Issue 4 - UN Peacemaker

Transcription

THE UN
CONSTITUTIONAL
A Newsletter on United Nations
Constitutional Support
I
Issue 4
Spring 2015
IN THIS ISSUE
“The UN Constitutional” team is pleased to publish the fourth issue of its
newsletter featuring articles by constitutional experts, reports from the field,
and a digest of recent constitutions-related publications.
This spring issue includes one exclusive interview with the current President of
the Libyan Constitutional Drafting Assembly. Our two feature articles deal with
the challenges facing constitutionalism in Africa, as well the historical roots of
constitutional Sharia. In addition, this issue presents experiences from 10 UN
field missions/offices, as well as updates from Headquarters.
“The UN Constitutional” is a manifestation of the collective desire of 6 UN
entities to raise awareness of constitutional issues and themes, share
information, and strengthen the provision of constitutional assistance.
The UN Constitutional team comes
from the following agencies:
 UN Dep. of Political Affairs (DPA)
 UN Dep. of Peacekeeping Operations
(DPKO)
 Office of the High Commissioner for
Human Rights (OHCHR)
 UN Development Programme (UNDP)
 UN Children's Fund (UNICEF)
 UN Women
INTERVIEW:
FEATURED:
FEATURED:
Ali Tourhani, President of
the Libyan Constitutional
Drafting Assembly (p.2)
History of Constitutional
Law in the Sharia Legal
System (p.4)
Constitutionalism in Africa:
the Challenge of Reform for
Undemocratic Purposes (p.6)
UPDATES FROM THE FIELD & HQ (p.7)
Burkina Faso p.8
Central African Republic p.9
Grenada p.9
Liberia p. 10
Libya p.11
Sierra Leone p.12
Somalia p.13
Tanzania p. 14
Yemen p. 15
Headquarters p.17
READER’S DIGEST (p.18)
RESOURCES ON CONSTITUTIONAL ASSISTANCE
SIGN UP FOR THE NEWSLETTER
www.constitutionmaker.un.org (UN System personnel only)
constitutionmaker@un.org
The UN Constitutional – Issue 4
Issue 2013
1
INTERVIEW: DR. ALI TARHOUNI PRESIDENT, LIBYA CDA
Interview with Dr. Ali Tarhouni
President of the Libya
Constitutional Drafting Assembly
Questions by UNDP/UNSMIL
Activists take part in a rally calling for Libyan unity. July 2012 (Credit: Iason Athanasiadis/UNSMIL)
Q.The CDA published a first
draft constitution on its website
in December 2014. Congratulations. Can you explain how
the CDA conducted its work?
A.There were a number of phases
leading to the work that has been
produced so far. Shortly after the
CDA’s first meeting in April 2014, it
elected the office of the presidency,
organized its internal regulations and
agreed on the constitutional road
map.
We then formed eight thematic
committees and mandated each to
concentrate on developing different
chapters.
The committee themes
were: (i) the form of the state and its
basic components; (ii) the form and
system of governance; (iii) the
judiciary, including the Constitutional
Court; (iv) independent constitutional
bodies; (v) the army and police; (vi)
rights and liberties, plus transitional
measures; (vii) local governance; and
(viii) the financial system, including
natural resources.
In the first few months, in addition to
our internal discussions, we wanted
to be proactive in reaching out to the
public, to encourage their participation and to hear for ourselves
their aspirations for the constitution.
The CDA travelled across the country
to villages, towns and cities, for a
number of open town-hall meetings.
Unfortunately by July 2014, due to
the escalating security situation, the
outreach tour and the viability of
visiting all parts of the country were
no longer possible, as some areas
became conflict zones.
To ensure the consultation process
continued, we established a mechanism to receive written proposals and
direct them to the relevant committee. We have also kept our doors
open at our base in Beida, hosting
meetings with different groups,
engaging with CSOs, community
leaders, women’s groups, academics,
experts and youth groups amongst
others, all of whom were thankfully
willing to make the often long journey
to give us their input and share their
work.
The CDA members also attended
workshops in Libya and outside
focusing on different topics such as
human rights, revenue sharing and
local governance, amongst others.
In total, the committees conducted
around 300 meetings and published
their initial work on the CDA’s website
on 24 December 2014.
Following the release of the initial
work of the committees on 24
December 2014, CDA members went
back to each of their constituencies to
discuss the drafts with stakeholders.
They conducted different meetings,
workshops and social media consultations in order to collect feedback
from the public on these outputs.
Issue 2013
2
Q.What
has
been
the
most
interesting and/or challenging
aspect of chairing the CDA?
A.
Chairing the CDA has allowed
me to feel connected to the whole of
Libya, because not only do the CDA
members represent the majority of
Libya, but as part of my work I meet
Libyans from all across the country
who want to share their thoughts on
the constitution and the hopes they
have for it. They remind me of how
much faith the Libyan people are
putting in us to deliver and also of
the responsibility we the CDA now
bear.
The biggest challenge is to keep the
institution of the CDA above the
current political struggles and ensure
we remain focused on the objective
of producing a constitution that all
Libyans feel represents them and
ensures their hopes and dreams of a
better future. I’m reminded every
hour, every day of how challenging it
is to draft a constitution for this
country that is divided and in the
midst of a civil war.
Q.What were some of the more
difficult issues the CDA had to
resolve? And how did the CDA go
about achieving consensus?
A.
Early on, one of the most
difficult issues that we worked hard
to resolve was how to ensure the
participation of the Amazigh, Tebu
and Twareg communities, as they
initially chose to boycott the constitutional elections. We succeeded in
bringing on board the communities of
Tebu and Twareg.
We took steps to find a resolution to
the Amazigh issue, including meeting
Dr. Ali Tarhouni is a member of the Libyan
Constitutional Drafting Assembly. During the first
CDA session, on 21 April 2014, he was elected the
President of the CDA by a simple majority vote of its
members.
Born in Libya, Tarhouni studied economics at
the University of Libya, until fleeing the country in
1973. He was stripped of citizenship, sentenced to
death in absentia, and put on a government hit list
in 1981. After immigrating to the United States,
Tarhouni continued his studies, earning a master's
degree (1978) and a Ph.D. (1983) from Michigan
State University. From 1985 until the outbreak of
the Libyan revolution, he was a popular senior
lecturer in business economics at the University of Washington Michael G. Foster
School of Business where he won numerous teaching awards.
After the Libyan revolution in 2011, Tarhouni was named to head both the oil and
finance ministries of the National Transitional Council, an opposition council
formed to coordinate anti-Gaddafi elements during the Libyan revolution. Tarhouni
was also named as Deputy Prime Minister on 2 October 2011 after acting in the
position for several months. Afterwards, he succeeded Mahmoud Jibril as acting
Prime Minister, a role which ended with the election of Abdurrahim El-Keib.
with some of their representatives to
hear their specific demands. In
December 2014, we established a
consensus committee, whose main
mandate is to define the concept and
mechanism of consensus with different representatives of the Amazigh.
Q.How
has the CDA engaged
with the different stakeholders
who are interested in the constitutional process – for example,
parliamentarians,
civil
society
organizations, academics and the
general public? Is more public
consultation envisioned?
