06.1 Arborist Report

Transcription

Arborist Report
Verizon Lawrence Road (APN: 206-160-0207)
Danville, California
Prepared for:
Complete Wireless Consulting, Inc.
Date:
October 20, 2015
Submitted by:
© 2015
Table of Contents
1.0 Introduction ..........................................................................................................................1
2.0 Methods.................................................................................................................................2
3.0 Results and Discussion.........................................................................................................5
3.1 Impacts and Mitigation ...................................................................................................................6
3.2 Tree Protection Recommendations .................................................................................................6
4.0 References .............................................................................................................................8
List of Tables
Table 1 — Tree Rating System.....................................................................................................3
Table 2 — Tree Estimated Life Span ...........................................................................................4
Table 3 — Summary of Protected Tree Data................................................................................5
List of Figures
Figure 1 — Approximate Tree Locations and Project Impacts ....................................................9
List of Appendices
Appendix A — Tree Survey Data
Appendix B — Appraisals of Protected Trees
Verizon Lawrence Road
Arborist Report
i
Foothill Associates © 2015
1.0 INTRODUCTION
This report presents the results of a tree assessment for the Verizon Wireless site located at
1455 Lawrence Road in Danville, California. The approximately 1.82-acre site is one parcel
(APN 206-160-0207), which is occupied by Breton’s School for Dogs and Cats. The site
consists of several buildings, including a multi-storied main office and house, three kennel
runs and storage areas. The majority of the property is paved with the exception to the three
fenced play yards and a side yard along the northern boundary. The property is bounded
along the north, south, and east by private residences and to the west by Lawrence Road.
The purpose of this report is to present information on the species, size, condition, and value
of the trees on the property.
The Town of Danville regulates disfigurement, damage or removal of protected trees under
the Tree Preservation Ordinance (Section 32-79.2). A “tree” is defined as a live woody plant
having a single stem or multi-stemmed perennial plant, which is over fifteen (15) feet in
height at maturity. “Protected trees” include any native trees that have a trunk diameter of
ten (10) inches or greater or a multi-stemmed tree that has a combination of trunks totaling
twenty (20) inches or greater measured at four and a half (4 ½) feet above the natural grade
of the site, also referred to as diameter at breast height (DBH). Native tree species are
defined as, coast live oak (Quercus agrifolia), valley oak (Quercus lobata), canyon live oak
(Quercus chrysolepis), blue oak (Quercus douglassii), California black oak (Quercus
kelloggi), interior live oak (Quercus wislizenii), white alder (Alnus rhombifolia), California
bay (Umbellularia californica), California buckeye (Aesculus californica), California
sycamore (Platanus racemosa), madrone (Arbutus menziesii), and London planetree
(Platanus xacerifolia). Protected trees also include trees that are designated as Heritage or
Memorial trees. A “Heritage tree” is defined as any single-trunked tree, regardless of the
species, which has a trunk diameter that measures thirty-six (36) inches or greater DBH. A
“Memorial tree” is defined as a tree planted on public property in memory or
commemoration of an individual or individuals.
Arborist Report
1
2.0 METHODS
The property was surveyed on October 13, 2015 by Charlotte Marks, International Society of
Arboriculture (ISA) Certified Arborist #WE-10519A. All trees on the property and along the
boundary of the adjacent parcel to the north (APN 206-140-0202), along the eastern side of
Lawrence Road and at the entrance of the site were surveyed. A diameter tape or calipers
were used to verify each trunk diameter. The measurement from the trunk to the end of the
longest lateral limb was used as the dripline radius (DLR). The height of each tree was
estimated and photo documentation was taken of each tree. All trees were surveyed and
mapped using a Trimble GeoXT Global Positioning System (GPS) hand-held unit. Larger
trees were tagged with pre-printed aluminum tags, and the remaining small trees were
assigned a tree number, which corresponds to the numbering in Appendix A and Figure 1.
Additionally, the overall health and structural condition of each tree was rated according to
Table 1 below. The health rating considers factors such as the size, color, and density of the
foliage; the amount of deadwood within the canopy; bud viability; evidence of wound
closure; and the presence or evidence of stress, disease, nutrient deficiency, and insect
infestation. The structural rating reflects the trunk and branch configuration; canopy balance;
the presence of included bark and other structural defects such as decay; and the potential for
structural failure. In cases where conditions fall between the good, fair, and poor ratings,
intermediate ratings fair-good and fair-poor were used.
