to view the course outline. - University of British Columbia
Transcription
to view the course outline. - University of British Columbia
EDCP 325: Approaches to Health Education – Summer Session 2015 July 6-24, 2015 10:30-1:00 Room 1214 Faculty of Education, University of British Columbia Instructor: Kathy Nicholson. B.ED., M.Ed. Correspondence and assignment email: kathynicholson@shaw.ca Blog address: http://blogs.ubc.ca/nicholson/ Kathy’s cell 778-386-1220 Twitter hashtag for our class #edcp325 Office: TBA Note: This is a graded course. EDCP 325 provides an introduction into approaches to health education in schools, health care providers, offices, unions and community organizations and may be taken as part of an undergraduate program; part of the Diploma Program in Health Education (for Nursing, Human Kinetics, Family and Nutritional Sciences and Education students); or as an elective in a Master’s Degree Program. PURPOSE OF COURSE: This course intends to provide participants with an overview of Health Education/Promotion theory and curriculum including Health Education in public health/school settings. The course perspective recognizes that healthy children and youth as well as adults are better able to learn and that schools and communities are well suited to be able to influence health. Particular emphasis will be placed on the following approaches: full service schools, the comprehensive school health movement, health integrated across the curriculum versus health as a separate course. Other topics such as cultural, legislative, comprehensive, peer education and outreach will be explored as vehicles for addressing the health knowledge, attitudes and skills of the participants in health promotion program and discussion of the pedagogy around health education and social constructs that influence all aspects of health. COURSE OBJECTIVES: Depending on the needs of the class, by the end of this course students will be given the opportunity to: 1) Examine the influence of health education on health literacy. 2) Describe the application of Health Promotion theory in the implementation of Health Education 3) Critically examine the concept of health education across cultures and throughout the lifespan 4) Investigate and evaluate a variety of community health resources 5) Think critically about contemporary Health Education issues – pedagogy and social constructs. GENERAL EXPECTATIONS AND COURSE EVALUATION It is expected that all students will: • Attend ALL classes. If your absence is unavoidable, you are expected to advise the instructor as soon as possible and make arrangements to complete what has been missed.(Bachelor of Education Program Policy Handbook http;//teach.educ.ubc.ca/publications/pdfs.Bed-Policy-handbook-2010.pdf) • Actively participate in each class- discussions, role plays, research, brainstorming, activities etc. • Provide helpful, honest, and supportive feedback to each other to encourage professional growth and collaboration. • Complete any assigned readings prior to coming to class. • Encourage personal reflection as a professional learning activity. • Meet deadlines for submitting assignments. • Use electronic devices in line with professional expectations and professional practice during class time. • Be familiar with, and abide by, the university rules regarding plagiarism. Attendance/Participation Attendance and participation are essential to the experimental learning that is necessary within professional program. Participation in class activities and discussions forms the basis of professional inquiry and development. Teacher candidates are expected to attend all scheduled classes, lectures and/or seminars. Teacher candidates who miss a significant amount of class time (more than 15% of course hours) may be required to repeat the course. If you are going to be absent, please inform me by email, by phone or in writing. Full details regarding Attendance and Participation are described in full in the Bed Program Handbook found at: http://teach.educ.ubc.ca/publications/index.html Professional Conduct and Respectful Learning Environment (adapted from the Climate Statement, EDST) Teacher candidates in the Faculty of Education are expected to adhere to principles of professional conduct while on campus and in schools. (See Bachelor of Education Program Policy Handbook: http://teach.educ.ubc.ca/publications/index.html) They are also expected to adhere the policy of university regarding respectful learning environment (http://teach.educ.ubc.ca/sustainability.html) Participants in this course are expected to demonstrate all of the qualities of professionalism, arriving at each class fully prepared, engaging actively in the teaching and learning process and interacting ethically with your peers and your instructor. Classes will be conducted within an atmosphere of respect, both for each other and for the ideas expressed by participants in class discussions and debates. Our responsibility in this class is to model professional