–17 YJB Corporate Plan 2014 and Business Plan 2014/15

YJB Corporate Plan 2014–17
and Business Plan 2014/15
Contents
© Youth Justice Board for England and Wales, 2014
The material featured in this document is subject to copyright protection under
UK Copyright Law unless otherwise indicated. Any person or organisation
wishing to use YJB materials or products for commercial purposes must apply in
writing to the YJB at ipr@yjb.gsi.gov.uk for a specific licence to be granted.
Foreword
Our Corporate and Business Plan sets out our plans and priorities for the next
three years, and specific areas of work for the coming year. Although we are
conscious of the size of the task ahead of us in the coming year, we believe that
this plan sets us in the right direction, with challenging but achievable
objectives. It will help us to focus our energy and resources on delivering our
priorities for the year.
The plan is driven by the youth justice system’s performance, as shown in the
Youth Justice Statistics 2012/13, and it is against this performance that we are
ultimately measured. The statistics continue to show a positive picture in terms
of the ongoing reduction in the number of young people entering the youth
justice system, and in those receiving disposals in and out of court, including
custodial sentences. The figures also show that the number of young people
who reoffend has diminished.
However, the rate and the frequency of reoffending by those in the youth justice
system remains relatively high and those in the smaller cohort have committed
more previous offences and have more complex needs. It is for this reason that
reducing reoffending is the focus of this year’s Corporate and Business Plan.
Responding to this challenge will require our continued support to youth
offending teams (YOTs), secure estate providers and the many stakeholders
who seek to engage and support young people who have offended. The YJB’s
reducing reoffending programme, now in its second year, will aim this year to
support YOTs to improve their performance, on a risk-led basis, prioritising
areas where we have concerns about high or increasing reoffending rates.
Also central to our plan is the Justice Secretary’s aim of improving educational
outcomes for young people in custody and we are working closely with the
Ministry of Justice on the Transforming Youth Custody programme. We believe
the secure college pathfinder to be built in spring 2017 represents a welcome
investment in the secure estate and offers the opportunity to commission
distinct and separate provision, designed specifically around the needs of
children and young people. We will continue to advise on the needs of young
people, while at the same time working to ensure the continual improvement of
our current secure estate for children and young people, and, in particular, to
improve resettlement support in the community for young people who are
released from custody.
This programme has specific plans for Wales, where we will continue to work
with the Welsh Government through our joint strategy to facilitate regional
resettlement partnerships across Wales and support the secure estate in Wales
to put education at the heart of their work.
In taking forward these priorities, we will continue to focus on our statutory
function to oversee the youth justice system for England and Wales. We will
also support the strategic aims of the UK Government, which include preventing
offending, protecting the public and supporting victims, and promoting the safety
and welfare of children and young people in the criminal justice system.
2
We will continue to provide support and challenge to local youth justice services
to help them deliver in a changing health and education landscape in England,
and through the move towards regional delivery in Wales. The YOT model has
delivered considerable achievements for the youth justice system since it came
into operation. However, it is important that we continue to review and test this
model, to ensure that the multi-agency partnerships through which it operates
are as effective as possible.
In developing this plan, we have taken into account the need to deliver within
extremely challenging financial circumstances, coupled with the need, as
always, to demonstrate value for money. We will work supportively and in
partnership with local authorities to make the most of the limited resources
available to the youth justice system. Perhaps more than ever, we need to build
strong relationships with the wider group of service providers connected to
reducing youth offending.
By the end of 2014/15, we will have delivered cumulative savings of £525m
across the period of this spending review. In the main, we will have achieved
this by investing in activities that reduce the need for custody and then
maximising savings from having fewer young people in custody by
decommissioning beds in the under-18 secure estate.
The strategy to achieve these savings has only been possible because of the
continuing commitment of staff across the entire youth justice system. In
particular, the work of YOTs, supported by the YJB, has been an essential
element of the effectiveness of the youth justice system, and hence a critical
enabler of the financial savings.
We believe that we have the team in place and the support of colleagues on the
frontline to achieve further improvement in the youth justice system. This
Corporate and Business Plan provides the priorities and deliverables which are
the basis on which we will do this.
Lin Hinnigan
Lord McNally
Chief Executive, Youth Justice Board
Chair, Youth Justice Board
3
Who we are and what we do
Founding legislation and statutory functions
The Youth Justice Board for England and Wales (YJB) is a non-departmental
public body created by the Crime and Disorder Act 1998 to oversee the youth
justice system for England and Wales and to support the strategic aims of the
government. The statutory functions of the YJB include the following:
to monitor the operation of the youth justice system and the provision of
youth justice services
to advise the Secretary of State for Justice on:




the operation of the youth justice system and the provision of youth
justice services
how the principal aims of the youth justice system might most effectively
be pursued
the content of any national standards the Secretary of State may see fit
to set with respect to the provision of youth justice services or the
accommodation in which children and young people are kept in custody
the steps that might be taken to prevent offending by children and
young people
to identify, make known and promote good practice
to make grants, with the approval of the Secretary of State, to local
authorities or other bodies for them to develop good practice or to
commission research in connection with such practice
to commission research and publish information in connection with good
practice
to enter into agreements for the provision of secure accommodation for
children and young people.
Our vision
The YJB believes in, and is committed to achieving, a youth justice system
where:
young people receive the support they need to lead crime-free lives and
contribute positively to society
more offenders are held to account for their actions and stop offending
victims are better supported
the public are protected.
4
What we have achieved
While there remains much to achieve, the youth justice system is working well.
With YJB support and leadership, youth offending teams (YOTs) and local
partners have successfully reduced the number of first-time entrants to the
criminal justice system and reduced the number of young people in custody.
The YOT model, which the YJB champions and supports, has contributed to
these successes by employing a multi-agency and targeted approach to
working with young people in the criminal justice system.
YJB support to youth justice practitioners and managers has transformed how
information is shared across the system, with further developments planned for
2014/15.
The work of the YJB and its partners has meant fewer lives are damaged by
crime, with fewer young people involved in crime and fewer victims. This is
demonstrated by the reduced number of young people in contact with the youth
justice system and the reduced total number of offences committed by young
people.
The National Audit Office estimated that in 2009 offending by all young people
cost the economy £8.5–11bn.1 Since 2009/10, the number of proven offences
by young people – a figure used by the National Audit Office in their calculation
– has halved.2 This is likely to have resulted in substantial reductions in the cost
to the economy of offending by young people.
Youth justice is one of the few areas of children and young people’s policy that
has not been devolved to the Welsh Government by Westminster. The YJB has
built a strong and productive working relationship with the devolved government
and stakeholders in Wales to ensure that the achievements of the youth justice
system have been realised in a parallel and equivalent way in both England and
Wales.
Key YJB achievements over the past 10 years are set out below.