Arborist Report
2
Table 1 — Tree Rating System
Rating
Tree Health
Good
There is an average or below-average amount of deadwood/dieback with respect to the tree’s size and
growing environment; leaf size, color, and density are typical for the species; buds are normal size,
viable, abundant, and uniform throughout the canopy; current and past growth increments are
generally average or better; any callusing is vigorous. This health rating indicates that there is very
little, if any, evidence of stress, disease, nutrient deficiency, and/or insect infestation.
Fair
There is an above-average amount of deadwood/dieback with respect to the tree’s size and growing
environment; leaf size, color, and density may be below what is typically expected for the species;
buds are normal size and viable, but slightly sparse throughout the canopy; current and past growth
increments may be below average; tree may be slow to callus around old wounds. This health rating
indicates that there is moderate evidence of stress, disease, nutrient deficiency, and/or insect
infestation.
Poor
There is an extreme amount of deadwood/dieback with respect to the tree’s size and growing
environment; leaf size, color, and density are clearly compromised; very few viable buds are present
throughout the canopy; current and past growth increments are meager; no evidence of callusing
around old wounds. This health rating indicates that there is widespread evidence of stress, disease,
nutrient deficiency, and/or insect infestation.
Tree Structure
Good
No wounds, cavities, decay, or indication of hollowness are evident in the root crown, trunk, or
primary and secondary limbs; no anchor roots are exposed; no codominant branching or multiple trunk
attachments are present; very little included bark at branch attachments exists; no dead primary or
secondary limbs are present in canopy; there have been no major limb failures; limbs are not
overburdened; branching structure is appropriate for species; any decay is limited to small dead
branches/stubs. This structure rating represents a low potential for failure.
Fair
With respect to the size of the tree, small to moderate wounds, cavities, decay, and indication of
hollowness may be evident in the root crown, trunk, and/or primary and secondary limbs; some anchor
roots may be exposed; codominant branching or multiple trunk attachments may be present, but
included bark does not exist or is not well developed; minor to moderate amounts of included bark at
branch attachments may exist; there may be small to moderate amounts of large dead limbs in canopy,
but there is no evidence of large limb failures; limbs may be slightly overburdened; branching
structure and/or canopy balance may be moderately altered by the tree’s growing environment. This
structure rating represents a moderate potential for failure.
Poor
With respect to the size of the tree, significant wounds, cavities, decay, and/or indication of hollowness
may be evident in the root crown, trunk, and/or primary and secondary limbs; anchor roots may be
exposed and/or the tree may have lost anchorage; codominant branching or multiple trunk attachments
may be present; significant amounts of included bark may exist in trunk and branch attachments; there
may be significant amounts of large dead limbs in the canopy; there may be evidence of trunk or large
limb failures; limbs may be severely overburdened; branching structure and/or canopy balance may be
drastically altered by the tree’s growing environment. This structure rating represents a high potential
for failure.
The monetary value of protected trees were assessed and evaluated in accordance with the
Guide for Plant Appraisal 9th Edition (ISA 2000). The health and structure of the roots,
trunk, scaffold branches, small branches, and canopy were rated on a scale of 1 to 4, with 4
meaning no apparent problems, and 1 meaning extreme problems. The location of each tree
was evaluated using a scale of 10 to 100, with 10 being lowest and 100 highest. The site
evaluates the relative market value of the site in comparison to other sites in the region and
the quality and general appearance of the site in which the tree is located. The functional and
aesthetic contribution of each tree to the landscape was estimated based on location,
appearance, and species characteristics. The placement of each tree was evaluated to
determine how effective the tree is at providing its functional and aesthetic contributions.
Arborist Report
3
Using the results of the tree assessment, Species Classification and Group Assignment lists
provided by the Western Chapter of the ISA (2004), and typical local prices for nursery
stock, an estimate of the value of each protected tree was determined using the Trunk
Formula Method. Appraised values were rounded to the nearest $10.00. Detailed
evaluations and value calculations for protected trees are provided in Appendix B.
Additionally, the remaining life span of each protected tree was estimated based upon the
overall health rating as shown in Table 2.
Table 2 — Tree Estimated Life Span
Health Rating
Predicted Life Span
Good
15 to 20 years
Fair-Good
10 to 15 years
Fair
5 to 10 years
Poor-Fair
2 to 5 years
Poor
1 to 2 years
Arborist Report
4
3.0 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
A total of 139 trees, consisting of 40 black walnut (Juglans nigra), 30 English walnut
(Juglans regia), 26 valley oak, 9 willow (Salix sp.), 5 coast redwood (Sequoia sempervirens),
5 juniper (Juniperus sp.), 5 white mulberry (Morus alba), 4 foothill pine (Pinus sabiniana), 3
Italian cypress (Cupressus sempervirens), 3 ash (Fraxinus sp.), 2 crape myrtle
