September 2012
Transcription
September 2012
bulletin AmerICAN CerAmIC SOCIetY emerging ceramics & glass technology September 2012 Nanoceramic sensors: A new approach to disease diagnosis by breath analysis INSIde: Special report Shattering glass cookware ACerS new Distinguished Life Members, Fellows and annual award winners • MS&T’12 and ACerS Annual Meeting premeeting planner • Overview & schedule of Innovations in Biomedical Materials 2012 meeting • Preview of ICACC’13 and Electronic Materials and Applications 2013 meetings • ORDER VERSION 3.4 ACERS–NIST PHASE EQUILIBRIA DIAGRAMS FOR CERAMIC SYSTEMS Version 3.4 includes 1,400 new diagrams, bringing the grand total to approximately 24,800. New content includes experimental and calculated data for an unprecedented range of nonorganic material types, including oxides and mixed systems with oxides, chalcogenides, pnictides, actinides and actinide-surrogates, oxycation systems, semiconductors, group 3 systems, and mixed systems with salts. Order online at www.ceramics.org/phasecd or contact ACerS customer service at customerservice@ceramics.org, 866-721-3322, or 1-240-646-7054 (outside the U.S.) contents September 2012 • Vol. 91 No. 7 feature articles The ACerS Awards Class of 2012 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 Distinguished Life Member Awards . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2012 Class of Fellows . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Class awards . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Society awards . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ACerS award lectures and symposium . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 18 20 21 23 Nanoceramic sensors for medical applications . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26 Perena Gouma Metastable polymorphs of metal oxide nanowires detect disease-marker gases in exhaled breath . Shattering glass cookware . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33 R.C. Bradt and R.L. Martens Recent reports of shattering glass cookware are looked at in terms of glass composition and the development of thermal stresses during use . meetings Highlights and photos from 4th International Congress on Ceramics and Ceramic Leadership Summit . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 cover story Nanoceramics and diseasedetecting breathalyzers Cover photo: Krithika Kalyanasundaram, a former student at Stony Brook University and Professor Gouma’s coauthor of “Nanosensor Device for Breath Acetone Detection,” published by American Scientific Publishers in the October 2010 issue of Sensor Letters, demonstrates the device. – page 26 MS&T 2012 premeeting planner . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39 ACerS lectures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Plenary session, special events, hotel information . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Program-at-a-glance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . General activities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ACerS committee meetings, short courses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Exhibitors, Young Professional programming . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39 40 41 43 44 45 Innovations in Biomedical Materials . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 46 Plenary speakers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 46 Schedule, tutorial session, hotel information . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 47 Tracks . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 48 Electronic Materials and Applications 2013 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 49 Introduction, symposia, hotel information . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 49 ACerS 2012 award winners – page 16 37th Int’l. Conference and Expo on Advanced Ceramics and Composites . 50 Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50 Hotel information, tentative schedule, exhibitors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 51 departments News & Trends . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 • UMinn–NSF math institute to host Materials Genome workshop • Business news • NSF seeking proposals, making investment in sustainable chemistry, engineering and materials • White House releases report on advanced manufacturing initiatives Shattering glass cookware – page 33 American Ceramic Society Bulletin, Vol. 91, No. 7 | www.ceramics.org 1 AMERICAN CERAMIC SOCIETY bulletin Editorial and Production Peter Wray, Editor ph: 614-794-5853 fx: 614-794-5813 pwray@ceramics .org Eileen De Guire, Senior Editor ph: 614-794-5828 fx: 614-794-5815 edeguire@ceramics .org Rusell Jordan, Contributing Editor Tess M. Speakman, Graphic Designer Editorial Advisory Board Allen Apblett, Oklahoma State University Kristen Brosnan, General Electric Olivia Graeve, Alfred University Andrew Gyekenyesi, NASA Linda E. Jones, Chair, Alfred University Joe Ryan, Pacific Northwest National Lab Customer Service/Circulation ph: 866-721-3322 fx: 240-396-5637 customerservice@ceramics .org Advertising Sales National Sales Patricia A. Janeway, Associate Publisher pjaneway@ceramics .org ph: 614-794-5826 fx: 614-794-5822 Europe Richard Rozelaar media@alaincharles .com ph: 44-(0)-20-7834-7676 fx: 44-(0)-20-7973-0076 Executive Staff Charles G. Spahr, Executive Director and Publisher cspahr@ceramics .org Sue LaBute, Human Resources Manager & Exec. Assistant slabute@ceramics .org Megan Bricker, Dir. Marketing & Membership Services mbricker@ceramics .org Mark Mecklenborg, Dir. Technical Publications & Meetings mmecklenborg@ceramics .org Linda Ballinger, Director of Finance and Operations lballinger@ceramics .org Peter Wray, Director Communications pwray@ceramics .org contents September 2012 • Vol. 91 No. 7 departments ACerS Spotlight .................................................... 7 • Welcome to our newest Corporate Members • Entries invited for 2012 BSD Ceramographic Competition • ACerS Board, Division leaders participate in strategic planning discussions • Student spotlight • Ceramic Tech Today • Calling all potential Emeritus members • Society’s next generation participates in Future Leaders Program at ICC4–CLS People in the Spotlight . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 • Mauro receives first SGT–Pilkington award • ASM appoints Sundaram to IMR committee • Varshneya named ICG glass ambassador • Cormack to review Italian university research Ceramics in Energy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 • High critical current density doped pnictide superconductors • Durable, flexible thin ceramic foils opening new applications Ceramics in Biomedicine . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15 • Microwaving of hydroxyapatite, ZrO2 combo yields promising strong bone graft scaffold columns Deciphering the discipline . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 56 Ryan Wilkerson and Liz Reidmeyer Mugs and Missouri S&T at MS&T resources Calendar . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 52 Classified Advertising . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 53 Display Advertising Index . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 55 Officers George Wicks, President Richard Brow, President-elect Marina Pascucci, Past President Ted Day, Treasurer Charles Spahr, Executive Director Board of Directors William G. Fahrenholtz, Director 2009-2012 David J. Green, Director 2010-2013 Vijay Jain, Director 2011-2014 Linda E. Jones, Director 2009-2012 William Lee, Director 2010-2013 James C. Marra, Director 2009-2012 Ivar Reimanis, Director 2011-2014 Lora Cooper Rothen, Director 2011-2014 Robert W. Schwartz, Director 2010-2013 David W. Johnson Jr., Parliamentarian Address 600 North Cleveland Avenue, Suite 210 Westerville, OH 43082-6920 American Ceramic Society Bulletin covers news and activities of the Society and its members, includes items of interest to the ceramics community and provides the most current information concerning all aspects of ceramic technology, including R&D, manufacturing, engineering and marketing. American Ceramic Society Bulletin (ISSN No. 0002-7812). ©2012. Printed in the United States of America. ACerS Bulletin is published monthly, except for February, July and November, as a “dual-media” magazine in print and electronic format (www.ceramicbulletin.org). Editorial and Subscription Offices: 600 North Cleveland Avenue, Suite 210, Westerville, OH 43082-6920. Subscription included with American Ceramic Society membership. Nonmember print subscription rates, including online access: United States and Canada, 1 year $95; international, 1 year $150.* Rates include shipping charges. International Remail Service is standard outside of the United States and Canada. *International nonmembers also may elect to receive an electronic-only, e-mail delivery subscription for $75. Single issues, January–November: member $6.00 per issue; nonmember $7.50 per issue. December issue (ceramicSOURCE): member $20, nonmember $25. Postage/handling for single issues: United States and Canada, $3 per item; United States and Canada Expedited (UPS 2nd day air), $8 per item; International Standard, $6 per item. POSTMASTER: Please send address changes to American Ceramic Society Bulletin, 600 North Cleveland Avenue, Suite 210, Westerville, OH 43082-6920. Periodical postage paid at Westerville, Ohio, and additional mailing offices. Allow six weeks for address changes. ACSBA7, Vol. 91, No. 7, pp 1–56. All feature articles are covered in Current Contents. 2 www.ceramics.org | American Ceramic Society Bulletin, Vol. 91, No. 7 news & trends UMinn–NSF math institute to host Materials Genome workshop The Institute for Mathematics and its Applications, located at the University of Minnesota and one of the eight NSF-sponsored Mathematical Sciences Institutes, will be holding a special multiday workshop on the Materials Genome Initiative Sept. 12–15, 2012. According to an IMA web page on the event, the goal of the workshop is “to mobilize the mathematical sciences community to respond to the opportunities created under the Materials Genome Initiative. The planned workshop will gather researchers in mathematical sciences and those in materials sciences from academic institutions, industry and national laboratories as well as representatives from US government agencies and professional societies. The goal is to foster the involvement of both communities in the MGI. The desired outcome is interdisciplinary research activities that address the emerging challenges in materials research and the development of new mathematical tools to meet these challenges. IMA says the workshop program will include scientific presentations, panel discussions and informal discussions. In addition, the institute mentions that the meeting is designed to identify research opportunities and to provide networking opportunities for researchers. An educational component of the workshop has been inserted to “foster dialog and explore modes of collaboration with community colleges in developing curricula to prepare future work- force to meet the employment opportunities brought about by the MGI.” According to Fadil Santosa, director of the IMA, the workshop is open to any professional (i.e., minimum PhD level) working in a related field in science or math. He also says that some NSF financial aid may be available to facilitate attendance. For those that can’t attend, all is From slurry to sintering, count on Harrop. Engineered Engineered equipment equipment for for processing processing thin thin film film and and ceramic ceramic tape tape Carsten Tape Casters The Carsten line of lab and production models feature automatic slurry control with micrometer adjustment to within 0.0001” of wet tape thickness. PLC temperature controlled multi-zone infrared and forced air heating, selfaligning belt drive, and enclosed cabinet for cleanliness. Caster lengths from 6 ft. to more than 100 ft. Binder Sintering Burnout Ovens Kilns Carsten forced air conveyor ovens for binder removal from tape cast, pressed or extruded ceramic parts prior to sintering. Stainless steel belt and internals minimize contamination. Work is carried through multiple controlled heating zones. Processing temperatures to 450°C. Weight loss of organics controlled to ±0.3%. Harrop pusher plate kilns custom engineered for precise firing cycles tailored to specified production volumes. Accurate multi-zone heating and atmosphere control. Unique high-density, high-purity refractory design for thermal efficiency and extended service life. Fully automated product handling system. Harrop has been helping high-tech ceramic manufacturers for more than 50 years. Learn why we’re the most trusted name in the industry. Call 614-231-3621 to discuss your needs. American Ceramic Society Bulletin, Vol. 91, No. 7 | www.ceramics.org Fire our imagination www.harropusa.com 3 news & trends not lost: Santosa says summary documents will be prepared. He also expects that videos or other recordings of the sessions will be available. (The IMA already has built an extensive library of other lectures and presentations, including several on modeling, data extraction and industrial applications.) See: www.ima.umn.edu/2012-2013/ SW9.12-15.12 n NSF seeking proposals and making investment in sustainable chemistry, engineering and materials by Ashley White, AAAS Science & Technology Policy Fellow The National Science Foundation has announced a cross-directorate initiative in Sustainable Chemistry, Engineering and Materials. Created in response to the America COMPETES Reauthorization Act of 2010 (which called for NSF to establish a Green Chemistry Basic Research program), SusChEM will focus on opportunities for advances in research and education related to sustainable synthesis, use and reuse of chemicals and materials. The research funded under SusChEM will aim to enable basic science and engineering discoveries to reduce dependence on nonrenewable resources and toxic materials, enable economical recycling of chemicals and materials and improve the efficiency and environmental impact of industrial processes. The NSF Division of Materials Research will participate in SusChEM through the Sustainable Materials effort, which encourages researchers to design materials and devices with their entire life cycle and environmental footprint in mind. Specific research topic suggestions include materials and Business news Morgan Technical Ceramics’ bioceramic hip joints improve quality of life for patients (www.morgantechnicalceramics. com)… “Solar Meets Glass” conference at Glasstec/Solarpeq Oct. 22-23 (www. glasstec-online.com)… Texas Technical Ceramics Inc. awarded three-year contract with Backer EHP (www.texastechnicalceramics.com)… Pfeiffer Vacuum introduces new gas analysis systems for pressure ranges up to 50 millibars (www.pfeiffervacuum.com)… FEI announces new Verios extreme high-resolution SEM (www.fei. com)… Special offer: Discounted flights for Tecnargilla 2012 (www.tecnargilla.it)… Munson offers new high-torque screen classifying cutter (www.munsonmachinery. com)… Pair of Union Process tandem grinding attritors used to mill nanoparticles (www.unionprocess.com)… HIG acquires the specialty aluminas activity of Rio Tinto to create Alteo (www.alteo-alumina.com)… Prematech Advanced Ceramics adds technical and marketing strength with hiring of Bruce Gretz (www.prematechac.com)… Superior Technical Ceramics launches 4 new website (www.ceramics.net)… Fooken taking over as H.C. Starck’s new head of R&D (www.hcstarck.com)… MTC introduces expert custom brazing services (www. morgantechnicalceramics.com)… Mettler Toledo offers in-process-control white paper (www.mt.com)… Rockwood opens new lithium hydroxide facilities in North Carolina (www.rockwoodlithium.com)… Kyocera introduces environmentally friendly epoxy molding compound for semiconductor encapsulation (www.businesswire.com/ news/home/20120717005672/en/KYOCERAIntroduces-Environmentally-Friendly-XKEG5633-Epoxy-Molding)… New AVS sinter HIP available for immediate shipment (www.avsinc.com)… Marty Curran named Corning innovation officer (www.corning. com)… Harper chosen by Allomet Corp. for advanced rotary furnace for unique metal powder processing (www.harperintl.com)… Laeis: Positive response on TEAM Day 2012 (www.laeis-gmbh.com)… Powder Processing & Technology makes investments to support growth (www. pptechnology.com) n material systems for enhanced preservation and extension of natural resources; sustainability through material replacement; improved lifetime, performance and operational range of materials in extreme or harsh conditions; and materials designed for zero waste. In addition to the new science required to advance this initiative, success in improving materials sustainability will require a paradigm shift that encourages researchers to go beyond materials optimization by broadening their exposure to other disciplines and approaching sustainability from a total systems perspective. Five NSF divisions intend to participate in SusChEM in FY 2013: The Divisions of Chemistry, and Materials Research in the Mathematical and Physical Sciences Directorate; the Divisions of Chemical, Bioengineering, Environmental and Transport Systems, and Civil, Mechanical and Manufacturing Innovation in the Engineering Directorate; and the Division of Earth Sciences in the Geosciences Directorate. The president’s 2013 budget request to Congress included $27.2 million for SusChEM across NSF, of which $7.4 million is for DMR’s Sustainable Materials effort. A “Dear Colleague” letter announcing the SusChEM program can be found on the NSF website. Additionally, NSF has sponsored some recent events on SusChEM-related topics. A forum, “The Many Facets of Sustainable Development,” was held at the 2012 MRS Spring Meeting. It highlighted the importance of multidisciplinary, holistic approaches to the science and engineering of sustainable development. More information on that event, including video recordings of keynote talks and panel discussions, is available on the MRS website. A followup workshop is planned for the 2012 www.ceramics.org | American Ceramic Society Bulletin, Vol. 91, No. 7 MRS Fall Meeting in conjunction with Symposium G: Materials as Tools for Sustainability. Also, an NSF-sponsored workshop was held in January in Arlington, Va., to assist in designing the SusChEM initiative by identifying key research approaches and advances necessary to accomplish its goals. A workshop report is expected to be published sometime this year and made available through the NSF website. The SusChEM activity is one of five slated for Fiscal Year 2013 under the NSF-wide Science, Engineering and Education for Sustainability investment, and it is expected to continue in future years. Activities under the SEES umbrella are designed to advance science, engineering and education to inform societal actions aimed at environmental and economic sustainability. See: www.nsf.gov/pubs/2012/ nsf12097/nsf12097.jsp n White House releases report on advanced manufacturing initiatives The New York Times and other major newspapers are reporting that the United States economy grew in the second quarter of 2012, but at a paltry annualized rate of 1.5 percent, and the first quarter growth only was 2 percent. The concern, of course, is that the economic recovery from the recession is losing some of its momentum. However, the NYT article also cites updated statistics from the Commerce Department indicating that the recession was not as deep as previously thought. But, being in the shallow end of a recession can be as unpleasant as the deep end. Hopefully, it just means less energy is needed to pull out. New initiatives recommended by a report out of the White House to support advanced American Ceramic Society Bulletin, Vol. 91, No. 7 | www.ceramics.org manufacturing may provide some of the needed boost. The report, “Capturing Domestic Competitive Advantage in Advanced Manufacturing,” is the product of the Advanced Manufacturing Partnership Steering Committee of the President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology. The AMP was announced last summer by President Obama when he visited Carnegie Mellon University. It is a “national effort bringing together industry, universities and the federal government to invest in the emerging technologies that will create high-quality manufacturing jobs and enhance our global competitiveness,” says a press release from the CMU event. According to a fact sheet released by the White House, the US manufacturing sector has grown by 500,000 jobs since 2010, bringing the number of jobs connected to manufacturing to about 12 million. The manufacturing sector is 5 responsible for much more than bluecollar jobs, though. The document also says that 70 percent of all private sector R&D is in the manufacturing sector and that about 60 percent of the R&D workforce is employed by the private manufacturing sector. The fact sheet says, “… our nation’s ability to make things is inextricably linked to our ability to innovate,” and few would argue. At the recent ICC4–CLS meeting in Chicago, plenary speaker Delbert Day, professor at Missouri S&T and entrepreneur, showed several maps that correlated investment to discovery in his home state of Missouri. The “hot spots” of cities where patents were issued in Missouri from 1975 through 1999 were cities that have research universities, and similarly, the number of SBIRs awarded was much higher in those same cities. The link is pretty clear: Investment begets innovation, which begets spin-off companies and jobs. Day’s spin-off company, Mo-Sci, is a good example. In his talk, Day chronicled the role of sponsored research and SBIR funding that led to a company that today manufactures bioglass and employs about 40. Innovation is not necessarily a “blank-slate-to-product” process either, as work by University of Buffalo professor, Sarbajit Banerjee testifies. As reported in the Bulletin last month, the goal of his work is to adapt existing coating manufacturing processes to the application of novel graphene corrosion-prevention coatings. His research was supported by industrial powerhouse, Tata Steel, and a university research consortium. The AMP Steering Committee—led by Andrew Liveris, president/chair/ CEO of Dow Chemical, and Susan Hockfield, recent past president of MIT—recognized that there are many pathways to innovation. The executive summary of the report opens with, “Advanced manufacturing is not lim- 6 (Credit: Advanced Manufacturing Partnership Steering Committee; PCAST, OSTP.) news & trends A new report issued from the White House proposes 16 actions to improve manufacturing and innovation. ited to emerging technologies. Rather, it is composed of efficient, productive, highly integrated, tightly controlled processes across a spectrum of globally competitive US manufacturers and suppliers.” It goes on to say that the growth and health of advanced manufacturing will “require the active participation of communities, educators, workers and business,” as well as all levels of government. The 18-member committee is comprised of the top brass from manufacturing businesses and research universities, skewing a bit toward industry with 16 members from companies like Honeywell, Intel and Procter & Gamble. The committee spent about a year holding regional meetings across the US and consulted more than 1,200 stakeholders from industry and all levels of education and government, according to a press release. The report makes 16 recommendations organized into three categories that it hopes will provide the framework for a national advanced manufacturing strategy. The AMP Steering Committee also endorsed Obama’s $1 billion proposal to establish a National Network for Manufacturing Innovation back in March. The NNMI’s purpose is to “catalyze up to 15 manufacturing institutes nationwide.” n Advanced Manufacturing Partnership recommendations Enabling Innovation • Establish a national advanced manufacturing strategy • R&D funding in top cross-cutting technologies • Establish a national network of manufacturing innovation institutes • Empower enhanced industry/university collaboration in advanced manufacturing research • Foster a more robust environment for commercialization of advanced manufacturing • Establish a national advanced manufacturing portal Secure the Talent Pipeline • Correct public misconceptions about manufacturing • Tap the talent pool of returning veterans • Invest in community college level education • Develop partnerships to provide skills certifications and accreditations • Enhance advanced manufacturing university programs • Launch national manufacturing fellowships and internships Improving the Business Climate • Enact tax reform • Streamline regulatory policy • Improve trade policy • Update energy policy For more information, see www.whitehouse.gov/administration/eop/ostp www.ceramics.org | American Ceramic Society Bulletin, Vol. 91, No. 7 acers spotlight Dynamic Dispersions LLC Louisville, Kentucky www.dynamicdispersions.com ENrG Inc. Buffalo, New York www.enrg-inc.com Suntech Precision Ceramics Ltd. Hong Kong www.suntechceramics.com Entries Invited for 2012 BSD Ceramographic Competition The Basic Science Division is sponsoring the annual Ceramographic Competition at MS&T’12 in Pittsburgh, Pa. Enter a poster in any of the six categories. The best entry wins the Roland B. Snow Best of Show prize. The rules for submitting entries are available online at www.ceramics.org/ awards under the division award listings. Actual posters (not digital files) must be received by Karren More no later than Sept. 28, 2012. Contact More with any questions at 865-5747788 or morekl1@ornl.gov. n (Credit: ACerS.) ACerS recognizes organizations that have joined the Society as Corporate Members. For more information on becoming a Corporate Member, contact Tricia Freshour at tfreshour@ceramics.org, or visit us at www.ceramics.org/corporate. Just prior to the recent ICC4 meeting in Chicago (see page 12), members of the Society’s Board of Directors, along with many Division and volunteer leaders, met to brainstorm and debate possible new short- and long-range strategic initiatives. As one participant put it, the concept behind this meeting—one of a series that have taken place in recent years—is to “keep our eyes on the horizon and adjust ACerS’ course to maximize value and relevancy to its members.” One of the major themes emerging from this and previous meetings is the need to focus on the Society’s Divisions, including the desire for more Division involvement across a range of ACerS activities. Development of interdivisional cooperative efforts and support for growing the membership of individual Divisions also was mentioned. Another major theme had to do with the Society’s global network. The planning group pointed to the worldwide growth of ceramic, glass and other materials sciences, and there was a great deal of agreement on the benefits of expanding ACerS’ cooperative efforts with international ceramics and glass organizations, research institutions and businesses. The meeting also delved into concerns related to students and young professionals. As with international relations, participants felt expanding investments in time and resources in these ACerS president George Wicks and Glass & Optical Materials Division representative Steve Martin share ideas during the strategic planning session. areas—building on recent initiatives— would provide significant long-term benefits. Veteran members of ACerS agreed that the career and investigational benefits of ACerS and its Divisions aren’t always obvious to students and younger professionals. Mentoring, encouragement from members in academic settings, awards and symposia selection were mentioned as being important motivators for the early-career group. Several other strategic concerns were debated, and, by the end of the session, all participants agreed that their work should shift from the “What?