factbook 2013
Transcription
factbook 2013
◇◆◇◆◇◆ INDEX 1. Management Plan and Improvement of Business Structure 1-1. 2012 April "K"Line Vision 100 "Bridge to the Future" ①Review of the Medium-term Management Plan P2 ②Missions for Medium-term Management Plan ③Target for Financial Indices ④Trends of Business Performance (P/L) P3 ⑤Improvement in Financial Position ⑥Segment-wise Performance ⑦Fleet Upgrading Plan and Investment P4 ⑧Investment CF ⑨New Buildings (Results and Plan) 1-2. Trends of Financial Indices ①Net Income and Dividend per Share P5 ②Consolidated ROE/ROA ③Consolidated Assets Turnover ④Consolidated EV/EBITDA ⑤Operating Cash Flow ⑥Consolidated Interest Coverage Ratio 1-3. History of Management Plans P6 1-4. Effort for Structural Reform ①No. of Seafarers/ "K"Line Employee P7 ②Our Fleet Scale, Revenures & Ordinary Income 1-5. Current Business Composition ①Revenues, Ordinary Income <Division/Segment> P8 ②Fleet Composition & Division/Segment-wise Revnues ◆◇◆◇◆◇ 4. Bulk Carrier Business 4-1. "K"Line Fleet 4-2. Demand on Dry Bulk ① Major Container Carriers ② Containership Asia-N.America Loading Volume ③ Historical Top 20 Container Carriers Trade Share Breakdown by Carrier/Alliance ④ Transition of Alliances for Containership ⑤ Cape-size Bulker Fleet ⑥ Panamax Bulker Fleet ⑦ Handymax Bulker Fleet ⑧ Dry Bulker(All Types) Fleet ⑨ PCTC Operated ⑩ LNG Fleet (Managed) ⑪ Heavy Lifter Owned ⑫ Containership Fleet 5-1. Fleet and Cargo Movements ① ② ③ 5-2. Demand on Vehicles ① ② ③ ④ ⑤ Dry Bulk Carriers by Vessel-type/Age PCC by Vessel-type/Age Oil Tankers by Vessel-type/Age Containerships by Vessel-type/Age Ship Price as of Placing Order Dry Bulker and Tanker Market World Newbuilding Orders World Newbuilding Work In Progress World Newbuilding Delivery World Total Existing Tonnage Dry Bulker Scrap Oil Tanker Scrap Scrap Metal Prices Scrap History by Vessel-type Global Cargo Movements Dry Bulk Market Tanker Market China Containerized Freight Index (CCFI) History Key Economic Indicators for North America Real GDP Growth Mining and Industrial Output Growth (%) Iron Ore Import Steel Export and Import of China Sales of Automobiles Grain Transportation Driven by China (Soy Bean) Trade Trends for China Energy Consumption in China Per Capita GDP by Province in China Economic gap between Urban and Rural Areas "K"Line PCC Fleet Cars/Trucks Transported by Our Fleet Total Cars/Trucks Exported from Japan World Automobile Production (2012) No. of Vehicles Possessed (Cars/1,000 People) P25 P23 P24 P26 Transition of Overseas Production by Japanese Automakers Car Production and Sales in USA Monthly Automobile Export Volume from Japan 6-1. Fleet and Cargo Volume 6-2. 6-3. P11 P12 6-4. P13 6-5. ① "K"Line Containership Fleet P27 ② "K"Line Average Freight/Volume for All Routes ③ "K"Line Volume & Share for Asia-N.America/Europe ④ "K"Line/Market Volume and L/F for Asia-N.America/Europe P28 Container Terminal Operated by "K"Line P29 Cargo Movements ① Container Cargo Movements P30 ② Asia=>N.America/Europe Cargo Volume by Country Handling Volume by Port ① Container Handling Volume in Asia P31 ② Top 10 Ports for 2012 Container Handling ③ Transition of Container Handling among Major Ports in Asia ④ Asia-N.America Trade Trends by Commodity Factory of the World, Asia ① Procuction by Country P32 ② Trends of Export from Asian Major Countries and Regions 7. New Businesses 3. World Market 3-1. Fleet Scale by Vessel-type/Age ① ② ③ ④ 3-2. Trend of Newbuildings ① ② ③ ④ ⑤ ⑥ ⑦ ⑧ ⑨ ⑩ 3-3. Global Cargo Movement ① ② ③ ④ 3-4. Latest Economic Trends ① ② ③ ④ ⑤ ⑥ 3-5. Emerging Markets (China) ① ② ③ ④ ⑤ P22 6. Containership Business P9 P10 "K"Line Dry Bulk Fleet "K"Line Energy Transportation Fleet Ship Price as of Placing Order (Same as 3-2-①) Number of LNG Carriers Transition of Crude Steel Production Global Main Trades of Coal World Coal Consumption Iron Ore Import into Major Asian Countries Iron Ore Stocks at Chinese Ports BDI & Port Congestion in Australia 5. Car Carrier Business 2. Comparison to Major Shipping Companies 2-1. Fleet-scale Ranking ① ② ③ ④ ① ② ③ ④ ⑤ ⑥ P14 P15 P16 P17 7-1. Business Target of our Energy Transportation Division 7-2. New Business Expansion ① Heavy Lifter Business ② Offshore Support Vessel Business ③ Drillship Business ④ LNG FPSO Projects 8. Financial Data 9. Panama Canal Expansion Program 10. Shipping Business in 2030 ① World Population Prospects ② ③ ④ ⑤ ⑥ P18 P33 P34 P35 P36 P37 P38 P39 GDP Consumers’ expanding purchasing power in ASIA Automobile Market P40 Results and Proepect of Marine Transportation Cargo Volume Production of Deepwater Crude Oil 11. "K"Line Overview P19 P20 11-1 "K"Line Corporate Governance System 11-2 Safety in Navigation and Cargo Operations 11-3 Enviroment Preservation 11-4 Approach to Ballast Water Management 11-5 Brief History 11-6 Press Releases for FY2012 (Apr.2012-Mar.2013) 11-7 Certification by Third-party Organization & Information on Convertible Bonds/Ratings 11-8 Corporate Principles and Charter of Conduct 12. Tonnage Tax 13. IR Policy 14. Shareholder Composition P41 P42 P43 P44 P45 P46 P47 P48 P49 P50 P21 1 1-1. April 2012 ”K" Line Vision100 -Bridge to the Future ① Review of the Medium-Term Management Plan "K" LINE Vision 100 ②Updated Missions for our Medium-term Management Plan April 2008 “K”LINE Vision 100 This medium-term management plan was established against a backdrop of growing marine transport demand resulting from global economic growth, focusing on the mid-2010s, while also extending its outlook to encompass K" Line's centennial anniversary in 2019. The theme of the plan was “synergy for all and sustainable growth.” January 2010 “K”LINE Vision 100 KV2010 This plan was established as an emergency measure in response to the financial recession led by the collapse of Lehman Brothers in September 2008, and the vastly different business environment it produced. April 2011 “K”LINE Vision100 - New Challenges - In response to changes in market structures including energy demand increase, the rise of emerging countries, etc. a new medium-term management plan based on the “K” LINE Vision 100 was adopted to expand stable earning and achieve sustainable growth. April 2012 “K”LINE Vision100 - Bridge to the Future - Under such circumstances as supply pressure of new vessel capacity, fuel oil hike, further rise of yen, damage by the Great East Japan Earthquake, etc. , in response to opaquie business situation including market flactuation, by means of structural reform, we aim to increase stable profit, and change into constitution strong enough not to be over affected by market flactuation. ③ Updated Target for Financial Indicies as of April 2012 Item Unit FY2011 As of April 2013 FY2012 FY2013 FY2014 Operating Revenues (billion yen) 972 1,120 1,070 1,110 Ordinary Profit Income (billion yen) ▲ 49 12 39 60 Net Profit Income (billion yen) ▲ 41 11 25 42 EBITDA (billion yen) 14 100 110 135 Shareholders' Equity (billion yen) 243 260 280 330 Interest-bearing Debt (billion yen) 593 580 540 490 Operating CF (billion yen) ▲3 67 90 113 Investment CF (billion yen) ▲ 83 ▲ 50 ▲ 50 ▲ 50 DER - 244% 223% 193% 148% ROA - -5% 1% 4% 6% Equity Ratio - 23% 23% 26% 30% - 4.3 Interest-bearing debt / Operating CF Assumptions (times) 8.7 6.0 79 80 80 80 (US$/MT) 672 720 650 650 Exchange rate (\/US$) Bunker Price T/C Average CAPE (US$/Day) 15,350 18,750 23,000 25,000 PMAX (US$/Day) 12,325 13,500 17,000 20,000 HMAX (US$/Day) 13,225 13,500 15,000 18,000 Small (US$/Day) 10,075 10,750 12,000 14,000 2 ④ Trends of Business Performance (P/L) ⑥ Segment-wise Performance as of April 2012 Bridge to the Future Operating Revenues Operating Income Ordinary Income Net Income billion yen 1,400 ④ Trends of Business Performance (P/L) "K" Line Vision 2008+ "K" Line Vision 2008 KV2010 Unit billion yen KV-Plan 1,000 Target 10 K.R.Plan 100 80 600 Adjustment and Eliminations 60 400 40 200 20 0 -200 -20 -40 -600 -60 -800 -80 460 Ordinary income or loss (billion yen) ▲42 ▲3 10 15 Operating revenues (billion yen) 464 530 500 520 Ordinary income or loss (billion yen) ▲9 12 26 42 Operating revenues (billion yen) 113 130 110 130 Ordinary income or loss (billion yen) 7 7 6 7 Operating revenues (billion yen) 0 0 0 0 Ordinary income or loss (billion yen) ▲5 ▲4 ▲3 ▲4 Interest Bearing Debt Equity Ratio(x10) Operating revenues (billion yen) 972 1,120 1,070 1,110 (billion yen) ▲49 12 39 60 Exchange rate (\/US$) 79 80 80 80 Bunker Price (US$/MT) 672 720 650 650 CAPE (US$/Day) 15,350 18,750 23,000 25,000 PMAX (US$/Day) 12,325 13,500 17,000 20,000 HMAX (US$/Day) 13,225 13,500 15,000 18,000 Small (US$/Day) 10,075 10,750 12,000 14,000 as of April 2013 (after reformation)※ Unit Shareholders' Equity DER Containership Equity Ratio indicated x10↓ 700 700% 600 600% Bulk Shipping Offshore Energy E&P Support & Heavy Lifter 500% above 40% 400% 500 400 300 300% 200 200% 100 100% Other Adjustments & Eliminations Total 0% below 95% 0 Assumptions (Fiscal Year) '92 Exchange Rate (Yen/US$) Fuel Price (US$/MT) '93 125 108 99 83 '94 99 '95 '96 '97 '98 '99 '00 '01 '02 '03 '04 '05 '06 '07 '08 96 113 123 128 112 110 125 122 114 107 113 117 115 101 99 108 118 104 '09 93 '10 86 460 Ordinary income or loss ⑤ Improvement in Financial Position billion yen FY2014 460 T/C Average Assumptions -400 FY2013 396 Total 0 FY2012 (billion yen) Others New K-21 K.R.PhaseⅡ Non-Container Ships 120 FY2011 Operating revenues Container Ships 140 "K" LINE Vision 100 1,200 800 New Challenges '11 79 '12 82 FY2011 FY2013 e FY2012 FY2014 (plan) Operating Revenues (bln.yen) 468.0 552.8 580.0 Ordinary Income (bln.yen) ▲ 38.5 6.6 8.0 15.0 Operating Revenues (bln.yen) 443.1 502.6 500.0 520.0 42.0 Ordinary Income (bln.yen) ▲ 0.1 24.1 22.0 Operating Revenues (bln.yen) 20.4 35.7 40.0 460.0 Ordinary Income (bln.yen) ▲ 8.5 ▲ 2.4 ▲ 1.0 Operating Revenues (bln.yen) 40.8 43.7 40.0 130.0 Ordinary Income (bln.yen) 3.3 6.6 2.0 7.0 Operating Revenues (bln.yen) - - - 0.0 Ordinary Income (bln.yen) ▲ 5.2 ▲ 6.3 ▲ 6.0 ▲ 4.0 Operating Revenues (bln.yen) 972.3 1,134.8 1,160.0 1,110.0 Ordinary Income (bln.yen) ▲ 49.0 28.6 25.0 60.0 Exchange Rate Bunker Price T/C Average CAPE PMAX HMAX Small (\/US$) (US$/MT) 79 672 82 671 95 620 80 650 (US$/Day) (US$/Day) (US$/Day) (US$/Day) 15,350 12,325 13,225 10,075 7,350 7,575 9,250 7,800 12,000 8,500 9,500 8,000 25,000 20,000 18,000 14,000 ※from FY2012, segmentation was reformed 76 117 158 134 161 170 192 286 319 407 504 407 489 672 671 3 1-1. April 2012 "K"Line Vision 100 - Bridge to the Future ⑦ 【Fleet Upgrading Plan and Investment 】 ⑨ New Buildings (Results and Plan) (as of July 2013) In Mid-term Management Plan (as of April 2012) as of April 2012 Nbr of Nbr of Fleet Size Development as of July 2013 (unit: vessels) FY2011 Vessels at FY2012 FY2013 FY2014 FY2012-FY2014 Vessels at end of Deliveries end of Deliveries Deliveries Deliveries Deliveries Container Ship Business 6 80 4 0 0 4 66 Dry Bulk Carrier Business 34 236 23 25 11 59 279 Car Carrier Business 6 97 2 0 0 2 93 Energy Transportation Business 5 77 1 1 1 3 77 Heavy Lifer / Others 1 68 3 0 0 3 69 Total 52 558 33 26 12 71 584 (Showing vessels whose investment is decided only) Only the number of newbuildings is indicated in this table. (vessels returned or sold etc. is not reflected) 500 Total 584 Total 558 Heavy Lifter/Coastal /Ferry/Other 69 Energy Resource 77 Heavy Lifter/Coastal /Ferry/Other 68 Energy Resource 77 400 PCTC 93 PCTC 97 300 200 Dry Bulk Carrier 279 Dry Bulk Carrier 236 100 Container 80 Container 66 March 12 March 14 0 ⑧ Investment CF (billion yen) FY2011 Original Plan (Apr.'12) 83.2 Updated (Apr.'13) 83.2 95.0 Previous Plan (Apr.'11) FY2005 FY2006 FY2007 FY2008 FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 FY2013 FY2014 FY2015 FY2016 Plan Plan Plan Plan FY2014 FY2011 600 FY2004 FY2012 50.0 27.2 80.0 FY2013 50.0 50.0 65.0 FY2014 50.0 50.0 - Containerships 1,700TEU 2,400TEU 3,500TEU 4,500TEU 6,400TEU 8,000TEU Dry Bulk Capesize Panamax Handymax SmallHandy Chip/Pulp Corona Car Carriers 2,000units 3,800units 4,000units 5,000units 6,000units LNG Tankers VLCC AFRAMAX LRⅡ LPG CHEMICAL Energy New Biz Offshore Drillship Heavy Lifters Short Sea etc. Total 5 5 3 2 3 2 3 0 0 18 5 0 0 3 2 0 0 19 8 3 5 1 0 2 8 2 0 1 3 2 4 1 0 1 0 6 0 0 0 3 0 3 22 9 4 4 2 1 2 8 2 2 2 1 1 2 4 1 1 2 4 3 0 0 0 0 1 10 2 4 2 1 0 1 5 0 1 0 0 4 2 3 1 0 0 6 3 1 0 0 0 2 16 6 0 2 4 3 1 4 0 0 0 0 4 14 4 0 2 1 13 4 3 4 0 0 2 20 9 6 1 2 0 2 8 1 1 0 3 3 1 4 3 0 1 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 1 38 0 5 47 1 2 27 3 2 49 0 0 46 11 0 1 0 7 3 0 16 8 3 4 0 0 1 7 1 0 2 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 3 0 2 1 40 6 0 0 0 5 0 1 34 18 4 7 3 0 2 6 0 0 1 0 5 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 4 3 1 0 1 52 4 0 0 0 0 0 4 25 14 1 5 3 1 1 4 0 0 1 2 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 3 37 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 23 4 8 5 2 0 4 4 0 0 0 0 4 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 29 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 10 2 6 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 13 4 0 0 0 0 0 4 8 1 3 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 4 1-2. Trends of Financial Indices in Recent Years billion yen 100 ① Net Income and Dividend per Share yen/share 150 Net Income Net Income per Share Dividend per Share 80 60 90 0 0 0 4 5 3 5 10 16.5 18 18 26 60 0 0 13.5 9.5 2.5 30 3 3 0 0 0 0 92F 93F 94F 95F 96F 97F 98F 99F 00F 01F 02F 03F 04F 05F 06F 07F 08F 09F 10F 11F 12F ▲ 20 ▲ 30 ▲ 40 ▲ 60 ▲ 60 ▲ 90 ▲ 80 ▲ 120 billion yen 1400 ③ Consolidated Assets Turnover Operating Revenues Assets Turnover 1200 1000 1.6 ROE ROA 80 20% 40 10% 0 92F93F94F95F96F97F98F99F00F01F02F03F04F05F06F07F08F09F10F11F12F 0.8 600 ▲ 20% ▲ 80 ▲ 30% billion yen 200 ④ Consolidated EV, EBITDA EBITDA 150 EV/EBITDA 0.4 200 0.2 0.0 0 20 0 92F 93F 94F 95F 96F 97F 98F 99F 00F 01F 02F 03F 04F 05F 06F 07F 08F 09F 10F 11F 12F 140 Net Income 120 100 Operating Cash Flow 80 60 40 20 0 ▲ 20 92F 93F 94F 95F 96F 97F 98F 99F 00F 01F 02F 03F 04F 05F 06F 07F 08F 09F 10F 11F 12F ▲ 40 ▲ 60 ▲ 80 billion yen 140 ⑥ Consolidated Interest Coverage Ratio Operating Income 90 0 ▲ 20 ▲ 50 ⑤ Operating Cash Flow 80 40 50 92F 93F 94F 95F 96F 97F 98F 99F 00F 01F 02F 03F 04F 05F 06F 07F 08F 09F 10F 11F 12F billion yen 100 60 100 0.6 400 0% ▲ 10% ▲ 40 1.0 800 40% 30% 1.4 1.2 ② Consolidated ROE, ROA Net Income 120 40 20 billion yen 120 Interest Coverage Ratio 35 30 25 20 15 40 10 5 0 ▲ 10 92F93F94F95F96F97F98F99F00F01F02F03F04F05F06F07F08F09F10F11F12F ▲5 ▲ 10 ▲ 60 ▲ 15 5 1-3. History of Management Plans Nov.1982 Aug.1983 Mar.1984 Apr.1984 Plan name Emergency Plan for Strengthening the Corporate Foundation ("K" Plan) First Stage Emergency Plan for Strengthening the Corporate Foundation ("K" Plan) Second Stage Intermediate-term Operational Improvement Plan (A part of this plan was named New "K" Plan.) Subjects 1st theme: profitability improvement plan 2nd theme: efforts to modernize and increase the efficiency of operational systems 3rd theme: a cost-cutting campaign carried out with the participation of all personnel Reconstruction of system to implement "K"plan, mainly for above 2nd theme Promotion of office automation、Improvement in business procedure, Cost reduction etc Remarks Radical improvement in operational structure was targetted, feared continued simultaneous slump in three sales division and yen rising. (Reference-in June 1983, the Head Office was relocated to current location ) <Hibiya Central Building> 1) Emergency Measures (disposal of uneconomical ships, establishment land-based and marine personnel plan.) Aimed to establish the capability to resume dividend payment. 2) Reinforcement of operational capabilities (development of an internationally competitive fleet, Enhancement of cost control, Promotion of new business) (However, Plaza Accord in 1985 drastically rose yen to 150 yen per one U.S. dollar, 3) Augmentaton of financial measures and the U.S. Shipping Act of 1984 made container freight fall significantly. 4) Modernization and increasing the efficiency of operational organization (streamlining of land-based Our losses were expanded.) operations, reorganization and utilization of an information systems) Mar.1987 5)Promotion of safe vessel navigation and cost reduction Apr.1987 Emergency Ratiolization Plan 1) Disposal of uneconomical ships 2) Make the organization more efficient and streamlined. (inc. spinning off our subsidiaries) 3) Slashing of both of land and sea workforth with intoroduction of a special retirement policy. Almost all targets completed on schedule. <"Emergenvy Employment Measures"(agreed with All Japan Seamen's Union) 4) Improvement and reinforcement of operational capabilities =>Once Operating Income moved into the black F88. 