China`s Activities in the South China Sea
Transcription
China`s Activities in the South China Sea
China’s Activities in the South China Sea July 28, 2015 Ministry of Defense 1-1 China Makes Advances into South China Sea (SCS) China has made advances into the SCS exploiting power vacuums (1950s-70s: Paracel Islands; 80s-: Spratly Islands) Timeline France withdraws from French Indochina ↓ 1950s: China occupies half of Paracel Islands (South Vietnam also advances to Paracel Islands) ↓ 1973: U.S. withdraws from South Vietnam ↓ 1974: China occupies entire Paracel Islands (dislodging South Vietnam) (1975: Collapse of South Vietnam (after Vietnam War)) China’s Advancement Pratas Islands 1950s: Mid-1980s: Soviet presence in Vietnam decreased ↓ 1980s: China advances to Spratly Islands 1988: China occupies six features in Spratly Islands 1992: 1995: US withdraws from the Philippines ↓ China occupies Mischief Reef 2000s: China advances to southern SCS 2012: China gains de facto control over Scarborough Schoal 2014-: China conducts large-scale reclamation in SCS 1950s Paracel Islands Scarborough Shoal Fully occupied in 1974 6 features are Spratly occupied Mischief Reef in 1988 Occupied in 1995 ↓ Islands Massive reclamation since 2014 Second Thomas Shoal “Nine-dash line” South Luconia Shoal James Shoal 0 500 1,000km 1 1-2 China’s Maritime Push and Armed Clashes As China sought to gain control over new maritime features, it came into two armed clashes with Vietnam in 1974 and 1988. In January 1974, China sent a naval fleet (six ships incl. patrol boats) with militia onboard to western portion of the Paracels, which China had not occupied. Armed clashes with South Vietnamese frigates and other ships ensued. Losses/Casualties (China) Four vessels damaged 85 killed or injured Patrol boat (China) Losses/Casualties (South Vietnam) One vessel sunk, three damaged 100+ killed or injured Frigate (South Vietnam) In January 1988, China, which had possessed no foothold in the Spratlys, sent a naval fleet to Fiery Cross Reef and built a structure on the Reef. In March same year, three Chinese frigates clashed with three Vietnamese ships including a landing ship at Johnson South Reef. Losses/Casualties (Vietnam) Two vessels sunk, one damaged 400+ killed or injured China Paracel Islands Woody Island Duncan Island Structures on features etc. :China :Taiwan :Vietnam :Philippines :Malaysia Vietnam South Vietnam withdrew, China occupied the entire Paracel Islands. Losses/Casualties (China) One killed Pratas Islands Frigate (China) Subi Reef Spratly Islands Philippines Gaven Reefs Hughes Reef Fiery Cross Reef Mischief Reef Cuarteron Reef Johnson South Reef “Nine-dash line” Brunei Attacked vessel (Vietnam) Vietnam withdrew, China occupied Johnson South Reef. Indonesia Malaysia ※ On the causes of these two clashes, China cited South Vietnam’s illegitimate incursions and provocations. 0 500 1,000km (Ref.) Ministry of National Defense of China , Various press reports etc. 2 1-3 Activities by PLA, Maritime Law Enforcement Forces (MLEF) etc. ① In June 2010, near Natuna Islands, China’s MLEF vessel allegedly aimed a cannon at an Indonesian patrol vessel that seized a Chinese fishing boat. ② In May 2011, off the coast of Vietnam, China’s MLEF (China Maritime Surveillance) vessel allegedly obstructed the operation of Vietnamese resource exploration ship, and cut the cables that it was laying. ③ In June 2011, around Vanguard Bank, Chinese vessel