Laser-Driven Ion Acceleration In A Hybrid RPA
Transcription
Laser-Driven Ion Acceleration In A Hybrid RPA
Laser-Driven Ion Acceleration In A Hybrid RPA-TNSA Regime D. Gwynne,1 S. Kar,1 H. Ahmed,1 M. Cerchez,2 D. Doria,1 J. Fernandez,3, 4 R. Gray,5 J. Green,4 F. Hanton,1 D. Maclellan,5 P. McKenna,5 Z. Najmuddin,6 D. Neely,4 J.A. Ruiz,3 M. Streeter,6 M. Swantusch,2 O. Willi,2 M. Zepf 1 and M. Borghesi.1 1) Centre for Plasma Physics, School of Mathematics and Physics, Queen's University Belfast. 2) Institut für Laser-und Plasmaphysik, Heinrich-Heine-Universität, Düsseldorf, Germany. 3) Instituto de Fusion Nuclear, Universidad Politecnica de Madrid, Spain. 4) Central Laser Facility, Rutherford Appleton Laboratory, Didcot, Oxfordshire. 5) Department of Physics, SUPA, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow. 6) Imperial College, London. The production of proton and ion beams during ultraintense laser interactions with thin foils is a subject which has recently received a great deal of attention from both theoretical and experimental points of view [1]. Laser-driven ion acceleration has the potential to be a cost effective, compact alternative to conventional acceleration sources for scientific, technological and health care applications [2]. The LS regime of RPA is particularly promising for accelerating protons and ions more efficiently as it has a favourable dependence on the laser fluence Ζ [3β6], and produces similarly efficient acceleration for both protons and higher mass ions, as predicted by numerous computational and analytical studies [2]. 1. INTRODUCTION TNSA beam characteristics pose significant limitations for many of the envisaged applications [2-3]. By contrast, ion production by the radiation pressure of intense lasers has been predicted to be a promising route for accelerating large numbers of ions quasi-monoenergetically to the GeV per nucleon range in a more efficient manner to TNSA [2-3]. Surface contaminants Laser accelerates electrons (MeV) β’ eLASER β’ Fast electrons travel through the target Fast electrons create a Debye sheath at the rear of the target. Ions pile up at the rear surface of the target before the end of the laser pulse The E-field at discontinuity (~1012 V/m) accelerates the ions to multi MeV energies. LE1 Pinhole Magnets LE2 RCF B E C6+ V0 P+ Electric plates O7+ Figure 3: Schematic of the experimental setup. LB1 πΊπ© = ππ³ β LB2 πππ³ β π³ππ©π + ππ¬π³π¬π π³π¬π πΊπ¬ = + π³π¬π π π πππ π³π©π π³π©π πππ³ β π³ππ©π πππ³ 4. RESULTS β’ TP0: Z/A = 1 TP0: Z/A = 0.5 1.E+13 The M and Z of the species to be traced are entered and the code generates a trace line, according to the values of the E and B fields. The data is obtained by selecting a region enclosing the traced species, subtracting a background region of the same size, then the signal and energy spectrum are calculated. The distribution can be viewed immediately, thus allowing a visualisation of the experimental results before detailed analysis is carried out. OAP, f/3 TCC to pinhole TP3: 1855±5 mm TP0: 1865±5 mm TP-3: 1917±5 mm Figure 6: Spectra obtained from 50nm Au irradiated by a πΌ0 ~3 × 1020 W cm-2, 1.00 ps pulse. dN/dE (in MeV/nucleon/sr β’ If π > evanescence length of the ponderomotive force, the whole layer is cyclically accelerated Figure 2: Radiation Pressure Light Sail Acceleration. 