(Lagerstroemia indica), 2 Chinese hackberry (Celtis sinensis), 2 California sycamore, 2
interior live oak, and 1 Prunus (Prunus sp.), and are located on or adjacent to the site.
Appendix A shows detailed tree survey data for all trees. Tree locations are shown on
Figure 1.
Of these trees, 20 trees, consisting of 15 valley oaks, 2 California sycamores, 2 black
walnuts, and 1 willow, are protected under the Tree Preservation Ordinance. In general, the
trees on the site are in good to fair-good condition with an estimated life span from 10 to 20
years. Three trees are large enough to be considered Heritage trees (#59, #154, and #179),
but all three of these trees are in fair to poor condition with significant deadwood, large
wounds, and lack of canopy and are anticipated to live no more than one to two years. Table
3 summarizes the data of the protected trees and Appendix B shows detailed appraisal
information for each protected tree. The total appraised value of the protected trees is
$108,340.00.
Table 3 — Summary of Protected Tree Data
Tree
#
Species
DBH
DLR
(Inches)
(Feet)
Health
Structure
Estimated
Life Span
Appraised
Value
(Years)
20
Valley Oak
17
15
Fair-Good
Fair-Good
10 to 15
$6,070
48
Valley Oak
19
1
Fair
Poor-Fair
5 to 10
$2,320
52
California
Sycamore
19
15
Fair-Good
Fair-Good
10 to 15
$8,260
54
California
Sycamore
18
17
Good
Fair-Good
15 to 20
$7,430
55
Valley Oak
10
10
Good
Good
15 to 20
$2,410
59
Black Walnut
62
5
Poor-Fair
Poor
2 to 5
$13,010
141
Valley Oak
11
10
Fair-Good
Fair-Good
10 to 15
$3,230
142
Valley Oak
11
10
Good
Fair-Good
15 to 20
$3,060
148
Valley Oak
12
10
Good
Fair-Good
15 to 20
$3,340
154
Willow
55
12
Poor-Fair
Poor
2 to 5
$11,040
160
Valley Oak
10
8
Fair-Good
Fair-Good
10 to 15
$2,480
165
Valley Oak
11
5
Fair-Good
Fair-Good
10 to 15
$1,680
171
Valley Oak
12
12
Fair-Good
Fair-Good
10 to 15
$3,080
172
Valley Oak
15, 22, 2,
11
16
Fair-Good
Fair-Good
10 to 15
$15,630
Arborist Report
5
175
Valley Oak
13
12
Fair-Good
Fair-Good
10 to 15
$4,190
177
Valley Oak
11
8
Fair-Good
Fair-Good
10 to 15
$3,040
179
Black Walnut
57
5
Poor
Poor
1 to 2
$7,220
180
Valley Oak
15
12
Fair-Good
Fair-Good
10 to 15
$3,330
181
Valley Oak
14
12
Fair-Good
Fair-Good
10 to 15
$4,700
184
Valley Oak
11
10
Fair-Good
Fair-Good
10 to 15
$2,820
3.1 Impacts and Mitigation
The project is expected to remove Tree #129; a Chinese hackberry located next to the
existing utility pole and may remove Trees #102 and #103, both small native oak trees with a
trunk diameter of 1 inch, due to utility trenching. No protected trees will be removed by the
proposed project. Tree #48 is located just outside of the utility corridor along the northern
boundary. Although its canopy is extremely small, consisting mostly of stump sprouts due to
previous topping at ~6 feet, the roots of this tree likely extend into the utility trench area.
This tree will never recover from the loss of the entire canopy. Although it shows good vigor
and may survive for another 5-10 years, new growth is likely to be structurally unsound and
the tree is likely to develop decay and additional structural problems over time. Therefore,
this tree is recommended for removal. Although it is recommended for removal, a tree
permit would be required for the removal Tree #48. Mitigation, in the form of on- or off-site
planting of replacement trees with a cumulative diameter equal to the tree being removed,
may be required for removal of this tree, at the discretion of the Town of Danville Planning
Commission. If the tree is not removed, then no permit or mitigation is required.
3.2 Tree Protection Recommendations
The following tree protection measures should be implemented to minimize impacts to trees
to remain on or adjacent to the project site.
•
Tree Protection Fencing, consisting of four foot tall, brightly-colored, high-visibility
plastic fencing, shall be placed around the perimeter of the tree protection zone (TPZ)
(dripline radius +1 foot or edge of planter). The TPZ is the minimum distance for
placing protective fencing. Tree protection fencing should be placed as far outside of
the TPZ as possible. Signs shall be placed along the fence denoting this as a Tree
Protection Zone that shall not be moved until construction is complete. In cases
where proposed work infringes on TPZ, fence shall be placed at edge of work.
•
Whenever possible, fence multiple trees together in a single TPZ.
•
Tree protection fencing shall not be moved without prior authorization from the
Project Arborist or the Town of Danville.
Arborist Report
6
•
No parking, portable toilets, dumping or storage of any construction materials,
grading, excavation, trenching, or other infringement by workers or domesticated
animals is allowed in the TPZ.
•
No signs, ropes, cables, or any other item shall be attached to a protected tree, unless
recommended by an ISA-Certified Arborist.
•
Underground utilities should be avoided in the TPZ, but if necessary shall be bored or
drilled. If boring is impossible, all trenching will be done by hand under the
supervision of an ISA-Certified Arborist.
•
Pruning of living limbs or roots over two inches in diameter shall be done under the
supervision of an ISA-Certified Arborist.
Arborist Report
7
4.0 REFERENCES
International Society of Arboriculture (ISA). 2000. Guide for Plant Appraisal, Ninth
Edition. Council of Tree and Landscape Appraisers. Champaign, Illinois. 143 pages
Western Chapter International Society of Arboriculture (WC-ISA). 2004. Species
Classification and Group Assignment: A Regional Supplement to the CTLA Guide for
