Document 6480470
Transcription
Document 6480470
This practice algorithm has been specifically developed for M. D. Anderson using a multidisciplinary approach and taking into consideration circumstances particular to M. D. Anderson, including the following: M. D. Anderson’s specific patient population; M. D. Anderson’s services and structure; and M. D. Anderson’s clinical information. Moreover, this algorithm is not intended to replace the independent medical or professional judgment of physicians or other health care providers. Note: Consider Clinical Trials as treatment options for eligible patients. This Prostate Cancer treatment consensus algorithm is used as a framework for the application of individualized therapy for patients with prostate cancer at the M.D. Anderson Cancer Center. The faculty and members of the Genitourinary Center apply this general algorithm to individual patients accommodating patient preference and physician experience in the context of a specific knowledge of prostate cancer. Copyright 2012 The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center Department of Clinical Effectiveness V9 Approved by Executive Committee of the Medical Staff 06/26/2012 This practice algorithm has been specifically developed for M. D. Anderson using a multidisciplinary approach and taking into consideration circumstances particular to M. D. Anderson, including the following: M. D. Anderson’s specific patient population; M. D. Anderson’s services and structure; and M. D. Anderson’s clinical information. Moreover, this algorithm is not intended to replace the independent medical or professional judgment of physicians or other health care providers. Note: Consider Clinical Trials as treatment options for eligible patients. STAGING WORKUP INITIAL DIAGNOSIS PRESENTING CLINICAL STAGE cT1a Prostate biopsy1 DRE PSA Gleason score Life expectancy greater than or equal to 5 years, or symptomatic from local or metastatic disease Life expectancy less than 5 years and asymptomatic Follow up annually, no further work up until symptoms, for example, bone pain or voiding dysfunction Bone scan if: ● PSA greater than 15 ng/mL or ● cT3-cT4 disease or ● Bone pain or ● Positive nodes on CT/MRI imaging or ● Gleason scores of 8-10 or ● Adverse histologies (e.g. small cell and/or neuroendocrine) ● CT or MRI considered for high risk patients based on NCCN guidelines2 FNA if clinically indicated See Page 3 of this algorithm cT1b, cT1c, cT2a, cT2b cT3a cT3b, cT4 Any T N1, M0 See Page 4 of this algorithm Any T or N, M1 Symptomatic Any N M1 with Visceral or lytic bone metastases and low PSA 1 Perform prostate biopsy if not previously done. If done, MDACC review of prostate biopsy results. 2 http://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/PDF/prostate.pdf Copyright 2012 The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center Department of Clinical Effectiveness V9 Approved by Executive Committee of the Medical Staff 06/26/2012 This practice algorithm has been specifically developed for M. D. Anderson using a multidisciplinary approach and taking into consideration circumstances particular to M. D. Anderson, including the following: M. D. Anderson’s specific patient population; M. D. Anderson’s services and structure; and M. D. Anderson’s clinical information. Moreover, this algorithm is not intended to replace the independent medical or professional judgment of physicians or other health care providers. Note: Consider Clinical Trials as treatment options for eligible patients. PRESENTING CLINICAL STAGE Life expectancy less than 10 years cT1a Life expectancy greater than or equal to 10 years TRUS biopsy INITIAL THERAPY TRUS biopsy if Gleason score 8-10 Not reclassified to higher risk Reclassified to higher risk Low Risk Disease: cT1-cT2a and PSA less than 10 ng/mL and Gleason score 2-6 Monitor patient for symptoms; consider treatment if progression Active surveillance or 1 2 ● Consider external beam radiotherapy or Brachytherapy 1 ● Radical prostatectomy if life expectancy greater than 20 years ● Consider treatment based on new stage Active suveillance 2 ● Brachytherapy 2,5 ● Cryotherapy ● External beam radiation3 4 ● Radical Prostatectomy ● Brachytherapy2 (on protocol) 5 ● Cryotherapy ● External beam radiation with 4-6 months adjuvant androgen ablation (See Box B, Page 6) ● Radical Prostatectomy ● Active surveillance (on protocol) ● cT1b TRUS biopsy Yes cT1c, cT2a, cT2b Life expectancy greater than or equal to 10 years? Intermediate