/So what?” stage to an emphasis on the “Now what?” (implementation) phase. Along these lines, various Board and Division leaders accepted specific action-item assignments, including some aimed at identifying best practices among similar groups. The expectation is that the group will distill these efforts to actionoriented proposals that will be offered at the Board of Directors meeting this October in Pittsburgh (held in conjunction with the Society’s Annual Meeting and MS&T’12). n (Credit: ACerS.) Welcome to our newest Corporate Members ACerS Board, Division leaders participate in strategic planning discussions Scott Misture, Basic Science Division chair, sums up several ideas for facilitating Division growth and operations. American Ceramic Society Bulletin, Vol. 91, No. 7 | www.ceramics.org 7 acers spotlight Student spotlight Don’t miss MS&T’12 Join fellow Material Advantage members from around the world at MS&T’12 in Pittsburgh, Pa. Special sessions, contests and activities are planned. Read all about it at www. materialadvantage.org/mst-student-activities/. Student symposium planned for Electronic Materials and Applications 2013 A special student symposium, “Highlights of Student Research in Basic Science and Electronic Ceramics,” will showcase undergraduate student research during EMA 2013, Jan. 23–25, 2013, in Orlando, Fla. The deadline for submitting abstracts is Sept. 12, 2012. EMA 2013 focuses on materials and devices in electronics, sensors, energy generation and storage, photovoltaics and LEDs. Read all about the conference at www.ceramics.org/ema2012. Material Advantage membership dues increase The membership dues for Material Advantage are now $30, the first increase since the program’s inception. Over the years, the four partner organizations (ACerS, AIST, ASM and TMS) also have increased their own professional membership dues to keep up with increased costs of materials and delivering services to members. The partner societies remain committed to exploring ways to increase the value of membership in Material Advantage, by developing, for example, new contests and increasing travel assistance. Just last summer, the membership “year” was extended for new members—anyone who joins after Aug. 1 is a member for the remainder of the year and all of the following year. ICC4–CLS student scholars Congratulations to the students who were awarded travel grants to attend ICC4–CLS in Chicago in July! The grants were made available through support from the National Science Foundation, ArcelorMittal, Ceradyne, Corning Inc. and Kyocera. Additionally, Wiley sponsored scholarships for two student bloggers. • National Science Foundation student scholars – Jesse Angle, University of California, Irvine – Troy Ansell, Oregon State University – Chris Baker, University of Akron – Brooke Barta, Georgia Institute of Technology – Henry Colorado, University of California, Los Angeles – Maryam Dehdashti, Missouri University of Science & Technology – Lauren Garten, Pennsylvania State University – Liangfa Hu, Texas A&M University – Subramanian Ramalingam; Colorado School of Mines – Jorgen Rufner, University of California, Davis – Sheng Tong, University of Cincinnati – Valerie Wiesner, Purdue University • ArcelorMittal student scholars – Daniel Clark, Colorado School of Mines – Greg Harrington, Missouri University of Science and Technology • Ceradyne student scholars – Xinwei Chen, National University of Singapore – Mehdi Mazaheri, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Switzerland – Rolf Weigand, University of Mining and Technology Freiberg, Germany • Corning student scholars – Davide Morselli, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Italy – Giorgio Schileo, University of Birmingham/Sheffield Hallam University, United Kingdom – Meredith Shi, Alfred University (Credit: Russell Lee Leonard; ACerS.) • Kyocera student scholars – Chi-Hsiu Chang, University of California, Davis – Brian Ray, University of Kentucky – Eduardo Vitral Freigedo Rodrigues, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil • Wiley student bloggers – Bobby Harl, Vanderbilt University – Lee Leonard, University of Tennessee Space Institute NSF student scholar, Jesse Angle, talks about his research at the inaugural Interactive Technology Forum and poster session at ICC4–CLS. 8 www.ceramics.org | American Ceramic Society Bulletin, Vol. 91, No. 7 The 2012 installment of the ACerS Future Leaders Program took place during the 4th International Congress on Ceramics in Chicago in July. Twentytwo outstanding young professionals participated in the program while they were in Chicago for the meeting. Young professionals were invited to participate based on a nomination, their involvement in the Society or accomplishments in the field. The program included a networking dinner, presentation on leadership skills, roundtables and an interactive panel discussion with industry and government leaders Delbert Day of Mo-Sci Corp., Jay Lane of Rolls-Royce, Marina Pascucci of Cullen Hackler from the Porcelain Enamel Institute presented a program on developing CeraNova Corp. and Lynnette Madsen leadership skills at the Future Leaders breakfast at ICC4–CLS. from the National Science Foundation. Charles Baldwin, Ferro Corp.; Nicola Tokyo University of Science; Juan Participants at this event included Perry, Northwestern University; Sumin Nino, University of Florida; Jairo Mahmood Shirooych, University of ALTEO-ceram-177x123-0812-C:Mise en page 1 7/08/12 19:21 Page 1 Zhu, Vesuvius; Troy Ansell, Oregon Escobar, University of Los Andes; Southern California; Eva Hemmer, P172HPB, our High Purity Reactive Alumina for your High Performance Technical Ceramics Introducing ALTEO’s new addition to our range of high quality technical aluminas: P172HPB. It is characterized by very low impurity levels, and high fired density at lower sintering temperatures. P172HPB is perfectly suited for applications requiring the highest levels of wear and corrosion resistance, mechanical strengths and stability. Ceramic Rio Tinto Alcan Specialty Aluminas ALTEO PO Box 43 13541 Gardanne Cedex France is now T +33 4 42 65 22 22 F +33 4 42 51 41 79 www.alteo-alumina.com sales.specialty-aluminas@riotinto.com American Ceramic Society Bulletin, Vol. 91, No. 7 | www.ceramics.org ALTEO 9 (Credit: Bobby Harl, ACerS.) Society’s next generation participates in Future Leaders Program at ICC4–CLS acers spotlight State University; Robert Jensen, H.C. Stark; Noah Shanti, 3M; Kevin Fox, Savannah River National Laboratory; Tom Chapman, Corning Inc.; Brel Saiber, Du-Co Ceramics; Steven Jung, Mo-Sci Corp.; Carol Click, Corning Inc.; Aaron Schlett, Ipsen Ceramics; Leanne Saiber, Du-Co Ceramics; Hirokazu Sasaki, Shoei Chemical Inc.; Noaki Arimitsu, Shoei Chemical Inc.; Leah Glauber, Boeing; Nathan Ashmore, Boeing; and Thomas Henriksen, Ceramco Inc. The Basic Science Division sponsored four of the young professionals with $500 travel grants. They were Mahmood Shirooych, Nicola Perry, Carol Click and Sumin Zhu. The program will continue throughout the year with activities and further programming. To learn more about the Future Leaders Program or the ACerS Young Professionals Network, contact Megan Bricker at mbricker@ceramics. org or 614-794-5894. n Calling all potential Emeritus members It’s that time of year when the Society reaches out to long-time members to see if they qualify for Emeritus membership. Members qualify for Emeritus rank if they, by Dec. 31, 2012, will be 65 years or older and will have completed 35 or more years of continuous membership in ACerS. If you meet both of these qualifications, you may be eligible for Emeritus grade. Emeritus members’ dues are waived, and they get reduced meeting registration rates. To find out more about Emeritus membership, please contact Marcia Stout at 614-794-5821 or email her at mstout@ceramics.org. ACerS will be contacting members in September and October who, according the Society’s records, meet these requirements. But as a double-check, those who think they are eligible may contact Stout for confirmation. n CALL FOR PAPERS A Student bloggers Bobby Harl and Lee Leonard reported on ICC4–CLS in CTT in July. Find out more at www.ceramics. org/ceramictechtoday. Daily updates and biweekly emails on breaking news. Recently we reported on – Ceramics in fabrics – Pnictide superconductors – Zirconia bone scaffolds – Olympics and science – Superlight materials www.ceramics.org/ceramictechtoday In Memoriam Seymour A. Bortz Lyle E. Pefley Some detailed obituaries also can be found on the ACerS website, www. ceramics.org/in-memoriam DUE NOVEMBER 4, 2012 d of Scie o rl nc W e A BSTRACT CeramiC TeCh Today The 10th Pacific Rim Conference on Ceramic and Glass Technology including GOMD 2013 - Glass & Optical Materials Division Annual Meeting PACRIM an d Te c h n ol og y June 2–7, 2013 | Hotel Del Coronado | San Diego, CA, USA www.ceramics.org/pacrim10 10 www.ceramics.org | American Ceramic Society Bulletin, Vol. 91, No. 7 people in the spotlight Varshneya named ICG glass ambassador Mauro receives first SGT–Pilkington award Varshneya Arun Varshneya, ACerS Fellow, was named to the Advisory Committee of the International Commission on Glass at its June meeting in Maastricht, Netherlands. The group’s Steering Committee and Council unanimously approved Varshneya’s nomination to serve as an ICG Ambassador for North America. n (Credit: SGT.) Cormack to review Italian university research John Mauro receives the inaugural SGT–Alastair Pilkington Early Career Award from Pilkington’s daughter, Ros Christian. John C. Mauro of Corning Incorporated was named the first winner of the SGT–Alastair Pilkington Early Career Award by the Society of Glass Technology (Sheffield, UK). The award was conferred at the opening ceremony of the European Society of Glass Science and Technology conference in June in Maastricht, Netherlands. Mauro gave a lecture in conjunction with the award at the conference. The purpose of the award is to “stimulate creativity and determination in any field of glass studies,” among all who are new to the study of glass, regardless of age. The award was established by the family of Sir Alastair Pilkington to commemorate his contributions to glass science and technology, most notably, the float-glass process for manufacturing sheet glass for windows. n Cormack Alfred University professor and ACerS Fellow Alastair N. Cormack has been invited to serve as a peer reviewer for Italy’s National Agency for the Evaluation of Universities and Research Institutes. Cormack will serve on 14 panels, which are charged with evaluating the research conducted by Italian universities and research institutions between 2006 and 2010. n Yttrium Oxide & other Rare Earth materials ASM appoints Sundaram to IMR committee The ASM International Board of Trustees appointed Alfred University professor, S.K. Sundaram, ACerS Fellow, to a three-year term on its International Materials Reviews Committee, effective Sept. 1, 2012. The journal is published jointly by ASM International and the Institute of Materials, Minerals and Sundaram Mining (UK) six times per year and includes critical assessments of the literature pertaining to materials science and engineering. The role of the committee is to suggest review topics, recommend authors and provide technical review of manuscripts commissioned for the IMR. n American Ceramic Society Bulletin, Vol. 91, No. 7 | www.ceramics.org Leading Supplier of Rare Earth Materials 20 Years of Reliability 12930 Saratoga Avenue, Suite D-6, Saratoga, CA 95070 Tel : 1.408.864.0680 Fax : 1.408.864.0930 Email : info@candldevelopment.com www.candldevelopment.com 11 4th International Congress on Ceramics (Credit: Left, Lee Leonard, ACerS; right, ACerS.) Shaping the future at ICC4 (Credit: Left and right, ACerS.) (Credit: ACerS.) (Left) Video displays, laptop computers and iPads offered new dimensions to the traditional poster session. (Right) The Ceramic Leadership Summit featured a panel of experts who offered case histories of technology entrepreneurship and nextgeneration technology transfer. Overlooking the conference dinner, held at the Modern Wing of the Art Institute of Chicago, ICC4 president Kathy Faber thanks attendees for their participation in the successful congress. I t was fry-an-egg-on-the-sidewalk hot in host city Chicago during the recent Fourth International Congress on Ceramics and the colocated Ceramic Leadership Summit, but that had nothing to do with the warm and sincere feelings of collaboration and collegiality inside the meetings. At the reception, ICC4 student blogger Bobby Harl, left, and Keith Bowman, center, discuss their work with Bill Lee. to business leaders and materials professionals from all corners of the world. They left with new friendships, inspiration and invitations to pursue technical, entrepreneurial and leadership opportunities. While there was a clear international design to ICC4, the Ceramic Leadership Summit track offered opportunities for learning and discussion about materials-oriented business opportunities and challenges that tended to focus on the operations in the United States, such as small business funding opportunities, intellectual property best practices, patent law changes and university technology transfer case studies. The joint ICC4–CLS meetings also succeeded in providing a unique opportunity to expose a large group of students and early-career researchers 12 dia “poster” session ever held at a large-scale scientific or technical meeting. Looking forward to ICC5, ICC4 president Katherine Faber and her technical program cochair Edgar Lara-Curzio handed over the reins of the congress to a representative of incoming president, Longtu Li, who offered a preview of the 2014 event to be held in Beijing, China. n (Credit: ACerS.) ICC4 delivered on its promise to “Shape the Future of Ceramics” with an impressive blue-chip array Another distinction of the ICC4–CLS gatherings of international business leaders and researchers who offered their thoughts about how to approach was the organization of the two-day “Interactive Technology Forum,” perhaps the first multimestrategic questions related to priority research goals, engineering challenges and commercial opportunities for ceramic- and glass-based materials. The range and depth of plenary and technical session leaders provoked much discussion and reflection on the science and engineering strengths and weakness of various geographical regions and industries. Maxine Savitz, vice president of the National Academy of Engineering and leadoff plenary speaker chats with M.D. Patil following her presentation. The view from the audience during the plenary presentation by Corning’s Gary Calabrese. www.ceramics.org | American Ceramic Society Bulletin, Vol. 91, No. 7 ceramics in energy When high-temperature superconducting oxides were discovered in the mid-1980s, it was thought that they would revolutionize electric power delivery. They might still. However, the physics of these intriguing materials has made them tricky to engineer for applications. One problem that persists is the tendency of high-temperature superconducting cuprates, such as YBCO, to have weakly linked grain boundaries, which diminishes the global critical current density. The weak linking can be overcome by controlling the grain misorientation angle with textured substrates. Another way would be to find a material with high enough local intragrain critical current densities. The ferropnictide family of compounds shows some promise in this regard. (The pnictides are the Group Va compounds in the periodic table of the elements: N, P, As, Sb and Bi.) The ferropnictide family of superconducting compounds, in particular, is interesting because of the compounds’ high critical temperatures and some interesting physics related to their multiband superconductivity and antiferromagnetism. For example, the pnictide compound, BaFe2As2 (Ba-122), is of interest, because its magnetic and superconducting properties are in a range that makes them useful for applications. There has been a fair amount of research on cobalt-doped Ba-122 (electron-doped). A disadvantage is that this compound has the problem mentioned above, namely intrinsically weak linking of its grain boundaries. However, the critical current density is less sensitive to grain misorientation than is seen in the cuprate compounds. Thus, there is strong interest in studying polycrystalline ferropnictides. ACerS member Eric Hellstrom and his team at Florida State University recently published a paper in Nature Materials reporting on superconductivity in potassium-doped Ba-122 (hole- (Credit: Weiss; FSU.) High critical current density doped pnictide superconductors High critical current density doped ferropnictide superconductors. (a) Magneto-optical image of a rectangular slab of (Ba0.6K0.4)Fe2As2 bulk material after zero field cooling the sample to 10 K and applying 167 millitesla. (b) Current stream lines calculated for zero field cooled sample showing uniform current circulating though the bulk. (c) Magneto-optical image showing remnant trapped magnetic flux after zero field cooling to 5.7 K, applying a small field of 166 millitesla, and then removing the applied field. doped) wire and bulk material. The surprising result is that the global critical current density is much higher in K-doped Ba-122 than the Co-doped version. The abstract gets right to the point: “Here we present a contrary and very much more positive result in which untextured polycrystalline (Ba0.6K0.4)Fe2As2 bulks and round wires with high grain-boundary density have transport critical current densities well over 0.1 MA·cm–2 (self field, 4.2 K).” How “much more positive?” They report critical current densities that are “more than 10 times higher than that of any other round untextured ferropnictide wire and 4–5 times higher than the best textured flat wire,” which they say are “high enough to be interesting for applications.” The improvement is attributed to enhanced grain connectivity, which in turn, arises from several factors relating to the material’s microstructure, and therefore, processing. Three factors are singled out. First, the polycrystals were synthesized by chemical reaction, which could be done at temperatures that are low enough to prevent the formation of unfavorable secondary phases like FeAs. American Ceramic Society Bulletin, Vol. 91, No. 7 | www.ceramics.org Secondary phases have been shown to wet the grain boundaries and block current. Second, the synthesis process is done under high-pressure conditions, which yields a nearly 100-percent dense material and very good intragranular connectivity. Third, the material is very finegrained with grain sizes of approximately 200 nanometers. This means that planar grain boundaries are rare and the anisotropy values are low, which makes the vortex stiffness high. Why does this matter? Even though most of the vortices span grain boundaries, with this material, very little if any vortice actually resides in the grain boundary. In the paper, the authors suggest that there may be some compound-related factors involved, too. They cite a higher critical current density as a function of magnetic field for the K-doped Ba-122 than for the Co-doped material, which could be related to hole- vs. electron-doping. For full details see “High intergrain critical current density in fine-grain (Ba0.6K0.4)Fe2As2 wires and bulks,” Weiss, et al., Nature Materials (doi: 10.1038/NMAT3333). n 13 ceramics in energy A company in New York State, ENrG, has been seeking commercial opportunities after perfecting their ability to produce 3YZT foils in a variety of shapes and production sizes (currently the largest is 10 centimeters 3 15 centimeters), including foils that are 40 micrometers thick. Foils as thin as 20 micrometers are anticipated for later in 2012. Foils like these are not useful by themselves (aside from instilling some awe in the materials community). However, they are expected to be a highly useful enabling platform for any application that would require a ceramic membrane. Kathy Olenick, director of technical applications for ENrG, believes opportunities for using these foils is wide open because they have so many useful properties. “The idea is, for example, that you can have a flexible support that is dielectric, too,” says Olenick. “Instead of applying a dielectric material onto a substrate, the foils have it already integrated with support. In addition, the foil’s ability to retain its electrical and mechanical properties through thermal cycling makes it a prime material for electrolyte-supported fuel cells.” (Credit: ENrG Inc.; Don Dannecker, Izon Production Photography.) Durable, flexible thin ceramic foils opening new applications ENrG’s tough, flexible ceramic foil is an enabling foundation for energy, electronic and structural applications. (Credit: ENrG Inc.; Time Curry.) Olenick says the foil’s other properties open some unprecedented materials choices for applications engineers, especially where there are high temperatures and chemically harsh environments. And, the translucency, for example, means it is easy to align double-sided coatings. She says the foils are essentially transparent at mid-IR range wavelengths. She also notes that custom textures can be given to the foils, and holes can be added in the green state if air or fuel passages need to be structured. (The company makes the foils by tape casting followed by sintering.) In particular, Olenick touts her company’s Thin E-Strate product as a good choice for ENrG says its metalized Thin E-Strate readily adapts under thin-film photovolthermal stress. taic applications. 14 Along these lines, she says that the New York State Energy Research and Development Authority recently gave ENrG an award to explore the product’s potential in the solar energy markets. She says Thin E-Strate would be a more efficient backing for solar cells than materials used currently. The flexibility of the product apparently causes some doubletakes. Olenick says, “When ceramic technologists see Thin E-Strate at our trade shows or in our videos, they question if it’s really a ceramic!” A company representative made a presentation on the foils and the company’s capabilities at ACerS 2012 ICACC meeting. An online version of this presentation can be seen by contacting the company. The company has received support in the past from NYSERDA and NIST to work on large-area ceramic fuel cell development and fabrication capabilities. For more information, including videos demonstrating the flexibility and thermal durability of ENrG foils, see: www.enrg-inc.com. n www.ceramics.org | American Ceramic Society Bulletin, Vol. 91, No. 7 ceramics in biomedicine Korean researchers at Soonchunhyang University have been working on developing bonelike scaffolds to help regenerate defective or damaged bone tissue. They say they have found a fairly uncomplicated mixed-material candidate for use in situations where mechanical strength is a factor but the dimensions are fairly small, such as in fingers and toes. The scaffold is composed of hydroxyapatite and zirconium dioxide. They say the key to making this combination work together—each has separate beneficial characteristics but different coefficients of thermal expansion—is carefully engineering the interface between the two materials and microwave sintering. The group, led by Byong-Taek Lee, has been creating a variety of bone scaffold structures for several years. For example, in 2011, they reported on the clever use of electrospinning to engineer a candidate for artificial cancellous bone, a spongy, soft and weak type of bone tissue found, for example, at the expanded heads of long bones and in the interior of vertebrae. In contrast with cancellous bone, “compact” or cortical bone is harder, denser and stiffer and provides more structural support for organs and joints and, ultimately, the whole body. This time Lee’s group focused on a substitute for this tougher bone for use in bone graft applications. Bone grafts have become fairly common in dental reconstruction efforts (to build support for dental implants). They also are used in complicated bone fractures and situations where small amounts of bone are missing or have necessarily been removed. Currently, the most widely used materials for bone grafts are tissues taken from elsewhere on the individual or from a cadaver. However, there are drawbacks to both of these sources. The biomedical materials community in recent years has been active in (Credit: Jang et al.; Science and Technology of Advanced Materials.) Microwaving of hydroxyapatite, ZrO2 combo yields promising strong bone graft scaffold Mechanically strong and biocompatible hydroxyapatite/t-ZrO2 composite scaffolds prepared by microwave sintering at (a, b) 1,300°C, (c, d) 1,400°C and (e, f) 1,500°C. developing alternative materials and scaffolds for grafting. The search is on among many groups looking for the “ideal” artificial graft materials. Several tests have been made using scaffolds of hydroxyapatite, bioactive glass and other ceramic materials. It is not clear whether there will ever be a single ideal graft material, especially if the composition can be customized based for a specific site. However, at a minimum, any substitute material will have to be fairly light and strong, will have to be porous to allow cell growth and fluid penetration, and will have to encourage bone cell growth (not to mention growth of vascular and neural tissues). The recent work in Korea has to do with combining two well-known materials: hydroxyapatite and ZrO2. A news release from the National Institute for Materials Science notes that, “While hydroxyapatite encourages bone cell ingrowth, when it is porous like natural bone, it is mechanically weak. The second material, zirconium dioxide, is stronger, but cells do not grow on it.” The question they faced was how to create a scaffold from these very different materials (with normally incompatible coefficients of thermal expansion) without cracking and damaging the structure during the sintering process. The answer is in a paper in the journal Science and Technology of Advanced Materials, “Microwave sintering and American Ceramic Society Bulletin, Vol. 91, No. 7 | www.ceramics.org in-vitro study of defect-free stable porous multilayered HAp–ZrO2 artificial bone scaffold” (doi:10.1088/14686996/13/3/035009). The researchers say their goal is “to fabricate a bone preform that can be strong enough to maintain a reasonable load during the natural healing period, and at the same time offers extensive porous space for the bone regeneration to take place throughout the whole scaffold.” The solution they discovered is to carefully build up hydroxyapatite on the exterior of a ZrO2 core. They use a gradient zone between the two, and then sinter using a microwave oven instead of a conventional furnace. In particular, they credit the gradient region with resolving the potential thermal expansion problems. In their paper, the researchers say the microwave sintering “ensures sufficient sintering within a short time. … In this method, the heating rate is relatively high and the dwelling time is significantly shortened, which hinders undesired reactions and, hence, preserves the biocompatibility of the intended materials.” After creating test structures and confirming their strength and porosity, the team seeded the composite with cells and found that they indeed grew successfully, divided as hoped and after several days covered the entire surface. They also found that the cells completely filled the pores and penetrated the ceramic structures. n 15 The ACerS Awards Class of 2012 During the 114-year history of The American Ceramic Society, a system of awards has evolved to honor and recognize its members’ outstanding contributions and accomplishments and to create career benchmarks for aspiring young scientists, engineers and business leaders. The most prestigious of ACerS awards is the designation of Distinguished Life Member, a recognition bestowed upon only two or three members each year. In 2012, ACerS has chosen three individuals— Noboru Ichinose, Brian R. Lawn and Joel P. Moskowitz—to receive the DLM laurels. This year, ACerS will add 15 members to its Class of Fellows and recognize many more outstanding members with various Society-wide, Division and Class awards (and lectures) that will be formally presented at the organization’s Annual Meeting, Oct. 7–11, 2012, held in conjunction with MS&T’12 in Pittsburgh, Pa. A description of each winner is presented in the following pages. Awards Banquet The winners of the Society’s 2012 awards will be feted at the ACerS Annual Awards and Honors Banquet, Monday, Oct. 8. Banquet tickets maybe purchased during registration for the conference. See pages 39–45 for schedule details. 