Plant Appraisal, Ninth Edition.
Arborist Report
8
157
155
156
57
56
55
154
47
43
51 8
164 163 162
m
n
m
n
m
n
152 150
m
nm
n
m
n
149
166 167
151
m
n
m
n
m
n
m
n
m
n
m
n
m
n
168 145 144
106 102
m
n
153
m
n
m
n
m
n
m
n
m
n
m
n
170 172 171 174
175
m
n
m
n
m
n
m
n
m
n
m
n
nm
m
nm
n
n
m
n m
m
n
m
n
176 177 140 179 178
137
136
m
n m
n
m
n
m
n
m
n
m
n
m
n
m
n
m
n
n
m
n
m
n m
m
n
nm
m
nm
m
nn
m
n
m
n
48
23 1
15
m
n
13
m
n
m
n m
m
n
nnm
n
nm
m
n m
n
m
nm
n m
n m
n
m
nm
m
n
m
n
m
n
n
m
nm
m
n
m
n
n
m
nm
m
n
m
n
m
n
27 26
34
40 30
36
28
29
124
125
126
20 19
16
105
11
12
m
n
14
m
n
59
60
127
61
m
n
64
m
n
128
m
n
m
n
m
n
131
66
183
62
m
n
65
m
n
m
n
123
m
n
m
n
m
n
m
n
17
58
m
n
182
4
18
41
122
130
135
134
133
132
24
21
m
n
m
n
181
180
n
m
nm
101
146
173
141
129
138
139
143
142
6 50
10
103
100
148
147
m
nm
n
m
n
m
n m
n
m
n
m
nm
n
m
n
37
31
m
n
m
n
120
119
121
184
63
m
n
m
n
m
n
m
n
m
n
m
n
!
A
Protected Tree
Ca Cro
ny w
on
Rd
Legend
Danville
Other Tree
Proposed Tower Location
§
¨
¦
Blackhawk-Camino
Tassajara
680
Tree Canopy
San
Ramon
rty
he
ug
Do
Impacts Within Dripline
Proposed Project Footprint
Detail
Area
Rd
on
am d
n R Blv
Sa lley
Va
Document Path: O:\N_Cal\V_Projects\Verizon_Lawrence_Road\GIS\GIS_Project_Files\Verizon_LawrenceRd_TreeLoc_Impacts_20151016v2.mxd
m
n
m
n
n
nm
m
n m
m
n
m
n m
n
m
n
m
n
161
m
n
m
n
m
n
n
m
n m
m
n
m
n
m
n
22
39
23
25
m
n
m
n
m
n
35
m
n
m
n
159
169
46
5
49
53
n
m
n m
165
45
52
9
54
104
158
160
7
44
42
33
38
32
APPROXIMATE TREE LOCATIONS AND PROJECT IMPACTS
© 2015
VERIZON LAWRENCE ROAD
±
0
40
80
Feet
1 inch = 75 feet
Drawn By:
MUB
Date:
10/20/2015
FIGURE 1
Document Name: Verizon_LawrenceRd_TreeLoc_Impacts_20151016v2.mxd : : 10/20/2015 12:10:46 PM
Appendix A — Tree Survey Data
Arborist Report
Appendix A
Tree Survey Data
Tree #
4
Species
English
Walnut
English
Walnut
English
Walnut
English
Walnut
5
English
Walnut
1
2
3
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
Black
Walnut
English
Walnut
Black
Walnut
English
Walnut
English
Walnut
Black
Walnut
Black
Walnut
14
Black
Walnut
English
Walnut
15
Black
Walnut
13
19
Black
Walnut
Black
Walnut
Black
Walnut
Black
Walnut
20
Valley Oak
16
17
18
# of
DBH
DLR
Trunks (Inches) (Feet)
1
1
1
Health
Structure
Height
(ft)
Good
Good
10
Notes
Tag
No tag
hollow at base, bark
damage
included bark,
multistemmed
3
1,1,1
4
Fair-Good
Fair
7
2
1,1
5
Good
Fair-Good
6
1
1
4
Good
Good
10
2
2,1
3
Fair-Good
Fair
12
1
1
2
Fair-Good Fair-Good
1
1
3
2
1,3
3
1
1
1
Good
Good
7
No tag
3
1,1,1
4
Good
Fair-Good
7
No tag
1
6
2
Poor
Poor-Fair
15
1
4
1
Poor
Poor
10
1
6
1
Poor
Poor
10
1
1
5
Good
Good
17
3
6,6,3.5
2
Good
Good
Fair-Good Fair-Good
Poor-Fair Poor-Fair
10
7
8
20
1
3
1
Poor
Poor-Fair
17
1
4
10
Fair-Good
Fair
10
1
8
7
Fair-Good Fair-Good
20
2
13, 12
15
Fair-Good
30
1
17
15
Fair-Good Fair-Good
Protected Trees shaded in gray
Arborist Report
1 of 8
Fair
30
No tag
No tag
bark damage
No tag
wild grape vines entangle
tree branches, included
bark
No tag
Wild grape vines entangle
tree branches, sapsucker,
leaning
No tag
bark damage
included bark, bark
damage
No tag
No tag
deadwood, severe dieback,
bark damage, woodpecker
bark damage, dieback,
leaning
severe dieback, bark
damage, trunk cavity,
woodpecker, included bark,
leaning
included bark, bark
damage, severe dieback,
leaning
bark damage, woodpecker,
deadwood, included bark,
severe dieback
leaning, dieback, bark
damage
bark damage, dieback,
included bark
included bark, embedded
fence, ants, leaning
included bark, bark
damage, dieback
Appendix A
Tree Survey Data
# of
DBH
DLR
Health
Structure
Height
(ft)
Notes
20
Fair-Good
Good
50
bark damage, oozing
wound
28
20
Fair-Good
Good
55
1
5
8
Fair-Good
Good
20
Foothill Pine
1
29
20
Fair-Good
Good
55
1
24
20
Fair-Good
Good
50
2
1,4
5
Good
Fair-Good
17
included bark
1
4
4
Good
Fair-Good
12
included bark
1
4
6
Good
Fair-Good
12
29
Foothill Pine
English
Walnut
English
Walnut
English
Walnut
English
Walnut
5
2,1,1,2,1
3
Good
Fair-Good
10
included bark, slight lean
included bark, bark
damage, multi-trunked
30
English
Walnut
3
4,2,2
5
Good
Fair-Good
12
4
6
Poor-Fair Poor-Fair
15
5
4,5,5,4
1,1,1, 2,
1
4
Good
Fair-Good
12
bark damage, included
bark, codominant branching
included bark, bark
deadwood
bark, multistemmed
bark, codominant branching
Tree #
Species
21
Foothill Pine
1
32
22
1
23
Foothill Pine
Black
Walnut
24
25
26
27
28
31
32
Black
Walnut
English
Walnut
4
1,1,1,1
2
Good
Fair
15
34
English
Walnut
English
Walnut
1
1
1
Good
Good
12
35
English
Walnut
2
1,2
4
Fair-Good
Fair
15
2
3,2
4
Fair
Fair
12
1
1
2
Good
Fair-Good
10
2
1,1
1
Good
Fair-Good
10
4
1,1,1,1
2
Good
Fair-Good
6
5
1,1,1,1,1
4
Good
Fair-Good
8
2
2,1
1,3,1,5,3
,1
7
Good
Fair-Good
12
10
Fair-Good
Fair
15
33
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
English
Walnut
English
Walnut
English
Walnut
English
Walnut
English
Walnut
English
Walnut
English
Walnut
6
Arborist Report
2 of 8
Tag
bark damage
damage, dieback, included
bark
damage, sapsucker,
included bark
included bark
included bark, bark
damage, trunk wound
bark, multistemmed
bark
included bark, codominant
branching
bark damage, hollow at
base, included bark
Appendix A
Tree Survey Data
Tree #
Species
47
English
Walnut
English
Walnut
English
Walnut
Black
Walnut
Black
Walnut
48
49
# of
DBH
DLR
Health
Structure
Height
(ft)
Notes
included bark, sapsucker,
codominant branching
5
2,1,1,2,2
6
Good
Fair-Good
15
1
2
4
Good
Fair-Good
10
1
1
3
Good
Good
10
2
8,9
12
Fair-Good Fair-Good
29
5
6,7,2,3,2
12
Fair-Good
Fair
20
Valley Oak
1
19
1
Fair
Poor
6
1
25
12
Fair
Fair-Good
25
50
Mulberry
English
Walnut
2
9,3
5
Fair-Good
Fair
12
51
Willlow
3
9,20,13
20
Fair-Good Fair-Good
35
52
Sycamore
1
19
15