A.
The CDA has always been
willing and is in fact proactive in
engaging with all of civil society. As
previously mentioned, alongside the
outreach to the cities that we held
early on, we have ensured our doors
were open to any of the civil society
stakeholders interested in sharing
their work, offering feedback or
requesting information.
However as the CDA must remain
non-partisan, and keep itself and its
activities separate from the current
political bodies, it has had very little
engagement with parliamentarians.
Q.The
constitutional roadmap
calls for the CDA's draft, eventually, to go to public referendum
is this possible in the current
political climate? If not, what do
you think should or will happen
next with the constitution-making
process?
A.
There is still every intention
that once the CDA delivers a draft
Constitution there will be a referendum. We have great hope that the
current political turmoil will not
continue much longer and that a
resolution will be found. In the
meantime, we are continuing on the
roadmap we have outlined and
focusing on completing our mandate
of delivering a draft constitution that
is ready for a national public
referendum.
Issue 1–December 2013
3
Q.In what ways can the CDA
and constitution making process
contribute to positive resolution
of the conflict?
A.Libya is going through a difficult
period, which has adversely impacted
the population at large. People now
are looking forward to having a social
contract that will govern the political
scene, and govern the relationship
between the rival parties, as well as
regulate the use of force, which
would be limited to the state
institutions that are defined in the
constitution.
By leading the constitution-making
process, and including public consultations, the CDA is contributing to
bridging the gap between differing
opinions. It will hopefully provide a
valuable opportunity for Libyans to
address
their
aspirations
and
concerns, which in turn will create
stronger social cohesion.
Once passed, the constitution will
become the basis on which issues
would be dealt with, as it will equally
protect the rights of the population.
Q.How
has the UN supported
the CDA in its work?
A.
The UN, through its Special
Support Mission and its agencies, has
given support to the CDA by
providing
expert
advisors,
coordination and facilitation of round
tables discussions with local experts,
activists, women groups and civil
society
representatives
and
by
helping make the process more
inclusive and participatory. The UN
has also taken a leading role in the
co-ordination of the international
community’s efforts to support the
CDA.
However unfortunately because of the
security situation, the UN was forced
to evacuate Tripoli and base itself
outside Libya. This has meant that
the CDA is unfortunately deprived of
the day-to-day technical and practical
support on the ground here in Beida.
This is something that is very much
needed and that has accompanied
the work of other regional constitutional drafting bodies. We very
much appreciate the support being
given and hope we can find a way to
have even greater access to their
expertise.
FEATURED: CONSTITUTIONAL LAW IN THE SHARIA LEGAL SYSTEM
History of Constitutional Law in the
Sharia Legal System
By Mohamed AbdelAziz GadelHak Ibrahim
Many States in the Middle East and North Africa are
experiencing what Yale Law Professor Bruce Ackerman has
dubbed “constitutional moments.” In the aftermath of the Arab
Spring, many Arab and Islamic countries, including Egypt,
Tunisia, Yemen and Libya, began to draft new constitutions or
amend existing ones. These new constitutions embrace the
aspirations of young generations for freedom, justice, equality,
democracy and human rights.
By Charmaine Rodrigues
At the same time, citizens expect
these constitutions to reflect their
unique national identities and
Islamic heritage. Having recently
removed
tyrannical
or
undemocratic regimes, the people of
these countries are demanding the
right to participate in constitutional
reform processes to establish a
sense of ownership over their
political
destinies.
Noting
that
Islamic law is inherently intertwined
with these destines for many people,
this article reflects on the very first
constitution in the Sharia legal system,
known as the Charter of Medina,
including its historical background, the
process by which it was drafted and its
main characteristics.
After Prophet Mohamed emigrated
from Mecca to Yathrib (aka Medina) in
622 CE, he spent the first six months
in discussions with vari-ous Muslims
(including
“Muhajirun” (immigrants
from Mecca) and “Ansar” (supporters
from both Aws and Khazraj tribes)), as
well as Jewish clans, polytheist/animist
groups, and Christian communities, in
Medina.
The
purpose
of
these
consultations was to end the prolonged
inter-tribal conflict in Medina, to reestablish peace and security and to lay
the foundations of the first Islamic
state.
This inclusive consultation process led
to the first constitution in the Islamic
legal system - the “Charter of Medina”.
4
FEATURED:
CONSTITUTIONAL
LAW PRESIDENT,
IN THE SHARIA
LEGAL
SYSTEM
INTERVIEW:
DR. ALI TARHOUNI
LIBYA
CDA
Some scholars view the Charter of
Medina as the first form of social
contract between a peoples and their
leader. Others perceive it as the
Magna Carta of the Islamic world.
The
Charter
of
Medina
was
revolutionary
in
the
way
it
transformed how communities in the
Arabian Peninsula affiliated, by
uniting people from a large number
of distinct tribes in one multireligious State (the “Ummah”).
The Charter of Medina consists of 52
articles
covering
wide
ranging
aspects of the relations between
Muslims
and
other
religions,
particularly Jews, Christ-ians and
polytheist/animist communities. The
document embodies certain core
principles
and
established
new
systems. These include
(1) the
notion of the superiority of nations
over tribes; (2) social solidarity; (3)
social security and the establishment
of a tort and insurance system; (4)
protection of non-Muslim minorities
(dhimmis); (5) respect for pacts and
covenants; (6) establishment of
Islamic law as a new legal system for
resolving disputes between diverse
groups living equally within one
nation in a peaceful manner (whilst
preserving
the rights of other
religious groups to apply their own
laws); (7) freedom of religious beliefs
and practices for all citizens; (8)
establishment of a tax system to
support the community in times of
conflict; (9) financial independence of
each tribe; (10) mutual defence
against
any
aggression;
(11)
founding relations between Muslims
and non-Muslims on advice and good
will; (12) freedom of each faction to
establish alliances that did not harm
the State; (13) responsibility to
protect any oppressed groups; (14)
individual responsibility; and (15)
the right to safety and security of
every citizen. The Charter declared
Medina as a ḥaram, or "sacred place",
where no weapons could be carried
and no blood spilt.
Women candidates and Libyan civil society activists sing the national anthem
at an UN-sponsored event aimed at encouraging female participation in the
elections. March 2012 (Credit: Iason Athanasiadis/UNSMIL)
The Charter of Medina, which is
nearly fifteen centuries old, does not
include all the elements that we
consider central features of modern
constitutions (for example, hierarchical judicial review). Nonetheless,
this document is an important constitutional precedent for the Arab and
Islamic world. It conveys strong
moral and religious values that
constitute the normative foundation
of a multicultural community.
Moreover, the process through which
the Charter of Medina was drafted,
especially the inclusion of all religious
and tribal factions in Medina and the
consultative phase through which
they consented to this document,
could
inspire
modern
countries
undergoing political transitions and
emerging from conflict. The same
could be said for the substantive part,
which could be used to demonstrate
the importance of provisions which
respect fundamental human rights
and the rule of law in the text of
newly drafted constitutions.
