Order No. 19 - ITC Law Blog
Transcription
Order No. 19 - ITC Law Blog
PUBLIC VERSION UNITED STATES INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION Washington, D.‘C. ' In the Matter of CERTAIN FORMATTED MAGNETIC DATA STORAGE TAPES_ANDY CARTRIDGES CONTAINING THE SAlV[E [nv_ No_337-1"A_931 ' . Order N0. 19: Initial Determination On June 19, 2015, pursuant to Commission Rules 210.21(b), complainant Advanced Research Corporation (“ARC” or “oomplainant”) and respondents FUJIFILM Holdings Corporation; FUJIFILM Corporation; FUJIFILM Recording Media U.S.A., Inc.; Intemational Business Machines Corporation; Oracle Corporation; and Oracle America, Inc. (collectively, “respondents”) (all collectively, “private parties”) filed a joint motion for termination of the investigation based on a fmalized Settlement Agreement (Exhibit 1 to the motion). Motion Docket No. 931-38. On June 26, 2015, the Commission Investigative Staff (“Staff”) filed a response supporting the motion. ' \ Commission Rule 210.21(a)(2) provides that “[a]ny party may move at any time to I terminate an investigation in whole or in part as to any or all respondents on the basis of a settlement, a licensing or other agreement . . . .” 19 C.F.R. § 210.2l(a)(2). Commission Rule 2 l 0.2 1(b)(1) provides in relevant part that “[a]n investigation before the Commission may be terminated as to one or more respondents pursuant to section 337(0) of the Tariff Act of 1930 on the basis of a licensing or other settlement agreement.” 19 C.F.R. § 2l0.21(b)(1). C The pending motion complies with the Commission Rules, and is in the interest of public policy. Pursuant to Commission Rule 21O.21(b), the movants state that “there are no other agreements, written or oral, express or implied between the parties concerning the subject matter of the investigation.” Mot. at 2. The movants further state that “[t]ermination of this Investigation will conserve the Commission’s and private parties’ resources and therefore is in the public interest.” Id. lt is argued: “The Private‘Parties further submit that tennination ofthis investigation will not negatively impact the public health and Welfare, competitive conditions in the United States economy, the production of like or directly competitive articles in the United States, or United States consumers.” The Staff agrees. See Staff Resp. at 4. i Accordingly, it is the initial detemiination of the undersigned that Motion No. 931-38 is granted. This investigation is terminated in its entirety. Pursuant to 19 C.F.R. § 2l0.42(h), this initial determination shall become the determination of the Commission unless a party files a petition for review of the initial determination pursuant to l9 C.F.R. § 2lO.43(a), or the Commission, pursuant to 19 C.F.R. § 210.44, orders on its own motion a review of the initial determination or certain issues contained herein. David P. Shaw Administrative Law Judge Issued: June 29, 2015 2 ' PUBLIC VERSION UNITED STATES INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMJVIISSION > WASHINGTON, D.C. Before The Honorable David P. Shaw Administrative Law Judge In the Matter of CERTAIN FORMATTED MAGNETIC DATA STORAGE TAPES AND CARTRIDGES CONTAINING THE SAME Investigation N0. 337-TA-931 JOINT MOTION TO TERMINATE THE INVESTIGATION Complainant Advanced Research Corporation - (“Complainant”) and Respondents FUHFILM Holdings Corporation, FUJIFILM'Corporation, FUJIFLLMRecording Media U.S.A., lnc., International Business Machines Corporation, Oracle Corporation, and Oracle America, Inc. (collectively “Respondents”) (all collectively “Private Parties”) hereby jointly move to terminate the above-captioned investigation pursuant to the provisions of l9 C.F.R. § 2l0.2l(b) and based on the attached finalized Settlement Agreement (Exhibit l to this motion). ' Complainant and Respondents have satisfied the requirements of 19 C.F.R. § 2lO.21(b). Regarding motions to terminate by entry of a settlement, Commission Rule 2l’0.2l(b)(l) states: . An investigation before the Commission may be terminated as to one or_more respondents pursuant to section 337(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930 on the basis of a licensing or other settlement agreement. A motion for termination by settlement shall contain copies of the licensing or other settlement agreement, any supplemental agreements, and a statement that there are no other agreements, written or oral, express or implied between the parties conceming the subject matter of the investigation. If the licensing ~ or other settlement agreement contains confidential business infonnation Within the meaning of § 20l.6(a) of this chapter, a < ~ PUBLIC VERSION copy of the agreement with such information deleted shall accompany the motion. , The parties executed an amendment to the Settlement Agreement on June l7, 2015 I _ butthe amendmentdid not changethe dateon whichthe partiesagreedto file papers for the termination of the litigations between them. As such, the Settlement Agreement is now final. Pursuant to Commission Rule 2lr0.2l(b)(l), the Private Parties state that there are no other agreements, written or oral, express or‘implied between the parties concerning the subject matter of the investigation. The Private Parties further certify that the Settlement Agreement contains confidential business information within the meaning of § 20l.6(a); accordingly, a copy of the agreement with such information deleted has been attached to this motion as Exhibit 2. Termination of this Investigation will conserve the Commission’s and private parties’ resources and therefore is in the public interest. Certain DVD/CD Players and Recorders, Color Television Receivers and Monitors, and Components Thereofi Inv. No. 337-TA-_542,Order No. 16, Initial Determination Granting Joint Motion to Terminate the Investigation Based on Settlement Agreements, at 3 (December 21, 2005) (“[T]he public interest favors settlement to avoid needless litigation and to conserve public and private resources”); see also, e.g., Certain Equipment for Telecommunications or Data Communications Networks, Including Routers, Switches, and Hubs, and Components Thereofi Inv. No. 337-TA‘-574, Order No. 27 at 4 (May 24, 2007) (“terrnination of litigation under these circumstances is generally in the public interest as settlement avoids needless litigation and conserves public resources”); Certain Ink Cartridges 2 PUBLIC VERSION and Components Thereofl Inv. No. 337-TA-565, Order No. 59 at 2 (Nov. 9, 2Oll) (“Private resolution of disputes is in the public interest because it conserves time and resources”). The Private Parties further submit that termination of this investigation will not negatively impact the public health and welfare, competitive conditions in the United States economy, the production of like or directly competitive articles in the United States, or United States consumers. See Certain Personal Computer/Consumer Electronic Convergent Devices, Components Thereof and Products Containing Same, Inv. No. 337-TA-558, Order No. 10, Initial Determination Granting Joint Motion of Complainant lntervideo'Digital Technology Corp. and Respondent Winbook Computer Corp. to Terminate, at 4 (April 20, 2006) (citing 19 C.F.R. § 2lO.50(b)(2)). The Private Parties respectfully request that the enclosed confidential Exhibit l and the information bracketed in red in the instant motion be treated as confidential pursuant to the Protective Order, and only be disclosed to the Commission, the"Administrative Law Judge, and the Staff. Pursuant to Commission Rule 21O.21(b)(l), the Private Parties have provided a public version with financial terms and other terms not relevant to the public redacted. The confidential treatment requested by the parties is appropriate and consistent with Commission precedent and the public interest, which favors settlement. See Certain Semiconductor Chips and Products Containing the Same, Inv. No 337-TA-753, Order No. 26 at 1 (June 20, 2011); Certain Automotive‘Multimedia Display and Navigation Systems, Inv. No. 337-TA-657, Order No. 27 (June 23, 2009); Certain Dynamic Random Access Memory Semiconductors and Products Containing Same, Including Memory Modules, Inv. No. 337-TA-707, Order No. 10 (June 29, 2010); see also Certain Ink Cartridges, Inv. No. 337-TA-565, Order No. 59 at 2. 