Risk Disease: cT2b (but not qualifying for high risk disease) or PSA 10-20 ng/mL or Gleason score 7 High Risk Disease: cT2c-cT3a or PSA greater than 20 ng/mL or Gleason score 8-10 See Page 7 for appropriate follow up or active surveillance based on initial therapy See Page 7 for appropriate active surveillance based on initial therapy Cryotherapy5 ● External beam radiation with 2-3 yesrs adjuvant androgen ablation (See Box B, Page 6) ● Radical Prostatectomy ● Locally Advanced – See Page 4 No 1 Monitor patient for symptoms; consider treatment if progression or 1 ● Consider external beam radiotherapy or cryoablation or hormonal ablation (See Box B, Page 6) ● All localized treatments: length of follow-up and quality of data differ with each treatment and should be discussed with your treatment team Brachytherapy and cryotherapy eligibility limited by prostate size, pubic bone geometry, baseline urinary function 3 External beam radiation should be dose escalated using either IMRT (intensity modulated radiation therapy), or proton therapy. Inflammatory bowel Disease and peri-rectal disease may be contraindications. 4 Radical prostatectomy is performed by open retropubic or robot assisted technique. These technique choices, eligibility for a nerve sparing procedure, and the need for a pelvic lymph node dissection should be discussed with your treatment team. 5 Department of Clinical Effectiveness V9 External beam radiation and Brachytherapy radical prostatectomy have longer duration of follow-up and may be preferred over cryotherapy Approved by Executive Committee of the Medical Staff 06/26/2012 Copyright 2012 The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center 2 This practice algorithm has been specifically developed for M. D. Anderson using a multidisciplinary approach and taking into consideration circumstances particular to M. D. Anderson, including the following: M. D. Anderson’s specific patient population; M. D. Anderson’s services and structure; and M. D. Anderson’s clinical information. Moreover, this algorithm is not intended to replace the independent medical or professional judgment of physicians or other health care providers. Note: Consider Clinical Trials as treatment options for eligible patients. PRESENTING CLINICAL STAGE INITIAL THERAPY External beam radiotherapy with androgen ablation1, 3 or 3 ● Androgen ablation (See Page 6, Box B) or ● Consider radical prostatectomy in selected cases or on protocol ● Locally Advanced (cT3a, cT3b, cT4) Any T N1 Life Expectancy greater than or equal to 5 years or symptomatic? 1 2 3 Favorable clinical response Consider: ● Radiotherapy or ● Consider radical prostatectomy or ● Clinical trial Yes Consider 6-12 months androgen ablation No Consider androgen ablation 3 (See Page 5 or 6) PSA every 3 months, Radiographic studies if clinically indicated (bone scans, CT of abdomen and pelvis) Androgen ablation 3 (See Page 5 or 6) Any T or N M1 Any N, M1 with visceral or lytic bone metastases and low PSA FOLLOW UP Biopsy metastatic lesions Pathology shows Small Cell component and/or neuroendocrine markers Cisplatin and Etoposide or Clinical Trial or ● Palliative Care ● ● 3D conformal radiotherapy or intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) are standard for external beam radiotherapy. Based on pathologic findings after radical prostatectomy (e.g. path stage, margin status, Gleason score, age), consider adjuvant external beam radiotherapy. Treatment recommendation is dependent of life expectancy. See Page 6. Copyright 2012 The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center Department of Clinical Effectiveness V9 Approved by Executive Committee of the Medical Staff 06/26/2012 This practice algorithm has been specifically developed for M. D. Anderson using a multidisciplinary approach and taking into consideration circumstances particular to M. D. Anderson, including the following: M. D. Anderson’s specific patient population; M. D. Anderson’s services and structure; and M. D. Anderson’s clinical information. Moreover, this algorithm is not intended to replace the independent medical or professional judgment of physicians or other health care providers. Note: Consider Clinical Trials as treatment options for eligible patients. ANDROGEN ABLATIVE THERAPY FOLLOW-UP ANDROGEN-INDEPENDENT SALVAGE THERAPY ● A Intermittent androgen ablation1 Follow up visit every 3 months with PSA and testosterone, repeat imaging if rising PSA and/or clinical progression, and liver function tests every month for 3 months if on antiandrogens. If on anti-androgen alone, add LHRH agonist; if progression, go to Box D on page 6 If on LHRH agonist alone, switch to continuous androgen ablation and add anti-androgen; if progression, go to Box C on Page 6 Yes ● No Continue follow up and current treatment Rising PSA or other signs of progression? Progression For Continuous Androgen Ablation, see Box B on Page 6 1 Consider intermittent androgen ablation for rising PSA only. If skeletal metastases are present, recommend 7 to 14 days of antiandrogen prior to initiation of LHRH agonist to prevent flare. 