Recognizing
the
importance
of
nationally-owned and led constitutional processes, the United Nations
supports national actors engaged in
constitutional reform in a variety of
ways, including the deployment of
legal/judicial experts to assist with
reviews and drafting. Experts who
provide such assistance in the Arab
States region and elsewhere in the
Islamic world are generally skilled in
Sharia and constitutional law. The
United Nations will continue to
support countries in their efforts to
reform
their
constitutions
by
promoting
inclusive
processes,
cultural sensitivity and adherence to
international human rights standards.
The Author
Mohamed AbdelAziz GadelHak
Ibrahim is an Islamic Law Expert
currently working with the UN
Department of Peacekeeping
Operations. He also is a former
Judge at the Egyptian Judiciary.
5
FEATURED: CONSTITUTIONALISM IN AFRICA
Constitutionalism in Africa:
The challenge of constitutional reform in
pursuit of undemocratic purposes
By Charmaine Rodrigues
In July 2000, African heads of state came together as the OAU and
agreed the Lomé Declaration on the Framework for an OAU
Response to Unconstitutional Changes of Government, following a
review on the state of democracy in Africa. The Lomé Declaration
was a groundbreaking statement, elaborating a set of principles
underpinning constitutional government, including proper adoption
of a democratic constitution, respect for the constitutional rule of
law, separation of powers, and the protection of human rights. In
the context of democratic renewal, the Declaration also specifically
recognized the role of the opposition, the importance of political
pluralism, the need for regular credible elections and the “principle
of democratic change”, meaning that there should be regular
turnover of government.
The Lomé Declaration was a direct
response to the OAU’s concerns
regarding the impact of coups d’etat
across the region. In its respect for
constitutional government and the
rule of law, it sought to discourage
the violent and/or unlawful removal
of governments. Interestingly, the
Declaration went so far as to
explicitly describe what might qualify
as an unconstitutional change in
government, focusing primarily on
violent overthrow, but also covering
cases where a government refuses to
hand over power following defeat at
elections.
As the Lomé Declaration celebrates
fifteen years, it is worth reflecting on
the continuing relevance of the
democratic principles which it espoused. Arguably, while its fundaThe UN Constitutional – Issue 4
mental tenets remain highly relevant,
recent constitutional phenomena in
the region warrant reflection on the
existing principles to assess whether
they sufficiently capture the current
breadth
challenges
to
constitutionalism in Africa.
Over the last decade or so, there has
been a noticeable increase in the
number of governments across Africa
which have sought to use constitutional processes to extend their
mandates to govern and/or to
consolidate their powers at the
expense of other branches of
government. Whereas undemocratic
processes such as coups or rigged
elections were previously common
mechanisms for extending the life of
governments, it is notable that the
recent trend has seen governments
attempting to change the constitutional “rules of the game” through
technically legal means.
It is increasingly common to see
presidents
utilizing
constitutional
amendment processes set out in the
constitution (most commonly, a
super-majority vote in Parliament,
without the need for endorsement by
popular referendum) to amend the
constitution to consolidate their
power. Most notably in this regard, in
a number of countries there has been
a recent push to remove or amend
existing term limits.
In early 2014 Burundi’s parliament
voted against a constitutional amendment to the existing term limit, but
the issue has lingered and continues
to be discussed in advance of the
2015 national elections. Likewise in
DRC, proposed amendments to the
electoral law to delay the national
elections were viewed by some as
paving the way for further reforms to
change term limits, though these
amendments were recently defeated,
putting the issue on the back-burner.
However, Article 220 - which imposes
the term limit - also specifies that the
Article may not be amended.
This was intended to prevent the extension of an existing president’s
term, although it has been recognised
Issue 2013
6
FEATURED: CONSTITUTIONALISM IN AFRICA
that drafting a new
constitution could be
used to avoid this prohibition.
In Rwanda, there has
been speculation on the
issue as the President’s
second term starts to
draw to a close.
In Burkina Faso, the
threat of a constitutional
amendment to extend
the
President’s
term
limit
triggered
mass
unrest and the burning
down of Parliament. In
2012,
the
Supreme
Court in Senegal issues
a decision regarding the
retrospective
imposition of term limits,
which
allowed
the
existing President to still
run for an extra term.
Burkina Faso. In October 2014, the threat of a constitutional amendment to extend the
President’s term limit triggered turmoil in which protesters burned the Parliament
building.
The increasing tendency of governments to “legally” extend their
constitutional mandate to govern is
one which bears closer attention. The
Lomé Declaration was robust in its
efforts to tackle a clear threat to
democracy, namely unconstitutional
changes of government, through
violent or illegal means. However, the
situation facing advocates of democratic governance and constitutionalism in Africa is now more
complicated.
History shows that without regular
turnover of political parties via
credible elections and/or political
leadership within ruling parties,
democracies risk slowly morphing
into one-party autocracies. This is
particularly the case in countries
transitioning from conflict, for which
peaceful transitions of power may be
historically unfamiliar and a genuine
cause
for
concern
amongst
a
populace that may prefer one-party
stability to adversarial democracy.
What does it mean for the flourishing
of African democracy that constitutional amendments are being developed
and
approved
through
constitutionally legal processes, but
where those amendments seek to
entrench the consolidation of power
in a single party or individual? How
does one balance the principles of
political pluralism and democratic
change against respect for the
sovereignty of parliament and the
constitutions own amendment processes?
The risk posed by technically legal
extensions of presidential mandates
poses a subversive threat; while
violent conflict may not always be an
outcome from such constitutional
changes, nonetheless, history has
shown that the consolidation of
powers into a single governing entity
(e.g. the President) most often leads
to a narrowing of democratic space
and a threat to human rights (in
particular, of opposition groups and
minorities).
Where to then for constitutional
practitioners and the African Union?
Recognising that the Lomé Declaration is now 15 years old, it is perhaps
time for the AU to reconvene to
reflect on constitutional opportunities
and threat in the region, with a
particular emphasis on transitions of
power and term limits. This could be
complemented by a broader set of
regional
and
national
dialogues
across the continent, bringing the
voices of ordinary Africans to bear on
this core set of questions about what
type of democracy people want.
The Author
Between October 2014 and March
2015, Charmaine Rodrigues was
as a specialist on constitutional
assistance and political dialogue in
the UNDP Bureau for Policy and
Programme Support (BPPS). She
was previously a Crisis Governance
Specialist in the former UNDP
Bureau for Crisis Prevention and
Response.
7
FIELD & HEADQUARTERS UPDATES
What is the United Nations doing in constitutional
assistance? This section offers an overview of the
latest developments, challenges and lessons in this
key area of support sourced directly from our field
missions, country offices and other UN entities.
BURKINA FASO
UNDP Country Office
UNDP supports the Burkina
Faso transition to ensure coherence between the Charter of
the Transition and the Constitution
Over the course of 30 and 31 October
2014, the popular uprising in Burkina
Faso led to the resignation of the
President of the Republic. Consequently, Burkina Faso was faced with
the need to restore constitutional
order while balancing the need to
avoid maintaining provisions of the
Constitution which were no longer
appropriate because they would have
had the effect of returning to the old
regime.