Achievements in the community
The YJB has:
worked with over 50 YOTs to improve their performance in respect of firsttime entrants, numbers in custody and reoffending
developed Asset, the first national assessment framework for the youth
justice system to individually assess the factors involved in young people’s
risk of reoffending; we will soon be launching a revised version of this
framework called AssetPlus
invested in evidence-based interventions as robust alternatives to custody,
including the Intensive Supervision and Surveillance Programme and
Intensive Fostering
1
Published in the National Audit Office report, The Youth Justice System in England and Wales:
Reducing Offending by Young People (December 2010).
2
Taken from Youth Justice Statistics 2012/13, available at:
www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/278549/youth-justicestats-2013.pdf
5
promoted the use of restorative justice across the youth justice system,
including Safer Schools partnerships in England
established multi-agency resettlement support panels in Wales to
strengthen and improve work to reintegrate young people following a period
in custody
initiated targeted and well-managed early intervention programmes
(including Youth Inclusion Panels and Youth Inclusion and Support Panels)
that are now mainstream practice as part of wider local authority early
intervention approaches.
Achievements in custody
The YJB has:
separated young people from adults in custody and provided ageappropriate provision
completed safeguarding reviews of custody and implemented a programme
of change backed by capital investment to improve facilities and enhance
safety
introduced social workers in custody and an advocacy service to support
young people
introduced a comprehensive workforce training programme
introduced specialist units within the custodial estate, including a mother
and baby unit at Rainsbrook Secure Training Centre, and units for young
people with complex needs at Wetherby Young Offender Institution and
Hindley Young Offender Institution
transformed how information is shared across the system through the YJB’s
Wiring Up Youth Justice ICT programme
decommissioned under-18 young offender institution (under-18 YOI)
accommodation for young women, instead placing them in secure training
centre (STC) or secure children’s home (SCH) accommodation, which can
better meet their needs
introduced standards for the delivery of health services to young people in
custody
provided a bespoke placement protocol and service delivery model for
Welsh young people placed in custody that takes account of their
educational, cultural and language needs
supported the design, development and ongoing roll-out of a new behaviour
management and restraint system in under-18 YOIs and STCs.
6
Our strategic objectives 2014–17
We will work in partnership across the community and commission the secure
estate to:
prevent offending
reduce reoffending
protect the public and support victims
promote the safety and welfare of children and young people in the criminal
justice system.
The YJB also has an organisational objective for 2014–17 to continue to
develop the YJB to deliver our mandate, working closely with the UK and Welsh
Governments and other stakeholders to deliver a coherent, distinctive and
effective youth justice system in a time of reduced resource.
This objective will be delivered through continuous improvement in the way we
operate; further detail is provided in the key outcomes within the Business plan
for 2014/15 section (see pages 26–31).
Our priorities for 2014/15
The Ministry of Justice’s (MoJ’s) business plan for 2013–2015 sets out the UK
Government’s agenda for justice. To support its policy objectives, support the
youth justice sector most effectively and to reflect our financial and resource
challenges, we have agreed with the Secretary of State the following priorities
for 2014/15.
Reduce reoffending by young people
This reflects our focus on preventing and reducing reoffending by those who
have previously committed crimes.
Transforming Youth Custody programme
This supports the UK Government’s aim of placing education at the heart of
detention, including the opening of a secure college pathfinder in spring
2017.
These priorities will be achieved through our delivery of the business plan
outcomes detailed on pages 26–31 of this plan.
Our commitment to equality and diversity
We are committed to promoting equality, embracing diversity and working to
ensure that the criminogenic risk factors of children and young people in the
youth justice system are reduced. We believe that promoting equality, valuing
diversity and delivering youth justice services in an anti-discriminatory way is
fundamental to reducing offending and reoffending, making our communities
safer and addressing disproportionality within the youth justice system.
7
We will strive to create an organisation that harnesses the different perspectives
and skills of all our staff, that values their individual contribution, and provides a
working environment that is free from discrimination, harassment and
victimisation.
8
How we deliver our services
The United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child (UNCRC) provides
the overarching context for the YJB when undertaking its statutory functions.
The guiding principle for safeguarding and promoting the welfare of children is
described in Article 3(1) of the UNCRC, which states that:
In all actions concerning children, whether undertaken by public or
private social welfare institutions, courts of law, administrative authorities
or legislative bodies, the best interests of the child should be of primary
consideration.
The UNCRC binds the UK in international law. The Rights of Children and
Young Persons (Wales) Measure 2011 sets out the requirement for due regard
to be given to the UNCRC. Our work in Wales is underpinned by the Welsh
Government’s National Standards for Children and Young People’s
Participation. These standards set out the guiding principles for organisations in
Wales whose work has an impact on the lives of children.
Whether taking broad commissioning decisions or individual placement
decisions, the YJB is committed to ensuring that the best interests of the child
are always its primary consideration.
The members of our Board – of which there are currently 11 – are appointed by
the Secretary of State for Justice. Lord Tom McNally took up his appointment as
the Chair of the YJB in March 2014.
The Board is responsible for overseeing the youth justice system on behalf of
the Secretary of State; providing advice on how the system could be improved;
planning the future demand for secure accommodation and entering into
agreements for its provision. The Board has corporate responsibility for
ensuring that the YJB fulfils its strategic objectives, which are agreed with the
Secretary of State for Justice, and for promoting the efficient and effective use
of staff and other resources. The YJB executive and wider organisation which
support the Board are made up of a dedicated group of staff with a range of
expertise, drawn substantially from a youth justice practice background. This
allows the YJB to translate the principles of reform into delivery for young
people.
The youth justice system consists of a network of organisations working
together to administer justice and help children and young people live free from
crime. In addition to the YJB, the network consists of:
youth offending teams (YOTs) – local partnerships made up of partners
from the police, the Probation Service, local authority children’s services
and health services
police and crime commissioners
the police, the Crown Prosecution Service and victim services
the courts and the judiciary
9
secure accommodation providers – under-18 young offender institutions
(YOIs), secure training centres (STCs) and secure children’s homes
(SCHs).
In order to access the wider resources and know-how required to effectively
deliver our programme of work, the YJB will work in close partnership with a
wide range of stakeholders, as set out below.
Working with young people
In carrying out our work, we are committed to listening to the views of young
people so that their needs are understood and so we can use their experiences
and feedback to shape effective services to protect and support them. By
encouraging young people’s understanding and participation in the youth justice
system, we and practitioners are better placed to design interventions that will
successfully address and prevent offending behaviour. This is reflected both in
our work with YOTs and in the secure estate, where we specifically consult with
young people when reviewing and developing services. Young people may also
be able to take an active role in co-designing interventions or services with us
and practitioners.
Working with the Ministry of Justice and other UK and
Welsh Government departments
We work closely with our sponsor department, the Ministry of Justice (MoJ),
ensuring that we can deliver our work within the policy and resourcing
framework determined by the Secretary of State for Justice. We also advise
other UK and Welsh Government departments on the operation of the youth
justice system to ensure that national policies and legislation in England and
Wales support better outcomes for the youth justice system and can be
effectively implemented.
