presentations
Transcription
presentations
Introduction: retrofitting commercial buildings, a new focus with important results for policy-makers Roberto Lollini EURAC Research Bolzano Energy Day, June 13, 2016 Smart strategies and policies for sustainable shopping centres: energy efficient and cost-competitive retrofitting solutions EUSEW 2016 CommONEnergy project Objective Re-conceptualize shopping malls through deep retrofitting through a comprehensive systemic approach involving innovative technologies and optimizes solution sets. Targets • Up to 75% reduction of energy demand • Power peak shaving • 50% increased share of renewable energy source • Improved indoor environmental quality Numbers • 3 demo cases • 4 years • 23 organizations and 3 third parties Brussels, 13.6.2016 EUSEW 2016 CommONEnergy project PARTNERS 23 organizations from industry, SMEs and research institutions, covering: • Monitoring and control system manufacturer • HVAC, Refrigeration and Lighting manufacturer • Storage systems manufacturers • Solar system manufacturer • Materials manufacturer • Building enterprises • R&D experts (building physics, HVAC+R systems, monitoring, lighting, materials) • Engineering/Architectural consultants • Building owners Brussels, 13.6.2016 EUSEW 2016 Why shopping centers? • Gross leasable area (GLA) per 1000 capita in EU-28+NO+CH is 224 m² • More than 119.2 million m2 shopping centre GLA in the EU28+NO+CH • Shopping centre renovation rate (RR) is 4.4% • RR of residential sector is 1.2% CommONEnergy Deliverable 2.1 Brussels, 13.6.2016 EUSEW 2016 Why shopping centers? • Final energy consumption of the shopping centre stock was 32.2 TWh in 2013 CommONEnergy Deliverable 2.1 Brussels, 13.6.2016 EUSEW 2016 Why shopping centers? source: http://www.buildingsdata.eu/ Brussels, 13.6.2016 EUSEW 2016 Shopping centre: a peculiar case of building Nearly all retail locations use mechanical cooling systems to ensure indoor comfort temperatures and mechanical ventilation to ensure adequate air exchange, primarily for hygienic reasons. These energy uses are responsible for around 40% of the total electricity consumption of a shopping centre. Share of total energy demand in retail buildings ( Retail forum sustainability 2009) Brussels, 13.6.2016 EUSEW 2016 CommONEnergy project WP2 context finished WP3+WP4 technology solutions development + modelling prototyping proofing/validating, finalizing, assessing WP5 solution-sets, methodologies (but also as a way to “sell” technologies!!) running and to be finalized asap WP6 demonstration (of technologies and methodologies) 3 different stages: • MVAL: almost finished • CitySyd: designing, procurement and implementation running together (men at work!) • COOP Modena/Grosseto: design phase almost finalised, under procurement, implementation in Jun-Sep 2016 We (partners, local stakeholders, and EC) are waiting for first measured results WP7 communication, dissemination, exploitation (market expectation/penetration) Brussels, 13.6.2016 EUSEW 2016 Sales Growth 2000-2012 and GLA per Capita 17.50% Slovakia High share - high growth Markets Low share - high growth Markets 15.00% Av. Sales Growth 2000-2012, [%] Bulgaria 12.50% Hungary Romania 10.00% Latvia Luxembourg Lithuania 7.50% Estonia Poland 5.00% Belgium Cyprus Greece 2.50% Czech Republic Malta Germany Switzerland Low share - low growth Markets 0.00% 0 Croatia Finland France Italy Portugal Spain Denmark Ireland Slovenia Norway Austria Sweden Netherlands United Kingdom 225 High share - low growth Markets 450 675 GLA per 1000 Capita, [m²/1000 capita] Source: ICSC, Eurostat Brussels, 13.6.2016 EUSEW 2016 CommONEnergy Reference Buildings Selection criteria • Climate condition • Market saturation • Location • Shopping centre typology • Building typology • Opening year Brussels, 13.6.2016 Heating & cooling Dominated Well-developed markets GE/KA GE/KA GE/KA ME/BC/DO/ ME/BC/DO/ WA/GB WA/GB ME/DO/GB Urban Location Suburban Small shopping mall Shopping centre typology Medium & large Shopping mall Spezialised and Others Reconceptualized building Building typology Shopping Center purpose Before 1990 Opening year BC/WA ME/GE/KA/D CS/BC/WA O/GB