To facilitate a new democratic
constitutional order, political actors
initiated the formulation of a charter
to guide the process of political
transition. UNDP Burkina Faso was
asked to assist with this process. To
this end, UNDP engaged the services
of Professor Ibrahima Fall, former
Foreign Minister of Senegal and
former Deputy Secretary-General of
the UN, to provide technical advice
and support to: (i) the Constitutional
Council in their legal assessment of
the situation; (ii) national stakeholders in defining structures and
statutes of the transitional organs of
the State; and (iii) mediation efforts
led by the UN Office for West Africa
(UNOWA), Economic Community of
West African States (ECOWAS) and
the African Union.
The support provided by UNDP:
Enabled the Constitutional Council
of Burkina Faso to undertake a
thorough legal analysis of the
vacancy of the Presidency of the
Republic following and suspension
of the Constitution following the
uprising and to identify actions
necessary to ensure constitutional
continuity (including enabling the
Constitutional Council itself to
perform its role);
Supported national stakeholders
with the development of the
Transitional Charter, including by
ensuring its coherence with the
Constitution. The Charter calls for
the
creation
of
transitional
institutions and describes their
status, making a plea for limiting
the number of organs. It also calls
for the Constitutional Council to
decide on any cases of conflict
between the provisions of the
Charter
and
those
of
the
Constitution; and
Contributed to the negotiation and
mediation efforts of the joint
ECOWAS/AU/UNOWA,
providing
technical advice on the treatment
of political and legal issues in
general, as well as constitutional
issues in particular.
UNDP’s support to national and
regional stakeholders has helped to
define and identify responses to
"aspirations expressed by the people"
and to lay the foundation for the
preparation of elections which will
mark the end of the political
transition. In providing support,
UNDP was part of a broader group of
international partners committed to
providing support to ensure an
inclusive,
stable,
peaceful
and
conclusive transition.
Burkina Faso. Billboard promoting peace in Ouagadougou, capital of
Burkina Faso. Photo: IRIN/Chris Simpson
Issue 2013
8
This effort continues through the
International Support Group on the
Transition, which is co-chaired by the
AU/ECOWAS/UN troika, and brings
together international and African
multilateral
institutions,
several
African countries (including from
ECOWAS) and key member states of
the United Nations, including the
members of the Security Council.
Briefing prepared by:
 Dieudonné Kini, Team Leader,
Governance Unit, UNDP Burkina Faso
CENTRAL AFRICAN
REPUBLIC (CAR)
UNDP Country Office
Linking the CAR peace agreement and the constitutional
process
Since the outbreak of the crisis in
December 2012, CAR has been facing
the most tumultuous set of sociopolitical challenges in its history.
Indeed, the crisis led to a change of
political regime by a coup, which then
led to the suspension of the
constitution in March 2013. After
considerable negotiations, on 18
August 2013, a Transitional Constitutional Charter was put in place. The
Charter sets out the current transition
process; Article 55 calls for the
drafting of a new constitution, which
is entrusted to the National Transition
Council (NTC).
By exclusively entrusting the design
and drafting of the new constitution
to the NTC, the authorities wanted to
encourage an inclusive and participatory process for development and
adoption of the new constitution.
Indeed, the new constitution will be
adopted by referendum after consultation with various stakeholders from
politics through seven steps set out in
Article 65 of the Charter.
Central African Republic. The text of the ceasefire agreement is displayed
at the launch of nationwide public consultations in Bangui, aiming to
promote the appropriation by the Central African people of the peace
process. Credit: UN Photo/ Dany Balepe
The NTC has been working for several
months now. MINUSCA has provided
technical
support
to
the
Law
Committee of the NTC, which has
undertaken discussions and writing
assignments. Based on that work, a
constitutional proposal was adopted
in early 2015 by the NTC, with a
majority of 83 members, and was
then submitted to the Government
for consideration. The submission of
the proposal to the Government is
one step in a long process, which will
include: organization of a validation
workshop with the involvement of
stakeholders across the political
spectrum; consultation with the
Constitutional Court for its opinion on
the validity of the text; integration of
amendments from the workshop
based on the opinion of the Constitutional Court; final adoption of a
draft
text
by
the
NTC;
and
submission of the constitution to a
public referendum.
UNDP support to this process so far
has been limited, in advance of the
Bangui Forum which will set out next
steps in the transition. However, it is
envisaged that UNDP will work with
MINUSCA to provide technical and
financial support to the organization
of
the
constitutional
validation
workshop, in support of encouraging
deeper consultation on the text. As
part of the electoral process, UN
support will also be provided for the
organization of the constitutional
referendum, which is envisaged to be
held before the presidential and
parliamentary elections.
 Aboubacar Koulibaly, Country
Director, UNDP CAR
GRENADA
UNDP Country Office
Grenada works to repatriate its
independence Constitution
Since independence in 1974, Grenada
has had its constitutional boundaries
rigorously
tested,
most
notably
during the turbulent period between
March 1979 and December 1983.
9
After that date, more established and
conventional norms of parliamentary
democracy have prevailed.
Since that time, Grenada has
embarked on four constitutional
review
processes,
aimed
at
repatriating the Constitution and
ensuring it serves the governance
and development needs of the
populace. The fourth phase of
constitutional reform in Grenada was
instituted in 2013. The Constitution
Reform Advisory Committee (CRAC)
was established to review recommendations from the previous three
processes, undertake stakeholder
constitutions and come up with a final
package of reforms for consideration
by Cabinet and then by Parliament.
Throughout 2014, the CRAC undertook a process of deliberative review,
complemented by public consultations. In July 2014, initial recommendations were released, but these
were contested by the Opposition
party, which wanted deeper political
reforms. A second round of consultations were undertaken in late 2014
and an additional set of recommendations put to cabinet in early
2015. Discussion is still underway
about the breadth and depth of the
final package of reforms which will be
put to a public referendum, but the
CRAC is now working on drafting
constitutional amendment bills to be
considered by Parliament.
The UN was invited to support the
constitutional review process in late
2014 by the Government and the
CRAC. To this end, the UN MultiCountry Office in Barbados, which
covers Grenada, supported the Government to hold a meeting with
development partners in October
2014, to encourage broad donor
support. Subsequently, in December
2014, the UN Barbados, UNDP
headquarters and DPA headquarters
undertook a constitutional assessment mission, which was followed in
January 2015 with an EAD-UNDP
needs assessment mission to look at
referendum issues specifically.
On the basis of the UN assessment
missions, the UN is putting together a
package of support. In the meantime,
direct technical advice has been
provided to the CRAC on issues
covered by the constitutional amend-
Liberia. Civic Education and public consultation in Behwan, Grand Kru Co.
Credit: UNDP Liberia
ment bills. UNDP’S governance and
climate
change teams
provided
advice on key aspects of the bills, and
the OHCHR reviewed the bills to
ensure they reflected international
human rights norms, and also
undertook a mission to Grenada in
March 2015. UN Women has also
supported the CRAC to undertake
specific consultations on gender
issues.
