Cabinet Date: 12 November 2012 Subject:

Transcription

Cabinet
Date: 12 November 2012
Subject:
Financial Monitoring Report 2012/13 – September 2012
Lead officer: Paul Dale
Lead member: Mark Allison
Recommendations:
A. That Cabinet note the projected revenue budgetary control position, showing a forecast
underspend at year end of £5.196m after a transfer of £631,000 to the capital financing reserve.
(£5.819m underspend reported last month); the capital position and an update on corporate items
and consider any relevant action that they wish to take in respect of variations.
B. That Cabinet approve the re-profiling contained in appendices 5a to c summarized below:
Reprofiling from 2012/13
CCTV Match Funding
£0.14m to 2013/14
Waste Phase B
£0.20m to 2013/14
Rep of Cfirst/Contingency
£0.971m to 2013/14
IT Transformation Unallocated
£0.49m to 2013/14
Other
Civic Centre Windows
£0.05m to 2012/13
£3.00m to 2013/14
£1.45m fm 2014/15
£1.60m fm 2015/16
c) That Cabinet recommends to Council the creation of a new scheme by virement:
From Redundancy Payments £1.0m
1.
2
1.1
0
to Acquisitions £1.0m
PURPOSE OF REPORT AND EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
This is the regular financial monitoring report for 2012/13 presented to Cabinet in line with the
financial reporting timetable. It is the expenditure and income as at 30th September 2012.
3
This financial monitoring report provides:-
-1-
7
•
•
•
The latest budgetary control information on revenue expenditure and income, forecasting a year
end underspend of £5.196m (£5.819m underspend reported last month);
An update on the capital programme and detailed monitoring information;
An update on Corporate Items in the budget 2012/13;
4
5
2.
2012/13 FORECAST OUTTURN BASED UPON LATEST AVAILABLE DATA
2.1
Executive summary - As at September, the forecast is expected to be a net £5.196m
underspend compared to the current budget (£5.819m underspend reported last month). This
report reviews the 2nd quarter of the financial year and identifies the important areas where
financial management and corrective action is being focused.
6
Summary Position as at 30th September 2012
Department
3A.Corporate Services
3B.Children, Schools and Families
3C.Community and Housing
3D.Environment & Regeneration
NET SERVICE EXPENDITURE
3E.Corporate Items
Impact of Capital on revenue
budget
Transfer to Capital financing
reserve
Transfer to Closing the Gap
Reserve
Central budgets
Levies
TOTAL CORPORATE
PROVISIONS
TOTAL GENERAL FUND
FUNDING
Grants
Council Tax and Collection Fund
FUNDING
NET
Forecast
Variance
at year
end
(Sept.)
£000s
Forecast
Variance
at year
end
(Aug.)
£000s
Original
Budget
2012/13
£000s
Current
Budget
2012/13
£000s
Full
Year
Forecast
(Sept.)
£000s
10,256
42,366
60,223
28,008
140,853
10,534
42,124
60,134
27,708
140,500
10,741
42,779
58,772
27,946
140,238
207
655
-1,362
238
-261
110
535
-1,451
-510
-1,319
14,080
14,080
13,449
-631
-602
0
0
631
631
602
5,738
5,738
5,738
0
0
-5,983
-5,630
-10,565
-4,935
-4,500
880
880
880
0
0
14,715
15,068
10,133
-4,935
-4,500
155,568
155,568
150,371
-5,196
-5,819
-68,888
-86,680
155,568
-68,888
-86,680
155,568
-68,888
-86,680
155,568
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
-5,197
-5,196
-5,819
The spending position is after transfers to and from reserves which are included above.
A detailed table is provided as Appendix 1.
-2-
8
The following table shows the summary actual and projected position for September, in subjective format.
Expenditure
Employees
Premises Related Expenditure
Transport Related Expenditure
Supplies and Services
Third Party Payments
Current
Budget
2012/13
Year to
Date
Budget
(Sept)
Year to
Date Actual
(Sept)
Full Year
Forecast
(Sept)
Forecast
Variance at
year end
(Sept)
£000
£000
£000
£000
£000
85,920
42,806
42,946
86,721
801
8,900
5,130
3,670
8,701
(200)
10,824
4,782
4,922
11,300
476
155,459
76,985
69,702
154,586
(873)
83,567
39,805
37,255
83,858
291
112,589
4,590
4,410
112,653
65
Support Services
33,744
347
12
33,743
(1)
Depreciation and Impairment Losses
13,920
17
0
13,920
1
Corporate Provisions
15,068
2,902
925
10,133
(4,935)
519,991
177,363
163,841
515,616
(4,376)
(258,191)
(7,978)
(7,518)
(258,373)
(182)
Transfer Payments
GROSS EXPENDITURE
Income
Government Grants
Other Grants, Reimbursements and
Contribs
Customer and Client Receipts
Interest
Recharges
Balances
GROSS INCOME
NET EXPENDITURE
(15,712)
(5,127)
(4,313)
(15,702)
10
(52,427)
(23,497)
(24,535)
(53,102)
(675)
(44)
0
0
(44)
0
(0)
(35,323)
(529)
(364)
(35,323)
(2,726)
(1,680)
(1,700)
(2,701)
25
(364,422)
(38,811)
(38,430)
(365,245)
(823)
155,569
138,552
125,411
150,371
(5,196)
-3-
9
Chart 1 below shows the forecast year end variance for departmental expenditure with a comparison
against 2011/12.
Service Expenditure - Forecast Year End Variance
2,000
1,000
0
£'000
March
February
January
December
November
October
September
August
July
June
May
-1,000
Service Expenditure
12/13
Service Expenditure
11/12
-2,000
-3,000
-4,000
-5,000
-6,000
Chart 2 shows the forecast year end variance for corporate provisions with a comparison against
2011/12.
Corporate Provisions - Year End Forecast Variance
0
February
January
December
November
October
September
August
July
June
May
-1,000
£'000
-2,000
12/13 FY Forecast
-3,000
11/12 FY Forecast
-4,000
-5,000
-6,000
-4-
10
Charts showing the forecast year end variance for each department with a comparison against
2011/12 are attached as Appendix 8.
The table below shows the extent of the reduction in forecasts for each period to the 11/12 year end.
Service Departments need to ensure their current year projections are substantially more robust than
was the case in 2011/12.
Variance Reported in 2011/12
Budget
£'000
JUL
£'000
AUG
£'000
SEP
£'000
OCT
£'000
NOV
£'000
DEC
£'000
JAN
£'000
FEB
£'000
OUT- TURN
£'000
9,021
309
17
-583
-583
-625
-652
-739
-781
-975
9,173
18,194
-13
296
-1,097
-1,080
-1,126
-1,709
-1,126
-1,709
-1,012
-1,637
-1,030
-1,683
-1,093
-1,832
-1,088
-1,869
-1,646
-2,621
12,544
-300
-300
-400
-170
-309
-344
-747
-799
-1,129
54,733
-462
-462
-492
-1,683
-1,693
-2,254
-2,556
-2,726
-2,864
85,471
-466
-1,842
-2,601
-3,562
-3,639
-4,281
-5,135
-5,394
-6,614
58,537
-944
733
536
115
-186
-695
-1,264
-849
-542
144,008
-1,410
-1,109
-2,065
-3,447
-3,825
-4,976
-6,399
-6,243
-7,156
3,000
2,002
2,135
2,135
2,135
1,887
1,889
1,889
2,025
1,590
893
70
-1,312
-1,690
-3,089
-4,510
-4,354
-5,131
Waste
Operations
Waste
Services
Total Waste
Children’s
Social Care
Adult Social
Care
Total Big 3
Other
Services
Total
Redundancy
Total
144,008
The table below shows the forecast variation for the same services in the current year
Variation in forecast against budget
2012/13
£'000
-282
-54
-875
June
£'000
July
£'000
Aug
£'000
Sep
£'000
-860
-26
-1,344
-783
150
-1,028
-935
362
-1,206
-698
327
-1,153
-1,211
-2,230
-1,661
-1,779
-1,524
May
Total Waste
Children’s Social care
Adult Social care
Variation on "Big 3"
Other departmental expenditure
Variation from budget
-5-
96
-440
325
460
1,263
-1,115
-2,670
-1,338
-1,319
-261
11
7
3.
DEPARTMENTAL SUMMARY OF CURRENT POSITION
(A) Corporate Services Department
2012/13
Current
Budget
Full year
Forecast
September
Forecast
variance
at year
end (Sep)
Forecast
variance
at year
end (Aug)
2011/12
Variance
at year
end
£000
£000
£000
£000
£000
Business Improvement
Infrastructure &
Transactions
1,821
1,821
0
49
47
8,974
8,936
(38)
(47)
Resources
7,074
7,044
(30)
4
71
(122)
Human Resources
1,797
2,003
205
148
(51)
Corporate Governance
4,407
4,366
(42)
5
(140)
403
728
326
299
29
1,184
969
(215)
(348)
1,700
25,660
25,867
207
110
1,534
Customer Services
Corporate Items
including redundancy
costs
Total (controllable)
Overview
At period 6 the Corporate Services department is forecasting an overspend of £207k.
8
The main variances are summarised in the table below.
Aug
Budget Sept
forecast forecast
variance variance
£000
Human Resources
School’s SLA
Agilisys contract costs
Other costs
£000
£000
(444)
349
1,892
156
91
(42)
146
91
(57)
Total Human Resources variance
Customer Services
Corporate Communications
Income
Shortfall on recovery of court
costs
Underachievement of bailiff’s
income
Other costs
1,797
205
148
(199)
112
112
1,030
100
0
(887)
237
237
459
(123)
(50)
Total Customer Services variance
403
326
299
Human Resources (HR) – forecast overspend £205k
-6-
12
The payroll service provided by Agilisys is forecasting an overspend of £91k. This is due to 30%
of the workforce requiring paper payslips which results in an additional unbudgeted cost and the
requirement of the business objects module of the iTrent system. There is also a shortfall on the
Schools SLA income due to a reduction in the price of the SLA to provide a competitive market
rate. The previous SLA was priced at a cost per post not employee, which also results in lower
income as several employees in schools hold more than one post. Both of these factors, together
with a small reduction in buyback, are the reason for the forecast shortfall in SLA income of
£156k.
This overspend is partially offset by an underspend in Learning and Development training.
The HR managers are addressing the above overspend by holding vacancies where possible,
reviewing the structure of the Central Operation Team and reviewing the pricing of all Schools
SLA. A clear strategy for balancing these budgets for 2013/14 is needed.
Customer Services – forecast overspend £326k
The Corporate Communications sponsorship, advertising and filming income is expected to show
a shortfall of £112k.
An underachievement of income of £237k is expected on Bailiffs income. The Bailiffs shared
service with Sutton commenced in August but is now not expected to generate additional income
until 2013/14.
A £100k shortfall is projected on recovery of court costs. The costs recovered to date are £155k
down on the same time last year. This is partly due to the reduction in the number of court dates
since transferring from Wimbledon to Richmond Magistrates court. We have only been given one
hearing per month and at Wimbledon we could have two in the early part of the year.
The above forecast overspends are partly offset by forecast overachievement of income in the
Registrars office (£50k) and an underspend on some vacant posts (£100k
Infrastructure and Transactions– forecast underspend £38k
The main reasons for the underspend are an overachievement of income on the Alto Digital
recharges of £65k and an additional £35k on recovery of overpayments. These are offset by a
forecast overspend on print room costs due to a fall in demand.
Corporate Items – forecast underspend £215k
The forecast underspend is due to lower redundancy costs.
Management Action
Budget managers are working closely with finance officers to reduce spend where possible to
address the above cost pressures.
-7-
13
(B)
Children, Schools and Families
Children, Schools
and Families
(Non-DSG)
Commissioning,
Strategy and
Performance
Education
Social Care and
Youth Inclusion
PFI
Redundancy costs
Total excluding
overheads
9
2012/13
Current
Budget
Full year
Forecast
(as at Sep)
£000
£000
Forecast
Variance at
yearend
(as at Sep)
£000
Forecast
2011/12
Variance at
Variance
yearend at yearend
(as at Aug)
£000
£000
7,645
9,965
7,723
10,227
78
262
99
86
(135)
(11)
11,613
6,941
2,019
11,940
6,941
2,007
327
0
(12)
362
0
(12)
(1,115)
22
150
38,183
38,838
655
535
(1,089)
Overview
As at the end of Period 6 Budget managers are forecasting a net overspend of £655k on local authority
funded services. DSG funded services are forecast to underspend but these budgets are not within the
council’s general fund and underspends cannot be offset against overspends on General Fund budgets.
10
Local Authority Funded Services
The key variances are shown in the following table.
