and a critical approach to representation. lt is too little noted that the school they went to was Hochschule für Gra{ik und Buchkunst, or the Academy for Graphics and Book Arts. ln the year 2000 nearly three times the number of students applied to do photography there as painting. What distinguishes the painting department is its antagonistic relationship with the photography department, not its privileged isolation. And what distinguishes the painters that come out of it is thejr need to negotiate with photography as a medium. The Leipzig School t'',. F:.; st.'r':r l '-,1-,-'.tir l:.t:., P.iJr;i"-'r. i:r"1 u#f"** i- : ; ls what we have examined here a movement, a school or a moment? A school implies a shared ideoloEy or working approach that allows lesser artists to produce high-quality works and gives a ready, comprehending audience for the best artists, It is a microcosm where competition and collaboration are mutually help{ul. Certainly there are shared interests: burlesque, waiting figures and perhaps, above all else, a concern with space. lt is a postmodern understanding that psychoanalytic events happen in space and that space is psychoanalytically charged. The spaces in Kobe and Schnell are as tense as those in Loy or Rauch, despite the absence of figures. Stylistically of course, there is a 'Leipzig look': one of the painters diseussed above pointed at some unusually neat, schematic passage in one of his works and laughed: 'Look, I do East German art. A longing for the former East Germany is common: the cars were dreadful and the foodstuffs dreary, but it was a secure, comfortable life. 429. Christoph Ruckhäberle Farewell (Abschiedl , 2aO4 Oil on canvas, 1 90 There was always a job and a place to live, however (743/a unglamorous. However, where socialist realism was optimistic, these painters present the world not necessarily as pointless but certainly as puzzling: 430. Rosa Loy alternately delirious and wry. lf we think of Rauch as restaging Samuel Beckett's plays as comical soap operas and Weischer as restaging lonesco! Theatre of the Absurd via The World of lnteriors, we may start to understand the paradoxes. Ultimately, itis the situation not the school that matters most: Bisky, for example, was burtr in Leipzig Eut studied under Baselitz. lf 1989 Leipzig school.' and the collapse of communism was the key event of the last fifty years, then art has been surprisingly quiet about it. lt is to the credit of these artists of the (as we The work of the Leipzig school has been termed 'repo-realism': a conscious aping of the style of address such cultural sea change, however indirectly. now understand) partly reunified Germany that they do 389 ' . 280 cm x 11O% inl Hiding Place l/erstecQ, 24O3. Casein on canvas, '1 00 x 1 70 cm l39lz x 67 in). Essl Collection, Benjamin Ferguson: Interview with Tilo Baumgärtel, www.artslant.com, 09/2009. Interview with Tilo Baumgärtel by Benjamin Ferguson London / Sept 2009 - Tilo Baumgärtel presents a series of paintings, conceived and produced over the last two years, which hang as emblems of why this medium shall live on forever. Displaying them for the first time in Wilkinson gallery’s newly renovated space (on view from 3 September - 4 October 2009), Baumgärtel utilizes the width of each wall to magnify his thoughts. His work narrates a series of independent unrealities that describe both his impeccable use of imagery as a language as well as his imagination. Yet, behind the curtain of each scene is a bedrock of stories, a veil that only questions could pull back. BFerguson - Your paintings are wonderful descriptions of your imagination. Are there parts of your mind that you visit for inspiration or is your work more automatic than that? Tilo Baumgärtel - The start is mostly a sketch in my drawing book. I seek inspiration from a dream, a text, a movie, the theatre or just from a thing during the normal course of life. Then I build the painting step by step with a basic composition and the adequate atmosphere. BF- Preliminary drawings and initial sketches are presented in a book that accompanies the exhibition. Do you think it’s important to show the route taken to reach the finished piece? TB- I like to show the intermediate steps like sketches and idea drawings. There are no secrets and I wish to see it (preliminary work) from other artists as well. BF- Comparing work from your first solo exhibition in 1998 to the display today, are there less fears for you to draw inspiration from as you get older or do you think life always presents new things to be scared of? TB- Yes. I constantly try to become more open and more direct in my work. It’s just the attempt to find the best way to move from my subconscious to my conscious imagination. I find permanent reasons to be scared and then work hard to break free of these fears more and more. BF- You studied animation for a while because you felt that your painting might have reached a dead end. What did you feel was lacking from your work at that time? Are you satisfied now? TB- That’s difficult to explain. Sometimes in the past I wanted too much from my own paintings, or just the wrong things. I noticed that painting often needs more energy, sometimes more commitment and more patience. It’s an all-or-nothing game and I have to invest a lot of time when I want to use it like a language. BF- The Leipzig School became renowned for traditional methods of painting and printmaking, a resistance to the expressionist hab its of the West. Do you think Germany’s East/West divide is relevant to your work today? TB- I am, of course, aware of the fact that we have an entirely different upbringing and education system in the east. Although the education was not really imprecise, many aspects, such as intellectualism, pop-culture and the contemporary west-art at that time were left out. At the core was often a type of search for meaning in terms of socialism. Not uncommonly, somehow rigid but also touching in a way, somebody said that while artists in the west in terms of pop-culture flew through the front-shield a long time ago, in the east many are still trying to interpret the dying Icarus. BF- Dionysus is referenced in one painting. What is this a call for? TB- Dionysus stands for chaos, intoxication, anarchy, the unconsciously uncontrolled, and so on. In his text, The Birth of Tragedy from the Spirit of Music, Nietzsche used the conceptual duality apollinic-dionysic. Thereby, apollinic stands, for example, for the text of an opera and dionysic for the music, the melody. One can use the conceptual duality for a variety of things. Thereby Apollo always represents the control, the structure, the culture and its rules. At least in terms of contemporary a rt I personally wish often for more Dionysus. BF- But maybe you need to acquire a certain amount of authority before you can indulge completely in your area of study...Does it bother you to know that drawing is a skill that’s being overlooked in art school syllabuses nowadays? TB- I know as a fact that in many art universities in Germany the technical basics of traditional fine arts are taught neglectfully and are not compulsory. That is a shame, because in particular the drawing of these ancient principles is, due to the directness from the thought to the piece of paper, so poetic and so true, more than almost any other medium. Hence, there should be an appreciation in the foundations of this study. Ferguson, Benjamin. Interview with Tilo Baumgärtel, www.artslant.com, September 2009. Arthur Lubow: The New Leipzig School, The New York Times, 01/08/2006. Lubow, Arthur: „ The New Leipzig School“, New York Times, January 8, 2006 The New Leipzig School When the painters who are now the young lions of the international art scene enrolled at the venerable Art Academy in Leipzig in the early 1990's, they wanted to study art as it was taught for centuries - drawing from nude models, mastering the rules of perspective and analyzing formal composition. The ascendance of abstract painting in the years after World War II had eroded that tradition in the West, elevating originality and authentic feeling over technique and lifelike depictions, and reducing the word "academic" to a slur. But the Iron Curtain and the Berlin Wall were effective windscreens, blocking artistic change from ruffling the German Democratic Republic. Figurative art that was deprecated as hopelessly passé in Paris and Düsseldorf never lost its grip in Leipzig. The city prided itself on being the birthplace of Max Beckmann and (if you looked back a few centuries and across Saxony to Wittenberg) on a painterly lineage begat by Lucas Cranach. "The disadvantages of the wall are well known," says Arno Rink, a 65-year-old recently retired professor of painting who served as director of the academy in Leipzig both before and after the wall came down. "If you want to talk of an advantage, you can say it allowed us to continue in the tradition of Cranach and Beckmann. It protected the art against the influence of Joseph Beuys." Fifteen years ago, the East German Communist regime had only recently collapsed. For students arriving in Leipzig from the West, coal smoke in the winter sky and gaping windows in derelict buildings exuded a dank romantic allure. The atmosphere for those who had grown up in the East was even more intoxicating. Their world was in free fall, mutating rapidly and unpredictably. Even at the academy, which proudly claims a heritage more than two centuries old, change sizzled in the air. A department of new media was established so that students could make videos, design conceptual art and construct installations in the manner of the long-shunned Beuys. Meanwhile, in the unchanged department of painting, the rear guard clung to its palettes. "We learned how to construct a house in double perspective, or a staircase that spirals up," says Tilo Baumgärtel, an artist who was born in Leipzig. The painting students, many of them Westerners who had baffled their friends by journeying to the impoverished East for a traditional education, now had to withstand the ridicule of their peers. "Painting was the most boring department in the school, and everyone was making jokes about the painters, because they were so old-fashioned in the East German style," recalls Ricarda Roggan, a Dresden-born photographer. The first hint of a shift appeared in 1997, when Neo Rauch won the art prize of the local newspaper, the Leipziger Volkszeitung. Rauch, now 45, came of age in the G.D.R., but he was young enough to absorb the imagery of comic books, television and computer graphics that shaped the stylistic tastes of his generation. He was a bridge between the older political painters of the G.D.R. and the young artists of a unified Germany. He wrote his master's thesis at the Leipzig academy on West German abstract painters of the 1950's, discussing works - "abstract painting, which is primarily color," he says - that he was unable to see except in "shabby black-and-white reproductions." Having risen, through industry and talent, to become an assistant to Professor Rink, Rauch painted large canvases in a style that hovered somewhere between Socialist Realism and Pop Art, of workers in 1950's-vintage uniforms performing enigmatic tasks of physical labor. The Leipziger Volkszeitung prize and the accompanying show of his work at the Museum der Bildenden Künste, which is the main Leipzig art museum, presaged an escalating demand for Rauch's paintings and a one-man show at the David Zwirner Gallery in New York in 2000. The painter with the strange moniker - his given name was an invention of his parents, and his family name means "smoke" - was gaining an international reputation that resounded in the academy. "Even in the halls of the school, it is a little smoky," the students joked. The success of Rauch seemed like a one-off, however. "During