 UNDP Grenada Country Office
 Charmaine Rodrigues, former
UNDP BPPS
 With inputs from Robert Husbands,
OHCHR
LIBERIA
UNDP Country Office
The Road to Gbarnga: Liberians
go for the National Constitutional
Conference
Three major factors, arguably, gave
rise to the current constitutional
review process in Liberia. The first
was the return of freed slaves from
America who – armed with the
slogan, “the love of liberty brought us
here” – declared a republic and in
1847 adopted the first national
constitution. Notably, that declaration
would
later
be
countered
by
indigenous groups who declared, “the
love of liberty found us here”. This
contestation over the republic has
existed since its creation. The second
major
precursor
preceding
the
current
constitutional
review
is
Liberia’s turbulent past, characterized
by a 14-year old war that debilitated
the country, undermining the foundations of constitutionalism. The third
event was the historic democratic
election of the first-ever female
president in Africa, current President
Ellen Johnson Sirleaf.
Cumulatively, these factors gave birth
to the current review process whose
10
aim is to bring lasting peace to the
nation and to reflect the present
realities of Liberian society.
To this end, the 6-member Constitution Review Committee was appointed by the President in August
2012 to spearhead a review of
Liberia’s 1986 Constitution. UNMIL
and UNDP worked together to design
the UN Constitution Review Support
Project, which underpins many
elements of the current review
process.
Since the constitutional review process began, the CRC has faced many
challenges - not least the outbreak
of the Ebola virus, which has
severely
impacted
on
public
consultations as well as delaying the
holding of the National Constitutional
Conference (NCC) - but it has still
achieved a number of milestones.
Public consul-tations have been
completed in all 73 electoral districts
of the 15 counties, together with five
Diaspora consul-tations in Ghana and
the USA (Philadelphia, Minnesota,
Atlanta and Maryland). A programme
of civic edu-cation accompanied these
consul-tations. To inform the CRC’s
process, a comparative analysis of
the consti-tution review processes in
Kenya
and
Ghana
was
also
undertaken through study tours.
Resulting from its consultations, the
CRC has collected and analysed
stakeholder views, and used them to
inform proposals tabled at the
National Constitutional Conference
held in Gbarnga City, Bong County,
between March 30 and April 2, 2015.
The NCC’s objectives were to:
Present to delegates the process to
date and the CRC’s detailed report
and recommendations. The report
draws on public consultations,
submissions, expert opinions and
CRC’s own reflections; and
Enhance national ownership, inclusiveeness, transparency and legitimacy of the review process by
creating a platform for delegates to
Libya. In January 2015, a workshop brought together 35 women activists in
Tunis to review and analyze the CDA’s substantive committees’ preliminary
work on 12 proposed new constitutional chapters. Credit: Adam Styp-Rebowski
build a national consensus around
the proposed amendments.
Prior to the NCC being held, the CRC
agreed on the conference agenda and
on the specific issues to be discussed
in detail. This includes contentious
issues
(such
as
whether
dual
citizenship should be prevented, and
whether Liberia should be declared a
Christian nation), as well as those
over which a consensus exists (such
as whether the terms in office of
senators should be reduced from 9
years to 6, and of the President from
6 years to 4). The CRC also
undertook awareness-raising activities, and the NCC agenda was
published in advance, to create
awareness via the media.
Delegate selection was also undertaken. An imperative was to try to
represent the diversity of Liberia’s
society.
A
representative
final
contingent was seen as important in
order to assuage the fears of some
sectors that they would suffer
discrimination. NCC delegates were
encouraged to familiarize themselves
with the process and with the CRC
report, and to consult with their own
constituencies in order to bring a
representative perspective to the
NCC.
The NCC was a precursor to the next
steps that will complete the review
process, namely: (i) submission by
the CRC of a final set of proposed
amendments with explanatory notes
to the President; (ii) transmission of
proposed amendments by the President to the Legislature; (iii) debate
and passage of final proposed
amendments by the Legislature; (iv)
a one-year process of civic education
on the proposed amendments, and
(v) a national Referendum on the
amendments, to take place in 2016.
 Ekuru Aukot Chief Technical Advisor
to the CRC
LIBYA
UNDP Country Office and UN
Mission in Libya (UNMIL)
Libyan Women’s Demands for a
Constitution
From mid-2014, UNDP, UNSMIL and
UNWOMEN,
with
later
support
11
provided
by
the
International
Foundation for Electoral Systems
(IFES), began working with Libyan
women
activists
on
articulating
women’s demands for a future constitution.
Due to the deteriorating security
situation, initial plans to organize
consultations throughout Libya had to
be changed. Accordingly, the UN
facilitated a participatory process
engaging Libyan activists through
meetings outside of Libya, while
informal consultation and advocacy
activities were carried out within the
country.
In November 2014, the UN convened
a meeting of seventy Libyan activists
and women members of the Constitutional Drafting Assembly (CDA) in
Cairo to formulate an initial set of the
demands. These were conveyed to
the CDA and discussed at its office in
the city of Al-Baida.
A second meeting in January 2015
brought together 35 activists in
Tunis. Participants reviewed and
analysed the eight CDA’s substantive
committees’ preliminary work on 12
proposed new constitutional chapters.
Analysis was carried out from a
gender perspective, with an emphasis
on international good practices and
standards. The meeting participants
agreed on a set of demands to the
CDA and an advocacy strategy.
OHCHR and UNSMIL co-organised a
workshop in Geneva from 23-25
February for a number of CDA
members, and in particular those
from the Rights and
Liberties
Committee, to discuss the human
rights part of the draft.
The advocacy process is on-going.
The activists involved will liaise
directly with CDA members on the
inclusion of their demands in the
drafting process, and the UN will
support further efforts to mobilise
civil society groups and individuals to
support the demands.
Sierra Leone. Sierra Leonean Members of Parliament and CRC members
reviewing Human Rights provisions during a working group meeting. Credit:
Sanaullah Baloch
The
activists’
demands
include
guarantees of at least 45% representation of women in elected
bodies and within the executive,
similar representation in the courts,
and equal opportunity to progress in
judicial institutions. They also called
for criminalization of violence against
women and of underage and forced
marriage and that the right of women
to free movement to be guaranteed.
Their outcomes statement also refers
to equality between men and women
with regards to nationality, and
demands free compulsory education
for girls. In all, the demands touched
on the constitutional chapters on
Form of State and Fundamental
Principles, Form and System of
Governance,
The
Judiciary
and
Constitutional Court, Independent
Institutions, Rights and Liberties and
Provisional
Measures,
Natural
Resources, and General Provisions.
For the full list of the demands in:
 Arabic (original)
 English (unofficial translation)
For the CDA preliminary works in:
 Arabic (original)
 English (unofficial translation)
 Adam Styp-Rekowski, Project
Manager, Assistance to Building a
Constitution, UNDP
 David Raikow, Political Affairs
Officer, Constitutional Support,
UNSMIL
 With inputs from Robert Husbands,
OHCHR
SIERRA LEONE
UNDP Country Office
CRC Sierra Leone intensifies
stakeholder consultations in the
western Area
President Dr Ernest Bai Koroma has
extended the constitutional review
process by one year, to March 2016.
The process, which was inaugurated
in July 2013, was slated to end in
March 2015. The extension came
about as a result of the unprecedented outbreak of the Ebola
virus and the subsequent declaration
of a state of public emergency which
adversely
disrupted
consultations
with national stakeholder groups and
the public.