Description
Budget
Independent fostering and residential placements (ART)
Various other small over and underspends
Subtotal Commissioning, Strategy and Performance
Direct and Discretionary payments
SEN and FE transport
Subtotal Education
Special guardianship orders
Section 17
Staffing
Subtotal Children’s Social Care and Youth Inclusion
Subtotal PFI
Subtotal Redundancy cost
Grand total Children, Schools and Families
-8-
14
£,000
4,971
2,674
7,645
231
2,917
6,817
9,965
112
36
612
10,853
11,613
6,941
2,019
38,183
Variance
September
£,000
102
-24
78
130
61
71
262
188
112
54
-27
327
0
-12
655
Variance
August
£,000
113
-14
99
86
0
0
86
188
0
125
49
362
0
-12
535
Heads of service across all three divisions of CSF manage a number of volatile budgets, which require
continuous and careful demand management. Significant cost pressures and underspends identified to
date are detailed below:
Commissioning, Strategy and Performance Division
•
Pressure on fostering and residential placement costs continue as a result of the nature of cases.
The net position includes ongoing pressures in independent agency fostering and placements for
looked after children, offset by underspends on in-house fostering and mother and baby budgets,
amounting to some £102k.
The Access to Resources model has been applied and robust negotiations have delivered 110k
of savings since April 2012 split almost evenly between residential and IFA placements. However
over the same period the average weekly cost of a placement has increased from £2,801 to
£3,072 in Sept 2012, partly because of the need to make 2 very specialist placements. High cost
placements are being closely monitored and step down options will be considered when
appropriate. We are piloting the care calculator which is expected to deliver lower cost rates from
providers over time.
•
There are various other small over and underspends predicted across the division totalling £24k
underspend. This, combine with the significant items described above, equals the reported
Divisional overspend forecast of £78k.
.
Education Division
•
The SEN and Disability integrated service is forecasting overspends of £130k on their direct and
discretionary payments due to increased numbers of clients reflecting rising numbers of children
with complex needs.
•
SEN and FE transport cost are expected to overspend by £61k due to the increased number of
service users.
Work with E&R delivered unit cost reductions and streamlined routes to deliver savings.
However, this is another service area which is subject to demographic growth pressure as a result
of increasing client numbers. A review of our policy has been undertaken as well as proposals to
deliver savings for the MTFS which are currently being consulted on. The draft policy went to
CYP Scrutiny last month.
•
overspend. This, combine with the significant item described above, equals the reported
Divisional overspend forecast of 262k. Work is underway to continue to improve budget
management here.
-9-
15
Children’s Social Care and Youth Inclusion
•
Due to an increase in the number of special guardianship orders, this budget is expected to
overspend by £188k by the end of the year. £52k of this overspend will be one-off because it
relates to a backdated outcome of an external review.
•
The Section 17 budgets are forecast to overspend by £112k for the current financial year. This is
due to increased demand in the Access and Assessment, Children in Need, and 16 plus teams.
These costs include “no recourse to public funds” (NRTPF) cases, which will be offset by
underspends on unaccompanied asylum seekers grant income.
•
Various sections are expecting staffing pressures due to increased caseloads and agency staffs
cover. This is expected to overspend by £54k.
•
Commissioning savings at Leyton Road are expected to result in an overall underspend for the
year of £60k.
•
Adoption allowance costs have increased to secure appropriate placements for young people with
complex needs, resulting in an expected overspend of £40k.
•
Recovery of costs through the unaccompanied asylum seekers grant is expected to generate a
£62k underspend. This budget will be required for NRTPF cases, which are currently included
under the Section 17 cases and forecasted to overspend (see above). Virements will be done
next month to realign these budgets and offset the over and underspend.
•
Cost pressures of £81k are arising during 2011/12 relating to maternity cover.
•
underspend. This, combine with the significant item described above, equals the reported
Divisional overspend forecast of £327k.
•
Changes to the Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offender (LASPO) Act 2012 coming
into force in December 2012 will introduce a new remand framework. Financial responsibility for
remands to youth detention accommodation will transfer from the Youth Justice Board (YJB) to
Local Authorities. The current funding transfer proposal from the YJB to the LA to fund this
transfer is not sufficient to cover the expected cost. This proposal is in its consultation stage but
the department is anticipating a cost pressure for part of this year which could lead to further
overspending in the current year. It is not possible to estimate the full-year effect of this pressure
for 2013/14 as it is dependant on the number of placements, which is unknown, and the funding
transfer which is still under consultation.
•
Work is underway to continue to improve budget management here.
Dedicated Schools Grant
Based on current client costs, independent residential SEN placements are expected to underspend.
The current client costs do not build in contingencies for new assessments during the year or new
- 10 -
16
starters from September. A more accurate underspend estimate; excluding the possibility of any tribunal
cases, will be provided for October budget monitoring.
Implementing the strategy to increase in-borough SEN provision is delivering reduced spend on out of
borough placements, and increased income from other boroughs, by charging for out of borough
children placed in Merton schools. Initial forecasts indicate a net underspend on these recoupment
activities, which will be quantified once the most of the claims are received from other boroughs. This will
be quantified for October budget monitoring.
Management Action
CSF DMT regularly review spend across the board and have ”deep dive” reviews of volatile budgets
such as SEN Transport and C&YP placements budgets across education and social care. The ART
service is working to negotiate down the costs of Individual placements and work with consortium
partners continues including piloting the care cost calculator.
Work is being targeted to prevent high cost interventions where possible. Early intervention and
prevention services are being reviewed to ensure maximum impact and best use of the resources
available.
CSF managers are working closely with finance staff to continue to make forecasting more robust, and
will continue to reduce spend where possible to address cost pressures that arise throughout the year.
(C)
Community and Housing
As at end of September, C&H is forecast to under-spend by £1.363m.
Community and
Housing
Access and
Assessment
Commissioning
Direct Provision
Directorate
Adult Social Care
Libraries and Heritage
Merton Adult Education
Housing General Fund
Total (controllable)
2012/13
Current
Budget
Full Year
Forecast
(Sep)
Forecast
Variance
(Sep)
Forecast
Variance
(Aug)
2011/12
Variance
at year end
£000
40,806
£000
39,740
£000
(1,066)
£000
(1,030)
£000
(1,643)
5,239
4,832
847
51,724
2,471
(12)
1,263
55,446
5,054
4,929
847
50,570
2,493
(12)
1,031
54,082
(184)
97
0
(1,153)
22
0
(232)
(1,363)
(154)
(22)
(0)
(1,206)
22
0
(267)
(1,451)
(698)
(463)
(62)
(2,866)
8
107
(391)
(3,142)
The main variances to report are summarised below, the majority of the under-spend is income.
Placements budget is over-spending, but at this stage this is offset by other under-spends within A&A.
- 11 -
17
Budget
Client Contribution
PCT Contribution
Total over-achievement of Income
Miles Re-ablement Service
Other A&A Net under-spends
Gross Placements over-spend
Total A&A under-spend
Other C&H under-spend
TOTAL FORECAST UNDERSPEND C&H
(Sep)
Forecast
Variance
(Sep)
Forecast
Variance
(Aug)
£000
(7,970)
(2,297)
(10,267
2,653
9,955
38,465
40,806
14,640
£000
(893)
(139)
(1,032)
(202)
(365)
533
(1066)
(297)
£000
(895)
204
(691)
(191)
(152)
3
(1031)
(420)
55,446
(1,363)
(1451)
Commissioning
The projected under spend in Commissioning of £184k is due to under-spend of the supporting people
grant £88k, reduction in the contribution to Voluntary Organisation contracts and grants of £40k salaries
due to delay in recruitment £56k
Direct Provision is forecast to overspend by £97k.
Mainly due to additional staff required at Glebelands and new service at Haselmere Avenue.
There is also additional income from a full cost client
Housing
The projected under spend is caused by preventing homelessness forecast under-spend on rent
deposits, repossession and eviction £232k. This is an area where spend to date suggests that the under
spending may well be greater.
Libraries £22k forecast over-spend that will need action to contain within existing budgets.
Merton Adult Education (MAE) is forecast to breakeven, however given the need to implement a
package of savings and a track record of overspending in recent years this needs to be viewed with
some caution at this stage, unless firm management action is taken.
MAE have been awarded a growth bid of £55k from the Skills Funding Agency with the possibility of more to
come, in recognition of the service exceeding the targets set for it by the SFA.
The budget for the new academic year is being re-profiled.
Overview
Placements
The total gross placement budget for 2012/13 is £38.465m; this includes £1m growth allocated in setting the
budget and savings of £3.5m.
- 12 -
18
The impact of the savings on the budget position for 2012/13 and future years is being monitored
closely.
The table below identifies the movement in care package numbers:
Total Yearly
Commitment
@ Sep 12
£000
Increase/
decrease
since
Budget
Setting
No of Care
Packages
as at
October
2011
(budget
setting
£000
179
No of Care
Packages as
at
Sep 2012
177
(2)
£1,640
Physical and Sensory
278
275
(3)
£3,659
Learning Disabilities
357
371
14
£12,271
1,681
1647
(34)
£20,348
7
8
1
£209
22
19
(3)
£243
2,524
2,497
(27)
£38,998
Activity Data – Care Package Numbers
Service Area
Mental Health
11
Older People
Substance Misuse
12
13
No recourse to public funds
Other Placement Expenditure
TOTAL FORECAST UNDERSPEND A&A
£628
Pressures
Based on current packages within care-first , gross placement expenditure budget is forecast to over-spend by
£533k at Period 6, which broadly equates to the saving taken against the budget in this area for 2012/13.
Trend analysis of placement expenditure over the last 5 financial years, indicates that placement
expenditure increases by an average of 1.62% between September and the end of the financial year.
It is estimated that spend on Adult Social care placements may increase by £630k, especially due to
winter pressures.
A meeting has been scheduled with the PCT to discuss transfer of resources and to develop this year’s
framework for agreement and sign-off .The S256 agreement is required from NHS London as part of the
governance process. This is particularly important with winter pressures ahead of us and the need to
reduce demand on Hospital capacity and confirm funding available. The net impact of this needs to be
modelled.
Management Action to date
Adult Social Care
Managers have been requested to review the placement expenditure data with a view to improving the
accuracy of the forecast.
The Temporary Accommodation budget is being reviewed by the budget manager. The forecast for
temporary accommodation does not seem to be fully consistent with actual spend to date as all invoices
have not been accounted for.
At the same time last year the Adult Social Care budget was forecast to underspend by £492,000. The
actual under spent in 2011/12 was £2.9m. This broadly splits as £1.4m for additional income and £1.5m
for lower expenditure. £800,000 of unbudgeted income was taken towards balancing the budget in
2012/13. The actual extent of continuing under spending is currently being investigated by the Director.
The current adult social cares forecast underspend of £1.363m includes an estimated £0.893m
- 13 -
19
overachievement of income. It is important that as one of the major contributors to recent under
spending that the extent of any structural budgetary overprovision is clarified and dealt with through the
future budget setting process.
- 14 -
20
(D)
Environment & Regeneration
Public Protection & Development (PP&D)
Sustainable Communities
Street Scene & Waste
Safer Merton
2012/13
Current
Budget
£'000
-6,281
3,170
24,937
963
Full year
Forecast
(Sept)
£'000
-6,047
3,466
24,677
931
Forecast
Variance
(Sept)
£'000
234
296
-260
-32
Forecast
Variance
(Aug)
£'000
197
0
-708
0
2011/12
Variance
£'000
-95
235
-2,533
-45
Total Excluding Overheads
22,789
23,027
238
-511
-2,438
14
Description
2012/13
Current
Budget
£000
15
Forecast
Variance
at year
end (Sept)
£000
395
(93)
(68)
234
174
192
77
(124)
(23)
296
298
(289)
(669)
(123)
16
17
21
25
29
33
37
41
45
49
53
57
61
65
69
73
Shortfall in Building & Development Control income
Employee underspend within Parking Services
Other
Total for Public Protection & Development
Shortfall in Greenspaces income
Shortfall in Property rental income
Premises related costs
Employee underspend within Senior Mgnt & Support
Other
Total for Sustainable Communities
Employee overspend within Waste Services
Reduced transport sla costs within Waste Services
Reduced SLWP related costs
General Supplies & Services underspend within Waste Services
Shortfall in Waste Services income – principally Commercial Waste
18
22
26
30
34
38
42
46
50
54
58
62
66
70
74
77
81
85
89
93
97
Employee overspend within Traffic & Highways
Reduction in ability to capitalise expenditure
Transport Services
Other
Total for Street Scene & Waste
Employee related underspend
Shortfall in income
Other
Total for Safer Merton
1 01
1 05
1 09
Total Excluding Overheads
(1,972)
2,330
(6,639)
(6,281)
(1,661)
(3,439)
267
872
7,131
3,170
7,170
2,433
8,708
772
19
23
27
31
35
39
43
47
51
55
59
63
67
71
(2,359)
1,475
(691)
(66)
7,495
24,937
1,101
(76)
(62)
963
75
78
98
1 02
1 06
1 10
22,789
28
32
36
40
44
48
52
56
60
64
68
72
254
245
252
57
(285)
(260)
(77)
44
1
(32)
83
86
94
20
24
76
79
82
90
Forecast
Variance
at year
end (Aug)
£000
316
(73)
(46)
197
56
162
103
(128)
(193)
0
(106)
(274)
(495)
(129)
84
87
91
95
96
1 00
1 03
1 04
1 07
1 08
1 11
238
463
(167)
23
(253)
(708)
(44)
44
0
0
88
92
99
1 13
230
80
1 12
1 14
(511)
Overview
The Department is currently forecasting an overspend of £238,000 at year end. There are seven main
areas of variance –Traffic & Highways, Building & Development Control, Greenspaces, and Property
Management are forecasting overspends whilst Waste Services, Parking Services, and Senior
Management & Support are forecasting an underspend.
