Designing Lab Exercises to Simulate Pathogen
Transcription
Designing Lab Exercises to Simulate Pathogen
Designing Lab Exercises to Simulate Pathogen Transmission Elizabeth Ingram, Presenter: Valencia College, Orlando, FL eingram@valenciacollege.edu Objectives: After completing this exercise, the students should be able to: 1. understand the difference between infection and disease; 2. understand the manner by which infectious agents are transmitted from person to person; 3. understand the manner by which infectious agents are transmitted from food and water; 4. perform serial dilutions, calculate dilution factors, and determine bacterial density of the sample using a standard formula; 5. perform the spread plate technique and count colonies on plates showing appropriate growth; 6. evaluate the applications of the viable plate count as a quantitative procedure in microbiology; 7. analyze various food items for the presence of potential pathogens; 8. extrapolate collected data to illustrate the importance of sanitation and safe handling practices; 9. show that they can relate the information to public health safety challenges. Background: Infection is defined as the entry of a microorganism into the body of the host. Disease results only when the infectious agent causes the appearance of typical signs and symptoms in the host. In 1876, Robert Koch established the link between the causative agent and infectious disease in his famous Koch’s Postulates. These postulates still hold true today. The public health practice that involves the study of the occurrence of diseases in terms of time, place and distribution is called epidemiology. Infectious agents can be transmitted by direct contact between hosts by skin to skin contact, body fluid contact, or by droplet nuclei (e.g. cough, sneeze). They can also be spread indirectly by contact with contaminated inanimate objects called fomites (e.g. beddings, towels). Sometimes pathogens are ingested as contaminants of food or water. Others are transmitted from one host to another by means of arthropod vectors, which serve either as mechanical (e.g., houseflies) or biological (e.g. mosquitoes) carriers of pathogens. Another interesting aspect of epidemiology is the fact that some human or animal hosts serve as continual sources of infection, and they are called reservoirs. Those individuals who harbor pathogens without exhibiting signs and symptoms are called carriers. Food microbiology deals with the study of the role of microbes in human enteric disease and food spoilage. As we know, foods and drinks are common vehicles by which bacterial diseases of the digestive system are transmitted. During processing and preparation, food may be contaminated with microbes from the soil, animals, food handlers and machinery. Sanitary standards have been set by government agencies so that the quality of food and drink can be controlled and regulated. In this way consumers are protected from food infections and food intoxications. The general public frequently refers to the resulting illness as food poisoning. Public health laboratories routinely test for the presence of coliforms (gram-negative, non-spore-forming bacilli that ferment lactose with gas production) in foods and drinks because these organisms serve as indicators of fecal contamination. To test foods for the presence of enteric pathogens, the standard or viable plate count is used to determine the total number of bacteria in a food sample. Large numbers of bacteria in food are usually equated with the presence of pathogens or increase the potential for food spoilage. The standard plate count has some clinical and diagnostic applications as well. For instance, it is useful in determining the clinical significance of urinary tract infections and severity of bacteremic and septicemic infections. A serial dilution of the original sample is performed and an aliquot of each dilution is inoculated on agar plates using the spread plate technique. After incubation, only plates containing 30-300 colonies are counted. Plates containing fewer than 30 colonies will give unreliable counts and those containing more than 300 are too crowded to provide accurate counts. Counts are expressed in terms of CFU (Colony Forming Units) per mL. CFU replaced the term colony to account for the fact that a single growth on the plate sometimes results from a clump of cells attached together rather than a single cell. The original