Acute Toxic Effects of Hevea brasiliensis on the Gills of Hatchery
Transcription
Acute Toxic Effects of Hevea brasiliensis on the Gills of Hatchery
Journal of Academia and Industrial Research (JAIR) Volume 3, Issue 11 April 2015 562 ISSN: 2278-5213 RESEARCH ARTICLE Acute Toxic Effects of Hevea brasiliensis on the Gills of Hatchery Reared Oreochromis niloticus Fingerlings 1 George Ubong1*, Ini-Ibehe N. Etim2, M.P. Ekanim2 and Akpan, Monica K.2 Dept. of Fisheries and Aquaculture, Institute of Oceanography, University of Calabar, Cross River State, Nigeria 2 Dept. of Marine Biology, Akwa-Ibom State University, P.M.B. 1167, Uyo gboy4jesus@yahoo.com*; +2348032625310 ______________________________________________________________________________________________ Abstract The effects of water soluble fraction (WSF) of Hevea brasiliensis on the gills of Oreochromis niloticus fingerlings had severe impacts on the test organisms. Six concentrations ranging from 0, 8, 16, 24, 32 and 40 mg/L were prepared from the WSF of the latex for histopathological examination. There was no observable change in the gills of the test organism in the control group. The test organism in the 8, 16, 24, 32 and 40 mg/L concentration exhibited various reactions which included irregular movement, attempt at jumping out, color changes, exhaust swimming motions and changes in opercula rate. In the 8 mg/L concentration, the gill showed loss of cells integrity, in the 16 mg/L concentration it was observed to show loss of cell integrity and disintegration, in the 24 mg/L of toxicant, cell disintegration was observed in the gills, in the 32 mg/L of toxicant loss of gill secondary lamellae was observed and in the 40 mg/L concentration pronounced lamellae erosion and hyperplasia was observed in gill ray. From the findings, it is observed that latex obtained from Hevea brasiliensis is toxic to aquatic life. Therefore, effective management strategies should be put in place to ensure safety compliance. Keywords: Hevea brasiliensis, Oreochromis niloticus, histopathology, toxicant, management strategies. Introduction Despite the numerous benefits that are rendered to the modernization of this world by natural rubber, the consequence of natural rubber processing has yet to provide a serious problem due to its highly polluted effluents. The rapid growth of this industry generates large quantities of effluents coming from its processing operations which is really a big problem because its wastewater contains ammonia and high biological oxygen demanding substances. These substances can deplete dissolved oxygen and create anaerobic conditions in water bodies. Without proper treatment, discharge of wastewater from rubber processing industry to the environment may cause serious and long lasting consequences (ATPC, 2004). Pollution has become a general term for the common man because of its regular occurrence. Environmental pollution has been woven into the fabric of our modern life. Very often, the world is shocked by reports of pollution disasters and then man becomes active and conscious about the harmful effects of pollution and thinks about the ways and means to keep the environment clean. Studies have shown that structural changes in gills are induced by toxicant (Nowak, 1992; Tamse et al., 1995). From results obtained from previous studies, the damage to gills as a result of toxicant effects strongly suggests that the gill is a common mode of action by which hyperventilation is induced because most of these histological changes increase the diffusion distance for oxygen from the water to the blood, which again could explain the separation of ©Youth Education and Research Trust (YERT) the respiratory epithelium. Acute exposure to some toxic chemicals can result in severe destruction of the gill lamellae within a few hours and further affects the rate of oxygen consumption (Health, 1995). The study of Environmental toxicology is thus, concerned with how Environmental toxicants, through their interaction with humans, animals and plants, influence the health and welfare of these organisms. Ecotoxicological