Alongside our close working with the MoJ, we also work with the Home Office
to:
prevent anti-social behaviour and youth crime, including youth violence
support the delivery of the cross-departmental Ending Gang and Serious
Youth Violence strategy and related work to prevent the sexual exploitation
of girls.
We work with the Department of Health and local commissioning bodies so that
high-quality health services are provided (including mental health and
substance misuse services) to young people in the youth justice system. We will
continue to build on the effective working relationship with NHS England, which
is responsible for commissioning services for young people in the secure estate
to ensure that young people have access to services that address their health
needs.
10
We work with the Department for Education (DfE) to:
help ensure education services meet the educational, training, and job
readiness needs of children and young people, across custody and the
community
support children’s services to deliver services that meet the welfare needs
of children who come into the youth justice system; this includes work to
improve the outcomes for looked-after children, who are over-represented
in the youth justice system
ensure there are sufficient SCH places to meet the needs of children who
require this type of provision.
We also work with the Cabinet Office in its capacity as the lead government
department on youth policy in England, to ensure that our work informs and
complements the government’s overall strategy for giving opportunities to young
people from all backgrounds, including those in the youth justice system.
In Wales, we work closely with Welsh Government departmental leads so that
devolved government policies are aligned with the implementation of youth
justice policies.
Working with YOTs and the wider youth justice system
We support YOTs and local youth offending services to deliver against the three
youth justice outcome indicators set by the UK Government:
reducing first-time entrants to the criminal justice system
reducing reoffending
reducing the use of custody.
We now have a comprehensive set of guidance, improvement support and an
escalation process in place to help improve performance in YOTs. This
includes:
the setting of minimum standards through the Secretary of State’s Modern
Youth Offending Partnerships guidance for England and the National
Standards for Youth Justice Services
a sector-led programme of self-assessment and peer reviews
an escalation process which provides improvement support from the YJB’s
in-house youth justice experts, as well as, ultimately, the potential
intervention of the Minister.
We will continue to provide more transparent and easily accessible data to help
local youth justice services benchmark their performance and direct their
resources to deliver our strategic objectives.
We use a risk-led process (liaising with HM Inspectorate of Probation) to
intervene in the poorest performing YOTs and help them to develop and deliver
post-inspection and other improvement plans.
11
We also continue to work with practitioners to identify and share effective
practice through a range of other approaches. Our quarterly prioritisation
process helps allocate YJB resources where they are most needed. Our
thematic and incentive-based work, such as reducing the use of remand,
operates within this collaborative approach.
In Wales, we have tailored our approach to take account of Welsh ministers’
responsibility for devolved services such as education, housing and health. The
escalation process operated by YJB Cymru is executed in collaboration with the
Welsh Government and can include the intervention of Welsh ministers where
appropriate. Our liaison with HM Inspectorate of Probation includes regular
contact with Estyn, the Care and Social Services Inspectorate for Wales and
Health Inspectorate Wales. Furthermore, we have worked in partnership with
the youth justice and academic sectors in Wales to pilot and deliver the use of
an evidence-based collaborative review system undertaken by trained
assessors. This enables our youth justice oversight and support staff to develop
and assist in the delivery of targeted improvement activities to services that
have requested assistance.
Working with secure accommodation providers
We work with secure accommodation providers to ensure the delivery of
services that both protect the public and keep young people safe, addressing
the causes of their offending behaviour. This means working closely with the
National Offender Management Service (NOMS), local authorities, and private
contractors to ensure continuous improvement and value for money, and to
improve delivery of specialist services. We develop and disseminate effective
practice in areas such as safeguarding, behaviour management and restorative
justice.
Our Placement Service is responsible for placing remanded and sentenced
young people into secure establishments. We work with YOTs to ensure the
most up-to-date information about young people is available to the Placement
Service and the secure estate so that the most appropriate placement decision
is made, and so the correct interventions are delivered to young people. Our
service includes a process for reviewing placement decisions and ensures that
transfers between establishments are managed in a timely and appropriate
manner, following consultation with all those with interests in the young person’s
welfare.
Working with the voluntary and community sector
Voluntary and community sector organisations make a critical contribution to
youth justice. The sector providers help to deliver services in community and
custodial settings – for example, the provision of an advocacy and independent
person’s service, and support for better resettlement for young people leaving
custody.
The voluntary and community sector is a key partner in our drive to identify and
disseminate effective practice through its delivery of youth justice services and
ability to innovate.
Around 6,000 volunteers work with YOTs in a range of different roles, including
restorative justice, as appropriate adults for young people in police custody, as
mentors, in prevention or education schemes, and with families.
12
Working with other national and regional partners and
stakeholders
We work with a wide range of other national and regional partners across
England and Wales to influence and shape a coherent youth justice system.
While all our staff play a role in working with our partners, our Board members
and executive management group lead aspects of our stakeholder engagement
personally. In particular, our Board members bring a diverse range of
experience and knowledge in areas including local authority and voluntary
sector youth services, policing, judiciary, education and health services. Our
stakeholder strategy aims to make best use of this experience to deliver the
YJB’s strategic objectives and to support partners to develop new ways of
working. This includes working with:
local authority consortia to support them in developing new approaches for
providing resettlement services for young people leaving custody
NOMS, the Probation Service, and professional associations and groups
such as the T2A Alliance, to improve young people’s transitions between
the youth and adult justice systems
charities, faith groups, and groups working to promote and protect the rights
of children and to share information on areas of mutual interest
the judiciary, HM Courts and Tribunals Service, magistrates, youth court
officials, and youth court judges, to help improve court practice, reduce
unnecessary use of custody and improve confidence in community
sentences
the police, the college of policing, and police and crime commissioners to
ensure policing takes account of the specific needs of children and young
people
the Early Intervention Foundation in order to support and maintain the focus
on prevention and early intervention locally
Her Majesty’s inspectorates, in particular HM Inspectorate of Probation, HM
Inspectorate of Prisons, Ofsted, Health Inspectorate Wales, the Care and
Social Services Inspectorate Wales, and Estyn, to ensure standards are
met and to inform inspections
national bodies representing local service providers in England and in
Wales, including those representing local government, children’s services,
education services, YOT managers and secure accommodation providers.
Working with the academic community and other research
bodies
We will continue to strengthen our links with the academic sector to ensure that
our advice and guidance is based upon the latest UK and international
research.
To ensure that we remain informed about developments in relation to effective
practice and deliver the most up-to-date and relevant information to the youth
justice sector, we establish and maintain links and partnerships with those in the
wider effective practice and research communities.
13
A key example of this is our practice classification panel. This panel is made up
of leading academics in the criminological and youth justice fields. The panel
advises us on whether examples of practice have met our standards of
evidence and makes recommendations for the future development of our
effective practice framework.
In Wales, the Practice Development Panel, overseen by the Head of YJB
Cymru, provides us with advice, guidance and scrutiny to ensure that the
operation of the effective practice cycle in Wales is itself effective. The panel is
made up of representatives from the youth justice sector, the Welsh
Government and our academic partner in Wales, the Welsh Centre for Crime
and Social Justice. The Welsh Centre for Crime and Social Justice is a
consortium of the criminology departments from the Welsh universities which
assists us to identify and disseminate research and learning related to youth
justice and its application to the devolved context.