12
Sierra Leone. USB sticks with
information on the constitutional
process distributed to citizens in
Sierra Leone. Credit: UNDP
In spite of the emergency regulations, the Constitutional Review
Committee (CRC) has still made
considerable progress. The 8 CRC
sub-committees held a number of
consultations with major stakeholders
in the Western Area of the country,
including with parliamentarians, civil
society organizations, government
ministries and agencies, and various
experts on constitutional matters.
The CRC also engaged journalists in a
Dialogue Forum where they collaborated to develop a strategy to
popularize the review process.
The State Policy and Human Rights
Sub-Committee and the Legislative
Sub-Committee of CRC, together with
the Human Rights and Legislative
Sub-committees of Parliament, also
worked together to undertake a
thorough analysis of the recommendations contained in the various
position papers submitted to the
Committee by stakeholders. Those
recommendations first underwent
scrutiny and pruning by committee
support stuff, such that they could
then be easily assessed and endorsed
by committee members.
To broaden the horizon of CRC
Committee members on thematic
issues
and
to
enable
deeper
discussions, a series of experts
selflessly engaged the sub-committees on a range of constitutional
issues, resulting in the development
of recommendations that would
significantly address key constitutional deficiencies in the current
constitution. In this quarter, experts
advising the CRC sub-committees
include: Mr Chernor Bangura, an
expert on natural resources; Dr Habib
Sesay, a political scientist at the
University of Sierra Leone; Mr Floyd
Davies,
a
specialist
on
local
governance; Ms Jane Aspden, an
expert on state policy and human
rights; and Dr Victor Massaquoi, a
communications expert and lecturer
at Njala University.
Development partners, facilitated by
UNDP, continue to play an invaluable
role in the entire process. The multipurpose civic education flash disk
produced by UNDP has proven a very
useful resource, not only to CRC
members but also to national stakeholders engaging in the review
process. The easy-to-carry device has
been distributed across the country,
and contains information about the
CRC, the 1991 Constitution, the 2008
Report of the Commission to Review
the 1991 Constitution, Public Submission Forms and a host of other
very important documents.
 Sana Baloch Chief Technical Adviser
to the Sierra Leone Constitutional
Review Project, UNDP Sierra Leone
SOMALIA
UNDP Country Office
Somalia Constitutional Process
Gains Momentum
Following a protracted political crisis
arising from the October 2014 cabinet
re-shuffle by former Prime Minister
Abdiweli Sheikh Ahmed, a new
Somalia Government was inaugurated in February 2015, led by
Prime Minister Umar Abdirasheed Ali
Sharmake. A new Ministry of Constitutional Affairs, headed by Hussein
Mohammed Sheikh Hussein, was
created out of the former Ministry of
Justice and Constitutional Affairs. An
experienced politician who previously
held the ministerial portfolios of
finance
and
higher
education,
Minister Hussein was Deputy Prime
Minister during the final stages of the
drafting
and
adoption
of
the
Provisional Constitution in October
2012. He is assisted by a Deputy
Minister of Constitutional Affairs and
State Minister for Constitutional
Affairs.
Somalia. NFP Speaker Mohammad Sh. Osman Jawari meeting with UNDP
CD George Conway and CTA Oskar Lehner Credit: Oskar Lehner
13
Preparations for the constitutional
review process were significantly impacted by the crisis, and momentum
has only resumed in the last few
weeks.
From late February 2015,
the leadership of the parliamentary
Oversight Committee (constitutional
committee) the Independent Constitutional Review and Implementation
Commission (ICRIC) and the Ministry
of Constitutional Affairs held several
consultative and planning meetings
on the constitutional review process.
The discussions focused on the
proposed Process Framework for the
review and the draft Memorandum of
Understanding (MoU) clarifying roles
and responsibilities of these institutions. The participants agreed upon
a number of changes to the MoU
mainly
to
reflect
the
process
framework and to harmonize some of
the activities. The MoU was signed on
9 March 2015.
The UN integrated constitutional
support team (ICST) provided support for the consultative/planning
meetings, including through a consultant who facilitated the meetings and
planning activities. Together with the
renewed political will re-stated by the
new Government to complete the
Vision2016 goals including constitutional review, the signing of the
MoU opens the way for sustained
engagement and support from the UN
and international partners to the
Federal Government of Somalia. The
UN ICST is now providing support,
including capacity development, to
set up the ICRIC. The parliamentary
Oversight Committee met on 7
February to commence preparing
initial instructions to ICRIC; the OC is
also finalizing its report on contentious issues in the Provisional
Constitution which will need to be
considered in more detail.
On March 19, the constitutional
review process formally commenced
with the parliamentary Oversight
Committee issuing instructions to the
ICRIC to review Chapters 1 and 4 of
the Provisional Constitution. The OC
also forwarded to ICRIC a preliminary
review of the chapters conducted by
the OC at a retreat in Kampala,
Uganda in October 2014 with support
from the Max Planck Institute.
From 4-6 February 2015, the first
meeting of senior federal and regional
leaders on constitutional issues was
held in Mogadishu. In attendance
were the President of Somalia, Prime
Minister of Somalia, Speaker of the
Federal Parliament, President of
Puntland, President of the Interim
South-West Administration, and the
Leader of the Interim Juba Administration. The discussions focused on
building the federal system, centrestate
relations,
the New Deal
Compact, the Vision2016 programme,
state participation in key national
bodies and the national security
forces.
The UN and international partners
have encouraged the Government to
commence high level political dialogue with regional leaders and
enhance the participation of regional
authorities in the New Deal Compact
processes, including the constitutional
review process. The Government has
identified the formation of an InterRegional Consultative Forum which
will formally bring together these
leaders as a top priority for 2015.
There was also progress recently on
sub-national constitutional processes.
The leadership of the Interim Juba
Administration (IJA) in southwest
Somalia requested UN support for
drafting of an interim state constitution as part of the implementation
of the August 2013 Addis Ababa
Agreement on formation of the
proposed Jubaland State. Together
with the Electoral Institute for
Sustainable Democracy in Africa and
the Somalia Stability Fund, the UN
ICST is providing support as part of a
pilot project on drafting interim state
constitutions. A UN consultant is
presently in Kismayu consulting with
senior IJA officials in order to assist
with drafting the interim constitution
while EISA will provide support for
the public consultations process.
 Ndubisi
Obiorah,
Officer, UNSNOM
Political
Affairs
TANZANIA
UN Women Office
UN Women Integrates Gender
Equality into Constitutional
Review Process
In 2014, UN Women played a technical,
convening and facilitating role in the
on-going constitutional review process
in Tanzania. As a result, the newly
proposed Constitution of the United
Republic of Tanzania submitted to the
President and which will be put to a
referendum is framed by principles of
women’s rights and gender equality and
incorporates specific provisions to
advance gender equality and women’s
empowerment.
Beyond the principles of equality and
the supremacy of the constitution, the
draft Constitution would nullify other
provisions that are contradictory to the
principle of gender equality. It includes
proposals for 50-50 representation of
women in parliament, measures to
safeguard women’s dignity, protection
from exploitation and violence, and the
right to access, use, benefit, own and
control land and natural resources. It
also defines the age of the child at 18
years with important implications for
the age of marriage, which now stands
at 14 with parental consent in the Law
of Marriage Act. If approved by the
upcoming referendum, this will represent a significant departure from the
present 1977 Constitution.