2 Consider baseline bone density scan and bisphosphonate therapy every 6 months to minimize osteoporosis associated with LHRH agonist use. 3 Check Liver Function Tests 1 month after initiation of antiandrogen and then with each 3 month follow up visit thereafter. Copyright 2012 The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center Department of Clinical Effectiveness V9 Approved by Executive Committee of the Medical Staff 06/26/2012 This practice algorithm has been specifically developed for M. D. Anderson using a multidisciplinary approach and taking into consideration circumstances particular to M. D. Anderson, including the following: M. D. Anderson’s specific patient population; M. D. Anderson’s services and structure; and M. D. Anderson’s clinical information. Moreover, this algorithm is not intended to replace the independent medical or professional judgment of physicians or other health care providers. Note: Consider Clinical Trials as treatment options for eligible patients. ANDROGEN ABLATIVE THERAPY B Continuous androgen ablation with LHRH agonist alone1, 2 or with antiandrogen3 ANDROGEN-INDEPENDENT SALVAGE THERAPY FOLLOW-UP Follow up visit every 3 months with PSA, testosterone, repeat imaging if rising PSA and/or clinical progression, liver function tests every month for 3 months if on antiandrogens. Serum testosterone greater than 50? C Rising PSA or other signs of progression? Yes Yes Yes No Chemotherapy (Docetaxel and Glucocorticoids) or ● Clinical Trial or ● Supportive care ● Yes Progression No Progression, go to Box C D No Antiandrogen given? Progression with visceral or lytic bone metastases and low PSA Yes Discontinue antiandrogen Continue follow up Decreasing PSA? No No Continue follow up or current therapy For Intermittent Androgen Ablation, see Box A on Page 5 Progression of symptoms or by imaging? If LHRH agonist and anti-androgen, consider Orchiectomy or ● If LHRH agonist alone, consider adding antiandrogen2 orswitch to GnRH receptor antabgonist ● Secondary hormone therapies or noncytotoxics Antiandrogen3 , Diethylstibestrol, Ketoconazole, Abiraterone, Sipuleucel-T or low dose Glucorticoids if not previously given Biopsy metastatic lesions Pathology shows Small Cell component and/or neuroendocrine markers Cisplatin and Etoposide or ● Clinical Trial or ● Palliative Care ● Clinical Trial or ● Bone-targeting radio● Palliative radiotherapy or isotopes such as Strontium or ● Salvage chemotherapy or ● Supportive care 3 ● Secondary hormone therapies or noncytotoxics Antiandrogen , Diethylstilbestrol, Ketoconazole, Abiraterone, Sipuleucel-T or low dose Glucorticoids if not previously given ● Progression without visceral or lytic bone metastases and low PSA Secondary hormone therapies or noncytotoxics Antiandrogen3, Diethylstilbestrol, Ketoconazole, Abiraterone, Sipuleucel-T or ● Low-dose Glucocorticoids if not previously given or ● Clinical Trial or ● Observation ● 1 If skeletal metastases are present, recommend 7 to 14 days of antiandrogen prior to initiation of LHRH agonist to prevent flare. Consider baseline bone density scan and bisphosphonate therapy every 6 months to minimize osteoporosis associated with LHRH agonist use. 3 Check Liver Function Tests 1 month after initiation of antiandrogen and then with each 3 month follow up visit thereafter. 