studies are very vital because it provide information on the concentration of a particular toxicant (i.e. at what level of concentration it is lethal or sub-lethal) and also helps in understanding the adverse effects associated with a particular toxicant. According to Azevedo-Santos et al. (2011), Oreochromis niloticus is a species of tilapia, a cichlid fish native to Africa and as far west as Gambia. It is also native to Israel and numerous introduced populations exist outside its natural range (e.g. Brazil). The choice of Oreochromis niloticus as a biological indicator in this study correlates with the fact that it is an important aquaculture species in many part of the World, including Nigeria. The present investigation was conducted to provide information on the histological changes in the gills of Oreochromis niloticus under exposure to Hevea brasiliensis. Materials and methods Test organism: Hevea brasiliensis was collected from the Rubber research institute, Calabar, Nigeria located within Calabar (08o22’10.583’E and 05o8’2.85’’N) (George et al., 2014) (Fig. 1). jairjp.com Ubong et al., 2015 Journal of Academia and Industrial Research (JAIR) Volume 3, Issue 11 April 2015 563 Fig. 1. Map of the study area. Definitive test: The final concentration chosen for the WSF of Hevea brasiliensis latex for the toxicity test on Oreochromis niloticus after the preliminary tests ranges from 0, 8, 16, 24, 32 and 40 mg/L. The experiment lasted for 96 h. The fish were not fed in order to reduce waste production. Distress behavior were closely monitored and recorded from the onset of the experiment for 6, 12, 24, 48, 72 and 96 h respectively. Prior to stocking, initial water parameter were monitored and also daily water parameter such as dissolved oxygen, temperature, pH, nitrite and ammonia were monitored using mercury-in-glass thermometer, Lurton Do and pH meters and nutrafin test kits for measuring the concentration of ammonia and nitrite. The battery operated meters were calibrated according to manufacturer’s instructions before being used for measurement (Boyd, 1989, 1990). About 120 healthy Oreochromis niloticus fingerlings in the range of 2-4.5 cm in size procured from the University of Calabar Fish Farm, Cross River State located within the University of Calabar at latitude 0405, 020’N and longitude 008020’ 450’E, respectively (Asuquo and Bassey, 1999; Akpan et al., 2002) were used for the studies and was transported to the Research Laboratory of the Institute of Oceanography (IOC), University of Calabar for acclimatization. Oreochromis niloticus fingerlings were acclimatize to laboratory conditions for 24 h in the glass tank and aerated with air stone connected to electrically powered aquarium pumps for the test organisms to get acquainted with the environment. Preparation of toxicant solution: Water soluble fraction (WSF) of Hevea brasiliensis latex was obtained by vigorously shaking rubber extract with filtered habitat water in a separatory funnel. The system was allowed to stand for 6 h for complete phase separation, after which the lower aqueous layer containing the WSF was decanted for the toxicity test. Stocking of specimens: Twelve glass tanks measuring 25 x 10 x 15 cm was used for the toxicity test. The glass tank was filled with 2 L of dechlorinated water each. Ten Oreochromis niloticus fingerlings were gently picked using a hand net in order to avoid stress into each of the glass tank Range finding test: The concentration chosen for the range finding test of WSF of Hevea brasiliensis latex on Oreochromis niloticus ranges from 0, 10, 20, 30, 40 and 50 mg/L. Ten fishes were randomly picked and introduced into each of the reconstituted latex and each concentration was set in duplicate with control containing dechlorinated water without the presence of WSF of Hevea brasiliensis latex. ©Youth Education and Research Trust (YERT) Histopathology: Tissues (gills) isolated from the test animal were fixed in formal-saline for 48 h. The fixed tissue (gills) were processed manually through graded ethanol, cleared in xylene, impregnated and embedded in