1 15
- 15 -
21
Some of the reported variances this month reflect more intensive analysis for the period six return. They
do require even more detailed analysis which is underway, and the Director is meeting with budget
holders to investigate the changed position. Improvements in budget monitoring are being made and the
position in respect of savings is under review.
1 16
Public Protection & Development
Building and Development Control
An overspend of £370k is currently being forecast, which is mainly due to the section being unable to
fully implement an agreed saving of £300k. The saving relates to a Government proposal which would
allow the Council to set its own fees (levels are currently prescribed) in order to recover the full cost of
delivering a number of services within the section. However, the Government has delayed this proposal
and no agreement has been made as to when it might be announced. The section has also recently
seen a fall in application fee income received. It may be that this partly relates to d to the Ministerial
Statement to relax the requirement for planning consent in certain classes of development, where those
who may no longer require permission assess their situation.
However, this pressure is expected to be partially offset by the fact that the DCLG have recently
proposed a one-off adjustment to up-rate planning application fees in line with inflation amounting to
around 15%, as the Government, who set the fee, have not been increased it since 2008. It is
anticipated that this increase will take effect from October, and could result in an additional £50k of
income during this financial year above that currently forecast. The resolution of the bulk of this saving
has been deferred into 2014/15 at the cabinet meeting of 22nd October
This forecast overspend is being partially mitigated by underspends elsewhere within the PP&D division,
especially within Parking Services where an employee underspend is expected.
Sustainable Communities
Property Management
The Property Management section is currently forecasting a shortfall in rental income of around £192k,
as a result of several void properties during the year. Also, as a result of these void lets, the section is
also liable to pay the related NNDR, security and any repair costs required.
Mitigating action is being taken to address this pressure, for example, ensuring the vacant units are in a
good state of repair, resulting in six units being re-let since June and two units being under offer.
However, the section often needs to agree a rent free period of up to six months in order to secure the
lease agreements and, although the better presentation of the units is helping to reduce the length of the
rent free periods necessary, this will result in limited additional income this financial year. Officers are
working on mitigating action in order to bring the budget back into balance for 2013/14.
Greenspaces
The section is currently forecasting a shortfall in income of around £174k, principally in internment fees
which is forecasting a £126k shortfall, mainly as a result of 2012/13 savings relating to additional income
- 16 -
22
not being achieved. Action is being proposed to address the overspend, including looking at costs and
how they can be contained, as well as ways to increase income. Internment income is partly seasonal in
nature and the coming months will indicate whether this forecast is overly pessimistic or not. This has
highlighted the need for a strengthening of budget management in this activity. An update on the
position will be included in future monitoring reports once it is clearer what can be achieved.
In the short-term, this forecast overspend, coupled with the overspend forecast within property
Management, are being partially offset by underspends elsewhere within Sustainable Communities,
principally within the Senior Management and Support section.
Waste Services
The section is currently forecasting an overall underspend of £698k, which is mainly due to a reduction
in expected transport related costs, and a reduction in the levels of residual waste being taken to landfill.
This compares to an underspend of £2.6M in the previous financial year, but their respective budgets
have been reduced by around £1.2M for this financial year.
1
However, there is notable pressure relating to Commercial Waste, where an income shortfall of around
£256k is forecast based on current projections. This compares to an overspend of £278k in 2011/12. A
review of the commercial waste business and the operating model has recently completed and reported
and the action plan to reduce cost and increase income is being finalised.
The saving related to 6 day working is proposed to be replaced with a saving of similar value achieved
by some double shifting of refuse collection rounds both residential and commercial.
Traffic & Highways
The section is currently forecasting an overspend of £381k for two main reasons. Firstly, there has been
a delay in the introduction of the London Permit Scheme due to a delay in the approval from the
Department for Transport. At this stage, it is estimated that the delay will be approximately three months,
meaning that the section will only receive three months of related income rather than the expected six.
Secondly, due to a clearer understanding of actual patterns of expenditure the section is able to charge
a lower level of highways maintenance spend than it anticipated to Capital.
Safer Merton
This section is not forecasting an overspend or underspend. Issues have arisen in regards to existing
CCTV contracts that may put additional pressures on the budget, and are being worked through at
present. However, this pressure is expected to be mitigated by staffing underspends, mainly as a result
of maternity leave, recent agreements to reduce hours and difficulty in recruiting staff.
1 17
Management Action
Action is being taken to improve budget management in some areas and to bring the budget back into
balance.
- 17 -
23
12 9
(E)
Corporate Items
These budgets cover a wide range of significant areas including treasury management,
contingency, contributions to past service deficiency on the pensions fund and contributions from
government grants and use of reserves.
The assumptions underpinning budgets and projected outturn are contained in Appendix 1 and 2.
The main areas of variance as at 31st September 2012 are:-
3E.Corporate Items
Cost of Borrowing
Investment Income
Council
2012/13
£000s
Original
Budget
2012/13
£000s
14,481
-401
14,481
-401
14,080
4,537
1,335
5,337
-14,816
-1,136
14,080
4,537
1,334
4,095
-14,813
-1,136
Central Items
Levies
-4,743
881
-5,983
880
Appropriation to Reserves
TOTAL CORPORATE PROVISIONS
5,738
15,956
5,738
14,715
Impact of Capital on revenue budget
Pension Fund
Pay and Price Inflation
Contingencies and provisions
Depreciation and Impairment
Income Items
Forecast Forecast
Variance Variance
Current Full Year at year
at year
Budget Forecast
end
end
2012/13 (Sept.)
(Sept.)
(Aug.)
£000s
£000s
£000s
£000s
14,481
-401
14,080
13,879
-401
13,478
--631
0
--631
-602
0
-602
4,537
1,334
4,030
-14,233
-1,136
4,537
426
1,070
-14,233
-2,203
0
-908
-2,960
0
-1,067
0
-908
-2,525
0
-1,067
-5,468
880
5,738
15,230
-10,403
880
6,340
10,295
-4,935
0
631
-4,935
-4,500
0
602
-4,500
Details of forecast variances have been provided in previous monitoring reports and are shown in
Appendix 2
The only major change in September is a reduction of £435,000 in the forecast use of corporate
contingency. This assumes that expenditure of up to £0.500m will be available as cover for the
remainder of this financial year. A small change in the impact of capital on the revenue budget
has resulted from the latest capital programme monitoring information.
- 18 -
24
4.
CAPITAL PROGRAMME 2012-16
4.1
The table below summarises the position in respect of the Capital Programme as at September
2012:
Merton - September 2012 Capital Monitoring Information
Department
Total
Budget
YTD Actual
YTD Budget
Variance to
Date
Forecast For
Year
Forecast
Variance
1,408,090
364,598
375,606
(11,008)
1,108,800
(299,290)
Corporate Services
5,173,370
1,068,761
1,740,662
(671,901)
4,970,318
648
Children Schools and Families
31,230,730
16,318,652
13,332,358
2,986,294
28,569,365
(2,061,365)
Environment and Regeneration
15,042,320
4,115,448
5,565,011
(1,449,564)
14,338,870
(666,450)
Total Capital
52,854,510
21,867,459
21,013,637
853,821
48,987,353
(3,026,457)
5.1
The scheme level programme is attached as Appendix 5a.
5.2
There have been the following movements in budget since the report submitted last month:
August
Department
Monitoring
Corporate Services
Increase/
(Decrease)
Total Budget
2,379,090
(971,000)
1,408,090
5,613,370
(440,000)
5,173,370
31,230,730
0
31,230,730
15,693,410
(651,090)
15,042,320
Total Capital
54,916,600
(2,062,090)
52,854,510
i)
ii)
Community and Housing – Replacement of Carefirst budgets of £971,000 have been reprofiled into 2013/14. This is detailed in Appendix 5b.
Corporate Services – There are two changes to the programme
a)
£1,000,000 redundancy budget for 2012/13 is being vired into an Acquisitions
budget, this new tranche of money will be held corporately rather than by
Environment and Regeneration.
b)
Civic Centre windows have been re-profiled forward in the programme due to health
and safely concerns. The changes to the overall programme are detailed in
Appendix 5b.
c)
Transformation Unallocated £490,000 has been re-profiled to 2013/14
- 19 -
25
iii)
5.3
Environment and Regeneration – Officers have
a)
re-profiled nineteen schemes totalling £672,090 into 2013/14,
b)
one scheme of £16,000 has been removed from the programme, and
c)
one scheme of £37,000 for a Beach Volleyball Court in Wimbledon Park has been
added funded by grant from Sport England.
These adjustments are detailed in Appendix 5b.
The Table below shows the movement in the corporate capital programme for 2012/13 since it’s
approval at March 2012 Council:
Approved
Cabinet
March 2012
Department
Slippage
from
2011/12
ReProfiling
from
2012/13
Additional
External
Funding
New
Internally
Funded
0
769
0
4,796
1,740
(922)
33,214
6,885
(13,905)
4,175
0
14,602
3,466
(3,498)
298
827
Total Capital
52,612
12,860
(18,325)
6,083
827
Corporate Services
5.4
1,610
Schools
Contribu
tions
August
Monitoring
Report
Increase /
(Decrease)
Sept.
Monitoring
Report
0
2,379
(971)
1,408
0
5,614
(440)
5,174
31,230
0
31,230
15,695
(651)
15,044
54,918
(2,062)
52,856
861
861
The table below summarises the impact of the re-profiling and virements in 5.3 on the Capital
Programme 2012-16.
Impact of Re-Profiling and Virements on the Capital Programme 2012-16
Dept
Starting
Budget
2012/13
Changes
Revised
Budget
2012/13
C&H
CS
CSF
E&R
(1)
£000s
2,379
5,614
31,230
15,694
(2)
£000s
(971)
(440)
0
(651)
(1+2)=
(3)
£000s
1,408
5,174
31,230
15,043
Total
54,917
(2,062)
52,855
5.5
Starting
Budget
2013/14
Chan
ges
Starting
Budget
2013/14
0
4,084
25,536
17,720
(5)
£000s
971
3,490
0
669
(4+5)=
(6)
£000s
971
7,574
25,536
18,389
47,340
5,130
52,470
(4)
£000s
Original
Budget
2014/15
Changes
Starting
Budget
2014/15
(7)
£000s
(8)
£000s
0
4,376
13,090
10,086
0
(1,450)
0
0
(7+8)=
(9)
£000s
0
2,926
13,090
10,086
27,552
(1,450)
26,102
Appendix 5c updates the funding of the capital programme for 2012/13.
- 20 -
26
Original
Budget
2015/16
Changes
Revised
Budget
2015/16
(10)
£000s
(11)
£000s
0
4,057
4,165
15,946
0
(1,600)
0
0
(10+11)=
(12)
£000s
0
2,457
4,165
15,946
24,168
(1,600)
22,568
5.6
The Table below compares spend to September for the financial years 2011/12 to 2012/13 and
will be updated each month:
Comparison of Capital Spend September 2011 to September 2012
Department
Corporate Services
Spend to September
2011
486,951
2,133,101
8,862,532
9,066,487
Spend to
September 2012
364,598
1,068,761
16,318,652
4,115,448
20,549,071
21,867,459
Total Capital Spend
Variance to
Date
(122,353)
(1,064,340)
7,456,120
(4,951,039)
1,318,388
i)
ii)
Corporate Services have only spent 50% of the spend achieved last year
Environment and Regeneration – considerable officer activity has been directed at the Olympics
and certain restrictions on activity have been in place over the Olympic period. This has impacted
on their spend this year.
6.
RISK MANAGEMENT
6.1
Attached as Appendix 6 is the updated Key Strategic Risk Register for October 2012.
Disappointingly only one risk has reduced and all other key strategic risks have remained the
same.
6.2
As part of the Authority’s Insurance arrangements the Authority has £20,000 per annum to spend
on Risk related training with specialist staff within our insurers. Officers have met with
representatives from Zurich and identified the following training which will be delivered before the
end of the financial year:
£
Two Member Training Sessions
3,000
Corporate Risk Management Group Training
3,000
Review of Departmental Risk Registers
20,000
--------Total
26,000
6.3
The timing and content of the training is currently under review.