allegedly obstructed the navigation of operating Vietnamese resource exploration ship. ④ After the confrontation against Vietnamese vessels in 2012, China’s MLEF (China Coast Guard) vessels have maintained their presence around Scarborough Shoal. ⑤ In May 2013, PLAN and China’s MLEF vessels allegedly blocked the Philippine military’s supply mission to its sentinel post (old landing ship) at Second Thomas Shoal. ⑥ In October 2013, China allegedly sent MLEF vessels near South Luconia Shoal. Moreover, in January 2014, PLAN vessels allegedly conducted activities near James Shoal. ⑦ From May to July 2014, to the south of Triton Island, China placed oil rigs with escort of PLAN and MLEF (China Coast Guard) vessels, and faced off against Vietnamese vessels. ⑧ In August 2014, China’s MLEF (China Coast Guard) vessels allegedly put markers around Reed Bank. Also in 2011, Chinese vessels obstructed the navigation of Philippine ship in the same area. ⑨ In April 2015, the Philippines expressed concern about a series of China’s actions near Subi Reef, such as aiming powerful light to Philippine Air Force plane and warning to leave the area. China Coast Guard vessel used water cannon on a Vietnamese ship “Haiyang Shiyou 981” China China Maritime Surveillance vessel allegedly cut cables Triton Island Structures on features etc. :China :Taiwan :Vietnam :Philippines :Malaysia ※ Thin dash lines are basically 200NM lines from coasts. Scarborough Shoal ⑦ ② ④ ⑨ Vietnam ⑧ Philippines Reef Bank Subi Reef Gaven Reefs Hughes Reef Fiery Cross Reef Cuarteron Reef Mischief Reef ⑤ ③ Second Thomas Shoal Sentinel post of the Philippine military (old landing ship) Vanguard Bank ① Johnson South Reef North Luconia Shoal Indonesia Natuna Islands ⑥ South Luconia Shoal Brunei James Shoal Malaysia 0 500 1,000km (Ref.) Various press reports etc. 3 2-1 China’s Occupation in SCS (before reclamation) ● China gained de facto control over seven maritime features in the Spratlys and built structures at all of the seven features. ● Based on its sovereignty claim, China has taken legislative and administrative actions such as the enactment of the Law on Territorial Sea (1992) and establishment of Sansha City and the Sansha Security District (2012). Subi Reef Structures on features etc. :China :Taiwan :Vietnam :Philippines :Malaysia 1997 Philippines Paracel Islands Macclesfield Bank ※ Thin dash lines are basically 200NM lines from coasts. Scarborough Shoal Gaven Reefs “Nine-dash line” Vietnam 1990 Hughes Reef Fiery Cross Reef 1988 1988 Cuarteron Reef 1991 Johnson South Reef 1988 Spratly Islands Mischief Reef 1995 Brunei Malaysia 0 500 1,000km (Ref.) Various press reports etc. 4 2-2 China’s Occupation in SCS (after reclamation) Structures on features etc. :China :Taiwan :Vietnam :Philippines :Malaysia Woody Island China engages in large-scale reclamation work at features under its de facto control. As of Oct. 2014, Fiery Cross Reef has become the largest land feature in the Spratlys. (*Taiwanese-controlled Itu Aba Island had been the largest.) Fully occupied in 1974 (US withdrawal from South Vietnam in 1973) Paracel Isalands Subi Reef ※ Thin dash lines are basically 200NM lines from coasts. 2,400m-class runway ⇒ Extension work EW Radar [est.] Scarborough Shoal Macclesfield Bank Gaven Reefs Fiery Cross Reef 15 Nov. 2014 (Ref.) CSIS/AMTI Runway and apron construction underway 12 Apr. 2015 Philippines Hughes Reef (Ref.) Philippine Armed Forces Massive reclamation Enough space for building a 2nd runway Twin cannon Reclamation completed Infrastructure being built Mar. 23. 