Structured Credit Outlook
Transcription
Structured Credit Outlook
Guggenheim Investments Structured Credit Review May 2015 Structured Credit Review As of May 2015 ABS May ABS performance was positive and outperformed the overall bond market. The BofA Merrill Lynch AA-BBB U.S. Asset Backed Securities Index gained 21 bps for the month while the BofA Merrill Lynch U.S. Broad Market Index fell 24 bps. Spreads on the BofA Merrill Lynch AABBB U.S. ABS index were 1 bp tighter on the month at 146 bps, while ABS benefitted from shorter duration as rates markets widened. CLO total returns as measured by JP Morgan’s CLOIE indices for post-crisis issues were positive for the month, with gains from 27 bps at AAA through 155 bps for BBB tranches. New ABS issuance for May totaled $22.7 billion per SIFMA, down from $22.1 billion in May 2014. New ABS issuance was more weighted to esoterics, with $10.2 billion auto, $2.8 billion credit card and $4.4 billion esoteric ABS. While prime auto securitizations picked up substantially in May, subprime auto deals slowed from a historically prolific first quarter. JP Morgan Research shows U.S. CLO issuance of $6.6 billion for the month, down 42% from April. Limited supply of loan collateral was the main driver of reduced CLO issuance. Eight post-crisis CLOs refinanced in May – a monthly a monthly record – as managers and equity holders sought to benefit from tighter liability spreads. Credit performance across the commercial ABS and CLO sectors remains favorable given the benign credit conditions and collateral valuations across the U.S. economy. Consumer ABS credit performance is expected to show modest deterioration from strong levels as underwriting standards loosen and subprime originations increase share. Corporate defaults are expected to rise in 2015 led by the energy sector, under continued pressure from low oil prices, as well as increasingly aggressive M&A activity and related corporate financing. Overall, U.S. economic performance is expected to be strong and supportive of credit performance. Non-Agency RMBS The Non-Agency RMBS market showed neutral performance in May with the J.P. Morgan Non-Agency Index returning 40 bps for fixed-rate prime and Alt-A RMBS and 20 bps for subprime RMBS. Synthetic benchmarks posted similarly tepid performance as the ABX.AAA Indexes, backed by subprime RMBS, ended the month up 20 bps. Trading volumes in May were moderate – approximately $2.5 billion/week – and dealer inventories grew by roughly $750 million. Three new issue private-label deals, backed by approximately $2.1 billion of recently originated loans to fully documented borrowers with excellent credit histories, came to the market. Approximately $2.3 billion of non- and reperforming loan backed RMBS deals were also placed in May. The GSEs issued one credit risk transfer deal consisting of investment grade and non-rated floating rate tranches which reference approximately $45 billion of mortgage loans originated in late 2013 and early 2014. Housing data was generally positive in May. The Case-Shiller 20-City Composite showed a year-over-year increase of 5.0% and a stabilizing rate of appreciation. The forward looking indicators of housing starts and building permits reversed their weak results of the past few months and printed month-over month increases that exceeded consensus expectations. New home sales roughly met expectations and stand 22% higher than May 2014. Pending home sales showed a strong increase (up 13% year-over-year), which, when viewed with the historically low 5.3 months of listed inventory, provide a positive climate for the upcoming spring and summer months. Existing home sales, on the other hand, missed expectations with a 3.3% change month-over-month but remained in the 4.8 to 5.2mm/yr range observed over the last 12 months. Mortgage loans showed reduced prepayments speeds in May in lagged response to rising mortgage rates in February and March, with the effect most pronounced in higher credit quality loans. The balance of delinquent loans also fell across the Non-Agency RMBS universe. Loss severities and liquidation rates were roughly unchanged despite the population of distressed loans slowly shifting toward states with expensive, slow-moving judicial foreclosure processes. The climate of low interest rates, stable employment, and improved homes prices, combined with ongoing credit curing of mortgage collateral continue to provide constructive tailwinds for mortgage credit performance, particularly in the more credit sensitive Alt-A and subprime subsectors. CMBS Cash conduit spreads were roughly unchanged in May. New issuance volume across conduit, single