- 21 -
27
7. DELIVERY OF SAVINGS FOR 2012/13
7.1
The savings proposed for 2012/13 of £11.229m are shown below:
2012/13
£000
SAVINGS
Corporate Services
2,414
1,003
3,562
4,250
TOTAL
11,229
The savings expected to year end are reported in Appendix 7.
8.
CONSULTATION UNDERTAKEN OR PROPOSED
8.1
All relevant bodies have been consulted.
9.
TIMETABLE
9.1
In accordance with current financial reporting timetables.
10.
FINANCIAL, RESOURCE AND PROPERTY IMPLICATIONS
10.1
All relevant implications have been addressed in the report.
11.
LEGAL AND STATUTORY IMPLICATIONS
11.1
All relevant implications have been addressed in the report.
12.
HUMAN RIGHTS, EQUALITIES AND COMMUNITY COHESION IMPLICATIONS
12.1
Not applicable
13.
CRIME AND DISORDER IMPLICATIONS
13.1
Not applicable
14.
RISK MANAGEMENT AND HEALTH AND SAFETY IMPLICATIONS
14.1
The content of this report is linked to two Key Strategic Risks Developing Corporate Business
Plan and Setting a Balanced Budget for 2013/17 and Beyond (KSR49) and Delivery of Savings
Programme 2012/15
- 22 -
28
15.
APPENDICES – THE FOLLOWING DOCUMENTS ARE TO BE PUBLISHED WITH THIS
REPORT AND FORM PART OF THE REPORT
Appendix 1 – Detailed monthly position table
Appendix 2 – Detailed Corporate Items table
Appendix 3 – Pay and Price Inflation as at June 2012
Appendix 4 – Treasury Management: Outlook
Appendix 5a – Current Capital Programme 2012/13
Appendix 5b – Capital Programme Virements September 2012 Monitoring
Appendix 5c – Capital Programme 2012/13 Funding Statement
Appendix 6 – Key Strategic Risk Register
Appendix 7 - Savings expected in 12/13
Appendix 8 – Forecast year end variance by department
Appendix 9 – Movement on reserves
Appendix 10 – Cash flow (to follow)
1 26
1 27
16.
BACKGROUND PAPERS
16.1
Budgetary Control files held in the Corporate Services department.
17.
REPORT AUTHOR
− Name: Paul Dale
1 18
−
−
1 19
1 20
Tel: 020 8545 3458
email: paul.dale@merton.gov.uk
- 23 -
29
1 21
Budget as
per March
Council
2012/13
Original
Budget
2012/13
£000s
£000s
Current
Budget
2012/13
Year to
Date
Budget
(Sept.)
Year to
Date
Actual
(Sept.)
£000s
£000s
£000s
APPENDIX 1
Full Year
Forecast
(Sept.)
Forecast
Variance
at year
end
(Sept.)
Forecast
Variance
at year
end
(Aug.)
£000s
£000s
£000s
Department
3A.Corporate Services
8,329
10,256
10,534
12,880
11,397
10,741
207
3B.Children, Schools and Families
42,296
42,366
42,124
90,268
84,045
42,779
655
110
535
3C.Community and Housing
60,107
60,223
60,134
26,545
23,090
58,772
-1,362
-1,451
3D.Environment & Regeneration
28,889
28,008
27,708
5,957
5,954
27,946
238
-510
NET SERVICE EXPENDITURE
139,621
140,853
140,499
135,650
124,486
140,238
-261
-1,319
14,080
14,080
14,080
3,076
2,494
13,449
-631
-602
0
0
0
0
0
631
631
602
5,738
5,738
5,738
0
0
5,738
0
0
-4,743
-5,983
-5,630
-614
-2,009
-10,565
-4,935
-4,500
881
15,956
880
14,715
880
15,068
440
2,902
440
925
880
10,133
0
-4,935
0
-4,500
155,577
155,568
155,568
138,552
125,411
150,371
-5,196
-5,819
3E.Corporate Items
Impact of Capital on revenue budget
Transfer to Capital financing reserve
Transfer to Closing the Gap Reserve
Other Central items
Levies
TOTAL CORPORATE PROVISIONS
TOTAL GENERAL FUND
Funding
Formula Grant:
- NNDR
-58782
-58782
-58782
-29391
-29391
-58782
0
0
- RSG
-1179
-1179
-1179
-590
-590
-1179
0
0
- Council Tax Freeze Grant 2011/12
-2060
-2060
-2060
-1030
-1030
-2060
0
0
- Council Tax Freeze Grant 2012/13
PFI Grant
-2078
-2070
-2070
-2070
-2070
-2070
0
0
Grants
Collection Fund
-4797
-4797
-4797
-2398
-2398
-4797
0
0
-68,896
-68,888
-68,888
-35,479
-35,479
-68,888
0
0
-3891
-3891
-3891
0
0
-3891
0
0
-82522
-82522
-82522
0
0
-82522
0
0
-267
-267
-267
0
0
-267
0
0
-86680
-86680
-86680
0
0
-86680
-155,576
1
-155,568
0
-155,568
0
-35,479
103073
-35,479
89932
-155,568
-5197.41
0
0
Council Tax
- General
- WPCC
Council Tax and Collection Fund
FUNDING
NET
- 24 -
30
Current
Budget
2012/13
£000s
Year to
Date
Budget
(Sept.)
£000s
Year to
Date
Actual
(Sept.)
£000s
Full
Year
Forecast
(Sept.)
£000s
Forecast
Variance
at year
end
(Sept.)
£000s
Forecast
Variance
at year
end
(Aug.)
£000s
14,481
-401
14,080
14,481
-401
14,080
3,243
-167
3,076
2,641
-147
2,494
13,850
-401
13,449
-631
0
-631
-602
0
-602
4,537
4,537
4,537
0
0
4,537
0
0
408
927
1,335
408
926
1,334
408
926
1,334
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
426
426
-408
-500
-908
-408
-500
-908
Contingency
Single Status
Bad Debt Provision
Cost of DR Recovery
Agency workers
Cost of disposals - 4%
Revenuisation and
miscellaneous
Contingencies and
provisions
2,000
515
500
70
500
0
2,000
515
500
70
500
0
1,935
515
500
70
500
-162
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
500
0
500
70
0
-162
-1,435
-515
0
0
-500
0
-1,000
-515
0
0
-500
0
1,752
510
510
0
0
0
-510
-510
5,337
4,095
3,868
0
0
908
-2,960
-2,525
New Homes Bonus
Local Services Support
Grant
LACSEG refund
VAT Savings
Income Items
-1,136
-1,136
-1,136
-614
-614
-1,136
0
0
0
0
0
-1,136
0
0
0
-1,136
0
0
0
-1,136
0
0
0
-614
-347
-471
-578
-2,010
0
-471
-596
-2,203
0
-471
-596
-1,067
0
-471
-596
-1,067
-14,816
-14,813
-14,233
0
0
-14,233
0
0
9,337
8,097
8,450
2,462
485
2,884
-5,566
-5,102
881
880
880
440
440
880
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
631
631
602
Budget
as per
Council
2012/13
£000s
Original
Budget
2012/13
£000s
14,481
-401
14,080
Pension Fund
Corporate Provision for Pay
Award
Utilities Inflation Provision
Pay and Price Inflation
APPENDIX 2.
Corporate Items
Cost of Borrowing
Investment Inc.
Impact of Capital on revenue
budget
Depreciation and Impairment
Central Items
Levies
- Financing costs: saving
transferred to reserves
- Use of Reserves - re 20
minutes free parking
- Transfer to Closing the Gap
Reserve
Approp to/from Reserves
-30
-30
-30
0
0
-30
0
0
5,768
5,738
5,768
5,738
5,768
5,738
0
0
0
0
5,768
6,369
0
631
0
602
TOTAL CORPORATE PROV.
15,956
14,715
15,068
2,902
925
10,133
-4,935
-4,500
- 25 -
31
1 22
1 23
Appendix 3
Pay and Price Inflation as at September 2012
In 2012/13, the MTFS includes 0.5% for increases in pay and 1.5% for increases in general prices, with
an additional amount of £0.332m for extra inflation provision in Community and Housing for those areas
of high inflation.
1 24
Pay:
2012/13 – The MTFS approved by Council on the 7th March 2012 includes 0.5% for increases in pay.
This equates to £0.408m and is held as a corporate provision. It is not expected that this will be required.
Prices:
CPI annual inflation stands at 2.2 per cent in September 2012, down from 2.5 per cent in August which
is the lowest rate since November 2009, when it was 1.9 per cent. The largest downward pressures
came from the housing and household services sector (particularly utility costs). Increases in transport
costs, particularly motor fuels, recreation and culture, and miscellaneous goods and services offset this
to an extent. RPI annual inflation stands at 2.6 per cent in September 2012, down from 2.9 per cent in
August. There were similar reasons for the changes as for CPI.
Outlook for inflation:
On 4 October, the Bank of England’s Monetary Policy Committee voted to maintain the Bank Base Rate
at 0.5%. The Committee also voted to continue with its programme of asset purchases totaling £375
billion, financed by the issuance of central bank reserves. The Committee expects the announced
programme of asset purchases to take another month to complete. The scale of the programme will be
kept under review. The minutes of the MPC meeting noted that “inflation was a little above the 2%
target, and was likely to remain so in the near term. The outlook for inflation further out would depend
not only on whether demand recovered but also on whether that was accompanied by a recovery in
productivity.”
The latest inflation forecasts for the UK economy, based on a summary of independent forecasts are set out in the
table below:Source: HM Treasury - Forecasts for the UK Economy (September 2012)
2012 (Quarter 4)
CPI
RPI
Lowest %
1.5
1.8
Highest %
2.7
3.1
Average %
2.1
2.6
2013 (Quarter 4)
CPI
RPI
Lowest %
1.5
1.7
Highest %
3.3
3.6
Average %
2.0
2.5
The MPC continue to judge that there is a significant margin of spare capacity in the economy,
particularly the labour market which should continue to help the downward inflationary pressure in the
UK for some time to come. However, an increasing oil price means that the inflation rate will fall more
slowly than previously thought due to its impact on utility and food prices.
- 26 -
32
Clearly where the level of inflation during the year exceeds the amount provided for in the budget, this
will put pressure on services to stay within budget and will require effective monitoring and control.
The Autumn Statement 2012 will be made by the Chancellor of the Exchequer on 5 December 2012.
The Statement will provide an update on the Government’s plans for the economy based on the latest
forecasts from the Office for Budget Responsibility. These forecasts are published alongside the Autumn
Statement on 5 December 2012.
- 27 -
33
1 25
1 28
Appendix 4
Treasury Management: Outlook
The Bank Base Rate has been kept at its low of 0.5% since March 2009. Forecasts for interest rates are
that they will remain low for some time, until at least mid/late 2013. The Bank of England’s Monetary
Policy Committee on 4 October 2012 voted to maintain the official Bank Base Rate at 0.5%. The MPC
also voted to maintain the level of Quantitative Easing (QE) at £375billion financed by the issuance of
central bank reserves.
The minutes of the MPC meeting on3/4 October commented that “there were, as ever, limits to what
monetary policy could be expected to achieve. The Committee discussed the likely effectiveness of
further asset purchases, should they be required. Some members felt that there was still considerable
scope for asset purchases to provide further stimulus. Other members, while acknowledging that asset
purchases had the scope to lower long-term yields further, questioned the magnitude of the impact that
lower long-term yields on corporate debt and equity would have on the broader economy at the present
juncture…. But there was agreement that there was little to be gained at this meeting in changing the
current programme of asset purchases. The Committee would have the opportunity to gauge the impact
of past and prospective policy actions at home and abroad over the next month, in the context of
preparing its forecasts for the November Inflation Report.”
Forecasts for Bank Base Rates, based on September 2012 are summarised in the following table:End
End
End
End
End
End
End
End
Q.1
Q.2
Q.4
Q.2
Q.3
Q.1
Q.4
Q.3
2014
2014
2013
2013
2013
2012
2013
2012
0.5% 0.5% 0.5% 0.5% 0.5% 0.5%
0.5% 0.5%
0.5% 0.25% 0.25% 0.25% 0.25% 0.25% 0.25% 0.25%
Sector
Capital
Economics
UBS
0.5% 0.25% 0.25% 0.25% 0.25% 0.25%
Interest rate projections have become more dovish with most economists putting back their timescales
for when rates are expected to increase.
The International Monetary Fund (IMF) sharply cut its forecasts for Britain's economy from slight growth
this year to a 0.4pc contraction. Britain's goods trade deficit widened more than expected to £9.8bn, as
exports fell and oil imports rose, and its total trade deficit - which includes buoyant services exports rose to £4.17bn, the second highest on record. Industrial output, which includes energy production and
mining, fell 0.5pc on the month in August, in line with expectations, after a 2.8pc rise in July.