CS/ME/GE/BC/KA /DO/WA/GB PA/ST ST PA ME/GE/KA/D O/ST/GB CS/BC/PA/ WA GE GE GB BC/DO/WA ME ME GB CS/BC/KA/D O/WA ME/GE ME/GE PA/ST Opening year Building typology KA CS/PA/ST CS PA/ST KA GE KA BC/DO/WA/ ME/BC/DO/ GB WA CS/BC/KA/D CS/ME/GE/ O/WA/GB BC/DO/WA GB GB PA/ST ST/GB KA/DO PA CS/BC/WA ME/GE ME/GE PA/ST/GB KA/DO/ST/G ME/GE/DO B CS/BC/PA/ CS/BC/WA WA GB ME/GE KA/ST ST GB CS/BC/KA/D CS/BC/DO/ O/WA WA ME/GE KA PA/ST PA/ST/GB CS/BC/KA/D O/WA After 2002 Medium and large Shopping mall CS Between 1990 and 2002 Small shopping mall ST/PA Reconceptualized building Suburban CS/PA Specialised and Others Urban ST Market saturation Emerging markets Shopping centre typology Emerging markets Location Market saturation Heating & cooling Dominated PA/ST Before 1990 Cooling Dominated CS EUSEW 2016 Shopping center purpose Climate condition CS/PA/ST Well-developed markets Heating Dominated Cooling Dominated Climate condition Selection criteria Heating Dominated CommONEnergy Reference Buildings PA/ST KA ME/GE ME/GE ME/GE CS/BC/KA/DO/PA /ST/WA/GB CS/BC/DO/ WA CS/ME/GE/ BC/DO/WA Between 1990 and 2002 GB KA/PA/ST GB After 2002 KA/PA/ST Brussels, 13.6.2016 EUSEW 2016 The physical structure of shopping centres is in a state of constant change due to the changing requirements of the retail trade. Owners and managers questionnaire: "When was the shopping centre last rehabilitated/upgraded?" Owners and managers questionnaire: Interpretation of the follow up question where respondents are asked to describe the actions taken. Several replies could Brussels, be characterised as multiple refurbishments and extensions to the13.6.2016 original centre. EUSEW 2016 Architectural and aesthetic quality in shopping centres Sustainable planning requires the consideration of universal design, energy efficiency and aesthetic qualities at the same time. Buildings should be adaptable and spaces general and flexible both in terms of usage and energy consumption but functionality and technology should not be allowed to dominate at the cost of aesthetic and architectural quality. Response to the survey suggests that the sustainable shopping centres of the future will have high architectural quality with focus on legibility, durability and energy use. Emporia shopping centre, Malmø, Sweden Brussels, 13.6.2016 EUSEW 2016 The needs of shopping centres: a list of indicators Brussels, 13.6.2016 EUSEW 2016 Stakeholders in retrofitting processes Brussels, 13.6.2016 EUSEW 2016 Drivers for shopping centres energy retrofitting The need to reduce energy use in shopping centres is in itself a driver based on the needs to reduce operational costs and overhead costs. Thermal and visual comfort issues and potential improvement could be drivers to improve lighting and thermal aspects related mainly to the envelope, HVAC system and lighting devices Brussels, 13.6.2016 EUSEW 2016 Drivers for shopping centres energy retrofitting The need to have systems easier to control and maintain is a driver especially regarding the greater management and flexibility that could lead to economic benefits taking advantage of building-grid interaction aspects Lack of knowledge among stakeholder levels is a barrier to energy use reductions. Increasing knowledge potentially function as a driver for implementing actions to achieve energy use reductions. Brussels, 13.6.2016 EUSEW 2016 Drivers for shopping centres energy retrofitting Costs associated with retrofitting may be both drivers and barriers. Reducing overheads and operational costs may be considered a driver for energy retrofitting among stakeholders. However if the costs of implementing energy efficient measures outweigh the costs achieved by energy use reductions then the measures will not be implemented. Brussels, 13.6.2016 EUSEW 2016 Trends in shopping centres The state of constant flux Size and location matters Leisure and pleasure Green Retail Brussels, 13.6.2016 EUSEW 2016 Shopping centres in EPBD / EED Paula Rey García Directorate-General for Energy Energy Efficiency Buildings Team Leader Brussels, 13.6.2016 EUSEW 2016 Thank you for your kind attention! roberto.lollini@eurac.edu www.eurac.edu Brussels, 13.6.2016 CommONEnergy Day