5) Measures against stronger yen Mar.1989 6) Implemantation of measures for cost reduction. While we did not have specific management plan during this period, there was a campaign for imporoving customer satisfaction (named 'One for All, All for One', April 1990 - March 1994), and "Project 20・20", an internal campaign in Containership division around 1991 (targeting at total USD 40 min. profit rise through revenue up by 20 mil. and cost down by 20 mil.) , etc. Dec.1992 Target-10 - Reexamining costs and expenses from every angle - Around Oct.1993 Oct.1993 "K"Line Reengineering Program - Strenghtening international competitiveness through cost-saving and shift as many jobs as possible to overseas (K.R. Program) - Establishment of structrure to respond customers' needs and to ensure stable profit even if faced with Mar.1996 exchangerate rate 100 yen per one U.S. dollar,. Apr.1996 K.R.PhaseⅡ - Realization of the situation to implement continual payment of dividends Unfinished targets in K.R. Program. From non-consolidation to consolidation. Aiming for competetiveness matching - Reconstruction of operation on a consolidated basis by the entire "K"Line group shipping companies in developing Asia. =>In F97 dividend paid after 15 year absense Mar.1998 Apr.1998 New"K"Line Spirit for 21(New K-21) - Standing firm in our basic policy of pursuit of profitability while trying to expand scale of business, and Aiming to make containership division move into the black, which was not achieved in K.R.PhaseII. *In '00, raised the numerical targets continuing stable payment of dividends Positive management plan for the first time in many years. *Completed a year ahead of - To expand shipping-based logistics business globally with customer-oriented attitude, and to aim at a corporate =>Most targets achieved, though 9.11changed conditions at all. Mar.2002 schedule as most targets achieved group which is soild, and fully commited to challenge with courage. Apr.2002 KV-Plan 1. Further enhancing of Company’s overall organization through cost reductions and profitable use of IT, etc. Reconstruction of containership business-"Cost Slash 300" 2. Reinforcement of globalization firmly based on regional communities and pursuit of business synergy among business sectors. (Total 30 bln. yen cost reduction plan: 15 bln. is from deployment of larger ships) 3. Initiate stronger efforts to implement logistics business. In F03 (ends Mar. '04) most of final targets inc. numerical ones were atatined a year ahead of schedule. 4. Persuit of technical innovations in marine transport, perfection of safety in navigation and cargo operations, =>"K"Line Vision 2008 *Completed a year ahead of and further contribution to environmental preservation. Mar.2004 schedule as most targets achieved 5. Strengthening of corporate governance aiming at more transparency and greater effectiveness in management. Apr.2004 "K"LINE Vision 2008 1.Ensuring a stable profitability structure through reinforcing our business base Set a vision for F08, to regard the period from now to F09, our 90th anniversary, as a runway. 2.Creation of a high-level, refined and more matured culture of the "K" Line Group with materialization of As profit targets, set F04, 05 estimation & F08 vision -Sustainable Growth and Establishment of a Stable Profitability Structuredreams and upgrading of the "K" Line Brand Fulfilled most final numerical goals in F05/fuel price hike=>2008+ Mar.2006 (Completed as most targets achieved) 3.Reinforcement of corporate governance and response to risk management + Apr.2006 "K"LINE Vision 2008 -Measures to support systematic expansion of business scale (new target) F06 targets NOT achieved due to container freight drop -Sustainable Growth and Establish- Response to changes in business enviroments (new target) F07 resuts exceeded most targets for F08 in the plan due to dry bulk market hike and ment of a Stable Profitability Structurecontainership freigt restoration, & conditions change => "K"Line Vision 100 Mar.2008 (Completed as most targets achieved) Apr.2008 "K"Line Vision 100 1. Activities to promote environmental protection Themes: Synergy for All 2. Stable safety ship operation administration structure The plan based on what we will be like in 2019 when we celebrate our 100th anniversary. 3. Borderless management through the best and strongest organization Mar.2012 and Sustainable Growth + 4. Strategic investment and proper allocation of management resources Detailed targets are set for 4years fom 2008F to 2011F 5. Improvement of corporate value and complete risk management Image for 2019 (In addition to above 5 basic themes, new 3 missions as follows) Jan.2010 "K"Line Vision 100 KV2010 ○Basic Strategies 1. FY2010:move into the black and early resumption of dividends Themes: Synergy for All 1. Strengthening make up of containership business Mar.2013 + and Sustainable Growth(Continue) 2. Expansion of stable earnings base and sustainable growth 2. Restructuring business portfolio Mid of 2010's 3. Improvement and strengthening of financial make up 3. Adaptation to business environment fluctuations and strengthening of financial base (In addition to above 5 basic themes in the KV 100) Apr. 2011 "K"Line Vision 100 KV2010 Financial results in FY 2010 exceeded initial plans. However, there may be effects from the recent earthquake -New Challenges 1. Expansion of a stable earnings base and sustainable growth and there are still many uncertain elements. In response to changes in market structures including energy supply Mar.2014+ 2. Strategic investment in response to changes in market structures and increase in demand and demand and the emergence of developing countries, a new medium-term management plan based on the - Investment in creation of a flexible fleet and in new businesses “K” LINE Vision 100 was adopted to expand stable earning and achieve sustainable growth. Mid of 2010's - Ongoing measures for improvement and strengthening of financial makeup Apr. 2012 "K"Line Vision 100 KV2010 (In addition to above 5 basic themes in the KV 100) For FY 2011, the containership and dry bulk markets have deteriorated markedly, and the Great East Japan Earthquake, the yen Bridge to the Future appreciation, and rising fuel oil prices resulted in the Company reporting a net loss. In response to these developments, the 1. Generate ordinary income in FY2012 Mar.2015+ "K" Line Group adopted a newly reformed medium-term management plan with three priority tasks. By means of structural 2. Build a stable earnings structure Mid of 2010's reform, we aim to increase stable profit, and change into constitution strong enough not to be over affected by market flactuation. 3. Reinforce financial standing 6 1-4. Effort for Structural Reform and Business Scale Expansion ① No. of Japanese Seafarer/"K"Line Employee (No. of Consolidated Group Employee, Non-Consolidated Employee) 8,000 7,000 (Japanese Seafarer (Hundred)/Exchange Rate) 800 Consolidated Group Employee Japanese Seafarer for Overseas Shipping (Non-Consolidated) Employee on Sea Exchange Rate (\/$) (Non-Consolidated) Employee on Land 700 6,000 600 5,000 500 4,000 400 3,000 300 2,000 200 1,000 100 0 0 (Operating Revenues (Bln. Yen)/Operating Fleet (No. of Vessels, 100,000 Tons)) 1,300 1,100 (Non-Consol) Operating Revenues (Consol) Ordinary Income (Consol) No. of Operating Vessels ② Our Fleet-Scale, Operating Revenues, Ordinary Income (Consol) Operating Revenues (Non-Consol) Operating Fleet (Tons) (Consol) Operating Fleet (Tons) (Non-Consol) Ordinary Income (Non-Consol) No. of Operating Vessels (Ordinary Income(Bln. Yen)) 130 110 900 90 700 70 500 50 300 30 100 10 (100) ▲ 10 (300) ▲ 30 (500) ▲ 50 (700) ▲ 70 7 1-5. Current Business Composition ① Operating Revenues, Ordinary Income <Division-wise/Segment-wise> segement change Business Division FY2005 FY2006 FY2007 FY2008 FY2009 FY2009 Containership Operating Revenues 451.4 503.5 599.8 530.1 364.0 358.5 Business Ordinary Income 30.5 ▲ 7.8 4.7 ▲ 37.3 ▲ 67.0 ▲ 65.6 468.4 66.0 Bulk Shipping Operating Revenues Business Ordinary Income Offshore Energy Operating Revenues E&P Support & Ordinary Income Heavy Lifter Operating Revenues Ordinary Income Others Adjustment Total ※ ※ ※ ※ Operating Revenues Ordinary Income Operating Revenues Ordinary Income 489.4 58.1 940.8 88.6 113.6 5.7 1,085.5 63.9 615.8 115.3 115.4 5.9 1,331.0 125.9 609.1 92.9 105.2 4.4 1,244.3 60.0 394.8 ▲ 2.9 393.1 1.1 segement change FY2010 445.0 29.0 FY2011 395.5 ▲ 41.8 447.1 17.0 463.5 ▲ 8.6 (unit: billion yen) FY2011 FY2012 463.0 552.8 ▲ 39.7 6.6 443.1 ▲ 0.0 20.4 ▲ 8.6 502.6 24.1 35.7 ▲ 2.4 79.3 3.7 86.4 2.3 93.0 4.7 113.3 6.6 45.8 4.1 43.7 6.6 838.0 ▲ 66.3 - ▲ 4.1 838.0 ▲ 66.3 - ▲ 3.4 985.1 47.4 - ▲ 5.2 972.3 ▲ 49.0 - ▲ 4.7 972.3 ▲ 49.0 - ▲ 6.3 1,134.8 28.6 For FY2005, we had disclosed our total results in two 'division's: Containership Business and Others ~FY 2009, we disclosed in three divisions: 'Containership Business' 'Other Marine Business' and 'Others' 'Bulk Shipping Business' in new categories introduced from FY2010 is almost same as 'Other Marine Business' in the previous categories From FY2012, 'Offshore Energy E & P Support & Heavy Lifter' division is carved out from the former 'Bulk Shipping Businesss 'division, and logistics business included in the 'Others' is transfered to 'Containership Business'. Marine Transportation Logistics/Harbour Other Transportation Containership Business Bulk Shipping Business Offshore Energy E&P Support & Heavy Lifter ※New Segment (Starting from FY 12 1Q disclosure) Containership Business: containership , port , logistics businesses Bulk Shipping Business: dry bulk, PCC, LNG, oil tanker, coastal & ferry (operated by Kawasaki Kinkai Kisen) businesses Offshore Energy E&P Support & Heavy Lifter: marine energy resorce development, offshore support, heavy lifter businesses Others: ship management, inter-group businesses, etc. Adjustment (no change): ship management business, administration costs not to be distributed to each segement, etc. 【FY2012 Consolidated Operating Revenues】 ② Fleet Composition and Division/Segment-wise Revenues 1,200 Offshore Energy E&P Support & Heavy Lifter 1,000 Fleet Composition 800 Total 1134.8 bln. yen Others Offshore Energy E&P Support & Heavy Lifter, 35.7 Bulk Shipping Business , 502.6 Bulk Shipping 600 Business 400 200 Containe rship Business , 552.8 Containership Business 0 8 2. Comparison to Major Shipping Companies <2-1. Fleet-scale Ranking> ① Major Container Carriers 1,000 (TEU) 0 500 APM-Maersk MSC (Mediterranean Shg C) CMA CGM Group Evergreen Line COSCO Container L. Hapag-Lloyd APL Hanjin Shipping CSCL MOL OOCL Hamburg Süd Group NYK Line Yang Ming Marine Transport Corp. PIL (Pacific Int. Line) K Line Hyundai M.M. Zim 1,000 1,500 2,000 2,500 3,000 Operating 3,500 Orderbook Alliance-wise Operating and Newbuilding Delivery 1,000(TEU) APM-Maersk MSC (Mediterranean… CKYH Green GA TNWA CMA CGM Group Evergreen Line Operating On Order 1,000 2,000 3,000 ② Containership Asia-N.America Loading Volume Top 15 Carriers (Year 2012) Maersk Evergreen Hanjin APL(NOL) MSC CMA-CGM COSCO Hyundai M.M K-Line Yang Ming China Shipping OOCL NYK MOL Hapag-Lloyd Top 18 Container Carriers Ranked by Operating Capacity (TEU) Rank* Operator Operating Orderbook 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 (1) (2) (3) (5) (4) (6) (9) (8) (7) (10) (11) (13) (12) (16) (15) (17) 17 (14) 18 (18) APM-Maersk 2,615,937 MSC (Mediterranean Shg C) 2,340,801 CMA CGM Group 1,494,347 Evergreen Line 818,417 COSCO Container L. 767,735 Hapag-Lloyd 702,210 APL 626,861 Hanjin Shipping 623,594 CSCL 601,753 MOL 539,426 OOCL 457,677 Hamburg Süd Group 453,659 NYK Line 433,503 Yang Ming Marine Transport C 382,489 PIL (Pacific Int. Line) 370,871 K Line 353,448 Hyundai M.M. 333,900 Zim 330,043 372,281 177,534 92,890 300,273 97,328 52,676 124,800 89,000 176,738 104,600 88,384 165,458 26,416 111,250 68,512 69,350 65,500 85,408 Rank 1 (1) 2 (2) 3 (3) 4 (4) 5 (5) 6 (6) 7 (7) Operating Alliance APM-Maersk 2,615,937 MSC (Mediterranean Shg C) 2,340,801 CKYH Green 2,127,266 GA 1,593,390 TNWA 1,500,187 CMA CGM Group 1,494,347 Evergreen Line 818,417 On Order 372,281 177,534 366,928 167,476 294,900 92,890 300,273 *( ) is ranking for previous year Source : http://www.alphaliner.com/top100/index.php as of June 2013 0 Total 2,988,218 2,518,335 1,587,237 1,118,690 865,063 754,886 751,661 712,594 778,491 644,026 546,061 619,117 459,919 493,739 439,383 422,798 399,400 415,451 Prev. Total 3,040,603 2,508,819 1,416,459 1,115,668 887,703 774,291 854,453 759,216 687,701 594,415 562,193 590,305 454,619 425,450 367,437 370,589 447,560 476,439 Total Prev. Total 3,040,603 2,988,218 2,508,819 2,518,335 2,442,958 2,494,194 1,791,103 1,760,866 1,896,428 1,795,087 1,416,459 1,587,237 1,115,668 1,118,690 300 600 900 1,000TEU 1,200 1,500 YoY ▲ 1.7% 0.4% 12.1% 0.3% ▲ 2.6% ▲ 2.5% ▲ 12.0% ▲ 6.1% 13.2% 8.3% ▲ 2.9% 4.9% 1.2% 16.1% 19.6% 14.1% ▲ 10.8% ▲ 12.8% YoY ▲ 1.7% 0.4% 2.1% ▲ 1.7% ▲ 5.3% 12.1% 0.3% Rank * 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 (1) (2) (4) (3) (5) (6) (8) (7) (10) (9) (12) (11) (13) (14) (15) Rank 1 (1) 2 (2) 3 (3) 4 (4) 5 (5) Operator Maersk Evergreen Hanjin APL(NOL) MSC CMA-CGM COSCO Hyundai M.M K-Line Yang Ming China Shipping OOCL NYK MOL Hapag-Lloyd Alliance CKYH (inc. "K"Line) TNW GA Maersk Evergreen Cargo Loaded (Unit:1,000TEU) 1,455 1,228 1,058 1,038 898 863 819 769 732 691 642 615 568 545 527 Cargo 3,299 2,352 1,709 1,455 1,228 *( ) is ranking for previous year Source: Japan Maritime Center (as of June 2013) 9 2. Comparison to Major Shipping Companies <2-1. Fleet-scale Ranking> ③ Historical Top 20 Container Carriers Ranked by Operating Full Containership Capacity (From 1983, biyearly) Rank '83 1 HAPAG 2 SEA-LAND 3 MAERSK 4 OCL 5 NYK 6 OOCL 7 APL 8 NEDLLOYD 9 EVERGREEN 10 UASC 11 MOL 12 USL 13 YANGMING 14 CGM 15 ZIM 16 "K"LINE 17 BALTIC 18 W.WILHELMSEN 19 NOL 20 COSCO (Area-wise Number of U.S.A 3 Europe 7 Japan 3 Asia* 5 Others 2 '85 '87 '89 '91 '93 '95 '97 '99 '01 '03 '05 '07 '09 '11 '13 EVERGREEN USL MAERSK SEA-LAND HAPAG OCL NYK OOCL "K"LINE APL MOL COSCO NEDLLOYD UASC CGM ZIM YANGMING W.WILHELMSEN BALTIC NOL EVERGREEN MAERSK NYK APL YANGMING SEA-LAND HAPAG OOCL P&OCL "K"LINE MOL COSCO NEDLLOYD ZIM HANJIN CGM UASC NOL BSC W.WILHELMSEN EVERGREEN MAERSK SEA-LAND APL NYK COSCO OOCL HAPAG "K"LINE YANGMING HANJIN MOL P&OCL NEDLLOYD ZIM NOL CGM UASC W.WILHELMSEN BSC EVERGREEN MAERSK SEA-LAND NYK COSCO APL MOL OOCL HAPAG HANJIN "K"LINE YANGMING P&OCL NOL ZIM SCANDUTCH UASC NEDLLOYD CHO YANG CGM MAERSK EVERGREEN SEA-LAND NYK COSCO P&OCL HANJIN "K"LINE NEDLLOYD HAPAG APL YANGMING MOL NOL OOCL ZIM HYUNDAI UASC CGM CHO YANG MAERSK SEA-LAND EVERGREEN COSCO NYK P&OCL NEDLLOYD HANJIN MOL APL HAPAG DSR-SENATOR "K"LINE OOCL YANGMING NOL HMM ZIM CMA MSC MAERSK SEA-LAND P&ON EVERGREEN COSCO HANJIN NOL/APL MSC NYK HMM MOL ZIM YMTC OOCL "K"LINE HL DSR-SENATOR CMA WAN HAI CONTSIP MAERSK/SL EVERGREEN P&ON HANJIN/SEN MSC COSCO NOL(APL) NYK/TSK CMA/CGM CP ZIM MOL "K"LINE HMM OOCL YMTC HL UASC CSAV CHO YANG MAERSK P&ON EVERGREEN HANJIN MSC APL(NOL) COSCO CP SHIPS NYK CMA CGM MOL OOCL "K"LINE ZIM HL HMM UASC YANGMING CSCL H-SUD MAERSK MSC P&O/FARREL EVERGREEN HANJIN/SEN COSCO APL(NOL) CMA CGM/ANL "K"LINE NYK CP SHIPS MOL ZIM OOCL HAPAG YANGMING CSCL HMM H-SUD CSAV MAERSK MSC EVERGREEN CMA CGM/ANL HAPAG HANJIN/SEN COSCO CSCL APL(NOL) NYK MOL OOCL CSAV "K"LINE ZIM YANGMING H-SUD HMM PIL WAN HAI LINES MAERSK MSC CMA CGM EVERGREEN HAPAG CSCL COSCO NYK APL(NOL) HANJIN OOCL "K"LINE MOL ZIM YANGMING CSAV H-SUD HMM PIL WAN HAI LINES MAERSK MSC CMA CGM COSCO APL HANJIN EVERGREEN HAPAG CSCL NYK ZIM "K"LINE MOL OOCL YANGMING H-SUD CSAV HMM PIL UASC MAERSK MSC CMA CGM COSCO HAPAG EVERGREEN APL CSAV HANJIN CSCL MOL OOCL NYK H-SUD YANGMING ZIM "K"LINE HMM PIL UASC MAERSK MSC CMA CGM EVERGREEN COSCO HAPAG APL HANJIN CSCL MOL OOCL H-SUD NYK YANGMING PIL "K"LINE HMM ZIM UASC CSAV Companies) '84 US Shipping Act 1984 3 7 3 5 2 2 7 3 6 2 '86 US Line busted '86 HANJIN ranked in '86 'Emergency Employment Measure' *Excluding Japan 2 7 3 6 2 2 6 3 7 2 '88 Showa Line withdrew'91 NYK acquired NLS*** (Japanese 4=>3) '88 NLS established (Japanese 6=>4) '88 'Kaizoshin** Asia-N.America route WG's report issued 2 5 3 8 2 '92 HYUNDAI ranked in 1. Top 20 as of '83: U.S.A.: 3, Europe: 7, Japan: 3 , Asia (other than Japan) : 5, Others 2 '07:U.S.A.: 0, Europe: 5, Japan: 3, Asia (other than Japan): 10, Others: 2 U.S. carriers went away, and Asian shipping companies increased In '09, due to global economic crisis, larger movements among middle-ranking companies. 2. The number of European operators reduced, but through M&As after '95, business scale of each was enlarged. 3. No. of Japanese Containership Operators: until '87 6 '88 4 '91 3 *** Joint Venture for containership business spun out of 'Yamashita Shinnihon' and 'Japan Line'. Trade Share Breakdown by Carrier/Alliance (Data:Alphaliner) FE-Europe Capacity Share by Carrier/Alliance FE-North America Capacity Share by Carrier/Alliance 2 7 3 7 1 1 6 3 9 1 '96 'CKYH' alliance formed '96 P&O and Nedlloyd merged '97 NOL acquired APL '97 HANJIN acquired majority 0 5 3 8 4 0 6 3 8 3 '99 MAERSK acquired'00 China Shipping ranked in SEALAND (Americans went away) 0 6 3 8 2 0 5 3 10 2 0 5 3 10 2 '04 MAERSK acquired P&ON '05 HAPAG acquired CP SHIPS 0 5 3 9 3 0 5 3 9 3 0 5 3 9 3 '11 Restructuring and consolidation of Alliance GA+TNWA⇒G6 MSC+CMA-CGM CKYH+EVERGREEN 4. Time-series Major Events '84 U.S. Shipping Act 1984 effective '85 Plaza Accord '86 US Line busted. (No. of American carriers : 3=>2) 'Emergency Employment Measure' introduced '88 Kaizoshin** Asia-N.America route Working Group's report issued Showa Line withdrew, and NLS established (No. of Japanese carriers: 6=>4) '91 NYK acquired NLS*** (No. of Japanese carriers: 4=>3) '96 P&O and NEDLLOYD merged. 