2015 (Ref.) IHS Jane’s Cuarteron Reef Vietnam 24 Jan. 2015 (Ref.) IHS Jane’s Mischief Reef Reclamation completed Infrastructure being built Johnson South Reef Spratly Islands Late 1990s 19 Jan. 2015 13 Apr. 2015 (Ref.) The Diplomat “Nine-dash line” 1988 4 Mar. 2015 (Ref.) Philippine Armed Forces 6 features are occupied in 1988 (except Mischief Reef) (Decrease in Soviet Presence in Vietnam in 1980s) 29 Jul. 2014 Reclamation completed Infrastructure being built Massive reclamation (Ref.) CSIS/AMTI 15 Nov. 2014 (Ref.) CSIS/AMTI Early 1990s Reclamation completed Infrastructure being built 28 Feb. 2013 Indonesia Malaysia 0 Occupied in 1995 (US withdrawal from the Philippines in 1992) 500 1,000km (Ref.) Various press reports etc. ※CSIS/AMTI = CSIS Asia Maritime Transparency Initiative / DigitalGlobe 5 3-1 China’s Reclamation Activities in SCS Johnson South Reef Feb. 2013 Hughes Reef Jan. 2015 2013 Aug. 2014 (Ref.) CSIS Asia Maritime Transparency Initiative / DigitalGlobe (※), IHS Jane’s, Various press reports etc. Original Structure Original Structure Cuarteron Reef Mar. 2013 Gaven Reefs Nov. 2014 Mar. 2014 Nov. 2014 Original Structure ※ Fiery Cross Reef Original Structure Jan. 2015 ※ Subi Reef Apr. 2015 Mar. 2015 Aug. 2014 Original Structure (EW Radar [est.]) Original Structure ※ ※ Mischief Reef 2012 US DoD “Annual Report to Congress – Military and Security Developments Involving the PRC 2015” (May 8, 2015) Apr. 2015 “ As of late December 2014, China had reclaimed about 500 acres (= 2km2) of land as part of this effort. … Although it is unclear what will ultimately be built on these expanded outposts, they could include harbors, communications and surveillance systems, logistics support, and at least one airfield.” (* A DoD official said that China had reclaimed approx. 2,000 acres (= 8km2) of land in the SCS on the day of publication.) On March 31, 2015, then U.S. Pacific Fleet Commander expressed concern describing China’s reclamation in the SCS as “Great Wall of Sand”. On April 9, 2015, the China’s Foreign Ministry Spokesperson said: “After the construction, the islands and reefs will be able to provide … services to meet various civilian demands satisfying the need of necessary military defense”. Original Structure On April 21, 2015, the Philippines Chief of Staff said that the reclamation “will cause tensions … due to its possible military purposes”. ⇒ Various press reports pointed out the possibility of militarization of these reclaimed features based on satellite images and/or quoting statements above. 6 3-2 China’s Reclamation Activities in SCS (for each feature) Johnson South Reef February 2013 (Ref.) Philippine Armed Forces February 2014 (Ref.) Philippine Armed Forces August 2014 (Ref.) IHS Jane’s 7 3-3 China’s Reclamation Activities in SCS (for each feature) Hughes Reef January 2015 2013 既存の施設 Original Structure (Ref.) Various Info. (Ref.) IHS Jane’s 8 3-4 China’s Reclamation Activities in SCS (for each feature) Cuarteron Reef March 2013 November 2014 出典: 南海諸島網20140724 Original Structure (Ref.) Various Info. (Ref.) CSIS Asia Maritime Transparency Initiative / DigitalGlobe 9 3-5 China’s Reclamation Activities in SCS (for each feature) Gaven Reefs August 2014 March 2014 January 2015 Original Structure (Ref.) IHS Jane’s (Ref.) IHS Jane’s (Ref.) IHS Jane’s 10 3-6 China’s Reclamation Activities