BPIE, Brussels Dr. Veronika Schröpfer 13 June 2016 ACE Project Officer, Dr. Veronika Schröpfer – CommONEnergy Day, BPIE, Brussels, 13.06.2016 The Architects’ Council of Europe (ACE) The representative organisation of the architectural profession at EU level, founded in 1990 43 Member Organisations representative at national level in 31 countries Regulatory bodies and professional associations ca. 560,000 architects Member Organisations Member Organisations with special status Observer Members ACE Project Officer, Dr. Veronika Schröpfer – CommONEnergy Day, BPIE, Brussels, 13.06.2016 Objectives (1/2) ➔To be the single voice of architects in Europe ➔To promote and defend the architectural profession at EU level towards the EU institutions ➔Advancing Architectural Quality in the Built Environment ➔Supporting Sustainable Development of the Built Environment ACE Project Officer, Dr. Veronika Schröpfer – CommONEnergy Day, BPIE, Brussels, 13.06.2016 Objectives (2/2) Advocating Quality in Architectural Practice Fostering cross-border cooperation and facilitating European practice To devote itself to a better understanding of architectural and cultural values ACE Project Officer, Dr. Veronika Schröpfer – CommONEnergy Day, BPIE, Brussels, 13.06.2016 Housing (Paris, France) - Dietmar Feichtinger Architectes Ensuring High Standards of Qualification for architects Delegates from all Member Organisations 11 Members 6 elected, including President 5 by rotation 2 years mandate WORK GROUPS ACE Project Officer, Dr. Veronika Schröpfer – CommONEnergy Day, BPIE, Brussels, 13.06.2016 Based in Brussels EXECUTIVE BOARD PERMANENT SECRETARIAT GENERAL ASSEMBLY Housing (Paris, France) - Dietmar Feichtinger Architectes Structure Housing (Paris, France) - Dietmar Feichtinger Architectes The ACE Executive Board ACE Project Officer, Dr. Veronika Schröpfer – CommONEnergy Day, BPIE, Brussels, 13.06.2016 The ACE Secretariat Brussels Mr Ian Pritchard ACE Secretary General Dr Veronika Schröpfer Project Officer Mrs Caroline André Head of Administration Mr Pierre Obajtek Policy Officer Mr Gerardo Ambrosecchia Communications Officer ACE Project Officer, Dr. Veronika Schröpfer – CommONEnergy Day, BPIE, Brussels, 13.06.2016 Access to the Profession Practice of the Profession Responsible Architecture ACE Project Officer, Dr. Veronika Schröpfer – CommONEnergy Day, BPIE, Brussels, 13.06.2016 Housing (Paris, France) - Dietmar Feichtinger Architectes Three Working Areas Access to the Profession BECOMING AN ARCHITECT IN THE EU COORDINATOR DUBRAVKO BACIC 3 work groups: professional practical experience (PPE) leading to registration • Continuing Professional Development (CPD) 2. Regulatory Questions & Issues • Access to regulated professions within EU 3. Joint Working Group with EAAE (EU Association Architectural Education) • Best Diploma prize • Erasmus+ project ACE Project Officer, Dr. Veronika Schröpfer – CommONEnergy Day, BPIE, Brussels, 13.06.2016 Housing (Paris, France) - Dietmar Feichtinger Architectes 1. Professional Qualifications Directive, PPE and CPD • Professional Qualifications Directive revision every 5 years • Automatic recognition 5+2: 5 years education + 2 years Practice of the Profession HARMONIZATION & MOBILITY COORDINATOR GEORG PENDL 3 work groups: 2.Public Procurement/ Architectural Design Contests • Advocate the use of quality based selection in Public and • Private Procurement 10 rules for design competitions 3.Trade in Services • Mutual Recognition Agreements (MRAs) with parallel organisations at global scale to facilitate the export of Architectural services. (e.g. Canada, USA) ACE Project Officer, Dr. Veronika Schröpfer – CommONEnergy Day, BPIE, Brussels, 13.06.2016 Housing (Paris, France) - Dietmar Feichtinger Architectes 1.Scope of services • Fee scales • Insurance requirement for cross-boarder practices RESPONSIBLE ARCHITECTURE PROMOTING ARCHITECTURAL QUALITY & SUSTAINABILITY COORDINATOR PEDRO RAVARA 3 work groups: 1. WG Environment and Sustainable Architecture (ESA) achieve its targets for reducing energy consumption (EPBD, EED) 2. WG Urban and Housing Issues (UI) • Promoting an integrated, holistic approach to spatial planning, urban