– On Boarding Call Schedule –9/25 @ 2:00 Tuesdays 8/21

Transcription

– On Boarding Call Schedule –9/25 @ 2:00 Tuesdays 8/21
On Boarding Call Schedule –
Tuesdays 8/21–9/25 @ 2:00
Armstrong Institute for Patient
1
Safety and Quality
Learning Objectives
• To understand the basics of communication
• To understand the importance of having daily goals
• To learn how to implement daily goals in your ICU
• To understand that daily goals is a tool to improve
teamwork and communication AND supports interventions
to reduce VAP
2
Armstrong Institute for Patient Safety and Quality
Implementing Daily Goals
Nishi Rawat , M.D.
Johns Hopkins Community Physicians
Armstrong Institute for Patient Safety and Quality
CUSP & VAP Interventions
4
Armstrong Institute for Patient Safety and Quality
Basic Components and Process of
Communication
Elizabeth Dayton, Joint Commission Journal, Jan. 2007
Armstrong Institute for Patient Safety and Quality
5
Six Factors of Communication Risk
Woods. Pt Saf Qual Healthcare May/June 2006
6
Armstrong Institute for Patient Safety and Quality
Communication and Health Care
7
Lawton et al. BMJ Qual Saf 2012;21:369-80
Communication and Health Care
• 65% of all sentinel events occur due to breakdowns in
communication (JCAHO 2005)
• Nurses: communication with physicians is a leading
contributing factor for medical errors (NCSBN)
• 7% of respondents involved in medication error in past
year in which intimidation played a role (ISMP 2003)
• High performing ICUs: team-oriented, shared beliefs,
education, collegiality, informal but direct
communication, collaborative problem-solving
(Zimmerman et al. 2003)
8
Armstrong Institute for Patient Safety and Quality
ICU Physicians and ICU RN Collaboration
9
Armstrong Institute for Patient Safety and Quality
Huang, DT et al. Crit Care Med 2007 jan 35(1): 165-76 S Data
ICU Physician Rounds
• Should include a multidisciplinary group of
professionals as applicable:
– Physicians, nurses, pharmacists, respiratory
therapists
• Should be conducted at bedside if at all
possible
– Allows patient and/or family involvement
10
Armstrong Institute for Patient Safety and Quality
Crew Resource Management (CRM)
• Safety training program focused on effective
team management to improve performance
• Targets cognitive and interpersonal skills
• Goal: improve situational and self-awareness,
communication, flexibility, assertiveness,
adaptability
• Create a culture where there is freedom to
question authority
11
Armstrong Institute for Patient Safety and Quality
Communication and Aviation
Accidents
Aviation Safety Network
12
Armstrong Institute for Patient Safety and Quality
Conventional rounds
• Communication defects are common
• Rounds are generally provider rather than patient centered
• Discussion on rounds is more divergent (brainstorming) rather
than convergent (explicit plan)
• Prevents effective real-time or future feedback regarding plan
of care
13
Armstrong Institute for Patient Safety and Quality
Rounds with Daily Goals
• Creates explicit goals and enables feedback toward goals to
achieve more for the patient
• Standardizes communication to reduce encoding and
decoding errors, and creates independent checks
• Adds convergent thinking to often divergent rounds
• Helps ensure diverse input
14
Armstrong Institute for Patient Safety and Quality
Structure of Daily Goals Tool
• Items organized by organ system
• Medication review section
• To Do, Disposition, Family meeting and Code
status sections
• What can we eliminate? Lines, labs, abx…
• Safety item
• Include VAP process measures
• Check boxes vs open-ended vs combination
• One column vs second column for night goals15
Armstrong Institute for Patient Safety and Quality
How to Use Goals?
• Be explicit
• Important questions
– What needs to be done for discharge?
– What will we do today?
– What is the patient’s greatest safety risk?
• Completed on rounds and nurse reads back
• Stays with bedside nurse
• Modify to fit your hospital
Armstrong Institute for Patient Safety and Quality
16
Percent Understanding Patient Care Goals
Implemented patient
goals sheet
Pronovost J Crit Care 2003;18(2):71-5.
17
Armstrong Institute for Patient Safety and Quality
Impact on ICU Length of Stay
18
Armstrong Institute for Patient Safety and Quality
Recent Data in Support of Daily Goals
• Narasimhan et al. 2006: MICU
– Provider understanding of goals improved
– Improvement in communication scores
– LOS decreased from 6.4 to 4.3 days
• Agarwal et al. 2008: PICU
– Provider understanding of goals improved
– Trend toward decrease in LOS, not significant
19
Armstrong Institute for Patient Safety and Quality
Comprehensive Unit-based Safety Program
(CUSP)
20
Armstrong Institute for Patient Safety and Quality
Action Plan
• Present the idea to your ICU team
• Draft a daily goals form
• Obtain support from one or more ICU
physicians
• Pilot test on a couple of patients on rounds
• Get feedback from nurses and physicians
• Revise and expand
• Monitor physician paging, track LOS….
• Share your tool with the other teams
21
Armstrong Institute for Patient Safety and Quality
Questions
– Karol G. Wicker, MHS
Senior Director, Quality Policy & Advocacy
Maryland Hospital Association
kwicker@mhaonline.org
– Mary Catanzaro RN BSMT CIC
Project Manager HAIs
Hospital and Healthsystem Association of Pennsylvania
mcatanzaro@haponline.org
Armstrong Institute for Patient
22
Safety and Quality
What Should you do NOW?
CUSP Preparation:
1) Assemble team
2) Schedule meetings
CUSP Implementation:
1) Science of Safety Training for all staff
2) Identify Defects: How will the next patient be harmed?
3) Use elements of Toolkit, including Daily Goals
23
Armstrong Institute for Patient Safety and Quality
References - 1
Slide 5
Dayton E, Henriksen K. Jt Comm J Qual Saf. 2007 Jan;33(1);34-47.
Slide 6
Woods MS. How Communication Complicates the Patient Safety
Movement. 2006 May/June. http://www.psqh.com/mayjun06/dun.html.
Slide 7
Lawton R, McEachan RR, Giles SJ, Sirriyeh R, Watt IS, Wright J.
Development of an evidence-based framework of factors contributing to
patient safety incidents in hospital settings: a systematic review. BMJ Qual
Saf. 2012 May;21(5):369-80. Epub 2012 Mar 15.
Slide 9
Huang DT, Clermont G, Sexton JB, Karlo CA, Miller RG, Weissfeld LA,
Rowan KM, Angus DC. Perceptions of safety culture vary across the
intensive care units of a single institution. Crit Care Med. 2007
Jan;35(1):165-76.
Armstrong Institute for Patient Safety and Quality
24
References - 2
Slide 12 Aviation Safety Network
Slide 17 and 18
Pronovost P, Berenholtz S, Dorman T, Lipsett PA, Simmonds T, Haraden
C. Improving communications in the ICU using daily goals. J Crit Care.
2003 Jun;18(2):71-5.
Slide 19
Narasimhan M, Eisen LA, Mahoney CD, Acerra FL, Rosen MJ. Improving
nurse-physician communication and satisfaction in the intensive care unit
with a daily goals worksheet. Am J Crit Care. 2006 Mar;15(2):217-22.
Agarwal S, Frankel L, Tourner S, McMillan A, Sharek PJ. Improving
communication in a pediatric intensive care unit using daily patient goal
sheets. J Crit Care. 2008 Jun;23(2):227-35.
25
Armstrong Institute for Patient Safety and Quality