16 2012 Distinguished Life Members Noboru Ichinose With a long record of outstanding scholarly accomplishments and scientific contributions, Noboru Ichinose is an outstanding example of what ACerS Distinguished Life Members represent. Ichinose, now an emeritus professor, is the former dean of the faculty of engineering at Waseda University in Tokyo and the past director of the school’s Kagami Memorial Research Institute for Materials Science and Technology. He was at Toshiba prior to joining the university. He is an internationally recognized expert in the area of functional ceramic materials and has made seminal contributions in the development of a wide variety of functional ceramic materials, including bulk materials, thin films and single crystals. Ichinose’s works cover an enormous variety of electronic ceramic materials, such as ferrites, low-permittivity substrates, thermally conductive materials, dielectric materials, thermistors, piezolelectrics and pyroelectrics, non- linear resistors, sensors and superconducting materials. These include many commercial products manufactured by Toshiba Corp. “Over the years, because the electronics industry required highly functional materials with unique characteristics,” says Jay Singh, a friend and colleague of Ichinose, “he accepted the challenge and worked on both fundamental and applied aspects.” Singh lauds his contributions to low-temperature firing techniques and microwave dielectrics and to energy conversion, semiconducting, magnetic, functionally graded, intelligent and eco-friendly materials. “He continuously carried out the research work with the concept of creating new materials and their widescale applications,” says Singh. A prolific researcher, Ichinose authored or coauthored more than 200 papers, edited or coedited more than 60 books and earned more than 450 patents. Ichinose is the past president of the prestigious Ceramic Society of Japan and has had a long relationship with ACerS, including membership in ACerS Electronics Division since 1978. He has worked with the Society on several exchanges, workshops and meetings, including PACRIM. He is an ACerS Fellow and recipient of the John Jeppson and Richard C. Fulrath awards. Also, he has served as chair of the Japanese Fulrath Committee since 1997. Ichinose’s other honors range from www.ceramics.org | American Ceramic Society Bulletin, Vol. 91, No. 7 being named a member of the World Academy of Ceramics to receiving awards from the Japan Society of Powder and Powder Metallurgy, the Illuminating Engineering Institute, the Japan Fine Ceramics Association and Japan’s top science ministry. Brian R. Lawn A 35-year member of ACerS, Brian Lawn’s name is synonymous with indentation fracture mechanics and the development of indentation-testing methods, areas where he has been a true pioneer. Moreover, his work in advancing the understanding of fracture mechanics of brittle materials from the atomic to the macro level has delivered major advancements in basic science, engineering and, most recently anthropology. Before entering the field of materials science, Lawn was largely focused on physics. He gained his bachelor and doctorate degrees in physics at the University of Western Australia and in the mid-1960s was a postdoctoral fellow in the School of Physics at the University of Bristol. At Bristol, he began to sit in on lectures in the school’s nascent materials science offerings, which whetted his interest in the field. “That’s where it all started, and then I became interested in the causes of contact damage on diamond surfaces,” says Lawn. “I noticed that many diamonds had cracks, presumably from the mining process and impacts with small particles. I started to look into how indentations could take place on the diamonds. And, then I realized that there was a field out there where the notion of indentations leading to fractures had never been studied. That is how I got into indentation, and from there it just built up very, very quickly. I never planned my career that way. It was serendipity, and it just evolved that way.” As part of this work, Lawn says he was drawn into engineering. “The more practical side was appealing. I began to see that you could use indentation to study the mechanical properties of materials.” Lawn went on to author the book, Fracture of Brittle Solids, first published in 1975. He went on to publish more than 300 research papers (and became one of the most-cited materials scientists worldwide for many years). After periods of working in materials science and physics at Brown University, the University of New South Wales and the University of Sussex, Lawn became a member of the NIST staff. In 1987, he was appointed to the position of NIST Fellow. In 2001, he was elected to the United States National Academy of Engineering, and, in 2012, to the Australian Academy of Science. Lawn is an ACerS Fellow and has been tapped for many awards and honorary lectures from the Society, including the Edward Orton Jr., Ross Coffin Purdy and Robert B. Sosman awards. Although now nominally retired, Lawn has shifted his focus to biological applications of indentation, particularly in regard to how anthropologists can use studies of dental fracture patterns. “Teeth,” says Lawn, “can show a lot about how different species, including ourselves, evolved, and we can infer much information about what they ate.” Joel P. Moskowitz American Ceramic Society Bulletin, Vol. 91, No. 7 | www.ceramics.org Although trained as a ceramic engineer at Alfred University, Joel Moskowitz also earned an MBA degree at the University of Southern California, and eventually became an entrepreneurial superstar in the commercial ceramics field. Starting with only his life savings and a telephone in a bedroom, he built Ceradyne into a worldwide diversified business, although one that is best known for developing rugged and reliable ceramic armor plates. “I have known Moskowitz since the time he was a student at Alfred,” says L. David Pye, a professor emeritus at the school and former ACerS president, “and have followed with great admiration his remarkable career in the ceramic industry, his involvement with academia and his great support for ACerS over the years. These accomplishments arguably make him one of the most successful ceramic engineers in modern times.” After serving as an officer in the US Missile Command and a research engineer for Interpace Corp., Moskowitz used $5,000 to cofound Ceradyne in 1967 to forge a company based on advanced structural ceramics. Today, the company is a model of vertically integrated manufacturing and is an international publicly held corporation with a $545 million market capitalization. Ceradyne focuses on defense, transportation, electronics, medical, nuclear, solar and oil and gas applications. Research and manufacturing facilities can be found in the US, Germany, China and Canada. Moskowitz has provided remarkable leadership and financial support to several academic institutions, including Alfred University and Clemson University, and to ACerS. He served for many years on the Society’s President’s Council of Industrial Advisors and most recently helped the organization create its Ceramic Leadership Summit meeting series. Moskowitz also played an important role in supporting the International Ceramic Congress, the International Federation on Ceramics and the International Commission on Glass. 17 The 2012 ACerS Class of Fellows cation, sensor technology, nanotechnology and technologies for improvement of concrete performance. He has spun off three companies from OSU that are commercializApblett ing inventions in arsenic remediation, explosive sensing and neutralization, and wireless corrosion sensors, and he was recently inducted into the National Academy of Inventors. Apblett has served ACerS as program chair, secretary and chair of the NETD division. He currently serves on the Advisory Board for the ACerS Bulletin. Jun Akedo is prime senior research scientist, National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology in Tsukuba Science City, Japan. He also holds Akedo professorships at the Tokyo Institute of Technology and Shibaura Institute of Technology. Akedo has served as project leader for many national R&D projects, including “Nano Structure Forming for Advanced Ceramic Integration Technology” in the Japan Nanotechnology Program and has received numerous awards from the Japanese government and the Ceramic Society of Japan. His current research interests are room-temperature coating of ceramic materials for applications to green devices. He belongs to the Electronics and the Engineering Ceramics Divisions of The American Ceramic Society and has contributed as chair, organizer and advisory board member for MS&T meetings and ACerS meetings, including ICACC, ICC and PACRIM. Allen Apblett is a professor in the Chemistry Department at Oklahoma State University in Stillwater, Okla. His current research is in the areas of counterterrorism research, water purifi18 Alex Cozzi is a fellow engineer with the Savannah River National Laboratory at the Department of Energy’s Savannah River Site in Aiken, S.C. Cozzi’s current Cozzi research activities focus on cementitious waste forms for radioactive waste disposal. In addition to supporting the SRS Saltstone Facility, he is contributing to the development of the cementitious waste form and process for the Department of Energy’s Hanford Site. Cozzi is affiliated with the Nuclear and Environmental Technology Division of ACerS and served as chair in 2010–2011. He is an active member of the National Institute of Ceramic Engineers and served as president in 2010–2011. Matt Dejneka is a senior research associate in Corning’s Glass Research group in Corning, N.Y. His research interests have led to innovations in transparent, ferroelecDejneka tric and magnetic glass ceramics; tapered fiber lasers; compositions for optical amplifiers; rareearth-doped fluorescent microbarcodes; negative thermal expansion ceramics and glass-ceramics and glasses for a variety of laser and optics applications. Currently he is investigating chemically strengthened glasses and is a coinventor of Corning’s Gorilla Glass. In 2005 Dejneka received the Karl Schwartzwalder–Professional Achievement in Ceramic Engineering Award. He organized seven sessions, one symposium, and the 2006 Glass & Optical Materials Division Meeting. He served as president of Keramos in 2004–2006 and has been a member of ACerS since 1988. Doreen Edwards is a professor of materials science and engineering and dean of the Kazuo Inamori School of Engineering at Alfred University. Edwards joined the Edwards faculty at AU in 1997 and served as the graduate program director and associate dean of engineering before being appointed dean in 2009. Prior to graduate school, Edwards was a research scientist at Gould Inc. and Northwestern University’s Basic Industry Research Lab. Edwards’ research focuses primarily on oxides for electrical, optical and energy-conversion applications. Currently, her research group is working on projects related to photocatalysis, high-temperature thermoelectrics and sodium-metal halide batteries. Edwards has been a member of ACerS since 1994, is a member of the Basic Science Division and served on the Division’s Long Range Planning Committee. She was a member of the Phase Equilibria Program Subcommittee and served as its chair for two terms. Gao Lian Gao has been a professor at Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China, since 2010. His current interests and main research areas are energy materials and environmental materials. www.ceramics.org | American Ceramic Society Bulletin, Vol. 91, No. 7 Gao served as the chair of the Committee of Structure Ceramics of the Chinese Ceramic Society in 1998 and has been actively involved in organizing conferences and special sessions at large national and international meetings. He is the editor of several international journals. Three times he has been awarded the First Awards of Science and Technology from the Shanghai government and is an Academician of the World Academy of Ceramics. He is a member of the ACerS Basic Science Division. Curtis A. Johnson retired as principal scientist in Ceramics and Metallurgy Technologies at GE Research in Niskayuna, N.Y. area in 2008 and actively consults with Johnson GE and elsewhere. In 2010, he was appointed adjunct professor in the Department of Materials Science and Engineering at State University of New York, Stony Brook. Johnson has worked on the development, fabrication, characterization, life prediction and reliability assessment of advanced ceramics and coatings and helped develop processes for near-netshape fabrication of sintered silicon carbide. He helped advance analytical techniques for probabilistic strength and failure prediction of brittle materials. Recent research activities have focused on thermal barrier coatings and environmental barrier coatings with an emphasis on microstructure–property relationships. Johnson is a member of the Engineering Ceramics Division of ACerS and was awarded the ECD James I. Mueller Award in 2009. Carlos G. Levi is professor of materials and mechanical engineering at the University of California, Santa Barbara. His industrial experience includes appointments at the Levi Mexican affiliates of Harbison–Walker and W.S. Atkins, a UK engineering consultancy. He serves on the Technical Advisory Board at Alcoa Howmet and has been a consultant for various companies throughout his academic career. His current research focuses on the fundamental understanding of thermal and environmental barrier coatings for advanced gas turbine engines, processing and performance of ceramic composite systems and the development of environmental barrier concepts for advanced nuclear reactors. He is also working on the understanding and development of metastable paths to synthesize functional materials with improved capabilities, such as thermoelectrics. Hong Li is a staff scientist with PPG Industries Inc., where he leads development of new fiberglass technologies for printed circuit boards, wind blades, corrosion Li applications and other end use markets. His professional experience also includes Schott North America Inc., where he led high-power laser glass development, as well as Pacific Northwest National Laboratories, where he focused on vitrification processes for low- and high-level radioactive waste. Li coorganized and cochaired several international symposia and conferences covering fundamental glass science and fiber-glass technology. He serves as technical referee for numerous glass and materials science related journals. Li was chair of the Glass and Optical Materials Division of ACerS in 2009 and currently serves as a council member of the International Commission on Glass. McEntire American Ceramic Society Bulletin, Vol. 91, No. 7 | www.ceramics.org Bryan J. McEntire is chief technology officer at Amedica Corporation, in Salt Lake City, Utah. Beginning in 1978 he was employed by Ceramatec in various positions, including plant manager until he joined Norton/ TRW Ceramics in 1987, where he eventually became vice president and technical director. In 1993, McEntire became general manager of the Advanced Ceramics Division of Saint-Gobain Corporation. In 1998, he joined Applied Materials Corporation as its senior director for supply chain management, and, in 2004, he joined the staff at Amedica. His current interests involve the development and manufacturing of ceramics for orthopedic applications. For 10 years McEntire taught the “Forming of Ceramics” short course for NICE in conjunction with the ACerS Annual Meeting. He is an emeritus member of ACerS affiliated with the Engineering Ceramics Division and NICE. Fred Stover cofounded Applied Ceramics Inc. in 1967 and was ceramic engineer and lab director for Thermo Materials (now Ceradyne) in Scottdale, Ga. He is Stover principal, chair and founder of Matrix Enterprises and since 1985 has served as a manufacturer’s representative and distributor for ceramic raw materials. He consults for the abrasive and refractory industries on silicon carbide and fused alumina. Stover is a past president of the ACerS/National Institute of Ceramic Engineers. He is the past chair and current treasurer of the Michigan/ NW Ohio section of ACerS. He has served leadership roles in many ACerS committees including the Technology and Manufacturing subcommittee of the ACerS Meeting Committee, the ACerS President’s Council of Industrial Advisors, and the John Jeppson and Corporate Environmental Achievement Award committees. G. Sundararajan joined the India Defence Metallurgical Research Laboratory in 1982 as a scientist and was appointed director of the International Advanced Research Centre for Powder Metallurgy and New Materials in 19 2012 Fellows 1997. His research interests include understanding of the tribological behavior of a wide range of ceramic and cermet coatings obtained by various coating techSundararajan niques, such as detonation spray, electrospark coating, microarc oxidation and cold spray. Recent interests include development of yttriastabilized zirconia thermal barrier coatings by electron beam PVD technology and solution precursor plasma spray techniques, development a novel chemical technique for near-net-shape gelcasting of b-SiAlON and synthesis of Al2O3–ZrO2–Ti(CN) nanocomposites for cutting-tool applications. He is the president of the Materials Research Society of India. Takata Masasuke Takata is professor and vice president at Nagaoka University of Technology in Japan and director of the Japan Fine Ceramics Center. His research program focuses on water in glass, optically readable hydrogen sensors, hot-spot phenomenon of high-temperature superconductors, growth control of zinc oxide crystals for ultra violet lasers and new multiceramic film heat insulators. He is vice president of the Ceramic Society of Japan. He is a member of the ACerS Basic Science Division and a previous recipient of the Richard M. Fulrath Award. Tadashi Takenaka has been a professor of electrical engineering, at Tokyo University of Science, Noda, Japan, since 1996. His major fields are ferroelectric, piezoelectric Takenaka and pyroelectric properties; materials and applications of lead-free ferroelectric ceramics, and grain-oriented bismuth layer-structured ferroelectric ceramics. He received the 1993 Edward C. Henry Award of the Electronics Division of ACerS for a paper published in the Journal of the American Ceramic Society in 1989. He is an active member of the Electronics Division of ACerS and a Fellow of IEEE. Eric D. Wachsman, director of the University of Maryland Energy Research Center, is the William L. Crentz Centennial Chair in Energy Research, with Wachsman appointments in the Department of Materials Science and Engineering and the Department of Chemical Engineering at the University of Maryland. Wachsman’s research is focused on solid ion-conducting materials and electrocatalysts, and includes the development of solid oxide fuel cells, iontransport membrane reactors, solid-state gas sensors, electrocatalytic conversion of CH4, CO2 and NOx using advanced ion-conducting materials. He is editor-in-chief of Ionics, editor of Energy Systems, former associate editor of the Journal of the American Ceramic Society and former councilor of the Florida Section of ACerS. He serves on numerous boards and was appointed by the governor to the Board of Directors of the Maryland Clean Energy Center. Class awards ACerS/NICE: Arthur Frederick Greaves-Walker Lifetime Service Award, to an individual who has rendered outstanding service to the ceramic engineering profession and who, by life and career, has exemplified the NICE, ideals and purpose. Ceramic Educational Council: Outstanding Educator Award, to recognize truly outstanding work and creativity in teaching, directing student research or the general educational process of ceramic educators. Harrie Stevens retired from Corning Incorporated and Alfred University. During his university studies, he developed a love for the application of science to solve engineering problems and a strong Stevens commitment to undergraduate education. This led to teaching at Alfred for more than 25 years and to working as a process engineering manager at Corning for more than 10 years. Stevens has been a member of ACerS since 1965 and served as a Section president, Board of Directors member and Meetings Committee member. He joined NICE on graduating from Alfred. He was a member of the Education Committee, ABET Program Evaluator, EAC and TAC member and ABET Board of Directors. Concurrently, he went through the ranks of NICE, with the additional honor of being named a NICE Fellow. Stevens now serves as a program evaluator candidate trainer for ABET and a program evaluator in the area of ceramics and materials. Rajendra Bordia has been a professor of materials science and engineering at the University of Washington, Seattle, since 1991 and served as chair from 1998 to 2005. Previously, he was a research scientist with DuPont Co. Bordia His research is at the intersection of materials and mechanics and is focused on fundamental and applied studies in the processing and properties of complex material systems for energy, biomedical, environmental and high-temperature applications. His current emphasis is on ceramics, composites, multilayered and porous materials. Bordia is a Fellow of ACerS and Indian Institute of Metals. He was selected as the Teacher of the Year seven times by his students and received the Marsha Landolt Distinguished Graduate Mentor award. Bordia is an associate editor of the Journal of the American Ceramic Society, was the chair of the Basic Science Division and served on the ACerS Board of Directors. 20 www.ceramics.org | American Ceramic Society Bulletin, Vol. 91, No. 7 Society awards W. David Kingery Award Award, to recognize distinguished lifelong achievements involving multidisciplinary and global contributions to ceramic technology, science, education and art. William E. Lee is professor of ceramic engineering, director of the Centre for Advanced Structural Ceramics and codirector of the Centre for Nuclear Lee Engineering in the Department of Materials at Imperial College London, UK. He also is deputy chair of the UK Government Advisory Committee on Radioactive Waste Management, which reports directly to the Energy Minister. Lee holds a First Class Honours BS in physical metallurgy from Aston University and a PhD in radiation damage in ceramics from Oxford University, UK. From 1983 through 1989 he was a postdoctoral researcher at Case Western Reserve University and an assistant professor of ceramic engineering at Ohio State University. He returned to the UK and was at Sheffield University 1989–2005. While there he was director of the Sorby Centre for Electron Microscopy and the British Nuclear Fuels Limited university research alliance, the Immobilisation Science Laboratory. He is coauthor of four books and more than 350 peer-reviewed publications. He has been a member of The American Ceramic Society Basic Science Division for nearly 30 years, is a Fellow of the Society and a member of its Board of Directors. He also is a Fellow of the Institute of Materials, Minerals and Mining and of the City and Guilds Institute. He is a winner of the IOMMM Rosenhain Medal, the Pfeil Award and the Wakabayashi Prize of the Technical Association of Refractories, Japan. Lee’s current research interests cover ceramics in nuclear applications, including spent fuel durability, vitreous and glass composite wasteforms, and ceramic fuels and structural components in Generation IV reactors, as well as non-oxide ultra-high-temperature ceramics for aerospace applications. John Jeppson Award, to recognize distinguished scientific, technical or engineering achievements. Katsutoshi Komeya, who earned his PhD from the Tokyo Institute of Technology in 1977, is an emeritus professor at Yokohama National Komeya University, Yokohama, Japan, and an ACerS Fellow. He investigated nitride ceramics, especially Si3N4 and AlN, for 50 years at Toshiba Corp. (1962-1989) and Yokohama National University (1989–2012). His contributions have led to innovation and development of high strength Si3N4 and SiAlONs for bearing balls and high-thermal-conductivity AlN substrates for electronic devices. His recent research efforts focus on the powder processing and property evaluation for both nitrides. He has published more than 250 papers, more than 50 books and acquired many patents. Komeya was honored with the ACerS Richard M. Fulrath Award; the President Award for Pioneered Innovation on Nitride Ceramics, Toshiba Corp.; the Ceramic Society of Japan Award of Academic Achievement in Ceramic Science and Technology; and the ACerS Engineering Ceramics Division Bridge Building Award. He is an Academician of the World Academy of Ceramics. American Ceramic Society Bulletin, Vol. 91, No. 7 | www.ceramics.org Robert L. Coble Award for Young Scholars, to recognize an outstanding scientist who is conducting research in academia, in industry or at a governmentfunded laboratory. Roger J. Narayan is a professor in the Joint Department of Biomedical Engineering at the University of North Carolina and North Narayan Carolina State University in Raleigh, N.C. He is the author of more than 100 publications as well as several book chapters on processing and characterization of biomedical materials. He currently serves as an editorial board member for several biomaterials and nanomaterials journals, including as editor-in-chief of Materials Science and Engineering C: Materials for Biological Applications. Narayan has edited several books, including the Handbook on Materials for Medical Devices, Computer Aided Biomanufacturing, Printed Biomaterials: Novel Processing and Modeling Techniques for Medicine and Surgery and Biomedical Materials. He serves as president of the North Carolina Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine Society and vice chair of the TMS Electronic, Magnetic & Photonic Materials Division. He has organized several symposia for ACerS and the Materials Research Society. Narayan has received several honors for his research activities, including the National Science Faculty Early Career 21 Society awards Development Award, the Office of Naval Research Young Investigator Award and the ACerS Richard M. Fulrath Award. He is a Fellow of ACerS, ASM International and the American Institute for Medical & Biological Engineering. Karl Schwartzwalder-Professional Achievement in Ceramic Engineering Award, an ACerS/NICE award, recognizes an outstanding young ceramic engineer whose achievements have been significant to the profession and to the general welfare of the American people. Kevin M. Fox is a senior scientist and acting manager in the Environmental Management Directorate of Savannah River National Laboratory in Fox Aiken, S.C. He is also an adjunct professor at Clemson University in the Department of Materials Science and Engineering. Fox’s current research focus is on the development of innovative compositions for the immobilization of high-level nuclear wastes in glass as well as ceramic waste forms for the safe disposition of byproducts from commercial nuclear fuel recycling. He has a background in structure/property relationships in ceramic materials, with a focus on high-temperature deformation of ceramic composites and advanced microstructural characterization. He is chair of the ACerS Nuclear and Environmental Technology Division, president of the Ceramic Educational Council and treasurer of the Keramos National Board of Directors. Richard and Patricia Spriggs Phase Equilibria Award, to honor the author or authors who made the most valuable contribution to phase stability relationships in ceramic-based systems literature in 2011. The award winning paper is “Phase Equilibria in Synthetic Coal–Petcoke Slags (Al2O3–CaO–FeO–SiO2– V2O3) under Simulated Gasification Conditions,” J. Nakano, K-S. Kwong, J. Bennett, T. Lam, L. Fernández, P. Komolwit and S. Sridhar, Energy & Fuels, 25 [7] 3298–306 (2011). 