and rural development with a focus on reuse 3. BIM • Building Information Modelling ACE Project Officer, Dr. Veronika Schröpfer – CommONEnergy Day, BPIE, Brussels, 13.06.2016 Housing (Paris, France) - Dietmar Feichtinger Architectes Housing (Paris, France) - Dietmar Feichtinger Architectes • Seeking a leading role for architects in helping the EU RESPONSIBLE ARCHITECTURE Plus: 1. Research & Innovation Panel (R&I) research results of EU projects related to EEB (Energy Efficient Buildings & Districts) and the role of the architect in energy renovation 2. Architects Against Climate Change Campaign (AACCC) ACE Project Officer, Dr. Veronika Schröpfer – CommONEnergy Day, BPIE, Brussels, 13.06.2016 Housing (Paris, France) - Dietmar Feichtinger Architectes • Participation in EU funded projects, dissemination of Housing (Paris, France) - Dietmar Feichtinger Architectes PUBLICATIONS Sustainable Construction Glossary ACE Project Officer, Dr. Veronika Schröpfer – CommONEnergy Day, BPIE, Brussels, 13.06.2016 Housing (Paris, France) - Dietmar Feichtinger Architectes ACE Project Officer, Dr. Veronika Schröpfer – CommONEnergy Day, BPIE, Brussels, 13.06.2016 Housing (Paris, France) - Dietmar Feichtinger Architectes PUBLICATIONS Sector Study every 2 years ACE Project Officer, Dr. Veronika Schröpfer – CommONEnergy Day, BPIE, Brussels, 13.06.2016 EU-funded Projects of ACE ACE Project Officer, Dr. Veronika Schröpfer – CommONEnergy Day, BPIE, Brussels, 13.06.2016 Advisory Board • Commercial = 28% of non-residential building stock • Majority already built • Approach includes architectural quality and passive solutions • Large potential in adaptive façades, natural ventilation strategies and micro-layout design to improve thermal zoning • In line with our manifesto role/ importance of architect in retrofitting process • Tools and training ACE Project Officer, Dr. Veronika Schröpfer – CommONEnergy Day, BPIE, Brussels, 13.06.2016 Thank you for your attention www.ace-cae.eu veronika.schropfer@ace-cae.eu ACE Project Officer, Dr. Veronika Schröpfer – CommONEnergy Day, BPIE, Brussels, 13.06.2016 Brussels – Energy Day FRAMING POLICIES TRANSFORMING SHOPPING MALLS INTO LIGHTHOUSES OF ENERGY EFFICIENT ARCHITECTURE Maarten De Groote Head of Research Buildings Performance Institute Europe 13/06/2016 From historic market places to modern centres Setting the scene • The European wholesale and retail contributes around 11% of EU’s GDP • Around 7 percent of all retail and wholesale buildings are shopping centres • Strong increase of Gross Leasable Area (GLA) in the EU28+NO million m² GLA 112 25 1970 NOWADAYS Defining ‘shopping centre’ • Shopping centres vary in function, typology, form, size & shopping purpose • CommONEnergy definition for ‘shopping centre’ A formation of one or more retail buildings comprising units and ‘communal’ areas which are planned and managed as a single entity related in its location, size and type of shops to the trade area that it serves. The centre has 1) a retail complex containing several stores or units and 2) a minimum GLA of 5,000 m2 Social and environmental context Location Town Centre Shopping/ urban Type of Size development 5,000 – 19,999 m2 Neighbourhood centre/ community centre Speciality centre (e.g. market halls, or historical buildings) Regional centre Super-regional centre Anchor store Trip purpose Supermarket Convenience or hypermarket shopping Traditional markets, tourist shops Leisure, convenience shopping None Household shopping, Comparison shopping, leisure Medium/ large 20,000 – shopping 79,999 m2 centres One or more department stores Comparison shopping Very large shopping centres Several department stores, entertainment centres Comparison shopping, leisure Small shopping centres Retail Park and Factory Outlets Out-of-Town Shopping/ suburban GLA (m2) Usually 5,000 m2 and above 5,000 – 30,000 m2 80,000 m2 and above Gross Leasable Area of shopping centres UK+FR+IT = 50% of EU+NO IEECB 2016 Shopping centre GLA per capita Largest GLA per capita and highest market saturation 1. Sweden 2. Norway 3. Netherlands 4. UK New energy efficient buildings Extensions, upgrades and renovations IEECB 2016 