'P&O NEDLLOYD' (P&ON) formed. '97 NOL acquired APL (No. of American carriers : 2=>1) '99 MEARSK acquired SEALAND (American carriers disappeared) '04 MAERSK acquired P&O N '05 Hapag Lloyd acquired CP Ship '08 World Economic Crisis ('Lehman Shock' in September) ** Council for Rationalization of Shipping and Shipbuilding Industries Data: Containerisation International Yearbook etc. 10 2-1. Fleet-scale Ranking ④ Transition of Alliance for Containership Business 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2004 2009 2010 Maersk Sea-Land Maersk Sea-Land Maersk Sea-Land Maersk-SL Maersk-SL Maersk-SL Maersk-SL Maersk-SL Maersk(P&ONL) Maersk Maersk Maersk Maersk Maersk CMA CMA CMA Norasia CMA Norasia CMA-CGM CMA-CGM CMA-CGM CMA-CGM CMA-CGM CMA-CGM CMA-CGM CMA-CGM CMA-CGM CMA-CGM MSC Norasia HMM MSC Norasia MSC MSC MSC MSC MSC MSC MSC MSC MSC MSC MSC MSC COSCO K-Line Yangming COSCO K-Line Yangming COSCO K-Line Yangming COSCO K-Line Yangming COSCO K-Line Yangming COSCO K-Line Yangming Hanjin-Senator COSCO K-Line Yangming Hanjin-Senator COSCO K-Line Yangming Hanjin-Senator COSCO K-Line Yangming Hanjin-Senator COSCO K-Line Yangming Hanjin COSCO K-Line Yangming Hanjin COSCO K-Line Yangming Hanjin COSCO K-Line Yangming Hanjin Evergreen LT Evergreen LT Evergreen/LT Evergreen/LT Evergreen/LT Evergreen/LT Evergreen/LT Evergreen/LT Evergreen/IM Evergreen Evergreen Evergreen Evergreen CSCL CSCL CSCL CSCL CSCL CSCL CSCL CSCL CSCL CSCL NYK Hapag-Lloyd P&ONL OOCL MISC NYK Hapag-Lloyd P&ONL OOCL MISC NYK Hapag-Lloyd P&ONL OOCL MISC NYK Hapag-Lloyd P&ONL OOCL MISC (2003) 2005 2006 (2007-8) 2011 (2012) HMM COSCO K-Line Yangming Evergreen LT NYK Hapag-Lloyd NOL P&O 2014 CKYH NYK Hapag-Lloyd NOL P&ONL NYK Hapag-Lloyd P&ONL OOCL MISC NYK Hapag-Lloyd P&ONL OOCL MISC CP Ships(Cast) CP Ships(Lykes,CCP Ships(Ivaran, CP Ships CP Ships (TMM,OC CP Ships CP Ships (Italia Line CP Ships MOL APL Nedlloyd OOCL MISC MOL APL (P&ONL) OOCL MISC MOL APL(NOL) HMM MOL APL(NOL) HMM MOL APL(NOL) HMM MOL APL(NOL) HMM CSAV CSAV CSAV CSAV CSAV(Norasia) CSAV(Norasia) CSAV(Norasia) DSR-Senator Hanjin Choyang DSR-Senator Hanjin Choyang UASC Hanjin-Senator Hanjin-Senator Hanjin-Senator Hanjin-Senator Choyang Choyang Choyang UASC UASC UASC UASC UASC Choyang bankruptcy UASC 2013 Base leading to present alliances formed; Nedloyd⇒P&O, NOL⇒APL, HJ⇒DSR-Snator Maersk⇒Sealand, CMA⇒CGM, EMC⇒Lloyd Triestino, -a series of M&A MOL APL(NOL) HMM Existing alliances stabilized, new players emerging, CSAV=>Norasia (merged) Allian c e CKYH CKYH Green Carrie r MISC MISC NYK Hapag-Lloyd(CP S Hapag-Lloyd OOCL OOCL MISC MISC NYK Hapag-Lloyd OOCL MISC NYK Hapag-Lloyd OOCL NYK Hapag-Lloyd OOCL MOL APL(NOL) HMM MOL APL(NOL) HMM MOL APL(NOL) HMM MOL APL(NOL) HMM NYK NYK Hapag-Lloyd OOCL Grand Alliance The New World Alliance MOL APL(NOL) HMM MOL APL(NOL) HMM MOL APL(NOL) HMM CSAV(Norasia) CSAV(Norasia) CSAV(Norasia) CSAV(Norasia) CSAV(Norasia) CSAV(Norasia) CSAV(Norasia) UASC UASC UASC UASC Maersk ⇒ P&O Nedlloyd acquired Start-up new alliance (CKY+ Hanjin) GA TNWA Grand Alliance The New World Alliance COSCO NYK MOL " K" Lin e Hapag Lloyd APL(NOL) Yan gmin g OOCL Hyunday Han jin G6 GA + TNWA UASC Lloyd Triestino changed the name to Italia Marittima, and then integrated into Evergreen CMA/ CG P3 M& MSC CMA/CGM Mae rsk MSC CMA/ CGM MSC UASC MISC stated withdrawal from GA in May.2009 Hapaq-Lloyd was sold to Hamburg Business Group. Senator suspended it's business in Feb.2009 UASC Asia-Europe services, 4 major groups were formed beyond the boundaries of existing alliances. (indicated as above ) June 2012 MISC ceased containership business April 2014 New Alliance " P3 Network" to be launched by 3 major liners (under agreement of European Commision) 11 2-1. Fleet-scale Ranking 100,000DWT ⑤ Cape-size Bulker Fleet (Data: Clarkson) No. of Vessels ⑥ Panamax Bulker Fleet (Data: Clarkson) 100,000DWT 112.7 Nippon Yusen Kaisha 59 98.8 89.6 77.2 44 57.7 Hanjin Shpg Co. 34 83.6 Vale 57.3 29 73.7 Berge Bulk Ltd. 28 5.9 STX Pan Ocean 0 26 20 40 60 80 48 26.0 31 Excel Maritime Carr. 22.4 Safe Bulkers Inc. 22.1 100 120 29 26 18.1 Dryships Inc. 29 Zodiac Maritime Agy. 68 40.1 Mitsui O.S.K. Lines 45 Angelicoussis Group 58.2 K-Line 51 COSCO Group 94 Nippon Yusen Kaisha 55 Mitsui O.S.K. Lines 67.7 COSCO Group 107.1 K-Line China Shipping Group 17.0 Diana Shipping Inc. 17.3 Fujian Guohang Group 15.1 24 23 22 21 0 20 40 60 80 Clarkson July 2013 ⑦ Handymax Bulker Fleet (Data: Clarkson) 100,000DWT ⑧Dry Bulker (All Types) Fleet (Data: Clarkson) No. of Vessels Nippon Yusen Kaisha 33.3 China Shipping Group K-Line 25.4 Eagle Bulk Shpg. 25.1 Gearbulk Ltd. 20.6 Mitsui O.S.K. Lines 19.8 Sinotrans & CSC 17.2 Jinhui Shpg. & Trans 18.2 0 20 160 174.9 157 K-Line 46 154.1 153 Mitsui O.S.K. Lines 46 41 37 Sinotrans & CSC 54.5 Daiichi Chuo 51.5 STX Pan Ocean 34 Shoei Kisen K.K. 33 14.0 27 Soroush Sarzamin 109.2 China Shipping Group 62 Enterprises Shpg. 40 60 80 100 Clarkson July 2013 120 298 224.4 241 Nippon Yusen Kaisha 85 100,000DWT 227.1 COSCO Group 110 44.7 100 Clarkson July 2013 54.8 COSCO Group No. of Vessels 0 98 73 84.6 72 68.0 68 59.4 67 100 200 300 Clarkson July 2013 12 2-1. Fleet-scale Ranking 1,000 Cars ⑨ PCTC Operated Nippon Yusen Kaisha ⑩ LNG Fleet (Managed) No. of Vessels 599.9 104 475.8 Mitsui O.S.K. Lines 413.1 47 12.9 45 9.1 Nippon Yusen Kaisha 32 79 497.5 Eukor 7.7 Teekay Corporation 27 78 400.1 Wallenius Wilhelmsen Logistics 7.7 MISC 61 252.6 Hyundai Glovis 27 4.6 Gaslog 16 47 281.4 Leif Hoegh & Co. 4.0 BW Gas 14 46 177.4 Grimaldi 3.7 "K" Line 45 102.4 NMCC 11 Exmar 42.9 0 200 300 400 500 600 10 2.6 Golar 100 9 0 700 13 2.9 19 UECC 10 20 No. of Heavy500㌧~積み以上の重量 Lifters with capacity of over 500 ton物船隻数 BBC 30 0 SAL* 10 6 2 Hanza Heavy 7 Intermarine 8 15 0 Big Lift 12 1 Combi Lift 13 0 Jumbo 4 Ricjners No. of Vessels (Over 1,000 ton) 8 No. of Vessels (Over 2,000 ton) 10 0 0 No. of Vessels (Over 500 ton) 5 *SAL is our 100% subsidiary 10 15 20 25 30 35 Reserched by "K"Line in Oct 2012 30 40 50 Reserched by "K"Line in March 2013 Hesnes The World Car Carrier Fleet, July 2013 ⑪ Heavy Lifter Owned No. of Vessels Mitsui O.S.K. Lines 83 K-Line Share(%) 13.4 STASCO (Shell Group) 10,000 TEU ⑫ Containership Fleet APM-Maersk Mediterranean Shg… CMA CGM Group Evergreen Line COSCO Container L. Hapag-Lloyd APL Hanjin Shipping CSCL MOL OOCL Hamburg Süd Group NYK Line Yang Ming Marine… PIL (Pacific Int. Line) K Line Hyundai M.M. Zim 0 261.6 234.1 593 480 149.4 81.8 206 76.8 167 70.2 150 62.7 124 62.4 115 60.2 142 53.9 111 45.8 45.4 92 109 43.4 100 38.2 37.1 88 173 35.3 33.4 69 55 33.0 87 100 200 No. of Vessels 428 300 400 500 600 700 Clarkson July 2013 13 3. World Market <3-1.Fleet Scale by Vessel-type / Age> Min/Max* Fleet Increase Schedule ① Dry Bulk Carriers by Vessel-type/Age Cape (120,000dwt over) 1,800 No. of Dry Bulk Cariers ( Mini-Cape (80-120,000dwt) age 30- number of vessels as of last year) age 25-29 age 20-24 Capesize age 15-19 age 25- min age 10-14 age 20-25 age 5-9 Mini Cape age 15-19 age 0-4 Panamax 1,500 1500 1,200 1200 900 900 600 600 300 300 age 25- max 2013 delivery age 10-14 2014 delivery age 5-9 2015 delivery age 0-4 2016 delivery Handymax 0 0 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2016 Handysize Handysize 0 500 1,000 1,500 2,000 2,500 3,000 3,500 (number 4,000 of vessels ) Clarkson as of July 2013 **Min/Max are set as follows (ex. Handy/Tankers): - max: all ships over age 25 are in operation continuously. - min: all ships are scrapped at the age of 25. Those are same for containership and PCC fleet in following pages. For Handy-size vessels, we assume age 30 or over as borderline. Actually, average life is going up around 30, even in case of dry bulkers. (see below) For tankers 1800 please refer to the page 15. Scrapped Dry Bulkers No. of Vessels 800 600 400 200 0 Age Handymax 4,000 Panamax (-80,000dwt) 3,000 3,500 2,500 3,000 1500 10,000Gross Tonnage No./10,000tons 3,500 2,000 2,500 Age 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 - 1200 2,000 900 1,500 1,000 600 1,000 300 500 500 0 0 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Data: The Japanese Shipowners' Association 1,500 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 0 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 14 3. World Market <3-1.Fleet Scale by Vessel-type / Age> 1,000cars No. of Vessels PCC<All Types> (No. of Vessels) ② PCC by Vessel-type/Age 1,000 No. of PCC Carriers Unclassified age 25- 6000- cars 800 age25-max age 20-24 age 15-19 age 5-9 age 0-4 600 age 20-24 age 15-19 2014 delivery 2,000 age 10-14 400 age 5-9 2013 delivery 3000-4500 cars 3,000 age 25- min age 10-14 4500-6000 cars PCC<All Types> (units) 4,000 age 0-4 200 1,000 2015 delivery 2016 delivery -3000 cars 0 0 2011 0 100 200 300 2012 400(No. of Vessels) 2013 2014 2011 2015 VLCC 1,000 Clarkson as of July 2013 2012 2013 2014 2015 AFRAMAX 1000 age 25- max 800 age 25- min ③ Oil Tankers by Vessel-type/Age No. of Oil/Gas Cariers age 30- age 20-25 600 VLCC Aframax LR II age 20-24 No. age 10-14 400 age 5-9 200 age 0-4 200 age 5-9 age 0-4 0 2012 2013 delivery No. 2013 2014 delivery 2015 delivery LNG 400 age 15-19 age 10-14 600 age 15-19 age 25- No. 800 2014 2015 2016 LRII 300 2016 delivery No. 2017 delivery 0 200 400 600 800 ※Min. case for LNG Carriers: Scrapperd at the age of 30. 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 LNG 500 400 300 200 (No. of 1,000 Vessels) 0 200 100 100 Clarkson as of July 2013 (AFRAmax includes product carriers) 0 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 0 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 15 3. World Market <3-1.Fleet Scale by Vessel-type/Age> ④ Containerships by Vessel-type/Age Min/Max* Fleet Increase Schedule (Estimated) No. of Vessels 6,000 age 30- Containerships (No. of Vessels) age 20-24 10,000TEU over age 30- min age 10-14 age 25-29 5,000 age 20-24 age 0-4 age 15-19 2012 delivery age 10-14 2013 delivery 4,000 2015 delivery 20,000 18,000 16,000 14,000 age 5-9 age 0-4 2014 delivery Panamax 3,000- age 30- max age 15-19 age 5-9 post panamax-9,999 Containerships <All Types> (No. of Vessels) (1,000 TEU) Containerships <All Types>(Capacity) 22,000 3,000 12,000 10,000 2016ー delivery 8,000 2,000 6,000 1,000-2,999 4,000 1,000 2,000 -1,000 TEU type 0 0 (No. of Vessels) 0 500 1,000 1,500 2,000 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2,500 Clarkson as of July 2013 1,000TEU/Vessel 25,000 20,000 World Continership Increase (Results and Forecasts) No. of Vesses Capacity(TEU) Capacity Increase Ratio 25% 20% 15% 15,000 10% (1,000 TEU) 1,600 Laid-up Containerships 1,400 TEU 1,200 5% 5,000 0% 700 No of Vessels 600 500 1,000 400 800 300 600 10,000 (No. of Vessels) 400 200 200 100 0 0 -5% 0 '88 '89 '90 '91 '92 '93 '94 '95 '96 '97 '98 '99 '00 '01 '02 '03 '04 '05 '06 '07 '08 '09 '10 '11 '12 '13 '14 '15 '16 Alphaliner Report 2013 July Source: AXS Marine (as of July 2013) 16 3-2. Trend of Newbuildings ① Ship Price as of Placing Order (Dry Bulkers, Tankers) VLCC Cape Handy 150 ③ World Newbuilding Orders Mil. Gross Ton 180 180 Japan Aframax Panamax Korea China World Total 150 120 120 90 90 60 60 30 30 0 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 0 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 <Data: HIS ex. Lloyd's Register compiled by The Shipbuilder's Association of Japan March 2013> Year Year <Data: Clarkson, as of July 2013> Mil. Gross Ton 400 ② Dry Bulker & Tanker Market $240,000 VLCC Cape Handy $200,000 350 Afra Panamax ④ World Newbuilding Work in Progress Japan Korea China World Total 300 250 $160,000 200 $120,000 150 $80,000 100 50 $40,000 0 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 $0 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 <Data: Clarkson, as of July 2013> Mil. Gross Ton 1,000 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 ⑥ World Total Existing Tonnage Oil Tanker Bulk Carrier Others 800 600 400 200 0 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 Year <Data: HIS ex. Lloyd's Register compiled by The Shipbuilder's Association of Japan March 2013> 13 <Data: HIS ex. Lloyd's Register compiled by The Shipbuilder's Association of Japan March 2013> As of Year-end ⑤ World Newbuilding Delivery Mil. Gross Ton 120 110 Japan Korea China World Total 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 <Data: HIS ex. Lloyd's Register compiled by The Shipbuilder's Association of Japan March 2013> Year 17 3-2. Trend of Newbuildings No. of Ships /10,000GRT No. of Ships ⑧ Oil Tanker Scrap 10,000GRT Age 800 600 400 200 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 0 Age No. of Ships /10,000GRT No. of Ships 10,000GRT Age 40 1000 35 800 30 25 600 20 15 400 10 200 5 0 $600 Age 35 $500 Tankers Bulk Carriers $400 30 25 $300 20 $200 15 10 5 $100 $0 0 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 ⑦ Dry Bulker Scrap ⑨Scrap Metal Prices ('95-13) Data: The Japanese Shipowners' Association 「Kaiun Tokei Youran (2012)」 Number of Ships ⑩ Scrap History by Vessel-type 1000 Bulk Carrier 900 800 500 1975 Reopen Suez Canal 1978 Oil Crisis LNG Carrier 1997 Asian Currency Crisis 400 300 Tanker Containership PCC 1985 Plaza Agreement 700 600 Clarkson, as of July 13 1973 4th Middle East War 2001 Sept 11 2003 Iraq War 2008 Financial Crisis 1990 Gulf War 200 100 0 Clarkson, as of July 13 18 3-3. Global Cargo Movements, Market ① Global Cargo Movements (million tonnes) Clakson, as of July 2013 $/day 180,000 140,000 ③ Tanker Market (Spot) 2,500 VLCC 2,000 250,000 Cape-size Panamax Handy-max 200,000 ④CHINA CONTAINERIZED FREIGHT INDEX (CCFI) HISTORY AFRA max 1,500 120,000 100,000 150,000 1,000 80,000 100,000 60,000 500 CCFI 40,000 50,000 20,000 Clakson, as of July 13 Year 0 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 0 Clakson, as of July 13 Year 0 EUR MED USWC USEC 06-01 06-04 06-07 06-10 07-01 07-04 07-07 07-10 08-01 08-04 08-07 08-10 09-01 09-04 09-07 09-10 10-01 10-04 10-07 10-10 11-01 11-04 11-07 11-10 12-01 12-04 12-07 12-10 13-01 13-04 160,000 $/day ② Dry Bulk Market (1-year Charter) Month 19 ① Key Economic Indicators for North America 3-4. Latest Economic Trends units:1,000 1,200 1,100 1,000 900 800 700 600 500 400 15 (%) US Housing Starts (U.S. Census) JAN FEB MAR MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP 2008 4.9% 4.8% 5.1% 5.0% 5.5% 5.6% 5.8% 6.2% 6.2% 6.6% 6.8% 7.2% 2009 7.7% 8.2% 8.6% 8.9% 9.4% 9.5% 9.4% 9.7% 9.8% 10.1% 10.0% 10.0% 526 2010 9.7% 9.7% 9.7% 9.8% 9.6% 9.5% 9.5% 9.6% 9.6% 9.7% 9.8% 9.4% 689 2011 9.0% 8.9% 8.8% 9.0% 9.1% 9.2% 9.1% 9.1% 9.1% 9.0% 8.6% 8.5% 954 2012 8.3% 8.3% 8.2% 8.1% 8.2% 8.2% 8.3% 8.1% 7.8% 7.9% 7.7% 7.8% 2013 7.9% 7.7% 7.6% 7.5% 7.6% 7.6% 7.4% 7.3% JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC 2008 1,084 1,103 1,005 1,013 973 1,046 923 844 820 777 652 560 2009 490 582 505 478 540 585 594 586 585 534 588 581 2010 615 603 626 687 580 539 550 606 597 539 551 2011 636 518 585 541 549 613 601 571 630 628 685 2012 699 698 654 717 708 760 746 750 872 894 861 2013 910 968 1021 856 914 836 896 10 0 Japan 50.0 Korea 40.0 USA NOV 20.0 India 10.0 China France UK -10 Asia-USA Cargo Increase Ratio (YoY) ISM Non-Manufacturing index DEC 4,000 2,000 80 75 0 65 Ministry of the Commerce of<商務部 China, June 2013 2011年6月> 60 55 0.0 ⑥ Sales of Automobiles 50 -10.0 45 -20.0 40 -30.0 <Data: PIERS, ISM> 35 30 -40.0 2,000 <MOFA 'Key Economic Indicator' 2013> ④ Iron Ore Import 20 Japan 15 Korea 10 USA 5 Russia 0 China 1,000 ton China's Growth Rate Japan's Growth Rate 50,000 40,000 -10 30,000 -15 UK 20,000 India 10,000 <MOFA 'Key Economic Indicator' 2013> Japan Import 60,000 France -25 China Import 70,000 Germany -20 USA EU 18 China USA's Growth Rate* EU 18 GrowthRate* China's Growth Rate* 140% 120% 100% (%) ③ Mining and Industrial Output Growth (%) 25 -5 300% 280% 260% 240% 220% 200% 180% 160% 140% 120% 100% 80% 60% 40% 20% 0% -20% -40% -60% -80% 70 30.0 Russia Germany -5 OCT Cargo Increase Cargo Growth from Asia to US and ISM Non-Manufacturing Index ISM Index Ratio (YoY) Brazil 5 6,000 FEB MAY Export Import Export Growth Ratio Import Growth Ratio 8,000 JAN APR ② Real GDP Growth (%) 12% 11% 10% 9% 8% 7% 6% 5% 4% ⑤ Steel Export and Import of China (1,000 ton) 10,000 US Unemployment Rate *EU5カ国は独仏英伊蘭 0 Ministry of the Commerce of China, June 2013 1,500 80% 60% 120% 100% 80% 60% 40% 20% 0% -20% -40% -60% -80% 40% 1,000 20% 0% 500 -20% -40% 0 -60% *Growth Rate: YoY <The Japan Iron and Steel Federation, Japan Automobile Manufacturers Association.Inc. etc> 20 3-5. Emerging Markets (China) ① Grain Transportation Driven by China (Soy Bean) (mil. ton) Soy Bean Import Quantity by Country 120 (bil. US$) 2,200 ② Trade Trends for China Export 1,800 Import 1,600 80 4.0 350 3.5 (%) ③ Energy Consumption in China 20.0 3.48 2,000 100 (bil.SCE ton*) 400 Profit of Trade 1,400 300 3.0 250 2.5 200 2.0 150 1.5 Energy Consumption 15.0 Growth Rate (YoY) 10.0 1,200 60 5.0 1,000 40 800 600 20 0.0 100 1.0 0.77 50 0.5 0 0.0 400 0 1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 Others Spain Mexico Argentina Germany Japan Netherland China <FAO, as of July 2013> 200 0 -5.0 -10.0 85 87 89 91 93 95 97 99 01 03 05 07 09 11 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 <National Bureau of Statistics of China as of July 2013> <Jetro, as of July 2013> *SCE=Standard Coal Equivalent (mil.ton) ④ Per Capita GDP by Province in China Soy Bean Export Quantity <1,000 yuan> <Times> 100 ⑤ Gap between Urban and Rural Areas, 2012 A v era g e H ous ehol d A s s et i n Chi na Urban 90 Shanghai Beijing Guangdong Sichuan Yunnan Gap (1st-31st) 80 70 Hubei Shanghai Guizhou 5.8 Times (10,000 yuan) Rural Urban/Rural (times) Financial Asset 11.2 3.1 3.6 Non-financial Asset 145.7 12.3 11.8 Total Asset 156.9 15.4 10.2 Data: 'China Household Finance Survey' Beijing by Survey and Reseach Center for China Household Finance 60 Guangdong Gap (1st-31st) 50 40 30 Hubei 20 10.9 Times Sichuan Beijing 10 0 7.3 Times 1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 Others USA Paraguay Argentina Yunnan Guizhou Sichuan Yunnan Guizhou Hubei Shanghai Brazil <FAO, as of July 2013> <Trade White Paper 2012> Guandong 21 4. Bulk Carrier Business <4-1. "K"Line Fleet> ① "K" Line's Dry Bulk Fleet Cape Over Panamax Panamax Handy Max Small Handy Chip + Pulp Total Cape Handy Max vessels (DWT 170,000 ton~) (DWT around 100,000 ton) (DWT approx. 