A Loggerhead Larder - Colorado Field Ornithologists
Transcription
A Loggerhead Larder - Colorado Field Ornithologists
THE HUNGRY BIRD A Loggerhead Larder Dave Leatherman The job opening is that of biological technician for a natural resource agency with land management responsibilities on the northeastern plains of Colorado. It’s the kind of job I would have jumped at back in the 1970s with a formal description that might read something like this: “Inventory, collect and curate fauna from within an assigned area of native grassland. Applicants must be familiar with the life histories and diurnal habits of the insects, small mammals, passerine birds, reptiles and amphibians of Weld and surrounding counties. Work conditions include variable and potentially harsh weather, venomous snakes, barbed wire, cattle (including bulls), truck traffic and plants with thorns. Must be willing to have work habits and performance evaluated by at least one other technician on a regular basis. Pay commensurate with education and experience.” In the text and photographs that follow, I intend to make a case for the United States Forest Service or Colorado Department of Parks and Wildlife hiring a certain male Loggerhead Shrike (Lanius ludovicianus) to fill the job opening described above. This one bird, operating on Weld County Road 37 between Roads 114 and 122 during the summer of 2015, would not only warrant hiring, but a promotion, a letter of commendation and a 2016 rehire. In fact it did such a good job of collecting and displaying biota that I was in awe of its appreciation for diversity and was taken aback on more than one occasion by its lethal efficiency. He was an exhibitionist in every sense of the word. No doubt, as soon as humans began noticing shrikes in the natural world around them, their habit of sticking objects on sharp things became a source of curiosity. Our grandparents called them “butcher birds” and probably never used benign descriptors in their company. From our perspective, impaling creatures on sharp objects, especially when often the stickees are alive at the time of the act, and not eaten right away, or at all, can easily be interpreted as “mean” or “macabre.” So why do they do it? These unique raptorial songbirds have sharp, falcon-like beaks equipped with a pair of tomial teeth on the maxilla for severing the spinal columns of their prey (Craig 1978). And like hawks they have the skills to discover and catch things. But why stick them? The answer seems partly attributable to their relatively weak feet that lack talons (Yosef 1996). In essence, the act of prey consumption is made easier by use of sharp objects, both natural and unnatural, that function as “forks.” Colorado Birds Fall 2015 Vol. 49 No. 4 247 Fig. 1. Redshank grasshopper impaled intact by Loggerhead Shrike as found 18 June 2015 on Weld CR37 0.9 miles north of CR114. This particular species is perhaps the most commonly utilized insect by shrikes on the eastern plains of CO. Fig. 3. Robust camel cricket, second most commonly impaled insect in many parts of eastern Colorado. Fig. 5. Field cricket. 248 Fig. 2. Redshank grasshopper. Legs removed by shrike to make the handling and impaling easier. Fig. 4. A second species of robust camel cricket. Fig. 6. Ground beetle head and thorax. Fig. 7. Darkling beetle. Colorado Birds Fall 2015 Vol. 49 No. 4 But there’s more to impaling potential food items than that. A common theme throughout the Animal Kingdom is males showing off in various ways to females as a prelude to reproduction. The Loggerhead Shrike, the only one out of 30 true shrike species in the world that occurs wholly within North America, is mostly migratory throughout the northern part of its range, including Weld County, CO (Kingery 1998, Craig 2014, Yosef 1996). In spring males arrive on breeding grounds before females. All photos taken on either 18 June or 22 Usually for a period of weeks afJune (except for the one showing a pellet) ter the males arrive, an increasing frenzy of “bulletin board” activity by Dave Leatherman within 0.9 and 1.1 occurs, with these hormone-driven miles north of Weld CR114 along CR 37. individuals impaling things all over territories they think would be productive places to raise families. Colorado Breeding Bird Atlas I fieldworkers documented shrike courtship as basically a May activity (30 April to 6 June) (Kingery 1998). During this timeframe, males show off their skills at providing food for prospective mates and their resultant broods. During the two mid-June