14
Our strategy for 2014–17
Context
The work of youth offending teams (YOTs) and their key strategic partners,
including the police, has contributed to a reduction in the number of first-time
entrants. Targeted work by the YJB and local partners to reduce the
unnecessary use of custody has helped to reduce the number of young people
in custody. Both the number of first-time entrants and the number of young
people in custody have fallen significantly since the peak in 2006/07. During this
period, the number of young people who offend and reoffend and the number of
reoffences have also dropped. However, the rate and the frequency of
reoffending by those in the youth justice system has been increasing since
2007/08. There is evidence to suggest that the smaller group left in the system
have committed more previous offences and have more complex needs.
Responding to these needs and risks presents a new challenge for youth
offending teams (YOTs), secure estate providers and the many stakeholders
who seek to engage and support them.
The numbers of offenders, reoffenders (within a year) and reoffences reached a
peak in the 12 months ending March 2007, but have since reduced substantially
(see Figure 1).
Re-offences
Re-offenders
Offenders
200,000
180,000
160,000
Number
140,000
120,000
100,000
80,000
60,000
40,000
20,000
0
2000
2002
2003
2004
2005
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
months months months months months months months
ending ending ending ending ending ending ending
March March March March March March March
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
Cohort Year
Reducing reoffending has been highlighted as a priority by the YJB Board and
the Secretary of State for Justice. We committed last year to undertake targeted
work to reduce reoffending and improve outcomes in the youth justice system,
and we have embarked upon a three-year reducing reoffending project.
We support the Justice Secretary’s aim of improving educational outcomes for
young people in custody. We are working with the Ministry of Justice (MoJ) on
the Transforming Youth Custody programme, which aims to put education at
the heart of detention. This will include specific plans for Wales.
15
We believe the secure college pathfinder to be built in Leicestershire in spring
2017 represents a welcome investment in the secure estate and offers the
opportunity to commission distinct and separate provision, designed specifically
around the needs of children and young people. Both the physical design of
facilities and the services commissioned should facilitate a multi-agency
approach to addressing young people’s education, health and resettlement
needs. We will work closely with the MoJ on the development of this
programme.
In addition, we remain responsible for providing places for young people who
are sentenced and remanded to custody.
In Wales, many of the matters that drive delivery of youth justice services are
devolved to the Welsh Government. The Welsh Government consultation on
proposals to improve services for young people at risk of entering, or already in,
the youth justice system outlines many of these issues, and we are working
closely with the Welsh Government to develop policy responses to the
consultation that seek to support the prevention of offending in Wales. We will
continue to work with the Welsh Government to deliver a joint resettlement
programme to facilitate regional resettlement partnerships across Wales and
support the secure estate in Wales to put education at the heart of their work.
Our strategies are also shaped by the local landscape. The local landscape has
changed significantly over recent years and continues to change, with greater
local accountability and responsibility, including the transfer of key funding from
the UK Government to local authorities, and the opportunities created by local
integrated offender management. We will work supportively and in partnership
with local authorities to make the most of the limited resources available to the
youth justice system itself. Perhaps more than ever, we need to build strong
relationships with the wider group of service providers connected to reducing
youth offending. We must also support local youth offending services to work
effectively with key local decision-makers, such as police and crime
commissioners and, in England, clinical commissioning groups.
Another driver that we have needed to take account of in developing this plan is
the fiscal position and the need to deliver within extremely challenging financial
circumstances. The need to demonstrate value for money is not new but is
more acute as a result of our reducing budget and that of many partners. The
pressure remains to continue to demonstrate financial savings at the same time
as delivering challenging objectives.
Strategic objectives for 2014–17
In light of the drivers outlined above, our strategic objectives for 2014–17 are
set out below. These are consistent with the MoJ Business Plan 2013–15 and
the MoJ’s vision of transforming justice.
Strategic objective 1: We will work in partnership across the community
and commission the secure estate to prevent offending
Intervening early to prevent children and young people from offending is more
effective than dealing with the consequences of offending, when patterns of
behaviour are well-established and costs to the criminal justice system are high.
In promoting effective practice and overseeing youth offending services, we will
continue to focus on reducing the number of first-time entrants to the youth
justice system.
16
The large reduction in numbers of first-time entrants over recent years has
shown that evidence-based early intervention and diversion, delivered through
multi-agency partnerships, can be effective. In order to sustain this reduction,
we will promote joined-up youth crime prevention and work with partners to
monitor and support the implementation of the new out-of-court disposals3
framework among local areas.
Local strategies to prevent first-time entrants should be in place in every area,
in order to allow agencies and communities to resolve low-level offending in a
way that repairs harm but seeks to avoid the unnecessary criminalisation of
young people. Local children’s services should address the needs of young
people who are most at risk of offending and YOTs should be key partners in
this work.
Specific resources for prevention are now more dispersed – among police and
crime commissioners and, in England, the Troubled Families programme and
the Early Intervention Grant. All have a role to play in youth crime prevention,
and we will continue to promote the use of these cross-governmental funding
streams to help deliver our strategic objective.
Strategic objective 2: We will work in partnership across the community
and commission the secure estate to reduce reoffending
Reducing reoffending has multiple benefits, including fewer victims, a safer
society for all, and savings to the public purse.
With fewer young people in the youth justice system, those who make up the
cohort today are more challenging to work with, and while the actual number of
reoffences committed has reduced significantly, the proportion of young people
who reoffend remains stubbornly high. The cohort of young people now in the
youth justice system has changed from previous cohorts and we have more to
learn and more to achieve in reducing reoffending among this group.
Our strategy to reduce youth reoffending will focus on gaining the most detailed
possible understanding of the characteristics of today’s reoffending cohort in
order to inform effective intervention. More specifically, the research and
effective practice development that we, supported by the youth justice
community, have been undertaking in recent years has broadened and
deepened our understanding of the factors contributing to an increased
likelihood of reoffending. This knowledge is being shared and built into
AssetPlus, the new assessment, planning and interventions framework that we
will be rolling out from 2014/15.
We will also continue to maintain a focus on reducing reoffending through
monitoring progress and supporting YOTs to improve their performance, on a
risk-led basis, prioritising areas where we have concerns about high or
increasing reoffending rates.
In Wales, work to reduce reoffending will build upon detailed analysis of the
needs of young people from Wales with prolific offending histories. This will
include developing case management practice for these young people and
continued delivery of the Wales resettlement programme.
3
Disposal is an umbrella term referring both to sentences given by the court and pre-court
decisions made by the police.
17
We will work to better understand and address over-representation of groups
such as Black and Minority Ethnic young people and looked-after children, and
ensure that the system meets the specific needs of these groups.
