Collaborative development of open source
Transcription
Collaborative development of open source
Downloaded from http://innovations.bmj.com/ on July 6, 2015 - Published by group.bmj.com BMJ Innovations Publish Ahead of Print, published on April 3, 2015 as doi:10.1136/bmjinnov-2014-000034 COMMENTARY Collaborative development of open source-appropriate technologies: a way to reduce the global access gap? Roberto Aufieri, Simonetta Picone, Piermichele Paolillo Division of Neonatology and Neonatal Intensive Care, Casilino General Hospital, Roma, Italy Correspondence to Roberto Aufieri, Policlinico Casilino, Via Casilina, 1049, Roma 00169, Italy; r.aufieri@gmail.com Accepted 13 March 2015 To cite: Aufieri R, Picone S, Paolillo P. BMJ Innov Published Online First: [ please include Day Month Year] doi:10.1136/bmjinnov-2014000034 Healthcare systems in low- and middleincome countries (LMIC), due to scarcity of economic resources, often lack appropriate health technologies necessary for the prevention, diagnosis and treatment of many curable diseases.1 WHO acknowledges that most of the current global health targets and goals would be impossible to achieve without an increase in access to essential medical devices,2 hence promotes the development and local production of appropriate devices.3 Nonetheless, despite the increasing interest and efforts, prices of devices, as well as prices of patents for local producers, continue to not be appropriate for many LMIC. Research, development and production of biomedical devices are mostly performed by companies in high-income countries for high-income markets, and it has been estimated that only 13% of manufacturers are located in LMIC.2 Consequences are that high prices, along with inefficient local production and distribution, among other factors, contribute to set back commercialisation and availability of final products in lowresource settings. This problem has been recently highlighted and defined as the last mile translation.4 In the past few years, information technology achievements have had a profound impact on most people’s everyday lives. These have been obtained not only through research and development of novel technologies, but also thanks to the adoption of so-called open source licenses. Open source licenses are conceived to allow everyone to use, copy, modify and freely redistribute, under defined terms and conditions, a piece of software and its source code.5 The most notable example of free and open source software is represented by the Linux operating system. When, in 1991, its creator, Linus Torvalds, released the source codes of this new operating system to the public, asking for the collaboration of other developers, he unwittingly launched what has probably become the biggest collaborative software project ever. Nowadays, Linux is a fast, stable and secure operating system, widely used on web servers, personal computers, smartphones and tablets. The same philosophy, adopted for software licenses, later also found application in the hardware field, resulting in the development of low-cost, versatile products (eg, Arduino, an open source microcontroller) that inspire different uses and applications, and that are, together with the diffusion of three-dimensional (3D) printing, contributing to foster the “maker movement”, a growing community of novel inventors. 3D printing, also known as additive manufacturing, allows printing of solid objects of any shape from its digital model, layer by layer, out of plastic or other material. This novel technology has been shown to be highly cost-efficient and project files can be easily shared, allowing collaborative prototyping. A successful example of a 3D printing based collaborative project is the e-NABLE Project (http:// www.enablingthefuture.org), where a community of more than 1500 contributors collaborate to prototype open source 3D printed prosthetic hands that can be downloaded and printed by anyone for less than $50 in materials. Furthermore, the possibility of reducing research costs with the creation of Aufieri R, et al. BMJ Innov 2015;0:1–2. doi:10.1136/bmjinnov-2014-000034 Copyright 2015 by All India Institute of Medical Sciences. 