our studies we had the feeling that Neo was a very solitary phenomenon that couldn't be repeated," says Tim Eitel, a painter who moved East from Stuttgart in 1994. How wrong they were. Aided by the canny promotion work of Rauch's locally born dealer, Gerd Harry Lybke, this city of 500,000 in the distant east of Germany has acquired some of the art-world cachet of New York in the 50's or London in the 90's. Under the rubric of the "New Leipzig School," Eitel, Baumgärtel and several of their classmates among them, Matthias Weischer, David Schnell, Christoph Ruckhäberle and Martin Kobe - have coalesced into a group phenomenon that, in the words of Joachim Pissarro, curator of painting and sculpture at the Museum of Modern Art, is "suddenly the hottest thing on earth." Although the work of these painters, most of them in their early 30's, varies in content, style and quality, they share a technical skill, a devotion to figurative art and a predilection for dry-eyed, melancholy subject matter. From the academy in Leipzig, they derive their proficiency. Beyond that, the mood of Leipzig has provided them with their material. Like other cities in the former G.D.R., Leipzig is plagued with high unemployment and depopulation. Factories and housing projects stand closed or half-empty, many of them slated for demolition, while ornate Wilhelmine buildings from the early 20th century undergo restoration. "For me it is very important that on the one hand, you have these things coming down, but 100 meters away, they are building a new autobahn," says David Schnell, who hails from Cologne. The Leipzig central train station is a marvel of reconstruction, with glistening platforms and bustling shops. Board a tram to the southern suburb of Markkleeberg, where Rauch lives, and in half an hour's time you are confronted with a strip-mined, pock-marked landscape that evokes, in the words of Hans-Werner Schmidt, director of the Museum der Bildenden Künste, "the scenery of Mars." In the center of Leipzig, a major thoroughfare named for Karl Liebknecht - the Leipzig-born Marxist revolutionist who was executed in 1919 - throbs with sleek, packed restaurants serving caipirinhas and arugula salads. The taxi driver who brings you there is likely to have worked as an engineer or architect in the G.D.R. Leipzig is experiencing a morning-after moment. The euphoria that greeted German reunification has subsided into sulky disillusionment. A sour scent of curdled dreams seeps through the empty furnished rooms in Weischer's paintings and hangs over the half-dressed, enervated young people in Ruckhäberle's. The rotten barns of Schnell's landscapes, the soulless architecture of Kobe's fanciful futurism, the film-noir chill of Baumgärtel's charcoal cityscapes, the loneliness of Eitel's young people gazing at flattened vistas - all of these paintings emanate a disenchantment that is endemic to Germany, especially the former G.D.R., but speaks powerfully to viewers elsewhere, including the United States. "These are artists who are going back to a literal, descriptive figuration and giving it an air of anomie," says Robert Storr, a professor of modern art at New York University's Institute of Fine Arts. "It is happening everywhere. Mostly it is happening in photography, so it is interesting to see it in painting." Technically accomplished painting with narrative content and a contemporary slant is very easy to sell. One reliable bellwether is the London collector Charles Saatchi, who has turned from such British installation artists as Damien Hirst and Jake and Dinos Chapman, whom he championed in the 90's, to a wide selection of contemporary painters, including (along with the Leipzigers Weischer, Ruckhäberle and Baumgärtel) the figurative artists Marlene Dumas (a South African who lives in Amsterdam), Luc Tuymans (Antwerp) and Kai Althoff (Cologne). Even in today's superheated art market for painting, the Leipzig artists stand out. Collectors jockey to be wait-listed for their new works, while in the secondary market, their prices rise vertiginously. In 2004, a new painting by Weischer would set you back about $20,000. At a Christie's auction late last year, a Weischer fetched $370,000, while an Eitel brought $212,000. The Web site for a traveling exhibition now at Mass MoCA, "Life After Death: New Leipzig Paintings From the Rubell Family Collection," heralds the Leipzig artists as "the 21st century's first bona fide artistic phenomenon." Certainly, it is a collecting phenomenon. The two major museum shows of Leipzig painting in the United States have been exhibitions of personal collections: that of the Miami private museum owners Donald and Mera Rubell, now at Mass MoCA, in North Adams, Mass., and another one, held at the Cleveland Museum of Art, of paintings owned by Michael Ovitz. "What happened to us in Leipzig was very unique," says Mera Rubell, who, with her husband, bought multiple works by five young painters at first viewing, shortly before a group show in the Leipzig museum in fall 2003. "Discovering five artists in one day had never happened to us in 40 years of collecting." The opening of several new galleries in a former cotton-mill complex in Leipzig last April drew international collectors arriving in private jets. "Many American collectors grab into this pool of Leipzig very blindly," Rauch observes. "They buy it from the trademark. 'Is he young? Does he come from Leipzig? Then I buy it."' Not so long ago, Leipzig painters were isolated inside a bubble that shut them off from the West. Now they are being borne aloft by the bubble of the speculative art market. rtists were taken very seriously in the G.D.R., whether they were popular or unpopular," says Sighard Gille, one of three professors of painting at the Leipzig academy. "After the fall of the wall, painters had to struggle to be taken seriously." Under a regime that tightly controlled public information, figurative painting could be a propaganda tool for the state or a transmitter of dissent; either way, it was a potent force. A city historically known for its trade fairs and book publishing (as well as for its onetime cantor J.S. Bach), Leipzig in the G.D.R. maintained a substantial degree of political awareness and openness when compared with the tightly monitored capital of East Berlin and the nostalgic, erstwhile princely capital of Dresden. "Leipzig is still the most open-minded city for contemporary issues," says Barbara Steiner, the young director of the Gallery for Contemporary Art in Leipzig. "Dresden is the opposite, with a very obsessive way of dealing with the past." Dresden's insularity was compounded by geographical deprivation. Located in a low-lying valley, it could not receive the Western television broadcasts that other residents of East Germany secretly savored. "Dresden was called 'the valley of people who don't know anything,"' Steiner says. The Leipzig academy for painting and architecture opened in 1764, but its emphasis, in keeping with the city's businesslike attitude, had become more practical by the end of the 19th century. Since 1950, in acknowledgment of that down-to-earth focus, it has been known as the Hochschule für Grafik und Buchkunst - a center for graphic arts, like etching, lithography, woodcuts and book design. The academy's importance as a center for painting is relatively recent. In the 60's, a group of Leipzig painters rose to prominence: foremost among them, Bernhard Heisig, Wolfgang Mattheuer and Werner Tübke. Despite their very different styles - Tübke was an exquisite draftsman who emulated the Italian Renaissance and Mannerist artists, Mattheuer's folk-art realism lent itself to parables and Heisig's angry Expressionist paintings recalled Emil Nolde or the late work of Oskar Kokoschka - all of these artists exalted the painterly tradition, and their collective success established a nationally esteemed "Leipzig School." The painting teachers at the academy preferred to concentrate on technical concerns, perhaps because political subject matter under the G.D.R. was often either disingenuous or dangerous. That instrumental approach continues. "The difference between Leipzig and the other schools in Germany is that here there is more discussion about how to build the painting and less about what and why," says Christoph Ruckhäberle, a native of Bavaria. Or, as Matthias Weischer, who grew up near the Western city of Münster, puts it, "It wasn't so important what to draw, it was just important to draw and paint - just to keep on working without having any concrete subject or big vision." Paradoxically, while the artists of the old Leipzig School didn't discuss subject matter when they taught, they ruminated over it endlessly when they painted. They resorted to symbols to express a veiled criticism of their society without sacrificing their privileged status. "That was a possibility, using multiple layers, because the functionaries weren't the brightest people," Arno Rink says. "Icarus plays an important role in Leipzig painting. He is able to fly you can see it as a motif of fleeing - and he gets too close to the sun and falls down, like people who got close to power. Heisig, Rink, Tübke - everyone used Icarus, because it looked good as a figure and it also had another meaning." Mattheuer liked the biblical tale of Cain and Abel and the mythological character Sisyphus, who was fated to push a boulder up a mountain only to see it roll down before reaching the top. Tübke favored Christian references, like the Pietà. "These were used in a very intelligent way and could be read by people who were intelligent and had a higher level of education," Rink says. "Nobody paints a Sisyphus or Icarus anymore. Artists are free to interpret the world without enigmatic tools." Rink was a lifelong party member, but people on all sides of the political debates miss the days when both politics and painting seemed important. "Back then, there were problems we had to cope with," Rink says. "I think society today is quite superficial in many ways. It is only normal that painters include this superficiality in their work." The old Leipzig School disintegrated in the late 70's, when the G.D.R. began to display these painters' critical works as proof that dissent and freedom of thought existed in their society. "That was not our intention," Gille says. "We thought the state should be criticized. We didn't voice our criticism to support the state. We painted in a figurative way, and the following generation didn't want to do that. They thought it would be a concession to the state. Many started to do abstract paintings." But it was hard to win at this game. Taking advantage of the popularity of abstraction in the international market, the government turned around and sold the nonfigurative paintings in the West to gain hard currency. By the time the wall fell, the Leipzig artists hardly knew where to look or how to paint. As a young man, Neo Rauch tried on the styles of Francis Bacon, Max Beckmann, Markus Lüpertz and Bernhard Heisig. Eventually he settled into a style of his own. A mature Rauch painting contains figures with the mythological aura of a Sisyphus or Icarus. The iconography, however, is personal, and regardless of how well educated or intelligent the viewer, the code cannot be broken. The paintings convey a mood, not a message. Rauch's own history is the stuff of legend. Start with the name, which, he complains, "was a torture for me in my first 20 years." Every time he said it, he had to explain it. "The most terrible thing about it is most people think it is a pseudonym that I created to make myself more interesting," he says. "And this name seems like innovating, and I consider myself to be a very conservative person." Worst of all, he has no idea why his mother and father gave him the name, because he never had the chance