We will take forward the UK Government’s plan for secure colleges through the
Transforming Youth Custody programme. While the MoJ remains responsible
for the overall delivery of the programme, we will support it by:
advising and guiding on the needs of young people, and how these needs
might be best met
leading on particular workstreams, including re-tendering secure training
centres (STCs), under-18 young offender institution (under-18 YOI) reform,
education provision and resettlement
supporting the development of the secure college, including advising on the
physical design of the college, developing the operational specification for
the regime, and working with the MoJ on the legislation that will govern the
college.
Taking learning from our resettlement consortia work in England and Wales, we
will be working to improve young people’s access to education, training and
employment, healthcare provision and suitable accommodation following
release from custody, to improve outcomes and reduce reoffending.
Strategic objective 3: We will work in partnership across the community
and commission the secure estate to protect the public and support
victims
Public protection is at the heart of the role of those working in the youth justice
system. As well as protecting the public through their work on reducing
reoffending, youth justice practitioners intervene to identify and manage specific
risks. As already mentioned under strategic objective 2, in 2014/15 we will
launch a revised version of the assessment and planning interventions
framework called AssetPlus, which will include enhancements to aid
practitioners in this important task.
Where offenders pose a high risk to the public, youth offending services will
work with Multi-Agency Public Protection Arrangements (MAPPA) partners to
manage these risks.
Victims of youth crime must feel they have been well served by the system, with
their concerns listened to, their needs addressed and justice having been done.
We will continue to support the youth justice system with effective practice in
these areas and we will work to improve victim and public confidence in
community sentences.
Restorative justice not only plays an effective part in reducing reoffending by
making a young person face up to the consequences of their actions, it also
actively engages local people in youth justice. We will support the UK
Government’s approach to increasing the use of restorative justice across the
youth justice system.
18
Strategic objective 4: We will work in partnership across the community
and commission the secure estate to promote the safety and welfare of
children and young people in the criminal justice system
Addressing the welfare needs of children and young people who are at risk of
offending is a key part of preventing offending and reducing the risk of
reoffending.
In developing our commissioning plans for youth custody provision, we aim to
ensure a secure, healthy, safe and supportive place for children and young
people. We aim to minimise the likelihood of harm through rigorous
safeguarding and ensure that children are placed in the establishment best able
to meet their needs.
In 2014/15, we will continue to ensure our work to place young people in
custody is of the highest quality. We will invest in capital improvements to
create safer environments, and work to continuously improve the safeguarding
and welfare knowledge and skills of the workforce in the secure estate and
among YOTs.
We maintain an overview of serious safeguarding and public protection
incidents in the community and secure estate, and will continue to learn from
and act on the recommendations from serious incidents and deaths in custody.
The year 2013/14 saw a continued focus on safeguarding and on taking action
to respond to lessons from serious incidents. We published our review of action
taken against recommendations made to us following deaths in custody
between 2000 and 2012, and continued to work to improve the safety of young
people in custody through a range of activities and initiatives. In 2014/15 and
beyond, we will continue to act on this vital agenda.
In the coming year we will be seeking to improve and develop the social work
provision in under-18 YOIs and to understand how to better support the needs
of looked-after children. We will continue to push to improve information quality
and sharing through a range of projects and programmes, and we will ensure
that safeguarding is at the forefront of plans to transform youth custody.
Organisational objective: We will continue to develop the YJB to deliver
our mandate, working closely with the UK and Welsh Governments and
other stakeholders to deliver a coherent, distinctive and effective youth
justice system in a time of reduced resource
The prevention of offending is the principle purpose of the youth justice system
and we will develop and maintain strategies to ensure that our financial, staff
and information resources are focused on achieving this.
We want to ensure that we maintain good corporate governance to enable
stakeholders to have continued confidence in our stewardship of the resources
available to us. These stakeholders include our sponsor department, the MoJ;
Parliament; the National Audit Office; the Welsh Government – and, through
them, the public, from whom ultimately our funding flows.
Shared services
We need to ensure that our support services meet the organisation’s needs and
provide value for money. One way of achieving this is sharing services with
other organisations and we are committed to exploring the opportunities that are
presented by this. In particular, we have committed to using the MoJ’s shared
service centre to provide finance and HR transactions.
19
Staff
Our vision is to develop an organisation in which staff will have all the
necessary skills, knowledge, experience and passion to support the
achievement of an effective youth justice system.
To achieve this, we will develop the organisation through:
recruitment of staff with the right experience, skills and competence that we
need to deliver our objectives
effective performance management and development
effective leadership and engagement of our staff.
We will also review the structure of the organisation so that this continues to be
fit for purpose.
Information management
We have developed an Information Management Strategy that will enable us to:
improve efficiency
comply with legislation, regulations and standards, in particular the Data
Protection Act 1998
improve corporate ownership and responsibility.
We will develop and implement plans to ensure that this strategy is delivered.
How we will measure delivery
We will measure delivery of our corporate plan by using a number of measures
as outlined below.
1. The number of first-time entrants to the justice system: young people
aged 10 to 17 years receiving a pre-court disposal4 or conviction (the
MoJ publishes this data quarterly, by local authority).
There were 27,854 first-time entrants to the youth justice system in England
and Wales in 2012/13, a fall of 25% since 2011/12. The number of first-time
entrants has fallen by 75% compared to the peak of 110,748 in 2006/07.
4
Under the provisions of the Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders (LASPO) Act
2012, Reprimands and Final Warnings have been repealed and replaced by a new out-of-court
disposals framework, which offers Youth Cautions and Youth Conditional Cautions as formal
disposals. This change took effect on 8 April 2013.
20
First Time Entrants to the Youth Justice System
England and Wales, 2002/03 to 2012/13
120,000
100,000
80,000
60,000
40,000
20,000
0
England & Wales
Wales
England
2005/06
2006/07
2007/08
2008/09
2009/10
2010/11
2011/12
2012/13
107,626
110,748
100,353
80,340
62,559
45,950
36,920
27,854
5,630
5,875
5,652
5,218
4,097
2,801
1,989
1,728
101,996
104,873
94,701
75,122
58,461
43,150
34,931
26,127
2. The percentage of young people reoffending (the MoJ publishes this
data quarterly, by local authority).
The reoffending rate for young people in England and Wales was 35.5% in
2011/12. This represents a 0.3 percentage point decrease compared to
2010/11, and a 1.8 percentage point increase compared to 2000.5
The YJB is reviewing the measures associated with reoffending. The
performance of the youth justice system is currently measured against the
binary reoffending rate.
5
As the overall rate of reoffending has risen in the last few years, the number of young people
in the reoffending cohort has gone down, with particular reductions among those with no
previous offences and those receiving pre-court disposals. Because of this, those young people
coming into the criminal justice system are, on balance, more challenging to work with (Youth
Justice Statistics 2012/13).