conduct and to guide you to an understanding of professionalism when you are on campus. Academic Integrity (Paragraph used with permission of DR. Tom Sork, EPLT) The integrity of academic work depends on the honesty of all those who work in this environment and the observance of accepted conventions concerning such practices as acknowledging the work of others. Plagiarism and other forms of academic misconduct are taken very seriously at UBC, whether committed by faculty, staff or students. You should be aware of the sections of the University Calendar that address academic misconduct: www.students.ubc.ca/calendar and of the university’s website on scholarly integrity: http://clc.library.ubc.ca/airc.html. The UBC library also has a useful webpage on plagiarism and how to avoid it: www.library.ubc.ca/home/plagiarism/. If you have questions or concerns about any of these policies or conventions in relation to how they apply to the work you do in this course, please discuss them with me. Reading: • • • • • Personal Planning K-17 IRP OR Health and Career Education 8-9 IRP OR Planning 10 IRP. B.C. Ministry of Education. Victoria: Province of British Columbia. (View in the Reserve section, Education Library or online at B.C. Ministry of Education.) • Ottawa Charter http://www.who.int/healthpromotion/conferences/previous/ottawa/en/ • Millennium Project http://www.unmillenniumproject.org/ Critical health literacy: shifting textual-social practices in the health classroom by Kerry Renwick in Asia-Pacific Journal of Health, Sport and Physical Education http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/18377122.2014.940808 (I will make copies) Health knowledge and health education in the democratic health-promoting school by Bjarne Brun Jensen http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/09654280010330900 (I will make copies) http://www.buzan.com.au/learning/mind_mapping.html Articles assigned by instructor. Copy charges will apply. $5.00 fee will be collected for photocopying. Ottawa Charter emblem Assignment Guidelines & Evaluation Profile Assignment Due Date Done as … Value 1. 2. Health Mind Map Journal of Reflections July 6/24 July 6/24 Individual Individual 3. Article Summary July 10 Individual 15% 20% Part A- 5% Part B-15% 15% Presentation to persuade July 14 – Gallery walk Individual 10% July 20-24 Pairs 9 groups 30% Individual 10 % 4. Health Agency Promotion Presentations Peer Evaluation July 14 and 20-24 25% 40% Faculty of Education Grading According to the Faculty of Education’s Operational Definition of Letter Grade Categories (June, 1996) an assignment may be: Letter Grade Percent Range A+ A A- 90-100 85-89 80-84 B+ B B- 76-79 72-75 68-71 C+ C C- 64-67 60-63 55-59 Description Work of exceptional quality. Demonstrates excellent comprehension of the subject and use of existing literature and research. Consistently applies a high level of critical scrutiny to texts and discussions. Shows personal engagement with the topic; original insights and contribution. Flawless writing style. Work of good quality with no major weaknesses. All of the required elements of the assignment have been fulfilled. The writing is clear and explicit; the coverage and demonstrated comprehension of the topic is more than adequate. Some degree of critical thinking and personal involvement in the work is shown. Some flaws evident in writing style, grammar, and organization. Good use of existing knowledge in the subject. Adequate work. All of the required elements have been included, although some conceptual inadequacies are present. A fair comprehension of the subject is demonstrated, but weakness in content, style, organization, critical awareness, personal involvement and/or use of the literature are apparent. Grading is based on: Course Grading Criteria (Faculty of Education Guidelines) and the Assignment Guidelines & Evaluation Profile & Criteria outlined in each assigment: Assignments 1. ‘What is Health?’ Mind Map 15 marks Dates : Pre: July 6 Post July 24 Create a mind map or Venn diagram or time line or web diagram which conveys your perception of the multifaceted concept of health. Before one can plan to teach a topic it is useful to determine what our preconceived notions of what the topic means to us and how if at all they are influenced by our culture. Flesh out the map by bringing in all related topics of health demonstrating their interrelationships visually. This may be done by drawing various types of lines (dotted, straight, or crooked) and circles or other shapes to group concepts. Colours may also be used. Feel free to explore your creativity. This can be hand drawn (at first or throughout) and/or computer generated and then put on a large piece of paper. Helpful source - http://www.buzan.com.au/learning/mind-mapping.html During the first class, after our sharing of Part A of assignment 2 – Journal of Reflections, we will discuss the concept of health and after this, time will be given to explore this topic while creating your