bacterial density of the sample can be calculated using the following formula: Number of colonies counted Original cell density = = CFU/mL Volume plated x Dilution Factor Dilution Factors: Basically, dilutions can be expressed in the form of a fraction, a ratio or an exponential figure. Either one can be used. The following general formula may be used: Volume of the sample Dilution Factor = Total Volume (Sample Volume + Diluent Volume) 0.1 mL For example in Tube 2 = 0.1 mL = 0.1 mL + 9.9 mL Dilution factor for Tube 2 is 1:100 or 1/100 or 10 10.0 mL -2 Sometimes it is not necessary for food microbiologists to know the exact number of bacteria in order to predict a viable health threat by a bacterial pathogen. The occurrence of a new strain of E. coli, E. coli O157:H7, in the late 1980s precipitated the labeling of meat packaging with safe handling practices. This strain has the potential to cause illness and death in very small numbers. In addition, the exponential growth rates of bacteria by binary fission can result in very high numbers of bacteria in food and drink in a short time given the perfect conditions provided by the lack of refrigeration. Some of these bacteria also produce toxins, which are not inactivated by the reheating of food. The following is the safe handling label that now appears on all meat products. It appears in red to draw the public’s attention to it. SAFE HANDLING INSTRUCTIONS THIS PRODUCT WAS PREPARED FROM INSPECTED AND PASSED MEAT AND/OR POULTRY. SOME FOOD PRODUCTS MAY CONTAIN BACTERIA THAT COULD CAUSE ILLNESS IF THE PRODUCT IS MISHANDLED OR COOKED IMPROPERLY. FOR YOUR PROTECTION, FOLLOW THESE SAFE HANDLING INSTRUCTIONS. KEEP REFRIGERATED OR FROZEN. THAW IN REFRIGERATOR OR MICROWAVE. KEEP RAW MEAT AND POULTRY SEPARATE FROM OTHER FOODS. WASH WORKING SURFACES (INCLUDING CUTTING BOARDS), UTENSILS, AND HANDS AFTER TOUCHING RAW MEAT OR POULTRY. COOK THOROUGHLY. KEEP HOT FOODS HOT. REFRIGERATE LEFTOVERS IMMEDIATELY OR DISCARD. There are several methods in place in the food industry to reduce or eliminate pathogenic bacteria from food. One important practice that has been in effect for over a hundred years is pasteurization. There are now several variations on the original method but the outcome is the same – the maintenance of food quality with a reduction in bacteria that cause spoilage and disease. This exercise is composed of two experiments designed to provide students with active learning experiences pertaining to food and water safety. The first experiment involves sampling of meat purchased from a local grocery store for potential pathogens and the importance of using safe handling practices when handling raw meat. Second, a scenario is provided that investigates the effects of a water main break on the contamination of water by Escherichia coli. Students will determine if water has been contaminated at six locations and if the levels of contamination warrant intervention by the health department. Materials: Body Fluid Transmission TSB culture of Micrococcus luteus (mystery tube) Trypticase Soy Broth (TSB) Trypticase Soy Agar (TSA) plates Meat Experiment: Samples of beef, chicken, fish, and pork Sterile Pasteur pipettes Sterile cotton swab Media: TSB, LSB, PA, MSA, BESC Water Experiment Standard Plate Count: Water samples seeded with Escherichia coli Eosin Methylene Blue Agar (EMB) plates Two 9.9 mL Dilution tubes Three 9.0 Dilution tubes Sterile 1 mL pipettes and Pipettor Beaker containing ethanol Bent glass rod (“Hockey Stick”) Colony counter Part A: Pathogen Transmission by Body Fluid Exchange This experiment is designed to demonstrate how quickly a pathogen can be spread through contact with body fluids. Your results will have a real-life application, especially if you associate it with the rapid increase in the number of individuals infected with sexually transmitted diseases each year. One “mystery” tube has been inoculated with Micrococcus luteus. Will you be the one to spread the infection? 1. Obtain a TSA plate and a mystery TSB tube from your instructor (each student will work with a set of TSA and TSB). 2. Label your TSA plate by drawing a small circle at the top center and writing your tube # (as assigned by your instructor) inside the circle. 3. Draw 4 separate parallel lines across the plate below your number. These will eventually be labeled with the number of each person you exchange your sample with. 4. Soak a sterile cotton swab in your mystery TSB tube and then touch the swab to the circled area on your plate. 