Extreme high renovation rates • Analysis of data on 3400 shopping centres indicates an annual renovation rate of 4.4% • The renovation rate of the whole building stock in Europe is around 1% • Confirmed by facility managers from reference shopping centre • Mainly to update the buildings to modern lifestyles Window of opportunities for implementing energy saving measures Energy consumption in EU’s shopping centres • Total energy consumption of the whole shopping centre building stock in Europe has not yet been calculated RESIDENTIAL SHOPPING CENTRES BUILDINGS • Space heating (67%) • Water heating (13%) • Electrical appliances (11%) • Cooking (6%) • Lighting (2%) • • • • • Store lighting Ventilation Heating Cooling Food refrigeration Specific energy use in different shop categories • Composition of the energy consumption varies from one retailer to another • Mean floor area and specific energy use in different shop categories Anchor Stores Number of shops Mean floor area [m²] Mean spec. energy use [kWh/m2a] Clothing Hobby Home Supermarket Other Services Not categorised (14) 89 6 15 8 90 31 (3205) 421 241 645 824 174 318 (158) 180 206 244 456 385 288 Bottom-up appproach • Essential to have an overview on the store composition per GLA to make estimations and develop energy consumption patterns • Specific Energy consumption [kWh/m2a] of shopping centres Specific energy consumption of shops [kWh/m2a] Specific energy consumption of the common area [kWh/m2a] Total specific energy consumption per GLA [kWh/m2a] Small shopping centre 280 117 309 Medium shopping centre 263 117 292 Large shopping centre 248 117 278 Very large shopping centre 228 117 257 Total average 261 117 IEECB 2016 290 Total energy consumption of shopping centres The total final energy consumption of shopping centres in the EU28+NO+SI is estimated to be 32.2 TWh • Largest energy consumption: UK, DE, ES, FR, IT • Account for 54% of the total energy consumption Combining sales growth, GLA per capita and annual energy consumption IEECB 2016 Functional patterns and socio-cultural aspects • Main stakeholder are customers, tenants, management and community • Trips to shopping centres are often multipurpose and tenants benefit from customer traffic not generated by them • The main priority for tenants and managers is encouraging customers to choose their shopping centre (e.g. tracking visitors) • Reasons why customers choose where to shop? 1. Location 2. Physical environment 3. Range of products available 4. Tenant mix Functional patterns and socio-cultural aspects (2) • Customer satisfaction is main starting point at understanding functional patterns • Shopping centre attractiveness affects • • Sales for the tenants • Price of rental spaces • Tenants to cooperate in marketing efforts Areas to be addressed when upgrading the shopping centre? MANAGERS TENANTS • Reduced energy demand • Customer satisfaction • Architectural quality • Improved orientation • Durability • Customer satisfaction • Thermal comfort & IAQ • Worker satisfaction • Cost Individual measures with largest saving potential • Lighting: adapt or reduce the installed power density • Air infiltration: heat losses due to poor air-tightness and the many entrances • Thermal bridges and poor insulation levels • Increase the indoor operative summer temperature • Improving Energy Management Systems Measures should be combined in a set of solutions Integrated approach for retrofitting • Not just technical systems: social systems whose everyday functional patterns are based on satisfying customers • Attractive solutions for customers: optimising indoor environmental quality and comfort • Needs of the surrounding community • Flexible interior spaces: enabling to adapt according the tenant’s request • Improving architectural and aesthetic quality • Comprehensive planning approach • Integrate entire life cycle • Involve all stakeholders Drivers for (deep) energy retrofits Need to reduce operational and overhead costs - ESCO approach? Improving thermal and visual comfort induce the buildings’ efficiency User-friendly and more efficient building management system Increase knowledge on energy consumption at