21
Percentage of young people re-offending 2005/06 to 2011/12
40.0%
35.0%
30.0%
25.0%
20.0%
15.0%
10.0%
5.0%
0.0%
2005/06
2006/07
2007/08
2008/09
2009/10
2010/11
2011/12
England & Wales
33.6%
33.6%
32.4%
32.8%
33.3%
35.8%
35.5%
Wales
34.2%
34.1%
33.1%
33.2%
33.1%
35.9%
37.0%
England
33.5%
33.5%
32.4%
32.8%
33.3%
35.8%
35.4%
3. The number of custodial disposals per 1,000 of the 10 to 17-year-old
population.6
The number of custodial disposals per 1,000 of the 10 to 17-year-old
population in England and Wales was 0.61 in 2012/13. This represents a
25.1% decrease compared to 2011/12 and a 53% decrease compared to
2005/06.
In 2012/13, custodial disposals accounted for 6% of all disposals given at
court, with the total number of custodial disposals falling by 31% between
2011/12 and 2012/13, and by 61% since 2002/03.
6
Please note, annual totals will be affected by the exclusion of figures for YOTs where the YJB
does not hold a complete case-level data extract on the Youth Justice Management Information
System (YJMIS).
22
Use of Custody per 1,000 10 - 17 year olds, 2005/06 to 2012/13
1.40
1.20
1.00
0.80
0.60
0.40
0.20
0.00
2005/06
2006/07
2007/08
2008/09
2009/10
2010/11
2011/12
2012/13
1.30
1.30
1.26
1.23
1.00
0.87
0.82
0.61
Wales
0.87
0.72
0.49
England
0.90
0.88
0.65
England & Wales
Note: England and Wales split is not available prior to 2010/11.
4. Welsh youth justice indicators
In Wales, performance will continue to be measured against the Wales
youth justice indicators agreed with the Welsh Government, as well as the
English/Welsh indicators above. The performance areas specific to Wales
are set out below.
Increase engagement in education, training and employment (ETE)
for children and young people in the youth justice system in Wales.
In 2012/13, those of school age at the start of their order had an average
of 19.2 hours of ETE per week, against 19.6 in 2011/12. This compares
to an average of 20.3 hours of ETE for those of school age at the end of
their order in 2012/13 and 20.8 in 2011/12.
For those above school age, there was an average of 11.7 hours of ETE
per week at the start of the order, against 12.0 hours of ETE per week in
2011/12. This compares to an average of 13.0 hours of ETE per week at
the end of the order in 2012/13 and 13.4 hours in 2011/12.
Welsh Youth Justice Indicators - Average hours of ETE per week,
2009/10 to 2012/13
25.0
20.0
15.0
10.0
5.0
0.0
2009/10
2010/11
2011/12
2012/13
School Age Start
20.3
19.0
19.6
19.2
School Age End
21.8
19.9
20.8
20.3
Above School Age Start
13.0
12.9
12.0
11.7
Above School Age End
14.5
15.1
13.4
13.0
23
Increase access to suitable accommodation for children and young
people in the youth justice system in Wales.
In 2012/13, 95.7% of young people starting a community order had
access to suitable accommodation, compared to 95.1% in 2011/12. This
compares to 93.8% of young people ending their community order
having access to suitable accommodation in 2012/13, and 94.5% in
2011/12.
In 2012/13, 80.7% of young people starting a custodial sentence had
access to suitable accommodation, compared to 67.9% in 2011/12. This
compares to 93.8% of young people ending a custodial sentence having
access to suitable accommodation in 2012/13, and 84.7% in 2011/12.
Welsh Youth Justice Indicators - Access to Suitable Accommodation, 2009/10
to 2012/13
100.0%
80.0%
60.0%
40.0%
20.0%
0.0%
2009/10
2010/11
2011/12
2012/13
Community Start
97.0%
94.9%
95.1%
95.7%
Community End
96.1%
94.5%
94.5%
93.8%
Custody Start
76.7%
71.7%
67.9%
80.7%
Custody End
90.5%
88.8%
84.7%
93.8%
Ensure that children and young people in the youth justice system
in Wales with identified substance misuse needs gain timely access
to appropriate specialist assessment and treatment services.
In 2012/13, 87.4% of children and young people in the youth justice
system identified via screening as requiring a substance misuse
assessment received the assessment within five working days of referral,
against 87.0% in 2011/12.
In 2012/13, of those children and young people with an identified need
for treatment or other intervention, 92.9% receive that within 10 working
days of assessment, against 94.0% in 2011/12.
Welsh Youth Justice Indicators - Access to appropriate specialist treatment services,
2009/10 to 2012/13
100.0%
90.0%
80.0%
70.0%
60.0%
50.0%
40.0%
30.0%
20.0%
10.0%
0.0%
2009/10
2010/11
2011/12
2012/13
Assessment 5 days
86.0%
86.1%
87.0%
87.4%
Treatment 10 days
95.0%
96.2%
94.0%
92.9%
24
Transparency
We also publish other key data within the annual Youth Justice Statistics, to
allow the public to judge performance. This includes information about:
the demographics of young people with proven offences
proven offences that have resulted in a disposal
remand decisions for young people
disposals given to young people
young people in custody, including information about behaviour
management in the secure estate.
The local-level 2011/12 figures were published on 31 January 2014. Our most
up-to-date published data on youth justice can be found at:
www.gov.uk/government/publications/youth-justice-statistics
25
Business plan for 2014/15
This section outlines how we will progress the strategy outlined above in
2014/15. This will be achieved by a range of projects and business as usual
work based around our strategic objectives and the two business plan priorities.
During the year, the YJB will focus its work towards the achievement of seven
overall key outcomes, which are:
improvement in the delivery of the youth justice system in the community
an under-18 secure estate that better meets young people’s needs
structural and process improvements that support a better youth justice
system
young people are placed efficiently in the most appropriate establishment
the safety and well-being of children and young people in the youth justice
system is assured
practitioners have access to the best advice and support, and use this in
practice
the YJB is seen as an effective and efficient public body.
Each outcome is underpinned by a number of business plan outputs that we will
deliver during the year – these are listed below. Where dates are not identified,
it should be assumed that the business plan output will be completed within the
planning year.
Key outcome A: Improvement in the delivery of the youth
justice system in the community
Outputs:
1. Research/analysis on reoffending completed using youth offending team
(YOT) and secure establishment information, to enable resources to be
focused effectively on reducing reoffending rates (to be completed by March
2016).
2. Pilot YOTs improve service delivery as a result of risk-led monitoring and
support to address issues identified through the use of the reoffending
toolkit in 2013/14.
3. A wider group of YOTs use the YOT reoffending toolkit to develop action
plans to reduce reoffending (to be completed by March 2016).
4. YJB grant conditions that drive performance improvement in YOTs.
5. Local police and crime commissioners maintain youth justice as a priority
through joint work with YOTs.
26
6. Grants to YOTs increase the capacity to deliver wider use of restorative
justice within the youth justice system.
7. A new hosting environment that enables the continued secure electronic
transfer of information within the youth justice system.
8. Production of up-to-date consolidated requirements for improving YOT case
management systems.
9. Improvement of the delivery of youth justice services and the safe
placement of children in secure settings through work developed with
clusters of YOTs who work to a single youth court.
10. Establishment of panel-based restorative alternatives to police charging in
every police area in Wales.
11. A resettlement and reintegration programme in Wales that delivers:


a co-ordinated approach to resettling Welsh young people leaving
custody, established in North and South Wales
the development of a national model for regional reintegration and
resettlement partnerships with the Welsh Government (to be completed
by December 2015).
12. Publication of a joint five-year YJB/Welsh Government youth justice
strategy and the establishment of implementation and monitoring
mechanisms for its key deliverables (to be completed by March 2019).
13. Improvement of resettlement of young people leaving custody as part of the
Transforming Youth Custody programme.
14. Improvement of youth offending services and outcomes through:

YOT oversight

work with HMI Probation

implementing the new escalation process (to be completed beyond
March 2015).
Key outcome B: An under-18 secure estate that better
meets young people’s needs
Outputs:
15. A specification for the secure college pathfinder that is designed to meet the
needs of young people (to be completed by March 2017).
16. A more accessible service for young people who sexually abuse, or display
sexually harmful behaviour.
17. Transfer of responsibility for healthcare commissioning in secure training
centres (STCs) to NHS England, including the associated provider and
commissioner arrangements.
18. Roll-out of Healthcare Standards for Children and Young People across the
secure estate.
27
19. A programme of capital developments to enhance safeguarding within the
secure estate.
20. Robust contract management and monitoring procedures and practices that
ensure services delivered are of a quality to meet young people’s needs.
21. Commissioning of sufficient places in the relevant sectors of the secure
estate to safely accommodate all children and young people who are
sentenced or remanded to custody.
22. Improved safety by implementing the Minimising and Managing Physical
Restraint (MMPR) system of behaviour management and restraint to a
minimum of two under-18 young offender institutions (under-18 YOIs) and
two STCs during 2014/15.
23. Production of an action plan for the secure estate in Wales for putting
education at the heart of youth custody, in line with the UK Government’s
Transforming Youth Custody programme (to be completed by December
2015).
24. Delivery of new education contracts in under-18 YOIs, increasing the
number of hours of education delivered and improving educational
outcomes for young people.
Key outcome C: Structural and process improvements that
support a better youth justice system
Outputs:
25. A new multi-disciplinary case management and resettlement planning
model for the secure estate, with roll-out beginning in under-18 YOIs.
26. A virtual learning environment (a computer-based learning and resettlement
tool with limited and secure web access) in place in under-18 YOIs, as well
as ICT solutions that support the implementation of the Transforming Youth
Custody programme.
27. Production of the commissioning plan for the secure estate for 2014/15.
28. Y2A Portal implemented to increase probation/YOT efficiency in terms of
young people’s transition from the youth to adult secure estate (to be
completed by June 2015).
29. A new assessment and planning interventions framework (AssetPlus) rolled
out to all YOTs and secure establishments in England and Wales (to be
completed by April 2016).
30. An agreed plan, supported by relevant partner agencies, to address the
over-representation of Black and Minority Ethnic young people in the
criminal justice system.
31. The first phase of a three-year pilot in Wales that leads to an enhanced
case management approach for children and young people with complex
needs. The first year will:

establish the model

baseline current practice to inform evaluation
28

begin delivery in a sample of YOTs in Wales (to be completed by June
2016).
32. A programme (linked to Transforming Rehabilitation) that delivers:



the National Probation Service continued support for YOTs, including
representation on YOT management boards, seconded staffing and
financial contribution
the transfer of junior attendance centres from NOMS to YOTs, following
a review of their effectiveness and efficiency
the transfer of the responsibility for delivery of community payback
sentences for young people under the age of 18 from NOMS to YOTs
(to be completed by March 2016).
33. British Transport Police’s provision aligns with the new out-of-court
disposals framework following YJB support for a pilot scheme.
34. Transferral of the devolution of remands budgets to a ‘business as usual’
function through finalising the debt recovery process, agreeing future
budget arrangements with the Ministry of Justice (MoJ), and sharing best
practice.
Key outcome D: Young people are placed efficiently in the
most appropriate establishment
Outputs:
35. Development of a revised under-18 YOI operational specification and plan,
including starting implementation against the plan.
36. A monitored secure estate that ensures the effective use of custody and
maintains the safety and well-being of young people.
37. Remanded and sentenced young people placed appropriately in secure
establishments.
38. Improved return rate and quality of documentation from YOTs for young
people in custody.
Key outcome E: The safety and well-being of children and
young people in the youth justice system is assured
Outputs:
39. A reviewed specification for social worker provision in custody that helps to
reduce offending and reoffending by looked-after children.
40. Implementation of Department for Education statutory guidance on lookedafter children in the youth justice system.
41. Two restraint-related research projects, with findings to be incorporated into
practice, as appropriate.
42. Learning from deaths in custody shared across the whole youth justice
system.
29
43. Appropriate levels of child and adolescent mental health services in Welsh
YOTs and the Welsh secure estate established.
44. A reviewed Community Safeguarding and Public Protection Incident
process to provide improved oversight and increase the ability to share
lessons learnt from such incidents.
45. Development of data sets around violence in custody which support secure
sites in our approach to reducing violence and conflict arising from gang
affiliations.
Key outcome F: Practitioners have access to the best
advice and support, and use this in practice
Outputs:
46. An effective practice framework that supports better practice in the youth
justice workforce as well as identifies poor performance, to develop both
local and national levels.
47. Assessment of the resources needed and, subject to resource available,
formulation of an action plan to expand the Intensive Fostering programme
beyond the current four pilot site areas.
48. Guidance for the sector on girls and child sexual exploitation that improves
practice in YOTs and custody.
49. New joint YJB/Welsh Government outcome indicators for Wales.
50. Publication of management board guidance for YOTs in Wales.
Key outcome G: The YJB is seen as an effective and
efficient public body
Outputs:
51. Expertise and informed advice provided to the Secretary of State for Justice
to assist in his development of strategy for the youth justice system.
52. Improvement of the management and use of data, leading to greater
knowledge that supports and informs decision-making.
53. Implementation of the plan to conduct HR and finance transactions through
shared services.
54. Implementation of the agreed Triennial Review recommendations.
55. Appropriate compliance with public and parliamentary scrutiny
requirements.
56. Appropriate compliance with corporate governance obligations, as set out in
an agreed revised Framework Document.
57. Other UK Government Departments (OGDs) take account of key youth
justice issues in their policy-making.
30
58. Joint oversight of the youth justice system in Wales with the Welsh
Government and the MoJ to ensure that youth justice policies relevant to
Wales are effectively delivered.
59. An organisation fit for delivering this plan.
How our strategy will enable the delivery of savings
We will deliver significant savings over the remainder of the Spending Review
period. By the end of 2014/15, we will have delivered cumulative savings of
£525m, with a budget now £210m (45%) less than the 2010/11 baseline. The
reform of the secure estate through the Transforming Youth Custody
programme is anticipated to deliver further savings in the longer term.
Table 1: Budget allocation from the MoJ to the YJB
Baseline
£m
2011/12
2012/13
2013/14
2014/15
Secure
accommodation
288
261
232
197
141
Grants to YOTs
112
101
101
92
92
Community
programmes
10
10
8
7
8
Operating costs
24
18
17
14
14
Fiscal resource
allocation
434
390
358
310
255
44
76
124
179
Saving
Table 2: Budget allocation from the Home Office to the YJB
Fiscal resource
allocation
Baseline
£m
2011/12
2012/13
2013/14
2014/15
31
15
7
-
-
16
24
31
31
Saving
Our strategy for dealing with this financial challenge has been to:
maximise savings from having fewer young people in custody by
decommissioning beds in the under-18 secure estate
use our commissioning function to generate efficiencies across remaining
secure estate contracts
31
invest in activities that will avoid young people being placed in custody
where that is not the most suitable place for them (contributing to our ability
to decommission)
drive down our operating costs, ensuring that these reduce by at least the
same rate as reductions in the Youth Justice Good Practice Grant paid to
YOTs
reduce the Youth Justice Good Practice Grant by the minimum necessary
to operate within the available budget.
This strategy has been adopted because YOTs’ work, supported by us, has
been an essential element of the effectiveness of the youth justice system, and,
hence, a critical enabler of the financial savings being obtained across the
system.
Organisational restructure
The structure shown below represents the proposed reorganisation of the YJB’s
executive management group and divisional responsibilities, which will come
into effect in April 2014. An organisational review will be carried out later in
2014 to restructure teams and staff below executive management group level.
Chief Executive
Director – Partnerships &
Performance
Communications
and Stakeholder
Management
Information,
Analysis and
Research
Partnership with
MoJ and other
government
departments
CEO’s Office and
Board Support
Director – Operations
YOT Support
and Monitoring
Placement
Service
Community
Programmes
Secure Contract
Management
Safeguarding
Police
relationships
Director – Corporate
Services
HR
Finance
IT
Facilities
Management
Shared Services
migration
Flexible
Resource Team
Planning,
Support &
Governance
32
Head of Commissioning &
Change Programmes
Programmes
relating to
Transforming
Youth Custody
Programmes
relating to
Minimising and
Managing
Physical
Restraint
Head of Wales
Community and
secure youth
justice services
in Wales
Effective Practice
Framework in
Wales
Governance and
Partnership with
the Welsh
Government and
MoJ
Partnership and
communications
with national
partners in
Wales
Budget allocation for 2014/15
Our budget and resources are used to maintain and improve youth justice
services. The YJB is solely funded by the Ministry of Justice following the
transfer of the Home Office prevention funding from the YJB to police and crime
commissioners. The YJB also receives income from local authorities to meet the
costs of the accommodation of remanded young people in custody.
Table 3: Budget allocation for 2014/15
Area of spend
2014–15
£m
Purpose of funding
Community youth justice services
Grants
92
Youth Justice Good Practice grants to all
YOTs to develop good practice and
commission research to support delivery of:
the three youth crime and justice
outcomes (reducing first-time entrants,
reducing reoffending, reducing use of
custody)
indicators 4–6 in the Wales Youth
Justice Indicator Set
Intensive Fostering
1
Total
93
Intensive Fostering grant
Custodial services
Under-18 young
offender institutions
66
Secure accommodation in under-18 young
offender institutions
Secure training
centres
50
Secure accommodation in secure training
centres
Secure children’s
homes
29
Secure accommodation in secure children’s
homes
Secure escort
contracts
7
Transport for young people to and within
the secure estate, e.g. from court to
custody
33
Area of spend
2014–15
£m
Purpose of funding
Other custodial
initiatives
4
Advocacy, secure workforce development,
assisted visits, inspection programmes,
restraint review, custody pathfinder
Less recovery of
remand costs from
local authorities
(15)
Total custodial
services
141
Implementation of Legal Aid, Sentencing
and Punishment of Offenders (LASPO)
Act
Other areas of expenditure
Operating costs
14
Staff and administrative costs
Youth justice system
ICT support
4
Support and maintenance of youth justice
ICT systems: Connectivity, eAsset, and
Youth Justice Management Information
System (YJMIS)
Programme support
3
Includes implementation and support for
effective practice programmes, AssetPlus,
and Y2A (youth to adult change
programmes)
Total fiscal
resource (cash)
budget
255
Note: In addition to the above, the Welsh Government provides £0.3m towards resettlement and
case management programmes.
34
Planning assumptions and managing
risks
Planning assumptions
During 2012/13, there was an average of 1,544 young people under the age of
18 in custody at any one time, a decrease of 419 young people from the 2011/12
average of 1,963. There have been further decreases during 2013/14.
Decommissioning unused capacity in the secure estate contributes to the
delivery of Spending Review savings. To maintain the savings, the significant
falls in the demand for custody achieved over recent years must be maintained,
both as a result of improvement in youth justice outcomes and through policies
aimed at reducing the use of custody, including improved approaches to the use
of remand. Our key planning assumptions are that:
the custodial population does not significantly increase
new UK and Welsh Government policies and our actions will further reduce
the use of custody where this is possible.
We review our commissioning decisions regularly and base our decisions on a
range of existing management information to ensure supply meets demand. It is
important to obtain a significant degree of assurance that any planned
reductions in commissioned beds are sustainable over the medium to long term.
Managing risks
We face both challenges and opportunities in preventing offending and
reoffending by children and young people, and in providing secure
accommodation. Meeting these challenges requires innovative thinking and new
approaches, while continuing to meet rigorous standards of accountability and
governance. Managing uncertainty – risk – in an informed and intelligent way is
critical if we are to achieve our planned outcomes, constrain threats to
acceptable levels and take informed decisions to exploit opportunities.
Using the experience we have gained since we were established, we have built
risk management into the way we operate – in our approach to contract and
monitoring arrangements for the secure estate and in the support we provide to
youth offending teams (YOTs).
Our planning process has been informed by our assessment of risks to the
delivery of our corporate objectives and projects, as well as the changing
landscape within which youth justice operates. These risks will be monitored
through our risk management approach, and appropriate mitigating measures
will be developed.
35
The principal strategic risk we have identified is the changing nature of the
cohort of young people in the youth justice system – as the cohort has become
smaller, the needs and behaviour of those within it have become more
challenging. This means that we must support YOTs and secure accommodation
providers to identify and implement new approaches to case management and
addressing offending, and to meet safeguarding needs. Failure to do this could
result in offending not being addressed and undermine the progress made to
date. Furthermore, a failure to respond adequately to the new cohort could mean
the opportunity presented by fewer young people in the youth justice system not
being exploited.
36
Youth Justice Board for England and Wales
102 Petty France
London
SW1H 9AJ
Tel: 020 3334 5300
Fax: 020 3334 2250
Email: enquiries@yjb.gsi.gov.uk
Web: www.justice.gov.uk/youth-justice
Publication reference number: D155
37