Fair-Good Fair-Good
30
53
Willlow
4
18,9,10,
12
15
Fair-Good
Fair
17
54
55
Sycamore
Valley Oak
1
1
18
10
17
10
Good
Good
Fair-Good
Good
25
35
56
2
6,8
6
Fair-Good
Fair
20
57
Valley Oak
Black
Walnut
1
12
8
Poor-Fair
Fair
25
58
Black
Walnut
2
9,8
10
Good
Fair-Good
10
59
Black
Walnut
1
62
5
Poor-Fair
Poor
45
60
Mulberry
1
17
10
Good
Fair-Good
25
61
Mulberry
1
15
7
Poor-Fair Poor-Fair
15
43
44
45
46
Arborist Report
3 of 8
Tag
included bark, sapsucker
bark
branching
included bark, bark
damage, dieback
top lopped off, sucker
growth
Wild grape vines entangle
tree branches, bark
damage, included bark,
severe dieback
bark, sapsucker
included bark, bark
damage, dieback
exposed roots, included
bark, bark damage
included bark, bark
damage, dieback,
codominant branching,
leaning
bark damage, sucker
growth, included bark,
dieback
sapsucker, bark damage
embedded fence,
codominant branching,
leaning, included bark
severe dieback, leaning,
included bark, deadwood
branching, abutting fence
bark damage, deadwood,
nearly dead, severe
dieback
Heritage Tree
fissure, bark damage,
included bark
woodpecker, trunk cavity,
bark damage, deadwood,
pruning cut, trunk rot,
included bark
Appendix A
Tree Survey Data
# of
DBH
DLR
Health
Structure
Height
(ft)
Notes
Good
Fair-Good
20
bark, pruning cut
Fair-Good Fair-Good
20
Tree #
Species
62
Mulberry
1
14
8
63
Mulberry
1
16
8
64
Ash
1
20
10
Good
Fair-Good
35
65
Ash
1
14
10
Good
Fair-Good
30
66
Ash
1
17
8
Good
Fair-Good
35
100
101
102
2
1
1
1,2
1
1
1
2
1
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
6
8
5
1
1
2
Fair-Good
Fair
4
104
Valley Oak
Valley Oak
Valley Oak
Interior Live
Oak
Black
Walnut
3
1,1,1
3
Good
Fair-Good
6
105
Black
Walnut
4
6,3,2,5
5
Good
Fair-Good
15
4
1,1,1,1
2
Fair-Good Fair-Good
8
trunk cavity, root exposed,
included bark, pruning cut
girdling roots, bark
damage, included bark
abutting fence, bark
damage
No tag
No tag
abutting fence
No tag
bark damage, leaning,
included bark
No tag
included bark, bark
damage
No tag
abutting fence, wood
stockpile at trunk base,
bark
No tag
included bark, bark
damage, multistemmed No tag
1
1
2
Good
Good
10
No tag
2
1,1
1
Good
Good
8
No tag
2
1,1
1
Good
Good
6
No tag
8
6,3, 6, 3,
7, 2, 1, 1
3
Good
Fair-Good
12
sapsucker, included bark,
bark damage
No tag
2
1,1
2
Fair-Good Fair-Good
4
No tag
3
4,1,1
3
Fair-Good Fair-Good
7
1
1
3,2,3,3,1
,1
1,1,2,2,
1
1,1,1,1,2
,1,1,2,1,
1,1,1
2
Fair-Good Fair-Good
8
3
Fair-Good Fair-Good
12
3
Fair-Good Fair-Good
3
Fair-Good Fair-Good
103
106
107
108
109
Valley Oak
Italian
buckthorn
Italian
buckthorn
Italian
buckthorn
115
Italian
buckthorn
Italian
buckthorn
Italian
buckthorn
Italian
buckthorn
Italian
buckthorn
Italian
buckthorn
5
116
Italian
buckthorn
12
110
111
112
113
114
6
Arborist Report
4 of 8
Tag
20
dieback, included bark
bark, dieback
dieback, sapsucker, bark
dieback, bark damage,
included bark
No tag
20
included bark, bark
damage
No tag
No tag
No tag
No tag
Appendix A
Tree Survey Data
Tree #
117
118
119
120
121
Species
Italian
buckthorn
Italian
buckthorn
Italian
Cypress
Italian
Cypress
Italian
Cypress
# of
DBH
DLR
Health
Structure
Height
(ft)
Notes
Tag
11
1,2,3,2,1
,2,2,1,1,
2
2
Fair-Good Fair-Good
20
dieback, sapsucker, bark
No tag
2
2, 2
3
Fair-Good Fair-Good
15
No tag
1
10
2
Good
Good
20
No tag
1
14
2
Good
Good
20
No tag
1
19
2
Good
Good
20
No tag
leaning, bark damage,
pruning cut
122
Juniper
1
8
2
Good
Fair-Good
8
123
Crape myrtle
1
6
3
Good
Good
10
No tag
124
125
126
127
128
2
3
1
1
2
2,7
3,1,1
5
3
2,2
3
2
2
2
2
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Fair-Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
8
6
6
6
6
included bark, pruning cut No tag
No tag
No tag
No tag
No tag
1
5
6
Good
Fair-Good
15
leaning
No tag
130
131
132
133
134
135
Crape myrtle
Juniper
Juniper
Juniper
Juniper
Chinese
hackberry
Chinese
hackberry
Redwood
Redwood
Redwood
Redwood
Redwood
1
1
1
1
1
1
6
12
16
17
18
14
8
8
8
8
8
8
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
15
40
40
40
40
40
included bark
No tag
No tag
No tag
No tag
No tag
No tag
136
Black
Walnut
1
10
10
Fair-Good Fair-Good
12
137
Black
Walnut
2
7,6
12
Fair-Good Fair-Good
10
1
5
6
Fair-Good
Fair
12
deadwood, dieback,
included bark, woodpecker No tag
includded bark, codominant
branching, abutting fence,
dieback
No tag
deadwood, included bark,
bark dadmage, trunk rot,
dieback
No tag
1
10
10
Good
Good
15
No tag
1
1
1
8
11
11
8
10
10
1
8
12
Good
Fair-Good
1
7
8
Good
Fair-Good
129
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
Black
Walnut
Black
Walnut
Black
Walnut
Valley Oak
Valley Oak
Black
Walnut
Black
Walnut
Arborist Report
Good
Fair-Good
Fair-Good Fair-Good
Good
Fair-Good
5 of 8
No tag
No tag
No tag
No tag
15
bark damage, leaning
leaning
limb rot, leaning, included
bark
17
No tag
15
15
35
No tag
Appendix A
Tree Survey Data
Tree #
Species
147
148
Black
Walnut
Black
Walnut
Black
Walnut
Valley Oak
149
150
# of
DBH
DLR
2
1,4
6
1
4
1
1
Valley Oak
152
Willlow
Black
Walnut
Black
Walnut
145
Health
Height
(ft)
Poor-Fair
10
6
Fair-Good Fair-Good
10
9
12
10
10
Fair-Good Fair-Good
Good
Fair-Good
20
30
1
7
8
Fair-Good Fair-Good
25
1
5
2
2
6,2
8
Fair-Good Fair-Good
12
2
1
3
Fair-Good Fair-Good
6
153
Black
Walnut
1
1
3
Fair
Fair
7
154
Willow
1
55
12
Poor-Fair
Poor
8
146
151
Fair
Structure
Fair
Fair
7
3
6,10, 9
12
Fair
Fair-Good
30
156
Black
Walnut
English
Walnut
1
6
8
Good
Fair-Good
12
157
Black
Walnut
1
6
4
Poor
Poor
10
Fair
25
155
1
9
10
Fair-Good
159
160
Valley Oak
Black
Walnut
Valley Oak
1
1
10
8
Fair-Good Fair-Good
Fair-Good Fair-Good
25
35
161
Prunus sp.
6
12
10
1,1,1,12,
3,9
8
Fair-Good Fair-Good
25
162
Valley Oak
1
1
1
Fair-Good Fair-Good
10
163
