Sticky Tape Discussion SB
Transcription
Sticky Tape Discussion SB
Sticky Tape Lab Discussion Chemistry-Unit 6: Particles with Internal Structure Lab Debriefing Develop a class consensus table of results Learning Targets Learning Targets Describe evidence that supports the idea that particles have a property called “charge”. Synthesize observations into a logical pattern of behavior demonstrated by the various strips in the lab. Assessments 1. Conclusion to lab 2. Conclusion to lab Charge? " Which of the items do you believe had a charge? " " Why do you believe this? Two tapes - demonstrated attraction and repulsion Not charged? " Were there any items that did not have a charge? " " Why do you believe this? Paper and Foil - while they were attracted to both tapes, they were not attracted to themselves or each other Neutral? " If the Paper and Foil are neutral, how could they have been attracted to both the positive and negative tape? " What does neutral really mean? " No charge? " Equal amounts of positive and negative charge Transfer? " What is the smallest thing we are aware of that could be transferred? " " Atoms Does moving an atom or group of atoms from one place to another change the charge of something? " No - therefore ** there must be something smaller than an atom that was transferred Timing " When did the tape become charged? " " After we ripped them apart. If they didn’t become charged until we ripped them apart, what conclusion can we draw? " ** There was something transferred during the ripping Something smaller? " Based on our observations so far, what characteristics can we assign to this object? " " " It’s smaller than an atom It’s mobile (it moved from one tape to another) It has a charge (moving it changed the charge of both tapes) Which charge? " If it’s charged, is it positive or negative? " " If it’s positive, it moved from the bottom tape to the top tape, increasing the + charge of T and decreasing the + charge of B If it’s negative, it moved from the top tape to the bottom tape, increasing the charge of B and decreasing the - charge of T Begin Your Conclusion 1. Describe your evidence that supports the idea that particles have a property called “charge”. New Model J.J. Thomson came up with a new model of an atom to incorporate this tiny negative particle that we call electrons. The black dots represent the electrons, which called plums. These are negative. The rest of the atom was like a bowl of pudding. The bowl pudding is positive " This model is called the Plum Pudding Model the Atom Evidence for Thomson’s Model • Cathode ray was bent by a magnetic field • • Cathode ray was bent by an electric field toward the positive pole. • • Conclusion: The “ray” must be negative. Didn’t matter what kind of metal was used to generate the cathode ray. • • Conclusion: the “ray” must be matter with electromagnetic properties Conclusion: can be generated by any element Measured charge-to-mass ratio • Conclusion: mass is ~1/2000 the mass of a H atom w what do we know about the cause beh e attractions & repulsions observed in la " It’s smaller than an atom " It’s mobile " It has a charge " That charge is negative " What do we call this?? " Electron Transfer? So, the plums (electrons) transferred from the pudding (atom) of the top tape to the bottom ta o, the bottom tape is “plum rich” and the top tape “plum poor” Complete your own diagram of these atoms & tape in your notebook) Conclusion Question #2 escribe the macroscopic changes in the pes, d then provide a microscopic explanation ased upon Thomson’s model of the atom a ur drawings. Foil & Paper Foil (metal atoms) was not attracted or repelled by foil. Paper (non-metal atoms) was not attracted or repelled by paper. **BUT…both were attracted to both Top & Bottom Tape! How can we use the plum pudding model of atoms to explain the differences we observed? Neutral " objects? Can this model explain how a neutral object can be attracted to both positive and negative? his is a good model of what occurs in the paper. The pudding is “sticky” in non-metals. The electro an move in the bowls but not out of the bowls.) olarization: when a charged object redistributes We still have one question t answer... Why was the foil more attracted to the charged objects than the paper was? from Atom to Atom • • • In neutral foil, electro are equally distributed between atoms & homogeneously dispers within each atom In metals, bowls of pudding are really “so & electron “plums” ea move from bowl to bow The positively charged tape has polarized the foil---Why? top tape. (Be sure the size of the vect ws the relative strength of the ractions) raw electrons in each atom “bowl” for th per tape. (Be sure the size of the vectors ws the relative strength of the ractions) aw electrons in each atom “bowl” for th Conclusion Questions #4 & #5 Explain why these previous 2 arrangement electrons would produce the observed attractions (between paper & tape & betw foil & tape), but no attraction of either st to one just like it (paper to paper; foil to foil). Why was the foil more attracted to the charged objects than the paper was?