to ask them. When Neo was 6 weeks old, his parents were killed in a train crash just outside the Leipzig station. His father was a 21-year-old art student at the academy in Leipzig, and his mother, after completing a required stint of farm work, was planning to enroll there. Following the accident, his maternal grandparents raised him in a small town, Aschersleben, in the foothills of the Harz Mountains. He was surrounded on the walls of their apartment by his father's dark charcoal portraits and mining scenes. "There was a prophecy that he would die early, and this seems to be in his drawings," Rauch says. "When he was 5 or 6, he was walking hand in hand with my grandmother through a supermarket, and suddenly an old woman comes up and says to her, 'Be careful with this boy, he will not live to be older than 30."' Taking up drawing and watercolor painting, Neo resolved when he was 15 or 16 that he, too, would study art in Leipzig. Rauch's ramrod-straight posture and the unwavering gaze of his pale blue, almond-shaped eyes give him the appearance of a Prussian soldier. "He is an art soldier," Sighard Gille says. "He has a secret love of the military. You can see it in the painting." Rauch's self-discipline is renowned. He works every weekday from 9 in the morning until 6 at night, with a midday break to prepare lunch for his wife, the painter Rosa Loy, and their 15-year-old son. Taking after Rauch, the young Leipzig painters all pride themselves on their orderly work habits, which they contrast with the dissolute lives led by students in West German art academies. "Being an artist is much more important in Düsseldorf than the art itself," Tim Eitel says. "The old clichés of painting at night with a bottle of wine, taking drugs and being excessive - a lot of people in Düsseldorf think this is what it means to be an artist." In Leipzig, being a painter means working slowly and deliberately, like Rauch, to produce 15 or 20 canvases a year. Rauch's paintings are, in Robert Storr's words, "Völkisch and science-fictionish." They speak a Pop Art idiom with an East German accent. With their faded and thinly painted colors, anachronistically costumed figures and spatially disorienting landscapes, they recall the paintings that the American artist R.B. Kitaj made in London from the mid60's to the mid-70's. Kitaj, however, is a highly cerebral artist, and his paintings seem to carry endnotes as copious as the ones T.S. Eliot appended to "The Waste Land." Even though Rauch's paintings are also informed by history, especially art history, they resemble dreams that are receding from consciousness. "What Neo Rauch does is borrow themes and take imagery from the Socialist Realist paradigm," Joachim Pissarro says. "Along with that, there is a surrealistic quirkiness and bizarreness. You see simultaneous scenes that are not connected, that you as a viewer cannot pin down or put a name on. The characters never confront each other, either. There is a sense of isolation that goes on in his picture space." Lately, Rauch's canvases have become even stranger and more complex, as the uniformed characters from the 50's and casually garbed people of today are joined by 18th-century soldiers, peasants and dandies, and occasionally by fantastic animals, all displayed in luridly lighted landscapes with multiple vanishing points. Wildly theatrical, the paintings demand that the viewer's eye jump nervously to take in concurrently played, weirdly suggestive but ultimately inexplicable activities. Indeed, Rauch constructs his paintings like a theater director, first daubing in the backdrops. "It is important to create a definite environment or stage on which things can happen," he says. "For me, the function of painting as I understand it is to work with myths. I try to create a widespread system where impulses are trapped. With an analytic understanding, you can't grasp it." He hastens to clarify that he does not indulge in "psychological automatism." He begins with a general notion of the mood and subject of the painting. "Having set the fundamentals, the stage, I introduce the actors on the stage," he explains. "Then it happens - when I set the inhabitants into a relation, I am not able to plan. In between the figures, and in between the figures and me, subtle relations start to be created. A microclimate comes into being." Rauch blends rigorous precision with foggy mysticism, a brew that is very German. "It seems to me that I am drawn back further and further, that elements from distant periods are knocking on the door and want to be let in," he says. "That is also reflected in my dreams, that I am drawn back to earlier lives. The incarnation cycles are trying to reach formulation." Asked if he believes that he led previous lives, he replies: "Not as direct as that, but I have recurring dreams in the same rooms and same houses and same streets. What you see in the picture is not the dream but a new version of the dream, like from a recycling plant." ong before assuming the role of Rauch's dealer, Gerd Harry Lybke worked as his nude model. "He was a little bit thinner then," Rauch recalls. "And he had a lot of Afro-look hair, like Jimi Hendrix." At 44, Lybke now has thinning red hair and a penchant for pinstriped three-piece suits, but his dancing eyes, protruding lower lip and the space between his front teeth still give him the look of a mischief-loving child. It was his boyhood resemblance to the redheaded, freckled and gap-toothed character Jody on the American television show "Family Affair" that won him his lifelong nickname. Western television may have been forbidden in the G.D.R., but it seems that everyone in Leipzig watched it. "When I would walk out, people would say 'Judy, Judy,"' he recalls. "The name was 'Jody,' but a Saxonian couldn't say 'Jody.' Nobody in East Germany knows that 'Judy' is a woman's name." Lybke says that he stumbled into the art world almost by chance. What he really wanted to be was a cosmonaut. "I was young," he says. "To be a cosmonaut, why not?" He did so well in science and mathematics that he was awarded a five-year scholarship to study in the Soviet Union. When he realized that he dreaded the prospect of leaving Leipzig for Kiev, he turned down the honor and his troubles began. "From this moment, nothing," he says. "It was forbidden for me to study, even to work in a museum. I was on a blacklist." In 1981, having exhausted all conventional options, he found a daily gig as a life model at the Leipzig academy. At a monthly salary of 300 marks (considerably less than $100 but ample for his needs), he continued there for more than eight years, until the wall came down. Lybke's career as an art dealer began in 1983, when he opened in his (shared) apartment the only private gallery in Leipzig. He called it Eigen + Art, a pun that means both "your own art" and "weirdness." Eigen + Art in those days was a lark, not a business. "I opened the gallery naked, saying, 'Welcome to the Galerie Eigen + Art,"' Lybke recalls. "I had real dreadlocks, from not washing my hair, and three bird eggs in the hair. After this opening, I met a few good-looking girls, and I said, 'Why not do this again?"' To make the transition from an East German life, in which sex, alcohol and friendship were the markers of success, to a capitalist system governed by cash, Lybke recognized early that he would have to court international collectors. He borrowed money from a West German industrialist so he could take work to the Art Frankfurt fair in 1990. He opened temporary galleries in Tokyo in 1990, in Paris in 1991 and in New York in 1993 - the same year that he began showing Rauch's work. To establish a permanent Eigen + Art in the capital of the reunified Germany, he found a reasonably priced rental in the Mitte district of Berlin in what was then an out-of-the-way location but is now the heart of the gallery district. In 1997, when Rauch began to win international recognition, his fashionable peers in Leipzig were conceptual and installation artists. That soon changed. The next generation of painters, many of them originally Westerners drawn to Leipzig by its traditional education, stayed for the cheap rents and relaxed pace of life. In 2001, a group of them banded together to start the Liga Gallery in Berlin, a cooperative with a limited two-year run. Although he had no financial interest in the Liga Gallery, Lybke served as its godfather, recruiting a director, Christian Ehrentraut, and sending over collectors. The Rubells, for example, made their big investment in Liga artists after futilely trying to buy a Rauch. (Since then, they have acquired three Rauch paintings.) Lybke also monitored the gallery as a kind of farm team and took on three of the artists following the closing of the Liga Gallery. He shepherds their careers like an attentive, sympathetic older brother. Both the diversity and the group affinities of the New Leipzig School are evident in the Rubell exhibition that is at Mass MoCA until April 2 and then travels to Santa Fe, Washington, Seattle and Salt Lake City. Like their mentor, Rauch, the young Leipzig artists often construct their pictures as theatrical sets. Matthias Weischer typically paints empty rooms that bear the palpable presence of the absent occupants. In "Bisected," a two-panel painting of a room corner that is bare except for a pinned-up picture of a nude woman, he has built up the surface of the brown wall in layers of paint and then scored, smeared and encrusted it. A more ambitious picture, "St. Ludgerus," recreates a room that is fully furnished in a late-20th-century style and, at the same time, offers a refresher course in 20th-century painting: the window shade and lampshade are color stripes; the triptych window panels are Abstract Expressionist splotches; the bouquet and wall sconces are drawn on white canvas like elements in a Matisse; and a hanging picture of a house represents the realist tradition. Meanwhile, the awkward, alienated youths in Christoph Ruckhäberle's stagy paintings occupy spaces that recall the streetscapes of de Chirico and Balthus. Not that these artists ignore art forms that are younger than painting. Martin Kobe's elaborate architectures, graced by Escher-ish illusions and painterly smears, combine the artificial reality of video games with abstract brushstrokes. Of the group, Tilo Baumgärtel owes the most obvious debt to Rauch's dreamscapes, an influence he is escaping by eschewing color in his large charcoal drawings, like the one the Rubells acquired of two people in an urban room, somewhere in Asia, that is dominated by illuminated octopus tanks. A great deal has changed in Leipzig in the past few years. Lybke has become a wealthy, powerful art dealer. Rauch is a newly appointed professor at the academy, succeeding his own teacher, Rink. ("A very Prussian notion of duty," he says. "I've let myself be taken into service.") Saatchi is telephoning Matthias Kleindienst, a Leipzig gallery owner who scouts young talent, to buy paintings. All of the original Liga artists have waiting lists for their work. The commercial success of the formerly outcast medium of painting has, according to Rauch, produced "a very negative climate," so that "even in the early years of starting out," the artists are "considering the market." Yet some things seem not all that different. In October, Weischer won the Leipziger Volkszeitung prize, the same award that, eight years earlier, catapulted Rauch to prominence. And although Weischer already commands a devout following, the event still had the flavor of a coming-of-age ritual. There was a reception at the museum, with the requisite Champagne and canapés, that inaugurated an exhibition of new paintings, in which Weischer has incorporated humanoid (if not quite human) forms for the first time. After that staid event, many of the