in SCS (for each feature) Fiery Cross Reef August 2014 March 2015 Original Structure (Ref.) CSIS Asia Maritime Transparency Initiative / DigitalGlobe (Ref.) CSIS Asia Maritime Transparency Initiative / DigitalGlobe 11 3-7 China’s Reclamation Activities in SCS (for each feature) Subi Reef January 2015 既存の施設 April 2015 Original Structure (EW Radar [est.]) (Ref.) IHS Jane’s (Ref.) The Diplomat 12 3-8 China’s Reclamation Activities in SCS (for each feature) Mischief Reef January 2012 April 2015 Original Structure (Ref.) CSIS Asia Maritime Transparency Initiative / DigitalGlobe (Ref.) The Diplomat 13 4 China’s Increasing Presence after Spratly’s Militarization In general terms, China’s possible construction of military facilities in the Spratly Islands would have the following ramifications. Woody Island Paracel Islands Effects of Port Construction Macclesfield Bank Subi Reef Vietnam Philippines Gaven Reefs Effects of Runway Construction Mischief Reef Fiery Cross Reef Hughes Reef Cuarteron Reef Johnson South Reef Spratly Islands Malaysia 0 ※Image 500 1,000km Taiwan 2000km 1500km Vietnam “Nine-dash line” South China Sea Su-27/30 Spratly Islands UAV 200km 1800km Malaysia Malacca Strait Philippines Fiery Cross Reef H-6 (Approx. 1,400km) Sunda Strait (Approx. 1,800km) ● Building port facilities of certain size capable of berthing, resupply and maintenance would enable China to maintain more robust naval and maritime law enforcement presence in the entire SCS. ⇒ Some observers suggest considerable impact on coastal states of the SCS. Lombok Strait (Approx. 2,000km) ※Image ● Fiery Cross Reef with an airstrip and support facilities would enable China to forward-deploy various aerial platforms (incl. fighters, bombers and UAVs). Its ramifications may include: ① China’s improved air power-projection capability over the entire SCS; ② enhanced air superiority over the SCS; ③ improved A2/AD capabilities against U.S. intervention; and, ④ possible declaration of an “SCS Air Defense Identification Zone”. ● Reclamation is also being done at large-scale features such as Subi Reef, leading some observers to suggest possible construction of multiple airstrips in the Spratly Islands and attendant increase in China’s air force presence. Effects of Increasing Air/Maritime Presence ● Sustained deployment of various platforms including naval and law enforcement ships as well as aircraft enabled by military base construction would dramatically improve China’s ISR and other mission capabilities in the central and southern portions of the SCS. ● Some observers express concern over China’s achieving further fait accompli in the maritime domain, if China showcases the viability of these “islands” to sustain economic life by, for example, promoting civilian settlement (e.g. fishermen). 14 5 Comparison of Navy/Air Force Capabilities (China & Philippines/Vietnam/Malaysia) There is a vast gap both in the quality and quantity of navy/air force capabilities between main coastal states in SCS (i.e. the Philippines, Vietnam, and Malaysia) and China. China Warship×892 (1,423kt) Combat aircraft×2,582 4th-generation (incl. fighter×689) Submarine: Shang-class (6,100t)×2 Fighter:J-10×264 Yuan-class (2,900t)×12 Su-27/J-11×328 Kilo-class (3,100t)×12 etc. Su-30×97 etc. Destroyer: Sovremennyy-class (6,500t)×4 Patrol aircraft (fixed-wing): Y-8×3 etc. Luyang II (5,700t)×3 etc. China Vietnam Philippines Vietnam Naval Infantry: approx. 