Therefore, the overall picture remains of an extremely weak economy with a deterioration in public
finances, driven by lower tax receipts, which is a good reminder of the uphill challenges the UK still
faces. For this reason, it is possible that the MPC will extend its quantitative easing (QE) programme by
another £50bn possibly as soon as November when the MPC next meets.
Markets remain wary about the situation in Europe and this uncertainty shows little sign of dissipating.
There is also a risk of a sharper slowdown in emerging economies. Wage pressures in the UK have
remained subdued and output growth remains weak despite relatively strong employment growth.
- 28 -
34
Appendix 5a
Community and Housing Capital Monitoring - September 2012
Scheme Description
Total Budget
Adult Social Care
YTD Actual
Variance
To Date
YTD Budget
Forecast
For Year
Forecast
Variance
368,000
0
0
0
368,000
0
33,940
0
16,974
(16,974)
26,610
(7,330)
Adult Education and Community
145,340
111,647
70,838
40,809
124,380
(20,960)
Housing
860,810
252,951
287,794
(34,843)
589,810
(271,000)
1,408,090
364,598
375,606
(11,008)
1,108,800
(299,290)
Forecast
For Year
Forecast
Variance
Libraries Total
Community and Housing Total
Corporate Services Capital Monitoring - September 2012
Scheme Description
Resources
Business Improvement Total
Cloud Computing
Total Budget
YTD Actual
Variance
To Date
YTD Budget
203,700
14,504
0
14,504
0
0
85,530
14,052
39,430
(25,378)
85,530
0
297,780
31,825
149,136
(117,311)
297,780
0
Corporate Items
1,000,000
0
0
0
1,000,000
0
Facilities Management Total
1,012,570
367,185
436,178
(68,993)
1,012,571
1
IT Total
2,573,790
641,195
1,115,918
(474,723)
2,574,437
647
0
0
0
0
0
0
5,173,370
1,068,761
1,740,662
(671,901)
4,970,318
648
Corporate Services Total
- 29 -
35
Appendix 5a
Children, Schools & Families Capital Monitoring - September 2012
Scheme Description
Total Budget
YTD
Actual
YTD Budget
Variance
Forecast
Forecast
To Date
For Year
Variance
Aragon Expansion
994,460
558,774
497,564
61,210
979,619
(14,841)
BENEDICT PRIMARY SCHOOL EXP
820,780
753,630
351,892
401,738
824,031
3,251
Cranmer Expansion
611,400
63,736
414,560
(350,824)
150,000
(461,400)
School expansion 19FE to 25FE
290,000
263,549
120,336
143,213
290,926
926
Hollymount Primary School Exp
Joseph Hood Primary School Exp
William Morris PCP
Holy Trinity Expansion
St Mary's expansion
Pupil Growth - Unallocated
647,820
380,077
241,382
138,695
655,611
7,791
2,707,450
1,648,008
1,295,634
352,374
2,701,081
(6,369)
434,390
281,367
187,020
94,347
434,390
0
264,370
0
111,354
(111,354)
100,000
(164,370)
1,209,770
540,276
737,550
(197,274)
1,009,190
(200,580)
305,850
193,477
141,840
51,637
280,850
(25,000)
All Saints/ South Wim YCC exp
1,567,670
1,005,731
684,859
320,872
1,567,000
(670)
Gorringe Park expansion
2,120,850
1,610,437
909,262
701,175
3,092,837
971,987
Hillcross School Expansion
530,780
123,511
193,128
(69,617)
440,000
(90,780)
Merton Abbey Temp Accommodation
354,360
11,178
564,930
(553,752)
200,000
(154,360)
Pelham School Expansion
420,010
179,645
62,380
117,265
150,005
(270,005)
Cricket Grn Exp-Chapel Orchard
200,000
4,785
83,336
(78,551)
200,270
270
Dundonald expansion
331,940
58,127
31,638
26,489
100,000
(231,940)
Poplar Permanent Expansion
371,130
254,752
129,678
125,074
302,050
(69,080)
Liberty expansion
2,308,560
1,414,567
987,614
426,953
2,188,560
(120,000)
Singlegate expansion
4,504,990
3,440,150
1,322,581
2,117,569
4,379,690
(125,300)
Wimbledon Park expansion
2,040,510
485,961
886,924
(400,963)
2,040,510
0
Beecholme Expansion
350,000
0
42,857
(42,857)
0
(350,000)
St Ann's Primary Phase
283,310
199,439
82,546
116,893
467,233
183,923
Wimbledon Chase Expansion
185,390
25,368
114,614
(89,246)
185,368
(22)
23,855,790
13,496,545
10,195,479
3,301,066
22,739,221
(1,116,569)
- 30 -
36
Appendix 5a
Children, Schools & Families Capital Monitoring - September 2012
Scheme Description
Total Budget
YTD Actual
YTD Budget
Variance
To Date
Forecast
For Year
Forecast
Variance
Devolved Formula Capital
519,810
182,520
229,242
(46,722)
519,810
0
St Ann's - Targeted Capital
652,450
157,372
326,296
(168,924)
468,527
(183,923)
St Anns - Primary
10,610
7,796
5,240
2,556
10,610
0
Early Years
76,960
7,846
37,214
(29,368)
59,500
(17,460)
CSF General
0
0
0
0
0
0
Garden PCP
1,789,580
864,851
790,042
74,809
1,711,774
(77,806)
51,530
0
25,132
(25,132)
51,530
0
250,000
216,863
100,000
116,863
250,000
0
3,680
7,830
2,634
5,196
3,680
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Schools Access Initiative Inc
Bishop Gilpin New Classroom
St Thomas of Canterbury Expnsn
Hollymount
Joseph Hood
Abbotsbury-playgrnd Improvemts
0
0
0
0
0
0
30,000
0
12,336
(12,336)
30,000
0
Schools Capital M&A
Links PCP
St Mark's Primary PCP
SS Peter & Paul PCP
Poplar PCP
Extended schools
0
0
0
0
0
0
10,910
13,821
3,762
10,059
13,821
2,911
0
1,320
0
660
(660)
1,320
142,290
134,378
71,148
63,230
142,290
0
2,070
0
1,038
(1,038)
0
(2,070)
20,390
0
10,194
(10,194)
20,390
0
Primary Capital Programme
7,530
0
3,852
(3,852)
7,530
0
School kitchens/dining areas
43,620
41,017
21,810
19,207
43,620
0
St Ann's Primary Phase
58,740
58,740
58,740
0
58,740
0
Cricket Green Site
24,420
23,028
10,666
12,362
24,420
0
Behaviour Unit
60,910
23,132
25,154
(2,022)
60,910
0
1,700
0
728
(728)
1,700
0
Hillcross Unit
Primary school autism unit
580,000
0
242,047
(242,047)
30,000
(550,000)
Brightwell
299,960
253,908
137,101
116,807
299,960
0
Short Breaks Disabled Children
106,900
105,092
53,630
51,462
105,089
(1,811)
Primary Capital Improvements
584,230
129,321
263,377
(134,056)
525,422
(58,808)
Play Spaces
Former Royal Sun Alliance SG
Secondary Expansion
Secondary Improvements
Schools Loans
10,420
694
5,208
(4,514)
7,200
(3,220)
500,680
361,365
250,340
111,025
500,680
0
50,000
0
20,836
(20,836)
0
(50,000)
134,750
132,141
67,374
64,767
132,141
(2,609)
1,100,000
0
250,002
(250,002)
500,000
0
Schools IT
Youth Centres
0
0
0
0
0
0
249,480
100,392
111,076
(10,684)
249,480
0
7,374,940
2,822,107
3,136,879
(314,772)
5,830,144
(944,796)
31,230,730
16,318,652
13,332,358
2,986,294
28,569,365
(2,061,365)
- 31 -
37
Appendix 5a
Environment and Regeneration Capital Monitoring - September 2012
Scheme Description
Total Budget
YTD Actual
YTD Budget
511,586
Footways Planned Works
1,023,170
382,680
Greenspaces
1,837,390
544,713
Highways General Planned Works
1,038,850
219,771
Highways Planned Road Works
1,600,000
290,402
506,260
100,524
1,504,330
Leisure Centres
Other E&R
Variance
To Date
Forecast
For Year
Forecast
Variance
(128,906)
1,000,000
(23,170)
914,150
(369,437)
1,547,640
(289,750)
496,989
(277,218)
962,550
(76,300)
800,002
(509,600)
1,600,000
0
316,054
(215,531)
506,260
0
87,864
592,627
(504,763)
1,334,330
(170,000)
On and Off Street Parking
194,380
43,393
99,342
(55,949)
102,290
(92,090)
Plans and Projects
147,580
109,147
13,104
96,043
132,580
(15,000)
Regeneration Partnerships
367,790
8,990
(721,606)
730,596
191,700
(176,090)
Street Lighting
640,000
(39)
211,000
(211,039)
640,000
0
Street Scene
706,760
140,175
396,266
(256,091)
646,970
(59,790)
2,306,560
369,370
416,155
(46,785)
1,903,270
(403,290)
219,100
65,726
186,990
(121,264)
525,100
306,000
Transport and Plant
767,130
552,811
277,268
275,543
805,110
37,980
Safer Merton - CCTV & ASB
104,100
16,624
145,884
(129,260)
254,560
150,460
Transport for London
Traffic and Parking Management
Environmental Health
1,000,970
530,357
570,420
(40,063)
990,970
(10,000)
Waste Operations
1,077,950
652,940
338,780
314,160
1,232,540
154,590
15,042,320
4,115,448
5,565,011
(1,449,564)
14,375,870
(666,450)
- 32 -
38
Total Corporate Services
Civic C-Windows
Redundancy Payments
Acquisitions
Corporate Services
1000000
(490,000)
0
490000
- 33 -
(440,000)
50,000
(1,000,000)
0
1,000,000
£
1,490,000
£
Revised
2012/13
Budget
0
0
0
£
0
0
0
2012/13
Budget
971,000
71,000
900,000
£
Virements
971,000
71,000
900,000
£
Revised
2012/13
Budget
1,050,000
0
1,000,000
0
50,000
£
Revised
2012/13
Budget
0
490,000
0
500,000
3,490,000
0
500,000
3,000,000
0
£
Virements
0
£
2013/14
Budget
3,990,000
990,000
0
0
3,000,000
£
Revised
2013/14
Budget
2,100,000
500,000
0
0
1,600,000
£
2014/15
Budget
(1,450,000)
(1,450,000)
£
Virements
CAPITAL VIREMENTS AND REPROFILING SEPTEMBER 2012 MONITITORING
(971,000)
£
971,000
TOTAL
(71,000)
(900,000)
Virements
71,000
2012/13
Budget
900,000
Contingency
£
£
Adult Social Care
Replacement of Carefirst
Virements
2012/13
Budget
39
650,000
500,000
0
0
150,000
£
Revised
2014/15
Budget
2,100,000
500,000
0
0
1,600,000
£
2015/16
Budget
(1,600,000)
(1,600,000)
£
Virements
0
0
0
500,000
500,000
£
Revised
2015/16
Budget
Appendix 5b
TFL Casualty reduction and schools
TFL Cycle improvements
Shop from improvement
S106 Street scene improvement
Street Scene
Solar PV panel near Morden Park
Plans and Projects
River Wandle Footbridge
Haydons Road
Beach Volleyball
B650 Rowan Road Park Improvement
Greenspaces
TOTAL
Waste Phase B
Waste Operations
CCTV Match Funding
CCTV Raynes Park
Relocation of Cameras 50 & 52
Safer Merton - CCTV &ASB
Network Rail
Wimbledon town centre transport
improvements
Transport and Plant
Wandle Road 20mph
Eastfield Area 20mph
High Parth Area (20mph Scheme)
Parkway area (20mph)
Pelhams Road area 20mph
LBPN Design costs
- 34 -
1,633,020
850,000
8,150
2,310
(688,090)
(200,000)
(140,000)
(2,310)
(8,150)
944,930
650,000
0
0
74,930
0
(42,490)
42,490
214,930
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
70,000
150,000
0
0
0
0
0
37,000
0
(9,400)
(3,500)
(6,340)
(6,000)
(2,940)
(1,010)
(26,850)
(50,000)
(30,000)
(24,840)
(22,350)
(16,000)
(35,520)
(57,330)
37,000
£
Revised
2012/13
Budget
9,400
26,850
1,010
2,940
6,000
6,340
3,500
100,000
200,000
22,350
24,840
16,000
57,330
35,520
0
(3,060)
£
£
3,060
Virements
2012/13
Budget
0
0
0
1,000
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1,000
£
2012/13
Budget
672,090
200,000
140,000
2,310
8,150
42,490
9,400
3,500
6,340
6,000
2,940
1,010
26,850
50,000
30,000
24,840
22,350
0
35,520
57,330
0
3,060
£
Virements
40
673,090
200,000
8,150
2,310
140,000
42,490
9,400
26,850
1,010
2,940
6,000
6,340
3,500
30,000
50,000
22,350
24,840
0
58,330
35,520
0
3,060
£
Revised
2012/13
Budget
Appendix 5b
Appendix 5c
CAPITAL PROGRAMME FUNDING SUMMARY 2012/13
Funded
from
Funde
Merton’s
d by
Resource Grant
s
£000s
£000s
Current Capital Programme 2012/13 October 2012 Cabinet
Community & Housing
Replacement of Carefirst
Corporate Services
Roll forward of Civic Centre Windows
Transformation Unallocated
Environment & Regeneration
Greenspaces
B650 Rowan Road Park Improvement
Beach Volleyball
River Wandle Footbridge
Haydons Road
Plans and Projects
Solar PV panel near Morden Park
Street Scene
Shop front improvement
S106 Street scene improvement
TFL Casualty reduction and schools
TFL Cycle improvements
Wandle Road 20mph
Eastfield Area 20mph
High Parth Area (20mph Scheme)
Parkway area (20mph)
Pelhams Road area 20mph
LBPN Design costs
Transport and Plant
Network Rail
Wimbledon town centre transport improvements
Safer Merton - CCTV & ASB
CCTV Match Funding
CCTV Raynes Park
Relocation of Cameras 50 & 52
Waste Operations
Waste Phase B
Current Capital Programme 2012/13 November 2012 Cabinet
- 35 -
29,131 25,785
Total
£000s
54,916
0
(971)
(971)
50
(490)
0
0
50
(490)
(3)
0
0
37
(3)
37
(36)
0
0
(57)
(36)
(57)
0
(16)
(16)
0
0
(25)
(22)
(25)
(22)
0
0
(50)
(30)
(50)
(30)
0
0
(6)
(3)
(1)
(27)
(4)
(6)
0
0
0
0
0
0
(9)
(42)
(4)
(6)
(6)
(3)
(1)
(27)
0
(9)
(42)
(140)
(2)
(8)
0
0
0
(140)
(2)
(8)
(200)
0
(200)
28,265 24,590
52,855
41
KSR47 /
IT02
KSR21 /
RE03
Risk No
Cause
SWL waste
partnership
Safety of Staff
KSR09
42
KSR31/
ER09
Staff security
Inadequate supervision & management of
public areas
Impact on method and time it takes to
award contracts to suppliers. Adverse
budget and service implications if not
done correctly in adherence to PCRs
2006, such as court imposed stopping of
contracts. Slower delivery of savings,
service benefits & development of skills &
experience of staff takes longer.