22 Bennett Díaz James P. Bennett is research program lead at the National Energy Technology Laboratory, US Department of Energy in Albany, Ore. Laura María Fernández Díaz is a senior applications engineer at FEI Electron Optics International BV in Eindhoven, NoordBrabant, The Netherlands. Piyamanee Komolwit joined Kennametal Inc. in Latrobe, Pa., as a senior engineer in the Surface Technology group. Komolwit Kwong Kyei-Sing Kwong, a materials engineer, works for the National Energy Technology Laboratory, US Department of Energy in Albany, Ore. Thomas Lam is a Center for Nanoscale Science and Technology postdoctoral researcher in the Nanofabrication Research Group at the National Lam Institute of Standards and Technology in Gaithersburg, Md. Nakano Jinichiro Nakano works at the National Energy Technology Laboratory, US Department of Energy in Albany, Ore., as principal research scientist. Sridhar Seetharaman is the POSCO Professor of Steelmaking at Carnegie Mellon University in Pittsburgh, Pa., and the Seetharaman codirector of the IndustryUniversity Consortium, The Center for Iron and Steelmaking Research. Corporate Environmental Achievement Award, to recognize and honor an outstanding environmental achievement made by an ACerS corporate member in the field of ceramics. Morgan Technical Ceramics – Wesgo, Hayward, Calif., manufacturing site is awarded the ACerS Corporate Environmental Achievement Award for developing a zero-discharge metal process that significantly reduced environmental impacts by reducing waste effluent discharges. The site also is singled out for implementing other waste reduction, recycling and pollution-prevention initiatives. The facility’s zero-discharge metal-plating process reduces the amount of water discharged to the city’s overburdened sanitary sewer system. Process water from production equipment, such as spray dryers and vibratory mills, is treated by electrocoagulation and used as make-up water in the cooling tower for ceramic manufacturing. Only a small amount of sanitary water is not reused. In addition to reducing the amount of water discharged to sewers, recycling the water to the cooling tower reduced water usage by at least 150,000 gallons per year, a considerable cost saving for the company. Along with the zero-discharge metalprocessing process, the site’s cardboard, plastic and precious-metal recycling program has been especially effective. In 2010, the company recycled more than 46 metric tons of cardboard. In addition, 0.44 metric tons of precious and base metals, including gold, silver, platinum, titanium and copper, were recovered from the braze alloy manufacturing line and sent out to refiners for recycling. www.ceramics.org | American Ceramic Society Bulletin, Vol. 91, No. 7 ACerS Award Lectures and Symposium Frontiers of Science & Society— Rustum Roy Lecture Edward Orton Jr. Memorial Lecture Sunday, Oct. 7, 2012, 5:00 p.m. Zhong Lin Wang Kennette Benedict Nanogenerators and piezotronics—From basic science to novel applications Dilemmas of nuclear materials and technology: From Los Alamos to Natanz Abstract: The unleashing of atomic energy has brought peril and prosperity to human societies. In the form of nuclear weapons, governments have acquired the capacity to destroy civilization, On the other hand, in the form of electricity-generating plants, nuclear energy can power Benedict economies without emitting climate changingcarbon dioxide. Of course, many technologies can be used for military and for civilian purposes. Nuclear technology and material, however, is the most destructive on Earth and has presented scientists, engineers and policy leaders with grave and difficult choices over the past 70 years. The talk will focus on the dilemmas posed by nuclear technology and materials, reviewing the history of their development, the paths taken and the consequences for science and global security. Kennette Benedict is executive director of the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, a position she assumed in 2005. Benedict revitalized the Bulletin by reconnecting the organization to science, technology and policy researchers as authors and board members, forming a partnership with the University of Chicago Harris School of Public Policy and shifting to an all-digital format now published by SAGE Publications. The changes increased the visibility of the Bulletin’s Doomsday Clock to inform a worldwide audience about the dangers of nuclear weapons, climate change and emerging technologies in the life sciences. Benedict has appeared on or been quoted by many news outlets. She writes a monthly column for the Bulletin and teaches at the Harris School of Public Policy, where she is a Senior Fellow at the Energy Policy Institute. Before joining the Bulletin, Benedict was director of international peace and security at the John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation, where she served as senior advisor to the president. She was responsible for grant making on issues of international peace and security, including support for efforts to reduce the threat from weapons of mass destruction, and an initiative on science, technology, and security. While serving as director, she established and directed the foundation’s initiative in the former Soviet Union from 19922002. She has taught at Rutgers University, the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Northwestern University and the University of Chicago. She has published articles on global governance, nuclear security and violent conflict. Benedict currently serves on the Ploughshares Fund Board of Trustees, Advisory Council of the Stanley Foundation, Board of Directors of Physicians for Social Responsibility, Board of Trustees of Oberlin College, Compton Foundation and Peace and Security Funders Group. She is a member of the Council on Foreign Relations, Chicago Council on Global Affairs and International Institute of Strategic Studies. She earned her AB from Oberlin College and a PhD in political science from Stanford University. American Ceramic Society Bulletin, Vol. 91, No. 7 | www.ceramics.org Tuesday, Oct. 9, 2012, 1:00 p.m. Abstract: Developing wireless nanodevices of critical importance for sensing, environmental monitoring, defense and personal electronics. It is desirable for wireless devices to be self-powered, otherwise, most sensors may be impossible. The piezoelectric nanogenerators we have Wang developed might serve as self-sufficient power sources for micro/nanosystems. For wurtzite structures that have noncentral symmetry, a piezoelectric potential is created in the crystal by applying a strain. The nanogenerator uses the piezopotential as the driving force for electrons to flow in response to a dynamic straining of piezoelectric nanowires. A gentle strain produces an output voltage of 20–40 volts from an integrated nanogenerator. Piezo-potential in wurtzite can serve as a “gate” voltage that can control the charge transport across an interface/junction. These electronics are called piezotronics, with applications in force/pressure triggered/controlled electronic devices, sensors, logic units and memory. We show that the optoelectronic devices fabricated using wurtzite have superior performance as solar cells, photon detectors and LED. Piezotronics may serve as a “mechanosensation” for interfacing biomechanical action with silicon-based technology and active flexible electronics. This lecture will focus on science and applications of nanogenerators and piezotronics. Zhong Lin (Z.L.) Wang is the Hightower Chair in Materials Science and Engineering, Regents’ Professor, Engineering Distinguished Professor and Director, Center for Nanostructure Characterization, Georgia Institute of Technology. Wang’s research includes synthesis, discovery, characterization and understanding of physical properties of oxide nanobelts and nanowires as well as applications of nanowires in energy sciences, electronics, optoelectronics and biological science. His discoveries have contributed to developing nanogenerators for harvesting mechanical energy from the environment and biological systems for powering personal electronics. His research on self-powered nanosystems has led to study of energy for micro/nanosystems, a discipline in energy research and sensor networks. He pioneered piezotronics and piezo-phototronics by introducing the piezoelectric potential gated charge transport process in fabricating new electronic and optoelectronic devices. This breakthrough, by redesigning the CMOS transistor, has applications in smart MEMS/NEMS, nanorobotics, human–electronics interface and sensors. Wang’s publications have been cited more than 48,000 times. Wang was elected as a Foreign Member of the Chinese Academy of Sciences and Member of the European Academy of Sciences. He is a Fellow of the American Physical Society, AAAS, Materials Research Society, Microscopy Society of America and World Innovation Foundation. He is an honorary professor at many universities in China and Europe. He received the MRS Medal from the Materials Research Society, Burton Medal from Microscopy Society of America, S.T. Li prize for Outstanding Contribution in Nanoscience and Nanotechnology and Purdy Award from ACerS. Wang earned his PhD from Arizona State University in transmission electron microscopy. 23 ACerS Award Lectures and Symposium ACerS/NICE Arthur L. Friedberg Ceramic Engineering Tutorial and Lecture Basic Science Division Robert B. Sosman Award and Lecture Manoj Choudhary Dawn Bonnell Modeling of transport phenomena in the glass industry: Some illustrations Local interactions and consequent properties of oxide surfaces and interfaces: Lessons learned from SPM Abstract: This lecture illustrates process and product design and engineering in the glass industry through mathematical modeling of macroscopic transport phenomena. It reviews the principles and practices of numerical simulation of mass, momentum and heat transfer in Choudhary glassmaking processes and products with a focus on fiberglass. The processes considered are those of glass melting and forming. The products illustrated include fiberglass insulation for innovative applications. Glass manufacturing involves various phenomena, including melting and dissolution of raw materials, viscous flow of the melt in furnaces, turbulent flow associated with fossil fuel combustion and non-Newtonian flow in forming of glass objects. Other phenomena include electric heating and homogenization of melt. Further, glass is a participating medium for radiation heat transfer. We review physics and equations that describe these phenomena and the relationships for relevant material properties. This is followed by numerical techniques used to solve transport equations boundary conditions. We then discuss results to illustrate the application of modeling for process design and engineering and product development. We review areas needing to further enhance the utility of mathematical modeling in the glass industry. Manoj Choudhary is a senior technical staff member at the Owens Corning Science & Technology Center in Granville, Ohio. He obtained his doctorate in materials science and engineering from MIT, where he received the Falih N. Darmara Award for excellence in academic performance, research and extracurricular activities. He earned his MS in chemical engineering from State University of New York, Buffalo, and B.Tech. in chemical engineering from the Indian Institute of Technology, Kharagpur. At IIT he was awarded the Professor S.K. Nandi Gold Medal. After postdoctoral research at MIT, Choudhary joined Owens Corning in 1982. He researched process and product development and computational fluid dynamics across a broad range of glass-fiber- and polymeric-materials-based processes and products. His contributions led to many developments in glass melting and polymeric extrusion and development of fiberglass and extruded polystyrene foam insulation products. Choudhary’s achievements have been recognized by numerous awards, including Best Paper Award from the Glass Industry Committee of IEEE, Glass Service International Modeling Award. He was awarded several Owens Corning’s highest technical achievement awards, the Slayter Award and “Vision to Reality” Award. He is a Fellow of the Society of Glass Technology and ACerS. He is past president/ chair of the Center for Glass Research at Alfred University, Glass Manufacturing Industry Council and Glass and Optical Materials Division of ACerS. He is vice president of the International Commission on Glass. He is a Foreign Member of the Czech Glass Society, an associate editor of the International Journal of Applied Glass Science and an Ohio registered professional engineer. Abstract: In applications as diverse as dyesensitized solar cells, chemical catalysis, fuel cells and biomedical sensors, and in processes ranging from grain growth to molecular adsorption, to electronic transport, local interactions at interfaces dictate behavior. The abiliBonnell ty to probe structure and properties by scanning probe microscopy with increasing spatial resolution is advancing understanding of fundamental interactions in these systems. This talk will present a recently developed understanding of polarization-dependent molecular interactions on ferroelectric surfaces against the background of the behavior of the surfaces of transition-metal oxides. Examples of interface-induced properties at oxide grain boundaries and interfaces will be shown. Finally, future prospects enabled by next-generation scanning probes will be summarized. Dawn Bonnell is a Trustee Professor of Materials Science at the University of Pennsylvania and the director of the Nano/ Bio Interface Center. She earned her PhD from the University of Michigan and was a Fulbright scholar to the Max Planck Institute in Stuttgart, Germany, after which she worked at IBM Thomas Watson Research Center. She has authored or coauthored more than 230 papers and edited several books. Her work has been recognized by the Presidential Young Investigators Award, the ACerS Ross Coffin Purdy Award, the Staudinger/Durrer Medal from ETH Zurich, the Heilmeier Faculty Research Award and several distinguished lectureships. Bonnell serves on many editorial boards, national and international advisory committees, is a past president of the American Vacuum Society, served on the governing board of the American Institute of Physics and is a past vice president of The American Ceramic Society. She is a Fellow of The American Ceramic Society, the American Association for the Advancement of Science and the AVS. She is the founding director of the Nano/Bio Interface Center, a cross-disciplinary organization with an extensive research, education and outreach portfolio. Bonnell’s research group focuses on atomic processes at surfaces and was the first to image atoms on oxide surfaces using STM. More recently, her group developed a new paradigm for fabricating nanostructured devices, ferroelectric nanolithography, and discovered a new mechanism for harvesting light energy. An additional outcome of this research program has been the invention of new probes that reveal the behavior of small structures. Tuesday, Oct. 9, 2012, 8:00 a.m. 24 Wednesday, Oct. 10, 2012, 1:00 p.m. www.ceramics.org | American Ceramic Society Bulletin, Vol. 91, No. 7 Richard M. Fulrath Symposium and Awards To promote technical and personal friendships between Japanese and American ceramic engineers and scientists. Monday, Oct. 8, 2012, 2:00 p.m. Ram Devanathan “Ionic conductivity and radiation tolerance of rareearth compounds” Devanathan is a senior scientist in the Chemical & Devanathan Materials Sciences Division at the Pacific Northwest National Laboratory. His research interests include ceramics for energy conversion and storage, nuclear waste forms and nuclear fuels. His work integrates computer simulations starting at the atomic level with experimental observations. Elizabeth Dickey “Point defect dynamics in metal oxides” Dickey is a professor and director of graduate programs in the Department of Materials Science and Engineering at North Carolina State University. Her Dickey research programs focus on understanding microstructural and interfacial phenomena in ceramics for dielectric, electronic and high-temperature applications. Japan. His research interests include development of highperformance AlN ceramics, AlN powder and their applications. Kiyoshi Shimamura “Novel single crystals for optical applications” Shimamura is group leader of the Optical Single Crystals Group at the National Institute for Materials Science in Japan. A crystal chemist, Shimamura Shimamura previously worked for the Institute for Materials Research, Tohoku University, as a research associate at Waseda University and as an associate professor. Toshimasa Suzuki “Thin-film ferroelectric materials for decoupling and tunable capacitors” Suzuki is a manager in the Materials R&D Department of the R&D Laboratory at Taiyo Yuden Corp. in Suzuki Japan. He developed thin-film ferroelectric materials and capacitors. His current research interests focus on solidstate electrochemical devices. Yukihiro Kanechika “Research and development of high-performance AlN ceramics” Kanechika is a manager in the Specialty Products Development Department of Tokuyama Corp. in w ww .ce ram ic August 4-7, 2013 | Portland, Oregon /iccps12w d bruary 6, 2013 e F ue m era c . ww cts a r st 01 s.org Abst ract A s dub eF eb ru ar y 6, 2 International Conference on Ceramic Processing Science (ICCPS-12) 3 ic s 12 th .or g/ i c cps 12 Kanechika American Ceramic Society Bulletin, Vol. 91, No. 7 | www.ceramics.org 25 cover story ro o yB St on NY SU a, um Go it: re d (C Figure 1 Diabetic patients may one day be able to monitor their glucose levels by blowing into a breathalyzer instead of pricking their fingers. k) (Credit: Rawson; TPCC) bulletin Nanoceramic sensors for medical applications C eramics do not often bring biosensors to mind. It is even less common to associate this class of materials with medical diagnostics. Despite the counterintuitive connection of ceramic materials to disease detection, the future of personalized medicine may go hand in hand with the development of nanoceramic sensors. This article presents an overview of recent advances in the development of ceramic nanosensors to identify disease markers arising from nanoscale synthesis of novel polymorphs of metal oxides, the fabrication of one-dimensional nanoceramics and their emergence as viable solutions for noninvasive medical diagnostics. The development of diagnostic breathalyzers (Figure 1) illustrates the potential of nanoceramic sensors. Breath gases as disease markers By Perena Gouma Metastable polymorphs of metal oxide nanowires detect disease-marker gases in exhaled breath, such as acetone for diabetes, ammonia for renal disease and nitric oxide for asthma. 26 Antiquity’s first known physician, Hippocrates of Cos (460–370 BC), smelled his patients’ breath to diagnose disease and recommend the appropriate remedy (Figure 2).1 Some medical terms coined then survive today, such as “fetor hepaticus,” which describes the sweet, ketone- and ammoniarich scent that indicates the late stages of liver failure. Yet, breath analysis as a noninvasive means of disease detection is not common practice among physicians nor is it available to the general population. Ceramic sensor nanotechnology and nanomedicine are, however, capable of making breath-based diagnostics the personalized medicine tool of the future.2 Exhaled human breath is a mixture of N2, O2, CO2, H2O, inert gases and hundreds of other trace gases.3–5 The latter include inorganic molecules, such as NO, NH3, CO and volatile organic compounds, such as acetone, ethane and isoprene. Concentrations range from parts-per-billion to partsper-million. The composition of breath may vary significantly from person to person, qualitatively and quantitatively, particularly with respect to trace-gas concentrations. VOCs are www.ceramics.org | American Ceramic Society Bulletin, Vol. 91, No. 7 (Credit: Gouma, SUNY Stony Brook) products of core metabolic processes, while inorganic molecules are related to other health conditions and can be indicators of a potential disease, recent exposure to a drug or an environmental pollutant. Therefore, an abnormally high or low measured concentration of certain breath gases, so-called biomarkers, potentially could provide clues for diagnosing corresponding diseases. The first breath-testing devices appeared in 1784, when Lavoisier detected CO in the exhaled breath of guinea pigs.1 Since then, colorimetric assays and gas chromatography columns have been used to detect VOCs in human breath in quantities varying from millimolar to picomolar concentrations (which translate to ppm and ppb when multiplied by the molecular weight of the analyte of interest).3 The latter gas-sensitivity limit was achieved in 1971 by the famous chemist Linus Pauling’s gas-chromatography-based breath analysis device.6 It appears that about a thousand compounds comprise human breath, but only 30 have been identified so far. Most of them are potential indicators of more than one type of disease. For example, breath VOCs can provide new markers of oxidative stress conditions.7 VOCs in exhaled breath can be used to study the mechanisms of human metabolism fast and efficiently, thus enabling the early identification of diseases that cause oxidative stress, such as asthma or lung cancer. In today’s clinical practice, there are only invasive procedures, such as fiber-optic bronchial biopsies, for lung disease detection.8 However, noninvasive monitoring can assist in differential diagnosis of pulmonary diseases, assessment of disease severity and response to treatment. NO and its related products NO2– and NO3– are widely studied biomarkers for inflammation and oxidative stress in the lungs.9 Exhaled CO also is a marker for cardiovascular diseases, diabetes, nephritis and bilirubin production.9 Exhaled hydrocarbons of low molecular mass—such as isoprene, which is affected by diet and is a marker for blood cholesterol levels10—also are important biomarkers. Acetone concentration in Figure 2 The time has come for breath-analysis-based diagnostic tools. based resistive gas sensor technology— exhaled breath correlates better with which keeps the cost low. What would insulin levels in the body than does it take to produce similar devices to glucose.11 Therefore, it can be usedetect disease or metabolic malfunction ful to diabetics for controlling their markers? What are the technological insulin intake. Ammonia and amines limitations to diagnostic breath analyzmay detect H-pylori and renal diseases online and noninvasively. Quantitative ers? To date, only medical diagnostics a few types of requires simultane“If the medical evidence that human breath ous monitoring correlates gaseous species tests have been of multiple gases in exhaled breath to diseases applied successbecause markers fully in clinical are affected differis available and convincing, diagnosis. In 2003, ently in different what is there to impede the the Food and Drug diseases.12 development and use of breath Administration cleared the first Capturing and analysis-based disease noninvasive test analyzing detectors?” system based on breath chemiluminesWith so many cence analyzers—the NIOX Nitric gaseous compounds exhaled in trace 15 Oxide Test System, by Aerocrine concentrations with each breath, samAB (Solna, Sweden)—to measure the pling issues become predominant. So, NO levels in exhaled human breath. what does it take to capture and analyze 13 The system was intended for hospital breath? Obviously, a breathalyzer. use because the device, which collects Breathalyzers bring to mind the a single-breath sample, has to be conbreath alcohol content detectors used nected to a special computer system by law enforcement officers to screen that performs and displays the results. drunk drivers for breath alcohol level. The Sievers Nitric Oxide Analyzer The most inexpensive of these devices (NOA 280i) by GE Analytical sells for about $20. They are small Instruments16 is another desktop device (handheld) and easy to use (Figure that measures NO concentrations in 3).14 They use a semiconducting metal exhaled human breath and liquids. It is oxide—typically nonselective SnO2used mainly as a research tool. American Ceramic Society Bulletin, Vol. 91, No. 7 | www.ceramics.org 27 Figure 3 Prototype of an acetone breathalyzer for monitoring diabetes and diet control. The circuitry of the “black box” is shown in Figure 1. Inset: A keyring version of a commercial alcohol breathalyzer shows the potential for affordable, portable diagnostics tools. There are some drawbacks to existing breath analysis instruments. They tend to be bulky and costly, may require large sampling volumes (e.g., NO chemiluminescence-based analysis) or may require “unhealthy” receptors to be consumed by the patient prior to testing (e.g., the radioactive-carbon-labeled urea consumed in H-pylori breath testing).17 Although optical detectors have been developed that could monitor the presence of a specific compound (selective ethane detection18), they are too costly to become over-the-counter personalized medical tools. Detecting one in a billion: Singlecrystal nanowires with extreme gas sensitivity Detecting and discriminating among signaling metabolites—disease markers—in a complex fluid, such as exhaled breath, and measuring them in trace concentrations is not a trivial problem. The trace concentration of important biomarkers requires that a single molecule of the target gas be detected from among a billion exhaled breath 28 developed a novel, single-step approach to synthesize single-crystal, one-dimensional nanowires of binary metal oxide.21 A noncatalytic, bottomup electrospinning process is used to produce nanofibrous mats of polymer– oxide composite.22 The as-spun mats are calcined, which converts them to pure oxide nanowires with no trace of residual organic material (Figure 5). The nanowires are continuous, extremely high-aspect-ratio single crystals, with nanoscale diameters and lengths ranging from millimeters to meters. (The mechanism that allows nanofibers to grow with this morphology and structure is an item for ongoing investigation.) It is this single-crystal, extremely high-aspect-ratio structure and morphology that enable the detection of trace gas concentrations. Examples of such materials are α-MoO3, which is selective for NH3 (Figure 6), and ε-WO3, which is selective for acetone (Figure 4). The sensitivity of nanowire mats of α-MoO3 to NH3 is orders of magnitude greater than that achieved by a thin, polycrystalline film of equiaxed nanoparticles of the same diameter as the nanowires,21 thus validating the proof of concept. Our group built prototype single-gas sensors for NO,23 NH324 and acetone.25 gas molecules (Figure 4). This is really “a needle in a haystack problem” and the reason that the lowest detection limit of a gas sensor is very important. Nanotechnology offers a solution to increase the sensor sensitivity without losing selectivity: singlecrystal nanowires. Sensor selectivity is defined here as higher sensitivity to a given gas or class of gases in the presence of interfering gaseous species. The key is to control the polymorphic microstructure of nanocrystalline metal oxide and the operating temperature of the sensor so as to use Figure 4 To be effective as a