mind map. Support will be given regarding how to do this method of representation. This initial representation will be due July 6 and shared as a short gallery walk. As the course content develops in your mind throughout the 3 weeks you will have an opportunity to alter or further develop your diagram and then hand in the final draft on July 24. The final draft should demonstrate an expanded understanding of material. Size of the mind map will be 11x17 or legal paper. Assessment criteria: personal insights, critical analysis and presentation quality, as follows: 0 - 3: Incomplete information, simple concepts outlined 4 - 7: Adequate depth of information presented clear with interrelationship’s demonstrated 8 -10: Outstanding representation of complex information with synthesis & presentation quality Note: A more detailed rubric will be created with the class. 2. Journal of Reflections 20 marks Part A – 5% Date: July 6 Part B – 15% Date: July 24 Part A: 1. What is your background prior to coming into this course (family, education, work, health/illnesses, experiences, and hobbies or interests? 2. What do I know about Health Education? 3. What do I want to know? 4. What is your area of special interest? (Health issue, age group, general topic etc.) 5. What are your thoughts on approaches to health education? This part is first done in writing (typed) and then presented orally the first class – July 6 - Each question worth 1%. (Out of 5) Part B 1. What do I find surprising or interesting? 2. What do I disagree with regarding these approaches to Health Education? 3. How has my outlook or knowledge base of Health developed as a result of this course? Active participation in class and a 2 page (double-spaced) critical reflection of your understanding of Health Education from pre- to end of course, incorporating the following: a) Identify your goals for teaching Health - Foods, Planning 10, Family Studies, Public health, Personal health, P.E., etc. b) Discuss your understanding of the important pedagogical issues in teaching health in schools or other settings c) Provide a reflective summary that demonstrates your teaching and/or learning priorities (determined by or derived from?) as you think about teaching Health Education. d) Presentation on last day – brief and describes the key reflections This part is done in writing (typed) and then presented on the last class July 24 in a brief (5 minute) oral presentation. Assessment criteria: personal insights, critical analysis and presentation quality, as follows: 0 - 5: Incomplete information, critical reflections from course to date 6 - 10: Adequate critical reflections, writing organized and coherent 11 -15: Outstanding critical reflections, information synthesis and presentation quality Note: A more detailed rubric will be created with the class. 3. Article Summary & Presentation 25 marks Part A 15% Date: Written Summary: July 10 Part B 10% Static Presentation: July 14 Part A - Choose a topic within the scope of health promotion theories, health educational theory, or health prevention/ treatment theory that is pertinent to your interests or career. Find 2-3 up to date academic articles on this topic. Summarize the articles pulling out the central ideas and how these ideas may be applied to health education, your life, and the work you do (will do) in your career. Be sure to cover pedagogy, social/cultural issues and social evolution questions that may apply. What is the treatment based on? Present your summary in a 2+ page double spaced paper along with your critical reflection and insights with positives and negatives along with your supports or arguments. Please include urls or references for your articles. Assessment criteria: personal insights, critical analysis and presentation quality, as follows: 0 - 5: Incomplete information, brief description of applicability 6 - 9: Adequate critical review and summary, applications made, writing organized & coherent 10-12: Good critical review and summary with clear applications made and writing is very organized 13 -15: Outstanding critical summarizations and applications made, synthesis and presentation of material is of excellent quality Note: A more detailed rubric will be created with the class. Presentation of Information / Application to education – July 14 Create a presentation for the class in a static form – poster, brochure, b/b handout etc. outlining the concepts in your articles with the purpose to inform, educate, and possibly persuade the audience. The presentation should affect and impact our attitudes and behaviour regarding health and or health education. It will be displayed in the class and evaluated using a gallery walk concept. This assignment is purposefully broad in scope so that it can be maximally useful to you in your career and your life, so please tailor it to your interests. The presentation is meant to inform yourself, and your colleagues (classmates), but also to give you an opportunity to learn about the challenges involved