6-70,000 ton (DWT approx. 4-50,000 ton (DWT appox. 3-40,000 ton) 0103 33 10 23 13 19 11 109 0203 33 11 23 14 21 11 113 0303 45 12 29 20 17 13 136 0403 50 15 28 16 17 14 140 0503 51 14 40 15 15 14 149 0603 56 12 33 17 11 14 143 0703 62 15 35 21 11 15 159 0803 61 15 42 24 12 15 169 0903 61 16 35 22 15 17 166 1003 68 18 44 27 12 16 185 1103 77 20 49 31 13 16 206 1203 88 21 48 46 17 16 236 1303 99 26 42 50 22 13 252 *Data for Over Panamax till 0503 show no. of vessels operated by thermal coal carrier division 240 210 180 150 120 90 60 30 0 11 19 13 23 10 33 90 LNG (inc. co-owned) Tankers LPG CLEAN DIRTY VLCC 2 2 5 3 12 Tankers Total 0403 24 3 3 5 4 15 0503 26 3 3 6 4 16 0603 30 3 3 9 4 19 0703 31 3 2 10 4 19 3 5 10 5 23 0803 34 5 5 12 6 28 0903 47 5 6 13 6 30 14 17 16 28 15 14 15 15 40 14 14 11 17 33 12 45 50 51 56 LNG (inc. co-owned) Tankers CLEAN Tankers VLCC vessels 0303 22 13 17 20 29 12 Panamax Chip + Pulp 15 12 24 17 15 22 35 15 42 15 35 16 62 61 61 15 11 21 16 13 31 16 12 27 26 21 99 88 77 68 42 48 20 18 50 46 49 44 13 22 16 17 0103 0203 0303 0403 0503 0603 0703 0803 0903 1003 1103 1203 1303 ② "K" Line's Energy Transportation Vessel Fleet 0203 21 11 21 14 23 11 33 Over Panamax Small Handy 1003 47 1103 46 5 6 14 9 34 5 6 10 9 30 1203 43 5 6 7 8 26 1303 43 5 4 5 8 22 80 Tankers LPG Tankers DIRTY 70 60 6 50 3 5 4 5 2 33 4 6 3 3 4 9 3 3 21 22 24 26 40 30 20 2 10 4 10 23 5 10 5 3 12 5 5 30 31 34 6 9 13 14 6 5 47 9 6 5 10 6 5 8 7 6 5 8 5 4 5 47 46 43 43 0 0203 0303 0403 0503 0603 0703 0803 0903 1003 1103 1203 1303 ③ Ship Price as of Placing Order (Dry Bulkes, Tankers) 180 150 VLCC Afra Cape Panamax ④ Number of LNG Carriers (Industry) 400 Handy 350 120 300 250 90 200 150 60 100 50 30 0 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 0 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 <Data: Clarkson, as of July 2013> 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 <THE JAPAN MARITIME DAILY > 22 4-2. Demand on Dry Bulk ① Transition of World Crude Steel Production Data: The Japan Iron & Steel Federation, as of July 2013 Others Brazil China, Japan Korea India France Germany Italia Spain UK USA Turkey China France Spain CIS(Soviet) Others Others France UK CIS(Soviet ) Japan India Italia Turkey Brazil India France Germany USA China CIS(Soviet ) Germany Japan India Italia Turkey Brazil China France Spain CIS(Soviet) Others Korea Germany UK USA Korea USA France Germany UK Japan India Italia Turkey Brazil China France Spain CIS(Soviet) Others Italia CIS(exSovi et) Turkey Korea Germany UK USA Turkey UK China Korea India France Germany Italia Spain UK Turkey CIS(exSoviet) USA Brazil Others Brazil 2005 Total 1,146 mil.ton Japan 109.5 Others Brazil Spain Japan 2010 Total 1,411 mil ton (YoY 17.2 %) Japan 107.6 Others Brazil India 2011 Total 1,516 mil ton (YoY 7.4 %) Japan 107.2 China 95.4 Italia Spain CIS(Soviet) Turkey Korea Germany UK USA Korea India France Brazil Italia Spain UK Japan 101.6 Others Others USA Spain 2012 Total 1,548 mil ton (YoY 2.0 %) Brazil Japan Korea Turkey China France Spain CIS(Soviet) Others China Brazil Italia USA Korea Germany UK USA Others Japan Others Germany CIS(Soviet ) Japan India Italia Turkey Brazil Korea India Brazil 1995 Total 752 mil.ton 1985 Total 717 mil.ton 1975 Total 647 mil.ton 1965 Total 459 mil.ton Japan China 1955 Total 273 mil.ton Others Japan 112.5 Brazil USA USA CIS(exSoviet) USA CIS(exSoviet) China 716.5 Turkey UK CIS(exSoviet) China 683.2 Turkey Japan India Italia Turkey Brazil China France Spain CIS(exSoviet) Others Korea Germany UK USA Japan India Italia Turkey Brazil France India Korea UK Spain India Germany Italia France Spain Italia Germany France India Japan India Italia Turkey Brazil India Korea China France Spain CIS(exSoviet) Others Korea Germany UK USA CIS(exSoviet ) Turkey UK Spain Italia Germany France China 626.6 Turkey UK Spain Italia Germany China 353.2 USA Japan India Italia Turkey Brazil China France Spain CIS(exSoviet) Others Korea Korea Germany UK USA Korea China France Spain CIS(exSoviet) Others Korea Germany UK USA 23 4-2. Demand on Dry Bulk ② Global Main Trades of Coal (2010 Estimation) mil tons oil equivalent ③ World Coal Consumption 2,000 Russia Other Europe 1,800 USA EU15 1,600 China Japan 1,400 Russia India Others ASEAN 1,200 1,000 800 Canada 600 400 200 China OECD Europe U.S.A 0 Japan BP Statistical Review of World Energy June 2013 mil tons, oil equivalent 6000 Other Asia N.America Africa/M.East Estimate for Future Coal Demand 4000 World Columbia China 2000 Indonesia S.America India 0 1990 Australia 2000 2010 2020 2035 EDMC Asia/Energy Outlook 2013 ⑥ BDI & Port Congestion in Australia S.Africa Data: METI Energy White Paper 2013 (*)Cargo flow under 3 million tons not included Blue : Increased (YoY), Red : Decrease (YoY) Import to China is included in "Other Asia" (Unit: million ton) 12000 Dry Bulk Index (BDI) 10000 8000 6000 mil tons 1,300 1,200 1,100 1,000 900 800 700 600 500 400 300 200 100 0 ④ Iron Ore Import into Major Asian Countries Japan China Korea Taiwan Total 10,000ton 10,900 4000 ⑤Iron Ore Stocks at Chinese Ports 2000 0 10,400 9,900 9,400 8,900 8,400 7,900 7,400 6,900 6,400 Clarkson, as of July 2013 China Custeel Data 2013 SSY, as of July 2013 24 5. Car Carrier Business <5-1."K"Line Fleet and Cargo Movements> 6000 5000 (4750-5650) 0103 0203 0303 0403 0503 0603 0703 0803 0903 1003 1103 1203 1303 - 3 4 7 10 12 13 17 22 24 28 34 35 28 28 28 26 26 29 30 32 26 21 23 21 23 Vessels 110 100 800 4000 Fleet Scale (No of. Vessels) 13 13 15 17 20 24 25 21 16 20 24 20 22 10 2000 (1600-2500) 10 10 8 8 9 6 13 4 13 2 15 2 14 11 5 5 10 4 4 7 4 8 4 8 3 8 800 (800-850) 6 5 5 5 10 15 14 12 10 6 6 6 6 Total 67 65 65 70 78 93 100 102 93 78 89 97 95 60 Japan/Europe Trade Bound for Japan 7 28 13 20 10 10 6 32 28 13 8 9 24 26 13 13 2 8 6 4 5 5 5 10 21 Fleet Scale (Est. Capacity) 15 14 2 5 11 5 300 23 200 21 25 150 21 15 3000 6000 250 23 24 17 13 35 26 20 30 10 30 29 34 28 26 28 2000 5000 16 10 4 4 7 15 14 12 10 6 20 4 24 4 20 100 3 50 8 8 8 6 6 6 0 ③ Total Cars/Trucks Expoted from Japan (Inc. Cars by GM Japan)Total Cars/Trucks Expoted ② Cars/Trucks Transported by Our Fleet Japan/North America Others 4 40 0 10,000 Cars 3 800 4000 350 12 80 50 3000 (2800-3500) 17 0103 0203 0303 0403 0503 0603 0703 0803 0903 1003 1103 1203 1303 13 1,000 cars 450 3000 6000 400 13 90 70 4000 (3800-4600) 2000 5000 0103 0203 0303 0403 0503 0603 0703 0803 0903 1003 1103 1203 1303 ① "K" Line PCC Fleet No. of Cars (RT) Japan/Others 400 10,000 units 700 Others 600 Oceania 350 300 500 250 400 Africa South America Central America Russia 200 300 Middle East 150 Other Asia 200 100 50 China EU 100 USA 0 0 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 ※ 'Others' includes short sea transportation in Europe from 04/09 <Data: JAMA, July 2013> 25 5-2. Demand on Vehicles ① World Automobile Production <OICA, July 2013> ②No. of Vehicles Possessed (Cars/1,000 People) (Unit: Mil. Cars) 100 Breakdown in Asia (2012) CHINA USA Middle East EU27 900 Brazil China ASEAN9 Russia Japan Africa Korea 800 JAPAN 80 OTHER ASIA (EX.Japan and China) 60 Indonesia 2% Iran 2% Malaysia 1% Others 1% Thailand ASIA 6% EUROPE India 10% 20 Korea 11% OCEANIA Japan 23% 400 300 200 China 44% 0 AFRICA 600 500 40 USA 700 100 0 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 1997 31.2% 34.2% 33.2% Asia Europe USA 1971 1973 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 <Data: 'Handbook of Energy & Economic Statics in Japan' (2013),etc 2012 51.7% 23.6% 23.8% Unit : mil.cars 20 ③ Transition of Overseas Vehicle Production by Japanese Automakers EU Europe(ex.EU) Africa USA Middle East Latin America Unit 1000 Cars 18,000 <Data: JAMA, July 2013> Production Sales (Import in Sales) 15 10 Asia North America (ex.USA) Oceania 5 0 Overseas Vehicle Production by Japanese Automakers 16,000 ④ Four-wheel Car Production and Sales in USA 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 <DATA:JAMA, July 2013> 14,000 10,000 cars/month 12,000 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 10,000 8,000 6,000 4,000 ⑤Monthly Automobile Export Volume from Japan Global Financial Crisis The Earthquake 2,000 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 2001 2000 1999 1998 1997 1996 1995 1994 1993 1992 1991 1990 1989 1988 1987 1986 1985 0 <Data: JAMA, July 2013> 26 6. Containership Business <6-1. "K"Line Fleet and Cargo Volume> ~1400TEU type 2800TEU type 5500TEU type Vessels ① "K"Line Containership Fleet 0103 8000TEU over 0203 0 0 (8000-) 0303 0403 0 0503 0 0603 0 0703 0 0803 3 0903 4 1003 1103 1203 1303 6 8 8 100 Fleet Scale(No. of Vessels) 4 3 18 13 9 80 0 (5500-6500) 8 13 13 13 15 18 18 18 16 19 18 18 60 3500TEU type 21 (3400-4000) 16 17 17 22 25 23 24 25 29 24 28 26 0 0 8 (2700-2900) 2000TEU type (1500-2500) ~1400TEU type Total 1,000 TEU Volume 5 5 4 5 5 7 8 5 5 4 3 21 16 13 10 13 11 9 11 17 20 19 15 14 13 18 19 18 17 22 23 27 28 24 10 12 8 3 57 61 63 64 73 77 89 99 98 87 82 80 75 300 18 8 8 24 25 23 22 25 8 5 29 USD/TEU ② "K" Line Containership Average Freight/Volume for All Routes Average Freight 17 17 2000TEU type 3500TEU type 8000TEU over Fleet Scale (Estimated Capacity) 9 19 13 250 18 18 24 7 28 5 11 17 20 8 5 26 5 4 4 11 9 13 3 10 10 13 20 19 15 14 2 27 28 24 23 22 13 18 19 18 17 10 12 8 3 0 5 2 10 13 0 8 13 13 40 2800TEU type 0 6 16 15 1,000 TEU ~1400TEU type 2800TEU type 5500TEU type 350 0 18 0 5500TEU type 2000TEU type 3500TEU type 8000TEU over 200 150 5 100 50 0 ③ "K"Line Volume, Share for Asia-North America/Europe Routes (1,000TEU) Asia-North America East-bound Volume, Share (Share) 500 1,600 1,200 6.0% 450 5.0% 400 1,440 1,403 1,349 1,000 1,207 1,194 1,178 1,175 1,128 1,143 1,132 1,122 1,073 1,073 1,110 1,108 1,037 1,044 1,078 1,055 915 861 932 504 450 435 530 754 742 925 615 810 400 808 711 852 600 391 1,175 1,220 1,146 1,144 1,143 1,139 556 575 584 566 630 617 763 732 1,235 810 804 751984 789 753 729 1,400 1,323 771 738 3.0% 200 1,181 1,120846 833 1,108 789 790 777 4.0% 300 250 1,262 1,249 1,147 859 865 825 1,315 1,283 1,283 1,301 350 1,315 1,299 1,243 1,000 981 413 414 407 426 1,250 1,050 800 1,068 1,173 1,337 871 1,242 1,200 811 2.0% 150 100 793 768 716 1.0% 50 1,000 1,012 661 667 666 657 2001 2001 2002 2002 2003 2003 2004 2004 2005 2005 2006 2006 2007 2007 2008 2008 2009 2009 2010 2010 2011 2011 2012 2012 1H 2H 1H 2H 1H 2H 1H 2H 1H 2H 1H 2H 1H 2H 1H 2H 1H 2H 1H 2H 1H 2H 1H 2H 628 909 595 855 800 516 520 409 Share 4.8% 4.8% 4.9% 4.7% 5.1% 4.8% 4.6% 4.6% 4.8% 4.7% 4.8% 4.9% 5.4% 5.7% 5.5% 5.6% 5.6% 5.5% 5.2% 4.6% 4.7% 4.6% 4.7% 5.6% (1,000TEU) 600 355 311 266 258 277 280 0.0% KL Volume 172 195 208 235 244 251 248 280 291 334 325 374 382 439 361 384 300 352 332 343 314 329 330 413 Asia-Europe West-bound Volume, Share (Share) 350 6.0% 300 5.0% 250 400 4.0% 200 3.0% 200 150 200 2.0% 100 1.0% 50 0 97F 1H 97F 2H 98F 1H 98F 2H 99F 1H 99F 2H 00F 1Q 00F 2Q 00F 3Q 00F 4Q 01F 1Q 01F 2Q 01F 3Q 01F 4Q 02F 1Q 02F 2Q 02F 3Q 02F 4Q 03F 1Q 03F 2Q 03F 3Q 03F 4Q 04F 1Q 04F 2Q 04F 3Q 04F 4Q 05F 1Q 05F 2Q 05F 3Q 05F 4Q 06F 1Q 06F 2Q 06F 3Q 06F 4Q 07F 1Q 07F 2Q 07F3Q 07F4Q 08F1Q 08F2Q 08F3Q 08F4Q 09F1Q 09F2Q 09F3Q 09F4Q 10F1Q 10F2Q 10F3Q 10F4Q 11F1Q 11F2Q 11F3Q 11F4Q 12F1Q 12F2Q 12F3Q 12F4Q 0 *As cargo volume for '97 1H-'99 2H, half of the actual data are indicated. 2001 2001 2002 2002 2003 2003 2004 2004 2005 2005 2006 2006 2007 2007 2008 2008 2009 2009 2010 2010 2011 2011 2012 2012 1H 2H 1H 2H 1H 2H 1H 2H 1H 2H 1H 2H 1H 2H 1H 2H 1H 2H 1H 2H 1H 2H 1H 2H KL Volume Share 97 101 98 0.0% 151 155 174 179 187 198 209 222 234 262 252 269 290 227 224 226 249 246 245 239 241 3.7% 3.7% 3.5% 5.0% 4.5% 4.8% 4.4% 4.5% 4.2% 4.0% 4.1% 3.8% 4.0% 3.5% 4.0% 4.5% 4.2% 3.6% 3.4% 3.5% 3.6% 3.5% 3.5% 3.7% 27 6-1. "K" Line Fleet and Cargo Volume ④ "K"Line/Market Cargo Volume, Loading Factor for Asia-North America/Europe Services Container Transpacific Trade (Market) Data: Drewry "K"Line Asia-N. America (East-bound) Volume, L/F 1,000 TEU/USD CAPA E/B CARGO E/B Freight(USD/teu) as of July 2013 Loading FactorE/B(%) 120% 5,000 1,000 TEU Cargo Volume L/F 4,500 250 100% 120% 4,000 200 100% 3,500 80% 3,000 150 80% 60% 2,500 60% 40% 2,000 100 50 40% 1,500 20% 1,000 20% 0% 500 0% 0 1996 1997 1997 1998 1998 1999 1999 2000 2000 2000 2000 2001 2001 2001 2001 2002 2002 2002 2002 2003 2003 2003 2003 2004 2004 2004 2004 2005 2005 2005 2005 2006 2006 2006 2006 2007 2007 2007 2007 2008 2008 2008 2008 2009 2009 2009 2009 2010 2010 2010 2010 2011 2011 2011 2011 2012 2012 2012 2012 0 -20% 2H1H2H1H2H1H2H1Q2Q3Q4Q1Q2Q3Q4Q1Q2Q3Q4Q1Q2Q3Q4Q1Q2Q3Q4Q1Q2Q3Q4Q1Q2Q3Q4Q1Q2Q3Q4Q1Q2Q3Q4Q1Q2Q3Q4Q1Q2Q3Q4Q1Q2Q3Q4Q1Q2Q3Q4Q Container Asia Europe Trade (Market) "K"Line Asia-Europe (West-bound) Volume, L/F 1,000 TEU/USD 1,000 TEU 160 Cargo Volume L/F 120% CAPA W/B CARGO W/B Data: Drewry Freight(USD/teu) as of July 2013 Loading Factor E/B(%) 3,000 120% 2,500 100% 2,000 80% 1,500 60% 1,000 40% 500 20% 100% 120 80% 80 60% 40% 40 20% 0% 0 1998 1998 1999 1999 2000 2000 2000 2000 2001 2001 2001 2001 2002 2002 2002 2002 2003 2003 2003 2003 2004 2004 2004 2004 2005 2005 2005 2005 2006 2006 2006 2006 2007 2007 2007 2007 2008 2008 2008 2008 2009 2009 2009 2009 2010 2010 2010 2010 2011 2011 2011 2011 2012 2012 2012 2012 2013 2013 2013 2013 0 1H2H1H2H1Q2Q3Q4Q1Q2Q3Q4Q1Q2Q3Q4Q1Q2Q3Q4Q1Q2Q3Q4Q1Q2Q3Q4Q1Q2Q3Q4Q1Q2Q3Q4Q1Q2Q3Q4Q1Q2Q3Q4Q1Q2Q3Q4Q1Q2Q3Q4Q1Q2Q3Q4Q1Q2Q3Q4Q 0% 28 6-2. Container Terminal Operated by "K"Line Tokyo(Ohi) Husky (Tacoma) A.I.T Antwerp ITS (Long Beach) Tacoma Osaka・Kobe Tokyo・Yokohama Long Beach Kobe(Rokko) <海事センター/Piers> Japan USA <FEFC> Terminal Location "K"LINE Tokyo Container Terminal Ohi No.1 and No.2 Berth 660 m 15 m 259,500 m2 4,370 TEU 5 Units "K"LINE Yokohama Container Terminal Honmoku Quay A No.5 and 6 Berth 400 m 12 m 133,591 m2 1,968 TEU 3 Units "K"LINE Osaka Container Terminal Nanko No.8 Berth 350 m 14 m 63,031 m2 1,082 TEU 2 Units "K"LINE Kobe Container Terminal** Rokko Terminal RC 4 West and RC 4/5 Berth International Transportation Service, Inc. Long Beach, CA., Pier G Husky Terminal and Stevedoring Inc. Belgium Antwerp Internatinal Terminal NV*** Length Depth Total Area Storage Capacity* Gantry Crane 700 m 14 m 283,510 m2 4,478 TEU 5 Units 1,552 m 13-16 m 955,000 m2 12,155 TEU 19 Units Tacoma, WA., Berth 3&4 830 m 16 m 376,000 m2 4,800 TEU 4 Units Antwerp, PSA-HNN Deurganck Terminal 340 m 15.5 m 175,000 m2 2,990 TEU 3 Units * Flat Space **Operating with APM Terminals, Japan. Storage Capacity etc. is a total of the area that APM Terminals, Japan utilizez. ***Joint venture between K-Line ,Yang Ming Line,Hanjin Shipping and PSA-HMN. 29 6-3. Container Cargo Movements ① Container Cargo Movements <Maritime Report 2002> <IHS Global Insight Trade and Transportation: Report May 2013> ② Asia⇒North America/Europe Cargo Volume by Country 1000 TEU 15,000 640 12,000 9,000 6,000 351 1,152 572 456 736 Japan 10% 3,000 China 57% China * Cargo Volume : Asia⇒North America 630 1,683 630 581 1,701 585 1,611 1,605 630 602 502 551 612 539 828 611 883 607 1,445 1,446 575 447 743 429 419 1,326 615 873 529 539 515 1,283 685 813 629 512 516 773 736 10,083 9,779 9,174 8,634 7,867 7,403 5,448 1000 TEU 639 654 525 699 629 Taiwan ASEAN South Asia 530 703 643 448 9,062 9,001 8,948 308 405 994 919 708 543 314 Japan 5% 221 238 Japan 28% 2,000 6,111 China 34% 161 485 283 392 159 517 285 426 932 883 1,141 1,211 197 531 206 573 302 439 340 455 895 843 611 391 470 840 1,577 1,726 616 470 488 834 828 738 626 818 697 857 621 741 418 <Japan Maritime Center/Piers (as of July 2013)> 437 8,000 1,009 952 971 652 570 705 596 6,000 660 658 826 864 860 3,037 3,198 2,762 2,814 2,389 2,497 2,006 2,233 0 0 Cargo Volume : Asia⇒Europe Cargo Volume : North America⇒Asia 6,000 China 68% 1000 TEU 10,000 4,000 4,253 Korea 680 1,618 1,635 1,724 496 675 603 Japan *Data for China includes Hong Kong and Macao Japan 13% 4,000 