breathalyzer, the functional polymorph phases that material must be sensitive, respond quickly and give repeatable results. This plot shows that the response of ε-WO3 are sensitive only to a specific class of analytes nanoparticles to acetone is sensitive enough to detect it in the amounts that it is exhaled in human breath. The or to a specific single response is stable over time (note the constant baseline species.19,20 resistance of about 15 megaohms) and repeatable. The Our group has response time is quick, less than 30 seconds. www.ceramics.org | American Ceramic Society Bulletin, Vol. 91, No. 7 (Credit: Gouma, SUNY Stony Brook) (Credit: Gouma, SUNY Stony Brook) Nanoceramic Sensors for Medical Applications (Credit: Gouma, SUNY Stony Brook.) (a) (b) Figure 5 Electrospinning produces nanofibrous mats of polymer–oxide composite (a), which are converted to pure oxide nanowires (b) by calcining. Nanoceramic sensors (Credit: Gouma, SUNY Stony Brook) Ceramic gas sensor technology has been used widely since Taguchi3 devised the first commercial resistive sensor in 1968. These types of chemosensors have progressed considerably, primarily because of their low cost. Metal oxide-based ceramics are used as CO detectors, oxygen sensors and alcohol breathalyzers. Resistive chemosensing is based on the property whereby the electrical resistance of the metal oxide changes because of an interaction (adsorption of, reaction with, etc.) with a gaseous chemical. The magnitude of the change correlates to the relative concentration of the target analyte. Because these sensing materials (SnO2, TiO2, WO3) are semiconducting, the sensing action mostly occurs at elevated temperatures, typically between 100°C and 400°C (Figure 7). Depending on whether the semiconducting metal oxide is n-type Figure 6 Response of an NH3 selective sensor based on nanostructured α-MoO3 to 500 ppm gas pulses. The sensor detects ammonia down to 50 parts per billion, which makes it suitable for breath NH3 detection. Carrier gas is 10 percent O2, balance N2. (Credit: Gouma, SUNY Stony Brook) These prototypes demonstrate a feasible and affordable solution to this problem that results from the selective gas detection offered by binary metal oxide with controlled polymorphic structure. (The concept was extended to the detection of multiple biomarkers by sensor arrays through temperature control of a simple metal oxide thin-film-based gas-sensing element.26) or p-type and whether the gas detected is oxidizing or reducing, the electrical resistance of the sensor may increase or decrease with respect to its value in air in the absence of the gas, that is, its baseline resistance. Although this description of resistive chemosensors typically accounts for nonselective gas detection, gas–oxide interactions are not as random as might be inferred from this explanation. A crystallochemical approach has led to the discovery and development of chemosensing metal oxides.4,5 Our group gained insights from the field of heterogeneous catalysis, where metal oxide catalysts are responsible for selective oxidation or selective reduction processes involving gaseous chemicals. We also gained a better understanding of the importance of the crystal structure of a metal oxide sensor and the atom arrangements on the surfaces exposed to the gas in achieving gas selectivity and specificity. We recognize that the polymorphic nature of metal oxides effectively allows a single binary oxide to be present as many different materials of identical composition, but with distinct properties. Therefore, we can take advantage of a “toolbox” of novel sensor materials. Finally, the spectrum of the oxide polymorphs available for use in selective Figure 7 Principle of resistive chemosensing for a n-type metal oxide. The resistance changes in the presence of chemical species. In this case, the left side shows the response to an oxidizing gas and the right shows the response of the sensor to a reducing gas. However, sensors can be made such that they are selective for specific species by controlling the crystal structure of the metal oxide. American Ceramic Society Bulletin, Vol. 91, No. 7 | www.ceramics.org 29 Nanoceramic Sensors for Medical Applications Group B: oxides with the REO3 structure (cubic/perovskite); WO3, b-MoO3 Group C: oxides with a weakly bonded layered structure; a-MoO3, h-WO3 Reducing gases: Type I gases: CO and volatile organic compounds Type II gases: includes NH3 and amines Oxidizing gases: Type III gases: O2, NO/NO2 Figure 8 Semiempirical gas–oxide selection map. Note that the polymorph of a compound determines whether it is a Group A, B or C sensor. chemosensing is expanded by the availability of nanoscale synthesis methods (such as sol–gel chemistry) and nanomanufacturing processes (such as flame spray pyrolysis and electrospinning). Gas selection maps We obtained the first evidence of selective gas sensing by a metal oxide during previous attempts in our lab to develop an NH3 sensor for detecting urea in a selective catalytic reduction system (Figure 6). The α-phase of MoO3 showed a strong affinity for NH3 that was not expected based on what was published before in the literature for this oxide system. Several publications27–29 have discussed the nature of NH3 selectivity of the orthorhombic polymorph of MoO3. Previous researchers did not address the structural characteristics of their MoO3-based sensors. For example, when only the monoclinic β-MoO3 is used for gas sensing, it shows no sensitivity to NH3. However, it is very selective for NO. Unfortunately, a mixture of α-MoO3 and β-MoO3 is selective for neither NH3 nor NO. The relative phase content is a function of how the materials are synthesized. The operating temperature of the sensor explains the discrepancy among published reports in the literature as well as the prevalent notion that metal oxide gas sensors have overlapping selectivi† ties with respect to their gas response. The reality is that even a stoichiometric oxide of the simplest composition is not a simple material but rather it may behave similar to a composite. In our research, we produced semiempirical maps relating common structures of metal oxides (as opposed to their compositions) to their affinity for specific chemicals or classes of chemicals (Figure 8). For example, all stoichiometric cubic-REO3 structures, such as β-MoO3 and γ-WO3, are expected to show specificity for oxidizing gases, such as NO. Based on this principle, we prepared and evaluated selective NO nanosensors, that could be effective for asthma detection by breath analysis.23 Relative stability of polymorphic nanostructures Nanotechnology enables the presence of thermodynamically metastable or unstable ceramic oxide phases at room temperature and above. The anatase phase of titania is a prominent example.30–33 Rutile is the stable form of titania, and the other polymorphs (anatase, brookite, etc.) are metastable. Anatase formation is favored over rutile in nanostructured titania.† Anatase converts to rutile at temperatures between 400°C and 1,200°C. The onset temperature and the rate of this polymorphic reaction depend on various parameters, such as grain size, (Credit: Gouma, SUNY Stony Brook) Group A: oxides with the rutile structure (tetragonal); SnO2, CrO2, IrO2, b-MnO2, TiO2 impurities and processing. A decrease in the average particle/grain size of anatase from a coarse crystal to a fine nanocrystal can shift the onset of the reaction to temperatures closer to the gas sensor operating temperatures. Therefore, the issue of relative stability of anatase and rutile phases is of major concern for sensing applications using nanocrystalline titania systems. WO3 exists as various polymorphs (Figure 9). Nearly all of them are based on WO6 octahedron units. In this unit, one tungsten atom and its six neighboring oxygen atoms form a near-perfect regular octahedron. Tungsten is located in the center, and oxygen atoms are located in the corners. There are at least seven known polymorphic transformations between 0 K and 1,220 K.34 h-WO3 is a metastable layered-type hexagonal structure of WO3. Figlarz’s group35 reported on the synthesis of this polymorph by the dehydration of a tungsten hydrate compound (WO3·1/3H2O). Its structure is composed of WO6 octahedral units arranged in layers normal to the hexagonal c-axis, forming hexagonal tunnel structures. The h-WO3 polymorph attracted attention as an electrochromic material,36 suggesting that it might be possible to produce sensors that change color in the presence of reducing gases. Because oxides with open structures present an ideal configuration for guest–host reactions, we expected h-WO3 to show enhanced sensing properties. Tests using h-WO3 nanopowders confirm that this is the case.37 Furthermore, in recent work,38 for the first time, we synthesized h-WO3 nanowires without catalyst addition. Summary New breath analysis tools based on metastable metal oxide polymorphs could change the way diseases are diagnosed and monitored. Pure metal oxide nanowires are fabricated by electrospinning that are able to select for VOCs in the parts-per-billion range that are markers for chronic diseases such as diabetes, renal failure and asthma. The implications of ”stabilizing” anatase are reflected in the multibillion-dollar industry developed around anatase-rutile composite nanocatalysts (e.g., Degussa P25). 30 www.ceramics.org | American Ceramic Society Bulletin, Vol. 91, No. 7 (Credit: Gouma, SUNY Stony Brook) Disease markers in exhaled breath. Edited by N. Marczin, S.A. Kharitonov, M.H. Yacoub and P.J. Barnes. Marcel Decker, New York, 2002. Figure 9 Nanoscale synthesis methods of metal oxides make metastable phases readily available for use in gas sensing. The h-WO3 polymorph has a very open structure, which allows small molecules to travel through it. 2 P. Gouma, “Interview: Revolutionizing personalized medicine with nanosensor technology,” Pers. Med., 8 [1] 15–16 (2011). N. Taguchi, “A metal oxide gas sensor,” Japanese Patent No. 45-38200, 1962. 3 P.I. Gouma, “Nanostructured polymorphic oxides for advanced chemosensors,” Rev. Adv. Mater. Sci., 5, 123–38 (2003). 4 P.I. Gouma, “Controlling gas selectivity through polymorphic selection for metal oxide chemical detectors,” Chem. Sens., 20, [Suppl. B] 186–87 (2004). 5 Acknowledgments: The author thanks Lynette Madsen, manager of the NSF Ceramics Program. This work has been supported by NSF Grants DMR-1106168, DMR-0304169 and DMR-0224642. This article represents the collective effort of the author’s research group during the past 10 years, and particular recognition goes to Arun Prasad, Mallikarjun Karadge, Krithika Kalyanasundaram, Aisha Bishop and Lisheng Wang. Our breath gas-sensing devices became breathalyzers thanks to the expertise of Milutin Stanacevic of ECE at SUNY Stony Brook. About the author: Perena Gouma is professor of materials science and engineering at the State University of New York Stony Brook and director of the CNSD. Contact her at pgouma@notes.cc.sunysb.edu. References: M. Phillips, “Detection of volatile organic compounds in breath”; pp. 219–31 in 1 Center for Nanomaterials and Sensor Development Funding by the Ceramics Program of the National Science Foundation in 2002/2003 helped establish the Center for Nanomaterials and Sensor Development (CNSD) directed by the author, Perena Gouma. The first invention disclosure was submitted on her NH3 sensor technology in January 2002 for biosensing applications, “such as Gouma (center) with the CNSD staff. determining urea levels in Gouma happily reports that several of the the body and in monitoring physiological processes nanoceramic technologies developed at CNSD are related to reactions in bacterial infections.” prototyped (as on/off and as numerical breathalyzSince then, many national and international ers). They are ready for clinical trials to evaluate their collaborations with researchers from various usefulness in clinical applications for asthma, Hdisciplines and diverse institutions (including CFNpylori infection, diabetes (acetone) and blood cholesBrookhaven National Laboratory and Molecular terol (isoprene) monitoring. Fortunately, the medical Foundry-LBNL, United States; Sensor Lab-Univerfield is publishing guidelines for interpreting exhaled sity, Brescia, Italy; Sensor Materials Center-NIMS, gas levels (e.g., American Thoracic Society’s clinical Japan; Hungarian Academy of Sciences-Budapest, practice guidelines for exhaled NO levels40) and using Hungary; ETH Zurich, Switzerland; and UNICAMP, them to detect diseases, such as asthma. PUC-Campinas, Brazil) have contributed to Current efforts at CNSD focus on lung cancer augmenting Gouma's research at the Center on detectors that efficiently discriminate between alkanes nanoceramics synthesis and characterization. and alkenes as well as aim at providing a database The Center published a book documenting its for tailored ceramic nanostructured oxides targeting activities during the first five years of operation, specific gas detection. Gouma says nanoceramic summarizing its contributions to advancing nanosensors are likely to be among the first nanomedicine materials science and technology and their use in applications to get to the market, which she describes chemical sensing and biotechnology.39 as "a very good thing." American Ceramic Society Bulletin, Vol. 91, No. 7 | www.ceramics.org L. Pauling, A.B. Robinson, R. Teranishi and P. Cary, “Quantitative analysis of urine vapor and breath by gas–liquid partition chromatography,” Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 68 [10] 2374–76 (1971). 6 V.E. Arterbery, W.A. Pryor, L. Jiang, S.S. Sehnert, W.M. Foster, R.A. Abrams, J.R. Williams, M.D. Wharam Jr. and T.H. Risby, “Breath ethane generation during clinical total body irradiation as a marker of oxygenfree-radical-mediated lipid peroxidation: A case study,” Free Radical Biol. Med., 17 [6] 569–76 (1994). 7 A.D. Smith, J.O. Cowan, S. Filsell, C. McLachlan, G. Monti-Sheehan, P. Jackson and D.R. Taylor, “Diagnosing asthma: Comparisons between exhaled nitric oxide measurements and conventional tests,” Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., 169, 473–78 (2004). 8 T.H. Risby, “Critical issues for breath analysis,” J. Breath Res., 2, 03030 (2008). 9 10 T. Karl, P. Prazeller, D. Mayr, A. Jordan, J. Rieder, R. Fall and W. Lindinger, “Human breath isoprene and its relation to blood cholesterol levels: New measurements,” J. Appl. Psysiol., 91, 762–70 (2001). A. Manolis, “The diagnostic potential of breath analysis,” Clin. Chem., 29/1, 5–15 (1983). 11 S.A. Kharitonov and P.J. Barnes, “Exhaled markers of pulmonary disease: State of the art,” Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., 163, 1693–722 (2001). 12 http://mashable.com/2011/09/07/breathalyzer-medicine/, “Beyond BAC: How the breathalyzer is poised to revolutionize medical diagnostics.” 13 14 http://www.nytimes.com/2005/10/18/ health/18brea.html, “Breath analysis no longer just for drunken drivers.” L. Duckworth, N. Kissoon and K. Sullivan, 15 31 Call for Contributing Editors for ACerS-NIST Phase Equilibria Diagrams Program Nanoceramic Sensors for Medical Applications “Nitric oxide breath analysis: A method for monitoring inflammation in asthma,” Jacksonville Medicine, 485–87, Nov. 1999. http://www.geinstruments.com/productsand-services/nitric-oxide-analyzer 16 http://www.helico.com/pdf/Diagnosis.pdf The General Editors of the reference series Phase Equilibria Diagrams are in need of individuals from the ceramics community to critically evaluate published articles containing phase equilibria diagrams. Additional contributing editors are needed to edit new phase diagrams and write short commentaries to accompany each phase diagram being added to the reference series. Especially needed are persons knowledgeable in foreign languages including German, French, Chinese, and Japanese. Recognition: The Contributing Editor’s initials will accompany each commentary written for the publication. In addition, your name and affiliation also will be included on the Title Pages under Contributing Editors. Qualifications: General understanding of the Gibbs phase rule and experimental procedures for determination of phase equilibria diagrams, and/or knowledge of theoretical methods to calculate phase diagrams. Compensation Per Article: $40 for commentary & first diagram, plus $10 each second & third diagrams, plus $5 for each additional diagram For Details Please Contact: Mrs. Mary Harne National Institute of Standards and Technology 100 Bureau Drive, Stop 8524 Building 223, Room A229 Gaithersburg, MD 20899-8524, USA Tel. 301-975-6109 E-mail: mary.harne @nist.gov P. I. Gouma and M.J. Mills, “Anatase to rutile transformation in titania powders,” J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 84 [3] 619–22 (2001). 30 P.I. Gouma, P.K. Dutta and M.J. Mills, “Structural stability of titania thin films,” Nanostruct. Mater., 11 [8] 1231–37 (1999). 17 31 C.S. Patterson, L.C. McMillan, C. Longbottom, G.M. Gibson, M.J. Padjett and K.D. Skeldon, “Portable optical spectroscopy of ethane in exhaled breath,” Meas. Sci. Technol., 18, 1459–64 (2007). 32 18 19 P.I. Gouma, A.K. Prasad and K.K. Iyer, “Selective nanoprobes for ‘signaling gases’,” Nanotechnology, 17, S48–S53 (2006). Professors, Researchers, Retirees, Post-Docs, and Graduate Students... Sensors special issue),” J. Mater. Sci., 38 [21] 4347–52 (2003). P. Gouma, “Nanostructured oxide-based selective gas sensor arrays for chemical monitoring and medical diagnostics in isolated environments,” Habitation J., 10 [2] 99–104 (2005). 20 Sawicka, A.K. Prasad and P.I. Gouma, “Metal oxide nanowires for use in chemical sensing applications,” Sens. Lett., 3, 1–5 (2005). 21 P. Gouma, K. Kalyanasundaram and A. Bishop, “Electrospun single-crystal MoO3 nanowires for bio-chem sensing probes,” J.Mater. Res. (Nanowires . Nanotubes special issue), 21 [11] 2904–10 (2006). 22 P.I Gouma and K. Kalyanasundaram, “A selective nanosensing probe for nitric oxide,” Appl. Phys. Lett., 93, 244102 (2008). 23 P. Gouma, K. Kalyanasundaram, X. Yun, M. Stanacevic and L. Wang, “Chemical sensor and breath analyzer for ammonia detection in exhaled human breath,” IEEE Sens. J. (Breath Analysis special issue), 10 [1] 49–53 (2010). 24 L. Wang, K. Kalyanasundaram, M. Stanacevic and P. Gouma, “Nanosensor device for breath acetone detection,” Sens. Lett., 8, 1–4 (2010). 25 P. Gouma, A.K. Prasad and M. Stanacevic, “Selective nanosensor device for exhaled breath analysis,” J. Breath Res., 5, 037110 (2011). 26 A.K. Prasad, D. Kubinski and P.I. Gouma, “Comparison of sol–gel and rf sputtered MoO3 thin film gas sensors for selective ammonia detection,” Sens. Actuators B, 9, 25–30 (2003). 27 A.K. Prasad, P.I. Gouma, D.J. Kubinksi, J.H. Visser, R.E. Soltis and P.J. Schmitz, “Reactively sputtered MoO3 films for ammonia sensing,” Thin Solid Films, 436, 46–51 (2003). 28 H. Zhang and J.F. Banfield, “Understanding polymorphic phase transformation behavior during growth of nanocrystalline aggregates: Insights from TiO2,” J. Phys. Chem. B., 104, 3481–87 (2000). M.R. Ranade, A. Navrotsky, H.Z. Zhang, J.F. Banfield, S.H. Elder, A. Zaban, P.H. Borse, S.K. Kulasrni, G.S. Doran and H.J. Whitfield, “Energetics of nanocrystalline TiO2,” Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 99 [2] 6476–81 (2002). 33 M. Figlarz, “New oxides in the WO3– MoO3 system,” Prog. Solid State Chem., 19, 1–46 (1989). 34 35 B. Gérard, G. Nowogrocki, J. Guenot and M. Fitzlarz, “Structural study of a new hexagonal form of tungsten trioxide,” J. Solid State Chem., 29, 429–34 (1979). 36 I.M. Szilagyi, L.S. Wang, P.I. Gouma, C. Balazsi, J. Madarasz and G. Pokol, “Preparation of hexagonal WO3 from hexagonal ammonium tungsten bronze for sensing NH3,” Mater. Res. Bull., 44 [3] 505–508 (2009). 37 L. Wang, “Tailored synthesis and characterization of selective metabolite-detecting nanoprobes for handheld breath analysis”; PhD thesis, SUNY Stony Brook, Stony Brook, N.Y., Dec 2008. K. (Iyer) Kalyanasundaram, “Biomarker sensing using nanostructured metal oxide sensors”; PhD thesis, SUNY Stony Brook, Stony Brook, N.Y., Dec. 2007. 38 39 P. Gouma, Nanomaterials for chemical sensors and biotechnology, Pan Stanford Publishing, Singapore, 2009. 40 R.A. Dweik, P.B. Boggs, S.C. Erzurum, C.G. Irvin, M.W. Leigh, J.O. Lundberg, A.-C. Olin, A.L. Plummer, R.D. Taylor, et al, “An official ATS clinical practice guideline: Interpretation of exhaled nitric oxide levels (FENO) for clinical applications,” Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., 184, 602–15 (2011). n A.K. Prasad and P.I. Gouma, “MoO3 and WO3 based thin film conductimetric sensors for automotive applications (invited paper, 29 32 www.ceramics.org | American Ceramic Society Bulletin, Vol. 91, No. 7 (Credit:Consumer Reports.) Remnants of soda lime silicate glass cookware failure, from Consumer Reports testing. E Shattering glass cookware R.C. Bradt and R.L. Martens The shattering of glass cookware in household kitchens has been reported in Consumer Reports articles,1,2 television documentaries, complaints to the United States Consumer Products Safety Commission3 and Internet postings.4 This article examines the issue from a three fold technical perspective: (i) reviewing the reported scenarios of the incidents, which are suggestive of thermal stress fracture; (ii) comparing the thermal shock resistance of borosilicate glass with soda lime silicate glass; and (iii) examining new and broken glass cookware. Together, these related perspectives suggest the thermal stresses that develop during temperature changes are the primary cause of the explosion-like breakages. The substitution of higher thermal expansion soda lime silicate glass for borosilicate glass in the manufacturing is a contributing factor. xploding† or shattering glass cookware surfaced as an issue of concern during the past two decades, and reports of problems have been chronicled in several news stories. Collectively, the accumulated complaints suggest that there may be a fracture problem with some glass cookware products. However, none of the coverage has specifically addressed the scientific aspects of the reported failures. This article examines the technical aspects of the sudden, explosion-like failure of glass cookware products. Background Corning Inc. pioneered the development and market for glass cookware. The glass cookware products originally manufactured by Corning were made of a low thermal expansion borosilicate glass eventually marketed as Pyrex.5 (Many glass scientists also associate the name Pyrex with the original borosilicate glass products. Even today, Corning still produces high-quality borosilicate laboratory glassware under the name and trademark of Pyrex.) The original Pyrex cookware was promoted as “oven to icebox” or “icebox to oven” cookware,6 presumably because the low coefficient of thermal expansion of the borosilicate glass made it highly resistant to the thermal stresses that develop during these types of temperature changes. Corning retains the Pyrex registered trademark, but, in 1994, the company began licensing other companies to manufacture products under the Pyrex brand (see “From battery jars to kitchens: A short history of glass cookware,” page 35). Today, the Pyrex brand is manufactured for consumer markets in the US, North America, South America and Asia by World Kitchens LLC (Rosemont, Ill.)7 under a license from Corning. A separate company, Arc International (Arques, France),8 manufactures and markets Pyrex brand cookware for the European, Middle East and African consumer markets. Independently, the Anchor Hocking Glass Company9 (Lancaster, Ohio) makes its own line of glass cookware, and has been doing so for many decades under its own brand names. Compositions of glass cookware According to the World Kitchens website,10 Corning changed to a soda lime silicate composition for the glass cookware, and this is the Pyrex tech† Exploding and shattering have been applied interchangeably in reports describing cookware fractures because of accounts of glass shards being propelled for some distance.1–4 The term “explosion” as applied here is not the same as the pressure explosion of a carbonated beverage container. American Ceramic Society Bulletin, Vol. 91, No. 7 | www.ceramics.org 33 Figure 1. An Arc International label for its Pyrex glass cookware products, from cookware purchased in Europe. nology that World Kitchens (then Borden) bought from Corning in 1998. World Kitchens acknowledges that the glass cookware it markets under the Pyrex brand name is made from a soda lime silicate glass composition. On its own, Anchor Hocking developed a “me too” line of cookware that also is based on a soda lime silicate glass. These soda lime silicate glass cookware products appear to be commercial successes. However, they are not made of a low thermal expansion, thermal stress resistant borosilicate glass as originally developed by Corning. Arc International produces a line of glass cookware products. These are of a borosilicate glass composition, which it markets with the phrase “Authentic Pyrex” on the label (Figure 1). † † The three companies that currently manufacture glass cookware—World Kitchens, Anchor Hocking and Arc International—use different silicate glass chemistry formulations. The authors confirmed this by examining the glass chemistry formulations used in the products from each of the three companies using energy dispersive spectroscopy on a FEI Quanta 200 3D scanning electron microscope equipped with an X-ray analyzer Model Apollo XVF from EDAX. The Arc International cookware was determined to be a borosilicate glass with a distinctive, readily identifiable boron peak. It evidently is the original Corning Pyrex composition.5 The tests confirmed, as expected, that neither the World Kitchens nor the Anchor Hocking products are borosilicate glasses, but are soda lime silicate glasses of slightly different compositions. The chemical spectra clearly show the boron peak in the Arc International glassware, but the World Kitchens and Anchor Hocking glassware are free of boron. They are distinguishable by their calcium and magnesium peaks. Indications of thermal stress fracture of glass cookware Before going further, two things should be noted. First, the manufacturers of soda lime silicate glass cookware claim that it has superior mechanical strength and is less likely to fracture on impact, for example by dropping it, a not unreasonable concern in kitchen settings. Second, because of the †† The authors were not able to find any reports of Arc International Pyrex cookware failing in an explosive manner. 