a PDF of the full research description
Transcription
a PDF of the full research description
Engagement Intent: Connecting or Disconnecting Employees? Research Learning and Benchmarking Group Invitation for Leaders Focused on Improving Employee Engagement Lead Researcher: Theresa M. Welbourne, PhD This research project is a follow up to the Incentive Research Foundation technical report titled: Engaged in what? Creating connections to performance with rewards, recognition and roles. The report documents the history of employee engagement, definitions, research and outcomes of engagement as well as reviewing a case study of the Cleveland Clinic. The unique contribution of this report is the suggestion that role-based behavior provides a lens to connect engagement activities with firm strategy and organizational-level outcomes. The report also clearly suggests that without this type of specific linkage, the ability of employee engagement programs to have measurable business results is dramatically limited. Role theory provides a unique and valid lens for taking the powerful work on employee engagement and focusing it on the right behaviors needed to drive outcomes. The tools that are developed from this line of work help leaders improve alignment by taking employee engagement work forward. Engagement Intent After conducting interviews and discussions with a number of professionals regarding the original report, we realize the focus should be on what we are now calling engagement intent. This term captures the heart of the "engaged in what" question, and it does so in a way that helps leaders take their engagement projects to the next level. Basically, we are investigating the degree to which various employee engagement programs are intending to change employee role-based behavior and then the link between this intent and the subsequent behavioral changes along with teamlevel, business unit, and firm performance changes. Using the role-based model, introduced in the IRF technical report, we explore role as the "black box" between intent and outcomes. Ways to Engage in the Research In an effort expand this work and develop a tool kit that will be used by organizations involved in this project, we are initiating a group of firms. We now are seeking organizations interested in becoming part of the working group. Four institutions are sponsoring this work and are now seeking organizations to join the group: Incentive Research Foundation Center for Effective Organizations, University of Southern California Corporate Research Forum, London, UK University of Nebraska-Lincoln Through the research institutions and participating group members, we will develop a global research to meet the needs of the complex organizations interested in this work. Our goal is to, together, make employee engagement work more meaningful to today's businesses and employees. Research Commitment Firms involved in this project will be expected to take part in a research project aimed at examining the links between engagement efforts, role-based behaviors and business outcomes. We are asking for involvement in a few different ways (organizations do not have to engage in all of the work, but the more they do, the greater their learning experience): PHASE I: ORGANIZATION PROFILING Mapping engagement, intent, role-based behavior and outcomes The research team will access written employee engagement goals and/or related materials about the programs. The research team will need access to any engagement surveys and results. The team will need to interview key individuals in the firm involved in the engagement work; this may include executives in HR and within the overall company (e.g. CEO, CFO - executive team). Documentation of engagement-related interventions, including formal and informal HR programs will be reviewed and documented. The team is particularly interested in any rewards and recognition systems that are considered to be part of the engagement program. The research team is also looking for any programs implemented that may have supported or perhaps gotten in the way of the linkages between engagement and behavioral outcomes. The research team will need to review any outcomes, action plans or evidence of change as a result of the engagement programs. From all of the work above, the researchers will develop a profile of the participating firms, including engagement intent, engagement efforts, links to roles, and the relationship between role-based behavior and outcomes. PHASE 2: GATHERING NEW EVIDENCE Surveys with managers of the participating firms For this work, we will distribute surveys to members of the management team at the firm. We are seeking new data that specifically measures aspects about role-based performance. This information will be merged with the historical analysis and provide additional information on the degree to which engagement intent supports strategy and more data on the links between intent, role-based performance, and outcomes. It will also define any missing links-roles that should be important that might not be considered at this time. In other words, we will help the participating companies by providing them with roadmaps focusing on ways they can take their engagement programs further to better enhance performance outcomes. For those firms interested, we have supplemental tools that could be used as part of the research. Managers can do assessments of employees using the role-based performance scale (this takes about 3 minutes per employee). Also, for managers, we can use the 3-minute 360, which also focuses on role-based performance. All of these additional tools provide further diagnostic data for the research team, and in addition, it gives the participating company more information for their own benchmarking and learning.