paraffin wax. These sections were cut with a rotary microtome, stained by haematoxylin and eosin technique, studied microscopically for pathological changes. Statistical analysis: Statistical analysis was done by comparing the difference between control and Hevea brasiliensis treated groups by students t-test using (SPSS Inc; Chicago, USA). The results were considered significant (P<0.05). Results Various reactions were exhibited by the test organism which included, weaken swimming motions, changes in opercula rate, erratic movement, vertical swimming position, attempt at jumping out and color changes. The mucous secretion increased and accumulated on the gills. Hemorrhagic patches appeared on the ventral surface of the fish with general discoloration and anoxia. Gill epithelium of fish from the control group was similar to that of other teleostean fishes. However, tilapia exposed to WSF of Hevea brasiliensis showed several alterations in the gill (Table 1). Table 1. Histological changes in gills of O. niloticus fingerlings. Conc. (mg/L) 0 8 16 24 32 40 jairjp.com Histological changes Normal distribution of gill lamellae Loss of cells integrity in the gills Loss of cells integrity and disintegration of the gills Cells disintegration Loss of gills secondary lamellae Lamellae erosion and hyperplasia Ubong et al., 2015 Journal of Academia and Industrial Research (JAIR) Volume 3, Issue 11 April 2015 564 Plate 1. Normal distribution of gill lamellae at 0 mg/L of toxicant (X100). Plate 5. Loss of gill secondary lamellae at 32 mg/L of toxicant (X100). Plate 6. Lamellae erosion and hyperplasia of gill at 40 mg/L of toxicant (X100). Plate 2. Loss of cell integrity in the gills at 8 m/L of toxicant (X100). Plate 3. Loss of cell integrity and disintegration in the gills at 16 mg/L of toxicant (X100). Plate 4. Cell disintegration in the gills at 24 mg/L of toxicant (X100). No recognizable changes were observed in the gills of control fish (Plate 1). In contrast with the control ones, gills in fish exposed to Hevea brasiliensis was found to induce several histological alterations in the gills from slight to deep alterations, which were found to be concentration-dependent. After exposure to 8 mg/L of Hevea brasiliensis, the sections of fish gills showed loss of cells integrity (Plate 2). Exposure to 16 mg/L of Hevea brasiliensis showed loss of cell integrity and disintegration (Plate 3). In Plate 4, the gills of the fish are shown to have undergone cells disintegration at exposure to 24 mg/L of the toxicant, while Plate 5 shows loss of gills secondary lamellae at exposure to 32 mg/L of toxicant and at Plate 6, the gills of the fish was observed to undergone moderate to extensive lamellae erosion and hyperplasia. Discussion In aquatic ecosystem, industrial effluents are considered as one of the most important pollutants, since they find their way into the ecosystem through deliberate discharge or surface run-off. Once discharged into water bodies, they can either be adsorbed on sediment particles or accumulated in aquatic organisms. Fish may absorb dissolved elements from surrounding water and food, which may accumulated in various tissues in significant amounts and are electing toxicological effects at critical targets. This bioaccumulation may lead to high mortality rate or cause many histological alterations in the survived fish organs. ©Youth Education and Research Trust (YERT) jairjp.com Ubong et al., 2015 Journal of Academia and Industrial Research (JAIR) Volume 3, Issue 11 April 2015 565 This led us to undertake the study of Hevea brasiliensis toxicity to Nile Tilapia basing on histological studies of gills after exposure to water soluble fraction of these compounds. Histological study of the gills of Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) showed a typical structural organization of the lamellae in the control group. However, fish exposed to water soluble fraction of H. brasiliensis latex showed several histological alterations of the gills of the exposed organism. In the 8 mg/L concentration of the toxicant, it was observed to cause loss of cell