Summary and conclusion The agarose development
Transcription
Summary and conclusion The agarose development
Design of a novel agarose-based resin platform Hans J Johansson,* Hans Berg, Patrick Gilbert, Mark Hicks, Caroline Tinsley, Duncan Sinclair. Purolite Research and Development. Llantrisant, Wales. *hans.johansson@purolite.com Introduction Results Selectivity Monoclonal antibody purification* • The first agarose based chromatography beads were introduced by Hjerten in 1962. Fifty years later beaded agarose has become the dominant resin for protein purification and is extensively used, from research scale in sub mL volumes, to full scale manufacturing in 500 litre chromatography columns. Dynamic binding capacity (DBC), pressure/flow properties, and selectivity are three key performance parameters for any process resin. The charged groups of the SP and Q ligands used in Praesto media are identical to the charged groups used in many other ion exchange resins. Minor differences in selectivity still occur due to differences in base matrix, ligand density and the presence or absence of surface extenders. The Praesto platform demonstrates selectivity very similar to established agarose-based resins with the SP (Fig. 4a and 4b), the exception being Capto S, a dextran grafted resin, that shows poorer resolution for this application. Cation exchangers are present in most antibody processes with the primary function to remove product variants such as high molecular weight (HMW) aggregates and fragments. Here we compare four different cation exchangers with respect to DBC and removal of high molecular weight aggregates and host cell proteins. The generic conditions used were the same for all four resins and not individually optimized for each cation exchange resin. 800 800 600 400 0 Figure 1– Selectivity (Kav) curves 0.8 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.5 0.5 0.3 Praesto Pure45 0.3 Praesto Pure65 0.3 Praesto Pure90 0.2 Sepharose 4 FF 0.2 Sepharose 4 FF 0.2 Sepharose 4 FF 0.1 Sepharose 6 FF 0.1 Sepharose 6 FF 0.1 Sepharose 6 FF 4.5 5 logMW 5.5 6 0 4 4.5 5 logMW 3.5 3 4 4.5 5.5 6 0 4 4.5 5 0.5 2 1.5 1 2.5 Praesto SP90 (90 μm) Praesto SP65 (65 μm) Capto S (90 μm) Capto SP ImpRes (40 μm) SP Sepharose Fast Flow (90 μm) Praesto SP45 (45 μm) Praesto SP65 (65 μm) SP Sepharose High Performance (34 μm) 3.5 3 4 4.5 Praesto SP65, Praesto SP45, SP Sepharose High Performance and Capto SP ImpRes were packed at 4 bar to a bed height of 20 cm in a HiScale 26/40 column. 50 40 1000 30 0 20 10 15 Retention volume (mL) 5 25 30 60 1500 1000 80 90 70 60 50 40 6 8 Capto SP ImpRes Praesto SP90 Praesto SP45 Capto S Praesto SP65 Conductivity Conductivity 25 30 50 RT 2.4 min RT 6 min 2 4 Residence time (min) Q Sepharose FF Capto Q ImpRes 6 Figure 3b – Intermediate purification and polishing: comparison of DBC at different residence times for Praesto Q65, Praesto Q45 and Capto Q ImpRes. Column: Tricorn™ 5/50 Run conditions same as in 3a. 130 0 65 6 6.00 5 5.00 4 3 2 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 20.00 60.00 80.00 100.00 71 Capto S ImpAct Capto S ImpAct Praesto SP45 Praesto SP45 Praesto SP65 Praesto SP65 Capto ImpRes Capto ImpRes 10 Praesto A prototype 2 (large pore) 3 minutes RT (DBC 10%) 38 52 50 Resin Figure 5 – DBC measured with a 5 mg hIgG/mL, pH 7.4, solution. 75 100 90 80 70 50 8 6 4 Praesto PtA MabSelect SuRe 60 2 75% cut off 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 120.00 Recovery of protein % Figure 9 – Host Cell Protein (HCP) clearance for MAb A Relative alkaline stability comparison between MabSelect SuRe and Praesto Protein A prototype. 55 10 minutes RT (DBC 10%) 40.00 12 48 25 120.00 Figure 8 – Protein recovery vs. cumulative HMW aggregate removal at 10 and 70 % of the determined DBC. Elution with linear gradient over 20 column volumes from 20 mM sodium acetate, pH 5.0 to 20 mM acetate + 0.5 M sodium chloride, pH 5.0. The starting material (Protein A purified MAB) had a HMW aggregate content of 4 %. Figure 6 – Alkaline stability Praesto A prototype 1 (small pore) 3 minutes RT (DBC 10%) 33 0 100.00 40 Number of CIP cycles Figure 6 – CIP study over 40 cycles using 1.0 M NaOH, 30 minutes/cycle. DBC measured with a 5 hIgG/mL solution, pH 7.4. 