end-user level Reflection on the relevance of requirements • Multiple legal requirements, e.g. work environment, major renovation, replacing technical systems, accessibility public places • Organisational structure: owners - facility managers – tenants customers (e.g. tenants agreements or guidelines, contracts with energy suppliers) • Distinguish energy use according to end-use functions Some good practices on policy measures in France • New commercial buildings are required to have solar panels or plant-covered rooftops • New parking spaces – incl. commercial zones – should be equipped with charging points for electric vehicles • Commercial buildings >2000m2: execution of energy audit, set up an appropriate renovation plan and implement measures IEECB 2016 Recommendations for policy makers • Stimulate innovative business models (e.g. ESCO’s) and new technologies (e.g. multipurpose façade systems, SIM’s) • Address the retrofit of shopping centres in the national Renovation Strategies (EED art.4) • Energy performance requirements for new construction, retrofit and operation, specifically designed for shopping centres (or commercial buildings) • E.g.: wholesale and retail ‘subcategory’ are not included in the nZEB definition in many countries: AT, BE, CZ, HR, LV, PT, RO, SK • Awareness and stimulation of green building certification schemes • Shopping centres as pilot cases for becoming energy-hubs, interacting with the energy system H&C strategy EED RED Labelling ECODESIGN New Energy Market Energy Union EPBD THANK YOU! Maarten De Groote maarten.degroote@bpie.eu Buildings Performance Institute Europe Focus on the demonstration cases: lessons-learned and replication potential Roberto Lollini EURAC Research Bolzano Energy Day, June 13, 2016 Smart strategies and policies for sustainable shopping centres: energy efficient and cost-competitive retrofitting solutions EUSEW 2016 CommONEnergy demo-cases 3 demo cases have been selected representing a variety of building typologies, architectural/technological features and climatic boundary conditions Brussels, 13.6.2016 EUSEW 2016 CommONEnergy demo-cases CitySyd, Trondheim, NORWAY Mercado de Val (MVAL), Valladolid, SPAIN COOP Canaletto, Modena, ITALY Brussels, 13.6.2016 EUSEW 2016 Demo-cases progress Concept Solution-set Designing Procurement Implementation Assessment • MVAL Valladolid: almost finished • CitySyd Trondheim: designing, procurement and implementation running together (men at work!) • COOP Modena/Grosseto: design phase almost finalised, under procurement, implementation in Jul-Sep 2016 Brussels, 13.6.2016 EUSEW 2016 Mercado del Val, Valladolid/ES Brussels, 13.6.2016 EUSEW 2016 Mercado del Val, Valladolid/ES: timing MAIN REASONS FOR DELAYS • Environmental negotiations (parking and provisional market) • Procurement procedure / Implementation procedure • Unforeseen issues (underground stream) • Adaptation to works/EU project needs/amendments • Different language/cultural approach to the works: practitioners vs researchers … Brussels, 13.6.2016 EUSEW 2016 Mercado del Val, Valladolid/ES: state of progress Running works: • Façade system commissioning • iBEMS setting up and commissioning • Coupling iBEMS and “standard” BEMS and next: • Training on iBEMS operation • Monitoring, and building performances assessment Brussels, 13.6.2016 EUSEW 2016 Mercado del Val, Valladolid/ES Brussels, 13.6.2016 EUSEW 2016 Mercado del Val, Valladolid/ES Brussels, 13.6.2016 EUSEW 2016 Mercado del Val, Valladolid/ES Brussels, 13.6.2016 EUSEW 2016 COOP Canaletto, Modena/IT Brussels, 13.6.2016 EUSEW 2016 COOP Canaletto, Modena/IT • Coupling of R + HVAC: coupling will be realized by installing two heat exchangers before the gas cooler • CO2 trans-critical refrigeration plant • Optimized LT and MT cabinets Application of variable air flow fan to the display cabinet Optimised air distribution and air vents layout for the cabinets in the supermarket with the aim to reduce mist on the glass (linear diffusers) • Free cooling using the AHU during the night • Daylighting using solar tubes and very efficient artificial lighting • Functional painting on the roof • iBEMS • PV/batteries/eV (in