34 extensive handling of glass cookware, it is expected that surfaces will become damaged or scratched over time. With these provisos noted, the focus of the authors has been to isolate the effects resulting from thermal stress. What follows below focuses only on the thermal shock properties of the two glass types. Generally speaking, thermal stress fracture of glass is not an uncommon event. For example, impingement of bright sunlight on a portion of large windows can cause them to crack from the shady cold edge, and cold water splashing on hot glass marine light covers frequently fractures them. Much is known and understood about thermal stresses and thermal shock fracture.11 The nature of the published reports of the shattering incidents with the soda lime silicate glass cookware suggests a thorough consideration of thermal stresses because the failure incidents are often associated with significant temperature changes.1–4 The documented and reported glass cookware incidents1–4 suggest that the thermal stress resistance of present day soda lime silicate glass cookware is less than that of lowexpansion borosilicate glass, such as the original Pyrex. For example, some of the glass cookware items have been reported to fracture immediately on a change in temperature, while other cookware fractures occur during a short time after removing the cookware with its contents from a hot oven. (See Consumer Reports example, Figure 2.) Fractures that occur at a time interval after a temperature change, such as after removal of the cookware from a hot oven, are characteristic of thermal stress failures. However, there also are reports of failure while the cookware with its contents is inside Figure 2. Heat test: Frames from video the oven. These of tests conducted by Consumer Reports1 thermal gradients shows bakeware made of soda lime silimay have differcate glass shattering after being heated in ent origins, such a 450°F degree oven and placed on a wet as might develop countertop. www.ceramics.org | American Ceramic Society Bulletin, Vol. 91, No. 7 (Credit: Consumers Union.) Shattering glass cookware if frozen contents are placed in the cookware before being inserted into a hot oven. As described in Introduction to Ceramics, by Kingery, Bowen and Uhlmann,12 delayed thermal stress fractures will often occur after temperature changes. This is because the maximum thermal stress is achieved only as a temperature gradient develops after the temperature change. That delay time for thermal stress fracture depends on the heat transfer conditions of the cookware and the heat capacity of the contents within. For example, preparing a roast, a chicken or a ham in a glass cookware dish would each have different heat capacities and present different heat transfer conditions, and the cooking temperatures of their surroundings would be different as well. Therefore, time delay intervals to fracture are expected to vary. The reports that the soda lime silicate glass cookware experiences these delayed shattering fractures suggests that the thermal stresses that develop exceed its strength. The time dependence of thermal stresses is a function of the heat transfer conditions during the temperature change. These factors determine the magnitude of the temperature From battery jars to kitchens: A short history of glass cookware Today, glass cookware is found in virtually every household kitchen, giving the impression that it has been around a very long time. Many older consumers still associate the Pyrex brand with the Corning company, and most consumers are unaware that the manufacturers of Pyrex and the glass formulation have changed over several decades. Glass cookware is a commercial product of the early 20th Century. Present-day glass cookware appears to have originated from research at what was then known as the Corning Glass Works to improve the thermal shock resistance of battery jars. Corning developed a low-thermal-expansion borosilicate glass that vastly improved the longevity of the battery jar glasses by reducing their thermal shock fracture in service.6 It is an interesting scenario how this glass found its way into household kitchens.6 During the research studies, one of the Corning scientists, Jesse Littleton, took the bottoms of several of Corning’s borosilicate glass jars home for his wife to bake her pies. Her successful culinary endeavors led to the development of a line of cookware and laboratory glassware by Corning that became known as Pyrex. It was initially called “Py-right,” with an obvious “pie” to “py” phonetic association. The glass, itself, was originally called Nonex (NON-EXpanding). This glass appears to have evolved into the famous low-expansion Corning 7740 (tradename Pyrex)5 and other Corning borosilicate glasses. In 1997, the company sold its consumer products business, including Pyrex-branded consumer products, to Borden Inc. (now KKR Borden), which changed its name to World Kitchens in 2006. Corning still owns the Pryex trademark, and it still manufactures Pyrex-branded high-quality laboratory borosilicate glassware. However, most glass cookware in the United States is not the same borosilicate composition as the original Corning Pyrex. American Ceramic Society Bulletin, Vol. 91, No. 7 | www.ceramics.org gradients and cause the thermal stresses. For example, transferring a hot dish containing a roast directly from the oven to a cold wet stone countertop would be a much more severe thermal shock than putting the same dish on an insulating pad surface. Because it is impossible to consider all of the possible variations that might occur in household kitchens, a simple, linear elastic approach to a sudden temperature change is applied to estimate and compare the thermal stress resistance of the two glasses. As noted in Kingery, Bowen and Uhlmann,12 the simple formula for the fully restrained development of a linear elastic thermal stress, σts, from temperature change is σts = αE∆T (1) where α is the coefficient of thermal expansion, E the elastic modulus and ∆T the temperature differential over which the thermal stress or thermal expansion restraint is generated. The ∆T may occur during either heating or cooling. Note that this simple estimate does not include the heat transfer factors, nor time factors, nor does it account for the size and shape of the glass cookware pieces in question. Equation (1) is applicable to an instantaneous, rapid temperature change. To compare the thermal shock fracture resistance of borosilicate and soda lime silicate glasses, Equation (1) is rearranged to express the ∆T values required to achieve fracture by the thermal stresses generated in the glass cookware during a temperature change. These ∆T values can be compared with typical cooking temperatures and other temperature changes that are regularly encountered in a household kitchen. Equating σts to the fracture stress of the glass, σf , then rearranging Equation (1) yields ∆T = σf /αE (2) where the thermal stress, σts, is now σf, the failure strength of the glass object. A typically used benchmark value for glass strength, as noted by Mould13 and also by Kurkjian14 is about 5,000 pounds per square inch (about 30 megapascals). The elastic moduli of the two glasses are slightly different, but similar— about 10,200,000 psi (about 68 gigapascals) for soda lime silicate glass and about 9,100,000 psi (about 62 gigapascals) for borosilicate glass.15 Their coefficients of thermal expansions are very different. The α of borosilicate is about 3 3 10–6°C– 1 . The α of soda lime silicate glass is about 9 3 10–6°C–1, about three times greater.15 Substituting these values into Equation (2) yields the ∆T values of the rapid temperature change necessary to initiate thermal shock fracture. For borosilicate glass, the calculated temperature difference is about 183°C (about 330°F), but it is only about 55°C (about 99°F) for the soda lime silicate glass. This is a substantial difference. Carter and Norton,16 in their text Ceramic Materials, Science and Engineering, use a somewhat more complicated 35 Shattering glass cookware form of Equation (1) that includes heat transfer terms. They address many ceramics as well as glasses. Their results will be compared with the calculations of this simple approach. The αE∆T term is common to all mathematical models. Carter and Norton13 provide an example (which includes heat transfer terms), estimating thermal stress ∆T values for fracture that are about 270°C (about 486°F) for the borosilicate Pyrex and about 80°C (about 144°F) for soda lime silicate glass. Based on these two independent results, it is evident that the temperature differential—the ∆T for fracture initiation by severe thermal stress—is much larger for the borosilicate glass. A brochure posted on Corning’s website17 presents thermal stress resistance estimates of several glasses of various compositions, including its 7740 borosilicate glass and a soda lime silicate glass (Corning 0080). The reported thermal stress resistance value for the borosilicate glass is 54°C (97°F), whereas that of the soda lime silicate glass is 16°C (29°F)—a factor of about three. Thermal stress resistance is defined for this calculation as “the temperature differential between two surfaces of a tube or constrained place that will cause a tensile stress of 0.7 kg/mm (1000 psi) on the cooler surface.” It is important to note that, according to this brochure, the primary use of 0080 is Petri dishes, not household cookware. Also, it must be noted that soda lime silicate glass compositions vary widely, and values of thermal properties will vary, too. However, these data illustrate the magnitude of the difference in thermal stress resistance that is possible between the two categories of glasses. The superior thermal stress resistance of borosilicate glass for cookware was confirmed in empirical tests performed on glass cookware objects by Consumer Reports.1,2 It is informative to compare the ∆T values that have been determined to achieve the fracture stress from the three calculations. Table 1 lists those for the soda lime silicate glass and for Pyrex borosilicate. This tabulation shows that in every instance the ∆T for the soda lime silicate glass is much lower than that for the borosilicate. The difference is about a factor of three times for each despite the differences in the calculations. This is because the thermal expansion of the soda lime silicate glass is about three times that of the borosilicate. Clearly, soda lime glass is much more susceptible to thermal shock than the borosilicate glass because of its higher thermal expansion of coefficient. Table 1 Calculations of thermal differential, ∆T, for soda lime silicate and borosilicate glass. Source ∆T Soda lime silicate ∆T Pyrex borosilicate This paper ~55°C (99°F) ~183°C (330°F) Carter and Norton16 ~80°C (144°F) ~270°C (436°F) Corning brochure17 ~16°C (29°F) ~54°C (97°F) From the perspective of kitchen applications, a good calibration point is that of boiling water, 100°C (212°F) at sea level. None of the calculations suggest the soda lime silicate glass would be likely to survive a rapid exposure to boiling 36 water. Consistent with these calculations, the October 2011 Consumer Reports article describes a boiling water incident that led to explosive fracture of a measuring cup and an accompanying injury.2 Based on recipes in the famous cookbook, The Joy of Cooking, by Rombauer, Becker and Becker,18 these calculated ∆T values of concern are well within the temperature ranges of kitchen cooking endeavors. For example, their recommended oven temperatures are 350°F for a pork loin or rib eye roast (after 450°F preheat) and 325°F for a turkey (after 450°F preheat). Relative to room temperature, these cooking temperatures could easily exceed the expected ∆T values for the thermal stress fracture of soda lime silicate glass and could cause thermal shock fracture. The ∆T value alone does not guarantee thermal fracture of glass cookware. However, because of the low ∆T for soda lime silcate glass, one must exercise extreme caution when using cookware made of this glass. Even at modest kitchen temperatures, there is a definite possibility of thermal shock fracture. Heat strengthening of soda lime silicate glass cookware In Consumer Product Safety Commission correspondence,3 CPSC’s SaverProducts.gov website3 and literature relative to shattering glass cookware, manufacturers have responded that during manufacturing they have taken steps to strengthen the soda lime silicate glass cookware by applying a heat strengthening or a thermal tempering process. The manufacturers assert that the process increases the strength of the glass, its impact resistance and its resistance to thermal stress fracture.19 This strengthening approach is discussed by Mencik.20 In a related publication, Gardon21 extensively reviews the annealing and tempering processes, of which heat strengthening is a variant. In principle, this approach has technical merit, because increasing the glass cookware strength would be expected to increase the ∆T values for thermal shock fracture initiation. (Recall that the glass strength, σf, is in the numerator of Equation (2) for ∆T.) It is possible to detect residual stresses in glass via photoelasticity. Thus, to test this heat-strengthening issue, the authors bought a half dozen new, unused soda lime silicate cookware pieces, which were then examined in the photoelasticity laboratory at the University of Alabama. The authors observed no strong fringe patterns, which would be indicative of residual stresses, in any of the cookware. Although this could be the result of low-stress optic coefficients of the soda lime silicate glasses, it also suggests that the efficacy of heat strengthening that may have been applied to the cookware during manufacturing was minimal and was not sufficient to significantly increase strength or thermal stress resistance of the soda lime silica cookware. It is well documented that thermally strengthened glasses also have a characteristic cracking pattern when they fracture. Tempered glass breaks into small equiaxed pieces in a fracture process known as dicing. Automobile glass, for www.ceramics.org | American Ceramic Society Bulletin, Vol. 91, No. 7 (Credit: G. Quinn.) Fracture origin Figure 3. A reconstructed soda lime silicate Pyrex bowl fractured by thermal shock. Arrows outline the crack paths. delay to fracture initiation after a temperature change; and (iii) calculated temperature differentials, the ∆T values for the initiation of thermal shock fracture during temperature changes of soda lime silicate and borosilicate glasses. In addition, the creation of fracture shards instead of desired dicing of broken pieces of cookware suggests that manufacturers’ heat strengthening is insufficient. Fracture-initiating temperature differentials can be exceeded during household kitchen cooking. However, not all kitchen procedures create ∆T values that are sufficient to cause thermal stress fracture of the soda lime silicate glass cookware. Time-dependent heat transfer conditions also will affect the magnitude of the thermal stresses that develop. The original Corning Pyrex borosilicate glass is considerably more resistant to thermal stress fracture than the soda lime silicate glasses that currently are used for most glass cookware products in the US. The estimated ∆T values for (Credit: Fractograph supplied by G. Quinn.) example, fractures by dicing into small fragments. McMaster, Shetterly and Bueno22 depict this form of fragmentation in their review, and creation of these dicing fragments has been analyzed in detail by Warren.23 The authors’ examination of fracture pieces of several dishes, including some that were intentionally broken by thermal stress and some by impact, revealed no dicing fragmentation. The soda lime silicate cookware consistently fractured into extended glass shards. The large shards produced by the fracture of the soda lime silicate cookware imply that the thermal or heat strengthening of the soda lime silicate cookware was not substantive. Figure 3 illustrates a reconstructed “Pyrex” bowl that was purchased new and intentionally thermal shocked in a household kitchen. There is no evidence of dicing fracture. The occurrence of long sharp glass shards is also described in numerous reports on the Internet and in the CPSC literature. Another tool for evaluating whether there is significant heat strengthening of soda lime silicate glass is fractography, which can reveal information about the stress state of a fractured piece. When a glass object with surface compressive stresses fractures, the propagating crack front in the glass proceeds ahead of the crack at the object surface because the near-surface advance is inhibited by the surface compressive stresses.24 Indeed, the crack growth pattern on the fracture surface of shards of soda lime silicate glass cookware, as shown in Figure 4, indicates that the soda lime silicate glass has been heat strengthened. Note the Wallner line ripples on the cross section clearly are trailing at the glass surfaces, indicative of surface compressive stresses. (Wallner lines are slight ripples on a fracture surface that are indicative of the direction of crack propagation and the state of stress.) Thus, although the cookware definitely has been heat strengthened as stated by the manufacturer,19 it does not appear to be sufficient to increase substantially the thermal stress fracture resistance of the cookware, nor is it sufficient to create a desirable dicing fracture pattern for the glass cookware. Extensive, in-depth fractography of the fracture surfaces of shards from a large number or series of different reconstructed broken soda lime silicate cookware pieces would make it possible to identify the causes of individual failure events. Such studies, as described by Quinn25 in Fractography of Ceramics and Glasses, are recommended, but are beyond the scope of this article. Conclusions about shattering glass cookware The above analyses of shattering soda lime silicate glass cookware indicate that the phenomenological cause of these fractures is thermal stress fracture that develops from temperature changes to which the glass cookware is subjected in the household kitchen. This conclusion is substantiated by three observations: (i) occurrence of the shattering incidents during temperature changes; (ii) the frequent presence of a time American Ceramic Society Bulletin, Vol. 91, No. 7 | www.ceramics.org Figure 4. The fracture surface of a soda lime silicate glass cookware bowl (from bowl in Figure 3) as it formed during thermal shock failure. Note the Wallner lines trailing along the surfaces, inside and out, are indicative of heat strengthening of the glass during manufacturing.22 37 Shattering glass cookware thermal stress fracture of that borosilicate glass suggest that normal kitchen cooking temperatures are unlikely to cause thermal stress failures. However, the estimated ∆T values for thermal stress fracture of soda lime silicate glass cookware are well within the range of kitchen temperatures. Estimates of the ∆T temperature differentials indicate that soda lime silicate glass cookware can be expected to survive moderate temperature changes that are experienced in a household kitchen. However, documented reports of incidents of dramatic shattering failures during what most kitchen cooks would consider normal use suggests that the margin of safety for avoiding thermal stress failures of soda lime silicate cookware is borderline. It does not appear to be adequate for all household cooking. Caution is in order when using soda lime silicate cookware in applications that may involve temperature changes, as print warnings on the product labels indicate. References “Glass Bakeware that Shatters,” Consumer Reports, 44–48, January (2011). 1 “Shattered Glass,” Consumer Reports, 40–42, October (2011). 2 Consumer Products Safety Commission, and the CPSC’s SaferProdcuts.gov website, searched under “pyrex” and “glass cookware.” 3 Internet listings under “exploding pyrex.” 4 National Institute of Standards and Technology, http://www.physics. nist.gov/cgi-bin/Star/compos.pl?natno=169. 5 M.B.W. Graham and A.T. Shuldinier, Corning and the Craft of Innovation, pp. 55–58. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, 2001. 6 World Kitchens, Rosemont, Ill. 7 ARC International Cookware SAS, or ARC International Cookware Ltd., France. 8 9 Anchor Hocking Glass Co., Lancaster, Ohio. http://www.pyrexware.com/index.asp?pageId=30#TruthID30, viewed 3/30/2012 10 Acknowlegements The authors acknowledge the suggestions and assistance of M. Barkey, L.D. Pye, G. Quinn, S. Freiman, E. De Guire and P. Wray in the preparation of this manuscript. Special thanks are extended to G. Quinn for Figures 3 and 4. 11 About the authors 13 R.C. Bradt is the Alton N. Scott Professor in the College of Engineering at the University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, Ala. He presented an invited paper at ACerS Glass & Optical Materials Division meeting in 2011. He also has served as an expert witness in litigation cases involving glass cookware failures. R. Martens is manager of the Central Analytical Facility at the University of Alabama. Contact: rcbradt@eng.ua.edu Thermal Stresses in Materials and Structures in Severe Thermal Environments. Edited by D.P.H. Hasselman, et al., Plenum, New York, 1980. W.D. Kingery, H.K. Bowen and D.R. Uhlmann, Introduction to Ceramics; pp. 816–844. Wiley, New York, 1976. 12 R.E. Mould, “The Strength of Inorganic Glasses”; pp. 119–49 in Fundamental Phemonena in the Materials Sciences, Vol. 4. Edited by L.J. Bonis, J.J. Duga and J.J. Gilman. Plenum, New York, 1967. C.R. Kurkjian, “The Mechanical Strength of Glasses—Then and Now,” The Glass Researcher, 11 [2] 1–6 (2002). 14 Properties of Corning’s Glass and Glass Ceramic Families. Corning Incorporated, Sullivan Park, Corning, NY, 1979. 15 C.B Carter and M.G. Norton, Ceramic Materials, Science and Engineering; p. 633. Springer, New York, 2007. 16 http://catalog2.corning.com/Lifesciences/media/pdf/Thermal_ Properties_of_Corning_Glasses.pdf, viewed 3/30/2012. 17 I.S. Rombauer, M.R. Becker and E. Becker, Joy of Cooking. Scribner, New York, 1997. 18 http://www.consumeraffairs.com/news04/2008/08/pyrex_response. html, viewed 3/30/2012. 19 J.Mencik, “Strength and Fracture of Glass and Ceramics”; pp. 250–57 in Elsevier Glass Science & Technology, Vol. 12. Elsevier, Amsterdam, Netherlands, 1992. 20 R. Gardon, “Evolution of Theories of Annealing and Tempering: Historical Perspective,” Am. Ceran. Soc. Bull., 66 [11], 1594–99 (1987). 21 R.A. McMaster, D.M. Shetterly and A.G. Bueno, “Annealed and Tempered Glass”; pp. 453–59 in Ceramics and Glasses, Vol. 4, Engineered Materials Handbooks. American Society of Metals, 1991. 22 P.D. Warren, “Fragmentation of Thermally Strengthened Glass”; pp. 389–402 in Advances in Ceramics, Vol. 122. Edited by J.R. Varner and G.D. Quinn. American Ceramic Society, Westerville, Ohio, 2000. 23 V.D. Frechette, “Failure Analysis of Brittle Materials”; pp. 7–20 in Advances in Ceramics, Vol. 28. American Ceramic Society, Westerville, Ohio, 1990. 24 A 1936 adver advertisement for the original Pyrex borosilicate glass cookware. 38 G.D. Quinn, Fractography of Ceramic and Glasses, NIST Special Publication 960-16. US Government Printing Office, Washington, DC, 2007.n 25 www.ceramics.org | American Ceramic Society Bulletin, Vol. 91, No. 7 ® OctOber 7–11, 2012 DaviD L. Lawrence cOnventiOn center Pittsburgh, PennsyLvania usa Materials Science & Technology 2012 Conference & Exhibition www.matscitech.org Premeeting Planner The leading forum addressing structure, properties, processing and performance across the materials community. Sponsored by Organized by Join us for the ACerS 114th Annual Meeting! ACerS Lectures Sunday, Oct. 7 5:00 – 6:00 p.m. ACerS Frontiers of Science and Society— Rustum Roy Lecture Kennette Benedict, Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists “Dilemmas of Nuclear Materials and Technology: From Los Alamos to Natanz” Monday, Oct. 8 8:00 – 10:00 a.m. Plenary Session “Challenges for Materials-Intensive Industries: Energy, Transportation and Consumer Products” 10:20 a.m. – 12:00 p.m. ACerS Alfred R. Cooper Award Session “Science & Technology of Chemical Strengthening of Glass,” Arun K. Varshneya, Saxon Glass Technologies Inc. and Alfred University Tuesday, Oct. 9 8:00 – 9:00 a.m. ACerS Arthur L. Friedberg Ceramic Engineering Tutorial and Lecture “Modeling of Transport Phenomena in the Glass Industry: Some Illustrations,” Manoj Choudhary, Owens-Corning 1:00 – 2:00 p.m. ACerS Edward Orton Jr. Memorial Lecture “Nanogenerators and Piezotronics—From Basic Science to Novel Applications,” Zhong Lin Wang, Georgia Institute of Technology Wednesday, Oct. 10 1:00 – 2:00 p.m. ACerS Robert B. Sosman Lecture “Local Interactions and Consequent Properties of Oxide Surfaces and Interfaces: Lessons Learned from SPM,” Dawn A. Bonnell, University of Pennsylvania 2:00 – 4:40 p.m. ACerS Richard M. Fulrath Award Session – Japanese Academic: Kiyoshi Shimamura, National Institute for Materials Science, “Novel Single Crystals for Optical Applications” – Japanese Industrial 1: Yukihiro Kanechika, Tokuyama Corp., “Research and Development of High-Performance AlN Ceramics” – American Industrial: Ram Devanathan, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, “Ionic Conductivity and Radiation Tolerance of RareEarth Compounds” – Japanese Industrial 2: Toshimasa Suzuki, Taiyo Yuden Co., “ThinFilm Ferroelectric Materials for Decoupling and Tunable Capacitors” – American Academic: Elizabeth C. Dickey, North Carolina State University, “Point Defect Dynamics in Metal Oxides” American Ceramic Society Bulletin, Vol. 91, No. 7 | www.ceramics.org 39 ® Special Events Materials Science & Technology 2012 Conference & Exhibition Plenary Session October 7–11, 2012 | David L. Lawrence Convention Center | Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA Monday, Oct. 8, 2012 8:00 a.m. – 10:00 a.m. | Ballroom 1 Q & A session will follow the presentations. Challenges for Materials-Intensive Industries: Energy, Transportation and Consumer Products With ever-shortening product development cycles, increasing global competition and greater societal and customer demands, industry faces challenges on many fronts. This plenary session will focus on industries in which materials innovation represents an important component of their strategic advantage. Executives representing three diverse sectors of energy, transportation and consumer products will address their company’s R&D priorities as well as workforce development needs. Perspectives on the role of integrated computational modeling, digital data and experimental validation in translating R&D to commercialization will be offered. The format for the Opening Plenary session will consist of three 30-minute presentations followed by moderated Q&A. Confirmed Plenary Speakers Matthew J. Zaluzec Global Materials & Manufacturing Research Ford Motor Company, Research & Advanced Engineering 40 Network with your colleagues, meet new people and learn about the exciting membership offerings of the organizing societies. Monday, Oct. 8, 2012 ACerS 114th Annual Meeting 1:00 p.m. – 2:00 p.m. Newly elected officers take their positions and the Annual Membership Meeting is held. All ACerS members and guests are encouraged to attend. Women in Materials Science and Engineering Reception 5:30 p.m. – 6:30 p.m. Enjoy the chance to network with professionals and peers in a relaxed environment. ACerS Annual Honors and Awards Banquet 7:30 p.m. – 10:00 p.m. Enjoy dinner, conversation and the presentation of Society awards. Purchase tickets for $80 via the registration form. Tuesday, Oct. 9, 2012 MS&T Young Professionals Reception 5:00 p.m. – 6:00 p.m. Attend this reception to meet and network with fellow young professionals. Exhibit Happy Hour Reception 4:00 p.m. – 6:00 p.m. Network with colleagues and build relationships with qualified attendees, buyers and prospects! Hotel Information Please note that MS&T has assumed a financial liability for hotel rooms in blocks that are not reserved by attendees. We ask that you reserve your room at one of the hotels listed below in order to limit our financial liability and ensure the overall success of the meeting. MS&T has arranged for discounted rates at: Westin Convention Center Hotel Zaluzec Luana Iorio Technology Leader–Manufacturing Technologies GE Global Research Iorio Terry P. Smith Technical Director 3M Corporate Research Materials Laboratory Smith Sunday, Oct. 7, 2012 Welcome Reception 6:00 p.m. – 7:30 p.m. ACerS Headquarters Hotel Omni William Penn Marriott City Center Renaissance Pittsburgh Hotel * All government rates are sold out. Reserve your room at www.matscitech.org by September 11 to take advantage of the discount. Early-bird savings end Sept. 11, 2012 www.ceramics.org | American Ceramic Society Bulletin, Vol. 91, No. 7 Program-at-a-Glance Mon Mon Tue Tue Wed Wed Thu a.m. p.m. a.m. p.m. a.m. p.m. a.m. BIOMATERIALS Bio-inspired Materials Engineering Nanomaterials and Nanodevices Next-Generation Biomaterials Surface Properties of Biomaterials III • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • CERAMIC AND GLASS MATERIALS Ceramic-Matrix Composites Glass and Optical Materials Innovative Processing and Synthesis of Ceramics, Glasses and Composites International Symposium on Defects, Transport and Related Phenomena Multifunctional Oxides Novel Sintering Processes and News in Conventional Sintering and Grain Growth Richard M. Fulrath Award Session