Valley Oak
1
6
8
Fair-Good Fair-Good
25
158
Arborist Report
6 of 8
Notes
leaning, included bark,
trunk rot, woopecker, bark
damage, dieback, exposed
roots
leaning, dieback, bark
damage
leaning, bark damage,
dieback
leaning, sapsucker,
included bark, bark
damage
severe lean, severe
included bark, bark
damage, severe dieback
leaning, included bark, bark
damage, dieback
bark
trunk rot, trunk cavity,
severe lean, uprooted,
roots exposed, bark
deadwood, nearly dead
Heritage Tree
leaning, sever dieback,
included bark, girdling roots
asymmetrical canopy, bark
damage, leaning
nearly dead, trunk cavity,
severe dieback, exposed
roots, included bark, bark
damage
dieback, severe lean,
asymmetrical canopy
large pruning cut, severe
lean, included bark
leaning, exposed roots
included bark, exposed
roots
included bark, bark
damage
dieback, lean, included
bark
Tag
No tag
No tag
No tag
No tag
No tag
No tag
No tag
No tag
No tag
No tag
No tag
No tag
No tag
No tag
No tag
No tag
No tag
No tag
No tag
Appendix A
Tree Survey Data
Tree #
Species
# of
DBH
DLR
Health
Structure
Height
(ft)
164
Willlow
1
14
2
Poor-Fair
165
Valley Oak
Black
Walnut
1
11
5
Fair-Good Fair-Good
25
1
5
5
Fair-Good Fair-Good
20
2
1,1
5
Fair-Good Fair-Good
7
1
1
1
8
4
8
Fair
Fair
Fair-Good Fair-Good
8
25
5
7,1,1,1,1
8
Fair-Good Fair-Good
25
12
Fair-Good Fair-Good
30
16
Fair-Good Fair-Good
35
166
Poor
4
170
Black
Walnut
Black
Walnut
Valley Oak
Interior Live
Oak
171
Valley Oak
1
172
Valley Oak
4
12
15, 22,
2, 11
173
174
Willlow
Willlow
3
1
8,9,14
6
12
4
Fair
Fair
Fair-Good Fair-Good
20
15
175
Valley Oak
1
13
12
Fair-Good Fair-Good
35
176
Valley Oak
1
7
5
177
1
11
8
Fair-Good Fair-Good
25
178
Valley Oak
Black
Walnut
1
5
5
Fair-Good Fair-Good
15
179
Black
Walnut
1
57
5
180
181
Valley Oak
Valley Oak
1
1
15
14
12
12
182
Willlow
1
10,11
14
167
168
169
Arborist Report
Fair
Poor
Fair
Poor
Fair-Good Fair-Good
Fair-Good Fair-Good
Fair
7 of 8
Fair
25
25
25
20
20
Notes
Tag
severe lean, severe
dieback, pest infestation of
foliage, pruning cut, sucker
growth
No tag
leaning, exposed roots,
pruning cut, dieback
No tag
severe lean, dieback, bark
damage
No tag
leaning, included bark,
deadwood, severe dieback
bark damage, severe
included bark, leaning
included bark, bark
damage, sapsucker
asymmetrical canopy, bark
dieback
dieback, included bark,
exposed roots
bark, bark damage, severe
dieback, trunk rot, prunign
cut,
severe dieback, leaning
included bark, bark
damage, dieback
leaning, severe dieback,
included bark, bark
damage
included bark, bark
damage, dieback
include bark, dieback, bark
damage, trunk cavity
nearly dead, woodpecker,
trunk rot, trunk cavity,
deadwood, leader death,
limb death, severe dieback,
exposed roots
Heritage Tree
included bark, bark
damage, dieback
included bark, dieback
hollow at base, pruning cut,
included bark, bark
damage
No tag
No tag
No tag
No tag
No tag
No tag
No tag
No tag
No tag
No tag
No tag
No tag
No tag
No tag
No tag
No tag
Appendix A
Tree Survey Data
Tree #
Species
# of
DBH
DLR
Health
Structure
Height
(ft)
183
Willlow
2
22,28
15
Fair-Good Fair-Good
35
184
Valley Oak
1
11
10
Fair-Good Fair-Good
25
Arborist Report
8 of 8
Notes
Tag
codominant branching, bark
severe dieback
No tag
located on adjacent parcel
to the south, abutting
fenceline, dieback,
asymmetrical canopy,
included bark, bark
damage
No tag
Appendix B — Appraisals of Protected Trees
Arborist Report
Tree #: 20
Species
Trunk Diameter
Dripline Radius
Height
Valley Oak
17” @ DBH
15’
30’
Condition Assessment
Roots
Trunk
Scaffold Branches
Small Branches/ Twigs
Foliage and Buds
Total Condition Score
Health
Structure
4
3
4
3
3
84%
4
3
3
N/A
N/A
Notes
Included bark, bark damage
Lack of foliage
Some yellow foliage
4 = No apparent problems, 3 = Minor problems, 2 = Major problems, 1 = Extreme problems
Location
Site
Contribution (Total)
Aesthetic
Functional
Placement
Total Location Score
Rating
70
70
60
80
50
63%
Notes
Commercial lot on edge of urban development
Asymmetrical canopy
Shade, sound screening, privacy
Abutting fence; restricted area for growth
Scale of 10 to 100; 10 = poor; 100 = excellent
Tree Appraisal
Species Rating:
Replacement Tree Size
(TAR):
90%
1.69”
2.2 in2
Replacement Tree Cost:
$120
Installation Cost:
$250
Installed Tree Cost:
(Replacement Tree Cost +
Installation Cost)
Unit Tree Cost:
Arborist Report
$370
Appraised Trunk Area (TAA):
Appraised Trunk Increase (TAINC):
(TAA – TAR)
Basic Tree Cost:
(TAINC x Unit Tree Cost + Installed
Tree Cost)
Adjusted Tree Cost
(Basic Tree Cost x Species Rating % x
Condition % x Location %)
227
Total Appraised Value:
$6,070
280.8
$12,734
$6,065
$55/ in2
Tree #: 48
Species
Trunk Diameter
Dripline Radius
Height
Valley Oak
19” @ DBH
1’
6’
Roots
Trunk
Scaffold Branches
Foliage and Buds
Health
Structure
Notes
4
3
0
1
1
44%
4
1
0
N/A
N/A
Top lopped off
Not present
Sucker growth
Location
Site
Aesthetic
Functional
Placement
Rating
70
10
10
10
30
37%
Notes
Canopy removed
Canopy removed
Abutting fence, restricted area for growth
Tree Appraisal
Species Rating:
(TAR):
90%
1.69”
2.2 in2
$120
Installation Cost:
$250
Installation Cost)
Unit Tree Cost:
Arborist Report
$370
(TAA – TAR)
Basic Tree Cost:
Tree Cost)
Adjusted Tree Cost
283
$2,320
280.8
$15,814
$2,317
$55/ in2
Tree #: 52
Species
Trunk Diameter
Dripline Radius
Height
Sycamore
19” @ DBH
15’
30’
Roots
Trunk
Scaffold Branches
Foliage and Buds
Health
Structure
Notes
4
3
4
4
4
91%
3
4
3
N/A
N/A
Exposed roots at bank of a v-ditch
Bark damage
Included bark
Location
Site
Aesthetic
Functional
Placement
Rating
70
85
80
90
90
82%
Notes
Bark color and texture, large green leaves
Shade, sound screening
In large planting area