Grosseto/IT) Brussels, 13.6.2016 EUSEW 2016 CitySyd, Trondheim/NO N Main entrance Brussels, 13.6.2016 EUSEW 2016 CitySyd, Trondheim/NO Ground floor First floor Jens Hoff shop Brussels, 13.6.2016 EUSEW 2016 CitySyd, Trondheim/NO • • • • • Jens Hoff shop light tubes Jens Hoff shop lighting solution Skylight Natural ventilation iBEMS Brussels, 13.6.2016 EUSEW 2016 CitySyd, Trondheim/NO Brussels, 13.6.2016 EUSEW 2016 CitySyd, Trondheim/NO • Jens Hoff shop Brussels, 13.6.2016 EUSEW 2016 CitySyd, Trondheim/NO • Natural ventilation Brussels, 13.6.2016 EUSEW 2016 Systemic retrofitting solution-sets and methods Passive Active ‘Conventional’ Solution sets Brussels, 13.6.2016 EUSEW 2016 Systemic retrofitting solution-sets and methods Energy analysis Solution sets Economic evaluation Continuous commissioning Environmental impact assessment Socio-cultural assessment Replication potential and standardization needs Brussels, 13.6.2016 EUSEW 2016 Systemic retrofitting solution-sets and methods Step 0 – Evaluation of available sources/tools Step 1 – Strategy definition: solution-set Step 2 – Model definition: numerical description Step 3 – Solution-set analysis: simulations Step 6 – Fill in IDP library Step 5 – Share & Discussion NO NO Energy demand reduced by 75% YES YES PBT < 7 years Step 4 – Costs/Benefits PBT & NPV estimation Brussels, 13.6.2016 EUSEW 2016 Example of simulation study: KATANE’ – CATANIA (Italy). Energy balance Brussels, 13.6.2016 EUSEW 2016 Example of simulation study: KATANE’ – CATANIA (Italy). 1. Reduce internal gains and energy consumption by: Installing of more efficient lighting systems and automatic control lighting switch on/off 2. Reduce cooling need by: Insulating the roof and installing reflective coatings 3. Reduce energy consumption for ventilation and cooling need by: Exploiting existing automated openings to enhance stack natural ventilation in common areas and using adaptive comfort ranges as set-points 4. Reduce refrigeration consumption by: Using trans-critical system with features able to manage high external temperature5. Peak shaving by: PV+battery system Brussels, 13.6.2016 PV+battery Refrigeration – transcritical system Natural ventilation Roof insulation (5cm) + reflective coatings (0.8) Efficient lighting EUSEW 2016 Primary energy To be updated with setpoint settings according to adaptive comfort ranges Brussels, 13.6.2016 PV+battery Refrigeration – transcritical system Natural ventilation Roof insulation (5cm) + reflective coatings (0.8) Efficient lighting EUSEW 2016 Energy balance Brussels, 13.6.2016 EUSEW 2016 Thermal comfort – Fanger model Brussels, 13.6.2016 EUSEW 2016 Stakeholders workshop in Madrid • • A crucial chance to present the project achievements to possible users/clients and address the final fine tuning in the last year of the project Very short introduction to project approaches and methods: – – – – • • • Integrative Modelling Environment Technical/economic analysis Continuous commissioning Sustainability assessment Presentation of the solution-sets as applied for the 11 case studies: 3 demo-cases and 8 reference buildings in different climate, social, and economic contexts (simulators with active role, but presenting the performance of CommONEnergy technologies) Relaxed agenda to allow open discussion, giving our hosts room for comments and networking (partners and invited stakeholders) Tight scheduling of preliminary actions to prepare at best the workshop, also sharing in advance simulation results Brussels, 13.6.2016 EUSEW 2016 Thank you for your kind attention! roberto.lollini@eurac.edu www.eurac.edu Brussels, 13.6.2016 DEVIMO CONSULT 2016 L E A D I N G Y O U T O T H E M A I N B E N E LU X H OT S P OT S 2016 71 millions VISITORS 765.000 M2 UNDER MANAGEMENT 36 SHOPPING CENTERS AND RETAIL PARKS 60% OF BELGIUM’S LARGEST SHOPPING CENTERS 1.400 shops 35% OF THE RETAIL RENTAL INCOME PERCEIVED IN BELGIUM Belgium’s leader in Shopping center management 1 2 3 Innovation Fun shopping Experience A concept imported from the United States, the shopping centre or “mall” takes its first steps in Belgium marking the emergence of “out of town shopping” and “car culture”. Consumer habits are changing. Themed shopping centres are all the rage. The act of shopping becomes more complex. The contents replace the container! Faced with e-commerce, the centres have to re-invent themselves and appeal primarily to the consumer’s emotions. 1968 Creation The history of Devimo begins with the construction of Woluwe Shopping Center. 1983 Birth of Devimo Consult The company specialises in day-to-day operation and management. 2012 The roadmap for the future Devimo adapts and charts a new course. A unique expertise in the Benelux GLA (sqm) Shops Visit./year Number (millions) of sites SHOPPING CENTERS 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 City 2 Shopping Mall The W Shopping Woluwe L’esplanade Westland Shopping Grand Bazar Waasland Shopping Center Anspach Stockel Square Ninia Shopping Center Shopping Gent-Zuid Belval Plaza SC Galerie Toison d’Or 51.000 44.400 56.700 37.450 17.900 45.600 8.200 8.500 13.850 11.200 36.400 11.300 105 136 136 126 50 140 19 48 38 42 86 39 13,1 6,5 7,6 7,0 5,9 6,1 5,2 4,2 3,5 3,2 3,7 4,0 RETAIL PARKS 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 Shopping Cascade Shopping Pajot Les Dauphins Bierges Leonardo Retail Park Shopping Plaza Oostakker Zaventem Ath Shopping Marius Renard Zwijnaarde Houdeng-Goegnies N60 Apollo Park Douai 28.900 27.700 22.300 21.200 20.000 18.600 17.700 15.000 9.000 8.800 8.000 7.800 13.750 27.645 18 19 26 7 6 11 6 8 21 6 3 16 13 31 CONSULTANCY Marketing, technical, project management 27 28 29 Bellefleur Manufacture 65 Côté Senne 26.000 10.500 6.900 25 12 16 MAIN STREETS 30 31 Belgium The Netherlands 93 104 The main shopping centers and retail parks in Belgium and Luxembourg ANTW. / ST NIKLAAS GLA Shops ANDERLECHT 37.450 sqm 126 Visitors/year 7 millions Visitors/year 45.600 sqm 140 6,1 millions ANTWERPEN GLA Shops Visitors/year 17.900 sqm 50 5,9 millions GLA Shops GLA Shops Visitors/year BRUSSELS GLA Shops Visitors/year 51.000 sqm 105 13,1 millions WOLUWE-SAINT-LAMBERT 44.400 sqm 136 6,5 millions LOUVAIN-LA-NEUVE 56.700 sqm 136 Visitors/year 7,6 millions GLA Shops BRUSSELS GLA Shops 15.000 sqm 20 BELVAL 36.400 sqm 86 Visitors/year 3,7 millions GLA Shops The main shopping centers and retail parks in Belgium and Luxembourg GENT 11.200 sqm 42 Visitors/year 3,2 millions GLA Shops MOUSCRON GLA Shops BRUSSELS GLA Shops 20.000 sqm 6 22.300 sqm 26 WOLUWE-SAINT-PIERRE GLA Shops Visitors/year NINOVE 13.850 sqm 38 Visitors/year 3,5 millions 8.500 sqm 52 4,2 millions BRUSSELS GLA Shops GLA Shops SINT-PIETERS-LEEUW 27.700 sqm 19 Visitors/year 5 millions GLA Shops BRUSSELS GLA 12.400 sqm Shops 39 Visitors/year 4,0 millions Visitors/year 8.200 sqm 19 5,2 millions Reporting tool Structure of the reporting tool Yearly quantitative reporting Measurement of 5 KPI’s KPI’s Energy Total Energy Consumption (electricity, gas, fuel, urban network, renewable energy) TENTATIVE OBJECTIVES Objectives 2020 Between 5% and 30% decrease of kwh/m² Water consumption Objectives 2020 -10% of Liters/Visitor Waste management Objectives 2020 Increase the waste recycling rate of 20% Water Waste Charging spaces for electric vehicles or bicycles Bicycle car parks Objectives 2020 All shopping centers equipped Mobility Local development Philantropy Objectives 2020 At least one collaboration with local people in every Shopping Center Reporting on energy If significant evolution, please comment Reporting on energy If significant evolution, please comment Tools for energy management Tools for energy management Results / Objectives Tools: energy management Objectives • Below 100 kWh/m²/year • Below 30 Wh/m²/opening hour Reporting and tools on water consumption Reporting and tools on waste management If significant evolution, please comment Actions • Opening hours of the waste room • Supervision of the storage room • Automatic individual weight/retailer Reporting and tools on mobility Reporting and tools on local development • Installing beehives on the roof • Free leased square meters for local people or non profit association • Free training provided: Medical care Avenue Jules Bordetlaan, 142 1140 Evere www.devimo.be L E A D I N G Y O U T O T H E M A I N B E N E LU X H OT S P OT S