Introduction • These slides contain:
Transcription
Introduction • These slides contain:
Introduction • These slides contain: – Summaries of some of the main contents of European Dictatorships (with page references) – Additional material: • Historical • Historiographical • Instructions. – Go on to Slide Show > View Show. This will activate: • • • • Slide transitions Slide and box animations Hyperlinks within this PowerPoint Links to other websites for: – Illustrations – Text – Other links Title page follows EUROPEAN DICTATORSHIPS 1918 - 1945 THIRD EDITION ROUTLEDGE 2008 Supporting PowerPoint 2 Types of Dictatorship STEPHEN J. LEE Outline of the argument of Chapter 2 Introduction to the overall argument of Chapter 2 (Details in European Dictatorships 25-38) DICTATORSHIP IS A GENERIC TERM, CONSISTING OF TWO MAIN TYPES: 1. Totalitarian Normally associated with two ideological systems a. Communism b. Fascism/Nazism 2. Authoritarian Ideology usually absent, unless in traditionalist form Summary of argument of Chapter 2: Types of dictatorship (Details in European Dictatorships 37-8) LEVEL 1 GENERIC TERM: DICTATORSHIP Level 2: generic type Level 2: generic type Totalitarian Authoritarian Level 3: ideological system Communism Examples: Russia 1918-24 Russia 1924-53 Level 3: ideological system Fascism/Nazism Examples: Italy 1922-45 Germany 1933-45 Level 3: ideological system Usually absent Examples: Spain Portugal Austria Hungary Poland Baltic States Albania Yugoslavia Romania Bulgaria Greece Turkey Part 1 What is the meaning of ‘dictatorship’? The meaning of ‘dictatorship?’ (Details and comments in European Dictatorships 25-6) RESTRICTED APPROACH Original definition (Roman): Temporary grant by Senate of exceptional powers to deal with an emergency. Modern definition (BUCCHEIM): Temporary device: short-term suspension of democratic processes when quick and vigorous action necessary. Modern definition (LINZ): Interim crisis government which has not institutionalised Itself, breaking from previous regime – democratic, traditional or authoritarian. OPEN APPROACH Modern definition (CURTIS): Essential ingredient is power; an emergency is not necessarily present. Modern definition (BROOKER): Emergence since World War I of a regime with an official ideology and political party; ideological one-party state Part 2 What types of ‘dictatorship’ were there between 1918 and 1945? Authoritarian and Totalitarian systems: how do they relate to each other? (Details and comments in European Dictatorships 26-7) Authoritarianism is a term to cover all forms of non-democratic regime Preferred approach Totalitarianism is its most extreme manifestation Authoritarianism OR are distinct Totalitarianism Characteristics of Totalitarian regimes (Details and comments in European Dictatorships 29) Radical programme of change Deliberate mobilization of the masses Possession of a distinctive ideology Under control of a single party, which mobilized mass support Organization of paramilitary groups Subjection to systematic control – and terror Indoctrination, seeking destruction of cultural pluralism Establishment of complete control over the economy Authoritarian and Totalitarian regimes (Details and comments in European Dictatorships 29) Authoritarian regimes Totalitarian regimes had a had a conservative approach radical approach which which immobilised the masses mobilised the masses and and emphasized traditional values emphasized new ideologies This was done through This was done through a centralised monopoly of power – often military a one-party control of all power and sometimes enforced by and always enforced by a security apparatus a security apparatus Authoritarian and Totalitarian regimes: which were they? AUTHORITARIAN REGIMES Austria under Dollfuss etc. TOTALITARIAN REGIMES Germany under Hitler 1933-45 Hungary under Horthy etc. Spain under Primo de Rivera and Franco Portugal under Salazar Italy under Mussolini 1922-45 Russia under Lenin 1917-24 Poland under Pilsudski etc Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania Yugoslavia Albania Greece Bulgaria Romania Turkey under Atatürk Russia under Stalin1924/9-53 Russia after Stalin Authoritarian and Totalitarian