The gains in the revised Constitution
14
A key challenge for the CDC was
acquiring sufficient knowledge in a
very limited period of time to design
a federal system for Yemen, including
determining the levels of government
and their allocated authorities, a new
judicial structure, and a sound
finance system; in a country that
suffers from significant centralization,
corruption, marginalization of areas,
high rates of poverty and poor
service delivery. The NDC Outcomes
had provided little guidance on the
structures of the federal state.
Tanzania. Meeting of the Coalition of “Women for the Constitution”
Wanawake na Katiba. Credit: Wanawake na Katiba Coalition Facebook
Are the result of UN Women support to
the creation of the “Wanawake Na
Katiba” or “Women for the Constitution”
Coalition and their successful advocacy
and outreach, both to the grassroots
and to Parliament. The Coalition of 50
civil society organizations includes
women from grass roots organisations
and leaders from political parties.
Additional
collaboration
with
the
Tanzania Women Parliamentary Group
further strengthened their advocacy.
The coalition was among the few
constituencies which set aside religion,
political affiliation, social status and
ethnicity to work together to represent
the women of Tanzania in the
deliberations on the revised Constitution both inside and outside of the
Constituent Assembly.
Support provided by UN Women
enabled coalition members to engage
effectively in advocacy throughout
the process of the Constitutional
Review. Furthermore, UN Women’s
engagement supported a review of
the proposed second draft, which
equipped the coalition with evidence
to highlight key gains and gaps in the
proposed
document,
further
supporting their advocacy. In addition, fact sheets on key topics,
supported by UN Women, helped to
animate Constituent Assembly discus-
sions. It is useful to note that OHCHR
also provided comments on a wider
range
of
human
rights
issue
addressed in the draft Constitution.
 UN Women Tanzania Country Office
 With Inputs from Robert Husbands,
OHCHR
YEMEN
Office of the Special Adviser
to the Secretary-General on
Yemen
Yemen Constitutional review
Following a ten-month process, the
17-member Yemeni Constitutional
Drafting
Commission
(CDC)
submitted its first draft of the
Constitution on 22 January 2015 to
the
National
Body,
an
entity
mandated to review the draft to
ensure that it is not ‘significantly
inconsistent’
with
the
National
Dialogue Conference (NDC) Outcomes. The CDC, formed in March
2014, was tasked with transforming
the
NDC
Outcomes
into
a
constitution, to be submitted to a
referendum following a review and
revision process.
Working with the Secretariat of the
CDC, the UN played a significant role
in supporting the CDC with these and
other challenges to complete its first
draft. The core UN expert team was
composed of the Standby Team of
Mediation Experts, Christina Murray
and Hassen Ibrahim, and other
experts supported through the Yemen
National Dialogue and Constitutional
Reform Trust Fund and staff of the
Office of the Special Adviser to the
Secretary-General on Yemen. UNDP,
through its Multi-Partner Trust Fund
Office, is the Trust Fund Administrative Agent, and programmes and
projects funded by the Trust Fund are
executed by UNOPS, and the UN
Special Adviser to the SecretaryGeneral on Yemen and the SecretaryGeneral of the Secretariat for the
National Dialogue serve as the cochairs. The Trust Fund has been
generously supported by several
member states.
Several other UN agencies also
provided advice within their respective mandates: UNDP on election
issues, UNICEF and OHCHR on
human
rights
and
fundamental
freedoms, including rights of children,
youth and minorities, social and
economic rights, and, along with
UNFPA, advice on women’s rights and
gender equality. UNHCR supported
the CDC on rights of refugees and
IDPs and OCHA provided maps to
15
help inform discussions on electoral
constituencies. In addition to providing background papers and, at
times, draft text at the request of the
CDC, all experts provided comments
on the CDC drafts.
From the outset of the CDC’s work,
experts provided both substantive
and process advice. At the first CDC
retreat, the agenda was largely
designed by UN constitutional experts, with Secretariat and CDC
input. UN experts also facilitated the
CDC’s efforts in formulating a work
plan, drafting its rules of procedure,
preparing an outline of chapters in
the constitution, and classifying the
approximately 1,800 NDC Outcomes
into constitutional elements, and
legislative or policy principles. UN
support continued throughout the
process with the production of more
than 180 papers (memoranda in
response to particular questions,
specialized topic papers, and comments on draft text) and presentations on specific topics. Process
support was also provided to the
Secretariat in the development of
their outreach plans.
A CDC retreat was scheduled for the
end of the drafting process, to enable
intensive final consideration of issues.
In the last quarter of 2014, the UAE
generously hosted the CDC for ten
weeks to complete the first draft, in a
venue free from the political and
security instability in Sana’a.
The UN expert team assisted the CDC
to discuss various complicated and
politically controversial issues, such
as the allocation of authorities among
the tiers of government in the new
federal state, finance and judicial
structures in a federal system, special
status for the cities of Aden and
Sanaa, transitional provisions, and
guarantees for vital Southern interests, a constitutional requirement
stipulated in the NDC Outcomes. MSU
expert Hassen Ibrahim provided
process advice at a critical time, to
Yemen. CDC Deputy Chair Ms. Nihal Alalaqi, Christina Murray (MSU Standby
expert), Bassim Saleh (interpreter), Nicholas Steytler (constitutional
expert) supporting a small working group of the CDC. Credit: OSASG Yemen
response to the need for a fundamental change in the CDC’s working
methods if it was to complete the
draft within its projected time.
As the CDC was drawing near to
completing its first draft, it was
deadlocked on key political issues,
such as the question of Southern
guarantees, whether to include the
number and details of the six
proposed federal regions in the
constitution or a federal law, and the
structure of governments at the subnational level. The Special Adviser to
the
Secretary-General
and
the
Secretary-General of the Secretariat
of the National Dialogue helped to
facilitate agreement on text within
the CDC on these issues over a threeday period of intense negotiations
within the last two weeks of the
CDC’s work.
Today, the constitution-making process has stalled temporarily, due to
the political impasse that has seized
the country. While the political
transition progressed, Yemen experienced dramatic changes since
October 2013, when ongoing conflict
between the Houthis, other armed
groups
and
government
forces
escalated. In September 2014, the
Houthis seized control of the capital,
Sana’a. In January 2015, the
President
and
Prime
Minister
tendered their resignations and were
placed under house arrest, precipitating a political crisis. The decision
by the CDC to include the number
and details of the six regions in the
draft constitution also contributed to
the crisis because the Houthis seek to
redefine the regional boundaries.
Against this background, the Special
Adviser has been facilitating inclusive
negotiations to resolve the political
impasse and to find a consensus
solution in accordance with the
Transition
Agreement,
the
NDC
Outcomes, and the Peace and
National Partnership Agreement, to
enable the completion of the political
transition. Following a review by the
National Body and a public consultation period, the CDC will undertake
necessary revisions to the draft, prior
to its submission to a popular
referendum. The Mediation Standby
Team and other UN experts are
reviewing the draft and contributing
with expert papers in preparation for
the coming review period by the
National Body.