3 /> PUBLIC VERSION Counsel for the Private Parties, pursuant to Ground Rule 5(d), certify that they notified counsel for the Commission Investigative Staff on May 21, 2015 of the Private Parties’ intent to file the present Motion. Staff has stated that it will take a position on the papers. For the reasons stated herein, the Private Parties respectfully request that the Administrative Law Judge issue an Initial Determination terminating the Investigation, due to settlement. Dated: June 19, 2015 Respectfully submitted, /s/ Devan V.Padmanabhan Devan V. Padmanabhan Sri K. Sankaran Christopher A. Young WINTHROP & WEINSTINE, P.A. 225 South Sixth Street Suite 3500 Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402 Telephone: (612) 604-6400 - James B. Altman David F. Nickel FOSTER, MURPHY, ALTMAN & NICKEL, PC 1899 L Street, N.W., Suite 1150 V Washington, D.C. 20036 Telephone: (202) 822-4100 Counselfor Complainant Advanced Research Corporation Dated: June 19, 2015 /s/ D. Sean Trainor Gregory S. Arovas, P.C. KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP 601 Lexington Avenue New York, New York 10022 4 PUBLIC VERSION .. Telephone: (212) 446-4800 Facsimile: (212) 446-4900 Edward C. Donovan ' D. Sean Trainor KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP 655 Fifieenth Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20005 Telephone: (202) 879-5000 Facsimile: (202) 879-5200 Counselfor International Business Machines Corporation /s/ Steven J. Routh Steven J. Routh Sten A. Jensen Jordan L. Coyle Diana M. Szego ORRICK, -HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE, LLP Columbia Center 1152 Fifteenth Street, NW Washington, D.C. 20005 Telephone: (202) 339-8400 - Facsimile: (202) 339-8500 Dated: June 19, 2015 William H. Wright Andrew Y. Yen ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE, LLP 777 South Figueroa Street, Suite 3200 Los Angeles, CA 90017-5855 Telephone: (213) 629-2020 Facsimile: (213) 629-2499 David E. Case ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE, LLP Izumi Garden Tower, 28th Floor 6-1 Roppongi 1-Chome Minato-ku, Tokyo 106-6028 Japan Telephone: +81 3 3224 2900 Facsimile: +81 3 3224 2901 5 PUBLIC VERSION Counselfor F UJIFILMHoldings Corporation, F UJIFILM Corporation, and F UJIFILM Recording Media U.S.A.,Inc. /s/ Steven J. Routh Steven J. Routh Sten A. Jensen Jordan L. Coyle Diana M. Szego ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE, LLP Columbia Center 1 1152 Fifteenth Street, NW Washington, D.C. 20005 Telephone: (202) 339-8400 Facsimile: (202) 339-8500 Dated: June 19, 2015 Chris Ottenweller Vickie L. Feeman Anthony Tartaglio ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE, LLP 1000 Marsh Road Menlo Park, CA 94025 Telephone: 650-614-7400 Facsimile: 650-614-7401 Email: 931-Oracle@0rrick.com William 1-1.Wright Andrew Y. Yen ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE, LLP 777 South Figueroa Street, Suite 3200 Los Angeles, CA 90017-5855 Telephone: (213) 629-2020 Facsimile: (213) 629-2499 David E. Case ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE, LLP lzumi Garden Tower, 28th Floor 6-1 Roppongi 1-Chome Minato-ku, Tokyo 106-6028 Japan Telephone: 6 _+81 -_3_ 3224 2900- _- PUBLIC VERSION Facsimile: +81 3 3224 2901 Counselfor Respondents Oracle Corporation and Oracle America, Inc 7 Y PUBLIC VERSION UNITED STATES INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20436 g Before the Honorable David P. Shaw Administrative Law Judge In the Matter of CERTAIN FORMATTED MAGNETIC DATA STORAGE TAPES AND CARTRIDGES CONTAINING THE SAME Investigation No. 337-TA-931 GROUND RULE 5.L. DECLARATION OF D. SEAN TRAINOR Pursuant to Ground Rule 5(1), I, D. Sean Trainor, counsel for Respondent International Business Machines Corporation,‘ hereby declare that the information bracketed in red in the forgoing motion contains information asserted to be confidential by Complainant, Respondents, and/or third parties in this Investigation. I further declare that Exhibit 1 to this motion also contains information asserted to be confidential by Complainant, Respondents, and/or third parties in this Investigation. A public version ofExhibit 1 with confidential information deleted has been provided as Exhibit 2. Disclosure ofthe confidential information contained in the motion and Exhibit I may have the effect of either impairing the Commission’s ability to obtain such information as is necessary to perform its statutory functions, or causing substantial harm to the competitive position of Respondents and Complainant. ~ I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on this 19th day of June, 2015. ' /s/ D. Sean Trainer D. Sean Trainor I I have also been authorized to submit this declaration on behalf of Complainant Advanced Research Corporation, as well as Respondents FUIIFILM Holdings Corporation, FUJIFILM Corporation, FUJIFILM Recording Media U.S.A_,,Inc., Oracle Corporation, and Oracle America, Inc. _ 8 ___. __ ._ .__ . Exhibit 1 to Joint Motion to Terminate Investigation A Removed - Contains CBI Exhibit 2 to Joint Motion to Terminate Investigation ! . PUBLIC VERSION SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT ' ' This Settlement Agreement (“Agreement”) is entered into as of May 2l, 2015 (“Execution Date”), by and between Advanced Research Corporation (referred to herein as “ARC”), a Mirmesota corporation with a principal place ofbusiness at 4459 Wh.iteBear . Parkway, White Bear Lake, Minnesota 551 I0; Intemational Business Machines Corporation (referred to herein as “lBM”), a New York corporation with a principal place of business at 1 New Orchard Road, Armonk, New York 10504-i722; FUJIFILM Holding Corporation and FUJIFILM Corporation, Japanese corporations with a principal place of business at 7-3, Akasaka 9-chome, Minato-ku, Tokyo l07—0052,Japan; FUJIFILM Recording Media U.S.A., lnc., a' Delaware corporation with a principal -place of business at 200 Summit Lake Drive, Valhalla, New York 10595 (collectively referred to herein as “FUJlFlLM”); Oracle Corporation and Oracle America, Inc., Delaware corporations with a principal place of business at 500 Oracle Parkway, Redwood Shores, California 94065 (collectively referred to herein as “Oracle”) (each of ARC, IBM, FUJIFILM, and Oracle is referred to herein as a “Party” and are collectively referred to herein as the “Paities”). ‘ RECITALS Whereas, ARC, IBM, FUJIFILM, and Oracle are parties to the ITC Action and the District Court Action (both defined below); Whereas, to avoid the time and expense of litigation, and without any admission of liability or fault, the Parties wish to resolve and settle the ITC Action and the District Court Action, without admitting liability or conceding the claims or defenses raised against them, on the terms and conditions set forth below; and Whereas, each of the Parties acknowledges that the execution of this Agreement will be of substantial benefit to it; and NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the above recitals and the mutual covenants hereinafter contained and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the Parties agree as follows: l. DEFINITIONS As used herein, capitalized terms not otherwise defined herein shall have the following meanings: 1.l “ITC Action" means the action in the United States Intemational Trade Commission captioned Inlhe Matter ofC'ermin Formatted Magnetic Data Storage Tapes and Cartridges Containing the Same, investigation No. 337-TA-931. PUBLIC VERSION l.2 “Distn'ct Court Action” means the action in the United States District Court for the District of Minnesota captioned Advanced Researclz Corporation v. Jnrernarional Business Machines Corporation, FUJIFILM Holding Corporation, FUJIFILM Corporation, and Oracle Corporation, Civil Action No. t4~CV-03241. 1.5 “Patents—In~Suit”shall mean U.S. Patent Nos. 7,525,761, 7,948,705, 8,254,052, 8,437,103, and 8,542,457. 1.6 l “S"ubsicIiagy”of a Party hereto or of a third party shall mean a corporation, company or other entity: 1.6.1 more than fifty percent (50%) of whose outstanding shares or securities (representing the right to vote for the election of directors or other managing authority) arc, now or hereafter, owned or controlled, directly or indirectly, by a Party hereto or such third party, but such corporation, company or other entity shall he deemed to be a Subsidiary only so long as such ownership or control exists; or 1.6.2 which does not have outstanding shares or securities, as may be the case in a partnership, joint venture o:runincorporated association, but more than fifty percent (50%) of whose ownetship interest representing the right to make the decisions for such corporation, company or other entity is, now or hereafter, owned or controlled, directly or indirectly, by a Party hereto or such third party, but such coiporation, company or other entity shall be deemed to be a Subsidiary only so long as such ownership or controtcxists. 2. 1.7 “IEiT'ective Date” "means 1.8 “Execution Date” has the meaning set forth above. STAY OF ITC ACTION: DISMISSAL 2.1 In consideration of the mutual promises set forth herein, within one (1) business day of the Execution Date of this Agreement, the Parties shall with respect to the lTC Action, execute and/or cause their respective counsel to execute papers in the forms set forth in Exhibit A.l, or in such other form as required for the Commission’s approval, for the purpose of staying the ITC Action until the occurrence of the Effective Date or the termination of this Agreement pursuant to Section 5.2. In the event that the Effective Date has not occuned as of June l0, 201 . 2 7, tha 7', 2 " “.. .. T '.'f _"__ ' Ymf, 'T ' " PUBLIC VERSION settlement efforts have failed, and jointly seek the earliest possible date for any hearing or other proceeding in connection with the ITC Action. 2.2 In consideration of the mutual promises set forth herein, within one (1) business day of the Effective Date of this Agreement, the Parties shall: ‘ (a) with respect to the ITC Action, execute and/or cause their respective counsel _to execute papers in the forms set forth in Exhibit A.2, or in such other form as required for the Commission’s approval, for the purpose of terminating the ITC Action with prejudice as to IBM, FUJIFILM, and Oracle; and (b) with respect to the District Court Action, execute and/or cause their respective counsel to execute papers in the fonns set forth in Exhibit B, or in such other form as required for the Court‘s approval, to dismiss with prejudice the District Court Action as to all of their respective claims by and between ARC and IBM, FUJIFILM, and Oracle. 