2,000 China 48% 0 <Drewry, as of July 2013> 30 6-4. Container Handling Volume by Port ① Container Handling Volume in Asia Transition of Container Handling Volume in Asia Shanghai 32,500 49 Hong Kong 23,100 1,465 Kaohsiung 9,781 979 ② Top 10 Ports for 2012 Container Handling Busan 17,000 634 Osaka Bay 4,977 1,724 Tokyo Bay 7,288 1,354 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 8 2012(Above) ※ Ports in China 1980(Below) (Unit:1,000TEU) Singapore 31,649 917 Port Shanghai Singapore Hong Kong Shenzhen Busan Ningbo Guangzhou Qingdao Dubai Tianjin Xingang 2012 32.5 31.6 23.1 22.9 17.0 16.8 14.7 14.5 13.2 14.5 (Unit: Million TEU) 2011 Growth Ratio 31.7 29.8 24.3 22.5 16.1 14.4 14.4 12.8 11.8 13.6 2.5% 5.7% -5.3% 1.6% 5.2% 14.3% 2.2% 11.4% 10.6% 6.2% for reference 2006 Singapore Hong Kong Shanghai Shenzhen Busan Kaohsiung Rotterdam Hamburg Dubai Los Angels (Containerization International, March 2013) mln.TEU③ Transition of Container Handling among Major Ports in Asia 35 Singapore Shanghai Hong Kong Shenzhen Busan Kaohsiung Qingdao Tokyo Yokohama Nagoya Kobe Osaka 30 25 20 <④ Asia-N.America Trade Trends by Commodity> East Bound( Asia→N.America) 2012 Commodity 1 Furniture and Household Goods 2 Apparel and Related Items 3 General Electric Equipments 4 Auto Parts 5 Toys 6 Footwear and its Accouterments 7 Audio & Vidsual Equipments, like TVs or Videos 8 Plastic Products inc. Blind, Flooring 9 Construction Tools and Related Items 10 Tyres and tubes of Cars, Trucks, etc. <Japan Maritime Center > Share 14.3% 11.6% 7.8% 4.2% 3.9% 3.0% 2.9% 2.8% 2.8% 2.6% West Bound( N.America→Asia) 2012 Commodity 1 Paper, Paper Board, and its Products 2 Pet Food and Animal Feed 3 Metal and Scrap 4 Steel and its Products 5 Furniture and Household Goods 6 Apparel and Related Items 7 Raw Woods and its Products 8 Meat and its Processed Products 9 Plastic inc. Resin 10 Fat,Oil and Oilseed 15 Share 21.9% 7.7% 5.2% 4.2% 4.2% 4.1% 3.6% 3.4% 3.2% 2.7% 10 5 0 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 <Containerization International Year Book, Website for Each Port, etc. as of July, 2013> 31 6-5. Factory of the World, Asia ① Procuction by Country ② Trends of Export from Asian Major Countries and Regions Audio-video equipment : 870 mln units in '09 Europe 6% N. America 1% Others 8% China 66% Communications devices: 1.89 bln units in '09 2,000 N. America 5% 1,500 Asia (ex. Japan, China) 21% China 54% 1,000 500 Japan 3% 0 Electronic Parts: 3,800 bln yen in '08 Others 3% Europe 9% Europe 5% N.America 1% N. America 7% China 24% Asia (ex. Japan, China) 21% (Billion dollar) 800 Export ex. ASEAN 4 Year to Year Growth Rate (Billion dollar) 40% 1,400 700 Japan 37% 20% 500 10% 400 0% 200 100 0 1,000 800 400 -10% 200 -20% 0 ’80’82’84’86’88’90’92’94’96’98’00’02’04’06’08’10 China 23% Others 9% Japan 12% Korea 5% Asia (ex. Japan, China, Korea) 12% Others 13% U.S.A 15% Europe 24% Russia 5% U.S.A. 8% China 46% India 5% <METI White Paper on International Economy and Trade 2010, JISF, JETRO> (as of July 2013> 35% 30% 25% 20% 15% 10% 5% 0% -5% -10% -15% -20% ’89’91’93’95’97’99’01’03’05’07’09’11 Export ex. Japan Year to Year Growth Rate 40% 800 30% 700 20% 600 10% 0% 400 Taiwan 1% Korea 4% (Billion dollar) 900 500 Europe 11% Japan 7% Year to Year Growth Rate 600 300 Crude Steel: 1.54 mln giga ton in '12 Export ex. NIEs 30% 1,200 600 Asia (ex. Japan, China) 23% Japan 2% Automobile: 84.14 mln units in '12 35% 30% 25% 20% 15% 10% 5% 0% -5% -10% -15% -20% -25% 2,500 Japan 5% China 68% 3,000 Europe 12% Others 5% Asia (ex. Japan, China) 14% Export ex. China (inc. Hong Kong) Year toYear Growth Rate (Billion dollar) Home appliances: 480 mln units in '09 -10% 300 200 -20% 100 -30% 0 -40% ’80 ’82 ’84 ’86 ’88 ’90 ’92 ’94 ’96 ’98 ’00 ’02 ’04 ’06 ’08 ’10 ’12 32 7.New Businesses 7-1. Business Target of our Energy Transportation Division Stream of Oil and Natural Gas Midstream Upstream E&P Exploration Development&Production Transportation Downstream Refinement&Sales LNG輸送 Drill Ship Offshore Support Vessel LNG FPSO (LNG Producer) Offshore Support Vessel (by K LINE OFFSHOER AS) Drill Ship (7 ships in operation) (1 ship in operation ) LNG Carrier Crude/Prodcut LPG Tanker FSRU LNG FPSO (by FLEX LNG Ltd.) (under development) CNG Carrier (under development) World Oil and Gas Production Forecasts Mln.Barrel/day Heavy Lifter CNG Carrier As production at existing oil fields is shrinking, it is inevitable to develop undeveloped oil and gas fields in ultra-deep waters and remote areas to respond to steady energy demand. Demand for advanced drillships and offshore support vessels used at those areas is rapidly increasing. Notably, Brazil has succeeded in resource development in the pre-salt Santos Basin and is actively investing in development. Anticipating this change in the business environment, in the Group’s medium-term management plan that began in fiscal 2008, “K” Line set forth a policy of expanding the scope of energy resource development business beyond conventional marine transport such as oil and gas tankers by developing new businesses in the upstream sector, such as offshore support vessels, drillships and LNG FPSO. The “K” Line Group will establish a business model that will make possible participation in wideranging transport operations from upstream to downstream in offshore energy resource businesses and development of a stable earnings base by further increasing synergy between energy resource transportation services, heavy lifter vessel services and offshore support vessel services. Undeveloped Oil field Oil production from current producing fiels is peaking out and decreasing. 33 7. New Businesses <7-2.New Business Expansion> ①Heavy Lifter ●Business Environment We anticipate firm cargo movements as a result of movement of infrastructure-related cargo, centered on the Middle East and Australia, as well as active investment in offshore oil and gas field development and wind power generation systems in response to persistently high crude oil prices. Business ●Business Histroy Loading operation of large reactor for oil refinery Project cargo:Assembled module of LNG plant Project cargo:Drill equipment used in GOLIAT OFFSHORE project near Hammerfest Norway Project cargo:Wind energy components "K" Line re-entered heavy lift transportation business via its European subsidiary company possesses 50% share of SAL Group in 2007, headquartered in Germany, and aquired balanced 50% at the end of June 2011 which means "K" Line became 100% owner of SAL Group. We developed the heavy lifter services as a core business. ●Operating Fleet The SAL Group operates a fleet of 16 heavy lifters with lifting capacity ranging from 600 to 2,000 tons. The SVENJA and LONE, two heavy lifters owned by the SAL Group equipped with cranes with the world’s highest lifting capacity of 2,000 tons, equipped with the Dynamic Positioning System (DPS), will meet needs for the transport of oil and gas development facilities and offshore-related facilities, which require advanced transport techniques. SAL's Global Network SAL has business sites around the world and aims to engage in business development utilizing selling capabilities underpinned by SAL’s advanced maritime technical capabilities and knowledge and “K” Line’s global network. 34 7. New Businesses <7-2. New Business Expansion> ②Offshore Support Vessel Business ●Business Environment With the heightening of energy needs world wide, development of undeveloped oil and gas fields in ultra-deep waters is being more active . Demand for offshore support vessels has rapidly increased in all over the world, notably in Brazil which is actively investing large amount in development. ●Business History In 2007, “K” Line established K LINE OFFSHORE AS, an offshore support vessel operator headquartered in Norway, and began vessel operation in the North Sea in 2008. Activity of offshore energy E&P is increasing in step with the heightening of energy needs worldwide, and the “K” Line Group is actively entering the offshore energy E&P support business. Notably, subsidiary company K LINE OFFSHORE AS received delivery of final Newbuilding in June 2011, and now operates seven advanced offshore support vessels offshore of Brazil and in the North Sea, some under long-term charter contracts with highly-respected customers. We will continue business in the offshore Energy E&P support business sector, a growth market,and seek to win new business. ●Anchor Handling Tug Supply(AHTS) vessels AHTSs engage in support activities when offshore drilling rigs are moved from location to location, such as raising anchors from the seabed, rig towing. AHTS also engages in support activities for seabed pipeline laying works. Our AHTSs , with length 95 meter and width 24 meter, have propeller output of 34,000 horsepower and one of the world's biggest bollard pull power (towing power) of 390 tons. They are equipped with all the latest equipment and systems, including a dynamic positioning system (DPS) for maintaining the vessel in a fixed position using its propulsion system, remotely operated vehicles (ROV) for monitoring undersea work for use in the installation, repair and maintenance of subsea equipment etc. ●Fleet and Medium-Long term Contracts The company has a fleet of seven vessels, 2 AHTS and 5 PSV, all of which are now in operation. With regard to PSV, the company concluded a contract for two PSVs with Petrobras, the Brazilian state-owned energy company and entered into a contract for two large PSVs with the UK subsidiary of major US energy company ConocoPhillips. Other 2 AHTS and 1 PSV were under spot operation but the company suceeded to have good track record in North Sea and receive a high evaluation from charterers. ●Platform Supply Vessel (PSV) PSVs are “sea trucks” used mainly to transport materials and fuel to offshore rigs. The company’s new PSVs , with length 95 meter and width 20 meter , are among the world’s largest, with deadweight capacity of 5,100 tons and deck area of 1,100 square meters. Those vessels also have latest equipment and systems such as DPS. 35 7. New Businesses <7-2. New Business Expansion> ③ Drillship Business ●Ultra-Deepwater Drillship Now in Operation in Petrobras Pre-Salt Oil Field off Brazil Named “Etesco Takatsugu J,” the drillship is the most advanced of its type in the world and was constructed at Samsung Heavy Industries Co., Ltd. of South Korea in 2011. It is capable of drilling in water depths of 10,000 feet (3,000 meters) and down to 30,000 feet (9,000 meters) below the seabed. This ship has been under charter to Petrobras since April 2012.The first well will be drilled in the Franco SW block in water approximately 2,000 meters deep about 200 kilometers off Rio de Janeiro. The area is located in pre-salt fields in which Petrobras holds an interest. The drillship is owned by Etesco Drilling Services, LLC, a company that was established in the United States with the four Japanese companies(*4J) holding equity stakes totaling over 85 percent. (*4J = Nippon Yusen Kabushiki Kaisha , Mitsui & Co., Ltd., Kawasaki Kisen Kaisha, Ltd. , and Japan Drilling Co., Ltd. ) MV"ETESCO TAKATSUGU J" ④LNG FPSO Projects In recent years, there have been numerous discoveries of large oil and gas fields in presalt areas in Brazilian coastal waters, and there is worldwide interest in these massive deposits. The region concerned is believed to have the potential for further development and is a priority area for Petrobras. Through this business, the four Japanese companies will contribute to exploration for oil and gas in the promising fields. ● Business Environment As a clean energy, global demand for LNG is expected grow, and expectations for LNG producers is increasing more and more , as a tool to provide a solution for developing small and medium-size gas fields with lower costs and more efficiency where costs of buiding land-based production plants and port facilities are very expensive. ●Business Strategy FLEX LNG, a company in which “K” Line is the largest shareholder, is involved in a number of developing projects. “K” Line supports FLEX LNG Ltd.’s floating LNG producer projects as the company’s largest shareholder and strategic partner. 36 8. Financial Data <8-1. Trends of Major Financial Figures> Our Financial Term No. of Consolidated Subsidiaries No. of Equity Method Affiliates Total Marine transportation operating revenues Other operating revenues Total Operating Revenues Marine transportation cost Other cost Total Cost of Sales Gross Profit on Sales Selling, General and Administrative Expenses Operating Income Interest and Dividends Received Equity in Earnings of Affiliates Other Non-operating Income Total Non-operating Income Interest and Discount Expenses Other Non-operating Expenses Other sales Expenses Total Non-operating Expenses Ordinary Income Extraordinary Income Extraordinary Losses Income before Income Taxes Income Taxes :current Income Taxes for prior years Deffered Corporate Tax (△=Plus) Minority Shareholders' Interests (△=Plus) Minority Shareholder Income/Loss (△=Plus) Foreign Currency Exchange Adjustaments (△=Plus) Equity in Earnings of Affiliates ('+'=Plus) Net Income Total Assets Shareholders' Equity ('Net Assets' from the Year Ended in '07 Mar ) Net Assets Shareholders' Equity of Net Assets Average Exchange Rate Ordinary Income on Operatnig Revenues ROE Interest Bearing Liability Financial Account Balance The Ratio of Consolidated to NonConsolidated NonConsolidated 117th 118th 119th 120th 121st 122nd 123rd 124th 125th 126th 127th 128th 129th 130th 131st 132nd 133rd 134th 135th 136th 137th 138th Ended in Ended in Ended in Ended in Ended in Ended in Ended in Ended in Ended in Ended in Ended in Ended in Ended in Ended in Ended in Ended in Ended in Ended in Ended in Ended in Ended in Ended in 139th Ended in 140th Ended in 141th Ended in 142th Ended in 143th Ended in (Unit : Million Yen) 144th 145th Ended in Ended in '85 Mar. '07 Mar. '08 Mar. '09 Mar. '10 Mar. '11 Mar. '12 Mar. '87 Mar. '88 Mar. '89 Mar. '90 Mar. '91 Mar. '92 Mar. '93 Mar. '94 Mar. '95 Mar. '96 Mar. '97 Mar. '98 Mar. '99 Mar. '00 Mar. '01 Mar. '02 Mar. '03 Mar. '04 Mar. '05 Mar. 20 11 31 417,404 53,236 470,640 361,772 46,746 408,518 62,122 35,171 26,951 2,995 1,772 4,767 18,386 2,218 20,604 '86 Mar. 20 24 11 10 31 34 395,279 309,293 52,338 50,623 447,617 359,916 348,040 275,833 49,173 52,106 397,213 327,939 50,404 31,977 35,675 34,239 14,729 △ 2,262 2,662 2,240 8,190 13,517 15,757 10,852 17,264 17,455 833 1,370 18,097 18,825 27 10 37 312,946 49,923 362,869 276,898 52,684 329,582 33,287 32,531 756 2,000 14,939 16,939 17,574 1,114 18,688 31 7 38 323,908 65,479 389,387 273,747 58,979 332,726 56,661 41,458 15,203 2,135 7,588 9,723 17,902 636 18,538 39 6 45 383,541 71,010 454,551 319,454 68,718 388,172 66,379 44,100 22,279 2,559 6,655 9,214 21,297 2,869 24,166 48 10 58 394,933 93,173 488,107 330,387 85,524 415,912 72,194 57,260 14,934 3,267 9,203 12,471 22,443 2,688 25,131 53 10 63 413,470 97,765 511,235 335,125 93,761 428,886 82,348 63,094 19,254 2,748 6,241 8,990 22,457 2,946 25,404 53 11 64 402,960 95,883 498,843 333,645 92,140 425,786 73,057 60,155 12,902 2,716 6,402 9,121 17,159 2,367 19,526 59 11 70 359,809 84,283 444,093 298,281 79,831 378,112 65,981 59,779 6,202 2,046 6,305 8,354 13,746 2,752 16,499 82 10 92 361,318 87,651 448,969 289,322 87,879 377,201 71,767 60,594 11,173 1,588 4,188 5,778 12,767 2,913 15,681 90 11 101 352,090 98,004 450,095 272,963 103,784 376,748 73,347 49,280 24,067 1,701 5,570 7,273 17,720 3,636 21,356 95 12 107 378,793 103,827 482,620 299,352 108,403 407,755 74,865 51,265 23,599 1,960 1,344 3,306 15,840 2,734 18,574 91 13 104 411,893 105,862 517,755 322,695 116,961 439,656 78,098 51,176 26,922 1,841 1,304 3,146 15,652 3,610 19,262 88 17 105 416,308 96,791 513,100 338,768 103,075 441,843 71,256 49,748 21,507 2,157 797 1,442 4,398 15,128 5,281 20,411 87 21 108 398,602 87,090 485,693 323,902 87,839 411,741 73,951 47,133 26,817 2,100 654 1,944 4,699 11,591 5,564 17,157 93 19 112 464,341 93,527 557,869 370,014 103,351 473,365 84,504 48,494 36,009 1,992 312 1,164 3,470 12,240 434 12,675 114 17 131 493,832 77,181 571,013 410,022 92,740 502,762 68,251 49,202 19,048 1,463 178 1,680 3,323 9,478 925 142 18 160 540,208 92,516 632,725 446,189 105,816 552,006 80,719 51,436 29,282 1,332 208 1,118 2,659 6,487 1,781 177 18 195 633,564 91,102 724,666 496,401 105,151 601,552 123,113 52,579 70,534 1,904 528 827 3,261 5,451 5,778 186 18 204 730,633 97,810 828,443 550,443 115,656 666,099 162,343 54,289 108,053 2,030 790 1,319 4,140 4,546 412 11,114 2,900 6,191 7,823 3,084 64 △ 31 96 4,802 439,903 57,901 7,484 △ 5,330 △ 993 3,493 5,838 13,275 7,894 7,138 20,491 3,083 △ 6,630 △ 8,209 2,995 1,323 1,202 △ 130 △ 361 △ 625 61 △ 813 △ 618 3 222 124 160 △ 6,557 △ 8,044 441,476 461,444 447,644 67,850 61,074 51,674 6,388 6,639 12,124 903 1,762 197 △ 669 279 △ 108 437,795 51,933 7,327 2,274 2,647 2,829 2,574 1,760 7,400 3,342 4,839 6,193 210 489 336 248 2,687 △ 3,092 461,068 505,026 54,971 50,501 2,840 2,496 △ 1,943 10,753 2,957 9,898 4,648 2,935 4,068 8,946 2,518 3,886 4,386 5,037 1,334 623 398 △ 114 418 209 119 4,355 △ 2,707 2,787 518,672 506,988 