27,000 (Vietnam Fisheries Resources Surveillance) Coastal patrol vessel (>1,500t)×2 Coastal patrol vessel (<1,500t) ×1; Patrol aircraft×3 etc. ※ Excluding aircraft of coast guard etc. 1,500 1,000 0 97 71 Combat aircraft×26 26 ※ The Philippines purchased 12 Korean fighters FA-50 in 2014, and they will be in service by 2017. Fighter: null※ Attacker: OV-10 Bronco×10 Patrol aircraft (fixed-wing): F-27×1; N-22SL×1 etc. Malaysia Coastal patrol vessel (<1,500t)×5 Air-sea rescue helicopter×3 etc. Malaysia Combat Aircraft 2,000 500 Submarine: null Frigate: Hamilton-class (2,700t)×2 Cannon-class (1,400t)×1 Corvette: Auk-class (1,100t)×2 etc. Marines: approx. 8,300 Philippine Coast Guard: vessel×58 Vietnam Coast Guard: vessel×34+ 2,582 ※ According to Global Times, China possesses 52 MLEF vessels (>1,000tclass). Warship×80 (47kt) Submarine: Kilo-class(3,100t)×2; Yugo-class(100t)×2 Frigate: Gepard-class (1,600t)×2; Petya-class (1,000t)×5 Corvette: BPS500 (400t)×1 Combat aircraft×97(incl. 4th-generation fighter×34) Fighter: Su-30MK2×23; Su-27×11; MiG-21×33 etc. Patrol aircraft (fixed-wing): null 2,500 Coastal patrol vessel (>1,500t)×18 Coastal patrol vessel (<1,500t)×48 etc. Philippines Warship×94 (37kt) 3,000 MLEF vessel×370+ (t) Warship×208 (58kt) 140 Submarine: Scorpène-class (1,800t)×2 Frigate: Lekiu-class (1,900t)×2; Corvette: Kasturi-class (1,500t)×2 etc. Combat aircraft×71(incl. 4th-generation fighter×36) Fighter: Mig-29×10; Su-30MKM×18; F/A-18×8 etc. Patrol aircraft (fixed-wing): null 120 Malaysia Maritime Enforcement Agency: 4,500 Vessel×189; Marine Police: 2,100 Coastal patrol vessel (>1,500t)×2; Patrol aircraft×2 Air-sea rescue helicopter×3 etc. Warship 142.3 ※ Excluding vessel of coast guard etc. 1,000 Total tonnage 892 Number of vessel 100 600 80 60 40 20 0 800 400 208 5.8 4.7 80 94 3.7 200 0 (Ref.) Military Balance (2014), Jane’s Fighting Ships 2013-2014 etc. 15 6 Development Trends of Other Countries/Region in SCS ● Vietnam, the Philippines, Malaysia and Taiwan in the 1980s/90s built runways (600-1,200m) on the land features over which they have de facto control. ● All these countries/region have done facility maintenance and development. Reports suggest that Vietnam has recently conducted reclamation work. Structures on features etc. :China :Taiwan :Vietnam :Philippines :Malaysia 30 Aug. 2011 Paracel Islands Approx. 423m 19 Feb. 2015 (Ref.) CSIS/AMTI Vietnam Thitu Island (Philippines) Approx. 1,200m runway Sand Cay (Vietnam) Satellite images taken in August 2011 and February 2015 found that Vietnam reclaimed about 21,000m2 at Sand Cay. Itu Aba Island (Taiwan) West London Reef (Vietnam) Deep water wharf at which 3,000t-class vessel can be anchored is under construction (scheduled for completion in the end of 2015) Satellite images taken in January 2010 and April 2015 proved that Vietnam reclaimed approximately 65,000m2 at West London Reef. Approx. 162m Philippines Approx. 1,200m runway Approx. 173m ※ Thin dash lines are basically 200NM lines from coasts. 3 Jan. 2010 Runway renovation plan was announced in 2011, but the construction work has not yet started. Swallow Reef (Malaysia) Spratly Islands Approx. 1,400m runway Spratly Island (Vietnam) Brunei Approx. 494m 30 Apr. 2015 (Ref.) CSIS/AMTI “Nine-dashed line” Approx. 600m runway Malaysia 0 (Ref.) Various press reports etc. Runway extension work was conducted in 2003 (from 1,000m to 1,400m) 500 1,000km ※CSIS/AMTI = CSIS Asia Maritime Transparency Initiative / DigitalGlobe 16」