 Stephanie Koury, Political Affairs
Officer, OSASG Yemen
16
UNDP launches
Guidance Note on
Constitution-Making
Support
For the first time, the
UNDP Strategic Plan 20142017 explicitly recognises
constitution-making assistance as a key plank of
UNDP’s support for inclusive governance, peacebuilding.
In response to the demand of Country Offices working
in this area, UNDP launched a new Guidance Note on
Constitution-Making Support. The Guidance Note is a
first step in developing a stronger knowledge platform
to guide UNDP country offices on good–practice
constitutional assistance approaches.
The Note provides advice and tips, as well as sharing
good practice, case studies, and lessons learned, to
assist UNDP practitioners who are designing and
implementing support to constitution-making. Guidance
is provided on working with a range of partners,
including UN Missions, members of the UNCT and NGOs.
A range of technical entry points which Country Offices
may wish to consider are also explained.
Read the Guidance: http://bit.ly/1IexfrP
DPA-UNDP online portal ‘UN
Constitutionmaker’
The UN Department of Political Affairs (DPA), in close
partnership with UNDP, has launched the UN
Constitutionmaker
online
resource
centre
on
constitutional assistance.
UN Constitutionmaker draws on years of UN field
experience and provides access to a wide range of
sources, including materials produced by expert
practitioners, academics and constitution-making bodies
from around the world. The portal offers:
Resources, tools, templates and guidance on
substance, process and programming in the area of
constitution-making;
A repository for the UN’s experiences in providing
constitutional assistance, collecting together strategic,
technical and project-related documents from UN
Missions and Country Teams in a number of countries.
Access at:
constitutionmaker.un.org
The website is only
available to United
Nations personnel.
Create an account using
your UN system email:
constitutionmaker.un.org
Expert Group Meeting on the revision of the UN
Women Constitutional Database
An Expert Group Meeting was held by UN Women from 17-18 February
2015 in New York. The purpose of the meeting was to review and validate
the revised provisions of the
UN Women Constitutional Database,
a
global constitutional database on gender equality-related provisions which
was launched by UN Women in December 2013. The scope of the database
extends to 195 constitutions of Member States and Territories of the United
Nations.
A number of amendments have been made by UN Women to the Constitutional Database since its inception in 2013. The
initial 16 categories of the database were extended to 25 categories. Notably, new categories include provisions on
Affirmative Action and Temporary Special Measures, Gender Quotas, Constitutional Adjudication and Review, Gender
Equality Machineries and Commissions, Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity, among others.
Prior to finalization and uploading the revised database, UN Women brought together a group of experts from academia,
civil society organizations, governmental bodies and UN agencies to assess its quality and ensure that it is robust,
intellectually sound and of high utility value. Subsequently, a number of substantive amendments were made in order to
improve the quality, usefulness and effectiveness of the database.
The revised UN Women Constitution Database is expected to better respond to the needs of constitutional practitioners
and scholars working on constitution-making, gender equality and/or comparative constitutional studies, by including
provisions on important aspects of gender equality as set out in the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of
Discrimination against Women, and the general recommendations and concluding observations of the CEDAW Committee.
UN Women will also produce a User’s Guide to provide details about the criteria and reasoning for the selection of the
provisions, in order to assist users in navigating the database.
constitutions.unwomen.org
17
READER’S DIGEST
Oil and Natural Gas:
Constitutional
Frameworks for the
Arab States Region
International IDEA, Center
for Constitutional Transitions NYU,
UNDP
The report focuses on the relationship
between oil and gas and constitutions
and is of particular importance to the
MENA region because of its significant
natural
resources.
It
addresses
possible design options for the
regulation of oil and gas resources
through constitutional provisions to
enhance accountability, transparency,
fair
distribution,
and
efficiency.
(English) (Arabic)
Combating Corruption:
Constitutional
Frameworks for the
Middle East and North
Africa
International IDEA, Center for
Constitutional Transitions NYU, UNDP
The
report
delves
into
the
relationship between constitutional
law
and
the
struggle
against
corruption.
It
considers
the
constitutional
frameworks
and
mechanisms available to prevent and
reduce corruption, with particular
reference to the transitional states of
the Arab region. (English) (Arabic)
Decentralization in
Unitary States:
Constitutional
Frameworks for the
Arab States Region
International IDEA, Center for
Constitutional Transitions at NYU, UNDP
The report explores the important
issue of how decentralization can be
implemented in unitary countries to
deepen
democratic
values
and
improve the quality of life and human
security in neglected communities.
The report addresses the benefits of
decentralization to the MENA region
and how constitutional incorporation
of various principles can increase
opportunities for decentralization and
help improve standards of living
throughout the region.
(English) (Arabic)
Participatory and
Inclusive Constitution
Making
Jason Gluck, Michele
Brandt, USIP
The report draws from
the work of scholars and constitution
makers who have been exchanging
ideas about how to ensure that
modern constitutions incorporate the
needs and aspirations of the citizens
they are intended to govern. As the
countries
of
the
Arab
Spring
transition from authoritarian regimes
and overcome ethnic and sectarian
divisions, they can learn lessons from
comparative
constitution-making
experiences—including most recently
that of Tunisia—about how to achieve
more
consensus
based
social
compacts
and
lasting
peace.
(English)
Rule of Law and
Constitution Building The role of Regional
Organizations
International IDEA
The
publication
discusses
the
initiatives and actions in the field of
rule of law and constitution building
by
regional
organizations.
It
highlights their achievements, their
limitations and the challenges they
face,
and
puts
forward
policy
recommendations for consideration.
(English)
Marginalized Groups
and Constitution Building
International IDEA
The
report
highlights
the
key
conclusions and recommendations
emerging from an expert roundtable
conference around some of these
questions organized by International
IDEA in October 2013. (English
VIDEO PRIMERS
International IDEA
presents a series of
animated videos to
complement its
constitution-building
primers (click on title to
watch). They are now
also available in Arabic.
What is a Constitution?
(English) (Arabic)
How are Constitutions Made?
(English) (Arabic)
Why do Constitutions Matter?
(English) (Arabic)
*The text on this page generally
follows the original summary
provided by the publisher.
THE UN
CONSTITUTIONAL
United Nations Headquarters
New York City, 10017
New York, USA
This publication is a joint effort between the United Nations Department of
Political Affairs (DPA), the Department of Peacekeeping Operations (DPKO),
OHCHR, UNDP, UNICEF, and UN Women to strengthen system-wide information
sharing, coordination, and partnership in the area of constitutional assistance.
We welcome your comments and suggestions. Please contact us at:
constitutionmaker@un.org
Copyright © 2015 United Nations. All Rights Reserved.
Issue 2013
18

Issue 4 - UN Peacemaker

Transcription

Similar documents

Rochana Bajpai | SOAS London - Global Governance Programme

Available Courses for Section 4 Please note:

File

David Barton heads WallBuilders, a national pro

2014 NOVEMBER EXAM STUDY INFORMATION GRADE 8 GENERAL INFORMATION

DO NOT SUPPORT A1931/S1147 A1931/S1147 seeks to

Mabelline is our Pet of the Week!

Now! - National Constitution Center

Print - Preamble to US Constitution