Consequences
Failure to protect staff
Member of staff could be injured or killed;
impact on morale of other staff; open to
claims of negligence; potential financial
loss
PHASE A:
1) Beddington AD Plan. Contact risk
owner for more information
2) Indexation method. Contact risk owner Contact risk owner for more information
for more information
PHASE B:
1)Contact risk owner for more information
Inadequate security for staff, Coucillors
and MP's
Lack of awareness in departments that
procurement/purchasing is a tightly
Failure to adhere to regulated area of council activity.
Public Contract
Furthermore insufficient capacity (staff,
Regulations 2006
experience, knowledge & budget) in
departments and corporate Procurement
Team.
Short Name
Key strategic Risk Register October 2012
3
3
2
4
4
3
2
3
Impact
Likelihood
12
9
4
12
Risk
Score
A
A
A
A
J
J
L
J
R AGK J L
RAG Directio
Statu n of
s
travel
Simon
Williams /
Dean
Shoesmith
Cormac
Stokes
Mark
Humphries
Simon
Williams
Risk
Owner
Cllr Mark
Allison
Cllr Andrew
Judge
Cllr Mark
Allison
Cllr Mark
Allison
See comments
Managed by the
Joint Waste
Committee
CMT have now agreed for a united
system, PVP (potentially violent
person) and other systems can be
integrated. A meeting has been
planned for reps to start discussing
the detail.
Risks managed through the Joint
Waste Committee sense checked July
2012
SIA and physical
intervention training
has now been
Risk will always be a factor and is
completed by
managed by systems and staff training
Building Services &
Security Staff
Procurement Board
Action Plan
Portfolio
(Y/N) / Review Comment regarding review
Holder
date
Appendix 6
Data loss
Safe recruitment
practices
School places
KSR07 /
HR02
KSR34 /
CSF5
Short Name
KSR004 /
CG06
Risk No
Changing Borough
Demographics
Safeguarding
children
Single status
Terms & conditions
KSR35 /
CSF1
KSR42 /
HR09
KSR44 /
HR13
43
KSR55 /
CSF4
3
Primary school expansion programme
may be insufficient to increase capacity to
Increase in birth-rate and numbers of
meet demand. Need to consider additional
children reaching primary age locally, with
provision. Also future risk that increase in 3
subsequent impact on demand for
numbers will flow through to secondary
secondary and special school places.
system such that demand for places will
exceed supply.
Impact of review of T&Cs & ongoing
staffing reductions
4
3
Cost of settlement; cost of litigation &
resources to contest; impact on staff
morale; reputational & political impact
Impact on staff morale, recruitment & cost
implications
3
Child protection and safeguarding issues
including possible child death. Impact on
reputation and political consequences.
There could be an increase in high cost
interventions.
Difficulties recruiting experienced social
workers. High turn over of existing staff.
The potential for less effective
interagency working. Changed
expectations and updated regulatory
framework. Ongoing budget pressures
could undermine the Merton Model.
Post single status challenge
Additional demand for school places, and
services for children with special
educational needs and disabilities, as well 5
as pressure for growth in children’s social
care and child protection interventions.
Increases in both the total population in
the borough, including in particular
families with young children, and also in
the mix of the population with respect to
ethnicity, disability and deprivation.
3
2
4
2
4
3
3
Inappropriate person may get a role they
shouldn't; vulnerable children and adults
may be at risk as a consequence
Failure of systems to ensure
inappropriate staff are not recruited
Accidental loss by staff or hacking
4
Consequences
Harm to service users, through breach of
privacy or loss of services, reputation &
financial impact on council (up to 500K)
Cause
Impact
Likelihood
12
6
12
10
9
12
12
Risk
Score
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
R AGK J L
RAG Directio
Statu n of
s
travel
Dean
Shoesmith
Dean
Shoesmith
Theresa
Leavey
Paul Ballatt
Yvette
Stanley /
Paul Ballatt
Dean
Shoesmith
Karin Lane
Risk
Owner
Cllr Mark
Allison
Cllr Mark
Allison
Cllr Maxi
Martin
Cllr Maxi
Martin / Cllr
Martin
Whelton
Cllr Martin
Whelton
Cllr Mark
Allison
Cllr Mark
Allison
HR service plan
Single Status
LSCB Business
Plan & CYPP
Commissioning
strategy &
performance
service plan
Commissioning
strategy &
performance
service plan
N/A - see
comments
Project 3. Split ballot outcome will
require a return to the negotiating
table for 2013/14
Single status review project is
underway to complete those staff
groups that had not previously been
reviewed under single status
agreement
Major review undertaken of personal
files & employment records to ensure
safe recruitment practice in place with
recent Good Ofsted outcome.
Corporate
Project 7 - see also
governance service
Information Governance policy
plan
Action Plan
Portfolio
Holder
date
Appendix 6
Staff Health &
Safety
IT systems
KSR46 /
IT01
KSR48 /
IT03
3
2
4
Failure to provide accurate performance
data
Failure to evidence how equalities
Reputational impact for council, risk of
implications have been considered in
judicial review & litigation, negative impact 5
developing new policy, designing services
on service users and loss of savings.
& decision making
Failure to comply
with equalities
duties
KSR53 /
RE11
Inability to proactively manage resources
and performance
3
Data quality of
management
information
4
KSR52 /
RE08
Impact on service delivery to customers
One of Merton's key delivery partners or
sponsor goes in to administration
Supply chain failure
3
KSR51 /
RE07
3
Impact of
Procurement
First phase of improvements to
procurement delivered, as per Overview
Time taken to deliver procurement
& Scrutiny Report from March 12. Phase
benefits extends.
2, spend data, category management and
savings deliver still to come.
3
3
4
Major disruption in the civic centre
causing 6th floor data centre to become
unusable
4
4
H&S risk from poor investment in building Corporate manslaughter, negligence suits,
facilities / organisational downsizing &
poor staff morale, possible strike, poor
5
loss of staff with specialist skills
customer service.
IT failure leading to unavailability of IT
services impacting on organisational
service delivery
3
Failure to comply with statutory duty on
managing Asbestos
Consequences
4
Asbestos compliance officer post vacant
Cause
KSR50 /
RE06
KSR49 /
RE02
44
Developing
corporate Business
Impact on service provision, reputation,
Reduced budgets may impact negatively
Plan & setting a
staff morale & internal & external
on service delivery levels
balanced budget for
customers satisfaction
13/17 & beyond
Asbestos
Compliance
Short Name
KSR45 /
CG03
Risk No
Impact
Likelihood
10
12
12
9
9
16
20
12
Risk
Score
A
A
A
A
A
R
R
A
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
R AGK J L
RAG Directio
Statu n of
s
travel
Yvette
Stanley
Zoe Church
Caroline
Holland
Peter Stone
Caroline
Holland /
Paul Dale
Mark
Humphries
Mark
Humphries
Adam Viccari
Risk
Owner
Cllr Edith
Macauley
Cllr Mark
Betteridge
Cabinet
Cllr Mark
Allison
Cllr Mark
Allison
Cllr Mark
Allison
Cllr Mark
Allison
Cllr Mark
Allison
Resources service
plan
Data quality
CSO's
Procurement Board
Business Plan
timetable
Proposal to use Gifford House as DR
site. Fibre links being installed which
Business continuity
will enable DR arrangements to be
Plans and
transferred off site to LB Wandsworth,
strategies
including an additional Carefirst
server.
Building Condition Various capital and revenue projects
Survey linked to address this issue (e.g civic centre
Capital Programme windows)
TBA
References received but candidate
withdrew from process due to job
being part time only. Secured a short
term contractor to carry out pending
reviews whilst building a business
case to increase the role to full time to
attract qualified technical candidate.
Action Plan
Portfolio
Holder
date
Appendix 6
Consequences
KSR56 /
CSF6
Impact on ability to provide statutory
services, possibility of undermining the
Merton Model, causing additional spend
pressures in targeted services. Low staff
morale, difficulties in managing the impact
of the Workforce Management Strategy.
Time and effort required to manage
change & meet expectations of members
& central government may lead to failures
in the management of ongoing operational
work.
Business Continuity
Business rates
Premises
inspections
Savings of £25.791 million savings for
Delivery of Savings
2012-15 were identified as part of the
Programme 2012-15
MTFS 2012-16.
KSR58 /
CG08
KSR 59 /
CS12
KSR60 /
RE14
KSR61 /
RE16
Non achievement of any saving would
adversely impact on the Authority's ability
to balance it's budget in the medium to
long term if larger than the contingency.
3
2
4
Statutory inspections not being carried
Failure to comply with statutory duty to
out on engineering plant and other lifting formally inspect lifting equipment; Criminal 4
equipment on council premises
offence and harm to service users;
3
2
3
3
3
May impact on council's financial position
4
3
4
2
2
Localism agenda - review of business
rates inc. discretionary reliefs
Business Continuity and Business Impact Reduced ability to recover from major
Analysis forms out of date
disaster
Agency staff
45
KSR57 /
HR15
Additional rights given to Agency Workers
introduces additional costs & failure to
Use of agency staff following changes to
adhere to & comply with new regulations
employment rights
could bring legal challenge & adverse
reputational impact.
Uncertainty regarding changes to funding
regimes & external grants, including
government review of DSG, Acadamies
CS&F funding
funding & future reductions in EIG.
changes, budget
Requirement to make significant savings
savings & resource
over the next 3-4 years. Need to balance
management
competing demands at a time of
contracting resources & extensive
change.
Failure to deliver strategic priorities.
Loss of financial and partnership physical
Closure of Safer Merton, and fragmented
resources
delivery of statutory services.
Cause
Safer Merton
Funding
Short Name
KSR 54 /
ER39p
Risk No
Impact
Likelihood
6
16
6
6
12
6
12
Risk
Score
A
R
A
A
A
A
A
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
R AGK J L
RAG Directio
Statu n of
s
travel
Caroline
Holland
Richard
Williams
David
Keppler
Adam Viccari
Marissa
Bartlett
DMT & CS
Resources
Annalise
Elliott
Risk
Owner
Cllr Mark
Allison
Cllr Mark
Allison
Cllr Mark
Allison
Cllr Mark
Allison
Cllr Mark
Allison
Cllrs Maxi
Martin and
Martin
Whelton
Cllr Edith
Macauley
MTFS
Schools Insurance
SLA
Customer services
service plan
Review of BCs & BIAs underway.
Business continuity Reported to GP committee in Sept.
Plans and
and linked to DR plans with I&T.
strategies
Challenge meeting underway to be
completed in April 13.