0 Capto S ImpAct Purolite Praesto SP45 MAb A RE1 (10% DBC) Load 39.0 39.0 F1 0.44 0.25 F2 0.51 0.74 F3 0.70 0.75 F4 0.70 0.91 F5 0.96 0.66 F6 0.76 1.12 F7 0.99 1.07 F8 1.30 Below LOD Table 1 – Conditions used: Approximately 500 mg MAb A/mL resin was loaded under non-binding conditions (Protein A eluate pH adjusted to 7.7) at two different residence times. 2.4 and 6.0 minutes. The column bed height was 6 cm. • Purolite successfully developed homogeneous agarose resins with excellent pressure/flow properties, capacity and resolution Praesto is a trademark of Purolite Corporation ÄKTA, Tricorn, Capto, MabSelect SuRe, and Sepharose are trademarks of GE Healthcare companies Recovery of protein % 39 6 minutes RT (DBC 10%) 80.00 (ng/mL)/mg/mL *The monoclonal antibody purification evaluation was performed by Professor Anurag Rathore at the Indian Institute of Technology, Delhi. 2.00 Flow rate: 0.3 mL/min 60.00 (ng/mL)/mg/mL • Alkaline stable Protein A prototype resins with a capacity matching the market leading Protein A resin, MabSelect SuRe, has been designed 3.00 1.00 40.00 Rt 6.0 minutes • A dynamic binding capacity of > 120 mg/mL was achieved for two different antibodies using Praesto SP45 ImpAct 4.00 1 20.00 Rt 2.4 minutes Summary and conclusion MAb A – Protein recovery vs. cumulative aggregate % at 70% DBC. Elution buffer: 50 mM sodium acetate, 1 M NaCl, pH 5. 6 minutes RT (DBC 10%) 130 DBC MAb B at 5% breakthrough (mg/mL of resin) MAb A – Protein recovery vs. cumulative aggregate % at 10% DBC. Run conditions same as in 4a. 6 minutes RT (DBC 10%) 50 Figure 8 – HMW aggregate removal for MAb A Column: Tricorn 5/50 8 Figure 3a – Capture and intermediate purification: comparison of DBC at different residence times for Praesto Q90, Praesto Q65 and Q Sepharose 6FF. RT 6 min 123 65 30 Figure 7 – DBC data for two different monoclonal antibodies of subclass IgG1. MAb A: Protein A eluate adjusted to pH 5.5 with 1.75 M acetic acid. MAb B: 20 mM acetate, pH 5.0. 110 0 RT 2.4 min 79 0 Figure 4b – Intermediate purification and polishing: comparison of selectivity of Capto SP ImpRes, Praesto SP45, and Praesto SP65. MabSelect SuRe 3 minutes RT (DBC 10%) 81 Capto S ImpAct DBC MAb A at 5% breakthrough (mg/mL of resin) Figure 4a – Capture and intermediate purification: comparison of selectivity of SP Sepharose Fast Flow, Praesto SP90, and Capto S. Comparison between MabSelect SuRe™ and two different Praesto Protein A prototypes. Praesto Q65 Flow rates: 0.42 mL/min (2.4 minutes residence time), 0.17 mL/min (6 minutes residence time) 20 10 15 Retention volume (mL) 50 RT 6 min 92 Capto S ImpAct A new generation Protein A resins 60 Praesto Q90 Sample buffer: 50 mM Tris (pH 8.5) 5 Sepharose 6 Fast Flow Figure 5 – Dynamic binding capacity Praesto Q45 Sample load: Until 10% breakthrough 0 RT 2.4 min 80 RT 6 min System: ÄKTA™ Pure 25L 70 30 RT 2.4 min Residence time: 4 minutes 80 129 Capto SP ImpRes Capto SP ImpRes 10 0 86 RT 6 min 123 0 Purolite has started the design of an alkaline stable Protein A resin. Preliminary results indicate that dynamic binding capacities well above 50 g/L with a new alkaline stable Protein A can be achieved. Praesto Q65 Sample: 10 mg/mL Bovine Serum Albumin 20 500 40 30 4 Residence time (min) 30 Start buffer: 50 mM sodium acetate, pH 5. Comparison of DBC for Praesto Q45, Praesto Q65 and Capto Q ImpRes anion exchangers. 100 2 50 40 0 RT 2.4 min 101 RT 6 min Sample volume: 0.5 mL (5 x 50 mm) Figure 3b – Intermediate purification and polishing 90 0 70 2000 20 500 85 Praesto SP45 RT 2.4 min Sample: 25 mg/mL IgG, 5 mg/mL Lactoferrin in 50 mM sodium acetate buffer solution, pH 5. With the continuing development of high titer cell lines, high capacity is becoming increasingly important. The Praesto range of ion exchangers have significantly higher dynamic binding capacity compare to other non-grafted ion exchange resins. 20 1500 RT 6 min 89 Praesto SP45 Column volume: 1 mL Dynamic binding capacity logMW 60 0 Praesto SP90, Praesto SP65, and Capto S were packed at 4 bar to a bed height of 20 cm in a HiScale™ 26/40 column. 6 70 2000 44 80 10 Figure 2b – The figure compares the pressure/flow properties of Praesto SP65, Praesto SP45, SP Sepharose High Performance and Capto SP ImpRes. Comparison of DBC for Praesto Q65, Praesto Q90 and Q Sepharose Fast Flow anion exchangers. 