1 Downloaded from http://innovations.bmj.com/ on July 6, 2015 - Published by group.bmj.com COMMENTARY open source scientific hardware by combining 3D printing with open-source microcontrollers running on open source software has been emphasised.6 However, only a limited number of pieces of scientific equipment and devices, including a certified diagnostic electrocardiograph, optics components and syringe pumps for laboratory research, have been conceived and released under an open source license.7–9 The OS4BME (Open Source for Biomedical Engineering) project, in 2013, during the Innovator Summer School (an initiative of the United Nations Economic Commission for Africa), held an intensive course of open source design and rapid prototyping for biomedical engineering at the Kenyatta University (Kenya). Throughout the 1 week course, students designed and assembled an open source neonatal monitor.10 It is our opinion that, in a field where conventional approaches have not yet obtained the desired outcome, future strategies to reduce the medical technology access gap in LMIC should consider the promotion of collaborative development of appropriate open source technology for global health purposes. The use of 3D printing combined with low-cost microcontrollers or single-board computers, could help to reduce costs of prototyping, and open source projects, once available, could be freely used and modified by global biomedical companies. Trying to stimulate the debate and to provide a platform for online collaboration, we have ultimately started up the WikiBioMed project (http://www. wikibiomed.org). This is a collaborative non-profit project, aimed at creating a multidisciplinary collaborative coworking community that would conceive and prototype open source biomedical devices, shared on a wiki site. However, any initiative aimed at the development of open source appropriate technology for LMIC would be beneficial and therefore is to be encouraged. It is hoped that, in the future, the adoption of open source licensing along with application of new technologies, as mentioned earlier, will contribute towards increasing access to essential, appropriate and potentially life-saving technology in low-resource settings. 2 Contributors RA conceived the work, performed the literature research, wrote the first draft of the manuscript and revised subsequent and final drafts. SP, PP conceived the work and revised subsequent and final drafts. RA, SP, PP: read and approved the final manuscript. RA, SP, PP are accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved. Competing interests None. Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; internally peer reviewed. REFERENCES 1 Sinha SR, Barry M. Health technologies and innovation in the global health arena. N Engl J Med 2011;365:779–82. 2 WHO. Local production and technology transfer to increase access to medical devices. Addressing the barriers and challenges in low- and middle-income countries. World Health Organization, 2012. http://www.who.int/medical_devices/ 1240EHT_final.pdf (accessed 24 Nov 2014). 3 WHO. Compendium of innovative health technologies for low-resource settings 2011–2013. World Health Organization, 2014. http://www.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/108781/1/ 9789241564731_eng.pdf (accessed 24 Nov 2014). 4 Chao TE, Lo NC, Mody GN, et al. Strategies for last mile implementation of global health technologies. Lancet Glob Health 2014;2:e497–8. 5 Open Source Initiative. The open source definition. http:// opensource.org/osd (accessed 24 Nov 2014). 6 Pearce JM. Building research equipment with free, open-source hardware. Science 2012;337:1303–4. 7 Becchetti C, Neri A. Medical instrument design and development: from requirements to market placements.1st edn. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons Ltd, 2013. 8 Zhang C, Anzalone NC, Faria RP, et al. Open-source 3D-printable optics equipment. PLoS ONE 2013;8:e59840. 9 Wijnen B, Hunt EJ, Anzalone GC, et al. Open-source syringe pump library. PLoS ONE 2014;9:e107216. 10 De Maria C, Mazzei D, Ahluwalia A. Open source biomedical engineering for sustainability in African healthcare: combining academic excellence with innovation. Proceedings of the ICDS 2014, The Eighth International Conference on Digital Society; 2014 Mar 23-27; Barcelona, Spain. p 48–53. http://www. thinkmind.org/index.php?view=article&articleid=icds_2014_ 2_40_10173 (accessed 24 Nov 2014). Aufieri R, et al. BMJ Innov 2015;0:1–2. doi:10.1136/bmjinnov-2014-000034 Downloaded from http://innovations.bmj.com/ on July 6, 2015 - Published by group.bmj.com Collaborative development of open source-appropriate technologies: a way to reduce the global access gap? Roberto Aufieri, Simonetta Picone and Piermichele Paolillo BMJ Innov published online April 3, 2015 Updated information and services can be found at: http://innovations.bmj.com/content/early/2015/04/03/bmjinnov-2014000034 These include: References Email alerting service Topic Collections This article cites 5 articles, 1 of which you can access for free at: http://innovations.bmj.com/content/early/2015/04/03/bmjinnov-2014000034#BIBL Receive free email alerts when new articles cite this article. Sign up in the box at the top right corner of the online article. Articles on similar topics can be found in the following collections IT (6) Pacing and electrophysiology (1) Notes To request permissions go to: http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions To order reprints go to: http://journals.bmj.com/cgi/reprintform To subscribe to BMJ go to: http://group.bmj.com/subscribe/