2.3 The Parties agree that each Party shall bear its own costs, fees, and expenses relating to the ITC Action and the District"C0urt Action, including attorneys’ fees, expert Fees, and court costs, and costs in the negotiation, preparation, and execution of this Agreement, the License Agreements and the Patent Assignment Agreement (attached hereto as Exhibits C, D, E and F). 3.3 As of the Effective Date, except for the rights and obligations expressly created or reserved by this Agreement, ARC does hereby irrevocably release and forever discharge IBM, FUJIFILM and Oracle, and each of their officers, directors, employees, agents, predecessors, successors, Subsidiaries, affiliates, assigns, and attorneys from any and all actions, claims, demands, losses, liabilities or causes of action of any nature whatsoever, at law or in equity, whether asserted or unasserted, whether known or unknown, including without limitation (i) any that relate in any way to the Patents~In-Suit or for past actions relating to infringement of the Patents-In-Suit and (ii) any and all such actions, claims, demands, or causes of action of any nature whatsoever that were or could have been brought in the ITC Action or the District Court Action or in any lawsuit or other proceeding. All third parties included within the scope of this Section 3.3 are expressly agreed to be third-party beneficiaries of this Agreement. 3 PUBLIC VERSION 3.4 As of the Effective Date, except for the rights and obligations expressiy created or rcserved by this Agreement, each of IBM, Fujililm and Oracle does hereby irrevocably release and forever discharge ARC, and its officers, directors, employees, agents, predecessors, successors, Subsidiaries, affiliates, assigns, and attomcys from any and all actions, claims, demands, losses, liabilities or causes of action of any nature whatsoever, at law or in equity, whether asserted or unasserted, whether known or unknown, relating to or arising from the ITC Action or the District Court Action, including but not limited to any and all such actions, claims,‘ demands, or-causes of action of any nature whatsoever that were or could have been brought in the ITC Action or the District Court Action. All third parties included within the scope of this Section 3.4 are expressly agreed to be third-party beneficiaries of this Agreement. - 4 _ V PUBLIC VERSION 4.4 The Parties agree that this Agreement is intended solely as a compromise of disputed claims. Each Party expressly denies any liability or wrongdoing. A Party’s participation in this Agreement, its agreement to any IBKTTI ofthis Agreement, and any action taken by a Party pursuant to this Agreement: (a) do not constitute and shall not beconstrued as an admission of liability or as a concession by any Party that any claim or defense asserted by the other Party is valid; and (b) shall not be offered or admitted in evidence in any legal proceeding other than one to enforce rights and obligations arising out of this Agreement. A 5. TERMINATION 5.1 This Agreement may not be tenninatecl by any Party. Agreement 5.2 In the event the Effective Date has not occurred bi June 10‘ 2015,shall ll'lEiThl‘llS terminate (unless the Parties otherwise agree in writing to extend the term of this Agreement), provided that this Section 5.2 and the last sentence of Section 2. l. of this Agreement shall survive any such termination. 6. " ASSIGNMENT 6.1 Assignment. The terms of this Agreement are personal to and shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the Parties hereto and their respective parents, subsidiaries, officers, directors, partners, employees, heirs, conservators, successors, devisees, and assigns. This Agreement cannot be assigned to any third party in whole or part. 7. RE PRESENTATIONS; WARRANTIES 7.! ARC represents and warrants that (i) it has the full right and power to enter into this Agreement; (ii) no other person’s consent or approval is required for the granting of such rights; and (iii) this Agreement and the grant of rights herein does not conflict with, violate or otherwise constitute a breach of_anyagreement between it and any person. 7.2 IBM represents and warrants that IBM has the full right and power to enter into this Agreement and that this Agrcemcnt does not conflict with, violate, or otherwise constitute a breach of any agreement between IBM and any person. ' 73 . —FUJlFILM re resents andwarrants thatFUJIFILM hasthe p . . full right and power to enter into this Agreement and that this Agreement does not conflict with, violate, or otherwise constitute a breach of any agreement between FUJIFILM and any person. ~ 7.4 Oracle represents and warrants that Oracle has the full fight and power to enter into this Agreement and that this Agreement does not conflict with, violate, or otherwise constitute a breach of any agreement between Oracle and any person. 5 PUBLIC VERSION 8. CONFIDENTIALITY; NO PRESS RELEASE 8.1 Each Party shall hold the terms of this Agreement in confidence and shall not publicize or disclose it in any manner whatsoever. The Parties shall not issue any press release or make any statement to the press conceming the ITC Action, the District Court Action, or this Agreement. 8.2 Notwithstanding the "foregoing,the parties may disclose any information that is already publicly available, as well as the mere fact of settlement and that IBM, FUJIFIILMand Oracle are licensed “underthe Licensed Patents. Furthermore, each l‘arty may disclose the terms of the Agreement (a) to the extent disclosure is required by court or government order or otherwise required by law, provided such Party first gives to the others prior written notice at least 10 days prior to production (or reasonable notice if a court or government order requires production in less than l0 days) to enable the other Parties to seek a protective order; (b) to the extent required to enforce rights under this Agreement; (c) to the extent reasonablyneccssaty, on a confidential basis, to such Paity‘s accountants, attorneys, actual or potential investors, providers of venture capital, or potential investors in or acquirers of a product or service line and/or financial advisers; (cl)to the extent reasonably necessary, on a.confidential basis, to potential parties to a merger or acquisition involving the business or assets that are the subject matter of this Agreement, as well as to such parties‘ attorneys, accountants, and/or financial advisers; (e) to the extent reasonably necessary, on a confidential basis, to any person who, directly or indirectly, is or may be required to be bound by the lenns and conditions of this Agreement; and (O to the extent reasonably necessary, onla confidential basis, to such Pa11"y’s customers, potential customers, and third patties with which such Party has a current or potential commercial relationship. 8.3 For the avoidance of doubt, the Parties acknowledge and agree that Section 8.1 permits ‘IBM,FUJIFJLM, and Oracle to disclose so much of the tenns of this Agreement as is necessary to demonstrate to a customer that IBM, FUJIFILM, or Oracle and the customer are covered or protected by the terms of this Agreement. 9. __1\_’1I§CELLANEOUS agreement to the subject matter hereof and supersedes all prior proposals, agreements, representations, and other communications, if any, between the Parties with respect to the subject matter hereof. 9.2 If any section of this Agreement is found by competent authority to be invalid, illegal or unenforceable in any respect for any reason, the validity, legality and enforceability of such section in every other respect and the remainder of this Agreement shall Continuein effect. 9.3 Modification: Waiver. This Agreement shall not be binding upon the Parties until it has been Signed herein below by or on behalf of each Party. No modification. supplementation, or amendment to this Agreement will be effective unless it is in writing and executed by authorized representatives of the Parties, except that any Party may amend its 6 PUBLIC -VERSION address in Section 9.5 by written notice to the other Parties. Nor will any waiver of any rights be effective unless assented to in writing by the Party to be charged. The failure or delay of any Party in exercising any of its rights hereunder, including any rights with respect to a breach or default by another Party, will in no way operate as a waiver of such rights or prevent the assertion of such rights with respect to any later breach or default by another Party. 9.4 4 Headings. The headings used in this Agreement are for reference and convenience only and will not be used in interpreting the provisions of this Agreement. . 9.5 Notices. Notices and other communications shall be sent by facsimile, reputable overnight courier, email, or by registered or certified mail to the following addresses and shall be effective upon sending: To ARC and its Subsidiaries and affiliates: Advanced Research Corporation 4459 White Bear Parkway White Bear Lake, Minnesota 551 l0 To IBM and its Subsidiaries and affiliates: I _ IBM Corporation North Castle Drive, MD-NCl 19 Armonk, NY 10504-1785 Fascimile: (914) 765-4380 E-Mail: ipemail@us.ibm.com To FUJIFILM and its Subsidiaries and affiliates: FUJIFILM Corporation 9-7-3, Akasaka 9-chome, Minato-ku Tokyo, 107-0052, Japan Attention to General Manager of Intellectual Property Headquarters To Oracle and its Subsidiaries and affiliates: General Counsel ~ ' Oracle Corporation 500 Oracle Parkway Redwood City, CA 94065 cc: peter.orourke@oracle.com I 9.6 Goveming Law. The Parties agree that this Agreement willbe governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of New York and of the United States of America without regard to_ch0iceof law provisions or rules. The Parties further agree that this Agreement was mutually drafted by all Parties and that any interpretation of this Agreement or any terms thereof will not be interpreted against one Pany as the drafiing Party. 