467,293 1,271 10,745 6,817 5,199 1,780 △ 141 152 3,712 429,477 9,983 5,043 9,817 5,208 2,649 30 306 2,834 522,836 8,331 6,920 5,915 9,336 3,387 333 687 6,303 557,892 10,806 2,927 7,987 5,745 4,074 250 248 1,667 576,109 10,403 5,494 14,358 26,804 11,968 7,899 4,232 2,579 14,505 7,376 7,899 26,776 18,226 6,018 10,691 2,606 8,247 4,044 4,855 8,626 3,985 - △ 1,198 △ 8,348 △ 1,090 377 192 380 585 1,596 6,843 1,948 4,767 522,498 514,802 513,797 533,295 8,269 23,672 4,263 9,255 18,680 8,662 △ 872 518 10,373 515,824 11,230 4,959 62,564 107,235 1,860 1,980 9,398 13,704 55,026 95,510 20,103 37,420 857 △ 3,209 870 1,446 33,196 59,852 559,135 605,331 5,207 88,573 8,498 1,793 95,278 27,126 3,952 1,775 62,423 757,040 6,461 63,927 14,384 1,959 76,352 23,006 315 1,516 51,514 900,438 13,974 125,867 11,834 873 136,828 47,579 2,422 3,815 83,011 968,629 19,320 60,010 6,392 20,630 45,772 6,997 1,188 5,165 32,420 971,602 357,624 376,277 356,152 331,864 314,986 259,934 361,975 334,772 100.82 343,619 93.04 291,669 86.04 242,572 79.06 340,571 82.33 4.82% 9.39% ▲ 21.38% 4.81% 10.20% - 2.52% 3.13% 483,362 ▲ 5,815 51,604 53,894 57,163 60,235 66,773 68,435 68,606 74,131 68,647 77,716 82,039 121,006 181,276 257,809 159.91 138.49 128.31 142.85 141.29 133.18 124.84 107.85 99.43 96.48 112.70 122.68 128.27 111.62 109.71 125.11 122.29 113.97 107.46 113.09 344,476 116.91 355,763 115.29 2.36% 8.61% 283,504 1.67% 0.25% 286,536 319,172 309,105 1.64% 295,912 1.61% 5.03% 0.47% - 0.56% 8.24% 0.50% - 5.28% 0.28% 6.68% 2.22% 4.83% 1.73% 9.93% 2.09% 2.47% 1.07% 2.33% 2.96% 9.59% 4.80% 2.73% 2.10% 6.51% 3.74% 12.99% 8.63% 32.70% 12.94% 39.60% 9.41% 28.43% 5.89% 17.12% 9.46% 23.71% 311,468 348,861 350,201 349,777 318,820 272,775 373,559 394,619 404,633 367,352 348,601 331,482 △ 15,391 △ 14,602 △ 15,215 △ 15,574 △ 15,767 △ 18,738 △ 19,176 △ 19,709 △ 14,443 △ 11,700 △ 11,179 △ 16,019 △ 13,880 △ 13,811 △ 12,971 △ 9,491 △ 10,248 335,620 306,573 281,809 239,249 278,233 △ 8,015 △ 5,155 △ 3,547 △ 2,516 △ 1,123 326,187 1,468 329,716 1,442 1.25 - 1.24 - - - 1.19 1.58 (Ordinary Income) (Net Income) 1.57 1.46 1.53 - (Total Assets) 1.34 1.34 (Total Assets) Dividened/share (yen) 55,245 221.73 1.18 1.49 (Net Income) 207 220 275 311 319 26 28 28 30 30 204 248 303 341 349 831,638 961,419 1,203,183 1,132,348 837,949 109,180 124,120 127,865 111,969 83 940,818 1,085,539 1,331,048 1,244,317 838,032 659,447 811,439 973,758 966,226 713,084 132,356 146,408 153,259 139,119 110,938 791,803 957,847 1,127,017 1,105,346 824,022 149,015 127,692 204,030 138,970 14,010 61,039 66,335 74,381 67,367 66,085 87,976 61,356 129,648 71,603 ▲ 52,074 3,213 5,696 6,547 4,962 2,723 1,572 1,642 1,120 0 2,590 1,763 2,004 1,643 2,427 5,804 9,032 10,193 7,727 5,150 4,336 4,228 5,105 6,181 7,797 129 379 742 2,233 8,869 13,138 11,170 244.00 (Operating Revenues) (Operating Income) (Operating Revenues) (Operating Income) (Ordinary Income) '06 Mar. 1.39 1.41 1.30 2.21 1.28 1.66 1.34 2.66 1.33 2.21 1.34 2.21 3.59 - 1.41 0.88 2.18 - 1.65 1.20 2.11 - 1.44 1.53 1.63 1.63 1.69 399,026 18,121 7,065 376,780 288,602 291,652 300,366 9,322 △ 7,505 △ 3,975 6,884 4,893 △ 6,304 △ 2,260 1,777 3,279 △ 1,346 △ 6,953 △ 6,019 △ 2,009 327,856 0.0 328,925 0.0 332,692 0.0 316,538 0.0 303,906 0.0 355,085 13,453 363,942 5,622 5,182 3,044 1,045 3,224 301,968 0.0 310,498 0.0 384,257 8,731 1.67 592,522 ▲ 5,182 629,864 ▲ 7,749 1.38 1.92 1.36 1.57 1.33 1.68 1.34 1.60 1.32 1.47 1.27 2.30 1.27 1.48 1.24 1.28 1.26 1.27 1.27 1.55 1.27 2.18 1.25 1.45 1.30 2.91 1.32 - 1.28 1.41 1.32 - 1.36 - 1.29 70.04 1.02 1.78 1.20 3.48 1.05 0.74 0.67 0.53 1.29 1.69 1.24 0.43 1.68 1.71 1.44 1.59 1.26 1.36 1.23 1.22 1.53 1.61 2.00 2.04 1.42 1.41 2.89 40.58 - 1.15 1.24 - 2.10 - 1.69 2.13 2.19 2.23 2.16 2.12 2.13 2.06 1.92 1.69 1.61 1.57 1.74 1.79 1.95 328,123 12,788 348,613 12,281 379,602 17,171 385,482 12,766 362,029 16,809 424,021 24,444 449,157 8,299 499,791 19,843 584,957 55,068 658,699 85,288 742,568 56,678 1,719 1,181 △ 588 3,615 △ 1,280 △ 2,457 988 53 9,827 1,593 6,949 1,811 10,258 2,244 8,233 3,015 11,133 4,042 21,582 4,532 7,115 2,786 16,434 6,535 49,670 24,452 86,873 49,012 57,849 38,820 31,941 25,250 88,422 58,938 253,502 0.0 245,896 0.0 255,032 0.0 258,367 3.0 241,432 3.0 242,278 4.0 241,295 5.0 259,200 3.0 269,140 5.0 329,965 10.0 376,344 16.5 481,541 18.0 518,500 18.0 541,450 26.0 300,579 0.0 279,380 0.0 857,278 1,063,705 28,103 89,715 516,000 ▲ 6,014 14,973 13,961 ▲ 48,955 28,589 15,584 16,286 15,767 12,008 ▲ 49,138 32,867 5,123 7,585 ▲ 1,053 ▲ 13,432 11,902 1,575 2,710 ▲ 41,351 10,669 1,066,648 1,180,433 1.37 1.88 334,859 7,319 439,621 △ 1,219 19,348 16,085 ▲ 66,272 47,350 17,782 7,900 47,865 5,041 ▲ 96,355 50,209 3,846 5,297 ▲ 34,131 13,002 2,650 1,306 ▲ 68,721 30,603 1,043,884 1,032,505 1.34 1.53 335,758 2,363 317,388 0.0 372,516 5,846 1.32 2.62 '13 Mar. 316 288 288 29 26 27 345 314 315 890,921 859,202 1,004,945 94,163 113,108 129,825 985,084 972,310 1,134,771 748,012 817,051 880,475 113,984 129,811 158,743 861,996 946,863 1,039,218 123,088 25,447 95,552 64,478 66,010 80,666 58,609 ▲ 40,563 14,886 2,749 4,078 4,513 101 546 2,381 1,974 1,955 20,768 4,825 6,581 27,664 8,564 9,261 12,262 7,521 5,711 1,699 1.83 1.78 1.91 2.05 960,108 631,747 24,612 ▲ 59,462 772,321 737,994 41,656 ▲ 49,375 834,217 ▲ 7,017 20,762 ▲ 53,731 799 ▲ 56,949 41,162 ▲ 48,748 24,620 ▲ 37,044 13,643 ▲ 4,168 498,021 13.5 569,028 0.0 580,087 9.5 557,862 0.0 575,488 2.5 *1: Basically those figures are quoted from annual security report ('Yuka Shoken Hokokuisho'), which is mentioned by the million, and figures are rounded to the nearest million till 122nd, and rounded down, thereafter. 37 9. Panama Canal Expansion Program 【The Panama Canal 】 The Panama Canal is approximately 80 kilometers long between the Atlantic and Pacific Oceans and the Canal is composed of three locks and lakes. The Canal today has two lock lanes. The plan consists of adding a third lane with large locks including dredging etc, in order to make it possible for large containership more than 12,000 TEU size to transit the canal. It is scheduled to be completed during end 2014 - 2015. the Atlantic ■ Cristobal Gatun Locks New Atlantic Locks to be located at east current GatunLocks Gatun Lake ■Maximum ship which can pass current canal (Panamax) Beam: 32.3m LOA: 294.1m Draft: 12.04m Pedro Migel Locks ■Maximum ship after completion of third lane. (present plan) Miraflores Locks Beam: 49m LOA: 366m Draft: 15.2m ■ Panama City ■ Balboa the Pacific New Pacific Locks to be located (see drawing below) at south west current Miraflores Locks ★How much is the Panama Transit Fee ? ★ ⇒it varies so much by ship type and size, ■ In case of 4700TEU Containership(Panamax) ⇒ About $ 380,000/per transit (as of 2012) *Transit fee as of 2003 was abount $130,000/per transit and it has increased three times more than that time. Further price hike is big problem for shipping industry. ⇒For further information, please check website of The Panama Canal Authority (ACP) http://www.pancanal.com/eng/expansion/index.html 38 10. Shipping Business in 2030 ①World Population Prospects million 9000 8000 Others 7000 Europe 6000 South America 5000 unit:1000 mil US$ ② GDP Northern America 4000 Africa 3000 South-Eastern Asia 2000 India 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 2010 USA China J apan G ermany France UK Italia Brazil India Canada 1 4 ,6 1 2 5 ,8 6 0 5 ,4 6 5 3 ,2 9 2 2 ,6 0 2 2 ,2 5 9 2 ,0 4 4 1 ,9 8 9 1 ,5 9 6 1 ,5 7 2 2010 Source:Citi Group Feb.2011 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 2030 5 7 ,1 3 8 3 5 ,7 3 9 2 4 ,8 2 4 9 ,2 1 3 8 ,7 8 0 7 ,3 8 0 7 ,2 9 9 6 ,4 6 6 5 ,8 1 9 5 ,2 3 6 China USA India J apan Brazil Russia Indonesia G ermany UK France 2030 Status Quo China 1000 0 Source: United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs World Population Prospects: The 2012 Revision ③ Consumers’ expanding purchasing power in ASIA Source:Lloyd’s Register Global Marine Trends 2030 Total annual expenditure (trillion $2010 PPP) Source: ADB / LR 285 people joining the middle class every minute Source:Lloyd’s Register Global Marine Trends 2030 8 times the purchasing power in developing Asia will rise between 2010 and 2030 39 10. Shipping Business in 2030 ④ Automobile Market 14000 13000 Automobile Market will ⑤ Results and Proepect of Marine Transportation Cargo Volume (unit :mil ton) expand further mainly Iron Ore (Increased by 100% from 2012 to 2029) in Emerging Country Crude oil (Increase by 40% from 2012 to 2029) as China and India Unit:10,000 cars Actual Sales Results 12000 Prospect Coal (Increase by 50% from 2012 to 2029) Natural Gas (Increase by 50% from 2012 to 2029) 11000 10000 China 9000 8000 6000 Grain (Increase by 40% from 2012 to 2029) There's one car for every 17 people in China and one car for every 69 people in India as of 2010 (Source : FOURIN 2012) India Asia 7000 Oil Product (Increase by 40% from 2012 to 2029) Emerging Country : Others incl Containers (Increase by 100% from 2012 to 2029) 5000 4000 3000 1000 0 1992 1995 2000 出典: FOURIN 2012 2005 2010 2015 mb/d ⑥ Production of Deepwater Crude Oil 9.0 DOUBLE 8.0 7.0 2020 8.5 8.2 20% 7.4 8% 9% 7% 6% 8% 4% 2% 0.0 0% 2005 2011 270 Total platforms in 2010 618 2010 Total platforms in 2030 2030 10% 6% 3% 1.0 Prospect 12% 8% 5% Floating oil and gas platforms 16% 14% 4.0 2.0 Global Insight 18% 4.4 2.4 2023 (Mil bbl/day) 5.6 5.0 Possibility of market shrinking in countries with aging and depopulation society (Source: FOURIN2012) Source:Japan MLIT Website Seminer material as of 6th/March 2013"FTA's impact on Marine Transportation" 6.5 6.0 3.0 Developed Country : Europe Northern America 2000 2015 2020 Production 2025 2030 2035 Product share in global crude production Status Quo Competing Nations Global Commons Source:Lloyd’s Register Global Marine Trends 2030 40 11. "K"Line Overview <11-1. Corporate Governance System> ///Promotion of Compliance/// Chart: "K"Line Corporate Governance System ◎Group-wide efforts for developing a compliance system ・We have installed a Compliance Committee chaired by the president that discusses strategies and countermeasures to ensure compliance is maintained throughout the entire Group. ・We have also installed a dedicated division (CSR & Compliance Division) to enhance awareness on compliance to executives and regular employees through training courses and other activities. 未update ◎Compliance Month ・To increase the thoroughness of our Group’s compliance even further, we began designating a Compliance Month, starting in FY2011. During this month, we carry out various awareness-raising activities such as holding seminars for the management of our company and Group companies and sending notices out to Group companies. ・Spreading awareness about the UK Bribery Act throughout the Group in Japan and overseas.We also provided training courses on competition laws, including the Antimonopoly Act of Japan and the European Union Competition Law. ◎Response by the Compliance Committee ・If an alleged compliance violation has occurred, the issue is referred to the company’s Compliance Committee which sets out the procedures to be followed, the Compliance Committee conducts an investigation and then issues instructions to correct or cease the violation. If the issue concerns “K” Line, the Executive Officer in charge of personnel affairs will propose any disciplinary action to be taken under the working regulations.Under the “Rules on Operation of Compliance Committee,” the Compliance Committee is obliged to keep strictly confidential the names of whistle-blowers and the details of deliberations including the name, departments, or any other information that would permit identification of the persons involved in the matter, and permits them to consult with attorneys. ◎Investigating awareness of the Hot Line System ・We have introduced a whistle-blowing system called the “Hot Line System.” In addition to an internal contact, we have also appointed lawyers as external contacts. ◎Initiatives for protecting personal information ・We have developed a set of privacy policies and a personal information management code. We also undertake related training and education to further refine our system for protecting personal information. <Structure of Business Operation> Striving to improve corporate value under a governance structure We apply the Executive Officer System, under which we streamline our management through the transfer of authority and prompt decision-making. Board of Directors The Board of Directors meets at least once every month. At the Board, our Directors make decisions on basic management policies, matters stipulated by laws and regulations, and other significant management issues. They also supervise the performance of duties by Executive Officers and our staff members. Of the 13 Directors, two are Outside Directors stipulated by the Companies Act of Japan. Executive Officers' Meeting This Meeting is held twice a month, in principle, and is attended by Executive Officers and Auditors. Participants help the President to make decisions through frank discussions, in addition to sharing information and ensuring compliance. Auditors / Board of Auditors Three of the five Auditors are Outside Auditors specified in the Companies Act of Japan. The audit policy, audit plans, and other related matters are determined by the Board of Auditors, aiming for a fast, functional auditing process. Among other activities, auditors attend meetings of the Board of Directors and other important meetings and inspect documents showing final decisions, auditing the work of Directors as an independent organization. We also appoint dedicated staff to assist auditors. Management Conference The Management Conference holds discussions and exchanges opinions every week, in principle, and is attended mainly by Senior Managing Executive Officers and higher-level Executive Officers. Depending on the agendum, others may be invited to the Conference. 41 11-2. Safety in Navigation and Cargo Operations Safety Operation - The Key Element of a Shipping Business. Establishing and maintaining safety in navigation and cargo operations, environmental preservation, and economically efficient operations are the permanent missions of the "K" Line Group in its shipping business. Above all, safe navigation and cargo operations are the foundation of our business. For this reason, we are committed to building a secure system for establishing and maintaining this foundation. In "K" LINE Vision 100, the medium-term management plan we developed in April 2008, we once again defined that a secure system for managing safety in navigation and cargo operations is at the core of all of our business activities. We subsequently reviewed the medium-term management plan and adopted "K" LINE Vision 100 Bridge to the Future in April 2012 , in reviewing the Plan, we reconfirmed that establishing a system for safe navigation and cargo operations, with the continuous effort to environment preservation, was an absolutely critical and inalterable requirement. Ship Safety as the Pillar of Management The Ship Safety Promotion Committee embodies the comprehensive and systematic measures we take to ensure safety in navigation and cargo operations. It was established in 1983 as an internal committee, and its activities later encompassed Group companies responsible for ship management. The main tasks of this Committee, which meets every quarter, include aggregating defect reports during the period under review, analyzing their causes, and developing necessary responses. In addition, the Committee acts on all safety-related matters from every possible viewpoint, such as responding to international treaties, sharing new technical information, and recently considering measures against piracy in the Gulf of Aden, etc. Supporting People's Lives and Industrial Activities Among the many modes of transport, ocean transport plays an important role in international trade, as it ensures the economical transportation of large volumes of freight for long distances. In Japan's foreign trades, for example, ocean transport is used for as much as 99.7% of all cargo in weight basis., which include sources of energy such as crude oil, LPG, LNG, and coal, raw materials including iron ore, gypsum, feed, and grain, and consumables such as automobiles and home electric appliances. Ocean transport is an extremely important part of the logistics infrastructure to carry these essential goods for people's lives and industrial activities. . Activities for maintaining safe navigation and cargo operations are designed to deliver cargo that we are entrusted safely and reliably to customers as well as to ensure the safety of crew members and ships. These activities are also essential for maintaining the international logistics infrastructure, and so constitute part of our social responsibility. We never forget this fact in our daily work. Safety Management System (SMS) SMS is a system required by law. It is aimed at securing safe systems and environments for work during ship operations, establishing preventive measures for all predictable dangers, and continuously improving the safety management skills of