2 Copyright 2012 The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center Department of Clinical Effectiveness V9 Approved by Executive Committee of the Medical Staff 06/26/2012 This practice algorithm has been specifically developed for M. D. Anderson using a multidisciplinary approach and taking into consideration circumstances particular to M. D. Anderson, including the following: M. D. Anderson’s specific patient population; M. D. Anderson’s services and structure; and M. D. Anderson’s clinical information. Moreover, this algorithm is not intended to replace the independent medical or professional judgment of physicians or other health care providers. Note: Consider Clinical Trials as treatment options for eligible patients. PATIENT STATUS Consider active surveillance protocol PSA and DRE every 6 months ● TRUS biopsy at baseline and annually (option to skip years if 1-2 negative biopsies in a row) ● Consider active surveillance support group ● ● Patient on active surveillance PROGRESSION ACTIVE SURVEILLANCE PSA trend and/or repeat biopsy indicates reclassification to higher risk, or symptomatic, or unable to tolerate further biopsies Refer to appropriate stage on Pages 3 or 4 of this guideline FOLLOW UP (Continue monitoring until progression) Patient post definitive therapy (i.e. radiotherapy or radical prostatectomy) Symptom evalation PSA every 3-6 months for 5 years, then every 6-12 months for 5 years, then annually After radiotherapy: DRE every 6-12 months After radical prostatectomy: DRE every 1-3 years with follow-up visit Yes Signs of recurrence or progression? No See Page 8 for Recurrent Prostate Cancer Patient 5 or more years From Treatment? Yes Transfer to Survivorship Clinic No, continue monitoring Status post radical prostatectomy with positive surgical margins and/or pT3a or b, and Nx/N0, PSA undetectable after surgery Consider randomized clinical trials supporting the long-term survival benefits of adjuvant radiation weighed against the side effects Department of Clinical Effectiveness V9 Approved by Executive Committee of the Medical Staff 06/26/2012 Copyright 2012 The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center RECURRENCE This practice algorithm has been specifically developed for M. D. Anderson using a multidisciplinary approach and taking into consideration circumstances particular to M. D. Anderson, including the following: M. D. Anderson’s specific patient population; M. D. Anderson’s services and structure; and M. D. Anderson’s clinical information. Moreover, this algorithm is not intended to replace the independent medical or professional judgment of physicians or other health care providers. Note: Consider Clinical Trials as treatment options for eligible patients. PROGRESSION SALVAGE THERAPY Yes Androgen ablation (See Page 5 for intermittent or Page 6 for continuous) Consider prostatectomy or Cyoablation or ● Radio-isotopic implant ● Androgen ablation ● Observation ● Bone scan, abdominal and pelvic CT Patient presents after surgery or radiation with positive DRE or increasing PSA1 Bone scan and CT scans positive? ● Yes No PostRadiotherapy Consider prostate biopsy Biopsy positive? No or not done Observation ● Androgen ablation ● Post-radical Prostatectomy Bone scan, abdominal and pelvic CT, TRUS Consider prostate bed biopsy Consider Prostascint scan with co-registration Bone scan and CT scans positive? Yes No Androgen ablation (See Page 5 for intermittent or Page 6 for continuous) Observation 2 ● External beam radiotherapy or ● Androgen ablation ● 1 Rising PSA after radical prostatectomy is greater than 0.2 ng/mL Rising PSA after radiotherapy or brachytherapy is PSA greater than 2 .0 ng/mL above the nadir (lowest value post treatment off androgen deprivation, or medical castration therapy (ADT) 2 Numerous studies indicate that salvage external beam radiotherapy is most effective if delivered with a PSA less than 0.5 ng/mL Copyright 2012 The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center Department of Clinical Effectiveness V9 Approved by Executive Committee of the Medical Staff 06/26/2012 This practice algorithm has been specifically developed for M. D. Anderson using a multidisciplinary approach and taking into consideration circumstances particular to M. D. Anderson, including the following: M. D. Anderson’s specific patient population; M. D. Anderson’s services and structure; and M. D. Anderson’s clinical information. Moreover, this algorithm is not intended to replace the independent medical or professional judgment of physicians or other health care providers. Note: Consider Clinical Trials as treatment options for eligible patients. SUGGESTED READINGS 1. Bolla M, Collette L, Blank L, et al. Long-term results with immediate androgen suppression and external irradiation in patients with locally advanced prostate cancer (an EORTC study): a phase III randomised trial. Lancet 2002; 360:103106. 