9.7 Countegarts. This Agreement may be executed in counterparts by the Parties hereto on any number of counterparts, each of which will be deemed an original, but all such 7 PUBLIC VERSION respective counterparts will together constitute one and the same agreement. The Parties agree that electronically transmitted signature pages will be treated as if they were originals. 9.8 Additional Provisions. Each Party hereby declares and represents that it is executing this Agreement after consultation with its own independent legal counsel. 9.8.1 Any mle of construction to the effect that ambiguities are to be resolved against the drafting Party will not be applied in the construction or interpretation of this Agreement. As used in this Agreement, the words “include” and “including,” “for example,” “such as,” and variations thereof will not be deemed to be terms of limitation, but rather will be deemed to be followed by the Words“without limitation.” 9.8.2 Each Party acknowledges to the other Panies that it has been represented by independent legal counsel of its own choice throughout all of the negotiations which preceded the execution of this Agreement. Each Party further acknowledges that it and its counsel have had adequate opportunity to make whatever investigation or inquiry they may deem necessary or desirable in connection with the subject matter of this Agreement prior to the execution hereof and that in entering into this Agreement it is not relying on any representations of the other Parties in connection therewith, except for the representations expressly set forth in this Agreement. ' [Balance ofpage intentionally left blank.] 8 i 1' PUBLIC VERSION ln Witness Whereof, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed by their duly authorized representatives as undersigned: ‘ Advanced Research Corporation, on its own behalf and on behalf of each ofits Subsidiaries and affiliates Intemational Business Machines Corporation, on its own behalf and on behalf of each of its Subsidiaiies and affiliates By: By: ~ Printed Name: Title: Date: Printed Name: Jeffrey Zachmann Title: Counsel, Corporate Litigation Date: FUJIFILM Holding Corporation, FUJIFILM Corporation, and FUJIFILM Recording Media U.S.A., Inc., on their own behalf and on behalf of each of their Subsidiaries and affiliates By: Printed Name: Kazuhiko Furuya Title: Director, Corporate Vice President, General Manager Intellectual Property Headquarters FUJIFILM Corporation Date: Oracle Corporation and Oracle America, Ine., on their own behalf and on behalf of each of their Subsidiaries and affiliates By: Printed Name: Deborah K. Miller Title: Vice President, Associate General Counsel, Litigation t Date: 9 PUBLIC VERSION in Witness Whereof, the parties hereto have caused this Agrccirienl to be executed by their duly authorized representatives as undc-rsigncd: Advanced Research Corporation, on its own bcilalfarid on hchnlfofeach ofits Subsidiaries and affiliares international Business Mauhinrss Corporation, on its own bchnlfund on hchaif ofeach ofits Subsidiaries and affiliatcs /i BM M4“ Prime i'\i\,[/\i/ I “W ______'__"_~;>é'\:. _________M___..._.-..._fl 1 -‘i/5 Tiiiiw ii \»";_-‘_>M__ Tit ic: ___§_.ib_9____________________ _v By: i-i--,.i.A__,....,___. Printed Narnc: Jeifrc-y Zaohinann Title: Counsel, Corporate Litigation Date:__w__»________W_______________,_________ ___ Dfitvr _.__iit;'-.41.‘/-.?_1L.iv-P_jL.@_.l;§.._,____.____ I i"UJI}-‘iLi\/iHolding Corporation. I-‘UJii‘lL.M (",orporation, and F[_lJIi-'ii.,M R<:<:t_ii"r_iiii1; Media U.S.A., inu., on their own boimliand on bcliaii'c>i’¢aci1ofthcir Subsidiaries and niii Iintcs By: _ _ i'l'ii’iik;§Ci Name: Kazuhiko Furuya __ Titio: Di|'octor, Corporate Vioc l'-‘resident, General Manager Intellectual Property Headquarters FUJIFILM Corporation Date: Oracle Corporation and ()rz\t:ic AlTlL)t'iC-81, inc on their own bchziti’and on bchaifoiicucli of their Subsidiaric:» and ztiiilizites By1"_MW_W___W_”_W .......W_________________ _ Printed Name: Deborah K- i\/iiliur Title: Vice President, Associate General Counsci. Litigation Date; A____A______M_______%AW__ 1 9 , _____ PUBLIC VERSION ln Witness Whereof, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to he executed by their duly authorized representatives as undersigned: Advanced Research Corporation, on its own behalf and on behalfof each ofits Subsidiaries and affiliates international Business Machines Corporation, on its own behalf and on behalf of each of its Subsidiaries and affiliates By: Printed Name: Title: Printed %@c: Jeffrey Zachmann Title: Couns I, Cor aorate Litigation Date: , \ ; Date:6 l l5 FUJIFILM Holding, Corporation, FUJIFILM Corporation, and FUJIFILM Recording Media U.S.A., lnc., on their own behalf and on belialfolcach oftheir Subsidiariesand affiliates By: Printed Name: Kazuhiko Furuya Title: Director, Corporate Vice President, General Manager Intellectual Property ' l-Icadquaners FUJIFILM Corporation Date: Oracle Corporation and Oracle America, Inc. on their own behalf and on behalfof each of their Subsidiaries and affiliates By: Printed Name: Deborah K. Miller Title: Vice President. Associate General Counsel, Litigation I Date: / 9 . PUBLIC VERSION In Witness Whereof, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed by their duly authorized representatives as undersigned: Advanced Research Corporation, on its own behalf and on behalf of each ofits Subsidiaries and affiliates Intemational Business Machines Corporation, on its own behalf and on behalf of each of its Subsidiaries and affiliates By: By: Printed Name: Title: Date: Printed Name: Jeffrey Zachmann Title: Counsel, Corporate Litigation Date: FUJIFILM Holding Corporation, FUJIFILM Corporation, and FUJIFILM Recording Media U.S.A., lne., on their own behalf and on behalf of each of their Subsidiaries and affiliates By: V5‘-#196‘ Printed i>h{n16§KazblQl§0’i7uruyn Title: Director, Corporate Vice President, General Manager Intellectual Property Headquarters FUJIFILM Corporation Date: /"IQ X ll 1 2°/§_ Oracle Corporation and Oracle America, Inci, on their own behalf and on behalf of each of their Subsidiaries and affiliates By: Printed Name: Deborah K. Miller Title: Vice President, Associate General Counsel, Litigation Date: 9 PUBLIC VERSION iii 1';-y-‘ .1: r 1» !?.n-.'»,.>- '»‘~"h~:<::_1‘1'. L?» !v»;:*1».xs 1.1.4. =; ‘z ~ ~: ~ —= -:17 \.'~';~ 1, 6.1%}, r.:.|tIn<_ni1.\_:_l ,\_.;_1Ic3>»11R....i . \) /‘.121 !r.»@\~.,{db -.¥-:.~ /i3;r_.:..m.i».. ' Lu-. h» w-.: =:r»;=.-:: dr-;l's'&g_:r::1<.i: 1.: | W W5 .~\ d‘-ranged [vI_¢;,-;=,.:4r<:h(:Q)('§3Ol'Z%|,l'\'1i7‘ [n'u:x"r1.<1tiL>m1I on its uwn hulwalfand Curp<_>ra1Eor1, on its <;»w'\.Y;>(:h¢=.lT'e.e;'\c'i an bah ‘:ut:21»c1"r::' “ ' H 2*-mi:1i'filiz-aid; :3 , - ».[K ‘Mic: Name: :1 :,~"f@.<c‘nof '..~"_.¢'_1-._..._-_.>_.-.4,__._....... __“g';;-¢_3u;“,~a‘.'.v\_, __ Sa;:b_idia:‘?;-2 Ev’ ,_>r_.._h..__~-_______._____5___V._:i__..____ Pnnlcd E\‘zm1e: Jfiffrey _M__y___§_.1_T,_.;g,__________A_’__________i________,__M_____ Titlarz Counsel, D air-‘1_ U1lS!.\\-.L.$.S' 1'»’n2‘xu'=11 _,,..,. r:__/,_.,',» 1.‘ €__.\‘f_i.__‘ Prmtrrd on I;\r.:h,2‘i;"of<1:1-:}"= of 4;vr-.<-'?;§'_j"_~==~i_;1§4w~___-___ Corporate .Z_-aunmarm ’ Litigation Dai@r___________ ,__~....... ,__,.N..~_.-,.~_._ ,4. ‘J H"£l.:‘~.-1H<>|d.ing Corporatécu, §%"I.1.iH?'iifrv1 Cfiorpm-ation,and FLIJEFILM R':cording Meciia U.S.A.. I-'u:._.on th¢ir<1';wr: l:'.r:ha.H‘ar;:.‘\ on b=",hz11\“0fea\:h ofthcir SLlb5i:‘li>1z"i=E3 and afill iates By: Prmtcd Name: Ka;/.uhiko Fu"ru§;a Title: Director. COl'1JO1‘&IC:Vice Gen era} Manager E-livvl iiquaricrs Imeflsc-tuai P\.”('I51<lC»l1'~§.> Fr0p::r‘r_~,-" PU] IF I 1.-2°'~'l ‘Corp<>|'ati'on Dace. ____________i_i____,_ Gracie Corporation and Oracle Arnericya,inc‘, on their mm bchulfand on behall‘oi\:a¢;h of‘ ‘xhm r Subszdiaries and ‘affiliates ’,, Y, _ , , )1 1 By: __..........._._-_ Printed Name: Deborah K. Miller , Title: Vice Presid¢:nl;, A:a.<;uciate:Gem:-rel Coumel, . I ~ , LH'iva’i0n <;~~ r,;,__/;!_//,\)-, Dale? 5} =__”_;';__:,_.