5. Leave your mystery tube on your bench top while you are move around the room carrying your swab with you. 6. To exchange “body fluids” with another student, introduce your swab into TSB tubes of your classmates. Your classmates will go around and randomly sample others too. 7. Swirl the swab twice in their tubes, and then roll your swab across the TSA plate on the first, second, third or fourth line depending on which level of exchange is involved. 8. Label the first, second, third or fourth line on your plate with the other students’ tube#. Note: Make “fluid exchanges” with 4 other students that belong to different groups. You will be moving throughout the lab so be especially careful not drip your sample on the floor or touch your swab to other objects and items. 9. Place your swab back into the original paper wrapping. Then break and discard the swab in the biohazard container. 10. Incubate your plates in an inverted position at 37C for 24 to 48 hours. 11. After incubation, examine your plates for growth and enter your results in the Observation and Results section in Table 1. Part B: Safe Food Handling of Meat 1. Each group will be assigned to work on a specific food item by the instructor. (1-beef, 2-chicken, 3-fish, 4-pork, 5beef, 6- chicken). These food items were purchased from a local grocery store. 2. Each group will obtain the following media: TSB, LSB, PA, MSA, and BESC. 3. The food sampling technique is as follows: a. Soak a sterile cotton swab in TSB for 5 seconds. b. Vigorously scrub a 2.5 cm area (postage stamp size) of the sample for 30 to 60 seconds, rotating the swab as you scrub. Note: This is the only time you will scrub to sample the food. 4. Aseptically inoculate a tube of LSB (Lauryl Sulfate Broth) using the dip and swirl method. 5. Using the same swab, inoculate your plates and BESC tube in this order: PA (Pseudomonas Agar), MSA (Mannitol Salt Agar), and BESC (Bile Esculin Agar). 6. Roll the swab across plate in 5 parallel lines and use a fish tail for BESC. 7. Place swab back in the original paper, break and discard the swab in the biohazard container. 8. Mark your plates as recommended. Incubate them at 37C for 24 hours. 9. After incubation, read your plates and enter your results and those of other groups as well in the Observations and Results section in Table 2. Part C: Pathogen Transmission of Escherichia coli in Water D F C B E A Case Study: Sophia T. was driving home from work in the early morning hours and noticed “a lot of water on the road”. Her concern prompted her to contact the authorities, who in turn notified the water department at which you are employed as the manager of the water quality division. When the emergency response team arrived on the scene, they traced the hazard to a break in the water main and started working to repair the water lines. You have advised the local authorities to issue a boil water warning for the area. Your assistant has just handed you six water samples and now it is your job to test the water and determine which samples indicate a potential health threat if any to the residents in the affected area. In the previous map, the star represents the flooded area that Sophia had encountered. Water samples were taken from other parts of the water lines at the points identified by the letters A through F. Note: The success of this procedure depends on strict adherence and careful performance of dilutions, plating and counting techniques. Even the slightest deviation from the protocol or errors made through careless performance of the procedures and techniques can yield grossly inaccurate results. Day 1: [Work in your assigned groups.] 1. Obtain one of the water samples. 2. Prepare serial dilutions of this sample as follows: -2 -4 -5 -6 -7 a. First label 5 test tubes containing sterile saline solution as follows: 10 , 10 , 10 , 10 , and 10 . b. The first two tubes will contain 9.9 mL of saline solution. The last 3 tubes will contain 9.0 mL of sterile saline solution. -5 -6 -7 -8 c. Next label 4 EMB plates as follows: A, B, C, D, E, or F (water sample); 10 , 10 , 10 , and 10 (final dilution factor); your group; date of inoculation; d. Using a sterile 1 mL pipette, transfer a 0.1 mL aliquot of the sample to the first tube and 1mL to the second -2 -4 -5 -6 -7 tube (10 , 10 ), and then 1.0 mL aliquots to the each of the next 3 tubes (10 , 10 , and 10 ). Caution: Use a different pipette for each transfer! e. Mix these tubes well by tapping the bottom of each tube before transferring the sample to the next tube. (Alternately you may use your Pipettor to mix the samples by aspirating and expelling the fluid a few times inside the tube) Aseptic technique precautions and reminders: DO NOT set the pipette down on the desk. Maintain sterility at all times. DO NOT handle the part of the pipette to be inserted into the tube. Only grasp the pipette from the end. DO NOT leave the canister of pipettes open to the unsterile environment. Replace the cap of the canister after aseptically removing each pipette. Place all used pipettes in a steel beaker with disinfectant, point down. Flame the mouth of each tube after removing the cap and before replacing it. 3. Aseptically transfer 0.1 mL from the last four of the diluent tubes to the 4 agar plates as follows: -4 -5 a. Transfer 0.1mL from the tube marked 10 to 10 -5 -6 b. Transfer 0.1mL from the tube marked 10 to 10 -6 -7 c. Transfer 0.1mL from the tube marked 10 to 10 -7 -8 d. Transfer 0.1mL from the tube marked 10 to 10 Remember: The final dilution factor (FDF) incorporates the 0.1 mL aliquot as if it were an additional tenfold -5 dilution. For example, the FDF for the first plate would be 10 . 4. Aseptically spread the drop of inoculum transferred over the surface of the EMB plate using a glass rod (hockey stick) by rotating the plate while the glass rod is touching the surface of the plate. 5. Place all plates in the incubator under the appropriate laboratory section shelf at 37C for 24 to 48 hours. Day 2: 1. After incubation, examine all the plates and select those that show between 30 and 300 colonies. Set aside and dispose of all plates that are not countable. 2. Count the colonies using the Colony Counter with the aid of a thin marking pen to avoid miscounting and duplicate counting of colonies. Counts of two plates of the same dilution factor should be averaged out before using in the calculations. 3. Determine the cell density of the original sample by using the standard formula. 4. Enter your results in the Observation and Results section in Tables 3 and 4. Observations and Results: Part A: Pathogen Transmission by Body Fluid Exchange 1. Examine your plate for growth starting with your own spotted sample, and then read the spaces for the first, second, third and fourth exchanges. Enter your individual result and tally it for the entire class in Table 1. Table 1 – Bacterial Transfer Patterns Observed on Individual Plates and Collated as a Group Experience Your Data Growth (+) Class Data First Exchange First Exchange Second Exchange Second Exchange Third Exchange Third Exchange Fourth Exchange Fourth Exchange Number of Positives % Positive 2. Draw a graph by plotting the number of students infected on the Y-axis versus the number of “fluid exchanges” on the X-axis in Figure. Analyze the graph and draw your conclusions about the manner and ease by which disease can be transmitted from one host to another. Part B: Safe Food Handling of Meat Read your tubes and plates for the presence or absence of bacterial growth. Refer to the Table of Culture Media in the Appendix for proper interpretation of results. [LSB-look for coliforms; PA - look for Pseudomonas; MSA - look for Staphylococcus; BESC-look for Enterococcus]. Enter your results in Table 2. Table 2 – Bacterial Contaminations in Meat, Fish and Poultry Tested LSB Beef Chicken Fish Pork PA MSA BESC Part C: Pathogen Transmission of Escherichia coli in Water Standard Plate Count: 1. Examine your plates and determine or estimate the number of colonies observed for each dilution and enter your results in Table 3. Table 3 – Number of Colonies Counted on EMB Plates Inoculated With Serially Diluted Water Plate Final Dilution Factor (FDF) Colony Forming Units (CFU) Per Individual Plate 1 2 3 4 2. Calculate the approximate number of bacteria present in the water sample using your average count data obtained from Table 3 and the formula below: Average CFU Original Cell Density = = [expressed in CFU/mL] Final Dilution Factor Your computations: Your answer: ____________________ Table 4 – Final Colony Counts for Each Water Sample Location Samples OCD (CFU/mL) A B C D E F Questions: NOTE: Answers to some of the questions below can be found at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention website: http://cdc.gov Part A: Pathogen Transmission by Body Fluid Exchange 1. In the disease transmission lab, how many students were infected? Is this about the number you expected? 2. According to your graph, how many body fluid exchanges would need to occur for the entire class to be infected? 3. What would be the quickest way for a pathogen to spread through any given population? 4. How would the dynamics be different if we would be investigating the outbreak associated with a food-borne pathogen? Part B: Safe Food Handling Of Meat 1. What is the purpose of using the set of differential and selective media in this experiment? 2. Do you think it would be a greater health threat to have high numbers of bacteria growing on MSA or PA? Why? (Hint: What organisms are selected for by each medium?) 3. What might be the source of contamination (i.e. where did the bacteria come from) if the LSB tube is coliforms (+) or the BESC tube is Enterococcus (+)? 4. What might be the source of contamination (i.e. where did the bacteria come from) if there are a large number of organisms growing on MSA? 5. What might be the source of contamination (i.e. where did the bacteria come from) if there are a large number of organisms growing on PA? 6. How would cooking alter the results of this food microbiology experiment? 7. What are the most common pathogens associated with food-borne illness? 8. Which pathogen and food was associated with the most recent outbreak of food-borne illness? 9. What is the difference between infection and intoxication as it pertains to food-borne illness? How do the symptoms vary? 10. Have you ever read the “safe handling” label on the meat package? (Refer to the Background Section.) 11. How does performing this experiment affect how you handle the meat that you are serving at home? Part B: Pathogen Transmission of Escherichia coli in Water 1. Which location(s) showed evidence of water contamination by E. coli? What pattern of contamination was evident from where the break in the water main was reported? 2. Did the data show that there was more than one point source contributing to the contamination? 6 3. If an infectious dose of 10 CFU/mL is needed to cause illness, which water sample(s) would have had high enough levels of E. coli to be of concern? 4. Infection by E. coli O157:H7 may occur with only 10 CFU/mL. Which sample(s) would be of concern if the contaminated water contained strain O157:H7? 5. What are the symptoms of an intestinal infection caused by E. coli? How do the symptoms differ if the infection is caused by the strain O157:H7? 6. If a “boil water advisory” is issued, how should you treat the water to make it drinkable? Once the boil water advisory is over, what advice does the CDC give? 7. Name three other water-borne infectious agents. Appendix – Table of Culture Media Abbreviation Purpose C Bile Esculin Agar (BESC) Isolation of Enterococcus S & D Eosin Methylene Blue Agar (EMB) Isolation of Gram-negative Enterics Lauryl Sulfate Broth (LSB) Special Ingredients Preparation Inoculation Reading Criteria SA = Bile DA = Esculin Typical Fish Tail 1.Black = Enterococcus + 2. Not black = Enterococcus - S & D SA = Eosin and Methylene Blue DA = Lactose Typical Quadrant Streak 1.Metal green sheen, black, or pink mucoid = coliforms + 2.Not as above = coliforms - Detect/ID coliforms in foods S & D SA = Sodium Lauryl Sulfate DA = Lactose SP = Durham tube Place Durham tube in test tube before autoclaving Dip & Swirl 1.Gas bubble in Durham tube = coliforms + 2.No gas = coliforms - Mannitol Salt Agar (MSA) Isolates and differentiates Staph species S & D SA = 7.5% NaCl; DA = Mannitol; pH Indicator = Phenol Red Typical Quadrant Streak Pseudomonas Isolation Agar (PA) Isolation of Pseudomonas species S SA = Irgasan® ES = Glycerol Glycerol added prior to autoclaving Quadrant Streak Trypticase Soy Agar (TSA) Growth of wide range of bacteria G None Typical Varies Trypticase Soy Broth (TSB) Growth of wide range of bacteria G None Typical Dip & Swirl 1.Growth, medium is lemon-yellow = mannitol fermentation + 2. Growth, medium is pink = mannitol fermentation3. No growth = Staphylococcus – 1. Growth on streaked line = Pseudomonas + 2. No growth= Pseudomonas – Growth of wide range of bacteria; making smears & lawns Growth of wide range of bacteria; making smears & lawns Legend: Category (C): B = Biochemical D = Differential S = Selective G = General Special Ingredients: ES = Energy Source DA = Differential Agent SA = Selective Agent SP = Selective Property