integrity in Oreochromis niloticus. In the 16 mg/L of the toxicant, the effects of H. brasiliensis were observed to cause loss of cells integrity and disintegration in Oreochromis niloticus fingerlings. In the 24 mg/L concentration of the toxicant, the gill lamellae of Oreochromis niloticus were observed to undergo cell disintegration. Loss of gills secondary lamellae was observed in 32 mg/L concentration of the toxicant. Lamellae erosion and hyperplasia condition was observed in the gills of O. niloticus at 40 mg/L. Gill lamellae cell disintegration has been reported by Diana et al. (2007) in Carassius auratus gibelio when investigating biochemical and histological effects of deltamethrim on the species with different effects such as lamellae cells hypertrophy and nuclear pycnosis in the basal cells. Hypertrophic, necrotic, atrophy and dystrophy of secondary lamellae have also been reported in Clarias gariepinus juveniles exposed to refined petroleum oil and kerosene under laboratory conditions. These histological alterations have been observed by several authors in fish submitted to several toxicants (Karan et al., 1998; De Boeck et al., 2001). The general morphological changes in the gills recorded in this study have been reported in Astyanax sp. After 96 h exposure to water soluble fraction of crude oil (Akaisha et al., 2004). Gabriel et al. (2007) also reported similar changes in Clarias gariepinus exposed to petroleum oil and kerosene, reported in Oreochromis niloticus by Wannee et al. (2002), Ayoola (2011) and Ekpo and Chude (2011). Generally, fish gills are the prime target organ of all pollutants due to their sensitive and net-like structure. Both dissolved oxygen and colloidal materials tend to adhere to fish gills resulting in superficial rupture and disease condition to the gills. Gill morphology and configuration are important biomarkers, providing a basis for the detection of pollutants. Gills are considered as the most vulnerable organ to the changes in the aquatic environment (Bernet et al., 1999), because they are in direct contact with the surrounding water that may contain Hevea brasiliensis and consequently, they are the first entrance door for these and other environmental pollutants (Khan and Kiceniuk, 2003). Gill is an important environmental indicator providing a quick means of detection of the effects of pollutants. Gills of the fish exposed to the toxicants showed several histological alterations as a result of the toxicant, this was also reported by Camargo and Martinez (2007). ©Youth Education and Research Trust (YERT) Gills are very sensitive and respond extremely fast to water pollution caused by Hevea brasiliensis (George et al., 2014). The basic consideration of the use of gill of Oreochromis niloticus as environmental indicator of pollution is that living organisms provides the best reflection of the actual state of ecosystem and changes therein. Results obtained can provide a reasonable basis for comparing the effects of such pollutants on higher animals and human beings. Conclusion In the present study, the effects of the toxicant on the gills of the test organism were concentration-dependent. The higher the concentration, higher the manifestation effects of the toxicant on the gills of the test organism. Similar report was presented by George et al. (2014) when investigating toxicological impact of Hevea brasiliensis on the gills of fingerlings of African catfish Clarias gariepinus. Our findings uphold the concept of Mallat (1985) that toxicant induced alteration in gill histology is largely non-specific, because similar types of lesion occur under a wide range of toxicant-exposure conditions. References 1. Akaisha, F.M., De Assis, H.C., Jaakobi, S.C., Eras-stofella, D.R., St. Jean, S.D., Couteanty, S.C., Lima, E.F., Wagner, A.L., Scofield, A.L. and Ribeiro, C.A. 2004. Morphological and neurotoxicological findings in tropical freshwater fish (Astyanax sp) after waterborne and acute exposure to water soluble fraction of crude oil. Arch. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 46:244-253. 