asset / single borrower and CRE CLO was approximately $7 billion. Total 2015 YTD private-label issuance comes in at $40.7 billion, 47% higher than the same period in 2014. Recently, conduit CMBS transactions have excluded ‘major’ rating agencies from subordinate CMBS debt tranches. The practice of selectively choosing whether to include a ‘major’ rating agency, or ‘ratings shopping,’ has coincided with increasingly aggressive loan underwriting in conduit CMBS. Guggenheim does not believe loan underwriting has reached pre-crisis standards, however we note that ‘ratings shopped’ transactions generally feature less credit enhancement and price up to 15 bps wide of those transactions where ‘major’ rating agencies are included. The mix of loan originators in conduit CMBS has also changed since early post-crisis deals. Recently, loan contributions to CMBS deals from smaller, non broker-dealer originators have increased to as much as 50% of total transaction collateral in 2015 from a low of 9% in 2011. Guggenheim’s underwriting of loans from both broker-dealer and smaller originator cohorts suggests that smaller originators tend to more aggressively compete on underwriting terms and loan amount, where broker-dealer originators tend to compete using more aggressive loan interest rates. Please see disclosures and legal notice at end of document. 2 Disclosures and Legal Notice Guggenheim Investments represents the following affiliated investment management businesses of Guggenheim Partners, LLC: Guggenheim Partners Investment Management, LLC, Security Investors, LLC, Guggenheim Funds Investment Advisors, LLC, Guggenheim Funds Distributors, LLC, Guggenheim Real Estate, LLC, Transparent Value Advisors, LLC, GS GAMMA Advisors, LLC, Guggenheim Partners Europe Limited and Guggenheim Partners India Management. This material is intended to inform you of services available through Guggenheim Investments’ affiliate businesses. The information presented herein has been prepared for informational purposes only and is not an offer to buy or sell, or a solicitation of an offer to buy or sell, any security or fund interest. This data is for illustrative purposes only. Although the information presented herein has been obtained from and is based upon sources Guggenheim Investments believe to be reliable, no representation or warranty, express or implied, is made as to the accuracy or completeness of that information. No assurance can be given that the investment objectives described herein will be achieved. The opinions, estimates, and investment strategies and views expressed in this document constitute the judgment of our investment strategists, based on current market conditions and are subject to change without notice. The investment strategies and views stated here may differ from those expressed for other purposes or in other contexts by other entities affiliated with Guggenheim Investments that may use different investment philosophies. Forward looking statements, estimates, and certain information contained herein are based upon proprietary and non-proprietary research and other sources. The investments discussed may fluctuate in price or value. Investors may get back less than they invested. Changes in rates of exchange may have an adverse effect on the value of investments. Past performance is not indicative of comparable future results. Given the inherent volatility of the securities markets, it should not be assumed that investors will experience returns comparable to those shown here. Market and economic conditions may change in the future producing materially different results than those shown here. All investments have inherent risks. The comparisons herein of the performance of the market indicators, benchmarks or indices may not be meaningful since the constitution and risks associated with each market indicator, benchmark or index may be significantly different. Accordingly, no representation or warranty is made to the sufficiency, relevance, importance, appropriateness, completeness, or comprehensiveness of the market data, information or summaries contained herein for any specific purpose. © 2015 Guggenheim Partners, LLC. All Rights Reserved. No part of this document may be reproduced, stored, or transmitted by any means without the express written consent of Guggenheim Partners, LLC. GPIM 18092 Please see disclosures and legal notice at end of document. 3
Similar documents
4students: Read More about Our Writing Services
At 4students.us, students have an opportunity to get knowledge from the best academic writers. Read more at 4students.us about high quality custom writing easily.
More information