2. D'Amico AV, Manola J, Loffredo M, et al. 6-month androgen suppression plus radiation therapy vs radiation therapy alone for patients with clinically localized prostate cancer: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2004; 292(7):821-827. 3. Pound CR, Partin AW, Eisenberger MA, et al. Natural history of progression after PSA elevation following radical prostatectomy. JAMA 1999; 281: 1591-1597. 4. Stephenson AJ, Shariat SF, Zelefsky MJ, et al. Salvage radiotherapy for recurrent prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy. JAMA 200;. 291:1325-1332. 5. Pollack A, Zagars GK, Antolak, JA, et al. Prostate biopsy status and PSA nadir level as early surrogates for treatment failure: analysis of a prostate cancer randomized radiation dose escalation trial. International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics 2002; 54:677-685. 6. Papandreou CN., Daliani DD, Thall PF, et al. Results of a phase II study with doxorubicin, etoposide, and cisplatin in patients with fully characterized small-cell carcinoma of the prostate. Journal of Clinical Oncology 2002; 20: 3072-3080. 7. Tannock IF, de Wit RB, Berry WR, et al. Docetaxel plus Prednisone or Mitoxantrone plus Prednisone for Advanced Prostate Cancer. NEJM 2004; 351:1502-1512. 8. Petrylak DP, Tangen CM, Hussain MHA, et al. Docetaxel and Estramustine Compared with Mitoxantrone and Prednisone for Advanced Refractory Prostate Cancer. NEJM 2004; 351:1513-1520. 9. De La Taille A, Benson MC; Bagiella E, et al. Cryoablation for clinically localized prostate cancer using an argon-based system: complication rates and biochemical recurrence. BJU International 2000; 85:281-286. 10. Chin JL, Pautler SE, Mouraviev V, et al. Results of salvage cryoablation of the prostate after radiation: Identifying predictors of treatment failure and complications. Journal of Urology 2001; 165:1937-1942. 11. TNM Staging, 6th Edition, Copyright ©2004 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 12. Abuzallouf S, Dayes I, Lukka H, Baseline staging of newly diagnosed prostate Cancer: a summary of the literature. Journal of Urology. 171(6 Pt 1):212-7, 2004 Jun. 13. Thompson IM Jr, Tangen CM, Paradelo J, et al. Adjuvant radiotherapy for pathologically advanced prostate cancer: A randomized clinical trial. JAMA 2006;296:2329 –35. 14. Bolla M, van Poppel H, Collette L, et al. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer. Postoperative radiotherapy after radical prostatectomy: A randomized controlled trial (EORTC trial 22911). Lancet 2005;366:572– 8. 15. Wiegel T, Bottke D, Steiner U, Siegmann A, Golz R, Storkel S, et al. Phase III postoperative adjuvant radiotherapy after radical prostatectomy compared with radical prostatectomy alone in pT3 prostate cancer with postoperative undetectable prostate-specific antigen: ARO 96-02/AUO AP 09/95. J Clin Oncol 2009; 27: 2924-30. Copyright 2012 The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center Department of Clinical Effectiveness V9 Approved by Executive Committee of the Medical Staff 06/26/2012 This practice algorithm has been specifically developed for M. D. Anderson using a multidisciplinary approach and taking into consideration circumstances particular to M. D. Anderson, including the following: M. D. Anderson’s specific patient population; M. D. Anderson’s services and structure; and M. D. Anderson’s clinical information. Moreover, this algorithm is not intended to replace the independent medical or professional judgment of physicians or other health care providers. Note: Consider Clinical Trials as treatment options for eligible patients. Development Credits This practice consensus algorithm is based on majority expert opinion of the GU Center Faculty at the University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center. It was developed using a multidisciplinary approach that included input from the following medical oncologists, radiation oncologist, and urologic oncologists: Ana Aparicia, MD Wadih Arap, MD, PhD John Araujo, MD ‡ Seungtaek Choi, MD ‡ Paul Corn, MD, PhD ‡ John W. Davis, MD Colin P Dinney, MD Steven Frank, MD Ashish Kamat, MD Jeri Kim, MD Deborah A Kuban, MD ‡ Andrew K. Lee, MD, MPH Christopher J Logothetis, MD Surena Matin, MD Randall E Millikan, MD, PhD Lance C Pagliaro, MD Curtis A Pettaway, MD Louis L Pisters, MD David A Swanson, MD Shi-Ming Tu, MD John F. Ward, MD Amado Zurita-Saavedra, MD Core Development Team Copyright 2012 The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center Department of Clinical Effectiveness V9 Approved by Executive Committee of the Medical Staff 06/26/2012