both shore staff and crew members, including skills in preparing for emergencies related to safety and environmental preservation. At the "K" Line Group, we not only comply with the provisions of SMS, but also make additional efforts based on our own standard to establish a system for managing safety in navigation and cargo operations. Emergency Response Drills: Always Ready for Emergencies What should our Company or employees do if a ship has been involved in a collision and fuel oil is spilling, for example? We have set out the actions we need to take in such an emergency in our Emergency Response Manual. Based on this manual, we regularly conduct emergency response drills to maintain and improve the response capabilities of staff members and departments. We conducted our latest drill in February 2013 by assuming a large-scale oil spill and confirmed the functions of the manual. We also discussed issues on the application of the manual at a meeting after the drill so that we could refine it. The Emergency Response Manual contains the know-how we have accumulated through drills, and we are tackling further safe operation of ships each day to ensure that we never have to actually use the manual. Efforts for Eradicating Piracy: Resolutions and Measures Taken by the Global Community Education and Training Programs: "K" Line Maritime Academy (KLMA) The KLMA is the aggregate of training facilities in Japan and overseas, providing educational, training, and development programs including crew training programs and career path programs. We train crew members to operate ships managed by the "K" Line Group based on the "KLMA Master Plan," a plan designed to pass on to the next generation the "K" Line Group's maritime technologies accumulated over many years since our establishment. In this way, we strive to build an awareness of our safety standards, safety in navigation and cargo operations, and environmental preservation, improve our maritime technologies, and pass them on to future generations. In recent years, heavily armed pirates have appeared off the coast of Somalia and in the Gulf of Aden, vital link between Europe and Asia, and further in the Arabian Sea, the waters which link the Persian Gulf and Asia. In response, the United Nations Security Council passed a resolution that called for uncompromising action against this turpitude, and the International Maritime Organization has also passed a resolution requesting for nations to take necessary measures to eliminate piracy. Based on these resolutions, international naval forces, including Allied Powers in Europe, navies of other nations, and the Japan Maritime Self-Defense Force (MSDF), have begun to provide escort for ships passing through the area. Marine Safety Officers of Japan Coast Guard with police authority are onboard the MSDF escort ship to enforce laws against illegal action by the pirates. In principle, we operate under the security provided by these forces. We have also developed guidelines for sailing near Somalia and in the Arabian Sea to ensure the safety of our ships. If we should encounter pirates, we take evasive actions following Best Management Practice in anti-piracy measures. 42 11-3. Environment Preservation The seas are the stage where our industry comes into play. It brings various benefits to humanity with ships that are an energy-efficient and eco-friendly mode of transportation. We are required to defend the earth, to make best use of its limited resources and to promote recycling. Respecting and defending humanity´s beautiful and rich homeland is a social responsibility businesses must fulfill and also is an important homework assigned to us who are living in the 21st century. "K" LINE and its entire Group have long been tackling environmental preservation/protection issues simultaneously with our pursuit of perfection in safe navigation and cargo operations. We established "K" LINE Group´s Environmental Policy in order to further assure that all people within and outside the Group are well aware of how we are poised to effectively focus on environmental matters. "K"LINE Group's Environmental Policy Core Concept The “K” LINE Group is aware and recognizes that addressing environmental concerns is an issue shared by all mankind. Therefore, the “K” LINE Group is taking proactive measures as an essential condition for its existence and conducting a business enterprise, striving to reduce the environmental impact of its business activities, and seeking to contribute to the development of a sustainable society. In October 2001, we structured and commenced operation of "K" LINE’s own Environmental Management System (EMS), and were awarded ISO14001 Certification for our EMS by Nippon Kaiji Kyokai (ClassNK) on February 26, 2002. Our EMS embraces the entire scope of marine transportation services in all "K" LINE sectors and branches in Japan as well as three ship management companies ("K" Line Ship Management Co., Ltd., Taiyo Nippon Kisen Co., Ltd. and Escobal Japan Ltd.) KLine (Japan) Ltd., Kawasaki Kinkai Kisen Kaisha, Ltd., Nitto Total Logistics Ltd. (Terminal Dept.) are involved in the program. (Present certification is valid until Feb.25, 2014). Conduct Guidelines As EMS encompasses all marine 1. We are setting objectives and targets for environmental preservation and making improvements on an transportation services, its importance is directed to not only ship management itself ongoing basis to reduce the impact on the environment from our business activities. Furthermore, we are but also ship operations and deployment complying with all environmental treaties, laws and regulations as well as policies and voluntary standards planning. In cooperation with each group to which the “K” LINE Group has consented. company concerned, "K" LINE is tackling all environmental issues covering marine 2. We are striving to protect the global and marine environment through fleet-wide implementation of transportation business from the widest safe operation practices and are establishing the organizations and structures necessary for such possible perspective. implementation. From 2004, we started publishing our own "Social & Environmental Report" that 3. We are promoting research, development and introduction of ship facilities and equipment to improve information about Corporate Social ship energy efficiency and operating efficiency, which results in reduction of greenhouse gas emissions and contains Responsibility. (till 2003 "Environmental the prevention of atmospheric pollution. Report"only.) If you are further interested in how we are tackling environmental 4. In consideration of biodiversity, we are maintaining an awareness of the impact that the transport of preservation, we invite you to look through ballast water and living organisms that attach to ship hulls have on ecosystems and working to protect it. "Social & Environmental Report" may those ecosystems. also be accessed on our website. 5. We are contributing to establish a recycle-based society by promoting the 3Rs (reduce, reuse and LNG-Powered Vessel Development Project recycle) and promoting the effective re-use of resources, including ship recycling. 6. The entire “K” LINE Group is and will continue to support and participate in social contribution activities We are now attempting conversion to a ship propulsion method that will enable substantial reductions in greenhouse gases in exhaust and intended to protect the environment. environmentally destructive substances. 7. We are conducting education and training to elevate awareness and understanding of environmental This involves the development of ships that use as fuel liquefied natural gas (LNG), preservation issues among each member of the entire “K” LINE Group. considered a clean energy source. Revised in August 2012 43 11-4. Approach to Ballast Water Management Containership Dry Bulker ☆ Ballast Water Sea water used as weight to sink hull into the sea for necessary draft to stabilize it mainly during navigation without cargo. 【Traditional Way】 Ballast TankBulker Source : The Japanese Shipowners' Association During discharging cargo at ports, pump in ballast water, and out the water during loading cargo at ports 「Shipping Now 2012-13] Risk that aquatic organisms in ballast water profoundly affect ecological system around loading ports as alien species (ex.: Japanese seaweed bred in coastal area of Australia, etc.) 【Ballast 【Current Way】 During navigation on the open sea, replace ballast water (For some types of vessels, ballast-free-design hull form was developed) Water Management System Approved by IMO】 Process Flow of Processing ・loading ballast water Loading ballast water into ballast tank after sterilization by Filteration and UV Reactor. Feature ・No need for Chemical and self-inclusive method on board. ・Using a lot of electricity. Filteration + UV Irradiation Ballast Water Management Convention 2004 The IMO developed and adopted “The International Convention for The Control and Management of Ships Ballast Water and Sediments, 2004” (Ballast Water Management Convention) The convension requires that equipped the ballast water management system in vessels' hull to reduce aquatic organisms in ballast water before discharging the ballast. Article 18 : The convention will come into effect 12 months after 30 countries representing a combined total gross tonnage of more than 35% of the world’s merchangt fleet have ratified it. (as of July 2013, not effective yet because combined tonnage has not reached 35%) <Beginning Time of Application> Current IMO principle:For newbuildings, basically ships laid down* after 2012 (some ship types excepted) All commercial ships including existing ships must be euipped by 2020 as a general rule. ↓ IMO revised plan(to be deliberated in IMO Assemply in November 2013) ⇒ Application schedule varys according to period when the Convention becomes effective For newbuildings, basically ships laid down* after the convention being effective (some ship types excepted) Existing ships must be equipped by 2022 when the Convention comes into effect by 2016 as a general rule. U.S. Alternative Management System by USCG (U.S. Coast Guard) Filteration + Electrolysis Started concrete feasibility study of U.S.rule for vessels calling and potential calling at U.S. despite effective date of Ballast Water Management Convention by IMO * "Ships laid down" includes ‘Ship construction’ which refers to a stage of construction where: • the keel is laid or construction identifiable with the specific ship begins; and • assembly of the ship has commenced comprising at least 50 tonnes or 1% of the estimated mass of all structural material, whichever is less. ・loading ballast water Loading ballast water into ballast tank after sterilization by Filteration and Electrolysis. ・Need for care separately because electrolysis is impossible in fresh and brackish water area. ・discharging ballast water Discharging ballast water after putting neutralizer if needed. ・Require careful handling of hydrogen gas released by electrolysis. ・Using middle electricity. ・loading ballast water Loading ballast water into ballast tank after sterilization by Electrolysis. Electrolysis ・discharging ballast water Discharging ballast water after putting neutralizer if needed. ・loading ballast water Loading ballast water into ballast tank after sterilization by Filteration and Chemical Injection. ※ To be applied to ships calling at U.S. Apart from IMO, USCG established similar homogeneours rules: ⇒Effective in June 2012; For newbuildings, ships laid down* after December 2013*. Existing commercial ships must be euipped by 2021 as a general rule. ・discharging ballast water Discharging ballast water after sterilization by UV Reactor again. Filteration + Chemical Injection ・discharging ballast water ・Need for care separately because electrolysis is impossible in fresh and brackish water area. ・Require careful handling of hydrogen gas released by electrolysis. Alfa Laval Optimarine Panasia Hyundai Heavy Industry MAHLE Industrial Filtration Hyde Marine Wuxi Brightsky Electronic Aura Marine Wartsila Water System Ocean Saver RWO SunRui Marine Enviroment Enginering Company Hyundai Heavy Industry Seven Trent DeNora Samsung Heavy Industry Erma First Sweden Norway Korea Korea Germany USA Korea Finland Netherlands Norway Germany Techcross Korea JFE Engineering Japan Ecochlor USA Kuraray Japan Korea China Korea USA Korea Greece ・Using middle electricity. ・Continuous arrangement of chemicals is needed. ・Require careful handling of chemicals. ・Using low electricity. Discharging ballast water after putting neutralizer if needed. Ozonation ・loading ballast water Loading ballast water into ballast tank after sterilization by Ozonation. ・Require careful handling of Ozone. ・discharging ballast water Discharging ballast water after putting neutralizer if needed. ・Using rather a lot of electricity. NK - - Others (Omission) - ・A lot of equipment configuration. Source : Compiled by "K" Line based on Class NK website,etc. Manufacture 44 45 11-5. Brief History Line of Presidents in "K"Line and Brief History Company Name President AD Japanese Calender History (Kawasaki 1837 Tenpo 8 Born in Kagoshima 1853 Kaei 6 Started trading business in Nagasaki Heavy 1878 Meiji 11 Established Kawasaki Tsukiji Shipyard in Tsukiji, Tokyo Industries) 1881 14 Established Kawasaki Hyogo Shipyard in Hyogo 29 Incorporated Kawasaki Dockyard Co., Ltd. 1896 37 Started marine trasportation business, under name of KAWASAKI Marine 1904 Freight Department. Kawasaki Kisen Kaisha Ltd. 1 Yoshitaro Kawasaki 1919 Taisho 8 Official registration of 'Kawasaki Kisen Kaisha, Ltd.', started business with the name 2 Kojiro Matsukata 1920 9 〔1〕 10 'Kawasaki Kisen', tying up 'Kawasaki Marine Freight Department', and 1921 ("K"Line) 'Kokusai Kisen' formed "K"LINE.〔2〕 1927 Showa 2 'Kokusai Kisen' disengaged from "K"LINE 3 3 Fusajiro Kashima 1928 4 Hachisaburo Hirao 1933 8 9 'Kawasaki Marine Freight Department' liquidated. 'Kawasaki Kisen' became the only operator for "K"LINE. 10 5 Masasuke Itani 1935 6 Koichi Kimishima 1946 21 1948 23 Succeeded refloatation of KIYOKAWA MARU, sunk during the war.〔3〕 25 7 Motozo Hattori 1950 1951 26 Japan/Bangkok liner service inauguated. 1953 28 Started independent oil transport service (with vessel 'Andrew Dillon') 1960 35 Iron ore carrier "FUKUKAWA MARU" is completed. 1964 39 Japanese shipping industry consolidated into six groups. "K"Line merged with Iino Kisen〔4〕 1968 43 "K"Line's 1st full-container ship "GOLDEN GATE BRIDGE"delivered. "TOYOTA MARU NO.1"('Car Bulker')delivered 8 Mamoru Adachi 1970 45 "TOYOTA MARU NO.10", the first Pure Car Carrier in Japan delivered 51 9 Kosuke Okada 1976 10 Kiyoshi Kumagai 1980 55 1983 58 "BISHU MARU", the first LNG carrier in Japan completed 60 11 Kiyoshi Ito 1985 12 Hiroshige Matsunari 1988 63 "Manhattan Bridge"started service with 11crew as the first Japanese 'pioneership'. 13 Shiro Nagumo 1992 Heisei 4 1993 5 "K"Line Reengineering Program (K.R. Program) launched. 6 14 Isao Shintani 1994 1996 8 "K" Line Re-engineering Phase II (K.R. PHASEⅡ) started 10 A 5-year management plan, New"K"Line Spirit for 21 (New K-21) established 1998 Resumption of dividend for the first time in 15 years 12 15 Yasuhide Sakinaga 2000 2002 14 A 3-year management plan "KV-Plan" formulated. 16 New management plan "K"LINE Vision 2008 adopted 2004 17 16 Hiroyuki Maekawa 2005 + 2006 18 Newly developed management plan "K"LINE Vision 2008 started 2008 20 Newly developed management plan "K"LINE Vision 100 started 22 Newly refomed management plan "K"LINE Vision 100 KV2010 started 2010 22 17 Kenichi Kuroya 2010 2011 23 Newly refomed management plan "K"LINE Vision 100 "New Challenges" started 18 Jiro Asakura 2011 23 2012 24 Newly refomed management plan "K"LINE Vision 100 "Bridge to the Future" Dockyard) Shozo Kawsaki (ex. Kawasaki 〔1〕Kawasaki Kisen inauguration Aim to one of the major international shipping companies along with NYK and MOL using stock boats prepared originally for extra demand by World War I. 