2. Akpan, E.R., Offem, I.O. and Nya, A.E. 2002. Baseline ecological studies of the Great Kwa River, Nigeria. Physico-chemical Stud. Afri. J. Env. Poll. Health. 1: 83-90. 3. Applied Technique and Production Company (ATPC). 2004. Environmental impact assessment report for Xuan Lap latex rubber processing company. Dong Nai province, Vietnam. 4. Asuquo, F.E. and Bassey, F.S. 1999. Distribution of heavy metals and total hydrocarbons in coastal water and sediments of Cross River State, South Eastern Nigeria. Int. J. Trop. Environ. 2: 229-247. 5. Ayoola, S.O., Kuton, M.P., Idowu, A.A. and Adelekun, A.B. 2011. Acute toxicity of Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) juveniles exposed to aqueous and ethanolic extracts of Ipomoea aquatica leaf. Nat. Sci. 9: 3. 6. Azevedo-Santos, V.M., Rigolin-Sa, O. and Pelicice, F.M. 2011. Growing, losing or introducing? Cage aquaculture as a vector for the introduction of non-native fish in Furnas Reservoir, Minas Gerais, Brazil. Neutrop. Ichthy. 9: 915-919. 7. Bernet, D., Schmidt, H., Meier, W., Burkhardt-Holm, P. and Wahli, T. 1999. Histopathology in fish: Proposal for a protocol to assess aquatic pollution. J. Fish Dis. 22: 25-34. 8. Boyd, C.E. 1989. Water quality management and aeration in shrimp farming, Alabama Agricultural experiment station. Auburn University, Alabama. Fish. Allied Aquacult. Dept. Series no. 2, p.83. jairjp.com Ubong et al., 2015 Journal of Academia and Industrial Research (JAIR) Volume 3, Issue 11 April 2015 566 9. Boyd, C.E. 1990. Water quality in ponds for aquaculture. Alabama Agricultural experiment station. Auburn University, Auburn, Alabama, p.482. 10. Camargo, M.M.P. and Martinez, C.B.R. 2007. Histopathology of gills, kidney and liver of a Neotropical fish caged in an urban stream. Neotrop. Ichthyol. 5(3): 327-336. 11. De Boeck, G., Vlaeminck, A., Balm, P.H., Lock, R.A., De Wachter, B. and Blust, R. 2001. Morphological and metabolic changes in common carp, Cyprinus carpio, during short-term copper exposure: interactions between Cu2+ and plasma cortisol elevation. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 20: 374-381. 12. Diana, C., Andreea, S.C., Diana, D., huculeci, R., Marieta, C. and Anca, D. 2007. Biochemical and histological effects of deltamethrim exposure on the gills of Carassius auraus gibelio (Pisces: Cyprimidee) Biotech. 40(1): 65-72. 13. Ekpo, I.E. and Chude, L.A. 2011. Effects of glyphosphate herbicide (“Round Up”) on fingerlings of Oreochromis niloticus and Clarias gariepinus. World J. Appl. Sci. Technol. 3(1): 99-105. 14. Gabriel, U.U., Ezeri, C.N. and Amakiri, E.U. 2007. Haematology and gill pathology of Clarias gariepinus exposed to refined oil and kerosene under laboratory conditions. J. Anim. Vet. Adv. 6: 461-465. ©Youth Education and Research Trust (YERT) 15. George, U.U., Joseph, A. and Andy, J.A. 2014. Histopathological alterations in gills of fingerlings of Clarias gariepinus (Burchell, 1822) following Sublethal Acute Exposure to Hevea brasiliensis. Int. J. Sci. Technol. Res. 3(9): 252-255. 16. Health, A.G. 1995. Water Pollution and Fish Physiology. Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, Florida, p.245. 17. Karan, V., Vitorovic, S., Tutundzic, V. and Poleksic, V. 1998. Functional enzymes activity and gill histology of carp after copper sulfate exposure and recovery. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Safety. 40: 49-55. 18. Khan, R.A. and Kiceniuk, J. 2003. Histopathological effects of crude oil on Atlantic cod following chronic exposure. Can. J. Zool. 62: 2038-2043. 19. Nowak, B. 1992. Histological changes in gills induced by residues of endosulfan. Aquat. Toxicol. 23: 65-83. 20. Tamse, C.T., Gacutan, R.G. and Tamse, A.F. 1995. Changes induced in the gills of milkfish (Chanos chanos) fingerlings after acute exposure to Nifurprinol. Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 54: 591-596. 21. Wannee, J., Upatham, E.S., Maleeya, K., Somphong, S., Suksiv, V. and Prayad, P. 2002. Histopathological effects of Round-up glyphosate herbicide on Nile tilapa Oreochromis niloticus. Sci. Asia. 28: 121-127. jairjp.com Ubong et al., 2015