3. DATA ANALYSIS The data from the TPs was analysed using a MATLAB GUI TPspec, which reads in images scanned from the image plates of the TPs. Laser axis Target normal π Figure 1: Target Normal Sheath Acceleration. β’ The experiment was conducted employing the VULCAN laser system at the Rutherford Appleton Laboratory, UK. The laser delivered ~53 to 367 J in pulses of 1.00-5.90 ps. The πΌπ of the laser varied from 3 × 1019 to 3 × 1020 W cm-2 and targets of varying π and composition were irradiated. The ions produced were diagnosed by three Thompson Parabola (TP) spectrometers. Figure 4: Schematic of a TP and the equation set used by TPspec, rL is the Larmour radius. πππ³ β π³ππ©π TP-3: Z/A = 1 TP-3: Z/A = 0.5 β’ 1.E+12 1.E+11 1.E+10 1 10 100 Figure 7: Spectra obtained from 50 nm Cu irradiated with a πΌ0 ~8.9 × 1019 W cm-2, 3.05 ps pulse. Narrow band features can be clearly seen in the ion spectra. The highest energy peak for protons and carbon ions were calculated to be 18±2 and 7.4±0.5 MeV/nucleon respectively . To assess the influence of RP effects on the spectral profiles, a simple theoretical model was used [2], which estimates the peak energy of the ion will scale as π 2 , for thin targets, where π is the dimensionless fluence parameter β π02 ππ π [2]. This was calculated for each laser shot where πΌ0 is the peak laser intensity, π; laser wavelength (1.054 ΞΌm), π‘π ; laser pulse duration, π, π; target thickness and density, ππ; proton mass, and ππ ; critical electron density (1 × 1021 cm-3). 4.E+13 dN/dE (in MeV/nucleon/sr) Pre-plasma Metal foil e- Z+ Metal foil Detector β’ β’ 2. EXPERIMENTAL SETUP TP-3: Z/A = 1 TP0: Z/A = 1 4.E+12 4.E+11 2.50 Energy/nucleon (MeV) Energy/nucleon (MeV) ππ = π. ππ π°π ππ ππππ πΎππβπ 20 O7+ O6+ C4+ Z/A = 1 Z/A = 0.5 Z/A = 0.33 Previous Data Theoretical Model 18 16 14 π = πβ² π π πβ² = π ππ ππ 10 β’ 2 8 6 4 2 0 100 a02Οp/Ο 1000 The peak energy scaled as π 2 as expected. Numerous data points lie to the left hand side of the graph, which may have been caused by self-induced transparency. Figure 8: Peak energy against π02 ππ π for TP0 (a), TP-3 (b). The black line is the theoretical fit and the green data points are from Henig et al [7]. Z/A = 1 Z/A = 0.5 Z/A = 0.33 Previous Data Theoretical Model 18 16 14 1 (b) 12 10 2 8 6 4 2 0 10 100 a0 2Ο p/Ο 1000 5. CONCLUSIONS Figure 5: MATLAB GUI TPspec with an example of an image plate showing traced proton, carbon and oxygen tracks. β’ [5] A. Macchi, S. Veghini, T. V Liseykina, and F. Pegoraro, New Journal of Physics 12, 045013 (2010). [6] A. P. L. Robinson, M. Zepf, S. Kar, R. G. Evans, and C. Bellei, New Journal of Physics 10, 013021 (2008). [7] A. Henig et al., Physical Review Letters 103, 245003 (2009). 1 12 10 [1] M. Borghesi et al., Physical Review Letters 92, 055003 (2004). [2] S. Kar et al., Physical Review Letters 109, 185006 (2012). [3] K. F. Kakolee et al., Central Laser Facility Annual Report 2010-2011 (2011). [4] A. Macchi, S. Veghini, and F. Pegoraro, Physical Review Letters 103, 085003 (2009). ππ = πππ π (a) 20 Energy per Nucleon (MeV per nucleon) C5+ Energy per Nucleon (MeV per nucleon) P+ C6+ 25.00 Narrow-band features in the ion spectra consistent with a regime in which RPA-LS overcomes TNSA have been observed. The ion energy peaks achieved are encouraging, yet they are still a long way from the crucial milestone of 100 MeV/nucleon for the envisaged applications. The ion energy can be enhanced by increasing the fluence of the laser and/or reducing the target areal density; with current development in laser and target fabrication technology this does not seem entirely out of reach in the near future. The authors acknowledge funding from EPSRC (EP/E048668/1, EP/E035728/1 - LIBRA consortium, EP/J500094/1 and EP/J002550/1 - Career Acceleration Fellowship held by S.K.)