Solution-Based Processing for Ceramic Materials Sosman Award Symposium: Local Phenomena at Surfaces and Interfaces • ELECTRONIC AND MAGNETIC MATERIALS Advances in Dielectric Materials and Electronic Devices Controlled Synthesis, Processing and Applications of Structural and Functional Nanomaterials Magnetoelectric Multiferroic Thin Films and Multilayers Pb-Free Solders and Next-Generation Interconnects Semiconductor Heterostructures: Theory, Growth, Characterization and Device Applications • • • ENERGY ISSUES • • FUNDAMENTALS AND CHARACTERIZATION Failure Analysis and Prevention Frontiers of Materials Science: Fundamentals of Porous Materials from Development to Applications Fundamental Understanding of High-Entropy Alloy Formations and Their Properties In-Situ Characterization of Phase Transformations in Materials Integrated Computational Materials Engineering: The Customer’s Point of View Microstructure-Based Property Prediction and Small-Scale Experimental Validation Multiscale Modeling of Microstructure Deformation in Material Processing Phase Stability, Diffusion, Kinetics and Their Applications Quantification of Texture and Microstructure Gradients in Polycrystalline Materials • IRON AND STEEL Advances in Zinc-Based Coating Technologies for Steel Sheet Recent Developments in High-Strength Steels for Energy Applications Recent Developments in Steel Processing Steel Product Metallurgy and Applications American Ceramic Society Bulletin, Vol. 91, No. 7 | www.ceramics.org • • • • • • Register at www.matscitech.org today! Energy Conversion—Photovoltaic, Concentrating Solar Power and Thermoelectric Energy Storage: Materials, Systems and Applications Materials Development for Nuclear Applications and Extreme Environments Materials Issues in Nuclear Waste Management in the 21st Century Nanotechnology for Energy, Environment, Healthcare and Industry 41 ® Program-at-a-Glance Materials Science & Technology 2012 Conference & Exhibition Mon Mon Tue Tue Wed Wed Thu a.m. p.m. a.m. p.m. a.m. p.m. a.m. October 7–11, 2012 | David L. Lawrence Convention Center | Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA MATERIALS–ENVIRONMENT INTERACTIONS 42 Advanced Understanding of the Atmospheric Corrosion of Materials Coatings for Corrosion and Wear-Resistance Applications Development of Advanced Alloys and Coating Systems for Demanding Oil and Gas Applications Environmentally Assisted Cracking of Materials Surface Protection for Enhanced Materials Performance: Science, Technology and Applications • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • MATERIALS PERFORMANCE Beyond Nickel-Based Superalloys II Boron, Boron Compounds and Boron Nanomaterials: Structure, Properties, Processing and Applications Functional and Innovative Composites Materials, Structures and System Design for Extreme Environments in Aerospace and Energy Applications Multifunctional Materials for Aerospace and Defense: Challenges and Prospects Novel Methods for Deformation Testing of Metals and Materials Symposium on the Fatigue of Materials II: Advances and Emergences in Understanding Titanium Alloys for Demanding Applications Recent Advances in Phase Transformations and Structural Evolution in Titanium and its Alloys • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • PROCESSING AND PRODUCT MANUFACTURING Additive Manufacturing of Metals Advanced Materials, Processes and Applications for Additive Manufacturing Advances in Metal-Casting Technologies Design of Forming Processes and Tooling in Transforming Materials Green Technologies for Materials Manufacturing and Processing IV Joining of Advanced and Specialty Materials (JASM XIV) Powder Metallurgy Processing and Products • • • • • SPECIAL TOPICS ACerS Arthur L. Friedberg Ceramic Engineering Tutorial and Lecture ACerS Alfred R. Cooper Award Session ACerS Edward Orton Jr. Memorial Lecture ACerS Richard M. Fulrath Award Session AIST Adolf Martens Memorial Steel Lecture ASM Alpha Sigma Mu Lecture ASM Edward Demille Campbell Lecture ASM/TMS Distinguished Lecture Continuous Improvement of Academic Programs (and Satisfying ABET along the Way)—Elizabeth Judson Memorial Symposium Industrial Involvement in Academia: Anthony Pengidore Memorial Symposium MS&T’12 Plenary: Challenges for Materials-Intensive Industries: Energy, Transportation and Consumer Products Perspectives for Emerging Materials Professionals Raymond W. Buckman Jr. Memorial Symposium for Refractory Metals and Alloys Solidification, Crystal Growth and Microstructural Correlation with Properties of Materials: To Celebrate 75th Birthday of Prof. Martin E. Glicksman • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • www.ceramics.org | American Ceramic Society Bulletin, Vol. 91, No. 7 General activities (Information subject to change) Legend: CC = David L. Lawrence Convention Center WE = Westin Convention Center Event Time Location Sunday, Oct. 7 Conference Activities Registration 2:00 to 7:30 p.m. Society Member Lounges 2:00 to 7:30 p.m. ACerS/BSD Ceramographics Display 2:00 to 7:30 p.m. Welcome Reception 6:00 to 7:30 p.m. Lectures/Workshop Frontiers of Science and Society— 5:00 to 6:00 p.m. Rustum Roy Lecture Material Advantage Student Functions Chapter Leadership Workshop 10:00 a.m. to Noon Career Development Sessions 1:00 to 4:00 p.m. Undergraduate Student Speaking Contest Semifinal Rounds 1:00 to 3:00 p.m. Final Round 4:00 to 5:00 p.m. Undergraduate Student Poster 6:00 to 7:30 p.m. Contest Display Student Networking Mixer 8:00 to 10:00 p.m. CC CC CC CC CC WE WE WE WE CC WE Time Location Lectures/Workshops ACerS Arthur L. Friedberg Ceramic 8:00 to 9:00 a.m. CC Engineering Tutorial and Lecture Professor Martin E. Glicksman 8:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. CC Honorary Symposium Raymond W. Buckman Jr. Memorial 8:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. CC Symposium Edward DeMille Campbell Memorial 12:45 to 1:45 p.m. CC Lecture ACerS Edward Orton Jr. Memorial 1:00 to 2:00 p.m. CC Lecture Material Advantage Student Functions Undergraduate Student Poster 7:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. CC Contest Display Material Advantage Mug Drop Contest 11:15 a.m. to 12:15 p.m.CC Young Leaders Tutorial Luncheon Noon to 2:00 p.m. CC Student Awards Ceremony 2:00 to 3:00 p.m. CC Social Functions Young Professionals Reception 5:00 to 6:00 p.m. CC Wednesday, Oct. 10 Monday, Oct. 8 CC CC CC CC CC CC CC CC CC CC CC CC CC WE CC WE WE CC Tuesday, Oct. 9 7:00 to 8:00 a.m. 7:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. 7:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. 7:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. 9:45 a.m. to 2:00 p.m. CC CC CC CC CC 11:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m.CC 11:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m.CC 11:30 a.m. to 2:00 p.m.CC 2:00 to 6:00 p.m. CC 11:00 a.m. to 2:00 p.m. 4:00 to 6:00 p.m. 4:00 to 6:00 p.m. CC American Ceramic Society Bulletin, Vol. 91, No. 7 | www.ceramics.org Conference Activities Authors’ Coffee 7:00 to 8:00 a.m. CC Registration 7:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. CC Society Member Lounges 7:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. CC ACerS/BSD Ceramographics Display 7:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. CC MS&T’12 Exhibit - Exhibit Hall A Show Hours 10:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m.CC Poster Session 10:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m.CC Professional Recruitment & Career 10:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m.CC Pavilion MS&T Food Court 11:30 a.m. to 2:00 p.m.CC Refreshment Break 3:00 to 4:00 p.m. CC Lectures/Workshops Professor Martin E. Glicksman 8:00 a.m. to Noon CC Honorary Symposium Raymond W. Buckman Jr. Memorial 8:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. CC Symposium Perspectives for Emerging Materials 8:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. CC Professionals ACerS Robert B. Sosman Lecture 1:00 to 2:00 p.m. CC Material Advantage Student Functions Undergraduate Student Poster 7:00 a.m. to 1:00 p.m. CC Contest Display Thursday, Oct. 11 Conference Activities Authors’ Coffee Registration Society Member Lounges Educational Courses Focused Ion Beams and Secondary Ion Mass Spectrometry Mechanical Properties of Ceramics and Glass Physical Foundations of Electroceramics for Microelectronics Sintering of Ceramics 7:00 to 8:00 a.m. 7:00 a.m. to Noon 7:00 a.m. to Noon CC CC CC 8:30 a.m. to 5:30 p.m. WE 8:30 a.m. to 5:30 p.m. WE 8:30 a.m. to 5:30 p.m. WE 8:30 a.m. to 5:30 p.m. WE Friday, Oct. 12 Educational Courses Mechanical Properties of Ceramics and Glass Physical Foundations of Electroceramics for Microelectronics Sintering of Ceramics Register at www.matscitech.org today! Conference Activities Authors’ Coffee 7:00 to 8:00 a.m. Registration 7:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. Society Member Lounges 7:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. ACerS/BSD Ceramographics Display 7:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. Lectures MS&T’12 Plenary Session 8:00 to 10:00 a.m. Professor Martin E. Glicksman 8:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. Honorary Symposium ACerS Alfred R. Cooper Award Session 10:20 a.m. to Noon ACerS Richard M. Fulrath Award Session 2:00 to 4:40 p.m. Raymond W. Buckman Jr. Memorial 2:00 to 6:00 p.m. Symposium Elizabeth Judson Memorial Symposium 2:00 to 5:00 p.m. Anthony Pengidore Memorial 2:00 to 5:00 p.m. Material Advantage Student Functions Undergraduate Student 7:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. Poster Contest Display ACerS Student Tour 2:00 to 5:00 p.m. Social Functions ACerS Companion Breakfast 7:30 to 10:00 a.m. MS&T Women in Materials Science 5:30 to 6:30 p.m. Reception ACerS Banquet Reception 6:45 to 7:30 p.m. ACerS Annual Honors & Awards Banquet 7:30 to 10:00 p.m. Annual Meetings ACerS Annual Membership Meeting 1:00 to 2:00 p.m. Conference Activities Authors’ Coffee Registration Society Member Lounges ACerS/BSD Ceramographics Display Guest Tour—Pittsburgh Bites and Bits MS&T’12 Exhibit – Exhibit Hall A Show Hours Professional Recruitment & Career Pavilion MS&T Food Court Poster Session Poster Set Up Authors Present with Posters Happy Hour Reception Event 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. WE 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. WE 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. WE 43 ® Materials Science & Technology 2012 Conference & Exhibition Event October 7–11, 2012 | David L. Lawrence Convention Center | Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA Legend: CC = David L. Lawrence Convention Center WE = Westin Convention Center Time Sunday, Oct. 7 44 ACerS Committee Meetings (Information subject to change) Publications Committee Meeting ED Executive Committee Meeting BSD Executive Committee Meeting NETD Executive Committee Meeting ECD Executive Committee Meeting GOMD Programming & Executive Committee Meeting Monday, Oct. 8 Meetings Committee Meeting BSD General Business Meeting ED General Business Meeting EIC Business Meeting NETD General Business Meeting Location 12:30 – 3:00 p.m. 1:00 – 4:00 p.m. 2:30 – 4:30 p.m. 2:30 – 4:30 p.m. 3:00 – 4:30 p.m. 3:00 – 4:30 p.m. WE WE WE WE WE WE 8:30 – 10:00 a.m. Noon – 1:00 p.m. Noon – 1:00 p.m. 2:00 – 4:00 p.m. 5:45 – 6:45 p.m. WE CC CC WE CC Event Tuesday, Oct. 9 IJAGS Associate Editors Meeting ECD General Business Meeting GOMD General Business Meeting Panel of Fellows Meeting Wednesday, Oct. 10 Strategic Planning for Emerging Opportunities Committee Meeting Books Subcommittee Time Location 11:30 a.m.– 1:00 p.m. Noon – 1:00 p.m. 5:30 – 6:30 p.m. 3:00 – 5:00 p.m. CC CC CC WE 7:30 – 9:00 a.m. WE 3:00 – 4:00, p.m. CC Short courses Register for short courses at www.ceramics.org/shortcourses. Thursday, Oct. 11 8:30 a.m. – 5:30 p.m. Focused Ion Beams and Secondary Ion Mass Spectrometry Instructor: Fred Stevie, North Carolina State University Description: The course begins with a discussion of the components of a FIB system, including the liquid metal ion source. The interaction of ions with matter is presented and the ion-beam-assisted chemical vapor deposition process and the gas source method used to improve etch rate are explained. Current FIB instrumentation, including FIB-SEM combination instruments, is described. Next, SIMS is compared with other commonly used analytical techniques (AES, XPS, RBS and TEM). The SIMS process is discussed. Static sputtering versus dynamic sputtering is addressed. Become familiar with these two major materials analysis techniques. Attendees will learn the capabilities of current instrumentation and the principal applications. Applications for ceramics will be discussed, but the main goal is to provide an understanding of the two techniques. Thursday, Oct. 11– Friday, Oct. 12 8:30 a.m. – 5:30 p.m. | 8:30 a.m. – 4:30 p.m. Mechanical Properties of Ceramics and Glass Instructors: George D. Quinn, NIST, and Richard C. Bradt, University of Alabama Description: The course addresses the mechanical properties of ceramics and glasses for elastic properties, strength measurements, fracture parameters and indentation hardness. For each of these topical areas, the fundamentals of the properties are explained, discussed and related to the structure and crystal chemistry of the materials and their microstructure. Standard test methods are covered. Attendees will be exposed to the structures and properties of ceramics and glasses, learn standard test methods for the listed mechanical properties and complete these tests and understand the results. In addition, attendees will learn how the results of some tests may be used to design with ceramics and glasses, and about postmortem analysis of failures. Special topics include: • Stress, Strain and Elastic Properties • Measuring Elastic Properties • Theoretical Strength, Fracture and Fracture Toughness/R-Curves • Measuring the Fracture Toughness • Strength Test Methods • Weibull Derivation and Weibull Statistics, Standards, Graphs, Multiple Flaw Populations • Flaw Growth and Fatigue • Flaws and Fractography • Hardness of Ceramics. 8:30 a.m. – 5:30 p.m. | 8:30 a.m. – 4:30 p.m. Physical Foundations of Electroceramics for Microelectronics Instructor: R.K. Pandey, Texas State University Description: Electroceramics have become an integral part of modern microelectronics because of advancements made in the past decade and the advent of multifunctional oxides, multiferroics, spintronics, rad-hard electronics, bioelectronics, detectors and sensors, etc. The objective is to bring current state of knowledge in this field and emphasize practical applications, potentials for inventions as well as prospects for commercialization. Key topics include: • Introduction to the interacting forces connecting the fundamental physical properties • Importance and explanation of non-centro-symmetric crystal structures and symmetry groups for understanding the nonlinear phenomena exhibited by dielectrics • Physical basis of multifunctional materials and multiferroics and their applications • Nonlinear magnetics and their applications • Oxide wide-bandgap semiconductors for spintronics, bioelectronics and rad-hard electronics • Detectors and sensors. 8:30 a.m. – 5:30 p.m. | 8:30 – 11:30 a.m. Sintering of Ceramics Instructor: Mohamed N. Rahaman, Missouri University of Science and Technology Description: The course covers a review of sintering basics: characterization of sintering (methods used to measure/monitor the progress of sintering); driving forces; diffusion and defect chemistry; solid-state and viscous sintering; microstructure development and control; liquid-phase sintering; special topics—effect of homogeneities on sintering; constrained sintering of composites, adherent thin films and multilayers; solid solutions additives (dopants); reaction sintering; viscous sintering with crystallization; sintering practice—‘how to do’ sintering; effect of various materials and processing parameters on sintering; and case studies. The attendee will develop sufficient background in the principles and practice of sintering to be able to • Do sintering to achieve specified target microstructures • Understand the difficulties encountered in practical sintering • Take practical steps to rectify the problems encountered in producing required target microstructures. www.ceramics.org | American Ceramic Society Bulletin, Vol. 91, No. 7 MS&T’12 Exhibitors (as of 07/26/12) Company Booth# Company Booth# Company 315 332 201 532 214 T14 610 408 425 414 308 516 ABCR GmbH & Co. Across International AdValue Technology LLC Advanced Abrasives Agilent Technologies AK Steel Aldrich Material Science Alfa Aesar, a Johnson Matthey Co. Alfred University Allied High Tech Products Inc. American Stress Technologies Inc. Analytical Reference Materials International Angstrom Scientific Inc. Applied Test Systems Inc. Arcelor Mittal Asko Inc. ASM International Avure Technologies Inc. BigC: Dino-Lite Scopes Boise University Bose Corp. – ElectroForce Systems Buehler Business Expert & Press Carbolite Carl Zeiss Microscopy LLC Carpenter Technology Corp. Centorr Vacuum Industries Inc. Clemex CM Furnaces Inc. CompuTherm LLC Custom Milling & Consulting Inc. Decagon Devices Engineered Pressure Systems Inc. EMSL Analytical Inc. Evans Analytical Group FEI Co. Focus GmbH Gasbarre Products Inc. (PTX-Pentronix) Goodfellow Corp. 405 315 310 508 504 533 517 600 500 528 327 233 623 410 400 200 603 317 621 Granta Design H.C. Starck Harrop Industries Inc. Hitachi High Technologies America Inc. Horiba Scientific Hysitron Inc. International Centre for Diffraction Data IXRF Systems Inc. JEOL USA Inc. Jordi Labs LLC Kennametal ISA Kurt J. Lesker Co. Laeis GmbH Lapmaster International LLC Leco Corp. Leica Microsystems Maney Publishing Material Interface Inc. Minerals, Metals & Materials Society (The) Metal Samples Co. Metcut Research Inc. Metkon Instruments Micro Materials Micromeritics Instruments Corp. Microtrac Momentum Press MTI Corp. MTS Systems Corp. Nanovea Netzsch Instruments North America LLC NIST NSL Analytical Services Inc. Oak Ridge National Laboratory Ocean Optics 614 615 501 210 203 426 314 511 520 205 T12 505 T11 518 215 309 208 616 521 401 620 605 509 417 505 T7 T6 237 524 608 503 206 601 604 336 Olympus America Inc. Olympus Innovx Oxford Instruments PANalytical Pittcon 2013 Powder Processing Technology LLC Proto Manufacturing Inc. Resodyn Acoustic Mixers Rigaku Americas Corp. RJ Lee Group Inc. Saudi Aramco Sente Software Ltd. SMS-Millcraft LLC Spectro Analytical Instruments Springer Struers Inc. Swindell Dressler International Co. TA Instruments TEC Tescan USA Thermal Technology LLC Thermcraft Inc. Thermo Scientific Thermo-Calc Software Thermotech Timken Co. (The) TMK IPSCO TQ Electronics Inc. UES Inc. Union Process Inc. United Testing Systems Inc. Vision Research Inc. Westmoreland Testing & Research Inc. Wiley Zircar Ceramics 316 514 T8 T16 619 419 333 638 519 337 632 515 300 T13 424 427 421 319 624 428 325 204 526 609 602 525 324 305 415 431 328 432 538 632 536 409 321 301 209 318 437 225 Contact Pat Janeway to reserve your booth. pjaneway@ceramics.org | 614-794-5826 Young Professional Programming at MS&T’12 Monday, Oct. 8 | 12:30 – 4 p.m. Plant Tour – Hosted by AIST Tuesday, Oct. 9 | 8 a.m. – 4:20 p.m. Symposium: Perspectives for Emerging Materials Professionals – Hosted by ASM International Tuesday, Oct. 9 | Noon – 2 p.m. Young Leader Tutorial Luncheon – Hosted by TMS Register at www.matscitech.org today! Booth# Tuesday, Oct. 9 | 5 – 6 p.m. Young Professionals Reception – Hosted by ACerS American Ceramic Society Bulletin, Vol. 91, No. 7 | www.ceramics.org 45 Overview and Schedule Innovations in Biomedical Materials 2012 September 10-13, 2012 Hilton North Raleigh-Midtown, N.C., USA At the intersection of medical practitioners, materials researchers, manufacturers and marketers. Organized by: www.ceramics.org/biomaterials2012 Innovations in Biomedical Materials 2012 brings together the materials research, manufacturing and medical communities to explore technological advancements, facilitate product innovations and identify potential new applications. Review the final program at www.ceramics.org/biomaterials2012. Plenary speakers for Biomaterials 2012 include • Alan J. Russell, Carnegie Mellon University, presenting Bio-Inspired Materials for Health and Defense • Delbert Day, Mo-Sci Corp. and Missouri University of Science and Technology, presenting Radioactive Glass Microspheres for Medical Applications • Riad Salem, Northwestern University, presenting Radioembolization with Yttrium-90 Microspheres; • Larry Hench, University of Florida and University of London, presenting Bioactive Glasses: New Approaches for Tissue Repair, Regeneration and Prevention • Hyun Bae, Cedars-Sinai Hospital, presenting Pedicle Screw Electrical Resistance: Hydroxyapatite-Coated Versus Noncoated. 46 Meeting Cochairs Steven Jung, Director of New Product Development and Senior Research Engineer, Mo-Sci Corp. 573-364-2338 sjung@mo-sci.com Roger Narayan, Professor of Biomedical Engineering,University of North Carolina and North Carolina State University 919-696-8488 roger_narayan@ncsu.edu www.ceramics.org | American Ceramic Society Bulletin, Vol. 91, No. 7 SCHEDULE Monday, Sept. 10, 2012 Registration Networking Reception 2:30 p.m. – 7:30 p.m. 5:30 p.m. – 7:30 p.m. Tuesday, Sept. 11, 2012 Registration Plenary Speaker Plenary Speaker Break Three Concurrent Sessions Lunch Plenary Speaker Three Concurrent Sessions Break Three Concurrent Sessions Poster Session & Reception 7:30 a.m. – 6:15 p.m. 8:00 a.m. – 8:45 a.m. 8:45 a.m. – 9:30 a.m. 9:30 a.m. – 9:50 a.m. 9:50 a.m. – 11:50 a.m. 11:50 a.m. – 12:40 p.m. 12:40 p.m. – 1:25 p.m. 1:30 p.m. – 3:20 p.m. 3:20 p.m. – 3:40 p.m. 3:40 p.m. – 5:50 p.m. 5:45 p.m. – 7:15 p.m. Wednesday, Sept. 12, 2012 Registration Plenary Speaker Break Three Concurrent Sessions Lunch Plenary Speaker Three Concurrent Sessions Break Three Concurrent Sessions Conference Dinner, Including Speaker 7:30 a.m. – 6:15 p.m. 8:30 a.m. – 9:15 a.m. 9:15 a.m. – 9:45 a.m. 9:45 a.m. – 11:55 p.m. 11:45 p.m. – 12:40 p.m. 12:40 p.m. – 1:25 p.m. 1:30 p.m. – 3:20 p.m. 3:20 p.m. – 3:40 p.m. 3:40 p.m. – 5:50 p.m. 6:30 p.m. – 9:00 p.m. TUTORIAL SESSION – Licensing Technology from a Public University: What in the World Were you Thinking? Keith Strassner, Missouri University of Science and Technology – CE Marking of Medical Devices Matthew O’Donnell, British Standards Institution – Materials Data Impact on Device Design Gary Mushock, ASM International – Systematic Materials Selection – How to Optimize Product Performance While Lowering Risk Kristin Roenigk, Granta Design Premier Sponsor Thursday, Sept. 13, 2012 Registration Innovations in Biomedical Materials Panel Discussion Break Tutorial Sessions 7:30 a.m. – 12:00 p.m. 9:15 a.m. – 10:15 a.m. Gold Sponsor 10:15 a.m. – 10:30 a.m. 10:30 a.m. – 12:00 p.m. North Carolina Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine Society Conference will be held on Monday, Sept. 10, 2012, from 8:00 a.m. to 5:30 p.m. Although colocated, it is a separate conference. For more information, visit www.ncterm.org. Endorsed by MEDICAL MATERIALS Hotel Hilton North Raleigh-Midtown 3415 Wake Forest Road Raleigh, NC 27609 Tel: 919-872-2323 For rate information and to reserve your room, visit www.ceramics.org/biomaterials2012. American Ceramic Society Bulletin, Vol. 91, No. 7 | www.ceramics.org 47 Innovations in Biomedical Materials 2012 September 10–13, 2012 | Hilton North Raleigh-Midtown, Raleigh, N.C., USA At the intersection of medical practitioners, materials researchers, manufacturers and marketers. TRACkS Innovations in Biomedical Materials 2012 will emphasize collaboration between R&D, medical practitioners and biomedical materials manufacturers/marketers to better develop emerging technologies into marketable products. Commercialization of Biomedical Implants and Devices | Markus Reiterer Proof of efficacy and safety are very challenging issues on the path of commercialization of biomedical products. Regulatory requirements, which are different from country to county, add complexity in the path to commercialization. Speakers in this track will present a recent product success story and point out key challenges on the way from the lab to the patient. Commercialization I Sept. 12 1:30 – 3:40 p.m. Commercialization II Sept. 12 3:40 – 5:30 p.m. Surface Treatments and Coating of Titanium Implants | Peter Ulrich Surface treatment or coating technology aimed at improving the clinical outcomes of titanium implants. This track is open to all areas of clinical use including dental, orthopedic and spine. Metallic Implants and Coatings I Sept. 11 9:50 – 11:50 a.m. Metallic Implants and Coatings II Sept. 11 1:30 – 3:40 p.m. Metallic Implants and Coatings III Sept. 11 3:40 – 5:40 p.m. Metallic Implants and Coatings IV Sept. 12 9:45 – 11:15 a.m. Three-Dimensional Scaffolds for Tissue Regeneration | Hyun Bae Scaffolds for segmental load-bearing defects and nonload-bearing bone void fillers are of interest. Primarily for orthopedic, dental and spine applications. Three Dimensional Scaffolds for Tissue Regeneration I Sept. 11 3:20 – 5:30 p.m. Three Dimensional Scaffolds for Tissue Regeneration II Sept. 12 9:45 – 11:55 a.m. Three Dimensional Scaffolds for Tissue Regeneration III Sept. 12 1:30 – 3:40 p.m. Three Dimensional Scaffolds for Tissue Regeneration IV Sept. 12 5:10 – 5:50 p.m. Biomedical Imaging and Radiation Treatment | Andy Larson and Riad Salem This track will discuss specific clinical needs for advanced biomedical imaging or to showcase a new imaging technology and biomaterial radiation treatment options, current products, future products and new areas or methods of treatment. 48 Imaging and Treatment I Sept. 11 9:50 – 11:50 a.m. Imaging and Treatment II Sept. 11 1:30 – 2:20 p.m. Blood Vessel, Nerve Guides and Hemostasis | Amy Harkins Biomaterials that are used specifically for guiding vascular or nerve growth or regeneration. Hemostatic devices, advanced tourniquets and other blood-loss control technologies. Insight into current technologies and desirable future development are other acceptable topics. Blood Vessels, Nerve Guides and Hemostasis Sept. 11 1:30 – 3:20 p.m. Composites | Erik Erbe This is a general track that covers biomaterial composites for various applications. Composites I Sept. 12 9:45 – 11:55 a.m. Composites II Sept. 12 1:30 – 3:40 p.m. Malleable Bone Void Fillers | Greg Pomrink Improvements in bone void filler technology or insight into the current products commercially available. This track may cover improvements in carrier technology, bone-filler technology, new products or conceptual products. Bone Cements Sept. 12 3:40 – 5:40 p.m. Sensors | Randy Avent This is a general track that covers sensor technology that will be or is currently applied to improve healing. Sensors I Sept. 11 9:50 – 11:50 a.m. Sensors II Sept. 11 2:20 – 3:40 p.m. Uses of Bioactive Glass in New Treatments | Charanpreet Bagga Novel bioactive glass forms, compositions and microstructures focused on improving the natural healing process for treatment of any area of the body. Uses of Bioactive Glass in New Treatments Sept. 11 3:40 – 5:50 p.m. Wound or Burn Treatment | Luisa DePietro and Lin Chen Novel methods, dressings or insights into effective wound healing or burn treatment. In-vitro data may be acceptable, but in-vivo animal or human data preferred. Wound and Burn Treatment Sept. 12 3:40 – 4:50 p.m. See final program at www.ceramics.org/biomaterials2012. www.ceramics.org | American Ceramic Society Bulletin, Vol. 91, No. 7 www.ceramics.org/ema2013 Electronic Materials and Applications 2013 DoubleTree by Hilton Orlando at Sea World® | Orlando, Florida, USA | January 23-25, 2013 Final Abstract Deadline – September 26 INTRODUCTION Electronic Materials and Applications 2013, jointly programmed by the Electronics and the Basic Science Divisions of The American Ceramic Society, is the fourth in a series of annual international meetings. The 2013 meeting encompasses energy generation and storage, photovoltaics and LED’s, MEMS/NEMS, superconductors, thermoelectrics, data storage, sensors, actuators and other functional and nanostructured materials. The meeting will provide leaders and experts in the field of electronic ceramics the opportunity to discuss fundamental and technological challenges in these areas. The conference features plenary lectures by notables, including Ramamoorthy Ramesh, director, SunShot Initiative, DOE, and professor, University of California, Berkeley; Kitt Reinhardt, program manager, Air Force Office of Scientific Research; and Rainer Waser, director, Institute of Solid State Research, HGF Research Center, Germany. The technical program will include invited lectures, contributed papers, poster presentations and roundtables on emerging topics. Naturally, participants include an international mix of industrial, university and federal laboratory organizers and researchers. For students there also is the opportunity to participate in a special student-run symposium. We are pleased to provide this opportunity to focus on electronic materials and applications in 2013, building on the previous success of this conference series as well as the ever-expanding network of scientists in this field. With a continuing goal of fostering interconnections and collaborations, we expect this meeting will facilitate the presentation and development of new ideas crucial for future electronic materials, with ultimate applications ranging from consumer devices to solutions to grand challenges. Please join us in Orlando in January for this unique experience. ORgANIzINg COMMITTEE Quanxi Jia Electronics Div. Los Alamos National Lab Bryan Huey Basic Science Div. University of Connecticut Timothy Haugan Electronics Div. US Air Force Research Lab EMA 2103 SyMpOSIA •Thin-FilmIntegrationandProcessingScience •Thermoelectrics:DefectChemistry,DopingandNanoscale Effects •Failure:TheGreatestTeacher •ProductionQualityFerroelectricThinFilmsandDevices •CeramicCompositesforDefenseApplications •RecentDevelopmentsinHigh-TemperatureSuperconductivity •Sustainable,Low-Critical-MaterialUseandGreenMaterials Processing Technologies •NanoscaleElectronicsandMechanics •LEDsandPhotovoltaics:CommonMaterialsChallenges •InterfacesinCeramics •StructureofEmergingPerovskiteOxides:BridgingLength Scales and Unifying Experiment and Theory •FunctionalElectroceramicsforCapacitor,PiezoandEnergyHarvesting Applications •DataStorage •AdvancesinMemoryDevices •AdvancedDielectrics,PiezoelectricandFerroicMaterials,and Emerging Materials in Electronics HOTEl INfORMATION •IntegratedCircuits DoubleTree by Hilton Orlando at Sea World •HighlightsofStudentResearchinBasicScienceand Electronic Ceramics log os ies American Ceramic Society Bulletin, Vol. 91, No. 7 | www.ceramics.org a Al Los m an di a S *Limited number of available rooms grated Nanote nte ch rI no Rate: Single/double/triple/quad–$149.00 US Government Employee–current prevailing rate* SpONSORS Cen ter fo 10100 International Drive, Orlando, FL 32821 Phone: 407-352-1100 | 800-327-0363 Fax: 407-352-2632 49 37th InternatIonal ConferenCe and exposItIon on AdvAnced ceRAmics And composites Jan. 27–feb. 1, 2013 | hilton daytona Beach resort and ocean Center | daytona Beach, florida, Usa Registration coming soon. www.ceramics.org/daytona2013 organized by: intRoduction continuing the successful tradition as the leading international meeting on advanced engineering and multifunctional ceramics, the 37th international conference & exposition on Advanced ceramics & composites will be held January 27 through February 1, 2013, in daytona Beach, Florida. the American ceramic society’s engineering ceramics division and Acers have been organizing this prestigious conference since 1977—with tremendous growth in interest and participation from ceramic communities globally. topical areas include advanced structural and functional ceramics, composites and other emerging ceramic materials and technologies. the technical program consists of 13 symposia, four focused sessions, the 2nd Global Young investigator Forum and the engineering ceramics summit of the Americas. these technical sessions, including oral and poster presentations, and with an industry exposition will provide an open forum for scientists, researchers, engineers and industry personnel from around the world to present and exchange findings on recent advances on various aspects related to ceramic science and technology. icAcc’13 programming encompasses the diverse areas of ceramics and advanced composites, with particular attention to the current trends in research, development, engineering and application of advanced ceramics. the well-established symposia at this conference include mechanical properties of engineering ceramics and composites, Advanced ceramic coatings, solid oxide Fuel cells, Armor ceramics, Bioceramics, nanostructured materials, Advanced processing & manufacturing technologies and porous ceramics. For the third consecutive two key symposia—materials for extreme environments, 50 and materials and technologies for energy Generation and Rechargeable energy storage—will form part of the technical program. in addition, ceramics and composites for sustainable nuclear energy and Fusion energy will be organized and be cosponsored by Acers nuclear and environmental technology division. icAcc’13 will include two new symposia: computational modeling; and next-Generation technologies for innovative surface coatings. the technical program will include four focused sessions that have attracted considerable attention and interest: Geopolymers; thermal management materials and technologies; nanomaterials for sensing Application; and ceramic materials and processing for photonics and energy. Building upon the successful interactions and excitement generated from the 1st Global Young investigator Forum at icAcc’12, the 2nd GYiF will be organized and facilitated by a group of our young researchers. in addition, meeting leaders have organized the engineering ceramic summit of the Americas to provide a forum for the information exchange on current status and emerging trends in various ceramic technologies in south, central and north America. the ecd executive committee and volunteer organizers sincerely hope you will join us at icAcc’13 for a stimulating and enjoyable conference. Sujanto Widjaja 2013 icAcc program chair corning inc. corning West technology center palo Alto, cA 94304 usA widjajas@corning.com www.ceramics.org | American Ceramic Society Bulletin, Vol. 91, No. 7 hilton dAYtonA BeAch ResoRt 100 North Atlantic Ave. Daytona Beach, FL Phone: 1-386-254-8200 Rates: One to four occupants $149 Students: $123 US Government Employee: Prevailing Rate Mention The American Ceramic Society to obtain the special rate. Room rates are effective until Dec. 14, 2012, and are based on availability. exhiBition inFoRmAtion Reserve your booth space today for the premier advanced ceramics and composites event. This event offers an exceptional opportunity to present your company’s latest products, sevices and technology to a sophisticated audience sharply focused on this market. Exhibits Open: Tuesday, Jan. 29, 2013, 5:00 p.m. – 8:00 p.m. Wednesday, Jan. 30, 2013, 5:00 p.m. – 7:30 p.m. Exposition Location: Ocean Center Arena, 101 North Atlantic Ave., Daytona Beach, FL Visit www.ceramics.org/daytona2013 for more details or contact Patricia Janeway at pjaneway@ceramics.org or at 614-794-5826. tentAtive schedule oF events Sunday – Jan. 27 Welcome Reception 5:00 p.m. – 7:00 p.m. Monday – Jan. 28 Opening Awards Ceremony and Plenary Session Concurrent Technical Sessions 8:30 a.m. – Noon 1:30 p.m. – 6:00 p.m. Tuesday – Jan. 29 Concurrent Technical Sessions Exposition and Reception Poster Session A 8:00 a.m. – 5:20 p.m. 5:00 p.m. – 8:00 p.m. 5:00 p.m. – 8:00 p.m. Wednesday – Jan. 30 Concurrent Technical Sessions Exposition and Reception Poster Session B 8:00 a.m. – 5:00 p.m. 5:00 p.m. – 7:30 p.m. 5:00 p.m. – 7:30 p.m. Thursday – Jan. 31 Concurrent Technical Sessions 8:00 a.m. – 6:00 p.m. Friday – Feb. 1 Concurrent Technical Sessions 8:00 a.m. – Noon exhiBitoRs Exhibitor Booth No. AACCM 304 ACT-RX Technology Corp. 223 Alfred University 212 ANOR Precision Ceramic Industrial 223 Co. AVS Inc. 210 Buhler Inc. 301 Carbolite Inc. 206 CM Furnaces Inc. 311 Dorst America 220 Dunhua Zhengxing Abrasives Co. 205 Dynamic Dispersions LLC 203 Eirich Machines Inc. 222 Exhibitor Booth No. ENrG Inc. 321 ESL ElectroScience 202 Evans Analytical Group 313 Gasbarre Products/PTX-Pentronix 307 H.C. Starck Inc. 305 Haiku Tech Inc. 320 Harper International 326 Harrop Industries Inc. 200 Keith Co. 322 MEL Chemicals 315 MTI 214 Nabertherm 303 Netzsch Instruments N.A. LLC 201 American Ceramic Society Bulletin, Vol. 91, No. 7 | www.ceramics.org Exhibitor Booth No. New Lenox Machine Co. 306 NIST 111 NIST 113 Oxy-Gon Industries Inc. 204 PremaTech Advanced Ceramics 207 R.D. Webb Co. 216 Sonoscan Inc. 221 Swindell Dressler International 302 TEAM by Sacmi (Riedhammer) 300 TevTech 317 Thermal Wave Imaging 420 Union Process Inc. 410 51 resources Calendar of events September 2012 2–5 ICCCI2012: 4th Int’l Conference on the Characterization and Control of Interfaces for High-Quality Advanced Materials 2012 – Hotel Nikko Kurashiki, Kurashiki City, Japan; www.jwri.osaka-u. ac.jp/~conf/iccci2012/top.html 10 ACerS Pittsburgh Section Annual Golf Outing – The Links Course, Nemacolin Woodlands Resort, Farmington, Pa; contact Bill Harasty, bharasty@marsmineral.com, or Jim Gilson, jgilson@swindelldressler.com 10–13 Innovations in Biomedical Materials 2012 — Hilton North RaleighMidtown, Raleigh, N.C.; www.ceramics. org/biomaterials2012 12–17 Rare Earth Minerals/Metals: Sustainable Technologies for the Future – San Diego, Calif.; http://www.engconfintl.org/12ar.html 7–11 20–22 ALAFAR Congress 2012: Latin 7–11 ACerS Annual Meeting and Awards Banquet – David L. Lawrence Convention Center and Westin Convention Center Hotel, Pittsburgh, Pa.; www.ceramics.org December 2012 3–5 IBAAS-2012: Int’l Bauxite, Alumina MS&T’12: Materials Science & Technology Conference and Exhibition —Materials 2012 – David L. Lawrence Convention Center, Pittsburgh, Pa.; www.matscitech.org 9–11 Composites Europe – Exhibition Center Dusseldorf, Germany; www. composites-europe.com 9–12 IC-CMTP2: 2nd Int’l Conference on Competitive Materials and Technology Process – Hunguest Hotel, Palota Lillafüred, Hungary; www.iccmtp2.eu America Association of Refractory Manufacturers – JW Marriot Hotel, Cancun, Mexico; www.alafar.org & Aluminum Society – Jawaharlal Nehru Aluminium Research Development & Design Centre, Nagpur, India; http:// IBAAS.info 9–12 ICCMS 2012: 4th Int’l Congress on Computational Mechanics and Simulation – Hyderabad, India; www. ceramicsasia.net 13–15 Ceramics Asia 2012 – Gujarat University Exhibition Center, Ahmedabad, India; www.ceramicsasia.net 14–17 7–9 CeraGlass India 2012 Trade 16–20 XIII Int’l Conference on the Physics of Non-Crystalline Solids – Yichang Three Gorges, Hubei, China; www.xiii-pncs.com 18–21 January 2013 14–19 Bau 2013– Messe Muenchen 16–21 Int’l Conference on Fatigue 23–23 Solar Meets Glass: 3 Industry Summit for Markets, Cost and Technology, held in conjunction with Solarpec (see below) – Dusseldorf, Germany; www.solarpraxis.de Damage of Structural Materials IX– Cape Cod at The Resort and Conference Center, Hyannis, Mass.; www.fatiguedamageconference.com 19–20 55th Int’l Colloquium on Refractories – Eurogress, Aachen, Germany; www.ecref.eu 23–27 4th Asian Conference on Molten Salt Chemistry and Technology, and 44th Symposium on Molten Salt Chemistry – Hotel Taikanso, Matsushima, Japan; http://msc.electrochem.jp/acmsct4/ 24–28 Tecnargilla 2012 – Rimini Expo Centre, Rimini, Italy; http://en.tecnargilla 30–Oct. 5 Harnessing the Materials Genome: Accelerated Materials Development via Computational and Experimental Tools – Vail Marriott Resort and Spa, Vail, Colo.; www.engconfintl. org/12aq.html October 2012 1–3 73rd Conference on Glass Problems – Hilton Cincinnati Netherland Plaza, Cincinnati, Ohio; www.glassproblemsconference.org 52 DSEC IV: 4th Int’l Directionally Solidified Eutectic Ceramics Workshop – Washington, D.C.; www.dsec4.com. 6th Int’l Symposium on Refractories – Kai Fu Jianguo Hotel Zhengzhou, Zhengzhou, China; www. ceramsoc.com/ISR2012.htm rd 23–26 Glasstec/Solarpeq: Int’l Trade Fair for Glass/Solar Production – Dusseldorf, Germany; www glassteconline.com or www.solarpeq.com Oct. 30–Nov. 1 North American Cold Spray 2012 – Worcester Polytechnic Institute, Worchester, Mass.; www.asminternational.org. November 2012 5–8 Fuel Cell Seminar & Exposition – Mohegan Sun, Uncasville, Conn.; www.fuelcellseminar.com Fair and Conference – EPIP, Sitapura, Jaipur, India; www.ceraglass.in Int’l, Munich, Germany; www.baumuenchen.com 23–25 Electronic Materials and Applications 2013 – DoubleTree by Hilton Orlando at Sea World, Orlando, Fla.; www.ceramics.org/ema2013 Jan. 27–Feb. 1 ICACC’13: 37th Int’l Conference and Exposition on Advanced Ceramics and Composites – Hilton Daytona Beach Resort and Ocean Center, Daytona Beach, Fla.; www.ceramics.org/icacc13 February 2013 11–14 IMAC-XXXI Conference and Exposition on Structural Dynamics – Hyatt Regency Orange County, Garden Grove, Calif.; www.sem.org 7–9 JEC Composites America – Boston Convention & Exhibition Center, Boston, Mass.; www.jeccomposites. com/events Dates in RED denote new entry in this issue. 11–15 38th Int’l Symposium for Entries in BLUE denote ACerS events. Testing and Failure Analysis – Phoenix Convention Center, Phoenix, Ariz.; www.asminternational.org denotes meetings that ACerS cosponsors, endorses or otherwise cooperates in organizing. www.ceramics.org | American Ceramic Society Bulletin, Vol. 91, No. 7 Debbie Plummer—Advertising Assistant Phone (614) 794-5866 • Fax (614) 891-8960 classified advertising Career Opportunities Richard E. Mistler, Inc. QUALITY EXECUTIVE SEARCH, INC. R e c r u i t i n g a n d S e a rc h C o n s u l t a n t s Specializing in Ceramics JOE DRAPCHO •Consultation •SlipDevelopment •TableTopTapeCasters Morrisville, PA 19067 24549 Detroit Rd. • Westlake, Ohio 44145 (440) 899-5070 • Cell (440) 773-5937 www.qualityexec.com E-mail: qesinfo@qualityexec.com • Business Services •DevelopmentMachines •ProductMachines www.drblade.com consulting/engineering services Emilio Spinosa Glass Consultant email: tapecast@juno.com custom finishing/machining Custom Machined Insulation AbNat, Ltd. Phone: 513-360-7772 Fax: 513-360-4224 Your best source for: E-mail: abnatltd@gmail.com DELKI Ć & ASSOCIATES INTERNATIONAL CERAMIC CONSULTANTS •WorldwideServices• •EnergySavingCeramic Coatings&FiberModules• FERIz DElkIć CeramicEngineer P.O.Box1726,PonteVedra,FL32004 Phone:(904)285-0200 Fax:(904)273-1616 Alumina & Zirconia Fiber Insulation •LabFurnaceRelineKits •Custom Setters and Trays •Crystal Growth Stations •FuelCellsandReformers •Heat Exchangers •Applications up to 2200°C Call (845) 651-3040 Web: www.zircarzirconia.com Email: sales@zircarzirconia.com Multi-Hole Drilling—Ideal for gas discharge plates used in plasma etching and related applications. Whether it’s ten holes or thousands of holes, we machine them perfectly and precisely. Deep-Hole Drilling—Ideal for optical fiber preforms and similar applications. We can drill high-quality, pre-polished, long, deep holes in most technical ceramics and glass materials. Machine Sales—Acquire your own drilling capabilities when you invest in Sonic-Mill® sinker or rotary ultrasonic drilling equipment, custom suited to your manufacturing applications. Located in Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA 505.839.3535 www.sonicmill.com custom/toll processing services PROOF Contract Machining Service American Ceramic Society Since 1980 SMAD_CB_2011_BusinessServices.indd TOLL FIRING 1 3/31/2011 10:51: Approved By: ________________________________________ SERVICES • Utmost Confidentiality Signature Required • Sintering, calcining, • Alumina to Zirconia including MMC Corrections Needed • Exacting Tolerances Approved as is, shapes no corrections • Complex to slicing & dicing Please FAX• Fast back& approvals with a signature. reliable service Fax # 614-891-8960 160 Goddard Memorial Dr. Worcester, MA 01603 USA Tel:(508) 791-9549 • Fax:(508) 793-9814 • E-mail:info@prematechac.com • Web site:www.PrematechAC.com American Ceramic Society Bulletin, Vol. 91, No. 7 | www.ceramics.org 08BS_ZIRCAR.indd 1 heat treating to 1700°C • Bulk materials and shapes • R&D, pilot production • One-time or ongoing EQUIPMENT • Atmosphere electric batch kilns to 27 cu. ft. • Gas batch kilns to 57 cu. ft. Columbus, Ohio 614-231-3621 www.harropusa.com sales@harropusa.com 53 1/28/11 4:24 PM classified advertising SPECIALIZED CERAMIC SERVICES • Extrusion/Forming Services • Wet/Dry Pressing Services • Toll Firing to 2200ºF • Plaster & Rubber Die and Mold Design • Fire Clay: Processing Services and Sales Thermal Analysis Materials Testing n n n n n Dilatometry Firing Facilities Custom Testing Glass Testing DTA/TGA n n n n Thermal Gradient ASTM Testing Refractories Creep Clay testing ACCCO, Inc./Burley Clay Products Co. 3470 E. Fifth Ave., Columbus, Ohio 43219-1797 (614) 231-3621 Fax: (614) 235-3699 E-mail: sales@harropusa.com 800-828-7539 • Fax: 740-697-2500 Email: remmert@accco-inc.com • www.accco-inc.com SEM • COM COMPANY, INC. SPECIALTY & ELECTRONIC GLASS MANUFACTURING Weprovidethefollowingservices: n GLASS MELTING nGLASS FABRICATION nCOMPOSITION DEVELOPMENT nCONSULTING • Standard, Custom, Proprietary Glass and Glass-Ceramic compositions melted • Available in frit, powder (wet/dry milling), rod or will develop a process to custom form • Research & Development • Electric and Gas Melting up to 1650ºC • Fused Silica crucibles and Refractory lined tanks Callorwriteforfurtherinformation P.O. BOX 8428 TOLEDO, OHIO 43623 Ph: 419/537-8813 Fax: 419/537-7054 e-mail: SEM-COM@sem-com.com web site: www.sem-com.com • Pounds to Tons 305 Marlborough Street • Oldsmar, Florida 34677 Phone (813) 855-5779 • Fax (813) 855-1584 e-mail: info@sgiglass.com Web: www.sgiglass.com GELLER MICROANALYTICAL LABORATORY, INC. Analytical Services & NIST Traceable Magnification Standards SEM/X-ray, Electron Mircoprobe, Surface Analysis (Auger), Metallography, Particle Size Counting, and Optical Microscopy for Ceramics and Composite Materials Specializing in quantitative analysis of boron, carbon, nitrogen, oxygen, etc. in micrometer sized areas. Elemental mapping,diffusion studies, failure analysis, reverse engineering and phase area determinations. laboratory/testing services Electronic and Specialty Glass Frits & Powders Standard compositions Custom melt capacity • Glass development • Calcinations • Toll processing • Test sample availability • Production volumes • Tailored particle sizes • Press-ready granulation • ISO 9001:2008 registered • • I S O 9 0 0 1 & 1 7 0 2 5 C e r t ified Advanced ceramic testing Put our years of experience to work on your specimens! 426 Boston St. Topsfield, MA 01983 Tel: 978-887-7000 Fax: 978-887-6671 www.gellermicro.com Email: sales@gellermicro.com Superior quality and performance in: nThermal Analysis nCalorimetry nDetermination of thermophysical properties nContract Testing Services Chemical Analysis ISO 17025 and AS 9100 Accredited GLASS TECHNOLOGY Design • Development • Manufacturing 54 6701 Sixth Ave. S. Seattle, WA 98108 (206) 763-2170 E-mail: glass@viox.com www.viox.com NETZSCH Instruments North America, LLC 129 Middlesex Turnpike Burlington, MA 01803 Email: nib-sales@netzsch.com Ph: 781-272-5353 www.netzsch.com Glass - Ceramics - Refractories - Carbides Whitewares - Raw Materials - Metals XRF -ICP -GFAA - CI&F - C&S Visit: westpenntesting.com 724-334-4140 www.ceramics.org | American Ceramic Society Bulletin, Vol. 91, No. 7 NIB-Anz2_1211.indd 1 07.12.11 09:57 liquidations/used equipment CERAMIC MACHINERY and FACTORIES FOR SALE WORLDWIDE bulletin Advertiser Mohr trades ceramic machinery worldwide. When your surplus machinery is on one continent and the market is half-a-world away, it is Mohr Corporation that will put the deal together. Your only global source Corporate Offices: P.O. Box 1600 Brighton, MI 48116 USA Tel: +1 (810) 225-9494 Fax: +1 (810) 223-6647 Email: sales@mohrcorp.com Website: http://www.mohrcorp.com Mohr offices and associates are strategically located worldwide to give you local service anywhere in the world! BUYING & SELLING • Compacting Presses • Isostatic Presses • Piston Extruders • Mixers & Blenders • Jar Mills • Pebble Mills • Lab Equipment • Crushers & Pulverizers • Attritors • Spray Dryers • Screeners • Media Mills • Kilns & Furnaces • Stokes Press Parts Huge Inventory in our Detroit Michigan warehouse Contact Tom Suhy (586) 469-0323 sales@detroitprocessmachinery.com www.detroitprocessmachinery.com maintenance/repair services C E N T O R R Vacuum Industries AFTERMARKET SERVICES Spare Parts and Field Service Installation Vacuum Leak Testing and Repair Preventative Maintenance Used and Rebuilt Furnaces 55 Northeastern Blvd, Nashua, NH 03062 Ph: 603-595-7233 Fax: 603-595-9220 sales@centorr.com www.centorr.com/cb Alan Fostier - afostier@centorr.com Dan Demers - ddemers@centorr.com CUSTOM HIGH-TEMPERATURE VACUUM FURNACES September 2012 AMERICAN CERAMIC SOCIETY Page No. ACCCO Inc./Burley Clay Products 800-828-7539 remmert@accco-in.com•www.accco-inc.com 54 AdValue Technology 53 502-514-1100 sales@advaluetech.com•www.advaluetech.com Alteo sales.specialty-aluminas@riotinto.com www.alteo-alumina.com 9 American Ceramic Society, The Inside front cover, www.ceramics.org 10 American Elements www.americanelements.com Back cover C&L Development Corp. 408-864-0680 Info@candldevelopment.com www.candldevelopment.com 11 Centorr/Vacuum Industries Inc. 800-962-8631 sales@centorr.com•www.centorr.com/cb 55 Ceradyne Viox Corp. 206-763-2170 glass@viox.com•www.viox.com 54 Delkic & Associates 904-285-0200 53 Deltech Inc. 303-433-5939 www.deltechfurnaces.com 5 Detroit Process Machinery 586-469-0323 sales@detroitprocessmachinery.com www.detroitprocessmachinery.com 55 Emilio Spinosa/AbNat Ltd. 513-360-7772 abnatltd@gmail.com 53 Geller Microanalytical Laboratory 978-887-7000 sales@gellermicro.com•www.gellermicro.com 54 Harper International Corp. 716-684-7400 info@harperintl.com•www.harperintl.com 54 Harrop Industries Inc. 3, 53, 54 614-231-3621 sales@harropusa.com•www.harropusa.com Mohr Corp. 810-225-9494 sales@mohrcorp.com•www.mohrcorp.com 54 Netzsch Instruments NA, LLC 781-272-5353 nib-sales@netzsch.com•www.netzsch.com 54 American Ceramic Society Bulletin, Vol. 91, No. 7 | www.ceramics.org advertiSer index Advertiser Page No. Powder Processing & Technology 219-462-4141x224 asukovich@pptechnology.com www.pptechnology.com 54 PremaTech Advanced Ceramic 53 508-791-9549 info@prematechac.com•www.prematechac.com Quality Executive Search Inc. 53 440-899-5070 qesinfo@qualityexec.com•www.qualityexec.com Richard E. Mistler Inc. 800-641-1034 tapecast@juno.com•www.drblade.com 53 Sem-Com Co. 419-537-8813 sem-com@sem-com.com•www.sem-com.com 53 Sonic Mill 505-839-3535•www.sonicmill.com 53 Specialty Glass Inc. 813-855-5779 info@sgiglass.com•www.sgiglass.com 54 Technology Assessment & Transfer Inc. www.techassess.com 53 UNITECR 2013 www.unitecr2013.org Inside back cover West Penn Testing Group 724-334-4140 www.westpenntesting.com 54 Zircar Zirconia Inc. 53 845-651-3040 sales@zircarzirconia.com•www.zircarzirconia.com Advertising Sales Pat Janeway, Associate Publisher pjaneway@ceramics.org ph: 614-794-5826 fx: 614-794-5822 Europe Richard Rozelaar media@alaincharles.com ph: 44-(0)-20-7834-7676 fx: 44-(0)-20-7973-0076 Classified Advertising/Services Pat Janeway pjaneway@ceramics.org ph: 614-794-5826 fx: 614-794-5822 600 N. Cleveland Ave, Suite 210 Westerville, OH 43082 55 Ryan Wilkerson and Liz Reidmeyer deciphering the discipline Guest columnists Kevin Fox and Greg Hilmas carefully measure the drop height under the supervision of an enthusiastic group of onlookers. The mug was not designed to survive any sort of fall and was withheld from the dropping part of the competition. This year she hopes to make a mug that will be aesthetically pleasing as well as able to perform mechanically. Her plan is to make a mug that will survive a decent drop by altering the surface properties the mug’s material. The road to making a great mug can be filled with trials and tribulations, but it’s all worthwhile at the competition when your mug gets dropped! Although many students take a somewhat haphazard approach to the design and fabrication of their mugs, very sucReidmeyer with cessful and interesting her winning mugs often are made. aesthetic mug. This friendly student competition helps students learn by taking a hands-on approach to making a final product and focusing on the science and engineering underneath it all. Students must decide (Credit: ACerS.) Each year, as the MS&T conference approaches, students at Missouri S&T prepare for the Student Mug Drop competition, an annual event held at the conference. Students strive to make a ceramic mug that can survive being dropped from ever-greater heights, and the mug that survives the highest drop is the crowned the winner. This competition requires a large amount of prep work, and each student at Missouri S&T approaches the design aspects of the competition differently. Last year, for example, Ryan Wilkerson, a senior in ceramic engineering, focused primarily on a slip casting route. He modeled his design after mugs that had won in the past from Missouri S&T, more specifically a composite oxide system with a high toughness. This year Wilkerson is getting started early and taking a systematic approach to optimizing the mechanical properties and improving the performance of his mug. He plans to include multiple toughening mechanisms into his design, while also preserving strength. Liz Reidmeyer, a senior in ceramic engineering, won the 2011 competition’s aesthetics division with her entry. (Credit: ACerS.) Mugs and Missouri S&T at MS&T 56 which mechanical properties they want to optimize, such as fracture toughness or strength, while also determining the optimal synthesis route. To top all of this off, the mug shape must be engineered to meet the contest’s design specifications for volume and size, and it must have a handle. One of the most interesting parts of the competition is just observing all the other schools’ designs and considering how elements from each potentially could be commandeered and incorporated into one’s own mug. All in all, the mug drop is always fun and draws a large crowd of onlookers. It provides a great opportunity for students from different schools to socialize, while still practicing their knowledge in the field of materials science and engineering. Missouri S&T will be there, and its team looks forward to seeing what mug designs and strategies other schools bring to the competition. Ryan Wilkerson and Liz Reidmeyer are seniors in ceramic engineering at the Missouri University of Science and Technology. n www.ceramics.org | American Ceramic Society Bulletin, Vol. 91, No. 7 CALL FOR PAPERS! Abstracts due Oct. 1, 2012 13th Biennial Worldwide Congress on Refractories Unitecr 2013 The Unified International Technical Conference on Refractories September 10–13, 2013 | The Fairmont Empress and Victoria Conference Centre Victoria, British Columbia, Canada UNITECR’13 is designed for manufacturers, scientists, engineers and industry professionals interested in the science, production and application of refractory materials. Topics include: – Advanced Testing of Refractories – Advanced Installation Techniques & Equipment – Monolithic Refractories – Iron & Steel Making Refractories – Raw Materials Developments & Global Raw Material Issues – Refractories for Glass – Cement & Lime Refractories – Modelling and Simulation of Refractories – Petrochemical – Refractories for Waste-to-Energy Processing & Power – Energy Savings through Refractory Design – Nonoxide Refractory Systems – Refractories for Chemical Processes – Developments in Basic Refractories – Global Education in Refractories – Refractories for Nonferrous Metallurgy – Safety, Environmental Issues & Recycling Solutions for Refractories Hosted by: www.unitecr2013.org