Tree Appraisal
Species Rating:
(TAR):
70%
1.69”
2.2 in2
$120
Installation Cost:
$250
Installation Cost)
Unit Tree Cost:
Arborist Report
$370
(TAA – TAR)
Basic Tree Cost:
Tree Cost)
Adjusted Tree Cost
283
$8,260
280.8
$15,814
$8,260
$55/ in2
Tree #: 54
Species
Trunk Diameter
Dripline Radius
Height
Sycamore
18” @ DBH
17’
25’
Roots
Trunk
Scaffold Branches
Foliage and Buds
Health
Structure
Notes
4
3
4
4
3
91%
4
4
3
N/A
N/A
Bark damage
Included bark
Sucker growth
Some yellow foliage
Location
Site
Aesthetic
Functional
Placement
Rating
70
85
80
90
90
82%
Notes
Bark color and texture, large green leaves
Shade, sound screening, privacy
In large planting area
Tree Appraisal
Species Rating:
(TAR):
70%
1.69”
2.2 in2
$120
Installation Cost:
$250
Installation Cost)
Unit Tree Cost:
Arborist Report
$370
(TAA – TAR)
Basic Tree Cost:
Tree Cost)
Adjusted Tree Cost
254
$7,430
251.8
$14,219
$7,427
$55/ in2
Tree #: 55
Species
Trunk Diameter
Dripline Radius
Height
Valley Oak
10” @ DBH
10’
35’
Roots
Trunk
Scaffold Branches
Foliage and Buds
Health
Structure
4
3
4
4
4
94%
4
3
4
N/A
N/A
Notes
Sapsucker damage, leaning
Location
Site
Aesthetic
Functional
Placement
Rating
70
45
50
40
70
62%
Notes
Foliage at uppermost part of tree
Little screening foliage at lower levels
Abutting fence, restricted area for growth
Tree Appraisal
Species Rating:
(TAR):
90%
1.69”
2.2 in2
$120
Installation Cost:
$250
Installation Cost)
Unit Tree Cost:
Arborist Report
$370
(TAA – TAR)
Basic Tree Cost:
Tree Cost)
Adjusted Tree Cost
79
$2,410
76.8
$4,594
$2,410
$55/ in2
Tree #: 59
Species
Trunk Diameter
Dripline Radius
Height
Black Walnut
62” @ DBH
5’
45’
Roots
Trunk
Scaffold Branches
Foliage and Buds
Health
Structure
4
1
1
1
1
47%
4
2
1
N/A
N/A
Notes
Bark damage, cavities
Deadwood
Little to no foliage
Location
Site
Aesthetic
Functional
Placement
Rating
70
18
10
25
70
53%
Notes
Nearly dead
Potential habitat for wildlife
Abutting fence
Tree Appraisal
Species Rating:
(TAR):
50%
1.69”
2.2 in2
$120
Installation Cost:
$250
Installation Cost)
Unit Tree Cost:
Arborist Report
$370
(TAA – TAR)
Basic Tree Cost:
Tree Cost)
Adjusted Tree Cost
1894
$13,010
1891.8
$104,419
$13,005
$55/ in2
Tree #: 141 (no tag)
Species
Trunk Diameter
Dripline Radius
Height
Valley Oak
11” @ DBH
10’
15’
Roots
Trunk
Scaffold Branches
Foliage and Buds
Health
Structure
Notes
4
4
4
3
3
91%
4
4
3
N/A
N/A
Included bark
Lack of foliage
Some brown and yellow foliage
Location
Site
Aesthetic
Functional
Placement
Rating
70
75
80
70
70
72%
Notes
Green foliage
Privacy, sound screening, shade
Abutting fence
Tree Appraisal
Species Rating:
(TAR):
90%
1.69”
2.2 in2
$120
Installation Cost:
$250
Installation Cost)
Unit Tree Cost:
Arborist Report
$370
(TAA – TAR)
Basic Tree Cost:
Tree Cost)
Adjusted Tree Cost
95
$3,230
92.8
$5,474
$3,228
$55/ in2
Species
Trunk Diameter
Dripline Radius
Height
Valley Oak
11” @ DBH
10’
35’
Roots
Trunk
Scaffold Branches
Foliage and Buds
Health
Structure
4
4
4
4
4
94%
4
3
3
N/A
N/A
Notes
Slight lean
Mainly upper branches
Location
Site
Aesthetic
Functional
Placement
Rating
70
58
55
60
70
66%
Notes
Green foliage at upper part of tree
Privacy, sound screening, shade
Abutting fence
Tree Appraisal
Species Rating:
90%
(TAR):
1.69”
2.2 in2
$120
Installation Cost:
$250
(TAA – TAR)
Basic Tree Cost:
Tree Cost)
Adjusted Tree Cost
Installation Cost)
Unit Tree Cost:
Arborist Report
$370
95
92.8
$5,474
$3,056
$3,060
$55/ in2
Species
Trunk Diameter
Dripline Radius
Height
Valley Oak
12” @ DBH
10’
30’
Roots
Trunk
Scaffold Branches
Foliage and Buds
Health
Structure
4
4
4
4
4
91%
4
3
3
N/A
N/A
Notes
Slight leaning
Included bark
Location
Site
Aesthetic
Functional
Placement
Rating
70
58
55
60
60
63%
Notes
Privacy, shade, sound screen
Abutting fence and paved area
Tree Appraisal
Species Rating:
90%
(TAR):
1.69”
2.2 in2
$120
Installation Cost:
$250
(TAA – TAR)
Basic Tree Cost:
Tree Cost)
Adjusted Tree Cost
Installation Cost)
Unit Tree Cost:
Arborist Report
$370
113
110.8
$6,464
$3,335
$3,340
$55/ in2
Species
Trunk Diameter
Dripline Radius
Height
Willow
55” @ DBH
12’
8’
Health
Structure
Notes
Roots
Trunk
2
1
1
1
Scaffold Branches
Foliage and Buds
2
2
2
38%
1
N/A
N/A
Uprooted and roots exposed
Large cavities and rot in the trunk, severe
lean
Deadwood
Severe dieback
Location
Site
Aesthetic
Functional
Placement
Rating
70
18
10
25
45
44%
Notes
Potential wildlife habitat
On slope with some erosion
Tree Appraisal
Species Rating:
70%
(TAR):
1.69”
2.2 in2
$120
Installation Cost:
$250
(TAA – TAR)
Basic Tree Cost:
Tree Cost)
Adjusted Tree Cost
Installation Cost)
Unit Tree Cost:
Arborist Report
$370
1711
1708.8
$94,354
$11,043
$11,040
$55/ in2
Species
Trunk Diameter
Dripline Radius
Height
Valley Oak
10” @ DBH
8’
35’
Roots
Trunk
Scaffold Branches
Foliage and Buds
Health
Structure
Notes
4
4
4
4
4
91%
3
3
4
N/A
N/A
Exposed roots
Leaning
Location
Site
Aesthetic
Functional
Placement
Rating
70
58
55
60
70
66%
Notes
Privacy, shade
Road restricts growth
Tree Appraisal
Species Rating:
(TAR):
90%
1.69”
2.2 in2
$120
Installation Cost:
$250
Installation Cost)
Unit Tree Cost:
Arborist Report
$370
(TAA – TAR)
Basic Tree Cost:
Tree Cost)
Adjusted Tree Cost
79
$2,480
76.8
$4,594
$2,483
$55/ in2
Species
Trunk Diameter
Dripline Radius
Height
Valley Oak
11” @ DBH
5’
25’
Roots
Trunk
Scaffold Branches
Foliage and Buds
Health
Structure
Notes
4
4
4
3
3
81%
3
3
2
N/A
N/A
Exposed roots
Topped
Pruning cuts due to utility lines
Lack of foliage
Some browning or dead foliage
Location
Site
Aesthetic
Functional
Placement
Rating
70
35
25
45
20
42%
Notes
Privacy, shade
Overhead utility lines
Tree Appraisal
Species Rating:
(TAR):
90%
1.69”
2.2 in2
$120
Installation Cost:
$250
Installation Cost)
Unit Tree Cost:
Arborist Report
$370
(TAA – TAR)
Basic Tree Cost:
Tree Cost)
Adjusted Tree Cost
95
$1,680
92.8
$5,474
$1,676
$55/ in2
Species
Trunk Diameter
Dripline Radius
Height
Valley Oak
12” @ DBH
12’
30’
Roots
Trunk
Scaffold Branches
Health
Structure
4
4
4
4
3
2
Small Branches/ Twigs 3
Foliage and Buds
3
Total Condition Score 84%
Notes
Bark damage
Branches at uppermost part of tree,
included bark, asymmetrical growth
Lack of foliage
Some brown and yellow foliage
N/A
N/A
Location
Site
Aesthetic
Functional
Placement
Rating
70
50
40
60
70
63%
Notes
Privacy, shade
Road restricts growth
Tree Appraisal
Species Rating:
(TAR):
90%
1.69”
2.2 in2
$120
Installation Cost:
$250
Installation Cost)
Unit Tree Cost:
Arborist Report
$370
(TAA – TAR)
Basic Tree Cost:
Tree Cost)
Adjusted Tree Cost
113
$3,080
110.8
$6,464
$3,079
$55/ in2
Species
Trunk Diameter
Dripline Radius
Height
Valley Oak
15, 22, 2, 11” @ DBH
16’
35’
Roots
Trunk
Scaffold Branches
Foliage and Buds
Health
Structure
Notes
4
4
4
3
3
84%
3
3
3
N/A
N/A
Exposed roots
Codominant branching
Included bark
Lack of foliage
Some yellow foliage
Location
Site
Aesthetic
Functional
Placement
Rating
70
70
60
80
30
57%
Notes
Green foliage
Privacy, shade
Tree Appraisal
Species Rating:
(TAR):
90%
1.69”
2.2 in2
$120
Installation Cost:
$250
Installation Cost)
Unit Tree Cost:
Arborist Report
$370
(TAA – TAR)
Basic Tree Cost:
Tree Cost)
Adjusted Tree Cost
655
$15,630
652.8
$36,274
$15,631
$55/ in2
Species
Trunk Diameter
Dripline Radius
Height
Valley Oak
13” @ DBH
12’
35’
Roots
Trunk
Scaffold Branches
Foliage and Buds
Health
Structure
Notes
4
4
4
3
3
88%
4
3
3
N/A
N/A
Bark damage
Included bark
Lack of foliage
Some yellow foliage
Location
Site
Aesthetic
Functional
Placement
Rating
70
70
70
70
70
70%
Notes
Thin foliage density
Privacy, shade
Tree Appraisal
Species Rating:
(TAR):
90%
1.69”
2.2 in2
$120
Installation Cost:
$250
Installation Cost)
Unit Tree Cost:
Arborist Report
$370
(TAA – TAR)
Basic Tree Cost:
Tree Cost)
Adjusted Tree Cost
133
$4,190
130.8
$7,564
$4,193
$55/ in2
Species
Trunk Diameter
Dripline Radius
Height
Valley Oak
11” @ DBH
8’
25’
Roots
Trunk
Scaffold Branches
Foliage and Buds
Health
Structure
Notes
4
4
4
3
3
88%
4
3
3
N/A
N/A
Bark damage
Included bark
Lack of foliage
Some yellow foliage
Location
Site
Aesthetic
Functional
Placement
Rating
70
70
70
70
70
70%
Notes
Thin foliage density
Privacy, shade
Tree Appraisal
Species Rating:
(TAR):
90%
1.69”
2.2 in2
$120
Installation Cost:
$250
Installation Cost)
Unit Tree Cost:
Arborist Report
$370
(TAA – TAR)
Basic Tree Cost:
Tree Cost)
Adjusted Tree Cost
95
$3,040
92.8
$5,474
$3,035
$55/ in2
Species
Trunk Diameter
Dripline Radius
Height
Black Walnut
57” @ DBH
5’
25’
Roots
Trunk
Scaffold Branches
Foliage and Buds
Health
Structure
Notes
4
1
1
1
1
41%
3
1
1
N/A
N/A
Exposed roots
Bark damage; cavities and rot
Deadwood, large pruning cuts
Little to no foliage
Location
Site
Aesthetic
Functional
Placement
Rating
70
13
10
15
25
36%
Notes
Lack of canopy
Potential habitat for wildlife
Restricted area for growth; overhead utility lines
Tree Appraisal
Species Rating:
(TAR):
50%
1.69”
2.2 in2
$120
Installation Cost:
$250
Installation Cost)
Unit Tree Cost:
Arborist Report
$370
(TAA – TAR)
Basic Tree Cost:
Tree Cost)
Adjusted Tree Cost
1775
$7,220
1772.8
$97,874
$7,223
$55/ in2
Species
Trunk Diameter
Dripline Radius
Height
Valley Oak
15” @ DBH
12’
25’
Roots
Trunk
Scaffold Branches
Foliage and Buds
Health
Structure
Notes
4
4
4
3
3
88%
4
3
3
N/A
N/A
Bark damage
Included bark, codominant branching
Lack of foliage
Some yellow foliage
Location
Site
Aesthetic
Functional
Placement
Rating
70
75
70
80
50
65%
Notes
Green foliage
Privacy, shade
Tree Appraisal
Species Rating:
(TAR):
90%
1.69”
2.2 in2
$120
Installation Cost:
$250
Installation Cost)
Unit Tree Cost:
Arborist Report
$370
(TAA – TAR)
Basic Tree Cost:
Tree Cost)
Adjusted Tree Cost
113
$3,330
110.8
$6,464
$3,328
$55/ in2
Species
Trunk Diameter
Dripline Radius
Height
Valley Oak
14” @ DBH
12’
20’
Roots
Trunk
Scaffold Branches
Foliage and Buds
Health
Structure
Notes
4
4
4
3
3
88%
4
3
3
N/A
N/A
Included bark
Asymmetrical branching
Lack of foliage
Some yellow foliage
Location
Site
Aesthetic
Functional
Placement
Rating
70
75
70
80
60
68%
Notes
Green foliage
Privacy, shade
Next to road
Tree Appraisal
Species Rating:
(TAR):
90%
1.69”
2.2 in2
$120
Installation Cost:
$250
Installation Cost)
Unit Tree Cost:
Arborist Report
$370
(TAA – TAR)
Basic Tree Cost:
Tree Cost)
Adjusted Tree Cost
154
$4,700
151.8
$8,719
$4,696
$55/ in2
Species
Trunk Diameter
Dripline Radius
Height
Valley Oak
11” @ DBH
10’
25’
Roots
Trunk
Scaffold Branches
Foliage and Buds
Health
Structure
Notes
4
4
4
3
3
88%
4
3
3
N/A
N/A
Bark damage, leaning
Included bark, asymmetrical canopy cover
Lack of foliage
Some yellow and brown foliage
Location
Site
Aesthetic
Functional
Placement
Rating
70
65
60
70
60
65%
Notes
Shade
Abutting fence; overhead utility lines
Tree Appraisal
Species Rating:
(TAR):
90%
1.69”
2.2 in2
$120
Installation Cost:
$250
Installation Cost)
Unit Tree Cost:
Arborist Report
$370
(TAA – TAR)
Basic Tree Cost:
Tree Cost)
Adjusted Tree Cost
95
$2,820
92.8
$5,474
$2,818
$55/ in2

06.1 Arborist Report

Transcription

Similar documents

- Cantigny

Medico-botanical survey of Kumar parvatha Kukke Subramanya

2010 Product Catalog

Volutella Blight Causing Boxwood Dieback.

[Rural Life]

Tree Trail Booklet - Print Version

The Secret of the "Gee-Haw-Whimmy-Diddle"

Product Catalog Innovative Products for Your Daily Life

What the World Needs Is Front Porches Again Where People

Big Dog Rechargeable Bark Control