Yes
Report setting out risks & mitigation
agreed by CMT on 23.8.11. Guidance
produced for managers & regular
reviews at DMTs. Psned and usage
subject to monthly CMT review via HR
metrics
Monitor government proposals
consultation response & implications
fed into budget and MTFS. Budget
savings to be identified & analysed for
impact including EIA, TOM & service
planning work. All CSF service plans.
Action Plan
Portfolio
Holder
date
Appendix 6
Trinity project
Loss of income
Short Name
Partnership risks
Consequences
Failure of Trinity project
46
Recommissioin
Likely reduction in contracting
KSR62 / g Early
with local third sector leads to
CSF 9 Intervention &
reputational & political risk.
Prevention
Destabilisation of the Local
Strategic Partnership &
Children's Trust Board
partnership arrangments.
May affect the councils
expenditure process
Impact on HR management of staff &
payroll issues
Departmental budgets will not be
Current financial climate. Failure to meet
balanced.
income targets over next 3 years due to
Increased pressure on resources and
falling income
other budgets
Cause
New
Comprehensive Changes in the government
Spending
grants allocation
Review
Emerging risks
HR14 /
KSR60
KSR008 /
ER28
Risk No
3
3
5 2
3
5
Impact
Likelihood
10
9
15
Risk
Score
A
A
R
Marissa
Bartlett
Chris Lee
Risk
Owner
J
Paul
Ballat
Emergin Caroline
g
Holland
J
J
R AGK J L
RAG Directio
Statu n of
s
travel
Cllr Maxi
Martin
Mark
Allison
Cllr Mark
Allison
Cllr Mark
Allison
CSP Service
Plan
More detail
expected in
December
2012
Trinity project
HR service plan - project 2
monitored regularly by DMT and
finance meetings
Action Plan
Portfolio
Holder
date
Appendix 6
COMMUNITY AND HOUSING DEPARTMENT
APPENDIX 7
Ref
Comments
No.
ASC
4
Description of Saving
TCES Retail Model (simple equipment)
ASC
5
OT catalogue
ASC
ASC
12
6
CADL's (complex equipment)
Transport
2012/13
2012/13
Savings
Savings
Expected
Requirement to year-end
£000
£000
32
32
RAG
G
186
0
R
ASC
7
0% inflation uplift
650
650
ASC
8
Optimise block and spot contracts
300
200
G
R
ASC
10
Optimise telecare usage
300
9
R
ASC
13
Care Funding Calculator + plus high cost Res
200
150
A
ASC
19
Monitoring high value (1-to-1) and high cost placements
50
50
ASC
14
De-registration of residential care (Based on 40 not 50)
400
400
G
G
ASC
17
Optimise use of Shared Lives
350
50
R
ASC
18
Restructuring Supporting People
50
50
G
ASC
ASC
ASC
ASC
MAED
LIB
Hsg
20
21
22
23
1
1
1
Remodelling Dom Care
Staff Savings Reablement
Disabled Facilities Grant for adaptations.
Staff Savings Direct Provision
Increase income from commercial courses and cafe
Completion of changes to opening hours, rationalisation of a
number of small contracts and increase in income. Includes
some elements of capital rationalisation on Media Fund.
1,250
100
30
201
30
84
Deletion of funding to Age Concern for community gardening
service.
37
Total Community and Housing Savings 2012-2013
1,250
100
30
201
30
84
R /A Included in
Forecast
Over/Underspend
? Y/N
G
G
G
G
G
CADLS: The savings target for 2012-13 of £32k has been achieved. There are still a number of issues
that need to be resolved with LB Croydon IPH, and these are being progressed through the ICES
Board. This project is likely to over-achieve .
There continues to be a challenge around taxi expenditure, as the re-tendered routes are not yielding
savings as required. A0-S indicates this element will continue to be monitored, and a review will be
conducted once all taxi routes are re-tendered. A timeframe needs to be confirmed. Consultation
around proposed route changes for day service and self drive services continues. Work has
commenced on revising the Transport policy and will continue through to September.
We are still on track to achieve the target for 2012-13.
As a result of re-negotiation of block and spot rates with CCHT and Lifestyle, indicative savings for
the second half of the current financial year are circa £200k. This figure will be confirmed over the
coming month. The Award report for the new Care Home Framework (which will deliver the move
from block contracts) will go to Cabinet in December 2012. The Tender process will commence mid
September. There is a high risk this project will not achieve the targeted level of savings for 2012-13,
as any savings related to the introduction of the framework will only be yielded over the last quarter in
the current financial year.
The savings achieved to date remains at £9.4k, as the savings of circa £35k for the introduction of
assisted technologies reported in June has already been recorded as part of the proposals received
from Choice Support as part of the contract re-negotiation process for the 'De-registration' project
(ASC14) below. The Consultants report has been received. SW has proposed that the division works
together in taking this project forward. This project will not achieve the targeted level of savings for
2012-13.
Timeframes for protocol familiarisation training will be revised once the go live date for the Brokerage
function in Commissioning has been established. In the meantime ten reviews have taken place,
additional savings of circa £44.8k have been confirmed through the CFC process. The outcome of
further CFC negotiations awaited.
Customer reviews continue to generate savings. This project is likely to over-achieve its savings
target
The savings of circa £372k to date are due to contract re-negotiation with the Providers. Included in
the savings figure is £35k associated with the introduction of assisted technologies resulting from
three of the reviewed customers. An amount of circa £56k p.a that LBM will incur from importing a LB
Wandsworth customer under OR has been deducted from the savings figure.
The registration with CQC has been completed. An additional carer has been selected at panel on 17
July. The background processes including the development of a service specification, are being
progressed ahead of the pilot. There is a risk however, that if there are compatability issues between
customers and carers, this will impact on the number of customers available for the pilot.
A meeting between Commissioning and MH is scheduled to look specifically at the review of
Supporting People contracts. Once this meeting has taken place the project plan will be revised. It is
envisaged that this project will achieve at least an additional £16k savings in 2012-13, surpassing the
original target by at least £20k.
Need to monitor spend on homecare to ensure savings achieved.
Taken from budgets already
G
37
G
4,250
3,323
Savings proposals relating to reviews of Ordinary Residence of cleints scheduled for 2013-14, but the process has been bought forward to 2012-13. It is estimated that £470k savings will be achieved
Page 1 of 5
47
CORPORATE SERVICES DEPARTMENT SAVINGS
APPENDIX 7
2012/13
Type of
Savings
Saving Requirement
(see key)
£000
2012/13
Savings
Expected
to yearend
£000
RAG
Ref
Customer Services - Revenues and Benenfits
CS1
Reduction in postage budget
SNS1
30
30
G
CS2
Reduction in building work budget
SNS1
10
10
G
SS1
SNS1
7
5
7
5
G
G
SS1
19
5
R
SS2
45
45
G
SS1
70
70
G
SS1
SS2
31
40
31
40
G
G
SS2
20
20
G
SS1
SS1
SNS2
28
21
10
28
21
10
G
G
G
SI2
32
32
G
CS3
Reduction in recruitment budget
Reduction in agency staff and translation budgets
Customer Services - Business Rates
CS5 Reduction of Valuation Assistant post
CS4
Comments
R /A
Included in
Forecast
Over/Under
spend? Y/N
The post has been deleted but due to a fall in business rate
collection there is an overtime cost on improving collections
and reviewing processes.
Customer Services - Benefits
CS6
CS8
CS10
CS11
CS14
CS15
CS16
CS17
CS18
CS19
CS20
CS21
CS23
CS24
CS25
CS26
CS27
CS28
Reduce benefits officer posts by 1.5 FTE
Customer Services - Bailiff
Reduction of 1 FTE bailiff post and 0.4 FTE Admin Officer
Customer Services - Council Tax Collection
Reduce Revenue Officers by 1FTE.
Delete one Manager post.
Customer Services - Support Team
Reduce system support officers by 0.5FTE
Customer Service - Merton Link
Reduction of 1 FTE arising from CRM
Reduction of 1 FTE arising from introduction of menu option on switchboard
Reduction in level of cleaning in public areas
Customer Service - Registrars
Net impact of increased demand for weddings
Customer Service - Translation Service
Increase in income
Infrastructure & Transactions - IT Service Delivery
Deletion/reduction of various budgets
Deletion of training budget for specialised IT
Reduction/deletion of various budgets
Reduction/deletion of various budgets
Reduction arising from consolidation of budgets
Reduction in budgets
Reduction in budget due to cancellation/ consolidation of support and maintenance contracts
Reduction due to consolidation of maintenance contracts
CS29 Reduction in leasing costs for the Corporate Printing Strategy
Infrastructure & Transactions - Facilities Management
Reduction of 2 FTE's (Facilities Technical Manager + Technical Administration Officers post).
CS30
CS31
CS32
CS33
CS34
CS35
CS36
CS37
CS38
CS39
CS40
CS41
Change Energy Administration officer post to be self financing made self financing
Reduce 1 FTE Postal & Scanning Assistant
Restructure of Building Services & Security Team (delete Shift Team Leaders Posts)
Reduction of number of vans
Close Civic Centre on Saturdays (Contractual Overtime-Security) E02221-AA03
Councillor Courier Run - reduce to 1 visit per week from 2
Introduce a charge for the Archive Service Facility
Savings on Print Room copy equipment
Close Worsfold House and relocate service to Civic Centre
Close the YOT Office in Athena House and relocate the service to Civic Centre
Infrastructure & Transactions Transactional Services
Delete 1 vacant Assistant Vendor Maintenance Officer post (part)
CS42 Delete 1 Transactional Officer Post (compulsory redundancy)
CS43 Recovery of overpayments and other VAT recovery
Human Resources - Transactions
CS45
CS48
CS50
CS53
CS55
Reorganise payroll team, link to i-Trent implementation
CS62
CS63
CS64
CS65
CS67
CS69
CS70
CS71
10
10
G
8
21
2
9
30
8
21
2
9
30
G
G
G
G
G
SP1
SNS2
6
72
6
72
G
G
SNS2
SS2
30
60
30
60
G
G
SS1
SS2
SS2
SNS1
SS2
SS2
SI2
SNS1
SPROP
SPROP
63
37
23
10
5
63
5
15
50
12
51
63
37
23
10
5
34
5
15
50
12
51
G
G
G
G
G
A
G
G
G
G
G
SS2
10
SS2
SP1
28
50
10
28
50
G
G
G
59
0
R
SS2
SS2
Human Resources - Business Partners
Review of function with integration with Sutton Teams
Human Resources - Employee Relations
Reduce Senior Management
Corporate Governance - Democracy Services
Stop overtime payments to Democratic Services Officers
Reduce scrutiny support fund
Reduction in overtime payments to staff in Mayor's Office
CS56
CS57 Reduction in supplies & services inflation
CS61
S11
SNS1
SNS2
SNS1
SP1
SP1
Corporate Governance - Information Team
Fund direct LLC Staff costs from LLC Income
Corporate Governance - Legal Services
Restructure of Legal Services following merger with LB Richmond
Resources
Review of Insurance Arrangements
Resources
Reduce the Council's contribution to the Local Strategic Partnership.
Resources
Utilise London Councils Grants Scheme repatriated funding to avoid cut to Strategic Voluntary
Sector Funding
Energy Procurement
Business Improvement
Delete Director of Transformation's post
Communications, Graphic Design Team
Delete the in-house Graphics team
Communications Team
Delete vacant Communications Assistant post.
SS2
40
10
A
SS2
40
40
G
SS2
SNS1
SS2
24
6
24
6
G
G
4
20
2
20
A
G
SI2
49
49
G
127
127
G
300
300
G
24
24
G
280
300
280
300
G
G
105
105
G
SS2
(28)
(28)
G
SS2
26
26
G
2,414
2,280
Total Corporate Services 2011-2012
Base budgets were reduced. Monitored as part of monthly budgetary control.
C:\Documents and Settings\Susanne Wicks\Desktop\Fin Mon Gp\[Appendix7 savings.xls]CH
48
The full saving is unachievable due to late implementation
The saving is not achievable in the current year due to a
shortfall in Schools SLA income and higher costs due to
paper payslips required
A restructure of the HR Business Partner function is being
reviewed. Afull year saving is unachievable.
Y
Y
Y
Y
In-house service ceased
ENVIRONMENT & REGENERATION SAVINGS
Ref
ER01
Parks,
Greenspaces &
Cemeteries
1)
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
ER04
Leisure & Culture 1)
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
ER05
Leisure & Culture 1)
2)
3)
4)
ER07
ER13
Development & 1)
Building Control
Parking Services 1)
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
7)
8)
ER14
ER15
ER17
ER18
ER20
Parking Services 1)
Street Cleansing 2)
Waste
Management
Waste
Management
ER22
ER24
Staffing reductions, including a cemetery supervisor (which
would leave 1 supervisor covering both LBM and Merton &
Sutton cemetery teams) and the Wimbledon Park Development
Manager which is a fixed term contract that will not be renewed.