visits in this episode, I believe the nest was occupied and that the adults were in the process of whittling away at the male’s stash of food. I have long been enamored of shrikes and their penchant for impaling prey. Odd objects on barbed wire fences catch my eye. Seeing an impaled grasshopper here, a cricket there is not uncommon anywhere in Colorado where shrikes breed, and particularly not at a known stronghold like the Pawnee Grasslands. But I wasn’t prepared for what I saw on 18 June 2015 along CR37 north of CR114 between the Owl Creek Bridge and the Central Plains Experimental Range Headquarters complex to the north. There on metal fence barbs on both sides of the road within about 100 meters both north and south of a lone Siberian elm (1.1 miles north of CR114), was an exceptional assortment of shrike-impaled biota. I did not do an exact count but would estimate at least 75 objects. Insects were by far the most common animal group impaled. Most were what I have learned to be the “favorite” of shrikes on the eastern plains of Colorado, the redshank grasshopper (Xanthippus corallipes) (Figs. 1 & 2). These large, band-winged hoppers (family Acrididae, subfamily Oedipodinae) are widely distributed in the West and usually abundant on the arid plains. Their bright red inner “thighs” on the hind jumping legs are distinctive, although my friend Tim McNary, an orthopteran expert extraordinaire, reminds me that there are a few other lookalike species in this genus. Next in abundance among the six-legged larder were large crickets Colorado Birds Fall 2015 Vol. 49 No. 4 249 in the family Gryllacrididae, mostly reddish-brown but some creamytan. These so-called robust camel crickets (Udeopsylla robusta) (Fig. 3) and perhaps another species (Daihinia brevipes?) (Fig. 4) live in burrows in the soil or hide under objects like dry cow pies and are most active at night (Cranshaw 1995). Because male crickets are more apt to forage away from burrows (for other insects and a limited amount of plant material), it is likely more males are caught and impaled by shrikes than females, however, this needs to be verified. Several black field crickets of both genders (Gryllus sp.) decorated the fences (Fig. 5). There was one large predaceous ground beetle head (family Carabidae, genus Pasimachus) (Fig. 6) and one medium-sized darkling beetle (family Tenebrionidae, probably Eleodes sp.) (Fig. 7). As for reptiles, on 18 June the only representative taxon were four, small (about half-grown), intact, Short-horned Lizards (Phrysonoma hernandesi) (Fig. 8). On 22 June the number of “horny toads” was the same but it was obvious something, presumably a shrike, had eaten part of the upper torso of one, accessed from the underside (Fig. 9). Added to the reptilian ranks of the run-through were a Lesser Earless Lizard (Holbrookia maculata) (Fig. 11) and a small Western Hognose Snake (Heterodon nasicus) (Fig. 12). This lizard, multiple individuals of which I have seen impaled in other eastern CO locations, was partially shriveled, but its inner organs appeared to have been at least partly removed. The head end of the snake was missing. Loggerhead Shrikes are known to impale small mammals, at times in good numbers, but never as commonly as their relative, the Northern Shrike (Lanius excubitor) (Yosef 1996). The remains of only one mammal hung from a barb in this situation, what I think was a young Thirteen-lined Ground-Squirrel (Ictidomys tridecemlineatus) based on the shape of the skull and the color of hairs still attached to the carcass (Fig. 13). What seemed exceptional to me about this situation, in addition to the sheer number of objects, was what this shrike imposed on other birds. In addition to finding adults, it also found new nestlings, some that were essentially featherless (Figs. 15 & 16). Not only did it find birds smaller than itself, it apparently killed one bigger than itself, a juvenile Western Meadowlark (Sturnella neglecta) (Fig. 14). Some of its bird victims were affixed to a wire whole, others were beheaded. I must admit that on 18 June, even as a lifelong biologist, coming across the beautiful, unbloodied head of a Brewer’s Sparrow (Spizella breweri) with its lifeless, hollow stare, stopped me in my tracks (Fig. 17). I later found a headless Brewer’s Sparrow body over a hundred meters away that may have been its match. This shrike was not mess250 Colorado Birds Fall 2015 Vol. 49 No. 4 Fig. 8. Young short-horned lizard intact on 18 June 2015. Fig. 9. Same individual shorthorned lizad as shown in Fig. 8 as discovered on 22 June 2015 showing partial consumption after being impaled. Fig. 10. Short-horned lizard head as discovered on 7 August 2015. Fig. 11. Lesser earless lizard. Fig. 12. Western hognose snake. Colorado Birds Fall 2015 Vol. 49 No. 4 251 Fig. 13. Unknown mammal (probably young 13-lined ground-squirrel). Skull showing black mouth cavity at lower left part of carcass. Fig. 14. Young Western Meadowlark, presumably impaled by shrike. Fig. 15. Nestling bird (species unknown). Fig. 16. Nestling bird (species unknown). Fig. 17. Brewer’s Sparrow head. Fig. 18. Pellet, presumably of shrike, impaled by shrike. 