in teaching a health concept so that an impact is made on attitude and behavior if possible. Please include any audio or visual materials or websites that you feel will assist you/others in having an impact and presenting the information. Use any learning activity that you feel is relevant to the target audience that you may be trying to reach. Assessment criteria: personal insights, critical analysis and presentation quality, as follows: 0 - 3: Incomplete information, simple concepts outlined 4 - 7: Adequate depth of information presented clear with interrelationship’s demonstrated 8 -10: Outstanding representation of complex information with synthesis & presentation quality Note: A more detailed rubric will be created with the class 4. Presentation: Community Health Promoting Agency 30 marks (Note: May start earlier - July 16 - depending on class numbers) Dates: Jul. 17-24 In pairs facilitate a 30 min. presentation that actively informs the audience about an agency within any community that works to promote health and delivers health education. Choice an agency that is focused on a health issue that you are interested in and would like to know more about. Include the following information about the agency: The overall mission Intended recipients/target market What is the overview of the health education services they perform? Is it for profit or not? Is the staff paid? Volunteers? What is the ratio? What is the training of the staff? Where are they located? Are they part of a national body? Is there a board of directors that manages the operations? How can educators use this agency? Speakers, field trips. Relevance to Home Economics or public health Is there any bias in the educational policy that benefits the agency? What are the challenges faced by the agency? What is the benefit, if any, to the community from this agency? What, if any, are ways to prevent the “issues” that the agency deals with? What are the treatments and management of the issue Assessment Criteria: demonstrated ability to facilitate presentation to inform: 0- 8: Incomplete provision of information/presentation is lacking clarity, organization 9- 16: Adequate, but limited, information presented in marginally direct manor 17- 22 Articulate & organized presentation, giving audience clear and useful information. 23-30: Captivating presentation with a critical examination of the agency outlining in a concise and clear format all relevant information and how an educator can use the information. Note: A more detailed rubric will be created with the class. Peer Evaluation 10 marks Dates: Jul. 14 and 20-24 During class while your colleagues are making their presentation students will complete a peer evaluation on a sheet provided. More effective evaluations will include comments with positive feedback and a critique provided in a supportive and constructive format. Only students present will be able to participate. This is intended to be a learning activity to facilitate one’s own presentation skills, and to gain practice in evaluation and assessment. You will be focusing on strengths and areas for improvement. A completion mark is given when peer evaluations handed in and will be out of 10. Assignment #5 - Community Health Agency Presentation Schedule (30 min each and set up and discussion time). Dates: Friday July 17 Monday July 20 Tuesday July 21 Wednesday July 22 Thursday July 23 Friday July 24 Presenters- Agency Presenters- Agency 1 2 Tentative Class Schedule JULY 2015 Sunday MONDAY TUESDAY WEDENSDAY 1 THURSDAY 2 FRIDAY 3 Saturday 4 5 6 Introduce course. Self as required. Class intros. Part A 7 Group sign up. History of health education. Discussion 15 Pwpt + notes. 20 Food history youtube 20 (10 mins watch + 10 mins. dis.) 8 Pwpt – getting started on teaching Health 9 10 11 Health literacy debate Article summaries due Group activity. What is health? →individual →group →individual. Mind map clip Working time for mind map. Gallery walk of class mind maps 12 List of topics. + sign up 13 Approaches to Health Education Review of K. Renwick’s article Four dimensions Discussion Health literacy pwpt. Review history approach. Discussion. Health approaches. Article summary. Comprehensive. School Action School BC. Topics for articles Working time 30mins. Inspiration 14 Health articles static presentation Gallery Walk Inspiration 15 Health promotion (20 mins), Cultural prospects. 16 Review of Jensen article 17 Health research 18 Presentations 2 groups – 30 minutes Behavior or empowerment 30 mins working time. 19 20 McClearay connectiveness 30 mins working time 30 mins working time 30 mins working time 21 Healthy eating. Aboriginal Health 22 Education for new immigrants. 23 Sexual health – students. Presentations 2 groups each 30 minutes Presentations 2 groups each 30 minutes Presentations 2 groups each 30 minutes Presentations 2 groups each 30 minutes 27 29 30 24 Course evaluation Presentations Part B of Journal reflections Peer evaluations handed in Closing comments 26 28 31 25