Increases in fees and charges will be in the form of a 5%
increase in sport booking fees and an 20% increase in cemetery
Reducing supplies, services and utilities costs and procuring
more effectively.
Increased tenancy income will be made by letting 5 parks
properties on the open market.
By encouraging self management of some allotment sites or
increasing charges by 80%, there will be a saving of 17.5k and
.A reduction in grant to Mitcham Common Conservators of 10k
pa [out of £60k] is included.
Reductions in supplies & services budgets.
Reduction in 0.2 fte of staff.
Increased income at Morden Assembly Hall and the Watersports
Centre.
Service reduction of approx 15% less grant per annum in each
of the next three years to Polka and Attic Theatres.
Removal of small Olympics budget after 2012 games.
Transfer of Merton Hall to South Wimbledon Community
Association linked to schools expansion programme and transfer
of a 0.5 fte officer to support the Allotment Service to
Greenspaces to be self-financing.
Delete 3 fte Leisure & Arts Development Officers leaving one
Development Officer only to do commercial work self-funding the
post. Use £100k to commission some reduced arts and leisure
development function.
Identify alternative funding for or do not take part in London
Youth Games.
Delete post of Leisure & Business Projects Officer (0.7 fte).
Increase income through installation of multi use games area to
rear of Canons Leisure Centre to provide additional provision for
The Government are proposing changes to the current charging
model for DC. This would mean that the council will be able to
set its own fees (levels are currently prescribed) in order to
recover the full cost of delivering a number of services in this
area, although it will not be able to make a profit.
Increase in income for Hartfield Road Bus Lane.
Reduce lost cases at PATAS.
Eliminate part payments of PCN's.
Reduce PCN cancellations.
Improve management of CEO performance to generate
efficiencies.
Reduce CEO absenteeism.
CPZ expansion based upon the current demand for zones that
will go live in 2012.
New Expenditure initiatives organisational restructure remaining
full year effect.
Enforcement of moving traffic offences.
Graffiti Removal – This is a very small service:143k in total. The
workload is somewhat seasonal and it is proposed to change
working practices in this area to focus when need is greatest.
This will result in approx 50% saving
3)
Restructure and reduction of staffing in the enforcement team
1)
Reductions in landfill tonnage and anticipated Slwp contract cost
2)
3)
4)
Ceasing compensation payments to Sutton agreed as in the
overall Slwp financial interest
Net of £691,000 Landfil Tax etc.
Reduction in Slwp contract dry recycling handling rate per tonne
5)
6)
Contract renegotiations for Slwp HRRCs
Contract management of Garth Road Waste Transfer Station
7) Staff saving
12) Introduction of Customer Relationship Management (CRM)
system leading to reduction in staffing
1) Introduction of 6 day working week for refuse, recycling and food
collection from Oct 2012
Traffic & Highways 1)
Introduce Streetworks Permitting Scheme – Organisations
undertaking works on the highways will be charged a fee.This
saving recognises that some existing costs can be absorbed
within the fee charging arrangements
2)
Income from fixed penalty notices (FPN’s) in relation to skips,
hoardings and scaffolding and through access bar markings
3)
Savings on energy (£50k) and service changes associated with
the existing Street Lighting Contract (£22k)
4)
Potential Savings against final year of existing Highway
Maintenance & Improvement contract
Potential 10% saving in Revenue budget from re-procurement of
Highway Works and Services Contract – Potential savings will
only be known following Financial Evaluation of potential service
providers- To be confirmed in February 2012 (10% of the
remaining Revenue works budget associated with this contract£1m)
15% reduction in staffing
Reduction in Footway Maintenance budget (Revenue)
Reduction in Street Furniture Budget
Reduction in ‘Ditching/Watercourses’ budget
Reduction in Street Lighting budget (Revenue)
Reduction in ‘Walksheet’ budget – Highway Safety Inspection
Works
A further 15% reduction in staffing
5)
ER21
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
Transport
APPENDIX 7
2012/13
Savings
Requireme
nt £000
2012/13
Savings
Expected to
year-end
£000
RAG
459
285
R
Base budgets were reduced, but income related
savings not expected to be fully achieved
35
35
G
Base budgets were reduced. Monitored as part of
monthly budgetary control.
10
10
G
Description of saving
Service
1)
Make changes to staffing structure to merge and change some
work responsibilities, involving the deletion of one post plus
ceasing the payment of contractual overtime.
Total E&R Department Savings for 2012-2015
Comments
300
0
R
The Government has delayed this proposal and no
agreement has been made as to when it might be
announced. Underspends elsewhere within the
department are offsetting this saving in the shortterm, whilst other savings proposals are currently
being identified in case this saving is not
implemented.
720
720
G
400
400
G
120
120
G
219
219
G
271
0
R
The Head of Street Scene and Waste is currently
drawing up alternative proposals to meet this
saving.
185
145
A
There will be a delay in the introduction of the
London Permit Scheme due to a delay in the
approval from the Department for Transport. At
this stage, it is estimated that the delay will be
approximately three months, meaning that the
section will only receive three months of related
income rather than the expected six. Monitored as
part of monthly budgetary control.
467
467
G
246
246
G
129
41
R
The removal of the contractual overtime element of
this saving was not implemented. Explanations are
being sought as the reasons for this.
3,561
2,688
49
R /A Included
in Forecast
Over/Unders
pend? Y/N
Y
Y
CHILDREN, SCHOOLS AND FAMILIES DEPARTMENT SAVINGS
APPENDIX 7
2012/13
Ref
CSF01 CSF Early Years and Children’s Centres
2012/13
Savings
Savings
Expected to
Requirement
year-end
£000
£000
RAG
Comments
R /A
Included
in
Forecast
Over/Und
erspend?
Y/N
Reduction in commissioning budget and bringing in
house of a service
25
25
G
Base budgets were reduced. Monitored as
N
Reduction in provision of CPD (Professional
Development/training) and establishing some charges
for CPD/services
48
48
G
N
6
6
G
N
128
128
G
N
Restructuring of internal teams to reduce posts and
streamline management.
CSF07 Area Based Grant
100
100
G
N
Reduce management layer in the business support
team.
CSF09 CSF Children’s Social Care
30
30
G
N
Reduce level of expenses available to Fostering and
Adoption Panel members – may seek as a combination
of shared panels cross borough or reduced numbers of
panels alongside reduced levels of payment to panel
members.
20
20
G
N
Reduce the available daycare budget for children
currently used to fund childminding places, after school
and breakfast clubs etc.
Team Manager post in the Court Assessment Team.
20
20
G
N
47
47
G
N
30
30
G
t f
thl b d t
t l
N
10
10
G
N
50
42
A
Delay in redundancy caused an
underachievemnt of saving for 2012/13 only.
The overspend resulting from this is included
in monthly budget monitoring.
Y
50
50
G
N
70
70
G
N
30
30
G
N
14
14
G
N
Increase fees at Lavender CC
Back office and service efficiencies.
Reduce the budget available for commissioning expert
Reduce the travel budget available for parents whose
children are in care.
CSF17 CSF School Standards and Quality
Deletion of post in SSQ.
CSF18 CSF School Standards and Quality
Increase in income generation from CPD (Professional
development/training for teachers/school staff) and ICT
buy back
CSF20 CSF SEND Integrated Service
Deletion of management post from SEND integrated
service
CSF22 CSF Contracts, Procurement and School
Additional capitalisation of capital project management
staffing
CSF26 CSF Youth Inclusion
Reduce Youth Service Training budget used to provide
training to youth workers in Merton and some supplies
and services.
50
CHILDREN, SCHOOLS AND FAMILIES DEPARTMENT SAVINGS
APPENDIX 7
2012/13
Ref
Use the Hospital tuition budget (DSG) currently used to
fund education provision for children and young people
who are in hospital to continue funding the budget
reduction in the Education Welfare Team.
The Youth Service Manager post is proposed to
becomes half time from December 2012. This would
involve a redundancy.
CSF34 CSF Commissioning Function and Commissioning
Reduce ex LSC commissioning capacity for post 16
education and training
CSF36 CSF Commissioning Function and Commissioning
Reduce expenditure on LAC and SEN placements
through implementation of Access to Resources model.
CSF39 CSF SEN Transport
Implement new transport policy from April 2012
Total Children, Schools & Families Savings 2010
2012/13
Savings
Savings
Expected to
Requirement
year-end
£000
£000
60
60
RAG
G
Comments
R /A
Included
in
Forecast
Over/Und
erspend?
Y/N
N
15
15
G
N
100
100
A
Delay in redundancy caused an
underachievemnt of saving for 2012/13 only.
The overspend resulting from this is included
in monthly budget monitoring.
Y
100
100
G
N
50
50
G
N
1,003
995
51
APPENDIX 8
The following charts show the forecast year end variance by department with a
comparison for 2011/12:
Corporate Services
3,500
3,000
2,500
£'000
11/12 Variance
2,000
12/13 Variance
1,500
1,000
500
0
February
March
February
March
January
December
November
October
September
August
July
June
May
800
600
400
200
(800)
(1,000)
(1,200)
(1,400)
52
January
(600)
December
(400)
November
October
September
August
July
(200)
June
May
£'000
0
11/12 Variance
12/13 Variance
Adult Social Care
0
(500)
£'000
(1,000)
11/12 Variance
(1,500)
12/13 Variance
(2,000)
(2,500)
(3,000)
March
February
January
December
November
October
September
August
July
June
May
(3,500)
Libraries & Adult Education
140
120
100
11/12 Variance
£'000
12/13 Variance
80
60
40
20
0
March
February
January
December
November
October
September
August
July
June
May
53
0
(50)
(100)
(150)
£'000
11/12 Variance
12/13 Variance
(200)
(250)
(300)
March
February
January
December
November
October
September
August
July
June
May
(350)
(400)
(450)
500
0
March
February
January
December
November
October
September
August
July
June
May
(500)
11/12 Variance
£'000
12/13 Variance
(1,000)
(1,500)
(2,000)
(2,500)
(3,000)
54
Balance at Movement in
31/3/12
year
£'000
£'000
13,975
33,865
(1,561)
47,840
(1,561)
6,319
1,710
(83)
12,005
67,875
(1,644)
15,199
3,635
18,834
86,709
(1,644)
Reserves 2012/13
General Fund Reserve (including HRA)
Earmarked Reserves
Total Available General Fund revenue
Add reserves for future use towards Budget
Add DSG reserve for Schools
Add Schools own reserves
Revenue Reserves
Capital Receipts
Capital Grants
Capital
Reserves as per Council's accounts
Earmarked Reserves breakdown
Anticipated
Movement to
Year End
£'000
(4,530)
(4,530)
6,713
(277)
1,906
6,222
(1,339)
4,883
6,789
Forecast
balance at
31/3/13
£'000
13,975
27,774
41,749
13,032
1,350
12,005
68,137
21,421
2,296
23,717
91,854
(215)
485
(2,052)
(198)
(172)
(278)
(225)
(308)
(339)
(195)
(117)
(916)
(4,530)
7,820
(1,107)
6,713
(277)
1,906
7,159
5,646
2,322
1,750
1,048
1,078
996
841
850
282
232
1,192
182
225
200
8
143
3,620
27,774
7,820
28
5,184
13,032
1,350
42,156
£000
7,703
5,161
2,322
2,052
2,000
1,656
1,250
996
841
850
560
515
1,500
431
339
225
200
195
125
143
4,801
33,865
28
6,291
6,319
1,710
41,894
Outstanding Council Programme Board Reserve
Schools PFI Fund
Insurance Reserve
Closing the budget gap
Repairs & Renewal Fund
Performance Reward Grant
Pension Fund additional contribution
Community Care Reserve
Energy renewable reserve
Local Land Charges Reserve
LABGI Reserve
Schools Reserve
Apprenticeships
Corporate Services reserve
Merton Business Investment Fund
Waste & Recycling Reserve
ICES Reserve
E&R Partnerships
Wimbledon Tennis Courts Renewal Fund
Other
Grants and contributions
Sub Total
For use in future years for budget
VAT Reserve
Revenue Reserves for Capital / Revenuisation
Total for future use in budget
DSG Reserve
Net Total
Adjusted position following final audit
C:\Documents and Settings\Susanne Wicks\Desktop\Fin Mon Gp\[Appendix 9.xls]reserves table
55
(329)
(250)
(410)
(58)
(249)
(265)
(1,561)
(83)
(1,644)

Cabinet Date: 12 November 2012 Subject:

Transcription

Similar documents

Registration Form - NC-CCIM

LIPA Front-End Transition Cost Estimate

HPC and numerical modeling tools at the Chilean Weather

James Iademarco, Strategic Avalanche LLC

METEOROLOGICAL SERVICE, JAMAICA

How to make better business decisions

File - Meeting Portal

Cabinet Agenda Item 11 Date: 10 December 2012 - fp 1190

Presentation