252 Colorado Birds Fall 2015 Vol. 49 No. 4 ing around. Altogether I would estimate I saw a total of 10 impaled birds, most quite young, that had to have been taken from nests. So a total of about 75 objects: 6 reptiles, about 10 birds, one mammal and roughly 58 insects, most of the latter group being rather large grasshoppers and crickets. The major differences in the larder between 18 and 22 June were that many of the objects that were whole on the first visit were partially or mostly consumed on the second visit. Plus there was the addition of two reptile species. The male shrike doing the impaling seemed to accomplish what were likely his two primary objectives: storing food for later consumption and attracting a mate. As a follow up, I revisited the site on 7 August 2015. Mostly I drove the stretch of road on either side of the nest tree, but also walked some of it. The only identifiable object I found from the June larder was the head of one Short-horned Lizard (see Fig. 10). A regurgitated bird pellet, which appeared to be the right size for a shrike, was also new on the fence very near the shrikes’ nest elm (Fig. 18). And yes, I saw at least three fledged shrikes. Asking them the question, “who’s your daddy?” seemed unnecessary. They were hunting on their own, usually by flying down to the ground from the top strand of the fence. Twice I observed them returning to the fence with small insects, probably grasshopper nymphs, which they held against the wire with a toe, and consumed on the spot. In closing, my curiosity keeps returning to that impaled Brewer’s Sparrow head and those nestling birds. These objects perhaps fit within the standard reasons for impaling by shrikes cited in the literature, but struck me as possibly serving a third purpose–that of intimidation. It reminded me of something I saw once as a kid in a National Geographic Magazine involving cannibals in Borneo who, as a warning to would-be intruders, displayed heads on sticks. If whole birds are usually impaled (as was the meadowlark and most of the nestling birds), why did this male shrike go to the trouble of carefully beheading a sparrow and then, apparently, place the resultant two body parts at opposite ends of his territory? Did this, along with the impaling of nestlings, convey to other species nesting, or even considering nesting within this shrike’s territory, that competing with him for food resources might be a bad idea? No way to prove any of this, but one has to wonder. Regardless of answers to these last conjectures, if I was an HR person looking to fill a biodiversity surveyor position, and a male shrike was sitting across the desk, I’d ignore the bad recommendation in the application folder from somebody’s grandmother. Hire him! Colorado Birds Fall 2015 Vol. 49 No. 4 253 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I thank Tim McNary and Dr. Boris Kondratieff, both affiliated with the C.P. Gillette Museum of Arthropod Diversity at Colorado State University, for assisting with identifications of impaled insects. LITERATURE CITED Craig, R. B. 1978. An analysis of the predatory behavior of the Loggerhead Shrike. Auk 95:221-234. Craig, Susan. 2014. Movements, migration and breeding by Loggerhead Shrikes (Lanius ludovicianus) in eastern El Paso County, Colorado. CO Birds 48(2):266-271. Cranshaw, Whitney and Boris Kondratieff. 1995. Bagging big bugs. Fulcrum Publishing, Golden, CO. Kingery, Hugh E. (ed.). 1998. Colorado breeding bird atlas (I). Co-published by Colorado Bird Atlas Partnership and Colorado Division of Wildlife, Denver. Yosef, Reuven. 1996. Loggerhead Shrike (Lanius ludovicianus), The Birds of North America Online (A. Poole, Ed.). Ithaca: Cornell Lab of Ornithology; Retrieved from the Birds of North America Online: http://bna.birds. cornell.edu/bna/species/231 Dave Leatherman, daleatherman@msn.com 254 Colorado Birds Fall 2015 Vol. 49 No. 4