5.5 0 Pressure (bar) Figure 3a – Capture and intermediate purification 0.4 0.4 4 2.5 DBC 10% breakthrough (mg/mL) 0.8 0 2 1.5 0 2500 RT 2.4 min 63 RT 6 min 90 80 400 Figure 2a – The figure compares the pressure/flow properties of Praesto SP90, Praesto SP65, SP Sepharose Fast Flow and Capto S. DBC 10% breakthrough (mg/mL) 0.8 Kav 0.9 0.9 Kav Kav Selectivity curve of Praesto Pure90, compared with Sepharose 4 Fast Flow and Sepharose 6 Fast Flow, obtained with RNase, Bovine Serum Albumin, Ferritin and Thyroglobulin. 0.9 0.4 1 SP Sepharose Fast Flow were packed at 2 bar to a bed height of 20 cm in a HiScale 26/40 column. 1 2500 Praesto SP65 RT 2.4 min 100 90 Pressure (bar) To cover applications from capture to polishing three different particle sizes all with a porosity optimal for medium sized proteins (50 - 200 kD) were designed. 0.5 0.5 3000 100 Fractions 5% DBC data for MAb B on four resins at two different residence times. Praesto SP65 ng HCP/mg MAb 0 Minimal matrix volume (5 - 7 %): possibility to design high capacity resins without the use of grafting technology. 1 3000 200 Alkaline stable: allows the use of high concentrations of sodium hydroxide for cleaning and sanitization in place. Selectivity curve of Praesto Pure65, compared with Sepharose 4 Fast Flow and Sepharose 6 Fast Flow, obtained with RNase, Bovine Serum Albumin, Ferritin and Thyroglobulin. 600 200 Extremely hydrophilic: minimal unspecific interaction, long functional life time. Protein separation of 25 mg/mL IgG and 5 mg/mL Lactoferrin over Praesto SP45, Praesto SP65 and Capto SP ImpRes. UV signal (mAU) Agarose was chosen as the base for the Praesto™ platform because of the inherent properties of agarose: 1000 Linear velocity (cm/h) Linear velocity (cm/h) 1200 Protein separation of 25 mg/mL IgG and 5 mg/mL Lactoferrin over Praesto SP90, SP Sepharose 6 Fast Flow and Capto S. 5% DBC data for MAb A on four resins at two different residence times. Strong anion exchangers are commonly used as a scavenger step in flow through mode to remove trace contaminants and ensure sufficient virus clearance. In this study we looked at the removal of host cell proteins under non-binding conditions on Praesto Q65. All fraction showed HCP levels of 1 ppm or lower. Table 1 – Praesto Q65 Figure 7 – Dynamic binding capacity at 5 % breakthrough Cumulative HMW % of total 1400 Designing a platform 1 Pressure/flow performance of Praesto SP65, Praesto SP45, SP Sepharose High Performance and Capto SP ImpRes. Figure 4b – Cation selectivity, intermediate purification and polishing UV signal (mAU) Pressure/flow performance of Praesto SP90, Praesto SP65, SP SepharoseTM Fast Flow and CaptoTM S. Figure 4a – Cation selectivity, capture and intermediate purification DBC at 5% breakthrough (%) • The result is a novel range of homogeneous agarose resins designed for large scale manufacturing. The resins show significantly improved pressure/flow properties, capacity, and resolution compared to what is available today. Selectivity curve of Praesto Pure45, compared with Sepharose™ 4 Fast Flow and Sepharose 6 Fast Flow, obtained with RNase, Bovine Serum Albumin, Ferritin and Thyroglobulin. Figure 2b – Intermediate purification and polishing Figure 2a – Capture and intermediate purification Conductivity (mS/cm) • In this paper we have used a new technology to produce beaded agarose of different particle sizes ranging from 40 - 90 μm. The objective has been to improve pressure flow properties while creating a porosity structure optimal for protein chromatography. Cumulative HMW % of total Using a unique cross-linking chemistry the rigidity of Praesto resins allows for high flow velocities at pressures relevant to large scale operation. Conductivity (mS/cm) Pressure/flow properties Praesto Q65 for polishing of MAb A at a load of 500 g/L resin Purolite Praesto SP65 Capto S ImpRes MAb A RE2 (70% DBC) Figure 9 – There were no major difference in the HCP clearance ability under the conditions used. The Protein A purified starting material had a HCP content of approximately 40 ng HCP/mg MAb. The agarose development team