guests walked across the street, where, in one of Leipzig's unoccupied buildings, an alternative project space called Laden für Nichts (Shop for Nothing) was the setting for a party. "I don't know why there were so many gallerists at our party," the multiply-pierced painter Francisca Holstein said a couple of days later. True, there were, and at least one foreign journalist. The party lasted until 5 or 6 in the morning. And the next day, the Leipzig painters were back at their easels. Arthur Lubow, a contributing writer, last wrote for the magazine about Clive Gillinson, Carnegie Hall's new director. Bazon Brock: Standing and shamming – Death Reflexes, Tilo Baumgärtel – Senzo, 2006, Kerber / galerieKleindienst, 5-8. I r1 t. ,4 Bazon Brock Sta./iaf, ond, Al an increasing rate metropolitan reporters wam ucabour Manen\ rhelerrorof road.rdFpa'krn8 Sounders of wild boars vandalise suburban gardensr squadrons ot pigeons spread bacteria and defecate on fullu rdl henraCF as sFllas rt, carerakcr.:amre( of rats occupy the sewers. ln the black channels that form the educational faciliti€s oflelevision. shows concerned with animal life in our metropolises have already gained the status of exoiic iravel repofts.This perspective on our closer urban environment was initially developed by thelegendaryanimal documentaryfilmmakerFritz Stern, who made urban space feel like a place ,god knows where., He adhered to the so-called anthropological turn. which conceived human cultures as sorrF'rFs Fsrablr(hFd Ihe slruggle to.urvrrp. rn 'n with other particular by comparison evolutionary lifefonns. such as animals. lntoxicated bv the belief in progress which characterised early modernity. itwas commonly taken for granred that human triumph would lie in a continuously increased distance to animals. lt was assumed rhat only humans possessed both consciousness and the ability to use lools and languages.The turn towards an anthropological perspective soon disinregrared rhi. ficrion ol human cxrsrcnce ds a singu. larity. In consequence, the similarities in the formation of life and the interplay ofcells. organs. neuro-physio logical interactions and lhe like became the cenlre ofinterest. Forthese discoveries humans were most indebted to animals. Research conducted with ani, mals, including terrible vivisection, had eventually led to insights into the naiure of the human organism. Of course, this was not wid€]y appreciated. I nr,lroday rou wrll ne'rher frnd scienusrc prarsinB their research animals. nor popular cxlts praying tor forgiveness to the spirit oflife its animalshape. It is abouttime to erect altars in 'n the slaughterhouses. It is there that the ministers ofagriculture and their nail of civilsFflanr\ should. on a monrhly ba\i<. (r' for forgiveness of our share in the everyday mass murder. Hunters, as long as th€y are more than affected braggans depraved by affluence, on the other hand. acknowledge an animal s death. And there are also news of alarmingly radical protests against animal testing. But the most lasting insiructions ro the ritual celeb, ration of brother animal and sister plant still come kom painrer\ and wrirer\ rromrhera\Fdra$rng\ ofLascaux to Franz Marc, from Aesop to Hermann Lons Mummelmann andThomas Mann s,H€rrund Hund,,thefiarratorsof fablesandtheponraitisisof animals have shaped our perception of the unity of brother animal and sisterplant most deeply. The celebrations of James Ensor Herben A€hternbusch and Manin Kippenberger appearto be ofthe greatest importance to me - all three have depicted the frog at the cross, an imitatio christi. As the wit- 5h.q,nmiq-De!.t'Re4.e,€ nesses at the crucifixion saw the development of violence on the body ofihe human son,likewise do the scientists obseNe their innuence on the Iiving body of the frogs or otherwise the disjecta membra, the severed limbs and exposed organs. Under these circumstances we want to show our respect for the support of the spawning migration of frogs and, standing next to that trap fence erected lor rhe proredion of rhe human rlnpFrsonarors rn lhe labordlones of rhe ncuroph)srologrsrs. promi\e to donate to animal rights groups. If we are. however more concerned with thetwilight ofhumanity following the latest climate changes in our civilisa- iion, we should rather look to the iconographic force and vision of anisE such as Tilo Baumgiinel. Doing so in order to prepare us for what is apparently seeking to rule the Eafth, an open secret of the blockbusters featuring King Kong or mutated spiders. Minotaurs,Centaurs and the lalest creations of genetic engineers. Baumgartel shows the nighttime intrusions of the animals into the abandoned human habitats. Marrens invade kio.ki or .ear, h for lo.r humanrr) on longjoumeys through the waste land. where there are still humans. as in the transition zones bet$€en our world and the underworld. between arrival al the end and departure for the void. animals become conspicuous r€minders, whose eerin€ss can never bp resolved by the previously etleclive qh slLng in the woods or singing at the cradle. On the conrran. rhF flow ol roic$ seem. ro srmu.arp rhe rsrnrns plantsi the denser the vocalized attempts ro locare yourself b€come, the more impenetmble grolv the plants. But to remain silent and steal away from the collapsing new buildings onto the promising deck of a ship settingsailfor nowhere. appears hopeless from the very beginning. Ev€q'body knows that your onl! option not to be surprised by death is to feign it. Comfortingas it might beto pidur€ BaumgAftel qandering in the traces of Reinecke Fuchs or Dr Grzimek. so unsettling are his retellings of our defeats to the white whale of evolution and the horror oftransformarion rhar Kafha ordarns Gregor Sam\a rD expcn. ence for us all. Baumgafel's disposition to put his artistic skills at odds in selfexperiments at the open psyche, instead of marketing masterly demonstrations of his capabilities is admirable. what is this massive experiment? Baumgartel offers an opponunity to treat pictures. or anefads in general.like animals. since humans may only through unity with animals ensure their self-assertion as survivors. communication with animals is becoming increasingly important for the will to live. Psychologists hav€ long reported the indispurable cuc(ess dchreved by autistic children in.ociety of dolphins. or by sick, aged and lonely people in living together with pets:an increase of self-aware- . Bazon Brock Dufdl !aar.!.t! u^dTobf.&ttfi" - Sta'dta? qnd '- sFalegi€s and percpectives is lebensllhi€e nur noch aus der Einheit mit den Tle' The exchang€ of such symbolic€tly bet$len humaj$' ren bezieh; kainnen, wird dr€ Kommumkation mit alwavs communicated tabrics of signs, such as pEintings. There ihnen immer wichtiger fia die Behauptlmg des men' thb;gh need to charge their pictues with an . schlichen Lebensttillens. Psychologen berichten lorc Dainters force. tuming them into analoges for a life dariiber seit langeE und der E folg ist unbcstritten' emp;atic .ten altistische Kinder in der Gemeinschaft mit otherthanyourovtn.BauEgAnel'sftcommmdstion' for the cunEnt situauon is thut everyDelphine! erzielen oder Krank€. Ahe und Einsame and instruction themselves via domestication iffcdbe im zussmmenleben mil Haustiecn en€icheD: Das one should and cqts. so thet in the moondogF martens, into lat$ Ers€bnis ist die SteigBrutg der Selbstwahmehmung you can b€ save in the know' futurc the world of light D;der Audawch ober solche Strategien und Perby these animal repr€s€nted you will be that ledge sDektiven zwischen den Menschen symbolisch companions. ;oEt, also in Z€ichengeflrg€n wie Bildem. sollte eben di€6en Bildem von den Malem iene emphatische lkaft mitsegeb€n w€!dm' die sie zu Analoga fiir anderes Leben als das eiggne machen. Baumgiinels Empfehlung und Anleitung dazu heiBt' jetzt miigB sic; iederrechE€itig in Ratten Marder. Hunde und Katz€n durch Domestikation einscht€ib€n. damil er sich in der Zukunft vermondeter\lblt dulch eben diese tierischen C€noss€n !"ertrcten wei8. Gregory Volk: Figuring the New Germany, Art in America, 06/2005, 154-157. Manuela Thieme: Dschungel-Tour, Das Magazin, 10/2005, 46-53. THEMA Meister Immendorff und seine Frau Jörg Immendorff (60), Malermeister aus Düsseldorf und immer für Kontroversen zu haben, verlor durch eine unheilbare Krankheit die Macht über seine Hände. Seine Frau Oda Jaune (25), Foto rechts, war Meisterschülerin bei ihm und malt verstörende Bilder verletzter Seelen GESPRÄCH Dschungel-Tour Text: M A N U E L A T H I E M E Fotos: O L I V E R M A R K Düsseldorf und Leipzig nennen sich gern deutsche Malerhauptstadt. Sie konkurrieren um prägende Stile, um entscheidende Debatten, um mediale Aufmerksamkeit. Die Düsseldorfer Jörg Immendorff und seine Frau Oda Jaune hatten Tilo Baumgärtel, Leipzig, zu Gast. Keine Sorge, es wurde kein Schaukampf DAS MAGAZIN 47 GESPRÄCH Nachmittagsbesuch Zwei Männer, eine Frau. Sie reden sofort über ihre Arbeit, die Malerei. Der Leipziger hatte Lust, den berühmten Düsseldorfer Kollegen und seine Frau kennenzulernen, und ist mitgekommen. Jörg Immendorff sitzt auf einem rollenden Bürostuhl, er kann sich kaum noch bewegen. Keinen Pinsel mehr halten, keine Zigarette allein anzünden. Die unheilbare Nervenkrankheit ALS nimmt ihm die Kraft. Ein Maler, dem die Hände nicht mehr gehorchen. Auch wenn es dramatisch klingt, da ist man schnell bei Beethoven, der am Ende nichts mehr hörte. Immendorff hat sich seit der Schicksalsnachricht in einen wuchtigen Rausch gearbeitet. Die Frist, die die Ärzte ihm gaben, ist schon mehrmals verstrichen. Das riesige Atelier steht voller neuer Bilder, die noch fertig werden müssen. Jörg Immendorff thront geradezu auf seinem Stuhl. Konzentriert, aufrecht, energisch. Schnoddrig und witzig schiebt er Fragen beiseite und macht seinen Anekdoten Platz. Die neuere deutsche Kunstgeschichte ist sein biographisches Terrain, durch das er nur zu gern spaziert: bei Beuys studiert, dann als Maoist den Revoluzzer vom Dienst gegeben. Mit Richter, Polke, Lüpertz, Baselitz um Ruhm duelliert. Ost-West-Missionar gewesen, mit dem Leinwandanarchisten Penck aus Dresden gemeinsam gearbeitet. Heiner Müller getroffen, Bernhard Heisig & Co. »Kumpaneikunst« vorgeworfen. Den Lebemann gegeben. Die Kokain- und Sexparty, die ihn vor einiger Zeit vor Gericht brachte, hat das exzentrische Image noch mal etwas aufgefrischt. Ein Immendorff ist nicht kleinlaut. Er strahlt, lästert, plaudert sich durch die Vergangenheit. Seine Präsenz ist enorm. Der kraftlose Körper wirkt in diesen Momenten nicht mehr ohnmächtig. »Es geht mir einigermaßen gut«, hatte der Maler am Anfang klargestellt und wollte kein Wort weiter über die Krankheit reden. Es gibt Wichtigeres mitzuteilen: Die Neue Nationalgalerie in Berlin bilanziert jetzt sein Lebenswerk. Immendorff ist gerade 60 geworden. Natürlich freut ihn die Ehre, aber er will nicht vorzeitig über die Schlußlinie gewunken werden. Auch wenn man ihn Altmeister aus Düsseldorf nennt, reagiert er eher ungehalten. Jungstar aus Leipzig klingt nicht besser, aber wie auch immer: Tilo Baumgärtel sitzt jetzt vor Immendorff. Der 48 DAS MAGAZIN 33jährige gehört mit seinen lichten wie geheimnisvollen Bilderwelten zu den gefeierten Neuentdeckungen der letzten Jahre. Ein freundlicher, behutsamer Mensch, der sehr genau denkt. Baumgärtel mag, was Immendorff erzählt, er mag auch, was er malt: Vor allem die »Adlerpartitur« hat es ihm angetan. Eine Allegorie auf die deutsche Einheit, eher fatal in der Diktion. Lange hat Jörg Immendorff politische, historische Stoffe bevorzugt. Erst seit ihn der Tod bedrängt, wirkt er mystischer, vager. Auf dem Boden, vor dem Arbeitstisch, steht ein knallroter Plastikkasten mit bunten Tasten. Daneben liegt eine Sandkastenschaufel und ein selbstgebasteltes Puppenhaus. Die Spielecke seiner vierjärigen Tochter Ida. Immendorffs Frau, Oda Jaune, ist 25 und war seine Meisterschülerin. Eine zarte, nachdenkliche Frau, die verstörende Bilder mit großer Suggestion malt. Tilo Baumgärtel ist regelrecht begeistert: »Sie ist noch so jung und schon so reif. Eigentlich schon fertig, das ist absolut ungewöhnlich.« Oda Jaune stammt aus Bulgarien, den Künstlernamen hat sich ihr Mann ausgedacht. Er schenkte ihr einen Paß, der sie zur Bewohnerin eines geheimen Reiches macht: Gynthiana. Ibsen ließ Peer Gynt im Traum ein Wüstenland fruchtbar machen. Die drei also, Immendorff, Jaune und Baumgärtel, verbrachten einen kurzen, ziemlich versöhnlichen Nachmittag miteinander. Gespräch im Atelier Immendorff: Freut mich, daß Sie da sind. Baumgärtel: Bevor ich hierher fuhr, saß ich mit Neo Rauch im Garten zusammen. Ich soll unbedingt herzliche Grüße ausrichten. Immendorff: Das ist ja wie beim Gewerkschaftstag. Wunderbar. Weiter. Baumgärtel: Na ja, es wird ja immer so getan, als mögen wir Leipziger die Düsseldorfer nicht. Jörg Immendorff, Oda Jaune, Tilo Baumgärtel. Der Leipziger stellte im geräumigen HinterhofAtelier beeindruckt fest: Wer große Türen hat, kann auch riesige Bilder malen. In seinen Leipziger Räumen wird’s ab 2,50 Meter Rahmenhöhe schwierig, sagt er Immendorff: Das ist natürlich grober Unfug. Mir ist doch klar, daß ich nicht die Endmarke der Malerei bin. Ich lasse mich gern fesseln von anderen Gedanken- und Formwelten. Anfangs war ich noch etwas ungnädiger, als es hieß: Die Malerei wird neu erfunden. Das hat mich schon geärgert. Was sollen dann meine ganzen Bilder sein? Da habe ich erst mal ganz schön gestichelt gegen die angeblichen neuen Wunderknaben, ich kann ja ein böser Finger sein. Dann habe ich mich aber gefragt, warum wehrst du dich eigentlich so dagegen? Ist es nicht wunderbar, daß wieder neue Positionen entstehen und wachsen? Solange man sich aufregt und es Gründe dafür gibt, muß ja was dran sein. Das Schlimmste, was einem Maler oder Bild passieren kann, ist ja: Du gehst dran vorbei. Immendorff sitzt am Tisch. Das Telefon klingelt. Die Freisprechschaltung ist an. Es geht um die Bildnumerierung für die Berliner Ausstellung. Ein Glas Wasser mit Strohhalm steht in Reichweite seines Mundes. Er bittet seine Frau, ihm eine Zigarette anzuzünden und DAS MAGAZIN 49 GESPRÄCH zwischen die Lippen zu schieben. Als das Gespräch beendet ist, sagt Immendorff: Entschuldigung, wir waren bei den Leipzigern, glaube ich. Jaune: Ich bin naturgemäß neugierig. Alles, was von Künstlern meiner Generation kommt, studiere ich auf die Frage hin: Gibt es die Möglichkeit für ideelle Bündnisse? Teilen sie mit mir die Leidenschaft auf der Suche nach einem neuen Bildtypus? Spüre ich in ihrer malerischen Arbeit Zorn und Ungeduld? Passiert in einem jungen Künstler eine Revolte? Die Region, die Stadt, das Land sind für mich zu kurze Horizonte. Von den jungen Leipzigern kenne ich noch nicht viele. Einige habe ich mir angeschaut. Am Anfang hatte ich zum Beispiel Probleme mit Neo Rauch. Es gibt ja viele Chiffren, die man kennen muß. Jetzt habe ich mich da reingeguckt. Aber ich finde, ihr seid euch gar nicht so ähnlich, daß das alles zusammen als »die Leipziger« abgehandelt werden kann. Baumgärtel: Uns nervt, daß wir von außen in so eine Gruppe gesteckt werden. Ich kenne niemanden, der als Vertreter der »Neuen Leipziger Schule« durchs Land laufen möchte. Man möchte rufen: Stop, hört doch mal auf! Aber es ist so bequem. Man hat die Figuren schön zusammengestellt, und wenn sie einem nicht mehr passen, kann man sie mit einer Ladung Schrot auch wieder vom Tisch holen, ohne extra zu zielen. Tilo Baumgärtel Ohne Titel, 2003 50 DAS MAGAZIN Der 33jährige, einer der hochgehandelten jungen Leipziger Maler, ist keineswegs übergeschnappt: »Die Sammler pokern einfach. Man kommt sich manchmal vor wie beim Pferderennen.« Der gebürtige Leipziger hat das letzte Jahr weitgehend pausiert und kümmerte sich um das neue Baby der Familie Immendorff: Also Baselitz, Penck, Lüpertz, ich – die neuen Expressionisten wurden wir damals genannt. In den 80er Jahren wie auch heute ein falscher Begriff. Aber Etiketten gibt es immer. Irgend jemand braucht die offenbar, zum Glück fallen die nach einer Weile vom Gurkenglas wieder ab. Was bei diesem Gruppengerede völlig unterschätzt wird: Man fetzt sich auch untereinander, es gibt Eifersüchteleien. Hauptsache ist aber am Ende, daß man es in künstlerische Produktion umsetzt. Jaune: Natürlich muß die Auseiandersetzung mit den Kollegen sein, muß man die angebliche Szene kennen, um den Informationsfluß am Laufen zu halten, aber für mich ist das Atelier das eigentliche Zentrum. Gut ist es, wenn ich mit Immendorff über seine Erfahrungen sprechen kann. Generell finde ich es nicht wichtig, ob die Kunst von jungen oder älteren Menschen stammt. Biologie spielt keine Rolle in der Kunst. Ich bin froh, wenn ich ein Bild sehe und nichts über den Maler weiß. Ich will vom Bild überrascht werden. Manchmal ist es viel jünger als sein Schöpfer, manchmal ist es auch umgekehrt. Baumgärtel: Ich mag das auch nicht, zu wissen, wer da eigentlich malt. Wenn man einen Kollegen als Mensch sympathisch findet, fehlt die Distanz zum Bild, man überträgt die positive Sicht automatisch. Jaune: Spätestens nach 100 Jahren müssen es die Bilder sowieso allein schaffen. Wenn sie dann noch jemanden berühren, dann bleiben sie. Immendorff: Nachdem Beuys gestorben war, gab es in Paris eine Ausstellung. Da saß ich mit Heiner Müller im Café und habe mich geärgert, daß Beuys plötzlich völlig überästhetisiert wurde. Ich habe damals gesagt, man müßte ihn einschließen in ein Pharaonengrab und ins Tal der Könige bringen. Die Dinge ruhen lassen. Und wenn er nach 3000 Jahren immer noch strahlt, wunderbar. Aber man ist immer zu vorsichtig. Gerade bei Freunden. Baumgärtel: Ich habe eine Wand in meiner Wohnung, und wenn ich ein Bild male oder auch von anderen ansehe, stelle ich mir immer die Frage: Kann ich es dort hinhängen und damit leben? Immendorff: Wenn ich morgens den Blick auf das Bild von gestern werfe, sehe ich am ehesten, wo die Schwächen liegen. – Junge, kannst du mir mal bitte eine Zigarette in den Mund schieben? Baumgärtel: Natürlich. – Ich will noch mal auf die äußere Instanz von Freunden zurückkommen. Die lass’ ich überhaupt nicht gelten. Das wäre ein Wirrwarr an Meinungen, oft sagen zwei Leute glatt das Gegenteil. Da bleibt von mir nichts übrig. Jaune: Mich stört’s, wenn alle reinreden und das Bild noch gar nicht fertig ist. Wenn’s fertig ist, ändere ich auch nichts mehr. Beim Malen gibt es ja irrationale Eingebungen, die im Widerspruch zum denkerischen Bilderplan stehen. Ich finde, Gott sei Dank ist das so, sonst wäre man ganz schnell einer Rezeptur auf der Spur. Ungehorsame Ateliergeister sind die besten Mitbewohner. Immendorff: Ich will andere hören. Ich bin süchtig nach Kritik, das liegt an meiner maoistischen Erziehung. Zugleich hasse ich es auch, wenn man mich niedermacht. Mich hat wirklich geärgert, als es hieß, die Malerei sei durch die Leipziger neu erfunden worden. Ich meine, ich kenne euren Ex-Professor Arno Rink auch noch aus Vorwendezeiten. Alle waren noch in Deckung, und Jakobiner wetzten ihre Messer. Rink hat damals zugesehen, daß er nichts falsch macht. Später stellte er sich hin und sagte: Er wollte schon immer die Leipziger Schule in die Welt tragen. Ich glaube, angesichts seiner Schinken sollte er lieber den Ball flach halten. Genauso der Heisig. Helmut Schmidt hat ihn damals das Porträt malen lassen für die Kanzlergalerie. Ein Auftrag für Penck, das wäre ein Statement gewesen. Adenauer lag da besser mit Kokoschka. Daß Heisig einem Mörderregime so zu Diensten war, das stört mich wirklich. Abgesehen vom Mittelmaß seiner Arbeiten. Baumgärtel: Uns wirft Heisig vor, daß wir nur noch an den Erfolg glauben. Die Ideologien seien zusammengebrochen, und was bleibt, ist das Geld. Immendorff: Was heißt eigentlich Erfolg, das müßte man endlich mal definieren. Ich sage meinen Studenten immer: Mit einer guten ökonomischen Ausstattung malst du noch keine guten Bilder. Und was spricht dagegen, mal eine Zeitlang besser zu verdienen. Ich habe keine moralischen Probleme mit Geld. Für mich ist Erfolg aber was anderes: Wir wollen künstlerische Positionen weiterbringen, eine Debatte entfachen. Ich zumindest. Ich fand immer komisch, wenn sich jemand nicht für die Umstände interessiert, in denen er lebt. Das fängt in der Mensa an, wenn’s dort schlechtes Essen gibt. Und hört auch nicht auf, wenn jetzt das Kultusministerium in NRW abgeschafft wird. Ich erinnere mich noch genau an meine erste politische Aktion: Ich hatte ein Blatt Papier und sagte: »Bitte unterschreiben Sie hier gegen den Vietnamkrieg.« Beuys trug sich ein, Polke. Am Ende hatte ich vier lächerliche Unterschriften DAS MAGAZIN 51 GESPRÄCH Die Assistenten Seit Jörg Immendorff nicht mehr selbst malen kann, ist er zum Komponisten geworden, wie er sagt. In seinem Kopf entsteht die Sinfonie der Bilder, er dirigiert Assistenten, die die Striche nach seinen Vorstellungen setzen. An berühmten Vorbildern fehlt es ja nicht: Michelangelo hat die Sixtinische Kapelle auch nicht allein ausgepinselt und wußte nicht mal, wohin ich die Liste schicken sollte. Und als ich mit Hausbesetzungen anfing, da war Dutschke schon mit roten Fahnen am Horizont. Langweile ich euch eigentlich mit diesen alten Storys? Baumgärtel: Nein, im Gegenteil. Ich bin eher neidisch. Das sind wenigstens noch Geschichten. Immendorff: Meine Studenten klagen immer: Ihr hattet es gut, ihr hattet noch die großen Weltblöcke, echte Feindbilder. Ich kann nur sagen: Jubelt doch, ihr habt komplizierte Feindbilder, das ist viel reizvoller, ergiebiger. Die Seuche ist in den Poren, ihr könnt eigentlich nur Kampfkunst machen. Natürlich nicht mit Demotransparenten auf den Bildern. Wer sagt denn, daß Protest, Zorn laut sein muß. Aber daß etwas passieren muß, da bestehe ich drauf. Nur den Schlappi machen, das lass’ ich nicht durchgehen. Baumgärtel: Mir reichen in Bildern Signale, Haltungen, Zitate. Mir reicht es, in eine gedankliche Strömung zu kommen. Das geistige Niveau ist wichtig. In dieser herunterdemokratisierten, abgeflachten Mediengesellschaft ist Niveau als Gegenbewegung wichtig. Da brauche ich keine Botschaft. Jaune: Jedes Bild berührt jeden Betrachter anders. Es gibt keine verbindliche Botschaft für alle. Ich gebe meinen Bildern deshalb auch keine Titel. Ich will die Wahrnehmung nicht in irgendeine Richtung steuern. Im Moment besteht für mich die größte Herausforderung darin, Themen auszuloten, die meinen innersten Gefühlen entsprechen. Weg mit der vorschnellen Frage: »Was soll das?« Ich will das surrealistische Experiment. Ich will mich auf dieser Suche selbst überraschen können. Eins ist aber klar: Ich will meine Zeit nicht vergeuden mit privater Selbstbespiegelung. Das Telefon klingelt im Büro nebenan. Immendorff ruft durch den Raum: Ist von der »Park Avenue« der veränderte Peymann-Text gekommen? Der Theatermann schreibt über Immendorff, der Maler kann sich vor seiner Berliner Ausstellung über Mangel an Medieninteresse nicht beklagen. Der Assistent schüttelt den Kopf: kein Fax da. Er bringt ihm eine Liste, die der Maler überfliegt. Oda Jaune erzählt, das geräumige Hinterhof-Atelier sei früher eine Flaggenfabrik gewesen. Das paßt zu Immendorff. Ein Mao-Porträt hängt über der Tür. Über die Wand ist ein meterlanges rotes Banner gespannt: »Professor Immendorff, willkommen an der Akademie«. Auf Deutsch und Chinesisch. Zwischen den Bildern und Installationen gibt es immer wieder kleine Affenskulpturen, Immendorffs Fabelwesen. »15 Affen für Ida« heißt ein neues Buch, das er seinem Töchterchen gewidmet hat. Eine Geschichte über die Suche nach einem ganz besonderen Schatz. Schauplatz: ein Künstleratelier. Immendorff: Oda, was sagst du? Jaune: Na ja, ich habe sie natürlich inzwischen schon oft gehört. 52 DAS MAGAZIN Immendorff: Weiter geht’s. Ja, die Botschaften. Ich sage immer, jeder von uns ist doch Pädagoge. Nicht im üblichen Sinne. Aber jeder hat eine Verantwor- Baumgärtel: Ich finde gut, wenn man als Künstler eine klare Ansage macht. Aber dazu sind die Medien da. Nicht die Bilder. Das wäre mir zu platt, zu plakativ. Kunst muß Dschungel bleiben. Politische Dinge haben immer ästhetische Spuren und ethische Dimensionen. Das sieht man an der Nachkriegskunst. Das sind keine Trümmerbilder, das sind ganz karge, leere Szenerien. Ethik und Ästhetik berühren sich an einem ganz tiefen Punkt. Und der ist viel interessanter, spannender, als eins zu eins ein Geschehen darzustellen. Immendorf: Es muß einen wie eine gewaltige Flut mitreißen. Tübke ist vielleicht ein guter Handwerker, aber das ist es nicht. Da ist Matisse besser. Baumgärtel: Man sieht, wieviel Energie Tübke da reingesteckt hat. Jeder Mantel detailgenau. Ich denke aber, der Aufwand muß immer im Verhältnis zum Impuls stehen, der von einem Bild ausgehen soll. Immendorff: Genau, korrekt. Ganz anders Velázquez mit seinen Seiden. Das ist hingetuscht. Da hat der keine zehn Minuten gebraucht, aber es ist schon ein Pollock. Vollkommen gültig. Wie der Helm von Rubens. Da braucht man gar nicht mehr den bärtigen Mann. Der Helm hätte gereicht, mal salopp gesprochen. So, ihr Guten, jetzt muß ich Feierabend machen, ihr wißt, ich bin sehr geizig mit meiner Zeit. Jaune: Was hältst du davon, die Kollegen aus Leipzig und Dresden zur Eröffnung deiner Berliner Ausstellung einzuladen? Immendorff: Sollten wir machen. Ausstellungen & Kataloge Jörg Immendorff: Male Lago – unsichtbarer Beitrag. 23.9. bis 22.1. Neue Nationalgalerie Berlin, Potsdamer Str. 50 / Oda Jaune: Aktuelle Arbeiten. Herausgegeben von der Kunsthalle Koblenz / Tilo Baumgärtel: Neue Arbeiten. Ab November, Galerie Kleindienst Leipzig, Spinnereistr. 7 EVELYN RICHTER Rückblick Konzepte Fragmente M U S E U M DE R B I LDE N DE N KÜ N STE LE I PZIG 18. 9. – 20. 11. 2005 Katharinenstr. 10, 04109 Leipzig, Tel.: 03 41/21 69 90, mdbk@leipzig.de, www.mdbk.de Täglich 10 bis 18 Uhr, Mi 12 bis 20 Uhr, Mo geschlossen DAS MAGAZIN 53 ANZEIGE tung. Es braucht nicht das bewußte politische Manifest, ich muß mich nicht auf irgendeine Seite schlagen. Aber gleichgültig tun, da werde ich bockig. Ken Johnson: Art in Review; Clara Park – Positions of Contemporary Painting from Leipzig, The New York Times, 09/24/2004. ART IN REVIEW; 'Clara Park' -- 'Positions of Contemporary ... http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9501E4DF1... This copy is for your personal, noncommercial use only. You can order presentation-ready copies for distribution to your colleagues, clients or customers, please click here or use the "Reprints" tool that appears next to any article. Visit www.nytreprints.com for samples and additional information. Order a reprint of this article now. » September 24, 2004 ART IN REVIEW; 'Clara Park' -- 'Positions of Contemporary Painting From Leipzig' By KEN JOHNSON Marianne Boesky 535 West 22nd Street, Chelsea Through Oct. 2 Once an official bastion of East German social realist painting, the Leipzig Academy of Visual Arts continued to train artists in traditional techniques after the reunification of Germany in 1990. This exhibition, organized by the Berlin curator Christian Ehrentraut, presents works by eight academy graduates. It has the look and feel of a high-caliber student show. (The title, ''Clara Park,'' refers to a place where the artists like to congregate when not working.) The spirit of Neo Rauch, the most successful Leipzig painter to emerge in recent years, hovers over the show. None of the artists offer imagery as inventively fantastic as his, but his influence is evident in Matthias Weischer's large, thickly squeegeed, drably colored paintings of retro-modern rooms; David Schnell's vertiginous, strangely artificial landscapes; and Martin Kobe's glowing, futuristic, semi-abstract architectural visions. Of the four artists who focus on human figures, the most interesting are Tilo Baumg?el, whose king-size charcoal drawings are like illustrations for supernatural mystery stories, and Christoph Ruckh?rle, whose paintings of people in congested rooms suggest a simpler, less angst-ridden Max Beckmann. The others are Franziska Holstein, who presents a large painting of a photo album open to pages of baby pictures, and Stephanie Dost, who has filled a whole wall with photographs, drawings and sketchy paintings depicting young, attractive bohemians. Tobias Lehner, the only completely abstract painter, makes large, hectic compositions combining many different modes of application, from stenciling to splattering, which recall the works of another East German, Gerhard Richter. KEN JOHNSON 1 of 2 22.01.13 12:16 Hans-Werner Schmidt: First encounters with Tilo Baumgärtel & Harald Kunde: Uncertain Exit. Observations on the works of Tilo Baumgärtel, Tilo Baumgärtel – Hydroplan, 2002, Museum of Visual Arts / galerieKleindienst, Leipzig, 5-13. := .r::Jnlers ylilh lilo Balngerlel - _'::::.s.n ofthe Annua li4eeiing i'r 2001 of the,Forderer des Museums d bldenden Kinste L€ipzis e.V. (,Associat on of :: :::': Slpporiers of the lvuseum of F ne Arts Le pzig.), a ser es oi vis ts took place to the studios of young Leipzig a sts. - : . : _:': r'orn d ffereni parts of the Federal Repub ic were posltively surprised by ihe scope of art stic idioms leaving a lasting .!(ertly to be found n Leipzig ii the c assica domanofpantngandihegraphicads.Padicularlyiheencounierwihthe Balmgartel lead to a heightened inter€st in other p aces both in his oeuvre as we I as in ihe new generation of Dainiers n ::-- ::r b denden Kiinste Leipzig already purchased the picturc ,Begegnung{ (rErcounieft) by lllo Baumgart€ in sumrner 2001. ' -i: :' a t ght acquisitron budget, oLr prospects are by necessity dep€ndent on the risk ol purchasing adworks ai an early date, in :i : r,r a be ng repeated y defeated if spite of end ess ca cu at ons in the hope of achieving addit onal lundiig by the financia ::_:::: :aJsed by tlre purchase of a s nge masterpiece. :::::-,rg. ' ,' :: -: ct!res, ir whrch traffic breaks down and transport is tlansposed io more archaic states, and :_ :ie ewer fully awake - is mad€ io exper ence rnovem€nt ahead as reminisceni of a nightmar sh state of tread ng on th€ spot, :: r :h physical fatigue. Llke in a dream, rn which day and night consianily swiich, the p cture defies specific iempora deiinit on. be orgs to the group of snow p v -i::.".rysuff!sedwthasobtemixtureoicoloursspentbythefullmoon,theNortlrernLightsandiheglowofBengal ights, disallows :-:-::r ar ocating t in dayiime. - ; ::-.1gartel's pa ntrngs are much sought.after. This s reflected by the numb€r of recent exh bitions and by th€ transierral of his works _:: '--erous private co lections. Muse!m der bildenden Kiinst€ L€ipzig is able to attend to this growing interest due io ihe suppod of _:._ 18. wh ch ce ebrat€s iis 10th anr versary this : -: On this occas on, it was thus decided that in collaboration with Museum Vear. - : :.nden Kijnste Leipzig a priz€ for lp-and-coming young artists would be awarded every two years lrom now on. Compris ng an ::-:: r.. a cata ogue as wel asan acquisition for ihe [4useum d€r b ld€nden Krinste Lepzg, the prize s beneficial to adist and ::-- a rke, wh lsi a so lending add tiona esteem for its in tiator and sponsor, Sachsen LB. ":, r tirerefore like to €xt€nd my sincerest thanks to Sachsen LB and io al ihose who w€re actively involved in mak ng this decision : : - the project's realisation ::- : :: :rank the jury for conloin ng in ts resolute d€cision to award this yeals prize to T lo Baumgarte . I wou d also ike to express fiy i :::-ae to Jeann€tt€ Stoschek for her reliabil ty and open rn ndedness throughout th€ proiecfs d€ve opment at wIus€um der bildenden . '.:: Le pz g, as well as to l\Iatthias Kle ndienst for the passion and conf dence with which he performs h s pione€ring work as a gal ery : '._.' n addition, my sincere thanks go to the lend€rs, ioo, for supporting the adist's I rsi museum exhibition. -: ':-nd th ngs off, all of us ar€ obliged to lilo -.::s the viewels gaze to inger, thus causing :. Baumga el for his having opened up before oLrr eyes a novel world of p ctures, wh ch ihe d stance betw€en pictorial space and th€ aclual space surrounding the v€wer to 4ans Wenet Schnidt, Dircctot, Aluseun der bildenden KAnsrc Leipzig Venezianishe Blitler 5 . ::seftalioN on lhe worfts of Tilo . :::.iiers 2001 Eaumg;rlel Do!bt Tempera aul Pap er . 46 ess x 31.5 cm clustered around ihe art acadern es n Le p, g and Dr€sden Saxony n other p aces. art st c output rs deterrn n€d by far reach ng changes of parad gm irreconolable :::.. rE and ihe lnt rirg. explo tai ve greed of the market, arnonB artists rn Le pz g ihere s€ems to preva I a particular :: ._:e that places an urceasife tr!st rn pa nting as a coniemporarv medion; inde€d here pa nt ng was nev€r prrportedlv be onged to a centurv Sone by : ,::.4 n Rid cu ed n t rnes when descript ons such Wlr lst death and its subsequeri reb rth bv each new gereration were celebrated, thrs :::_:: ras taken noie of wthmuchstrprse after the reLrnflcaton of Germanv iva|dated ih€ verdict ol 'state at' ' , ".':nces became apparent urve ng a ! ew nto the h nterland of the avanlgard€i rf spite of be ng scre€n€d oif lrom ::::a nfluef.e ariists n this part of Gerrnany clairned ior thenrselves both a ceria n facel ous orrg na tvafdanassedive : :. : .. : on R€fer€nces and e €ci ve afflnrt es heishtened a sefse ol be ong ng n LeipzLg to tlr€ tradrtron oi the svrnbo c _:.r ! a th€ d stant grandmasters Eeckrnann, P casso ard Bacon. to the oLrterrnost ram trcations of the "Le pziger _ ; r.iei (vrestern) painting's presumed :: :: Le pzrg() rn Dresden, to the €xpressior sm of the ,Brijck€" and the eanv Penck, and to the parnier y sensua sm ol :::i'_ru€r Heirmann and Gdsche . Apart irom dlosyncrat c sol tar es such as Altenbourg, C aus and Glackner, ilr s br ef ist . :: :::i as ihe folndatron lpon wh ch lnaiiected by iime pa nt ng dev€ oped rn Saxonv However. Saxor pa nt ng on y .r: :::.nt on w th artists alt c! ating d st ncirve p ctoria concepts, stch as Neo Ralch n the mid 1990s, and a lltle later' rn Thomas Scherb tz. S!dd€nty ihe arnbrval€nt bonus of the exotic seened inval daied. Suddenly this partrc! ar : i,: .ss,on on y slight y lagg ng behird ihe zeige st co! d apt J/ disclose condit ons deeper w(hir the predicarn€nt oi :r:1 r'. ihe Lons tradii on ol paintrfs .t art academ es Ln Saxonv appeared as the verv prerequ s(e of the med um s . .- ::: a ': ::.rorks : '::-: nihisrnsprine durngthefrna agorv of a co!ntrv with a po|i cal and thls an eyewitness of fundamenta changes n al areas of |ie Balmgarte was and cornpeirtrve en! ronrnent. Rars€d :-.rmed to cave in on isel -r:iscfu e fur crafrk und Buchkunsi Leipzig whef prec sely this rnsttution was rmp cated in reforms oi great socieial rorhngseemedcedain:theeLphoriaofreformoftenturnediniothesoberaitltudeofthereformed,andonesfLrture r, r :y no means be conf rmed. How€ver, ai the same t m€ there was mtch fr€edom Tlr s he ghtened the poientia mpact - :i!,r aid subsequen|y necessitated art sts to focus more on th€ir own outpui. As Baumgadelwas nterested frorn the very : ;:!rences and assoc at ve narraiion, he orig na lv experimerted w ih f rn and staged photographv Requ ring cornpara -:-aley deterring technca equiprnent, ths nital phase was short ved Yei Baumgarte s mages have reta ned a : :: ,::!re to th s day, occasional y resernbling pa nted f lm st lls The oppodun iies nh€rent io ihe 'anc ert' medlLm of _ ::: rectangu ar canvas expanse prov€d more -, fasc nate.l Baumgartel most, the quieter sensat ons to b€ had w ihrn th€ .-:-:rheoretca,na(atrveandforrnalconcerns.ThefactthattherehappenediobeapainiingcomebackiLstasBaurn seems somewhat co nc dental. and doLrbiless accounts for herghiened attention ol h s work by . :: - s srud es at art schoo Aen. ll . 2oo2 . dl auf Leinwand .80 x60 cm the (fashion oriented) art wortd. However, closer €xarninaiion of some exernplary works by Baumgadel shows that he nd€ed possess€s highly ndividLral qualities as an adist. A recurring theme appears to be a fear of ine''ria, being stLrck and rema ning stranded. ln dramatic scenarios, Baumgijrte sheds lght on tempora y untimited aciions d sptaying whal Eazon Brock has caled th€ "eqoanimity oi the catastrophic.. Tra ns arc seen huding throLgh btizzards to remain forever stuck in ihe snow Without wheels, bLrs wecks rest ,n peace upon brick p inihs. Boat tr ps ihrough poisoned waters are frozen forever in the mom€nt of departure. Reduced to schematic outlines and hov€ring as f guided bv renrote contrcl' Baumgartet s protagon sts are genera lly vei ed n a sh im mer of tristesse. lt is noticeable that the figu res' dentit es con stantly sw tch There s no flxed set of actors carrying out the actioni the figures each fo low ng a diflerent path - seem to be groping and searchirg for (first experrenc ng the p cture as something. tt seerns as if, atter a given moment, Baumg,rtel devotes h rnself who ly to finding an image a ,b urred thoughi.) as welt as to the intrinsic demands of the mat€riaL, and is often surprised by the outcome The characier stic openness ol this apprcach enables Baumgddet to move between artistic intuition and cornposiironal improvem€nt. and to thus evolve pictures in cqmptex superimpostrons incorporating both sketchy outl nes and blocks oi colour. The res! iing p ctures are argely borne of inner necess ty and are uniquety attainab e through tlre very process of painting. However, th s method also ant cipates ta ure as a tegitimate resutt and consciously r€sists a I pressur€s of delivery: it ,ys cla m to the primacy of actual qua ty. Baumgarte thus avoids both overhasty restrictions and rmmob lization due to preclpitate success. lndeed, he assumes a coLlnter-pos t or to lr s creaied cast of fgures, whorn he dispatches - nhisplace- nto the crisis of stagnation. A btazingty neqn cotour scherne s a srgnature qua ity of Baurngadel's pictures. Diffuse fields ol p nk. chrome .x de green aid su phurous yet ow radiaie over and beyond the recognizable o!tlines of oblects, rendering a I ghiing and atmosphere ak n to Tft3retto aid E Greco WithoLri seekin€ hackneyed r€ferences to pa nt ngs ancestors, it deserves to be mentioned that s nce Baumga.te s s:ria arsh p n V€nice, i.2 -: r: rrsh,p ,n h s p ciures between 1 g!rat on and surface rs predomrnaftly achreved by tlre hono!rab e teclrn q!e oi sfumato : t..lrf qre wh ch tlrrouglr Gerha.d Rrchler's mastedr b urs rs a lar reach ng, cafon ca rif !eice on contemporary :__i'.!crds the prob ng, approxrrnate natur€ oi B:rmg:irtels percept of of the wor d s rend€red con.r€te through a p ctor a : : rsi.rms the repertory of the v s bly mater a nto a rea .n of personal expereice Th s rs part .! ar y ref ected by th€ : :. :_.ra.ienst c of many of the scenes wh ch somet mes ncorporate e emenis lrom , ustrat ons n ch ldren s.books: by th€ : ::riicance! deiermrn ng s ze and sc: e wrih n the pa nt ngs by emphas z ng the srblecirvely LrLrL,a anil byheghtefng :'i:n se!uencesi and f i3 ly by the .a cu ated d .holomy ol oblect ve prec s or and tlre pa nt€rly drsso utron of form. Earm : _::," methods wrth the a m of contur nB a 'crypt ca y po€t c. state. confroftrng us with the spec frc truth oi pa itrrg. : : ::server to read beiween the lnes. to look between the lavers For, altholeh Baurng;riel stud es comrcs. photographs :'::-i magesonada ybass he ns sG on the rneaf ngf! ness of the parnted ma8e wh ch rs loLrided w tlr n lsef : ,re rg most apt y trafsport€d by and throrgh the nv€ntion ol su tab e forms :.:r(:atl,,l!seumderbldefdefK!nsteLepzgontheoc.asonoitheSachsenLBAltPrz€,tscearthatBalmgart€ : .: these ,rteftrons rrto prrct ce Pari c! ar y the most recent grolp ol pa ni ngs. n wlr ch hydrop ares g rde over the the banks of r vers. best exemp fy the drecton and locls ol Baurng;rtels magrnaton Searchers rove : :: ,r..s. stumb e upon mock vesse s to caps ze and s,rk rfto the depths or it gro!nd evel are seen dr ving rboLrt : ::: As nu t ply €clreloned composrt ois sliiLrsed by a mephri c lght. ihese tableaLrx exude the arcaneness oi complex : : :s:ss a ir.ce ol know rg moLrrn ng; occas ofal y the bedro.k oi Saxon magery s fairtly v srb e. c osely ty ng llre : ' rrat ves to an rdent I ably speof. env ronmeft. At ihe same trme however they seern to hover rn a state of . : . _ ,_:..r:t . slate nwhrchalofTloBaumgartelsfglres:ct.Hrssearch€EVsbyperformtasks yeitheyhavero : : :lae.voursorcrfal pa. or!tmateam I contrast, Balmgarte atteftrvely obsetues the lrustle and blsteof te .' : ,!,e.t ve v ewpo ni and w th an ufcedarr outcome cruc al moments ol chanEe and departtre : oer Urlauber . l ooo F-pqaa.r Pap" 0 40 Ulrike Lorenz: Talk, Tilo Baumgärtel, 2002, Sparkassen-Kulturstiftung Hessen-Thüringen, 44-55. intrcduc€d for the llßt time Wirh Tilo Saumgärtel, born in r97r, a young LeiPzig-born painter is being prom inent Academy ofVisual in Willingshausen, Cermany's oldest adists'colony Agraduateofth€ mgärtel's rcots lie deep in Afts in his home town and a master pupil (until 2ooo) with Amo Rink Bau then€tapho c painting ofthe LeiPzigerschool," which made its mark on 2oth centuryCeman_ with subversive German art histo.) to a much lesser degree with solid Socialist Realism tha; studyingth€ "anci€nt Aftertraining as a machinist, BaumgärtelsP€nt the fißt Post'socialist decade pincipleof paiiting,"confused butnotoverwhelm€d bvthen -media boom'whichstrcnglv barclv30veaß old' h€ inRuerced the irternationalad sc€n€ duingjusl thos€v€aß ln the lat€ 9ot' life 3nd nightmare entered th€ scenewith develoPed ambiv.lent scena os th't balance eve'yday na ative modeland autonomous visions, pictoial woids that eristwithin the a.c oftension b€twe€n with a renaissanceofthe laGe' coupled painting. ThetriumPhant comeback ofthe trad itional gen ß' now fa'es th€ t'sk ofle'ming the sLlls scale narratlve, again shifted the balance ot powei Baumgärtel ad p zeofthestate ofcopingwith prcgrammed ea v rccognition.ln a last few days h€ ßc€ived the the €nd ofthe v€ar at for eank ofiaxony; a llrst comprch€nsive on€-man show has be€n announced the Leipzig t!4useum ofFineAds. thediscussion Bathed in the almon sPnitualglow ofthe light_grcen birch grcves in willingshausen' on the late spring ev€ning of May between theadist and the colony h€ld at Ge.had-von-R€utem-Haus messagefrcm the inte'iorto r66 promised a relaxed atmosphere in which to rcllect on painting as banishmentof the exterior world, on insplration as a formativ€ force, on ment'larchives and the on the work ofTilo everyd.y catastrcphes to fantastic painted stoies A discussion, thercforc' ofthe medium " Edmgärtel, someone forwhom Painting "is stillc!rent because ofthe simPlicity sees the picturc' level,''one "oneio one, plcture and viewer, autho..nd picture'- encounteß at ele looks away and the ßst takes Pl.ce insid€ one's head " ' You envision myslerlous locales: u.ban landscaPes emptv ofPeoP e siow covered paths and woods diverless locomotives, ghostllke patches offog pecu iar PeoPle The pictüres suggest that concrete decode the disasters or at least nysler ous acl ons arA äbout to unfo d A fi6t glance s noi e'oügh to from on images olact a story:fragments y remefrber tentior llled atmosPhere. But the. we sudden sutreal a llmorthe news somethirgwe absorbed Peripheralvand noworlv halfrememberThese shlmmering scenanos n midil2ed format ako co.fuse us because thev conte n chärged 'olor surlaces, sepärate and autoiomous. Orgaioid forms ard float rg br!sh structures mark "gaps act sure he'erthai as dlsruptions by ro means attheforefio.t, but stilli.sisterl On y one thing seems noth ng is clear That is what s ercitiig aboui Tilo BaumSärtels f. B. Realisti., figurative, u. Palnling Howwould vou descnbe nairatve canI sayadything moreaboutit lcan tdescribe my Painting' L, Peüaps because then you would have to Paint narratve thatyou envisior come lrom? more. Butwheredoes the kiid ofron rePresentative T.8, tdoesnt.omefrom o.e padicu arsource ilvares greatl Findinga picture s adifflcutthirg especially because t s tied to wantirg When l/r,tto find a Picture, l'an t lt s ree lv a most to express where the hspiration lor a p cture comes ftom Ma/be from a para lel intel ectualworld where whät have seei ard thought is stored and where these things merge with mpossib e eachotherThisdeveopssomehowintoasystemolunfocusedthoughts,astructurewthsürprising .rossjefe.ences that lrtuitivev learn how to use often Perce ve this ur(onscious structuring as an a reed for communication That is what I undersiand as a resonator One cannot co.tro .hance Chance events are decded bv p.iic p e of imagine t a higherforce, adeterm niigforce.That sounds sp rtlal butlts rea lvt'ue at east as And ihen one has the possibiity ofreProducing the form that one rece ved as resonance' ,rt st. event and out of t I develop nspirat on. f,1an ls a U. L. To stay with thls image:you rece ve somethingthat you have ro controlove( t grows irto a swarm picture Then the very sPecific of ind suicithoughts and chale.gesyou to commun cateihro!gh paint ng process begi.s, wh ch has a dynam c ofits own. That mears that yo! may rotice at some point that you can t go any lurther lt s poss ble that the ori8iia sense olirsp ratlor has aho alreadv a tB. (wth ai amused smie)Yet, Yes. u. l-. Something is crcat€d on cenv.s that is no longer -. p.rtofyou but 6th€rfa.esyou. Somethingthat you.nd.lso demands rcspons€s fiom you.That's how I imagineth€ proc€ss ofpainting constent reaction by the artist to wh.tever is taking place in fiont othim on th€ canvas- The pictur€ responds to is creat€d within this "conveßation." Howdo€s yourstudioand realizing,dammit, I thatwo*l l'v€ also sen you dissatisfied - standing in wantedsom€thingelse. T.8. Thafs kue. At nrstthe.e'sth€ purc canvas, this field, m.ybefourcubic met€6, white,virginal, €ternal ice... (l.ughs softly) lt took a while beforc I lost th€ feeling of revercnce I us€d to hav€ - and stilldo, . little. At filst ltrytoetpßss my.ough ideas ofa picture.Just as und€nned as m), idea is, lloosely hang a noose aro!nd the picture. Overth€ cou6eofdays, sometim€s w€€ks,lpullthe n@setogeth€r tightly. Then I see what's +ill inside th€ noose o.wh.t has aksdy slipp€d out ofit. Vr'hat €nds up on the canvas is not always what I originally wanted. U.L Doesyour own painting prcc€ss and ther€sults still su ryrise yo! I T.8. Yesss. l'm €xcit€d when Myp l'm painting, ollen. lt surpises me in both a positiv€ and a negative sense. mary intercst in painting is the unpred ict.bility of the whole process. U.L Painting-an advcnturc... T.8, Y€s, u. ifyou like.lalso see it.s an adventure. t. Bacltoth€ beginnings. Yourcarer p.th did not Leipzig. lead staightfiom machinist to Feelan<e painterin what led you ro become. painterl ta. lkn€wf.om th€ beginningthat lwanted to become an adist. I only staded rhe apprcnticeship bccause con.ected to thet lcould getthe secondary school cedificat€ that lneedcd ro study art. So lsp€nt wo* in. But it stillwasnt lost time - r etpeien.ed the last ofthe CDR production process. Therc w€r. impressiv€ images, forexämple, how in thefoundry the casting hungfiom the ceilungwath chains and were formed manually by hand. Thet 'nolds rcmind€d meofAdolf M€nzel's pictur€s. thrce y€e,rs learning a trade I didn'twant to gasps cant rememberexactywhei thech ldhood wishto become ar ad sl turned ntöserious determ natior; t was .erta nly a gradua process. But l've a ways been nvoved wth drawing, with attempis to portray things around me, I built model ships and t nkered with them. th rk I wanted to create another wond arouid me. IJ. L. As a buffer zore between yo! and rea ity) T, B. Perhaps whal I was attempting to do was ook at the world as lt a ready er sted. to relnterpret it lor myseliand thus create my own world. U. L. Did your parents support these early artist c terderc es? TA My parents themselves are not artins, but theywere veryfamillarwith the Leipz g ad scene [,llfather who ived n the reighborhood H s apartment a ways struck me as a alchemisrs abomtory. For erefrp e, he had a big wallcabinetwith anima s preserved in formaldahydeand then suddent .exttothem yöu sawa hu. ma. idex finger That made a very b g mpressioi on me. And then the pictures a.d drawings that fi led al ihe .ooms lo olerllowing .. I often look my own dmw igs to the book i lustrators Renate and Eckbert tselfu h: jrn did this, could you ieke e look al lt) So over t he, the fee ing grew in me that dEwingand paintngwas sonethingvery important. From the beginring ltook tveryseriously, is a physrcrst, my mother a teacher I very fiequendy visited a painter and etcher somet fles perhaps too ser ousl/ lt wasn't untll began to study art li the early r99o s that the do!bts came, becaüse there was no resonance from my suroundings. Back then Ean Cermary as we I modern. deep y odd abolt t. As a pa,ite/ oie pairting a.d pai.t ng from wasn t he d in pärt cu ary h gh esteem aiyway. There wes soneth ng d!ny, häd to fight ägairn these preiud u.. ces U, L. Ard how did you declde th T. s lght to your advartage? 8. Sometimes twaseasy:cerchyourjawu.diustkeepgoing tlled not to th nk ebout il so huch. Ol cou.se there were a aße number ofgood colleagu-os, !riveßity f,iends, who also cont nued with paint rg. 8ut we ako.egularl/ saw peop e demonstrat ve y leaving paint ng. I was always suspic ous when people turned rEo'degrees tom drawing to v deo or computers. U,L whydoesn tthe computer, that is, d gta processlrgofimagesasamedunfo.fndrgand exam n rg deas have the sane mportance for you that it does for othe' pa nteE ofyour generat on) tB. Cenera ly speak ng I made an nated pai.ting. wh€. a ways th rk doi t fnd t uninterest ng. h s fun ro create plcrures on the compüter I tried t, I f ms äid had iobs creatiig web pages fo' companies. Blt I can t lse it ior my I srr he tab e, a sheet ofdrewirg pape. r fiont olme and a penci my hand, a i why shou d I do th s on the computer) Why can t I pict!re on the screen do ne) I didnt know why I shou d take jlst skerch it? whar good does the th s deto!r U. L. A.d th s br r95 us to Eaumgärtel as graphic artist. Your wonderful sketchbooks are ike meta, naratives You describe drawing as ar "outpost ofreflect on what funct oh do you assign it r the ovecl co.text ofyour work? t8. t s very rare that a drawing is he plu as direct preparation for paint ng. As a gene€l rule, a good sketch is bad for the creat on ola good picture. I ofter assume that I don t have aiy sketches My drawings are menta monologues thet I ho d with myselfthrough the waystet on ofpaperi the/ represent a daiy processing a.d reworklng olimpressions. ltel mysel5omethingorjotdowndetak a.dthoüghtsasiradary,sothattheydor'tgetlostorsi.kintoaleveofcorsciousnessrhat no onger have ac.ess to when I pa nt. lt's a so a reläxing process Wher 'm dnw ng, th rgs come out that had gotte. ntomyhead nadvertenty, ikebrdsfindingawayourofahalthattheyflewirtoby vet a process ofsett ig down what you have seen and refected upor a5 im nary stag€ ofpa rtrng or does it represent independent ärtisr c express on? ls drawing lor yoü exc us pr€ a T. B. t can be seen as p' nc a separale aid distinct partolmywork. Drawng s basedor a com pletel/ ifferert or A4lormat. Also, the irear ratLre ack ines on white paper and see them n ai A5 old.awngcarnotbeeastrethought r rerms ofpainting. donlpaint 'trans ating dcwings to a arye cänvas defliite y döes iöt wörk p e. I have b ra d i.earfäsh,oi. so ln contrast to your much more spontaneous draw rg, a corstant re e€m nation ofwhat s on the carvas predom nates when yoü pai.t. The urge to exeß cortrolcould repress the aston shmeniyoü T.B. There are various stages ofwork on a paint ng month oftwo. - n some cases, the entire process can take !p to a obsetue the pict!re and then repeatedll put it away, because there is rhe danger ihar wher you look at sonethiig every day, you stop realy seeiig t, you deve op a b Thät doesn t happei toyo! iid tpot ... when yo! draw... tB. No. And that\ an advantage. Workirg on a paint ng, however, is often very much an up-and process, I ke trek ng over mourtains and thro!gh va leys. l ve noticed that moments about the picture make one physica lyvery äct ve are very flips o!t, b!t mportant ir dowr wh ch doubts don't wantto saywhen one when ore becomes bruta , hurts the pictüre ard then somehow liberates t from want rg. when I palit, l'm often ir darger ofwaiting too much. The "nanato," who s ts at the back ofmy head ard whispeß to me, rels me what lwant to do - he becomes my opponent ard ltry to ger id ofhim. Ihese are d frcult psychologcal prccesses. ln the monert when lhäve erough and hurt the picture, thatisakothemomentwhen lovercomethedowrhillside. lthappehsaboutthesamewaywth large format pictures. lt seems as iiore has to do volence in sohe form to what one loves. Oihetuise it doesn t go beyond wanting aid thal becomes nmngey u.interesting. u. t. It a most seems as destroy ifyo! deferd youßelfas a paiiter ig /ourwolk. ih an eiormously stressful situation by partia ly And this destrucuor creaies the openness that eiables you to make a rew beg hning ... t8. reshlmed, the portents change. And only ther can the process ofc,eat hg the pairtingcontinue.Again and egain,lhaveihefeeingthat l'm startngfrom the begrnirg.There is no pr ncip e or pattern thät I .an follow. There are no ru es or rhetorical set ofrules that help neither Yes, the cards are sti. nor painterll. mysel real Everyth hg nust be reinverted. lhave the impßssion thatyoudemard a o LlJ.e sloa.<. Fdv. /oL r'red 'lr( ard But find that preferable to repeartrg or d luting loiofyou6el Manyothersfind salvaion in pictureseries or itl eJecred 18. variat ons woLld ln fact be helpful But strangely enolgh, I can t do thai. ,\&hen l've developed a pi.ture aid feel that it is lln shed, then n that momeit that is the orly possib lty for th s ptcrure. wh€n tl tc repeat,t le ow pa .te-s vrho ca. But th€re s a rvho e dö create a new p cture, that do butnot at the same Ievelas the fißt one. envy my at east, sometimes I do. dige ofpossib I d trerent t nes olday wolid be ore . ties ol rep tit on - Monet s variations ofplciures ofcathedßls at . lB, N'latbe l reach t hat point somet .o lect ig Vary ng m ght be som€th ng me. considermyselfabegnnerwho scurenty I earh at a d fereni nage... n the process of U. L. narative But then perhaps differertly than N4onet. You are not interested n the subject as such, but in .ontexrs. The.anal ve is the constituting element ofyour pa ntiig. Therefore, the poirt s not to delve intothephysica.ha6cterist.sofes!biect,butrathertoevokemoods,andinthefnalanaysis perhaps ev€. to cr€ate repeated y appear o. a. nterpretve wor d concept. Now you youßelfspeak ofp.ture elements that the canvas a mosl !ncon5c ousyl for example train caß or baroque w gs and you sät thet th€se e ements gain neaning through ,epit tion. Therefore, ä p,o.ess ofacq!iring meaning thattales p a.ewthöutanyeffortonyou, part. Do you urde6tand yourpctures pimariy as T, B. nrhebackgound atthebackolmymird-there s always a narat ve o. a pi.tor a mood.lcantjlst create it w thour nco,poratlng real obiects. Anyth ng else would be abstract pairting e.d I feel very unsureofmys€finthatarea that br ng the atmosphere 50 lookforthingsthalaremoreorlessabetoexpresswhällwant, n ooking for into the picture. Ofcoursethere are sources that are access b e to al : news newspapeß, daiy perceptions. They täke up residence n one's head a who e storage faciity in the brain. When one wants to create an atmosphere orconstruct a na(atve, one goes nto lh s nental slorage fa.ilty aid look5 for somethi.g suitable That is I ke the room r a theater where pröps are kept. where all ihe obiects lor a perto,marce are stored. ln a practical sense, when I pa nt m the d rector who decides which props to use ard how U. L, But a.cord ng to which pri.c ples) A picture is ä wäys also a formal compositior. tB. There arevarous seectio. criteria. if.d fra.ythings simpytoo pedestrian, tooworn out. throw those out On the öthe, händ, I nnd urexpected objects. Fo. examp e, one oftei sees a beehive n my pa nt.gs. Or deep snowwthoutanyconnection to w rter sports or srow removal. Other be oved oblects are fe(es and sh ps lhat travelälongcahals.llke the dua meanngofthecanälasanariery n the picture and the ship as metapho ricalt w thout a a iransitory elehent, lt's possible to corstruct sofrething n excess ive am ou nt of myit fcation, thät fL nct on s on a level com pletely independeit of dait perceptions. u. t. Aid targetirg the viewer's abilit to uhderttaid metaphors) are you tB. ls mplytryloavoid p!re rcpresentataior wher whät a so see around me - because that see in a picture coiresponds exacdy doesnl lrigger anything, not n the viewer and towhat I nol in me. There are var ous ways. Sometimes it's enough wher oie lakes a very everyday scere and disgu ses it li coloß. U. L. ... or ihe "d yuption ofthe picture" th,ough abstract elehents, I conf!ses itse I ke these patches offog. The p ctu,e so to speak At the same tlme, when you use these genuine pairterly structures you ako br ng your medium nto plal. To me, this seems to indicate an eminentlyforma uideßtand ng... ta. Yes, this fog these are compo5itione aspe.ts that cän e so have an effect on the.ontent. Fog interests me because it s unclear Thet is exa.tly whät I already mentioned oftei fiid th s irdistin.tness nterest ng, because krowihat someth but that can come.ioserto during the process ofpa ntlrg. i. relation to reilection. ng ls there that I can t recogrize U. L. Do you see youßelfas pad ofa part cula.tradition ir paint .unent New F ng frcm Surealismus to Pop Art to the grratior) tB. No, I don t see myselfas parl ofa movement or a trerd that cou d be träced back lo something. B!t of course there are päi.ters thal i.terest me to a greäter or lesser extenti I don't or enl myselfoi them, butthoughthem regain and stre.gthen mybellefin pa corld you iame few hames as an aid? a itiig lB. Län yea, . ve. ce \!asdeepyimpressedbyTntorettosbgmuralsirtheMadon.adelOrtoChurch and the 5ä. Ro.co schoo. whal this man created out ofdeeP conviction and the for.ewith wh ch he d .i t defla.ds the h ghest respect. Filling these movie{creen formatt ... U. L. a so a mo! e atmosphe.e Baroque pa ntirg ofthe grand emotions ... TB .. F aid ejleds Doil ra I I d ke ro be afta d oleffectsl kror fyou, skelches are "dore real' than your paint ngs. T, B. My d6w ngs are thar\rtha sketch O. probab exist \ olien nuch more distorted ard twisted thah the palntirgs. I always have the feel ng arge-sca e pa a nti.g I can t make ary unrea clams. t!mucheasertodothatwithasmall large scale n often appears too diluted and too sihple.when lPaint, ltry to make pa,: olthe ca cuLat on. ltry to portray things that could actualt exlst even ifthey . :h s coiste ar on with my dmw rgs, on the other hand, arything is Draw.g s p,obabva *ay öf,ecover ng from the compulsion ofprobab lty possible 1n wilrever m free. Paintng U.L Comp!,s ö. oiprobab tt n palrting) T.8. der 'I nE n pa rti.g to be a great art. Puüing as de the fact that a Painting is a ways a "lle ' B!t whe. I n compos rg a sc€.e, it seems dargerous to drift offlnto comPlete arbilrariness As soon as detach mise llrom gcv q. from the rigid torm, I ose the contelt. At the momeit, the ftamework, I cons I very mportanttome.Perhapsll move beyond that in thal a so depends or my skill t me Ofcö!ße. - the better a ie is Presehted, the more convincing it is 8ut in the fna anä ys s my bas . point ofview s that feverything is Poss ble, like a Psychedelic dtug wh ch alsö ho d3 ml thoughts together. is st fa.tasy. leleryrhnscarbeconsderedprobable then- think, itcan no longer be takei seriously