____ 1, \ L,’ y H». _,; " " IIIIIIIIIII ON Exhibit A.1 PUBLIC VERSION . CONTAINS CONFIDEN TIAL BUSINESS INFORM/1 TION SUBJECT TO THE PROTECTIVE ORDER UNITED STATES INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20436 Before the Honorable David P. Shaw Administrative Law Judge In the Matter of . CERTAIN FORMATTED MAGNETIC DATA STORAGETAPES AND CARTRIDGES CONTAINING THE SAME Investigation No. 337-TA-931 JOINT UNOPPOSED MOTION OF THE PRIVATE PARTIES TO STAY TI-[E PROCEDURAL SCHEDULE Complainant Advanced Research Corporation and Respondents I-‘UJIFILM Holdings Corporation, FUJIFILM Corporation, FUJIFILM Recording Media U.S.A., Inc. (“PUJIFILM”), International Business Machines Corporation (“IBM”), Oracle Corporation, and Oracle America, Inc. (“Oracle”) (collectively, “Respondents”) (all collectively “the Private Parties”), hereby jointly move for an Order staying all remaining dates in the Procedural Schedule in this Investigation, including the Hearing set to begin June 9, due to a settlement agreement reached between the Private Parties. The Private Parties respectfully submit that good cause exists to grant the present Motion because the Private Parties have reached a settlement agreement that would terminate all pending litigation between the Private Parties, including this Investigation. Specifically, the Private Parties engaged in mediation on May 20, 2015 before the Honorable Gary A. Feess (Rot), during which the Private Parties reached agreement to settle all pending litigation between ARC and Respondents. Agreement. Pursuant to this agreement, the Private Parties have signed a Settlement Under the terms of the parties’ settlement agreement, the agreement does not become final until t which point thePrivate I *h¢ PUBLIC VERSION . . CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS INFORM./1TION SUBJECT T0 THE - PROTECTIVE ORDER . Parties have agreed to move to terminate this Investigation. private parties will either file a motion to terminate on or before June I0, 2015, or will provide the ALJ with a status update on June 10, 2015. In light of the significant litigation events scheduled to occur between now and June I5, including pre-hearing briefs, motions in limine, and the June 9 through June 15 Hearing, the private parties submit that good cause exists to stay the procedural schedule to allowtime for Staying the procedural schedule under these circumstances will preserve resources for both the parties and the Commission, particularly in light of the June 9 through June 15 Hearing. The ALJ has previously been amenable to staying a procedural schedule to allow parties to finalize settlement papers, including shortly before a scheduled Hearing. See, e.g., Certain /nk Cartridges and Components 771ere0‘/Ilnv. No. 337-TA—565, Order No. 59 (Nov. 9, 20ll) (granting stay of hearing scheduled to begin on November 14, 2011 in light of signed settlement term sheet that provided until mid-December 2011 for parties to enter into formal long-tcmi settlement); see also, e.g., Certain Compact Fluorescent Reflector Lamps. Produezs Conlainirlg Same and Components Thereofi lnv. No. 337-TA-872, Order No. 19 (May 30, 2013). Counsel for the Private Parties, pursuant to Ground Rule 5(d), certify that it notified counsel for the Commission Investigative Staff on May 21, 2015 of the Private Parties’ intent to file the present Motion, who does not oppose the motion and has agreed to waive the two-day requirement set forth in Ground Rule S(d). For the reasons stated herein, the Private Parties respectfully request that this motion be granted. J _ 2 PUBLIC VERSION CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS INFORMA TION SUBJECT TO THE PR OTECTI VE ORDER Dated: May 21, 2015 Respectfully submitted, Devan V. Padmanabhan Sti K. Sankaran Christopher A. Young WINTHROP & WEINSTINE, P.A. 225 South Sixth Street Suite 3 500 Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402 Telephone: (612) 604-6400 James B. Altman David F. Nickel FOSTER, MURPHY, ALTMAN & NICKEL, PC 1899 L Street, N.W., Suite 1150 Washington, D.C. 20036 Telephone: (202) 822-4100' Counselfor Complainant Advanced Research Corporation Dated: May 21,2015 Gregory S. Arovas, P.C. KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP 601 Lexington Avenue New York, New York 10022 Telephone: (212) 446-4800 Facsimile: (212) 446-4900 Edward C. Donovan D. Sean Trainor KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP 655 Fifteenth Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20005 Telephone: (202) 879-5000 Facsimile: (202) 879-5200 3 PUBLIC VERSION CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS INF ORMATION SUBJECT TO THE PROTECTIVE ORDER Counselfor International Business Machines Corporation Dated: May 21, 2015 Steven J. Routh Sten A. Jensen Jordan L. Coyle Diana M. Szego ' ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE, LLP Columbia Center 1152 Fifteenth Street, NW Washington, D.C. 20005 Telephone: (202) 339-8400 Facsimile: (202) 339-8500 William H. Wright Andrew Y. Yen ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE, LLP 777 South Figueroa Street, Suite 3200 Los Angeles, CA 90017-5855 Telephone: (213) 629-2020 Facsimile: (213) 629-2499 ' David E. Case ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE, LLP Izumi Garden Tower, 28th Floor 6-1 Roppongi 1-Chome Minato-ku, Tokyo 106-6028 Japan Telephone: +81 3 3224 2900 Facsimile; +81 3 3224 2901 Counselfor F UJIFILMHoldings Corporation, F UJIFILM Corporation, and F UJIFILM Recording Media U.S.A.,Inc. Dated: May 21, 2015 Steven I. Routh Sten A. Jensen Jordan L. Coyle Diana M. Szego 4 PUBLIC VERSION CONTAINS CONFIDE NTIAL BUSINESS INF ORMATION SUBJECT TO THE PRO TECTI VE ORDER _ ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE, LLP A Columbia Center ' 1152 Fifteenth Street, NW Washington, D.C4 20005 Telephone: (202) 339-8400 Facsimile: (202) 339-8500 Chris Ottenweller I Vickie‘L. Feeman Anthony Tartaglio ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE, LLP 1000 Marsh Road Menlo Park, CA 94025 Telephone: 650-614-7400 Facsimile: 650-614-7401 Email: 931-Oracle@orrick.com William H. Wright . Andrew Y. Yen t ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE, ‘LLP 777 South Figueroa Street, Suite 3200 Los Angeles, CA 90017-5855 Telephone: (213) 629-2020 Facsimile: (213) 629-2499 V Counselfor Oracle Corporation and Oracle America, Inc. r 1 5 9 PUBLIC VERSION CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS INEORMATION SUBJECT TO THE PROTECTIVE ORDER UNITED STATES INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20436 Before the Honorable David P. Shaw Administrative Law Judge In the Matter of CERTAIN FORMATTED MAGNETIC DATA STORAGE TAPES AND CARTRIDGES CONTAINING THE SAME Investigation No. 337-TA-931 GROUND RULE 5.L. DECLARATION OF D. SEAN TRAINOR Pursuant to Ground Rule 5(1), I, D. Sean Trainor, counsel for Respondent International Business Machines Corporationf hereby declare that the information bracketed in red in the forgoing motion contains information asserted to be confidential by Complainant, Respondents, and/or third panics in this Investigation. Disclosure of the confidential information contained herein"may have the effect of either impairing the Commission’s ability to obtain such information as is necessary to p6I‘f()I‘l'1'1 its statutory functions, or causing substantial harm to the competitive position of Respondents and Complainant. I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on this 21st day of May, 2015. - /s/D. Sean Trainor D. Sean Trainor I I have also been authorized to submit this declaration on behalf of Complainant Advanced Research Corporation, as well as Respondents FUJIFILM Holdings Corporation, FUJIFILM Corporation, FUJIFILM Recording Media U.S.A., Inc., Oracle Corporation, and Oracle . America, Inc. PUBLIC VERSION CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS INFORM/1 TION SUBJECT TO THE PROTECTIVE ORDER UNITED STATES INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION WASHINGTON DC Before The Honorable David P. Shaw Administrative Law Judge \ In the Matter of 1 CERTAIN FORMATTED MAGNETIC DATA STORAGE TAPES AND I CARTRIDGES CONTAINING THE SAME Investigation No. 337-TA-931 [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING JOINT UNOPPOSED MOTION OF THE PRIVATE PARTIES TO STAY THE PROCEDURAL SCHEDULE On May 21, 2015, Complainant Advanced Research Corporation and Respondents FUJIFILM Holdings Corporation, FUJIFILM Corporation, FUJIFILM Recording Media U.S.A., Inc. (“FUJIFILM”), International Business Machines Corporation (“IBM”), Oracle Corporation, and Oracle America, Inc. (“Oracle”) moved to stay all remaining dates in the procedural schedule in this investigation, including the cvidentiary hearing currently scheduled to begin June 9, 2015. The private parties request a stay due to a signed settlement agreement that has been reached between the private parties but that will not be finalized until 0n or about June 4, 2015. The parties state that once the settlement agreement has been finalized, they will move to terminate the Investigation. Having considered the papers and arguments submitted by counsel, the applicable law, and the relevant pleadings and papers on file in this Investigation, the motion is granted. Allowing the private parties to finalize the settlement papers will preserve resources for the parties and the Commission. Further, private resolution of disputes is in the public interest because it conserves time and resources. Therefore, good cause exists for the requested stay, 1 / . PUBLIC VERSION CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS INFORMATION SUBJECT TO THE PROTECTIVE ORDER since it will provide the private parties with the opportunity to complete a private resolution of their dispute. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Joint Unopposed Motion of the Private Parties to Stay the Procedural Schedule is GRANTED and the private parties shall either file a motion to tenninate on or before June 10, 2015, or provide the ALJ with a status update on June 10, 2015. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: , 2014 Hon. David P. Shaw » United States lntemational Trade Commission 2 IIIIIIIIIII ON x Exhibit A.2 PUBLIC VERSION UNITED STATES INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. Before The Honorable David P. Shaw Administrative Law Judge t In the Matter of CERTAIN FORMATTED MAGNETIC DATA STORAGE TAPES AND CARTRIDGES CONTAINING THE SAME Investigation No. 337-TA-931 JOINT MOTION TO TERMINATE THE INVESTIGATION i Complainant Advanced Research Corporation (“Complainant”) and Respondents FUJIFILM Holdings Corporation, FUJIFILM Corporation, FUJIFILM Recording Media U.S.A., Inc., lntemational Business Machines Corporation, Oracle Corporation, and Oracle America, Inc. (collectively “Respondents”) (all collectively “Private Parties”) hereby jointly move to terminate the above-captioned investigation pursuant to the provisions of 19 C.F.R. § 2lO.2l(b) and based on the attached finalized Settlement Agreement (Exhibit 1 to this motion)_ Complainant and Respondents have satisfied the requirements of 19 C.F.R. § 2l0.2l(b). Regarding motions to terminate by entry of a settlement, Commission Rule 2l0.2l(b)(1) states: . An investigation before the Commission may be terminated as to one or more respondents pursuant to section 337(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930 on the basis of a licensing or other settlement agreement. A motion for termination by settlement shall contain copies of the licensing or other settlement agreement, any supplemental agreements, and a statement that there are no other agreements, written or oral, express or implied between the parties conceming the subject matter of the investigation. If the licensing or other settlement agreement contains confidential business information within the meaning of § 20l.6(a) of this chapter, a PUBLIC VERSION copy of the agreement with such information deleted shall accompany the motion. , final. Pursuant to Commission Rule 210.21(b)( I), the Private Patties state that there are no other agreements, written or oral, express or implied between the parties conceming the subject matter of the investigation. The Private Parties further certify that the Settlement Agreement contains confidential business information within the meaning of § 20l.6(a); accordingly, a copy of the agreement with such information deleted has been attached to this ‘motion as Exhibit 2. Termination of this Investigation will conserve the Commission’s and private parties’ resources and therefore is in the public interest. Certain DVD/CD Players and Recorders, Color Television Receivers and Monitors, and Components Thereqfi lnv. No. 337-TA-542, Order No. 16, initial Determination Granting Joint Motion to Terminate the Investigation Based on Settlement Agreements, at 3 (December 21, 2005) (“[T]he public interest favors settlement to avoid needless litigation and to conserve public and private resourcesf’); see also, é.g., Certain Equipment for Telecomrnunications or Data Communications Networks, Including Routers, Switches, oncl Hubs, and Components Thereof; lnv. N0. 33 7-TA-574, Order No. 27 at 4 (May 24, 2007) (“termination of litigation under these circumstances is generally in the public interest as settlement avoids needless litigation and conserves public resources”); Certain Ink Cartridges and Components Thereof, lnv. No. 337-TA-565, Order No. 59 at 2 (Nov. '9, 2011) (“Private resolution of disputes is in the public interest because it conserves time and resources.”). The Private Parties further submit that termination of this investigation will not negatively impact the public health and welfare, competitive conditions in the United States economy, the production of like or directly competitive articles in the United States, or United 2 . ' PUBLIC VERSION States consumers. See Certain Personal Computer/Consumer Electronic Convergent Devices, Components Thereof and Products Containing Same, Inv. No. 337-T-A-558, Order No. 10, Initial Detennination Granting Joint Motion of Complainant Intewideo Digital Technology Corp. and Respondent Winbook Computer Corp. to Terminate, at 4 (April 20, 2006) (citing 19 C.F.R. § 210.5O(b)(2)). The Private Parties respectfully request that the enclosed confidential exhibit and the information bracketed in red in the instant motion be treated as confidential pursuant to the Protective Order, and only be disclosed to the Commission, the Administrative Law Judge, and the Staff. Pursuant to Commission Rule 210.21 (b)(1), the Private Parties have provided a public version with financial terms and other terms not relevant to the public redacted. The confidential treatment requested by the patties is appropriate and consistent with Commission precedent and the public interest, which favors settlement. See Certain Semiconductor Chips and Products Containing the Same, Inv. N0 337-TA-753, Order No. 26 at 1 (June 20, 2011); Certain Automotive Multimedia Display and Navigation Systems, Inv. No. 337-TA-657, Order No. 27 (June 23, 2009); Certain Dynamic Random Access Memory Semiconductors and Products Containing Same, Including Memory Modules, Inv. No. 337-TA-707, Order No. 10 (June 29, 2010); see also Certain Ink Cartridges, Inv. No. 337-TA-565, Ordcr No. 59 at 2. Counsel for the Private Parties, pursuant to Ground Rule 5(d), certify that they notified counsel for the Commission Investigative Staff on May 21, 2015 of the Private Parties’ intent to file the present Motion. Staff has stated that it will take a position on the papers. For the reasons stated herein, the Private Patties respectfully request that the Administrative Law Judge issue an Initial Determination terminating the Investigation, due to settlement. 3 PUBLIC VERSION Dated: June _, 2015 Respectfully submitted, Devan V. Padmanabhan » Sri K. Sankaran Christopher A. Young WINTHROP & WEINSTINE, PAAI 225 South Sixth Street Suite 3500 Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402 Telephone: (612) 604-6400 James B. Altman David F. Nickel FOSTER, MURPHY, ALTMAN & _ NICKEL, PC 1899 L‘Street, N.W., Suite 1150 Washington, D.C. 20036 Telephone: (202) 822-4100 ’ Dated Counselfor Complainant Advanced Research Corporation 2015 Gregory S. Arovas, P.C. KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP 601 Lexington Avenue New York, New York 10022 Telephone: (212) 446-4800 Facsimile: (212) 446-4900 Edward C. Donovan D. Sean Trainor KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP 655 Fifteenth Street, N.W. i Washington, D.C. 20005 Telephone: (202) 879-5000 Facsimile: (202) 879-5200 4 PUBLIC VERSION Counselfor International Business Machines Corporation Dated: , 2015 Steven J. Routh Sten A. Jensen Jordan L. Coyle Diana M. Szego ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE, LLP Colmnbia Center 1152 Fifteenth Street, NW Washington, D.C. 20005 Telephone: (202) 339-8400 Facsimile: (202)339-8500 William H. Wright Andrew Y. Yen ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE, LLP 777 South Figueroa Street, Suite 3200 Los Angeles, CA 90017-5855 Telephone: (213) 629-2020 Faesirnile: (213) 629-2499 David E. Case ORRIICK,HERRINGTON & SUTCLIF FE, LLP lzumi Garden Tower, 28th Floor 6-1 Roppongi 1-Chome Minato-ku, Tokyo 106-6028 Japan Telephone: +81 3 3224 2900 Facsimile: +81 3 3224 2901 Counselfor F U./IFILMHoldings Corporation, F U./IFILMCorporation, and FUJIFILM Recording Media U.S.A.,Inc. Dated: , 2015 Steven J. Routh Sten A. Jensen Jordan L. Coyle Diana M. Szego 5 PUBLIC VERSION ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE, LLP Columbia Center 1152 Fifieenth Street, NW Washington, D.C. 20005 Telephone: (202) 339-8400 Facsimile: (202) 339-8500 Chris Ottenweller Vickie L. Feeman Anthony Tartaglio ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE, LLP _ 1000 Marsh Road Menlo Park, CA 94025 Telephone: 650-614-7400 Facsimile: 650-614-7401 Email: 931 ~Oracle@orrick.c0m William H. Wright Andrew Y. Yen ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE, LLP 777 South Figueroa Street, Suite 3200 Los Angeles, CA 90017-5855 Telephone: (213) 629-2020 Facsimile: (213) 629-2499 David E. Case ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE, LLP Izumi Garden Tower, 28th Floor 6-1 Roppongi 1-Chome Minato-ku, Tokyo 106-6028 Japan A Telephone: +81 3 3224 2900 Facsimile: +81 3 3224 2901 Counselfor Respondents Oracle Corporation and Oracle America, Inc. 6 PUBLIC VERSION UNITED STATES INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION ~ WASHINGTON, D.C. 20436 Before the Honorable David P. Shaw Administrative Law Judge In the Matter of CERTAIN FORMATTED MAGNETIC DATA STORAGE TAPES AND CARTRIDGES CONTAINING THE SAME Investigation No. 337-TA-931 GROUND RULE 5.L. DECLARATION OF D. SEAN TRAINOR Pursuant to Ground Rule 5(1), I, D. Sean Trainor, counsel for Respondent International Business Machines Corporation’, hereby declare that the information bracketed in red in the forgoing motion contains information asserted to be confidential by Complainant, Respondents, and/or third parties in this Investigation. Disclosure of the confidential information contained herein may have the effect of either impairing the'Commission’s ability to obtain such information as is necessary to perform its statutory functions, or causing substantial harm to the competitive position of Respondents and Complainant. l declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on this 21st day of May, 2015. /s/ D. Sean Trainer D. Sean Trainor t 1 Ihave also been authorized to submit this declaration on behalf of Complainant Advanced Research Corporation, as well as Respondents FUJIFILM Holdings Corporation, FUJIFILM Corporation, FUJIFILM Recording Media U.S.A., Inc., Oracle Corporation, and Oracle America, Inc. ’ --7 ' ‘J1 tr. ' - - - - Y PUBLIC VERSION Exhibit B \ PUBLIC VERSION IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA Advanced Research Corporation, Plaintiff" . Case No. 0:14-cv-03241-JNE-TNL \ International Business Machines Corporation, et al., Defendants. JOINT MOTION FOR DISMISSAL OF ALL CLAIMS Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41, Plaintiff Advanced Research Corporation and Defendant International Business Machines Corporation represent to the Court that all matters in dispute in this action between all of the parties have been resolved and hereby move to dismiss with prejudice as settled all claims brought by the parties in this action. The parties further agree that the patties shall bear their own attorney’s fees, expenses, and costs. Defendants Fujifilm Holdings Corporation, Fujifilm Corporation, and Oracle Corporation join this motion. For good cause and in the interests of justice, as outlined above, the parties respectfully request that the Court grant this motion. Respectfullysubmitted, Dated: May 21, 2015 ‘ s/ Sri K. Sankaran Devan V. Padmanabhan (# 240126) Sri K. Sankaran (#2043 04) Christopher A. Young (#288998) 225 South Sixth Street Suite 3500 Minneapolis, MN 55402 1 _ PUBLIC VERSION Telephone: (612) 604-6400 Facsimile: (612)604-6800 dpaa'manabhan@win(hr0p. com s.s'ankaran@winthrop.c0m cyoung@winthr0p.com Attorneysfor Plaintifl‘Advanced Research Corporation Dated: May 21, 2015 /s/ Archana Nath David B. Potter (#121642) Archana Nath (#387662) Oppenheimer Wolff & Donnelly LLP Campbell Mithun Tower - Suite 2000 222 South Ninth Street Minneapolis, MN 55402-3338 Telephone: 612-607-7000 Facsimile: 612-607-7100 dpotter@0ppenheimer. com anath@0ppenheimer. com Attorneysfor Defendant International Business Machines Corporation Anne Sidrys, P.C. Gregory S. Arovas, P.C. Edward C. Donovan D. Sean Trainor KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP Of Counsel,Defendant International Business Machines Corporation I/ / PUBLIC VERSION r AMENDMENT OF SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT This Amendment (“Amendment”) of the Settlement Agreement entered into May 21, 2015 by and between the same Parties identified below (“Settlement Agreement") is made and entered into by and between Advanced Research Corporation (“ARC”), a Minnesota corporation with a principal place of business at 4459 White Bear Parkway, White Bear Lake, Minnesota 551 10; International Business Machines Corporation (“IBM”), a New York corporation with at principal place of business at 1 New Orchard Road, Armonk, New York 10504-1722; FU.lll—"lLM Holding Corporation and FUJIFILM Corporation, Japanese corporations with a principal place of business at 7-3, Akasaka 9-chome, Minato-kn, Tokyo 107¢0052,Japan; FUJIFILM Recording Media U.S.A., .lne., a Delaware corporation with a principal place of business :1t20OSummit Lake Drive, Valhalla, New York 10595 (collectively “FUJlFILM”); Oracle Corporation and Oracle America, lnc., Delaware corporations with a principal place of business at 500 Oracle Parkway, Redwood Shores, Califomia 94065 (collectively “Oracle”) (each of ARC, IBM, FUJIFILM, and Oracle is referred to as a “Party” and collectively as the "‘Partics”). RECITALS Whereas, the Parties entered into the Settlement Agreement to resolve and settle the ITC Action and District Court Action (both defined in the Settlement Agreement); Whereas, the Pa "* ' ' ~ * ‘ ' ' ‘ ~ 2.2, 4.2, and 4.3 thereof NOW, THEREFORE, pursuant to Section 9.3 of the Settlement Agreement, and in consideration ofthe above recitals and the mutual covenants contained hereinafter and in the Settlement Agreement as well as other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency ofwhich are hereby acknowledged, the Parties agree as follows: 1. DI*1FINI'l‘IONS As used herein, capitalized terms not otherwise defined herein shall have the some meanings as given to them in the Settlement Agreement. 2. nmnnnmrzm" OFSECTION 2.2 Section 2.2 of the Settlement Agreement is hereby amended and replaced by the following: 2.2 In consideration of the mutual promises set forth herein, on or before June l9, 20 l.5, the Parties shall; \ PUBLIC VERSION (kt)with respect to the ITC Action, execute and/or cause their respective counsel to execute papers in the forms set ‘forthin Exhibit A2 to the Settlement Agreement, or in such other form as required for the Commission’s approval, for the purpose of terminating the [TC Action with prejudice as to IBM, Fujifilm, and Oracle; and (b) with respect to the District Court Action, execute and/or cause their respective counsel to execute papersjn the forms set forth in Exhibit B to the Settlement Agreement, or in such other form as required for the Court’s approval, to dismiss with prejudice the District Court Action. as to all of their respective claims by tmd between ARC and IBM, Fujitilm,“ and Oracle. 3. AMENDMENT OF SECTIONS 4.2 AND 4.3 Sections 4.2 and 4.3 of the Settlement Agreement are hereby amended and replacediby the iollo ‘ wing; » 2 \ PUBLIC VERSION 1 4. CONTINUED EFFECT ANDENFORCEABILITY OF OTHER AGREEMENTS in effect and are enforceable in accordance with their terms. 5. C()NFIDENTlAl.ITY: NO PRESS RELEASE 5.1 Each Party shall hold the terms of this Amendment in confidence and shall not publicize or disclose it in any manner whatsoever. The Parties shall not issue any press release or make any statement to the press concerning the JTC Action and District Court Action or this Amendment. 5.2 Each Patty may disclose the terms of the Amendment (rt) to the extent disclosure is required by court or government order or otherwise required by law, provided such Party first gives to the others prior written notice at least l0 days prior to production (or reasonable notice if a court or government order requires production in less than l0 days) to enable the other Parties to seek a protective order; (b) to the extent required to enforce rights under this Amcnclment; (c) to the extent reasonably necessary, on a confidential “basis,to such Part)/’s accountants, attorneys, actual or potential investors, providers of venture capital, or potential investors in or acquircrs of a product or service line and/or financial advisors; (cl) to the extent reasonably necessary, on a confidential basis, to potential panics to a merger or acquisition involving the business or assets that are the subject matter of this Amendment, as well as to such parties’ attorneys, accountants, and/or financial advisors; (e) to the extent reasonably necessary, on 21conliclcntial basis, to any person who, directly or indirectly, is or may be required to be bound by the terms and conditions of this Amentimcnt; and (1) to the extent reasonably necessary, on a coniidential basis, to such l’atty’s customers, potential customers, and third parties with which such Party has a current or potential commercial relationship. i 3 ' 1.7."? PUBLIC VERSION 6. MISQQELLANEOUS 6.l Entire A reement. This Amendment alon with the Settlement A reement constitute tic entire agreement between ARC and each of lBt\/i, Fujitilm, and Oracle relating to the subject. matter hereof and supersedes all prior proposals, agreements, representations, and other communications, if any, between the Parties with respect to the subject matter hereof. 6.2 Sevcrability. If any section of this Amendment is found by competent authority to be invalid, illegal or unenforceable in any respect for any reason, the validity, legality and enforceability or such section in every other respect and the remainder of this Amendment shall continue in effect. 6.3 Modification: Waiver. This Amendment shall not be binding upon the Parties until it has been signed herein below by or ion behalf of each Party. No modification. supplementation, or amendment to this Amendment will be effective unless it is in writing and executed by authorized representatives of the Parties. Nor will any waiver of any rights be effective unless assented to in writing by the Party to be charged. The failure or delay of any Party in exercising any of its rights hereunder, including any rights with respect to a breach or default by another Party, will in no way operate as a waiver of such rights or prevent the assertion of such rights with respect to any later breach or default by another Party. 6.4 Governing La_\y.The Parties agree that this Amendment will be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of New York and of the United States ol America without regard to choice of law provisions or mles. 6.5 Counterpa_rt§. This Amendment may be executed in counterparts by the Panties hereto on any number of‘ counterparts, each of which will be deemed an original, ‘but all such respective counterparts will together constitute one and the same agreement. The Patties agree that electronically transmitted signature pages will be treated as if they were originals. 6.6 Additional Provisions. Each Party hereby declares and represents that it is executing this Amendment after consultation with its own independent legal counsel. 6.6.1 Any rule of construction to the effect that ambiguitiesare to be resolved against the drafting Party will not be applied in the construction or interpretation of this Amendment. As used in this Amendment, the words “include” and “including,” “for example,” “such as,” and variations thereof will not be deemed to be terms of limitation, but rather will be deemed to be followed by the words “without limitation." 