regimes: which were they? Alternative view AUTHORITARIAN REGIMES Austria under Dollfuss etc. TOTALITARIAN REGIMES Germany under Hitler 1933-45 Hungary under Horthy etc. Spain under Primo de Rivera and Franco Russia under Lenin 1917-24 Pre-totalitarian authoritarian? Portugal under Salazar Poland under Pilsudski etc Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania Yugoslavia Albania Greece Bulgaria Romania Turkey under Atatürk Russia under Stalin1924/9-53 Russia after Stalin Post-totalitarian authoritarian? Italy under Mussolini 1922-45 incomplete totalitarian? Complications of term ‘Totalitarian’ (Details and comments in European Dictatorships 27-9) 1 Were Communist regimes ‘totalitarian’ per se? Or was this simply a ‘Cold War classification’? (Gleeson, Curtis). Possible alternatives: Lenin’s Russia: ‘pre-totalitarian authoritarian?’ Stalin’s Russia: fully totalitarian? Post Stalinist Russia: ‘posttotalitarian authoritarian? 2 Was there ever any such thing as ‘totalitarian democracy’? (Talmon) Or were all Totalitarian regimes dictatorships? 3 Are there ‘weak’ and ‘strong’ forms of totalitarianism? (Tormey) Or were all Totalitarian regimes dictatorships? Weak systems: regimes have to react to changes rather than being able to control them Strong systems: regimes achieve control by socialization, indoctrination as well as force For comments on these, see European Dictatorships (3rd edition) 27-9 Authoritarian regimes and totalitarianism Totalitarian regimes and authoritarianism (ED 37) Spain, Portugal, Austria, Hungary, Poland, the Baltic States, Yugoslavia, Albania, Romania, Bulgaria, Greece – all prevented a takeover by Communism or Fascism, which took power in Russia (Provisional Government), Liberal Italy, Weimar Germany. Before 1939: Authoritarian regimes were generally strong enough to prevent democracy and also resist being taken over by totalitarian ideologies. Totalitarian systems arose in former democracies, not in authoritarian states. BUT After 1939: Totalitarian regimes conquered the authoritarian regimes as part of their process of expansion. They imposed their ideologies by occupation or Influence. Italy occupied Albania. Germany occupied: Austria, W. Poland, Baltic states, Yugoslavia, Greece; influenced Hungary, Bulgaria, Romania Russia occupied: E. Poland and Baltic States Principal European dictators TOTALITARIAN STALIN LENIN Italy MUSSOLINI Germany HITLER Portugal SALAZAR Spain Poland Baltic States Yugoslavia Albania Romania FRANCO PRIMO DE RIVERA Austria Hungary DOLFUSS Kun SCHUSCHNIGG Szálasi HORTHY PIŁSUDSKI SMETONA, ULMANIS, PÄTS ALEXANDER PAVELIC ZOG CAROL Bulgaria ANTONESCU BORIS Greece Turkey 1945 1940 1935 1930 1925 1920 Russia AUTHORITARIAN METAXAS MUSTAFA KEMAL ATATüRK European dictatorships by 1938 D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D Dictatorships by 1938 Dictatorships dismantled by other dictatorships 1938-42 D D Totalitarian dictatorships by 1938 D Authoritarian dictatorships dismantled by totalitarian dictatorships 1938-43 D Authoritarian dictatorships in alliance with totalitarian dictatorships after 1940 D Authoritarian dictatorships remaining outside control of totalitarian dictatorships D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D Part 3 What ideologies influenced these ‘dictatorships’ between 1918 and 1945? Communism: Marxist origins and Leninist adaptation MARX (Details and comments in European Dictatorships 30-1) ‘The history of all human society, past and present, has been the history of class struggles.’ (Marx and Engels: Communist Manifesto, 1848). Future: Revolution by proletariat against bourgeoisie & capitalism Dictatorship of the Proletariat Classless Society LENIN Revolutions most likely where capitalism was strongest and proletariat largest – e.g. Germany and Britain Importance of party organization. ‘Just as a blacksmith cannot seize a red-hot iron, so the proletariat cannot directly seize power’. Revolution by proletariat led by party of professional revolutionaries Dictatorship of the Proletariat maintained by party Classless Society Revolutions most likely where capitalism was weakest– e.g. Russia For comments on these, see European Dictatorships (3rd edition) 27-9 Communism: Early spread in Europe (Details and comments in European Dictatorships 31) Communist revolutions 1917-19 Successful Unsuccessful or temporary Communism: Stalinist adaptation (Details and comments in European Dictatorships 31-2) 1 He abandoned the emphasis by Lenin and Trotsky on Permanent Revolution and substituted Socialism in One Country 2 He upgraded the significance of the bureaucratic state by Strengthening the ‘Dictatorship of the Proletariat’ Reversing the relationship between ‘base’ and ‘superstructure’ Introducing the central Planning system For comments on these, see European Dictatorships (3rd edition) 31-2 Communism: later spread in Europe Communist regimes established after World War II Under Soviet control Independent of Soviet control Origins of fascism (1) (Details and comments in European Dictatorships 32) Marxist interpretations 1 Communist International 1933: in the crisis of capitalism after World War I, fascism was the dying and most extreme phase of bourgeois-capitalist domination. Fascist leaders were the ‘agents’ of capitalist controllers. 2 Gramsci: Fascism represented the political crisis of capitalist states. In its attempt to revive capitalism, fascism was a radical alternative to the fading appeal of the traditional ruling class. For comments on these, see European Dictatorships (3rd edition) 33 Origins of fascism (2) (Details and comments in European Dictatorships 33) Non-Marxist interpretations 1 Meinecke, Ritter: Fascism emerged from a moral crisis of European society. According to Fromm, it was ‘an escape from freedom and a refuge in submission’. 2 Blum: Fascism was a rejection of the ideals of the Enlightenment and French Revolution: rationalism, liberalism, democracy, egalitarianism. 3 Nolte: Fascism was a response to the development of Communism. ‘The origin of the Right lies always in the challenge of the Left.’ 4 Hildebrand: Fascism was a reaction to development, a resistance of ‘residual elites’ to ‘industrial tendencies’ of industrial society. 5 Fascism was a reaction to the unsettling impact of World War I, especially on recently united states such as Italy and Germany. For comments on these, see European Dictatorships (3rd edition) 33 The characteristics of fascism (Details and comments in European Dictatorships 34) It carried a belief in radical change and revolution to achieve social transformation and 1 rebirth. 2 It rejected (1) parliamentary democracy and (2) the revolutionary left and class conflict. 3 It was presided over by an absolute leader, who had the trappings of personality cult. 4 It was normally totalitarian, controlling all forms of communication. 5 It developed an alternative economic strategy to capitalism and socialism 6 It focused on the survival of the fittest 7 It was militarist, hypernationalist and often racist. Should ‘Fascism’ include ‘Nazism’? (Details and comments in European Dictatorships35) NO Sternhell: Fascism originated in France as the conjunction of the syndicalism and ultra-nationalism. It was developed further in Italy. Nazism was distinct and should not be included in the term fascism. The consensus is that Nazism should be included in fascism. Kershaw: Nazism and Italian Fascism were ‘separate species within the same genus’. YES Nolte: Nazism was ‘radical fascism’. Linz: Nazism was a ‘distinctive branch grafted on the fascist tree’. But: Nazism placed more emphasis than fascism on the racial community and antiSemitism. For comments on these, see European Dictatorships (3rd edition) 35 Where did fascism derive its support? (Details and comments in European Dictatorships 34) 1 The lumpenproletariat: some of the unemployed and socially displaced 2 Rural populations: peasantry and estate owners 3 Many former army officers, demobilized soldiers and veterans of the First World War 4 The middle classes, affected by economic crises in the 1920s and 1930s 5 Capital and big business – as a means of finding security against the threat of communism 6 Overall, fascism benefited from the instability of the inter-war period. For comments on these, see European Dictatorships (3rd edition) 34 Which regimes and movements were ‘Fascist’ before 1939? (ED 30) Fascist totalitarian regimes 7 8 Fascist movements in non-Fascist authoritarian regimes 6 12 2 14NAZI GERMANY 11 13 1 Falange (Spain) 2 Falanga (Poland) 3 Heimwehr (Austria) 4 Arrow Cross (Hungary) 5 Iron Guard (Romania) 6 Iron Wolf (Lithuania) 7 Estonian Freedom Fighters 8 Thunder Cross (Latvia) 9 Ustasha (Croatia) 3 4 10 5 FASCIST ITALY 1 Fascist movements in democratic regimes 10 Action Francaise (France) 11 Rex (Belgium) 12 British Union of Fascists 13 Lapua (Finland) 14 Dutch National Socialists Other influences in inter-war Europe (Details and comments in European Dictatorships 36) NATIONALISM CLERICALISM CONSERVATISM MILITARISM Nationalism: an ideology? (Details and comments in European Dictatorships 36) YES NO SUGAR: One of the three ‘dominant ideologies of the twentieth century’ (along with Communism and Fascism/ Nazism). MINOGUE: ‘a set of ideas’ but these ‘add up less to a theory than to a rhetoric’, the communication of ‘political excitement’ from an elite to the masses’. Possible support for this: - The only set of ideas which consistently means what it says. - Its capacity to generate huge levels of commitment and enthusiasm. - Its association with aggression against other identities. Possible support for this: - Basic principles of nationalism present in most ideologies (e.g. Fascism, Nazism, Stalinist Communism). - Large number of different variations. Types of Nationalism in inter-war Europe (ED 36-7) TYPE EXPLANATION EXAMPLES Search by indigenous groups for their own statehood Czechs, Poles, Serbs, Croats, Lithuanians, Estonians, Latvians Attempts by dominant nationality to impose its domination over others to achieve national unity Poland vs Lithuanians, Belorussians, Ukrainians; Romania vs Hungarians Attempts by nation states to claim or reclaim their co-nationals living in other states Italy vs Yugoslavia; Hungary vs Romania, Czech. Germany vs Poland, Czech. HISTORIC NATIONALISM Revival of national pride in longerestablished nations Spain: Francoism; Portugal: Empire; Hungary: Szálasi’s Hungarism ‘INFLAMED’ NATIONALISM Extreme, repressive or eliminationist manifestations – usually racist and anti-Semitic Instances in most dictatorships, especially Germany; antiSemitism widespread NATIONAL SELF-DETERMINATION INTEGRATIONIST NATIONALISM IRREDENTIST NATIONALISM Clericalism (Details and comments in European Dictatorships 36) Normally Catholicism or the Catholic Church, expressing itself as a Conservative influence and cooperating with conservative forms of authoritarianism against Communism especially in Spain under Franco, Austria under Dollfuss, Portugal under Salazar, Poland under Pilsudski Less apparent in Greece, Romania, Bulgaria, Baltic states The reverse (measures to restrict the political influence of the religious power) applied in Turkey under Atatürk Conservatism: the two roles (Details and comments in European Dictatorships 37) REDUCTIONIST CONSERVATISM To maintain the status quo and remove destabilising influences such as communism, socialism or fascism Examples: Hungary under Horthy; Poland under Pilsudski; Portugal under Salazar BONDING CONSERVATISM To rally the centre and right against the Left and far left Examples: later Weimar Germany; Spain under Franco Types of Militarism (Details and comments in European Dictatorships 37) Military action as a force against authoritarianism as a force for change and reform Examples: Pre- World War I Spain, Portugal, Turkey Militarism as the ally of conservative authoritarianism Examples: Inter- War regimes: Poland (Pilsudski), Spain Franco), Hungary (Horthy), Greece (Metaxas) Conclusion Classification of dictatorships 1918-45 Authoritarian This classification is open to debate Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland Turkey: Atatürk Austria, Portugal, Hungary (Horthy), Yugoslavia, Romania, Greece, Albania, Bulgaria Russia: post- Stalin Left Hungary (Bela Kun) Italy: Mussolini Russia: Lenin Russia: Stalin Germany: Hitler Totalitarian Right Spain: Franco Classification of dictatorships 1918-45 Authoritarian Suggest alternative classifications on this chart … Left Right Totalitarian Classification of dictatorships 1918-45 … or on this blank chart End of PowerPoint 2