〔2〕“K” LINE formed Operation in the same flag, funnel mark, and trade name 〔3〕KIYOKAWA MARU Our symbol of recovery from World War Ⅱ; reflotation of KIYOKAWA MARU 〔4〕Shipping industry consolidation Depression after boom in shipping by Korean War and closure of the Suez Canal - measures to strengthen shipping industry by the Japanese government 45 46 11-6. Press Releases for FY2012 (Apr.2012~Mar.2013) For details, please visit the following website: (http://www.kline.co.jp/en/news/index.html) 2-Apr-12 “K” Line Reverses Loss from Revaluation of Investment Securities in the Fourth Quarter of Consolidated Year Ending March 31, 2012 6-Apr-12 "K" LINE Continues to be Included in FTSE4Good Global Index 11-Apr-12 “K” Line Upgrades Asia – Mexico/West Coast South America Service 17-Apr-12 “K” Line Sets New Target to Reduce CO2 Emissions 20-Apr-12 “K” Line Service Ranked 1st Place in 6 out of 11 Categories in Shipper Sentiment Survey 27-Apr-12 Change of Directors 27-Apr-12 Review of Medium-Term Management Plan 8-May-12 First Class of “K” Line Students Graduate from Crystal e-College 9-May-12 CKYH Alliance to Restructure Asia – U.S. East Coast Services 16-May-12 Ultra-Deepwater Drillship Now in Operation in Petrobras Pre-Salt Oil Field off Brazil 22-May-12 Renewal of Plan on Countermeasures to Large-Scale Acquisitions of Company Shares (Takeover Defense Measures) 7-Jun-12 ”K” Line Receives Port of Long Beach Green Flag Award for 7 Consecutive Years 13-Jun-12 “K” Line and Noble form Joint Venture 13-Jun-12 Cooperation with Rescue of Small Boat in Distress 20-Jun-12 Cristal e-College Receives Approval from Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism Japan under new Certification Program 2-Jul-12 Notice Concerning Issuance of New Shares, Secondary Offering of Shares and Subordinated Loan Financing 2-Jul-12 "K” Line Posts Loss from Revaluation of Investment Securities in First Quarter FY2012 18-Jul-12 Notice of Adjustment of Conversion Price for ¥30,000,000,000 Zero Coupon Convertible Bonds due 2013 1-Aug-12 “K” Line - Containerships Services On-Time Arrival Performance Report 27-Aug-12 CKYH-the Green Alliance Winter Service Adjustment on Asia-North Europe service 18-Sep-12 “K” Line Maritime Academy (Philippines) Ship Simulator and Bridge Teamwork Training Course Certified by Class NK 28-Sep-12 "K" LINE Continues to be Included in FTSE4Good Global Index and Dow Jones Sustainability Index 31-Oct-12 Difference in Financial Results from Projections, Revised Forecast of Financial Results and Resolution to Pay No Interim Dividend 6-Nov-12 Voyage Cancellation Plan for Asia-Mediterranean Loops in Winter Season 12-Dec-12 Additional Voyage Cancellation Plan for Asia-North Europe and Mediterranean Loops in Winter Season 27-Dec-12 “K” Line Supports Typhoon Victims in The Philippines 4-Jan-13 “K” Line Reverses Loss from Revaluation of Investment Securities in Third Quarter of Consolidated Year Ending March 31, 2013 4-Jan-13 2013 New Year Message from President Asakura 28-Jan-13 "K" Line Enhances JABCO Services 7-Feb-13 Triple Decker Motorcycle Carrier has Landed in India 8-Feb-13 Shipping Industry Provides Funding to UNDP Job Creation Initiative in Somalia 15-Feb-13 Conduct Emergency Response Drill 15-Feb-13 “Satoyama” Project with academic-industry partnership 22-Feb-13 "K" Line Enhances JASECO Services 1-Mar-13 NEW Mobile and PC Global Container Tracking Service 11-Mar-13 CKYH – the Green Alliance to reorganize service network for Asia-North Europe and Asia-Mediterranean trades in 2013 18-Mar-13 “K” Line Decides to Deploy New Generation Eco-Friendly ULCVs (Ultra Large Container Vessels) 19-Mar-13 “CKYH” to restructure Asia-U.S. East Coast services 21-Mar-13 Actual Ship Onboard Test of SCR System for Diesel Generator Started on 8,600TEU New Container Ship “HANOI BRIDGE” 29-Mar-13 “K” Line to enter Long-Term Time Charter and Construction of LNG Carrier to serve Chubu Electric 46 47 11-7. Certification by Third-party Organization and Information on Convertible Bonds/Ratings Certification by Third-party Organization on CSR /Environment Environmental Management System ISO14001 Scope of Application : Marine Transportation Services Quality Management System ISO9001 (Ship Planning Group, "K" Line Ship Management Co.Ltd. New Building Group) Scope of Application : Planning, Development and Determination Business of Specification for New Shipbuilding, Approval Business of Plan and Drawings, Supervision Business in Shipyard FTSE4 Good Index Series FTSE(joint venture between The Financial Times and London Stock Exchange), a UK based famous global index company, has included our company for their SRI (Socially Responsible Investment) index FTSE4 Good Index series since Mar 2003. Rating Information (for Long-term Bonds) R&I JCR S&P 1996 BBB- 1997 BBB BB 1998 BBB BBB+ BB 1999 BBB BBB+ BB 2000 BBB+ BBB+ BB+ 2001 BBB+ BBB+ BB+ 2002 BBB+ BBB+ BB+ 2003 BBB+ ABB+ 2004 AA BB+ 2005 AA BBB- 2006 AA BBB- 2007 AA BBB 2008 A A BBB 2009 AABBB- 2010 AABBB- 2011 BBBBBB+ BB 2012 BBBBBB+ BB- Issued Convertible Bond Information Date of Issue Issued Amount Coupon 4 April 2005 30 bil. Yen zero-coupon Conversion Price 851yen/share Maturity Date 4 April 2013 Capital Increase through a Public Stock Offering Date of Offering Total Amount Issue Price Number of Shares 12 Feb 2010 38 bil. Yen \316 per share 126.5 mn shares 2 Jul 2012 20.8 bil. Yen \125 per share 174.0 mn shares Result in Dilution 19.80% 22.73% *Conversion price after adjustment as of 19th/July 2012 is 832.4 yen/share. 47 48 11-8. Corporate Principles, Charter of Conduct, etc. "K" LINE established its Corporate Principles and Vision, which promises the formation of a stable business base for the "K"LINE Group, in the management plan that was initiated from April 2004. The basic principles of the "K" LINE Group as a shipping business organization centering on shipping lie in: a.) Diligent efforts for safety in navigation and cargo operations as well as for environmental preservation: b.) Sincere response to customer needs by making every possible effort; and c.) Contributing to the world’s economic growth and stability through continual upgrading of service quality. 1 To be trusted and supported by customers in all corners of the world while being able to continue to grow globally with sustainability, 2 To build a business base that will be capable of responding to any and all changes in business circumstances, and to continually pursue and practice innovation for survival in the global market, 3 To create and provide a workplace where each and every employee can have hopes and aspirations for the future, and can express creativity and display a challenging spirit. Charter of Conduct : "K" Line Group Companies Kawasaki Kisen Kaisha, Ltd. and its group companies (hereinafter “K” Line Group) reemphasize that due respect for human rights and compliance with applicable laws, ordinances, rules are the fundamental foundations for corporate activities and that group companies’ growth must be in harmony with society and therefore, in order to contribute toward sustainable development of society, we herein declare to abide by “Charter of Conduct” spelled out below: 1. Human rights The “K” Line Group will consistently respect human rights and well consider personality, individuality and diversity of its corporate members and improve work safety and conditions to offer them comfort and affluence. 2. Compliance The “K” Line Group promises to comply with applicable laws, ordinances, rules and other norms of behavior both in the domestic and international community and conduct its corporate activities through fair, transparent and free competition. 3. Trustworthy company group The “K” Line Group continues to pay special attention to safety in navigation, achieving customer satisfaction and garnering trust from the community by providing safe and beneficial services. 4. Proactive environmental efforts The “K” Line Group recognizes that global environmental efforts are a key issue for all of humanity and that they are essential both in business activities and existence of the company and therefore we are committed to a voluntary and proactive approach to such issues to protect and preserve the environment. 5. Protection, proper management and disclosure of information and communication with society The “K” Line Group will protect personal and customer data, properly manage corporate information through timely and appropriate disclosure, widely promoting bi-directional communication with society including shareholders. 6. Contribution to society The “K” Line Group as a Good Corporate Citizen will make ongoing efforts to contribute to social development and improvement and support employees’ voluntary participation in such activities. 7. Harmony in the international society The “K” Line Group will contribute to the development of international society in pursuance of its business pertaining to international logistics and related businesses, respecting each country’s culture and customs. 8. No relations with anti-social forces The “K” Line Group will resolutely confront any anti-social force or organization which may threaten social order and public safety and never have any relationship with them. The management of each “K” Line Group Company recognizes that it is its role to realize the spirit of the Charter and takes the lead in an exemplary manner to implement the Charter while setting up effective mechanics throughout the company. The management also seeks cooperation from its business counterparts. The management, from the viewpoint of riskmanagement, sets up an internal system to prevent incidents in breach of this Charter and should such an event occur, the management of respective “K” Line Group member companies will demonstrate decisiveness to resolve the problem, conduct a thorough investigation to determine the cause and take preventative measures. Additionally, such management will expeditiously and accurately release information and fulfill its accountability to society. Adopted December, 2006 Revised August, 2012 This Charter of Conduct is accompanied by "Implementation Guidance for Charter of Conduct", which we have posted in our HP. (⇒http://www.kline.co.jp/en/csr/group/charter.html) 48 Tonnage Tax, Change in Circumstances for Japanese Vessels and Japanese Seafarers 49 12. Tonnage Tax 1.Basic Act on Ocean Policy (Enacted April 20, 2007, Effective July 20, 2007) This act includes 'Securing Maritime Transport', which is : (Securing Maritime Transport) Article 20: The Government shall take necessary measures to secure an efficient and stable maritme transport, including the securing of Japanese registered vessels, fostering and securing seafarers, developing hub ports as base for international maritime transport network and others. 2.Revised Marine Transportation Law for Tonnage Tax System (Enacted May 30, 2008, Effective July 17, 2008) -Japanese ocean-going shippping companies that are approved by the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism (MLIT) can select taxation on deemed profit instead of normal corporate tax for earnings connected to Japanese-registered vessels. ○Pattern Diagrams for Calculation of Tax Marine Transport Business ex. Japanese vessels, Japanese registered vessels <Quoted from MLIT Website> Original ・課税の計算方法は、船舶の純トン数xみなし利益x運航日数x 法人税率=法人税額、となり profit Tax loss Original 業績にかかわらず税額は一定となる。 related to Profit deemed profit Japanese vessels Taxable profit Original profit (Case1) Deemed profit (Case2) (Case1) Original profit related to Japanese vessels > deemed profit The amount over deemed profit is counted in tax loss. (Case2) Original profit related to Japanese vessels < deemed profit The balance between original and deemed profit is counted in taxable profit. (i.e., deemed profit = taxable profit) 3.First Approval of Plans to Secure Japanese Registered Vessels and Japanese Seafarers Concerning Tonnage Tax -As for applications for approval of plans to secure Japanese registered vessels and Japanese seafarers required under the tonnage tax system, after review by MLIT, all 11 business operators that applied, as listed below including ourselves, met the criteria and were approved by MLIT. ・【Business Operators (Alphabetical Order)】 Asahi Shipping Co., Ltd., Asahi Tanker Co., Ltd., Daiichi Chuo Kisen Kaisha, Iino Kaiun Kaisha, Ltd., Kawasaki Kisen Kaisha, Ltd., Mitsui O.S.K. Lines, Ltd., Nippon Steel Shipping Co.,Ltd., Nippon Yusen Kabushiki Kaisha, Nissho Shipping Co.,Ltd., The Sanko Steamship Co., Ltd., Shinwa Kaiun Kaisha, Ltd. 【Outline of the Plan by above 11 Operators】 ○ ○ ○ ○ Duration of the Plan : 5 years (April 1, 2009 - March 31, 2014) Ocean-going Ships Planned to be Secured by all 11 Operators : 77.4 => 161.8 (approx. 2.1 times) Japanese Ocean-going Seafarers Planned to be Trained by all 11 Operators : 698 for 5 years Japanese Ocean-going Seafarers Planned to be Secured by all 11 Operators : 1,072 => 1,162 (+90, approx. 1.1 times) 4.Expansion of Tonnage Tax after 2013 Outline of Expansion of Tonnage Tax. Against a background of increasing importance of safe transportation by Japanese shipping firms through the Great East Japan Earthquake and nuclear accident in Fukushima, the Tonnage Tax will be expanded to cover foreign vessels which are owned by foreign subsidiaries of Japanese shipping firms and meet the necessary requirements by the Japanese government in 2013 Tax Reform. Current System New System Period 2009-2013 (5 years) 2013-2017 (5 years) Vessel Japanese registered vessels ・Japanese registered vessels ・ Fore ign re giste re d ve sse ls th at are own e d by fore ign su bsidiarie s of Japan e se sh ippin g firms (FOC) Japanese Seafarer 4 Japanese Seafarer per 1 Japanese registered vessel ・4 Japanese Seafarer per 1 Japanese registered vessel ・2 Japan e se Se afare r pe r 1 Fore ign re giste re d ve sse l(FOC) <MLIT Home Page, The Japanese Shipowners' Association Home Page, The Japan Maritime Daily> ・Those vessels are what we call "Flag of convenience"(FOC). ・3 foreign registered vessels (FOC) can be applied Tonnage Tax against increase of 1 Japanese registered vessel from 2013. 49 50 13. IR Policy Kawasaki Kisen Kaisha, Ltd. ("K" Line) conducts its investor relations based on the fundamental direction outlined below, in order that a clear understanding and fair evaluation of our company can be made by all of our stakeholders, including shareholders and investors. 1. Fundamental Stance on IR Activities "K" Line's fundamental approach to IR activities is the timely and appropriate disclosure of important facts concerning the company to all existing and potential shareholders and investors, in an accurate and clear, impartial and swift manner, with the aim of establishing a relationship of trust through accurate information disclosure. 2. Information Disclosure Standards "K" Line discloses information in accordance with applicable laws and regulations such as the Financial Instruments and Exchange Act and the Timely Disclosure Rules set by the Tokyo Stock Exchange (TSE). We proactively disclose information that is deemed to be beneficial for the investment decisions of shareholders and investors, even where it does not fall under the Timely Disclosure Rules. 3. Information Disclosure Procedures For information that falls under the Timely Disclosure Rules or which could have a material influence on the investment decisions of shareholders and investors, "K" Line complies with Timely Disclosure Rules ・課税の計算方法は、船舶の純トン数xみなし利益x運航日数x 法人税率=法人税額、となり by disclosing information through the TSE's Timely Disclosure Network (TDnet). The information 業績にかかわらず税額は一定となる。 disclosed at TDnet is also posted on our website as quickly as possible. We disclose all other information as well by postings on our IR website, press releases, etc. 4. Enhancing Communication "K" Line seeks to enhance interactive communication with our shareholders and investors through briefing sessions and answering daily inquiries, etc. In order to gain further understanding of our company, we also try to enhance availability of IR information through our website, etc. 5. Notes for Future Prospects The information transmitted by us as IR news may include information about future forecasts, plans and strategy, etc. That information is based on our future prospects and may include risk factors and elements of uncertainty. For further information, please refer to Business Risks for details. 6. Quiet Period To prevent the leakage of material information of the company and ensure fairness, "K" Line has established the period about 2 weeks before the day of the announcement each quarter as a Quiet Period. During this period, the company refrains from answering questions and will not respond to inquiries concerning, or comment on, its earnings results, for which we sincerely request your understanding and acceptance. 14. Shareholder Composition Domestic Finance Institutions 17.2% (as of March 2013) Overseas Investors 25.8% Domestic Individuals Other Domestic Corporations Trust Accounts 24.3% Other Domestic Corporations 6.2% Overseas Investors Trust Accounts Domestic Individuals 26.6% Domestic Finance Institutions 50 【Contact Information】 KAWASAKI KISEN KAISHA, LTD. IR&PR Group IINO BUILDING, 1-1, Uchisaiwaicho 2-chome, Chiyoda-ku, TOKYO 100-8540, JAPAN E-Mail: kljtyoir@jp.kline.com Tel. (+81)-(0)3-3595-5063 Fax. (+81)-(0)3-3595-5001 Home Page: http://www.kline.co.jp/en/ President Message "K"Line & Group Companies ⇒ http://www.kline.co.jp/en/ir/policy/message.html ⇒ http://www.kline.co.jp/en/corporate/group/index.html Financial Highlights Annual Report Social & Environmental Report ⇒ http://www.kline.co.jp/en/ir/library/bs/index.html ⇒ http://www.kline.co.jp/en/ir/library/annual/index.html ⇒ http://www.kline.co.jp/en/csr/report/index.html Investor Meeting (PPT, Streaming, etc.) ⇒ http://www.kline.co.jp/en/ir/library/pr/index.html Management Plan (PPT, Streaming, etc.) ⇒ http://www.kline.co.jp/en/corporate/vision100/ ⇒ http://www.kline.co.jp/en/ir/library/plan/index.html Business Introduction ( inc. Fleet List) ⇒ http://www.kline.co.jp/en/service/index.html Mailing List Registration (Press Release etc.) ⇒ https://www.kline.co.jp/en/contact/other_e.php