6.6.2 Each Party acknowledges to the other Parties that it has been represented by independent legal counsel of its own choice throughout all of the negotiations which preceded the execution of this Amendment. Each Pauty further acknowledges that it and its counsel have had adequate opportunity to make whatever investigation or inquiry they may deem necessary or desirable in connection with the subject matter of this Amendment prior to the execution hereof and that in entering into this Amendment it is not relying on any representations of the other Parties in connection therewith. 4 4 PUBLIC VERSION 6.7 Effective Date: The Effective Date of this Amendment shall be June l5, 2015, subject to all Parties executing the Amendment. In Witness Whereof, the Parties hereto have caused this Amendment to be executed by their duly authorized representatives as undersigned: International Business Machines Corporation, on its own behalf and on behalf of each of its Subsidiaries and affiliates Advanced Research Corporation, on its own behalf and on behalf ofeach ofits Subsidiaries and affiliates B y: By:_ __ Printed Name:___ Title: Date: _ ___ Printed Name: Title: 7 __ - _A__~__ _ __>____N_____ Date: fl _ _ _____ FUIIFILM Holding Corporation, FUJIFILM Corporation, and FUJ[FILM Recording Media U.S.A., lnc., on their own behalf and on behalf of each of their Subsidiaries and affiliates By: _ )€;>;_y/‘ 9 7;j',;,' -/.':.i_i.‘_.,_,/(_/ ... em-e._._,. - Printed Name: Steven .I.Tiouth _ .W_“_ Title: Partner, Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP Authorized to sign on behalf OfFUJIFILM Date: '7/gW____ M __N___ Oracle Corporation and Oracle America, lnc., on their own behalf and on behalf of each of their Subsidiaries and al’filiate_s ' _ : "' T) ., ///i__.»~"" ’ ,'.;;>>~//” /' 4' B» ./"¢’+1I1.~_-.1-11;’/”’/5 S Printed Name:LSTevenJ. Routh Title: Partner, Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP Authorized to si vn,on_l;ehalfof Oracle Date: ....~__.._:____.-.:.._‘..__,. 5 PUBLIC VERSION ' Q1 lbjcicz! 1.01.111 }"1@r'1.i(:=siii‘;-!.‘1ZIi.:§i13_!;=f., rm; ha Wnn<1~;$ !.»‘i1*.f;= 0!. film; .-'\|na‘n»..i1m,<::i 1‘\3;.‘.113\;i:m?|iivu!5 .3 -1-.11: I » w.‘ N_i -"\.r'1"».;1zdmuni. \‘-/h<‘:'¢_*:;|i, §.h<--E‘-,1nu:.~: 11-_~.:"uI:> hz1vr_::::1u:~|:>zl ihis Yi1<;z's"<i.u1\/' au:1.hrn"i:./0.11 /"~.\:l@-'::1:c<;ni%fu:>:c:.m:h “t!u<;L:\.‘u ;\.|m:|1:€1n:;;ni h‘j'-111,:v.-\~:;a:(»;rE '"\y ur»1l1'1<i=_:a*~.@:1z1¢.-<1 Tnicm:.uio1~,ai i.'0|"p<>:‘e=.t%m1_. .U:.1&;in<‘s"a 5»-%:.u.:!:m=.':.~1 un '1?»v..1w!1).»;ix21I{‘umi on §'>r.;Im1E‘1"1i'\:z1ui:ufux (;<'>m:_n’z11i0n,um its um‘. i:|::i;e'11i';.=n(lnu bu‘ z ‘§uL»s;i¢li21='i\::wand ui \:=z<.Pa asE‘fiii:;1tc:; I» f51a:i>si<liz1m:s ’-;\~=;. ’ < nv» emd 21lfiiizuzzs: ‘ -z-:4,‘L,3¢_€w;,<_.c3_.4_< ,v ~ I’1'il1';w:di\'21n1u: 3l:§'FF-’P£{{k,/ T Hy‘ '1 .i¥lC;I urifi» 1’:*1rm:<=..zu:1r::,_, f..7‘:1iu:_ 1 2 r\' nvrw/11 3 =ii§fi»b\_ 5.9.1-<,';:» d=:£\"\'1;I L -E-Hr} P1-'n"\ h 1 Hiic l ‘: T'I~”!~7T,\'f E-?<=1»‘h1:-'1’ -*:n("1'{1!1a>1‘ Fl 115"}.-_\‘ ‘ml (...U!1n'\hl.L!L-l:,£ . . onh<:l1;1H‘:=1‘v1;':c-11(,>i' ."'\l '1; Y1 mus ' .-ix" S1 zmd affil mics Hy: , !’:'ii§i-cci .\i1i!':‘<=.r: ?\.’3uv u ., \. 'T'iH;:. Pz:|"Lz‘<;x.. \".=m':k. ' "‘\:|¥'?.i1;_'-;£:'\1'|&&,f~}:1irM1\. !.l I‘ /'\ilii‘.()!'if.L‘.(l M; Si§_f__i11._!lE u:imiI“n§' l,§&|l_'.‘I____ _ - - (\m<:;-_': #,,1mp0r:/'ri:<»n an T‘?..5.iI!"'|i_.Tv'i gixnll *._!c::<:lr\.."\1"|1c::.‘u'1;1, lnr“ 1§1:":ir (\\\3‘1 %:»a:h:-:Ei'.¢::z1[10:» 1>ui1z'zi('-J lhznr =2.-in1 mi i:L|hsiLhm'1u+»" amu :»1H\rz.‘<u:.~: IN-'1 Pr\1“ri¢: ' >\=m,: ,1’. R.¢_m:l\ ‘mck. /\::’d"1<.w:‘i/ Li €.=;@ zeigt! un E_:vn:.-; » ' ' - " ‘ i.h'.zT1L‘-';_:1.Oi.1.&'wL-11:? . i_~c:h::i f'vF('1!:1c:i:_ PUBLIC VERSION 6.7 _Y;lJ_T¢;g£_iyg_l]§_1g;: This EiTec'tive Dim of this /\.rn<.‘-ndrncm shall he June I5, 2015, subject to all Parties executing the /\mcndincm. In W itness \Vl1crc-of",the Parties hereto have caused this /\1nendn"1<~:nL to be exccuhsrl by their duly authorized rcpresemativcs as unclersigned: Advanced Research C0rp0m1.i0n, on its own hehalhuad on br:lml1"oFea<;hofits 1Ill€fl1J:\£i()i]£'1lBusinccss §3ul"»sidim'ic:s:111daffiliatcs nfcach M its Subsiclimics and axffiliautfzs . By ___ /_,, flk / ~ »,=2 ./-\/\. .14,‘ »_,»., : a/A/..=4 [v‘(_,\,\"\~*/‘/“ B Y121.... ,.--.__._._._____!_.-..__.v._......_. . , w- . \ ‘ ‘ _ Y\/Xaslfimrs . C01"po1'z1tion,on its own bah:-xli'm'|:l on bchallk Fri ntcd Name: _..____.. __..14<rv_v "1‘i 1 lcri ‘ D11‘-¢I_._..-__ .._..___....___......... , _ 1>1-M1 NEW:_.é\;;..@;:11§:.>;14.¢-Qg¢-~;.:>. 4" \-~ __ . N‘.-.-...... ~.'_'.‘..._'.’.'>,.'.T.'1i._.._....__........... ....‘_.._._._..)'._.._._. . ... l'T):u<::>____A ["lJl[1"'Il,F\/1 Holding Cr>rpm'z1ti011, C.'0z';fm1'aLiu1'\.l"'\.U!'§*'H_,I\’1 zm<..1FU.TIFH.T\/I Rcc<>1'&!i11g Media U.S.A.. 1nc., on their rawn hchalihncl on lJc}1ali'0fueLci1uf Lhcir Subs_idiarics and afl‘|1ia1.es (>7 ” ’€’// > //. , ' I’rinu:< Name: Sccvun .1. Rnmh Title: 1-’en'tncr, (Jrrick, Hcrring_mn SL1iclii'lTc= Ll(.i’ /\ui.h0ri'/‘excltn sign on behalf oi‘ !"L|)H"1l ,M Uremic C-<>rp01"ati0n and Oracle Alnerica, Inc, on their own behalf and on bchuH’ofcacl1 of their Subsidiaries l and z1FI'i1iem:s .51) /_/~ / ,~»’//-’/V /” .,.-,./",/ ,,'“* By: I (__ __,_,.-» I/' /,1‘ M1. ...."L_'f/” />_ 7 . ....... ..._':.._._ .,_‘..lI‘_t_f _.. ._._.., ..~ -... lnn1"¢:d :\Imm:: .»1<~:\';mJ. Jxnuth Titlu: r. .7 ....,. Pz¢\1"L1\ur, <):i1'i<::l'._, HC1‘!'.ii1§§,1().II ‘.515. S1114:-Ii!‘Fc l_,H’ /\uth01"ized . _._.._.._. . \\ _ to 'si<1n m b_g_hz1\l":1i'(’)1<:\clc Certain Formatted Magnetic Data Storage Tapes and Cartridges Containing the Same Investigation N0 337-TA-931 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I, Christopher A. Moyer, hereby certify that on this 19th day of June, 2015 copies of the foregoing document were served upon the following parties as indicated: Lisa R. Barton Secretary to the Commission‘ U.S. lntemational Trade Commission 500 E Street, S.W., Room 112 Washington, D.C. 20436 C] l:l El ® The Honorable David P. Shaw Administrative Law Judge U.S. International Trade Commission 500 E Street, S.W. Washington, D.C. 20436 Email: Qyong.yoon@usitc.gov [:l Via First Class Mail l:l Via Hand Delivery (XiVia Ovemight Courier X Via Electronic Mail Monisha Deka Investigative Attorney Office of Unfair Import Investigations U.S. International Trade Commission 500 E Street, S.W. Washington, D.C. 20436 Email: monisha.deka@,usitc.gov [:|Via First Class Mail [:1 Via Hand Delivery [:1 Via Overnight Courier @ Via Electronic Mail Via First Class Mail Via Hand Delivery Via Overnight Courier Via Electronic Filing (EDIS) On Behalf of Complainant Advanced Research Corporation WINTHROP & WEINSTINE, P.A. Devan V. Padmanabhan Sri K. Sankaran El Via First Class Mail |:| Via Hand Delivery |:_| Via Ovemight Courier 225 South Sixth Street, Suite 3500 Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402 Telephone: (612) 604-6400 Email: ARClTCTeam@winthrog.com FOSTER, MURPHY, ALTMAN & NICKEL, PC James B. Altman David F. Nickel 1899 L Street, N.W., Suite 1150 Washington, D.C. 20036 Telephone: (202) 822-4100 Email: FM-ARC-931@fostermurphv.com IXIVia Electronic Mail . [:1 Via First Class Mail |:] Via Hand Delivery |:| Via Ovemight Courier Via Electronic Mail '1? Certain Formatted Magnetic Data Storage Tapes and Cartridges Containing the Same Investigation No. 337 TA 931 On Behalf of Respondents Oracle Corporation, Oracle America, Inc., Fujifilm Corporation, Fujifilm Holdings Corporation, and Fujifilm Recording Media U.S.A.,Inc ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE, LLP Steven J. Routh 1152 15th Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20005 Telephone: (202) 339-8400 Email: 931-Oraclegalorrickcom r Email: 931-Fu'|ifilm§a;orrick.com |:] |:| U [E Via First Class Mail Via Hand Delivery Via Overnight Courier Via Electronic Mail /s/Christopher A. Mover Christopher A. Moyer 2 1 I . Y CERTAIN FORMATTED MAGNETIC DATA STORAGE TAPES AND CARTRIDGES CONTAINING THE SAME INV. NO. 337-TA-931 PUBLIC CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I, Lisa R. Barton, hereby certify that the attached Order N0. 19 (Initial Determination) has been served by hand upon the Connnission Inveséifigive Attorney, Monisha Deka, Esq., and the following parties as indicated, on 29 Lisa R. Barton, Secretary U.S. International Trade Commission 500 E Street SW, Room 112A Washington, DC 20436 FOR COMPLAINANT ADVANCED RESEARCH CORPORATION: David F. Nickel, Esq. ( ) Via Hand Delivery FOSTER, MURPHY, ALTMAN & NICKEL, PC (*4 Express Delivery 1899 L Street, NW, Suite 1150 Washington, DC 20036 ( ) Via First Class Mail ( ) Other: FOR RESPONDENT INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORP.: D. Sean Trainor, Esq. ( ) Via Hand Delivery KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP (K ExpressDelivery 655 Fifteenth Street, NW Washington, DC 20005 *( ) Other:______ ( . ) Via First Class Mail 4 \ 1». -.~J .--~ r" - ,_ _ ,,,» ~k.......,....W 5» . \ -W.-3*‘ -~..,___ " ‘ K.‘ ""%“"~ _ \" :~.‘ -_ .... _‘¢f“-7-_~‘_,‘ ~. '3ie.?" _...,:~&...&_...‘ \,__~ K u“ '-'-. '~ . L/ CERTAIN FORMATTED MAGNETIC DATA STORAGE TAPES AND CARTRIDGES CONTAINING THE SAME _ ' INV. NO. 337-TA-931 FOR RESPONDENTS FUJIFILM CORPORATION; FUJIFILM HOLDINGS CORPORATION; FUJIFILM RECORDING 1\/[EDLAU.S.A.,INC.; ORACLE . CORPORATION; AND ORACLE ANIERICA, INC.: " 1 Steven J. Routh, Esq. ( ) ia Hand Delivery _ORRICK,HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE, LLP ( \/E/xpress Delivery 1152 15th St., NW Washington, DC 20005 ( ) Via First Class Mail ( ) Other: